WEBVTT - Will the Capitol Rioters Face Justice?

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grassoe from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It was chaos at the heart of American democracy when

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a mob of pro Trump writers stormed the capital, reached

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the security barriers, terrorized lawmakers, and vandalized the offices and

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>congressional chambers, delaying the certification of the Electoral College vote.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>President elect Joe Biden was blunt. They were protesters. Don't

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>dare call them protesters. They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists,

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorists, and Biden was not alone in blaming President

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump for inciting his followers. Lawmakers like Republican Senator Mitt

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Romney also placed to blame on Trump. What happened here

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>today was an insurrection incited by the President of the

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>United States. Joining me is an expert in national security law,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>former federal prosecutor Jimmy Garula, a professor at Notre Dame

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Law School. Clearly, the Capitol police were unprepared, with all

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the notice, some from Trump himself, with much of the

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>nation bracing for what might happen, and with threats of

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>violence on social media. Should they have been prepared for this,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they had forewarning, literally weeks in advance. I mean Trump

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter had notified the world that he was again

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>recruiting as followers to come to Washington, d C. On

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>January six, and he said, you know, be looking out.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be like something you've never seen before.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be powerful. I mean, so it was

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>clear that again he was recruiting his followers to come

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to d C for this event, and then of course

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at the rally before the actual assault on the Capitol Building,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he's firing up his supporters and telling them to take

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>back America. And in order to do so, you have

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to be strong. We have to use act with strength,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which is code words for violence. So there was plenty

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of time to prepare. And it's inexcusable. I mean, this

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>should never have happened in America. And thank god it

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't worse than it actually was. I mean, had these

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>protesters have been more heavily armed when they took siege

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Capitol Building, we could be talking about today

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the killing of members of Congress, the killing of senators,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>violence a much larger scale than what was witnessing. This

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can never be permitted to happen again, and I'm hopeful

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that the new administration immediately initiates an investigation or commission

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to the bottom of this and to termine

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>what went wrong and to ensure that it never happens again.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you call this an insurrection, an attempted coupe? What

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>would you term this? Well, it's certainly an insurrection. You know,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it certainly falls with in the seditious Conspiracy Statute. It's

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>an act of sedition. It was an attack either to

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>overthrow the government by violence or to prevent the enactment

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of laws by violence, which is also prohibited by the

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sedition conspiracy Statute. These people wanted to disrupt Congress's fulfillment

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of their constitutional duties under the Twelfth Amendment. That's what

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was driving them. The timing of this wasn't accidental. You know,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>their presence on January six, they're storming the Capitol Building

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>while Congress was in session undertaking its constitutional duties. That

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was not a coincidence. This was an attempt to disrupt,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to prevent them from fulfilling those constitutional obligations, from certifying

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the electors and then certifying Joe Biden is an ex

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States, and I would say further there,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.279
<v Speaker 1>it was certainly anti Democrat because one of the principal

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>cornerstones of our democracy that we have cherished over the

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>last two hundred plus years is a peaceful transfer of power.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a range of crimes the rioters could be charged with,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>from misdemeanors to felonies, from vandalism to sedition. Does it

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>seem like they're going to be charged with the lower

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>level crimes vandalism, breaking and entering, etcetera, rather than sedition. Well,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say certainly everyone that can be identified who

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>is inside the Capitol Building should be charged under the

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Anti Riot Act because this clearly satisfies the requirements of

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the statute. I mean, these are people that traveled in

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>interstate or used an interstate facility for the purpose of

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>engaging in a riot, for either inciting a riot or

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>participating in a riot or facilitating acts of violence, which

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is what is required under the statute. And fortunately, many

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of these individuals were caught on video inside the Capitol

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Building and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies are

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to identify many of these perpetrators quickly,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and once they're identified, they should be charged by the

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>FBI and prosecuted by the Apartment of Justice, the U. S.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office. I mean, it could be the U. S.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's offices in the districts where these individuals reside, or

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in the district of Columbia where the offenses were actually committed.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>On the question of sedition, I think here we're talking

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>about again a conspiracy, and I think a conspiracy can

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>be proven through their concerted action. And their concerted action,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>their intent again was to buy the use of violence

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. That's language from the Seditious Conspiracy Statute,

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. And the law of the United

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>States that they were attempting to prevent was the Twelfth Amendment,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>was the certifying of the electors, the recognizing of the

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>electoral votes, and certifying of the president. I want to

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get your take on why the Capitol police allowed the

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rioters to leave the Capitol building. We saw a video

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of rioters walking out of the building yelling, threatening to

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>come back, with a police officer actually holding the door

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>open for them. No, it was it was certainly at

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the very least a dereliction of duty. I can understand,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the argument that the Capitol Police felt that

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they were overwhelmed, that they didn't have sufficient numbers to

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>prevent this assault on the Capitol building. That's one thing,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But to actually be opening the door, assisting them as

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they're leaving, not attempting to prevent any of this illegal

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>conduct that was taking place. These are officers, again, that

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>took an oath to defend the constitution to enforce the law.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They violated that oath. So this isn't simply a question

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or any shoe of the government wasn't adequately prepared to

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with the crisis. I think that there are some

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>officers that have to be held accountable for dereliction of

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>their duties and responsibilities as law enforcement officers. It's shameful.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing less than shameful. Beyond that, there was video

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Capitol Police letting writers get past the barricades,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>moving the barricades. Even now, people will look at that

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and say, was there an order from above that led

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>them to that course. It does raise an interesting question

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>whether there was an order. Here's the other aspect of

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that too. If you look at the videos and you

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>see some of these protesters. They didn't seem intimidated or

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all are worried by the presence of the law enforcement

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>officers of the Capitol Police. They were very confident, they

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>were very smug, and the action that they were taking,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't threatened at all feel threatened at all by

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>law enforces. So that makes you wonder. That raises a

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>question was there um order, either explicit or implicit, for

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol Police to stand down, to not enforce the law,

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to not arrest these individuals. I mean I watched literally

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two or three hours of footage on television and did

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not see a single arrest. Now we're told after the

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that there were, you know, individual arrest I I

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>witnessed hours and hours of illegal activity going on and

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>did not see a police officer, a law enforcement officer,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>arrest a single individual. That investigation should result in the

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>senior members supervisors of the Capitol Police being fired an individual,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>lower level officers being fired at a minimum, At a minimum,

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>our Capitol building, this symbol of democracy, was desecrated in

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a way that should never have ever been permitted to

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>happen in this country, and someone has to be held

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>accountable for that. There's been a lot of commentary about

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the marked difference in the way the Trump administration handled

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Black Life Matters protests this summer with federal agents

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and riot gear, tear gas, rubber bullets. That's a fair

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>point to raise because we saw over the summer the

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>use of force that was employed against peaceful protesters in

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Lafayette Square, and again, as you stayed at tear gas,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rubber bullets, etcetera. We didn't see that here. And this

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was an assault on the Capitol building. It raises questions,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, had these been block protesters, would they have

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ever been permitted to get that close to the building,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>let alone go into the chambers of the Senate, go

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>into the chambers of the House of Representatives. I am

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>confident the Capitol police would have found some way to

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>restrain them. They wouldn't have made it halfway up the

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>steps of the Capitol Building before they were confronted with

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rubber bullets, tear gas, and even more lethal use of force.

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that it's another issue that needs to be

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>addressed in this inquiry. Is this a dual standard of

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>justice here? So if you're a block protester, you're treated

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one way, but that if you're a white protester, and

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we all saw for ourselves that the these protesters are

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>white protesters, they're treated differently under the law. Our democracy

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot witness and embrace a dual system of justice that

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>depends on the color of the person skin. The articles

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment have already been drafted. How Speaker Nancy Pelosi

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has been calling on Vice President Mike pens to invoke

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fifth Amendment to remove President Trump from office

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>after the attack on the nation's capital by pro Trump rioters,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and Pelosi says the House will move forward on articles

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment if nothing is done. A very dangerous person

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>who should not continue in office. This is urgent. This

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is the emergency of the highest magnet too. I've been

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>talking to national security law expert Jimmy Garula, a professor

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at Notre Dame Law School. Top Democrats are calling on

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Pence to invoke the amendments. It's never been

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>used to remove a president. Do these circumstances fit Amendment?

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they do. It's actually Section four of the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Amendment that's applicable here, and that authorizes the president and

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the majority that's referred to as the principal officers basically

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the cabinet members, and in this particular case,

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it would require thirteen cabinet members along with the vice president,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that the president is unable to discharge the

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>powers and duties of his office. And so here I

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think you can make a compelling case that over the

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>last two months, the President Trump has been obsessed with

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the presidential election and his defeat, and his behavior during

0:11:55.120 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that period of time has become erratic. He's unstable. He

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:06.239
<v Speaker 1>has advocated his responsibilities with respect to the coronavirus pandemic,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He's advocated his responsibilities regarding a recent hacking attack by

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a Russia. So I think the prerequisite regarding his inability

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to discharge his powers and duties that's required under the

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>amendment can be met. Once that is communicated in writing

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to the leaders of the House and the Senate, then

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the vice president immediately assumes the duty as the acting president.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't end it. I think President Trump would

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately contest that, and then it would fall back on

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the vice president to make a further determination of the

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>president's lack of capacity to hold office. And I think

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that's probably about as far as we're going to get

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>within that short period of time. But interestingly, that would

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>deprive the president of his ability to stay in office

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for the balance of his his trump. Now it seems

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>highly unliyly that Penn's is going to involve the amendments.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So then we come to the Democrats threats of a

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>second impeachment. How much of the process could they get

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>through in the time left till its term ends. It's

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>finally unlikely that in that period of time. First of all,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the publican members of the House are going to be

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fighting this, and they're going to be resisting this at

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>every step, and so I think it's highly unlikely in

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>days that there would be articles of impeachment that are

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>submitted to the House, that are debated. You know that

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there witnesses that are called, and then a vote concluded

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on those articles of impeachment, and then of course that

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>again would just be the charging document. Then it would

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be up to the Senate to the side. Again, it

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>requires the two thirds vote of the Senate to actually convict.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just not practical, it's not feasible for all of

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. I think what's more realistic, again, if

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Vice President hence took the initiative and again was able

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to get the support of thirteen cabinet members that he

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>could become acting president and probably delay the final process

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>here through the balance in the president's term. Thanks Jimmy.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That's Professor Jimmy Garoule of Notre Dame Law School. The

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>votes in Georgia have been counted not once, not twice,

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but three times, and they confirmed that President elect Joe

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden beat President Trump by eleven thousand, seven hundred seventy votes.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But in a sixty two minute call last Saturday, Trump

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>pressured Georgia officials, including the Secretary of State, to find

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>thousands of votes and recalculate the election results to flip

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the state to him, just enough to pass Biden by

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one vote. So, look, all I wanna do is this.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I just want to find uh eleven thousand, seven d

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty loaves, which is one more that we have. The

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>people of Georgia are angry. The people of the country

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are angry, and there's nothing wrong with saying that you know,

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>um that you've recalculated. Georgia officials stood firm by the

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>election results, joining me as former federal prosecutor Elie Hoenig

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of Lowenstein Sandler. The first broad question, did Trump break

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the law during this call? So I think the short

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>answers is quite possibly, maybe meaning towards probably. You know,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have all the facts, but the call itself

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty darned good starting point. So both federal

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>law and Georgia law are similar in that bottom line,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.359
<v Speaker 1>They say it is a crime to try to influence

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>an election official to count ballots that we're not actually cast. Now,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly Donald Trump is trying to influence and then some

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>these Georgia Secretary of State Rapidsburger's overtly pressuring him, even

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>threatening him with the potential of criminal prosecution of his own.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And he's also clearly trying to pressure the Secretary of

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>State to count votes in his favor and votes that

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>if you are tethered to reality, you know we're never cast, right.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every source that has a pined on this,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>from d o J to DHS, two dozens of courts

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>have said there was no such fraud. Perversely, I guess

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the best defense of Donald Trump here would be he

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>actually believes, truly believes that he got those votes, Because

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>if he truly believes he had those votes. It's not

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a crime to ask an official to count votes that

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you truly believe. We're You're You're not asking for some

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fraud to be committed. If in your mind you truly

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>believe those votes were for you. Now, that would require

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>one to believe Donald Trump is delusional. Perhaps he is.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And I also think it's a little bit of intention

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with the words Trump uses on the call. If I'm

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor, going back to my prosecutorial role, I would say,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>why does he use the word find? We need to

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>find these votes? That to me is a little different

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>than we need to have a full counting of all

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the votes that were actually cast. And that number, remember

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump says we need exactly eleven thousand, seventy or whatever,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one more vote than he needed. That also is very

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>conspicuous and different from we need to count all the votes.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think at a minimum, prosecutors have to take

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a look here, investigate, and sit down and make a

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very hard decision. I want to talk about some problems

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that may occur because the call is very meandering. He

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>goes from topic to topic, He skirts the issue a lot,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and he keeps saying over and over that he won

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the election. So is that a problem? Well, so meandering. Absolutely,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a problem that he never says I would

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like you to perform this illegal act. I mean, that's

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly not required. And yes, it does complicate it though

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump repeatedly he seems like he's almost reading

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>off of a list or something of all these wild

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>claims that have really come from Twitter or you know,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>far far right wing media and I don't mean Fox News,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean far the right wing than that. And that

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>would be the defense, if I'm done Trump's defense lawyer,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, he truly believes that he won this

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>election and that he's entitled to have the Secretary of

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>State recount these votes. And I think the argument is

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that may be a bad look, that may say something

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>bad about his own mental stability, But legally it's a

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>defense because again, if you truly believe that votes were

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>cash for you, and you ask officials to count those votes,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not a fraud. That's not a crime. That would

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be the difficulty in prosecuting this case, and that would

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be something to prosecutors would need to sit down and

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of puzzle through in meticulous detail. Is his ignorance

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the law and excuse he says, I didn't know

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a problem. No ignorance of law. It's a motto,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a saying, but it's true. Ignorance of law is

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not a defense. You don't have to know specifically that

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this exact conduct is prohibited by statute. You have to

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know general link that it's wrong. I do want to

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>throw in one other potential wrinkle here. Clearly, Donald Trump

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>threatens Rappensburger with criminal sanctions of his own right. There's

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that weird passage where Trump says, what you're doing is

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>actually a crime, Mr. Happensburger, and paraphrasing here, it is

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a crime, a federal crime, an estate crime. To threaten

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody as part of an extortion, as part of trying

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to get something, you want to threaten somebody with unjustified

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>criminal charges. Now, there's no argument that Rappensburger committed a

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>crime of any sort, but Trump uses that as a

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bully tactic. There is an interpretation of the extortion laws

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that could include that, and I think prosecutors ought to

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>look at that as well. Do you really think that

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the threat is that explicit? He talks about a big

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>risk of potential criminal charges. Do you really think that

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the threat is explicit enough. Well, that's the question. It's

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not as explicit as a prosecutor would like it to be, right,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not. If you don't do this, I will go

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to FBI and we will indict and prosecute. That would

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be an example of the easiest case. This fall somewhere

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, And that's why I think that the

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>exact verbiage is important. You know, he does say, you know,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he gets fairly explicit about you you're committing a crime,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and even has the weird exchange where Trump says something

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like I'm putting you on note, I'm notifying you right now,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which is I think close to the line. But I

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>agree it's not as explicit as other extortions that I've seen,

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the mob world. But that also doesn't

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean he's in the clear either. Explain the willfully

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>requirement in the federal law. So will so he essentially

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>means with intent to commit a crime, or to commit

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the elements of the crime. So that gets back to

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the state of mind. Is the president in

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the deepest recesses of his mind and by the way.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the difficulty of any intent based crime. Right,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>So for example, a robbery of a seven eleven is

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not an intent based crime. You see someone coming with

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a gun in the mask and demand money, that's a robbery.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>But when you get into things like frauds, then you

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have to get into the mind of the person and

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>did they really know what they were proposing. Was they

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>fraud or was they llegal or did they actually honestly

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that they were entitled to this or that it

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was legitimate. So that's a difficulty here. And you know,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>if I was investigating this, I would start with the

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>tape itself, Like I said, I would scrutinize the words

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on the tape, but I'd also i'd subpoena or want

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to speak with those around Donald Trump, the other people

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on that call. Is there evidence that before that call

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or after the call he said to somebody, look, we're

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna bend this guy to our will, or is there

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>evidency said things that evidence that he doesn't truly believe

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that he was. But there's been reporting out there that

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump understands that he lost this election, but he's

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>doing this for show, or he's doing this to rally

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>donations or support, or to keep themselves relevant. If you

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>could find a couple of witnesses to say, I spoke

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump, he told me I know I lost this,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but just I'm playing this game here, right, It's something

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to that effect I think would be a significant piece

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. And again that goes to my point of

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>why prosecutors and to at least dig in here and

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>not just sort of glide past it. Two members of

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Congress referred the case to the FBI. Does that mean

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the FBI will actually do an investigation? No, it does not.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>There's this common misconception out there that there's some magic

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to a referral like criminal referral. There's not. All it

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>means is and I've gotten referrals as a prosecutor from

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>any source you can name, from members of the public,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from politicians, you know, you name it. All it means

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>is somebody has asked the FBI or whatever your law

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agency to take a look. Now, referrals are taken seriously,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and depending on both the source of the referral and

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the apparent seriousness of the conduct and the support for

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the conduct, referrals absolutely can lead law enforcement agencies and

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors to open cases to take a look. So it's significant,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't find anybody to do anything. The next

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>question is, let's just suppose that enough evidence is found,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>who would prosecute with the Justice Department under President elect Biden,

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>who said that he is not going to try to

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>influence that the Justice Department is there to do its job.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But are they going to want to start their administration

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>by prosecuting a former president? That's a great question, at

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a very important question. Let's start with focusing on the

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>federal authorities here, d O. J Joe Biden has done

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think is really important and good,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and one thing that I have an issue with what

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>he's done that I think anybody should approve of, is

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he has said publicly and clearly, I will not get

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>involved in the prosecutorial decisions of my Attorney General. That

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>will be entirely up to the new a G. I

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>don't get involved. That That is right, That is correct,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>That is as it should be, that something Donald Trump

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>himself frequently violated. What I don't approve of is the

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that Joe Biden reportedly told several people around him,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and this was reported by NBC News. They say they

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>had five sources saying this is a few weeks ago,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden has no interest in having his d

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>J go down this rabbit hole of Donald Trump investigations,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that he does not want to see his d o

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>J go that round. Now, Joe Biden has been around

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>long enough, you know, forty eight years, that he understands

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that if he's going to make a comment like that

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to five different people, it's going to get out there.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't like the fact that Joe Biden

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>is doing that, and in so doing is putting a

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thumb on the scale of what the attorney general will do. Now,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>as a practical matter, if you're the new attorney general,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to charge and prosecute a case against

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the former president, you have to understand that will consume

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>all the oxygen, all the attention, all the focus on

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>everything else you do um and probably everything else the

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>presidential administration does until that actual trial happens and it's

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>over with. We're talking a year, eighteen months. That is

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an enormous distraction, That is an enormous price to pay.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I fully understand that, and I expect the new A G.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>To to to factor that in. On the other hand,

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really difficult that the new Attorney General

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and new d o J to just say we were

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not even going to take a look. It's just too

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>much of a hassle. It's just too difficult. We're not

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>even going to bother with this that I don't approve

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of either as a prosecutor. Look, part of your job

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as a prosecutor, a big part of your job is

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to make difficult decisions and to do things that ruffle feathers.

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And if the job of a prosecutor was to just

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>look for the path of least resistance, then well, beyond

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, there's plenty of powerful people who would never

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be investigated. There's plenty of wealthy people, well connected people

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>who you would just say, too much trouble, people might resist,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it might be too much of a circuit. That to me,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is not the job of a prosecutor. So I will

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>say this, at a minimum, I believe d o J

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>has a duty to investigate this see what they find.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do appreciate that it's a very difficult charge

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring. And I also do appreciate that it's unlikely

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that d o J ultimately will charge the president. There

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>may be a slightly different calculus for state level prosecutors,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's how I look at d O J. What

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the fact that the U S.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Atlanta resigned one day after this phone call? Yeah,

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's in some respect, it's suspicious in some respect. That's

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not the timing everything that's happening in Georgia. You can

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it's consistent with I guess I'll say, we don't know

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, but it's consistent with he was asked

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to do something that he wasn't comfortable with doing and

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that caused him to resign. It also is unusual that

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Attorney would resign with essentially no notice.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Now what's not unusual is this is resigning season, um

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and it always is. Whenever you're about to have a

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>change in administration, especially from one party to the other,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>all the U. S. Attorneys start resigning around now um

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, up to January twenty and then they're

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>replaced fairly quickly by the new administration. That's the way

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>things go. But usually the way that happens is the U. S. Attorney,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, in New Jersey where I live put out

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a public statement weeks ago, and he said in January

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>five will be my last day. Um, you know, two

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks notice, three weeks notice. That's normally the way it goes.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So it is unusual to me that this has happened

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with essentially no notice. And also one of the lawyers

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>who was representing Trump on that call, Clio Mitchell, resigned

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>from her law firm. Look, obviously there was a lot

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of public pressure. I think the public was by and

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>large revolted by what was heard on that call. And

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the lawyer Cleedo Mitchell, is part of it, and she's

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on board with what Donald Trump's doing. And I think

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>most worrisome from my perspective looking at her as an attorney,

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is she is completely espousing and supporting these conspiracy theories,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>these theories that have no basis in fact. And you know,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult thing. I don't necessarily believe in going

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>after someone's employment or profession or vocation if you disagree

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>with what they've done. But there's also a line here

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that lawyers are not the cross of just spinning utter fantasy.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Your duty bounds to defend a client, including clients who

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>may be guilty of things, but it is another matter

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>altogether to affirmatively promote outright false statements and fictitious conspiracy theory.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So that was ultimately the consequence for this attorney. Thanks Ellie.

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That's former federal prosecutor Ellie Hohenick. And that's it for

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the sedition of the Bloomberg Lawn Podcast. I'm June Grosso.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening, and remember you can always

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Lawn podcast.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your favorite podcasts. And please listen to The

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Lawn Show every weeknight at ten pm Eastern on

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio