WEBVTT - Qualcomm Eyes $22 Billion Growth, Crypto Sees Political Success

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>From the heart of.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Where Innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Live from New York. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 5>All eyes on enveer As, a three trillion dollar chip maker,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 5>is set to report earnings after the closing Bell plus

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Comcast it plans to spin off some of its cable

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 5>TV channels. We talk future strategy and the CEO of

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Qualcomm joins us as a company details growth of twenty

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 5>two billion dollars in annual revenue over the next five years.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 5>But first you will know Qualcomm as the world's biggest

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 5>seller of smartphone processes. But the company is pushing into

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 5>new markets and generating potentially up to twenty two billion

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 5>dollars in additional annual revenue by fiscal twenty twenty nine. Look,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 5>eight billion dollars a year is going to be coming

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 5>from an expansion into automotive chips. Fourteen billion dollars they

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.919
<v Speaker 5>say will come from the Internet of Things. Qullcom CEO

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Christiana Amon was detailing that very vision yesterday and what

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.639
<v Speaker 5>your total addressable market now up to nine hundred million dollars.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 5>It is great to have you here after that investor meeting,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 5>you're looking out to twenty thirty. What gives you that confidence.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 4>Look, we have been first of all, great to be

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>here talking to you, but we have been on this

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 4>trajectory since twenty twenty one when we had our last

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 4>investor day and we outlined the plans to grow the

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 4>company to other markets.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 2>We realize that the.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Technology we produced for mobile could be very disruptive and

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>we could build actually a leading position where we did

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 4>in automotive, what we did in PCs, and we thought

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 4>we'll be the right thing to tell investors as we

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 4>look in the next five years how we're going to

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 4>diversify the company. When you look at the company right now,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>most of our revenues mobile Mobile is a great market,

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>but it doesn't grow as much until we have an

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 4>AI of grade cycle. However, those other markets that we're

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 4>going it will drive higher multiple. So as those revenues

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 4>from non mobile become a bigger percentage of Qualcom, we

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>have an opportunity to actually see a multiple expansion. So

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 4>we want to outline to investors our trajectory and what's

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 4>exciting is really where we are right now. We're very

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>happy with the results of the company in the near term.

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>We show on the last earnings called we're growing in

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 4>all markets, including handsets, and we put out in five

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>years we're going to have twenty two billion dollars of

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>non handset revenue.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>But bearing any sicklic.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Calid on the market, we'll expect to continue to grow

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 4>annually into that into those.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 5>Targets, bearing any sickl catesy, can you just talk through,

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 5>like what are the downside risks to automotive demands? Two

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 5>people actually upgrading to new and refresh Android phones, which

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 5>are going to remain probably.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what I mentioned about cyclicality, I think this in

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 4>my conductor industry, we have seen on the first the

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>past few years, we had a bunch of different cycles,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 4>different markets, inventory corrections, we have capacity constraints. We're not

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 4>assuming that going forward, but some of that you know

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 4>could happen. But when you look off the normalization of

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 4>the market we see right now, if that continues, we

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>feel very good about the ability to grow annually. To

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 4>your question, is cars is one that we're incredibly excited

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>because people are now buying new cars because of the

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 4>computational cupabilities and did those big screens in the digital

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 4>cupabilities of the car. And I think that's what actually

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>creating demand for our technology.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 5>Going in before we get to cars. The Internet of

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 5>things is really going to be something that we've been

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>talking about almost for a decade the mobile or Congress

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 5>and remember everyone's the zuberan about Internet of things and

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 5>then reality never quite gets there. And that's where previous

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 5>times you've made targets and perhaps have had to fall

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 5>short because the ecosystem doesn't build. What makes you sure

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 5>it will get to that fourteen billion this time?

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Like, we're very confident, but I I would like to

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>break that down for you. Yeah, So first PCs, because

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 4>actually what I need to tell you is we talk

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 4>about Internet of things, but the Qualcom Internet of Things

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 4>revenue stream, there's a bunch of things in there. We

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 4>have PCs, we have virtual reality, mixed reality devices, we

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 4>have industrial we have networking and personal devices like wearables

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 4>and watches. That's our Internet of things bucket. So we

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>gave a target of four billion dollars in PCIX. If

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>you think what we're doing right now Snapdragon X series

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 4>is the fastest processor is faster than Intel, faster than MD.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 4>We come in and within the industry as a new

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>player with a leading platform, the only platform they could

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 4>run Microsoft Copilot plus. If you look at this of

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 4>the service market, the TAM or the SAM that we're

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 4>I had an investigate of PCs in twenty twenty nine,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 4>it's thirty five billion.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 2>We say we're going to do four.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>It's very achievable target, especially when you think about we

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 4>have the best platform the market today.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 5>But everyone does indeed love that Silicon our om Bloomberg

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Intelligence saying you're in s Silicon and the AIPC is great,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 5>but there's been so much cynicism around the adoption of

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>on based PCs. What is stopping that?

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 4>We actually we see a little bit different. We launched

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>this platform in May. We have twenty designs right now.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 4>From May to today, we increase the design traction by

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 4>two point five times. We have fifty eight now platforms

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>across del HP, Lenovo, Sands on the Asia suits and

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 4>people buying them and these sales are exceeding our expectations.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's why we feel confident. And if you think

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 4>about the target, were putting four billion in the thirty

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 4>five billion SAM is not that high. The other one

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>is industrial. And you asked me about IoT. One thing

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Caroline did change the IoT in industrial is AI a

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 4>d edge.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 2>The ability to run AI a D edge.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 4>We can run multi billion parameter model into a device

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 4>at the edge. That changes the cost equation for a

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of companies that I actually think that it's going

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>to be cheaper than doing in the cloud, or they

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 4>have specific needs. That inflection point is what gives us

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 4>confidence we're going to get four billion in industrial by

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty nine. And the other two billion we provided

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>was for augmented reality and the ray band Meta smart glass.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Everybody talks about it is probably the favorite Christmas gift

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 4>this season.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk therefre about an inflection point when you go

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 5>back to what had been your bread and butter, which

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 5>is smartphones and cells. Are people upgrading? Are they going

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>to upgrade, particularly on the Android devices that you sit with,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 5>because Apple is course is going to be pulling back

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 5>for the next few years.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Look, Android is the largest global market for hintsts, and

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 4>we have very focused on premion teer Android. What we

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 4>see in the market that grows very you know, phones

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 4>grow with GDP. Right, it's flat to single dishit growth

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 4>because everybody has a phone. However, what we have seen

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 4>is at the premium teer they're growing significantly. We see

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a mix change when people buy their next phone, they

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 4>want a better phone, and that that actually allow us

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>to be growing in many.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Cases like double digit on.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 4>A market doesn't grow by expanding content, So what we

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 4>expect is that is the trend as we people buy

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>a premium smartphone with more AI and eventually as the

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 4>AI use cases start to be as big as apps,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see an AI driven upgrade.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 5>We are sitting with the call com Cio Cristiano, a'man

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 5>for worldwide radio and TV audiences. The upgrade cycle grows

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 5>the GDP. You're saying, China's GDP and looking so great.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>You have exposure to that economy. What does it feel

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 5>like by now?

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, our China business is business that we're very happy

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 4>with it. As geopolitics evolve, actually our business with China expended,

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 4>especially because as we become relevant in automotive and industrial

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 4>beyond phones, we have Chinese customers. I think, at the

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 4>end of the day, regardless of GDP growth, China is

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 4>a big market. If you are, as a my conductor company,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 4>that you have a leading technology that cannot be replicated

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 4>by a domestic product, you're going to have a big

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 4>business in China.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we have.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 5>They're fighting to make things domestically because of the new

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 5>administration and indeed the current administration still pushing back on

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 5>China that you don't have any pause, any concern about

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 5>taris rampop for example.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Look, you should think about our business. We are exporting

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 4>semi conductors when the right direction of trade for the

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 4>United States, especially when you think about trade balance so

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 4>so in and if we have a leading technology, we

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>expect that China will be interesting continue to buy our chips,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 4>So we're not concerned about that.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, have any procurement issues, you don't import anything.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 5>You're not having to.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Stop pile now.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 4>We I think we have been We're fabulous company and

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 4>we have been a big exporter of chips into China.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 5>You've got an amazing bird's eye perspective of the technological

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 5>race that we like to talk of between US and China.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 5>For example, you've got an array of large language models

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 5>within your snap Dragon mobile system and platform. Some of

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 5>those Chinese large language models, how do they perform compared

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 5>to the US one.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 4>Look, we can talk about this all day, but I'm

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 4>going to try to summarize a few things.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a very.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Large number of models becoming available, and they're very specialized.

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 4>I think we're heading towards AI as being a new

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 4>computing and you have models specialized in voice, major specialized

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 4>in imaging, like large visual models, et cetera. What we're

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 4>starting to see is a lot of those models are

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 4>becoming regionalized, especially when you think about text and converse

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 4>or conversation. As the computer starts to speak the language

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 4>of humans, every reason has a unique aspect that is

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 4>driving a lot of regional models. We expect the future

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 4>is going to be like that. China's going to have

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 4>their models, you know, Europe is going to have their models.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 4>We're going to have our models, and they're going to

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>be model specialized for different things. And we're just the

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>beginning of this exciting new transition.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 5>You could talk about it all day. The thing that

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 5>the markets that the media have wanted you to talk

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 5>about all day is whether you'll be making any acquisitions

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 5>and whether you will potentially making any acquisitions of Intel

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 5>parts of the businesses. Your CFO outline that, look, you're

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 5>actually gonna be giving money back to investors is M

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and A therefore not on the agenda.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, we have always been looking for opportunities. A lot

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of the Quaker M and A framework with the outline

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 4>has been apportunistic or been very target to.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Accelerate our plans.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>We has showed that with the M and A that

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 4>we've done for Auto, the M and A that we've

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 4>done to enter the PC space. So you're probably going

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>to continue to see qualk on doing that right now.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 4>At this point, we have not identified any large.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Acquisition that.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Is necessary for us to execute on this twenty two billion,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 4>and we're super focused on executing on the twenty two

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 4>billion in the next five years.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 5>So give us the confidence. Give the investor base that's

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 5>currently seeing perhaps your share price off by six cent

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 5>a moment, give them the confidence that this transition away

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 5>from Apple and focusing on an Android but focusing in

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 5>on the Internet of things opportunity that you articulated the autos,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 5>You're going to get that smoothly and with clarity on

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 5>time frame.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Look the way I see it, and I think

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 4>that's probably you know, I can't really you know, talk

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 4>about what's happening with the stock, but I think there

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 4>may be some confusion. Our plan in the investor day

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 4>is to tell investor there are strategies working.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't need a new strategy. It is working.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>We had executed on what we said we're going to

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 4>do in those new markets like Alto, for example, we

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 4>have been have five consecutive quarters of record growth, and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 4>we would grow even when the market doesn't grow because

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 4>we're gaining share. We had deliver on our entrance on

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 4>the PC and a well positioned to ramp, and we

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 4>told investors how this is going to play out with

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 4>the other markets. We had said since the beginning that

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 4>our planning assumptions assume that Apple is coming off the model.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 4>We had said our contract implies that we have twenty

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 4>percent share in twenty six Would that be the case,

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I think we have had two renewals of Apple, but.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 4>We have to make a planning assumption that Apple's coming.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Off the model.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Even with that, we are well positioned to continue growing

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 4>to the period and get to a point in twenty

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine that we have twenty two.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Billion of revenue non mobile, and when we.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Get to the end of the decade, we have a

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 4>potential about but fifty to fifty mobiles about fifty percent

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Of the revenue from growth market.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know what the anxiety is, but I

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 4>think we feel confident about the plan and we'll continue

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 4>to execute on that plank.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Let's get Hannah. Analyst Christopher Roland saying, we continue to

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 5>have confidence in CEO Amount's ability to move Quillcom beyond

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 5>modem and cellular IP company. We appreciate you, thank you

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 5>for being here. Quil Come CEO Cristiano Aman. Now as

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 5>a quick checkout on this particular chart of a chip

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 5>company that you're not looking at every day. Semiconductive Manufacturing

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 5>International Shares SMICK, as it's known they've more than doubled

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 5>over the past two months, even amid the risks tied

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 5>to competition to geopolitical tensions in China. The stock is

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 5>up one hundred and twenty percent from September, trancing global

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 5>sector names including nvidiomc As you see China autperforming particularly

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 5>on land in Beijing trading, I mean, while speaking of Nvidia,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 5>look all eyes on the company reporting earnings after the

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 5>closing bell, we'll discuss what to expect, particularly with Blackwell.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 6>This is Blue meg Technology, oh in vidious quarterly results

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 6>and the forecast they're out after the closing bell Today.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Analysts will be on the lookout see whether the world's

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 5>most valuable company can sustain what has been a remarkable run,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 5>fueled by spending, of course, on AI hardware. Relumeg Intelligence

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 5>analyst Kundren Savani joins us, now everyone wants clarity on

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 5>the supply side of Blackwell and demand for the Hopper too.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, look, second half, we have seen the

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 7>demand for the Hopper expand not just said the top

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 7>large cloud service providers and hyperscalers, but beyond them to

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 7>the sow end, which now we expect them to be

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 7>low double digits this fiscal year with the enterprise, with

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 7>the tier two cloud service providers. So we don't see

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 7>any limiting in terms of demand for Hopper, and everyone's

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 7>anticipatingly waiting for the Blackwell ramp, which we think will

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 7>see major portion of it next year.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 5>We allls seem to focus on revenue. It's going to

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 5>double for the full year. We anticipate it's going to

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 5>be up eighty percent for third quarter, up a little

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 5>bit less than that for the fourth quarter is the expectation.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 5>But what about margins, what about profitability conngin?

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, look, we have seen the peak of

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 7>the margins there behind us. Going into four Q, we

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 7>expected to not as low as some people are concerned.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 7>We expected to still stay above the seventy three percent mark.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 7>But going into twenty twenty five with Blackwell as a

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 7>new product ramping, we expected to stay at the same levels.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 7>We are also seeing the cost of the new products increase,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 7>but their ability to charge equivalently more pricing is not

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 7>going there because there's a lot of pricing pressure. These

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 7>are very expensive GPUs.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 5>May sure, and it's a very expensive stop bluing bag intelligence.

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 5>As of Bonnie, we thank you. Let's turn about that

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 5>valuation now with Kim Forest, founder and CEO Booker Capital Partners. Kim,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 5>we've had almost two hundred percent run up in in

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 5>video over the last year, and indeed that's on top

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 5>of a tripling the previous year. We have a massive valuation.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Is it too high?

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, if you get to it today, maybe I don't know.

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 8>We'll tell you at the end.

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Of the day.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 8>The problem that I see, and let me just say this,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm a believer in AI in general. I'm a little

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 8>bit skeptical of generative AI. I think it has a

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 8>lot of issues that just can't be solved through the

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 8>brute force throw more chips at it. But that being said, I'm.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Rooting for AI. Now.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 8>The problem with evaluation on in Nvidio is you laid

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 8>it out. It's already had a triple, a double, you

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 8>know everything. It's as if it's a quarter being tossed

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 8>and coming up heads heads heads. There is a day

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 8>it's going to come up tails and momentum investors are

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 8>going to freak out. And with every earnings call now

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 8>that we have, that day gets closer. Is it today?

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, But I don't know.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 8>And that's really my problem with this, that it's a

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 8>stock driven by momentum.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 5>To be fair, they have freaked out before after earnings,

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 5>even when they meet and beat. But the forecast isn't

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 5>living up to expectations. So what is it that you

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 5>therefore need to hear from Jensen to give you the confidence.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 5>It feels like you're pushing against the scaling laws that

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 5>actually he continues to think thrive at.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>The moment exactly.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, there's a couple of things that concern me. There

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 8>is a handful of companies that are willing to spend

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 8>unbelievable amounts of money on this. Now, if one of

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 8>them blinks, well the other ones kind of cool down

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 8>and you stop shoveling money to the end of this problem.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 8>That's the one thing. So who are we talking about? Apple, Meta,

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 8>and Microsoft are the big ones, right, maybe Amazon as well,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 8>but those are certainly the companies that have the cash

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 8>flow that.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>They don't even have to question it.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 8>They're going to spend, spend, spend, But you know, that's

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 8>a very narrow market if you're going to think of

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 8>it that way. So you know, I'm just a cautious

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 8>investor and everything has gone right, so that demand is key,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 8>and blackweil is a little bit of a concern. Yes,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 8>it's not really shipping yet. They'll probably modify the problem

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 8>that's causing overheating. You know, when these things get over

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 8>into the world, they're used differently than they've been tested for.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 8>We've seen this many times in other semiconductor cycles. But

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 8>it's all a concern for you know the thing that

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 8>leads the market now it you know, it drives all

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 8>the markets. It's such a high component of the S

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 8>and P five hundred game.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 5>It's a macro event. Do you buy all wetness?

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 8>If I buy on weakness, I'm going to look at

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>it very hard on weakness because again I still think,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 8>given what the other makers of chips and even the

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 8>people who are dreaming of being competitors of Nvidia, and

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 8>Vidia has a nice long runway to have people not

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 8>catch up to them. So there's some safety in there,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 8>but valuation is steep at this point.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Proceed. We're caution O Capital Partners, CIO, Kim Forest. It's

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 5>time now for talking tech them First Up Global Foundries

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 5>has been awarded one point five billion dollars by the

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 5>Buyer Administration's chips at The grant will support the chip

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 5>makers expansion of two factories and one new plant in

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 5>the United States and is estimated to create a thousand

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 5>production jobs and zeploint nine thousand construction workers plus salesforce.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Plans to cut workers from its recently acquired data management

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 5>startup own. The company says some roles will not be required.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Quote post harmonization and set an end date of January

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 5>thirty first for those employees, while others will remain on

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 5>a short term basis if needed for the transition and

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 5>shares of MicroStrategy rising today, catapulting the market value to

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 5>more than one hundred billion dollars. This is the company

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 5>announced plans to increase the amount of convertible senior debt

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 5>it plans to sell in an effort to buy more bitcoin.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 5>Now it's about forty billion dollars worth coming up. We're

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 5>joined by Strike Fanner and CEO Jack Mallers as traders

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 5>and making bullsh bets on bitcoin alongside Michael Sailor clearly

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 5>over at MicroStrategy from New York. This is blom Meg Technology.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to bloue Meg Technology. Look what else is

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 5>moving crypto? But actually there has still been that risk

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 5>on sentiment in bitcoin that drives us up another one

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 5>and a half percent. We're at ninety three six hundred

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 5>and sixty one and this as it's more about the

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 5>feel good factor around future policy in the United States

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 5>and indeed some heavy buyers continuing for their balance sheet.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about it in the industry at large, because

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 5>of course it's spent a lot in terms of lobbying

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 5>on candidates across party lines during the twenty twenty four election,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 5>and those efforts clearly seem to have paid off. Stand

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 5>with Crypto, a group that tracks those results, say two

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 5>hundred and seventy five pro crypto candidates were elected to

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 5>the US House, twenty in the Senate. Now they're looking

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 5>at how those lawmakers will influence the industry, including the

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 5>policy of President elect Trump. Here to detail what the

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 5>political effects are, what just buying is like at the moment.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Strike CEO Jack Manners, who actually has a pretty close

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 5>relationship with one of the senators who has been long

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 5>with the Red Eyes. Yes, Heir Loomis, And I'm interested

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 5>in ultimately what you've seen in terms of trading on

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 5>the platform since the election.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 9>The day post election, the Wednesday post election, our business doubled.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 9>We saw one hundred percent growth in bitcoin purchases. Our

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 9>customers are predominant purchasing bitcoin, and over ninety percent since

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 9>election are actually taking the bitcoin off the platform and

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 9>holding it in their own custody. So we're not seeing

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 9>active speculative trading on gambling on this short term price.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing long term accumulation on our platform, and our

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 9>customers are excited. We serve bitcoiners, and bitcoiners are excited

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 9>right now.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so you're maybe supporting those that are focused purely

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 5>on the ecosystem, but people are going elsewhere to trade,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>whether it's gambling or not. We now got options trading

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 5>on the bitcoin spot ETFs. What do you think of that?

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of this transition from well DeFi

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and crypto into more traditional finance.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 9>Well, the last time I was on this show, I

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 9>told you and ED, which ed congrats.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 5>By the way, I'm thinking of you.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 9>I told you, guys, I thought bitcoin was the only

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 9>money in crypto. I wasn't sold on any of the

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 9>other cryptocurrencies, and that my business, we're predicated on Bitcoin

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 9>is money, and we sell our customers financial services. So

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 9>if you're a customer of mine, you want bitcoin financial services.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 9>You want to buy it, you want to store it,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 9>you want to move it, you want to pay your

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 9>bills with it, you maybe want to loan against it.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 9>These are the type of products that we want to

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 9>serve our customers in the future. We do not think

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 9>of ourselves as a speculative exchange. So that's my customer

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 9>base options ETFs MSTR. All of these things are pro

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 9>liquidity for bitcoin. What you want in a money or

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 9>a store of value is you want it to be syllable.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 9>You want it to be liquid at any point twenty

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 9>four to seven, three sixty five globally.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>You want to be able to sell it.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 9>And so all of this is pro liquidity, which enhances

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 9>the profile for bitcoin to be a better asset for

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 9>a government and corporation and individual. So everything is bullish

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 9>for bitcoin. That's what I always say. So another day,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 9>more bullish activity for the asset.

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Okay, convince me of why for this liquidity, for this

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 5>vision for the future of money, you need a strategic

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin reserve because I know that's what you've been speak

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 5>with Youll Loomus about. So we're having infrastructure issues, not

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 5>your fault.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Not your fault here, you know.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 9>I think the unique positioning on the Bitcoin Strategic Preserve,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 9>I think if this happens, this will be one of

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 9>the most important economic announcements in US history. I think

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 9>it'd be on par with nineteen seventy one and Nixon. However,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 9>what I think is not being talked about enough is

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 9>it's positive caroline.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Because you'd have to go out there and buy in

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 5>the market. But will it actually happen. No?

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>My meaning is this.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 9>In nineteen thirty three, the US had a really big

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 9>economic announcement. What was it, We're taking all your gold.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 9>In nineteen seventy one, the US had a really big

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 9>economic announcement. What was it, We're divorcing ourselves from the

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 9>gold standard so we can print money. In two thousand

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 9>and eight, the US had a really big economic announcement.

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>What was it?

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 9>It was, we're bailing out all the big banks that misbehaved.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 9>In twenty twenty five, if the US has a really

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 9>big economic announcement, what is it, it's we're pro technology,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 9>We're pro innovation.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>What principles in morals?

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>In ethical alignment?

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 9>Does bitcoin have equal rights, equal opportunity and open network?

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 9>These are American ideals, American values. This isn't as that

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 9>was accessible to the people fifteen years ago, that the

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 9>people own. Governments only own two three four percent of

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 9>this asset. This asset is held by the people. It

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 9>acts in the best interest of the public. It's pro jobs,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 9>it's pro energy, it's pro industry, it's pro growth, and

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 9>does anyone else have a plan to get us out

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 9>of debt. We were going to start a lemonade stand

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 9>out here in Times Square. No, how about the best

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 9>performing asset in the history of mankind.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 2>We lean into it. We buy it.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 9>Coinbases in an American company, strikes in an American company,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 9>crackings an American company. Tether sells the US dollar. Let's

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 9>support these businesses. Let's support this industry.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 5>The market cap is less than in video for the

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 5>entire crypto ecosystem. When does that become bigger?

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I think when people buy it. Listen.

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 9>I think that ego gets in the way of many people.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 9>People think they're late to bitcoin. I don't understand that, right.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 9>I think that late according to who oh, because you're

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.479
<v Speaker 9>comparing yourself to Michael Saylor, you're comparing yourself to your

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 9>college roommate, you're comparing yourself.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 3>To your coworker.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 9>Over the last fifteen years, the best thing you could

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 9>have done is buy bitcoin. And I think that's going

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 9>to be true for the next fifteen hundred years. And

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 9>so as a country, I think we have a choice.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 9>I think everyone else around the world is understanding we

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 9>are pro growth, pro business, pro bitcoin.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 2>As this new.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Administration takes office and we have to make a decision.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.239
<v Speaker 9>I think the worst thing we can do is not

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 9>own enough, and actually to de risk this, we should

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 9>buy some and push these American ideals in technology and

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 9>innovation and growth through the best performing asset and technology

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 9>in mankind.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 5>See if she can get that through Congress. Strike CEO

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 5>check malis great to have you in the house. Thank

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 5>you so much. Coming up, SpaceX it achieves new feats

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 5>during six major test launch of the Starship system. We'll

0:26:45.640 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 5>have the details next. This is Broomberg. Let's just take

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 5>a look at a new trend in Silicon Valley tender offers.

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Until recently, there was a bit of a stigma if

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 5>a venture firms sold a lot of shares in a

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 5>portfolio company before an IPO, it was seen kind of

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 5>as a sign that the firm didn't believe in the

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 5>startups continued growth. But now that stigma is just going away.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's discuss Spoomberg's Katie Roof's piece. You wrote all about

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>this in Today's Tech Daily, and it does feel every

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 5>other day we're getting another announcement of a tender offer.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 5>You did data bricks, You've had SpaceX. But it's not

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 5>a negative.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 10>That's right, and so you know, secondaries have always been

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 10>a thing. But what's different is the stigma's gone. You know,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 10>as companies take ten to fifteen years to IPO, it's

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 10>no longer seen as you're giving up. It's just a

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 10>sign that you need liquidity for your LPs where you often,

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 10>you know, if you're a venture firm, you often have

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 10>to return cash back within ten years.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us about how it gets done. How formalized

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 5>is the secondary market becoming.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 10>Sure, there's different types of transactions. There's the tender offers,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 10>which are usually you know, they're sanctioned by the company.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 10>They're large transactions where often the employees will also sell shares.

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 10>But there's also a lot of one off trades and

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of brokers out there, a lot of

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 10>different intermediaries helping you know, to transact between buyers and

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 10>sellers on these private trades.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Does this and not putting off yet further IPOs.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 10>In some cases it does because part of the pressure

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 10>for IPOs is often because employees or insiders want to

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 10>get liquidity, they want to be able to buy that house.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Those employees that have been.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 10>There forever, and so that pressure goes away when those

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 10>employees and those those insiders are able to get liquidity,

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 10>and so yes, it does absolutely contribute to a delay

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 10>in IPOs new bugs.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Katie, We thank you, and we were just discussing with

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Katie SpaceX tender that we've been hearing about. Well, of course,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 5>it's actually just marked another successful launch with its Starship

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 5>Rocket in its sixth major test, that says Elon Musk

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 5>and President Elect Trump watched from Afar. Here's what one

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX investor had to say about the company's triumphs.

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 11>You don't want to be in SpaceX's way, right if

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 11>you're building there's a lot of benefits to SpaceX is

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 11>building the railway, and there's a lot of benefit that

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 11>now new opportunities become available that weren't available before. But

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 11>you don't really want to be building something that's on

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 11>their roadmap.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 3>They are the apex player.

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Let's get more from expertise in the spacefield. Lori Garva,

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 5>operating advisor at Bessemervenure Partners, former NASA Deputy administrator joining us.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 5>Now you've got a book out and he's worked alongside

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 5>the likes of Elon Musk. He thinks very highly of you,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 5>and I'm interested in about what you made of these

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 5>new feats, in particular, what this sixth test launch really

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 5>showed us because they didn't get to catch once again

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 5>with those so called chopsticks.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this test was a mix.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 12>However, I would finally put it in the win column.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We aren't used to seeing.

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 12>A company or even a government agency push technology like

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX is doing on this flight. Although it was disappointing

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 12>not to get the catch, we knew that was a possibility.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 12>They're making good calls, they're making safe calls. The Starship itself,

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 12>which is actually the more complex and important vehicle, went

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 12>on to succeed beyond anyone's imagination. They are taking out

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 12>weight of the vehicle by eliminating tiles just to test

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 12>the boundaries, to make sure that they are getting the

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 12>most out of every second of the vehicle, and seeing

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 12>that stage land the second stage into the ocean in

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 12>such a controlled way.

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the goal.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 12>The goal is continuing to march on to a fully

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 12>reasonable two stage vehicle, and they made a lot of

0:30:54.680 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 12>progress also with the engine lighting on the second vehicle

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 12>on the second stage.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So a mix, but I'd put it in the one column.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So the fact that it survived reentry through US atmosphere,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 5>the fact that we saw reigniting of one of the

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 5>raptor engines steering, that suddenly becomes possible. Just pitch us forward.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 5>What next is achievable? What ultimately how quickly can we

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 5>suddenly see trips to Mars on this kind of a vehicle.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the key is that the speed over the.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 12>Next couple of years, if we are seeing the cadence

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 12>increase as we did with their Falcon nine vehicle where

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 12>they're launching more than one hundred a year, Gwen Chatwell

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 12>recently said they'll be at the four hundred mark and

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 12>four years with this vehicle. I mean, if they can

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 12>make that, you then will be having on orbit fuel transfers.

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 12>That's the key to going beyond lower the orbit. Whether

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 12>this administration is still going to want to fulfill a

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 12>lunar ambition, we don't know, but definitely we're here hearing

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 12>the President elect and Elon talk about Mars trips and

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 12>those are refueling in lower thorbit, a technology that isn't.

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Proven, but isn't that complex.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 12>You could see missions to mars as they're talking about

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 12>in the four or five year timeframe.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I doubt they would put people on them, but.

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 12>That is indeed what the president has at least talked

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 12>about doing within his term.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Laurie, Yeah, we were just seeing pictures of President elect

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 5>Trump there alongside elaw Musk. You've been there. You were

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 5>in that transition team, the NASA transition team with President

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 5>elect Obama at the time. How likely are we to

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 5>see other companies thrive in this new era where SpaceX

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 5>is so integral and so close to the next administration.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 12>Well, it is a really strange trajectory in the sense

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 12>that the Obama transition team that I led back in

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 12>two thousand and eight.

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and nine set us on.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 12>A course for a more competitive arrangement to have our

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 12>space transportation to and from lower orbit. That gave the

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 12>opening to SpaceX that they have absolutely run through.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And now have dominated the market.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 12>You couldn't have guessed back then how much farther ahead

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 12>they would.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Be than everyone else.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 12>They hadn't even been able to get contracts through the

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 12>military side, and now they're the dominant player. So at

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 12>this point, I think any transition team once they're there.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 12>If the Trump folks even go this route, is to

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 12>put in policies that will allow for more competition. The

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 12>goal is never a monopoly. In fact, we did what

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 12>we did because there was a monopoly, the United Launch Alliance,

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 12>and it was much more expensive to the government. So

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 12>as much as politically things are really tense between competitors

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 12>right now, there's no and we shouldn't be able to

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 12>inspire more people than just SpaceX to be making these advancements,

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 12>and I don't think we want just a single player.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.479
<v Speaker 5>So briefly, Laurie, where do you back in the tech

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 5>stack of ultimately rocket companies and space industry right now?

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 12>Well, at this point, United Launch Alliance is still launching,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 12>it's more expensive, they're not reusable. Blue Origin has launched

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 12>now their Vulcan rocket, and I think in twenty twenty

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 12>five will launch New Glen, which.

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Is supposed to be reusable.

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 12>Over the longer term, the Europeans are developing new vehicles,

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 12>mostly not reusable, so there is no questions.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is in the lead.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 12>As I've said in my book, be hard for anyone

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 12>to catch up in ten years unless SpaceX and Elon.

0:34:54.920 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 5>Trips escaping Gravity your first time account of a new

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 5>era of NASA and Space. Lori Gava also a bestmer

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Venture Partners. We thank you very much.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 13>There could be more decline, It could level off YouTube

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 13>TV Bulu Live.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 14>Is it going to hurt your soul a little bit

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 14>if YouTube TV surpasses you as the biggest cable operator.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 13>Not if they're using Exfinity broadband and watching NBC and

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 13>watching over. We will have transitioned our company pretty carefully.

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>We're going to, you know, be pretty.

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 13>Happy with the Comcast NBCUniversal that we got.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Transitioning carefully. The Comcast CEO Brian Roberts. They're back in

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 5>October at Broomberg screen time when he throwed to the

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 5>idea of perhaps spinning off the company's cable networks into

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 5>a new company in the face of an industry wide

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 5>decline in subscribers. Now Comcast confirmed it. It's been off

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 5>of cable TV channels, including MSNBCCNBC USA Room Meg's Lucashaw

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 5>is here with why that level of detail on those

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 5>channels and what they actually leave out in terms of

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 5>setain channels.

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 14>Well, they will keep NBC, which is the broadcast network

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 14>it's got. Most are the kind of their biggest sports rights,

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 14>including pro football and what will be a lot of

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 14>Pro basketball starting next year. It has their sort of

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 14>hard news gathering business, and it also is an entertainment business.

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 3>They're their biggest entertainment business. They're also keeping Bravo.

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 14>That's because Bravo programming does quite well on Peacock. You know,

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 14>when they're thinking about the future of their entertainment business,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 14>there's three pillars. There's their studio business in LA which

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 14>produces film and television.

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>There's their theme parks, and then there's kind.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 14>Of what has been cable networks but now is really

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 14>all about streaming. And so all the cable networks that

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:46.479
<v Speaker 14>don't fit into that streaming future that have been.

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 3>A drag on their stock.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 14>Because they're not a fast growth business are getting spun

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 14>out into something completely separate.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 5>And what does that spin co as it's currently still

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 5>cool and not becoming lucas it's seven billion dollars an

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 5>annual revenue. Does that grow? Does that shrink?

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 14>It's going to be up to the new leadership, which

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 14>is Mark Lazarus, who's a top person at NBCUniversal now

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 14>will be the CEO of that new company. He was

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 14>one of the architects of Comcast deal for the NBA rights.

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 14>You know, the Comcast executives that I've spoken with believe

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 14>that this new spin Co could be a vehicle for acquisition.

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 14>It could go and buy other cable networks. It could

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 14>go and buy some other media assets. It could also

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 14>be something that a private equity firm wants to.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Come and buy it. It's a little bit unclear, you know.

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 14>I think a lot of people in the industry look

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 14>at it and see it as something that.

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Will sort of overtime trible and die.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 14>But there is a belief that it could be a

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 14>vehicle for acquisitions that Comcast wouldn't want to do.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 5>NUCA sure appreciate analysis, Thank you. Let's talk more about

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 5>reorientating pivoting. Hasbro wants to shift its focus back to

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 5>play a maker of Gi Joe action figures, Mister Potato

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 5>Head is moving away fromerhaps the film in the TV

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 5>business side, instead focusing on digital versions of some of

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 5>the most popular brands. Cecilia Denestasier joins US now with

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 5>gaming like, where does the vision of some of their

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 5>iconic ip end up going. It's a good question. Video

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 5>games for Hasbro. They feel are very intuitive because it's

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 5>crowded in play.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 15>You're thinking, you know, kids growing up with Plato Gi Joe,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 15>Now they want to play video games. They want to

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 15>play video game versions of you know, Gi Joe on

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 15>consoles and on PCs.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 5>What's so fun? The way in which you've written the

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 5>story is you deep dive on Chris Cox is the CEO,

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 5>relatively new, taking over after the passing of the previous leader,

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 5>and he's a gamer at heart, like you talk about

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 5>how into the card game he was playing.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 15>Chris Cox and I've played Magic the Gathering together during

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 15>our meeting in New York City. He beat me, I'm

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 15>sad to say, but we also got to talk a

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 15>lot about the future of Magic the Gathering, which.

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 16>Is a playable, tradable collectible card game. It's several decades old,

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 16>really popular and a huge driver of sales for the

0:38:57.920 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 16>Wizards of the Coast division of Hasbro.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk about ultimately their buyers. Because I've got

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 5>a son who's obsessed with the Pokemon and there's a whole

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 5>load of cards in paraphernalia we keep on buying. Who

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 5>are the demographic because there's also older collectors. There's also

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 5>people who've loved it and grown up with it, and

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 5>therefore do they transition to the gaming too? Is it

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 5>really about the younger demographic?

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 15>Magic the Gathering is a game that's really complicated and

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 15>difficult to get very good at, but younger people can

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 15>enjoy it too. Right now, what has Goes contending with

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 15>is the fact that there are a lot of older

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 15>Magic the Gathering players who want to continue playing with

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 15>their friends and their family and their communities. But they're

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 15>also launching all of these cards, for example, with Marvel

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 15>and Lord of the Rings themes to bring in newer,

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 15>younger players.

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 5>How do they partner? Do they build internally, do they

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 5>go externally? What does the future look like?

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 15>Magic the Gathering is incorporating IP from other companies into

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 15>the cards, so that will just basically look like, you know,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 15>Spider Man or Wolverine images on these playing cards.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 5>Okay, partnerships, cross ip, cross businesses, cross platforms as well.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 5>We love it, Thank you, it's a great We go

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 5>check it out. Bloomberg. Cecilia Dinastasio with the latest when

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 5>it comes to all things Hasbro. Now, that does it

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 5>for this edition of bloombg Technology. Look, you do not

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 5>want to forget about not only our podcast, but also

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 5>what's happening later after the bell in Video coming out

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 5>with its earnings, all important macro event for the entire market.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 5>You're going to be seeing up to what three hundred

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars in market capitalization move any which way. This

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 5>is a three trillion dollar company. Currently we're off by

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 5>four ten percent on the Nastak one hundred tug lower.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 5>By the likes of video, we are off of our

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 5>lows though one hundred and forty five ninety three is

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 5>where we trade. Can we see a future of Blackwell's

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 5>supply side matching up with the demand. We'll have a

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 5>special coming to you on Bloomberg TV at four pm

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 5>in Eastern time, But for now, check out what we

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 5>just count for you on the show on the Terminal,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 5>online on Apple and Spotify, and iHeart by tuning in

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 5>too our podcast.

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology