WEBVTT - Voternomics: How the Left Lost Its Way in Europe

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to another Voter Nomics where politics and markets collide.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>This year, voters around the world have the ability to

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>turn markets, countries and economies like never before, so we've

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>created this series to help you make sense of it all.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephanie Flanders.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I made Frim Wildridge, and I'm Alegristratgy and on this

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 3>episode we thought we would take a closer look at

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>the rise of right wing populism in Europe and we

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>have obviously had our own variety of that on show

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>at the start of this week with the release of

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the Reform Party's contract not manifesto with the UK, but

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Nigel Faraj has spoken about wanting to be prime Minister

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>after the next election.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>George of Maloney is already Prime Minister of Italy and

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>she was on show this weekend hosting her counterparts at

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 2>the g seventh summit in Pulia, and it was pretty

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>evident that she was the only leader with a spring

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>in her step and a favorable poll rating, so we

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 2>wanted to hear about the secrets of her success and

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the lessons for mainstream and maybe also less mainstream conservative

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>parties in the UK from one of her fans, Francesco Jubilee,

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the president of the leading Italian conservative foundation, Fondatzioni Tartarella.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 2>He's also the author of the History of European conservative thought.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And then we're going to hear a completely different perspective

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 2>from Janis Fara Facis, who of course you will know

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>as the former Finance Minister of Greece, motorbike owner and

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>author of several international best selling books, including recently Techno

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Feudalism What Killed Capitalism. So, Adrian Alegre, it does feel

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>like a week to be thinking about the rise of

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the right in Europe. We can see also in this

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>election that Macrants called in France, obviously a big focus

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>on Marine Le Penn's Class Envelementale party formerly the National Front.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to understand it, but I also want to

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>think about lessons, as I said, for everybody in the UK.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. One of the.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Striking things about the writers that these are nationalist movements

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 5>and the things that they hate most of all are

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>the sort of the global devils, elites, and yet in

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 5>some ways they are in themselves international. They learn from

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 5>each other, they imitate each other, And I was just

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>thinking of Farage who has launched his contract this morning

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 5>contract with you, and that's directly taken from New Gingrich.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, we don't have that in British politics. We

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 5>have manifestos. You know, Peel launched the whole thing with

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 5>the Tom Tamworth manifesto. Now we have somebody using the

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 5>language of a contractarian society like the United States. And

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, his own political party is really a political party.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 5>It's a private company which treats him as a star,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 5>not as a party leader, but as a star with

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 5>lots and lots of followers, which is exactly the politics

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 5>that you see with Trump, but also with a lot

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>of European populist leaders. So it's a strange mixture of

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 5>nationalism and internationalism that we're seeing.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But Adrian he's leading a revolt, you know, he's making

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a play of that. Isn't He's not a manifesto because

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>that would be too vanilla, wouldn't that?

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I suppose so. But they're all in some sense

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 5>leading revolts. But in a lot of Europe now they're

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 5>moving from being a party of revolt to being a

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 5>party of government. And you see that with the French

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 5>in particular.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And This is what I think is interesting because although

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they are all considered themselves to be in the same

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>family to some extent, although actually recently none of them

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>have got on very well with the alternative. For Deutschlan

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes Party, he's considered to be beyond the pale, even

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>in far right circles. But I think Georgia Maloney's leadership

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>her time in government has been very interesting in the

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>way that she's been willing to compromise, willing to have

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>very mainstream views and policies on Ukraine on quite a

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of economic things, and I thought it was very

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>striking these statements that nobody really cares about except the

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>people drafting them. But they have this communic case from

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the G seven, and the only disagreement of all the

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>things they'd agreed on this very important package for Ukraine

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 2>and other things, was around the restatement of support for

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>reproductive rights and safe and legal abortion from last year's communicate,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And I thought it was interesting that the one thing

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>she was actually sort of playing ball and to all

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>intentsive purposes being a mainstream leader when it came to

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 2>many of these important European issues, But on that core

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>cultural ground she still had to mark out a more

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>traditional and more in some ways it was more to

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>her base.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely well. We tend to talk about the far rights

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 5>and the right, but there are very important in terms divisions.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 5>There's a division between the pro pro Putin people and

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 5>the anti Puotin people, and there's a division over sort

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 5>of responsible economic policy as well, and I think probably

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 5>some fundamental cultural divisions. If you look at the far

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 5>right in the Netherlands, for example, it's very pro gay

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 5>rights because it's basic critique.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>But in some ways this is a topsy turvy conversation

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because actually if you look at Maloney and her international allies,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you would say Ishi Sunac, you know, is her intellectual bedfellow, because.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 5>They do seem to get on quite well.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And her and her Albania plan, which looks like some

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>European politicians are falling behind, which is, you know, the

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of having the immigrants processed off shore is partly

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>inspired by Rwanda. So there's a kind of topsy turviness

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, her mate, Rishi Sunac, he was doing

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so badly in the opinion polls, potentially is leaving government.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>But actually some of the ideas he's espoused in government

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are those in the ascendant.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>That shows again, I mean it's immigration as this absolutely

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>core driving force for some of this. But there has

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>been a question about whether Kiss Darmer will have anyone

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk to at these summits. He will be the

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>exception if we see all of these sort of mainstream

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>centrists and right leaders go in the next few years.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 5>That's the other topsy turbinus that Britain is completely out

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 5>of sync with Europe and may well be out of

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 5>sync with the United States as well. We may be

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the one surviving area for liberal Democrats to look at.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>What Kiss Darmer's foreign affairs spokesperson David Lammy is saying,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, regarding Trump, you know and others you know,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they are they are cognizant that they are going to

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have to work with everybody.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Lammi is somewhat changed his tune on Trump.

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I think well, I suspect. I think I have a

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>feeling partly from looking at our outlines for future weeks.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll be getting on incoming incoming days. So

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>we should move to our conversation with Francisco Jubile, the

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>president of the Italian Conservative Foundation Fondazioni Tartarella. Francesca, thank

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining us. We are fascinated looking

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>at Georgia Moloni at the recent g seventh summit and

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously in previous months, really comfortable in her position as

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister of Italy and successful both domestically, and it

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>seems at these international summits. So I guess the obvious

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>question is what's the secret of her success?

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that Georgia Meloni is becoming here by here

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 4>an important leader not only for Italy, not only for

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 4>our country, and not only for the Italian conservative right,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 4>but also for the European Lensks, especially after the result

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of the European elections, because we saw that the result

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 4>of the President of.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 6>France, Emanuel Macron was not a good result.

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>In fact, the result of Simble More National and Marie

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 4>lepen was quite good, and the same is for all

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 4>of Schortz, the leader of Germany. And in the case

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>of Italy, Georgia Meloney had a really important result, not

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 4>only as the leader of Fertality Italian, the main Italian

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 4>center right party, but also for all the Italian government.

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 4>And after that we are entering in a new phase

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>for the European Union right now there are some important

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 4>discussion for the president of the European Commission and the

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Georgia Meronic can play an important role as Prime Minister

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of Italy, but also as the president of the.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 6>E CR and the leader of the main Itally party.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess one thing we should sort of understand is

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>whether we're even describing her in the right way. You know,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 2>we talk about far right, and when she came to power,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>we were very focused on her origins. But I wonder

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 2>whether she represents something different that's not a traditional kind

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>of conservatism or certainly traditional far right.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is quite an important point. Usually when someone

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 4>especially abroad, but not only abroad, sometimes also in our country,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 4>want to describe or sometimes attack Georgia Miloney or in

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 4>general some politicians that are part of the Italian right,

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 4>they describe them as a neo fascist or some people

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>that are linked with some fascist idea, and I think

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 4>this is not correct and this is not the correct

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 4>way to try to understand what is happening in our country.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 4>The truth is that the right that is represented by

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Georgia Meloni is a conservative right. When I use the

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 4>word conservative is quite important to make an extinction between

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the Latin conservatism and the Italian conservatism and the American

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 4>and English conservatism, because there are some important difference, for example,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 4>on the economic issues. Our conservatism is more focused on

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 4>welfare state, for example, and the British and the American

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 4>conservatism is more focused, for example, on some classical liberals ideas.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 4>So there are some difference, of course, but in general,

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>the correct way to try to understand the why George

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Meloni is becoming so important and so voted in our

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 4>country is because she's trying also to talk with the

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 4>lower class.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 6>That in the past voted for the left. But right now,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 6>if we saw also the result in the main city,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 6>for example, in the city center of Roma, or the

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 6>people vote for the left. If we we go to.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 4>For example, some difficult areas of the of Roma, we

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 4>see that in this part of the city the people

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 4>decide to vote.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 6>For for Formeloni, and this is quite interesting.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think that it's important to try to analyze

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 4>in a deeper way what is the success of JN.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 6>Maloney.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much of following British politics, but

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>who would you put Georgia Maloney closer to Brittie Sunac,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 1>who's obviously a friend of hers, or Nigel Farah, she

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>leads the Reform Party.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I think definitely that she's closer to the Conservative Party,

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>the Tories, and to Sunak then to Farajef. There are

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 4>many points in common between Miloni and the Sunaco or

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 4>in general Miloni and the Conservative Party. But how I

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>say to you before, there are also some difference because

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 4>of course, to be conservative in Italy is different than

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>being a conservative in the UK, because our conservatism is

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>quite link for example, with the Catholic traditions. So when

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 4>we talk about the ethic themes, for example, in our

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 4>conservatism is quite close with the vision of the Catholic Church,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 4>and this is a big difference with the Tories. But

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 4>in the same time, when we talk about Parage, I

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 4>think in Italy we use a word there is not

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 4>a translation in English. The word is Soverignismo, is meaning

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 4>probably national populism or something like that. And when we

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 4>talk about Farage we can talk more than a conservative leader.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>We can talk about a national populist leader. So I

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 4>think that Menoni is definitely closer to the Conservative Party.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 5>You talked about her ability to reach beyond the sort

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 5>of metropolitan elites who live in the middle of Romee

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 5>two ordinary people. How can she do that? What are

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 5>the things that bind the conservative leadership to the working

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 5>class voter.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 4>In the bigger city or in the city center of

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>the bigger city, and the people vote for the left

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 4>or the center or left. When we go to the

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 4>neighborhood that are more close to some problems, for example

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 4>with the security, with the migration, the people decided to

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 4>vote for some a conservative party, and the same is

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 4>for example in some smaller city in our country, people

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 4>decided to prefer and to vote for Georgia Maloney and

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 4>to vote for the center right a coalition because they

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 4>feel that the answers that Georgia Maloney give for example

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 4>with the migration problem, for example, on economic issues, for example,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 4>on the European Union issues.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 6>There is a big debate in our country about.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 4>The green police made by the European Union, especially for

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 4>the decision to stop in the engine motors in two

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 4>thousand and thirty five, and because of that the people

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 4>decide to vote for gentlemen only because also the lower

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 4>class think that the answers that the Conservatives and the

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 4>right gave to their problem.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 6>Right now is closer to them than.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 5>The left, So liberalism is becoming an elite project. It's

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 5>captured by the rich.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 6>I make you an example. I live in Roma.

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Roma is probably the bigger capital in the European Union

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 4>or in European general, with the worst public transportation because

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately the underground in Rome is not working as well.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 4>And every time that they are trying to do some

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 4>new projects, they discover some ancient Roman ruins, so it's

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>quite difficult to build a bigger underground. And in Roma

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 4>there is a left. This measure, and the idea of

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the measure was to create a bigger zone in which

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the car couldn't hunterer and this of course creates some

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 4>problem not to the rich people which lived in the

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 4>center of the city and they can move walking or

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>by taxi or by scooter, but this creates some big

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 4>problem for the poor people which live in some area

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 4>not near the city center, and they must take their

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 4>car to go to work, and of course they are

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 4>angry against the measure because of that.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting that there's a similar kind of issue

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>in the UK around twenty miles per hour limits, which

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>is a popular campaigning force for many in our election Francisco.

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Where does this end?

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Because is that the question? So where does this end?

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>In that Georgie Maloney looks like her deficit has gone

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up to seven point two percent.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 2>You'll correct me if I'm wrong.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So you you've very lucidly outlined how pro welfare spending

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>she is, and that's clearly important to her coalition of voters.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Can she afford to keep on being ultra popular?

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 6>You mean about economy or you mean in general economy?

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, under the procedures, you know, the fiscal rules for

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the European Union, they could well have to do. She

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>should could have to do some very tough things which

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>in the past have overturned Italian governments on a very

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>regular basis.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>This is quite an important point. I mean, our economy

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 4>is a good economy. We have the third economy of

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 4>European Union. We have a private incomes that is quite good.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Most of the Italians they own their house. We have

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 4>quite a strong bank system. So our economy is a

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 4>good economy. But our private economy is economy. Our problem

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 4>is the public economy.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 6>And when we.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Talk about the public economy, we talk about the state

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 4>which have a really hiked the public debt, and the

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 4>problem of our public debt is that the people, the

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Italians and also the politician think about our public debuta

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 4>as something that is of no one. In reality, the

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 4>public debt is a debt of everyone. The bigger problem

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 4>of our country compared to the high debty, is the

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 4>lower the possibility of growth of our economy. If we

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 4>we do in a comparasion between a high public debt

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 4>and the low growth of our economy, this can create

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>some problem. But I have to say this is not

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 4>a problem of Meloni. This is the problem of everyone, which.

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We leave with respect. Though it's going to be her problem.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, will that mark the end of her honeymoon

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>with the voters when she actually has to make the

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>same tough decisions about this to manage this big stock

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of debt that every government in Italy has had to

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>deal with for the last twenty or thirty years, and

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>has actually managed to, you know, just about prevent from

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 2>spiraling out of control. Has stepped back from the BIS

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>quite a few times, each time by making very tough

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 2>decisions that she has sofa been quite reluctant to make.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think that luckily the most the toughest decisions

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 4>were made ten years ago, especially in twenty eleven after

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Monty government. It was a technical government and he made

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 4>many tough decisions. So right now the public debty is

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 4>really height but it's more or less under control. Of course,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>the COVID period didn't help us and didn't help everyone.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 4>So I think that Meloney she knows and she understands

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 4>that she doesn't have the opportunity of doing many economic

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 4>measures that are really in fervor in helping the in

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the Italians, for example, cut the taxation.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 6>But if she she.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Won't, for example, introduced new taxation, this can be something

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 4>good for example, and I think that she will manage

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 4>in Hinita and the economy is of course quite an

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 4>important issue, but there are other issues that are important

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 4>for the Italian electorate. For example, the migrant crisis is

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the topic that is quite important, especially in the south,

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>in the south of Italy foreign politics, and I think

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>that Menoni is managed quite well on this topic. And

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 4>of course she also has to manage in the European

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Union contest, where also the economic situation of Germany, that

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>is the main economy of European Union, is becoming world

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 4>compared to three years ago.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Francisco to Bila. I'll be very interested to see her

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>next few budgets, how she manages to square the circle.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime, and then we'll have you back.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime, thank you very much for joining us.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, it was a pleasure.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 2>And now, as they say, for something completely different. Janasparafukis

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Greece's Finance minister for six months in twenty fifteen, negotiating

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>on behalf of the Greek government during the Greek debt crisis,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 2>who has also been secretary general of the Democracy in

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Europe Movement twenty twenty five, a left wing pan European

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>political party he co founded in twenty sixteen. Janisparafuck is

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 2>very good to have you physically in the studio. Thanks

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 2>for joining us on Vota Nomics.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 7>It's a great pleasure.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 2>We've got lots of things to talk to you about,

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>but we are focusing on this program on the rise

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of the populist right in Europe. I guess you know.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>One obvious question is why he is right wing populism

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 2>so much more successful than left wing populism at the moment.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 7>Because it's authentic. I don't believe you can be left

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 7>wing and the populist, because my definition of populism, whoor

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 7>anderstand populism is to be all things to all people,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 7>make ausers of promises and then jump on a soapbox

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 7>and being jingoistic and call upon people to trust you

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 7>to make things great again and dot dot I won't

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 7>go on, but that if you do that, then you're

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 7>not the left winger in my view, You're not a humanist,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 7>you're not facing the truth, and you use up the

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 7>people's vote against the people. So this is a kind

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 7>of contest I have with other leftists would disagree with me.

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 7>The two words left and popularism, you put them together,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 7>you end up with an incongruity. And so you know,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 7>when the left tries populism, it becomes ridiculous. When the

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 7>right become populist and become fascist, and they are very

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 7>successful as we have seen during the Middle War period

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 7>the left, and that of course is the end of

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 7>the left when the left, the.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Left are too honest to be populists.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 7>The left should be honest and therefore should avoid populism

0:21:58.880 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 7>in its pursuit of.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Popular With the populist approach, even by your definition, we

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>have parties that are offering a lot to all people,

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly working people, who feel they've been left out, excluded

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 2>from the direction that modern economies have gone. If what's

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>being promised by your description is not possible or not

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 2>possible without a lot of other difficult sacrifices, does that

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>mean you think these these leaders are going to eventually

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>come to grips, have to sort of face reality and

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 2>become a cropper. Where do you see this going? Because

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 2>they had doing very well with the brand of populism

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that we've been hearing.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 7>This is a brilliant question. I think it all depends

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 7>on how many levers they have access to. So compare

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 7>and contrast Georgia Mloney with Victor Roban. Because Allban is

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 7>not in the Europe, he has more leavers to pull,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 7>so he troubled the minimum wage. He did was also

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 7>lilily did. In other words, he looked after the working class.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 7>But it was a fasting bargain in the sense that

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 7>I will look after you. You keep your mouth shut authoritarianism,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 7>You make me great again, so that I make Hungary

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 7>great again. We turn against the foreigners, the Jews, the Muslims,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 7>at them the other It doesn't matter, so he had

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 7>more degrees with him to do that. Georgie Milan doesn't

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 7>because she's in the Euros. She has an unsustainable public debt,

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 7>she has a banking system which is ricketty, So she

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 7>simply follows Maria Dragi's policies, no difference to married Drage

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 7>with weaponized misanthropy when it comes to migrants, foreigners, lesbian's, gays,

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 7>you know, Walke and all that. But her days are

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 7>numbered as a populist, as a right wing neo fascist populist,

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 7>because she doesn't have the livers. She cannot look after

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 7>the people the way that she's been promising them. If

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 7>anything she's doing, you know, taking away protections that have

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 7>been there from the previous governments.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Well days might be numbered as representing a far right

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>populist position, but as as a different kind of right

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>wing but sort of normalized leaders could have.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 7>Quite yes, if he becomes a Bolusconi, who is somebody

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 7>on the center left who again is misogynist, racist and

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 7>so on. So a little bit of Trump, but with

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 7>Mario drag economics new liberal economics. The mi great fear

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 7>is that we are now seeing in Europe because of

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 7>a fragmentation of the European Union, the single market, the

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 7>politics this European Union parliament is is going to be

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 7>completely incapable of effectively exercising any parliamentary process. My fear

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 7>is that you're going to have a right wing, neo

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 7>fascist populist right that manages to ditch austerity, to ditch

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 7>the new liberal agenda, completely, erect new borders, erect new tariffs,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 7>and you know, channel a lot of money into armaments,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 7>which may have an economy impact, but the most important

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 7>impact will be the coalescence with nationalism, and that could

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 7>be successful, and if that happens, Europe is simply not

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 7>going to be a place that will want to live in.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Is a key potential part of this the French election,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 2>because if you look at Marine Le penn currently they

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 2>do have a very old collection of policies, but very

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>leftist economic policies.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 7>The don't call fascism leftism.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at her economic policies.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 7>That's also Leni was a socialist and then he became

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 7>a fascist. And what was the deal I will protect

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 7>you introduced the first pension system in continental Europe, universal one.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 7>He increased wages and then he clamped down on trade unions,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 7>he climbed down a democratic processes and effectively started the

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 7>process that led to the Second World War together with

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 7>his friend Hitler. I call this fascist. This is the definition.

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about the significance of the French election?

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where does that? Where does where does that

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>fit into the kind of that darker vision that you

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>just painted.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, let's let me try to lighten up the mood.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 7>I hope, I hope that Macron's strategy, even though I'm

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 7>completely opposed to everything he's been doing in the last

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 7>few years, but I hope his strategy of bringing him

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 7>bringing them into essentially government through cohabitation. He's trying to

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 7>do what Shirak did with Spend, what Mitterrand did with Iraq,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 7>effectingly to defunct them by making them less popular through

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 7>allowing them to occupy ministries. How that works, but I

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 7>feel it might not. I'm very worried that they may

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 7>actually succeed because, let's face it, the finance, the public

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 7>fire answers for France, just like Italy is and the

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 7>public finances of Germany for that matter, are not consistent

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 7>with the fiscal rules. So something we'll have to give

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Now if Bardella together with le Pen with the collapse of.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 2>His young the young leader, he might be the prime minister.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Who's my nightmare personally, because under the two Lapins, at

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 7>least they were not that palatable to the young. Now

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 7>this is a guy who is quite photogenic, he has

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 7>style quality, he's young, he comes from a working class area,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 7>he speaks well. He doesn't look like a fascist, even

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 7>though he is. That's why he's my nightmare, because he's

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 7>affect You.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 5>Mentioned the young. One of the striking things about right

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 5>wing thought or right wing movements on the continent rather

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 5>than in Britain, is how popular they are with younger

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 5>people and how they're able to attract quite as you say,

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 5>photogenic and dynamic young politicians. Why is that because with

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 5>the left failed.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 7>This is the fault of the left. Let's face it.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 7>The worst thing that can happen to democracy is to

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 7>have fascist presenting the anti systemic trend. Twenty fifteen, we

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 7>get elected on an anti austerity program. I personally had

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 7>proposals for the IMF and the European Center blank, which

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 7>I thought were very sensible in terms of dead swaps

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 7>and nothing very radical, together with an anti asterity program,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 7>and we said that we will be elected and we

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 7>will not budge. We are not getting taken other credit card,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 7>other conditions that are completely financially unsustainable, and you don't

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 7>have to be left to agree with that. And we buckled.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 7>And then our own government after I left, I have

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 7>to say that, but who cares about me? Our own

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 7>government practiced the worst kind of a stity, the worst

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 7>kind of over taxing small business, everyone in a as

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 7>if in a part of a plan to make the

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 7>place unviable. And then then is the domino effect, because

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 7>the left wing in Spain po Demos collapse as a

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 7>result of not wanting to be you know, cities are

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 7>number two the linking. In Germany, the French left collapses,

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 7>and what is left the populist right, which I call

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 7>neo fascists, being the only ones that are out there

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 7>suggesting something different. I mean, whether you're here in Britain

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 7>today with Suna and Starma, or whether you are looking

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 7>at the policies of the ESPEE, all of Shults and Merge,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 7>the differences between them are tiny. And it's not as

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 7>if Europe is flourishing. Europe has had a fifteen year

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 7>dearth of investment. That's why we're following behind the Chinese.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 7>We have not invested in modern technologies, any kind of

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 7>modern technology for fifteen to twenty years in Europe. So

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 7>this discontent. Who is going to pick up up the

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 7>votes from that discontent? The only anti systemic forces we

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 7>of the left have gone to ground. We try to

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 7>bend over backwards to accommodate the new liberal policies. I

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 7>remember telling Shoubler once, I said, look, I know you

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 7>don't like seeing me in front of you, because.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>If the German finance minister.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, because you know I'm a lefty, but you know

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 7>what we're europeanis and we're Democrats, and if you squash

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 7>the living daylights out of our people, you know, to

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 7>get rid of us, you're going to end up with

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 7>fascists on the other side of the table. And I

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 7>think that was right.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But kase Armer is of the left.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He's very close.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 7>This is what I want, which I find preposterous.

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Right, Ok, he's not of the left.

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 7>That's all a bad thing. I mean, I'm not there

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 7>to tell it that. You know, believe that everybody should

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 7>be from the left, But I just don't agree that

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 7>he's from the left.

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, that's clear. Let's look at immigration where

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 1>he is trying to forge another path where he's saying

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's not going to renew freedom of movement and

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so on, but he is saying that they will negotiate

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>returns agreements with the continent. What is We've heard from

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>another guest earlier in the program, and you've threaded through

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>everything you've said, this kind of immigration seems to be

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus for some of the rise of these parties.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What would be the other way to deal with the

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>worries about immigration that so many electorates around Europe are

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly feeling.

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 7>How about ditching a racism light because this is what

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 7>Kirstarmy is doing. Personally, I don't know here. Personally, I

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 7>suspect he and I would agree on immigration being a

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 7>blessing not a curse. Europe is getting old. For a

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 7>thousand years, we've been populating the rest of the earth.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 7>We've been migrating everywhere, sometimes with guns and you know,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 7>white settlers. So suddenly we have a problem with immigration.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 7>What has happened is that demographics have changed. We're getting

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 7>all people are coming towards US, and that should have

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 7>been fine if we had a migration policy. Kirstama, however,

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 7>being a relatively spineless politician, is not going to stand

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 7>up to the parajes and to the sonic sent to

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 7>the braver Mans and say, you know what, we need

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 7>immigration and we're going to create a policy which is

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 7>simultaneously financial in the economically viable and humane and consistent

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 7>with international law. He's not saying that, so he's trying

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 7>to what happened, just like a steadicy light.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Play that back though. I mean, one of the things

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you just argued was if you don't give a key

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 2>chunk of the electorate something at the table, if you

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 2>force austerity down their throats, then you're going to get

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>something worse down the road. I mean, you could make

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same argument about keeping immigration off the agenda

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 2>for many years as sort of a coalition of the

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>right and left mainstream across Europe, not just the UK.

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 2>If you don't let people have a view or even

0:32:56.080 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>discuss the scale the direction of immigration, you end up

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>with something worse. And if you're a Democrat, you have

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to accept that there are people who feel that people

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>don't feel the same way they see the economic benefit.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they may also see it as an economic cost

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to them if it affects if it pushes down their wages.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>But they also see a cultural consequence which many people

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>are uncomfortable with.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 5>There must be a differential economic impact of immigration as well,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 5>doesn't it. It's poorer people and benefit in many ways

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 5>richer people.

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 7>Of course if you practice astadity, lots of people in

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 7>But let me ask you a question, because because I

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 7>think you're perfectly right, I don't believe in keeping important

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 7>issues like this off the table. I believing in a

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 7>vigorous debate.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>But to engage in that conversation you're actually saying is racism?

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 7>Like no, no, not at all.

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Well that is what I think. That's what the lidbody

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 2>would say. They're part of the conversation.

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 7>No, I don't think it's engaging with the conversation when

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 7>they effectively say that we will manage to find a

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 7>way of limiting immigration which is more efficient than the

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 7>Tories if you really want to engage. And here's I'm

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 7>coming to your question too. Look, I remember I was

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 7>in Doncaster during the Brexit campaign. I was campaigning against Brexit.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 7>As somebody who is not really a narmor of the

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 7>U confusing people. And I remember there was you know,

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 7>there was this wonderful older woman who came to me

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 7>and said, Yannis, she wanted to engage in it's custo

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 7>about immigration. As you say, I am not a racist

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 7>im internationalism. I left Winger. But you know, my building

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 7>is now full of Romanian boys who live for in

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 7>one room and they can afford because there are four

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 7>boys to bid runts up and we cannot afford to

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 7>compete with them. And then I asked her question. I said,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 7>so tell me the story of this building. It used

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 7>to be a council house. It was sold off to

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 7>the private sector. So the problem is not the Romanian boys,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 7>is that these councilor houses were sold. Now they're part

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 7>of a rent maximizing a reenteer frenzy, and council houses

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 7>have not been built to replace the old stock of

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 7>council house. So if you really want as a labor party,

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 7>as a progressive, to engage with people, you have to

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 7>take very seriously what this woman said about the fact

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 7>that now she has a building full of Romanian boys,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 7>which actually she actually liked, so she was not even

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 7>a racist to call her a racist is just preposterous.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 7>It's a totally unacceptable It's like Hillary Clinton calling Trump's

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 7>supporters deplorables. No, you have to engage and you have

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 7>to explain that, you know what, that was a mistake.

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 7>Now we need to build, you know, council housing. The

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 7>solution is not to get rid of the Romanians. This

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 7>is going to make Doncaster even poorer and center. That

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 7>is the kind of debate I would like to see

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 7>the Labor Party engage in.

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 5>The Labor Party would claim that it is in favor

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 5>of activist government. It's going to have a national energy

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 5>company that it's going to have a national investment scheme

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 5>that is going to be much more and.

0:35:58.120 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Have a big expansion in a hay building.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, money come from nothing there.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Do you think there's nothing there from the Labor Party

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 5>that's intentions?

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 7>But you know how many comments? So I read stuff.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 7>I have this bad habit and I read very carefully

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 7>both the manifesto of the twenty twenty four manifesto and

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 7>what instead of fiscal studies said, And what I see

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 7>is a steadity baked in. I don't see the money

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 7>coming in anywhere. They're going to have to affect cuts,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 7>and they will affect cuts that are brutal in areas

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 7>that will be very helpful to the most to the

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 7>weakest of people.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>What should the left be learning from the last few

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 2>years in Europe and particularly when you look at, say,

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 2>for example, the European elections.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 7>My nightmare is that because we have messed up with

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 7>the left, have messed up that now the coalescence between

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 7>the most rabbit and Australian and trumpest aspects or segments

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 7>of the old Tory Party in this country, but also

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 7>in France, in German and so we will go into bed

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 7>with any of Ussists and with the Left are irrelevant

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 7>because we've been tried, We've been tested, and we failed

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 7>our tests. And we are ourselves recoiling into identity politics,

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 7>into fighting one another as to how do you define

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 7>a woman? Which is a very interesting philosophical topic. But

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 7>the fascists love it when we recoil in that manner

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 7>into identity politics. That is my nightmare. So the one

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 7>thing I'm trying to do as a Left is to

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 7>dem to divide a democracy Urope. Moving across Europe. You know,

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 7>we have a small, small movement, but we are held

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 7>a little bit in influential amongst the left. Is to

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 7>ask the big questions again, you know, how do you

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 7>combine combine investment with social policies, how do you break

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 7>down that alliance between austerelity and and racism and hatred

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 7>of the other, of the foreigner. What do we do

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 7>about Europe turning into a war union? With the idiotic

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 7>concept that since the Green Deal failed, we are gained

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 7>now to develop through spending on arms and developing a

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 7>military industrial complex in Europe, which we never will. But

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, we need to tackle these things. We need

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 7>to take a break, be self critical, and as you

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 7>said before.

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you're going to get a break at least

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in many parts of Europe.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 7>We are already having a break. But we must not

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 7>go into self referential you know, identity politics becoming irrelevant

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 7>with glee.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 7>Well, thank you.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So that was That's quite a lot.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 5>Of meat, definitely outspoken and some very interesting analysis. Not

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 5>my politics, but some of the analysis I think holds

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 5>true whatever your politics are.

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the idea that the left is going to be

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 2>almost sort of bringing its hands on the sidelines for

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>quite a long time and somewhat irrelevant certainly in Europe.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Question mark about the UK because it depends who you

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 2>consider to be left.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>But it's complicated if you think about the last election,

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen election where Jeremy Corbyn's manifesto did very well.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So actually lots of this is twenty nineteen.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, no, everything Well, there was that point about

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the individual policies in it were individually popular, but labeling

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>it labor and saying you were going to do it

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>all together was not a credible propositions along with Corbyn.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the complexities about and you say that,

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you heard it a little bit with Francesco around Actually

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, her politics is grounded in what appeals to

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the lower class and so on. I hate the phrase

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lower class, but he used it, so we have to

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>use it the less well off. That plus twenty nineteen

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn's manifesto doing quite well, and then also a little

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bit further back than that, but actually some of the

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Theresa May manifesto was not a million miles away from

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it either in terms of you know, have to reach

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>out and appeal to the people who feel they've been

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>left behind by globalization.

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Well and That's why I think it's going to be

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 2>this key question about how do these sort of these

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>outside forces far right, however you describe them, when they're

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in government, how do they govern? Do they, as he claims,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>end up or at least as he fears, end up

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 2>going down a profoundly kind of authoritarian even anti European

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Union sort of divisive road, or as looked a bit

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 2>what Georgia Maloney has been doing, do they more become

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a different face of the right, saying things that we

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily agree with on cultural issues, but fundamentally not

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>challenging the fundamental the institutions of Europe.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 5>The fundamental problem is that centrist liberalism has become a

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 5>philosophy of the elites, of the ruling classes of people

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 5>who are doing quite well out of globalization, has quite

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 5>well out of the status quo. And if that's the case,

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 5>you find it very very difficult to win elections, if

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 5>not impossible. So liberalism, centrist liberalism, which I think everybody

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 5>in this room would subscribe to, needs to find a

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 5>way of reconnecting with poorer people. The best way, of course,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 5>is to improve the economy, raised productivity, show that you

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 5>can actually get richer. But I think it also needs

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.879
<v Speaker 5>to be done on certain cultural issues, on the issue

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 5>of nationalism versus globalism and things like that. And personally

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 5>I believe in terms of taking back control of immigration.

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm trying to find reasons to make

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Joannis Farafut focus feel less bad. But I think the

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>other thing I think we have learned from recent politics

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is that things might look, you know, for a particular

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of the political spectrum or the one, and they

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>flip very quickly. And it's the volatility and the fact

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that trends are coming. You know, everything is shortened and

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>trends come and go so quickly.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't that long ago to die. And perhaps you

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 5>were writing articles about why is it that the Conservatives

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 5>are the most powerful and successful party in human history?

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 2>But that the thing, the longer you're in power, the

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 2>more likely you're going to be destroyed. Reached a very

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 2>sticky conclusion. All right, Well, I feel like we had

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 2>something of a seminar on European political thoughts this week.

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Who knows what we'll do next week, but Allegra and Adrian,

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much, thanks for listening to this week's

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Potonomics with Bloomberg. This episode was hosted by Me Stephanie

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Flanders with Adrian Woldridge and Allegra Stratton. Produced by Summer

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Sadi with booking support from Chris martloom Additional editing and

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 2>sound designed by Moses and dam Brendan Francis Noonan is

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 2>our executive producer. Stage Bowman is head of Bloomberg Podcast,

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 2>with special thanks to Francesco Jubilet, Jannies, Baro Fakis and

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Qiarra Albinici. Do subscribe, rate, and review this show, especially

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 2>if you like it wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 2>tell all your friends