WEBVTT - Avoid Banks, More Downside Coming: Charles Peabody (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. We're

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>focused on banks. We've got a slew of earnings out

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from the likes of Balls, Fargo City Group and JP Morgan.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan in particular started out with a bang, but

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>shares have since gone negative. Joining us now as somebody

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>who perhaps isn't entirely surprised by this, Charles Peabody as

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 1>president of Portala's Partners and Charles, I'm so glad you're

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us today because just Wednesday you actually downgraded your

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>rating on JP Morgan too, a neutral from a bio

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>believed today's results edify your decision in your view or

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>did it make you rethink anything? Um, just a quick clarification,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I went from a neutral to a sell on Yeah. Um, Listen,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>when you when you think of the themes that are

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that that the analysts are espousing to try

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and get people to buy these banks. There are three

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>major themes. One is um by those banks that have

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>big capital returns. The second is by those banks they're

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>showing positive operating leverage and and the third is by

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>those banks that have low loan to deposit ratios because

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be as effected by an increasing

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>deposit data. And if there's a uh theme that I

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>think is running through the weakness in the stocks today,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the lack of positive operating leverage,

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>which you didn't see at JP Morgan, you didn't see

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at p n C. And that gets back to the

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that revenue growth is starting to slow um at

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the margin and particularly in n I I it's it's

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>still positive, but if you go back to the first quarter,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth was high single digits. Now it's mid to

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>low single digits. Charles, maybe you could explain to people

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>your perspective when it comes to the cycle of bank

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>operating earnings and how they go through cycles at times

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of rising interest rates. Absolutely, you know, the theme I've

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>had all year is that we are now investing for

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>end of cycle dynamics, and when you enter that end

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of cycle period. What you want to look at is

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>what is happening to the change in the rate of

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>growth and and there are three key line items that

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want to pay attention to UM. One is revenues,

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the other is credit costs, and the third is capital return.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And this year, what we're seeing is the revenue growth

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is decelerating. So we started high mid single digits in

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, we're entering sort of mid single digits

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. We'll probably down to low single digits by

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter. And I think that's what we're going

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to see in in nineteen is low single digit revenue growth.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you're seeing credit costs, which are

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>right now are very benign UM are likely to accelerate

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>higher in nineteen UM. And then I think beyond that

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the capital return is going to slow dramatically. So the

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>three variables are working against improving profitability. So I think

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen peak profitability and that's what these stocks are

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to reflect. So one thing that I'm struck by

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is that JP Morgan posted its biggest loan growth in

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a back to back period ever. Uh and this really

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>edified initially anyway, people's feeling of strength at basically, even

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as interest rates rise, they're able to expand their loan

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>book and they're able to capitalize the fact that interest

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>rates are raising fast, rising faster than how much they

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have to pay depositors. Why does not not what does

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that not give you confidence? Well, again, JP Morgan is

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the better in terms of execution, and they've

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>been investing in their businesses and then showing some of

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the better, um you know, revenue growth. This I mean

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for this quarter, total revenues were up five percent year

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>over a year, which is one of the better quarters

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see. Um So, I have no

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with what JP Morgan reported. What I'm what I'm

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>focused on is is that rate of change and growth.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And going back to your question about loans, they grew

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>core loans around six this quarter, but they have been

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>growing core loans at the upper single digit range earlier

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>in the year. So it's that rate of change that's

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to show us flowing over what period of time, Charles,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that the banks can turn their operations

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to be more nimble based on where they are in

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>the cycle right now, because that would reflect decisions that

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are made now that only bear fruit six twelve months,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>even twenty four months into the future, if not longer. Yeah,

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that's an excellent question, tim because because for example, PNC

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is getting punished today if the stock is down six dollars,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and the reason is because they had sluggish loan growth

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in are only projecting low single digit revenue growth in

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, and and they're falling behind the competition

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of their momentum indicators. And they're claiming it's

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>because they're trying to be prudent in this end of

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>cycle where a lot of mistakes are made, but they're

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>being punished for that because they're not showing the positive

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>operating leverage that somebody else is to maybe taking more risk.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Is I think at the end of the day, the

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>banks will come out of this next down cycle whenever

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it happens. I think it's going to happen in nineteen

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>um the recession um with their balance sheets intact, with

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>their capital intact, and they're going to be able to

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>grow day one when we come out of that recession,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's going to be a much bigger positive revaluation

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of these bank stalks out of that next cycle. But

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>going into it, there's going to be skepticism that they

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed their historical practices, which is always to reach

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for growth at the wrong time of the cycle. And

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, but it's going on more in the

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>non bank system or the shadow market banking system than

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it is the banking system. Charles, is there any bank

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>right now in the US that you think is a

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>buy well? You know, I think we started a bear

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>market and that the bank stocks will be down some

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty from their September I mean from their first quarter

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>UM highs of eighteen, which I think is the peak.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the top is now in place, and they'll be

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:02.119
<v Speaker 1>down thirty by the depth of the recession. So within

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that cycle, call no, you don't want to buy banks.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Can they outperform relatively? They could, but I'm not convinced

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that you get that change of secular leadership until you

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have that down in turn. On a trading basis, I've

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>been advising my clients it's probably not no more than

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>another five percent downside from where we are today, and

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so on a trading basis, maybe you want to pick

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>up a Wells Fargo or a city group. But you know,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about as a trader, because I still think

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that the cycle is for much bigger losses. Thank you

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>very much for spending time with us as always interesting

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and insightful. Charles Peabody is the president of Portalis Partners.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaking about bank earnings. We are broadcasting from the Bloomberg

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker's studios. I'm pim Fox along with my co

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>host and colleague, A Lisa Abramwitz. Just for an moment,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you are in charge of a one hundred

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty three year old company that started life in

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the pulp business, a paper mill in Finland, and after

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a series of reorganizations, it turns out that you have

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>remade yourself in just twelve months. Here's what happened at Nokia.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>In April of the company completed the sale of its

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone handset business to Microsoft that accounted for more

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>than half of the company's sales. In April of Alcatel

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Lucent agreed to Nokia's sixteen point six billion dollar buyout offer.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The deal closed in January. It has created the world's

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>second biggest telecom equipment company. Hind Ericsson here to tell

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>us about transformation is the chairman of Nokia. Resto Salisma

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the author of a new book entitled Transforming

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Nokia The Power of Paranoid Optimism to Lead through Colossal Change,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and he joints us here in our studios. Thank you

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>very much, sir for being here. It's great to be here.

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell us why you decided to write this book. Well,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe in learning. I'm an entrepreneur by background, and

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to develop your company, every time you

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>do something, you need to look back what worked out,

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what didn't work out, to create a culture of learning,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so that people always sort of do a post mortem

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>after they finished a project. And this is about learning.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It's about sharing the story of how to create a

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>trusting environment, how to promote teamwork, how to promote openness,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>how to make bad news flow to the top quickly

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so that people can react to what is actually happening.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We were sort of poisoned by the success of Nakia

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as a handset vendor, and that toxic side effect of

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>success faces every single company that is hugely successful. And

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think our lessons are worth sharing with other companies.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So what's the toxic side effect? Because at its peak,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Nokia is the world's largest mobile handsup maker and cadet

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for about four of Finland's entire economic output. How is

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that a poisoning factor? Because when you're at the top

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world and everybody is telling you that you

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>are the best thing ever, you start to believe that.

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to believe that, you become complacent.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>You start paying more attention to external factors such as

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>share price and what the analysts are writing, what the

0:10:53.800 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>media says, rather than customers, got technology, employees, competition, and

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>those small things accumulate and suddenly your competitiveness starts to disappear,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but you may not notice because you're not paying attention

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to those crucial details anymore. You've been described as someone

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>who has been motivated as much by maximum returns as

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>by soft values. Can you explain that a little bit? Well,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Like many entrepreneurs, I believe that the long term is

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the the only real horizon. I don't follow daily share

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>price movements at all. It may be two weeks between

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I pay attention to what the share price is. I

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>want to build companies where employees really want to be

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>proud of not only what the company achieves, but how

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they achieve That that how thing is so important, and

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's all about the long term. So perhaps you don't

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to the share price, but the shares have

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>risen more than since you took over in two thousand

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and twelve the company, so I will say that it

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>has done well. How do you foster that feeling though,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of pride and belief in the company and its purpose,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>especially as its purpose changes. And there are certain core

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>elements that that remain and survive all changes. And for example,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in Nokia, as we started rebuilding and transforming the company,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we went back to our values from the nineties, which

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of resonated with people whose they they remember how

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties Nokia grew from being completely unknown to

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of the world. And it's it's that sentimental

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>feeling that we are all humans aren't driven by feelings

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and emotions. It's not about fact only. Although I have

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>to wonder. I mean a big conglomerate, right, I mean

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conglomerates are facing a lot of issues

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>because they have to kind of figure out what are

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>they right and when we're seeing this with General Electric

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>for example, So you know, belief and in faith, in

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a sense of pride or go so far, But what

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>about the skills that you need to overhaul, etcetera. When

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you when you make a big shift, that's a that's

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a good point. If you have a strong foundation of trust,

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which means openness, which needs means being ready for both

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bad news and good news, then you can experiment. People

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have the courage to try out new things even if

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they know they might fail, because they know that if

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I fail, nothing bad will happen. And when you experiment,

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll learn, and if you can do that at a

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>rapid cycle, then you'll survive the unpredictable changes in the environment. Now,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you just went back to school in order to fulfill

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly some of these things. Explain what you're learning at

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>school and why you decided to do this. Yeah, like

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>many other leaders, I was challenging ins by machine learning

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and what it can do. And like many others, I

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>was told by my teams sort of what it means,

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and I learned those bullet points by heart, and like

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a paratte I went out and gave presentations on the

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>power of machine learning without understanding the whole thing at all.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And then I sort of woke up that this cannot be.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell the world that machine learning will be

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the key component of our future competitiveness if I don't

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>understand how it works. And then I went back to

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>school and I have studied programming again. I have taken

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>six courses in machine learning programming and done so all

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sorts of architectures. And then I created a training program

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>based on what I now understood and tried to create

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>content that I would have wanted somebody to tell me

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was trying to figure out what does machine

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>learning mean for us? And this has been something of

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>an inspiration to our R and D people, who I

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>felt and come to me and said that I'm being

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of shame that our chairman knows more about

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>machine learning than I do. I'm not taking night courses

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on machine learning, and that's of course music to my ears.

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's sign up for this well, the power of shame,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>right if if if your fosters more about your job

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>than you do, you start to feel like you gotta

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>catch up. Risto Celisma, thank you so much for being

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with us, and thank you congratulations on your book, Transforming

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Nokia The power of Paranoid Optimism to lead through colossal change.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Resto Celis's chairman of Nokia also chairman and founder and

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>former chief executive of f Secure Corporation. Here in our

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven three oh studios. Washington Post columnist and known critic

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia disappeared mysteriously. Turkey is accusing uh Saudi

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Arabia of murdering the journalist in an alleged attack that

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was planned. Joining us now as Bobby got Ghosh. Bobby

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Ghosh is editor of Bloomberg Opinion based in London. Bobby,

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. First, can

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you explain what we know at this point about this

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>situation and why it's so important. But we know that

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Kashogi about a week ago went into the Saudia

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>consulate in Istanbul to collect some papers, um, and that

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was the last anybody saw or heard from him. Um.

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that the Turkish authorities have been leaking to

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the media, both local as well as international media, that

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they believed that they had evidence that Jamal Kashogi was

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>first tortured and then murdered and then that his body

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was removed from the Saudi consul. That they also have

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>tracked the movements of a private aircraft with fifteen passengers

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that arrived that very day. They believe that these passengers

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>included people who were responsible for the torture and murder.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the extent off These are the facts that

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we know. UM. This is important because it is it

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>comes while Saudi Arabia is trying to change its image

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in the world. The crown Prince, the relatively new Crown

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Prince um moment Bin Salman, he's better known as MBS.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>He has been trying to change the way the country behaves.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He has been trying to reform economy, trying to change

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>many of the social regulations in the country, and trying

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to improve its image in the world. So this comes

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at a time this is this couldn't have been worse

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>type UM. This incident. If it is true that Jamal

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was killed in the Saudi consulate buy Saudi officials on

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the orders of senior Saudi figures in government, then this

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a new and improved Saudi Areia. This is

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>very much an old one. In fact, in some ways

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it is worse than the old Saudi Arabia Bobby Ghost.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>This also has implications for the relations and ship between

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Saudi Arabia. Correct yes, name it

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>does because Jamal was a resident of the United States

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of Washington. UM. He was a columnist of Washington Post,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>well known in Washington political and diplomatic circles, were liked

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in those circles. UM. This is important because Saudi Arabia

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>is very important to the Trump administration. Donald Trump's President Trump,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>his first international trip was to Saudi Arabia. UM. His

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>son in law, Jared Kushner, has a close personal relationship

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Cown Prince. UM. The Trump administration has made

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a big deal of the fact that they're very close

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to South Arabia. So anything that reflects poorly on South Arabia,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>especially since it involves an American resident, UM, he is

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going to there's going to be a splashback on the

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. Bobby, It's really interesting in light of the

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>news that we have this morning with Turkey freeing in

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the detained pastor that President Trump and his administration have

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>argued war, and it's interesting district contrast the rhetoric out

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration around that versus the rhetoric around

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>this particular incident, and that basically President Trump seems to

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be taking a pretty hands off approach to this, saying yeah,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>well you know who knows why. Argument This argument is

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that jama Kahoki is not an American citizen, whereas the pastor,

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of course he's an American citizen. Unfortunately, that argument won't

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wash because you know, States does have a responsibility for

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody who was legally resident in Washington. It has a

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>responsibility because Saudi Arabia is a major ally, and it

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>has a responsibility as the leader of the free world,

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as a beacon for for free speech and a free expression.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>And Jamaica Shokei was essentially exercising his free speech. He

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>was not I would I think we should point out

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>he was not a strident opponent of the Soudi regime.

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>He was very much a part of the South, the elite.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>His criticism had been quite mild. He supported the conference

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>when the conference was appointed, he disagreed with some of

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the policies at the conference, then implemented and wrote about it.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the extent. This is not some left wing radical

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who's hiding out in the United States and taking pot

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>shots at a regime. Is it possible that the United

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>States will conduct an investigation and if it does and

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>find something untoward, that there will be sanctions. Well, a

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>number of senior senators in the US have pressed the

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>presidents to do exactly that. Um Ran Paul the the

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Senator from Kentucky, is threatening to call a vote in

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Senates to block all American arms sales to sell

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Arabia. He's run into tens hundreds of billions of dollars.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Very senior American political figures are taking this seriously. Um

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration might try to wriggle out of it,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but if the if the Senators keep pressing and keep

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>demanding answers, uh, then I think it'd be hard for

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the White House to keep avoiding it. Bobby, just real

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>quick here, there are a number of company leaders who

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>have already said that they're not going to attend the

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so called Davos in the Desert event that is upcoming

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because of this incident. How significantly will that gain the

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>attention of Saudi Arabian leadership. But this is a very

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>very important, in fact, arguably even more than than NGOs

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or human rights organizations complaining about what happened to to Jamal.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is going to make a much greater impact because

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the Crown Prince's reform agenda is

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to bring more foreign and private investment investment into the country.

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>If major business leaders are backing out and don't want

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to be associated with this event, which is a sort

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of crown jewel of the of the program, that's a

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>big deal. I want to thank you very much for

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Bobby Ghosh is a Bloomberg opinion editor speaking

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about a Saudi Arabia Turkey and the disappearance of the journalist.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamal also just mentioned that Bloomberg is a sponsor of

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the devas and we are monitoring this situation. This is

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg here to tell us more about municipal markets as

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Alright, municipal bond reporter for Bloomberg. She joins us

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. Amanda, thank you

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. Before we get into

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>sort a big picture, you know, trends and so on,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about this really. I thought

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a very interesting story having to do with

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles and what the city, what Los Angeles does

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with the revenue that it receives from parking finds from

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sales taxes. Explain what they do now and what might

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future. Sure. So. We had a really

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>good story this week by reporter rom e Var Gazy

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>um So. She wrote about Los Angeles considering UM creating

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a public bank. UM. It would be the first U.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>S city to do so. Um So what that means

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it would move it's eleven billion portfolio UM

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>from some of the biggest banks in the country to

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, self managed UM. It would invest in you know,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 1>local projects and kind of you know, seek to have

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more of like an E. S. G UM mindset rather

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>than working with UM. Some banks that can come under controversy.

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Why would they be doing this? Is it

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because of that environmental, social and governance issue or would

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there also be in a financial incentive. So the story

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>talks a little bit about kind of how this effort

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>UM you know, first started and so a lot of

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it was prompted by UM concerns about the Dakota Access

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>pipeline UM and work with Wells Fargo a few years ago.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Um So. Actually there was a big movement around public

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>banks UM during the Occupy Wall Street time. Um So

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it does sort of come from this E. S. G

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>mind frame, and we do see Los Angeles being one

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of those cities that's you know, very much a leader

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to e s g UM issues, Amanda,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to shift gears a little bit to what

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past week. There were some pretty big

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>outflows I believe the biggest and more than a year

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>from municipal bond funds in the United States. Why is

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this just a rising rates kind of story. Yes, So

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the investors that I've spoken with, um, you know, one

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of them described it as simple bond math um. Basically,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>retail investors they start seeing the losses that munis have posted. UM,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they see you know, the FED telegraphing more rates, and

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they get a little bit nervous about their holdings, and

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so they start pulling out of these funds. UM. It

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that investors keep a close eye on because

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>retail is so important to this market. UM. And you know,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>banks and insurance companies have kind of been on the

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>sidelines after their taxes were cut earlier this year. UM.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So these outflows are really really importan and we've seen

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>them with mutual funds and we've also seen them with

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>community ETFs. So what is going to be the likely consequence?

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at what point will this actually hamper or

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>make it prohibitively expensive for municipalities to borrow money to

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>continue with projects they have planned. Or we're not anywhere

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>close to that. I mean we're already seeing sort of

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning stages of that. UM. The tenure benchmark from

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>munis is at the highest since early UM. So that's

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant UM. And that obviously we're seeing, you know,

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>deals that are coming in higher this year than they

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>were last year. UM. You know, issuers have kind of

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>had these really low UM borrowing costs UM, and you know,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we always wrote stories about how they didn't necessarily take

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>advantage of those costs as much as they could UM.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 1>And so now they're kind of facing this prospect of

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rates for the foreseeable future. Does any of

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this have to do with the banks that no longer

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 1>see municipal bonds as an attractive investment previous to the

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>tax reform? Absolutely so. UM. One really interesting dynamic is UM,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the longer out you go on muni bond deals, the

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>higher the yields are. And so if you look at

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>where muni stand compared to treasuries, they're very cheap on

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the long end, but they're more expensive on the short end,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>which is where you know, retail kind of hangs out. UM.

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But because banks and insurance companies, you know, face this

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lower tax rate, they haven't been buying munis as much. UM,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So yields on the long end have already kind of

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>risen up this year, whereas now we're seeing the short

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>end kind of join in on on yield rising. I

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder, just going back to what him was

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about with this Los Angeles Public Bank, would that

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>replace municipal debt as a form of financing. Would they

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have to borrow in the muni market? I ask this

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>because as rates rise, I have to wonder what alternative

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>methods municipalities are going to look to possibly finance themselves.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great point, um. And also the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity zones that we saw come out of the tax

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>reform Act, Um, municipalities are going to have to get

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>creative with how they finance projects within their own orders. UM.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Los Angeles Bank, you know, there's a

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lot to be determined their you know, voters have to

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>approve it first of all. UM, And there are still

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>some questions about the costs of creating such a bank.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So Muni's might still end up being the more cost

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>effective option. As far as this creates this potential bank,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>would that be something that would have to have like

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a federal charter a state charter? Is there any precedent

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for this? Do we know there is a state bank

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>out of North Dakota. UM, so it's not federally regulated,

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting. UM. But obviously Los Angeles is very

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>very big, UM. You know, being the first to get

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>involved with something like this, UM, you're gonna invite a

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of scrutiny not only from maybe regulators, but also

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>um from residents living in that city and wanting to

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure funds are used appropriately and and matters like that. Amanda, alright,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>really really great stuff. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one before the podcast. You

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bluebirg Radio.