Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Yesterday President Trump took
Speaker 1: actions saw the immigration crisis, and today we realized that
Speaker 1: this was really a Democrats hate Trump crisis. That's right,
Speaker 1: This was for political gain. They have no real interest
Speaker 1: in fixing the overall immigration system. They want open borders,
Speaker 1: they want Trump to bend the knee, and they are
Speaker 1: looking to use this as a wedge issue to win
Speaker 1: the mid terms. We'll talk about that, plus updates on
Speaker 1: where we are going with the investigation into the investigators
Speaker 1: at the d o J and FBI. Plus liberals love
Speaker 1: to track down conservatives and yell at them at restaurants.
Speaker 1: This is a troubling trend. We'll get into what we
Speaker 1: can do about it and more coming up on The
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great
Speaker 1: American Again, The buck Sexton Show begins. Former CIA analysts
Speaker 1: remember this would lead to family internment camps. Trump once
Speaker 1: again has lied. Course, there was a crisis that he
Speaker 1: created and attempted to address today, but he didn't go
Speaker 1: anywhere year far enough, just because the arsonist comes back
Speaker 1: and throws a bucket of water in the fire, doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that they didn't start the fire in the first place.
Speaker 1: Do you give the president any credit for stopping a
Speaker 1: crisis of his own making their alteration of the policy
Speaker 1: in their heartlessness. If they're not going to lift a
Speaker 1: finger to reunite these kids with their families, then the
Speaker 1: American public needs to stay outraged. This is nothing short
Speaker 1: of inhumane, barbaric, and frankly immoral. Moving kids from DHS
Speaker 1: cages to d O d KH just doesn't solve the problem.
Speaker 1: My administration is also acting swiftly to addres us the
Speaker 1: illegal immigration crisis on the southern border. Loopholes and our
Speaker 1: immigration laws all supported by extremist open border democrats. And
Speaker 1: that's what they are, their extremist open border democrats. If
Speaker 1: you look at Nancy Pelosia, you look at Chuck Schumer,
Speaker 1: you'll see takes where they wanted to have borders, They
Speaker 1: needed borders for security just a short while ago, a
Speaker 1: number of years ago. I see Chuck Schumer, we must
Speaker 1: have borders, Hillary Clinton, we must have borders. If people
Speaker 1: penetrate our borders, we must get them out of our
Speaker 1: country now. All of a sudden, the big open border
Speaker 1: people to hold big Conjab welcome to the bucks next
Speaker 1: and show everybody. Short version here is that Trump is
Speaker 1: right and all those haters that played before him are wrong. Man,
Speaker 1: it's amazing to see this isn't it here we are.
Speaker 1: The president finally says, Okay, well, well I'll listen to
Speaker 1: this outcry. I I care about kids too, big X
Speaker 1: is the problem, and now all the US Oh he
Speaker 1: made the problem. You know, the problem was made by
Speaker 1: the Obama administration choosing the path of lawlessness because it
Speaker 1: was politically convenient for them. Hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: have used the oh I have a child, let me
Speaker 1: into America excuse now to get into the country, and
Speaker 1: over them have not showed for their hearings. Over so,
Speaker 1: this just was another way of getting a wave of
Speaker 1: illegals into the country and Trumps in or We're not
Speaker 1: going to do this anymore. But there are so many
Speaker 1: people that are used to thinking that this is the
Speaker 1: the easy way, this is the open door into America.
Speaker 1: Show up with a kid that we we weren't prepared
Speaker 1: for housing all of these people, because that's not what
Speaker 1: we're supposed to be doing is something we're supposed to work.
Speaker 1: But Trump said, okay, fine, I get it. Kids will
Speaker 1: take care of the kids. And now they're just finding
Speaker 1: another way, another way to complain about the president. This
Speaker 1: has always been about how much they hate Trump more
Speaker 1: than it's about hating kids. I mean, whether it's about
Speaker 1: helping kids rather, this has always been about how much
Speaker 1: they despise the President of the United States. And I
Speaker 1: applaud him for saying that they are extremest open borders democrats,
Speaker 1: because that's what they are. No one ever asked the question,
Speaker 1: it seems like to me, at least I don't ever
Speaker 1: see it asked on TV. Who is not allowed to stay?
Speaker 1: Does anyone get deported anymore? Okay, only violent criminals. Violent criminals.
Speaker 1: We don't really care that much about them being deported
Speaker 1: because they're going to spend the next twenty or thirty
Speaker 1: years in American prison. I guess what we're paying for
Speaker 1: them anyway, right, So the whole we're gonna deport violent criminals. Yeah,
Speaker 1: after they've served their sentence here, so the taxpayers still
Speaker 1: on the hook for it. By the time they actually
Speaker 1: get deported. We've had we've had to deal with it.
Speaker 1: Does anyone else get does anyone else get kicked out
Speaker 1: of the country. I do recall, and I want to
Speaker 1: do a little more of a deep dive into this
Speaker 1: to make sure that I see what end up happening.
Speaker 1: But you know, when there was the last time I
Speaker 1: can remember, there was a little bit of opposition to
Speaker 1: allowing people into this country and claiming asylum. It was
Speaker 1: from Democrats and it had to do with Iraqis, but
Speaker 1: it was a very particular kind of a rocky Iraqi Christians.
Speaker 1: Because Christians fleeing the Muslim world then seeking assign in
Speaker 1: the United States doesn't really it doesn't really get the
Speaker 1: left excited, and they don't that doesn't make them feel
Speaker 1: all warm and fuzzy for a whole bunch of reasons
Speaker 1: that we could talk about another time. But here we
Speaker 1: are again with the President United States trying to do
Speaker 1: the best he can under the circumstances. You know, you
Speaker 1: could say he and they keep saying this is a
Speaker 1: problem of Trump's creation. The truth is this is a
Speaker 1: problem that Donald Trump inherited from Barack Obama, and Barack
Speaker 1: Obama created the problem with his lawlessness. The alternative here, folks,
Speaker 1: was to continue the Obama catch and release policy at
Speaker 1: the southern border, which just allows so many people to
Speaker 1: come into the country. It means no consequences for a
Speaker 1: legal entry, for failed legal entry. It's not that hard
Speaker 1: to come into this country illegally. Look at the guy
Speaker 1: who shot Kate Steinley. What have you had? Been deported brucer, Mike,
Speaker 1: what was it seven times? I think seven times? Okay,
Speaker 1: he's not James Bond. He wasn't wearing disguises or being
Speaker 1: para dropped into the United States. He just snuck across
Speaker 1: the border seven times. And now someone's dead because we
Speaker 1: couldn't keep him out of the country. And now Kate
Speaker 1: Steinley's life has been taken from her, her family shattered
Speaker 1: as a result of our inability to keep people from
Speaker 1: coming into the country illegally. And you know, the basic
Speaker 1: economics of this do not work out, folks. You cannot
Speaker 1: have a massive welfare state and unrestricted immigration from the
Speaker 1: Third World, from the developing world, from impoverished countries that
Speaker 1: do not speak our language. It does not benefit us.
Speaker 1: He will say, oh, buck, but the history of immigration
Speaker 1: this country wrong. The history of immigration in this country
Speaker 1: is periods of open door for immigrants from some places
Speaker 1: and then stop, let's assimilate, Let's allow things to to
Speaker 1: settle a bit. It has been peaks and valleys. It
Speaker 1: has not just been you know, people always refer to
Speaker 1: the the the mm Lazarus poem and the Statue of
Speaker 1: Liberty like that's policy. It's not policy. We did not
Speaker 1: say give me your tide, you your hungry. If you
Speaker 1: showed up at Ellis Island and you know they thought
Speaker 1: that you had you know, tuberculosis or you know, then
Speaker 1: they turn you back. Do they ever in the media,
Speaker 1: did they ever talk about, how about with with the
Speaker 1: great waves of immigration, uh, including Italians and Germans in
Speaker 1: the early twentieth century, that a good percentage something in
Speaker 1: the neighborhood of them went back. Why would they go back?
Speaker 1: Because if it was working here, guess what. There was
Speaker 1: no welfare state to tap into. There was no Hey,
Speaker 1: the taxpayer is gonna give me healthcare, gonna give me
Speaker 1: how is ain't gonna know? It was tough here people
Speaker 1: on back home. You don't have that anymore. America is
Speaker 1: a great place to show up and expect other people
Speaker 1: to take care of things for you. And when you
Speaker 1: look at the usage of of welfare that then gets
Speaker 1: transferred to illegal immigrants, because all you need is, you know,
Speaker 1: if you have a kid and one person in the
Speaker 1: household and illegals, and there's so many end runs on
Speaker 1: the system. Never mind what happens in and I've seen
Speaker 1: this my own eyes, Okay, what happens in emergency rooms,
Speaker 1: how they're used as a first line of care by illegals,
Speaker 1: which clogs emergency rooms. Which you I'm telling you you
Speaker 1: will be very displeased if this has never happened to
Speaker 1: you when you show up in an emergency room because
Speaker 1: you know, you had a little accident with the electric
Speaker 1: saw in your in your garage and you really need help,
Speaker 1: and someone's there getting a vision test. You know, someone's
Speaker 1: there for an ear an ear ache. Lots of people
Speaker 1: there for that, and and by the way, you're paying
Speaker 1: for that too. So you know, there's so many lies
Speaker 1: about this issue that have been out there. And you'll
Speaker 1: just notice the primary effort has been to make this
Speaker 1: about Trump and about how terrible he is, how mean
Speaker 1: he is, how awful he is. But you know they
Speaker 1: also have gone after other administration officials. Now, they went
Speaker 1: after Ivanka full disclosure, Ivanka and I were pretty friendly
Speaker 1: growing up, So there's that. I think I've said that
Speaker 1: to you all before. You know. So she's very busy
Speaker 1: these days, so I don't get a chance to catch
Speaker 1: up with her. But she's she's a senior visor the president,
Speaker 1: also the president's daughter. And they're blaming Ivanka for this stuff,
Speaker 1: to blame nine And it's her silence amid the crisis
Speaker 1: that is so striking. And it's not the first time
Speaker 1: she has done this. I'm going to say something here
Speaker 1: that is not out of the realm of possibility, that
Speaker 1: the patriarchical pole and this family really is so strong
Speaker 1: that she does hell intimidated that she does feel like
Speaker 1: she can't do that. She can do this. This This
Speaker 1: is a moment Ivanka Trump stepping up and taking charge
Speaker 1: of reuniting those two thousand three Hunt It children, those
Speaker 1: lost children, those lost toddlers, those lost infants, those lost
Speaker 1: young girls. That would be using her position. If she
Speaker 1: could show the world that she cares about mothers and children, um,
Speaker 1: that would be good, and that if she can't that
Speaker 1: no one's going to ever respect her again, because this
Speaker 1: whole thing has been a joke. This position that she
Speaker 1: holds is a joke. That's pretty harsh, isn't it? For
Speaker 1: Mika there? Whenever I want really astute political analysis, I
Speaker 1: turned to Mika because you know Brginsky and stuff. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it's pretty pretty amazing. But do we do we have
Speaker 1: the clip of of Joe and Mika where he tries
Speaker 1: to hold her head or something that we gotta get that,
Speaker 1: we gotta we gotta get that one oh man, funny
Speaker 1: funny stuff. So yeah, this is what's happening, folks. There
Speaker 1: they're lying about all this stuff, and and here you know,
Speaker 1: you know who really you know who nailed it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I like to think I nailed on radio every night,
Speaker 1: But you know who really nailed this issue? I got?
Speaker 1: I got even credit new Newt Gingrich. This really is
Speaker 1: just about using kids as the as the trojan horse
Speaker 1: for open borders, and because the Democrats love this. Right,
Speaker 1: you're seeing a pattern. You're seeing a pattern. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you about the pattern in a second. But here here's
Speaker 1: what Newt said about open borders play. He signed an
Speaker 1: executive order. Oddly enough, the very Democrats who wanted him
Speaker 1: back came back immediately and didn't like the fact that
Speaker 1: he acted. But but the President has the right position,
Speaker 1: which is, yes, we want to keep children with their families,
Speaker 1: but we also want to control the border. The Democrats
Speaker 1: want to use the children as an excuse to go
Speaker 1: to an open border where tens of millions of people
Speaker 1: could flood into the US. Remember, there's been a huge
Speaker 1: increase because of the cartels, because of the Mexican government.
Speaker 1: The Obama administration had a zero toler his policy. You
Speaker 1: can find quote after quote of the Obama administration leadership
Speaker 1: saying We're not gonna let people come across the border illegally.
Speaker 1: It's true the Obama aministration was saying they weren't gonnallow this,
Speaker 1: but they did allow it. Right, they lie. They were
Speaker 1: lying in the issue of immigration, which is no surprise,
Speaker 1: Democrats lie all the time, but on the use of
Speaker 1: children for political ends. Here's the big pattern Democrats. I
Speaker 1: feel like they made some headway after years of not
Speaker 1: getting anywhere with the gun debate. Just they'd always they try,
Speaker 1: and they'd have some some buffoon like Piers Morgan or
Speaker 1: something out there. Oh that's great, let's have an overpaid,
Speaker 1: pompous British guy explained the Second Amendment to us badly,
Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, he's never fired a weapon.
Speaker 1: Let's have that guy telling us, you know, what's wrong
Speaker 1: with you? Why can't you just get rid of you
Speaker 1: all guns? You know? Yeah, well not exactly the prefensive
Speaker 1: you seeing that. Yeah, give Piers, we're going a big show.
Speaker 1: That's a that's a brilliant idea. Oh. Anyway, but they've
Speaker 1: managed to and even Obama was not able to get
Speaker 1: any make any headway really on gun control. But they
Speaker 1: think that with the Parkland kids and deploying the Parkland
Speaker 1: kids not just on gun control, but also in a
Speaker 1: few cases as as a as weapons against conservative media targets.
Speaker 1: We saw that right there. They weren't just limiting themselves
Speaker 1: to gun control. After a while, it was, you know,
Speaker 1: they would criticize people, and if they got criticized back,
Speaker 1: Look what you're saying about the children. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: they've been traumatized. Why are you so evil? They did
Speaker 1: it with Parkland, they did it on guns, and now
Speaker 1: they're doing it on immigration the border. They are using children,
Speaker 1: they are exploiting the fear, the suffering of kids for
Speaker 1: clearly partisan ends. It's a disgrace because ultimately this also
Speaker 1: falls into that great separation between conservatives and liberals where
Speaker 1: I think considered. I think liberals are wrong. I just
Speaker 1: think they're wrong. I think that they don't really understand
Speaker 1: human nature and society and his are and I think
Speaker 1: that they're just wrong. Liberals don't understand or know any
Speaker 1: of those things and think that you and I are evil.
Speaker 1: We are evil, And our view of kids at the
Speaker 1: border is an extension of that, because they, deep down
Speaker 1: really believe that you and I don't care about seeing
Speaker 1: you know, a ten month old who's crying because he
Speaker 1: missed his mommy. Of course we get sad about that.
Speaker 1: Of course we wanted to be able to see mommy.
Speaker 1: But we're also dealing with a national policy crisis, and
Speaker 1: we're trying to keep a country together here, and there
Speaker 1: are limitations on how comfortable and happy we can make
Speaker 1: everybody when people are breaking the law on a massive
Speaker 1: scale time and time again. As you can tell, we're
Speaker 1: just getting started here. Eight four to five, eight four
Speaker 1: four nine, Buck. If you would like to chat, Tabe,
Speaker 1: what do you think about this? We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: So the Democrats want open borders, Let everybody come in,
Speaker 1: let everybody pour in. We don't care. Let them come
Speaker 1: in from the Middle East, let them come in from
Speaker 1: all over the place. We don't care. We're not gonna
Speaker 1: let it happen. And by the way, today I signed
Speaker 1: an executive order. We're gonna keep families together, but the
Speaker 1: border is gonna be just as tough as it's been.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't care about the impact of uncontrolled migration on
Speaker 1: your communities, your schools, your hospitals, your jobs are your safety.
Speaker 1: Democrats put illegal immigrants before they put American citizens. What
Speaker 1: the hell is going on? Illegal immigration costs our country
Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of dollars. Will imagine if we could
Speaker 1: spend that money to help bring opportunity to our inner
Speaker 1: cities and our rural communities, and our roads and our
Speaker 1: highways and our schools. You know, this is where Trump
Speaker 1: is just incredible, folks. There is no other Republican period
Speaker 1: who can make as strong and compelling a case about
Speaker 1: this as Trump does and really just talking about really
Speaker 1: get into it. You know, this is what's going on.
Speaker 1: Illegal immigration is a massive transfer of wealth from you,
Speaker 1: the taxpayer, you the citizen, to non citizens. It is
Speaker 1: a It is a massive campaign of lawlessness by Democrats
Speaker 1: who are hoping to import constituencies that will vote for
Speaker 1: them and keep them in power. And they are utterly
Speaker 1: and completely devoted to this idea. Now, I mean, when
Speaker 1: you look at what democrats are, what is the top
Speaker 1: of the Democrat agenda? It is abortion, illegal immigration, and
Speaker 1: probably higher taxes, socialized medicine. Maybe that's what they want
Speaker 1: to do. That is what they are focused on. By
Speaker 1: the way, speaking of making the case shameless plug here
Speaker 1: the Freedom Huld with Buck Sex and is live. Maybe
Speaker 1: it is up the new podcast. Please please go check
Speaker 1: it out, subscribe to it. You go do the iTunes store,
Speaker 1: type in the Freedom Hunt with Buck Sex and we're
Speaker 1: just the Freedom Hunt. It'll pop up, you'll see it.
Speaker 1: We did a show yesterday Comrade Commy Bear makes an appearance.
Speaker 1: So if you're wondering who the heck is Comrade Comedy Bear,
Speaker 1: you gotta download that podcast and please tell some friends
Speaker 1: about it. We want to grow that thing out. If
Speaker 1: we get to enough downloads on that show, you know
Speaker 1: what happens next, folks, We do a streaming video of
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt podcast. That's right. We're gonna start to
Speaker 1: do to live stream and then we're gonna start doing
Speaker 1: another and we might even have some folks who can
Speaker 1: join us via video chat on the live stream. I've
Speaker 1: got all kinds of crazy and fantastic ideas. More time
Speaker 1: for all of us to hang out, chat, talk about
Speaker 1: what matters, have some fun. That's the idea. So The
Speaker 1: Freedom Up with Buck Sexton. It is available on iTunes. Also,
Speaker 1: those you listening, please do give it a review hopefully
Speaker 1: hopefully five stars, but we'd like to see reviews up there.
Speaker 1: It pushes it up in the Apple Store. And uh
Speaker 1: and also if you write a nice thing about me
Speaker 1: or about the show, that helps because people read that
Speaker 1: stuff so and and please do it before the before
Speaker 1: the Libs find out that that this is going on,
Speaker 1: because then they'll try to do the one star. He's terrible,
Speaker 1: he's so mean. He does all these silly voices for Democrats,
Speaker 1: but like Republicans, he doesn't do the mean voices. Fact
Speaker 1: check true. But still go check out The Freedom Help
Speaker 1: with Buck Sexton on iTunes. He's back with you now
Speaker 1: because when it comes to the fight for truth, Funk
Speaker 1: never stops. Thank the Border Patrol. I think they're doing
Speaker 1: the best they can under the circumstances. They have handled
Speaker 1: this well. But the facilities just do not meet the
Speaker 1: need and we have to be helpful. Well. I hope
Speaker 1: that while some may have tried to politicize it, I
Speaker 1: hope that that was not the case. And I think
Speaker 1: anyone who comes here knows that this is not about
Speaker 1: an issue. It's about of value, and it's a value
Speaker 1: that we share, all Americans share, is that we uh,
Speaker 1: we will show how strong we are to the rest
Speaker 1: of the world on how we deal with this humanitarian
Speaker 1: opportunity or crisis that we have had some really reasonable
Speaker 1: stuff from Nancy Pelosi, you know, I mean she she
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi had just visited a child detention facility at
Speaker 1: the border and she you heard her, right you, saying
Speaker 1: they're doing the best they can this difficult situation. We're
Speaker 1: working on. This is the the best we can. And you know,
Speaker 1: Border patrol they deserve some credit for trying to handle this.
Speaker 1: They're not really meant for this, you know. I'm just
Speaker 1: like you know, Nancy, that's really Oh it was in
Speaker 1: when Obama was president. Oh okay, okay, that was that.
Speaker 1: That's the big difference. I see. That's amazing. Producer Mike,
Speaker 1: how that happens, same facilities, same problem, same thing happening,
Speaker 1: and yet you're not hearing her be like, hey, there
Speaker 1: is there concentration camps. No, She's like, yeah, look, it's tough.
Speaker 1: You know, they're doing the best they can. They got
Speaker 1: a difficult situation here. We're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna,
Speaker 1: you know, we're gonna rise to the challenge. What changed?
Speaker 1: Oh that's right, Trump is president, not Obama. Oh, the hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: The defining characteristic of liberalism is hypocrisy, as I keep saying,
Speaker 1: because it is so very very true. Wasn't that amazing? Guys?
Speaker 1: You probably were listening to that if you because you know,
Speaker 1: I had a little cheat sheet here, so I knew
Speaker 1: what year was. But you must have been thinking for
Speaker 1: a second. Pelosi, she's you know, she's not really dumping
Speaker 1: on the border patrol. She's saying, it's oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: because the border patrol at the time is part of
Speaker 1: the executive branch. And who was at the top of
Speaker 1: the executive branch in twenty fourteen. Oh that's right, Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: It's really hard on the border. I got a lot
Speaker 1: of people I went across the border. We got these
Speaker 1: tons of facultists and these little kids. We want to
Speaker 1: take carolt kids, but we want to secure border. Uh.
Speaker 1: And you know they didn't. They wanted to let the
Speaker 1: kids come into the country, and you know, tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of them. And part of this is I would
Speaker 1: just note no one ever discusses how by creating a
Speaker 1: huge incentive for children to be used as props to
Speaker 1: get entry for adults at the border, all the terrible
Speaker 1: stuff that happened as a result of that, really really
Speaker 1: bad things. Kids died, kids sexually assaulted, a lot of
Speaker 1: that happening. And you're you see little bits of reporting
Speaker 1: on this, not all that much, a little little bits
Speaker 1: of it here and there. You know, milani A Trump,
Speaker 1: the first lady, went down to the border, and the
Speaker 1: biggest thing I saw, the biggest report was that she
Speaker 1: was wearing And the media went crazy on this one.
Speaker 1: She's wearing some kind of fashion fashion jacket that said,
Speaker 1: I really don't care, do you? So? Milannia wore a
Speaker 1: thirty It's a thirty nine dollar jacket, which I'm sure
Speaker 1: is it is. It's sold out, isn't it, Mike. Everybody
Speaker 1: bought this. Once somebody sees something like this, it becomes
Speaker 1: a news story. Everybody buys it. Uh so, yeah, she
Speaker 1: said there's no She says, there's no hidden meaning to it.
Speaker 1: I don't think. I don't know. I don't know what
Speaker 1: to say about this one. I think that I don't
Speaker 1: think it was a hidden meaning thing. But it isn't.
Speaker 1: It wouldn't have been my choice. I'd say that it
Speaker 1: wouldn't wouldn't have been my choice. Mike, what do you
Speaker 1: think that the jacket? Was this just a just a
Speaker 1: thing that happened. I can't hear, Mike. Yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: think the thing that just happened. I don't believe in
Speaker 1: just haphazard accidents or mistakes. I think it was It's
Speaker 1: not to send a particular message, but just it poked
Speaker 1: the bear, get the media talking about it. I think
Speaker 1: that's what Trump's grave is doing. Yeah, because there's kind
Speaker 1: of an irony it, right, She where's that as she's
Speaker 1: going down to the Yeah there's no way. Yeah, you're right,
Speaker 1: there's no way. I just don't really understand what the
Speaker 1: messages I think you're at. They're just poking the bear.
Speaker 1: That would make sense. The media freaked out about this.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, Milania's careless coat. They wrote exactly, dude,
Speaker 1: they were in I mean, they lost their minds. It
Speaker 1: was they wrote said the cat in the hat. Uh yeah,
Speaker 1: this is there's the thing that happened. Uh. She was
Speaker 1: down there with the detention facility. And I want to
Speaker 1: just play some of the audio from what it was
Speaker 1: like the first ladies down there. She's taking this, you know,
Speaker 1: she's taking this off as a personal matter. Ivanka Trump
Speaker 1: tweeted about this today, So she's also taking it up
Speaker 1: as a as a personal uh an area of personal interest.
Speaker 1: But here's how here's what Malania said, play fourteen. I'm
Speaker 1: here to learn about your facility and to which I
Speaker 1: know you housed children on a long term basis. And
Speaker 1: I also like to ask you how it can help
Speaker 1: to these chooses to run out with your families as
Speaker 1: quickly as possible. So thank you again for all what
Speaker 1: you do. Okay, So you know she's just trying to
Speaker 1: figure out it's not a fact finding mission down there,
Speaker 1: and you know the first lady. Look, there's gotten a
Speaker 1: lot of attention. As I said, if we if this
Speaker 1: problem was being approached from the perspective in the press
Speaker 1: and and in this discussion of Hey, every everyone wants
Speaker 1: to take care of little kids. All right, Everyone wants
Speaker 1: little kids to be safe, to be fed, to be okay.
Speaker 1: No one wants the little kids through a trauma necessarily,
Speaker 1: we get it, okay, So what do we do about this?
Speaker 1: How do we fix this? But what the Democrats, dude,
Speaker 1: is they said, it's about kids trauma. Now it's about
Speaker 1: family trauma. It was you're putting kids in kittie prisons,
Speaker 1: and now if you're putting families and family prisons, well
Speaker 1: the alternative is just people get to come into the country.
Speaker 1: The alternative is that we don't really have an immigration
Speaker 1: system worthy of the name, which is what the Democrats want.
Speaker 1: By the way, that is what they want. Um. In fact,
Speaker 1: Newt laid it down on this one. Before we go
Speaker 1: back to Malani. Here's what Gingrich said about that exact
Speaker 1: point plate twelve. He signed an executive order to make
Speaker 1: sure children are not separated from their parents. They want
Speaker 1: now implement that. He has said, correctly, the Congress ought
Speaker 1: to change the law. After all, it's a law passed
Speaker 1: by Congress which caused this mess, plus two judicial decisions
Speaker 1: of the Congress. Ought to pass a law, and you
Speaker 1: already have Senator Schumer on the Democratics. So I'm basically
Speaker 1: saying he doesn't want to pass a law. Um, yeah,
Speaker 1: he really worries about the children unless it means Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and whim, at which point he doesn't worry about
Speaker 1: the children because he can't let Trump whim. I think
Speaker 1: this will in the end remind people how irresponsible and
Speaker 1: how intellectually dishonest the Democrats have become. Yep, absolutely true.
Speaker 1: Absolutely the case. This will remind people of how irresponsible
Speaker 1: the Democrats have become. And and that's one of the
Speaker 1: things that I'm trying to do here on the show.
Speaker 1: Just no good faith in this discussion at all. Really,
Speaker 1: it's very difficult. But hey, so Milannia's back to Milannia.
Speaker 1: I'm jumping around a little bit here. Back to Millania.
Speaker 1: So she wore this. I don't. I really don't care,
Speaker 1: do you code. I agree with Mike that there's no
Speaker 1: way you put that on and don't realize that it's
Speaker 1: saying something just you know, right, I mean, yeah, to
Speaker 1: see Mike keeps Mike keeps me on the straight and narrow,
Speaker 1: doesn't doesn't allow the just just because I'm the proprietor
Speaker 1: of the freedom hund doesn't mean that I get you,
Speaker 1: just like make it up as I go along in here.
Speaker 1: So Milannia then asked the detention center for the detention
Speaker 1: center employees about how often kids can speak to families
Speaker 1: here here This was a very interesting point. Here play
Speaker 1: I heard you have my tift eight children here, and
Speaker 1: those children how many times they speak with their relatives
Speaker 1: of families per week? For example, the children are allowed
Speaker 1: to communicate with their family twice they can attending the
Speaker 1: phone call. First, we have to ensure that the persons
Speaker 1: that their contact with their families are in before family.
Speaker 1: So there is a process they have to follow all
Speaker 1: of or our policies and regulations and make sure that
Speaker 1: we identify, positively identify that the persons that they're communicating
Speaker 1: with are indeed their family, and that could lead to
Speaker 1: verification of birth certificate kates photo identification. But they do
Speaker 1: communicate with their famis they're gonna make sure they're actually
Speaker 1: talking to family. Child trafficking has become a big problem
Speaker 1: at the border because of the policies the Obama administration
Speaker 1: pursued and the way that they disregarded certain aspects of
Speaker 1: the law. Think about that, I mean that that that's
Speaker 1: a consequence of this lawlessness, and you know, it never
Speaker 1: gets discussed here really, I mean very rarely gets discussed
Speaker 1: as part of all of this. You know, people that
Speaker 1: are bringing children the border that aren't really their kids,
Speaker 1: and then how do you handle that. I would also
Speaker 1: note that now you have the uh, the settling of
Speaker 1: a lot and not settle, but the temporary housing of
Speaker 1: a lot of these family units in the border. They're
Speaker 1: gonna go to d O D facilities. I think, although
Speaker 1: I might be wrong on this one, this is getting
Speaker 1: down the reads. I think that that may mean that
Speaker 1: the floor has consent decree from the nineties UH does
Speaker 1: not necessarily technically hold, so you might be able to
Speaker 1: keep them on a d D facility longer than twenty
Speaker 1: I could be wrong on that though, Uh. But they
Speaker 1: are moving to d D facilities, so they're gonna be
Speaker 1: on some military basis, which that they're gonna be house
Speaker 1: I assume, and and barracks a situation. So that's one
Speaker 1: consequence also of this of this executive order. But I
Speaker 1: would note that you're gonna probably see a lawsuit or
Speaker 1: that there's a liability that's going to come from the
Speaker 1: government housing these individuals. The moment that you know a
Speaker 1: child is attacked or or violated at one of these
Speaker 1: in any of these government facilities, because the child was
Speaker 1: kept with adults or with an adult that claimed to
Speaker 1: be a relative, you're gonna say, I think you're gonna
Speaker 1: see lawsuits from that. You're gonna see lawsuits across the
Speaker 1: board from people that are just trying to weigh the
Speaker 1: administration down and make life difficult for all things Trump.
Speaker 1: So that's part of it, right that they're probably, mark
Speaker 1: my words, they're probably going to have lawsuits that come
Speaker 1: against Trump from organizations like the A C l U
Speaker 1: for putting families together when technically lead really speaking, he
Speaker 1: doesn't really have the authority to do this. You know,
Speaker 1: the moment that you have a kid that's they're twenty
Speaker 1: one days instead of twenty, they're not gonna say, well,
Speaker 1: I mean, but this is they're keeping the family together
Speaker 1: and this is a good faith act by the government. Nope,
Speaker 1: they're gonna sue. So you can expect a lot of
Speaker 1: lawsuits and this there's no good faith in this discussion whatsoever.
Speaker 1: So this is this is it's been an important reminder folks,
Speaker 1: Democrats there's no honesty, there's no decency in the way
Speaker 1: they're approaching this issue. It's become very emotionalized for them.
Speaker 1: They are all about making this a Democrats good kind,
Speaker 1: caring Republicans evil conversation. Republicans are evil. I mean, while
Speaker 1: we're the ones that understand that if you do not
Speaker 1: have borders, you don't really have a country. A country
Speaker 1: beyond that is it's just a conception. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you don't control geographic territory, you are not a nation state.
Speaker 1: If anyone can come and go as they please and
Speaker 1: not have to really check in with you, that's an
Speaker 1: issue as an issue. But there will be more of
Speaker 1: these radical open borders type speaking in the days and
Speaker 1: weeks ahead. You'll see it. They're gaining steam right now.
Speaker 1: I mean, they they are growing in brazenness, and I
Speaker 1: think it's because they they view this as an open
Speaker 1: They view this as an opening right now. They really do.
Speaker 1: They think that people are coming over their study equation.
Speaker 1: Here's what I think. I think Trump knows that the
Speaker 1: American people are with him on this. In fact, there's
Speaker 1: a new poll from rass Mussin says that quote, when
Speaker 1: families are arrested and separated after attempting to enter the
Speaker 1: United States illegally. Fifty percent of likely U S voters
Speaker 1: to the parents are more to blame for breaking the law.
Speaker 1: Latest rass Mussin reports national telephone online survey finds that
Speaker 1: only thirty five percent believe the federal government is more
Speaker 1: to blame for enforcing the law. Here's another part, as folks,
Speaker 1: that I think it's lost in this whole conversation on
Speaker 1: this whole issue. Ultimately politically, not only is Trump right
Speaker 1: because the law is the law, Trump will win politically.
Speaker 1: Trump has come out of this once again with all
Speaker 1: these people arrayed against him, fighting as dirty as they can,
Speaker 1: all the hatred, all the nastiness. A majority of American
Speaker 1: people are gonna be with him on this one. And
Speaker 1: the majority of American people who go to the polls
Speaker 1: in the mid terms, I think are gonna remember this.
Speaker 1: They're gonna remember m eight four four buck. If you
Speaker 1: want to chat eight four four to five, we will
Speaker 1: be right back. The media never talks about the American
Speaker 1: victims of illegal immigration. I know them well. I know
Speaker 1: so many of them. I campaigned to them. What's happened
Speaker 1: to their children? What's happened to their husbands, what's happened
Speaker 1: to their wives. The media doesn't talk about the American
Speaker 1: families permanently separated for their loved ones because Democrat policies
Speaker 1: release violent criminals into our communities. We need safety, we
Speaker 1: need safety. They don't bring cameras to interview the angel
Speaker 1: moms whose children were killed by criminal aliens who should
Speaker 1: have never been here in the first place, not even close.
Speaker 1: They don't want to talk to the angel mom. But
Speaker 1: as your president, I will always fight to protect American families.
Speaker 1: The president knows how to knows how to get his
Speaker 1: message across, and certainly knows how to get a crowd
Speaker 1: fired up, that's for sure. All right. We got lots
Speaker 1: of calls lightening up the lines here. Brian in Jackson, Mississippi. Hey, Brian, Hey,
Speaker 1: how you doing. I'm good, Thank you for your call,
Speaker 1: Sir Fields High, thank you. I just I just want
Speaker 1: to get your response on something as about immigration. The
Speaker 1: immigration today, that's the big topic you know, of the week. Now,
Speaker 1: if we'll have another whenever we have these situations and
Speaker 1: Trump calls the Congress to do something, and let's get
Speaker 1: a proposed along the table and let's get something done
Speaker 1: about this. Let's make something happen. The time, it's the
Speaker 1: Republicans bringing something to the table to be voted a
Speaker 1: farm and the Democrats rarely bring anything to the table.
Speaker 1: They just bring amnesty. Brian. I mean, you're right, but
Speaker 1: all they want is amnesty, right, you know that. I
Speaker 1: know that Trump the tell all right, let's see your proposal.
Speaker 1: Let's make them say it. Yeah. Well, the well, their
Speaker 1: proposal is as DACA is amnesty. I'm telling you. That's Brian,
Speaker 1: You're you're your spot on here. But it's just, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm as frustrated as you by this. Man. Democrats don't
Speaker 1: have any proposals other than yeah, let's legalize everybody and
Speaker 1: then let's have more legal immigration. That's what they want. Man,
Speaker 1: You're onto it. I'm onto it. Brian Shields, Hi, and
Speaker 1: thank you for the call. Tim up in Rhode Island
Speaker 1: hate to him, Buck shield Tie. Thanks for taking my call. Shields. So,
Speaker 1: I was having a conversation with a guy at work.
Speaker 1: Obviously immigration hot topic right now, and um, you know
Speaker 1: he brought up the argument, well, you know, immigrant people,
Speaker 1: they come up here and they do the jobs that
Speaker 1: Americans don't want to do. And you know I got
Speaker 1: I got very defensive after you said that, because I said, so,
Speaker 1: what kind of jobs would that be? He said, oh,
Speaker 1: clean toilets. I said, come on, what people? United States
Speaker 1: citizens can't clean a toilet, So they're incapable to clean
Speaker 1: a toilet? Is that is that your argument here? I
Speaker 1: mean I can take this to extract. I can take
Speaker 1: this to a bit of of an extremer, Tim. But
Speaker 1: you know, for example, if somebody was gonna pay you
Speaker 1: a hundred fifty bucks an hour to you know, to
Speaker 1: to clean up, would you would you do it? I
Speaker 1: would do it. Heck, I could use the money. It's
Speaker 1: a function of economics. So when they say they won't
Speaker 1: do the jobs, it's because, yeah, because the labor, their
Speaker 1: wages are being undercut by people that are coming who
Speaker 1: are being paid off the books were illegal. Yeah, I know.
Speaker 1: Um so I think we lost Tim, Tim, I'm sorry
Speaker 1: you got me fired up. Uh team our two coming up.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about a sex in the city star.
Speaker 1: Who's got some thoughts on ice? Here's the short version,
Speaker 1: shut it down? Who needs borders or border security? Wow?
Speaker 1: I'm sitting here right now on the freedom hud And
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm drinking Black Rifle Coffee. Why because
Speaker 1: it's delicious and I love America and freedom and supporting
Speaker 1: veterans who have built a kick butt company that is
Speaker 1: all about helping fellow veterans and making some delicious coffee too.
Speaker 1: You can go online and check it out for yourself.
Speaker 1: In fact, you can get a subscription to Black Rifle
Speaker 1: Coffee and have them send your preferred blend or K
Speaker 1: cup flavors to you every month. You'll never have to
Speaker 1: think about getting coffee at the store again. All you
Speaker 1: have to do is visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck and type in Buck fifteen at checkout. You'll
Speaker 1: re see fifteen percent off your first order. That's Black
Speaker 1: Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck coupon code buck one
Speaker 1: five to get just slashed off that order. I'm a subscriber.
Speaker 1: I drink it every day. I think it's delicious. Don't
Speaker 1: drink that COMI coffee, put it aside and joined the
Speaker 1: freedom revolution with Black Rifle Coffee. Buck Sexton Pission decoding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton shown.
Speaker 1: No welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody. I've
Speaker 1: got sad news for you. Uh. It just broke in
Speaker 1: the last hour. We just found out here that the
Speaker 1: the peerless writer thinker um, Charles Croudhammer, has has passed away.
Speaker 1: He is an icon to conservatives. And I can say
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who always has made it a habit of
Speaker 1: knowing who in this this business that I'm in and
Speaker 1: have been in now for almost eight years or going
Speaker 1: on eight years, who is a really good person and
Speaker 1: someone to emulate and someone whose skills you should look
Speaker 1: up to as a way to motivate yourself and to
Speaker 1: learn from someone else. And crodhammers at the very top
Speaker 1: of that list. I never met him, never got a
Speaker 1: chance to work with a more medium, which is now
Speaker 1: of course, it feels like even you know, an even
Speaker 1: greater Shames, I'll never get that opportunity. So I can't
Speaker 1: tell you any personal stories about about Charles Kradhemmer. I
Speaker 1: can tell you that he's someone who I read voraciously,
Speaker 1: stretching back all the way to my time in college.
Speaker 1: There are only a few columnists that I I seek
Speaker 1: out and would seek out and read their columns. They
Speaker 1: didn't have to be put in front of me. It
Speaker 1: didn't have to be something that, you know, I happened
Speaker 1: to stumble upon the newspaper. I would really make the
Speaker 1: effort to find and there's I could count the number
Speaker 1: of people that I feel that way about on one hand,
Speaker 1: and Crowdhammer was one of them. Uh so, yeah, he
Speaker 1: he passed away. You will recall we discussed the letter
Speaker 1: that he wrote a couple of weeks ago saying that
Speaker 1: his time was was coming to an end, so very
Speaker 1: sad and thoughts and prayers to his family. And I
Speaker 1: thought that this would be worth sharing as well, because
Speaker 1: I don't have any personal story, but I saw this
Speaker 1: online from Nash Jenkins, who is a writer for Time magazine.
Speaker 1: All of this are very very moving story, and I'll
Speaker 1: share it with you now in honor of the passing
Speaker 1: of of Dr Charles Crowdhammer. So these are Nash's words.
Speaker 1: I'd like to share a story about Charles Crowdhammer. In October,
Speaker 1: my dad met Charles and Robert Reich at a thing
Speaker 1: in Washington. I'm not sure exactly what the thing was,
Speaker 1: but they chatted for a while after my dad's a
Speaker 1: geek for this stuff. So he got a photo and
Speaker 1: posted it Instagram. Nash Jenkins post this photo here of
Speaker 1: his dad with with Charles Crodhammer, and he writes, until
Speaker 1: I saw that photo, I had no idea that Krodhammer
Speaker 1: was in a wheelchair. I knew him as the pundit
Speaker 1: that conservatives of an older generation like my dad revered.
Speaker 1: I looked it up and learned that in his first
Speaker 1: year of medical school at Harvard, Crodhammer was in a
Speaker 1: swimming accident that left him largely paralyzed. Despite this, he
Speaker 1: found success as a psychiatrist and then as a political writer. Still,
Speaker 1: I remember thinking how sad. On June last year, I
Speaker 1: was living in Hong Kong. I got a FaceTime call
Speaker 1: shortly after midnight from my mom back home in North Carolina.
Speaker 1: I almost didn't answer, Everything is okay, but your dad's
Speaker 1: been in an accident, she told me. My dad is
Speaker 1: now fifty six, but up until that point he had
Speaker 1: been pathologically active. In this case, he was surfing in
Speaker 1: Nicaragua away I've had crashed on him and slammed him
Speaker 1: to the bottom. He quickly realized he couldn't move to
Speaker 1: abbreviate a long story that's still very painful. After a
Speaker 1: forty eight hour trip from the jungle to Managua to
Speaker 1: the neurological Hospital at U n C, my dad learned
Speaker 1: that he had broken his neck and severed his spinal cord.
Speaker 1: He was and remains paralyzed from the chest down. Doctors
Speaker 1: told him very candidly that he'd never walk again. For
Speaker 1: my sisters and me, those first two weeks remained foggy.
Speaker 1: Those memories are shrouded in a patina of grief, confusion, fear,
Speaker 1: and in my case, jet lag. I'd flown back from
Speaker 1: Hong Kong once we realized the severity of the injury.
Speaker 1: But what I do remember is the email that Charles
Speaker 1: Crothhammer sent my dad. I'd like to I'd like to
Speaker 1: share it here. Dear Mr Jenkins, I heard about your accident.
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. I enjoyed meeting you last year and
Speaker 1: and and deeply sympathetic to your new and most harrowing situation.
Speaker 1: As you know, I've been there. I know full well
Speaker 1: how difficult things are at the beginning, and often how
Speaker 1: hopeless they seem. I also do know what's possible, and
Speaker 1: it turns out to be quite a lot. I don't
Speaker 1: pretend it's everything, but a good and productive and deeply
Speaker 1: enjoyable life is possible. What it required in my case
Speaker 1: was the simple determination to keep going in the direction
Speaker 1: I was heading. I found that I could do psychiatry
Speaker 1: and then a journalism career at a totally even par
Speaker 1: with my colleagues. Your accident is occurring much later in
Speaker 1: life than mine. I was twenty two, which presents its
Speaker 1: own challenges. On the other hand, you have so many
Speaker 1: years of experience and so much respect and admiration from friends, colleagues,
Speaker 1: and family accumulated over a lifetime. They will serve you
Speaker 1: well and help you through what will at first be
Speaker 1: significant challenges. I write you because I know the challenges firsthand.
Speaker 1: I know how discouraging they can be initially. But I
Speaker 1: also know with absolute certainty that they can be accommodated
Speaker 1: and even overcome, and that a good life is possible.
Speaker 1: I'm fully aware of how terribly discouraging it is to
Speaker 1: have put in twice the effort for gains that seems
Speaker 1: so meager at the beginning, But I can assure you
Speaker 1: that it can be done, and then it is rewarded.
Speaker 1: I don't mean to sugarcoat things. Life is more difficult
Speaker 1: with a spinal cord injury, but the obstacles are not insurmountable.
Speaker 1: I know this is all scant consolation and it is
Speaker 1: not really meant uh as such. It is simply meant
Speaker 1: to give you a different perspective on your future. Mine
Speaker 1: is from the rear view mirror. I know what actually
Speaker 1: can be. I also know that for you so soon
Speaker 1: after your accident, it is perspective you are looking into
Speaker 1: a future that has necessarily unclear to you. I only
Speaker 1: wish to assure you, for my own experience of forty
Speaker 1: five years post accident, that it can be a very
Speaker 1: good life. Indeed, I hope this is helpful. I wish
Speaker 1: you all the best in your recovery. Sure All's Crodhammer.
Speaker 1: It's quite a letter to receive from somebody that was
Speaker 1: a hero for Nash's dad, given the situation that he
Speaker 1: had gone through that at that stage in life to
Speaker 1: be paralyzed. Nash continues here with the story there is
Speaker 1: no playbook for coping with spinal cord injuries. Their statistically
Speaker 1: rare support networks are limited at best, But in a
Speaker 1: year that has been defied by uncertainty and emotional exhaustion.
Speaker 1: That letter has meant the world to my dad and
Speaker 1: to us. I always wanted to thank Mr Crodhammer for that,
Speaker 1: and I'm ashamed that I never did. It was a
Speaker 1: voice of lucid hope at a time when my family
Speaker 1: needed it more than anything. I will always be so
Speaker 1: grateful for it. Anyway, I'm a wreck now, as I've
Speaker 1: been for much of the last twelve months, but who's counting.
Speaker 1: Monday marks a year since my dad's injury, and I
Speaker 1: love him so much. I guess I don't really care
Speaker 1: about his politics right now. There'll be others to eulogize
Speaker 1: and critique that writing this because Charles crost Hammer knew
Speaker 1: what to say at a time when virtually no one did,
Speaker 1: and he took the time to say it, and it
Speaker 1: meant so much. I can't think of a better eulogy
Speaker 1: to give a person who has just passed away, then
Speaker 1: for someone who didn't even know Charles very well to
Speaker 1: reach out and say his gifts, his understanding of life,
Speaker 1: and his wisdom weren't just things that people read on
Speaker 1: a page, that they affected people's lives, that they gave
Speaker 1: people like Nash Jenkins's father strength and courage and perspective
Speaker 1: at critical times in their lives. And it's a reminder
Speaker 1: to me and to all of us who are in
Speaker 1: this business who look up at someone like Charles croft
Speaker 1: Hammer as one of the true greats, one of the
Speaker 1: people that blaze the path for all the rest of
Speaker 1: us to follow, that this work that we do, writing,
Speaker 1: speaking television, talking about ideas can have a real impact
Speaker 1: on people's lives, not just in the general sense of
Speaker 1: the national conversation, but in giving people hope, in giving
Speaker 1: people comfort, and in sharing the knowledge that can make
Speaker 1: even the most difficult situations in life seem like they
Speaker 1: are surmountable, seem like it is possible to push through
Speaker 1: and carry on. And dare I even say Charles Cronhammer
Speaker 1: was someone who gave millions of people across the country
Speaker 1: the ability and the strength to hold their shields high
Speaker 1: like Charles did throughout his life. We'll be right back,
Speaker 1: m The door has been kicked wide open when it
Speaker 1: comes to celebrities running for president, because look, the current president,
Speaker 1: as great as he is, is also a celebrity. Celebrities
Speaker 1: is not a dirty word. There's some Ronald Reagan was
Speaker 1: a celebrity, wasn't accurate, So we know, listen, there's some
Speaker 1: great Hey, Chris Pratt had a really inspiring speech he
Speaker 1: gave early week. Celebrities can be great people to Yeah, Conservatives.
Speaker 1: I feel like I have a tendency to we we
Speaker 1: like to bash all celebrities and then once through all
Speaker 1: celebrities a little bit nice to not even conservatism, just
Speaker 1: traditional values, and we go, oh my gosh, there's a
Speaker 1: movie star who likes us. But generally speaking, we are
Speaker 1: we are pretty cynical about celebrities getting involved in the
Speaker 1: political discussion. And because most of them are Look, let's
Speaker 1: be honest, most of them are just complete clowns, right,
Speaker 1: most of them walk around. You get like the Tim
Speaker 1: robbins is of the world. You got the uh Bell
Speaker 1: guys and Belzer, these people who are just they've all
Speaker 1: got the politics of Michael Moore. And you know, Michael
Speaker 1: Moore has got the politics of hating America and being
Speaker 1: a disingenuous redistributionist phony. But and and and propaganda us
Speaker 1: by the way, complete and utter propagandists. But not Nonetheless,
Speaker 1: I'm open minded the idea that you that you can
Speaker 1: have some celebrities that are going to run for things.
Speaker 1: And look, if if Oprah were to run for office,
Speaker 1: she would be formidable. Could she be Trump? I don't know,
Speaker 1: but could she? You know, would Oprah have you know,
Speaker 1: been able to beat some of the other candidates that
Speaker 1: we've seen in the national Oh yeah, she would. Let's
Speaker 1: just be honest about it, folks, she would. Cynthia Nixon
Speaker 1: is not Oprah, but so that's a statement of fact.
Speaker 1: But she for those of you don't know, she is
Speaker 1: a an actress who is best known and really I
Speaker 1: would say, almost entirely known for her role on the
Speaker 1: show Sex and the City, which, because of my because
Speaker 1: of of past girlfriends that I've had, I have seen
Speaker 1: episodes of Okay I am, I am somewhat familiar with
Speaker 1: the you know, the Sex in the City genre and
Speaker 1: and the show and all that stuff. I think, by
Speaker 1: the way, it's a terrible show for the message that
Speaker 1: it gives women. And I've actually convinced some of my
Speaker 1: female friend peers about this and they agree with me.
Speaker 1: It's really a very selfish and the people in the
Speaker 1: show are selfish, immature, superficial. They're not good people. They're
Speaker 1: not honorable, people. They're really self indulgent and destructive, and
Speaker 1: and this whole thing of like who cares about who
Speaker 1: cares about a family or or or decency, Like let's
Speaker 1: just drink mimosas and like go shop for shoes. It's
Speaker 1: not good. It's you know, and a lot of the
Speaker 1: women watched it who are my age. Now, I think
Speaker 1: we're lead down the wrong the wrong path with that stuff.
Speaker 1: But maybe I'll do a full sex in the city
Speaker 1: bash another time bashing throwing a party for sex in
Speaker 1: the city. Yeah, you know, no, that's not what I'm doing.
Speaker 1: But Cynthia Nixon maybe running, but she said some interesting
Speaker 1: things about this whole border. I think what she running against,
Speaker 1: uh not Broke Cuomo, the other Cuomo. Right then, the
Speaker 1: Nixon does not have a chance to defeat the current
Speaker 1: governor of New York. Nobody can defeat a man who
Speaker 1: yells in a monotone. What about irony as the governor
Speaker 1: of New York named Cuomo who has a brother who
Speaker 1: lived weights at CNN. Yeah, that's I don't think she's
Speaker 1: gonna be able to be Cuomo, who who does look
Speaker 1: a little bit like Vigo from the painting in Ghostbusters
Speaker 1: too some of you got that reference. A lot of
Speaker 1: you are like, what the heck are you talking about? Buck?
Speaker 1: But if you go check look at Cuomo and look
Speaker 1: at the Vigo. It is Vigo from Ghostbusters too. You'll
Speaker 1: see exactly in that painting. They look alike, guys, I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you the truth. But so Nixon is running
Speaker 1: and she said some things that I think illustrate a
Speaker 1: little bit more of the Democrat position than they usually
Speaker 1: like the illustrate. They don't want us to know what
Speaker 1: they really think about this stuff. But but here's where
Speaker 1: you said about immigrations. Because she's not the only one
Speaker 1: to say this, right, we got a congressman is running
Speaker 1: an ad on this. Here's what Cynthia Nixon had to
Speaker 1: say about immigrations and customs of force in place seventeen.
Speaker 1: Parents and children aren't just being separated at the border,
Speaker 1: you know, they're being separated throughout this country by ice.
Speaker 1: I think we need to abolish ice. That seems really clear.
Speaker 1: The aily tsive live we don't need to replace. You know,
Speaker 1: ice is relatively new. It came in after September eleven.
Speaker 1: We've been handling immigration and customs for a long time.
Speaker 1: Here we don't need ice, and and they have strayed
Speaker 1: so far from the interests of the American people and
Speaker 1: the interests of humanity. We need to we need to
Speaker 1: abolish it, abolish immigrations and customs. So so just it's
Speaker 1: such a dumb it's such a dumb thing to say that,
Speaker 1: you're left being she really just a she just a
Speaker 1: dodo I mean, is she just an idiot? I don't understand.
Speaker 1: It's kind of mean. By the way, you know, the
Speaker 1: whole Dodo thing actually comes from the Dodo bird, which
Speaker 1: was a flightless bird that was hunted to extinction because
Speaker 1: it really had no natural predators in its habitat. And
Speaker 1: they used to club dodo birds and they weren't even
Speaker 1: particularly skittish around humans. So no more, no more dodo birds. Anyway,
Speaker 1: she here, she wants to abolish immigration and customers. So
Speaker 1: that means what the human trafficking, drug trafficking, Just let
Speaker 1: everything come in. No more national sovereignty. Whatever wants to
Speaker 1: be here can be here. We'll just have the taxpayer
Speaker 1: foot the bill for whoever shows up with whatever they
Speaker 1: show up. Carrot. This this is, by the way, she
Speaker 1: was there with joy bei haa hello, joy BEI haa.
Speaker 1: You know, I just don't understand. Why can't we just
Speaker 1: you know, I wish you'd abolish it absolutely. Joy By
Speaker 1: Hall doesn't like it. I think that's pretty close. But
Speaker 1: I gotta work on Beyar. I gotta listen a little more.
Speaker 1: Get it really in my ear, you know, it kint
Speaker 1: us out. It's like if Gilbert godfreyed have it. It It
Speaker 1: had assisted. Uh the fact that she's on TV and paid,
Speaker 1: She's paid millions of dollars to give her opinion, folks.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that says about this country, but
Speaker 1: it doesn't say good things. But Cynthia Nixon after her
Speaker 1: incredibly stupid comment about immigrations the cust of the force,
Speaker 1: but she she she went even further. She wanted to
Speaker 1: go for an even cheaper applause line in some ways
Speaker 1: an even number one too. So get rid of immigrations
Speaker 1: and customs. Remember we had a Congress. I got running
Speaker 1: for Congress with an ad saying that too. This isn't
Speaker 1: just Cynthia Nixon. This has now become a talking point
Speaker 1: because the left has lost its mind. Let's just not
Speaker 1: just abolished immigrations and cunstoms. Huh, how are you gonna
Speaker 1: do that? Well, what are you're gonna replace it with
Speaker 1: the really nice Immigrations and Customs service or how is
Speaker 1: that supposed to work? But then she just went after
Speaker 1: Trump because she's on the view and you need a
Speaker 1: cheap applause line, play sixteen. It's devastating the images from
Speaker 1: the border, and I have to say, the recordings of children,
Speaker 1: uh begging for their parents. Uh, I'm I guess I
Speaker 1: am glad he has signed this executive order against himself
Speaker 1: detecting them from them. I wish he would signed some
Speaker 1: more executive orders protecting all of us from him. Ya clapping,
Speaker 1: ignorant people clapping. She she just encapsulated, really the the
Speaker 1: Democrat position on Trump and the executive order right there,
Speaker 1: which is I I applaud Trump protecting us from Trump
Speaker 1: and what Trump did, and how we should have more
Speaker 1: protection from Trump. This is just it's about Trump hatreots,
Speaker 1: straight up, full stop. That's what this is. They don't
Speaker 1: really care. They don't really care about these kids. I
Speaker 1: keep having to say it. Yeah, sure they'd like to
Speaker 1: cry and get all emotional whatever, you know, but they
Speaker 1: don't care. I'm not doing anything. No, they're not they're
Speaker 1: not working to fix the problem. I'm sorry, I really
Speaker 1: don't believe that they care all that much. By the way,
Speaker 1: how much do they care about all the Syrian refugee
Speaker 1: children that I went and spent time with at the
Speaker 1: border of Syria and Jordan's while the Obama administration basically
Speaker 1: had its hands tied because it was so worried about
Speaker 1: appeasing Iran and not doing anything in Syria to upset Iran? Uh?
Speaker 1: Do they are they up late at nights, you know,
Speaker 1: losing sleep because of those kids? I'm I'm just wondering, Well,
Speaker 1: what you know, those kids who had their whole families,
Speaker 1: in some cases machine gun in front of them, disappeared
Speaker 1: as Odd's death squads took them out. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: it's just these kids now because it's useful against Trump.
Speaker 1: By the way, are they are they losing sleep or
Speaker 1: are they doing anything about the kids and foster homes
Speaker 1: across the country? The orphans kids were abandoned Americans are
Speaker 1: fellow Americans. A lot of them are minority children, Black
Speaker 1: and Hispanic kids that don't have parents that are in
Speaker 1: the system, in the foster care system. Are they are
Speaker 1: they losing sleep over that no, no, no, just just
Speaker 1: these kids at this time. They weren't losing sleep when
Speaker 1: Obama was in charge and the same practice was happening.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, hypocrisy. Cynthia Nixon world class and incompoop.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's what she is. A lot more teams,
Speaker 1: they're right there. Recently, I've been getting all my style
Speaker 1: tips from the clothing experts at Peter Millar. And if
Speaker 1: you're like me and you love wearing some golf gear
Speaker 1: when you're out and about, you know the name. If
Speaker 1: you don't, you should, because Peter Millar is all about quality,
Speaker 1: value and style. It's the most comfortable clothing I've ever worn.
Speaker 1: In Right now, I'm wearing their performance sports shirt. That's right.
Speaker 1: I like to do it when I'm in the radio
Speaker 1: mode because guess what, it's kind of wicking. It has
Speaker 1: a lot of breathability, it's comfortable, and Molly says it
Speaker 1: makes me look like a handsome dad, even though I'm
Speaker 1: not a dad yet, So I'm all about it. Peter
Speaker 1: Millar stuff is top quality. I love their gear, and
Speaker 1: the performance sports short that I'm wearing is the most
Speaker 1: comfortable shirt I've ever worn. I can say that about
Speaker 1: everything that I've gotten from Peter Millar, And right now
Speaker 1: you can head over to Peter Millar dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck to check out some of my favorites. Be sure
Speaker 1: to use my link and you'll receive complimentary shipping and
Speaker 1: a free hat. That's Peter Millar am I L L
Speaker 1: A R dot com, slash Buck, Peter Millar dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: his back. I love shopping on the internet. I've become
Speaker 1: so lazy. I don't want to have to actually go
Speaker 1: anywhere interact with any human beings, have to talk to
Speaker 1: people about what sizes they have in stock, or what
Speaker 1: I need to regrout my kitchen floor. I look it
Speaker 1: up online, I buy it online. But guess what, folks
Speaker 1: that's got That's gotten more expensive as of today courtesy
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court, which makes me very sad. They
Speaker 1: have a ruling on taxing internet based businesses that's gonna
Speaker 1: affect every single person listening to the show. It's gonna
Speaker 1: make things more expensive and more annoying. But I want
Speaker 1: to give the details of just how dare I say
Speaker 1: lame this Supreme Court decision actually is for that, we've
Speaker 1: brought in a buddy of mine and a tax expert.
Speaker 1: Miss Maddie Duppler is with us now. She is a
Speaker 1: senior fellow at the National Taxpayers Union, also a visiting
Speaker 1: fellow's a double fellow at the Independent Woman's Forum, Miss Doubles.
Speaker 1: Good to see you, Hey, my, good to see you.
Speaker 1: So Maddie and I also bumped into each other recently
Speaker 1: at Fox, and it was like it was like long
Speaker 1: lost pals because she used to do our show, Real
Speaker 1: News at the Blaze, and we missed Maddie because she
Speaker 1: had to She then just focused more on you know,
Speaker 1: commerce and business and and and her career. But we
Speaker 1: liked hanging out with her during the TV show where
Speaker 1: we could So Maddie, tell me about this, uh, this
Speaker 1: internet sales tax bonanza that's gonna happen. Now. It's making
Speaker 1: me sad. Yeah, but as you said, I have lots
Speaker 1: of sads all day because of what the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: ruled this morning. And frankly, I was a little surprised.
Speaker 1: I thought that we would see a decision from the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court that was a lot like the Masterpiece Cake
Speaker 1: decision um speak or two weeks ago. Which would be
Speaker 1: narrow in scope wide in vote um. Instead, we had
Speaker 1: a five four decision where the Supreme Court basically tossed
Speaker 1: out thirty years of precedence and said, listen, the way
Speaker 1: that we have been contemplating interstate commerce and how we're
Speaker 1: taxing interstate transactions all garbage. We need to start over um.
Speaker 1: And there's several problems with this, but one is that
Speaker 1: what they did is they rejected the notion of physical presence.
Speaker 1: So in the Supreme Court considered this question of you know,
Speaker 1: what does it take, how why, what does the state
Speaker 1: have to prove in order for a business to be
Speaker 1: liable to its tax structures, and it decided that the
Speaker 1: business has to have a physical presence in the state.
Speaker 1: So that makes sense, right. You know, you've got a
Speaker 1: business that operates within the bounds, my geography of that
Speaker 1: state is under the onus of that taxing authority. So
Speaker 1: today the tax the Supreme Court said, no, we don't
Speaker 1: believe that standard can be adaptable for modern times. We
Speaker 1: think we need to revisit this. And what was that
Speaker 1: The heart of the question was a law in South Dakota,
Speaker 1: and basically what South Dakota had done was it looked
Speaker 1: at this physical president standard and said no, now, we
Speaker 1: don't want to do this. We think that there's a
Speaker 1: lot of revenue out there that we're missing out on,
Speaker 1: and we want to get our hands on it. So
Speaker 1: we're going to write a law that slows the President
Speaker 1: and the legal standard for interstate commerce and basically challenges
Speaker 1: Supreme Court to take it up, knowing full well that
Speaker 1: the law that they had written did not um did
Speaker 1: not work with the legal standards in place in the
Speaker 1: United States and the laws Passenge sixteen, and today we
Speaker 1: have the Supreme Court decision on it. So I have
Speaker 1: a lot of concerns about how this is going to
Speaker 1: move forward. Number one is that we basically have now
Speaker 1: eroded what was a barrier to taxation that protected all Americans.
Speaker 1: Geography essentially has served as a ceiling that dictates what
Speaker 1: constituencies can handle when it comes to levels of taxation,
Speaker 1: because essentially, in the United States, if you live in
Speaker 1: a high tax state, you don't want to of a
Speaker 1: high tech state. Either move out of that state or
Speaker 1: you vote the politicians who passed the high taxes onto
Speaker 1: you out of LOCKDA. What the Supreme Court side today was,
Speaker 1: you know, We're going to give the taxting authorities the
Speaker 1: ability to tax people who don't live and don't vote
Speaker 1: for them in the state or locality where they reside. Now,
Speaker 1: taxing authorities the United States essentially have borderless authority to
Speaker 1: tax any American involved in commerce. And I find that
Speaker 1: very very worrisome as someone who wants taxing to remain
Speaker 1: low and government to remain small. This is a giant
Speaker 1: step away from those principles. So if if I, just
Speaker 1: if I if I go on Electronic Bay dot Com
Speaker 1: and I decide that I'm going to purchase from somebody
Speaker 1: a a Winston Churchhill bust from let's say, you know,
Speaker 1: from from Wichita, Kansas, now they can can they tax
Speaker 1: that transaction to? I mean, who gets to put the
Speaker 1: tax on this now? Or a better example be this, Maddie,
Speaker 1: When when I go online now and I buy something
Speaker 1: from Amazon? Are they forced now to add the tax
Speaker 1: to whatever I purchase wherever I live? How does this
Speaker 1: actually get implement this what I'm getting out? What will
Speaker 1: this mean for folks taking at home? We're like, I
Speaker 1: want to go buy a bunch of Faberge eggs online,
Speaker 1: Who's going to tax them for it. Yeah, Buck, that's
Speaker 1: a great question, and I don't know the answer to it,
Speaker 1: and neither does anyone else. And that's the problem here.
Speaker 1: We've got twelve thousand different taxing jurisdictions in this country,
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, the Supreme Court has said,
Speaker 1: every single one of you, you figure it out. You
Speaker 1: figure out how you can tap and align your protocols
Speaker 1: with the next state, in the next municipality. And you know,
Speaker 1: the people who are shopping online, sir, and it will
Speaker 1: be accost to them and they'll see it show up
Speaker 1: when they're trying to check out and bring up their
Speaker 1: purchases online. But the real difficulty here is for people
Speaker 1: who sell online. You know, Amazon does charge sales tax
Speaker 1: on its transactions for its products. What it doesn't do
Speaker 1: is it doesn't collect the sales tax for transactions for
Speaker 1: third party vendors. And this, of course is being a
Speaker 1: platform that small businesses across the country have been able
Speaker 1: to use, has widened up and expanded their marketplaces. Those
Speaker 1: are the guys who are going to suffer at the
Speaker 1: hands in this decision. So there's a lot of people
Speaker 1: who want to draw a false choice saying that this
Speaker 1: is a good decision from main Street and it really
Speaker 1: goes after a big business. And I would argue that's
Speaker 1: a completely unsophisticated way of understanding the way the twenty
Speaker 1: one century market works. I mean, the biggest democratizing thing
Speaker 1: that has happened in business is the Internet. We've been
Speaker 1: able to distill down what has been an incumbent game
Speaker 1: by having the Internet, and small businesses across the country
Speaker 1: have been able to increase their influence as a result
Speaker 1: of it. Do you have any sense any scary numbers
Speaker 1: tell us about how much more money is going to
Speaker 1: take out of the American people's pocket and give it
Speaker 1: to greedy states? Oh? Man, I you know I I
Speaker 1: I don't even want to venture a guest because it
Speaker 1: could be huge. I think the biggest difficulty here is
Speaker 1: that not only do we now have no lines keeping
Speaker 1: taxing authorities raining them in in certain locality is but
Speaker 1: we've now opened the door to a question of where
Speaker 1: does this end. It's not just tasting authority that's been expanded.
Speaker 1: What if? What if the question is regulatory authority? What
Speaker 1: if California decides not only do we want to tap
Speaker 1: everything every transaction that is adjacent to our states but
Speaker 1: what if we want to export all of our regulations
Speaker 1: that we have here in the Great People's Republic of California.
Speaker 1: This Supreme Court decision seems to raise the question that
Speaker 1: there may not be the limits that we that we
Speaker 1: suppose as members of this great federalist society UM. And
Speaker 1: I think that that is a question moving forward. This
Speaker 1: is not the last time that the Court will have
Speaker 1: to visit this. UH. Congress can act and Congress should
Speaker 1: ask to clarify. I think that I certainly and many
Speaker 1: the experts on this issue are still sorting through what
Speaker 1: exact day that would look like UM. And of course,
Speaker 1: as Congresses want to do, I worry that Congress will
Speaker 1: overcorrect UH and try to instill different definitions of what
Speaker 1: what constitutes business transactions and nexus UM, and really start
Speaker 1: to mess with the geographical boundaries that have kept taxes,
Speaker 1: at least since sun State's quite low. But that's the
Speaker 1: question that remains for both both for the Supreme courts
Speaker 1: when this is challenged again on grounds of different laws
Speaker 1: in different ways that states handled this issue, UM, but
Speaker 1: also if regulatory questions rise UH, in whether or not
Speaker 1: Congress has the political will to do something about it.
Speaker 1: We we really do need to guys in the freedom
Speaker 1: out there. We need to work on that, least for
Speaker 1: buck Topia in the South Pacific. No no taxes there.
Speaker 1: For what we're gonna do. Maddie Dumpler, everybody, senior fellow
Speaker 1: National Taxpayers, you and your Maddie. Great to have you,
Speaker 1: Thanks for hanging out. Great to talk to you about.
Speaker 1: See you soon, team quick break, we come back. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you about how people are being mean to
Speaker 1: conservatives at restaurants right near where I am. Dame, I've
Speaker 1: got an update for you on that story about Kirsten Nielsen.
Speaker 1: Remember we we just a few blocks from where I
Speaker 1: do this broadcast in the swamp in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: There were these uh Democrats Socialists of of the Metro
Speaker 1: DC area or something, you know, a group of middling
Speaker 1: and unimpressive ne'er do wells live streaming. They're shame, shame, shame.
Speaker 1: Chance Well, a DHS UH secretary was just trying to
Speaker 1: sit down and have a meal. You know, she's just
Speaker 1: trying to just trying to enjoy your tacos, folks. You
Speaker 1: know I, you know, I just can't have some reef
Speaker 1: fried beans and a and a Margarita or if she's
Speaker 1: really smart, just some delicious mesical Uh can't do that
Speaker 1: without people yelling at apparently not Apparently that can't happen, right, Well,
Speaker 1: it's very frustrating because there's no more decency, isn't There's
Speaker 1: no honor in politics anymore for the left, at least
Speaker 1: at all none. It's just whatever works, whatever allows you
Speaker 1: to shame the conservatives. You know, we joke around here
Speaker 1: on my show rising that we we we are different
Speaker 1: from so many others because we don't try to own
Speaker 1: the Libs and we don't try to shame the Conservatives. Now,
Speaker 1: I obviously could own the Libs a lot more than
Speaker 1: I do, but I choose not to because I'm being nice,
Speaker 1: because that's the man, that's the mission of the show.
Speaker 1: But with Libs, they try to just shame conservatives all
Speaker 1: the time, and if they really only have two pop
Speaker 1: culture references that come up time and time again. By
Speaker 1: the way, Harry Potter, there was like that person's like
Speaker 1: Baltimore and that one scene from Game of Thrones where
Speaker 1: Cercy Lanister walks naked through King's landing and Pete and
Speaker 1: that woman stands behind a ring the bell gung shame shame.
Speaker 1: I mean it was actually a really it was a
Speaker 1: very powerful scene. But the pointy are making is, yeah,
Speaker 1: they should maybe maybe try reading reading adult books, you know,
Speaker 1: books that make you think a little bit more. I know,
Speaker 1: Harry Potter lovers don't get mad at me. I know,
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's great. Ms. Molly loves Harry Potter tells
Speaker 1: me that it's, you know, very well written on all that.
Speaker 1: I get it, I get it. But here's here's what.
Speaker 1: Here's what what happened with the Nielsen thing? Uh? It
Speaker 1: turns out that there was a Department of Justice employee
Speaker 1: among those who are yelling same at Kirsten Nielsen. H
Speaker 1: A d o J. Now, not a senior one. I
Speaker 1: forget what her what her particular role was is not.
Speaker 1: This isn't like the deputy director of something or other.
Speaker 1: But there was a d o J employee among them,
Speaker 1: which just goes to show you, folks, what I've been
Speaker 1: telling you all along. The left wing infiltration of elite
Speaker 1: government institutions has mirrored the left wing infiltration of academia
Speaker 1: and the arts and Hollywood. These places, they require advanced degrees,
Speaker 1: they require people to go usually through certain kinds of
Speaker 1: programs in schooling. They have become incubators for pretty radical progressivism.
Speaker 1: You know, They've got these people that go to you know, Brown,
Speaker 1: which is a university full of people who think they're
Speaker 1: much more impressive than they are. I'm just saying you
Speaker 1: you cannot mean, you can hate on me for that one.
Speaker 1: But it's so left wing and they don't get grades,
Speaker 1: and the whole thing is just a scam. And I've
Speaker 1: known a lot. I had a lot of friends who
Speaker 1: went to Brown, and a lot of people have got
Speaker 1: a family member went to Brown. Brown just trains people
Speaker 1: to think they're awesome. And I've never met anybody that
Speaker 1: I was like, Wow, you must have learned a lot
Speaker 1: at Brown. That's all I can say. Okay, it's among
Speaker 1: the most liberal schools in the country. But people go
Speaker 1: from places like that to the Department of Justice. Right,
Speaker 1: maybe they make a little stop over it Yale Law
Speaker 1: School or something which is also really progressive and left wing,
Speaker 1: and then they find themselves the d o J. And
Speaker 1: people think, well, Buck, there must be a lot of
Speaker 1: conservatives at these places too, And I say, yeah, but
Speaker 1: conservatives show up and they just do their jobs. We
Speaker 1: can separate in our mind, you know, the way that
Speaker 1: we approach our lives. Conservatives in general approach their working
Speaker 1: their lives the way Americans generally do. When it comes
Speaker 1: to you other day to day versus you know, say
Speaker 1: what you see in a in a theocracy, you know,
Speaker 1: say what you see in a country like Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 1: You know what I mean. We're like, yeah, we're doing
Speaker 1: our thing. We can separate it out. We don't have to.
Speaker 1: We don't have to bring our beliefs and everything we do.
Speaker 1: You know, Saudi Arabia, they won't sit in a meeting
Speaker 1: with a woman, right. That's progressives have that view of
Speaker 1: their politics, meaning that they can't they just job right.
Speaker 1: They won't put aside their beliefs. And that's why we
Speaker 1: see this. This isn't an ideological infection. I mean it
Speaker 1: is a plague at the upper at the upper reaches,
Speaker 1: in particular bureaucracy. Look at Mike Hayden. I'm really disappointed
Speaker 1: this guy. I worked for Hayden. He's tweeting out photos
Speaker 1: of concentration camps. Is he is he a moron? Does
Speaker 1: does he not know what really happened at those concentration camps?
Speaker 1: I'm sure he does. He thinks that somebody being separated
Speaker 1: from mommy for a few days while people are feeding, clothing,
Speaker 1: giving medical attention, letting play with to always giving exercise
Speaker 1: and going to bring back, you know, the whole family.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying it's a I'm not saying it's
Speaker 1: a good thing where I wouldn't be sad, right, But
Speaker 1: I'm just to compare that to marching people to their
Speaker 1: deaths and in gas chambers. Of me, you how dumb
Speaker 1: can you? How crazy can you be? Right? Brennan, same thing.
Speaker 1: Brennan's lost it. That guy, the bald guy who kind
Speaker 1: of sort of make believe ran for president and the
Speaker 1: third party ticket or whatever. He's running around there. He
Speaker 1: also worked with the government. He's crazy too. He acts
Speaker 1: like Trump is is basically getting wired transfers every week
Speaker 1: from Putin and taking orders from the FSB. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's just nuts. So that's why when you see the
Speaker 1: cursty Nielsen thing and there's a d J employee who
Speaker 1: shows up at a restaurant and just causes this commotion
Speaker 1: and harasses somebody, it doesn't surprise me at all. Oh
Speaker 1: but by the way, not only was there a d
Speaker 1: o J employee had tip Daily Caller for that for
Speaker 1: breaking that report that story. Also, they've done this again.
Speaker 1: This is now a thing that they will do. In fact,
Speaker 1: not only did they did protesters find another administration official
Speaker 1: to harass while he was trying to eat. Last night,
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller was found at a yes, you guessed it,
Speaker 1: a Mexican restaurant in DC A different one. Uh this, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. This was Sunday at Espita Mescalaria, which I
Speaker 1: just bring up because you know who ate there two
Speaker 1: weeks ago. The guy you're listening to right now on
Speaker 1: the microphone I did. It was pretty good, not great,
Speaker 1: I give it a beat. But this guy was trying
Speaker 1: to have dinner and patrons called out Miller and they said, uh,
Speaker 1: they yelled, hey, look, guys, whoever thought we'd be in
Speaker 1: a restaurant with a real life fascist begging for money
Speaker 1: for new cages. Um, so the you know, this guy's
Speaker 1: getting heckled the restaurants now too. Did you ever have
Speaker 1: an Obama administration officials getting heckled at restaurants? You know,
Speaker 1: did you ever have people that we're just trying to
Speaker 1: work for the work for the administration who weren't allowed
Speaker 1: to have some peace and quiet. I gotta tell you
Speaker 1: some some of the progressives I know, because look, I'm
Speaker 1: in a I'm in a mixed environment here at the Hill.
Speaker 1: We got we got progressives, we got conservatives. I got
Speaker 1: my man Joe Contra with me on the right, but
Speaker 1: I got a lot of there a lot of progressives
Speaker 1: around me. Some of the progressives here are like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, that they shouldn't have any peace. You know,
Speaker 1: some of the progressive writers that I've talked to you,
Speaker 1: and just in d C in general, you know, they
Speaker 1: shouldn't allow these administration officials to be able to have
Speaker 1: a meal without getting harassed. Really no decency, no honor,
Speaker 1: no manners. That that that's should be the new bumper
Speaker 1: sticker for the left, so that they they're doing this now,
Speaker 1: they're finding people at restaurants. So basically, guys, I gotta
Speaker 1: get famous enough that they started heckling me at restaurants.
Speaker 1: But I do one day. I also would say that
Speaker 1: at some point the folks need to know that the
Speaker 1: little skinny Beta mail protesters, they don't want to get
Speaker 1: up in my face. I may look like I am
Speaker 1: in my early twenties, but I've got old band string,
Speaker 1: but I know how to throw a punch. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying so I'm a fair warning for whether it's Antifa
Speaker 1: or the Metro DC socialist whatever clowns. See all these
Speaker 1: guys at the time. They all weigh about a hundred
Speaker 1: and ten pounds, soaking wet and have like whispy facial hair,
Speaker 1: And I'm like, we won't stand for Trump, we and
Speaker 1: all that stuff. They why they they stay away from
Speaker 1: the buck bad alright, alright, we'll be right back. Our
Speaker 1: sponsor this half hours nine Line Apparel. I want to
Speaker 1: tell you about them. They are relentlessly patriotic, They are
Speaker 1: better and inspired. They support the Second Amendment. They're all
Speaker 1: about showing love to our first responders, and they have
Speaker 1: gear that ranges from just the stylish chill out session
Speaker 1: to performance where you've got to check them out. Nine
Speaker 1: Line Apparel is a it are and owned and operated
Speaker 1: patriotic lifestyle brand. T shirts, hoodies, tank top, sweatshirts, all
Speaker 1: of the stuff that you want. I stand for the
Speaker 1: national anthem, Stomp my flag, I'll stomp your butt in
Speaker 1: the halls of Valhallow. These are just some of the
Speaker 1: designs and brands. You'll see when you go to nine
Speaker 1: line apparel dot com and type in the coupon code,
Speaker 1: by the way, buck twenty. When you type in Buck twenty,
Speaker 1: you get twenty percent off your entire order and also
Speaker 1: shows them that you're part of Team Buck and you
Speaker 1: want to give a high five to them and to us.
Speaker 1: Nine line apparel dot com. Coupon code Buck twenty percent
Speaker 1: off nine line apparel dot com. Buck Sexton mission decoding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information is actionable intelligence. Banks, make
Speaker 1: no mistakes, American American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Analyst No, Welcome to our three team of the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. I really do hope you've already had a
Speaker 1: chance to listen to The Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: Is the new podcast just out last night. Hoping everybody
Speaker 1: listening to this radio broadcast across the country will check
Speaker 1: out the podcast. It's quick, it's fun. I think you
Speaker 1: will really enjoy it, and uh, it's gonna be a
Speaker 1: weekly thing, more of a laid back chill session. Think
Speaker 1: of it like if we were sitting around having a beer.
Speaker 1: This is how I would talk about some of the
Speaker 1: things that come to mind, so I hope you'll enjoy it.
Speaker 1: I'm also gonna be looking at a lot of your
Speaker 1: feedback on it, but I need you to hear it
Speaker 1: if you're gonna give me feedback. So all you do
Speaker 1: is go on the into the Apple Store and then
Speaker 1: do a search for the Freedom Hunt and it will
Speaker 1: pop up. It should be in the buck Sexton feed already.
Speaker 1: You can listen to it there, but I'm hoping you
Speaker 1: will subscribe to it, uh, and please do check it out.
Speaker 1: So I had a chance to sit down with Mark Meadows.
Speaker 1: It's on the House House, Oh does house Oversight and
Speaker 1: is somebody who you know is looking very closely at
Speaker 1: what's going on here with the FBI and what's happening
Speaker 1: with the d o J and the needs for reform.
Speaker 1: And you know what, guys, I gotta tell you. You
Speaker 1: can see that this whole collusion thing is going nowhere,
Speaker 1: and there's gonna be such a such a c y
Speaker 1: a effort from the media and from f behind d
Speaker 1: o J. It's gonna be amazing to watch, right But
Speaker 1: nothing can shock me anymore after we've seen with this
Speaker 1: whole immigration situation, where you know, Trump's not doing anything
Speaker 1: and then Trump does exactly what they've been telling to
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, Trump didn't do it fast enough, and
Speaker 1: he's still a Nazi. I mean, the stuff they're saying
Speaker 1: is crazy. They're gonna act like they weren't telling a
Speaker 1: year ago today or you know, a year ago this month,
Speaker 1: remember whether the stuff came out about the Trump Tower
Speaker 1: meeting and they were gearing up for Trump is going
Speaker 1: to be impeached for being a trader, as he worked
Speaker 1: with Russia too to undermine the election. Right, it was
Speaker 1: an illegitimate election because of Trump working with Russia. Just
Speaker 1: a crazy conspiracy theory and a lie. And we're gonna
Speaker 1: this is all gonna run out of steam pretty soon.
Speaker 1: We know it's gonna happen, and some of the folks
Speaker 1: who were involved in creating this mythology of Russia collusion
Speaker 1: are gonna just hope to evade any and all accountability
Speaker 1: for we cannot let that happen. We cannot allow for
Speaker 1: a replay, replay of what happened with the I R
Speaker 1: S during the Obama administration when you had that targeting.
Speaker 1: The only person that caught a little bit of real
Speaker 1: heat for that was Lois Learner and she ended up
Speaker 1: getting her pension and everything else right. They were targeting
Speaker 1: conservatives in an election year, folks, The I R S
Speaker 1: was doing that, And and we're what real consequences to
Speaker 1: the government face Obama one re election? I mean, no
Speaker 1: consequences none. Could you imagine? I mean, if the Democrats
Speaker 1: found out that a Republican administration was overseeing an I
Speaker 1: R S that was actively and unquestionably targeting them based
Speaker 1: on their left wing ideology, they would lose their minds.
Speaker 1: And they've already lost their minds. So we can't let
Speaker 1: them just get away from us. We need the documents.
Speaker 1: We need to know what happened with Struck. We need
Speaker 1: to know what happened with the interview of General Flynn.
Speaker 1: Uh this is you know, when Mueller doesn't have anywhere
Speaker 1: else to go, when the collusion probe finally winds down,
Speaker 1: they're gonna try really hard to keep us from finding out. Hey,
Speaker 1: hold on a second. Did they just decide to to
Speaker 1: jam up General Flynn because they could? What was that?
Speaker 1: What happened was that the decision that they made? Uh?
Speaker 1: So we you had color has been good Lad speaking
Speaker 1: earlier today about Peter Struck. The now well not not
Speaker 1: yet fired, but removed from headquarters FBI age. And here's
Speaker 1: we had to say a plate tenant. Absolutely, he's got
Speaker 1: to appear before the committee. Uh. We believe we have
Speaker 1: an agreement for him to appear next week. Uh. It's
Speaker 1: important that he appeared for an interview and then we'll
Speaker 1: have a public hearing after that. Uh. And we are
Speaker 1: prepared to issue a subpoena for anything that's necessary to do.
Speaker 1: But if he appears voluntarily, we're good. But if he renigues,
Speaker 1: he'll see a subpoena immediately. He's gonna get subpoena. He's
Speaker 1: got to show up. I am so curious to hear
Speaker 1: what what he has to say. Now. I know not
Speaker 1: all of it is going to be I know not
Speaker 1: all of it will be stuff that we can probably hear.
Speaker 1: But nonetheless, we get the answers, we finally can find
Speaker 1: out what's gone on here. Then I think will be
Speaker 1: in a place where we can put together the we
Speaker 1: can we can put together the real picture. Right if
Speaker 1: we we get this information, the three O two is
Speaker 1: the FBI version of what went on the General Flynn,
Speaker 1: I think, and I'm calling it right now. We can
Speaker 1: mark this down as a prediction. We are going to
Speaker 1: find out that in initially the FBI did not think
Speaker 1: Flynn lied, and then a senior person came along, either
Speaker 1: Muller or McKay, but the FBI and said, nope, you
Speaker 1: gotta charge Flynn. Because remember you go back to when
Speaker 1: they charged Flynn. That made all the rest of this
Speaker 1: to the left seemed more legitimate, legitimate. Whenever we would
Speaker 1: say hold on this whole Russia thing, we were trying
Speaker 1: to slow it down the early stages, this Russia collusion mess. Guys,
Speaker 1: is that joke is up? Incoming national security advisor pleaded
Speaker 1: guilty to a felony. Oh, he's a he's going to
Speaker 1: be a convicted felon. Now, they would just say that
Speaker 1: this became the the mantra, the talking point. They would
Speaker 1: shout you down, Oh, there's nothing to Russia collusion. It's
Speaker 1: just a bunch of Facebook accounts that Muller's in diving.
Speaker 1: What about Flynn felon? Oh you mean that they may
Speaker 1: have manufactured that prosecution, They may have abused prosecutorial power
Speaker 1: and discretion for political purposes. Oh, that's what may have happened,
Speaker 1: isn't that intry stick We may find that out from
Speaker 1: Struck too. Guess what question they're gonna ask Struck when
Speaker 1: he appears before the committee. They're gonna ask him, did
Speaker 1: General Flynn, in your opinion, because you interviewed him about
Speaker 1: the phone call with Sergei Kiseli act the ambassador to Russia,
Speaker 1: did he lie? If he says no, this, we are
Speaker 1: gonna have a huge reckoning and we are gonna have
Speaker 1: to demand justice. By the way, if they decided after
Speaker 1: the fact to bring a a charge of lying against
Speaker 1: but this is this is one of those areas where
Speaker 1: prosecutor of this question is everything. What's an important lie
Speaker 1: and what's not in the eye it's really in the
Speaker 1: eyes of the prosecutor. What's perjury and what's misremembering, it's
Speaker 1: in the eyes of the prosecutor. This is what they did.
Speaker 1: The Scooter Libby too, by the way, couldn't get him
Speaker 1: on an actual charge. They said, well, you lied about
Speaker 1: a thing that you didn't that wasn't criminal that you did,
Speaker 1: But we're gonna get you online about the non criminal thing.
Speaker 1: You know, the prosecutor can can decide to let that go,
Speaker 1: can give you the benefit of the doubt and say
Speaker 1: you misremembered, or they can decide to make you a fellone,
Speaker 1: to ruin your life. We all know that Flynn did
Speaker 1: not get the benefit of the doubt. We definitely know
Speaker 1: that Hillary and her folks got more than the benefit
Speaker 1: of the doubts. So this is why it's so important
Speaker 1: to stay on this and keep this information. We'll keep
Speaker 1: this quest for information in the front of in the
Speaker 1: front of our our minds insofar as we actually think
Speaker 1: about this, right. I know you're like, bluck, I got
Speaker 1: other things to think about. Of course I do too,
Speaker 1: but well I do think about this stuff a lot.
Speaker 1: And then you got good lot and Jordan talking about
Speaker 1: getting documents from Rosenstein, Play eleven. We have now access
Speaker 1: to over a million documents in a room at the
Speaker 1: Department Justice that we can see unredacted, and then we
Speaker 1: can point to individual documents and demand that they be produced.
Speaker 1: But there are other things in that subpoena where we
Speaker 1: specifically ask for. Some have been complied with, some not uh,
Speaker 1: And this speaker made it very clear that if they
Speaker 1: didn't produce him this week that they would face the resolution,
Speaker 1: which has already been introduced. If they don't give us
Speaker 1: the documents we're going to pass a resolution on the
Speaker 1: House floor this the speaker has been cleared they will.
Speaker 1: We will pass that, and the whole House will go
Speaker 1: on record saying Mr Rosenstein, give us what we're entitled
Speaker 1: to have to get answers for the American people. And
Speaker 1: then if he still doesn't do that, then it's contempt.
Speaker 1: I like what Jim Jordan's putting down here. But let
Speaker 1: me tell you something. I spoke to Congressman Shabbott today
Speaker 1: of Ohio and see the Buck's work in the network
Speaker 1: all the time now, folks, and he's on the Judiciary Committee.
Speaker 1: I said, what happens if you would get to the
Speaker 1: point of a contempt contempt citation for FBI d J.
Speaker 1: He goes, well, we can go to a judge, but
Speaker 1: ultimately kind of just hope you work it out. And
Speaker 1: so what if the President says they have to release
Speaker 1: the documents their executive branch as well, he can order that,
Speaker 1: but ultimately you have this kind of work it out.
Speaker 1: This is this has been the strategy of the hashtag
Speaker 1: resistance from the beginning. Folks, just don't do what you're
Speaker 1: supposed to do in government because there's no accountability. I
Speaker 1: think We're gonna see a situation where the f behind
Speaker 1: the d o J. No matter who says it, whether
Speaker 1: it's the President or the Congress, they just won't turn
Speaker 1: over documents. They're gonna try to hold out until the
Speaker 1: mid terms. That's what I think is gonna happen here, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, is a real crisis of government, and
Speaker 1: I think it is looming right now. Home title theft
Speaker 1: is a big deal and it can be a terrifying ordeal.
Speaker 1: You know. The FBI says that home title theft is
Speaker 1: one of the fastest growing crimes out there. And if
Speaker 1: you have ever had your credit card stolen, it is
Speaker 1: nothing nothing. I mean, I've had my credit card stolen
Speaker 1: a few times. That's nothing compared to what's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: Once an identity thief takes control of your your home's title.
Speaker 1: It's not that hard to do. All the bad guys
Speaker 1: need is internet access. They get the information they need online.
Speaker 1: They replace your home's title, they replace your name with
Speaker 1: an alias. Then they borrow every penny they can using
Speaker 1: your home's equity, and then you have to deal with
Speaker 1: the payments. It will not protect you that you have
Speaker 1: an insurance policy identity theft policies, and they don't work either.
Speaker 1: What you need is Home Title Luck for just pennies today.
Speaker 1: Home Title Luck protects my most viable asset, my family home.
Speaker 1: Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your
Speaker 1: home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value.
Speaker 1: Free visit home title lock dot com. That's Home title
Speaker 1: Luck dot com. Hypocrisy, my friends, hypocrisy. It's one of
Speaker 1: the great defining characteristics of the Democrat Party and and
Speaker 1: its allies in the media, or the extension of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is the mainstream media. But you know, on
Speaker 1: this issue of the parental separations of the border, I mean,
Speaker 1: the the sanctimony has been fast and furious. Man, it
Speaker 1: has been all over the place. Oh my gosh. It's
Speaker 1: just putting them in cages as animals. It's terrible what
Speaker 1: they're doing. They're treating them like animals. And people have
Speaker 1: been completely losing their minds over this, right. Uh, they're
Speaker 1: just completely freaking out. And there's a really important point
Speaker 1: to be made here, which is that this tactic, which
Speaker 1: is the main objection of separating families when there's a
Speaker 1: criminal proceeding and just know those are separating families. You're
Speaker 1: arresting somebody. When you arrest somebody, the kids don't get
Speaker 1: to go in the cell with them. I mean, this
Speaker 1: happens in law enforcement across the country all the time. Okay,
Speaker 1: so they're arresting people that somehow is getting lost in
Speaker 1: this process because it's illegal to cross the border. But
Speaker 1: these things are complicated for liberals. They can't really handle them.
Speaker 1: But what about the fact that this was happening under
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. Fact not not a dispute, There not
Speaker 1: a This was a tactic that was used, that was
Speaker 1: in practice during the Obama administration. UM. CNN's Brooke Baldwin,
Speaker 1: who I will say full disclosure. I like on a
Speaker 1: personal level, and I think among the CNN anchor she
Speaker 1: makes the best effort to be fair. So I will
Speaker 1: say that, you know, I and I will never trash
Speaker 1: somebody who is a personal friend of mine because I
Speaker 1: think that that's dishonorable. She does work at CNN, and
Speaker 1: I think CNN is the enemy of truth. But I
Speaker 1: like Brooke. She's she's been a good person whenever I've
Speaker 1: dealt with her. So but but she asked her she's
Speaker 1: asking a real question here of this congresswoman. I don't
Speaker 1: I don't even know which congresswoman it is. It doesn't
Speaker 1: it's a Democrat. That's all you really need to know. Uh.
Speaker 1: But she asks her about what's going on at the
Speaker 1: border or what is going on at the boarder years
Speaker 1: ago with Obama? You know, did anybody did you have
Speaker 1: a problem with what was going on then? And here
Speaker 1: is what Democrat congresswoman, And here's how the response goes.
Speaker 1: Play a job for Democrats because you hear the president
Speaker 1: now you know a lot on a lot of topics,
Speaker 1: and this one included you know, looking back to previous administrations, well,
Speaker 1: they should have done more right and so as so
Speaker 1: many people in this country are certainly outraged by the
Speaker 1: cages and the thermal blankets and the facilities housing these kids.
Speaker 1: You know, they were all there in under President Obama.
Speaker 1: And my question to you, Senator Baldwin is did you
Speaker 1: speak up against them? Then? You know, on the on
Speaker 1: this issue that we get into a moment where we're
Speaker 1: making progress and then when it uh, when installs we
Speaker 1: turned around, I think we can need to continue to
Speaker 1: be focused on it and press it through the American
Speaker 1: people made confidence that we can solve problems. Nobody believes
Speaker 1: that we have uh an immigration system that works? Okay,
Speaker 1: did you I know I was messing with a little
Speaker 1: bit underneath there. But guys, that was the biggest non answer.
Speaker 1: That's the biggest non answer every seat in my life.
Speaker 1: I think the American people confidence immigration? And you know
Speaker 1: she said, did you make a big deal of this
Speaker 1: when Obama was doing it? That's the question immigration confidence
Speaker 1: and the American people. Uh it's Senator Tammy Baldwin, by
Speaker 1: the way, uh so, senator, Wow, it's a senator. I
Speaker 1: thought it was I thought it was a congresswoman. Pardon me,
Speaker 1: Senator Tammy Baldwin. Whoa gosh? What state does she represent?
Speaker 1: What the heck is wrong with that? Wisconsin? Wisconsin? What
Speaker 1: is going on with you? Guys? You you voted for
Speaker 1: this person? Your immigration? All right? And Brooke Baldwin at CNN,
Speaker 1: to her credit, hey, I say good things are good.
Speaker 1: I say bad things are bad. To her credit, she
Speaker 1: pushes back in and basically gives the senator pardon me
Speaker 1: for saying she was a congresswoman, before gives the senator
Speaker 1: another another at bat here to actually answer the question.
Speaker 1: Remember the question is did you care when Obama was
Speaker 1: separating families at the border, when parents and children were
Speaker 1: separated by Obama during his administration, did you care? And
Speaker 1: and here's her second attempt play it, but were you
Speaker 1: worried about it? Then? Did you raise your voice under
Speaker 1: the Obama administration? You know, in numbers of cases usually
Speaker 1: I remember a constituent who was in attention out of
Speaker 1: the border, arguably very inappropriately, and we, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: we raised our voice in that instance and many others.
Speaker 1: But that's uh, We've got to do this now in unison.
Speaker 1: It's not enough to do it case by case or
Speaker 1: senator or a house member by house member. We've got
Speaker 1: to resolve to fix this this year. Did you hear that?
Speaker 1: You know, I think there might have been a guy
Speaker 1: at some point somewhere that maybe something said, you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: there was a guy that that was at the border,
Speaker 1: you know, a long time ago. I think he wears
Speaker 1: T shirts. Sometimes I helped that guy, that guy, you
Speaker 1: know that one. This is kind of like the uh
Speaker 1: is it Norm John? You know, you know the show
Speaker 1: Cheers where Norm goes on Jeopardy as a long time ago.
Speaker 1: Oh Cliff, thank you, Cliff. Not Norm Cliff Cliff goes
Speaker 1: on Jeopardy and he and his answer to the to
Speaker 1: the to the Jeopardy final Jeopardy question is you know,
Speaker 1: you know someone who's never been in my kitchen. It's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's technically true. And Senator Tabby Baldly here's like,
Speaker 1: there may have been a guy and a guy at
Speaker 1: the border um inappropriate and border and collective action and
Speaker 1: raising a where it is just blather. She's just blathering.
Speaker 1: This is like what she's saying doesn't even make It's
Speaker 1: not even really English. I mean it's words, but they're
Speaker 1: they're just strung together. I know. I think it's funny
Speaker 1: because how else could you there are so many ways
Speaker 1: to answer that question just say oh, yes, you know,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party definitely was concerned about the issue. No
Speaker 1: one can disprove that really, right. I mean it's it's
Speaker 1: not accurate, but that's that's just like your opinion man, right.
Speaker 1: But instead, and there may have been at one person
Speaker 1: wha Wisconsin man. I'm telling you, your cheese is amazing
Speaker 1: and your people are wonderful. Actually had a room made
Speaker 1: from Wisconsin when I lived in d C. Over a
Speaker 1: decade ago. At a Wisconsin roommade the night of Family
Speaker 1: was the nicest people. They're so nice they could have
Speaker 1: been Canadian. But what's up with this senator? All right, guys,
Speaker 1: you can do better than this, this Tammy Baldwin, this
Speaker 1: is you. You can better. It's all I can tell you.
Speaker 1: All Right, it's just craziness. Uh. And here's the real answer.
Speaker 1: No one Obama was doing this. Yes, there were a
Speaker 1: few left wing groups here and there that are you know,
Speaker 1: open borders hard you know, hard line open borders advocates
Speaker 1: who may have made some noise about it. But in fact,
Speaker 1: the the hypocrisy here is so strong that they will
Speaker 1: use photographs from the Obama era around the border and
Speaker 1: blame Trump for it. They're like, oh god, these terrible
Speaker 1: photos of what was going out of the border from
Speaker 1: what Obama was president. Thanks Trump, how does that work?
Speaker 1: Of course it doesn't work, but they don't care. They
Speaker 1: just want to be upset at Trump. That's I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you something that's been a bigger part of all
Speaker 1: of this. Then. That's been a bigger part of this
Speaker 1: than even than than the political win. That there was
Speaker 1: just a need for a collective scream. Remember that woman
Speaker 1: who did the scream, you know, after Trump one. This
Speaker 1: was the political equivalent of that. They wanted to just
Speaker 1: scream about our Trump. Trump's a Nazi, I hate Trump,
Speaker 1: you know. They just wanted to freak out about him.
Speaker 1: This was their opportunity to do it. The fact that
Speaker 1: the tactic isn't new, that the rule of law is
Speaker 1: it was being shredded by Democrats on the border, everything,
Speaker 1: none of that matters. They just want to yell about
Speaker 1: how much they hate Trump. All right, I'll be right back.
Speaker 1: He's holding the line for America. Buck sex in his back.
Speaker 1: Because there are some fantastic things about this president. One
Speaker 1: of them is that he's really really entertaining, and he
Speaker 1: reminds us of things like the man bun is never
Speaker 1: a good idea unless you are, in fact a samurai
Speaker 1: warrior in feudal Japan. I'm sorry, I just I can't
Speaker 1: get excited about the man Bun, and neither kin President Trump.
Speaker 1: He was at a rally in Duluth, Minnesota last night,
Speaker 1: and some guys showed up, drove two and a half
Speaker 1: hours apparently just so he could go and heckle the president.
Speaker 1: And he was a dude with a man bun. And
Speaker 1: this is how the president decided to deal with this
Speaker 1: particular Heckler play. It was that a man or a
Speaker 1: woman because he needs a haircut more than I do,
Speaker 1: wouldn't wouldn't tell, Oh, I couldn't tell needs a haircut?
Speaker 1: As president? And you you you you come at the
Speaker 1: Trump your best, not your best, not miss if you're
Speaker 1: gonna try to bring the insult game his way, you know,
Speaker 1: if you're gonna try to be that guy man bun,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you it's it's something occasionally was I
Speaker 1: was seen in New York for a while. Tough thing
Speaker 1: to pull off, tough thing to pull off. If I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be totally honest with you, there was a very
Speaker 1: brief period in college where my hair was long enough
Speaker 1: because I wasn't getting it cut very often. That occasionally
Speaker 1: during some sports, I would man bun it and I
Speaker 1: that will live in infamy, folks, that will live there.
Speaker 1: There are fortunately no photos of this, zero photos exist,
Speaker 1: Thank heavens. It was before everyone had photography on their
Speaker 1: cell phones, right, I mean, can you imagine Buck with
Speaker 1: the man bun circuit two thousand and two that was
Speaker 1: that would be uh no, bueno. But it was a
Speaker 1: thing that happened. But Trump shut this guy down, and
Speaker 1: and he wasn't even done with the He wasn't even
Speaker 1: done with his commentary on the man bun. He he
Speaker 1: kept it going. He told him where this protester needs
Speaker 1: to go play it. So, yeah, a single protest, sir,
Speaker 1: He's going home to his mom, say a lot of mommy,
Speaker 1: and tomorrow the fake news will say tomorrow, massive protests
Speaker 1: at the Trump rally. One person. See, you know, he
Speaker 1: makes a really important point there. The fake news always
Speaker 1: tries to hide CNN Number one others as well. They're
Speaker 1: trying to hide behind us. Oh no, we reported that.
Speaker 1: Oh no, that's we're factually accurate. We're factually accurate. But
Speaker 1: they're always looking for ways to inflate certain aspects of
Speaker 1: the narrative. They're always looking for ways to focus on
Speaker 1: certain parts of the coverage to tell a narrative that
Speaker 1: is helpful to Democrats, helpful to the left, and hurts
Speaker 1: Trump and conservatism. That's what they do. But this this
Speaker 1: guy with the man, but I will say this. To
Speaker 1: show up at a Trump rally surrounded by a sea
Speaker 1: of red Maga hats and rocking your man Bun go
Speaker 1: up and start trying to yell about how Trump is.
Speaker 1: I don't know what he was saying, you know, a
Speaker 1: fascist or it was something like that. There is a
Speaker 1: certain degree of hutspa there. I will say, I think
Speaker 1: it's it's a dumb idea, but wow, the sky is
Speaker 1: uh is deciding to go right right into the lions
Speaker 1: den and get himself some attention. But yeah, man Bunn
Speaker 1: is just never okay, And so Trump was really giving
Speaker 1: us a public service announcement. Just say no to the
Speaker 1: man Bun. Now the ponytail, that's a whole other caret
Speaker 1: that's a whole other thing. What do we think of
Speaker 1: the ponytail? Folks? You know, people get I I've talked
Speaker 1: ponytail before on this show. People get for guys, not
Speaker 1: for girls. People get very opinionated about this one. I'll
Speaker 1: leave that one to all of you. But man Bun,
Speaker 1: I give it the thumbs down. Roll Call is up next. Well,
Speaker 1: it's been quite a week here in the Hut my
Speaker 1: friends and and I just wanted to say, first off,
Speaker 1: thank you to all of you who have downloaded the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut with Buck Sexton Podcasts. Even if you're a
Speaker 1: radio listener, if you've never listened to podcasts before, I
Speaker 1: hope you will check it out. It's only it's like
Speaker 1: twenty or thirty minutes. It's quick. It's just kind of
Speaker 1: an update, a very a very relaxed chat between us
Speaker 1: in the in the Hut. So it really would be uh,
Speaker 1: very appreciated if you wouldn't mind downloading that Just all
Speaker 1: you have to do if you have the Apple Store,
Speaker 1: going into you know, iTunes or Apple click on store,
Speaker 1: type into the Freedom Hut, and then when you get
Speaker 1: there you'll see there's a subscribe button. Click subscribe and download.
Speaker 1: So so downloaded, but but click subscribe because then each
Speaker 1: one will pop into your inbox. And guys, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be experimenting with it a lot. I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: adding probably some fun guest interviews, people that I just
Speaker 1: really like. We're gonna have a long chat over not long,
Speaker 1: but you know, in depth chat about whatever we think
Speaker 1: is important. There will be Commy Bearer, there will be
Speaker 1: Angus McManus, there will be uh Jean Jacques, the French millionaire,
Speaker 1: all the characters from the original Buck Sex and Show.
Speaker 1: They're gonna live in the Freedom Hut because I think
Speaker 1: that's the best place for it. So, like I said,
Speaker 1: please do downloaded. And it means a lot. It means
Speaker 1: a lot to me to have you all. Look, it's
Speaker 1: it's all. It's it's free. So there's that the freedom
Speaker 1: Hunt is free. And you can see we've got kind
Speaker 1: of a cool logo. It's red, white and blue with
Speaker 1: little island. Uh. So go into your iTunes store. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get it up on Stitcher. I don't know for
Speaker 1: up on Stitcher just yet. We're working on the technology
Speaker 1: side for that, as in I'm trying to figure out
Speaker 1: simple technological issues. So there you have it all right,
Speaker 1: now you know what time it is, team, this party
Speaker 1: is about to get it. Feel those beats. It's time
Speaker 1: for roll call, all right. If you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of roll Call, which is always fun, all
Speaker 1: you have to do is go on your Facebook account,
Speaker 1: go to Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton send us
Speaker 1: a message please, and many of you did. Just that's
Speaker 1: we won't get into it now. Karen wait, no, yes, Karen, sorry,
Speaker 1: here we go. Now. I know why people got so
Speaker 1: excited about Commy Bear. How can you be so funny
Speaker 1: on so little sleep, take care of yourself. I wonder
Speaker 1: about the way you were burning it at both ends
Speaker 1: of the candle. From Karen Well, Karen, thank you. I
Speaker 1: was very tired yesterday. Um And although some people say
Speaker 1: that when I get tired, this is just a thing
Speaker 1: that I've noticed, somebody we will know me very well
Speaker 1: said that when I get tired, I'm a little less
Speaker 1: patient with things in general, which means I get a
Speaker 1: little grumpier and a little more fire in the belly
Speaker 1: to go after the bad guys, so to speak, to
Speaker 1: really take the fight to the enemy and to talk
Speaker 1: to them at some level about you know, basically, I'm
Speaker 1: fiery when I'm when I'm angry. When I get angry,
Speaker 1: radio gets a little bit better sometimes. All right, first
Speaker 1: up are next up here? Sorry I keep messing that up.
Speaker 1: Brian writes book I'm in the Battle Space Deployed. Would
Speaker 1: like to send you an email. OSS will be in
Speaker 1: DC in early July. From Brian uh Well, Brian, send
Speaker 1: an email official Team buck at gmail dot com. I'll
Speaker 1: get it there and if you're in d C, happy
Speaker 1: to give you some rex about good places to go
Speaker 1: get a beer and all the rest of it. Uh
Speaker 1: Dr Lee rights, good morning Buck, great show. Oh wait
Speaker 1: no that's not doctorally. Why is this keeps giving me
Speaker 1: the wrong? Something wrong? On my Facebook, Stephen writes, good
Speaker 1: morning Buck, great show, great hair. You're smart man, Stephen.
Speaker 1: You know how to get into the roll call. I'll
Speaker 1: listen to your podcast on my drive into work this morning.
Speaker 1: And you said that the Democrat position was that they
Speaker 1: only want to push for amnesty in regards to this
Speaker 1: border craziness. I have to respectfully disagree with you. Trump
Speaker 1: offered them an amnesty deal earlier, but they rejected it,
Speaker 1: saying it wasn't good enough. Really, what they want is
Speaker 1: the issue as a political tool. They don't actually want amnesty.
Speaker 1: They don't actually want to help these people. What they
Speaker 1: want is control and power. Keep up the good work.
Speaker 1: I'm loving all your new endeavors and most of all
Speaker 1: shields high well, Stephen, thank you so much. I'll say this, Uh,
Speaker 1: there's a I would agree there's a lot of truth
Speaker 1: in what you're saying here, but I also think that
Speaker 1: they would take a full scale amnesty with nothing else
Speaker 1: attached to it. They were They're not even willing to
Speaker 1: trade amnesty for a wall, which is I think where
Speaker 1: people really realize that the open for Democrats is that
Speaker 1: they can keep this issue going forever. They don't want
Speaker 1: one amnesty, they want amnesty in perpetuity. They want amnesties
Speaker 1: going forward as far as possible until I don't know,
Speaker 1: until we are completely an open borders country. I do
Speaker 1: believe that as the end state for the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: that is what they want. Remember, we will say, oh,
Speaker 1: it will dissolve the country, it's such a bad thing.
Speaker 1: They will say, no, We're just gonna be in charge.
Speaker 1: America will be this massive status enterprise that takes from
Speaker 1: the productive and gives to the less productive. And there's
Speaker 1: no real patriotism. It's just force. It's the force of
Speaker 1: the state that will hold it all together. No sense
Speaker 1: of unified political culture. The polity in the ancient Greek sense,
Speaker 1: in the Platonic or Socratic sense of the term, will
Speaker 1: cease to exist, and you will just have a superstate
Speaker 1: in its place, and not super like Superman. So now
Speaker 1: that we've gone into that, we can hear from Dr
Speaker 1: Lee here. She writes, Hey, Buck, I'm loving the new
Speaker 1: show Rising. It's great finally seeing you throw down some
Speaker 1: good arguments with a progressive and a fair environment. I
Speaker 1: would love for you to ask Crystal if someone shows
Speaker 1: up at the border illegally, what should be done with them,
Speaker 1: because it sure seems like you would rather none of
Speaker 1: the laws be enforced, and thus you would rather have
Speaker 1: open borders. I have a feeling I know what she
Speaker 1: would say. Well, Chris and I I did bring that
Speaker 1: up in fact today during the show, and for those
Speaker 1: of you who missed it, you can watch it at
Speaker 1: hill dot tv slash Rising. I said, I get the
Speaker 1: feeling Democrats really just want to tell everyone that they
Speaker 1: can stay, and I believe that I think that that
Speaker 1: is true. So there you go, Doctor Lee. Always good
Speaker 1: to hear from you. Give the hubs a high five
Speaker 1: from me, and hopefully see you guys soon. Uh James
Speaker 1: next up here? Hey Buck. I'm loving Rising, but of
Speaker 1: course I have a couple of critiques your comment that
Speaker 1: this show is an opportunity to share thoughts from a
Speaker 1: different perspective without the snippiness. But Crystal is often quite snippy.
Speaker 1: She has no qualms about tossing a snide remark in
Speaker 1: your direction. But I have seen no retorts coming from you.
Speaker 1: Either you all keep it nice or not. PS you're
Speaker 1: not being Mike correctly. Most often you sound like you're
Speaker 1: being picked up by an area Mike, more acoustic noise
Speaker 1: and reverb than a close body Mike. Interesting. Interestingly, Crystal
Speaker 1: don't seem to have that problem, just saying keep up
Speaker 1: the good fight. James on the first comment, I can't
Speaker 1: speak to what my co host does because we are
Speaker 1: partners in this endeavor and I want her to just
Speaker 1: be as successful as possible and everything that we're doing,
Speaker 1: I can speak to my side of it and just
Speaker 1: say that I, whether it's with my co host or
Speaker 1: anyone else on the show, I am. I have a
Speaker 1: mandate to be uh a gentleman, and that is not
Speaker 1: always easy. It's not easy in this media world. And
Speaker 1: sometimes I'll tell you the truth, it puts me at
Speaker 1: a disadvantage. Certainly would put me to a disadvantage sometimes
Speaker 1: at CNN, because there I would think I was having
Speaker 1: a gentlemanly discussion and then all of a sudden, the
Speaker 1: ambush would be set. And and then when you realize
Speaker 1: what's happening, meaning that all of a sudden, the nastiness,
Speaker 1: the snippy comments, the the unfair personal dig once that happens,
Speaker 1: then you got like thirty seconds before you're in commercial
Speaker 1: and you realize, oh wait, what what? Just what was that?
Speaker 1: It's very much like the drive by phenomenon that Rush
Speaker 1: talks about. They do drive bys to people when they're
Speaker 1: guests on TV. But we will try to work this out.
Speaker 1: And look, there will be some fireworks on the show.
Speaker 1: They're always there. Always is the possibility of fireworks. And
Speaker 1: you have people that disagree as much as I do
Speaker 1: with Crystal, but we're gonna try to keep them good
Speaker 1: natured always. And and do I have a particularly long
Speaker 1: fuse for somebody who does TV immediate? Yes? Is that
Speaker 1: always to my advantage? No, but that's how I am,
Speaker 1: and my mom and little sister watch what I do,
Speaker 1: and I have to be a gentleman. So there you
Speaker 1: have it. But thank you, James. And I'll look into
Speaker 1: the mic issue too. I think you may be correct
Speaker 1: on that one. We've been having some audio issues, all right, Craig.
Speaker 1: Craig Rights Test Studio. Buck just heard your latest podcast though,
Speaker 1: bro pozzalo va nazad Russian for welcome back Commy Bear. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Craig, and yeah, Commy Bear. His home is
Speaker 1: now The Freedom Hunt Podcast So those of you who
Speaker 1: like the Freedom Hunt podcast, you want yourself some Commy
Speaker 1: Bear h or if you want Commy Bear, you want
Speaker 1: the you know what I'm saying. Thank you Craig for
Speaker 1: the message. Great to hear from you, much appreciated. Stephen writes,
Speaker 1: loving the Freedom Hunt. On martial arts, I have taken
Speaker 1: taekwondo and did note the attempts to be a safe
Speaker 1: martial art. I like Kraftmagaw much better because it is
Speaker 1: in philosophy straight forward the throat, and it actually trains
Speaker 1: unarmed self defense for modern weapons, useful for anyone, but
Speaker 1: especially for me being a non sworn volunteer. I do
Speaker 1: not get to carry on duty. Uh And yeah, so
Speaker 1: there you have it. Thank you Stephen for writing in.
Speaker 1: I would say, you know, Kraftmagan is better for self
Speaker 1: defense than taekwondo in my experience I did. I did
Speaker 1: take some quove maga. I've done taekwondo as well when
Speaker 1: I was really little, but I don't can't pretend to
Speaker 1: really remember any but I've seen enough of it to
Speaker 1: get a feel of it. And the truth is, I mean,
Speaker 1: high kicks are just inherently risky uh and low probability
Speaker 1: of success in a self defense scenario. That doesn't mean never,
Speaker 1: it just means rarely. Uh So yeah, um, I I
Speaker 1: will tell you that in my opinion at this point,
Speaker 1: without being somebody who is a I know means a
Speaker 1: martial artist or a self defense expert, but as an
Speaker 1: analyst who pays a lot of attention to things and
Speaker 1: learns about them, I would think that if you want
Speaker 1: to learn how to defend yourself, uh you want a
Speaker 1: basis for striking, which would be um boxing I think
Speaker 1: is probably the best one to start with because you're
Speaker 1: also it's a basis for striking, but you're learning to
Speaker 1: hit and get hit, which is an important part of
Speaker 1: self defense. And then some form of grappling, so you know,
Speaker 1: you want boxing and wrestling would work. Boxing and jiu
Speaker 1: jitsu honestly probably a little bit better. Kickboxing and some
Speaker 1: form of grappling, you know, that would be what I
Speaker 1: think is is the best. And you know, some fencing
Speaker 1: if you want to be really fancy and learn how
Speaker 1: to fight with a foil and a pay or a
Speaker 1: right pier. Uh No, No, fencing is not good for defense,
Speaker 1: although the footwork and fencing is useful for a whole
Speaker 1: lot of things, including I mean the footwork and fencing
Speaker 1: is not all that dissimilar from the footwork in wing chong,
Speaker 1: which is basically kung fu. Uh so, and footwork is
Speaker 1: the basis of what were they all martial arts actually,
Speaker 1: So fencing does have some utility that way. But if
Speaker 1: somebody jumps you in a dark gallery and you said,
Speaker 1: but wait, I don't have my foil um, that's not
Speaker 1: gonna help you. You're they're probably gonna punch you a
Speaker 1: little bit harder with that one. So here we go.
Speaker 1: Roger rights Buck, how do I get your podcast? Now?
Speaker 1: You've just started your new series. I'm only seeing twenty
Speaker 1: eight minute shows, thanks Roger. That twenty eight minute show
Speaker 1: is the first of Freedom Hunt podcast. If you want
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show, that's the full radio show I do.
Speaker 1: It should be in the same feat under iTunes. So
Speaker 1: search for the Freedom Hunt see what pops up, download that,
Speaker 1: subscribe to that, and also search for the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show and you can get them all. Remember the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show is five nights a week. It's this radio
Speaker 1: show you're listening to right now. There's a podcast of
Speaker 1: this five night a week radio show. So people can
Speaker 1: listen on demand. There's also a podcast that is a
Speaker 1: completely separate product called The Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: which is just me sitting doing a podcast once a week,
Speaker 1: which we just started in the last twenty four hours
Speaker 1: and I really really really hope as many of you
Speaker 1: as possible will uh download it, will listen to it,
Speaker 1: and and we'll check it out. So there you go. Um,
Speaker 1: that's what we've got Tomorrow. We're gonna have a bit
Speaker 1: of a freestyle Friday. You know what that means. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have all kinds of fun and uh until then,
Speaker 1: my friends Shields High