WEBVTT - Peter Mallouk on Building a Powerhouse RIA

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend on the podcast what Can I Say?

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>This was a master class in how to build a

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>powerhouse r i A. Peter Maluke has been with Creative

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Planning for twenty years. He kind of started as a

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>junior person, eventually buying the firm um for on on

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a I guess an earned out basis when the then

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>founder wanted to retire and took what was essentially a

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollars or smaller firm and built

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it up to a forty billion dollar powerhouse. If if

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn the right way to manage money,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with clients, to provide services, to grow a business,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>then strap yourself in. This is a master class with

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>no further ado. My conversation with Creative Plannings Peter Maluke.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholtz on Boomberg Radio.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>My extra special guest this week is Peter Maluke. He

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is the president and chief investment officer of Creative Planning,

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>affirm that manages about forty five billion dollars in assets

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>under management across nearly a hundred thousand client accounts. He

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is the only person on Worth's list of one hundred

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>most Powerful people in global finance who actually advised clients.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>He was listed number one on the Baron's Top one

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred Independent Advisors for three consecutive years, and he is

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the author of the book The Five Mistakes Every Investor

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Makes and How to Avoid Them. Peter Maluke, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here. Good to see again, Barry Uh.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been looking forward to having this conversation with you.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We spoke briefly at a conference in September, but that

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was so short. Twenty minutes. A half hour just doesn't

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>get it done. And we should be able to wrap

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this up by dinner time and I'll get to every

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>question I have for you. I have to start with

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>your career because it's a little unusual. You get a

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>j d, m b A so a legal degree and

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a business degree from the University of Kansas in what

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what was your career plans? Where did you think you

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>would go with that? So? I didn't have any career plans.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people look at my college education history

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and think there was some master master plan, or I

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think I've perceived as as a strategic planner when it

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to business, and the amount of just good fortune

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and luck along the way is tremendously underestimated. I for sure,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing UH an undergrad I just took business,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just took business because I thought I liked business, and

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I added other majors that were interesting to me. And

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>then I got an MBA because I wasn't sure what

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do. And the same thing with the

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>law degree. There was a joint program at University of

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas where I went, and so I did both. So

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I came out of college with a bunch of degrees.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But I still, even leaving campus and heading back by COMB,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea what I was gonna do. And

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and somewhere along the lines, you were involved with used

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>record stores. Tell me about that, because in my misspent

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>youth I used to haunt you c D stores looking

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for cheap albums and discs um that were used. What

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what brought you to that space? So you know, I

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know where this entrepreneurial thing came from. I know

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>my mom really encouraged it when I was younger, and

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>I remember UH always having a paper route, which meant

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I couldn't drive a car when I had it.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I was twelve. So my my dad, you know, drove

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the paper out and I threw the You weren't on

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the back of a bike, that's how. That's how so

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in suburban New York, that's how you When I had

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a paper out, it was a bike with you would

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>put a bunch of baskets on and you would go

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>down the street flinging papers both ways. I thought they

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>only did that in movies. No, not all that was real.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's when you're in a tight suburban neighborhood. You

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sound like you were in a little more spread out

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>spread I mean in Kansas, spread out suburban neighborhood house

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to another, you'd get you to get worn out sometimes.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I just set out the back of a

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>station wagon and throw and throw the newspapers. Uh. Then

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I had a lawnmowing business, and then I had a

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>DJ business. I loved music, um but the music stores

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was probably the thing that was the biggest manifestation of

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what I really enjoyed and having a business. And I

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>had started that while I was in college, and it had,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, but pretty much gone bankrupt by the time

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I got out, So you really begin your career at

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Creative Planning in what capacity did you join the firm?

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And this was, by the way, a much much smaller

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 1>firm at the time. Right they was had been started

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>by three guys in the insurance business, and they had

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>an insurance arm and they mainly did disability insurance for physicians.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>And one of them was really into investing all the

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>way back in the early eighties, you know, when I

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was in grade school and he um so he started

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Creative Planning as a sister company had you know, maybe

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a few dozen clients basically using American funds, mutual funds

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and and doing planning with with you know, by hand.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't remember I took over. I look

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at looking at the plans. I mean there was no

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Internet back then. And in great technology we we take

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>things like money Guide pro for granted today really lets

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you dig deep and and come up with a lot

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of options. Yeah, I mean technology literally lets you scale

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in the way you never could before in every in

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>every business, but just being born and now you could

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>do all these things that you could have never done

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago, no matter how brilliant you were,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh. I had worked for somebody for two years

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just advising this physician and his practice. And at the

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, a couple of years after that, I started

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>working with advisors, doing wills and trusts and that sort

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of advice for them, putting putting that legal degree to work.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So never been in a courtroom for for

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>anything ever with the practice of law, but I enjoyed

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>helping people. Hey, you've you've got this problem. You want

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. You you probably hate dealing with lawyers.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make this easy. It's gonna take a few days,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a flat fee. I'm gonna explain it

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in English. And that really took off. A lot of

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>advisors started to use me. I really learned a lot

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of those advisors. A lot of them

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>were amazing, a lot of them were terrible. Um, a

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were brilliant but did the wrong thing

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of them always did the right thing. Um.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And then creative planning. At the same time, their financial

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>planning team had left to start their own firm. They

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>asked me to come in. And when I take on

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that department, I looked at it and thought you know,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I can do this and two days a week. It

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was pretty straightforward. So I was doing that from and

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I was taken care of maybe

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred other advisors clients doing estate planning. So now

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's two thousand four and you say I have an idea, Yeah,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>let's buy the firm. So first question is what what

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>motivated that blight bulbin? Oh four? By the way, before

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, but not too long after the dot

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>com implosion? Right, you know the markets had only bottom

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>let's call it October two and then March oh three, right,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'd come right into the industry basically when

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I was running creative plannings a few dozen clients. During

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that period, you had the tech bubble and you had

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven. So the markets were just, you know, a

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>disaster um during that period and the lightbulb going off.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you really think about it? Here I am for

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>six years, I'm doing financial planning and investments for some people,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm doing a state and tax advice for other people,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And you would think the light bulb would have gone

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>off sooner, right that Hey, maybe people would like this

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if it was all together, right, And so I knew

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>three things. I knew I wanted to be an independent advisor,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I knew that I was not comfortable with dual registration.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Creative planning was duly registered at the time, and back

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then that was very normal, and that was Hey listen,

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>back then r s were relatively that was and people

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>were just adding it to brokerage firm says, oh, let's

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>well for these services. Exactly right. I mean it was

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>innovative to even be an r A at all at

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that point. Um. And I was very uncomfortable as an

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>attorney built maybe a complex of state plan with charitable

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>trust there bublble trust, and then find out and annuity

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was in there that wasn't the right kind or shouldn't

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be there at all. But they have a giant commission built, right,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's where they get sold. And so you go

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and you do the legal. Then that advisor might do

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't ideal. So I I wanted to a

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>firm that was independent, didn't sell its own products, was

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>able to combine all those things in one place, and

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, could take each client and and change the

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio per their situation. And so I went to all

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>my clients, including Creative Planning and said, you know, I'm

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>going this is what I want to do. And the

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>owner of Creative Planning was basically like he had had

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>those two former partners. One had died very young, one

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>became disabled very young, and he said, you know what,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had enough of this. You know, if you want

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy, if you want to take over Creative Planning,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. So did you do this yourself? Did you

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>bring in partners? Did you bootstrap it? How? How did

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this transaction? I mean, we're talking about a firm that

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had a couple hundred thousand of revenue. There wasn't I

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it was so it wasn't a multimillion. I mean,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're there and basically made monthly payments for a few

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>years and it was over. It was not We're talking

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about a few dozen clients, and so what it was

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>really the advantage for me was I didn't have to

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>go create from al a from scratch. There was one there.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I already knew those those clients, and so I could

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>skip this like six month period of figuring all that

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>out and get on with it. Even even more, it's

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen months by the time you're done with everything.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We did hours from scratching, you find yourself spending a

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one amount of time with lawyers and accountants and compliance

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>people just to launch the farm, right, so you bypass that.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So now it's oh, four oh five, you're a hundred

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in assets. When do things really start to

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>scale up? You're now forty five billion. That's a big jump,

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know it was. It was really instant in terms

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of percentage growth. I mean every year it seemed it

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was thirty or thirty growth, and it's never really stopped.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've been a couple of little more than

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that in a couple of years, a little below that.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the numbers change obviously, you know three years

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>ago where at eighteen billion, and now we're at almost

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>forty five. That seems crazy, but it might even be

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a slower growth rate than when we went from a

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred to five hundred. I think what we were doing

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning was very innovative, and it doesn't sound

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>like it today to have a firm that was, you know,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>dropping its dual registration, was totally independent. We were using

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>e t F. So I remember hearing from Van Vanguard

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rep that we had larger holding of indexes than any

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>independent r A A. I'm hearing that No. Nine or

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember having to explain when E T F was

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>two clients what pastive investing was. And then we were

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>doing the legal and tax and all of that in

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>one place. The way we delivered it was very efficient,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>and we we were doing including the planning without a

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>separate feedback. Then if you're reading all the financial stuff,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it said, this is stupid. No one will value it

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if you do it for free, and you always have

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to charge. And so there were just a maybe six

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or seven things we were doing that no one else

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing that. Today a lot of people are doing um.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But the difference is today that's not enough. Today you

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be more specialized, you have to be faster,

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to cost less, you have to have much

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>much more credential people. It's gotten way more competitive. You know,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if I started this today, it wouldn't worked, right. I

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think that back then it was very unique. It was

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very on the front end of things, and

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it allowed us to build a lot of a lot

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of momentum. And you have a colleague that that sent

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>me a wonderful article about cumulative advantage, which is you

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>start to One of the things that people want in

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this business is they want to feel safe. You know,

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean you you if you're looking at hiring an advisor,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like a restaurant. You know, we're here

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. The way I picked where I

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was eating last night as I want to trip advisor.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>A trip advisor tell me where to eat last night, right,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So part of it is probably going to go to

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good place, and the other part is I'm

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to throw up, right, probably probably not,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna be horrible. And I think people look

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at advisors the same way. I think they want to

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like, Okay, I'm at a place that's pretty safe. Okay,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this place has lots of clients, big clients, pretty sophisticated,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>probably did a lot of due diligence. I feel safe there.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna do all right. I'm probably not gonna

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have a really bad outcome. It's just the way. So

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think as you as we're sitting in this world today,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>people have been at nine eleven, the tech bubble, oh

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>eight oh nine, Bertie made off. Just there's so much

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>crap happening. Right. If you're an investor. You're really looking

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at at this landscape and going, you know what, the

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>guy with two million dollars makes me a little nervous. Um.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And now not everybody thinks that there's a path for

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy with two hundre million dollars, but there are

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some people that person encounters that goes you know,

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're bigger, or they might not use those words,

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's what I had a lot of people that

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't sign up with me in the first few years

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>that signed on years later, like say, my mom and dad,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I've been calling you president. Is that right? Good enough? Yeah?

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>The bro chief investment officer, chairman? Is there a preferred title?

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Really it doesn't matter. But but you are the head

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Han show at Creative Plants, which is a billion? Can

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I call you forty five billion dollars? Is that? Are

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you just very close? Depends on I guess it depends

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on when this Brookt is going. That's right, depends on

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>where the market closes. Um. So let's talk about those

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers because they're crazy. When you when you took over

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the firm and O four it was it was a

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>hundred and change a hundred million dollars not a lot

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of firm funds. How do you scale up that a

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>u M from a few million dollars to almost forty

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Well, I think you have to have a

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of different things. So I think that one, you

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have to have a sound investment philosophy that's kind of

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>worked out for people. Right, You're not going to get

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>through all of those things and have your clients referring

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>other clients and aggregating their assets with you unless you

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>deliver on your promises. As one, you have to have

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>an investment approach that works. I think. Second, you have

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to have more than that, um and and so we

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we have more than that. We've been planning and legal

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and tax and trust services and institutional services and all

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of those things. UM. Third, you have to have the people.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think this industry, and I've spoken about this

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times before with you, the people in

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this industry are tremendously underrated, and I think they're viewed

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>as interchangeable. And if you watch the behavior of a

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of financial services firms, they view the people as interchangeable.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you look at some of these firms now, there's

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of press around them, preparing for the next recession.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>At low rates, they're not going to make as much

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>money holding money, So what do they do. A lot

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of them aren't firing their bottom performers. They're firing their

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>highest compensated people, which you know, presumably are their highest

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>compensated people because they rose to levels the highest performers,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and they go in and go, we're gonna fire all

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>those people, which obviously the assumption is that other people

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>will just naturally make that work out. I don't hold

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that view at all. I think that, you know, when

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a I'm looking for health care for someone

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the family or myself, or I'm looking for a lawyer,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I do not view all physicians are lawyers equally. But

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this industry really views people as equal, and I never have.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, from the very very first higher I knew

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the importance of people. And I've personally witnessed and received

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of mostly wonderful hiring and you know, a

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of really bad hires. And if you attribute almost

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge percentage of the success to getting the right

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>type of people, and really the biggest grief I've had

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in my career to one or two people I hired

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that were mistakes. How many employees are you up to now?

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>About six? So at a certain point you're no longer

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>interviewing every single person, right, you know, I'm in I'm

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>interviewing them all, but you're you're the final check off. Yeah,

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a better way to put it. I mean I'm

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not running that. I mean before they're getting to me,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been through a background check at the blian's check,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They've they've interviewed with a talent acquisition team, the head

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of their department, usually somebody else. Then they're coming to me.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But I would say, you know, one and three is

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not getting past me after even after all of that. Um,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just for I have a of the firm as

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole, um and I have you know, sometimes if

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got ahead of the department, they really have a

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>need right that you you have this you want to

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>fill it. Right. So you're interviewing somebody and you're looking

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for reasons to hire them, and I'm really looking for

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody in going if this doesn't work out a year

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>from now, why is that? What is it about this

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>person of interviewing that's not going to feel? Uh? That

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>could be the reason for that, I'm gonna look at

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the investments the same way I'm looking at a DO investment.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, if this blows up in my face, right,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got to explain this to clients a year from

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>now or ten years from now. What what was the

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>scenario that made that happen? And so I'm I'm trying

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to think my way through those sorts of things. Sometimes

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the person is a wonderful person, but I don't think

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be satisfied in that role. They're taking their

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>switching under the wrong circumstances. There was one person that

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>interviewed with us from another firm, and he just so

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>treated badly at the other firm. And I really am

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not want to hire somebody is leaving something when I

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are somebody that's coming to something. We ought to hiring

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of years later. But I'm looking at

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>more of those things, and and that I am all

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the things have already been figured out by others. I've

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>had a number of CEOs, both from within finance and

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>from other industries, say hiring is the single hardest thing

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>they do, and it feels sometimes like the outcome can

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be random people that all right, that person will work

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>out and they're become a superstar or someone they're convinced

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be perfect for the role and it

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work out. Do you think hiring is Is that

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>challenging and that important? Well, that that important? You can't

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you really can't overstate how important it is and the

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>positive and negative side of this business. On the randomness,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's random. I think you're gonna have

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>some random, random outcomes. But I think our hiring process

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is probably more likely to have success than say another one,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's probably somebody that is more likely to have

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>success than we are. So I think there are certain

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>things you can control that are gonna narrow the field

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes. I had a person who at the time

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch bigger firm than me, had said had

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>told me about hiring that he looks at the world

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's there's a there's a a social curve out there.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>There's some crazy person that's going to script your firm.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>There's some malicious person, there's some psychopath, you know, whatever

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the population fits those things. And then there's

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all these wonderful people, but they're not bright. There's bright

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>people that aren't wonderful. And he's like, I'm looking at

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>this whole social curve and when and I'm trying to

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>keep the bad part, that standard deviation that's way off

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on the I'm trying to keep that away from my firm,

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to get the other end. And I

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thought there was an interesting way to look at it.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>You hiring is not random, like just pulling somebody off

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the street. You can really do a lot of things

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that are objective and some that are subjective to really

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>narrow the range of outcomes you're gonna have. There's still

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be surprises, but I will tell you every year

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>we have less surprises than we've had before. And I

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think we've just gotten better at identifying all those things

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that derail somebody. In part of it, there's every Every

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>culture has something different. Our culture is a very rapid pace.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a very high energy culture, um very high expectations.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you can have somebody that's brilliant and wonderful, but

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just not that's just not their style, right, So

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>some of this is stylistic too. You can screen for

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>some of that. So you mentioned you work with Vanguard.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you also work with d f A. Is

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that correct? A black Rock State Street, so you basically

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>we do the same thing. You basically have a bias

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>towards passive but not purely passive. Is that fair? That's fair?

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And then we use a lot of alternatives for our

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>clients that have five million or more. So that's a

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>question I had for you later on, but we might

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as well talk about it now. Private equity is hot

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>as a pistol. As we work our way towards some

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the larger, more sophisticated family offices and ultra high

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>net worth investors, they're very interested in alternatives. How do

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you reconcile? Hey, look, we're passive over here, but we're

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna put some money in with alternatives. They're a little pricey,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and we don't exactly have a lot of transparency into things,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but some of the returns have been really good. How

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>how can you reconcile those two? Well? I don't, I

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think, I mean to me, it's I don't have

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to reconcile the bond market in the stock market. They're

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>different markets, they have different outcomes, and so I don't

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>view it as conflicted, you know whatsoever? I think that

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe that the US large market international markets are

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>generally efficient or efficient enough that I'm not going to

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>outsmart them. Right. I know your firm feels the same way.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just not going to play that game, right,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna figure out what the client needs, what return

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to hit, how much volatility they can handle

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to get there, and I'm going to create some mix

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that I think has the highest probability of creating that outcome.

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when I add bonds, my expectation as

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the bonds are gonna underperform equity, right, So I mean,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>although we could point out that there have been long

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>periods of time the past three decades where bonds did

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>really well versus equity. Yeah, but in general, right, most

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of our clients, their their timeline is multidecade, and the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>odds they're gonna underperform with bonds are very high. Yet

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we introduce bonds into the portfolio. We do that because

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they might have short term income needs. We've got to

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>make sure we can deliver that to them. Even if

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an O eight on nine crisis or tech bubble

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or at night eleven. It's not about you know, maximum

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>performance to introduce the bonds you're you know, you're introducing

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>something that will probably underperform in exchange for making sure

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't blow up the portfolio by withdrawing from stocks

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>when they're down right. What about the behavioral side of

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I know a number of UM people who advocate equity portfolio,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which in theory does well until you hit an O

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eight O nine where things get cut in half and

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>people have a tendency to jettison stocks at the worst

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>possible moment at the lows, and then they missed the

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>whole recovery. How do bonds fit into the behavioral side

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of a portfolio? I really think the behavior most of

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>it can be controlled through education and empowerment. So I

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>think if you're a pure money manager, I think getting

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>somebody to get through a drop is gonna gonna be

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough. But if you're seeing them throughout the year

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're educating them on hey, you you're stocks or

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you're nine stocks, if the market goes down fifty, you

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>can expect to go down fifty maybe more, you know,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>depending on what other other asset classes we have subasset classes,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's international, emerging markets or small cap or whatever, um,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And here's what's going to happen. And here is why

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the dividends are enough to meet your needs and so

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to worry about it. And here is

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>historically what's happened. If you're having those discussions all the time,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>then when it happens, you're more likely to get through it.

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think the reality is most people can't afford that.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So even if you're sitting with a couple and it's

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a doctor and he's sixty eight, he's got four million

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars because she and her husband have been saving for forever,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know they need a couple year. They

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can't be all stocks because if the market goes down

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>at half, the dividends are not enough to meet their needs.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>So almost everybody has to have bonds in their portfolio,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, even the top one percent. And when you

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>get to the top one one they don't need bonds

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolio, right. The dividends really are enough, and

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they are more focused on even tying it up more

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>than markets with you know, things like alternatives. So for me,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds are about how how much bonds do I need

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to meet their needs? If something goes wrong in the

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>short run and then it stocks for the long run.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And what about since you mentioned this in terms of

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of income, what about people who are living in high

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tax states where there is a fairly robust municipal bond

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>market that can generate tax free income. Well, I think

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that the municipal bond markets completely distorted now because of

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>what's pension plans having to allocate to bonds and the

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>aging population of people that are in those pension plans. Uh,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and the tax law really pushing money to bonds. And

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to take a client today and say,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>let's go putt of your money and municipal bonds. Was

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that an option years ago? Absolutely? I think that. I

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think three years ago, you know what it was real

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was an option. I think that when

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you're now where you're at, it's it's just you can't

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>justify it. You look at the dimdend on stocks and

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and you compare it to bond yields, and it's it's hard.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You and I had a conversation over the summer about

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition space that I found fascinating and I wanted

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to um delve back into that because quote, it's the

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>hottest that's ever been, and possibly the hottest that will

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ever be. It's just bonkers right now. I don't know

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>where the top is, but it ain't gonna get a

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot better than right here. I'm paraphrasing, but it's

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to what you said. Why is M and

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>A in the registered investment advisory space so hot today?

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I think you have a lot of different things. So first,

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you see this rotation um institutional investors moving

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>money out of hedge funds where they've looked at orically

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, hedge funds haven't done that great for

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>us for the last twenty years, but these other alternatives

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>have in many cases outperformed the market for us, and

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so they're rotating to those. And one of those asset

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>classes as private equity, So you have the big funds

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are bigger than ever. I mean just you can't go

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>a month or even a week and not see about

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a big private equity family raising their biggest fund ever.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's number one, the big In fact, Mackenzie, the

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>data point I just was reading about. Mackenzie said, by

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of that calendar year, private equity had raised

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>seven fifty billion in new funds, UH and Fresh Capital.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of months crazy, So the big have

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten bigger. The second is there's a lot more private

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>equity funds. There's now over eight thousand private equity funds.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There's way more private equity funds than there are stocks UM,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so so we have more funds with more money. So

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's number one, right, just a bunch of just this

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>huge slash of liquidity out there. Second, we have very

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>very low interest rates. And when private equity goes in

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and buys a business, they don't usually just write a check.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They usually do the same thing a real estate fund

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>when they does when they buy a property, they use leverage.

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So they're borrowing money to buy the firm, right that

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the company they're buying. And so if interest rates are lower,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they can obviously pay more, just like your listeners can

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>buy more house if the mortgage is lower. Right. So

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you have very low interest rates, more funds, bigger funds, UH,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and high net worth investors are starting to move more

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to private equity too. So all there's all that money

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>over there, Now, what do they want? They want to

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be in an industry that is growing fast, has recurring revenue,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>has built an inflation hedge, UM, where people are sticky, uh,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and where there's a need for consolidation right where they

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>can take you know, Mary over here, he's doing a

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty good job, and Joe over there, he's doing a

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good job. But together, wow, they could really be

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>impressive because Mary is good at this and Joe is

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>good at that. Well, what checks the boxes on all

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of those things about are a space sure money is sticky,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>market goes up there as your inflation hedge, and uh,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's recurring quarterly revenue stream although I think UM a

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>handful of places rannual, handful of places a monthly, but

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for the most part it's a quarterly UM invoice the right.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And they compare that to all the other areas of

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the financial space where there's more client turnover and people leaving,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're going, you know what, this is the space

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to be in and not what a coincidence. The space

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in is the space that's really in its

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>early stages. You know, there's a lot of room to

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>improve some of these places. So yeah, there's a huge

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>loss of money with very low interest rates going into

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a space that is attractive for a bunch of you know,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Fluke reasons, and all this timing comes together, and you

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>now have private equity coming into this space um to

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>buy up firms. And the other thing is they've been

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>very successful at it, right, So somebody who's just built

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a five million dollar firm or a ten billion dollar

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>firm is probably not the person usually right to run

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a much much bigger firm. And they know that and

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to do that. Like I know, I

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to run a publicly traded company, right, So

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been approached several times about, hey, you guys should

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>go public. That's never happening with me. I've got clients

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that are CEO CFOs of publicly traded companies that they

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are not happy no. And I am very focused on

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>my quality of life, and I just I look at

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>them and they just look like they're aging every every review,

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they're aging twice as fast as all other. So it's

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back up a sect because this is really a fascinating digression.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Most companies, when they go public, they're going public for

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one of two reasons. Reason Number one, they need capital

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to either grow or make acquisitions or some other financial

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>engineering that's part of their long term business plan or two,

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they end their staff and their outside investors, typically venture

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>capitalists or whoever, are looking for an exit. Yeah, you

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to have either of those issues. No, I don't.

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's would be another reason I would I would

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>never do that. So so, and you are still the

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>main owner, the soul owner of Soul one today, Soul one. Really,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at what point does that change? Because I know we

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>went through a whole process of setting up a path

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to equity for employees. You guys have been growing so

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>crazy fast for so long that that hasn't really come

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>up to the four yet. No, I mean that's part

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. I have a lot of partners in our

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>affiliated entities. So there I have partners with the law

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>firm and the the benefits firm, and the forward K

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>firm and the and the those are all separate corporate entities,

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all creative planning entities, all operating out of the same place,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all helping the same clients. So once there's been stable growth,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always had partners and favor them in those areas

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and creative planning. It's just been such rapid growth and

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's required so much capital. I mean it, there's that's

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>never made sense to do it. I don't know that

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone would have really enjoyed the ride um and what

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it was going to take, uh financially along the way

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to do to do the or the commitments or the

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>deferral and the patients to do this um. But we

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we were are considering and have for a long time

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>considered raising money by selling a minority stake to a

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm because I do think that valuations are high,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that the world moves very very

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>very fast, and you are going to need money to

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get through it. If you look at how these big

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>financial firms are doing it, they're doing it by preemptive layoffs, right,

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what they're doing now. And I would like

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it by a preemptive pile of money sitting

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in the bank so that no matter what happens when

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a contraction, that we can go take advantage of that.

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And that that's what we did in O eight oh nine.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We grew rapidly through that crisis, and I want to

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to grow rapidly through the next one, which

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>means I not only want to keep my team enforced,

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to go find more talented people and focus

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>on getting clients and not worry about about reserves. So

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned oh eight oh nine, Um, I have to ask,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you grow in the middle of a rices

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>where every time you buy equity a week later, or

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or a fund or an et F or anything a

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>month later, it's down five or ten or fift How

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>did you manage both existing clients and growth throughout the

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis? So back then there were only a

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>few of us, and so I was in every single

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>client meeting of every client of creative planning back then.

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And a very very big part of this was education.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So when you're doing needs based investing instead of risk

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>based investing, so most places are like, well, this is

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>your risk tolerance, and here's your portfolio for for you

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or your this age. Here's your portfolio. Have five models,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you go to the closest model. We've never done that,

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>even on day one, and we don't do it today.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>We've really said, you know you've got real estate, We're

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>going to leave that out here. You you your belief

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>system doesn't match these, will leave them out. You want

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more of that. It does work for your situation. But

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>here's how we're gonna cover your short run in your

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>long run, and here's all the horrible things that are

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna happen in the investment world with your life. Well,

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're going through that with people um over and

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>over again, they're sticky. And we were we were doing

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>their planning, we were doing there, we were doing a

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things for them, and so when they

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>were going through this crisis, they were not surprised. I

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think people panic when things are not aligned with their expectations,

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it was a big shake up and a

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were leaving their advisors, and our clients

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>were referring people to us. Now, there were a couple

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of things we were doing too, but I think we're

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very proven out, very quickly, very very basic things. So

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we were tax harvesting, for example, which you didn't hear

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about back then. And the other thing we

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>did is we we we have a feeling we don't

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>balance at the end of the year. We don't balance

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>every quarter. We balanced on sharp market drops. So let's

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just take the O eight crisis that you brought up.

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It bottomed in the beginning of it bottomed around March

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>nine of oh nine, and the market just those nine

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>days of March had dropped about we're buying, right, So

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we're calling our clients and we're buying and we're harvesting.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>By the end of that month, the market had recovered

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the losses for OH nine, not all all

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>from OH eight, It was just up thirty plus percent.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you take just a seventy thirty portfolio and

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you're buying not at the end of the quarter a year,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but on when it's dropping and you're harvesting, what do

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you get. You're not breaking even when the market does

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>four or five years later, you're breaking even. You take

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a take and a half the time to get to

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>break even, and you have losses on your tax return,

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and that creates advocacy, right. And so that was really

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the explosion for creative planning was those clients going, you

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>know what, I feel confident to tell my friends. I

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of people that are happy with

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>their lawyer or their c p A, or their financial

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>advisor or their doctor, but they're not positive that they're

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>going to look good if they refer somebody to you, right,

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that what you do through a crisis

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is you get a chance to prove yourself. So I

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>really view all of those as tremendous opportunities of Hey,

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we told you this is the scenario that would happen.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's why you're okay, here's exactly what we're gonna do.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And then they see the outcome. They but they go

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>from clients to advocates. And that was the turning point

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for us. And so you know, you talk about the

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the power of luck and all of this, and I

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say I would root for another oh

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.479
<v Speaker 1>eight o nine. I mean, it's painful to go through

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and long hours and a lot of stress, and not

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody's not every clients like hooray. I get the opportunity here, UM,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>but there's no question that without it, creative planning is

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>not what it is today. Quite quite fascinating. One last

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>question I have to ask about acquisitions because it circles

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>back to um your reference that it's the hottest it's

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ever been. We met with a bunch of consultants early on,

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much the number everybody uses is two x

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trailing years revenue or two point two times trailing twelve.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was, you know, six seven years ago, you

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and I had discussed the numbers today that are being

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>used for acquisitions. They don't even remotely resemble that anymore.

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I do that, No, I mean I think that. What's

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I think what people have figured out is we've now

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>moved to a level where a lot of these are

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>enterprises and all anyone cares about now is the future

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>earnings of these businesses. And so you can have a

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar firm that's running on a ten percent

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>margin and you can have a five d million dollar

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>firm that's running on a thirty five percent margin. They're

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>going to have wildly different valuations um when a strategic buyer,

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a private equity buyer comes in. That that's definitely changed

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the last few years. So so what

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of multiple are you looking at for Let's take

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the average one percent firm, which is now probably a

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>high fee. We were playing with numbers the other day

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and we were about sixty two bits on average across everything, um.

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But the typical firm is one percent or so, and

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>their overhead is primarily either technology, their rent and their employees.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the reasonable multiple for the average farm on either

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue or profits? Well, revenue is I don't have no one,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that no one would pay attention to that.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a great example, is well. I mean

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the expenses of those places could be wildly different depending

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on where their rent is and how do their employees

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>produce on their own and get bigger payouts, or it's very,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very wildly different. I'd say if you look, you're looking

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at these five million dollar firms, um, the multiples could

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be as low as five and as high as seven

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or eight or sometimes profits at times profits, And I

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think that people are looking at even the profits isn't enough.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Like if the average client is seventy eight and there's

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>no new clients coming in, you're looking at declining earnings, right,

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So you would have somebody say I'm not gonna buy

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this at all, or it's going to be two times

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or three times filings. You could have a firm like yours.

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You know where you're growing, but there's a mojo factor, right,

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a there's something that that could really spark

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 1>great greater growth. A different buyer might look at it

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and go, there might be more risk here, right, And

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think that you've got that is a very

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>big factor, especially when you're looking at these firms that

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are three millions eight hundred million, Where is it's totally

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>dependent on one person, or are people tied to other people?

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>What's the average age our accounts growing, or people referring

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>or they're not referring. So you really need to look

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>through all that. But you're getting to the mid the

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>mid range. You know, when you get up to firms

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>your size where you're billion more, you could be talking

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>double digits um, and you get to the very large firm,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you're definitely in the in the double dish. So it's

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's much more complicated than we tend to see in

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the headway because do you see oh, so and so,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's such a company, or here's the fifth acquisition

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>done by this company, and they kind of make it, oh,

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there's this much revenue, here's the multiple, and this is

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>their seventh acquisition this month. I don't think that ever,

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that ever happens where where someone looks at the revenue

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>anymore and makes a decision based off of that. Let's

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about investor expectations. Ten year bond

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 1>yields are but under two percent. It's hard to look

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>at US stocks and not say they're let's call it

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>fully valued, richly valued. I don't know, I don't know

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>what phrase you want to use. What sort of future

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>expected returns should investors have today? Well, I think what

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you can never figure out the stock market completely, but

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is largely math, right, so we we

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>know we can't replicate in the next thirty years what

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the bond market did in the last thirty years. So

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>since it's all a function of of where the yield is,

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at the treasury, it sets

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the tone for everything else. Right, If the treasury is

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>under two and corporates are a little bit higher than are,

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>expected return for large stocks is a little higher, some

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would argue for small stocks might be a little higher,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 1>or maybe emerging markets, and you you go out that way.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So you've gotta get rid of this double digit return

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>expectation and move yourself into the squarely into the single

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>digit range, somewhere in the mid to hire single digits,

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on your allocation of bonds and your beliefs around

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 1>uh markets that are certainly not overvalued, like emerging markets,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>are small, kept international, and do you believe that they're

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>low valued at a low price now, because it's just

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>gone and it's never going to recover or or or

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 1>do you think they're at a low price because things

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are a little messy and they're gonna get worked out

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>like they did in the in the US UM. So

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can make your argument, but it's very hard to

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 1>make an argument for the double digit returns that people

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>were making in the nineties. So a blended portfolio seventy

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty including exposure to international and emerging markets five six

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 1>seven percent is that a reasonable in our projections, we're

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>using a four percent real return. These six percent return

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>subtract inflation, and we feel pretty comfortable with that. So

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that brings up the issue we briefly talked about earlier,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>which is alternatives, most notably private equity. People have a

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>h story of saying I'm not getting the sort of

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>returns I want, so I'm gonna either look for something

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps has more risk um and try and achieve

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>those returns. I don't get the sense you look at

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>private equity that way, or am I am I oversimplified? No,

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right, and I think this is a point you

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>know that we disagree on. Right. I think that that

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>when when I look at the public markets, I don't

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to find a bigger advocate for that.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Those markets are pretty efficient. My entire book Five Mistakes

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is basically about, here's all the evidence that you just

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 1>gotta quit market time and quit six stock picking and

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on allocation and discipline. So, by the way, you

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and I completely sympatica with that. Let's see how much

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>space is between us on venture capital, hedge funds, and

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>private equity. Now vent your capital, I would put it. So,

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the problems with alternative investments is

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about alternative investments like it's one thing, and

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not. It's it's not. So alternative investor investments

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is basically an alternative to anything that's not a publicly

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>traded stock or in the real estate. Right. So you know,

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a listener that owns a duplex, that

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 1>they're running out there in the alternative investment business, right.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And so you own a farm and someone's actually farming it,

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's welcome to the alternative investment, direct investment in real

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>estate or something else exactly. And so now when you

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>take alternate investments, we can divide them out into a

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. One area we agree on it I

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think hedge funds work. Now why do I not

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think they work? Is it because the evidence of the

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years? But it doesn't work? No, it's not

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really that. It's because there's evidence that the stock market

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is fairly efficient, and what is a hedge fund. Hedge

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 1>fund is basically overpaying somebody to create even more negative

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>tax consequences to trade within the stock market usually usually right, So,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>now we've got a market that's pretty efficient, and we're

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>increasing the taxes and fees and somehow expect to beat

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that market. It doesn't surprise me, right, that that hasn't

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>worked out well for the overwhelming majority of people that

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>have invested in hedge funds. And you see institutions saying, hey,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't work. Great, we're not doing this anymore, and

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they're taking their money and they're moving it to private

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>real estate and private equity. Now, why are they doing that?

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Because there is evidence that private real estate and private

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>equity has worked out. So the question is is it

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a fluke, is it an aberration, or is it sustainable?

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I think we now have eight thousand private equity

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>funds instead of a few hundred, So it's you're going

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to have diminishing returns just with all this money chasing businesses.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think what you're seeing as a fundamental shift

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>in the way that the US economy is running. So

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I like, on Monday, I went to Los Angeles and

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I met two guys that started a keto diet food

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>business and they just sold it for two and eighty million.

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Well they're getting to an eighty million, sold for much

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>much more than that. Yesterday I was in Fargo and

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I met with somebody who was in the pharmaceutical business

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that's also getting a nine figure check. Who do they

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>all sell to? And they sold a private equity. This

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is something that in my whole career has never happened,

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and in the last three years, it's happening like crazy.

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You brought up earlier how it's happening in our the space.

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>We happen to be in the r A space, but

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really happening everywhere. And what you're seeing is these

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that are starting businesses, they get it to a

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 1>certain size, and they're not the same person to take

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it to the next level. I believe that good private

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>equity firms are better at taking those firms to the

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>next level than they would be themselves. They know how

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to institutionalize, they know how to bring in a strong

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>financial team. They have some sophistication around mergers and acquisitions. Uh,

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot more ways to exit. Uh. Good

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>firm can take you public, they can sell you another sponsor.

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>They can. I mean, that's what they do from when

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they get up in the morning, when they leave, is say,

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 1>how do we take this business, this idea and help

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>grow it? Are there bad apples out there? They go

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in and get the business and screw it up? And yes,

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>are their complete idiots out there. Private equity running Private

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>equity fun of course, But I don't view it like

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund managers, where if one mutual fund manager outperforms

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the other, it's probably but not always due to luck.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think when you see certain private equity funds with

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:06.720
<v Speaker 1>persistent outperformance, I do think the fact that private equity

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>fund A has forty McKenzie consultants that have been doing

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it since the eighties is probably going to do better

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>than the one that's, you know, four blocks away from

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>my office. That's like two guys that opened up shop

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. They're not the same manager. Managers make

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a difference in the private equity space. So I think

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you can take that universe of private equity funds and

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 1>go who's got the history, who's outperformed? Why have they outperformed?

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Is there is? There is the repeatable pattern here and

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>my personal experience of watching my clients now I still

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>am seeing clients. I see hundreds of clients and where

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm involved with our ultra fluent practice, that's mainly focused

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>on people that have tens of millions or hundreds of

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>millions or even more than that, and many, many, many

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of them got there because they built a business to

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a level and they sold a private equity fund. And

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you when their biggest payout was Barry.

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't their first buyout, it's their second. So what's

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>happening is an equity fund is coming in and they're

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>taking a stake, like the recent example I talked to

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you about with somebody had sold a majority interest, but

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the private equity funds want them in there because they

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 1>want them engaged. You know, those people are the people

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that got the business at that level, and so they

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 1>still have twenty percent or whatever the business. The second

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sale that's happening four or five years later, almost always,

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in my experience, is much much bigger than the first one,

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 1>which is the proof that the private equity fund has

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>more than doubled the value of that business when they

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>stepped into it. Now, I've seen this and the restaurant business,

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and the consumer staples business, and the financial super over

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again. I've seen a couple of

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>times where it's not worked out, But the overwhelming majority

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time, the client I'm sitting in front of

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that finds themselves worth million or a hundred and fifty

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>million was never going to get there without the institutionalization

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of their practice. The private equity brought. Now does that

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>translate into the private equity investor provacuity investors participating there?

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't buy the fee thing either. Like when

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I look at the stock side and I look at

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the mutual funds. Yeah, if you divide out the world

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of mutual funds and take the ones that charge one

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>more than one percent, they're in the bottom quartile of performers,

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and the ones that charge less than basis points or

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the top quartile. Because the market's pretty efficient. Fees matter

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, fees matter in the private equity space. If

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you can get the same performance and pay less, of

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 1>course you would want that, but it's not the same thing.

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean the private equity firm. The good ones are

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>involved in running the business. Now. The ones that are

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>not so great, they just go put money in a

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>firm and keep doing your thing, and we'll sell you

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>three years later, no value added. I think that's thousands

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of private equity funds, all those, a lot of the

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>small ones. That's what they do. So there's a lot

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:42.360
<v Speaker 1>less space between our views than you originally imagined. But

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for academic purposes, let me push back a little bit

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>um And there's two things that stand out. The first

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is I heard very very similar things about hedge funds

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and to a lesser degree, venture capital um. We talked

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>about cumulative advantage earlier. Hey, our guys are unique and

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>special and because of our track record, we get to

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>see the best deal flow, we get access to the

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>best entrepreneurs. We get, we get, we get. And we

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>heard that about vcs, we heard that about hedge funds,

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's still very much a fathead, long tailed distribution,

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a handful of giant winners, which if you have a

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of billion dollars come on in, We're happy to

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bring you aboard. Um. So, so that's pushback number one,

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then pushback number two is sort of the soft

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.919
<v Speaker 1>bank vision fund idea. When you raise a hundred billion

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars and you have to put it to work quickly,

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you just distort the valuations in the space. We're watching

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>private equity raise almost a trillion dollars a year, and

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned eight thousand. I guarantee you that will be

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 1>nine and eleven thousand. So how does somebody who says,

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the lack of volatility the non correlation um

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to equity, which private equity actually is much were much

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>less correlated to stocks than venture capital or or hedge

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>funds are. And I'm interested in this, But how do

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I pick out of these eight funds? And by the way,

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a billion dollars, I have five million

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or fifty million to put to work. Well, first of all,

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds, they had that argument twenty years ago.

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We get, we're we're smarter and bigger, non correlated with

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>this with that, but I mean twenty years ago, we

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of evidence that that markets were pretty efficient.

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in early in my career, we had

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that evidence, and I think all we're seeing is, you

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know that they've been called out that that that's just

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not true and that they can't beat the efficient markets.

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Well in the the argument is in the eighties and

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>nineties they did, and then once there was this rush

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of capital and people to hedge funds space. It's you

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>know the watchman called Jim Chandos has said, I'm always

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>quoting him on this. Thirty years ago there were a

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred hedge funds, they all created alpha, and now there's

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand. It's the same hundred hedge funds creating alpha. Yeah,

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I see a different I see a different reason. I

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at the eighties, there was no internet,

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>so the market really wasn't efficient as efficient, right, I

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just I didn't. You can't buy the argument. In the

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>eighties you could find mutual fund managers that would outperform

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and hedge fund managers that would outperform. When the market

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really became efficient and the two thousands, all of that

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>stuff went away. I don't think as more hedge fund

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:18.760
<v Speaker 1>managers and mutual fund managers came into the space, Although

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that helps make a market more efficient, I think the

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>reality is there's a kid in a garage and Malaysia

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that knows everything that that the hedge fund manager does,

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it's came over. Now, all this money going

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to the private equity space is going to dilute returns,

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:34.399
<v Speaker 1>just like all the money going to the real estate

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>space is going to dilute returns. If you have a

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch more money changing the same amount of property, uh,

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have lower expected returns. More private equity

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>um firms coming in to buy firms like yours, you

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 1>now have higher valuations than you did a few years

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>ago just because they're in the space, which means the

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>competition has by definition created a lower expected return. Is

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there're only two private equity funds Chase r As, they

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to compete on price so much, they have

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a better expected return, but the return can still be

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>better than the stock market And I think in the

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>private equity space that you can find those firms more

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to outperform way easier than the stock market space.

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>If you believe the space is not efficient, I believe

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the private space is not completely efficient. I believe if

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if I bought your firm, my expected return going forward.

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>After I paid you some monstrous valuation that you would

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>insist on, it would be I would have to advise

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>you that that was insulted at what you would tell

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>me for your price. But if we did that, my

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>expectation would be I would have a better return than

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if I invest in this. And I just think that's

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the reality of it. And I think you think

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that um to some degree. I mean the the you

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about randomness and a little lock in things working

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>out in the right place. I spent the first twenty

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 1>years of my career turning money down, and then my

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>epiphany was, all right, and I'm just sending people out

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to the wolves to be, you know, having their being shorn.

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We might as well do this. I'm telling them the

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:05.760
<v Speaker 1>right way to do it. I might as well execute

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>it myself. That was quite the aha moment. And if

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you would have asked me five years ago, hey, you're

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a billion years and five billion dollars in

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>five years, I would have laughed at you. But people

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to something that's a little different, a little outside

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of the box what you were offering in oh four

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or five or six, And through the financial crisis, nobody

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>else was or very few people were talking in those

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>terms and offering those services. So of course you're going

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to see faster growth and better returns. The big question

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that has to be on anybody's mind who's making investments

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the r I A spaces How long can this

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:49.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to go for? Are we gonna see continuing consolidation.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Can we continue to pay five and seven and nine

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:56.720
<v Speaker 1>times profits to these small companies and expect an above

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>market return or at what point does that become, you know,

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just too pricey. Well, I think like, let's take a

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>business and just assume you paid them ten times and

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a modest growth rate. That expected to return

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 1>by itself is higher than people hundred right if you

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>start to do the math um, so it just shows

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you that that it's not it's not totally crazy. Now

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it's the highest it's ever been. I don't think. I

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:24.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of things they're gonna make this

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>party stop. One is there's gonna be fee compression in

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the industry still. It's ongoing and has been for a

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I think creative planning has been the

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>largest driver of the hidden fee compression in the industry,

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>which is, which is, hey, we're not just going to

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>manage your money for that fee. We're gonna charge you

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less than other places, and we're gonna

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:47.439
<v Speaker 1>do ten times more, and so we're that's a type

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of fee compression, right if so, in other words, you're

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>doing planning and you're doing you're not charging additional for

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 1>trust in the states, or or you have to pay

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those lawyers something so you know they'll come in and

0:52:56.520 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll get planning investment management. When we use alternatives, we

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:01.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have a upper fee, we don't have a pooled

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 1>asset fee. That's all part of it. So now, how

0:53:03.880 --> 0:53:07.240
<v Speaker 1>do you deal with the fact that these private equity

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>firms tend to charge much more than financial planning firms charge.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>How does that fee another word, you're just passing along

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the fee or is it just goes straight through, straight

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>through to the clo. It's passed through. You're not charging them,

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're not tacking anything on top. That's exactly right,

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and some sometimes we're able to negotiate breaks for them,

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, we're definitely not marking it up. So you're

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>adding some complexity. We have to have a whole of

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>their team. But we don't have a separate fee. We

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.479
<v Speaker 1>give legal advice and do trust funding without a separate fee.

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>We give tax advice without a separate fee. We won't

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>prepare a document some time with us severe and mean

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't you don't create the trust or the will

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>that goes out to some No, we do. We do

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>create them. We have a separate fee for it. Yeah,

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and there's a separate fee for that. So there's all

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of these all of this advice and and specialists that

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:54.439
<v Speaker 1>they can access. When our clients are trying to figure

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>out they've retired and they're they're not a medicare yet,

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>we have a team that does nothing but advise them

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:01.839
<v Speaker 1>on what health plan should they get and helping them

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 1>implement it and all those things. So you have all

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of these different things that costs something, but we're not

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>adding anything to the fee to the client. And that's

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by hidden fee compression. That's hidden feed compression. So, um,

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 1>you know we're set up that way because that's what

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we philosophically believed in from the beginning. I'm super passionate

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about this business. I'm going to be in this business

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>until they you know, I'm gonna die working in this business.

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I love this business. I love sitting down with a

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>client and saying, here's where you are right now, and

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we can do these seven things and

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all those things you talked about that you're dreaming about,

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I can increase really a lot the chances all those

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things are going to happen for you. I love that.

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite part of the of this whole thing.

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But that has different components to it. There's charitable components,

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's legal components, there's tax components, there's investment components. That

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to me, is what the client values the most is

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>getting that that advice delivered in a way that is

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>actionable and make sense to them. That's the part that

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm most passionate about. But that's that if you look

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>at the larger r A A s, we were the

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>first to do that, and almost all of the other

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>large r A s have changed what they're doing to

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>try to put together some semblance of what we're doing,

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>but they've done it too late. They've done it with

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>private equity money, They've done it with people that are

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:26.360
<v Speaker 1>CEOs that have never been advisors or are not advisors today,

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's just clunkier, and so I think that's the

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage we have today is from top to bottom,

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the president, the vice president of the CEO, all of

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>us are planners. All of us are certified Financial Planner

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>UH certificates. We all of us sit in front of

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>clients UM, all the directors in the firm. Do we

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>understand how that deliverable works? And that becomes a big,

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a big differentiator. And and that has created a lot

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of feed compression in the industry because for someone to

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 1>compete with us, they've and on a large scale, they've

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>had to start to add these things without changing their fee. Now,

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>once that's done, what happens. Once that's done, The next

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>wave happens and you've got a lower fees. And I

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna be on the front end of that

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the second it could happen. We're gonna do what we

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:14.959
<v Speaker 1>can to push those down and and push our competitors out.

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think those fees dropped too? I think

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're a pure money manager, you're gonna start looking

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at fifty basis points. If you're a money manager with

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>planning light, you're gonna look at sixty six five basis points.

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're a comprehensive wealth manager doing everything customized and

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 1>needs based with a lot of other services. You can

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit higher than that, but that's you know,

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that's substitutive and um and I think it's gonna be quick.

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people think all this happens

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>over twenty years and blah blah blah. That ten years

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>into the feed compression at least, So maybe it is.

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Look what just happened with trading fees. So they went

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from twenty to ten to five. We're on this trend.

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It could be another ten years. Then Schwab goes to

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>zero and the end of the day TV goes to

0:56:57.640 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>zero and the next week Fidelity goes to zero. So

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know how percent drop from five in a couple

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days, right, So there will there

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is always a tipping point. We saw it with mutual

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>funds where oh, commissions are fee only. Who cares? Then

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:13.439
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden commissions were gone, right then high

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 1>cost mutual funds. Who cares? The people? The prospective clients

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I met in oh seven or eight or nine, It

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was too easy if they're coming in they had five

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds they're gonna they're paying the mutual funds more

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>than they're gonna pay us. I'm gonna do a lot more.

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lower their taxes. I mean, what's what's not

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to like now? All of that's out the window. E

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 1>t F s Now, all of a sudden, five basis

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:35.400
<v Speaker 1>points for SP five hundred fund is crazy, ridiculous. It's

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>free now, you know. And so you're we've seen that

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>tipping point with everything else, and this is the one

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>space that's left and we don't see it here yet

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's not a firm that has the scale to

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:50.840
<v Speaker 1>really to do it UM. And I think firms are

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 1>emerging that have the scale and aren't entirely motivated by

0:57:54.800 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>profits that might be the one to deliver it. And

0:57:57.360 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that just might be creative planning. So I have to

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ask you one follow up question on the die at

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>my desk comment. We've seen Personal Capital get acquired, We've

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>seen United Capital get acquired. We've seen a number of

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>big firms, billion dollar firms get acquired by places UM

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like Goldman Sachs was one acquirer and Financial Engines was

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>another requirer, and there's a handful both coincidentally publicly traded.

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.680
<v Speaker 1>What to prevent someone from coming along and making you

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>an offer you can't refuse? Well, I think I've already

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>seen that a couple of those offers where I've looked

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at them and said, you know, I, I really truly

0:58:39.800 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>believe that I can double this business and five years

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:45.800
<v Speaker 1>from now not get that number. I think the I

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think the market's so insane now. But but I mean,

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 1>so wait, you you're saying, hey, five years growing, I'll

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>double the size. And even if I don't get that number,

0:58:57.400 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't care. I don't think i'll get that. I

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think i'll get that number. Finding I think rates

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>will be different and private equity will be different, and

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, who know, it could be a recession. They're

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we could try. Who knows what's good? But there's too

0:59:06.880 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>many things that are perfect right now, and I don't

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not confident are going to be perfect in

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in five years. I don't think there's any precedent for

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>them to be. But you've never been tempted to take

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the money and run. No, because I really, um, what

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do? No? I know what I would do.

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I still have a good time. I could be in

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this industry and have a great time. I don't have to,

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, do it on this scale and at this pace.

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But but I do enjoy it. I enjoy the clients,

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoy the team that I work with, and

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't It's easy for somebody who's worth millions of

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars to say they don't care about money. So I'm not.

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say I don't care about money. I

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:45.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously do. I don't care about more money. I don't

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>care about money. I just don't. And so I feel like,

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't have to maximize, right, So but

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. I'm sitting with clients and they

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me, I'm worn out. I've grown my business to

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this level. I got this, this offer from private equity.

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>What should I do? I tell him, Look, it's a

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>bit if you if you are not in love with

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, take the money and run because this

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.439
<v Speaker 1>is really really good times right now, and we don't

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>know what it's going to be like in four or

1:00:10.000 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>five years. And you know so. But but for me,

1:00:13.080 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's regret minimization. When I'm don't do

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it and this offer goes away, are you gonna feel

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>worse than if you do do it and maybe you

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>got a slightly better offer in five years, right, And

1:00:22.960 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have no regret minimization, because I just that's

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>not what's motivating me. I want. I want to build

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the best offering. I want to be able to look

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>back and go. Anybody that came to work for Creative

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Planning said, you know what, I was challenged. I learned something. Uh.

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Peter never put anything in my way. In fact,

1:00:39.640 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there was an obstacle in my way. He removed it

1:00:41.520 --> 1:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was able to achieve the very best I

1:00:43.520 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>could there. That matters a lot to me. I want

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a client's when they're at our annual event and they're

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talking to each other, I want them to say, you

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, Creative Planning promise some things to me, and

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:54.439
<v Speaker 1>they delivered all those things, and I feel great about

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.439
<v Speaker 1>my decision to come there. I am very motivated by

1:00:57.760 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>those things. Uh. It's great that we're in a business.

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Um that happens to be very hot right now. Um,

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but if it is half as hot five years from now,

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be fine. You know, you can only one

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>steak stake then or at night and I feel like, um,

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've already achieved that. I'm in my forties,

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just motivated by different things. So you mentioned

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier about being able to take advantage of the next

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis the way you did with the last financial crisis.

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>What would you do to accumulate some sort of a

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>war chest you you had hinted at that earlier. How

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>does a firm put together a war chest to go

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>out and make acquisitions when things are, let's say, less

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>perfect than they are today. You have two choices. You

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>can hope nothing happens in the next couple of years

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and wells and build it from cash flo or you

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>can sell a minority steak where you still control everything.

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when you sell the minority steak, you

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:55.919
<v Speaker 1>don't get a full valuation, you get a discount. Right. Really,

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if somebody's gonna buy a minority steak in general, they're

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay you twenty five sent less. And they're gonna

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do that because they don't have any control. So they're

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really betting on you to continue to do a good

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>job and not be an idiot about something strategic. Right.

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I was halfway there, right, So I think that

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that because I'm not into the maximization of

1:02:19.400 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it that that fits. I think our needs where we

1:02:22.440 --> 1:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>could take you sell five somewhere in that range, raise

1:02:28.160 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>enough money that when we're going to the next crisis,

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, at our annual meeting, I can say what

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I always did, which is, We're never ever going to

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>let anybody go because of what's going on in the

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>markets or with the economy. In fact, I'm going to

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>keep doing what I've done every quarter of my entire career,

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, higher good people, and bring on new clients.

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Creative Planning in its entire history has never

1:02:51.040 --> 1:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>had a month that didn't have positive flow. More even

1:02:56.040 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in the financial crisis. Even in the financial crisis, more

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>money was come and the Creative Planning than leaving every

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>single month from oh four to today. And we've never

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>had a period of time of any significance where there

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a tremendous positive employee flow. Right. We are attracting

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>clients and employees with our behavior, and I think a

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>big part of that is the that they know that

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a place where, through thick and thin, uh,

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be with him, you know, to the end.

1:03:24.320 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be in the in the in the battle. Well,

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you you're the you know the old expression is fish

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>rot from the head down. You set the tone as

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the firm, and that obviously permeates out

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the six employees. So I have

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton more questions for you. Can you stick around

1:03:40.040 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit? We have been speaking with Peter Malukey

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is the c i O and President of creative Planning

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of forty five billion dollar firm headquartered in Kansas City.

1:03:51.960 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Is right, um. If you enjoy this conversation, we'll be

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sure and come back for the podcast extras, where we

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>keep the tape rolling and continue discussing all things are

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I A related. You can find that at Apple iTunes,

1:04:05.320 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, wherever your finer podcasts are found.

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us

1:04:14.120 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. Give us

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a review on Apple iTunes. Check out my weekly column

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Riolts.

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast, Peter, Thank you so

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this, and I'm just gonna share a

1:04:35.160 --> 1:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>little inside baseball. Um. You and I really met for

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the first time in September at the Wells Stacked conference

1:04:42.520 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that my firm is one of the hosts of. And

1:04:47.400 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I was fascinated to learn you don't do a lot

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of media. You don't go to that was your first conference. Um,

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's astonishing because here in New York, in the

1:04:57.400 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>media center of the world, everybody has dying for some exposure.

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You guys really built this with practically no national news exposure.

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And I am i overstating that. I think you've got

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it right. We we tried for a long time to

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>do nothing, you know, to have no exposure. And there

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was one industry publication that that had called, maybe for

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the third time, to do an interview, and I didn't respond,

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and I got an email from the reporter. He said, Hey,

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a story on creative planning, and right now

1:05:26.720 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we just have quotes from your competitors, So do you

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be interviewed or not? That's a smart smart

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And they made the headline was outing a reluctant star,

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was the beginning of that. That's a great

1:05:36.840 --> 1:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>headlining being totally under the radar that that was the

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>end of that um and see I would have gone

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>with the biggest firm you've never heard of. That that

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been my sounds cooler. So I you know,

1:05:48.320 --> 1:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's got it's a little edgier. But but outing a

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>reluctant star is is pretty accurate because you guys have

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>built something that's unique and you know, can I call

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it specially? Is it a special phase? Um? Well, you

1:06:03.600 --> 1:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can't help but look at those growth numbers from oh

1:06:06.960 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>four through eight oh nine and then from on nine

1:06:10.280 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>forward for the past decade and not say, Wow, these

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>guys have to be doing something right. You don't grow

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that fast. There are firms that have been around longer,

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are firms that have grounded out there that

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are just grinding out sales, the sales process. I don't

1:06:25.720 --> 1:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that that's your your approach now. I

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that we've gotten a lot more

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>attention now obviously as we've gotten to this size and

1:06:35.880 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we reached just a point where we either had to

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>embrace it or it was not gonna go great is

1:06:39.840 --> 1:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the word to the word to the embracing it, So

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that was my Actually, that's a question I didn't get to,

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to. Why are you now finally saying,

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:51.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, I guess we have to participate in some

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>selective conversation through the public media. Is it simply just

1:06:57.280 --> 1:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it's unavoidable at this point? Well, you know, I had

1:06:59.720 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a I had a client that was NPR and she

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>sat across from me at at an interview we had

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and she said, Peter, I've never seen a firm do

1:07:08.880 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>so little with so much. And I said, what do

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you mean. She's like, you guys don't have You're not

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>even on We were on social media, which is funny

1:07:15.040 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>talking to you, because there's no firm as president on

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>social media as yours in the space I mean, we

1:07:19.600 --> 1:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we I mean I think my Facebook page was controlled

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>by Russians literally, like you went to my Facebook page

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, um, And and she's like, you know, when

1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at creative planning, they're googling, and they're

1:07:33.040 --> 1:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>going to the they're not seeing anything you're saying, right,

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They're just seeing what other people are saying, and so

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you should at least tell your story. And you know,

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a lightbulb for me that you

1:07:44.600 --> 1:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>really can't. There is no under the radar. Yeah, and

1:07:48.640 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>so uh if if you want people to learn, it

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>would be nice if they at least heard your voice

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and you telling the story of what you're all about.

1:07:57.920 --> 1:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean she was right, and I all I

1:08:00.120 --> 1:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>back now as as probably being so under the radars

1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for that time period was probably good. But that was

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>probably the best piece of advice I've had in the

1:08:08.000 --> 1:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>last you know, three or four years. So um, there's

1:08:12.360 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>really two types of communication. One is with the world

1:08:15.640 --> 1:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at large and prospective clients, but the other communication is

1:08:20.320 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with your existing clients. How do you and you mentioned

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you really when you're building a plan, you're really drumming

1:08:26.680 --> 1:08:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it into people's consciousness. Hey, markets go up and down.

1:08:30.920 --> 1:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Expect uh correction or a crash at some point in

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. Recessions are cyclical. Everything isn't great all the time.

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But after the that initial review, how do you keep

1:08:44.200 --> 1:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in touch with clients? How do you keep them informed

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the world, where we are in

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the market cycle, how the portfolio is doing. What what

1:08:53.200 --> 1:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of client communications do you guys manage? So I

1:08:56.760 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>write newsletters many times throughout the year and anytime there's

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a big event, you know, bregsit that night, they get it.

1:09:02.160 --> 1:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They'll get a newsletter, you know, it is just instantly

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>will send out a communication others in the firm right newsletters.

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>We do several different podcasts that we share with our

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>internally internally interesting we UM we UM have an annual

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>symposium that we invite clients to. We had almost three

1:09:18.840 --> 1:09:22.479
<v Speaker 1>thousand at our last one, really a great experience. We

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>email the videos of the speakers that will allow us

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to send videos to our clients. And then for us,

1:09:27.320 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we see our clients in person beyond the onboarding, so

1:09:30.720 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>they're coming in to do all kinds of stuff throughout

1:09:33.479 --> 1:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, and then they do an your reviews with us,

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>so they're seeing they're talking to their advisor and multiple

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>people within creative planning, plus hearing the voice of the

1:09:40.600 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>investment team and the firm. You know, many many different

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ways throughout the year. How do you keep that message consistent?

1:09:46.320 --> 1:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have six hundred people were a fraction of that.

1:09:49.800 --> 1:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>One of my concerns is always we have a lot

1:09:52.760 --> 1:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of people in the office who do research, who publish,

1:09:55.160 --> 1:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>who who write about different things. Philosophically, we're all more

1:09:59.200 --> 1:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or less on the same page. So the message is consistent.

1:10:04.000 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But the concern is as you scale up and it's

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that many more people, does that become a challenge to

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>keep the message the same across every advisor to every client. No.

1:10:15.240 --> 1:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that we are definitely a one voice firm,

1:10:18.360 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's a different firms have different decisions.

1:10:21.400 --> 1:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We look at larger r A s. They tend not

1:10:23.400 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to be that way. They tend to look like a

1:10:26.160 --> 1:10:28.799
<v Speaker 1>brokerage house. You know, you can go to Morgan Stanley

1:10:28.800 --> 1:10:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and the guy in Office one might be a guy

1:10:30.520 --> 1:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that does options for all his clients. In Office two

1:10:33.080 --> 1:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who does bonds for all his clients.

1:10:35.439 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>At Creative Planning, we it's the same thing. Every client

1:10:38.680 --> 1:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is going through a planning process. It doesn't matter if

1:10:41.720 --> 1:10:44.479
<v Speaker 1>they're on the Forbes List, which is somebody we started

1:10:44.520 --> 1:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of weeks ago. It's going through the

1:10:46.160 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>same process as somebody who's got five dollars. And we

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have that process in place because we know that in

1:10:53.040 --> 1:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>our we've developed a way that we think is the

1:10:56.640 --> 1:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>best way to get the information we need from the

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:00.639
<v Speaker 1>clients to figure out what their needs, their dreams, their

1:11:00.720 --> 1:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>vision are. It sounds cheesy, but sometimes your goals are

1:11:03.400 --> 1:11:05.519
<v Speaker 1>not your dreams, right, So we want to know what

1:11:05.640 --> 1:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to accomplish and how feasible it all is.

1:11:09.479 --> 1:11:12.519
<v Speaker 1>So everyone's going through that same process. And then we

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:15.759
<v Speaker 1>have a philosophy. So when we were talking earlier about

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:18.479
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe in hedge funds, but we I believe

1:11:18.520 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in in in private equity and alternatives, and I believe

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that the markets are fairly efficient, so we use indexing

1:11:24.080 --> 1:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of most instead of large camp mutual funds. When

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I say that's what I believe, that's what creative believes. Right.

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>So if you're coming and interviewing a creative planning, you're

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not coming to creative planning unless you believe that or

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>close enough, and you're gonna you're going to believe you're

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really gonna act that way. There is no oh, by

1:11:43.040 --> 1:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, we've got a hedge fund thing over here

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and the large camp mutual funds over there. It's one voice,

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>one philosophy, consistent messaging. If a client gets a newsletter

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, they're not going, what the hell is this?

1:11:54.120 --> 1:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm in Los Angeles and my advisor is

1:11:56.600 --> 1:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>doing something completely different. That's not that's not happening. And

1:11:59.040 --> 1:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what's great about that because we don't have to write right,

1:12:01.880 --> 1:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>vague garbage, right, we can be very specific about what

1:12:05.760 --> 1:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we believe and what we're doing at any point in

1:12:07.560 --> 1:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the market cycle, because everyone's going to read that and go, yeah,

1:12:10.720 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm experiencing. So I don't remember if it

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:16.639
<v Speaker 1>was you or someone else who used the phrase Franken firms. Yeah,

1:12:16.800 --> 1:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>where that is you right where you have hedge funds

1:12:20.040 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>over here, and covered coal options over there, and some

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>wacky SMP sector rotation here, and affirm just becomes a

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>conglomeration of ten small affirms and no conces in philosophy.

1:12:33.080 --> 1:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that Is that a survivable model these days? No?

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I look at like some of these some of the

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms in this space. Um, they come in,

1:12:40.640 --> 1:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they buy a one billion dollar or two billion dollar firm,

1:12:42.760 --> 1:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they call it a platform, and then they take that

1:12:45.120 --> 1:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>firm and they go buy other firms and go, well,

1:12:46.880 --> 1:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>do your compliance and HR and financial stuff for you,

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and give you a big check. Come join us. Oh

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you use this software, Oh that's fine, and keep keep

1:12:54.360 --> 1:12:57.519
<v Speaker 1>using it. Oh you you believe in you know exiting

1:12:57.560 --> 1:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the market when your signals from your bond does say this,

1:13:00.360 --> 1:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you go ahead and keep doing that, and

1:13:02.680 --> 1:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you wind up with a firm and it grows to

1:13:04.160 --> 1:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>ten billion, and it's really just twenty five small firms,

1:13:07.560 --> 1:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>uh that don't operate the same don't do the same things. Um,

1:13:12.600 --> 1:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think of as a frankin firm. I

1:13:15.000 --> 1:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think that buck is getting passed from one private equity

1:13:17.400 --> 1:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>firm to another and is going to explode in somebody's lap.

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of the larger firms, that's what they are.

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They're just an amount of amalgamation of a bunch of

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's not philosophically existent. I do think this is

1:13:29.120 --> 1:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a one of the negatives of private equity is you

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have private equity come into a space like this. Let's

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>say they want to exit in three years. You take

1:13:37.160 --> 1:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a two billion dollar firm, you buy eight firms, you

1:13:39.320 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>make it four billion, you you exit, you make everyone's

1:13:43.080 --> 1:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>high fiving. But somebody now has something that doesn't really

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>probably isn't best for the client anymore, and probably isn't

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:53.639
<v Speaker 1>best for the employee anymore, and everyone can smell it right,

1:13:53.720 --> 1:13:57.599
<v Speaker 1>and AND's eventually the smell will get bad enough that

1:13:57.640 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll lose employees, you'll lose clients. But by then the

1:14:00.320 --> 1:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>person who put it all together is long gone. So

1:14:02.439 --> 1:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hot potato, so one of the Knox against private equity

1:14:06.880 --> 1:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and R I a s years ago and I don't

1:14:10.040 --> 1:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>know if this is still true and is a gym

1:14:12.960 --> 1:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in your office? And I had a cold conversation about this.

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Was in the old days, private equity would come in,

1:14:17.720 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they'd buy a firm. They basically loaded up with variable

1:14:22.040 --> 1:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>A nuities that have a giant commission on it and

1:14:25.600 --> 1:14:29.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out for anybody except the pe guys and

1:14:29.479 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>whoever sold the firm and exited. I'm getting the impression

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that that old school model, and maybe that's more than

1:14:36.400 --> 1:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, that that's not what we're talking about

1:14:39.240 --> 1:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in this space. No, I don't think you're seeing that

1:14:41.200 --> 1:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that's long gone. Now. It's sticky money, regular um revenue

1:14:46.160 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on a on an ongoing basis. That's the appeal of this. Yeah,

1:14:49.320 --> 1:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I see two two, Well, a couple of

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>different things happening. One is you see someone comes in

1:14:53.880 --> 1:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>actually makes your place better and helps institutionalize it and

1:14:56.960 --> 1:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>grow it. H That's that's one group, and there's another

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>groupe that's like, Hey, we're gonna come in, We're gonna

1:15:02.160 --> 1:15:03.599
<v Speaker 1>buy it. We're gonna get rid of a bunch of people.

1:15:03.600 --> 1:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna put in some new people. We're gonna go

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:07.599
<v Speaker 1>buy twenty three firms. We don't care what they look like.

1:15:08.320 --> 1:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna put all this crap together, and we're gonna

1:15:10.080 --> 1:15:11.519
<v Speaker 1>sell it to somebody else. Because there's a bunch of

1:15:11.520 --> 1:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>money slashing around and eventually someone's gonna get stuck, right,

1:15:14.000 --> 1:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and when the music stops, you don't want to be

1:15:16.040 --> 1:15:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that person, right. It's it's so, but but I think

1:15:18.439 --> 1:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>there's more of the good guys than the bad guys.

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about a couple of things with creative

1:15:22.760 --> 1:15:25.519
<v Speaker 1>planning that I wanted to ask you about that I

1:15:25.560 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to. Um you would previously mentioned four one ks,

1:15:30.080 --> 1:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or less than ten percent of your practice. How do

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you grow that space? It's a very slow and sticky space,

1:15:38.760 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>even when employees and management are not happy with their

1:15:43.200 --> 1:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>four O one K providers. Right, I think we probably

1:15:47.120 --> 1:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have three four billion in four one KOs sets and

1:15:49.800 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's growing very rapidly, and we're divided into two segments.

1:15:53.240 --> 1:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>One segment is takes care of bigger plans where employees

1:15:57.240 --> 1:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>want to sit down one and want when somebody learn

1:15:59.040 --> 1:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot health help. Another one is very technology oriented

1:16:04.000 --> 1:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>startup plans um small plans where the economics of building

1:16:09.880 --> 1:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a foreign K are very difficult for those folks. Maybe

1:16:12.320 --> 1:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's too two dentists starting a practice, but what we

1:16:16.400 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>bring to our clients is almost always they're going from

1:16:19.840 --> 1:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the traditional model of an insurance company providing it to

1:16:23.360 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a fiduciary providing it. And there's a lot of liability

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>around foreign K plans now, so if you're on the

1:16:28.040 --> 1:16:30.519
<v Speaker 1>board making decisions for foreign ks, you've got a liability.

1:16:30.520 --> 1:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're an HR, if you're if you're the owner,

1:16:33.000 --> 1:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got liability. So they love transferring that liability to

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:39.599
<v Speaker 1>a fiduciary, and we offer that full fiduciary service um. Second,

1:16:40.320 --> 1:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>almost every single time, we lower the fees very substantially.

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And the third we bring a common sense investment approach,

1:16:46.080 --> 1:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, low cost index funds in the in the portfolio,

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:52.559
<v Speaker 1>along with ways where the client can choose the model

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and and get their money managed that way. And so

1:16:55.479 --> 1:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing very fast growth in that space. It's just

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the private side is growing faster. But I think that

1:17:02.760 --> 1:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the key in the foreign case space is to be competitive.

1:17:06.439 --> 1:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>You have to be able to drive fees way way

1:17:08.760 --> 1:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>way down. We found a way basis points how how

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>low is low in four o one? I think like

1:17:14.360 --> 1:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>even a startup plan for US might pay a fee

1:17:17.200 --> 1:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of thirty basis points. I mean, like, and you're talking

1:17:19.400 --> 1:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about someone starting with zero assets. Now they still have

1:17:22.479 --> 1:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>their When you look at a foreign K plan, there's

1:17:25.240 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>administration costs that you have to pay for the fund,

1:17:28.120 --> 1:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>record keeping, with all of it. They should be less

1:17:31.680 --> 1:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>than one one percent in the plan, appreciably less than Yeah,

1:17:35.000 --> 1:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it should be appreciably less than one percent, And most

1:17:36.840 --> 1:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>plans are one and a half plus, and so it's

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like very easy. I think if we your

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:44.559
<v Speaker 1>fuse in half, that's a huge win for everybody. Most

1:17:44.600 --> 1:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time, when we're talking to somebody about a

1:17:46.040 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>four one K, we're going to get that four one K.

1:17:48.080 --> 1:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>The issue is foreign cas are much harder than the

1:17:50.000 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>private side because private side, somebody walks in and they're

1:17:53.400 --> 1:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a decision with the four own K. Somebody

1:17:56.120 --> 1:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>walks in and they're the owner, but they've gotta there's

1:17:58.000 --> 1:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a CFO, there's hr you're talking to HR protect. I mean,

1:18:00.640 --> 1:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it's a process, and it should be a process.

1:18:02.600 --> 1:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a big decision for the business. So in the

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>old days, it was um, somebody's brother in law was

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:10.519
<v Speaker 1>one running the fore own cave. That those days are over.

1:18:10.560 --> 1:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that's gone. I think on the private side, that's gone.

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It was very, very common where everyone just had their

1:18:15.720 --> 1:18:18.559
<v Speaker 1>money with their with their buddy or their neighbor or whatever.

1:18:18.600 --> 1:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That that stuff's gone. And I think that's another thing

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that oh eight oh nine and made Off and all

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that just got rid of that, and people are getting

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:27.479
<v Speaker 1>much more serious about who their advisor is. Let's let's

1:18:27.479 --> 1:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about the institutional side, which has its own set

1:18:30.400 --> 1:18:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of challenges. How do you deal with pension funds, foundations, um,

1:18:35.760 --> 1:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>larger entities, even family offices that might have a different

1:18:39.800 --> 1:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>set of needs and a different investment target than a

1:18:45.000 --> 1:18:47.519
<v Speaker 1>family who has a portfolio with you. So this is

1:18:47.520 --> 1:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the smallest part people that have family office as we

1:18:49.920 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>manage a lot of money for those folks. Private family

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>offices separate from endowments and instructions. But but institutional, as

1:18:57.320 --> 1:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I think of it, like you do is endowments and

1:19:00.200 --> 1:19:03.519
<v Speaker 1>universities and things like that. That that space we entered

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>about five years ago. It is by far the smallest

1:19:05.560 --> 1:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>part of our business. And I would just take the

1:19:07.920 --> 1:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>foreign case space and make it even harder, a lot

1:19:10.680 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more decision makers and a lot lower fees. And you're

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing a very big migration away from alternatives towards you know,

1:19:18.760 --> 1:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>low cost passive investing complimented with certain alternatives. Seems to

1:19:22.680 --> 1:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be where that space is heading. Quite quite interesting. And

1:19:26.400 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you have described the tears of your clients as private

1:19:31.040 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>wealth group, ultra affluent, and emerging wealth. How do these

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>segments different and do you offer different services to each

1:19:38.280 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of them. So we used to just call everything private wealth,

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and you went through the process. We built a portfolio.

1:19:42.360 --> 1:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Artypical client was the multimillionaire next door um. You know,

1:19:45.840 --> 1:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the doctor or dentist or lawyer that worked their entire career,

1:19:49.560 --> 1:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the business owner or guy who made money in real estate.

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:54.839
<v Speaker 1>They put together a million dollars or twelve million dollars

1:19:54.880 --> 1:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and they became a client of Creative Planning. About four

1:19:58.760 --> 1:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago we set minute out Emerging Wealth Group. We

1:20:02.160 --> 1:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>had so many family members of clients and it. We

1:20:05.320 --> 1:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have a great way to handle it. But

1:20:07.200 --> 1:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to sit with somebody who's got seven

1:20:09.040 --> 1:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollars and they've got three kids and their kids

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>are all twenty eight and say we're not going to

1:20:12.400 --> 1:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>work with your kids. But they would wind up maybe

1:20:15.040 --> 1:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with the wrong advisors, because the advisor working with somebody

1:20:17.920 --> 1:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>who has twelve million dollars at that point would be

1:20:20.960 --> 1:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>our most was our most sophisticated advisors, and they'll be

1:20:23.400 --> 1:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>working with somebody who had fifty. So we created Emerging

1:20:25.920 --> 1:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Group to deal with that and open the doors

1:20:28.400 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to people who had less than half a million, and

1:20:30.000 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it exploded. I mean, the group has thousands of clients,

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about twenty employees, and interestingly has become one of the

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest lead sources for our ultra affluent practice, which is

1:20:41.320 --> 1:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>where we really try to day to only take on

1:20:43.080 --> 1:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>people at a twenty million million or more UM, like

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a few this week that came on had a hundred

1:20:48.280 --> 1:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>million or more UM. And there's a group that's probably

1:20:53.520 --> 1:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>our longest running group as a whole within the firm

1:20:56.479 --> 1:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's used to dealing with those kind of clients, and

1:20:58.840 --> 1:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the there is a lot more sophistication needed. They're not

1:21:02.080 --> 1:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily for a large part of the portfolio, but for

1:21:05.320 --> 1:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a small part of the portfolio. And from a legal

1:21:07.360 --> 1:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and tax perspective, if you've got somebody who's got a

1:21:09.880 --> 1:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollars, all this debate we've been

1:21:12.800 --> 1:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>having about our stocks, canna do better than bonds? And

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>do small to better than large? And will emerging markets

1:21:18.640 --> 1:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to better than stocks? And we'll private ut when you

1:21:20.040 --> 1:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>do better. These are what I call one percent conversations. Right,

1:21:23.640 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to move them on it. You know you're

1:21:25.080 --> 1:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna make one percent more less. I you've got a

1:21:26.600 --> 1:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty billion dollars, you really don't care about that.

1:21:29.360 --> 1:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You care about the fort of state tax. You care

1:21:32.320 --> 1:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>about the twelve percent state tax. You care about how

1:21:36.400 --> 1:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>your kids are going to get the money and is

1:21:37.760 --> 1:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it going to screw them up? You care about asset protection.

1:21:41.520 --> 1:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And these are very sophisticated concepts that most of the

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are a space is not equipped to handle. And we

1:21:48.000 --> 1:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have a I think a very substantive group within creative

1:21:50.720 --> 1:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Planning that's used to dealing with hundreds of those families,

1:21:53.600 --> 1:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think we bring a very unique perspective there.

1:21:55.840 --> 1:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's interesting is when they're comparing, it's

1:21:58.479 --> 1:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it's always between us and say a place like a

1:22:00.320 --> 1:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan or a a Goldman Sachs, and the r A

1:22:03.160 --> 1:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>story resonates so much independent and we don't have our

1:22:05.960 --> 1:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>own products, but we also practice tax and law and

1:22:08.720 --> 1:22:11.799
<v Speaker 1>they don't. And we're used to dealing with folks your size,

1:22:11.800 --> 1:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's not something that I could say seven years ago, right,

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's allowed us to become very competitive and

1:22:18.800 --> 1:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and the one of the fastest growing parts of our

1:22:21.120 --> 1:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>practice is that very very very large family. So one

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of the issues we've noticed amongst our i as, especially

1:22:29.680 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>independent r A s, is that there's sort of a

1:22:32.920 --> 1:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>barbell across the age spectrum. You have a lot of

1:22:36.120 --> 1:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>advisors in their sixties, late fifties, and then a bunch

1:22:40.240 --> 1:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of people in their twenties who were um you met

1:22:43.360 --> 1:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the conference, very social, very active, very um specialized

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in different areas. But there's this big gap across the middle.

1:22:53.439 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So question number one is what does this mean to

1:22:56.400 --> 1:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>your future growth? And question number two do we have

1:23:00.439 --> 1:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>enough young people coming into the r I A industry?

1:23:03.680 --> 1:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, I read a lot about this and I

1:23:05.680 --> 1:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>view it very differently, so as running creative planning, our

1:23:09.800 --> 1:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>market share is your point O O O R to

1:23:13.240 --> 1:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>writer point oh no sce. So I don't to me,

1:23:17.720 --> 1:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>even if there were half the advisors I don't need

1:23:20.120 --> 1:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to have. I'm not Merrill Lynch. I mean, so no

1:23:24.160 --> 1:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>thundering her and just I mean, I just need to

1:23:28.439 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>find a few awesome people every quarter, and I'm always

1:23:31.600 --> 1:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to find that, right, And so

1:23:33.240 --> 1:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I just don't I lose I spend any time worrying

1:23:36.360 --> 1:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about about that, and frankly about the industry. I think

1:23:40.400 --> 1:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the industry could use less advisors. Really. Do you think

1:23:44.080 --> 1:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the headspace compression like the few compression we've seen over

1:23:48.720 --> 1:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the past ten years, does that continue well? I think

1:23:52.320 --> 1:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are advisors that do a lot

1:23:54.920 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of good and there's a lot of advisors this is

1:23:57.200 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not fantastic. And I think having a bunch of really

1:24:01.400 --> 1:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>good advisors that survive is better than having a whole

1:24:04.520 --> 1:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of advisors. Uh. And so I don't see this

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as an industry crisis. I think if the industry contracts

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, that's just fine. We've got the technology

1:24:13.120 --> 1:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for it to contract. I'm just focused on finding the

1:24:15.880 --> 1:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>right people for our little tiny, you know, section of

1:24:19.000 --> 1:24:23.519
<v Speaker 1>your little tiny section of the wealth management industry. And

1:24:23.520 --> 1:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's funny, I was shocked to read

1:24:26.760 --> 1:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>about your little tiny firm. I think once you cross

1:24:30.720 --> 1:24:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the billion dollar threshold and a u M that puts

1:24:34.560 --> 1:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you in like the top eight percent or so advisors.

1:24:37.760 --> 1:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really that their advisors mostly. I think someone else

1:24:41.960 --> 1:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>called it lifestyle practices. So so you have a unique

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>perspective on what's going on. Um, what happens with those people?

1:24:50.720 --> 1:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a massive consolidation or can you just

1:24:54.120 --> 1:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have a very nice, little million dollar practice And that's fine,

1:24:58.479 --> 1:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know there's a lot of people running around.

1:25:00.200 --> 1:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>All those guys are gonna get crushed, and I don't

1:25:02.080 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily agree. If you go to the conference,

1:25:04.640 --> 1:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they're the same three people who coincidentally have been on

1:25:07.640 --> 1:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition. So so maybe they're talking their books a

1:25:11.240 --> 1:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit um. You know, I'm assuming, like us, you

1:25:14.320 --> 1:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really buy into that. I don't buy into it totally.

1:25:17.439 --> 1:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that I think that most most five

1:25:20.720 --> 1:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollar firms cannot compete at the level they used to.

1:25:23.640 --> 1:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I'm hearing that from firms that call

1:25:25.560 --> 1:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>us to be acquired. I mean, they're just saying, look,

1:25:28.200 --> 1:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I used to be able to grow, and it's gotten

1:25:29.760 --> 1:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a little more intense, a little more competitive, and I

1:25:32.479 --> 1:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like to bring on larger clients, I need to

1:25:35.360 --> 1:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be in a larger firm. There's no question that's a force.

1:25:38.880 --> 1:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But it reminds me of like when the robot advisors

1:25:40.960 --> 1:25:42.519
<v Speaker 1>came out and everyone said, well, everything is going to

1:25:42.560 --> 1:25:45.559
<v Speaker 1>go to the robos. Well everything didn't go to the robos,

1:25:45.600 --> 1:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but but some did, right, So that came from somewhere,

1:25:49.280 --> 1:25:51.559
<v Speaker 1>And you guys don't have a robot do We don't

1:25:51.680 --> 1:25:54.599
<v Speaker 1>know any thoughts of setting up a robo for that

1:25:55.280 --> 1:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sub two thousand dollar client who maybe eventually moves from

1:26:01.800 --> 1:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>um under a hundred thousand to emerging wealth to high

1:26:05.000 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>net worth. You know, I've I've thought about it, and

1:26:06.880 --> 1:26:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, you know, that's just not what we do.

1:26:09.880 --> 1:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not our style. And I want one creative planning

1:26:12.040 --> 1:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>client to talk to another creative planning client and go,

1:26:14.479 --> 1:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what they do for me, and I don't

1:26:16.280 --> 1:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>want anybody to go. I never saw a person ever,

1:26:19.880 --> 1:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything was online, and I know there's people that

1:26:22.880 --> 1:26:25.559
<v Speaker 1>want that, and that's totally fine. It's just not what

1:26:25.600 --> 1:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we do. To me, It's just we don't sell ice

1:26:28.040 --> 1:26:31.559
<v Speaker 1>cream either. It's just completely it's completely different. And then

1:26:31.680 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>before I get to my favorite questions, I have one

1:26:34.680 --> 1:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>last um general question about the firm. You actually made

1:26:40.320 --> 1:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>your first acquisition this year, a five million dollar firm.

1:26:43.720 --> 1:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Um that was part? Was that? Is that this year

1:26:45.800 --> 1:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or last year? That was this year? And it was?

1:26:48.120 --> 1:26:51.799
<v Speaker 1>It was amazing to me. This was really fascinating because

1:26:52.280 --> 1:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I was very focused on building out all our services

1:26:55.280 --> 1:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and building a culture. And you know, we we did

1:26:58.240 --> 1:27:01.519
<v Speaker 1>that and really inan we moved to a headquarters, we

1:27:01.640 --> 1:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>made a bunch of shifts in technology, We finished our

1:27:04.000 --> 1:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>hiring push, got all the right people at all the

1:27:05.640 --> 1:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>right places, finished building out our trust company, institutional arm

1:27:09.120 --> 1:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and so on, and really we're in a place where

1:27:11.920 --> 1:27:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I could finally start to think about that a little bit.

1:27:13.600 --> 1:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of put it on the shelf. Is

1:27:14.840 --> 1:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not a priority. And uh, I got Brad Johnston gave

1:27:17.920 --> 1:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>me a call literally out of the blue and just said, hey,

1:27:20.160 --> 1:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to all these firms. I thought, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,

1:27:22.400 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Brad Johnson God, you don't know. I don't know him

1:27:24.920 --> 1:27:27.479
<v Speaker 1>at all. Calls you, and Peter Muluke says, yeah, I'll

1:27:27.479 --> 1:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>take the call. So actually, I don't know. He winds

1:27:30.360 --> 1:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up talking to Jim in office and Jim is like,

1:27:33.320 --> 1:27:35.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you should talk to Brad, and I'm like,

1:27:35.560 --> 1:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just we just got done with this.

1:27:37.840 --> 1:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's give it a little time before we do a

1:27:39.320 --> 1:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of acquisitions, so we'll just just have a conversation.

1:27:42.560 --> 1:27:44.799
<v Speaker 1>So Brad comes to Kansas I want to come to Kancities,

1:27:44.800 --> 1:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to Kansas City, brings an advisor. I find out

1:27:46.960 --> 1:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the advisor as his son. So I'm like, well, maybe

1:27:49.160 --> 1:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>they're just kicking tires, but I really liked them there

1:27:51.439 --> 1:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from Minnesota all this stuff, and says about it's true.

1:27:55.040 --> 1:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it, but I really liked him. Um,

1:27:59.120 --> 1:28:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they left, and I told Jim's I

1:28:01.560 --> 1:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>kinda go. I really liked him, but you know, I

1:28:04.080 --> 1:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>think they just want to know what we're doing. And uh, anyway,

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Brad calb me the next day and Study

1:28:09.080 --> 1:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is interested in continuing dialogue. I think it was thirty

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>days later. They were part of creat of planning really

1:28:13.520 --> 1:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that fast. Yeah, and even though it was our first

1:28:15.960 --> 1:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>one and they didn't know what they were doing, we

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know we were doing. You know, they've never been

1:28:19.200 --> 1:28:22.479
<v Speaker 1>acquired before, we never acquired I have. It was wonderful

1:28:23.000 --> 1:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and our and I looked at Minnesota and said, you know,

1:28:25.520 --> 1:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we had a presence there. I might have been around

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>half a billion. And now all of a sudden, we're

1:28:30.120 --> 1:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>about a billion dollar enterprise and uh, we've got some

1:28:33.720 --> 1:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>scale and we're gonna get noticed and we're in the

1:28:35.800 --> 1:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just like you said, how many billion dollar firms are there? Right?

1:28:38.439 --> 1:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So now all of a sudden we're in the conversation

1:28:40.560 --> 1:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on cases we weren't before. And it got me looking

1:28:43.360 --> 1:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>at the whole country and saying, you know what, um

1:28:46.439 --> 1:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas we manage about a billion UM. We were

1:28:50.360 --> 1:28:52.719
<v Speaker 1>approached by a firm that has about six and or million.

1:28:53.320 --> 1:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>We're now having l o I with them, and so

1:28:56.080 --> 1:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so you'll be close to two billion in Dallas and

1:28:58.360 --> 1:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>now you're a player there. Yeah. So I think that

1:29:01.120 --> 1:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that what's happening now is the description I use is

1:29:04.960 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we have a very very strong tree trunk with very

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>strong branches that we've built. We built them they're they're

1:29:12.439 --> 1:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the creative planning DNA, and we could add leaves to

1:29:15.479 --> 1:29:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that tree and have that tree flourish without damaging the tree.

1:29:20.280 --> 1:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we're not a billion dollar firm where the

1:29:21.920 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>whole trunk was put together by twenty five firms. Right,

1:29:24.680 --> 1:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so when people come into Creative they know this is

1:29:27.240 --> 1:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>how it works, right, this is the culture, this is

1:29:29.720 --> 1:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the investment philosophy, this is what the people are like.

1:29:32.600 --> 1:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's not different from office to office because it's

1:29:34.840 --> 1:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>not twenty three different firms. So it's really open my

1:29:37.160 --> 1:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>mind to that we've now done two acquisitions. We have

1:29:39.200 --> 1:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>two other firms under l o I, and we don't

1:29:42.800 --> 1:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have a merger's acquisitions team. You know, it's just someone

1:29:45.800 --> 1:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>has a conversation with Jim and then and then they

1:29:47.680 --> 1:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>meet me and and um we're off and and and

1:29:50.120 --> 1:29:52.519
<v Speaker 1>if if they're philosophically a fit, and the look maybe

1:29:52.520 --> 1:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>one and ten times it is right. You've got to

1:29:55.240 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be philosophically a fit. You've got to like the people

1:29:57.360 --> 1:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and all that. So you get to that ten percent.

1:30:00.040 --> 1:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>With that ten percent, it's happening pretty quickly. I think

1:30:02.360 --> 1:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're finding there are a few people that are

1:30:04.439 --> 1:30:06.599
<v Speaker 1>very like minded out there, and I think they're finding that, Hey,

1:30:06.640 --> 1:30:09.599
<v Speaker 1>this is a firm that's kind of like me. It's

1:30:09.640 --> 1:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not really an amalgamation of a bunch of stuff, and

1:30:12.160 --> 1:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so they can they can be a part of something

1:30:14.400 --> 1:30:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what they were doing. But Turbocharged, that's fascinating.

1:30:17.920 --> 1:30:20.439
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting to hear you guys have have scaled

1:30:20.520 --> 1:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that up, because that was one of the questions I had.

1:30:23.800 --> 1:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>How the hell do you get to be that big

1:30:25.560 --> 1:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>organically with no acquisitions? And imagine if they did acquisitions,

1:30:30.040 --> 1:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys are gonna be a hundred billion dollars not

1:30:31.920 --> 1:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>too not too long from now. Yeah, it's a crazy industry.

1:30:35.040 --> 1:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You can never predict what's going to happen. True, But

1:30:38.360 --> 1:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like I feel very good about the

1:30:43.280 --> 1:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>offering that we have from the people, the process, and

1:30:45.840 --> 1:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know what you have to be.

1:30:48.200 --> 1:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be the the fastest person in

1:30:50.360 --> 1:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. You've got to be faster than the people

1:30:52.200 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you're racing against, right And I feel like we're in

1:30:54.040 --> 1:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a good spot right now the that that makes perfect

1:30:57.280 --> 1:30:59.599
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. I know I don't have you for

1:30:59.600 --> 1:31:02.599
<v Speaker 1>for ever, So let me get to my favorite questions

1:31:02.640 --> 1:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we ask all of our guests. These have been designed

1:31:06.320 --> 1:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to be revealing about who you are. UM, let's start

1:31:09.840 --> 1:31:12.479
<v Speaker 1>with the first car you ever owned. You're making model

1:31:14.040 --> 1:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Ultimobile Omega crashed it, Uh, teaching my younger fourteen year

1:31:18.640 --> 1:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>old brother how to drive? Teaching it was not a

1:31:21.960 --> 1:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>good lesson. Where did you grow You don't start with

1:31:24.200 --> 1:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a left turn. Were you in Kansas or Yeah, we

1:31:27.400 --> 1:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>were in Kansas. So to me, I'm the first question

1:31:30.520 --> 1:31:33.519
<v Speaker 1>is how do you crash something in Kansas? Well, it's

1:31:33.560 --> 1:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's an actual city barrier. They're like million

1:31:36.360 --> 1:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>people there Kansas City. So you're in Kansas City and

1:31:40.720 --> 1:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not in like a town of three hundred west.

1:31:43.920 --> 1:31:46.639
<v Speaker 1>So easy enough to have because when I think Kansas,

1:31:46.720 --> 1:31:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking farms and ranches and lots of open space

1:31:52.360 --> 1:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>most of the Kansas Yes, Kansas City, No, got it.

1:31:55.840 --> 1:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize you grew up in Kansas City. That's

1:31:58.040 --> 1:32:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a interesting Um. Who were some of your early mentors

1:32:01.920 --> 1:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>who affected the way you look at the world of

1:32:05.240 --> 1:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>investing in financial planning? Well, I would say that, Um,

1:32:10.520 --> 1:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the person that owned creative Planning before me was just

1:32:13.240 --> 1:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>such an incredibly he's an incredibly positive person and was

1:32:17.280 --> 1:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>an incredible influence to watch. He treated people so well

1:32:21.400 --> 1:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and he always had a positive attitude. He always looked

1:32:23.840 --> 1:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bright side of things. And this is a

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>business that that you you need to infuse. It's interesting

1:32:30.160 --> 1:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because you need to be an optimistic person, but you

1:32:33.120 --> 1:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>have to take a pessimistic point of view when you're

1:32:35.400 --> 1:32:37.919
<v Speaker 1>doing planning. You have to plan for the worst, right,

1:32:38.200 --> 1:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So I really liked that kind of style that he had.

1:32:43.120 --> 1:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But really the biggest influence it was very early. I

1:32:46.280 --> 1:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>had had a T shirt company and I made a

1:32:48.880 --> 1:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money and and I was a few thousands

1:32:52.040 --> 1:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of dollars and my dad said, I just put it

1:32:55.400 --> 1:32:57.799
<v Speaker 1>in an index spud and I remember watching the Asian

1:32:57.800 --> 1:33:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Contagion on TV. I cant remember what year was. Okay, alright, alright,

1:33:02.680 --> 1:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>well that's impressive and I can be wrong. And my

1:33:06.760 --> 1:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Dad's like, hey, um, yeah, don't worry about it. It'll

1:33:09.840 --> 1:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it, it'll all work itself out over five years.

1:33:12.720 --> 1:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's interesting. And I went and read a bunch

1:33:14.840 --> 1:33:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of books and found out he was right, and that

1:33:16.600 --> 1:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>probably wound up sending me on the trajectory. And are

1:33:18.880 --> 1:33:22.759
<v Speaker 1>reading some Bogel books and Jeremy Siegal books and and

1:33:23.400 --> 1:33:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the rest is history. So I'm gonna say Asian contagion

1:33:26.520 --> 1:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>long term capital management, but around both around the same

1:33:30.200 --> 1:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>time and and both with the same result. Temporary setback, um,

1:33:35.439 --> 1:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what we tend to see all market YEP

1:33:37.760 --> 1:33:42.599
<v Speaker 1>corrections are temporary. Even if they last from fifty four,

1:33:42.640 --> 1:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still temporary. Hopefully you're not retiring went into that. Um,

1:33:47.200 --> 1:33:49.759
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about books. Give us some of the favorite

1:33:49.760 --> 1:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>books that you like to read. Be they you mentioned Bogel?

1:33:53.200 --> 1:33:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Who else? Who else? Uh? So I read a couple

1:33:55.640 --> 1:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of books every week, but I can't get away from

1:33:57.400 --> 1:34:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the same two books I think as being huper influential

1:34:00.720 --> 1:34:02.559
<v Speaker 1>to me. One takes like twenty minutes to read. It's

1:34:02.560 --> 1:34:05.679
<v Speaker 1>called how Full is Your Bucket? And it's basically just says,

1:34:05.720 --> 1:34:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you know everybody you encounter, um, you leave feeling better

1:34:09.560 --> 1:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or worse? Uh? And is somebody? Are you filling people's

1:34:12.439 --> 1:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>buckets up? Are you draining their buckets? It's really informed

1:34:15.439 --> 1:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the way I interview, the who I work with, the

1:34:18.000 --> 1:34:20.439
<v Speaker 1>way I get through a day, making sure that I'm

1:34:20.439 --> 1:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in the right mind frame all the time. And it

1:34:22.760 --> 1:34:26.559
<v Speaker 1>was so obvious, such a light, quick read, but it's

1:34:26.600 --> 1:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>really informed. How full is your bucket? Yeah, I don't

1:34:29.760 --> 1:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>know if I've ever heard of that. I'm gonna don't

1:34:31.400 --> 1:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have to really short, really short book. I mean I

1:34:34.000 --> 1:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>got it for my kids, I got it for all

1:34:35.240 --> 1:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>our employees at the time. And and it's really interesting.

1:34:38.160 --> 1:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like when you when you talk to that client,

1:34:40.360 --> 1:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to a colleague, when you talk to

1:34:41.840 --> 1:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a family member, are they leaving feeling better about themselves

1:34:45.840 --> 1:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in their day or worse? And it and it's it's

1:34:49.200 --> 1:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting, pretty straightforward makes a lot of very very

1:34:52.080 --> 1:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>straightforward um. And then a book that really kind of

1:34:57.439 --> 1:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>transformed my thinking was Awareness by Demello and he was

1:35:00.479 --> 1:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Jesuit priest to Awareness Awareness he was a Jesuit priest

1:35:04.920 --> 1:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that um lived in the Far East. And so it's

1:35:08.800 --> 1:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>got a combination of all these things. But the basic

1:35:11.400 --> 1:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>message of the book is get over yourself. You know,

1:35:14.640 --> 1:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't matter whatever you accomplish. A couple of years

1:35:17.200 --> 1:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from now, no one's gonna know who you are. Uh,

1:35:19.320 --> 1:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't know who anybody from Mesopotamia is.

1:35:21.680 --> 1:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we might remember Abraham Lincoln, but you know,

1:35:24.640 --> 1:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you go far up in the future, very very very

1:35:27.080 --> 1:35:30.599
<v Speaker 1>little matters. It sounds like really horrible. What it does

1:35:30.680 --> 1:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is it clarifies for you, Um, the high shouldn't be

1:35:34.400 --> 1:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>too high, the lows shouldn't be too low, and um,

1:35:37.960 --> 1:35:41.679
<v Speaker 1>very solomonic in its wisdom. Yeah, and this two shall pass,

1:35:42.160 --> 1:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this two shall pass, And it really if you start

1:35:45.000 --> 1:35:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to take that attitude. For me, I'm not sure this

1:35:47.479 --> 1:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is what the book was about, but it really crystallized.

1:35:50.160 --> 1:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I look at like all the stuff

1:35:52.120 --> 1:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that comes at you all day, everywhere, and all the

1:35:54.120 --> 1:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff you encounter, the reality is it doesn't matter at all.

1:35:59.120 --> 1:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's ephemeral, right, just like investments, right, it's there's so

1:36:02.439 --> 1:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>much stuff out there. Part of being good at investments

1:36:05.240 --> 1:36:07.599
<v Speaker 1>is to know the nine percent that doesn't matter at all,

1:36:07.960 --> 1:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>what you don't need to read, what you don't need

1:36:09.439 --> 1:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch, what you don't need to care about, what

1:36:10.960 --> 1:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to invest in, what you don't need

1:36:12.360 --> 1:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to research, and then you get you carve away all

1:36:15.439 --> 1:36:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that stone, you get the masterpiece, right, And I think

1:36:17.800 --> 1:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that that that book for me really just changed my

1:36:21.680 --> 1:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking of who do I want to be around, who

1:36:23.360 --> 1:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do I want to spend my time? With what things matter,

1:36:26.000 --> 1:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what things don't? How do I get everything that doesn't

1:36:28.200 --> 1:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>matter away from me and focus more on the things

1:36:31.040 --> 1:36:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that do matter? And so I it was became an

1:36:33.720 --> 1:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting time in my life to read that book. It's

1:36:35.439 --> 1:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the only book I've read more than once. UM. I

1:36:38.240 --> 1:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it a lot. That that is quite fascinating. UM

1:36:41.479 --> 1:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tell us about a time you've failed and what you

1:36:43.880 --> 1:36:47.280
<v Speaker 1>learned from the experience. So I've I've failed many, many,

1:36:47.320 --> 1:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>many times. So I'll give you just some growing up experiences.

1:36:50.320 --> 1:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I I UM started a lot mowing

1:36:55.080 --> 1:36:56.519
<v Speaker 1>company with a friend, and I mean it was a

1:36:56.520 --> 1:36:58.800
<v Speaker 1>real deal. We were making some good money. And back

1:36:58.840 --> 1:37:01.479
<v Speaker 1>then you had to bag all the grass. And then

1:37:01.720 --> 1:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>some other people came along with these big machines and

1:37:04.840 --> 1:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't need to bag grass. It turned out.

1:37:06.800 --> 1:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>It's turned out people thought you need to do but

1:37:08.479 --> 1:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you didn't need to. It would take us like five

1:37:10.200 --> 1:37:11.439
<v Speaker 1>hours to do a long they would do it in

1:37:11.479 --> 1:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes. And you know, we were like, wow, we're

1:37:13.920 --> 1:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out of business. That was super quick. You know, we

1:37:15.640 --> 1:37:18.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand where this industry was going. I had an

1:37:18.720 --> 1:37:21.679
<v Speaker 1>idea for a T shirt. It was against drunk driving.

1:37:21.720 --> 1:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>My school wouldn't let us do it. It was a

1:37:24.000 --> 1:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Catholic school and it was a little racy. So we

1:37:26.360 --> 1:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>created the T shirt. I was we should just go

1:37:28.120 --> 1:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>make it. So I made it. Wound up selling like

1:37:30.160 --> 1:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand of T shirt. What was the T

1:37:32.760 --> 1:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>shirts saying that the school wouldn't let you. On the

1:37:34.920 --> 1:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>front it said sed drink, Scenic drive, Sedic die, and

1:37:37.439 --> 1:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on the back it said don't don't be you know,

1:37:40.080 --> 1:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>basically right. So so this winds up selling like a

1:37:44.760 --> 1:37:50.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand shirts Scenic Scenic drink, Scenic drive, Scenic give

1:37:50.560 --> 1:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>us the sceedic drink, Scenic Drives. I'm really regretting. I remember,

1:37:56.240 --> 1:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember those shirts. I had no idea that was

1:37:59.400 --> 1:38:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you those shirts until now, probably nobody did. I don't

1:38:02.720 --> 1:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>know why what door I've opened here, but I have

1:38:05.360 --> 1:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>found you can't find one online, thank god. So anyway,

1:38:09.720 --> 1:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then the wound up creating like cedic smoke and all

1:38:12.560 --> 1:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>created a whole line around this, were you doing anything

1:38:14.800 --> 1:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with the proceeds involving any drunk driving or mother's and

1:38:18.680 --> 1:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a donation that went back to Sad and Mad And

1:38:20.960 --> 1:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so this went on for you know, like two years,

1:38:24.000 --> 1:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, hey, I'm I'm not even in college. Do

1:38:26.200 --> 1:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I need to go to college? Well, here's what I

1:38:28.400 --> 1:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>learned about patents. So all of a sudden, the shirt

1:38:31.080 --> 1:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>went up all over the country. And I hadn't had

1:38:32.840 --> 1:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a trade, and that was it. I was at a

1:38:34.080 --> 1:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>business trademark. People were just stealing it. The printer I

1:38:37.200 --> 1:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>used stole it, so they basically took the art my

1:38:41.000 --> 1:38:43.559
<v Speaker 1>mama drawn and the sayings and then just copied the

1:38:43.560 --> 1:38:45.679
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. And so that was a hell of a lesson.

1:38:46.760 --> 1:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The biggest lesson though, was the music stores. You know,

1:38:49.280 --> 1:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>at one store, save the money out, got to to

1:38:51.800 --> 1:38:53.599
<v Speaker 1>save the money, got to force save the money, got

1:38:53.600 --> 1:38:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to eight, had three partners, bought out the three partners,

1:38:56.880 --> 1:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was about to graduate from law school, and I'm like,

1:38:58.880 --> 1:39:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you know what I might I bet if I stopped

1:39:01.640 --> 1:39:03.559
<v Speaker 1>opening stores, I can make a hundred grand doing this.

1:39:03.720 --> 1:39:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna work, you know, this is what I'm

1:39:05.560 --> 1:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. Napster came out. I M telling I think

1:39:10.280 --> 1:39:12.559
<v Speaker 1>it was a hundred days. Ever the last store was closed.

1:39:13.680 --> 1:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>My total take over my I think six years of

1:39:17.320 --> 1:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of running these and buying out all my partners was

1:39:20.000 --> 1:39:23.720
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand four hundred dollars. It calculated into cents per

1:39:23.760 --> 1:39:26.679
<v Speaker 1>hour spent in the store. But but you know what,

1:39:26.800 --> 1:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it was worth more than any college degree that I got.

1:39:30.400 --> 1:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It was an incredibly valuable experience. But it taught me

1:39:33.640 --> 1:39:37.519
<v Speaker 1>about how fast technology changes then And you can be

1:39:37.560 --> 1:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>growing and you can think your competition some music store

1:39:40.160 --> 1:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>across the street. Uh, it's not. It's something you're not

1:39:44.080 --> 1:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>even thinking about, right And I and I constantly look

1:39:47.160 --> 1:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at creative planning and say, what am I not thinking about?

1:39:50.800 --> 1:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>What can I do better? How can I stay in

1:39:52.720 --> 1:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>front of somebody else? How can I be the better offering?

1:39:56.120 --> 1:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>How can I, you know, do more for less? All

1:39:59.040 --> 1:40:02.519
<v Speaker 1>the time I'm asking question because I've been on the

1:40:02.520 --> 1:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>receiving end of capitalism. Capitalism is a death blow several

1:40:06.120 --> 1:40:08.479
<v Speaker 1>timepsle of times. Well Andy Grove had it right, only

1:40:08.520 --> 1:40:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the paranoid survivor. Um, what do you do for fun?

1:40:11.600 --> 1:40:13.639
<v Speaker 1>What do you do when you're not helping people plan

1:40:13.760 --> 1:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for their financial futures? So I I love UM short trips.

1:40:18.120 --> 1:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's probably my favorite thing where I can. If I'm

1:40:19.880 --> 1:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>going to see a client in Boston, I'll you know,

1:40:22.520 --> 1:40:24.479
<v Speaker 1>take the whole family and I'll go make a weekend

1:40:24.520 --> 1:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of it, and and I can kind of get Griswold

1:40:26.960 --> 1:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. You know my kids. My kids are like,

1:40:28.920 --> 1:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so I've you have to explain the European vacation reference.

1:40:33.400 --> 1:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I find myself the problem with getting older isn't the

1:40:36.720 --> 1:40:40.679
<v Speaker 1>body falling apart, it's all of your cultural references fail.

1:40:40.800 --> 1:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>With the younger generation, I try to cram too much

1:40:43.120 --> 1:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>trip in the two little types. So I've tried to

1:40:44.880 --> 1:40:46.519
<v Speaker 1>lay off that and just go, look, I'm gonna going

1:40:46.560 --> 1:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to a city. We're gonna do two or three things

1:40:48.800 --> 1:40:52.519
<v Speaker 1>that are fun. But I think that America's amazing cities,

1:40:52.560 --> 1:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and so we've tried to hit every city that has

1:40:54.280 --> 1:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a baseball stadium where three force of the way done that.

1:40:57.280 --> 1:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That's been a complete blast. And I try to cram

1:40:59.840 --> 1:41:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that and wherever I possibly can, which is rare because

1:41:02.400 --> 1:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got three kids that are teenagers and they all

1:41:04.200 --> 1:41:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have like twenty seven sports. And have you seen the

1:41:06.800 --> 1:41:09.240
<v Speaker 1>book thirty six Hours in I think it's the New

1:41:09.320 --> 1:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>York Times puts it out. I haven't. Oh, so this

1:41:11.960 --> 1:41:15.479
<v Speaker 1>is basically every the top two hundred or four hundred

1:41:15.479 --> 1:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>cities in the country, you're gonna spend thirty six hours

1:41:18.360 --> 1:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the city. Here's what you need to see. Here's

1:41:20.280 --> 1:41:24.240
<v Speaker 1>what man could use that book like eight years ago. Well,

1:41:24.240 --> 1:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you have some cities left, but it's uh,

1:41:26.920 --> 1:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting books. You should look at it.

1:41:29.080 --> 1:41:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the industry for a second. What are

1:41:31.760 --> 1:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you most optimistic about within the financial services industry today

1:41:36.680 --> 1:41:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and what might you be pessimistic about within that same industry.

1:41:39.680 --> 1:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm optimistic about is I think the consumer

1:41:42.720 --> 1:41:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is very close to finally getting what they deserve right.

1:41:45.800 --> 1:41:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean taken long enough to take it a long, long, long,

1:41:48.680 --> 1:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>long time, and I think we're almost there. I think

1:41:52.080 --> 1:41:54.439
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to a world someday where every advisor

1:41:54.479 --> 1:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is a fiduciary, that the firm that's advising the client

1:41:57.120 --> 1:41:59.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't own their own products, that they get to know

1:41:59.800 --> 1:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the line a little bit before they invest their money,

1:42:01.840 --> 1:42:03.599
<v Speaker 1>and that they do all that at a reasonable price.

1:42:04.080 --> 1:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I had taken a long, long, long time. I think

1:42:06.920 --> 1:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we're well on our way there. That gives me a

1:42:08.800 --> 1:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism. I felt like the industry has been

1:42:10.840 --> 1:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>broken for a long time. Now we could be really

1:42:13.320 --> 1:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>close to there and have it not be fixed. You

1:42:14.960 --> 1:42:16.519
<v Speaker 1>know by the time when you and I are still working,

1:42:16.560 --> 1:42:18.519
<v Speaker 1>it might not be I still might not be fixed,

1:42:18.560 --> 1:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly on the path to getting closer. Even

1:42:22.080 --> 1:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>if the government decided not to embrace the fiduciary standard.

1:42:25.520 --> 1:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the market is That's exactly right. I

1:42:28.400 --> 1:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think the market is what's forcing most of this. The

1:42:30.840 --> 1:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>market is what has forced lower mutual fund fees and

1:42:33.360 --> 1:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>lower commissions and disclosing proprietary products, and all the markets

1:42:37.320 --> 1:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>pushing that. The government has done a phenomenally horrible job

1:42:40.880 --> 1:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in this space. And so I think that

1:42:43.160 --> 1:42:46.599
<v Speaker 1>that you're right. I think capitalism itself is forcing us

1:42:46.640 --> 1:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to get where we need to be. Pessimistic. Um, I

1:42:49.920 --> 1:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about two things. I think one, UM, I think

1:42:55.000 --> 1:42:57.679
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a cybersecurity attack on a major

1:42:57.680 --> 1:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>financial institution that succeeds that so point in the coming

1:43:00.840 --> 1:43:03.479
<v Speaker 1>years that is horrifying. Is and and I don't think

1:43:03.800 --> 1:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't I know institutions are worried about the very

1:43:06.920 --> 1:43:10.679
<v Speaker 1>big institutions. I don't think we quite know what that's

1:43:10.720 --> 1:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna do to the average American when that happens. Is

1:43:13.800 --> 1:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>everything going to be in mattresses? I mean, the post crisis,

1:43:18.760 --> 1:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>post cybersecurity, if we get a serious breach of a

1:43:23.560 --> 1:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>major institution, you know, a trillion plus institution, of which

1:43:26.920 --> 1:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a whole bunch of them. Um, that is

1:43:30.120 --> 1:43:34.479
<v Speaker 1>enough to freeze capitalism for a while, I think, And

1:43:34.520 --> 1:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's gonna be very interesting to see

1:43:37.880 --> 1:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if that can be prevented, uh, and if it happens,

1:43:42.560 --> 1:43:44.760
<v Speaker 1>how our economy is going to react to it. The

1:43:44.760 --> 1:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>other thing I worry about is you look at what

1:43:46.520 --> 1:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>happened in Saudi Arabia or I think we're debating who

1:43:50.320 --> 1:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who those those drones that went in and the oil

1:43:54.320 --> 1:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>up the oil fields right before they were going public.

1:43:57.560 --> 1:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not brain surgery, right, And I think that we

1:44:01.200 --> 1:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>look at nine eleven as like an impossible You know,

1:44:03.840 --> 1:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got all these measures in place to do all

1:44:06.120 --> 1:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>all these things to protect things, but at the end

1:44:08.840 --> 1:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the day, a kid in the garage with ten

1:44:11.120 --> 1:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>drones and the internet can cause a lot of damage.

1:44:15.479 --> 1:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I am I am concerned about that what it

1:44:18.280 --> 1:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>does to the way we live with each other, you know,

1:44:20.280 --> 1:44:22.879
<v Speaker 1>from a personal level, you know, kind of your kids, grandkids,

1:44:22.920 --> 1:44:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thinking, and from your specific question about

1:44:25.600 --> 1:44:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry, what does it do to economics? Like

1:44:28.439 --> 1:44:30.479
<v Speaker 1>if you remember after nine eleven, no one went to

1:44:30.520 --> 1:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the movies, everything, no one went to the months, there

1:44:33.200 --> 1:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was a cocoon effect for months. This to me would

1:44:36.160 --> 1:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be much worse because people would be like, well, wait

1:44:39.280 --> 1:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a second. You know nine eleven at least requires some

1:44:42.760 --> 1:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>strategicy and some breakdown and defenses. But and a physical event,

1:44:47.439 --> 1:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not a cyber events. Right. If if we move into

1:44:49.800 --> 1:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a world where there's a cyber event or you know,

1:44:52.720 --> 1:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some teenager with drones causes havoc in Times square, I

1:44:56.800 --> 1:44:59.639
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be a cocooning effect that we're

1:44:59.680 --> 1:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>not we've never thought about, are prepared for. I think

1:45:02.880 --> 1:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>those are the real, the real threats to the economy

1:45:06.439 --> 1:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that because you look at the economy is very resilient.

1:45:08.479 --> 1:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It can get through everything. Bretto Uch pot is gonna

1:45:10.960 --> 1:45:12.639
<v Speaker 1>cost more ten years from now than it does today,

1:45:12.800 --> 1:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and like you, shoes are gonna cost more ten years

1:45:14.360 --> 1:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from now than they do today. The market's going to

1:45:15.920 --> 1:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>go up into the right the way it always has.

1:45:17.960 --> 1:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>But these kind of things are the kind of things

1:45:20.720 --> 1:45:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that can change that that narrative. And so those are

1:45:23.760 --> 1:45:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the things that I think about when I think about

1:45:25.640 --> 1:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>existential threats to the norm. Huh. Fascinating. And our final

1:45:30.200 --> 1:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>two questions. A recent college grad comes to you and

1:45:33.439 --> 1:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>says they're interested in financial services as a career. What

1:45:37.240 --> 1:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice do you give them? So first I'd say,

1:45:39.560 --> 1:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's kind of like show me your friends.

1:45:41.040 --> 1:45:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll show you who you are. You know, you give

1:45:42.640 --> 1:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>four people you hang out with the most. I don't

1:45:44.200 --> 1:45:45.760
<v Speaker 1>need to meet you. I can pretty much tell you

1:45:46.240 --> 1:45:49.439
<v Speaker 1>what what kind of guy you're like. Don't just go

1:45:49.520 --> 1:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhere for experience. Try to get to a place that

1:45:52.640 --> 1:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is aligned with the values that you're you're trying to

1:45:55.200 --> 1:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do right, So try to get if you're focused on

1:45:57.680 --> 1:46:00.639
<v Speaker 1>being a fiduciary and be based or you only get

1:46:00.640 --> 1:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>into an r a A. Just start there right, Try

1:46:04.080 --> 1:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into the right environment to begin with. Second,

1:46:07.280 --> 1:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>create separation between you and other people. And I think

1:46:10.920 --> 1:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of things. One of the interview process.

1:46:12.720 --> 1:46:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm always fascinating when somebody goes, well, I'm coming here

1:46:15.439 --> 1:46:17.439
<v Speaker 1>for experience, or I'm coming here because I can think

1:46:17.439 --> 1:46:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I learned this and that. Imagine, uh, somebody going to

1:46:20.520 --> 1:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>an NFL tryout and going I'm here because I want

1:46:22.439 --> 1:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to learn to get to get better, and I want

1:46:25.800 --> 1:46:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you want somebody who's gonna come. Here's how I can

1:46:27.880 --> 1:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>help you win. You know, here's what so talk about.

1:46:31.040 --> 1:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>How you can help the place that you're coming into

1:46:33.320 --> 1:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>now once you show up, Um, you can differentiate yourself

1:46:38.600 --> 1:46:41.439
<v Speaker 1>by going the extra mile. This is an industry where

1:46:41.479 --> 1:46:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy to go to the the extra mile. I mean,

1:46:43.320 --> 1:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things you can do more for

1:46:44.720 --> 1:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>your client or your employer, and it's not hard to

1:46:47.880 --> 1:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>separate yourself from your peers if you are willing to

1:46:51.360 --> 1:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stay a little later, or take on a project or

1:46:53.680 --> 1:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>offer your help. I mean, even with hundreds of people.

1:46:57.240 --> 1:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I am very aware of the people within creative planning

1:46:59.720 --> 1:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that do that, especially those that are starting out. And

1:47:02.760 --> 1:47:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so you tend to get judged in the first thirty

1:47:06.320 --> 1:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>days when you're at work. The reality is we all

1:47:09.280 --> 1:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>judge each other in the first few seconds of seeing

1:47:11.080 --> 1:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>each other. There's a whole book about this called You've

1:47:12.960 --> 1:47:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Got Three Seconds, and basically the ideas when you meet

1:47:15.640 --> 1:47:17.519
<v Speaker 1>somebody in a few seconds, you've decided what you think

1:47:17.520 --> 1:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of them, and it's up to them to dig themselves

1:47:19.080 --> 1:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>out of that hole or they're gonna go up or

1:47:20.920 --> 1:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>down later over time, but you've kind of put you

1:47:23.120 --> 1:47:25.439
<v Speaker 1>put an anchor on them. The same thing happens when

1:47:25.479 --> 1:47:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you're employed. Don't grow into it, come in hard, come

1:47:28.560 --> 1:47:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in strong. If it's the ground running, it's the same

1:47:30.400 --> 1:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I try to do with the client. I try

1:47:31.960 --> 1:47:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to give that client as much value upfront as I can,

1:47:34.840 --> 1:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're going, Wow, this is I made the right decision.

1:47:38.160 --> 1:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>You want the employer to feel the same way about you, huh.

1:47:41.240 --> 1:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And our final question, what do you know about the

1:47:43.920 --> 1:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>world of investing and financial planning today? You wish you

1:47:47.920 --> 1:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>knew twenty five or so years ago when you were

1:47:50.040 --> 1:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>first getting started. Well, I mean it took all the

1:47:52.160 --> 1:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>way until, you know, from oh four until to put

1:47:56.000 --> 1:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>all the pieces together, and it was really like hearing

1:47:58.080 --> 1:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from clients, Oh I need this, I need at and

1:48:00.640 --> 1:48:02.720
<v Speaker 1>then going well, I need to build a service to

1:48:02.760 --> 1:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>do that. So I always had a very strong bias

1:48:04.439 --> 1:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>against product. I don't want to own anything where I

1:48:06.240 --> 1:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>make more money, and a very strong bias towards service

1:48:09.200 --> 1:48:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and value. How do I deliver more services? I wish

1:48:12.560 --> 1:48:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I had the vision and no four to go. These

1:48:14.720 --> 1:48:17.280
<v Speaker 1>were all the services that were needed and really found

1:48:17.280 --> 1:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to build it out all on day one

1:48:20.040 --> 1:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>instead of taking you know, fourteen years to build it.

1:48:23.200 --> 1:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I I told our team at our last annual meeting

1:48:25.880 --> 1:48:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that for the first time, I feel like I'm at

1:48:27.320 --> 1:48:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the starting line. I feel like the first time I

1:48:30.840 --> 1:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have an offense and a defense, and an offensive coordinator

1:48:33.960 --> 1:48:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and a defensive coordinator. Up until now, we've been playing

1:48:36.240 --> 1:48:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with an incomplete, incomplete team and complete coaching. We didn't

1:48:39.960 --> 1:48:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have all the piece we have the special teams. We've

1:48:42.280 --> 1:48:44.800
<v Speaker 1>got it all now. Um, and you know, I wish

1:48:44.800 --> 1:48:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I had a time machine. I could go go have

1:48:46.600 --> 1:48:49.439
<v Speaker 1>started that way. But to be fair, you have you

1:48:49.520 --> 1:48:52.559
<v Speaker 1>were path dependent. You had to travel that route in

1:48:52.680 --> 1:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>order to figure out what all those pieces were. That's true,

1:48:55.600 --> 1:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so but that's still still quite fascinating. Thank you, Peter

1:48:59.000 --> 1:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for being so generous with your time. I've I've had

1:49:00.880 --> 1:49:03.599
<v Speaker 1>you in here for two hours, and uh, most people

1:49:03.800 --> 1:49:06.760
<v Speaker 1>fade by by sixty minutes. In fine, you were great.

1:49:06.800 --> 1:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed it. Barry. We have been speaking with

1:49:09.040 --> 1:49:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Mluke. He is the c I O and President

1:49:12.479 --> 1:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of Creative Planning. If you enjoy this conversation. Well, look

1:49:16.400 --> 1:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>up an intro, down an intron Apple iTunes and you

1:49:18.680 --> 1:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can see any of our previous three hundred such conversations

1:49:22.880 --> 1:49:25.559
<v Speaker 1>we've had over the past five years. Where has the

1:49:25.600 --> 1:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>time gone? Um? We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

1:49:29.560 --> 1:49:33.439
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

1:49:34.000 --> 1:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and give us a delightful review on Apple iTunes.

1:49:37.560 --> 1:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You can check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com.

1:49:40.280 --> 1:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for the Daily Reads at Reholts dot com.

1:49:43.400 --> 1:49:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:49:45.320 --> 1:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>crack staff that helps me put together this podcast each week.

1:49:49.439 --> 1:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolin O'Brien is our audio engineer, Michael Batnick is my

1:49:53.080 --> 1:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>head of research, and Michael Boyle is our producer. I'm

1:49:57.000 --> 1:50:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Barry Riholts. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

1:50:00.200 --> 1:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.