1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:10,119 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 3 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,119 Speaker 1: noon and five pm Eastern on Apple Coarclay and Android 4 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever 5 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 2: Bringing you all of the information you need today, not 7 00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 2: just Wall Street, which boy does not feel good right now, 8 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 2: and that's why we stay in touch with Charlie throughout 9 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:35,879 Speaker 2: the fastest show in politics to see what's happening on 10 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:36,639 Speaker 2: this job's day. 11 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:38,600 Speaker 3: Of course, it has its own look. 12 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 2: The news about Donald Trump breaking a short time ago, 13 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 2: we'll get into this. 14 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 3: He is not going to jail. 15 00:00:44,560 --> 00:00:47,120 Speaker 2: If you listen to this broadcast or watch us on YouTube, 16 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:49,720 Speaker 2: you knew that already. But he will enter the White 17 00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 2: House with a criminal record sentencing a short time ago. 18 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 2: This is the New York hush money case, the Stormy 19 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:58,279 Speaker 2: Daniels case, sentence to no jail time. We'll have more 20 00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 2: on that coming up with Wendy Benjamin s want to 21 00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 2: dig further into jobs though this is big stuff today 22 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,479 Speaker 2: obviously looking at the market reaction and trying to get 23 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 2: a sense of exactly where this job market is as 24 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:12,080 Speaker 2: Joe Biden leaves the White House. That's the last one. 25 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:14,840 Speaker 2: That's the last report you're going to get. We spent 26 00:01:14,920 --> 00:01:17,600 Speaker 2: some time earlier today knowing that this number blew the 27 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,679 Speaker 2: doors off here the most jobs since March, unemployment rate 28 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:25,640 Speaker 2: down unexpectedly. The Acting Labor Secretary, Julie Sue spoke with 29 00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 2: us earlier on Bloomberg with Katie Greifeld. 30 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 4: Let's listen today's numbers, following on the heels of consistent, steady, 31 00:01:33,959 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 4: stable growth, sixteen point seven million jobs sin since President 32 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:40,160 Speaker 4: came into office. He is the only president that has 33 00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:43,680 Speaker 4: had positive job growth every single month of his presidency. 34 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 4: And that is what we hand off because we knew 35 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 4: that that's what the American people deserved, and we knew 36 00:01:50,520 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 4: that if we focused on what was good for workers first, 37 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 4: that we could have recovery like no other. And that's 38 00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 4: certainly what this month's numbers reflect. 39 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 5: Yeah, I believe we're looking at forty eight months with 40 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 5: consecutive payroll gains, and that of course is going in 41 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,440 Speaker 5: data going back to nineteen thirty nine. I do want 42 00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:13,440 Speaker 5: to talk about the manufacturing sector because if you're looking 43 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 5: for some pain. You're going to find it there in 44 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:20,760 Speaker 5: the manufacturing sector shedding jobs again in December. What do 45 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,840 Speaker 5: you think is going on specifically in that industry. Can 46 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 5: we draw a line between those job losses to all 47 00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 5: of the different labor disputes that we've been seeing. 48 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 4: No, I would draw the line to really decades of 49 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:39,520 Speaker 4: economic policies, trade policies that have not favored workers and 50 00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 4: of commitment to jobs, which is also why President Biden 51 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:45,120 Speaker 4: came in and said we're going to invest in manufacturing. 52 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:49,639 Speaker 4: As a result, the recovery that we've seen since twenty 53 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 4: twenty one is the only economic recovery in this century 54 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:57,600 Speaker 4: in which the manufacturing sector actually bounced back from a 55 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,520 Speaker 4: crisis like the one we inherited, and so there's more 56 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 4: work to do, there's no question about it. And we 57 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:08,359 Speaker 4: know that workers in states where manufacturing has been the 58 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:12,160 Speaker 4: foundation need continued investments, and there's some uncertainly about that 59 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 4: because the incoming administration has raised questions about whether those 60 00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 4: investments would continue. But what we've seen is that doing that, 61 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 4: having the Inflation Reduction Act right, having investments in bringing 62 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 4: manufacturing back to the United States into our heartland is 63 00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:32,080 Speaker 4: the right way to build the economy. 64 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 2: Julie Sue's last job's day, the acting Labor Secretary with 65 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,640 Speaker 2: us earlier today on Bloomberg with the ambience of the 66 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 2: fire alarm ringing at the labor department? 67 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:42,840 Speaker 3: Is there symbolism there? 68 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 6: By? 69 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 2: The way can we get an indoor studio for the 70 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:48,400 Speaker 2: next labor secretary? It was like three degrees when she 71 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 2: was out there in the snow and the wind, and 72 00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 2: the whole thing is it's not like that at every 73 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 2: agency they're always out on the porch. Right, there's beautiful 74 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 2: shot on TV, but the poor secretary ends up freezing. 75 00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 2: Maybe there's symbolism there too. We better ask Anna Wong, 76 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 2: who is our winner today on the Price is Right, 77 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 2: Bloomberg's chief US economist at Bloomberg Economics. 78 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:12,200 Speaker 3: You came closest. 79 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:16,320 Speaker 2: You have the highest consensus, highest number in the consensus 80 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 2: when it comes to this job before. 81 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 3: What do you know that no one. 82 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:19,080 Speaker 2: Else does too? 83 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 7: Job market is warming the winter around us, so that's 84 00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:27,120 Speaker 7: the only hot things. So that we track high frequency 85 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:30,359 Speaker 7: data and that data. When I saw that data a 86 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:34,200 Speaker 7: couple of weeks ago, I was surprised by this broad based, 87 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,520 Speaker 7: unseasonablely strong hiring across sector. So this is why we 88 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:42,000 Speaker 7: made this forecast. Our forecast is always made based on 89 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 7: actual data, and so I think there is genuine signs 90 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 7: that the labor market is stabilizing. And Joe, you know me, 91 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 7: I have been pretty down in the labor market for 92 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 7: most of last year. I would still say that, you know, 93 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:59,720 Speaker 7: the non farm payroll is still overstating the degree of hiring. 94 00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:03,080 Speaker 7: An in the next month report, we're going to see 95 00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:07,400 Speaker 7: benchmark revisions which will be downward revising most of the 96 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:11,840 Speaker 7: data last year. Nonetheless, I will say that this report 97 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:17,479 Speaker 7: is genuinely good and it would be rational to be 98 00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 7: hopeful about the future. 99 00:05:19,279 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 2: Well, yeah, the market's freaked out. The S and P 100 00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:25,200 Speaker 2: five down two percent, same as the Nasdaq. The VIX 101 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:28,039 Speaker 2: is up ten percent. Are we given up on interest 102 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:28,640 Speaker 2: rate cuts? 103 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:32,239 Speaker 7: I think the I think the fix in the stock 104 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:38,000 Speaker 7: market is reacting to definitely the fixing come traders pricing 105 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:42,640 Speaker 7: out one whole seven exactly. So, so immediately after the 106 00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:47,039 Speaker 7: payrolls report, the traders were prising out one rate cut 107 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 7: out of twenty twenty five. And now the earliest for 108 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:54,080 Speaker 7: a rate cut is September now, so it would be 109 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:55,279 Speaker 7: a pretty long pause. 110 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:59,599 Speaker 2: What's inside this report that has your attention when it 111 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,239 Speaker 2: comes to ages, when it comes to participation. 112 00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:02,279 Speaker 8: What should we know? 113 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:08,720 Speaker 7: Yeah, I think that, you know, the private sector employment 114 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:11,760 Speaker 7: jump in the household survey really caught my eyes because 115 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 7: I thought that the household survey was going to show 116 00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:19,279 Speaker 7: more weakness because it doesn't suffer from the overstatement problems 117 00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:23,720 Speaker 7: measurement problems as the establishment survey. But we saw actually 118 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:27,240 Speaker 7: a very strong showing of private sector hiring, in particular 119 00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:31,479 Speaker 7: the increase in hiring and retail trade sector. And I 120 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:36,239 Speaker 7: have to wonder whether some of that reflect that firms 121 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:41,279 Speaker 7: are front running the tariffs, and we have seen anecdotes 122 00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:45,880 Speaker 7: of you know, firms stocking up before expectations of higher 123 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 7: rate tariffs, and therefore that's basically boosting the logistics sector 124 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:52,200 Speaker 7: and retail sector. 125 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 2: So front running like that though, can lead to weakness 126 00:06:55,080 --> 00:06:55,680 Speaker 2: later in the years. 127 00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 9: Yes, exactly. 128 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:01,280 Speaker 7: So that if that that's the reason why there was 129 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:04,920 Speaker 7: such a strong showing in the trade and logistics sector, 130 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:08,599 Speaker 7: then one shouldn't expect this increase to be endurable. 131 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:14,800 Speaker 2: Fascinating. You close the border, you conduct a mass deportation, 132 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:18,679 Speaker 2: and what happens to the job market, then. 133 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 7: Well, you know. So if everything stays constant, as an 134 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 7: economist would say, then if you reduce the labor force, 135 00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:32,080 Speaker 7: you would actually tend to reduce the unemployment rate. However, 136 00:07:32,600 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 7: it really depends on the details, which is where do 137 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 7: these numigrants tend to work? So I suppose that they 138 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 7: tend to work in construction sector, which is undergoing a downturn, 139 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 7: particularly in the South, then a reduction in the labor 140 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 7: supply geared toward the construction sector actually would not really 141 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:56,120 Speaker 7: boost prices in the construction sector given the slack in 142 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:57,160 Speaker 7: the market there. 143 00:07:57,200 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 2: There's been a greater conversation, and I don't know if 144 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:02,559 Speaker 2: this come to the form of legislation or not about 145 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:06,120 Speaker 2: work vices as a new element of the debate. Let's 146 00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:11,040 Speaker 2: say lawmakers crack down on border security but also raise 147 00:08:11,240 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 2: the cap on H one b's. Would it have a 148 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 2: meaningful impact on the job market or would that be 149 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:18,960 Speaker 2: isolated to the tech sector and not show up in 150 00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 2: national numbers like these? 151 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean from a pure economous perspective, so the 152 00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:31,720 Speaker 7: economy needs more immigrants in sector that's experiencing shortages, and 153 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 7: also it would be great for the economy to receive 154 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:39,000 Speaker 7: more immigrants in sectors that innovate. So in high tech 155 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 7: sphere we have a lot of form born immigrants who 156 00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 7: are contributing significantly to TFP productivity increase. 157 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:50,520 Speaker 2: So I think that you ask Elon Musk right, right. 158 00:08:50,520 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 7: Exactly, So raising the cap so allow more to come 159 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,960 Speaker 7: in actually would be great for the economy. 160 00:08:56,720 --> 00:08:58,840 Speaker 2: And would actually show up in numbers. Though, would you 161 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:02,000 Speaker 2: see something in the household employment surveys where you'd actually 162 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:05,079 Speaker 2: make a dent in the data on a jobs day 163 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 2: like this. 164 00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:07,920 Speaker 7: Well, I think not yet. So what we have seen 165 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:11,840 Speaker 7: is a labor force decline in the last in November 166 00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:16,319 Speaker 7: and October that's more driven by cyclical hiring weaknesses and construction, 167 00:09:16,440 --> 00:09:21,120 Speaker 7: sexual leisure and hospitality, which seem to have reversed in December. 168 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 7: But I would say that the first sign of contraction 169 00:09:25,679 --> 00:09:30,120 Speaker 7: and labor supply would be more due to cyclical forces 170 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 7: like slow down and hiring rather than deportations. 171 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:36,520 Speaker 2: Anna Wong always a pleasure. It's a clinic with Anna Wong, 172 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:40,440 Speaker 2: whose number in the consensus was the highest. We should 173 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:42,800 Speaker 2: have played plinko while we have the chance with Anna. 174 00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:43,680 Speaker 2: Thank you so much. 175 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg balance of power podcasts. Catch 176 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: us live weekdays at noon and five pm e's durn 177 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 1: on Apple Cockley and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. 178 00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:58,959 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 179 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 1: flagship New York's station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty. 180 00:10:04,960 --> 00:10:07,480 Speaker 9: It looks like a labor market that's in pretty good 181 00:10:07,480 --> 00:10:09,600 Speaker 9: shape as a new administration gets ready to come in. 182 00:10:09,640 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 9: Not just the two hundred and fifty six thousand on payrolls, 183 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 9: but an unemployment rate that went down to four point 184 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:16,000 Speaker 9: one percent. 185 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's obviously this has been a difficult time for 186 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:21,120 Speaker 2: forecasting all the way around, and it's an opportunity to 187 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:23,200 Speaker 2: spend some time with Ben Harris, who is with us 188 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:26,319 Speaker 2: at the desk here in Washington, vice president director Economic 189 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:29,640 Speaker 2: Studies Program at Brooking's former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury 190 00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 2: for Economic Policy. 191 00:10:30,840 --> 00:10:32,680 Speaker 3: Welcome back. It's great to see you. Happy jobs Day, 192 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:33,400 Speaker 3: Happy job say. 193 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 2: At least we're not outside shivering with Julie suit exactly. 194 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:40,440 Speaker 2: People were so far off on this, I will say, 195 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 2: Anna Wong at the highest number in the consensus at 196 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:45,719 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Economics, how come we can't get close to these 197 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 2: It's not just this month where we're just far off 198 00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 2: the mark in the market. 199 00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:51,360 Speaker 7: Yeah. 200 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:53,880 Speaker 10: So when we're talking about payrolls, I think one of 201 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 10: the things that makes it so difficult is immigration. And 202 00:10:57,360 --> 00:10:59,559 Speaker 10: research coming out of Brooking showed that when we're getting 203 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,720 Speaker 10: these really high payroll prints at the beginning part of 204 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,719 Speaker 10: the recovery, one of the reasons why you could see 205 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:07,640 Speaker 10: the high prints was because we had so many people 206 00:11:07,679 --> 00:11:11,720 Speaker 10: coming into the country, both seeking asylum and through illegal means, 207 00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 10: and so I think it really complicates things. I mean, 208 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:16,880 Speaker 10: it could mean we'll see an extra one hundred thousand 209 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 10: jobs in a month that we just didn't anticipate on 210 00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 10: the household side. So for the unemployment rate, that's just 211 00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:25,680 Speaker 10: a story of non response. And you saw this coming 212 00:11:25,720 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 10: out of Governor Bowman's comments from the other day where 213 00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:30,840 Speaker 10: she said, look, we just can't rely on the U 214 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 10: three like we used to. And this is true of 215 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:35,920 Speaker 10: surveys across the spectrum, whether we're talking about the survey 216 00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:37,640 Speaker 10: of consumer finances coming out of the FED or we're 217 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 10: talking about consumer confidence. People just don't answer surveys the 218 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:43,679 Speaker 10: way they used to, and I think that makes forecasting 219 00:11:43,679 --> 00:11:44,720 Speaker 10: that much more difficult. 220 00:11:44,960 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 9: Okay, So forecasting is tough, but then you get the 221 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 9: data and it paints a story for those who have 222 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:51,640 Speaker 9: to make decisions around it, like the Federal Reserve. The 223 00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:53,960 Speaker 9: market today is reading this data as a sign that 224 00:11:54,040 --> 00:11:56,000 Speaker 9: this is not an economy that needs the FED to 225 00:11:56,040 --> 00:11:58,840 Speaker 9: ease policy as they have been doing. Some on the 226 00:11:58,840 --> 00:12:01,439 Speaker 9: street are suggesting no cuts this year. Perhaps a height 227 00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:03,199 Speaker 9: could be back on the table. How do you see it? 228 00:12:03,280 --> 00:12:05,560 Speaker 10: Bent, Yeah, So the way that markets seem to be 229 00:12:05,559 --> 00:12:07,320 Speaker 10: looking at this is that we will be in a 230 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 10: period of an elongated pause and the Fed will need 231 00:12:10,679 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 10: some sort of drastic data print to push us off that. 232 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:18,400 Speaker 10: So you either need to see something happened on the 233 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:21,200 Speaker 10: inflation side to get us back into the hiking cycle, 234 00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:25,360 Speaker 10: or potentially, you know, we'll need to see several prints 235 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:28,359 Speaker 10: of weakness in order to see cuts that might materialize. 236 00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:31,200 Speaker 10: Right now, I think markets are expecting cuts either in 237 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:33,520 Speaker 10: the summer or potentially in the early fall in the 238 00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:36,120 Speaker 10: September meeting, But for right now, it feels like we're 239 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:37,040 Speaker 10: an elongated pause. 240 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 2: Well, of course, there are a lot of folks that 241 00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 2: will tell you there's a big tank of gasoline that 242 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,040 Speaker 2: Donald Trump's about to pour on that fire and that 243 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 2: reinflation will be the buzzword next year after Trump tax 244 00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:51,720 Speaker 2: cuts or extended tariffs are implemented, deficits explode. 245 00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:54,320 Speaker 10: Were you on that, Yeah, I mean I would describe 246 00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:56,840 Speaker 10: this economy as that don't mess it up economy. And 247 00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:58,880 Speaker 10: it was similar to the last time, I mean Trump 248 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 10: came into office. The unemployment rate had been falling. It 249 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:05,320 Speaker 10: was four point seven percent when he was inaugurated, but 250 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:08,560 Speaker 10: had been falling for years. The economy right now is 251 00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 10: even better than it was then. So you've got household 252 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 10: balance seats are really strong, Debt relative to disposable income 253 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:18,000 Speaker 10: is really low. You know, there's some bad news as 254 00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:20,880 Speaker 10: far as transitions into delinquencies on credit cards. We really 255 00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:23,079 Speaker 10: have to squint in order to find any sort of 256 00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:25,920 Speaker 10: story which suggests that the US consumer's going to slow 257 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 10: down anytime soon. 258 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:30,079 Speaker 3: And then you're seeing similarly, you're seeing nearly. 259 00:13:29,840 --> 00:13:33,280 Speaker 10: A perfect labor market. I mean, we're seeing real wage gains. 260 00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 10: You've got plenty of jobs. You didn't have that type 261 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:37,680 Speaker 10: of imbalance like you saw in twenty twenty when they're 262 00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:40,960 Speaker 10: just you know, we're just so many openings per worker. 263 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:45,320 Speaker 10: So we have this really strong, healthy labor market, and 264 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 10: that means, you know, my advice, not that Trump's asking 265 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:49,920 Speaker 10: for it, but it's like, just don't mess this up. 266 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:53,360 Speaker 10: And so there's real concerns around tariff policy, there's real 267 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 10: concerns around overborrowing through a reconciliation pill, and I think 268 00:13:57,120 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 10: there's real concerns that are about being too strict on 269 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:02,440 Speaker 10: immigration policy and possibly seeing net out migration, which is 270 00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:04,120 Speaker 10: something we haven't seen in my lifetime. 271 00:14:04,400 --> 00:14:06,880 Speaker 9: Well, so as we consider this notion that maybe everything 272 00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 9: is just right and we're kind of in this Goldiglocks 273 00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:12,960 Speaker 9: phase right now, it doesn't seem though Trump necessarily agrees 274 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 9: with that. He had a press conference in mar A 275 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:16,880 Speaker 9: Lago earlier this week in which he said interest rates 276 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:19,280 Speaker 9: are far too high. And we actually asked the former 277 00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:22,760 Speaker 9: House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry about that on 278 00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:25,440 Speaker 9: this program earlier this week. This is what he told us. 279 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 11: Mean tweets that does not make monetary policy. And the 280 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:34,800 Speaker 11: board of governors at the Feederal Reserve have long terms, 281 00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 11: as Congress designed so they can have this longer term view. 282 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,400 Speaker 11: And I think Jay pal has done a fabulous job 283 00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:44,720 Speaker 11: is share the FED. But this president will speak his 284 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:49,880 Speaker 11: mind publicly where other presidents privately complained and that is 285 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 11: a big distinction between now and what was then. 286 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:56,440 Speaker 9: So when we consider that distinction in this question of 287 00:14:56,480 --> 00:15:00,520 Speaker 9: the independent operation of monetary policy setting in the United 288 00:15:00,520 --> 00:15:02,280 Speaker 9: States for the FED, what would it mean if the 289 00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:04,680 Speaker 9: data is suggesting the FED can stand pat but the 290 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 9: President of the United States is saying no interest rates 291 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:08,600 Speaker 9: need to go lower. 292 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:10,600 Speaker 10: Well, this has been in my mind in part because 293 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:13,760 Speaker 10: you saw President Carter's funeral yesterday and thinking about some 294 00:15:13,800 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 10: of the lessons that came out of the administration, and yeah, Vulgal, 295 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:18,920 Speaker 10: So one of the lessons that came out with Look, 296 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:21,600 Speaker 10: if you want to fight inflation, the first, second, and 297 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:24,280 Speaker 10: third best thing to do is to appoint a credible 298 00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 10: FED share and let that share do their job. 299 00:15:27,520 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 3: And so, you know, I think that a lot of 300 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:30,000 Speaker 3: people do. 301 00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:33,960 Speaker 10: Worry about FED independence under this administration, but that's something 302 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 10: we will probably not have to worry about until the 303 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:38,200 Speaker 10: middle part of twenty twenty six when Palace term is up. 304 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 10: When you look at the names of possible people who'd 305 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 10: be considered for FED share, they are all credible people, 306 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:46,280 Speaker 10: people like Kevin Hassett and Kevin Warsh and Mark Summerlin 307 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:50,240 Speaker 10: and people Larry lindsay, people, some of them have political backgrounds, 308 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:51,280 Speaker 10: but all credible people. 309 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 3: And so. 310 00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 10: Obviously Tonald Trump doesn't want to repeat some of the 311 00:15:56,080 --> 00:15:58,320 Speaker 10: sins of the nineteen seventies the early part of the 312 00:15:58,320 --> 00:15:59,800 Speaker 10: decade before or does the Fed? 313 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:00,760 Speaker 3: Or does the Fed? 314 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 10: And my senses is that you have to look at 315 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:06,640 Speaker 10: what Donald Trump does, not so much what he says, 316 00:16:06,680 --> 00:16:09,080 Speaker 10: whether you're talking about a trade war, you're talking about 317 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:10,200 Speaker 10: a corporate tax cut. 318 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:12,680 Speaker 3: I mean, sometimes his bark is much. 319 00:16:12,560 --> 00:16:12,960 Speaker 10: Worse than this. 320 00:16:13,320 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 9: Seriously and literally, Oh yes. 321 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 2: I've heard that people. Well you said speaking of if 322 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 2: you said something important referred to immigration. And we're still 323 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 2: trying to get a sense of how serious or literal 324 00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,200 Speaker 2: Donald Trump is about mass deportation. Let's say we close 325 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:31,880 Speaker 2: the border. Let's say this mass deportation takes place. Caps 326 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:34,960 Speaker 2: are not lifted on H one b's whereas the job market. 327 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 10: Yes, So one thing I realized coming out of research 328 00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:40,400 Speaker 10: out of Brookings is that you don't have to have 329 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:45,680 Speaker 10: this oppressive deportation scheme in order to get net out migration. 330 00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 10: So you can do other things right, So you can 331 00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 10: put more agents of the border, you can transition people 332 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 10: who are here legally into illegal status, they're going to leave. 333 00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:56,480 Speaker 10: The rhetoric I think has a chilling effect, and you 334 00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:58,480 Speaker 10: can have people who are here legally who decide they 335 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:00,640 Speaker 10: want to leave because it's no longer a spitable place 336 00:17:00,680 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 10: to legal immigrants. And so pretty quickly, even without these 337 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 10: mass deportation programs, you can get to net out migration, 338 00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 10: a shrinking of the labor force, which might precipitate something 339 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:13,359 Speaker 10: which we thought we might see in the last administration 340 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:15,679 Speaker 10: but didn't, which is a wage price spiral. And so 341 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:17,320 Speaker 10: if we get to the point where the labor market 342 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:21,119 Speaker 10: is so tight that you start to anticipate future tightness 343 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:26,800 Speaker 10: down the road, companies start giving raises prematurely, consumers start 344 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 10: buying anticipation, you know, then that's that's something which we 345 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,520 Speaker 10: haven't dealt with in a long time, and that possibly 346 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:36,120 Speaker 10: cuddled coupled with a non credible FED, or a FED 347 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 10: which is seen as being political, it could be terrible 348 00:17:38,320 --> 00:17:39,080 Speaker 10: news for inflation. 349 00:17:39,480 --> 00:17:41,679 Speaker 9: I want to talk about something else regarding the incoming 350 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:44,879 Speaker 9: administration and those affiliated with it that has been in 351 00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:47,159 Speaker 9: the news this week. Elon Musk talking about the Department 352 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:50,200 Speaker 9: of Government efficiency maybe pulling back expectations a little bit. 353 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:52,439 Speaker 9: Maybe it's not going to be two trillion dollars in 354 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 9: spending cuts, but if they aim for two, they could 355 00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:57,600 Speaker 9: get one trillion dollars. Even if we assume that that 356 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 9: level is achievable, one trillion dollars is not an inconsequential 357 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,640 Speaker 9: amount of money. When whether they're talking about pulling back 358 00:18:03,680 --> 00:18:05,840 Speaker 9: the scope and scale of the federal government, what would 359 00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:09,440 Speaker 9: that actually do economically if that drastic kind of cut 360 00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:10,879 Speaker 9: is implemented, Well. 361 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:12,240 Speaker 3: It depends on the nature of the cuts. 362 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 10: And my guess is that based on the type of 363 00:18:15,600 --> 00:18:18,240 Speaker 10: cuts are considering, which is non defense discretionary spending, which 364 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,000 Speaker 10: is a pretty small share of the overall federal budget, 365 00:18:21,280 --> 00:18:23,040 Speaker 10: these are the type of things that a tend to 366 00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 10: make us a richer country, So investments in education, R 367 00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 10: and D, science, spending cancer research that improves health. 368 00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:32,440 Speaker 3: I think that that's more or less. 369 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 10: Just a hit on our natural national prosperity down the road. 370 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:38,600 Speaker 10: If they're talking about cuts to medicare to social security, 371 00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:43,640 Speaker 10: that has serious implications for the wellbeing of retired households, 372 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:46,600 Speaker 10: but less so for the future prosperity of our country. 373 00:18:47,520 --> 00:18:50,640 Speaker 2: This was the final jobs report, while Joe Biden is 374 00:18:50,680 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 2: in office. What should Donald Trump prepare for in the 375 00:18:54,800 --> 00:18:57,960 Speaker 2: early phases of his administration. We'll get I guess what 376 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:01,760 Speaker 2: would technically be Joe Biden's last jobs reporter partial month 377 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:04,240 Speaker 2: while he's in office. How do you come off. 378 00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:08,959 Speaker 10: Data like this, Well, I mean, you're handed a terrific economy, 379 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:12,920 Speaker 10: and I would just encourage those who are in policy 380 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:17,600 Speaker 10: making positions to move slowly when it comes to tariff policy. 381 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:21,960 Speaker 10: I looked the last administration, the last Trump administration, where 382 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:23,960 Speaker 10: the average tariff rate went up about one hundred fifty 383 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:26,240 Speaker 10: basis points. It was not a trade war, it was 384 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 10: a trade war with China. So the average terrify on 385 00:19:28,760 --> 00:19:31,280 Speaker 10: Chinese imports went from three percent up to eleven percent. 386 00:19:31,359 --> 00:19:34,440 Speaker 10: So certainly consequential for China. But if you're talking about 387 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 10: goods it came from anywhere but China, the tariff movements 388 00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:40,199 Speaker 10: were almost zero. And so my hope is that he 389 00:19:40,240 --> 00:19:44,440 Speaker 10: doesn't come in too strong with changes in our trade policy. 390 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:48,600 Speaker 10: My hope is that they are as worried about the 391 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:51,240 Speaker 10: deathsit as many economists are, and you don't see big 392 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:54,480 Speaker 10: increases in issuance coming out of a reconciliation package. I 393 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:57,960 Speaker 10: think right now, markets are expecting around five trillion dollars 394 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:01,560 Speaker 10: in new borrowing. If you came in with seven trillion dollars, 395 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:03,679 Speaker 10: I really I think theoud royal fancial markets so like, 396 00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:06,800 Speaker 10: we have to step back, take a pause. We don't 397 00:20:06,800 --> 00:20:08,440 Speaker 10: know what to do with all this new issuance. So 398 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:11,840 Speaker 10: I would say move slowly, honor the terrific stay of 399 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:15,960 Speaker 10: the economy and realize that all this rhetoric Nestley isn't 400 00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 10: a good thing for business conditions, isn't a good thing 401 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 10: for American households, and maybe dall it back a bit. 402 00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:23,600 Speaker 2: Donald Trump's always watching, so he'll get Yeah, he definitely 403 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:25,640 Speaker 2: cares what Ben Harris, thank you so much. It's great 404 00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:27,640 Speaker 2: to see you. Let's compare notes in a couple of weeks. 405 00:20:27,680 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 2: We do have headlines from the White House, Kaylee as 406 00:20:30,040 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 2: Joe Biden is briefed on the wildfires in California, FEMA 407 00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:36,199 Speaker 2: turning on its Critical Needs Assistant program, and they are 408 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:39,280 Speaker 2: making some progress on containment in the last twenty four hours. 409 00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:42,080 Speaker 2: We'll have more ahead here on Balance of Power on Bloomberg. 410 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:49,040 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 411 00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:52,119 Speaker 1: us live weekdays at noon and five pm. Eastern on 412 00:20:52,280 --> 00:20:55,520 Speaker 1: almal Coarckley and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. 413 00:20:55,680 --> 00:20:58,960 Speaker 1: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch 414 00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:01,480 Speaker 1: us live on YouTube. 415 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:02,960 Speaker 3: Thanks for being with us here. 416 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 2: It's Friday on the fastest show in politics. This is 417 00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:08,440 Speaker 2: Balance of Power and I'm Joe Matthew alongside Kaylee Lines 418 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:11,399 Speaker 2: in Washington. We have our signature panel with us. Kayley 419 00:21:11,440 --> 00:21:13,520 Speaker 2: with a lot more to talk about here. It's all 420 00:21:13,560 --> 00:21:14,960 Speaker 2: on to mar A Lago this week, and are you 421 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:16,040 Speaker 2: going to Florida? 422 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:18,399 Speaker 9: Did not get a little warm weather like half the 423 00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:23,800 Speaker 9: House of Representatives. 424 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:26,080 Speaker 2: The Republican Conference is going along with one Democrat by 425 00:21:26,080 --> 00:21:29,480 Speaker 2: the name of John Fetterman, who is reaching across the 426 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:31,679 Speaker 2: aisle here. He says he wants to be the next 427 00:21:31,760 --> 00:21:35,520 Speaker 2: Pope of Greenland. We can save the comedy for our 428 00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,800 Speaker 2: signature panel. They're with us here Rick Davis and Genie Shanzano. 429 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:42,159 Speaker 2: He is Republican strategist and partner at Stone Court Capital. 430 00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:45,439 Speaker 2: Genie is our democratic analyst of course, political science professor 431 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:48,680 Speaker 2: at Iona University and Senior Democracy Fellow with the Center 432 00:21:48,720 --> 00:21:50,640 Speaker 2: for the Study of the Presidency and Congress. 433 00:21:50,840 --> 00:21:51,879 Speaker 3: I'm compelled by this. 434 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 2: John Fetterman situation here, Genie, I mean it was actually 435 00:21:56,320 --> 00:21:59,359 Speaker 2: news that the Republican Main Street Partnership would have a 436 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:02,720 Speaker 2: representative at Marra a Lago. They're coming from the center, 437 00:22:02,800 --> 00:22:04,840 Speaker 2: they're coming from the right, and we've got a Democrat 438 00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:05,800 Speaker 2: from Pennsylvania there. 439 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:06,360 Speaker 3: What's he doing? 440 00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:10,960 Speaker 12: Yeah, I think it makes sense. He's gotten some criticism, 441 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:13,199 Speaker 12: as you can imagine, from the left for going, but 442 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,320 Speaker 12: he has said, look, it is this is the incoming 443 00:22:16,400 --> 00:22:19,119 Speaker 12: president of the United States. I am from a fifty 444 00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:22,399 Speaker 12: to fifty state. It is incumbent on me to open 445 00:22:22,440 --> 00:22:25,560 Speaker 12: these conversations and continue them. And this is sort of 446 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:29,240 Speaker 12: a really interesting trajectory of Fetterman. You know, he was 447 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:34,200 Speaker 12: often seen initially as a real progressive lightning rod and attacked, 448 00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:37,439 Speaker 12: but since I pay attention to conservative media over the 449 00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:40,480 Speaker 12: last year or so, he's become really something of a 450 00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:44,160 Speaker 12: darling of the conservative media. He was the first Senator 451 00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:46,880 Speaker 12: the other day to support first Democrat, I should say 452 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:50,119 Speaker 12: senator to support the Lincoln Riley Act, which pertains to 453 00:22:50,680 --> 00:22:53,879 Speaker 12: border security. So I think he is really making a 454 00:22:53,960 --> 00:22:56,639 Speaker 12: name for himself and trying to lead the way to 455 00:22:56,840 --> 00:23:00,840 Speaker 12: work with Donald Trump and the Republicans. When they can 456 00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:04,320 Speaker 12: on issues they agree on, and certainly for John Fetterman, 457 00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:07,679 Speaker 12: there's a lot from Israel and the border to the economy, 458 00:23:07,760 --> 00:23:09,440 Speaker 12: so I'll think it makes sense. 459 00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:13,439 Speaker 9: Well, it makes me wonder, Rick, if we're going to 460 00:23:13,440 --> 00:23:15,960 Speaker 9: be having to watch the way John Fetterman votes and 461 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:19,119 Speaker 9: the confirmation votes for Trump's nominees. Is he going to 462 00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:21,520 Speaker 9: be the one Democrat potentially that crosses the line on 463 00:23:21,560 --> 00:23:23,960 Speaker 9: some of the more controversial ones. 464 00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:27,320 Speaker 13: I don't know about the more controversial ones, but he 465 00:23:27,440 --> 00:23:31,080 Speaker 13: has said publicly I will vote for Donald Trump confirma 466 00:23:31,320 --> 00:23:36,000 Speaker 13: nominees to be confirmed. And you know the proviso to 467 00:23:36,040 --> 00:23:40,399 Speaker 13: that is obviously, you know, pending background checks and things 468 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:42,399 Speaker 13: like that. But at the end of the day, I 469 00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:45,399 Speaker 13: think he is opening up this session of the Senate 470 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:48,200 Speaker 13: basically saying I'm here to cooperate and get stuff done. 471 00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:52,280 Speaker 13: Tired of the politics of the past, the division, the partisanship, 472 00:23:52,600 --> 00:23:55,639 Speaker 13: and let's get something going on here that can change. 473 00:23:55,680 --> 00:23:55,840 Speaker 8: Now. 474 00:23:55,880 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 13: What I think is really interesting is here's a guy, 475 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:02,480 Speaker 13: John Fetterman, who's going down to Marlago basically preach bipartisanship, 476 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:06,680 Speaker 13: and there is not a clear leader of the Democratic 477 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 13: Party who will be the loyal opposition at this point 478 00:24:10,320 --> 00:24:14,560 Speaker 13: to Donald Trump. I mean, you've just had a presidential campaign, 479 00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:19,359 Speaker 13: and the Democratic Party seems completely without a rudder to say, 480 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:22,399 Speaker 13: we're not for what he's trying to accomplish. And that 481 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 13: is just from a purely political point of view, a 482 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,679 Speaker 13: real missing element to this Democratic Party. 483 00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:33,320 Speaker 2: You know, we talk about bipartisanship a lot around here. 484 00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:37,159 Speaker 2: Jeanie is John Fetterman the smartest politician in Washington. Look 485 00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:38,960 Speaker 2: at this tweet he just put up here with his 486 00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:43,200 Speaker 2: Republican counterpart in the Senate Pennsylvania, David McCormick. He's retweeting 487 00:24:43,280 --> 00:24:48,280 Speaker 2: McCormick here, and he writes, two dudes, two better halves, bipartisanships, 488 00:24:48,320 --> 00:24:52,080 Speaker 2: sixty seven counties, a stronger Pennsylvania. They went out to 489 00:24:52,119 --> 00:24:54,520 Speaker 2: dinner together. I know they're had some diner of something here, 490 00:24:54,680 --> 00:24:57,560 Speaker 2: which really shouldn't take the wives. Jeannie with the wives. Yes, 491 00:24:57,600 --> 00:24:59,639 Speaker 2: look at this, Look at the smiles. Does he have 492 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:00,520 Speaker 2: something figured it out? 493 00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:02,840 Speaker 6: They do? 494 00:25:02,920 --> 00:25:05,520 Speaker 12: And I'm so glad you raised that tweet because again 495 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:09,159 Speaker 12: he got so much flack for going and eating and 496 00:25:09,200 --> 00:25:11,680 Speaker 12: sitting with you know, Dave McCormick and his wife and 497 00:25:11,960 --> 00:25:15,960 Speaker 12: Fetterman and his wife, But I think he is onto something. 498 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:20,800 Speaker 12: The reality is is Pennsylvania is a big, complicated state. 499 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:23,240 Speaker 12: It's a fifty to fifty state, and to Fetterman and 500 00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:27,159 Speaker 12: McCormick's points, they represent the entire state, and so I 501 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:30,720 Speaker 12: think it's incumbent on him to work with Dave McCormick 502 00:25:31,040 --> 00:25:33,560 Speaker 12: and you know, try to do what's best for Pennsylvania 503 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:35,600 Speaker 12: in the country. The other part of this is I 504 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,880 Speaker 12: agree with them on bringing civility back to Washington. We 505 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:43,359 Speaker 12: need people to bring civility back. And a few weeks 506 00:25:43,359 --> 00:25:46,720 Speaker 12: ago Fetterman, I think he was talking on EBC. He said, look, 507 00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:50,280 Speaker 12: I'm not rooting against Donald Trump. I want what's best 508 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,360 Speaker 12: for my state and for the country. And I think 509 00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 12: that's approach. We hope all Americans, and certainly are representatives 510 00:25:57,080 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 12: in Congress take to Rick's point, and it's a good one. 511 00:26:00,160 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 12: Democrats also have to pick and choose their battles, and 512 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,119 Speaker 12: they do need somebody to stand up when Donald Trump 513 00:26:06,240 --> 00:26:09,199 Speaker 12: is doing something or the Republicans are that's against the 514 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:12,080 Speaker 12: interest of the lower middle class and to say so 515 00:26:12,400 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 12: and to you know, represent the opposition. And they're going 516 00:26:15,680 --> 00:26:17,359 Speaker 12: to have to find their way to do that because 517 00:26:17,560 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 12: they don't have a lot of leadership there, although they 518 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,960 Speaker 12: do have Hockem. Jeffries and they have Chuck Schumer. 519 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,199 Speaker 9: Well Joe as Genie talks about civility in Washington. We 520 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:30,159 Speaker 9: arguably saw that on display yesterday when the state funeral 521 00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:32,720 Speaker 9: services for former President Jimmy Carter were held to the 522 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:36,400 Speaker 9: National Cathedral and all five living presidents were an attendant 523 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:41,720 Speaker 9: sitting in pews together, talking, maybe even laughing together in 524 00:26:41,760 --> 00:26:44,920 Speaker 9: the case of Donald Trump and Barack Obama. And Donald 525 00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:47,760 Speaker 9: Trump actually spoke about that interaction last night. 526 00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:52,920 Speaker 14: It did look very friendly. I must say, I didn't 527 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:56,920 Speaker 14: realize it. I didn't realize it how friendly it looks. 528 00:26:57,680 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 14: I saw it on your wonderful network just a little 529 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 14: while ago before I came in, and I said, boy, 530 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:04,800 Speaker 14: they looked like two people that like each other. 531 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 6: And we probably do. 532 00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:09,080 Speaker 14: We have little different philosophies, right. 533 00:27:09,000 --> 00:27:10,399 Speaker 6: But we probably do. 534 00:27:10,920 --> 00:27:12,520 Speaker 14: I don't know. We just got along, but I got 535 00:27:12,520 --> 00:27:16,199 Speaker 14: along with just about everybody and that we you know, 536 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:20,320 Speaker 14: we met backstages, you know, before we went on, and 537 00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:22,040 Speaker 14: I thought it was a beautiful service. 538 00:27:22,080 --> 00:27:24,480 Speaker 6: But we all got along very well, which is good. 539 00:27:25,960 --> 00:27:28,720 Speaker 9: They probably do like each other. Rick Davis, you buy 540 00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:30,239 Speaker 9: that or was this a one day only thing. 541 00:27:31,560 --> 00:27:34,159 Speaker 13: Oh, You're gonna need experts much more capable of than 542 00:27:34,280 --> 00:27:37,320 Speaker 13: I to determine whether or not Barack Obama and Donald 543 00:27:37,359 --> 00:27:40,600 Speaker 13: Trump like each other. That being said, I mean, you know, 544 00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:44,720 Speaker 13: it is a celebration of our institutions when you can 545 00:27:44,800 --> 00:27:47,960 Speaker 13: have these former presidents in a pew together and a 546 00:27:48,000 --> 00:27:51,639 Speaker 13: fight doesn't break out right after an election. Kudos to 547 00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:55,359 Speaker 13: Jimmy Carter for bringing these people all together, and maybe 548 00:27:55,359 --> 00:27:58,359 Speaker 13: that does usher in an era of good feeling. I 549 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:02,280 Speaker 13: mean this point about Fetterman. I mean, up until this election, 550 00:28:02,359 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 13: we only had five states with split delegations in the 551 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:09,000 Speaker 13: United States Senate where there was one Republican and run Democrat. 552 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:13,119 Speaker 13: We live in a hyperpartisan, divided country, and all of 553 00:28:13,119 --> 00:28:15,200 Speaker 13: a sudden we start to see a little movement toward 554 00:28:15,280 --> 00:28:19,680 Speaker 13: the center, even amongst Republicans, you know, which may be 555 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 13: a good reason to have them all down to Florida 556 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:24,640 Speaker 13: for a cold weekend in Washington, that's right. 557 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:27,199 Speaker 2: I don't know Genie your take on this. By the way, 558 00:28:27,280 --> 00:28:29,560 Speaker 2: I'm not sure if there's a stage in the National 559 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:34,880 Speaker 2: Cathedral that would justify a backstage. It wasn't a show. 560 00:28:34,880 --> 00:28:38,200 Speaker 2: It was a funeral yesterday. But nonetheless, I'd love to know, 561 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:40,440 Speaker 2: by the way, what Donald Trump and Mike Pence said 562 00:28:40,480 --> 00:28:41,760 Speaker 2: to each other when they shook hands. 563 00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:43,000 Speaker 3: But what do you think, is. 564 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:45,720 Speaker 2: He getting soft in his age or is this the 565 00:28:45,760 --> 00:28:47,760 Speaker 2: mainstreaming of Donald Trump or what's happening. 566 00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:51,760 Speaker 12: Yeah, I wouldn't say he's getting soft, but you guys know, 567 00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:53,920 Speaker 12: I love the New York Post. Cheers to the New 568 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 12: York Post. And they had a lip reader there, and 569 00:28:56,840 --> 00:29:00,080 Speaker 12: the lip reader had some very interesting things to say 570 00:29:00,080 --> 00:29:03,160 Speaker 12: that Obama and Trump were talking about. Apparently, he said, 571 00:29:03,360 --> 00:29:05,560 Speaker 12: we need to find a quiet place later in the 572 00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:08,840 Speaker 12: day to discuss a matter of importance. So who knows 573 00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:11,200 Speaker 12: what they were discussing. There was sort of speculation it 574 00:29:11,280 --> 00:29:14,360 Speaker 12: was like an international agreement. So you know, remember like 575 00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:16,960 Speaker 12: the liver readers, the body language folks that come on. 576 00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:20,040 Speaker 12: I love that, So who knows what they were discussing. 577 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:22,960 Speaker 12: But you know, the reality is is that there was 578 00:29:23,120 --> 00:29:26,720 Speaker 12: an interaction with Donald Trump to your point, and Mike Pence, 579 00:29:26,760 --> 00:29:30,320 Speaker 12: but Karen Pence not so much, and who can blame her? 580 00:29:30,360 --> 00:29:33,240 Speaker 12: After January sixth, so a lot of intrigue in the 581 00:29:33,280 --> 00:29:35,760 Speaker 12: personal space there and I thought it was fascinating. 582 00:29:36,880 --> 00:29:39,280 Speaker 9: Yeah, no handshake offered by the former second lady. 583 00:29:39,360 --> 00:29:41,200 Speaker 2: Oh that's correct, she was a smile. 584 00:29:41,720 --> 00:29:45,240 Speaker 9: Yeah, not down for that. Yesterday, Jeanie Schanzeno and Rick Davis, 585 00:29:45,280 --> 00:29:48,080 Speaker 9: our signature political panel, thanks as always for joining us. 586 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:49,480 Speaker 9: Of course, they'll be back for more in the late 587 00:29:49,600 --> 00:29:52,200 Speaker 9: edition of Ballads of Power coming up at five pm. 588 00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:54,760 Speaker 9: But before we go, in this early edition, we got 589 00:29:54,800 --> 00:29:58,360 Speaker 9: to talk about TikTok. It was arguments heard at the 590 00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:01,880 Speaker 9: Supreme Court today. I'm seeing the courts necessarily anti ban 591 00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:02,520 Speaker 9: at this point. 592 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:04,640 Speaker 2: Donald Trump may not like the way this works out. 593 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 2: We may not be blocking the talk. We'll find out next. 594 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:09,200 Speaker 2: On Bloomberg. 595 00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:14,440 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 596 00:30:14,520 --> 00:30:17,360 Speaker 1: us live weekdays at noon and five pm. E's durn 597 00:30:17,480 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: on Apple, Cockley and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. 598 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:24,000 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 599 00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:29,240 Speaker 1: flagship New York station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty. 600 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:34,920 Speaker 2: Today is the sentencing of no jail time for Donald Trump. 601 00:30:34,920 --> 00:30:37,160 Speaker 2: This is the hush money case, Kayley, the Stormy Daniels 602 00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:39,360 Speaker 2: case in New York. He had asked the Supreme Court 603 00:30:39,400 --> 00:30:42,120 Speaker 2: to intervene, yep, and no such luck. Even Amy Comb 604 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:44,200 Speaker 2: Barrett took a pass on that. So he was in 605 00:30:44,240 --> 00:30:48,520 Speaker 2: fact in a sentencing hearing virtually and we heard from 606 00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:50,560 Speaker 2: the President elect at least an audio form. 607 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 3: Listen. 608 00:30:51,600 --> 00:30:54,600 Speaker 6: This has been a very terrible experience. 609 00:30:54,640 --> 00:30:57,280 Speaker 14: I think it's been a tremendous setback for New York 610 00:30:57,320 --> 00:30:59,960 Speaker 14: and the New York court system. 611 00:31:00,080 --> 00:31:03,280 Speaker 6: This is a case that Alvin Bragg did not want 612 00:31:03,320 --> 00:31:08,200 Speaker 6: to bring. He thought it was, from what I read 613 00:31:08,280 --> 00:31:14,600 Speaker 6: and from what I hear, inappropriately handled before he got there. 614 00:31:16,320 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 9: But of course the case was brought, it was tried, 615 00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:22,160 Speaker 9: and a jury in New York did find Donald Trump 616 00:31:22,240 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 9: guilty of these thirty four crimes. He was convicted, but, 617 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:30,560 Speaker 9: as Joe mentioned, won't really face punishment for that conviction. 618 00:31:30,680 --> 00:31:34,000 Speaker 9: No jail time, no probation, and unconditional discharge is what 619 00:31:34,120 --> 00:31:36,520 Speaker 9: he received. So for more, let's go to June Grosso, 620 00:31:36,640 --> 00:31:40,040 Speaker 9: host of Bloomberg Law here with us on balance of power. June, 621 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:44,280 Speaker 9: given that this really is not consequence at all, necessarily 622 00:31:44,320 --> 00:31:47,200 Speaker 9: no real punishment here for Donald Trump. What is the 623 00:31:47,240 --> 00:31:50,320 Speaker 9: important thing about this? Is it just that he will 624 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:53,240 Speaker 9: now take the of office ten days from now as 625 00:31:53,280 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 9: a convicted felap. 626 00:31:55,040 --> 00:31:57,200 Speaker 15: Well, I mean that's the main thing on his side, 627 00:31:57,320 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 15: On the judge's side, he said that all the protections 628 00:32:01,440 --> 00:32:05,520 Speaker 15: that a president gets can't erase a jury verdict. So 629 00:32:05,520 --> 00:32:08,160 Speaker 15: I think that was the important thing for the justice system, 630 00:32:08,320 --> 00:32:12,160 Speaker 15: that the jury verdict stands and is honored. Donald Trump 631 00:32:12,600 --> 00:32:14,640 Speaker 15: what he was trying to avoid. He knew that he 632 00:32:14,680 --> 00:32:17,040 Speaker 15: wasn't going to get any prison time, but yet in 633 00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:20,040 Speaker 15: the last few weeks there have been furious legal motions, 634 00:32:20,080 --> 00:32:22,600 Speaker 15: even as you mentioned to the Supreme Court, because he 635 00:32:22,680 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 15: wanted to avoid the stigma of being the only president, 636 00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:31,120 Speaker 15: the only US president in office as a convicted felon, 637 00:32:31,480 --> 00:32:34,080 Speaker 15: And so that was what he was trying to avoid, 638 00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:37,720 Speaker 15: and now that's happened to him. There also is one 639 00:32:37,800 --> 00:32:41,120 Speaker 15: thing is that he won't be able to vote as 640 00:32:41,160 --> 00:32:44,200 Speaker 15: a felon in Florida, although people I've talked to have 641 00:32:44,400 --> 00:32:47,560 Speaker 15: said that they think that the governor will make some 642 00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:51,680 Speaker 15: exceptions for him. 643 00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:54,640 Speaker 2: Well, so we're done here, right, No, we're not. You 644 00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:58,320 Speaker 2: could see a special Council report that may or may 645 00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:01,360 Speaker 2: not be released with regard to this case. Anybody come 646 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:03,600 Speaker 2: back around in four years. Donald Trump is now in 647 00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:03,960 Speaker 2: the clear. 648 00:33:04,280 --> 00:33:07,520 Speaker 15: Well see, and what the Supreme Court said was take 649 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 15: up all your evidentiary issues at appeal, where normally the 650 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:16,080 Speaker 15: normal defendant would get sentenced and appeal and then might 651 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:18,120 Speaker 15: go to the Supreme Court if they had enough money 652 00:33:18,160 --> 00:33:21,160 Speaker 15: to do that. But so now we're going to go 653 00:33:21,240 --> 00:33:23,600 Speaker 15: through with the appeal. He has thirty days to appeal. 654 00:33:23,640 --> 00:33:25,800 Speaker 15: You know he's going to appeal because he's appealed every 655 00:33:25,880 --> 00:33:28,440 Speaker 15: single thing else. And he mentioned that he was going 656 00:33:28,480 --> 00:33:32,360 Speaker 15: to appeal the night before last night. Things have been 657 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:34,600 Speaker 15: happening so fast, I'm trying to keep track. Last night 658 00:33:34,640 --> 00:33:36,800 Speaker 15: at mar A Lago when he made some statements, he 659 00:33:36,880 --> 00:33:39,480 Speaker 15: mentioned that he was going to appeal. And they do 660 00:33:39,560 --> 00:33:42,640 Speaker 15: have some appellate issues based on presidential immunity, so that 661 00:33:42,720 --> 00:33:45,560 Speaker 15: will might take years to get through the court systems, 662 00:33:45,600 --> 00:33:49,240 Speaker 15: and I think we'll end up at the Supreme Court again. 663 00:33:50,040 --> 00:33:55,400 Speaker 9: Still well, busy justices they are, and they certainly were 664 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:58,320 Speaker 9: today June where this morning they heard arguments in the 665 00:33:58,360 --> 00:34:02,240 Speaker 9: TikTok case. It's really mentally a case about national security 666 00:34:02,280 --> 00:34:04,920 Speaker 9: and how it stacks up against the right to free 667 00:34:04,920 --> 00:34:08,200 Speaker 9: speech in the United States. Are reporting and analysis signals 668 00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:10,640 Speaker 9: that the justices do seem open to keeping this band 669 00:34:10,680 --> 00:34:14,439 Speaker 9: that is set to go into effect on January nineteenth, 670 00:34:14,480 --> 00:34:16,880 Speaker 9: allowing it to go into effect. But how did you 671 00:34:16,920 --> 00:34:18,160 Speaker 9: read arguments? 672 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:22,040 Speaker 15: So when you say national security, the courts seem to 673 00:34:22,080 --> 00:34:26,640 Speaker 15: freeze national security. And when a president says something as 674 00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:30,920 Speaker 15: national security a risk, then in Congress does then the 675 00:34:30,960 --> 00:34:33,399 Speaker 15: courts think that that's the most important thing. It has 676 00:34:33,480 --> 00:34:37,680 Speaker 15: precedence over anything else, including it seems like from these 677 00:34:38,000 --> 00:34:41,120 Speaker 15: oral arguments today free speech concerns. And you have to 678 00:34:41,200 --> 00:34:44,880 Speaker 15: remember something, you know, the Congress, no one has really 679 00:34:45,880 --> 00:34:50,200 Speaker 15: sort of set out what are the national security concerns here? 680 00:34:50,320 --> 00:34:54,839 Speaker 15: What has TikTok done that would give pause? You know, 681 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,440 Speaker 15: I mean it's sort of like the nip on steel 682 00:34:57,680 --> 00:35:02,240 Speaker 15: US steel ban where Biden said it's national security concerns, 683 00:35:02,280 --> 00:35:05,800 Speaker 15: but no one says what are those concerns? And apparently 684 00:35:05,840 --> 00:35:08,440 Speaker 15: there is a you know, secret record that Congress has 685 00:35:08,640 --> 00:35:11,400 Speaker 15: only seen, but the public hasn't seen it. And the 686 00:35:11,440 --> 00:35:14,319 Speaker 15: public is going to be very very annoyed a lot 687 00:35:14,360 --> 00:35:17,920 Speaker 15: of the public if that date comes and the ban 688 00:35:18,120 --> 00:35:21,399 Speaker 15: goes into effect. And so from the Supreme Court, one 689 00:35:21,400 --> 00:35:23,840 Speaker 15: thing that they did say, I mean, it was discussed 690 00:35:24,120 --> 00:35:27,240 Speaker 15: could they possibly put this off, give it a stay 691 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:30,480 Speaker 15: of the law until Donald Trump takes office, because he 692 00:35:30,600 --> 00:35:34,960 Speaker 15: filed a brief with the court, not mentioning any constitutional issues, 693 00:35:34,960 --> 00:35:38,040 Speaker 15: but just mentioning his deal prowess and how he'd be 694 00:35:38,080 --> 00:35:40,040 Speaker 15: the only one who'd be able to put this all 695 00:35:40,080 --> 00:35:45,560 Speaker 15: together and solve it. So, you know, that is a possibility. 696 00:35:45,560 --> 00:35:48,480 Speaker 15: Perhaps the court will put it off, but they certainly 697 00:35:48,520 --> 00:35:53,360 Speaker 15: seem to think that the national security concerns overrode everything else, 698 00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:56,600 Speaker 15: and they didn't you know, the lawyers for TikTok and 699 00:35:56,640 --> 00:36:00,320 Speaker 15: the lawyers for the creators of the program on the 700 00:36:00,360 --> 00:36:05,080 Speaker 15: app didn't seem to get much play for their arguments. 701 00:36:05,840 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 2: Jude's good to see you. Thank you so much, June Grosso, 702 00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:10,799 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Law, of course, as we want to add another 703 00:36:10,880 --> 00:36:13,919 Speaker 2: voice of experience to this conversation, Sarah o'lam, Senior fellow 704 00:36:13,960 --> 00:36:17,960 Speaker 2: at the Technology Policy Institute. Sarah, welcome to Bloomberg TV 705 00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:21,360 Speaker 2: and Radio. What do you think here do national security 706 00:36:21,400 --> 00:36:24,800 Speaker 2: concerns override the First Amendment in this case? 707 00:36:26,120 --> 00:36:27,759 Speaker 8: Well, we have to go back and look at the 708 00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:31,040 Speaker 8: law that was passed and signed by President Biden. It 709 00:36:31,080 --> 00:36:33,600 Speaker 8: went through the House, and it passed three hundred and 710 00:36:33,640 --> 00:36:36,440 Speaker 8: sixty votes to fifty eight in March. It passed the 711 00:36:36,480 --> 00:36:40,359 Speaker 8: Senate seventy nine votes to eighteen in April, and then 712 00:36:40,560 --> 00:36:45,040 Speaker 8: it was signed in April twenty fourth, twenty four. So 713 00:36:45,600 --> 00:36:49,520 Speaker 8: you know in the record, Congress is concerned about the 714 00:36:49,560 --> 00:36:55,160 Speaker 8: corporate ownership of TikTok by Bye Dance, and they have 715 00:36:55,239 --> 00:37:00,839 Speaker 8: concerns about the data collection operations and label China as 716 00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:05,040 Speaker 8: a foreign adversary. And so that is the posture that 717 00:37:05,080 --> 00:37:10,160 Speaker 8: we're looking at with this deadline that's coming up January nineteenth. 718 00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:14,799 Speaker 8: What's interesting, though, is that President Trump he started all 719 00:37:14,840 --> 00:37:18,279 Speaker 8: of this with executive orders in twenty nineteen. So this 720 00:37:18,440 --> 00:37:24,239 Speaker 8: conversation about TikTok has been ongoing for five years now. SIPHIUS, 721 00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:27,720 Speaker 8: the Committee on Foreign Investment had a finding in twenty twenty. 722 00:37:28,360 --> 00:37:32,400 Speaker 8: They've been trying to go through risk mitigation and plans 723 00:37:32,440 --> 00:37:36,399 Speaker 8: for monitoring by Oracle, and so there's been a lot 724 00:37:36,440 --> 00:37:40,480 Speaker 8: of back and forth. But really what happened was Congress 725 00:37:40,480 --> 00:37:43,479 Speaker 8: passed the law, the President signed it, and so now 726 00:37:43,520 --> 00:37:46,040 Speaker 8: the Supreme Court is in this position where they're being 727 00:37:46,120 --> 00:37:51,440 Speaker 8: asked to maybe extend the deadline from January nineteenth, or 728 00:37:52,040 --> 00:37:55,399 Speaker 8: as the DOJ asked them to let it go through 729 00:37:55,480 --> 00:37:58,720 Speaker 8: to January nineteenth and see what happens if by Dance 730 00:37:58,760 --> 00:38:00,280 Speaker 8: will divest. 731 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:03,440 Speaker 9: Yeah, and we'll have to wait for a ruling on that, 732 00:38:03,480 --> 00:38:07,040 Speaker 9: which presumably could come any time in the next nine days, 733 00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:10,399 Speaker 9: since that's the deadline we're up against here, Sarah. It 734 00:38:10,440 --> 00:38:12,719 Speaker 9: does seem though, that this really does just come down 735 00:38:12,760 --> 00:38:16,719 Speaker 9: to the question of ownership, specifically that it doesn't necessarily 736 00:38:16,840 --> 00:38:20,400 Speaker 9: matter what is being propagated or posted on TikTok or 737 00:38:20,440 --> 00:38:24,760 Speaker 9: by who. It only matters where ultimately the ownership lies. 738 00:38:24,920 --> 00:38:27,319 Speaker 9: Is that a correct way of reading this, and that's 739 00:38:27,360 --> 00:38:30,480 Speaker 9: the out that Congress gave TikTok right, just change the ownership, 740 00:38:30,520 --> 00:38:32,720 Speaker 9: make sure that it doesn't lead back to China. 741 00:38:33,880 --> 00:38:36,040 Speaker 8: Well, what was really interesting was I listened to the 742 00:38:36,120 --> 00:38:38,600 Speaker 8: oral arguments this morning. They went on from ten am 743 00:38:38,719 --> 00:38:42,759 Speaker 8: to twelve thirty, so right before this time, and it 744 00:38:42,840 --> 00:38:46,600 Speaker 8: was very interesting to hear the nine justices talk with 745 00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:52,000 Speaker 8: the solicitors about these questions. And so they kept trying 746 00:38:52,040 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 8: to separate the content free speech concerns from the ownership concerns. 747 00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:00,439 Speaker 8: But there is a chicken and egg ish you here, 748 00:39:00,680 --> 00:39:05,000 Speaker 8: where you have a corporate parent that is related to 749 00:39:05,920 --> 00:39:11,080 Speaker 8: a nation state that has control over the algorithms that 750 00:39:11,600 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 8: implicate content. There was discussion though about how in the 751 00:39:16,680 --> 00:39:20,640 Speaker 8: law it doesn't seem to end. Congress doesn't seem to 752 00:39:20,719 --> 00:39:25,040 Speaker 8: be concerned about the dance videos, the cat videos, just 753 00:39:25,120 --> 00:39:28,320 Speaker 8: so long as the ownership is by a different type 754 00:39:28,320 --> 00:39:32,120 Speaker 8: of entity. So the justices, you know, they picked apart 755 00:39:32,239 --> 00:39:37,760 Speaker 8: the different arguments, asking hypotheticals, what if this statute didn't 756 00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:39,719 Speaker 8: have anything to do with speech, what if it was 757 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:45,399 Speaker 8: just ownership? And they did address questions of what level 758 00:39:45,400 --> 00:39:48,239 Speaker 8: of scrutiny to apply it by looking at the first 759 00:39:48,239 --> 00:39:51,600 Speaker 8: Amendment questions is it strict scrutiny, is it intermediate scrutiny. 760 00:39:52,120 --> 00:39:55,120 Speaker 8: So what's going to be interesting is to see how 761 00:39:55,200 --> 00:40:00,520 Speaker 8: they decide their place in the separation of powers. So 762 00:40:00,560 --> 00:40:05,239 Speaker 8: they've been asked to come in and even be between 763 00:40:05,840 --> 00:40:09,680 Speaker 8: the future president who will be installed in January twentieth. 764 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:13,080 Speaker 8: And like the reporter before me said, he did file 765 00:40:13,120 --> 00:40:16,240 Speaker 8: an amicus brief in this case asking for a stay, 766 00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:22,600 Speaker 8: saying that the deadline is a bit arbitrary and that 767 00:40:22,880 --> 00:40:26,560 Speaker 8: it happens to be right before the change of administration, 768 00:40:26,800 --> 00:40:29,840 Speaker 8: and so there could be some wiggle room there to say, 769 00:40:30,200 --> 00:40:34,080 Speaker 8: and the statute includes a ninety day extension for certain circumstances, 770 00:40:34,400 --> 00:40:38,320 Speaker 8: so there are some reasons that the court might say, 771 00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:41,600 Speaker 8: you know, we don't want to make an emergency decision here. 772 00:40:41,719 --> 00:40:45,320 Speaker 8: We'll let things sort out by giving an extension of time. 773 00:40:47,760 --> 00:40:50,200 Speaker 2: So that answers my next question, which is be more 774 00:40:50,239 --> 00:40:53,880 Speaker 2: what's more likely an extension on this deadline or an 775 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:56,759 Speaker 2: imminent ruling. The Court's going to need to take some 776 00:40:56,840 --> 00:40:59,520 Speaker 2: more time, right, they have to question, DOJ officials where 777 00:40:59,560 --> 00:41:00,680 Speaker 2: you going to be watching. 778 00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:00,960 Speaker 6: In the day's head? 779 00:41:02,719 --> 00:41:02,919 Speaker 5: Right? 780 00:41:03,120 --> 00:41:07,160 Speaker 8: Well, they did ask questions about can the president not 781 00:41:07,480 --> 00:41:10,560 Speaker 8: enforce the law? And so the president is the one 782 00:41:10,560 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 8: who enforces the deadline. But if it is law, TikTok 783 00:41:17,160 --> 00:41:19,560 Speaker 8: and its partners. So they were saying, all the cloud 784 00:41:19,600 --> 00:41:24,080 Speaker 8: providers and contracted partners, if the law is in effect 785 00:41:24,200 --> 00:41:28,719 Speaker 8: January nineteenth, they can't provide the services that they currently are. 786 00:41:28,880 --> 00:41:34,200 Speaker 8: So you would see a blackout on the app. And 787 00:41:34,280 --> 00:41:40,160 Speaker 8: there was discussion about analogs to broadcast TV and communications law. 788 00:41:40,840 --> 00:41:45,720 Speaker 8: We've seen blackouts for you know, sports and different contracting, 789 00:41:46,200 --> 00:41:49,920 Speaker 8: so it's not unprecedented that there could be a blackout. 790 00:41:50,160 --> 00:41:50,799 Speaker 15: It would be. 791 00:41:52,280 --> 00:41:56,239 Speaker 8: It would make one hundred and seventy million people, you know, confused. 792 00:41:56,920 --> 00:41:58,799 Speaker 8: But this is where we are. 793 00:42:01,160 --> 00:42:04,200 Speaker 9: And just quickly, Sarah, as we're having this conversation around 794 00:42:04,200 --> 00:42:06,400 Speaker 9: free speech and First Amendment rights as it pertains to 795 00:42:06,440 --> 00:42:09,839 Speaker 9: TikTok and obviously goes well beyond that, Meta we learned 796 00:42:09,880 --> 00:42:12,520 Speaker 9: this week is pulling back on fact checking, saying that 797 00:42:12,560 --> 00:42:16,560 Speaker 9: there's kind of a new political reality with this incoming administration. 798 00:42:16,640 --> 00:42:19,880 Speaker 9: How do you think widely across technology, the approach to 799 00:42:19,920 --> 00:42:22,799 Speaker 9: these free speech issues and questions of censorship is going 800 00:42:22,800 --> 00:42:23,959 Speaker 9: to change in the next four years. 801 00:42:25,239 --> 00:42:27,520 Speaker 8: Well, I think it's very interesting that we're in a 802 00:42:27,560 --> 00:42:31,480 Speaker 8: time where user generated content is growing in volume. People 803 00:42:31,520 --> 00:42:34,319 Speaker 8: are used to being able to express themselves. There are 804 00:42:34,760 --> 00:42:38,200 Speaker 8: AI bots that are automated that are pushing out more content, 805 00:42:38,680 --> 00:42:41,520 Speaker 8: and so really this case is a good kind of 806 00:42:41,560 --> 00:42:48,200 Speaker 8: microcosm of where we are in technology. Meta is trying 807 00:42:48,239 --> 00:42:52,279 Speaker 8: to promote more speech on its platform, and there is 808 00:42:52,320 --> 00:42:58,360 Speaker 8: a competition with Chinese companies. So really in the next 809 00:42:58,400 --> 00:43:01,440 Speaker 8: five years or so, you're going to see more competition 810 00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:06,280 Speaker 8: between US companies and Chinese companies. But then there's also 811 00:43:06,360 --> 00:43:10,319 Speaker 8: a lot of like cross commerce, so TikTok wants to 812 00:43:10,360 --> 00:43:14,120 Speaker 8: operate in the US and our companies want to be 813 00:43:14,320 --> 00:43:18,319 Speaker 8: in China, and so there there is that interplay and 814 00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:19,880 Speaker 8: also competition. 815 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:23,719 Speaker 9: And therein lies the rub. Sarah o'lambs, Senior Fellow at 816 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:26,919 Speaker 9: the Technology Policy Institute, joining us on Balance of Power 817 00:43:26,960 --> 00:43:29,439 Speaker 9: here in Bloomberg TV and Radio. Thank you so much. 818 00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:32,160 Speaker 9: I would point out Joe as it's looking not that 819 00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:34,480 Speaker 9: great for TikTok and the Supreme Court Meta is a 820 00:43:34,480 --> 00:43:37,480 Speaker 9: beneficiary of that today on a down day for financial 821 00:43:37,520 --> 00:43:40,239 Speaker 9: markets up three percent in this Friday trade. 822 00:43:40,320 --> 00:43:42,720 Speaker 2: It's about as good as it's looked all session as well. 823 00:43:43,160 --> 00:43:45,399 Speaker 2: This could be good news from Mark Zuckerberg. We'll find 824 00:43:45,400 --> 00:43:48,319 Speaker 2: out that's part of the motivation. So you're write their friends. 825 00:43:48,000 --> 00:43:50,120 Speaker 6: Now again, Yeah, problem. 826 00:43:49,800 --> 00:43:59,280 Speaker 2: Trump, than they're warming up to each other probably. Thanks 827 00:43:59,280 --> 00:44:02,399 Speaker 2: for listening to the Balance of Power podcasts. Make sure 828 00:44:02,440 --> 00:44:05,320 Speaker 2: to subscribe if you haven't already, at Apple, Spotify or 829 00:44:05,360 --> 00:44:08,040 Speaker 2: wherever you get your podcasts, and you can find us 830 00:44:08,080 --> 00:44:11,640 Speaker 2: live every weekday from Washington, DC at noontime Eastern at 831 00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:12,880 Speaker 2: Bloomberg dot com.