1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,080 --> 00:00:10,720 Speaker 2: As we bring you a special conversation now thanks to 3 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 2: our colleague Michael McKee, who's joining us from world headquarters 4 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,920 Speaker 2: in New York, and a special conversation with Cleveland Federal 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,320 Speaker 2: Reserve Bank President Loretta Mester. Michael, take it away. 6 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:26,360 Speaker 1: Well, thank you very much, and good afternoon to everybody 7 00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:28,720 Speaker 1: watching us and listening to us on Bloomberg television and 8 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 1: radio around the world. And I don't know what you 9 00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: say to people on the internet who are watching, listening, whatever, 10 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 1: but thank you very much for joining us. This is 11 00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:40,239 Speaker 1: sort of your farewell tour. You're retiring at the end 12 00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 1: of the month, so let me ask you. You're not 13 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:47,800 Speaker 1: you've been a voter this year to this point. By December, 14 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 1: do you think we will see one rate cut, more 15 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:53,520 Speaker 1: rate cuts, or no rate cuts. 16 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 3: Well, thanks for inviting me to be here. I mean, 17 00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 3: we all put in our projections at this that was 18 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:05,000 Speaker 3: held this week, and the medium projection in the SEP 19 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 3: is pretty close to my own projection for the economy. 20 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:11,840 Speaker 3: We've made pretty good progress on inflation over the last 21 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:16,559 Speaker 3: two years. It's still too high the most recent data 22 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 3: that we received. In fact, we got the CPI report 23 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,240 Speaker 3: on the second day of the meeting, and it was 24 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:25,320 Speaker 3: it was a great gift for my last FOMC meaning 25 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 3: to get that report. The good news there, but it 26 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 3: still means that there's work to do on inflation to 27 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 3: gain confidence that it is on that downward trajectory to 28 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:38,520 Speaker 3: two percent. And you know, the unemployment rate has ticked 29 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,959 Speaker 3: up a little bit over the last couple of months. Certainly, 30 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:46,320 Speaker 3: though if you look overall, the labor market conditions remain 31 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 3: healthy and that's a great thing too. So I think 32 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 3: monetary policy right now is well positioned really to ensure 33 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:58,800 Speaker 3: that inflation does move back down towards two percent over 34 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 3: time and that labor market conditions remain healthy. And that's 35 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 3: a good position to be in. And if you look 36 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 3: at the SEPs overall, what you see is the path 37 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:12,600 Speaker 3: of the modal path of the SEP across participates as 38 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 3: at rates will be coming down. The dot plot shows 39 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 3: that there is weight on one zero two, But it'll 40 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 3: really depend on how the economy actually evolves, and I 41 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:24,960 Speaker 3: think that's going to be the work of the committee 42 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 3: going forward assess incoming information about the economy. Does it 43 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 3: change your outlook? Is it consistent with the modal outlook, 44 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 3: and as inflation comes down, and as inflation expectations short 45 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 3: run a year ahead comes down, then it'll be appropriate 46 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 3: to reduce that fit funds rate and remove some of 47 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 3: the restrictiveness. 48 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 1: Well for their confidence that you're moving towards the two 49 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:52,160 Speaker 1: percent target is almost a cliche. Now what does that 50 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 1: actually mean? Does it mean you need to see the 51 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:58,840 Speaker 1: various inflation indicators keep coming down even if it's only 52 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 1: say a tenth. Do you have a level of the 53 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: year over a year rate of inflation that you want 54 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 1: to hit? 55 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 3: Uh? 56 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: How can people judge what the FED is going to do? 57 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 1: What they're thinking about? 58 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,959 Speaker 3: So what my view would be is, I'd like to 59 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:16,480 Speaker 3: see a few more months of inflation reports that are 60 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 3: positive in the sense of similar to what we got 61 00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:24,840 Speaker 3: last month. I'd like to see that continue. Remember, at 62 00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:27,960 Speaker 3: the beginning of the year January inflation was higher. There 63 00:03:28,040 --> 00:03:31,639 Speaker 3: was some real issues with measurement, you know, residual seasonality 64 00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:34,280 Speaker 3: in that measure. But then we got two more reports 65 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 3: that were consistent with Wow, there's not been progress this year. 66 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 3: I came into the year not expecting the same l 67 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 3: degree of progress that we saw over the second half 68 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 3: of last year because a lot of we did get 69 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,640 Speaker 3: a lot of help from the improvement in supply conditions, 70 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:53,400 Speaker 3: both in the labor market and in product markets, and 71 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 3: I didn't expect that to continue. And a lot of 72 00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:58,520 Speaker 3: the work that the Cleveland Fed does in are Center 73 00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:01,320 Speaker 3: for Inflation Research suggests that it's going to take some 74 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,560 Speaker 3: time to get inflation back to two percent all the 75 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 3: way back. So my projection is that we probably won't 76 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:11,160 Speaker 3: get there until twenty twenty six, but we'll see progress 77 00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:17,080 Speaker 3: continue in my modal view, and that's enough to then say, Okay, 78 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:20,719 Speaker 3: it's time to start the process of bringing rates down 79 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 3: and normalizing our propose. 80 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 1: As long as it moves down, it doesn't have to 81 00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:25,720 Speaker 1: hit a point target. 82 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 3: Yeah, not to me. To my view would be that 83 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 3: if I continue to see some of these better inflation 84 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,280 Speaker 3: reports that we got then we got earlier in the year, 85 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 3: if that continues, then I'd feel comfortable starting that process 86 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:39,880 Speaker 3: of normalizing rates. 87 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:41,960 Speaker 1: Well, you've said what others have said on the FED 88 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 1: that once the momentum is there, it'll keep going down. 89 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:47,359 Speaker 1: So you don't want to wait till you get to 90 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:50,680 Speaker 1: two so you don't fall below it. But by implication 91 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:52,800 Speaker 1: that means you're going to be starting behind the curve. 92 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: Inflation will already be heading in that direction. Can you 93 00:04:56,560 --> 00:04:58,880 Speaker 1: put the brakes on fast enough so that it doesn't 94 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 1: go back down disinflationary territory? 95 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 3: Well, so let's step back from that. I don't know 96 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,279 Speaker 3: whether we're behind the curve, right. M Policy affects the 97 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 3: economy with a lag, as we know. You know that 98 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:13,720 Speaker 3: you know long and variable lags. So we've got to 99 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:17,039 Speaker 3: make sure that we're gonna be taking some of the 100 00:05:17,080 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 3: restrictedness off before inflation gets to two percent. And so 101 00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 3: when we're thinking about it's it's really is it? Are 102 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 3: we confidence on the path back to two percent? But 103 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:29,680 Speaker 3: then it's a calibration exercise, right, Taking into part both 104 00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:32,719 Speaker 3: parts are remanding, right, we wanna maintain healthy labor marketing 105 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:36,880 Speaker 3: conditions at the same time ensuring that inflation goes all 106 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 3: the way back down to two percent. And so we're 107 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:42,720 Speaker 3: gonna the Committee will be calibrating its policy right to 108 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 3: achieve both parts of its mandate and taking to account 109 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 3: the risks to both parts of this mand aid as 110 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 3: it goes forward. So I think that's the way I 111 00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 3: view it is that this really is now monetary policy 112 00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 3: is well positioned no matter which side the risk manifests themselves, 113 00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 3: and then the work of the committee is to assess 114 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 3: those conditions incoming information, how's inform your outlook, how's it 115 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 3: affect the risk around the outlook, and what is that 116 00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 3: the implications for policy. So I think that's what the 117 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:12,520 Speaker 3: exercise is going to be going forward. 118 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:15,000 Speaker 1: When you're looking at the outlook for the economy. There's 119 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: a lot of criticism on Wall Street that the FED 120 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:19,240 Speaker 1: being data dependent. It's always looking at what's happened in 121 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 1: the past, perhaps not realizing you're constantly talking with people 122 00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 1: in your district, with CEOs in your district companies and 123 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:30,599 Speaker 1: getting their views, and I'm wondering how well their views 124 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:33,479 Speaker 1: that they're telling you now end up matching up to 125 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 1: the data. 126 00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 3: So you're exactly right, Michael. The work that we do 127 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 3: in the districts is incredibly important because we talk to 128 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:47,360 Speaker 3: a number of contacts, business contacts, community development practitioners, labor 129 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 3: market representatives, so we have a really good sense of 130 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,760 Speaker 3: what is really happening in the economy, and right now, 131 00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:57,000 Speaker 3: what they're telling us is very similar to what's in 132 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,680 Speaker 3: the data. Right in terms of the labor market. It 133 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 3: is easier to higher now than it was a year ago. 134 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 3: It is easier to retain workers than it was a 135 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:08,480 Speaker 3: year ago. The offers they have to make on wages 136 00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 3: are lower than they were a year ago. They averaged 137 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 3: for our district expectation for this year is four percent, 138 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 3: a year ago is five percent. So that n sort 139 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:21,520 Speaker 3: of balancing between supply and demand is happening when you 140 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 3: talk to businesses about what they're seeing out there. Similarly, 141 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 3: you know there are firms that are telling us that, wow, 142 00:07:30,280 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 3: I wish, wish I had raised my prices higher last year, 143 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 3: because now it's much harder to raise prices cause price pressures, 144 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:41,360 Speaker 3: and the you know, whether the consumers will accept the 145 00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 3: the price increases is coming down. They don't have as 146 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:49,160 Speaker 3: much pricing power as they did before. Nonetheless, there's still 147 00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:53,080 Speaker 3: some and so that's another thing indication that, Okay, we've 148 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:56,160 Speaker 3: done pretty well on inflation getting it down, but we're 149 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 3: not all the way back to two percent, and that's 150 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:00,920 Speaker 3: gonna again be something that the Committee is going to 151 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,640 Speaker 3: have to keep assessing. But I would say that what 152 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 3: we're hearing from our context is very similar to what's 153 00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:10,320 Speaker 3: in the data you know, demand has moderated a bit 154 00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 3: across firms in our district. There are several firms that 155 00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:19,680 Speaker 3: say the infrastructure spending and the support from the federal 156 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:23,760 Speaker 3: programs is they've benefited from it and they expect to 157 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:26,080 Speaker 3: continue to benefit from it. So again, you know, the 158 00:08:26,080 --> 00:08:31,600 Speaker 3: economy seems to be still on a good, solid, firm stance, 159 00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:34,160 Speaker 3: and now it's a question of like, let's get inflation 160 00:08:34,240 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 3: back to two percent, let's keep those labor markets healthy. 161 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:39,560 Speaker 1: Well, we're going to get a couple more inflation reports 162 00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:43,440 Speaker 1: obviously before the next meeting. Would you say that July 163 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:47,040 Speaker 1: is actually a live meeting in play? Would September be 164 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:47,800 Speaker 1: the first one? 165 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:52,240 Speaker 3: I mean, I think all meetings are always in play. Again, 166 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 3: it's really going to be about what happens in the economy. 167 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 3: So rather than think in calendar time, I think the 168 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:01,920 Speaker 3: better approach is to think about, how is the economy evolving? 169 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:06,679 Speaker 3: Do you have has your confidence been raised that given 170 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 3: the reports that have come in, that inflation is on 171 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:12,800 Speaker 3: that sustainable path back to two percent? And I think 172 00:09:12,840 --> 00:09:15,400 Speaker 3: that committee is going to do that careful analysis and 173 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 3: also being assessing what's happening in the labor market. We 174 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:22,199 Speaker 3: have seen the uninflorment rate move up. It's moved up 175 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 3: I think six tenths of percent since early last year. 176 00:09:26,040 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 3: So again you've got to assess both parts of the mandate. 177 00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:33,360 Speaker 3: When we started raising rates, we were focused wholly on 178 00:09:33,400 --> 00:09:35,880 Speaker 3: the inflation part of the mandate because labor markets were 179 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 3: strong and inflation was hot. Now, as inflation has come down, 180 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 3: both parts of the mandate now become very important for 181 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 3: us to be assessing risk around it. And so I'm 182 00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,800 Speaker 3: confident that the Committee will continue to do that as 183 00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 3: it calibrates its policy rates to the economy as it's 184 00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:58,000 Speaker 3: evolving and as they expect it to continue to evolve. 185 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 1: You've got a big calendar data in the middle of 186 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:03,320 Speaker 1: your meetings that I know you would say doesn't have 187 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:06,079 Speaker 1: anything to do with us the election. But would you 188 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:10,120 Speaker 1: say a rate move if inflation continues to cooperate, is 189 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 1: more likely before or after. 190 00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 3: I honestly can tell you. And I've gone to a 191 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:17,480 Speaker 3: lot of FOMCTE meetings. Someone told me I went over 192 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 3: two hundred FOMC meetings in my career, not all as 193 00:10:21,880 --> 00:10:24,440 Speaker 3: a policy maker course as a research director at the 194 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 3: Philly Fed. Politics doesn't enter the room. It really is 195 00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:31,680 Speaker 3: about what can we do with our policy to achieve 196 00:10:31,679 --> 00:10:35,120 Speaker 3: our dual mandate goals, taking into account what the incoming 197 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 3: information is telling you about the outlook for the economy, 198 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 3: taking into account what the risks around achieving our dual 199 00:10:43,280 --> 00:10:46,960 Speaker 3: mandate goals is telling us. And there's nothing about politics 200 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:48,280 Speaker 3: that enters these decisions. 201 00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:51,080 Speaker 1: Well, it could have an effect next year in the 202 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:53,160 Speaker 1: sense that if we got a new president, we'd have 203 00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:56,760 Speaker 1: new fiscal policies. We've got a lot of problems coming 204 00:10:56,800 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 1: up in Washington next year with the debt ceiling, with 205 00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:05,679 Speaker 1: budget negotiations, with taxes. How much faith can we put 206 00:11:05,720 --> 00:11:08,440 Speaker 1: in the dot plot for twenty twenty five and for 207 00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:11,320 Speaker 1: the forecast in twenty twenty five, It seems like there's 208 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 1: somebody unknowns that the Fed really can't have any idea 209 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:16,040 Speaker 1: what's going to happen. 210 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:18,160 Speaker 3: Well, we do have an idea because we have to 211 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:21,080 Speaker 3: do a forecast. Right whenever you're setting monetary policy, because 212 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:24,559 Speaker 3: you know it doesn't affect the economy immediately, it takes 213 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:26,560 Speaker 3: some time to play out. You have to think about 214 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 3: what's happening with the economy. I think every business does that. 215 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,560 Speaker 3: They're all setting sessing what's going to happen to my company. 216 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:35,959 Speaker 3: Where do I think the environment is. We're doing the 217 00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 3: same thing. We have a review of where the economy 218 00:11:39,280 --> 00:11:42,480 Speaker 3: is most likely to go, but we also understand that 219 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:45,000 Speaker 3: as you go further out in the horizon, it could 220 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:48,520 Speaker 3: evolve differently than our current expectation. Is right, it could 221 00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:53,480 Speaker 3: be that labor markets, you know, detriguer faster than we're effected. 222 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:56,160 Speaker 3: Now that's not my base case, but it's possibility. It 223 00:11:56,160 --> 00:11:58,840 Speaker 3: could be that inflation, you know, even though we've gotten 224 00:11:58,840 --> 00:12:01,920 Speaker 3: a couple of reports, maybe hangs up there a little 225 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:03,719 Speaker 3: bit longer. You know, the research that we do with 226 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:05,800 Speaker 3: the Cleveland Fed suggests that it's going to take some 227 00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:07,840 Speaker 3: time for inflation to come back down, but it is 228 00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:10,839 Speaker 3: going to come back down. And so that is always true. 229 00:12:10,880 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 3: And the longer time you go out right, the less 230 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:17,719 Speaker 3: certainty there is about things. So you know, my expectation 231 00:12:17,960 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 3: is that will be systematic and how we adjust policy 232 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:26,960 Speaker 3: based on what's coming in in terms of telling us 233 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:29,560 Speaker 3: about where the economy is going and what the risk are. 234 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:32,280 Speaker 3: And that's I think the way to view this. 235 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:32,680 Speaker 1: Right. 236 00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 3: The committee can't be precient, right, We can't know for 237 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:39,080 Speaker 3: sure what's going to happen. But what we can do 238 00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 3: is we can assess us best we can where the 239 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:46,320 Speaker 3: economy is going and there's risks, and set our policy appropriately, 240 00:12:46,360 --> 00:12:49,080 Speaker 3: and if information comes in that suggests that, oh, the 241 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:52,600 Speaker 3: economy is evolving differently than we might have thought, will 242 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 3: adjust policy in response to that. 243 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 1: We have about thirty seconds left, one last time for 244 00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:00,320 Speaker 1: all the people on trading desks who are watching you 245 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 1: right now. Any forward guidance for Wall Street. 246 00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 3: No, but just understand that the Committee and the institution 247 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:11,480 Speaker 3: at the FED really does focus on setting policy to 248 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 3: achieve our dual mandate goals. We're very committed to doing that, 249 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 3: and we're committed to getting price stability again, inflation down 250 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:23,199 Speaker 3: to two percent, while maintaining healthy labor markets. And I 251 00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 3: think that's the key thing for the Wall Street to understand. 252 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:28,520 Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, Cleveland, Indians weren't supposed to be 253 00:13:28,559 --> 00:13:30,600 Speaker 1: any good this year there at first place? Is that 254 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:32,320 Speaker 1: because of Fed monetary policy? 255 00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:34,560 Speaker 3: Oh? Of course that's definitely the pause. 256 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Loreena Vester, president of the Cleveland 257 00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:41,040 Speaker 1: FED for two more weeks. Thank you for joining us 258 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: today here on Bloomerick