WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Siren

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb. Today is Saturday, so we have another

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>episode from the vault for you here. This originally published

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>eleven seven, twenty twenty four. It is our episode on

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Siren from Mythology. So let's dive right in.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick. And once again October

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 3>content has spilled over the edge of the month.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. In today's episode, we're continuing our Halloween twenty

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four express with an episode that was originally scheduled

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for late October, but our episode on the Hogs of

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Hell went a little long, ended up going into two episodes,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so we bumped this one back a bit. It's a

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>topic we've touched on briefly before, but it's a great one,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>taking us back to the world of oceanic monsters of

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>myth and legend. We're going to be talking about the Siren.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>The Siren, So I realized Rob, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 3>but I realized I think we both had we had

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 3>different theeomorphic hybrids in mind when we were separately thinking

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>about the siren, Because when I thought of the siren,

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I first thought of sort of half woman, half bird

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 3>creatures that sing to the sailors. But I get the

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 3>impression that your mind first went to half human, half fish.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>So I guess those are both within the siren tradition,

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>aren't they?

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They are. This is one of the things about the siren,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss, is that there are takes on them

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in which they are essentially mermaids. It's essentially some version

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the European North European mermaid tradition. There are versions

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of it in which they are just sort of beautiful

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ladies who sing sailors to their death, that sort of thing.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And then other times they are essentially what we might

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think of as a harpie, you know. They are a

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>winged creature, perhaps like an all out vulture type being,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with even just the head of a maiden or the

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>face of a maiden.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>But in either case, I think we're to assume that

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 3>their voices may be lovely, but they sing sailors to

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 3>their doom.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And that's one thing we can be sure on

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>when we look to really the most famous literary account

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the sirens, but also the one that continues to

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>raise a lot of questions because it does skim over

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>some of the details, as we'll discuss. We are, of

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>course talking about Homer's the Odyssey. I'm just going to

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>read a quote here. This is from the Samuel Butler translation.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I believe this is Circe warning Odysseus and his men

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about the challenges ahead. First, you will come to the sirens,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>who enchant all who come near them. If anyone unwarily

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>draws in too close and hears the singing of the sirens,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>his wife and children will never welcome him home again,

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 1>For they sit in a green field and warble him

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to death with the sweetness of their song. There is

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a great heap of dead men's bones lying all around,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the flesh still rotting off them.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Number one, that's intense. Number two does not describe them physically.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>And number three warbled to death.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Warbled to death. You know which, if you got to go,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>why not choose warbling? Why not? So this is you know, considered.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is probably the most famous literary description

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and non description of the sirens. But we have a

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of other materials that have depicted the sirens, describe them,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>or depicted them visually that also sort of compete with

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>our imaginations here and end up and this is often

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the case with these things, ends up coloring our absorption

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of Homer's original writings. We've had some great cinematic sirens

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>over time. We have, for example, to get into the

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>adaptations of the Odyssey itself, there, of course the Three

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Sirens and No Brother, Where art thou? The three strange

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>women that appear as beautiful washer women singing go to sleep,

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>little Baby. They of course lure end del Mar and

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>turn him into a horny toad sort of.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 3>Wait does he get turned back? I haven't seen this

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 3>movie in a while.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, he doesn't. Actually, we end up finding out later

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was never turned into a horny toad. He

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was captured by authorities because he was wanted.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, they find him again in the movie Theater

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Do Not Seek the Treasure.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you know, it's a great sequence in the film,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of laughs, and it works nicely in comparison

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to the theme of bat that's also employed in the work.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Elsewhere in cinema, we tend to see the idea of

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sirens employed more in terms of the evil mermaid. You

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:11.799
<v Speaker 1>want to have a mermaid, but you want an evil

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one where you lean into this idea of the siren.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Just a few quick mentions, and I'm missing a lot

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of them. I'm sure there's two thousand and one's Dagon.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Stuart Gordon film you have neat Split

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Tale at Kidneess style Mermaids in that. There's a two

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and another two thousand and one film titled She Creature

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that I have not seen since two thousand and one,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but I remember having a nice little cast to it,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and also having a monstrous mermaid more recently. I don't

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>know much about the plot details here, so I don't

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>know where this falls in terms of sirens. But there's

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a Polish musical horror film titled The Lure that seems

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to have resonated with a number of viewers. I've seen

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>some nice reviews of that. And then I think we've

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>had at least a couple of different Mermaid slash Siren

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>TV shows in recent decades, but I have not seen them.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to lean on our listeners to write

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in and tell us what those are like now. Again

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to get back to what we were just talking about earlier.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Though sirens are not definitively sea creatures or definitively mermaids. However,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to separate the two completely, so you know,

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>we do have to acknowledge that to whatever extent sirens

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are based in this idea of undersea creatures, well, you know,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of people and creatures from beneath the waves. Naturally,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it goes back very long ways. As long as humans

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have gazed out across the waves or peered down through

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>clear waters from the side of their boats, they've dreamed

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of a mirror world to our own, a place where

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>every animal has its watery reflection, where intelligent human like

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>beings no doubt dwell as well, along with various monsters

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and gods and so forth. There is a paper by

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Easter. This is a two thousand and one paper

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>again back to two thousand and one that we've we

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>cited in a much older episode of the podcast titled

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Hans Christian Andersen's Fish out of Water, and she points

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out that the Babylonians recognize gods with fish features or

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hybridity you have, like what Adappa fish the fishermen of Onias,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the teacher of wisdom. Even mighty Inky, the ancient Sumerian

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>water god, is sometimes depicted as having a cloak of

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>fish or scaled skin, and the chief place of worship

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was a ziggurat known as the House of the Subterranean Waters.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And additionally fishtailed gods, water dragons and so forth found

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>throughout the cultures of India, China and Japan and so forth.

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a quote from that Easter paper. She writes some

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>other mythological sea beings and deities, such as Poseidon and

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Sirens were not originally associated with water and pissine anatom.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The sirens were originally birds. We'll get back to that

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, indicating that divine power and woman leolure

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>became combined with the power and promise of the sea

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>when ancient cultures overtook maritime war and trade. So in

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that paper gets into a familiar theme on this show

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about deities and supernatural beings, is that

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of course they are passed down and they do not

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>stay in one form or another. They are reused, recreated,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, different, different, various relaunches and reboots of the

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>brand over time.

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 3>And in past episodes we've even talked about reasons for

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 3>questioning the very idea of such a thing as a

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 3>canonical form of a deity or a monster or something that.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, that makes sense when you have something like

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property, like if a monster is the creation of

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>a specific author and they describe it a certain way,

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and then other people could take the idea and vary it,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 3>but you would want to refer back to what is

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 3>the original one, you know, with like gods and monsters

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and things that come out of folklore. You know, maybe

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it makes sense to say there's basically an authoritative

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>version of a story, but most of the time there's not.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes the characteristics aren't even given in the earliest works

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that are still extant today. So like searching after the

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 3>canonical form of the monster or deity or whatever is fruitless.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 3>There just is no original that we can access.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we've talked about this before. You get

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of close to this idea when you look at

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a multi author of franchise like say Marvel Comics, where

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you can say, you know, you try to explain like, well,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>who's Venom, Oh, he's a villain of Spider man. Oh well, no,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>he's also kind of a hero. He's kind of an

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>anti hero. Oh yeah. And sometimes he's just straight up

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what we would think I was the protagonist of a story,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So it just it changes. And there are probably better

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>examples than Venom to turn to.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 3>There. Yeah, well, I think that's a good one. Except

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 3>it's like that. But imagine if most Marvel comics were

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>lost and we don't know what they said or what

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>was in them, and we don't know where the first

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 3>appearance of Venom was.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, But coming back to the Siren and

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>getting into the Greek traditions, here, we as the quote

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you read earlier attests to, we certainly experience the sirens

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and Homer's eighth century BCEE work The Odyssey, and they

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are described as malicious doomy women when we put in

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>asterisk by that woman description, malicious doomy entities anyway, who

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>hang out on rocks and sing to passing sailors. But

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Homer neglects to physically describe them at all. So again,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>even by just briefly mentioning them as women, I'm airing

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>because he does not ascribe gender to these creatures. But

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the thing is it's really hard not to be infected

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>by the various visual treatments of this encounter of these

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>creatures from throughout Western art, you know, which has often

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>served as a great opportunity to create dramatic and evocative

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>scenes that make use of, you know, the the unclothed

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are partially unclothed male and female bodies. I was talking

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about this with my son yesterday when I was researching this,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned to him, and he already knows his

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>way around myths and monsters pretty well, I mentioned, you

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>know that Homer never actually describes them. So they could

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>look like a woman, they could look like a fish monster,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they could look like a bird person, we don't know.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And he asked, well, could they just be like a

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>banana peel? And I dare say they could. And he

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>does not say that they do not look like banana peels,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and provides no other physical description at all.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 3>They could literally be Ronald McDonald.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They could be. There's nothing in the Odyssey that says

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not. So I was reading a bit more about

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this in this is an older book. This is an

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>older publication. This is from nineteen seventy. The Homeric Sirens

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>by Gerald K. Gressith. This was publishing the Transactions and

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Proceedings of the American Philological Association, and in it the

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but there spends a lot of time talking about what

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time were like two dueling interpretations of the

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sirens in Homer's the Odyssey, and I think that it's

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting to look at them here. So the first one

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that he references is the idea that the sirens are

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>soul birds, again playing on the idea that in other

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>texts we have the sirens described in Avian terms. And

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the connection here is that they would be representations of

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the souls of the dead in bird form, an idea

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that extends back through ancient Egyptian religion. This was an

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>idea champion by the German classical archaeologist Georg Viker. In short,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this view sees the sirens as things that emerge from

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>hades and or the grave, and as grethis explains, Homer

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>likely wouldn't have thought that the soul became a bird

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>upon death in this scenario, but he might have been

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>influenced by older ideas still present in art and culture

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of his time. Okay, then there's this other idea, and

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that is that the sirens are other world enchantresses, so

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>an idea in this case champion by German archaeologist and

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>translator Ernst Bouscher in response to Vicker arguing that Homer

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sirens are anthropomorphic. This view sees the sirens not as

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>creatures of the afterlife, but as something else that doesn't

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>reside in Hades, though perhaps does reside in a different

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>other world and might not even be directly malicious. That's

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about this kind of view. They might

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>be more in line with muses offering song and information

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're just not equipped to resist. We just can't

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>handle a song this beautiful and or information this tantalizing,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we are just drawn into it. And this

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>actually gets into the vagueness of how they actually bring

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about these men's dooms, because, as Aggressive points out, we

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have an answer for this in Homer either and

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere interpretations range from an overt and then the sirens

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ate him sort of situation to this idea that enraptured

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>individuals just slowly die of exposure on the shores of

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the sirens, like they're drawn by the song, and then

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they just you know, forget to eat, forget to stay

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the sun and just waste away.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And so in that.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Scenario, it's like, well, the muses, like they may not

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>even be entities that are aware of what they are doing.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>They're just sharing song and information, but we just can't

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>handle it as mortals.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating, And it's funny because the interpretation I always

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 3>just had in the back of my mind isn't even

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>listed there, which is the idea that they sit on

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the rocks and they sing to the sailors and they

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>draw the sailors in close, and the ships wreck on

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the rocks and the sailors drone that I don't know

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 3>where that idea came from, but that is what I

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 3>thought was being described in the Odyssey.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, Like I said, there are a lot of

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>paintings of the Sirens and or Odysseus, and I think

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they also so almost at times subliminally charge one's understanding

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of this scenario. And there are several of these that

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I've just seen most of my life. There

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are a couple in particular that pop up in the

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>time Life Enchanted World book series that of course makes

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>use of a lot of excellent original art, but also

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of classic art as well too, In particular

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>John william Waterhouse is the Siren from nineteen hundred. This

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is a like a vertical piece in which there is

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a nude woman with a harp of some kind of

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>or is this a lute?

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I believe it's a liar. Yeah, there you go, U

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>shaped stringed instrument.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So she's playing it on the rocks, and there

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>down in the water below her is an enraptured male,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like a youthful male, who looks like he is probably

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going to drown. And so like, I think this really

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>matches up with your read on it, and you know,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I often I think thought about it in similar terms

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at these images, like the sirens just draw you

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in and then you know, stuff happens. But it's not

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like they're biting into you or anything.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 3>That's right. But in the Waterhouse painting, the siren does

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>not look malicious. She does not look like she's even

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>really attempting to lure him. She's just kind of there existing,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 3>and he is up to his neck in the water,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>clearly about to die, looking like he has this combination

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 3>of just joy and terror.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then the other piece that was definitely in

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Enchanted World series is Herbert James Draper's nineteen oh

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>nine painting Ulysses and the Sirens. This is a very

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>captivating piece in which you see the familiar scenario that

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I may again describe her in a second, where, of course,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>how does Odysseus how does he get past the sirens? Well,

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of course he clogs the earholes of all of his

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>men with wax, and then he himself is strapped to

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the mast of the ship, and then they just keep

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>moving that way. The siren song doesn't infect the oarsman.

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It infects him, but he can't do anything about it

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's strapped to the mast.

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>And this is usually presented as a result of curiosity,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>like Odysseus wants to hear what the siren song is like,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>but doesn't want to allow himself under its spell to

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>command his men to do otherwise, so he has himself

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 3>tied up on purpose.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so in this particular piece by Draper, which

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know is widely available you can find it on

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wiki commons, and so forth, we see, you know, this

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>crazed look on Odysseus's eye. He's completely enraptured, straining against

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the ropes that bind him. Meanwhile, the naked sirens in

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this case seemingly seeming to transform out of mermaid form

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>into humanoid form, just like the movie Splash as they

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>crawl on the ship. And of course this is this

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>image of course, like a lot of the like later

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>treatments of sirens, is of course very there's a certain

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>sexual politics to all this and gender politics to it,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's clearly showed like the feminine form is the

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>aggressively alluring temptation that is coming at the men on

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the ship.

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it looked there are very different implied situations

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>in these two paintings, Like in the Waterhouse painting. I

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know, you could interpret it multiple ways, but it

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't look obvious to me. Like I said that the

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 3>siren is even trying to attract the man. She's just

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 3>sitting there. She might just be minding her own business. Yeah,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>and he's enraptured. In the second painting, the Draper painting

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 3>from nine, these are beings that are obviously trying to

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 3>seduce the men, and they are posed with seductive ill intent.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so these are the two that I was most

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, But there's a third I want to mention,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is the Sirens Annulylysses from eighteen thirty seven

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>by William Edie or Eddie I'm not sure which, but

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>this one is also tremendous. I was not familiar with this,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but in this one, we see the sirens on their

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>rocky island in the foreground, and in the background we

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>see Ulysses send a ship and there's a lot of

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>struggling going on there. But in the foreground the sirens

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are just kind of like, hey, Sirens, party, come on over, guys.

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And then next to them we see rotting bodies and bones.

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's quite quite a quite a scene.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 3>It is wonderful. But to your point, yeah, I interpret

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 3>this one more along the lines of the waterhouse painting.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 3>There's no indication that their attention even has anything to

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>do with the men on the ship.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, So I already rolled through the basic

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>scenario with Odysseus and the Odyssey and how they get

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>past the sirens. But we have another encounter, and this

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>one is detailed in the Argonautica from the third century BCE,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and this one involves Jason and the Argonauts. How did

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they defeat the sirens? Well, they brought Orpheus along with them,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the most famous bard of Greek mythology, at least as

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>far as mortals go. And his song is even sweeter

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>than the sirens, so you know, they explode or something.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>It's the Devil went down to Georgia.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, actually, as Apollodorus described it, I believe the sweet

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>song of Orpheus causes them to throw themselves into the

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>sea and become rocks. And it would turn out that

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>these were like the terms of their power, that if

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>their song ever failed to enthrall someone, then they have

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to die. They were done for. And there are similar

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>accounts with the Sphinx as well, you know, like if

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's riddle as guest, it has to throw itself off

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a mountain, that sort of thing.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 3>Wait, now that I said it, I'm trying to remember

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 3>what happens to the devil at the end of Devil

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Went Down to Georgia. BET's a fiddle of gold against

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>your soul. But what happens if Johnny wins, he.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Gets to keep the golden.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Golden Devil's just out of gold fiddle, that's it. Yeah.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>There was some I forget who was some stand up

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>comedian I think was talking about how you know, it's

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that the Devil's music is more impressive in that

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>particular song, we still give the wind to the mortals.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I agree, it is like very much like

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Devil goes down to Jordan.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Which text came first. I'm not sure.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the exact number of sirens fairies. They're like between

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two and five depending on what telling you're looking at.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>They have various names different there are different takes on

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>their parentage as well. Again it's just how many there

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>are to begin with, but their exact nature in large

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>part due to Homer being vague about it, This has

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>always been an area of discussion, and apparently it's not

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the only area that Homer's vague, And for instance, according

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to Gressith, he never explains that the Cyclops as one eye.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are moments like that where we

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like assume, like we knows as the

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>reader what it's supposed to be or what it becomes

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>canonized as later. But you can apparently get into discussions

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>with any of this of like, well, what did the

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>original author intend? What was the shape of it? Then?

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course, then again that because most of these

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 3>stories would be drawing on pre existing concepts and stuff

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>you never know, like what did people just naturally assume

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>when you name a character or type of being, Like

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 3>what did the reader bring to the reader or listener

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 3>bring to the table.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's one thing that Gressith gets into as well,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is that you have to end up looking for these

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>answers in the contemporary religion, but also in contemporary folklore.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>To whatever extent you can, you pick at it through

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>other sources. Now, I picked up a couple of my

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>my favorite monster books for a little more on these

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>these sirens, and I was looking at Jorge Luis Borges's

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Book of Imaginary Beings, and he points out three different traditions.

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>He points out that Avid describes them as golden birds

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the faces of virgins. He points out that Paulinius

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of Rhodes described them as women with the lower half

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of seabirds, and then much later medieval heraldry and bestiaries

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to present them just as straight up mermaids, again

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>fusing these older classical tellings with Northern European traditions of mermaids.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a reality you just can't

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>get away from. Then, when you keep tugging at siren

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>myths because the terms are often used interchangeably, Like some

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>some tales of the siren, you could sort of maybe

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>make a better case that these are actually mermaid stories.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But some of them are very are very juicy, and

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I just couldn't resist getting into a particular one. This

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is one that Borges also talks about. This would have

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>been the sixth century in northern Wales. It has said

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that a siren was caught and baptized, eventually becoming at

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in some traditions by the name of Murgan or Murrgain,

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which I believe means Seaborn. She was reportedly carried to

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>her baptism in a vat, and I believe and this

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is also tied to an Irish legend of lie Bon

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I often I've elsewhere seen this character

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>referenced as li Ban Murrgan, for example. I've also seen

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Mergan described as an early discredited saint, so I don't

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>know if I don't believe that she is officially a

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>saint in the Catholic Church. This would have been around

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what five eighty eight CE, I think, But she had

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a feast day at one point and it was January

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh, which I think is also devoted to various

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>other saints and so forth.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 3>This is an interesting story, but I'm thinking about the

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 3>symbolic implications of the baptism of an animal that lives

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 3>under the water.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and it, you know, comes back to what

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we were talking earlier about baptism and sirens. No, brother,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>we're art thou. There's apparently a more complete telling of

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this story, and I found that in Carol Rose's Spirits Fairies,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Lecracrouns and Goblins, where this luban murrgan. She starts out

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as a human, a human daughter of the High King

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of Ireland and a goddess Iatawan I believe is her name,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and she's just a normal human child. But then she

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is caught in the flood of a sacred spring with

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>her dog and carried to an underwater cavern, and she's

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>trapped there for a year. But then she prays that

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>she might be free like the fishes, and so her

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>lower half becomes like a fish, and her dog transforms

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>into an otter.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Well that is appropriate because otters are good boys.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred years later, enter a cleric by the name

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bioch and he hears her singing, and then he's

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>drawn to her singing. So they meet, and she asked

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>him to bring her to Saint Comgall, an actual historic saint,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is where the vat comes into the picture.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>They throw her in a vat and she is willingly,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, brought to the saint so that she may

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>be baptized. But at her baptism she is or upon

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>her baptism, she is faced with the choice another three

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred years of life or immediate entry into heaven, so

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, do not pass go directly to heaven. She

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>chooses heaven. So anyway, it's a lovely little little bit

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of folklore there. I like it quite a bit. And

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they're apparently depictions of the saint here, Saint leban or

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Saint Morgan, and yeah, sometimes she's depicted with a crown,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>yeah quite well. And then and some depictions you also

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>see her order there beside her.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's adorable.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, you know, we have these Northern European mermaid traditions,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>not to be confused with similar tales from around the world,

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>merging to some extent with classical tales of sirens, but

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>plenty of winged descriptions remain that ultimately line up more

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>with what you might think of today as a heartbeat.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, ancient wind spirits eventually transformed into fiends through

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>tellings of Greek myth. Depending on how you slice it,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Harpies and sirens may have been both female bird human hybrids,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but of different demeanors. So harpies you can think of

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>more as vengeful cannibal to spoilers, while sirens are alluring,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>musical beings of temptation, and if faced with both, you'd

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>need to fight the harpies off with physical weapons, while

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the siren demands a more cerebral approach. So you know,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, they're kind of if you're looking at

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>them both as avian beings, they're kind of reflections of

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>each other, one targeting the body and the other targeting

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the mind.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we mentioned earlier the idea of the siren

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as a feminine monster, and Carol Rose in Giants, Monsters

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and Dragons discusses this. Briefly points out that in medieval

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>European traditions, the siren takes on various symbolic powers. Quote

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for her attributed where the comb and the mirror of vanity,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the fish or eel symbols of the entrapped Christian soul,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ensnared by luxury and vice, the small dragon the symbol

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of her liaison with the devil, and her nakedness taken

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as a sign of wanton sexuality. So then and to

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this day, in some depictions we see the siren presented

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>as this monstrous female temptress, a corruptor of menfolk, but

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>also like this, indeed, like something that has been summoned

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>up to test ones resolve. Still, as Rose points out,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there were still descriptions of the siren as a bird

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>woman you know, well, you know, out of of the

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient world. Pops up in the seventh and eighth century

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Liber Monstorum, also a twelfth century Latin bestiari which describes

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>them in much more harpy terms as winged, rock dwelling

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>beasts well that will not only lure sailors to their death,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but pounce on them with flesh rending talons. And then

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>during the nineteenth century we even see again kind of

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like bumping up against all of these depictions of sirens

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>as mermaids and naked women in the water, we see

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>John William waterhouses eighteen ninety one painting Ulysses and the Sirens.

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And what do we see here? We see big birds

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with the heads of women, and they are the ones

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of sailing Ulysses strapped to the mast and his various oarsmen.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's no ambiguity about their intentions here they are

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 3>swarming the boat.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes there. Yeah, these are definitely aggressive human headed birds here. Waterhouse,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it would seem drew more on those classical Greek descriptions

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and depictions on vases and urns rather than what his

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>contemporaries were doing.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because I think it's the same painter John

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 3>William Waterhouse did the siren from nineteen hundred we talked

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 3>about earlier, the much more haunting and ambiguous image.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't help, but one, I don't know much

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about about the man in his work, and you know

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who's painting for. But I wonder if with the nineteen

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred someone was like, I'd like you to draw me

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a siren and no birds this time, John, I wanted

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a lady.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>The one from nine years later does seem a little

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>more mysterious and maybe mature.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, these are just a few like

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very famous examples of sirens and paintings from this period.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>There are others, So if you have favorites, feel free

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to send them into us, and you know I'd love

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at them.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, absolutely, Contact at Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Get in touch as always. Now, the idea

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 3>of the siren song luring sailors to their destruction by

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 3>one means or another got me thinking about nature. I

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 3>was wondering, are there any predators in nature that have

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the genuine biological equivalent of a siren song? A sound

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>or a song or a vocalization that lures prey to

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>their doom? And after I did a little digging, I

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 3>discovered the answer is yes. Apparently it is not very

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 3>common in nature, at least as far as we know.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>But there is one excellent example I want to talk about,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and this predatory song involves an animal that we just

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.479
<v Speaker 3>did a series on earlier this year, the cicada. In

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>this case, the cicada not as the predator, but as

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the prey. So I'm going to be referring to one

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 3>major source here, a zoology paper from two thousand and

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 3>nine published in Plus one by David C. Marshall and

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Kathy B. R. Hill called versatile aggressive mimicry of cicadas

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 3>by an Australian predatory Katie did So. This paper begins

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 3>by talking about the concept of mimicry in nature. Mimicry

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>in the animal kingdom is when an animal has an

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>adaptation that makes it seem like something other than what

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 3>it is, and this can take a lot of different

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 3>forms and serve a lot of different purposes. A lot

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 3>of animal mimicry is defensive in purpose and visual in format.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>So a vulnerable prey animal might try to fool predators

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 3>into leaving it alone, perhaps by looking like something totally

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 3>uninteresting to the predator, like a leaf, or like another

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 3>animal that tastes bad and is non nutritious. In some cases,

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 3>visual defensive mimicry makes the prey animal look threatening. It

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 3>makes it look like a different animal that is dangerous

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and could put up a fight, or one that is poisonous.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 3>But there are non visual forms of defensive mimicry as well.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>For example, a prey and can smell like something uninteresting

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 3>or something dangerous, so that's defensive mimicry. But there's also

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 3>what's called aggressive mimicry. This is when an animal disguises

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 3>itself for aggressive purposes, usually to attract or gain advantage

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 3>over prey if the mimic is a predator, or over

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 3>a host if the mimic is a parasite. And apparently

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the most common strategies for aggressive mimics in

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 3>nature is to exploit mating drive. So it's like, hello,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>fellow conspecifics, I am a member of your species and

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm very sexy. So the authors give some examples of this.

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>One is the bolus spiders collectively known as a Mastophora,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 3>which have been documented to attract male moths of at

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 3>least two different species by copying the sex pheromones of

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 3>female moths of those same species, so this would be

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 3>aggressive mimicry by smell. There's another into example, which is

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 3>predatory fireflies known as Fouturis versicolor, which these animals use

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 3>flashes of light to initiate mating within their own kind,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 3>but they can also copy the courtship flashes of females

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 3>of other firefly species to trick the males of those

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 3>species into getting close for a mating opportunity, and then

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the predatory fireflies just eat them, so this is aggressive

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 3>mimicry by visual signal. And the authors note that this

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 3>case is particularly interesting because the predatory Photurus fireflies can

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 3>copy the flashing patterns of eleven different prey species of fireflies.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's incredible versatility in the predatory mimic behavior, and

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 3>it's an interesting evolutionary question in cases like this how

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 3>that much versatility in the predatory behavior comes about. The

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 3>authors speculate that it might be possible in part because

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>in this case the predator and the prey are closely related.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But whatever the explanation there, both of these previous examples

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 3>work by the predator falsely appearing to be a female

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 3>conspecific that is ready to mate, either by smelling like

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 3>one or looking like one. This paper presents an example

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 3>of aggressive mimicry that is interesting for several reasons. Like

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the fireflies, the predator in this case shows versatility in

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 3>altering the mimic behavior to match multiple different prey species.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 3>But unlike the fireflies, the predator is not closely related

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 3>to the prey in a phylogenetic sense. And then also,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 3>though I didn't notice this priority claim in the paper itself,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a couple of news and blog sources I was reading

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 3>about the paper say that this was the first scientifically

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>documented case of an aggressive or predatory mimic relying on

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 3>sound rather than on visual or smell based cues, though

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 3>this mimic the mimic in question also does use visual

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 3>mimicry as a secondary appeal. I can't confirm there were

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 3>no earlier documented examples in nature, and I'm a little

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 3>curious why I found that claim in the popular sources

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and not in the research itself. But I did not

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>find any earlier examples. So if that is true, this

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 3>is the first documented case or sound is the medium

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 3>being used for the aggressive mimic to mimic something that

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 3>gets it access to its prey. Wow, So what is

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 3>this dangerous mimic? Well, it is the spotted predatory katie

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 3>did or Chlorobalius leucoviritus. So this is a large green,

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 3>green and white patterned katie did or bush cricket. It's

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 3>a species native to Australia, mostly found in the dry

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 3>interior regions of the continent, and it preys on multiple

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 3>different species of cicadas, belonging to the tribe Cicadatini. Among

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 3>other things. It's got multiple prey, but it likes to

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>eat these cicadas of Cicadatini. Now, it's important to know

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 3>that these prey cicadas rely on a two part acoustic

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 3>signaling behavior to initiate sexual pair formation. And when we

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>did our series on cicadas, we talked a lot about

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the songs of cicadas, how they use sound in their

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 3>mating behaviors. But in this case, these specific cicadas rely

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 3>on what the authors call signal response duets. So when

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 3>it's time to mate, the male cicada initiates with a

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 3>song particular to its species, and then if a female

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>is nearby and she's receptive to mating, she will reply

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 3>with a series of wing flicks, which can be recognized

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 3>visually if you're very close. But more importantly, the wingflicks

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 3>produce an audible sound that matches with that species specific

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 3>mating call put out by the male. So the wingflicks

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 3>can usually be heard for a range of several meters

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 3>and they will help the male locate the female. Authors

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 3>write quote. Because a wingflick reply is structurally nondescript, it

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 3>must closely follow the cue in the male cicada's song

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 3>in order to be recognized. But this leads to a

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of interesting situation where a clicking sound that has

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>roughly the right sound quality and the right latency meaning

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I interpret this, I hope I'm right about this. I

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 3>think they're talking about the time delay between the end

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of the male cicada's song and when the clicks start

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and stop in response to that. If it has these

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 3>these sonic qualities correct, it can be interpreted as a

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 3>female sexual signal by the male cicada. And as an example,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 3>the authors mentioned that with some of these cicadas in

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the tribe Cicadatini, you can attract males by like snapping

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 3>your fingers if you time it right with respect to

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 3>their songs. But different species listen for different things, and

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 3>some are more wary than others. I guess some just

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of rush right in there. Now, coming back to

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the katie DIDs, Chlorobelius adults are most active in the summertime,

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 3>and you will tend to find them perched in the

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 3>upper branches of small trees and large shrubs, where they

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 3>can take advantage of their green and white camouflage coloration

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 3>pattern to hide in the foliage and rob I've attached

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 3>a couple of pictures for you to look at, where

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 3>one is against a white background, where this animal is

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 3>very easy to see. Another one is of its standing

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 3>in the tree branches, where it's much easier to see

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 3>how it would just kind of blend in, especially if

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>you weren't looking very close.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it is often the case. Right when you

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the specimen more in its natural habitat, it

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>does blend in.

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So what do these katie diids do to mimic and

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 3>hunt the cicadas they eat?

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 3>The authors write that they can quote attract male cicadas

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Hemiptera cicatady by imitating the species specific wing flick replies

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 3>of sexually receptive female cicadas. This aggressive mimicry is accomplished

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 3>both acoustically with tegmental clicks and visually with synchronized body jerks,

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 3>so it's a two part mimic They imitate both the

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 3>sounds and the visually recognizable body movements produced by female

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 3>cicadas that are ready to mate, attracting male cicadas from

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the surrounding area, and when the when the male cicada

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 3>gets close enough, the katie did will promptly snatch it,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>bite into it, and eat it. And observations of these

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 3>predatory encounters find that the kadi did typically just eats

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing. They the entire cicada except for the wings,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 3>and they leave the wings behind. And I thought that

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 3>was interesting because I recall from our series on cicadas

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 3>this was also true of some bird predators, which would

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 3>eat the whole cicada except the wings and then just

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 3>leave pairs of wings everywhere.

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Interesting.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Now, one really interesting thing that the authors point out

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is that these predators are able to not only reproduce

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the different specific sounds of a bunch of different cicada species,

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 3>experiments showed they can reproduce the songs of cicadas they

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 3>have never come across before. So this acoustic mimicry is

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 3>not just a singular, evolved, pre programmed behavior, but it's versatile.

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 3>It is a versatile adaptable capacity to mimic and respond

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to cicada calls. Interestingly, and perhaps relatedly, Chlorobelius also uses

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 3>acoustic signals for its own reproductive purposes. So when it's

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 3>time for this Katie did to mate, the male Katie

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 3>DIDs will produce a trilling sound with a file and

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 3>scraper system on the edges of their fore wings, which

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 3>is thought to attract females which are interested in mating. Now,

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 3>coming to the discussion section of this paper, it's worth

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 3>noting that this is not the only way that the

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 3>mating call of cicada could be used to help a

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 3>predator eat a cicada. The predator could, for example, just

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 3>follow the song to its source and to eat the mail,

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and many predators do exactly this. They do follow the

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 3>mating calls of prey animals to hunt. But this is

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 3>a different strategy like the siren, or at least one

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 3>version of the siren. The kdy did lures victims to itself,

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's kind of interesting to consider. It's

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like a different evolutionary investment. I don't believe the authors

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 3>say this, so this could be on the wrong track,

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 3>but I was just personally wondering if it could have

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 3>something to do with the fact that the katy did

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>already has a cryptic coloration pattern, It has camouflage, and

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 3>so the fact that it may be using camouflage for

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 3>one thing, it may be using camouflage defensively to hide

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 3>from its own predators, from birds, and so forth. You know,

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 3>whatever praise on it, it may be able to get

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 3>double use out of that by specializing in a type

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 3>of predation that allows it to hold still and hide

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 3>among the leaves and have its prey come to it.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, And also, I guess maybe it's helpful if

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's this way, it doesn't have to worry about

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the predators. They could potentially be seeking out the mating

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>call of their very prey.

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's a very good point because as we talked

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 3>about it in our cicada series. I don't know with

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>this specific Australian family with the Cicadatinian Australia, but in

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 3>most places everything eats cicadas when the cicadas come out

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 3>their dinner, for everything out there, and most of the

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 3>things that are eating them, or at least a lot

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 3>of the things would be big enough to Eaticata did

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 3>as well. Right now. The authors in this paper argue

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 3>that the katie did's versatility and mimicry probably follows from

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the application of a few simple rules for one thing.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Since their game to eat pretty much any cicada, and

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 3>not just one particular species, they can probably ignore everything

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 3>about the male cicada's song except whatever part of it

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 3>cues the female cicada to respond, so there's less information

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to process. Just tune most of that out, focus on

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 3>whatever part you need to pay attention to to time

0:43:56.200 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 3>your response, your clicks and response, which is typically probably

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 3>something about the onset of a pause at the end

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 3>of a song segment. And this was funny because it

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 3>made me think about like text message scammers who are

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 3>going to possibly ignore basically everything you type to them

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and just be looking for a couple of keywords to

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 3>advance the scam script to the next waypoint.

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm, yeah, I mean often predatory. There you go.

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Efficiency, Yeah, predatory efficiency. But in general, the authors point

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 3>out that a complex adaptation like the Katie did has here.

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 3>It requires multiple parts. Right, You've got to have sound

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 3>producing organs, which they do in the four Wings. You've

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>got to have sound perceiving organs. You've got to be

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 3>able to listen so you know what to respond to,

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 3>and you've got to have the neural processing required to

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 3>make that match right, to produce the appropriate sound to

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 3>match the call you just heard. And fortunately for the

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 3>KDI DIDs, they already have all three capabilities for use

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 3>in their own mating. I remember that from earlier they

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 3>also sound in their own mating. However, there's an interesting

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 3>complication here, which is that if this predatory mimicry of

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 3>cicada mating duets were based on the mating behavior of

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 3>the predator species, you would expect the katie DIDs to

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 3>also engage in duets, and as far as the authors

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 3>could tell, this was not the case. The kd DIDs

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 3>do not seem to do male female duets. Instead, it

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 3>seems as of the time of this paper that males

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 3>generally produce a song which attracts a silent female to

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 3>its source. So the male makes a song, the female

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 3>comes and finds the male. But the authors acknowledge that

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 3>not a lot is known about this Katie did species,

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 3>so maybe some information is missing here. And also just

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 3>a reminder that I said there was both an acoustic

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 3>and a visual signal. The kt did also does this

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 3>body jerking behavior which accompanies the mimicry clicks, and it

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 3>does not seem to be physically necessary to make the

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 3>click sound, so it's probably also a mimic behavior in

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 3>this case to kind of look like a female cicada

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 3>flicking its wings between the leaves. So the male's like,

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, I see it right up there, and the

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 3>male's crawling up and then it gets eaten.

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating it. I mean this lines up with the basic

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Sirens script.

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Right absolutely, But in fact, to come back to the Odyssey,

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 3>one thing we see in the Odyssey is that the

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 3>prey of the sirens, at least one member of the

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>sirens prey, has a clever workaround a way of avoiding

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 3>the sirens song by plugging the ears of the men

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 3>rowing the ship and by lashing himself to the mast

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>so that the sirens wouldn't get him. This is what

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Odysseus does, and you could see that as the beginning

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 3>of a possible arms race in adaptations between sailors and sirens,

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And in fact there may be a fairly complex predator

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 3>prey arms race in evolution between these cicadas and the

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 3>katie DIDs. So here to read from the paper, the

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 3>author's right. Even though Cobonga ox lay, the species we

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 3>observed being attracted by Chlorobelius lucoviritis, has a structurally obvious

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 3>song cue and an easily timed repetitive rhythm. We have

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 3>found this species to be extremely resistant to our artificial signals.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Poorly timed finger snaps cause males of many species to

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 3>become wary, with kox Lay an especially strong example. Perhaps

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 3>persistent aggressive mimicry by Chlorobelius lucoviritis has selected kox Lay

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 3>males for greater sensitivity to the occasional poorly timed click.

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 3>This possibility also suggests an additional evolutionary route for the

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 3>cicada prey, the addition of false cues that ilicit premature

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 3>katie did replies without queuing female cicadas, whose response depends

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 3>on a particular combination of song elements. Long continued selection

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 3>of this sort might account for the extraordinarily complex songs

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of many Australian cicatatine species found in the arid Acacia

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 3>dominated habitats where see lucoviritis is most common. So that's

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 3>very interesting. We may have some Cicada odysseus'es on hand

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 3>who have evolved a defensive reaction to this type of

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 3>predatory mimicry by, for one thing, throwing out some decoy

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 3>sound signals that are not going to get females of

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 3>its own species responding. But if you do hear clicks

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 3>in response to them, that's something to be afraid of.

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Lets you know, there's a monster nearby. And then also

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 3>perhaps by being more sensitive to incorrect timing on the

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 3>response clicks in the duet.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Interesting. So yeah, so their use of the song

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes more nuanced in a way, in a way to

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>outwit these pretenders. Yeah, I mean one is tempted to

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>make various comparisons, to say, conversations between humans, perhaps in

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a dating scenario, you know, like a first date where

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one might throw out, hey, you know, did you see

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>such and such movie? And I thought it was pretty

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>good and they're like, yeah, it's great. Well, then you

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>know that's a red flag fill in your own example. Sorry,

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little slow today. I can't come up with

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a good example that we can all stand behind as

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>being the red flag for a first date.

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 3>But I absolutely understand what you're talking about, sort of

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 3>tossing out a sonic conversational bait to draw out the

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 3>attention of anything that you should be avoiding.

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well this is fascinating and again more evidence to

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a point that we're always making on the show, and

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that is that anything you find in myth and in

0:49:54.640 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>legend and fictional monsters, there is almost always something equally

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>weird in the natural world.

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's you know, through doing a lot of these

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.839
<v Speaker 3>October Monster episodes, I find it varies how close of

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 3>a match we can find in the natural world. Sometimes

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 3>there's just not something in nature that is a real

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 3>tight fit on whatever fictional example we're talking about, but

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 3>there's always something more amazing. Yeah, but this was a

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 3>case where I was shocked how close the fit is,

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 3>especially with the Odysseus cicadas. To be clear, that's not

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 3>their biological name, that's just what I'm calling him.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Now, all right, I have one more little curiosity to

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>consider here. Take it from the cabinet of curiosity, if

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you will, because it concerns a very learned individual who

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to have thought very long and hard on the

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>reality of sirens, as well as the reality of some

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>other things that I don't think one typically thinks of

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as having an objective reality. So I ran across this

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in Literature and a Lore of the Sea edited by

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Patricia Ann Karlson, specifically in an article titled the Extraordinary

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Being Death In The Mermaid and Baroque Literature by Eileen S. Goodman,

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>she points out the seventeenth century German polymath and Jessuits

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:33.760
<v Speaker 1>scholar Athanasius Kircher, who is sixteen o two through sixteen eighty,

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in one of his natural history volumes, seems to give

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>serious consideration to not only the objective reality of Noah's Ark,

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>which isn't completely out of the ordinary. He still see

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing going on today, but also spends

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time trying to figure out where Noah

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.560
<v Speaker 1>put all of the sirens.

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Right next to the unicorns.

0:51:55.960 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, well, we'll get to unicorns. He also believed in them.

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess brief refresher for those of you who don't

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>remember the story of Noah's Ark is this Old Testament

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Book of Genesis tale concerning the Great Flood and one

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>anti Theiluvian patriarch's mission to save all of the world's

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>animals from the flood in a great big boat. It's

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one of various great flood myths found throughout the ancient world. Obviously,

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not a story that easily endures very close

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>literal scrutiny. When you dig down into the two by

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>two details of the endeavor. I think you know a

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of us who grew up, you know, going to

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunday school class. You reach that point where you're like, wait,

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 1>how does this work? Now? Wait to two of each animal,

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then various questions arise. But Kircher was

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 1>very into figuring out exactly how all of this would work,

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and he, to be clear, seems to have believed in

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the reality of mermaids or sirens as well as unicorns,

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>based on some like the tail and the bones of

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a mermaid that were in his museum.

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so he had empirical evidence.

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like, we have evidence, this is what these were.

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And he describes them as amphibians and stresses that there

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is some controversy as to whether these particular amphibians were

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>or were not received into the arc. And I imagine

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>some of you might have wondered about this. How did

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened to the mermaids? So he explains in his writing,

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>well that others have said, well, perhaps they lived on

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the outside of the arc, outside of this great boat,

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in some sort of a nest, something like a

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:40.879
<v Speaker 1>fixed to the hole.

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm finding it a little confusing here because I would

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 3>not normally think that aquatic animals needed to be taken

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.439
<v Speaker 3>onto the arc at all, which I guess is part

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 3>of why he's classifying them as amphibians. That like, they

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:55.800
<v Speaker 3>can't live their entire lives in the water. They must

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 3>come to dry surface at some point.

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so there is some disagreement with people asking the

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>same questions here where did the mermaids or sirens go?

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Some said they stayed in nests on the outside of

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the ark, but Kircher dismisses the idea, stating that this

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is a This is a quote translated quote from his work,

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as referenced in that article by Goodman. Holy writ is

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in agreement on the matter of the little stalls into

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>which the animals were distributed, and it does not teach

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that any existed outside. And I believe he argues against

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that any creature lived outside the ship during

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the cataclysm, like even fish. I mean it, it's I

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have no answer there. It's like, even if you're even

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>if I'm going to assume that fish surely get away

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with living outside of the arc. I think he's making

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a case that amphibian creatures could not. They would have

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:54.359
<v Speaker 1>to be aboard the arc.

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 2>HM.

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'm assuming here based on what I'm reading,

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Kircher is arguing that the sirens would have ridden inside

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the arc, and I have to acknowledge the Yes, that

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds ludicrous to even be wondering about that. But I

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:14.320
<v Speaker 1>also I don't want to give everyone the wrong idea

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about this man, because by all accounts, he was a

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>brilliant mind, you know, a brilliant man of his time,

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes described as being the last man to know everything.

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is a guy who studied religion, linguistics, geology, medicine.

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>He tried to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and claimed that

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>he had translated them, but apparently not. He wrote an

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:46.439
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedia on China. He kept a vundo kama, or a

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>cabinet of curiosities, and he spent the majority of his

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>career at Roman College. He was fascinated by fossils. He

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 1>made proposals about the cause of plague that apparently line

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 1>up with some of the the actual you know, the

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 1>actual reality of it. He was intrigued by various devices,

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:08.359
<v Speaker 1>made little inventions. He was a science superstar of his day,

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:11.919
<v Speaker 1>even if He's often eclipsed in our recollection by such

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:15.759
<v Speaker 1>contemporaries as Galileo. And there is the fact that he

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed to believe in the existence of both mermaids and

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:21.720
<v Speaker 1>unicorns based on the evidence in his museum.

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well, I mean this would be, by no

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 3>means the only example of a truly brilliant mind in

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 3>history who spent a lot of time obsessing over minutia

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 3>based on false premises. Yeah, you know, the all the

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:39.320
<v Speaker 3>all the devotion to to alchemy and trying to trying

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 3>to work things out based on the literal interpretation of

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 3>the Bible and things like that.

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of books have been written about him,

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and I ran across there's actually a review of a

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:54.439
<v Speaker 1>particular book about him. This was in this case, the

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>review was written by the Vatican Observatory's brother, Guy Consumajno,

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who I the pleasure to hear speak here in Atlanta

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>many years ago. It was not speaking about this, he

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:09.919
<v Speaker 1>was speaking, I believe about religion and extraterrestrials. That's sort

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of like speculative material. But yeah. He wrote this article

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one titled A mishmash of brilliance and absurdity,

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and he stressed that, Yeah, here's this guy Kirchner, who

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was brilliant, you know, was obsessed with optics, acoustics, you

0:57:25.040 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>name it, just like everything that could be learned or

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>known about the world. He was all in on it.

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, he wrote three volumes on

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>how Noah managed to fit all of the animals and

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 1>their food into the arc, and then also speculates about

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the sirens as well.

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Isaac Newton, one of the most brilliant minds of all time,

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 3>was spent a huge amount of intellectual energy obsessed with

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 3>interpreting his with like his interpretations of biblical prophecies.

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Kanzemajno writes, quote, Kirchner makes a fascinating contrast in style

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with Galileo. While both were shameless self promoters, Galileo was

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>far more rigorous, focused, and polemical in his science. Kirchner's

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>theme was simply wonder and delight, reporting marvelous machines and novelties,

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like a seventeenth century version of Ripley's Believe It or.

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Not, Well, far be it from me to find fault

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 3>there in wonder and delight.

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know it kind of you know, drives

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>home that you know, wonder and delight are great, but

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they too can be kind of a siren song, steering

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you off into I mean, in the worst cases, you know,

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and delusion, but even into maybe just ideas that

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are not ultimately that productive but maybe entertaining. I don't know.

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Did Kirchner's three volumes on Noah's art like hurt anything,

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Did his belief in the physical reality of unicorns and

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mermaids hurt anything? Well? Maybe not, Maybe it's fine.

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's hard to say about that kind of thing,

0:58:58.080 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 3>though I would say in general, it's absolutely the case.

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that the estheticization of ideas can in some

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 3>cases have very negative consequences. Appreciating ideas primarily for whether

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 3>they are fun or exciting or how they make you feel,

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 3>with not enough appreciation for testing whether they are true,

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 3>can be in fact quite quite dangerous.

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, we've We've discussed multiple times in the show

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 1>various hypotheses that you know, sometimes are quite enthralling and

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and even inspiring, but are they the best hypotheses with

0:59:32.320 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>which to understand the universe? And that's not always the case.

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you just follow what's exciting. Then you're you know,

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in search of with Leonard Nimoy or something. You know,

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you're you're in the realm of Let's just talk about

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>these ideas because they are entertaining and not because they

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 1>actually explain the world around us.

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though, if we can make a persuasive case, I

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 3>hope we could convince you that you can put truth

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 3>testing as the first priority and ideas can still be fun.

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, So you know, don't put wax in your ears,

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>puts put a little Stuff to Blow your Mind in

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>your ears. Hopefully that'll help you out. All Right, We're

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and close up this episode, but we'll remind

1:00:14.120 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone out there. The Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>primarily a science and culture podcast, with core episodes on

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays and Thursdays. We do a short form episode on Wednesdays,

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and on Fridays. We set aside most serious concerns to

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:26.919
<v Speaker 1>just talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

1:00:27.320 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to us on Apple Podcasts or what

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have you, make sure you're subscribed to the show. If

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't reviewed us, give us a nice review. Maybe

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>touch up that old review. I don't know, but you know.

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The stars help, the nice words help, and likewise it's

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the If you're on Instagram you can follow us. We

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>are STBYM podcast.

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:56.919
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

1:00:57.040 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact the Stuff to Blow

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:08.360
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>H