WEBVTT - Why the UK Is a Stock Pickers Paradise with Kernow's Alyx Wood 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Welcome to Meron Talks Money,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast in which people who know the markets explain

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I'm Meren sumsat Web. This week I'm speaking

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Wood, chief investment officer of Kerno Asset Management.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Kerno describes itself as a contrarian investment manager, specializing exclusively

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in UK equities, currently about one hundred million pounds in

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>assets under management. Before co founding Kerno in twenty seventeen,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Alex worked as a fund manager at Downing, a vice

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>president at Deutsche Bank, and a management consultant at KPMG.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Alex to Merin Talks Money.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a pleasure, Miron. Thank you very much for your time.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit surreal, little bit of a career highlight

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.319
<v Speaker 2>for me because I've listened to your show and I'm

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>on it so and I just found out you're half

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>your cornished as well, So this is this is perfect.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a career highlight for me as well,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and that so far we have never yet had a

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>cornish person on who is a value orientated contrarian who

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>specializes in the UK. It looks like hitting every single

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>button for this podcast. So we're more excited than you are.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Gott to tell you hopefully certain quality. But yes, I agree.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so listen. Tell me about why you started this fund.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the key behind it?

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's been my lifelong dream since I've been investing

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>since fifteen. I enjoy it. I love it. The opportunity

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>set is amazing in the UK. The number of decent

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>jobs and places you can practice this craft has been

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>declining because of the growth of index hugging and businesses

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>merging and forgetting how to make money. So the opportunity

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>aligned got big enough and ivy enough to go for it,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and so I did.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the beginning of what you said

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't very many markets left where you can

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be properly active because the rise of passive are slightly

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the ability to do that. Can you talk a

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more around that.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It's more the index hugging. You know, it's a disease.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, ten years ago there were four hundred U

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>came up exaggerating ums a little bit, but the four

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred UK managers that were doing plus and minus ten percent.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Now you've got forty guys probably doing decent job and

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>everyone else's plus and minus two on the index, and

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that index hugging that lack of conviction makes it very

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>hard to find a job because if you go join

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>a big house or a medium house, you're tracked against that,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and if you go too far away, you get fired.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's better to fail conventionally rather than

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>win unconventionally, and you have to follow someone else's philosophy

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 2>to have your own philosophy and come out of an

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 2>investment bank in your twenties that doesn't exist anymore to join.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to use names, but some of the

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>great training programs that still exists, they just don't give

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you that career exposure anymore. There are places the multi

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>straps are doing a pretty good job of the young

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>people today, but the dearth of talent and opportunity is

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of frightening. The flip side of that, it creates

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 2>huge opportunity and trend following now is massive. The wisdom

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of crowd don't exist of ais to the same extent,

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>so fundamentals and reality are getting a long way from

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 2>each other. And there's a lot of crazy, interesting things,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>fascinating things going on today. And I'm chomping at the

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>bitch on to capsule this and share it with people.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's very interesting. So what you're saying is something

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>we have heard quite a lot on the part of

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, which is that the closet tracker

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>never disappeared. There was a period when we all read

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot about closet trackers and we were infuriated by

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what they charged, et cetera, etc. And then there was

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a view that gradually that would disappear. But from what

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, the most of the funds left in the

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>UK that call themselves active funds are really closet trackers,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's maybe one of the reasons why active has

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>such a difficult time in theory. But the other thing

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that we have looked at recently is the performance of

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>genuinely active funds. So if you look at funds with

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a very high active share, you tend to find a

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>much more and much higher likelihood that they will.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Outperform exactly, I would just caveat that. It's the larger

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>funds have got larger as opposed to there aren't good

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>There's still plenty of active, good high quality managers out there.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just that the marketing machine has sucked it all

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>up into the say, the twenty largest, and that proportion

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>of assets has then flown in. And then you also

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>have fun flows from interlashal investors pulling from small caps

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and all the rest of it. So you have this

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>quite interesting distortion and Carlstone flows out of acting markets

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and all this.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but we still need to say it.

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>It just creates pockets of opportunity. And you know how

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>many people really do all the fundamental work and take

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>a different view out of consensus. You're just not going

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>to get paid for it. And I love it, so,

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, looking silly and being ridiculed making money doesn't

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>go out of fashion. So that's what I'm going to

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>stick to.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And how's performance been.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>It's been good, it's been pleasing. I would have liked

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to have made more, but we've we've beaten the pack

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>by a decent margin. That means we're starting to be

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>taken seriously. Now we've got to do another five years

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>of that before we have we earn any sort of reputation.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I can ask for more, given how important

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it is to beat the competitors. But this buck sustaining

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that and have been maintaining that edge is the important thing.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you found that you're in a position where

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you could start your own fund. Fantastic, and of all

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets in the world, you chose possibly the most

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>unpopular one there is and still is. I would likely

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.559
<v Speaker 1>I keep looking at the numbers and thinking this will

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>come back. People are going to become interested in this again,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's going to happen. But even the most recent numbers,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the calistone numbers that you're talking about, So where money

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is flowing to. We've seen one of the biggest movements

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>out of UK stocks in record in January and hopefully

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that will have turned around a little in February March.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't become any more popular in the last

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>five years. But this is the market that you chose.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the causality is probably the other way. I used

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 2>to invest in everything since I was fifteen. Then I

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>specialize in twenty twelve and UK only because I get

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the culture of a very fortunate accounting background. I can

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>get in front of anyone in terms of network, So

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 2>it's an area where you can really build an area

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 2>of specialism, and part of my philosophy is I spend

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>as much time analyzing shit sareholders as I do companies.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>So my specialism is I understand the flows and a

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>makeup of a shareholder base very very well. And I'm

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>buying off to stress sellers and selling to greedy buyers,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and I almost don't need to know about the company

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to make money. I do because it's a safety thing

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 2>and that's actually the core of what I find interesting

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and so it's a product of history why I specialize

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in the UK and just quickly touched on the UK.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's more ten bagglers in the UK than

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 2>there's a percentage market cap than in the US. The

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>distribution of curve, the flatness of the curve means you've

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of high quality, amazingly rated, great businesses,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, experience games works, and then you've got a

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of dogs to make that work. The net result

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>is you have a pedestrian, frankly boring market that does

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>four to six percent, but the tails, you know, it's fantastic.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a stock picker's paradise. Which is the weird dichotomy

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of this situation that when the discounters and closes, you

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>are articulated earlier.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that you are both long and short and

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>will come to short later. But what kind of companies

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are looking for you? Mainly large caps, small medium cap

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing down the bottom end of the market cap spectrum.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 2>We go where the value is, where the biggest opportunity is.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>So we have large caps, we have medium and small

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>today with a bias and medium because of the high

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 2>quality business of dominant positions. I imaginedent teams sent out

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>in a big chunk, and still sometimes we found ERUs.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>You've been doing a lot recently on investment trusts. We've

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>got two investment trust trades on that disappear now. So

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we just move where the biggest gap is. Small cap

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>is currently still I think primed to you talk about turning.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Small cap does turn. That's the best returning asset class

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>in the world. If it doesn't, then we won't do

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>a big proportion of it. There's some great large cap businesses,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, global businesses on the UK discount. We'll do

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>them as well, so you know, we paid less for

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>something and then we trade the catalyst and we'll move

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>wherever the value is. That's why we call the fund

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the navigator and Okay.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So many questions I want to didn't we start Let's

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to the first thing you said about it

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>recently getting into doing vestment trust and you're right, listener,

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the very interested investment trust, and so we what what

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are the two that you've brought into.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>One the other one is Amadeo, which is an airline

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>craft fleecing company. So this nearly went bust and COVID

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>just for reasons. You can imagine the two clients. One

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>was very safe and the other one was actually in bankruptcy,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>but then that got bailed out, so then the covenants

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>became good. We got interested in the asset class because

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you're trading at a eighty sixty percent discount and the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>cash flows are good. The catalyst there was the board

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 2>and governments and the other shareholders Metage and Elliott are

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>incredibly smart investors. And that discount has closed and you've

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>we were collecting a twenty two percent dividend, it's now

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>down to thirteen and they've been doing terrific buybacks. So

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty great assets story, good managed governance, change

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and a wind down of the business over eight years

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>that will hopefully double our money okay.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>That was an example of looking at the other shareholders

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the business to find the catalyst for the value to

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>be released. Yes, yeah, okay. And then the next thing

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you said was about large caps and the global UK discount,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting, you know, the idea that the UK

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>has a discount is not generally accepted. Everyone refers to it.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that discount comes from.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a natural oscillation of markets, of perception of reality.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>That's how prices work and story. So the UK out

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of two thousand and eight twos and I actually came

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>up pretty good relatively speaking. And from twenty eleven to

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen the UK he was doing incredibly well. You

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 2>have to ignore my Eco because it's been absolutely fantastic

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>in India and China. Those are the outlies if you

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>were Jim Rodgers picking Macro. But the the Brexit haze,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 2>as I should to be kindly called it, essentially was

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>a middle finger to the rest of the world, and

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>that perception caused money to essentially start flighting. And then

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>you had a Woodford scandal which would have hurt people

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>having a go cavid and so it's just a general

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the natural buyers of UK equities has been

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 2>declining and pension funds don't buy it. So the retail

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>market in the UK's are lower than in terms of

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>active buying as a percentage is lower than other countries.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So you have to ask if the liquidities are not there,

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and then the companies have perception of lack of liquidity

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and then they don't ipo. It then starts self fulfilling.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>So we're in this self fulfilling, self harmed situation. At

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the moment, the companies are amazing. Some of the companies

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>are still amazing, and it just means you have a

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>better opportunity to get and it will turn because things

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>always change. We just don't know when.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Aw where you still when?

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you holding?

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>In the large caps, we've got hiscocks phrases these probably

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>more than the mid cap ones. We recently come out

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of a viva. We've got Burbery, Okay, took us through that.

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 2>Burbery went from an embarrassing stock last year to hold

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to having a change of management. And that's interesting. So

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>then you look at the luxury market and well, actually

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that's growing and globalization is going to get bigger. It

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel like it but there's more people and wealth's

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>going up, and there's more millionaires every day than there's

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the day before. Status and security. They don't sell clothes,

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>they're selling status and that only goes up with globalization.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 2>So the setup is great. The best luxury goods ban's

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 2>obviously in Europe, but I don't trade that, so Birbury

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>happens to be the highest luxury factor company in the

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 2>UK for two one hundred. I can't buy Mold because

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it's too small than there's a shareholder problem. So the

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>setups are very very interesting. New management team, great tailwind asset.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Then you're saying, well, they need to make money, and

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>what's the normal basis for their cash flow, what does

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 2>the business valuation look like, and all the fundamentals and

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 2>all of that, and you get to about a ten

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>or twelve billion valuation and the market cap I think

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>was two and a half or three, which is quite

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a big gap. So then you need the setup to

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>realizing that value, which is essentially what we're trading. It's

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the time value of money because this could take five

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>or eight years to do two three hundred percent and

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the stretching might be wrong, and you have to recycle

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it once or twice. I've been watching Birbray for fifteen

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>years and this is the only time I've ever been

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>able to buy it, that trench coat in that brand.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It's been arounded a long time. And if you can

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 2>make me for thirty quid a scarf and select for

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>one thousand pounds, that's a very high quality business.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do all like to do that. So this

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is the way you look at it on your website.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>When you look at your process, it's value, the equity

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>acquired at the acquired a discount, which is something that

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>you know everybody wants to do. But then the difficult

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>bit is finding the catalyst. So what was the catalyst here?

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>The change of management or a change in the shareholder structure.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 2>So when I get in, I want to know who

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to sell it to. Birbury's my new games workshop.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So when it's toasted the town and it's winning awards

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and all, and they're paying back the normal progressive dipogrant,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>we will exit because then the normal buyers are back in.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>If you think about the register, you want to have

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>a proportion of blackwork x X and if the register

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is close to what the normal register should look like

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it can't move very much. If the register is a

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>long way and they deliver, then you the share price

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>can move along towards it. It's a pretty much turnaround,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>classic turnaround story. And so you then come out at

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the back of that. You need two or three good

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 2>years of numbers going up, and then the greed comes

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>back in, and then you exit and you get the

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>multiple expansion and the growth.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>In earnings, and you're happy to come out a little

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>before the top. Leave it for everyone else.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I would love to be able to time tops and

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>bottoms perfectly. I've never figured a way to do that

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 2>without activism.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Without activism, so that I mean, it's interesting because you're

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that's not something that you're going to be able to do.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So when you join, when you join the shareholder register

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of a company, you may be joining one where mcdike

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>take their investment Cruss. We've just been talking about where

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you might have Elliot, etcetera. On the share register, but

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they're the activists. You might come in behind them, but

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily of a science to be activist, you're I.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Think people prefer the quality of argument as opposed to

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 2>strong arguing as long as you get past one or

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>three percent, if there's an activist involved and it's important.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>In Burby's case, it's not that important. I'll give you

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a live examples. I'm looking at BP now, I'm not

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>trading it. I don't think it's good enough. But you've

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>got an activist in there. The CEO will get fired

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and maybe the Roles Royce CEO will come along and

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>take over the BP roll. He's literally at the top.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Can't go any bed at rolls Royce. He must not

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>take over a BP, which is actually what he wants

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 2>to do. That becomes very interesting because BP can be

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>tidied up and double in value without too much effort

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and shouldn't be ashamed of what it is. That setup

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>is right there and looking that's the stuff that we

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>look up and we just we wait for these things

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to become real where they can hit enough trade ticks.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>That wouldn't happen without the activist involving BP being strong

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>enough to basically get the board to do that. And

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I probably won't. It probably won't. Just I'm giving it

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Won't happen. Yes, So that's that's an examp something that

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you would look at and you recognize the value, recognize

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the discount, but aren't convinced that there will be a

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>catalyst in reasonable timescale.

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's hundreds of these and you just watch them.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's like gardening. So the shorting is the weeds,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the oaks, things that make money, and then it's the

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>change of weather and what's flowering and what's not, and

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>just how do you spend your time on the day.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>It's about a time. You have to swing at everything

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>you've put to use your time effectively. And you know,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>if I hold Burberry, there's no point me looking at

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 2>too many other retailers. I'll get more value go looking

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 2>at some pharmaceutical businesses or something.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so there aren't very many of you. I mean

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you're the only investment managers like analyst at the company, right,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So how many how many storms can you look at?

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we'll no. My co founder was

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>an ex head of extity research that an investment bank.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>We use four different outsourced research company. We use to

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>referencing companies, we use a background check company. We have

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a quant outsourced product model. So it's a full offering.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't our team and research depth. I hope is

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>an inch wide and a mile deep.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry about the operating environment in the UK

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in general? Awful lot of smaller companies in particular are

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have increasing troubles operating in a high tax,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at high cost of employment, high regulation economy, and that

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's going to turn around at any

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>time soon, which may limit the universe in which you

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can invest.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Am I concerned? I guess I'm a personal level. It's

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit disheartening. But then I take you know, do

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>you want to be Singapore and Dubai or do you

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>want to be Switzerland and Norway? And both of those,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, ones heavily regulated, high tax, and the others aren't.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And there's what you want to do is find a

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>place in society that works. So I think I was

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>very proud of the UK when I worked in London

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>because there was a globalization hotbed between great art and

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>media and business and I'm so close largest city in Europe.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>It was like combining the East and West, the time

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>zone in the immigration and accept It's felt really good

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to me. I really enjoyed that narrative as the UK,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, grown up. It was a nice place to

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 2>be where I've kind of become a bit upset. I

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 2>don't want to move into politics. Is that's kind of

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>less feels less now and we've sort of lost a

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 2>bit of the golden goose. If I'm interpreting what you're saying,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I go abroad a lot and I

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 2>hear oh UK's instructural decline. It's not very nice. It's

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>one on the numbers. But my life would be easier

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>if more great companies listed Quantum, Cambridge Quantum and we

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 2>lost armholdings to America and things. So I'd love to

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 2>be part of the next revolution and the great companies

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of the future and be able to have that story

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>over the next ten twenty years. Let's all find a way.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's been talking about. This is all very marginal

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 2>from an investment perspective. It makes no difference.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Only must make a difference to profit to earnings. If

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>employment costs go up and if taxes go.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Up, oh yeah, But if it's priced in or if

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm shorting it, then I'll make money on that side.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>If the multiple goes from you might you all share

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>multiple stays fifteen If the market multiple taxes go up

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to your point should actually be ten. Then I'll price

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 2>everything off ten. So you know, if we have a

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>dot com boom, then I can do fifty to one

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent a year. If we have an income driven

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>five percent market, then I might be able to do

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent per year. So the opportunity to deliver and

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the dispersion definitely changes, and I can control that. Would

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I like a crazy market, I think not every year.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>A stable one makes my job frankly easier. It means

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I can keep up and hopefully develop ahead of everybody.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about shorting, so presumably that's that works in

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite way. Find something that's overvalued and wait

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for a catalysts and then short.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, preferably zero. So we do fads, failures, and frauds.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 2>The frauds are the sexy fun one. Our big win

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>was Wan Disco. We discovered that billion pound forward. We've

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>got a couple of others or seven others today that

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>we've identified these criminal enterprises. I feel a bit like man.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I like going after them. We don't do activism, we

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>don't make them public apart from our investors, and we

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 2>just take the money off the table and typically we

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>wait for them to run out of money, to not

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 2>be too clever with it.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Hang on, does this mean that you are not going

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell me what your criminal enterprises are.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you past case studies, but I will

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>be shot by my CEO and compliance department. If you're

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>an investor and you come in, I will tell you.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Only where you can find out what's the minimum investment?

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Why do our listeners have to pay to hear the stuff?

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Fifty? We put out fifty rather than the traditional million pounds.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>We wanted to be big enough but not be completely

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>impossible for people to pretty much invite only on the

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>platforms that might pass. Some money's in it via a

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 2>j bell and we can go direct and it's a

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>non shore fund as opposed to offshore. We take many

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>regulation boxes we were physically able to.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We talked earlier about large caps and the long you

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>held there, but our listeners are really interested in smaller companies.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you bought any new small company positions recently? Small

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>On mid.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Last month we purchased Kistos. This is actually our smallest

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 2>position on the crity wisely, it's only one hundred million

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 2>market cap, which is on the CUSP of what I

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>can physically buy, tell us about it. So Kistos is

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 2>a well and gas company. What's interesting is I think

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>they're worth three hundred and fifty million and the market

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>was one hundred. So I did some work, happened to

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>know the management team for a decent time. Very savvy

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 2>op operators own twenty the business. They forty two bagged

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the previous similar art incarnation on the previous company called

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>rock Rose. The old shareholders and here have ridden this

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>share price down from six quid to a quid. The

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>shareholder rotation told me that it was near the end

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the fundamentals of the business. It's going to double its

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>production this year, its profits are going to not quite

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a double, but get to one hundred million free cash flow,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>which is the value of the market cap of the company,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and then the cat lists are getting paid. Is the

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>reserves they have for the worlds that they're plugging into

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>will also they regrade them to basically how probable they're

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 2>going to get them out, but they put them into

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the best bucket, which means they can double their cash

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>flow between twenty seven and twenty thirty, which hopefully the

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>market will value in some way and so we should

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>double our money.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>If that's the case, what's your average holding period? How

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>long do you give things to come to fruition.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 2>It's all different, but to averages three years, so it's

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>further enough away that it's too far for and listener

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>once you know, yea, at the beginning of the year,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>everything's in years, and I'm sure you feel this, you know,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months is the furthest the brain kind of works.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Three years for us kind of is enough for perceptions

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>of reality to change and new magical things to happen,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>So that works very well. Ten years it is just

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 2>too long for my tension span to make money out

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of the catalyst. And if you're wrong, you're holding something

0:21:59.359 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 2>for too long.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Then, but it can also happen very quickly. And one

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we have been talking about on

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the pod recently is the extent to which it's now

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.479
<v Speaker 1>possible to have much higher turnover than you used to. So,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, even five ten years ago, the general idea

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was that you should trade as little as possible because

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>those expenses agent to your performance. But now that it

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is really so cheap to trade, that's not really a

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thing anymore. And maybe there is a case for much

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>higher levels of turnover inside active funds, and so instead

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking at that as a negative, now we should

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>start looking at as a positive.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>It just depends on the edge you're trading, what value

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to capture. What's your edge? If you're I

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 2>will use into training because there are a great manager

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>that's having a difficult time, but his trading period is

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 2>very long and his edge has to work on that

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>because in your eighty percent of a return in a

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>year is a rating return. If you're trading incremental growth

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of compounding of profit, you need to give it five

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 2>ten years become a significant portion of the shareholder return.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Is this impossible to do any the way? If you're

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 2>a multi strat, their long term for them is a

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>week and they're very good at upgrading on downgraded earnings

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 2>into news reports every day and that's what they do,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>so it makes sense for them to have extreme extreme turnover.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And Alex, have we've got any gold miners in there?

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Are? We used to doing sentiment which was a Egyptian

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 2>guide gold miner that got taken over four months ago,

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>which was actually pretty good timing on reflection, so I'd

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>probably be selling it now a new gold high.

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Speed selling gold miners buying them at this point, Yes.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm short to gold miner. Now we're shut. AI were

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>short copper and gold mining, anything that's really popular, we're

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 2>probably short.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So Alex. When I look at gold, which I've been

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>keen on for years, I mean decades actually, at this

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>point tally embarrassingly, it looks like the rest of the

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>media has suddenly discovered gold as a thing. Central banks

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are suddenly replacing their treasuries with gold, etc. But when

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the investment situation, retail investors, particularly in

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the US haven't really moved into golden Institutional investors certainly haven't.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>You're just not seeing those big flows in to the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ETFs beginning, but not really there. So it doesn't look

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to me like gold is suddenly super popular. It feels

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's more at the beginning than the end.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a fair observation. So i'm gold physically personally,

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 2>because you know, it's a bet on government's collapse every

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred years. I think gold probably close should be five

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>or ten thousand pounds if you look at the what

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it brings, and it's been replaced by perceptions of other

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>safe assets and other extremes. Bitcoin. Where we are with

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 2>it is it's an enduring asset that that's great, but

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't do very much apart from protect and over

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the last given the last five years, you would have

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 2>thought there would be a lot more protection going on

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and it hasn't really been that bashion of safety, and

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>then we'd have the inflation boom. So you know, there's

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>definitely an argument to have it as a balanced portfolio,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and it would be strange not to particularly a family office.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>In terms of trading it, we just look at the company,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 2>so you know, if the company's got a catalyst and

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>they're overvalued on it or they're undervalued, then great. In

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 2>terms of the commodity price, we can just hedge it out,

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.479
<v Speaker 2>so I actually don't need to worry about the price.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>We are actually shorter gold mine today, which kind of

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of makes sense because they're currently in the high

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>part of the cycle. The ball case I've just given

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you in gold in general that has then taken multiple

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 2>expansion and the gold prices their outputs aren't going to

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>go up and if anything, they've got some problems. So

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>really really interesting situation. I suspect our spilly looking at

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>it in ten years times. It's one that's worth spending

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 2>some time on. It's one of the easier assets to

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 2>keep a track of.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Alex. I'm just going to guess here, but are you

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>holding bitcoin too?

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I wouldn't hold bitcoin.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not a listen on the UK stock market and

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>it's a massive No.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I meant personally you said you hold gold. You said

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you hold gold personally, it is Bitcoin is something that

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you would hold personally.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>So I did buy it in twenty twelve, and I

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 2>did buy a house with the money. So I'm probably

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a hypocrite here, but I did it

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>knowing that it was worthless and it was a bit

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 2>of fun. It's a fascinating example of I spent every month.

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I used to buy one thousand pounds and whatever from

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>trainers and if her can find invest in it, I

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>used to put a thousand pounds in it to take everything.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a good way to find new things. If I've

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 2>heard about it, probably a bit late. It's a young

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 2>person thing early if it's an old person thing. And

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 2>so it's a fascinating way to plug in and pay

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 2>attention to the world, and bitcoin is a fantastic It's

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>putably a bit deep here, but example of how story

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 2>can be the entire valuation of something. It's not prices

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of perception of reality, and story can have the and

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>religion have infinite value.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so bitcoin is all story, but that doesn't make

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 1>it not valid.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 2>That's a much quicker, more particularly worth of putting it.

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's just talk a little about the difficulties of investing

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like this, because, as you said earlier, it makes you

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>feel a bit silly a lot of the time. It

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>makes you feel unpopular, makes you feel like you're not

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>with the crowd. And here you are sitting in what

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I think and I hope you think as well as

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>once in a gener origin an opportunity to buy into

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a rather amazing market at a very low price. But nonetheless,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>no one has agreed with you for years. It's tough.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of being a good fan manager is

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>really about being able to sort of weather that emotional difficulty,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't it.

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree, and it's something that it took me

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 2>a long time to fully appreciate. Part of the reason

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>why Ed and I own the business is to defend

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 2>against that. Partly when I live in Cornwall, it's probably

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>overdoing it, but it is to manage the lifestyle and fitness.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Like an athlete, You've got to look after your brain.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>There's only so many decisions you need to make as

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a decision based business. Those decisions need to be very good.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 2>There aren't many of them that need to be very good.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 2>You need to be in the best headspace possible to

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>do that, and to defend yourself from because you're going

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to be wrong a lot and ask you and contrain

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the way I do things. Actually I'm wrong most of

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 2>the time in terms of going to a party, so

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>that that can't get you and make you a negative person.

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Triumph for the optimist. So I've set it up in

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a way to protect to myself and I think that's

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to apply in different ways for different personalities. And really

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to is the performance and the game

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>more important to you? Is it making money and looking

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 2>clever and safe more important? And I think most people

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>will be risk averse and should go for the second.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>To do the first one is kind of not worth it,

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>like the return on headache in any business, And so

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 2>there's something either wrong with you or you've got a

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>point to prove.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You make it sound really quite hard.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>The big change for me here is I never used

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to speak to the investors, so it was really obvious,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 2>just make money, do the best trades. Right now I

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>have investors. I don't want to let people down. I

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 2>talk to very very clever people who give me opinions

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that I have to try and.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Ignore, and then you have to explain yourself to them

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>when things go wrong.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>That's hard, Oh do we do. We're very transparent to

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the degree that we can. Actually, one of my best

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>friends is despite us making loads of money, he's flat

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>because every time the market goes up he buys more

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and every time it goes down herself, and it's you know,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>it might change our relationship. And I've actually not let

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of my friends come in for this very

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>reason and managing other people as well. You know, I

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>come in the morning and I talked about Birbury earlier.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I started buying Bibery at fifteen quid. I was buying

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it for a year and doubled it at seven quid. Fortunately,

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>but along the way emotionally taking people on you that journey,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't realize it until you have to do it.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>It's very on reflection, it's easy, but at the time

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it's incredibly hard. You really are running into a by

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I run into a burning building and then buy the

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>lands to redevelop it the next day in effect. But

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>telling someone whore running into a burning building is not

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that attractive to most people. Even so, But if you're

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 2>going to change the world, and do you think special

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 2>hard and it's got to be hard, you're so glad

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you did that. Yes, life dreaming, I'm very very lucky.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's are so much more that we want to do,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>so so much more.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you one last question. And you

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have time for bread for this, so if you

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't got an answer, it's all good. But are you

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>reading anything at the moment that you would recommend to

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>our listeners.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Thinking in Bets is what I'm reading right now on

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>my table. That's very good. It's it's an ex actually

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>world series poker player lady who then started doing touring

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and speaking to fund managers and CEOs about making a

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 2>good decision and the outcome. We're actually unrelated. So you

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 2>make a decision and the outcomes bad, you feel like

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you've done something wrong. It's called resulting. Making a decision

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>is the important part, and that's the process you want

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to work on. The outcome of probabilities is a separate point.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>But emotionally it's very hard because you focus on the

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>outcome whenever you talk about a case study, not the

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>quality of the decision. And it sort of reinforces poker

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>players get this, and that's quite an interesting reinforcement idea.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 2>You want good quality idea, good quality decision and positive

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>or you know, I like out If you have a

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>bad quality idea and you get a positive result, actually,

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 2>that can be a very dangerous situation because you then

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>might try and repeat it.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, that sounds great. I haven't read that. I

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>will get that, and I suspect a lot of the

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>listeners well as well. Alex, thanks very much for coming up.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It's been a real pleasure. I really enjoyed it. Thank

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.479
<v Speaker 2>you for the good questions, and I hopefully you'll meet

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>you and call more next time.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would be great. That would be great, but

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not at the Seale Sankstuary. Thanks for listening for this

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>week's Maren Talks Money. If you like us, show, rate, review,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe. Wherever you listen to podcasts, I keep sending

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>questions or comments to Merron Money at Bloomberg dot net.

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also follow me and John on Twitter or x.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm at marinas W and John is John Underscore STEPIC.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>This episode was hosted by Me Maren's Sunset webs, produced

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>by Summersidi and Moses and our executive producers Brendan Francis,

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Newnan production supportant sound designed by Blake Maple's and special

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks of course to Alex Wood