Speaker 1: Cool Zone Media.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to it could Happen here. I'm Garrison Davis.
Speaker 2: I'm joined by Mia and Robert to discuss predictive programming.
Speaker 2: So last episode we talked about the origin of this
Speaker 2: conspiracy theory, how this Canadian Scottish conspiracy theorist named Alan
Speaker 2: Watt came up with this idea that through Hollywood movies,
Speaker 2: TV books, video games, the secret couple of shadowy governments
Speaker 2: is trying to subliminally prepare us to accept planned events
Speaker 2: as they take place in the future by putting little hints, shadows,
Speaker 2: and seeds into our everyday entertainment diet. One of the
Speaker 2: oldest examples that conspiracy theorists will point to you as
Speaker 2: an example of predictive programming is this book from the
Speaker 2: late eighteen hundreds called Futility that talks about a fictional
Speaker 2: ship called the titan which was thought to be completely
Speaker 2: unsyn which eventually crashed on an iceberg and sank. This
Speaker 2: obviously it mirrors what happened to the Titanic in the
Speaker 2: decades to follow, So, yeah, what are we talking about
Speaker 2: this sort of stuff? Last episode ended in our discussion
Speaker 2: of the Hunger Games. I found this old conspiracy blog
Speaker 2: by this British guy named Neil where he talks about
Speaker 2: all of his theories surrounding the Hunger Games, books and movies,
Speaker 2: So we will return to hear Neil's thoughts on the
Speaker 2: predictive programming implanted into the Hunger Games. Neil also has
Speaker 2: fascinating opinions on trains. He really doesn't like that in
Speaker 2: the Hunger Games there is a big train system which
Speaker 2: he links to like the which he links to the
Speaker 2: European Union's future train plan as well as as well
Speaker 2: as like high speed rail plans for North America, which
Speaker 2: he is very against because do you know who else
Speaker 2: used trains?
Speaker 3: Was it the Nazis?
Speaker 2: Garretton, It's the Nazis?
Speaker 3: Is it the Nazis?
Speaker 2: It's the Nazis?
Speaker 4: You know you can tell this is an older conspiracy
Speaker 4: because they because they're actually using the Nazis as the
Speaker 4: people who use trains and not like the Soviet Union.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I think Neil just really likes driving and he thinks
Speaker 2: that driving is like the epitome of freedom. So he
Speaker 2: talks about how like trains are trying to control which
Speaker 2: areas of the country you can go to instead of
Speaker 2: the freedom of the open road.
Speaker 5: I got stuck behind a train and traffic on my
Speaker 5: way to the airport, very frustrated to make me late
Speaker 5: to this call. So I actually I think he's right.
Speaker 5: I'm on board now.
Speaker 2: He also rants about this, this this nineteen ninety two
Speaker 2: UN plan called Agenda twenty one about like a big
Speaker 2: environmental management plan with highly condensed human settlement zones. This
Speaker 2: is something that both John Birch and Glenn Beck were
Speaker 2: also like, really.
Speaker 5: Oh, Alex Jones is huge on. Yeah, this was the
Speaker 5: entire conspiracy ecosystem for about fifteen years. Couldn't shut the
Speaker 5: fuck up out agenda to anyone. Some of them still
Speaker 5: go on about it.
Speaker 2: So Neil's upset because that looks similar to like the
Speaker 2: map of like because PanAm is in like a post
Speaker 2: climate collapse, we have these very condensed areas of settlement
Speaker 2: and like a vast like unusable land mass in America.
Speaker 2: So he has he has this whole thing about that.
Speaker 2: He he doesn't like that President No looks like the
Speaker 2: Saturnian figure of Kronos, the father of time, who devours children,
Speaker 2: just like just like how President Snow sacrifices children to
Speaker 2: maintain like societal control of PanAm in the Hunger Games.
Speaker 5: You know, let him see my bed, my bathroom. That'll
Speaker 5: uh yeah really good. In the center of some I
Speaker 5: have a giant copy of the Saturn eating his Son painting.
Speaker 5: That's like right next to my toilet. It's great painting.
Speaker 5: Also not necessarily about that. They just found a painting
Speaker 5: of a guy eating a guy, and we're like, it's
Speaker 5: probably Saturn that this guy was trying to bait.
Speaker 2: That is the research quality that Neil also does. He's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: it's probably all these things.
Speaker 3: Seems like it's Saturn.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it seems like it's Saturned.
Speaker 5: Yeah, kind of uncomfortable to imagine it's anyone else.
Speaker 2: Neil also compares The Hunger Games to China's one child
Speaker 2: policy and the population reduction conspiracy theories of Agenda twenty one.
Speaker 2: Just like in the Hunger Games, it's about having children
Speaker 2: kill each other, just like the one child policy.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's that's how China does the one child policy.
Speaker 5: Other children are told to kill.
Speaker 2: The family back on the Revolutionary tract quote. I can't
Speaker 2: confirm that Susan Collins used the archetype of Artemis for
Speaker 2: her character of Catnus, But what can be observed is
Speaker 2: how this female role model is a symbol for revolution,
Speaker 2: a new order, and more importantly, a new world system.
Speaker 2: This is clearly the blueprint for a new America. So
Speaker 2: part of this blueprint that he talks about is like
Speaker 2: implanted microchips and a brutal police state that arrests and
Speaker 2: kills protesters, unlike our current police state, which would never
Speaker 2: arrest or kill a protester. Yeah, and everyone just carries
Speaker 2: micro trips around. Yeah yeah, now more more devious than
Speaker 2: the murder happy police. Neil finds the bird symbolism to
Speaker 2: be including Catnus's dress, which transforms into the mocking jay symbol, which,
Speaker 2: according to Neil looks quote remarkably like a Benu bird
Speaker 2: of Egypt, as well as a phoenix, especially when encircled
Speaker 2: in fire quote. The phoenix a classic mystery school symbol
Speaker 2: that relates to the unseen forces that transforms the world.
Speaker 2: Both Catnus and Pete's costumes set a fire as they
Speaker 2: enter the arena before the tournament, with Catnus becoming the
Speaker 2: bird on fire. She's the embodiment of the coming transformation,
Speaker 2: the beginning and the end. Catinus and Peda are symbols
Speaker 2: of Artemis and Apollo, the twins and children of the
Speaker 2: New World Order of Gods. Smokeless fire is also a
Speaker 2: major symbol used by the Illuminati and as their vehicle
Speaker 2: to communicate with the Arkans. He never goes into further
Speaker 2: detail of.
Speaker 5: A Yes, smokeless powder is what made warpop, so you know,
Speaker 5: we've there's other things. It's not just the Illuminati. We
Speaker 5: use it for fireworks too.
Speaker 2: Catnus is the woman closed in fire sun in the
Speaker 2: Book of Revelation and the EU, the United Nations, and
Speaker 2: the Security Council replicate the symbolism a phoenix rising out
Speaker 2: of the tyranny and war. It's all reversed symbolism, of course,
Speaker 2: because these bodies are set to administer the World Army,
Speaker 2: Police and the future New World Order unquote. Though he's
Speaker 2: there complaining about a United Nations mural that was made
Speaker 2: after World War Two about a phoenix of peace rising
Speaker 2: from the ashes of war and houses actually reversed symbolism
Speaker 2: because they're actually going to be, you know, laying out
Speaker 2: this global one world government calling it peace. You know.
Speaker 2: He also talks more about the Book of Revelation and
Speaker 2: how twelve and thirteen combined and the unification of the
Speaker 2: new world, just like in the Bible. And then finally
Speaker 2: to get to three that three finger salute quote, it's
Speaker 2: interesting when you dig a little deeper and find that
Speaker 2: Catnus's salute is reminiscent of a certain Nazi youth salutes
Speaker 2: found in Eastern Europe in the late nineteen thirties. He's
Speaker 2: and he's also quite concerned by the new adoption of
Speaker 2: the salute by the Girl Scouts, despite the three finger
Speaker 2: salute being used in Scout organizations for over a century.
Speaker 5: You know, yeah, yeah, like the boy Scouts have a
Speaker 5: lot are sinister, but not because of the salute. Now,
Speaker 5: is the least of the problems with the Scout was
Speaker 5: a brief moment of reprieve for a lot of those
Speaker 5: boys getting to do a salute.
Speaker 2: And then he also says, quote, it's no surprise that
Speaker 2: the mocking jpin also looks similar to a Nazi gunner badge, because,
Speaker 2: as I've already shown, the bird is the symbol for
Speaker 2: the power of revolution, a new order that goes all
Speaker 2: the way back to the Holy Roman Empire.
Speaker 5: And these are the guys will be like, look the
Speaker 5: mocking jay symbol it's similar to then they'll see like
Speaker 5: a Scout sniper flag that looks like the SS logo
Speaker 5: and go, well, there's clearly nothing related to.
Speaker 2: That, and then we will we will close this by
Speaker 2: continuing on the revolutionary elements quote what kind of revolution
Speaker 2: does catnus symbolize? Are the youth of today being readied
Speaker 2: for another revolution followed by another dictatorship? How many more
Speaker 2: celebrities are we going to see being used as a
Speaker 2: mouthpiece for revolution. I am all for peaceful revolution based
Speaker 2: on respect and love, but the movies never portray that
Speaker 2: kind of revolution. A peaceful revolution is one inspired by
Speaker 2: the inner world of imagination and not necessarily the outer
Speaker 2: world of this five sensus. The type of revolution that
Speaker 2: the elite would want us to unfold here would be
Speaker 2: one born of pandemonium. The illuminati, in those in control
Speaker 2: of the current global empire in the making, love to
Speaker 2: hide their agenda in plain sight within commercial so called
Speaker 2: fictitious movies and in the media industry in general. The
Speaker 2: Hunger Games is the script for the ttalitarian elite ruled
Speaker 2: brutal police state, the agendas repeatedly being laid out in
Speaker 2: front of our very eyes, both in real everyday life
Speaker 2: and in things we choose to expose ourselves within the
Speaker 2: so called entertainment industry.
Speaker 4: That's one of these things where all of these conspiracy
Speaker 4: theories center around the fact that people, for reasons that
Speaker 4: are incomprehensible to be believed that the thing the US
Speaker 4: government wants you to do is shoot guns at them.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, No, No, they don't.
Speaker 4: I guarantee they don't want you to shoot machine guns
Speaker 4: out there.
Speaker 5: They like you to spend money and go to work.
Speaker 5: That's the primary thing the US government wants you to do.
Speaker 5: Pay your taxes without too much fuss.
Speaker 2: Do you know what else the US government wants you
Speaker 2: to do, Robert.
Speaker 5: I know a number of things the US government wants
Speaker 5: me to do, Garrison, but I won't. I will not
Speaker 5: stop telling people to take colloidal silver for all of
Speaker 5: their health care problems. The only way to really carry
Speaker 5: out the revolution starts with putting silver in your body.
Speaker 2: All right, we are back. I've actually always wanted to
Speaker 2: do the topical silver and get that like blue skin.
Speaker 2: I thought that'd be kind of cool.
Speaker 3: You have to do a lot of it, cares.
Speaker 2: I'm well aware, like we can.
Speaker 4: Achieve this with body paint.
Speaker 5: I do find it very funny that they're so obsessed
Speaker 5: with like the Hunger Games as this like this is
Speaker 5: the elite showing you how they're going to crack down
Speaker 5: on all of us. And then when it actually when
Speaker 5: the Hunger Games inspires an actual revolution, it's like the
Speaker 5: one that gets no support from any like Spook agency
Speaker 5: in the the only one. There's no CIA, no FSB,
Speaker 5: fucking nothing like it's it's just a bunch of teenagers
Speaker 5: and their books and three D printers.
Speaker 2: I mean, And like looking back at at that Hunger
Speaker 2: Game section, it's always interesting how people like this they're
Speaker 2: like in the real world, very like pro police in
Speaker 2: a lot of cases, but then also being like they're
Speaker 2: trying to instill a police state, right, It's they get
Speaker 2: to eat their cake and have it too, where they
Speaker 2: are both pro law enforcement but also anti this like
Speaker 2: imagined evil version of law enforcement. That's always like right
Speaker 2: on the cusp of being introduced, there's a.
Speaker 5: Through line there, which is that they are anti whatever
Speaker 5: it seems like people are telling them is like obviously, okay,
Speaker 5: it's it's oppositional, definant. It's the same reason why, like
Speaker 5: you think that you're on, you're living in a normal earth,
Speaker 5: so it's got to be a hollow earth, right, Like
Speaker 5: it's this if something is popular, if a movie's popular,
Speaker 5: it can't just be a movie that people liked. And
Speaker 5: if it's like, you know, I saw a Hunger Game,
Speaker 5: the first Hunger Games movie, and I tried to read
Speaker 5: the books and I was like, nah, I can't read
Speaker 5: these you know, they're not they were not written for me.
Speaker 5: Like it's it's just I was not interested in them.
Speaker 5: And that's all I really thought about it. But like
Speaker 5: certain people, if they see something popular and they don't
Speaker 5: immediately fall in love with it, they have to come
Speaker 5: up with some reason why it's sinister. And it's the
Speaker 5: same thing that leads them to reject everything else, right that, Like,
Speaker 5: if other people like something and I don't get it,
Speaker 5: or I feel weird or don't understand it, then it
Speaker 5: has to be a fucking conspiracy. Like that used to
Speaker 5: be one percent of this country, and through social media
Speaker 5: it's become like half of us because it's a deeply
Speaker 5: addictive way to feel.
Speaker 2: I think the most sinister thing about the new Hunger
Speaker 2: Games is that they did not put nearly enough Hunter
Speaker 2: Shafer in that movie.
Speaker 5: So let's know who that is.
Speaker 2: Let's continue to the last.
Speaker 3: That's got to be predictive hunter Shaver. So they wanted.
Speaker 5: Okay, so this is like very clearly, well, no, I
Speaker 5: could go into like I could go into like they're
Speaker 5: trying to make the kids trans right, they wanted to
Speaker 5: like hunt down their parents shaved right in Shave you
Speaker 5: know Earth. Well, I'm saying you could easily turn it
Speaker 5: into a conspiracy theory, Garrison, you could make it work.
Speaker 2: So last thing we are to talk about the new
Speaker 2: hit movie Leave the World Behind. Garrison made me watch this.
Speaker 4: I'm never gonna forgive them for it.
Speaker 2: One of it is. It is one of the most
Speaker 2: recent examples of a movie sparking predictive programming conspiracies. It's
Speaker 2: by the creator of mister Robot, which retroactively makes mister
Speaker 2: Robot much worse. Now. There is a few reasons why
Speaker 2: this movie has caused so much uproar, a major factor
Speaker 2: being that it's produced by the Obamas, as in the
Speaker 2: Presidents Very responsible. There is, there is, there's Havana syndrome
Speaker 2: references discussion of an evil cabal that runs the world
Speaker 2: plans to collapse The United States and the two child
Speaker 2: leads wear t shirts that read obey and NASA, respectively,
Speaker 2: which has been the cause of a lot of discourse.
Speaker 6: NASA, Yeah, the left's long term plan.
Speaker 5: Look, several of the letters in NASA are also in Stalin.
Speaker 5: Are you gonna tell me that's a coincidence?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Probably, I will, I will now, I will now
Speaker 2: share this, share this clip from Steve Bannon, who had
Speaker 2: a Dutch far right e girl on his show to
Speaker 2: discuss the movie.
Speaker 3: He's doing good, then, So he's doing good. That's good.
Speaker 3: I was worried about Steve.
Speaker 7: Okay, So we see a movie here now that is
Speaker 7: co produced by the Obamas about the potential potential cyber
Speaker 7: attack which causes mayhem obviously, and I saw it and
Speaker 7: it reminded me an awful lot of the narrative portrayed
Speaker 7: in a video published about two years ago by the
Speaker 7: World Economic Forum. And this was a video in which
Speaker 7: they supposedly warned us for a cyber pandemic. Interesting choice
Speaker 7: of words there, And they detail what could happen if
Speaker 7: we are under a cyber attack, and that the only
Speaker 7: way that we could solve an attack like that would
Speaker 7: be to disconnect everything and everyone completely from the Internet.
Speaker 3: So I figured this.
Speaker 7: Seems to me like a classic case of predictive programming
Speaker 7: where not just the World Economic Forum, but now also
Speaker 7: through movies and you know, fictional stories, they are trying
Speaker 7: to prepare public to the idea of cyber attacks and
Speaker 7: the potential chaos that could come with that.
Speaker 2: So that is that is her her big problems with
Speaker 2: the movie, which we'll see we'll see echoed in a
Speaker 2: lot of the people we talk about here with the
Speaker 2: World Economic Forums warning about a big cyber attack. She
Speaker 2: then went on to rant about the movies anti white sentiments,
Speaker 2: probably from the Obama's involvement.
Speaker 3: Clearly, yeah she has.
Speaker 2: She has almost a million followers followers on Twitter. It
Speaker 2: is wild also because she's Dutch. Her last name is
Speaker 2: and I shit you not Vlardinger broke so great, great
Speaker 2: stuff happening in the Dutch.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what is that predicting?
Speaker 2: For a summary of the movie, all at this conspiracy theory,
Speaker 2: TikTok explain the basic themes that we'll be discussing here.
Speaker 8: Essentially, the movie is about the downfall of civilization and
Speaker 8: how it's done in three steps, her step being that
Speaker 8: the government is going to be tappled from within the
Speaker 8: next one that it's going to be literally with disinformation
Speaker 8: and misinformation to confuse the masses and to create chaos.
Speaker 8: The third step, if the first and second step are
Speaker 8: done correctly, is going to cause basically a civil war,
Speaker 8: causing the paranoid and problematic to start turning on each other.
Speaker 8: The little girl is obsessed with the last episode of Friends,
Speaker 8: called How It Ends, which is interesting because the star
Speaker 8: of the movie, Julia Roberts, also dated Matthew Perry way
Speaker 8: way back, Matthew Perry, who also passed away earlier this year.
Speaker 8: The movie also references like billionaires and their bunkers, and
Speaker 8: it references the Cabal on way more than one occasion.
Speaker 8: The heart of it is that the cabal has fallen
Speaker 8: and so nobody is in charge, and this is what's
Speaker 8: leading to the fall of the United States of America. Essentially,
Speaker 8: it has a very predictive programming feel to it, and
Speaker 8: I mean with the Obamas and the constant references to water.
Speaker 8: Planes crash in the water and a boat called the
Speaker 8: White Lion runs up on shore from the ocean. Everybody
Speaker 8: wants water, They're constantly drinking water. Here's some water you
Speaker 8: want some water. Then the Obama chef just drowned. I
Speaker 8: can't watch anything anymore. I can't enjoy any summon up.
Speaker 8: The entire movie itself doesn't even have a plot. There's
Speaker 8: no real storyline to this movie, and the ending is awful.
Speaker 8: If I if I were not paying attention like I am,
Speaker 8: I would think the movie would be terrible. There's no resolution,
Speaker 8: there's no real start. It just seems like it's just here,
Speaker 8: just here, it's just telling you and one more thing.
Speaker 8: It talks about microwave e MP.
Speaker 2: Like, Okay, that's that's. That's that.
Speaker 5: Their brains are so melted that like they can't see
Speaker 5: a movie made in the image of all of their
Speaker 5: fears is made in the image of all their fears.
Speaker 5: Like the whole it's so sunsettling. It doesn't even start properly.
Speaker 5: It's just it just begins. You're just in it, like Noah, man,
Speaker 5: that's it's kind of how a movie goes.
Speaker 2: I like how she talks about she like she like
Speaker 2: can't enjoy movies anymore, which is like the end result
Speaker 2: of all these all these conspiracy theorists, like they just
Speaker 2: they just can't enjoy life because they see everything as
Speaker 2: this series of like interconnected incidents leading to some kind
Speaker 2: of grand narrative that makes it impossible to like actually
Speaker 2: like be happy, which is probably the funniest thing. Also
Speaker 2: that she thinks the movie predicted the death of the
Speaker 2: Obama's chef, which I don't don't know if that's real.
Speaker 5: Yeah, if you're one of these people, that's the most
Speaker 5: significant thing that's happened the last eighteen months. The Obama
Speaker 5: chef and Matthew Perry are like the Rosetta Stone for
Speaker 5: everything that's wrong in society, and not just two people
Speaker 5: who died because it's a year.
Speaker 2: Because Matthew Perry used to date Jessica Roberts, who's the
Speaker 2: star of the Verbe, of course, and there's friends references
Speaker 2: all throughout the film, so it's all connected.
Speaker 5: Subtle friends' references, very subtleind you miss him if you
Speaker 5: don't pay attention.
Speaker 2: So the last conspiracy theorist want to talk about is
Speaker 2: this like metaphysical influencer named Tristan Haggard who spends most
Speaker 2: of his time on stream selling hormone supplements for men
Speaker 2: so that they could boost their testosterone and stop being
Speaker 2: soy boys. While discussing various conspiracies, love it, he says,
Speaker 2: quote cyber attacks, bio warfare, weaponized limes disease, lone star tick,
Speaker 2: chronic wasting, disease, things that get you to stop eating meat.
Speaker 2: These things, these types of these types of programs are
Speaker 2: seated throughout the film. I feel like the tick bite
Speaker 2: and a lot of that stuff might have been a
Speaker 2: little bit of that DARPA extracurricular script editions. Yeah, yeah, unquote.
Speaker 5: Yeah, sure, yeah, of course. The fact that a kid
Speaker 5: gets a bit by a tick and gets all fucked
Speaker 5: up is like trying to stop you from eating a try.
Speaker 2: To stop you from eating meat. Quote. I feel like
Speaker 2: the average norm you might not put together the limes disease,
Speaker 2: possible bioepon connection unquote amazing. Yeah, I don't think the
Speaker 2: average normy might might not put that one together.
Speaker 5: You know, that does suggest to me that all these
Speaker 5: people are gonna die in thirty seconds if there's any
Speaker 5: real kind of unrest because their attitude towards the idea
Speaker 5: of disease that was planted by.
Speaker 3: The New World Order.
Speaker 2: Yeah, people won't get sick now. These two guys on
Speaker 2: this stream also said that they they had to stop
Speaker 2: watching mister Robot in the third season because there were
Speaker 2: too many quote unquote gay scenes, which is really funny.
Speaker 5: I had to stop watching it in this first season
Speaker 5: because I don't like Remy Malick. But you know, see
Speaker 5: I I are built different.
Speaker 2: I had. I had to keep watching just for Christians later,
Speaker 2: but that's just me.
Speaker 3: He did make it hard to quit.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, So most of the time these two guys
Speaker 2: on their conspiracy podcast just complain about how Ethan Hawk
Speaker 2: is a weak little soy boy, and all of the
Speaker 2: and and and and all and all of the quote
Speaker 2: unquote by POC people were more like put together and
Speaker 2: more commanding. They constantly say bye Palk, which is an
Speaker 2: interesting choice from that that is really fascinating.
Speaker 5: Actually, since Marshall Ali's daughter isn't really a character in
Speaker 5: that movie. Marsha law Ali is okay because he's a great,
Speaker 5: great actor, but like, it's not like it's not like
Speaker 5: all of the characters who aren't white or like written
Speaker 5: stirringly well, most of the characters of this movie are
Speaker 5: written like dog shit eates things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but Tristan here says, quote there's so much predictive
Speaker 2: programming and social engineering of how the mechanics of possible
Speaker 2: collapse of the power grid, collapse and the communications would
Speaker 2: result in basically chaos. And then I have I have
Speaker 2: this little clip here of him talking about the big
Speaker 2: cyber attack.
Speaker 9: Right now, a lot of people are saying, well, this
Speaker 9: is predictive programming. They're going to do this cyber attack.
Speaker 9: And you know, we've been talking about this type of
Speaker 9: stuff for years, right with the cyber Polygon exercises and
Speaker 9: the World Economic Forum, and you're working with U defense
Speaker 9: contractors in military intelligence was not working on the possible
Speaker 9: scenario of a cyber attack, right The cyber attack is
Speaker 9: one of these scenarios that they're saying it's gotta happen.
Speaker 9: It's coming, the big cyber attacks coming. But I feel
Speaker 9: like films like this the intention could be to make
Speaker 9: people so afraid of just the mere possibility of a
Speaker 9: total collapse like.
Speaker 2: This, so they obviously sound like they know what they're
Speaker 2: talking about there. That's very very very polished. Now Tristan
Speaker 2: thinks that he has a better idea to kind of
Speaker 2: seed collapse quote. A better way to implement this would
Speaker 2: be to not really roll out a huge wide scale
Speaker 2: power outages and communications outages but make it up protracted,
Speaker 2: small and localized so that you can still maintain a
Speaker 2: certain level of propaganda and control and then create enough
Speaker 2: fear to where people will accept the mandatory digital ID
Speaker 2: for the Internet and the Central Bank digital currencies and whatnot.
Speaker 2: It's like a limited type of thing, a regional type
Speaker 2: of thing that then is hyped up to be the
Speaker 2: worst thing ever unquote. These guys are really like talking
Speaker 2: about this mandatory digital ID and the central bank digital
Speaker 2: currencies as being this big threat and there's gonna just
Speaker 2: be and any day this this this cyber attack which
Speaker 2: is gonn, which is gonna force us to all adopt
Speaker 2: this this uh, this digital ID to be able to
Speaker 2: sign into the internet.
Speaker 3: Quote.
Speaker 2: All you have to do is have most of the
Speaker 2: normal people afraid enough of the possible scenario and tease it.
Speaker 2: It's almost like a cyber attack brinksmanship type of thing unquote,
Speaker 2: so they think that, you know, you don't actually need
Speaker 2: to have the cyber attack, You just need to have
Speaker 2: people afraid enough that it could happen by by talking
Speaker 2: about it in media, film, TV, you know, all all
Speaker 2: this sort of stuff.
Speaker 5: You can't even get people to like change their passwords like.
Speaker 2: And it's so funny because like the past few months,
Speaker 2: there actually has been a decent number of.
Speaker 3: Cyber attacks constantly, yes, which are.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like a very like a constant influx, which are
Speaker 2: all just being constantly handled. And it's it's not led
Speaker 2: to any of these massive apocalyptic scenarios that that that
Speaker 2: they're talking about, know.
Speaker 5: I mean, like the movie has part of how the
Speaker 5: movie has to make this, like has to make it,
Speaker 5: Like why the movie is set in the middle of
Speaker 5: nowhere is that if it's set in a city and
Speaker 5: the internet goes out, the way people would actually respond
Speaker 5: would be like the way they respond when there's just
Speaker 5: some sort of random outage initially like like oh shit,
Speaker 5: my phone doesn't work right now, I guess I've got
Speaker 5: to figure something else out for a second. Like it's
Speaker 5: it's easier to have it seem disconnected and like completely
Speaker 5: disorienting when you have everybody like out in the middle
Speaker 5: of nowhere without other people around to make shit makes sense.
Speaker 2: I'm going to play Well one more clip from from
Speaker 2: Tristan's livestream here.
Speaker 10: I feel like, well, also, I mean they haven't they've
Speaker 10: been building all of this technocracy stuff to throw it away. Thanks, Right,
Speaker 10: they've been building it to implement it, so if there
Speaker 10: was an outage or the cyber attack or whatever, this
Speaker 10: would be some temporary, limited thing, you know, hyped up
Speaker 10: into oblivion and oh it was all the Trump maga people,
Speaker 10: or it was all the Christians that did it to
Speaker 10: go working with Russia. Right, that's what they're gonna say.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, totally. They're gonna blame the big cyber attack
Speaker 2: on the Trump Christians. That's Timby, who's gonna who's gonna
Speaker 2: launch the big attack?
Speaker 6: Totally absolutely to everyone will assume knew how to do
Speaker 6: hack is the Trumpers. Yeah, we taught him how to
Speaker 6: change the settings on their smart TV.
Speaker 3: And now they've hacked the planet.
Speaker 2: What do you do? As as soon as you turn
Speaker 2: off motion smoothing, then you're ready to go. They're gonna
Speaker 2: hack the system, get in, shut everything down. Oh so
Speaker 2: this Tristan guy was getting like hundreds of dollars in
Speaker 2: super chats on this stream. He's he's verified on YouTube.
Speaker 2: He has over one hundred thousand subscribers, and he is
Speaker 2: one of the has some of the like not not
Speaker 2: very hidden anti Semitism, but like I am kind of
Speaker 2: surprised that he's able to say as much as he
Speaker 2: is while still being verified and getting all this money,
Speaker 2: because he has this line towards the end of his
Speaker 2: of his stream quote, the little girl is inside the
Speaker 2: house with the bunker that everyone else was trying to
Speaker 2: go to, and she's sitting at the table surrounded by
Speaker 2: like goy slop. She's just got all the freaking kibble
Speaker 2: foods like Funians and Doritos. She's having a feast of gluttony.
Speaker 2: It's all freaking globo homo kibble, fruity pebbles and stuff.
Speaker 2: She's just gluttonously consuming a bunch of you know, trash
Speaker 2: processed foods. She's just all alone, just looking kind of autistic.
Speaker 2: Unquote what the fuck? So, Yeah, he's just talking about
Speaker 2: like goy slop. Like there's like the like like the
Speaker 2: Jews are creating junk food to pacify.
Speaker 3: I want you to eat worms and stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. So that that is most of most of
Speaker 2: his interesting opinions. I'll leave the world behind a pretty
Speaker 2: a pretty bad movie.
Speaker 3: A pretty bad movie.
Speaker 5: You know, there's one real conspiracy theory about it, and
Speaker 5: it has nothing to do with the Obamas or predict programming,
Speaker 5: we see a character at the beginning of the movie,
Speaker 5: a survivalist prepping to take care of his family even
Speaker 5: though no one knows a disastro is coming. And later
Speaker 5: near the end of the movie, when Ethan Hawk's son
Speaker 5: is sick, we meet the survivalist again. It turns out
Speaker 5: he's a handyman who lives in the edge of town,
Speaker 5: and he's played by Kevin Bacon now Garrison. In the
Speaker 5: classic film Trimmers, Kevin Bacon plays a handyman character who
Speaker 5: with his friend Earl Bassett played by Fred Ward, has
Speaker 5: to fight off an attack by subterranean ancient giant worm
Speaker 5: beasts in order to save himself in his small community
Speaker 5: and Dune in just like Dune Garrison and in the
Speaker 5: Lore of the Trimmers movies Val McKee. Kevin Bacon's character
Speaker 5: is not seen in further movies because he gets rich
Speaker 5: and he marries Ronda le Beck and they move off somewhere.
Speaker 5: Maybe they move to the northeast to an island off
Speaker 5: the coast of the East Coast, where he bought a
Speaker 5: house and became a survivalist prepper, informed by his experiences
Speaker 5: with his good friend Bert Gummer. The local survivalist who
Speaker 5: shot a giant worm to death and maybe leave the
Speaker 5: world behind, as a stealth sequel to the first Trimmers movie,
Speaker 5: showing what Kevin Bacon's character does later in life.
Speaker 2: I would be so much more of a fan of
Speaker 2: Sam s Mill if he if he tried to, if
Speaker 2: he tried to put the Tremor's movies into the canon
Speaker 2: of mister Robot like.
Speaker 5: It would have been, It would have been perfect. I
Speaker 5: would have completely changed my opinion on this movie. He
Speaker 5: shout up to Kevin Bacon's house and he'd come out
Speaker 5: with a gun, and they'd been like, look, we just
Speaker 5: need some antibiotics. And He's like antibiotics, what about the
Speaker 5: fucking worms? How are you people walking around? And then
Speaker 5: the movie ends. At the end of the movie, it
Speaker 5: was all a Trimmer's sequel.
Speaker 2: You you you Korean Iranian terrorists went into the wrong reckcrooit.
Speaker 2: So I lastly just want to talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about some of like, you know, the obvious problems with
Speaker 2: this diictive programming idea. Right, it completely annoys the fact
Speaker 2: that humans use art as a form of cultural creation,
Speaker 2: like we imagine futures in our art, specifically because they
Speaker 2: could come into being. Like a lot of a lot
Speaker 2: of like sci fi that influences technology comes from this.
Speaker 2: That's also kind of the basis of Mark Fisher and
Speaker 2: Nick Lan's like a cultural hyperstition where you specifically make
Speaker 2: art to have this larger cultural effect that then it
Speaker 2: can bring things into being as opposed to the more
Speaker 2: like individualistic use of like occultism. And then a big,
Speaker 2: a big part of all of this, this predictive programming
Speaker 2: thing is also just like apaphenia, right It's it's people
Speaker 2: creating connections and patterns and random data because it's it's
Speaker 2: actually easy to look back and pick out past media
Speaker 2: that has seemingly predicted events, but it's much harder to
Speaker 2: identify current media that is actually predicting future events.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 2: This is this is a part of hindsight bias. The
Speaker 2: tendency that we have to look at past events is
Speaker 2: more predictable than what they actually were. It is it's
Speaker 2: a common psychological response to a traumatic event like like
Speaker 2: a big pandemic or a school shooting. There's also you know,
Speaker 2: all of these all of these predictive programming theories fall
Speaker 2: into these kind of contradictory depictions, which is why the
Speaker 2: which is why the Hunger Games guy like uh calls
Speaker 2: it like reverse symbolism. Right, it's it's if this if
Speaker 2: if predictive programming is orchestrated by a shadowy cabal seeking
Speaker 2: to implement a totalitarian takeover by normalizing an incredibly oppressive government. Uh,
Speaker 2: in media and film TV, why is the said media
Speaker 2: almost exclusively about like rebel heroes overthrowing and evil to
Speaker 2: talitarian government. Right, it doesn't, it doesn't actually match. And
Speaker 2: there's been a lot of like cultural studies showing that
Speaker 2: whether you portray something in media as positive or negative
Speaker 2: will strongly affect the audience's takeaway of the stimulus. So
Speaker 2: if you show something positively, they're more like they're more
Speaker 2: likely to view it as a positive thing. If you
Speaker 2: show something negatively, they're more likely to view it as
Speaker 2: a negative thing. Right, this this, this sounds very obvious,
Speaker 2: but you do have to do like social science to
Speaker 2: actually like show this is a real pattern. And then finally,
Speaker 2: I will I will end this by quoting from that
Speaker 2: that article from the Ohio State University quote. There are
Speaker 2: a few purposes for predictive programming, and not all of
Speaker 2: them have to deal with tyranny. Some of them are
Speaker 2: meant to lessen the blow of an event like nine
Speaker 2: to eleven or as previously mentioned, at the Sandy Hook shootings.
Speaker 2: The contradiction arises when thinking about why the government would
Speaker 2: want to warn us or prepare us for Sandy Hook.
Speaker 2: The whole point of Sandy Hook conspiracies is to doubt
Speaker 2: the event even happened, so the government would create a
Speaker 2: conversation around gun control. This would defeat the purpose of
Speaker 2: staging it if the government was trying to ensure a
Speaker 2: smaller or inexistent response unquote. Especially like looking back at
Speaker 2: what we talked about with like the Simpsons, it's just
Speaker 2: a fun game people play, right Like it sounds like
Speaker 2: a fun a fun world to live in. If you
Speaker 2: can imagine this interconnected web connecting every single thing that
Speaker 2: happens to your own experiences, it's it's it's it's a
Speaker 2: way to turn turn the world into like this, this
Speaker 2: great mystery that you can instead of just like experiences
Speaker 2: that you have to live through.
Speaker 4: These people need real hobbies.
Speaker 2: Like Finally, the thing I wanted to mention is that
Speaker 2: the the upcoming discussion of predictive programming is all centered
Speaker 2: around this movie coming out next month called Civil War,
Speaker 2: which many many of these people in their discussion of
Speaker 2: Leave the World Behind are are are very much talking
Speaker 2: about how Civil War just seems like a sequel to
Speaker 2: Leave the World Behind, because Leave the World Behind seems
Speaker 2: like it's set up like a possible American civil war,
Speaker 2: and how this upcoming movie is itself going to be
Speaker 2: a massive predictive programming operation to prepare American citizens for
Speaker 2: civil conflict with each other. So have fun seeing a
Speaker 2: whole bunch of conspiracy theories develop around this movie that
Speaker 2: comes out next month.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that'll be that'll be good.
Speaker 5: I mean, I wish people would start some conspiracy theories around.
Speaker 5: Alex Garland's TV showed Devs, which is dog shit also
Speaker 5: and and one of the one of the worst uses
Speaker 5: of that guy from Parks and rec that I've seen
Speaker 5: in a long time, heartbreaking. They use math to see
Speaker 5: the past, Garrison.
Speaker 2: That kind of reminds me of this movie I watched
Speaker 2: for research called Knowing with with Nick Cage, who finds
Speaker 2: a piece of paper that has something that's able to
Speaker 2: predict like catastrophic events. Alex Jones saw this movie predicted
Speaker 2: an oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico. But
Speaker 2: besides that, you don't see it. You don't really see
Speaker 2: it much in these in these circles, despite its very
Speaker 2: like obvious, like predictive focus.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Mostly Dev's features a bunch of very good actors standing
Speaker 5: around and staring at a screen where a grainy picture
Speaker 5: of Jesus from the past is lit up in like
Speaker 5: movie theater size screens like it's it's it's very it's
Speaker 5: very mid. That's what I'm saying about DEVS. It's pretty mid.
Speaker 5: Folks don't watch DEVS.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, same same thing with this Obama movie.
Speaker 2: So yeah, watch out for the Obama's new movies, which
Speaker 2: are all to seed the collapse of humanity, as well
Speaker 2: as the A twenty four, the A War movie, which
Speaker 2: is probably devious in some way, so have fun with that.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 5: I'll say this, Barack Obama, it's not his fault, obviously
Speaker 5: that a bunch of racists lost their mind when he
Speaker 5: became president. But knowing that it was kind of responsible
Speaker 5: for him to make his debut movie production a movie
Speaker 5: about a cabal taking over the government using secret weapons.
Speaker 3: Absolutely you knew what was going to happen. Barack you're
Speaker 3: not a dumb man.
Speaker 5: Tell me that's not what was going to happen.
Speaker 2: Absolutely all right, Well, I think that does it for
Speaker 2: us today. Have fun predicting the end of this episode.
Speaker 1: It Could Happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.
Speaker 1: For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website
Speaker 1: cool zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcast
Speaker 1: You can find sources for It could Happen Here, updated
Speaker 1: monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.