Speaker 1: Hi, glad your with a Sean Hannity Show told free
Speaker 1: it is eight hundred and nine for one, Sean. You
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. By the way,
Speaker 1: this just handed to me. Vice President Mike Pence has
Speaker 1: joined our friends at the Heritage Foundation as a distinguished
Speaker 1: Visiting Fellow, And well, it's great for both of both
Speaker 1: of them in my view. And you know, and that
Speaker 1: sort of gets to where I want to go on
Speaker 1: the program today. I've always been a big fan of
Speaker 1: the Heritage Foundation over the years. Good people. They were
Speaker 1: really the intellectual firepower behind all things Reagan when he
Speaker 1: came to office. And you know, I'm watching this week,
Speaker 1: I'm watching you know Everything with Marjorie Taylor Green and
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney. And next week it's The Shift Show two
Speaker 1: point zero and I'm watching it all. I'm watching Joe
Speaker 1: Biden rule through executive fiat by his own definition. I'll
Speaker 1: play it for you. You know, he says that would
Speaker 1: be dictatorial, that you'd need to get the votes. This
Speaker 1: is a democracy, man, I gotta get the votes. I
Speaker 1: gotta get the votes. That's why, you know. The one
Speaker 1: thing and I have this strange notion we are a
Speaker 1: democracy some of my Republican friends and some of my
Speaker 1: Democratic friends even occasionally say, well, if you can't get
Speaker 1: the votes by executive order, you're gonna do something things
Speaker 1: that can't do by executive order unless you're a dictator.
Speaker 1: We're a democracy and we need consensus. Come on, yeah,
Speaker 1: come on, man, what are you? Are you on drugs
Speaker 1: that you're indicting the drugs I forgot about, Joe, You're
Speaker 1: a junkie. Come on, man, come on, we gotta first.
Speaker 1: Come on, man, I think that Joe Budden cut of
Speaker 1: the week was. And we're gonna we're gonna have four
Speaker 1: hundred million vaccines, and we're gonna raise it to fifty
Speaker 1: percent to six hundred million vaccines, and then fuzzy math
Speaker 1: kicks in and we're gonna get by the summertime, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have three hundred Americans vaccinated. Three hundred Expect these
Speaker 1: additional two hundred million doses to be delivered this summer,
Speaker 1: and some of it will come as early began to
Speaker 1: come in early summer, but by the mid by the
Speaker 1: midsummer that this vaccine will be there and the order,
Speaker 1: and that increases the total vaccine order in the United
Speaker 1: States by fifty from four hundred million order to six
Speaker 1: hundred million, just enough vaccine to fully vaccinate three hundred
Speaker 1: Americans by end of the summer the beginning of the fall.
Speaker 1: But we want to make it look that's I want
Speaker 1: to repeat, it'll be enough to fully vaccinate three hundred
Speaker 1: Americans to beat this pandemic. Three. I mean, he said
Speaker 1: it twice. Didn't just say it once, he said it
Speaker 1: twice twice. Anyway, I don't even know what to make
Speaker 1: of that. And anyway, so I'm watching all of this,
Speaker 1: and I was thinking, all right, Mike Pennce joins the
Speaker 1: Heritage Foundation. A Heritage Foundation provided a lot of the
Speaker 1: intellectual firepower of reducing taxes burdensome regulation in the Reagan years.
Speaker 1: You know, we had we literally doubled revenues to the
Speaker 1: federal government by cutting taxes, ending burdensome regulation, twenty one
Speaker 1: million new jobs, created the greatest peacetime of the longest
Speaker 1: peacetime economic growth and history up to that point. And
Speaker 1: then the Trump policies really on steroids in many ways
Speaker 1: from what Reagan did, and that led to the exact
Speaker 1: same results, and that is incredible economic recovery and higher
Speaker 1: paying jobs. Record low unemployment, and couple that with again
Speaker 1: the burdensome bureaucracy so manufacturers can manufacture again in America,
Speaker 1: and also securing the border that helped less competition for jobs,
Speaker 1: raises wages, and then you have record low unemployment for
Speaker 1: every demographic in the country. These things work, and I
Speaker 1: know that we're now right now, we're caught up in
Speaker 1: this whirlwind about Marjorie Taylor Green and the show that's
Speaker 1: going on today, and then we're gonna spend a week
Speaker 1: at least depends if they bring in witnesses. There's a
Speaker 1: part of me that says, oh, yeah, you want to
Speaker 1: go down this road. I have a few ideas up
Speaker 1: my sleeve. I don't want to telegraph them, and I
Speaker 1: have my own witness list, idea of ideas because I'm
Speaker 1: a little I'm a little sick and tired of the
Speaker 1: double standard, like most of you are too, and you
Speaker 1: should be. I mean, we're gonna have, well, this is
Speaker 1: the president incited insurrection. We're gonna have a snap impeachment.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna have any evidence presented, We're not gonna
Speaker 1: have any defense given none whatsoever. We're not even gonna
Speaker 1: gather the facts and now as the facts come out,
Speaker 1: we're beginning to see, oh, we missed a lot of
Speaker 1: the intelligence that was out there and available to us.
Speaker 1: Even at Casio Cortez, I knew for a week that
Speaker 1: this was coming. Well, who did she tell I want
Speaker 1: to know, did she tell Nancy Pelosi? Did she tell
Speaker 1: anybody in leadership that she tell the sergeant at arms?
Speaker 1: And how come the police chief, the Capitol police, you know,
Speaker 1: had requested long before anybody you know, with they knew
Speaker 1: one hundreds of thousands of people were in town, marching
Speaker 1: in the capital. Where why didn't they prepare you know? Well?
Speaker 1: And then the idea that people had planned it, they're
Speaker 1: identifying specific groups that had planned it. Well, then how
Speaker 1: do you make the argument that it is the words
Speaker 1: that incited the quote insurrection the medium mob and Democrats
Speaker 1: favorite new word. And then how do you say, well,
Speaker 1: how are we going to define insurrection and who are
Speaker 1: we going to apply the standards too? As we've been
Speaker 1: pointing out, well, the same thing would go with you know,
Speaker 1: all of the people in the in the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: that pushed the biggest conspiracy theory ever in this country,
Speaker 1: and they made it mainstream with the help of their
Speaker 1: friends in the medium mob, which is the Russia collusion hoax.
Speaker 1: It was all a lie, and they pushed this and
Speaker 1: ran this down this country's throat and drag this country
Speaker 1: through hell for three long, solid years, just like the
Speaker 1: Ukrainian impeachment hoax. How do you ignore quit and pro
Speaker 1: and quote Joe and zero experience Hunter, I mean, the
Speaker 1: hypocrisy is nauseating. Now. I see that people that use
Speaker 1: insurrectionists like language, that make that spread conspiracy theories like
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff and let's see. Then you got Maxie Waters
Speaker 1: and the crazy stuff and threats that she's made over
Speaker 1: the years. And you can add Congresswoman Omar to Leave
Speaker 1: and Congresswoman Acacio Cortez to all of this list. Okay,
Speaker 1: well they gonna they're gonna be removed from their committee assignments.
Speaker 1: I don't see it happening. But the President said at
Speaker 1: the speech on the sixth that you know that we
Speaker 1: want you to fight like hell. They also said to
Speaker 1: march peacefully and patriotically, to let your voices be heard.
Speaker 1: So let's take it off. But there's one standard for Democrats,
Speaker 1: and there's one standard for the rest of the world,
Speaker 1: and that's how it works, and that's that's what's sad
Speaker 1: about all of this. So we're going to go through this,
Speaker 1: but back to my initial observation about the Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 1: and that's why I really you know, when people have
Speaker 1: views that I don't know why they express them. Now,
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green went out there and she actually told
Speaker 1: the House today that her statements on things that I
Speaker 1: mentioned yesterday, I went into some detail, you know about
Speaker 1: nine to eleven and the plane hitting the Pentagon, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that happened. And school shootings, Yeah, they're real. And my
Speaker 1: humble opinion, even though the kid that somebody said is seventeen,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. He's still a kid to me, and
Speaker 1: he's still watched, you know, kids in his school die
Speaker 1: and families lost loved ones. They're real, as she said,
Speaker 1: and nine to eleven happened, and she disavowed some of
Speaker 1: these other things, and I'm just wondering, well, what about
Speaker 1: all the people that have said all these other incendiary things.
Speaker 1: How come we don't hold them to the same standard,
Speaker 1: Because from what I can see is the people and
Speaker 1: Adam Shift's district and Nancy Pelosi's district and the people
Speaker 1: of Maxim Waters district, and the people and Congresswoman Talip's
Speaker 1: district and Congresswoman Omar's district and Naoc's district. They they
Speaker 1: get to decide that they're going to vote people with
Speaker 1: extreme views back into Congress, and so should in the
Speaker 1: case of Marjorie Taylor Green be the people of North Georgia.
Speaker 1: She did get seventy four percent of the vote, pretty
Speaker 1: impressive for any elected official in this day and age.
Speaker 1: And that's the bottom line. And you know, she has
Speaker 1: an opportunity to you know, she's knew. I don't even
Speaker 1: know anybody that knows her, and I thought it was good.
Speaker 1: She actually went on the floor and gave a pretty
Speaker 1: fascinating speech. If you want to take we'll take some
Speaker 1: time tonight, probably on Hannity, and show you some of this.
Speaker 1: But it all comes down to meet as something even
Speaker 1: more fundamental. So we're gonna deal with this today, We're
Speaker 1: gonna deal with the next impeachment shift show next week,
Speaker 1: and that they're going to get into that last last
Speaker 1: last digs to hurt Donald Trump. And for me, conservatism
Speaker 1: is pretty simple. I don't I don't want to make
Speaker 1: this any more complicated than it is. And the reason
Speaker 1: that Reagan was successful. If if there's in modern day,
Speaker 1: if there's three movements, three moments for the conservative movement,
Speaker 1: and I'm a conservative, I'm an America first conservative, the
Speaker 1: first would be Reagan. And Reagan proved through his economic
Speaker 1: policies and peace through strength, that not only can he
Speaker 1: keep the world safer, but also he can he can
Speaker 1: spur economic growth and an explosion of economic activity by
Speaker 1: using limited government policies of low taxation and limiting the bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: And Trump did the same thing, and Newt in the
Speaker 1: Contract with America, they did the same thing. They actually
Speaker 1: even balanced the budget for a couple of years, if
Speaker 1: you can believe it, and we saw nothing but record
Speaker 1: low unemployment for all these different demographics. So what is
Speaker 1: conservatism for me? It's it's not complicated for me. And
Speaker 1: that's why, you know, we get lost in the weeds
Speaker 1: of what other what maybe some people want to talk about,
Speaker 1: or what some people might say, or the rage or
Speaker 1: the agenda of other people. It's not that complicated for
Speaker 1: me because what matters to me is that if we
Speaker 1: do these simple things, the fundamentals of conservatism, it's going
Speaker 1: to be better for we, the people. I mean, it
Speaker 1: breaks my heart to see careers ruined with the stroke
Speaker 1: of a pen. These are high paying career jobs and
Speaker 1: energy they're gone. People have lost them. Nobody's paying attention
Speaker 1: to them in the media. You know, they're just casually,
Speaker 1: nonchalantly cast aside as, oh, we want you to get
Speaker 1: another high paying union job. Really, where as you open
Speaker 1: up the borders and now we have more competition for
Speaker 1: the few jobs that are available as we work our
Speaker 1: way out of this pandemic with the draconian shutdowns that
Speaker 1: accompanied it. But it's simple. I believe in limited government.
Speaker 1: I believe in freedom of the individual under the presumption
Speaker 1: that rights are God given, not government given. I believe
Speaker 1: in low taxes. I believe that stimulates economic activity, ending
Speaker 1: burdensome regulation. I believe in a strong support for our constitution,
Speaker 1: including the Second Amendment. I believe we have law in
Speaker 1: order and safety and security in our cities. I believe
Speaker 1: that you got to have good schools for our kids.
Speaker 1: It's not complicated secure borders, it's good foreign policy, national security,
Speaker 1: and it's you know, we can't have so many people
Speaker 1: coming here that nobody can get a high paying job.
Speaker 1: Too many people in the job market that's not good.
Speaker 1: And I believe in energy and dependence. I believe in
Speaker 1: people that believe in our constitution, constitutionalists on the bench,
Speaker 1: not judicial activists, free and fair trade. And I believe
Speaker 1: in peace through strength. And I believe if we do
Speaker 1: these simple things that pretty much covers the ability of
Speaker 1: the American people. I believe in religious freedom, but that
Speaker 1: goes with limited government. I believe in you know, don't.
Speaker 1: I don't want to get into the rights of I
Speaker 1: think states at some point begin to make their own decisions.
Speaker 1: But if a government does those simple fundamental things, stick
Speaker 1: to the fundamentals, then the lives of all of us
Speaker 1: are going to be dramatically better. And that's why I
Speaker 1: hate getting off into all of these distractions that some
Speaker 1: other people want to bring in for pure political purposes,
Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, it's about the
Speaker 1: people that don't have radio or TV shows, that do
Speaker 1: you know, work hard, play by the rules, pay their taxes,
Speaker 1: obey the laws, raise their families, and just go out
Speaker 1: and kill themselves every day twelve fourteen, sixteen hours. And
Speaker 1: they want to build a better life for them and
Speaker 1: their kids and their grandkids. And they want to find
Speaker 1: whatever makes them happy, where they can make the most money,
Speaker 1: and everybody provides some goods of services for other people.
Speaker 1: That's just what life's about. That's it. It doesn't get
Speaker 1: any more complicated than that. We do, those things will
Speaker 1: all be better off. I love how the Russia collusion
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory truthers out there now are saying that they
Speaker 1: want Donald Trump to testify at their show trial. Why
Speaker 1: would anybody offer any validity, legit jitimacy to what was
Speaker 1: totally completely unconstitutional Jamie Raskin, by the way, the guy
Speaker 1: that is leading this effort for the Democrats. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: challenge Trump's win in twenty sixteen himself and in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: he should be forced to detail his behavior under oath
Speaker 1: in person. Sorry, but you haven't figured it out yet.
Speaker 1: You don't even have jurisdiction in this case. You might
Speaker 1: want to take note of the fact that the Chief
Speaker 1: Justice of the US Supreme Court, mentioned in the Constitution
Speaker 1: as the person to preside over such an impeachment, is
Speaker 1: not partaking. That's why you've had to enlist somebody has
Speaker 1: already come to a full conclusion. Pat Lay here, what
Speaker 1: a kangaroo court that is anyway a political employee on there.
Speaker 1: If you decline the invitation, we reserve any and all rights,
Speaker 1: including the right to establish a trial. Your refusal to
Speaker 1: testify supports a strong adverse inference regarding your actions. The
Speaker 1: Senate can even be offering any legitimacy to this one
Speaker 1: week snap impeachment before we found out that, in fact,
Speaker 1: there had been plotting and scheming and planning behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: as we now know from Acasio Cortez, we now know
Speaker 1: from FBI, FBI investigators, we now know from court documents,
Speaker 1: and we now have even fake news medium mob they're
Speaker 1: reporting these things. Yeah, they're saying the same thing. It's
Speaker 1: a show with a predetermined outcome. Why Because they'd love
Speaker 1: to distract all of us in the longest period of
Speaker 1: time so they can use executive fiat to get all
Speaker 1: to bypass Congress completely and always why need a second
Speaker 1: branch of government? Right twenty five to the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred and nine four one Sean, if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, of course,
Speaker 1: I'd notice everything, and I just wait, and I usually
Speaker 1: don't talk about things until until we get our own
Speaker 1: conference ormation on issues. And that's just the way the
Speaker 1: show rolls. We go our independent way, and it certainly
Speaker 1: has served us well on a lot of issues. Most recently,
Speaker 1: our three year investigation totally vindicated that there was no
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion, and the Ukrainian double standard and the
Speaker 1: Biden family foreign syndicate. Yeah, that's all been born out
Speaker 1: to be true too, just like oh, let's see Ferguson,
Speaker 1: and just like Baltimore, and just like Uva, and just
Speaker 1: like let's see a bunch of other places. Duke Lacrosse.
Speaker 1: You know, we get we get to be right a
Speaker 1: lot when the media is wrong. So I've seen the
Speaker 1: There was a trending momentum. It started yesterday, and people
Speaker 1: sending me stuff all day long. So I'm you know,
Speaker 1: I'm looking at whatever's there. Sweet baby James is sending
Speaker 1: me stuff every second of every day, and I'm just looking, looking, looking,
Speaker 1: looking looking anyway. So one of the things that led
Speaker 1: to a trend on Twitter hashtag Alexandria Cossio. Smullett was
Speaker 1: appearing all over social media as details emerged that she
Speaker 1: may have may have keywords here exaggerated the extent of
Speaker 1: her trauma at the Capitol Ryan, given that she was.
Speaker 1: What they're saying is what may not have been at
Speaker 1: the site of the siege, but in an office building nearby. Now,
Speaker 1: these some of these office buildings are connected. In other words,
Speaker 1: the capitol buildings connected to other buildings. There's a whole
Speaker 1: underground railroad there. Like for example, offices can be located
Speaker 1: like hers is in the Cannon Building and apparently, according
Speaker 1: to report, she may have been there when the rioters
Speaker 1: stormed the building or stormed the Capitol. I think she
Speaker 1: said she was in the bathroom there. That building is
Speaker 1: part of the overall capital complex, but it's not within
Speaker 1: the Capitol building itself, and we know that that's in
Speaker 1: some cases, like far as ten minutes away from where
Speaker 1: the congresswoman's office may be. So I don't know the
Speaker 1: truth about the story is that, But if true, then
Speaker 1: we have to ask, Okay, did they get to that
Speaker 1: part of the building people that went into the Capitol
Speaker 1: that day. But anyway, so I know somebody from Red State,
Speaker 1: I don't know who it is, but somebody from Red
Speaker 1: State actually launched a freedom of information or submitted an
Speaker 1: Freedom of Information Act request to the Capitol holl Police
Speaker 1: in order to obtain the security footage from outside the
Speaker 1: offices where Congressman Aoc has her office and Congresswoman Katie
Speaker 1: Porter has her office, And I won't you know, and
Speaker 1: I guess they would would see. In other words, if
Speaker 1: the footage shows people banging on doors and people running
Speaker 1: up and down the halls, you know, they say they
Speaker 1: would like to publish the photos in the videos and
Speaker 1: in the meantime, give her the benefit of the doubt
Speaker 1: offer to anybody, Well, that's something that we do that
Speaker 1: many people don't do well. We offer people the benefit
Speaker 1: of the doubt all the time, and but that just
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to ever be the case with people on
Speaker 1: the left. You know, it's it's it's rough. How do
Speaker 1: you how do you were living in an environment where
Speaker 1: we're bypassing an entire branch of government, we're using a
Speaker 1: third branch of government for judicial activism as often as
Speaker 1: you possibly can. And and and then Republicans where do
Speaker 1: they find themselves constantly on defense? And Democrats you know,
Speaker 1: it's they don't skip a beat, They don't sit there
Speaker 1: and say, well, what about Congresswoman Omar or Maxie Waters,
Speaker 1: what about the insurrectionist language of the left, what about
Speaker 1: quid pro quote Joe, what about zero experience? Hunter? What
Speaker 1: about the dirty Clinton dossier? They don't seem I mean,
Speaker 1: these are these are weird times. It's orwelly, and it's
Speaker 1: it's actually shocking that things can that things that up
Speaker 1: can be down, and down could be up, and the
Speaker 1: color red can be viewed as the color I don't know, purple.
Speaker 1: It's just insane because there are certain things that that
Speaker 1: should be applied equally to everybody. And you think fundamental
Speaker 1: fairness at some point would kick in with somebody, but
Speaker 1: it often does not. I noticed that the authoritarianism and
Speaker 1: statism of the left is now in full swing. And
Speaker 1: the two people in the Senate, and that would be
Speaker 1: Mansion in Cinema, um that both of them there's a
Speaker 1: lot of anger and a lot of lashing out and
Speaker 1: a lot of targeting of politically by the radical extremist
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. And I'd hardly called either one of them conservative.
Speaker 1: And I know that Joe Mansion flirts with it, but
Speaker 1: he never goes down that road. I was reading John
Speaker 1: put Hearts in the New York Post today and he's saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: that would be the place if he did become the
Speaker 1: moderate voice in the Senate. It would be the most
Speaker 1: powerful position, but I doubt he's going to do it.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately that's just typical because usually what happens, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you end up, you know, they end up buckling and
Speaker 1: caving to the pressure from within their party. Anyway, there
Speaker 1: there are founders of these progressive groups. The founders of
Speaker 1: Progressive Pack Justice Democrats, which helped elect socialist Democrats like
Speaker 1: Acacio Cortez, have launched a new Progressive Pack No Excuses,
Speaker 1: and they're raising money for candidates to challenge both Mansion
Speaker 1: and Cinema with primary challenges, to raise money for anybody
Speaker 1: that might want to challenge them in a primary. Both
Speaker 1: of them are not up in twenty twenty two. From
Speaker 1: from memory, I think it's it's who is up. Somebody
Speaker 1: is up in Mark whatever his name is out in Arizona,
Speaker 1: he's up, and I Mansion just went through a reelection
Speaker 1: not long ago, so he's not up. So I'm not
Speaker 1: sure exactly what their plan is. But you know, what
Speaker 1: was the purpose of Kamala Harris, Mark Kelly, Yeah, thank you.
Speaker 1: What was the purpose of Kamala Harris Speaking to local
Speaker 1: media in Arizona and West Virginia, anyway, So we're gonna
Speaker 1: watch this AOC backlash and I guess if they Freedom
Speaker 1: of Information Act that information becomes available. I don't like
Speaker 1: to rush to judgment. I'm watching, I'm paying close attention.
Speaker 1: It's not just because it's gotten so loud and started trending.
Speaker 1: I figured i'd make you aware that it's going on,
Speaker 1: because remember the claim was Senator Cruz almost had her murdered.
Speaker 1: Senator Crews was calling for an election audit. That's it,
Speaker 1: that's all. He was doing, same thing Democrats have done
Speaker 1: in past elections. Oh, anyway, but it did trend on Twitter,
Speaker 1: and so we're watching that closely. Now. The question here
Speaker 1: is gonna be how quickly can Republicans get their agenda
Speaker 1: items now focused on, Because if we start talking about
Speaker 1: issues and start looking deeply at what the Democrats are
Speaker 1: doing and implementing the Biden Bernie Sanders Manifesto and the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal, there is a narrative that needs to
Speaker 1: emerge that there are alternative views. And I believe that
Speaker 1: the country is not a left wing country. There's not
Speaker 1: a socialist country. I still believe we're center right country.
Speaker 1: And if that's correct, and if socialism fails, as it
Speaker 1: always does, and the false promises that every single thing
Speaker 1: you're gonna need your life is going to be given
Speaker 1: to you by a big bureaucracy in the federal government,
Speaker 1: and every fear that you have in the natural stresses
Speaker 1: of life that every human being faces in a country
Speaker 1: that that prides itself in the concept of liberty and freedom,
Speaker 1: then if you fall for those beliefs. So I don't
Speaker 1: have to worry anymore because the government is going to
Speaker 1: get take care of it all for me. And they're
Speaker 1: gonna steal the money of those rich people, those terrible
Speaker 1: rich people. If you confiscate all their money, they're gonna
Speaker 1: they'll spend more on themselves than I promise than the
Speaker 1: American people. You know, just as you watch politics, it's
Speaker 1: just it's gotten in the gutter. Like I am really
Speaker 1: looking forward to the super Bowl this week, Unt Linda,
Speaker 1: you're gonna be watching the super Bowl as you make yourself. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna bet on the super Bowl? Who you betting on?
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna go with the Buccaneers. You're going
Speaker 1: with the Buccaneers? Really, who's telling you? Who's telling you
Speaker 1: who to go with? And there is it, Jason. No
Speaker 1: one is tell me anything. I've actually been talking about
Speaker 1: this a lot today and I have decided to up
Speaker 1: my sports game. So I am now going to become
Speaker 1: quasi informed. The rest of you need to now be
Speaker 1: quiet in that room. Is that no one has said anything.
Speaker 1: How do you get a touchdown? Touchdowns? Honest, you gotta
Speaker 1: you gotta run the ball. Run the ball. You gotta
Speaker 1: put it in the end zone. Put the ball in
Speaker 1: the end zone, you get six points, six points. Then
Speaker 1: you gotta kick a field goal, get another point. That
Speaker 1: wouldn't be called a field goal. The field goals as
Speaker 1: were three points, but that's okay. Whatever. You're kicking a ball.
Speaker 1: You gotta kick it through those two things, which looks
Speaker 1: really hard to be. We could just call them the uprights. Yeah, whatever.
Speaker 1: The two poles, you put the two poles, you put
Speaker 1: the ball between the two poles. Okay, it does sound terrible.
Speaker 1: Do you know what color the poles are? They're silver?
Speaker 1: No silver poles. Okay, I didn't know that look yellow
Speaker 1: to me. But okay, you said you had to run
Speaker 1: the ball into the end zone. Are you allowed to
Speaker 1: pass the ball into the end zone? You can't throw
Speaker 1: it to other people. Yes, you can throw the ball
Speaker 1: to other people. I watched them do it ball backwards
Speaker 1: to other people. How can you throw the ball backwards?
Speaker 1: And you have to be looking at where you're going
Speaker 1: to throw the ball, and you can throw it behind
Speaker 1: the head, a lateral pass you can throw. You could
Speaker 1: pitch it back. I mean, whatever way their body wants
Speaker 1: to move, that's the way they can figure. You can flicker,
Speaker 1: you can hand it this wherever anybody wants to go. Now,
Speaker 1: if you catch the ball in the end zone, is
Speaker 1: there any rules governing that? Or as long as you're
Speaker 1: in you know how any rules governing I just started learning.
Speaker 1: I think this is a little bit in depth for me.
Speaker 1: It's a little too in depth for you. The most
Speaker 1: important part for me is that there's a fair she
Speaker 1: has like multiple master's degrees, and it's but they're not
Speaker 1: in sports. So the point it's like I'm watching the
Speaker 1: movie Clueless for five minutes. Let me tell you something. Okay,
Speaker 1: I am not clueless. I'm a little bit I'm struggling
Speaker 1: in sports. I'm trying. But my son loves football, so
Speaker 1: he he loves watching it, and he asked me questions
Speaker 1: and I'm like, oh, I don't know the answer to
Speaker 1: these questions. I really need to figure it out. So
Speaker 1: I'm learning always call Uncle Sean and I'll tell him, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not calling you because you're gonna make fun of
Speaker 1: me the whole time. He needs I'm going to do
Speaker 1: that anyway. So I'm excited. I think that Brady, you know,
Speaker 1: he's to me right now. He's the underdog. He's getting
Speaker 1: trashed in the media, and he's such a good player,
Speaker 1: and I think he's a good dad and I like
Speaker 1: him as a person, so I want him to win.
Speaker 1: Although I think Mahone's a great player, so you know
Speaker 1: it's gonna be I think it's gonna be tight. Andy
Speaker 1: Reid's from Philly, so you know, I gotta love him
Speaker 1: a little bit there, and I just think he's a
Speaker 1: lovable guy. And he always has his wife with him
Speaker 1: on the field, which is very sweet. Yeah, okay, those
Speaker 1: are things. So you're not going to be watching the
Speaker 1: Lingerie Bowl of the Puppy Bowl. Oh my god, I
Speaker 1: do love the Puppy Bowl. If I could bet on
Speaker 1: the Puppy Bowl, I would, honestly, I'd be, like, you know,
Speaker 1: I'd be I'd be rooting for the Mutton. But I'm looking.
Speaker 1: I'm looking now I'm gonna. You know, online betting is
Speaker 1: legal in my state, so I'm gonna make a wager
Speaker 1: out to my state. Um, I remember already one pool,
Speaker 1: but it's that's one out of my control. Um, and
Speaker 1: i'd like to get I'd like the place. I don't
Speaker 1: even know how to place them. But I don't think
Speaker 1: it's legal for me to go to Jersey. I have
Speaker 1: to go, but you have to actually make the bet
Speaker 1: in New Jersey to be the bridge, make the bet
Speaker 1: and then come back home. And then yet, if you
Speaker 1: get paid, you have to go back to Jersey to
Speaker 1: get the money or the wire. I don't think. So
Speaker 1: you just have to place the bet over the bridge. Okay,
Speaker 1: how stupid is that? It's the dumbest government can think
Speaker 1: of that, you know, listen, but you have to think,
Speaker 1: you know, how how big is the toll to go
Speaker 1: over the bridge. So you're losing twenty bucks so you
Speaker 1: have to count that and think about this. All the
Speaker 1: years that government said, oh you can't know the numbers,
Speaker 1: just you know, racket and all this betting, you know,
Speaker 1: see illegal? What's the lottery the lottery's government bet what
Speaker 1: is it? And they all, we're gonna give them money
Speaker 1: to education. They squander every penny of it. It's ridiculous
Speaker 1: and there as bad as the Blasio. Well, Cuomo is
Speaker 1: now thinking about gambling. He's thinking about legally. Oh it
Speaker 1: doesn't think about anything. Cuomo is a terrible human being. Okay,
Speaker 1: But that they want money so bad that all the things.
Speaker 1: And but if they do it, they're gonna make it
Speaker 1: that they make the money from, you know, selling weed
Speaker 1: in capacities, they'll make all the money in taxes on
Speaker 1: their stuff. By the way, even with cigarettes, for example,
Speaker 1: Oh we're doing this because we want to limit smoking.
Speaker 1: Governments make more money from a pack of cigarettes than
Speaker 1: than the tobacco companies. They that's why they talk soda too.
Speaker 1: They did the same thing, same thing. They know what
Speaker 1: people are addicted to. They're not interested in helping them,
Speaker 1: They're interested in profiting off the drugs. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's scambling for example, I mean it's
Speaker 1: gambling technically, But I'm just saying, like I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: you know, like I'm not somebody who I'm not somebody
Speaker 1: who bets all the time. But I'm very excited about
Speaker 1: you know, how much are you planning on betting? I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'm just starting right now. I'm looking. I'm
Speaker 1: I like that you can bet, like on the color
Speaker 1: of the gatorade. I think that's fun. I'm learning about
Speaker 1: prop bets and what that means. Um, you know who's
Speaker 1: going to score? How much in the in the quarters?
Speaker 1: You know, in that first part of the game. And
Speaker 1: you know how many many, how many? How how many
Speaker 1: halves are there? There's four? No two halves, four quarters?
Speaker 1: Very good, I'm very Now, how do you get a
Speaker 1: goal in football? I just told you you have to
Speaker 1: run it down the fields and put it in the
Speaker 1: end zone. No, you don't get goals. You get a
Speaker 1: touch whatever. You know, the points you get the points,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, the touchdown, touchdown. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't think that the dancing and all that stuff
Speaker 1: is very gracious though. That's a little rude. You know,
Speaker 1: they get get those weird dances. That's not very sports
Speaker 1: USA today, the stupid Communist day. Why has Tom Brady
Speaker 1: gotten a free pass for supporting Trump? I just did
Speaker 1: the NFL hell favor. Stop talking about politics exactly right,
Speaker 1: because let me tell you what America wants Sunday a break,
Speaker 1: Give me a break. Not only that I want to
Speaker 1: cook bad food that I'm not supposed to eat and
Speaker 1: I want to eat it. Not only do not want
Speaker 1: to have friends over the CDC is literally saying virtual noisemakers,
Speaker 1: and don't make any noise because shouting will spread COVID.
Speaker 1: I'm like, you can't have a crowd, you can't have
Speaker 1: a group, and they want you to. They want me
Speaker 1: to pull out the New Year's zeve. You know horn,
Speaker 1: you know what else you don't want to think about
Speaker 1: during the sports, during the Super Bowl? Your taxes to
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show, to free our numbers, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Sean, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. All right, So a lot happening
Speaker 1: you got now the Democrats will get into this a
Speaker 1: little more detailed. The bottom of the hour, Steve Moore
Speaker 1: will tell us the danger of all of these economic
Speaker 1: changes that are happening in the country. We've got the
Speaker 1: latest shift showed and unconstitutional post presidency impeachment trial. It's
Speaker 1: only a question of how long this thing is going
Speaker 1: to go on. It's a predetermined outcome, and of course
Speaker 1: the one. A couple of things really bothered me in
Speaker 1: this whole process. It's sort of like, you know, I
Speaker 1: don't agree with Marjorie Taylor Green's comments, but apparently the
Speaker 1: people in North Georgia made that decision. Every year, I
Speaker 1: guess every election year, Maxie Waters gets re elected and
Speaker 1: we have her on tape. What I'm saying things that
Speaker 1: I believe are insurrectionists, like language, and I don't see
Speaker 1: any efforts to ever remove her from any committee or
Speaker 1: Congresswoman Omar or Congresswoman talib or Congresswoman Nicasio Cortez or
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer for example, and his insurrectionist message on the
Speaker 1: steps of the US Supreme Court, or Kamala Harris or
Speaker 1: Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi, because we've been playing all
Speaker 1: of them. You know, when you look at the impeachment articles, okay,
Speaker 1: they talk about incitement to insurrection, and they refer often
Speaker 1: the President said that day to go fight like hell.
Speaker 1: I also said, many of you will patriotically and peacefully
Speaker 1: march to the Capitol so your voices will be heard.
Speaker 1: They failed to put that in their complaint or in
Speaker 1: their incitement charge between that and the incendiary language of
Speaker 1: the left. We don't have anything that resembles fundamental fairness,
Speaker 1: equal application of standards on any of these issues. And
Speaker 1: I don't care if it's Marjorie Taylor Green versus the
Speaker 1: squad members, even anti Semitic statements and even calls to
Speaker 1: violence and threatening language, etc. Etc. Because this a reek
Speaker 1: of hypocrisy and a double standard. For example, you can't
Speaker 1: say fight, Okay, let's listen to the Democrats talk about fighting.
Speaker 1: What does Congress do about this weight? We keep fighting.
Speaker 1: We're going to keep fighting and fighting and fighting for this.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean we don't fight. I think we have
Speaker 1: to fight harder than every we know this is going
Speaker 1: to be a hard fight. It's going to be a
Speaker 1: competitive fight. We should dream big, fight hard, and take
Speaker 1: back our country. This is a fight of our lots.
Speaker 1: Stand up and fight for the best of who we are.
Speaker 1: And I'm prepared to fight, and I know how to fight.
Speaker 1: But I'm ready for that fight. Increasing numbers of people
Speaker 1: are ready for that fight. Stand up and fight for democracy.
Speaker 1: I will fight every day until he is in bags.
Speaker 1: There's only two ways to win a fight. You can
Speaker 1: win a fight through submission, or through exhaustion. We can't
Speaker 1: just imagine a better future. We've got to fight for
Speaker 1: We continue to fight for a progressive agenda in our future.
Speaker 1: That's what we're fighting against when we fight Republicans and
Speaker 1: Congress who don't want to pass legislation. Now, this is
Speaker 1: time for every single one of us to get up
Speaker 1: and fight for our country. This new freshman class in
Speaker 1: Congress has got to come in and really set the
Speaker 1: agenda and fight, fight, fight. You cannot be civil with
Speaker 1: a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for,
Speaker 1: what you care about it. But I like to debate this, gentleman,
Speaker 1: and I said no. I said, if we're in high school,
Speaker 1: I take you behind the gym and beat the hell
Speaker 1: out of them. You take a punch, throw a punch,
Speaker 1: you get out, and you get get a God and
Speaker 1: you get back on them. And God. Everyone should take
Speaker 1: note of that, on both levels, that this isn't They're
Speaker 1: not going to let up, and they should not. I
Speaker 1: want to tell you. I want to tell you, Gavnaugh,
Speaker 1: you have relief the whirlwind, and you make me you
Speaker 1: won't know you get up in the face of some
Speaker 1: Congress people, does you any good running away from Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I think you need to go back and punch him
Speaker 1: in a face. I know that everyone here will soon
Speaker 1: be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and
Speaker 1: patriotically make your voices her. All right, joining us now,
Speaker 1: former Speaker of the House, New King Rich writing the
Speaker 1: bestseller Trump The American Future as well, and he has
Speaker 1: his own podcast which we link to on Hannity dot com.
Speaker 1: All right, so apparently everybody uses the word fight, fight, fight,
Speaker 1: not just Donald Trump. And apparently if we're going to
Speaker 1: define insurrection as marching peacefully and patriotically to let your
Speaker 1: voices be heard, well, I would say all these democrats
Speaker 1: we keep playing are a lot more a lot They
Speaker 1: are far more guilty of insurrection than Donald Trump, of course,
Speaker 1: And remember that this is a standard of behavior from
Speaker 1: people who've read rules for radicals. Do what you're doing,
Speaker 1: and then blame your opponent for the same thing. So
Speaker 1: you have these people who have been lying, who have
Speaker 1: been you know, starting with Madonna saying that she dreamed
Speaker 1: of the White House burning down with the Trump. She dreams,
Speaker 1: Get that right, She dreams an awful lot about blowing
Speaker 1: up the White House, up the White House. I apologize,
Speaker 1: thank you for correcting me. Just want to be specific. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and that was the day after he was sworn out.
Speaker 1: So it has been going on for four years. But
Speaker 1: what we're faced with here is not justice. It's not
Speaker 1: a legal structure. What we're faced with is a system
Speaker 1: of political destruction that is deliberate, that is totally outside
Speaker 1: the American system, totally against the rules of how we operate.
Speaker 1: And the Democrats clearly don't care. They are making an
Speaker 1: all out effort to take control of the country and
Speaker 1: to get it done before twenty twenty two, and they
Speaker 1: are going to apply the most radical behaviors that we've
Speaker 1: ever seen. I mean, it's really I think in the
Speaker 1: north of this problem, I think, well it's a huge problem.
Speaker 1: But now this is where we find ourselves as a country.
Speaker 1: So you know, you got Joe Biden in office. Hasn't
Speaker 1: been very long, mister speaker. You know, what's all of
Speaker 1: sixteen days and you see him now ruling by the
Speaker 1: stroke of a pen executive fiat executive orders. Joe Biden himself,
Speaker 1: let me play it for you. He actually said that
Speaker 1: you can't do that, that we're a democracy. You need
Speaker 1: to get the votes otherwise you'd be a dictator. Here's
Speaker 1: what he said. I gotta get the votes. I gotta
Speaker 1: get the votes. That's why, you know the one thing,
Speaker 1: And I have this strange notion we are a democracy.
Speaker 1: Some of my Republican friends and some of my Democratic
Speaker 1: friends even occasionally say, well, if you can't get the
Speaker 1: votes by executive order, you're going to do something things
Speaker 1: that can't do by executive order unless you're a dictator.
Speaker 1: We're a democracy. We need consensus. Well, he started out
Speaker 1: in just day one with three times the amount of
Speaker 1: exact kit of orders than the three previous presidents combined.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I think nothing that Biden has said has
Speaker 1: any meaning. I think you have to watch what he does,
Speaker 1: not what he says. And I think that what he
Speaker 1: does is every possible step to impose a genuine left
Speaker 1: wing system that can't be challenged. I mean, their models California.
Speaker 1: They want a one party country. They want that party
Speaker 1: to be the Democrats. They know that if they don't
Speaker 1: move very aggressively, that the next election will repudiate them.
Speaker 1: And so you're having a all out effort, in my judgment,
Speaker 1: to see that kind of pressure being brought to bear
Speaker 1: and I find it frankly scary when when when they
Speaker 1: start announcing that they're going to start reviewing the military,
Speaker 1: and I assume that's the first step towards purging the military.
Speaker 1: I find that really sobering about where they're going. And
Speaker 1: so you have the same thing going on here that
Speaker 1: these people are bullys and the announcement today that they
Speaker 1: want Trump to come and testify. There's a clear provision
Speaker 1: you can't make people testify against themselves. If the Trump
Speaker 1: same thinks it's not to his advantage to show up,
Speaker 1: he shouldn't show up. But they want, they want the
Speaker 1: public spectacle of being able to take him apart, because
Speaker 1: that's where they're starting from. I've been very clear lately
Speaker 1: because there seems to be and I guess things. We
Speaker 1: have these actions against these actions today against Marjorie Taylor Green. Okay,
Speaker 1: she gave a speech on the House floor and im
Speaker 1: and I'm watching it, and she did apologize for things
Speaker 1: she has said in the past. Okay, some crazy stuff
Speaker 1: that she has said, But that's really up to the
Speaker 1: people of North Georgia. In my view, it's up to
Speaker 1: the people and Maxie Waters Districts or a congresswoman Nicasio
Speaker 1: Cortez's district or or Mars strict or you know, any
Speaker 1: any of these controversial congressmen and women that are out there,
Speaker 1: and that's the voters will ultimately make the decision on
Speaker 1: these issues. Not I don't think it should be from
Speaker 1: other representatives, especially considering they haven't really done this a
Speaker 1: lot in the past. And I'm just I'm just watching
Speaker 1: the reaction, and I see now we have such a
Speaker 1: flagrant double standard in this society, and I wonder, and
Speaker 1: I worry, and I'm concerned that on every issue there's
Speaker 1: there's breathtaking hypocrisy. I mean it, basically, if you're a conservative,
Speaker 1: you get arrested, you'll spend eight years in jail for
Speaker 1: spitting on the sidewalk. But we saw what a deep
Speaker 1: state has gotten away with. Now we see that the
Speaker 1: incendiary language of the left is ignored by the left
Speaker 1: and ignored by the media and by big tech on
Speaker 1: all of these issues. Is one standard for conservatives, one
Speaker 1: standard for liberals, thoughts, Well, that's you're right. What you
Speaker 1: have is a propaganda media totally dedicated to turning America
Speaker 1: into a left wing state. You have a Democratic party
Speaker 1: now totally determined to destroy the Republicans if they can
Speaker 1: possibly do it, and then you just go through item
Speaker 1: after item like this, And I think it's very important
Speaker 1: people to get out of their heads this idea of fairness.
Speaker 1: There is no fairness. We are in the middle of
Speaker 1: a delivered effort by left wing to tolitarians to take
Speaker 1: over the country, to do whatever they have to do
Speaker 1: to drive us out of power, to chase down every
Speaker 1: one of our people and make it expensive to have
Speaker 1: been for us, and US is not just Trump. I mean,
Speaker 1: they are amazingly aggressive and frankly, they're also destroying things
Speaker 1: that they're not They will look back and realize the
Speaker 1: danger that they're going to be in because if you
Speaker 1: think about it for a second, this year they happen
Speaker 1: to have a majority, It's a very small majority, it's
Speaker 1: five votes. What happens if it is very likely we
Speaker 1: take control in the next election in the House. At
Speaker 1: that point, I think they should the Republicans should require
Speaker 1: every single Democrat to come in front of the Republicans
Speaker 1: Steering Committee in order to get their committee assignments and
Speaker 1: just say you started down this road, this is the
Speaker 1: game you wanted to play, and now you're going to
Speaker 1: pay the cost to that game. We never you know,
Speaker 1: we talked, we'd never do it, though, is it to me?
Speaker 1: You know, I go, I look at the three legs
Speaker 1: and modern conservatism, and you're one of them. The Contract
Speaker 1: with America Reagan's one of them. The Trump election and presidency,
Speaker 1: which is consequential, is one of them. It's simple, mister Speaker.
Speaker 1: Cut taxes, more liberty, more freedom, and the burdensome bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: Conservative constitutionalists on the bench, secure borders, energy, independence, we support,
Speaker 1: love our Constitution and our Second Amendment. Then free and
Speaker 1: fair trade and piece through strength. And I think I've
Speaker 1: pretty much covered most of what matters to me and
Speaker 1: works for the country right. That makes sense, radically different
Speaker 1: from the people on the left who want to acquire power,
Speaker 1: take away your freedoms, dictate to you what you're allowed
Speaker 1: to say, and basically reorganize the entire country around their
Speaker 1: values and their power structure. Doug in North Carolina, what's up, Doug?
Speaker 1: How are you glad you called? Sir? Doing well? Thank you?
Speaker 1: I was wondering now that the Chief Justice has decided
Speaker 1: he's not going to be involved in this trial in
Speaker 1: the Senate and Patrick lay He's decided to step in
Speaker 1: and be the chair of this. Most any commission or
Speaker 1: trial that I've ever experienced, whoever's presiding over that wouldn't
Speaker 1: necessarily have a vote in it. And I'm just wondering
Speaker 1: how lay he can In the past couple of weeks,
Speaker 1: record is accusing Trump of inciting an insurrection and then
Speaker 1: preside over what is essentially going to be a trial
Speaker 1: in the Senate. He's already determined, He's already determined the
Speaker 1: Trump's guilty. How could he be the judge of anything
Speaker 1: involving this case. It's just as insanity to me, right,
Speaker 1: and they get to vote as a senator once he's
Speaker 1: presided over over the trial. I mean, that doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense to me. And you know, I thankfully haven't
Speaker 1: been in front of a lot of judges, but I wouldn't.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't want to have the judge, jury and executioner.
Speaker 1: I will be the same guy. Yeah. Look, and it
Speaker 1: makes it more of a force every day. I mean,
Speaker 1: some people say, well, they want to call Trump as
Speaker 1: a witness, Okay, what they want is more theater. They
Speaker 1: want a bigger show. And I think I don't think
Speaker 1: the President's lawyers would want him to do that, and
Speaker 1: nor do I think he'd ever go Why should he
Speaker 1: validate what they're doing. The Senate shouldn't be validating what
Speaker 1: they're doing. Nobody should be validating and legitimizing this. You know,
Speaker 1: there was no witnesses, no evidence, no hearings, nothing. That's
Speaker 1: a snap impeachment before we found out. Oh, a lot
Speaker 1: of this was pre planned and it was not words
Speaker 1: that incited these people after all, although you know some
Speaker 1: might have gotten caught up in it. All right, anyway,
Speaker 1: I appreciate your observation. You know what, you make too
Speaker 1: much sense for Washington, Doug. That's probably you're probably smartly
Speaker 1: living in North Carolina. All right, quick break, we'll come back.
Speaker 1: Steve Moore weighs in on this massive spending for this
Speaker 1: COVID relief package, the impact it will have, the use
Speaker 1: of reconciliation and executive orders and bypassing one entire branch
Speaker 1: of government. Next twenty five to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one sewn, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, so in keeping with
Speaker 1: the never ending executive orders, remember, I want to play
Speaker 1: this again. Joe Biden defined the use of executive orders.
Speaker 1: And what that really means is if we have three
Speaker 1: branches of government, the executive branch, the legislative branch, and
Speaker 1: of course the judicial branch of government and their coequal
Speaker 1: branches of government, and you have a president the executive
Speaker 1: branch through through legislative bypass, if you will, ignoring one
Speaker 1: whole entire branch of government and just you know, through
Speaker 1: the stroke of a pen and executive fiats. That is,
Speaker 1: you know, you begin to argue when somebody's doing everything
Speaker 1: possible that way, what is wrong with them? Then? Of course,
Speaker 1: as a means of getting passed the usual process of
Speaker 1: passing a budget, which would include bringing in Republicans to
Speaker 1: get the budget passed, why why bother doing it that way?
Speaker 1: This is how they passed This is how they did
Speaker 1: Obamacare through the reconciliation process. You haven't talked about it
Speaker 1: in a while. And this is what they're going to
Speaker 1: now do with their one point nine trillion dollars to
Speaker 1: pass their COVID relief package, which is also basically a
Speaker 1: blue state bailout. Let me explain the blue state bailout.
Speaker 1: The blue state bailout is for states like New York California, Illinois,
Speaker 1: New Joysey, and other words, states that will never vote Republican,
Speaker 1: that have been governed by liberal Democrats on the state
Speaker 1: government side for decades, same with their mayors like a
Speaker 1: New York City, etc. And the people in these states
Speaker 1: elect big spending, big deficit accumulating officials, and they don't
Speaker 1: balance their budget. They live well beyond their means. They
Speaker 1: tax people into oblivion. And those states now that have
Speaker 1: been fiscally responsible, electing fiscally responsible politicians and also funding
Speaker 1: their pensions, balancing their budgets, they will now be forced
Speaker 1: to pay for these bailouts. And here's Bernie Sanders saying, now,
Speaker 1: why go through the normal process of passing a spending
Speaker 1: bill when we can just ram it through with the
Speaker 1: reconciliation process. Should Democrats move to pass Corona virus relief
Speaker 1: with fifty one votes if they can't get Republicans support,
Speaker 1: say before the impeachment trial, Well, I don't know what
Speaker 1: the word compromise means. I know that working families are
Speaker 1: living today in more economic desperation than since the Great Depression,
Speaker 1: and if Republicans are willing to work with us to
Speaker 1: address that crisis, welcome let's do it. But what we
Speaker 1: cannot do is wait weeks and weeks and months and
Speaker 1: months to go forward. We have got to act now.
Speaker 1: That is what the American people want now. As you know, reconciliation,
Speaker 1: which is a Senate rule, was used by the Republicans
Speaker 1: under Trump to pass massive tax breaks for the rich
Speaker 1: and large corporations. It was used as an attempt to
Speaker 1: repeal the Affordable Care Act. And what we are saying
Speaker 1: is you use it for that. That's fine. We're going
Speaker 1: to use reconciliation that has fifty votes in the Senate
Speaker 1: plus the Vice President to pass legislation desperately needed by
Speaker 1: working families this country. Right now. You did it, We're
Speaker 1: gonna do it. But we're going to do it to
Speaker 1: protect ordinary people, not just the rich and the powerful.
Speaker 1: And what's your timeline on that? As soon as we
Speaker 1: possibly come. So what they're saying and what it means
Speaker 1: is the way they went and passed it was actually
Speaker 1: he got his facts wrong. This all started under Obama.
Speaker 1: Remember Scott Brown, he was going to be the vote
Speaker 1: against Obamacare. Big election. Republicans want it, and they'd bypassed
Speaker 1: the normal process anyway to do whatever they wanted anyway
Speaker 1: here to weigh in on this big question, is Steve Moore,
Speaker 1: between the executive orders and now using reconciliation your thoughts. Well,
Speaker 1: First of all, Sean, one of the most important things
Speaker 1: people have to realize is that there is one trillion.
Speaker 1: And by the way, we're telling about millions, billions of
Speaker 1: trillions of dollars. I think people's eyes glaze over. You know,
Speaker 1: when you and I first came to Washington, we talked
Speaker 1: about the budget and the millions and billion. Now they're
Speaker 1: talking about in the billions and trillions of dollars. But
Speaker 1: there is if you know, Sean, there's one trillion, more
Speaker 1: than one trillion dollars of money that hasn't already been
Speaker 1: spent by the first time COVID release bills we want. So,
Speaker 1: in other words, we appropriated for some four trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in the last year on COVID, and one trillion of
Speaker 1: it still hasn't been spent because these agencies can't spend
Speaker 1: it as fast as Congress keeps appropriating more and more money.
Speaker 1: And we just passed a bill, as you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: in the final days of the Trump administration appropriating nine
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars, and now the Democrats want to spend
Speaker 1: another one point nine trillions when they haven't even spent
Speaker 1: one trillion of it. What I really want to ask you,
Speaker 1: and I want you I want people to understand now
Speaker 1: because you're right about the nine hundred a million that
Speaker 1: is remaining that has yet to be distributed. And by
Speaker 1: the way, how ridiculous is it that I got two
Speaker 1: six hundred dollars checks? Did you get any of those checks? Well,
Speaker 1: I didn't get a check to my wife and I
Speaker 1: told I mailed it to my guy, said, whatever we do,
Speaker 1: don't cash this stupid check. I don't want this six
Speaker 1: hundred dollars. I don't think I don't deserve to get
Speaker 1: six hundred dollars that should go to Americans that are
Speaker 1: in need of six hundred dollars. And they're not even
Speaker 1: apparently going to even means test this, or they weren't
Speaker 1: up until yesterday. I think they finally finally considered it
Speaker 1: for the first time. So here's my big question. This
Speaker 1: is the big question I want you to answer. Okay,
Speaker 1: we showed the conservatism works, cutting taxes and in the bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: pursuing energy independence, securing our border, increasing wages for all
Speaker 1: demographic groups in America. All of that worked under the
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's policies. So now we're going now we're reversing
Speaker 1: all of it. Take your time in your answer. How
Speaker 1: does this end? You know? I was honored to serve
Speaker 1: as an economic advisory to Donald Trump, and we put
Speaker 1: together the tax cut and the deregulation and the pro
Speaker 1: America energy policies, the kind of things you talked about
Speaker 1: every day on your show. And the lapt to remember
Speaker 1: what they sat back and in two thousand and sixteens
Speaker 1: of a team they said it would never work. Remember
Speaker 1: they said apart movement said it would cause a second
Speaker 1: great depression if we if we did all these things,
Speaker 1: Well we did it. We did the scientific experiment, and
Speaker 1: we had the best economy in American history. We had
Speaker 1: the lowest poverty rate in the history of the United States,
Speaker 1: not just for all Americans, but for minorities. Think about that.
Speaker 1: A smaller percentage of Americans were poor during Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: first three years in office than any other time in
Speaker 1: the history of the United States. We had the biggest
Speaker 1: wage gains in twenty years. We had income gains for
Speaker 1: the middle class median family income, the people that Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders was just talking about. Those the median family income
Speaker 1: went up to six thousand dollars, and three years under
Speaker 1: Donald Trump it only the numbers went up, only about
Speaker 1: three thousand dollars. And eight years under Obama we had
Speaker 1: the lowest unemployment rate ever, We had a booming stock market.
Speaker 1: We I mean, I could go on and on and on.
Speaker 1: The point is we had the best Trump was right.
Speaker 1: We did have the about the best economy ever. And
Speaker 1: now you're right. You know, we twisted the dials in
Speaker 1: the right direction for growth and we got it. And
Speaker 1: now what Biden is doing is we're just going to
Speaker 1: repeal all of that. And I got to tell you so,
Speaker 1: I'm not not going to have a happy ending. We
Speaker 1: go back to massive spending, massive borrowing, massive tax increases,
Speaker 1: the reduction in American energy. You know, I have a
Speaker 1: great statistic for you, Sean. Do you know how much
Speaker 1: oil United States imported from Saudi Arabia in the month
Speaker 1: of January? I knew, zero zero. Isn't that amazing? It's
Speaker 1: amazing in Europe. By way, forget America first, this is America. Last,
Speaker 1: this is make Russia rich again. Make a Rand rich again,
Speaker 1: China rich again, in Middle Eastern countries that hate US
Speaker 1: rich again exactly. For example, that the tax cuts we did.
Speaker 1: What we did was we cut tax rates on American
Speaker 1: companies and we did it on apologetically. Why did we
Speaker 1: do that because jobs come from businesses, and we wanted
Speaker 1: American businesses to be the most competitive in the world.
Speaker 1: And all of a sudden, we started sucking capital back
Speaker 1: from all of these countries like China and Japan and
Speaker 1: USA and Mexico. It all came back to the United States.
Speaker 1: As Trump said, in the first time, we actually had factories,
Speaker 1: you know, leaving Mexico come to Michigan rather than the opposite.
Speaker 1: And I fear that we're going to make America a
Speaker 1: very uncompetitive place. And you're right, the Chinese facades and
Speaker 1: the Russians are going to greatly benefit from this. If
Speaker 1: you look at the record low unemployment for every specific
Speaker 1: demographic in this country, which happened, and we had record
Speaker 1: after record after record sent a set by Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: You add now amnesty to eleven plus million people, open
Speaker 1: borders that's also happening, loss of high paying career jobs
Speaker 1: in the energy sector. Then you add the economic burden
Speaker 1: to business of regulation, which will push manufacturing again away
Speaker 1: from America, like during the Biden Obama years, increasing the
Speaker 1: federal minimum wage, increasing paid family medical leave, repealing right
Speaker 1: to work laws, literally, you know, up posing the border wall. Education,
Speaker 1: we're going to pay for education for illegal immigrants, less
Speaker 1: money for American children, medicare for all. Add that to
Speaker 1: it in this green new deal with a price tag
Speaker 1: you know, up and around the ten trillion dollar range.
Speaker 1: To me, is nothing but a formula for catastrophe. Would
Speaker 1: you would think so? And I think it is a
Speaker 1: recipe for catastrophe. To what Joe Biden has going for
Speaker 1: him is exactly the opposite of what he's saying, which
Speaker 1: is that Donald Trump has cheed up this economy. I mean,
Speaker 1: once we get this vaccine out there, if we were
Speaker 1: just to keep the taxes low, get get the regulations
Speaker 1: out of the way, continue to produce American energy, I mean,
Speaker 1: we'd see an explosion and growth in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: And even if Biden screws everything up this year, because
Speaker 1: you know, you saw the unemployment numbers came out this morning,
Speaker 1: declining number of people getting unemployment benefits. Because the economy
Speaker 1: is getting healthier, and none of them. This is my point, schrun.
Speaker 1: We don't need one point nine he and hollers of
Speaker 1: new debt, and middle five people and young people are
Speaker 1: gonna have to pay the cost of this enormous debt.
Speaker 1: You just let the economy work. It is healing itself.
Speaker 1: Get the vaccine out there. By the way, I'm not
Speaker 1: even sure we need a massive government program to do that. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think we do actually at all. It just
Speaker 1: gets very very interesting all the way across the board,
Speaker 1: all right, unrelated questions. So I have friends of mine
Speaker 1: that are huge into bitcoin. People have been telling me
Speaker 1: to buy bitcoin for years and years and years. Cryptocurrency.
Speaker 1: This is what I know about bitcoin. It's cryptocurrency. Scaramuccia
Speaker 1: think says, he thinks that's going on one hundred bucks.
Speaker 1: It was in one paper today somewhere anyway, So I
Speaker 1: think it's at thirty seven as of yesterday. I didn't
Speaker 1: look at it today. And so bitcoin is an algorithm,
Speaker 1: a mathematical equation, and it's a cryptocurrency, and there's only
Speaker 1: a finite amount of it, and once they mind it all,
Speaker 1: there'll be no more. So and more and more places
Speaker 1: are accepting. We have government governments is accepting it. Now
Speaker 1: we have more and more companies that are willing to
Speaker 1: accept cryptocurrency. You don't have to pay the fees normally
Speaker 1: associated with transactions. Okay, I get it. Why does the
Speaker 1: price keep going up the way it is? And do
Speaker 1: you believe in it? The reason the price is going up?
Speaker 1: And by the way, there's many big I mean, there's
Speaker 1: many cryptocurrencies. And what's going on here, Sean is pete
Speaker 1: because these governments are out of control right now, the
Speaker 1: European economies Biden's talking about massively increasing our debt, are
Speaker 1: increasing our spending. Well, what does that do to the currency? Right?
Speaker 1: It reduces the value of the currency. You and I
Speaker 1: live through the big inflation of the nineteen seventies, when
Speaker 1: the old joke was if you saw a dollar go
Speaker 1: on the ground, you see if there's you pick it
Speaker 1: up to see if there's anything of value underneath it.
Speaker 1: Because the dollar, it's so crashed, and I think a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans and investors around the world are worried
Speaker 1: about what we call government currencies because they're cheapening in
Speaker 1: them every day when they spend and spend and spend
Speaker 1: and borrow. I like the idea of having a private
Speaker 1: competition with government central bank currencies. I really do. Now
Speaker 1: would I buy, you know, bitcoin right now, I'd be
Speaker 1: a little skeptical because it's already gone up so much
Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna you know, I'm not going to
Speaker 1: give a recommendation one way or the other. But it
Speaker 1: is a good thing because these I ask you personally,
Speaker 1: as a as a private citizen, did you buy any No?
Speaker 1: I don't own bitcoin. I'm worried about it. I think
Speaker 1: the one thing people have to understand is as much
Speaker 1: as we have debauched our currency, that it is still
Speaker 1: the single best asset to own because it has something
Speaker 1: that no private currency, Bitcoin or any other has, which
Speaker 1: has has the full faith and credit the United States
Speaker 1: government behind it. And you're taking a risk if you
Speaker 1: buy a bitcoin, because there's nothing that stands behind it.
Speaker 1: And that's that's my recommendation. Why you mentioned these other
Speaker 1: other cryptocurrencies coming online, Why do you think they may
Speaker 1: do well? Because we're moving into a digital digital age
Speaker 1: right now, and for making transactions. You know, more and
Speaker 1: more of what we do is with credit towards and
Speaker 1: with digital transactions. The need for paper currency is declining
Speaker 1: all of the time, and so the other thing people
Speaker 1: like about cryptocurrencies is privacy. No privacy. I don't want
Speaker 1: the government to know every transaction I make. And this
Speaker 1: is a way of you know, being able to Yeah.
Speaker 1: And I think in the past anybody that was using
Speaker 1: it early was look was looked upon a suspect. But
Speaker 1: I think it's more mainstream now, right. I agree with you.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not you know, people say, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: the government says, oh, we can't have cryptocurrencies because it's
Speaker 1: drug dealers and so on. But no, there are very
Speaker 1: many reasons why an honest business would want not to
Speaker 1: have government officials no every transaction they're making. Yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: Steve Moore, always love having you on the program. Thank
Speaker 1: you for being with us as book. By the way,
Speaker 1: Trumponomics inside the America first plan to revive our economy.
Speaker 1: Right when we come back a news roundup, information overload hour,
Speaker 1: we'll get to your calls, you know when they I've
Speaker 1: meant to ask Steve about this now. Romney's proposing a
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty dollars monthly child allowance to replace
Speaker 1: current assistance, and that would be for that. In other words,
Speaker 1: for children younger than six, they would receive three hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty bucks. Parents of kids ages six to seventeen
Speaker 1: would receive two hundred and fifty dollars. Why are we
Speaker 1: going to give kids that much money? All right, anyway,
Speaker 1: we'll get to our news Roundup Information Overload. Greg Jarrett
Speaker 1: and Don Brown breakdown the impeachment constitutional shampa next week
Speaker 1: and more as we continue here for our final news
Speaker 1: round up and Information Overload. All right, News Roundup and
Speaker 1: Information Overload hour. Thanks for being with a Sean Hannity show.
Speaker 1: Your calls coming up this hour eight hundred ninety four
Speaker 1: one Sean, if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program now. So next week the shift show the
Speaker 1: Predetermined Outcome post presidential Unconstitutional Impeachment cham begins and they
Speaker 1: have been talking, well, maybe we'll just we'll have censor
Speaker 1: you for considering. We already know forty five Republicans are
Speaker 1: not going to go along with what they deem as unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: and so you know, Chuck Schumer had the option of
Speaker 1: I guess Susan Collins. Then Tim Kaine said, well, maybe
Speaker 1: we'll just do a censure and move on the only
Speaker 1: question that remains is though they're going to drag this
Speaker 1: out with witness after witness after witness, and I'm finding
Speaker 1: either way with it, to be honest, if that's what
Speaker 1: they want to do, because every day they do this,
Speaker 1: it is going to further alienate and anger the American people.
Speaker 1: And see, they'll see this for what this is a
Speaker 1: purely political maneuver by the Democrats that cannot let go
Speaker 1: of their irrational rage, psychotic hatred towards all things Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So Schumer's out there. Trump deserves a conviction, no less, Okay,
Speaker 1: And then you got Pelosi snapping at reporters they dare
Speaker 1: to ask the impeachment question, considering she's the one that
Speaker 1: allowed the snap impeachment without any evidence, without really really
Speaker 1: any facts on the table, without any witnesses whatsoever, because
Speaker 1: she wanted her last dig at Donald Trump. Anyway, let's
Speaker 1: play them both. Question as though there were a lot
Speaker 1: of conversation last week from Senator Cane and others seeing
Speaker 1: writing on the war for the votes. Then maybe if
Speaker 1: he's not convicted, do ancher when the president? Are you
Speaker 1: open to that? As I think the president should be tried.
Speaker 1: I hope he will vote to be convicted. Anything past
Speaker 1: that is something we can discuss, but he deserves conviction.
Speaker 1: As far as the impeachment a trial is concerned, Senator
Speaker 1: Graham said that if the Democrats call any witness that
Speaker 1: they'll be prepared. The Republicans prepared to call in the
Speaker 1: FBI and quote tell us about people who have it
Speaker 1: with the security footprint at the Capitol. What's your remember
Speaker 1: threatened to safety of other members? Would be the first
Speaker 1: ones to take them off a book committee. That's it.
Speaker 1: Thank you. I can't answer that question whatsoever because I
Speaker 1: have no idea what the right answer is. Anyway here
Speaker 1: to weigh in on the legal aspect of this, we
Speaker 1: got Greg Jarrett. He's the host of his new podcast,
Speaker 1: The Brief to New York Times number one best sellers,
Speaker 1: The Russia Hoax and Which Hunt Don Brown, former US
Speaker 1: Navy jag officer and author of the book Travesty of Justice,
Speaker 1: a best seller at its own right. Thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. Greg. I know you've been following this.
Speaker 1: It seems you know, once you determine it's unconstitutional, it's over.
Speaker 1: Has to be over in the eyes of forty five
Speaker 1: Republican senators. Correct, Oh, you're absolutely right, and you were
Speaker 1: correct San to point out that the outcome of the
Speaker 1: Senate trial was ordained the moment. Forty five Republicans last
Speaker 1: week voted to dismiss the case against Trump. You can't
Speaker 1: impeach under the Constitution a president who's no longer president.
Speaker 1: So but what I find so contemptible about Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: and or fellow Democrats and voting to impeach without holding
Speaker 1: a single hearing is that they knew that if they
Speaker 1: held a hearing it would be destructive to them. They
Speaker 1: didn't want to present evidence because they have no credible
Speaker 1: and incriminating evidence, so they rushed through the impeachment. And
Speaker 1: now Pelosi demanding, oh, the Senate should do what I
Speaker 1: didn't do and call witnesses. Fine, I say, let's call
Speaker 1: Alexandria Kasia Cortez, who revealed on Tuesday this week that
Speaker 1: she was warned of the violence a week in advance
Speaker 1: of the riots. And hell yeah, I mean, how is
Speaker 1: it possible for Trump who have incited violence as is
Speaker 1: claimed in the article of impeachment, if that violence was
Speaker 1: actually planning and before he delivered his speech and show
Speaker 1: you know, they're just underscores that this is all about
Speaker 1: vilifying and destroying Donald Trump. It's an abuse of power
Speaker 1: by Pelosi and Schumer. And your take, Don bro Well,
Speaker 1: I agree with Greg. They don't want to touch the
Speaker 1: evidence with a ten foot pole, not only because you're
Speaker 1: going to expose why Democrats knew, such as why AOC
Speaker 1: knew and not only that, but you know Doug Jones
Speaker 1: a lot smarter Laurie than I am. But if I'm
Speaker 1: defending the case, I probably play a montage of all
Speaker 1: those incendiary comments that Maxine Waters and Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer have made over the years about getting their
Speaker 1: faces go out in the street. I play that and say,
Speaker 1: what does it mean to incite? Because whatever the President
Speaker 1: said when he said to go peacefully falls far beyond
Speaker 1: that standard. But this is the second time in thirteen
Speaker 1: months they've taken basically the US Senate. The Democrats haven't
Speaker 1: turned it in sort of a Barnam and Billy's clown
Speaker 1: show by ignoring the Constitution. Greg Jarrett had a great
Speaker 1: OpEd I'm gonna plug a little bit yesterday on Fox
Speaker 1: in which he caused the Democrats and new patron saints
Speaker 1: of lost causes. But if you get an Article two,
Speaker 1: section four that lays it out as to who can
Speaker 1: be impeached the president, the vice president, and all civil
Speaker 1: astars of the United States, not the former president, the
Speaker 1: former vice president, the president, the vice president, and all
Speaker 1: civil ASTs. If the Founders wanted to open up the
Speaker 1: Constitution for a senate impeachment of private individuals, they could
Speaker 1: have done so. But the Democrats are throwing the Constitution
Speaker 1: in the trash. Can they give lip service to the constitution,
Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, is the restrained
Speaker 1: device against successive government power it gets in their way.
Speaker 1: They're the ones that ought to be appeached from making
Speaker 1: a mockery of the constitutional process. If you ask me,
Speaker 1: I think there are three arguments that are going to
Speaker 1: be made here now from Once you win the constitutional argument,
Speaker 1: you really could just pack up and leave. But I
Speaker 1: think both of you are touched on the two other
Speaker 1: arguments that I think are impertinent to the case. Considering
Speaker 1: I've read the you know, the entire case that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are putting forward, and they're gonna try and make
Speaker 1: it as incendiary as possible, and they'll probably slice and
Speaker 1: dice and edit their words fighting the you know Republicans said,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump said go fight like hell, and I put
Speaker 1: a montage together on TV the other night, Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 1: and all it was was Democrats saying, we've got to fight.
Speaker 1: This is the fight of our lives. Don't stop fighting.
Speaker 1: And then the third one is, well, if we're gonna
Speaker 1: now define one being an insurrectionist by saying go fight,
Speaker 1: that means all the Democrats can be included in that category.
Speaker 1: And more importantly, you can't ignore, as Don was putting out,
Speaker 1: many of you will now peacefully and patriotically march to
Speaker 1: the Capitol so your voices will be heard. When you
Speaker 1: put all of these elements together. And now the discovery
Speaker 1: of the pre planning that went into all of this
Speaker 1: and identified groups and court documents and FBI investigations and
Speaker 1: even liberal media now have to report it was pre planned,
Speaker 1: it kind of takes away that the words incited what
Speaker 1: happened on the sex of January. You're absolutely right. And
Speaker 1: the word fight, by the way, has multiple meanings. It's
Speaker 1: a generic term. But I would do as you just suggest, Sean,
Speaker 1: I'd play a bunch of clips. I mean, you can
Speaker 1: go look at Trump's speech, you can look at the
Speaker 1: comments of Democrats. Nowhere in Trump's speech did he advocate
Speaker 1: or direct imminent harm. And that's what law, the law
Speaker 1: of incitement, demands, you have to show specific intent to
Speaker 1: cause violence. There's no evidence that Trump ever intended the
Speaker 1: mob to launch an assault in the Capitol building, or
Speaker 1: breach security or tax police, none of that. So Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosie and I agree with you again, Sean, I would
Speaker 1: play clips of the things Nancy Pelosi has said. She's
Speaker 1: accused Trump publicly of racism, fascism, treason's edition by very
Speaker 1: causing math death. You know, is that incendiary? Absolutely, And
Speaker 1: in fact, Trump's words pale in comparison to Pelosi's bombastic
Speaker 1: rhetoric that you know, one could equally argue is incitement
Speaker 1: under their standard. You know, it seems again there is
Speaker 1: a legal definition of this. And Trump's own words, you know,
Speaker 1: he's telling people that you're going to do the exact
Speaker 1: opposite of what happened. I like the montage idea, I
Speaker 1: like the Republicans playing offense, But when you pre plan
Speaker 1: an event and you identify specific groups in the Washington
Speaker 1: Post and fake news CNN and court documents citing the
Speaker 1: FBI investigations that are ongoing, you know, conclude can identify
Speaker 1: the very specific people involved where the breach took place,
Speaker 1: the signs that were missed that all of this could
Speaker 1: possibly happen. We had intelligence apparently leading up to this,
Speaker 1: as referenced by AOC. And when you put all of this,
Speaker 1: you know together, Don and I'm thinking, well, how did
Speaker 1: they miss this whole thing? And will the Democrats hold
Speaker 1: the same standards to themselves? And how do Republicans hold
Speaker 1: them to these same standards while there's the colossal double
Speaker 1: standards as you pointed out in concreasingly an accurate matter
Speaker 1: over the years. They won't hold the standards to themselves.
Speaker 1: They will they'll try to play an incendiary montage of
Speaker 1: the worst that they can find. And then my guess
Speaker 1: is that if if the President's team tries to, you know,
Speaker 1: put on a montage of Maxine Waters and you know,
Speaker 1: and and the Speaker herself and U and the Vice
Speaker 1: President now of some of the incidior thing they said,
Speaker 1: they're want to try to shut it down as not
Speaker 1: being relevant. And the other thing they don't want to
Speaker 1: touch is this shon I touched it, touch on this
Speaker 1: last time they have me on they don't want to
Speaker 1: touch on the underlying basis of the claim itself that
Speaker 1: the president made false claims of election fraud. That they
Speaker 1: do not want to go there because that's a nuclear
Speaker 1: hot potata. So there are a number of dangerous, you know,
Speaker 1: booby traps for the Democrats to step in. But hey,
Speaker 1: they sort of speak first and ask questions later and
Speaker 1: have been very, very reckless in their approach. And I
Speaker 1: expect the scene to get pitched, but it'll be interesting
Speaker 1: to see exactly what it is the lab in terms
Speaker 1: of evidence to be placed on by the President's team. Yeah,
Speaker 1: moving on to another topic, Hunter Biden is being investigated criminally.
Speaker 1: As we know, Greg Jarrett, we know that Joe Joe
Speaker 1: Biden had to I guess, publicly speak out against his
Speaker 1: brother who was getting paid a consultantcy fee for some
Speaker 1: law firm I think, down in Florida and using video
Speaker 1: from the from inauguration day as a means of touting
Speaker 1: this law firm. All right, Hunter Biden, I guess he
Speaker 1: can't do any more deals with Ukrainian oligarchs and with
Speaker 1: Russian oligarchs and with corrupt officials in Ukraine, and he
Speaker 1: can't get another deal with the Bank of China, but
Speaker 1: he's not wasted any more time himself to cash in
Speaker 1: on his father's office. And apparently he's going to publish
Speaker 1: a memoir Beautiful Things. It's called I Don't See Anywhere.
Speaker 1: And my reading of any of this that as he
Speaker 1: discusses I guess his struggles with substance abuse, which was
Speaker 1: fairly obvious from the picture in the laptop where he
Speaker 1: fell asleep with a crack pipe in his mouth. But
Speaker 1: I've got to believe isn't that kind of a quick
Speaker 1: way to cash in my dad's president buy my book. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's pretty consistent with Hunter Biden. He's been a grifter
Speaker 1: all his life, and a pretty good one, judging by
Speaker 1: the millions he's made, leveraging his father's power and making
Speaker 1: promises to foreign clients that you know, he can exploit
Speaker 1: his father's power for their benefit. I think these investigations
Speaker 1: need to continue at full steam. It'll be interesting to
Speaker 1: see the confirmation hearing of the Attorney General nominee Merik Garland,
Speaker 1: because I am sure that people like Lindsey Graham on
Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee will solicit an absolute, solemn promise from
Speaker 1: Garland that he will not shut down those investigations or
Speaker 1: otherwise try to unduly influence them. These are investigations into crimes,
Speaker 1: and from what I understand, it could be a great
Speaker 1: many of them. Oh, thank you both, Greg Jared, Thank
Speaker 1: you Don Brown. Thank you of your calls in here.
Speaker 1: We'll take calls also for the final half hour of
Speaker 1: the program. All right, the United Socialist Utopia of California. Melody, comrade,
Speaker 1: welcome to the program. Thanks for being well. Us looks
Speaker 1: more and more every day like your governor may not
Speaker 1: make it, hopefully not. I'm sean. Why don't we have
Speaker 1: two parties when only the Democrats seem to implement their
Speaker 1: outland is agenda. For example, they ordered us to stand
Speaker 1: down in Benghazi while our men died so that Obamaca
Speaker 1: win reelection with no consequences. They ordered us to stand
Speaker 1: down as we watch with our own eyes Biden still
Speaker 1: an election and again with no consequences. What are the
Speaker 1: Republicans doing? Shouldn't it be congresses Number one duty to
Speaker 1: protect our from both foreign and domestic enemies. Right now
Speaker 1: we're dealing with a domestic enemy. What are the Republicans doing? Well, Look,
Speaker 1: don't diminish the four years the consequential presidency that was
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pennce. He cannot dismiss it.
Speaker 1: I mean conservatism melody. When you apply it, it works.
Speaker 1: People didn't like the style of Donald Trump, some people
Speaker 1: I had no problem with it, but he got the
Speaker 1: job done. Philosophically sound conservatism, that's how we did it.
Speaker 1: That's president I've seen in my lifetime. And look how
Speaker 1: they treated him. They threw him out of office when
Speaker 1: he won. That was like the biggest night for the Republicans.
Speaker 1: We won that election, they threw him out of office
Speaker 1: and they're still coming after him. Why are we allowing this?
Speaker 1: We are a free America. What the heck are we doing?
Speaker 1: This is crazy. We need to give them all pink
Speaker 1: slips now except for few, and put in new guard
Speaker 1: for our liberty. What are we doing? We could do
Speaker 1: this lead to something faith. I've said this last night.
Speaker 1: I'm a conservative. My agenda is simple, what I think
Speaker 1: works for the country right. One thing they got to
Speaker 1: add to that is, you know, if laws exist, statutory
Speaker 1: language exists that observers get to observe vote counting, we've
Speaker 1: got to enforce it. If a constitution of a state
Speaker 1: says that you can't have mail in voting. They have
Speaker 1: to they have to have a constitutional amendment laws that
Speaker 1: say you can't have mail in voting in a state,
Speaker 1: and they allow it anyway. You've got to get these
Speaker 1: things straightened out so people will have faith, trust confidence
Speaker 1: in elections moving forward. That's got to be a big
Speaker 1: agenda item or else, you know, we'll never have confidence
Speaker 1: in it again. As you're expressing, eight hundred nine four one,
Speaker 1: Shan is our number will continue hight twenty five till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine four one, Sean.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of this extravaganza. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get a lot of calls in this half hour.
Speaker 1: We'll go to colonies in Pennsylvania. First, feel sorry for
Speaker 1: people in the energy field, be losing their jobs in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: IH paying career jobs. Good people, great Americans, make our lives.
Speaker 1: They're out. They've been saving us all money at the
Speaker 1: pump and heating. How are you calling? What's going on?
Speaker 1: I'm doing great, Sean, sext for taking my call. I
Speaker 1: love the state. My question had to do with given
Speaker 1: all the baggage, whether earned or unearned, or made up
Speaker 1: by the media. However, happens to be that Trump's with him.
Speaker 1: Do you think that ultimately he would be a help
Speaker 1: or a hindrance to the Republican Party and Conservatism as
Speaker 1: a whole to try to run or influence future elections.
Speaker 1: I think he's a genuinely a big plus look a
Speaker 1: lot of things. It's very interesting to me to watch
Speaker 1: the media because for the most part, by being silenced
Speaker 1: by big tech world and not being on Twitter and
Speaker 1: social media, and the president now certainly he's growing accustomed
Speaker 1: to his new new basically returning to his old life
Speaker 1: and being um well, uncharacteristically quiet for a little while.
Speaker 1: It's got everybody wondering what's he thinking, what's he doing,
Speaker 1: what's he gonna say, When's he gonna say it? And
Speaker 1: I find that part of it amusing, and I think
Speaker 1: it's we have the attention spans collectively, they're very short.
Speaker 1: Let me let me say it more charitably, we don't
Speaker 1: have very long attention spans as a country. The news
Speaker 1: cycles they go very quickly in this country. And I
Speaker 1: know because this is what I do every day, and
Speaker 1: big stories, ones that might have lasted a week, a
Speaker 1: month or gone out even longer, you know, can be
Speaker 1: over in a twenty four hour, forty eight hour, seventy
Speaker 1: two hour cycle. And because we're getting hit with so
Speaker 1: much information at once, and so I think that we're
Speaker 1: going to go through the shift show. I'm not really
Speaker 1: gonna be too worked up about next week because it's
Speaker 1: a predetermined outcome and Democrats acting mad and feigning their
Speaker 1: outrage and their anger and blame and and they're just
Speaker 1: they're going to rage away. And the American people have
Speaker 1: seen all of this now for five straight years. I
Speaker 1: think there's going to be a collective sigh and rolling
Speaker 1: of eyes and people have moved on. Now when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump re emerges, um, I think in many ways the
Speaker 1: agenda that he that he proved can be successful is
Speaker 1: going to be in the forefront. You add to that,
Speaker 1: probably we've got to make sure that laws are followed
Speaker 1: and constitutions are followed in states and so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. And we see Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona and now
Speaker 1: looking to make the appropriate change to instill more confidence
Speaker 1: in our election systems, and other states need to follow.
Speaker 1: So I think that's a key component. Or I worry
Speaker 1: that if the Democrats get their wish with no voter
Speaker 1: id ever of any kind, no signature verification of any kind,
Speaker 1: all mail in ballots, that it would lend itself as
Speaker 1: The New York Times told us to much higher rates
Speaker 1: of fraud. I'm just quoting them. So I think he's
Speaker 1: going to come back and we'll see what he has
Speaker 1: to say. Would Donald Trump come back again? Well, he
Speaker 1: wrote The Art of the Deal and cullen people forget
Speaker 1: he wrote another book, The Art of the Comeback. Why
Speaker 1: wouldn't he come back? Yeah? Yeah, I think I think
Speaker 1: his policies are something that a lot of people, even
Speaker 1: middle of the ground people, really agree with. They're incredibly popular.
Speaker 1: I think sometimes just a mixture between media bias against him,
Speaker 1: which has been absolutely absurd obviously, and let's face it,
Speaker 1: his own mouth sometimes get him in so much trouble
Speaker 1: that there's just so many people who hate him so much,
Speaker 1: and so I'm just worried about him possibly being this
Speaker 1: big easy target going forward. He's definitely a lightning rod.
Speaker 1: But also people appreciate the fact, look, what he did
Speaker 1: was take the conservative agenda and it got jacked up
Speaker 1: on human growth hormone and steroids. In the sense that
Speaker 1: he took it, and he went and he took the
Speaker 1: fight to the swamp and the sewer, and he went
Speaker 1: in as a disruptor, and he left as a disruptor.
Speaker 1: He went in as an iconic class that he left
Speaker 1: his one and the American people knew what they were
Speaker 1: doing in twenty sixteen, and he ended up getting what
Speaker 1: twelve million more votes in twenty twenty. That doesn't normally happen.
Speaker 1: So I think that people like the fact that he
Speaker 1: kept his promises. We've gone up and down that checklist
Speaker 1: how many times? And he's also proven that the agenda works.
Speaker 1: And the one major mass criticism is stylistically people are
Speaker 1: some people are turned off by it. I'm not. I'm not,
Speaker 1: and I think a lot of people were feigning being
Speaker 1: outraged about it. But you know, two months from now,
Speaker 1: telling you right right now, the mob and the media
Speaker 1: they're missing him. They want to hear from him, they
Speaker 1: want to be mad at him. It's like their drug
Speaker 1: and they're going through withdrawals. Thank you, Colling. Let's say
Speaker 1: hi to Wendy is an Idaho. Hey, Wendy, how are
Speaker 1: you glad you call it mass immigration into Idaho? I
Speaker 1: notice you're getting a lot of new people moving into
Speaker 1: your state. Oh boy, howdy, including us? Oh congratulations, where'd
Speaker 1: you go? Where'd you move from California? Mmm? How much
Speaker 1: money are you saving just by moving there? Quite a bit,
Speaker 1: as well as peace of mind? I get it no more.
Speaker 1: You don't have to listen to traffic reports every two
Speaker 1: minutes on every station. Go ahead and we get waived
Speaker 1: debt with all five fingers, exactly what's going on today?
Speaker 1: What's happening in your world? Well? I am so happy
Speaker 1: to hear that you are strongly pushing what the how
Speaker 1: hypocritical the Democrats are in spewing such hatred? And but
Speaker 1: where where my anger and frustration lies, Sean is with
Speaker 1: McCarthy and McConnell. Why aren't they pushing back and standing
Speaker 1: up for their representatives. You're talking about Marjorie Telegreen, Well,
Speaker 1: the Republicans, That Republicans. She got the support of McCarthy.
Speaker 1: She gave a pretty passionate speech look on the on
Speaker 1: the on the House floor today, explained who she is,
Speaker 1: her background, and and disavowed some of the statements, studies,
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, whatever it's really you know, I just find
Speaker 1: it pretty what frustrates me and what frustrates so many
Speaker 1: of you, I think is the hypocrisy in it all.
Speaker 1: Because you got Congresswoman Omar, congresswoman to leave, you know, AOC.
Speaker 1: You got the whole litany of Democrats that have said,
Speaker 1: you know, Maxine Waters, and nothing ever happens, and they're
Speaker 1: not as outraged as they pretend. But Sean, that is
Speaker 1: exactly my frustration. They have all came out, the Gang
Speaker 1: of five Spartacus, all of them have such deeply offensive
Speaker 1: state that yet the gyms are pushing to have the
Speaker 1: Republican censored or taking off committees. Why aren't we doing
Speaker 1: the same thing against them? Well, That's what I've been saying,
Speaker 1: and I'm also saying there needs to be one standard,
Speaker 1: one standard for the definition of insurrection, and one standard
Speaker 1: for whether or not a congressman or a woman, you know,
Speaker 1: meets the criteria to serve on a committee. And the
Speaker 1: reality is the people in Maxie Waters, AOC's Talibo Mars,
Speaker 1: they keep voting their congress women in this particular case,
Speaker 1: and I would bet that the people of North Georgia
Speaker 1: will based on the seventy four percent of the vote
Speaker 1: she got, they're going to vote her back in but
Speaker 1: in terms of leadership, listen, I want every I want
Speaker 1: to reset. I want to focus on issues here. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this to me is just what politicians do that has
Speaker 1: no impact on our lives, none whatsoever. But anyway, good
Speaker 1: call Wendy. All the best to you and your family
Speaker 1: in New State. Let's go to uh let's see here.
Speaker 1: Ron is in Kentucky. What's up? Ron? Glad you called? Hey?
Speaker 1: How you doing, Sean? I was good, sir. That's just
Speaker 1: concerning me. I'm looking at these teachers and stuff. But
Speaker 1: we're you ps drivers and we're in the union. I
Speaker 1: don't think people know the difference between a private union
Speaker 1: and public union. But we don't stand behind these public unions.
Speaker 1: I mean we are upset with our union reps. I
Speaker 1: mean they vote Democrat and put our money towards the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. And we're truck drivers. None of us are
Speaker 1: involved in any of that. We are conservatives. Yeah, listen,
Speaker 1: I mean this was driving me crazy. One of the
Speaker 1: first guys that I interviewed about losing his job for
Speaker 1: the Keystone Excel pipeline, I said, well, where is your
Speaker 1: union on this? And the union heads, not the rank
Speaker 1: and file, but the union leadership supported Biden. I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: they supported the guy that basically, with a stroke of
Speaker 1: a pen ended your career. Ended it right there, because
Speaker 1: it ain't coming back in the next four years. That
Speaker 1: career is gone. And if my union leader, why am
Speaker 1: I paying dues to a union that's not supporting candidates
Speaker 1: that support our industry. It's pretty dumb, no, it is, yeah, right,
Speaker 1: Ron Union, Shine, that's that's the same we've been out here.
Speaker 1: We've been out in this stuff the whole time. Shine,
Speaker 1: for the COVID we have not missed a beat because
Speaker 1: we had to get medicine to people, food to people,
Speaker 1: everything else. We see these teachers out of restaurants and
Speaker 1: grocery stores and then they're shutting their kids down. It's
Speaker 1: it's insane. We've dealt with it. Why can't they, I mean,
Speaker 1: it just doesn't make any sense to me what they're
Speaker 1: trying to do here. Well, it should have been a
Speaker 1: top priority, you know, right underneath first responders and those
Speaker 1: with the most serious health issues and underlying conditions. Teachers
Speaker 1: should be getting themselves the vaccine younger people overall. There
Speaker 1: are exceptions, but the vast mandatority of them have minimal
Speaker 1: symptoms with COVID. You know, it's it's just this, this
Speaker 1: virus is the strangest thing I've ever seen. Anyway, good call,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Jay and Maryland. What's Jay? How are you hi? Sean? Um? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm going to preface um. Actually I want to make
Speaker 1: a statement, and then if you have time, if I
Speaker 1: could make a comment about your interview with Dave. Dave
Speaker 1: shown the lead attorney for Trump. But first I want
Speaker 1: to say, I want to preface this by saying, none
Speaker 1: of this what I'm about to say will make any
Speaker 1: sense or any difference if the elections aren't corrected. We
Speaker 1: all know that, and be they need to be primaried,
Speaker 1: the rhinos need to be primaried over the next two
Speaker 1: years in twenty twenty twenty two. So what I'm going
Speaker 1: to say is something occurred to me that I would
Speaker 1: have loved Trump to have been elected last November. But
Speaker 1: then I started thinking, maybe it's a good thing that
Speaker 1: he wasn't. In this sense, he would not have the Senate,
Speaker 1: he would not have the House, he would be subjected
Speaker 1: to the same stuff he went through from twenty eighteen
Speaker 1: one and probably the last four years in total. So
Speaker 1: now he can come back, and the way the country
Speaker 1: is situated right now with his backers, that if he
Speaker 1: gets to twenty twenty four, there's a really good chance
Speaker 1: he would have both the House and the Senate, in
Speaker 1: which case he can finally get his America First agenda through.
Speaker 1: It would have been virtually impossible if he had won
Speaker 1: the November third election, which he should have. Look, elections
Speaker 1: have consequences. You're right on. You know, we partisan observers.
Speaker 1: We've got to be able to observe. You got to
Speaker 1: have that. I mean mail and and ballot. You gotta
Speaker 1: have voter ID, you gotta have a signature verification. You
Speaker 1: gotta have very stringent controls as it relates to any
Speaker 1: any type of mail and balloting. I don't think these
Speaker 1: elections need to go on and perpetuity the way some
Speaker 1: states are doing it either. We know that we can
Speaker 1: do this right. Florida is a great case in point
Speaker 1: with problems in two and twenty and twenty sixteen, but
Speaker 1: those were resolved by twenty twenty. We can fix things.
Speaker 1: We can send people to the moon and bring them
Speaker 1: home if that's what we choose to do. You know,
Speaker 1: whether it's a good thing. I see I just see
Speaker 1: socialism for what it is, and I see it as
Speaker 1: extraordinarily damaging, and I see that these policies ultimately will fail.
Speaker 1: Steve Moore earlier today was dead on accurate that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was handed an opportunity here to really do a
Speaker 1: lot of good for the country with a good economy,
Speaker 1: and he was handed the vaccines. He's in a good
Speaker 1: spot now. All his actions, unfortunately, are gonna take away
Speaker 1: all the progress we've made in the last four years.
Speaker 1: It's unfortunate. Mitigating as much as we can by having
Speaker 1: men and women, you know, battling in the arena of
Speaker 1: ideas and winning with conservative views is the antidote. Anyway,
Speaker 1: appreciate the call. That's gonna wrap things up for today.
Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled, Hannity nine Eastern. We
Speaker 1: hope you'll set your DVR and we're loaded up tonight
Speaker 1: is AOC. Apparently some are saying WEA Is she really
Speaker 1: in as much danger as she's claiming anyway, Congresswoman Nancy Mace,
Speaker 1: her office is two doors down from AOC. We'll give
Speaker 1: you a little view of the Capitol. There's a Freedom
Speaker 1: of Information Act request. Congressman Jim Jordan Dan Bongino joins
Speaker 1: US Senator Josh Holly and Dana lash nine Eastern S DVR, Hannity,
Speaker 1: Fox News. Thanks for being with us, see you tonight.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow