WEBVTT - Electric Vehicle Outlook 2023: On the Road to Net Zero

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switch on

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the BNF podcast. Earlier in June, BNAF released the twenty

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three edition of the Electric Vehicle Outlook, or EVO

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>for short. It's one of our flagship publications where we

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>take a detailed look at how electrification, shared mobility, autonomous driving,

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and other factors are going to impact road transport in

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the coming decades. The report is written by our extensive

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>team of specialists from around the world. They can look

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>at scenarios for how these trends are going to impact

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the automotive, energy, infrastructure, and battery materials markets. So we

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>want to know what's changed since twenty twenty two and

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>set it against net zero targets and also talk about

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which areas of the electric vehicle fleet are succeeding and

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which might be lagging. In today's episode, I get to

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>speak with benef's head of Advanced Transport, Colin Mcharricer, and

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>together we go through consumer demand for electric vehicles across

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>different global regions, along with the current mid and long

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>term sales forecasts. We also discussed the chin challenge is

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>facing medium to heavy commercial fleets and the evolution of

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>battery chemistries and the new battery tech that is now

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to reach the commercial market. Now, of course this

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is just a snapshot into what is an extensive report,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but we've pulled out a few nuggets for you and

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you enjoy. And if you do like it and

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear more podcasts from us, make sure

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to receive updates on future episodes. And also

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>if you want to share it with others, the best

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>way to do that is to give us a rating

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Now my conversation with Colin

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about the twenty twenty three Electric Vehicle Outlook from vna Hi, Colin,

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us again today.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Hid integrate to be on the program again.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're here to talk about this year's edition. So

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty three Electric Vehicle Outlook. So we do

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.639
<v Speaker 1>one of these every year, which is a herculean effort.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I know there are numerous members both in your

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>team and in other parts of VNF that all contribute

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to making this report happen. And so for those who

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe are not familiar with the report, or maybe didn't

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to our show last year where we went over

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the findings, which a few things have changed

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>between then and now. Can you just give a very

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>quick overview of what this is and perhaps isn't.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely. So the Electric Vehicle Outlook is our outlook

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 2>at BNF for all of road transport. So despite the name,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not only about electric vehicles, it's about everything that's

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 2>going on with the vehicles on the road in the world.

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>And it also bears mentioning that that isn't just passenger cars.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 2>So we immediately think of cars, but of course there's

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>vans and trucks that are moving around all the goods

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 2>around the world. In some markets, two and three wheelers

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>are a big part of the mobility mix. There's municipal

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 2>buses as well. And what you find as you dig

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>into these is that not only is each country different,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>but each segment is on its own sort of different trajectory.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>So when we do this exercise, what we're trying to

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>figure out is what's happening, and again not just with

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicles, with combustion vehicles and with other aspects of

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the road transport mix around the world and across all

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>these different segments. So we sort of start with what

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>does the world look like today, and that is saying

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>literally how much do people move around in each country

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and how much do goods move around? So in people

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about something like a passenger kilometer, or in

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>freight you're talking a freight ton kilometer, and then we

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>look at how those might change over time. So that's

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>where the things around, Okay, the adoption of electric vehicles

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>comes in. That's where things like shared mobility. That's where

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.399
<v Speaker 2>things like autonomous driving, changes in consumer behavior, demographic changes,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>urbanization changes, and all of these things come together to

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>form our outlook for what happens for road transport. And

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 2>then once we've got that outlook together about where we

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>think each segment and country is going, we then map

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that onto on all these other areas, and those are

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>things like electricity demand, battery metals and materials, CO two emissions,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 2>oil demand, infrastructure needs, and of course vehicle sales as well.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So that was for the people who are not necessarily

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>avid followers of this one year to the next, but

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for those who are, there were some new sections this year,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and within that we added a section on Nordic's in California.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain why those sections were added and then

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>let's come to some of the other things that maybe

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are newer updates for your loyal followers who have been

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>waiting for this year's installment of the electric vehicle outlook.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the Nordics in California. Every year we get

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 2>asked for by quite a few of our clients to

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>add different countries. And each time you add a country,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 2>it's quite a bit of work because you have to

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>go and dig up all of the data about the

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 2>mobility mix in that country and all the other factors

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>that I mentioned about what might change that in the future.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 2>So we try and limit it to adding kind of

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>one or two each year. And what we wanted to

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>do this year is to show what does the transition

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 2>look like in some leading areas. So California is of

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>course leading the US, but as also a leader globally,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the Nordics is probably the furthest along this transition of

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>any group of countries or states. I'm sitting in Oslo

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 2>and Norway right now. Over eighty percent of vehicle sales

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>are fully electric. Markets like Sweden, Finland others are not

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>too far behind. So what we I wanted to do

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>was play out some of the emissions and energy market

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>impacts and fleet turnover impacts in countries and regions where

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>electricic flood option is going quite quickly, So that was

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the logic behind adding those. Last year we added a

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 2>lot of detail on Southeast Asia because we were seeing

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 2>really interesting things happening there. Next year we'll probably add

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>another big emerging economy, so somewhere potentially like Brazil or Mexico,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>where again the mix some mobilities different and the timelines

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>are different for all of the things that we're seeing

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>happen around the world.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So a bit of a case study and something that

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you could in theory extrapolate out.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly what we want to have is indicative countries

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>or regions that people can understand. So we now cover

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 2>fourteen major auto markets around the world.

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of different sections in our

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>research on the vehicle outlook. Which section matters the most?

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they all matter, and it's hard to pick your

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite child, but in this you know what is weighted

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>most heavily. When you think about things like batteries, battery chemistry,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or supply chains or charging networks or consumer trends, which

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>one would you say is probably the most influential part

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of actually determining what these long term forecasts really look like.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the starting point for BNF has been

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>for a long time that batteries are really what's enabling

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>this change. And you can take the view that well,

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>governments could just force the issue and push every all

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the markets over into electric with enough taxation or subsidies,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>but that gets politically difficult in a lot of countries

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 2>if the underlying technology isn't continuing to get cheaper and better. Fortunately,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the technology is continuing to get better. It actually got

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>more expensive last year due to spike and raw material prices,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>So we go into that a lot and look at

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>what's happening there. But I would say the starting point

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>is still really in terms of what's going to change

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about electric vehicles anyway, is certainly the

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>battery side. So one of the things we did this year,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 2>for example, is say, look, battery prices went out slightly

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>last year, what do we think happens and what's some

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>scenario analysis for when you get to in the passenger

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 2>vehicle segment price parity with combustion vehicles based on different

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>battery experienced curves or learning rates that we saw them

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>go up for the first time last year. So again

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>looking at the underlying technology, battery chemistry mix, and price outlook,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>it still forms the basis for us being able to

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 2>say with some confidence that things are going to continue

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>to accelerate quickly on ev adoption. And so again you

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>said it, Yeah, I don't want to pick a favorite child,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>but I would say that's probably the most foundational part

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>of the work that we're doing. Now. We also do

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>this net zero scenario. So the base scenario in the

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>report is this economic transition scenario, which says, look, this

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is led by techno economic forces and that's the primary

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 2>thing that drives changes in the vehicle markets around the world.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>And we assume that no new policies are in place,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and again that's where the battery cost stuff really becomes critical.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>But we also run a net zero scenario, which is

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>more of a backcasting exercise that says, if we want

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to get to a net zero capable fleet by twenty fifty,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>what has to happen. That's less reliant on the battery

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>price part, because you're sort of saying, well, if you

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>believe we can get on track, here's where it would

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>have to go, and here's the policy recommendations to keep

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it on track. Obviously, that's a bit of a different

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>exercise than sort of what's the trajectory we're on today.

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But the punchline ultimately being that it is possible. A

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>net zero future is possible with enough will.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely. And I mean one of the things we

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of show is that some countries are actually getting

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of close, and some segments are getting kind of

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 2>close to the net zero scenario. So when we break

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>out two wheelers, three wheelers, buses, those segments are actually

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty close. Three wheelers is pretty much on track, two

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>wheelers and buses are pretty close, and then you get

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>into light duty vans and commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of variation by country, but again

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to get some countries that are looking like

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be able to phase out combustion vehicle

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>sales at least very close to by the early to

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>mid twenty thirties. And that's roughly what you need to

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>stay on track for a carbon neutral capable fleet by

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifty. Now, it's worth noting that twenty fifty carbon

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>neutral capable fleet you also have to have a lot

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of stuff going on in the power system to decarbonize

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the power system to enable that fleet to actually operate

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 2>in a zero emissions way. And so that's a separate

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 2>part of bnef's work, the New Energy Outlook. But what

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>we're doing here is looking at can the fleet of

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 2>vehicles on the road operate without producing CO two emissions.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of money at stake. This is

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely a big industry and when we look at consumer demand,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle sales are increasing. Where are they I guess

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of sales and where do we expect

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>them to be in the future, you know, twenty thirty

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all the way out to twenty fifty, both in terms

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of percentage of total vehicles sold, but also in terms

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of how much money is there actually flooding into this

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>specific part of the market.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's start with the near term picture. So last

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>year there was about ten point five million plug in

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>vehicle sold, so that's battery electrics and plug in hybrids.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 2>This year, we think there's going to be about fourteen

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>million sold a little higher than that. Actually, we're trending

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit above that, and by twenty twenty six,

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>we're forecasting about twenty seven million sales, and just to

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 2>translate that into percentage terms, that's about thirty percent, so

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>just under a third of the global vehicle market we're

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>saying as plug in vehicles by twenty twenty six, and

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>that's really not very far away, and that's that's coming

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>at us quite quickly. What's important again there is that

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>there's quite a lot of regional variations. So countries like

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>China are probably going to be above fifty percent by then,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 2>regions like Europe above forty percent, and then there's kind

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of everybody else, and there's quite a big spread between

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the some of the other markets. So the near term

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 2>picture is one of continued pretty rapid acceleration, but then

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of variety between the different countries. And we

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>think the fleet of passenger vehicles we're talking about here

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 2>crosses one hundred million evs by twenty twenty six. Now,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that kind of falls out of

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 2>that is that combustion vehicle sales have already peaked. So

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 2>they actually peaked in twenty seventeen, they declined in twenty

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>eighteen and twenty nineteen, then really dropped in twenty twenty

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 2>because of COVID, recovered a bit in twenty twenty one

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and recovering again in twenty twenty two, but all of

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 2>that recovery is essentially on the electric side, and we

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>don't really see them ever getting back to those twenty

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>seventeen highs. You just look at what's going on in China,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>where the most recent month sales are, you're already at

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a third of sales. In Europe, you're running around twenty percent.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just really hard to offset that anywhere else in

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the world to get up to the levels of combustion

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>vehicle sales we saw in twenty seventeen. So that's kind

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 2>of a near term implication is that they're already combustion

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>vehicle sales are already twenty percent off their peak of

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen, and they're probably going to be more like

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>forty percent off their peak by the time you get

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to twenty twenty six, and they're now in terminal decline.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>When we look at it further out, a couple of

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>things happen. One this gap between the countries, it sticks

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>around for a while, but then it starts to even

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit. It starts to get smaller as

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>things take off in the countries that have been slower

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to start with. So a good example of that is

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>somewhere like Australia. It's been quite slow so far in

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>evy adoption, but it's now picking up quite quickly. And

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>we've seen this in a few cases, the countries that

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>go slower at the beginning oft and then pick up faster.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And some of that is just built up demand. There's

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>also an economic effect going on when we look at

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>emerging economies. So the way we model this is around

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 2>the price competitiveness of evs in different segments and in

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>different countries, and one of the things you find is

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that emerging economies are quite price sensitive, right There's not

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>a lot of spare money people have to spend on vehicles.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean there is at the premium end, but in

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the bulk of the vehicle market in emerging economy there's

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>not a huge amount of extra money available. That price

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>sensitivity works against EV adoption before the point of price parity,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>but then it accelerates it afterwards. Once EV's become the

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>cheaper option, then things start to go quite quickly, whereas

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>before they were the cheapest option, things go quite slowly.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 2>So that's why you get these different curves where it's

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of slow and then really accelerating in the countries

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that are going slowly now and in the emerging economies

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's actually fast, and then starting to tail off

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 2>in some of the wealthier countries that are in China

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that are going quicker right now. And the reason for

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that tailoff is actually just you start to saturate the market.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Around the twenty thirty five period, we have markets like

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Europe and China really starting to slow down because you

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>start to get to sort of seventy eighty even ninety

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>percent of sales being electric, and that just means that

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>we think the last sort of ten percent is going

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>to be a bit hard to address, and so the

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>S curve flows down there. On a global basis, again,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about the passenger vehicle segment. Evs get to about

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent of sales in twenty forty globally, and

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 2>that's pure electrics. At that point we see plug in

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 2>hybrids kind of disappearing. By then there are scenarios where

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>that goes faster. Of course, the net zero scenario it's

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>much faster. It has to be one hundred percent or

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>almost one hundred percent by twenty thirty five of new

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 2>vehicle sales to standtrack for the net zero scenario. But

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 2>that's our economic transition scenario, which says no new policies.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>It's about seventy five percent by twenty forty.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked a bit about where adoption is going

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>really well in what's working well. But let's talk a

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the medium in heavy commercial vehicle space,

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>which is lagging behind some of the other success stories

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like three wheelers. So what is it that's keeping medium

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and heavy commercial vehicles from really having the same adoption

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as you're seeing in other areas.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the commercial vehicle segment is significantly behind the

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 2>other vehicle segments, and there's a couple couple of reasons

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>for that. One of them so far has really just

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 2>been around available models right now, there just aren't many

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>that you can go out and buy, and there's sort

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>of technological reasons for that. Batteries needed to get better.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>We're starting to see that log jam ease a little bit,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's we're starting to see a lot more models,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 2>particularly launching in the big markets, so China, North America, Europe,

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and actually so far China is leading this, but it's

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>interesting to note that trucking might be one of the

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 2>areas where the US is really going to jump forward on.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>It's been a bit behind those other two regions on

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>passenger cars. But I actually think there's some really interesting

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>stuff happening on heavy and medium trucks in the US

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of very interested, large corporate buyers who

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>are going to push that forward, and some interesting starting

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>points places like ports using these big vehicles for dray Edge,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and you're seeing some really fascinating activity happening there in California.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>But so there's that model availability question, which is sort

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of being easy now you're seeing more things launch. Then

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 2>there's the price part of it. These vehicles are still

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>significantly more expensive, but we see that coming down the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>same way we see it coming down on the passenger

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>vehicle side. In general. We've seen the prices of batteries

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>going into trucks lag a couple of years what you

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>see in passenger cars, and that's just because passenger cars

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 2>are a bigger segment, the buyers have more power, and

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>there's just lower prices negotiated there. But again that's starting

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to close a little bit too. The last thing that

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is really still there is charging heavy trucks at the

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>highway is tough. It's a lot of power. It's a

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 2>huge demand on the grid in many cases in places

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>where there isn't a very thick grid connection, if you will,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and that's a challenge. Now, it's not a challenge for everybody.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>There is a fair amount of depot charging that can

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 2>go on and predictable routes and relatively slow charging overnight

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>because most of those vehicles stop overnight, but that really

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>heavy duty, long haul trucking, there is a big charging

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure need there now. The good thing is we're also

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>seeing a lot of money starting to flow towards that

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and a lot more truck focused charging stations start to

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>be built. But it's kind of early days, and so

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the EV share of the medium and heavy commercial vehicle

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>fleet last year was only zero point one percent, so

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>we're at the very very beginning of that. So for

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>passenger vehicles it's about two percent of the fleet last year,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>for some of the other ones it's much higher. Commercial

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and heavy vehicles about zero point one percent of the fleet.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>But we saw again just kind of when you're looking

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>at these segments where it's early, you're trying to scan

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the horizon of it and see what's happening, and you

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 2>start to see some interesting success stories. So China is

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot on this. You're in Towards the end

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of last year, there were a few months where medium

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and heavy zero missions vehicles so that includes some fuel

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>cell vehicles hit around five percent of medium and heavy

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>truck sales in China. On the light commercial vehicle front

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>South Korea, about twenty five percent of light commercial vehicle

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>sales in South Korea are already electric, so you're starting

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to see more of that stuff happen, but it is

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>early days. And I think that charging infrastructure part is

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 2>both a real opportunity and a real challenge.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And can we describe what a day in life really

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like for someone who is driving one of those

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>commercial vehicles, because my understanding is that they're driving long

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>distances and have really long hours. And to your point

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>regarding charging overnight, that makes sense when you're on the road,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but can you even make it to overnight? Do you

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>have the range and the power? And if not, how

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>long is your lunch break essentially that you will need

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to take in order to recharge in order to be

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>able to make that route. And I guess if I

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really had to boil it down, what's the range and

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the recharge time for a let's say heavy duty

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>semi style vehicle or a lory as they would call

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the mayor in the UK.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is another one that varies a fair bit

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>because there's actually different regulations in different countries on how

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>long drivers have to stop for. So we did some

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>work looking at root patterns within Europe and actually what

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you discover is that there's quite a lot of most

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of the freight moved is actually moved on routes less

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>than four or five hundred kilometers in Europe, but you

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>do still have a fair bit of really long haul

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff and in that case then you are going to

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 2>be dependent on the charging infrastructure on route. And so

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>what we did find is that if you say, look

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 2>at Europe, the average time or the amount of time

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that a driver is required to stop for every four

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 2>hours of driving sufficient to recharge to add significant enough

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>range to continue on the trip. So I actually don't

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think the downtime is going to be the limitter. Here.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>You're starting to see the truck ranges creep up. A

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of them are still in regional and urban duty

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 2>cycles right now, so they do maybe two three hundred,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 2>four hundred kilometers. Even we're probably going to see the

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 2>next ones that reach five hundred kilometers in large scale

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>production in the next little while. Tesla Semi of course

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>claiming they're going to be able to do much more

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 2>than that, but we haven't actually seen that in fully

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>loaded delivering that capability, which is important to note, but

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to be the dwell time.

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there is more activity around megawatt scale charging,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 2>so being able to deliver a full megawatt of power

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to the truck. Once you do that, you can cut

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the charging time down into what I think will fit

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>into a normal rest period that a driver needs to take. Anyway,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>based on the calculations we've done, the bigger challenge is

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be getting all that power down to where

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>you need it, and so there you might see a

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 2>quite interesting set of solutions come in. You're seeing in

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>China they're experimenting with some battery swapping. You're probably going

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>to see a lot of battery storage at the sites

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>so that you're charging those batteries at a slower rate

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and then charging battery to battery to cut some of

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the grid strain that you're seeing there. And then you're

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>probably also going to see a bit of a land

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 2>grab for where you have places where there is sufficient

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>charging or power capacity coming down to the site that

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>are going to be suitable as larger scale truck stops.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Now let's switch over to innovation a little bit, and

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>on the technology side, there have been some experiments of

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sorts going on when it comes to battery technology and

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>battery chemistries. Can you share a little bit around what's

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>happening when it comes to battery chemistries at the moment,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe what are the more exciting innovations?

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this year we highlighted three. So each year we

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 2>try and do these thematic highlights where we look at

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>things that are we think kind of interesting questions. And

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the ones that are beyond the sort of

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 2>big picture modeling stuff and country level modeling, and one

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of the ones we came up with this year was

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 2>noting how there are all these battery innovations that have

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>been considered pre commercial for quite a while but are

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>now entering the commerci realization phase. And so what we

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>did is we identified three of them, and there are more,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think three of the most interesting ones are

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>one sodium ion batteries on next generation anautes and solid

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>state batteries. And our battery team is all over this

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and they've been publishing a lot on tracking these developments

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>over the years and how they've gotten to this point.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think the important thing to note is that

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 2>one innovation in the battery industry is not slowing down

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 2>at all. If anything, it's speeding up as the industry grows,

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 2>which is what we've expected, but it's still sometimes hard

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>to predict exactly what shape that takes. On sodium ion batteries,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a technology that is in theory been around

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>for quite a while, but there was challenges. You've got

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 2>this balancing act anytime with a new battery around things

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>like cycle life and capacity and density and all these

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>sorts of things, and some of those it looks like

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the leading battery manufacturers have significantly improved on

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the technology enough to be confident that they can put

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>it into passenger cars. So you've seen the very first

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 2>set of announcements from some smaller players and some big

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>ones on building significant amounts of sodium ion battery capacity

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 2>and commercializing that into vehicles late this year or more

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>likely in the next few years, but that's a big

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a potential game changer. Now, the energy density isn't

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>as good as traditional lithium ion batteries, but they're very

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 2>stable and the materials for them are very cheap, and

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 2>we've done some work looking at how low those prices

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 2>could go, and we think there's a route to getting

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty dollars a kilo what hour sodium I own batteries,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>which would be a game changer for very affordable electric vehicles. Now,

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that won't happen overnight. What we've seen is that things

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>take time to scale up in the battery industry. But

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that is a chemistry and a technological advancement that we

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>think can play a significant role in alleviating some of

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the pinch points we've seen on the battery supply chain

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>for some of the materials, So things like lithium or

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 2>cobalt or nickel that spiked last year and I have

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>since come down quite significantly, So it's not to say

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 2>they all remain high, but there will be future spikes

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of all of these things and having a diversified portfolio

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of battery options that you can go to if that

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 2>happens for a prolonged period of time, is very, very

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 2>good for the industry. So we think sodium ion is

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>going to start at the lower end of the vehicle market,

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 2>similar to the way lithium iron phosphate batteries did a

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>few years ago, but we think it has potential to

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>change the dynamics significantly sort of in twenty thirty and

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>beyond in terms of total amount of lithium demand needed

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>for vehicles.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So really at a point when we talked so much

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about range anxiety and wanting to increase range for drivers

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, and how that instinctively seems like

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the way of the future. The way of the future

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>also increasingly looks like you're going to have different types

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of vehicles for different economic price ranges and also use cases,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and that perhaps maybe a much lower range but also

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>much lower cost for a specific use case. Perhaps urban

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>pinging around seems like it's more of a potential than

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it was in the past.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, And this is an important thing, is that

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see more separation in the overall vehicle

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>market in terms of all of it, really the battery

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>chemistry they use, the range that people require. As you

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>get to more and more scale and get into more

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>and more segments, As I said earlier, some segments are

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 2>more price sensitive than others, so you really need to

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>have affordable options there. And I think you are going

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to see more diversification of the technology going into different vehicles,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and even now you're starting to see that. So you're

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 2>starting to see say a Volkswagen or a Ford saying actually,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>our entry level vehicles and even Tesla, Tesla push pioneering

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>this approach among Western automakers. Our entry level vehicles are

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 2>going to use a lithium iron phosphate battery. Our higher

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 2>end ones are going to use an NMC or an

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 2>NCAA battery with higher density and higher associated cost as well.

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it won't end there. I think you will

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>have some who say, no, we're just focusing on urban

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 2>vehicles and those are going to be using a sodium

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 2>ion battery and it's going to be ultra cheap and

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>ultra affordable, but still very safe. And I think that

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>is a significant difference from where we were a few

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>years ago and is a big.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Change now we can't seem to make it through an

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>episode here these days without talking about supply chains. So

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>let's go there. Because supply chains globally are shifting, certainly

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>within the battery space, but how about within the auto

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing space. I know, for electric vehicles, a big part

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the kit is the battery, so we can't touch

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>upon that. But when it comes to making that complete

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that rolls off the line, whether it's for commercial

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or direct individual use to get around town, are those

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chains also dramatically changing?

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely. One of the consistent things in the auto

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>industry is that it's always changing and evolving, and you

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>can see that over the decades. I think automotive is

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>a fascinating lens to view the world through. Generally, you

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 2>have these waves of different companies and countries coming in,

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 2>so the Japanese automakers in the seventies and eighties, and

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 2>then the Koreans and the nineties and two thousands, and

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>now the Chinese coming in the twenty twenties. Here that

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>will continue to happen. Automotive supply chains are long, so

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they reach a long way up. There's even in an

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>ev where there's less parts there's still a lot of parts,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of material, a lot of physical material

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>that goes into making a car, and so they are

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>also subject to trade challenges. Right, generally they've been able

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 2>to operate without too many restrictions and a lot of

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>countries have benefited from relatively free trade on automotive but

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that period may be ending a little bit. We start

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to see more and more tensions around this topic. Other

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>policies that are aimed at really explicitly supporting domestic manufacturing.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>So the Inflation Reduction Act in the US China have

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of course been supporting domestic manufacturing of vehicles and batteries

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>for quite a long time. Europe now responding to Inflation

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Reduction Act. So this play by play of where are

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the job's going to be and where are the vehicle's

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be made and where the battery is going

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 2>to make it's going to continue. We're not at anything

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>resembling a steady state on that yet. One thing I

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>will say though, is that in the long term, you

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>do want to generally make vehicles near the market where

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>they're being consumed or used, I should say, and similar

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 2>for batteries. Now right now you're seeing some interesting dynamics

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of companies are making evs in China

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and shipping them to Europe. I think that holds at

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 2>some reasonable volume and for a little while, but I

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 2>think in the long term it is more desirable to

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>have the vehicles made relatively near where they're being consumed. Now,

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there's always going to be exceptions to that, but if

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at the orientation of vehicle markets over the

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>last twenty years, that is still the case. So, Yes,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of Japanese vehicles sold in the US,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>but most of them are made in US plants. Yes,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 2>there are some vehicles shipped from Germany to China or

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the US, but there's also a lot of those made

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 2>domestically in those countries as well. So it's going to

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>continue to be a dance. There is going to be

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>a fair bit of localization. I think it is going

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to continue to be a bit of a political hot

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 2>potato around how you incentivize domestic jobs and domestic manufacturing.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I think this year it caught us by surprise a bit,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 2>the Inflation Reduction Act, and I think it caught a

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 2>lot of people by surprise, even within the industry, just

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 2>how big a push that was going to be on

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>shore the US vehicle and battery manufacturing supply chain, and

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that is happening. It's happening really quickly. There are tens

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of billions of dollars announced since Iro's announced in North

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 2>American battery and component manufacturing, and so I sometimes hear

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 2>this view that like, oh, this has done, China won

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>this race. I think we're still in the early going

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 2>of this. I said only the end of the last year,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 2>only two percent of all the vehicles on the road

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 2>we're electric. There's a lot of rooms still for countries

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to carve out new industrial policy clusters and build new

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>base of jobs and innovation. So I think we're going

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to continue to see a fair bit of maneuvering there.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I hope it doesn't end up too fragmented, because I

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 2>think that will slow down the transition at a time

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>when we want to be speeding it up. But I

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>think that's a very real possibility.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So now it's going to be impossible to go through

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>everything in this report, and I feel like we pulled

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>out some interesting themes, and certainly there is also the

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>meat of these forecasts. But I want to pivot now

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to something that I've started doing at the end of

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the shows now, which is trying to find

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out what our lead analysts are looking at, what they're watching,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and what they're ignoring. Maybe in the category broadly of

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>weird and wonderful tech, so not covered in this report,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but in Collins list of things to watch and ignore.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering about hydrogen vehicles.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's a good question. I get asked this

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>question a lot. I'm still not really clear always why

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I get asked it a lot, because the picture hasn't

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>actually changed very much. So this year we actually took

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen vehicles out of the passenger vehicle forecast. And I'll

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>give you a bit of background of why hydroden vehicles

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>sales vehicles. Hydroden fuel cell vehicles, I should say, have

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>been around for quite a long time. The first discussions

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of them go back decades, and really they have not

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>delivered on any of the promise that has been discussed

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>over the years. And last year sales of them fell

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>from twenty twenty one, so they were down. And not

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>only were they down, we saw a few automakers sort

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 2>of reduced their commitment, and we also saw more and

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>more of the sales concentrated in the passenger vehicle segment

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>in South Korea, So it's about seventy percent of passenger

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>fuel cell vehicles were in South Korea. About fifteen thousandth

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>sold last year. It's not very many. It's a very

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>very small market. It's concentrated in a few models, a

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 2>few automakers, and a very small number of geographies. The

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 2>few refueling infrastructure part is still a major major challenge.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 2>We've seen supply issues at the hydrogen fueling stations that

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>are there a lot of them offline at any given time,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and some of them just plane removed. For example, in

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>the UK, Shell pulled a few out because they weren't

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>being used enough. So it's expensive and it's just not

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>really what consumers seem to want. In the places even

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that built a fair amount refeeling infrastructure, like California, sales

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>are way way down. Sales have plummeted in Japan, which

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 2>has been the biggest backer of the technology. So at

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>some point, as forecasters, we just start to get really

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable saying I don't feel comfortable making a twenty year

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>forecast for something that is so concentrated and falling last year,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>so we just sort of said, look, we're taking it out.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll revisit it when field sell vehicles reach zero point

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 2>one percent of global vehicle sales. So that's not very much.

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not a high bar. Zero point one percent is

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty low. That would be around eighty thousand vehicles a year.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they get there. Will happily revisit it when they do,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 2>but they're not there now, and it's very uncomfortable for

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>people who rely on data to try and make a

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>long term forecast. Trucking. They still play a role in

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>our zero scenario, but they're sort of backfilling where batteries

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>don't work rather than the main solution. So I think

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>another way to think about hydrogen fuel cell vehicles if

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about energy and emissions from the passenger vehicle segment,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>if you were to double the size of the passenger

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>fuel cell vehicle fleet, So you take all the number

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>that have been on the road sold over the last

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, and you double it every three years, so

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>all the way out to twenty forty. Every three years

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you double the size of the fleet. That's a pretty

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>aggressive rate of growth considering how long it's taken to

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 2>get to where we are. If you do that, then

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>they will be about zero point two percent of the

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>vehicle fleet in twenty forty, so have no meaningful impact

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>on emissions or energy consumption in passenger transport. So again

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you sort of look at that. If that's the upper

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>bound snario, that's the optimistic scenario for growth, and it

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>has zero impact on global CEOTO emissions in twenty forty,

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>then you have to sort of say, well, why are

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>we spending so much time talking about this? So I

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>think there's still a potential role to play as backfill

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 2>in the trucking segment, in heavy duty long haul in

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 2>parts that are hard to electrify. I think it's significantly

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>smaller than batteries and smaller than a lot of the

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 2>proponents suggest. But I really don't see, at least in

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the data right now, much of an interest from consumers

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in the passenger vehicle segment.

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So maybe more in the weird and wonderful category. Are

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you closely watching or ignoring solar cars?

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Ignoring? That's for me, the ignoring camp.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So last one, you can't look at the news these

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>days without looking at something that has to do with AI,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and I want to know, are you closely watching or

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are you sort of ignoring self driving vehicles because the

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>self driving space has come in and out of fashion

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a few times.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're not ignoring it. And I would say if

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you read media coverage only, you would think that self

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>driving cars are completely failing. And our view has always

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 2>been that it will take time. Once we're talking about

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 2>big impact. Societal impacts are more of a twenty thirties

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and twenty forty story, but there is real progress being made.

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>There are commercial self driving car services you can take

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>now in San Francisco, in Beijing, and they're expanding. Yes

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>they're geofenced, and yes, there's all sorts of caveats to it.

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But you should probably be more optimistic on the technology

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>now than in the past because it exists now and

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>it didn't when the sort of hype cycle was that

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>its peak. You couldn't commercially go and get in a

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 2>self driving car. You can do that now and they're

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 2>really racking up the kilometers and the China market is

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 2>moving really quickly. So I think all this stuff around

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>stelf driving cars gets caught up in these all or

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 2>nothing it's going to go take over one hundred percent immediately,

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>or it's all smoking mirrors and nothing's going to happen.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I think you're going to see this stuff slowly and

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 2>steadily expand more geofenced areas. But it is real, and

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>so one of the things we did this year is

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>run two scenarios to say, look, what does happen if

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 2>this stuff really takes off? And it does potentially dramatically

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>cut down the size of the global vehicle fleet, and

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>it also can push you towards electrification sooner. And that's

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>because more of the autonomous vehicles that are being used

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>for testing right now are electric, and there's a lot

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of reasons to think because of economics and regulation that

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>future ones are going to be electric as well. That

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>means that the kilometers can go electric faster than the

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 2>fleet can if we take how much people move around

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and assign it to different drive trains, so it can

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>both lower the size of the vehicle fleet and push

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it towards electric faster. Of course, there's still the nightmare

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>scenario where there's a big bound in the amount of

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>vehicle use because of the self driving cars. We didn't

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 2>really dive into that in this time, but in general,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's not something you should ignore. I think

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 2>it's something you should recognize that we don't know and

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>do sensitivity on scenario analysis accordingly. So I think it's

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>definitely still something to watch, and I actually think you're

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>going to hear quite a bit more about it in

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five, as some of

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 2>these services start to scale up further.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg NF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg an

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon which

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this recording, and any viability as a result of this

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>recording is expressly disclaimed.