WEBVTT - The Diesel Midterms

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.460
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios.

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts. Radio.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:07.300
<v Speaker 3>News.

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.260
<v Speaker 4>How much nuance is the president, is the White House

0:00:11.380 --> 0:00:14.420
<v Speaker 4>using in talking about the drivers of these higher energy prices?

0:00:14.820 --> 0:00:17.570
<v Speaker 2>Well, off camera, they will make some of the same arguments.

0:00:17.610 --> 0:00:19.630
<v Speaker 2>You know, inflation adjusted, it's not as bad as it

0:00:19.700 --> 0:00:22.509
<v Speaker 2>used to be. $ 100 oil isn't $ 100 oil the way

0:00:22.550 --> 0:00:24.930
<v Speaker 2>we used to think about it. But in reality, it's

0:00:24.970 --> 0:00:27.310
<v Speaker 2>a five alarm political fire for them. And it is

0:00:27.350 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>not only seemed to have put the House further and

0:00:30.020 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>further out of reach in these midterm elections, but expanded

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the Senate map into fairly jaw-dropping places like Kansas and

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.490
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina, where the president is campaigning. Gas prices are

0:00:40.970 --> 0:00:43.350
<v Speaker 2>very closely correlated to the president's approval rating. And so

0:00:43.390 --> 0:00:46.050
<v Speaker 2>you've seen Trump go around, kind of knock on every door,

0:00:46.229 --> 0:00:49.050
<v Speaker 2>open every cupboard, try to find every gallon of gasoline

0:00:49.390 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and diesel he can find anywhere, including from Vladimir Putin.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm David Gurra, and this is The Big Take from

0:00:57.860 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News. Today on the show, energy prices are up.

0:01:01.860 --> 0:01:12.390
<v Speaker 4>Will they take down Trump's party in the midterms? I'm

0:01:12.410 --> 0:01:15.110
<v Speaker 4>going to start by having you both introduce yourselves, first name,

0:01:15.130 --> 0:01:16.949
<v Speaker 4>last name, and what you do here at Bloomberg.

0:01:16.990 --> 0:01:17.990
<v Speaker 1>Josh, let me start with you.

0:01:18.390 --> 0:01:20.730
<v Speaker 2>I'm Josh Wingrove. I'm a White House reporter here at Bloomberg.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.780
<v Speaker 3>My name is Will Kubzanski. I cover refined products for Bloomberg.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.500
<v Speaker 3>So that's fuels like gasoline, diesel, jet fuel.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a classic Bloomberg beat. Very niche. It is

0:01:30.060 --> 0:01:31.060
<v Speaker 1>so Bloomberg, yeah.

0:01:31.940 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 4>Will, before I sat down, I checked Brent Crude. It's

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.980
<v Speaker 4>at $ 106. 50 a barrel, thereabouts. In the U.S., the average

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.179
<v Speaker 4>price of a gallon of gasoline, according to.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>AAA, $ 4. 33 a gallon. Diesel's about $ 6.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:43.899
<v Speaker 2>30.

0:01:43.900 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Put all of this in context for us.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 4>How high are energy prices right now?

0:01:47.580 --> 0:01:47.980
<v Speaker 1>They're high.

0:01:48.740 --> 0:01:53.020
<v Speaker 3>Energy prices... at least on fuels, are at the highest

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.940
<v Speaker 3>point for this time of year that we've ever seen.

0:01:54.940 --> 0:01:59.290
<v Speaker 3>$ 6 diesel was something that was unprecedented until this year alone.

0:01:59.730 --> 0:02:01.190
<v Speaker 3>To be fair, right, you can go back and you

0:02:01.210 --> 0:02:03.250
<v Speaker 3>can do inflation adjustments and you can say, well, in

0:02:03.250 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>2008 and in 2022, maybe it was more comparable. But

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.220
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the absolute number drivers are seeing at

0:02:09.260 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the pump, it has never been higher for diesel. And

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>this time of year, it's never been higher for gasoline.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.270
<v Speaker 1>How much of this is directly.

0:02:15.930 --> 0:02:18.270
<v Speaker 4>Attributable to the war in the Middle East, the war

0:02:18.290 --> 0:02:18.709
<v Speaker 4>with Iran?

0:02:19.050 --> 0:02:21.690
<v Speaker 3>This is a question that we have spent a while

0:02:21.770 --> 0:02:24.290
<v Speaker 3>trying to sort of get a solid answer on. The

0:02:24.310 --> 0:02:27.710
<v Speaker 3>White House has said Russia is to blame for diesel prices. Look,

0:02:27.770 --> 0:02:29.970
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to the chart of Brent crude

0:02:30.490 --> 0:02:33.030
<v Speaker 3>and you go to, you know, February 27th and then,

0:02:33.090 --> 0:02:34.769
<v Speaker 3>you know, first week of March when the war began,

0:02:34.790 --> 0:02:38.930
<v Speaker 3>the cost of oil spiked. And that was certainly the

0:02:38.990 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>cause of higher gas prices, higher diesel prices in the

0:02:42.020 --> 0:02:44.669
<v Speaker 3>first months of the war. The amount of supplies that

0:02:44.690 --> 0:02:46.590
<v Speaker 3>we lost coming from the Middle East through the Strait

0:02:46.610 --> 0:02:48.990
<v Speaker 3>of Hormuz is much larger than the amount of supply

0:02:49.030 --> 0:02:51.790
<v Speaker 3>that we lost from Russia. With that said, as Ukraine

0:02:51.830 --> 0:02:55.590
<v Speaker 3>has picked up its drone strikes on Russian refineries, the

0:02:55.710 --> 0:02:58.970
<v Speaker 3>barrels we have lost from over there have risen, and

0:02:59.070 --> 0:03:00.889
<v Speaker 3>that has also contributed to rising prices.

0:03:01.130 --> 0:03:03.190
<v Speaker 4>Will, we got this reading of the Consumer Price Index,

0:03:03.210 --> 0:03:07.150
<v Speaker 4>the latest read of that index this morning. Gasoline prices,

0:03:07.169 --> 0:03:10.810
<v Speaker 4>that index up 9% in September, made up over half

0:03:10.850 --> 0:03:14.940
<v Speaker 4>the monthly increase for all items. situate energy in kind

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 4>of the broader U.S. economy, the degree to which these

0:03:16.700 --> 0:03:18.900
<v Speaker 4>rising prices are affecting the overall economy?

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, gasoline and diesel, I think, are actually

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>two really good ways to look at the economy because

0:03:23.590 --> 0:03:27.010
<v Speaker 3>gasoline is, you know, a personal consumption item. You're a driver,

0:03:27.169 --> 0:03:29.690
<v Speaker 3>you know, you live in Michigan or Wisconsin or Iowa

0:03:29.730 --> 0:03:30.889
<v Speaker 3>and you see the price every day.

0:03:30.910 --> 0:03:31.730
<v Speaker 1>You're feeling that pain every day.

0:03:31.750 --> 0:03:33.190
<v Speaker 3>You're feeling it every day and you fill up your

0:03:33.230 --> 0:03:35.490
<v Speaker 3>car and you say, I'm going to put X amount

0:03:35.530 --> 0:03:39.700
<v Speaker 3>of money into the tank. With that said, comparatively, if

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.820
<v Speaker 3>you think about your expenditures as a broad picture, there's

0:03:42.860 --> 0:03:45.730
<v Speaker 3>obviously a lot more than just gasoline. Diesel prices seep

0:03:45.750 --> 0:03:48.290
<v Speaker 3>through into everything else. Diesel is a fuel that is

0:03:48.350 --> 0:03:51.610
<v Speaker 3>primarily used for, aside from agriculture and industry, it's used

0:03:51.630 --> 0:03:52.210
<v Speaker 3>for trucking.

0:03:52.510 --> 0:03:53.930
<v Speaker 1>The workhorse fuel.

0:03:54.050 --> 0:03:57.110
<v Speaker 3>Workhorse fuel of the global economy. We've said that a lot.

0:03:58.010 --> 0:04:02.490
<v Speaker 3>Diesel prices... push inflation higher. We might not be seeing

0:04:02.550 --> 0:04:05.070
<v Speaker 3>the impacts of higher diesel prices right now in the

0:04:05.090 --> 0:04:08.529
<v Speaker 3>inflation print because it takes time. There's pass-through from agriculture

0:04:08.650 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>to truckers to grocery stores, but it's sort of a

0:04:12.060 --> 0:04:14.700
<v Speaker 3>squeeze on both ends that is making the economy really

0:04:14.740 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>feel this.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Josh, you've spent a lot of time with the president

0:04:17.779 --> 0:04:19.620
<v Speaker 4>recent weeks. You've been on the campaign trail with him

0:04:19.660 --> 0:04:22.740
<v Speaker 4>as he's been stumping for Republican candidates. How much is

0:04:22.779 --> 0:04:26.050
<v Speaker 4>this in energy prices How much has it turned into that?

0:04:26.310 --> 0:04:30.270
<v Speaker 2>I think it is very substantially that under a broader umbrella,

0:04:30.290 --> 0:04:33.349
<v Speaker 2>this is a cost election. This is an affordability election

0:04:34.029 --> 0:04:37.070
<v Speaker 2>like the last two were. We're seeing that in particular

0:04:37.100 --> 0:04:40.859
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of polling that shows certain demographic groups.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Latino voters, for instance, swung to President Trump substantially in

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.659
<v Speaker 2>2024 over concerns about prices. They're now swinging back in

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.260
<v Speaker 2>such a jarring way that some of the gerrymanders that

0:04:51.300 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Trump did to try to cling to the House majority

0:04:53.860 --> 0:04:58.010
<v Speaker 2>are maybe even backfiring. And so I think for Trump,

0:04:58.630 --> 0:05:01.310
<v Speaker 2>The question is, you know, what can you do to

0:05:01.589 --> 0:05:04.250
<v Speaker 2>calm voter concerns on that? We've seen him do things

0:05:04.290 --> 0:05:08.710
<v Speaker 2>like announce checks, both $ 90 checks to certain people, as

0:05:08.740 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>well as the promise of a $ 5, 000 check that not

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people think is ever, of course, real.

0:05:13.940 --> 0:05:16.339
<v Speaker 2>But he's trying to respond to it in some ways.

0:05:16.540 --> 0:05:18.420
<v Speaker 2>But then he's also Donald Trump, and he can't kind

0:05:18.460 --> 0:05:21.380
<v Speaker 2>of help himself, but like veer off into other topics,

0:05:21.580 --> 0:05:24.490
<v Speaker 2>including renovations and this and that. And so there's not

0:05:24.529 --> 0:05:28.650
<v Speaker 2>been a consistent message from the administration on what they're

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>doing on this. And that's, you know, where it's sort

0:05:31.339 --> 0:05:33.980
<v Speaker 2>of landed. Now, Trump's administration right now is sort of

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.300
<v Speaker 2>holding out hope that things won't be bad. Republicans still

0:05:37.339 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of money. It's possible that they can

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.100
<v Speaker 2>sort of thread the needle, you know, treat the Senate

0:05:42.140 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 2>in particular as sort of a last ditch effort. One

0:05:44.740 --> 0:05:47.849
<v Speaker 2>official telling our colleague, Catherine Lucy, it's now sort of

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.710
<v Speaker 2>a firewall. But the polls on that don't look good either,

0:05:50.750 --> 0:05:53.570
<v Speaker 2>because if states like Texas and Iowa and Ohio and

0:05:53.610 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Alaska are going to flip, or at risk of flipping,

0:05:56.930 --> 0:05:58.810
<v Speaker 2>that really changes the math. This wasn't supposed to be

0:05:58.830 --> 0:06:01.250
<v Speaker 2>a very good cycle for Democrats, but if, you know,

0:06:01.470 --> 0:06:03.910
<v Speaker 2>that they even have a hope of flipping the Senate

0:06:04.990 --> 0:06:06.910
<v Speaker 2>at all is an indication of how bad things have

0:06:06.950 --> 0:06:07.930
<v Speaker 2>gotten for Republicans.

0:06:09.930 --> 0:06:11.390
<v Speaker 1>We're like two weeks out, Will.

0:06:12.330 --> 0:06:13.950
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to make you opine on the politics,

0:06:13.990 --> 0:06:15.850
<v Speaker 4>but let me just ask you about the time horizon here.

0:06:16.070 --> 0:06:19.810
<v Speaker 4>Is there any hope or likelihood that in that period

0:06:20.170 --> 0:06:22.469
<v Speaker 4>we could see these prices of gas, of diesel, of

0:06:22.550 --> 0:06:24.549
<v Speaker 4>oil come down at all substantially?

0:06:25.710 --> 0:06:29.050
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question. I mean, there is sort of

0:06:29.170 --> 0:06:32.950
<v Speaker 3>an upper bound on how much prices can move within two,

0:06:33.050 --> 0:06:36.219
<v Speaker 3>three weeks before election day. You know, the dynamic everyone

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>always talks about with gas prices is rockets and feathers,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.340
<v Speaker 3>which is when crude oil goes up, prices for gas

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>go skyrocketing up right with it. And then feathers, when

0:06:44.140 --> 0:06:47.340
<v Speaker 3>it comes down, it sort of trickles down slowly. Right now,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.950
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing in sort of the gasoline and diesel

0:06:49.990 --> 0:06:53.150
<v Speaker 3>futures markets doesn't really seem to indicate that we're getting

0:06:53.190 --> 0:06:55.810
<v Speaker 3>a massive price relief anytime soon. The other thing that's

0:06:55.830 --> 0:06:58.250
<v Speaker 3>going on right now is right now the U.S. has

0:06:58.650 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 3>seasonally really low stockpiles of both gasoline and diesel compared

0:07:02.540 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>to sort of normal fall months. So that means that

0:07:05.460 --> 0:07:08.100
<v Speaker 3>whenever there's a refinery that has an issue, if there

0:07:08.260 --> 0:07:10.740
<v Speaker 3>is a pipeline that has a problem, if there's a

0:07:10.820 --> 0:07:13.820
<v Speaker 3>storm that means you can't ship fuel from, say, the

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Gulf Coast to the Northeast, that is going to meaningfully

0:07:16.900 --> 0:07:20.690
<v Speaker 3>impact the price of fuel. So yeah, two, three-week horizon,

0:07:20.710 --> 0:07:24.050
<v Speaker 3>you could certainly see prices decrease, but not by blockbuster margins.

0:07:24.710 --> 0:07:26.130
<v Speaker 4>Josh, I was going to ask you what levers the

0:07:26.150 --> 0:07:29.150
<v Speaker 4>president has to pull and indeed has pulled in recent weeks.

0:07:29.170 --> 0:07:30.850
<v Speaker 4>I'll take your cupboard metaphor, though, as he's kind of

0:07:30.890 --> 0:07:33.530
<v Speaker 4>rooting through that cupboard. What has he found?

0:07:33.730 --> 0:07:37.050
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Europeans agreed to release some stockpiles, although I

0:07:37.070 --> 0:07:40.210
<v Speaker 2>think there are questions about how much and how quickly

0:07:40.430 --> 0:07:42.970
<v Speaker 2>that will come. The most controversial deal, of course, is

0:07:43.010 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the deal with Russia to release diesel. The administration has

0:07:46.300 --> 0:07:49.100
<v Speaker 2>not really been clear on what that means. There's a

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.020
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan group of senators who've objected to that, saying it's

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>against the law. There's a 2022 law banning direct Russian

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.750
<v Speaker 2>energy sales into the U.S. The administration has seemed to

0:07:58.790 --> 0:08:00.770
<v Speaker 2>signal that it won't come to the U.S. and instead

0:08:00.790 --> 0:08:02.850
<v Speaker 2>would hit the global market and then, you know, maybe

0:08:02.870 --> 0:08:06.710
<v Speaker 2>bring prices down generally, including here in the U.S., but

0:08:06.750 --> 0:08:09.930
<v Speaker 2>that will only expand the criticism that Trump is giving

0:08:09.990 --> 0:08:12.010
<v Speaker 2>a lifeline to Putin. You know, why are you doing

0:08:12.060 --> 0:08:14.540
<v Speaker 2>this if it's not even directly coming to the U.S.

0:08:14.740 --> 0:08:16.620
<v Speaker 2>in the first place? I mean, you know, this has

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>come up in other calls, including over the weekend with

0:08:18.500 --> 0:08:22.020
<v Speaker 2>the Canadian prime minister, according to Carney's office. They discussed

0:08:22.060 --> 0:08:26.170
<v Speaker 2>diesel as well. So it seems like he's Basically mentioning

0:08:26.190 --> 0:08:29.690
<v Speaker 2>it in every call, calling anyone he can to try

0:08:29.730 --> 0:08:32.330
<v Speaker 2>to shake loose what he can. And this is part

0:08:32.350 --> 0:08:35.030
<v Speaker 2>of a pattern of him, you know, not being afraid

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.100
<v Speaker 2>to use the administration and its policies to an electoral

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.780
<v Speaker 2>end in a pretty aggressive way. I think right now

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.420
<v Speaker 2>he's just kind of running out of cupboard doors. Time

0:08:45.460 --> 0:08:48.500
<v Speaker 2>is running out. And their question is, can they reallocate

0:08:48.540 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>money fast enough in particular to keep states like Kansas

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>not affected? a swing state when it comes to the Senate,

0:08:56.050 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>although they do have a Democratic governor, from flipping. And

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>if they can do that, if they can sort of

0:09:00.460 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>cling on to maybe like a 51-49 or a 50-50

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Senate with J.D. Vance breaking the ties, then, you know,

0:09:08.260 --> 0:09:11.550
<v Speaker 2>they think that maybe that's a better case scenario than

0:09:11.570 --> 0:09:13.670
<v Speaker 2>the alternatives that are in front of them at the moment.

0:09:13.950 --> 0:09:15.810
<v Speaker 4>Will, I'm going to ask you to level set here.

0:09:15.910 --> 0:09:18.469
<v Speaker 4>So the president announces this diesel deal. Russia's going to

0:09:18.510 --> 0:09:22.589
<v Speaker 4>supply the global market with around 36 million barrels of diesel.

0:09:23.210 --> 0:09:25.370
<v Speaker 4>What's the impact of that likely to be if, in fact,

0:09:25.410 --> 0:09:25.949
<v Speaker 4>it does happen?

0:09:26.390 --> 0:09:29.070
<v Speaker 3>The short version is, at least in the short term,

0:09:29.130 --> 0:09:33.170
<v Speaker 3>pretty limited. Analysts are pretty underwhelmed by the amount of

0:09:33.230 --> 0:09:36.390
<v Speaker 3>diesel that Trump announced and then that Russia later confirmed.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.060
<v Speaker 3>And I should just say these numbers are moving targets.

0:09:39.140 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>We're sort of getting changing numbers from the Russians on

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 3>how much they're going to release. We don't know when

0:09:44.179 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>those ships are going to load. There are legitimate legal

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>hurdles to getting those cargoes to the U.S., as we discussed.

0:09:50.630 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 3>But the initial shipments, especially pre-election, are not going to

0:09:53.860 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>be anywhere close to large enough to move the price

0:09:56.020 --> 0:09:59.030
<v Speaker 3>of diesel. Look, 36 million barrels at the margin, and

0:09:59.070 --> 0:10:01.380
<v Speaker 3>this is sort of over. multiple months, and we're talking

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.780
<v Speaker 3>about maybe a resumption of monthly exports sort of into

0:10:03.820 --> 0:10:08.699
<v Speaker 3>the winter. Anything helps. The diesel market is incredibly undersupplied

0:10:08.740 --> 0:10:11.859
<v Speaker 3>right now. Any additional barrel is helpful to a farmer

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil or someone looking to heat their home in Europe.

0:10:15.450 --> 0:10:19.670
<v Speaker 3>With that said, Compared to where Russia was, Russia is

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>normally the world's second largest exporter of diesel. This still

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 3>leaves the market pretty short. I would actually say really

0:10:26.020 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 3>quite short of where it needs to be to sort

0:10:28.580 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of resolve those supply issues that it's facing right now.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, more of my conversation with Josh Wingrove and

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:48.950
<v Speaker 4>Will Kosansky. Josh, a busy weekend. So we had this

0:10:48.990 --> 0:10:52.550
<v Speaker 4>announcement about diesel exports from the president, announced that the

0:10:52.570 --> 0:10:54.390
<v Speaker 4>Treasury Department was issuing a waiver to Russia to be

0:10:54.429 --> 0:10:57.610
<v Speaker 4>able to do this, ending sanctions that had been in

0:10:57.670 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 4>place effectively. And then he announced this so-called energy truce

0:11:00.780 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 4>between Ukraine and Russia. What has that meant, if anything,

0:11:04.780 --> 0:11:06.100
<v Speaker 4>in actual fact, over the last few days?

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.020
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he has said that it is a truce

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.140
<v Speaker 2>that exists because he declared it to exist. And so,

0:11:12.540 --> 0:11:15.550
<v Speaker 2>by extension, he's admitting that they didn't agree to it.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 2>or at least both countries haven't. It is tenuous at best,

0:11:19.260 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and it is not only sort of fueling questions about

0:11:23.580 --> 0:11:29.130
<v Speaker 2>the president's lifeline or olive branch to Russia, but renewing

0:11:29.170 --> 0:11:31.569
<v Speaker 2>all these questions about what, if anything, the U.S. will

0:11:31.610 --> 0:11:35.930
<v Speaker 2>do to support Ukraine to sort of drive the circumstances

0:11:36.210 --> 0:11:40.250
<v Speaker 2>to force some kind of a ceasefire or truce between

0:11:40.309 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Russia and Ukraine. Europeans They don't like this. They think

0:11:43.850 --> 0:11:47.510
<v Speaker 2>that it is a hurting and undercutting efforts to reach

0:11:47.550 --> 0:11:50.670
<v Speaker 2>a deal of some kind and to support Ukraine. Because,

0:11:50.710 --> 0:11:53.030
<v Speaker 2>of course, the question is, well, if Putin gets all

0:11:53.070 --> 0:11:56.660
<v Speaker 2>this revenue from oil. and from diesel and just keeps

0:11:57.059 --> 0:12:00.540
<v Speaker 2>hammering along in the war. And Trump tries to clip

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.620
<v Speaker 2>the wings of Zelensky to fire back and use drone

0:12:03.660 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>strikes or whatever to limit Russian energy production. Then that

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.179
<v Speaker 2>tilts a pretty, what already is a pretty precarious sort

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.100
<v Speaker 2>of balance a little bit towards Russia or perhaps more

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:12.620
<v Speaker 2>than a little bit.

0:12:13.020 --> 0:12:16.730
<v Speaker 4>So there's like the questionable or dubious legality of this.

0:12:16.780 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 4>There's the blowback that the president has gotten from his peers,

0:12:20.429 --> 0:12:23.470
<v Speaker 4>many leaders in Europe pushing back on this. And then

0:12:23.490 --> 0:12:25.390
<v Speaker 4>there's domestic pushback as well, Josh. And I wanted to

0:12:25.490 --> 0:12:27.010
<v Speaker 4>ask you about that and sort of what it says

0:12:27.070 --> 0:12:29.309
<v Speaker 4>about the political moment that we're in, that you have

0:12:30.270 --> 0:12:32.380
<v Speaker 4>lawmakers speaking out against the president for doing this. You

0:12:32.390 --> 0:12:35.620
<v Speaker 4>have legislation in the name of Ronald Reagan pushing back

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 4>on this as well. What does that tell you about

0:12:38.100 --> 0:12:41.140
<v Speaker 4>the president's ability to consolidate power in this very immediate

0:12:41.179 --> 0:12:42.230
<v Speaker 4>run up to the midterms?

0:12:42.550 --> 0:12:45.110
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And also this seems to fly in the face

0:12:45.170 --> 0:12:48.030
<v Speaker 2>of the Lindsey Graham Russia sanctions bill that was, you know,

0:12:48.390 --> 0:12:51.339
<v Speaker 2>passed not that long ago. We are starting to see

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.099
<v Speaker 2>Republicans more comfortable speaking out against the president in some

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>cases because they have to, because they're seeking reelection in

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 2>either swing districts or what they hoped weren't swing districts,

0:13:00.460 --> 0:13:03.069
<v Speaker 2>but suddenly are because the tide has come out 10 points.

0:13:03.809 --> 0:13:06.090
<v Speaker 2>Or they just are trying to send public warnings to

0:13:06.110 --> 0:13:08.809
<v Speaker 2>the president and they're fearful that he's getting poor advice

0:13:08.850 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>from his inner circle. which has remained sort of unchanged

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.260
<v Speaker 2>but shrinking since he took office again for the second

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.090
<v Speaker 2>time in 2025. And so I think sort of overall,

0:13:19.450 --> 0:13:22.150
<v Speaker 2>you kind of sense among Republicans certainly that they expect

0:13:22.170 --> 0:13:25.610
<v Speaker 2>to lose the House and that now, you know, this

0:13:25.650 --> 0:13:27.990
<v Speaker 2>sort of despondency that the Senate might flip.

0:13:30.270 --> 0:13:32.830
<v Speaker 4>Will, as you know so well covering this, and as

0:13:32.870 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 4>the president I think is learning, there's an intractability to

0:13:35.740 --> 0:13:38.179
<v Speaker 4>the global energy market. And we've seen this string of

0:13:38.220 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 4>attacks everywhere. It's taken place in Saudi Arabia. The Houthis

0:13:40.940 --> 0:13:44.460
<v Speaker 4>have attacked the airport in Riyadh, Aramco.

0:13:44.059 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Facilities as well. What effect is that having on prices globally?

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.740
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, any additional conflict in the Middle East adds to

0:13:52.020 --> 0:13:55.790
<v Speaker 3>what is called the risk premium for oil. Any expectation

0:13:55.950 --> 0:13:59.750
<v Speaker 3>of increased fighting, of pipelines being attacked, of increased attacks

0:13:59.809 --> 0:14:03.570
<v Speaker 3>on shipping adds to the price of oil. And the

0:14:03.590 --> 0:14:05.410
<v Speaker 3>price of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz right now

0:14:05.550 --> 0:14:08.170
<v Speaker 3>has gone up. There's still a lot of oil that's

0:14:08.230 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>making its way out. but the risk of attacks from

0:14:10.580 --> 0:14:13.300
<v Speaker 3>Iranians has risen. And so that's risen the price of freight.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.660
<v Speaker 3>And in turn, the price of freight all around the

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:17.580
<v Speaker 3>world is going up. So it's this sort of chain

0:14:17.620 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>reaction that's pulling different parts of the string and you're

0:14:19.980 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>seeing the price react in turn.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Josh, how is that shaping the president's calculus when it

0:14:26.420 --> 0:14:28.980
<v Speaker 4>comes to the Middle East? I mean, it's really been

0:14:29.020 --> 0:14:31.300
<v Speaker 4>kind of a back and forth. Would he get involved

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:32.620
<v Speaker 4>again in the Middle East or not?

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.610
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he will. No, he won't. Maybe he'll wait to

0:14:34.620 --> 0:14:35.190
<v Speaker 1>the midterms.

0:14:35.210 --> 0:14:39.330
<v Speaker 4>Kind of classic Trump uncertainty or projected uncertainty about that

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to these attacks that we've seen in

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Arabia. He has floated the idea that he might

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.780
<v Speaker 4>be willing to support Saudi Arabia in going after the Houthis.

0:14:49.900 --> 0:14:50.660
<v Speaker 1>Where does that stand?

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 4>What's your sense of his thinking when it comes to

0:14:52.330 --> 0:14:54.270
<v Speaker 4>further engagement or additional engagement in the Middle East?

0:14:54.930 --> 0:14:57.770
<v Speaker 2>I talked to a White House official yesterday and asked them, hey,

0:14:58.170 --> 0:15:01.190
<v Speaker 2>is this on the table, both the question of helping

0:15:01.230 --> 0:15:04.690
<v Speaker 2>the Saudis with targeting information, for instance, or actually more

0:15:04.730 --> 0:15:09.660
<v Speaker 2>broadly joining the war with U.S. strikes in particular? they

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.210
<v Speaker 2>really didn't want to bite on that. The source indicated

0:15:13.230 --> 0:15:15.070
<v Speaker 2>that it really wasn't top of mind. I think the

0:15:15.090 --> 0:15:17.950
<v Speaker 2>broader concern is the president would see this as a

0:15:17.990 --> 0:15:20.830
<v Speaker 2>risk of looking like he's getting further into a foreign

0:15:20.870 --> 0:15:23.310
<v Speaker 2>entanglement at a time when there's a lot of concerns

0:15:23.370 --> 0:15:25.790
<v Speaker 2>in his base about this already. He's, of course, declared

0:15:26.010 --> 0:15:30.940
<v Speaker 2>victory several times over the course of this conflict with Iran.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>And so right now, the signals that they're sending are

0:15:34.980 --> 0:15:38.350
<v Speaker 2>not a no, But very, very cool interest about getting

0:15:38.390 --> 0:15:41.450
<v Speaker 2>dragged further and further into this. And of course, there's

0:15:41.470 --> 0:15:44.170
<v Speaker 2>good reason with that, right? Trump has reshaped the Republican

0:15:44.230 --> 0:15:47.940
<v Speaker 2>Party in part with a sort of message of not

0:15:47.980 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>getting involved in these foreign wars. And I think it

0:15:50.980 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>just remains one of the thornier forks in the road

0:15:54.470 --> 0:15:56.670
<v Speaker 2>facing them about whether they decide to double down and

0:15:56.690 --> 0:15:59.790
<v Speaker 2>get further involved. Into this, we might see that potentially

0:15:59.950 --> 0:16:03.170
<v Speaker 2>after the election or if they just leave it to

0:16:03.190 --> 0:16:05.010
<v Speaker 2>the Saudis to try to deal with it and, of course,

0:16:05.100 --> 0:16:07.540
<v Speaker 2>risk the Saudis getting frustrated that the U.S. isn't there

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.260
<v Speaker 2>to help them deal with the collateral fallout of all

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:13.540
<v Speaker 4>Josh, I'm going to pick up on something you said there,

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.260
<v Speaker 4>which is what happens after the midterm elections. How are

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.170
<v Speaker 4>you thinking about that? You know, if control of Congress changes,

0:16:20.230 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>for instance... Do we have a president who is as

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>engaged with this issue of energy prices, more engaged, less engaged?

0:16:26.140 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about that going forward?

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.990
<v Speaker 2>In the past, a sort of cornered Trump has been

0:16:31.030 --> 0:16:33.870
<v Speaker 2>a more unpredictable Trump. And so I think it's really

0:16:33.910 --> 0:16:37.370
<v Speaker 2>difficult to know. He's, of course, teed up the prospect

0:16:37.450 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>of reengaging with strikes on Iran after the election. He's

0:16:42.340 --> 0:16:44.700
<v Speaker 2>sort of spoken on both sides of his mouth on that.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.390
<v Speaker 2>So I think sort of basically anything happens. is on

0:16:47.410 --> 0:16:49.450
<v Speaker 2>the table. But the dynamic is going to shift here

0:16:49.470 --> 0:16:51.790
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. At minimum, if the House flips, Trump's going

0:16:51.810 --> 0:16:55.310
<v Speaker 2>to be facing a range of investigations from the Oversight Committee,

0:16:55.330 --> 0:16:58.410
<v Speaker 2>among other committees about, you know, family business and any

0:16:58.790 --> 0:17:00.650
<v Speaker 2>conduct of the administration. I mean, the list will go

0:17:01.410 --> 0:17:03.050
<v Speaker 2>on and on and on and on. And all that

0:17:03.090 --> 0:17:05.300
<v Speaker 2>will be playing out in the context of the 2028

0:17:05.300 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>race ramping up, his own vice president being increasingly ensnared

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.820
<v Speaker 2>by these questions. And so I think the domestic politics

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.270
<v Speaker 2>are going to get messy pretty quick for him. As

0:17:15.310 --> 0:17:17.790
<v Speaker 2>we see it here, Trump's first goal is get to

0:17:17.850 --> 0:17:21.889
<v Speaker 2>the midterms with the best outcome possible. After that, I

0:17:21.930 --> 0:17:24.010
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of things are on the table, but

0:17:24.590 --> 0:17:27.690
<v Speaker 2>he will be increasingly confined to executive power and not

0:17:27.730 --> 0:17:31.050
<v Speaker 2>congressional power. And that could manifest sort of either way.

0:17:31.290 --> 0:17:34.030
<v Speaker 2>Either he's focused more domestically and dealing with whatever's going

0:17:34.109 --> 0:17:38.130
<v Speaker 2>on politically, or he decides that this is a legacy

0:17:38.170 --> 0:17:39.990
<v Speaker 2>issue and he wants to engage in it. No one

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:40.950
<v Speaker 2>knows which way he's going to go.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.770
<v Speaker 1>This is The Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gurra.

0:17:52.050 --> 0:17:54.550
<v Speaker 4>To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access

0:17:54.570 --> 0:18:00.100
<v Speaker 4>to all of Bloomberg.com, subscribe today at Bloomberg.com slash podcast offer.

0:18:00.780 --> 0:18:02.540
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.