WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Trump Is Desperate For Iran Off-Ramp As His Popularity Sinks + Most Vulnerable Incumbents In 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>by Incognate. You know, one of the things we talk

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot about on this podcast is trust, who deserves

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it and who doesn't. And lately I've been thinking about

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>how much of our personal information is just floating around online.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about phone numbers, home addresses, emails, even information

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about your family, all sitting on websites you've probably never

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>heard of. In the scary part, that information can be

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>used by scammers and identity thieves to piece together enough

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>details to impersonate you, target you, or worse. That's where

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>incognate comes in. Incognate works behind the scenes to track

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>down and remove your personal data from hundreds of websites,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>things like online directories, people search sites, and even commercial

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>databases that collect and sell your data without your consent.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>The process is automated, and because data can pop back

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>up again, incognit keeps monitoring and removing it for you.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And one feature I really like its custom removals. If

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you find something about yourself online that you want eliminated,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a listing, an old record, or something you just

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want publicly available, you can send incognit the link

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and a dedicated privacy expert handles the removal for you.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>It's a great way to reduce your digital footprint and

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself from scams and identity theft. Right now, you

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>can get sixty percent off an annual incognyplan. Just go

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to incognit dot com slash Chuck podcast and use the

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>code Chuck podcast. Use the code you get a discal again,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's in cogni dot com slash chucktodcast and use the

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>code Chuck podcast to get sixty percent off and start

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>taking control of your personal data today. Trust me, I'm

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>constantly working on this for years myself, and here's an

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for you to take matters into your own hands

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hello thereon, Welcome to the Wednesday episode of

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. So on Monday, I left you with

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a cliffhanger, right, I said I

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>had a new announcement coming and involved sports history, and

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of course the minute it loaded, it turned out my

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>friends at Variety were dropping their story on Monday, not Tuesday,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was not trying to hide it from anybody.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was all hitting on Tuesday, so I

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>was trying to respect the embargoes that I'd done with

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>some coverage. But yes, I've teamed up with longtime sports

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>journalists Ja Donde. You may know Ja from his work

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Post or his work at the LA Times.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where I first got to know him and read them.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>As a Dodger fan, I would consume anything Ja wrote

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>about the Dodgers, but would also follow his other work

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, and then, of course, as part of the

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>hour long must see TV for the longest period of

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time on ESPN when he had Around the Horn at

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern and PTI at five thirty pm Eastern.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Around the Horn is no longer with us. Ja's been

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>He also is at the Medill's School and has been

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>doing that at Midill at Northwestern, teaching sports journalism for

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes back to about twenty seventeen. So look,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we've teamed up to do recall it dynastic, and basically

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what it is is every month Jay and I are

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do a deep dive on a franchise, whether

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a professional sports franchise or a college sports program

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that is gone to another level. Right, there's sort of

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>there's that where they become iconic right, what makes a

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>team or a program go from simply successful to that

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>next level to become iconic? And we will make no bones.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We are absolutely inspired by our friends over at Acquired

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what they've done for the business world, long form storytelling

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about how the great institutions in the business world were built.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've done Google and JP Morgan Chase. They've

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>even dabbled and talked about the NFL and F one

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Is businesses And honestly, we're you know, great ideas like

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>why not do this for sports? And we're applying the

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>same approach to sports franchises and programs. We want to

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>discuss the key people in the history of that franchise,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the decisions of turning points of forks on the road.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So our first episode dropped Tuesday. You may have gotten

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>it in the feed already, you may going, what the

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>hell is this? And our first franchise that we're doing

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive is the Dodgers, the La Dodgers. It's

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a franchise that has spent decades chasing the Yankees in

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>prestige in World Series Championships. Right, you know, in many

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ways it was always that's the measuring stick. But along

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the way in order to chase the Yankees, they ended

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>up becoming probably arguably the most innovative sports organization in

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all of sports history, regardless of sport that you pick.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>In order to catch the Yankees, they had to be

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the innovators, and usually that's what happens, right. Necessity is

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the mother of all invention, right. And of course the

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>story doesn't start there. The story begins in this little

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>borough before it even became a borough of New York City, Brooklyn,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>New York. Eighteen eighty three is when the franchise was born.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Happened to be the same year that the Brooklyn Bridge opened,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and within six or seven years Brooklyn itself would become

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>part of New York City. But that's sort of how

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go through this, and Jay and I

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are both get involved with the research, and it really

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>is sort of are we're making the argument. That's sort

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of like we're making the case why this franchise X

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is iconic. So every month we're going to take a

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into an iconic franchise. So this month it's

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. It'll be from teams you love, in teams

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you hate, and everyone in between. The curious those that

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>you're curious about. So the Dodgers this month, we're going

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to tackle the Pittsburgh Steelers in April. They will be

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the franchise that hosts the NFL Draft, so we thought

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that would the timing of that will be good. We're

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>going to do these every month. In between each episode

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of again borrowing a you know, we're not trying

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to reinvent the wheel here, borrowing a page from our

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>friends that acquired We'll also have a have an episode

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who can sort of talk about the franchise

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in more personal terms. Look, we're doing this independently. We

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>have no patron for any time we do this. So

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I think as much as we know there are plenty

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of sports documentaries out there and episodic you know sort

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>of takes on you know, various individual players part of

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a franchise, we are not taking our cues from anybody.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>We are simply doing it. Really, I look at it

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes of a of a want to be

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a historian, Right, I'm a history junkie, and I think

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>what I love about Jaa and our partnership is that

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he you know, he's not he's as interested in the

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>off the field stuff as he is in the on

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the field stuff just like I am. And in that sense,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is why this partnership is already working.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think. So take a listen. It's a

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>couple takes more than it's more than two hours, right,

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't you know you're telling the story. It takes

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>more than a thirty minute episode. But we don't expect

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you to listen to it in one listening. We know

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know it may be that's why we're going

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to do one of these a month and not try

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to make you consume this here. But it's a lot

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of fun. It's a labor of love for me, and

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just been amazing to get to know Ja and

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to work with him. Special shout out to the sort

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the godfather of this idea, the third partner in

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>this my longtime friend and colleague Steve Hall as well.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So I hope you give it a chance. It's called Dynastics.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe today wherever you get to all your podcasts me on,

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>iHeart already it's being syndicated there. And look, each episode

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we come up with a we're both Jay and I

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>have a mount rushmore of the four most iconic people

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>associated with that franchise Hard Stop. You know, I will

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>argue for more than you know, multiple amount rushmores that

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we could come up with, but we decided to lean

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>into that gimmick. And we know it's a fun gimmick,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and yes it's a gimmick, but it to just narrow

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it down to four creates fun little debates. So we'd

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. Don't be shy about giving

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>us your opinion on this. Trust me, in the world

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of sports. The only place where people are more opinionated

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of sports is of course, in the

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>world of politics. So I hope you'll check it out.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the patients in this feed that I've added

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. As for this episode, we got a lot

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of interesting nuggets on all things having

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to do aroun. I have a little bit of a

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign twenty twenty six update, including a fascinating new top

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>five list, a unique take on my top five this week,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which is top five most likely state wide incumbents to

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>lose to not return to office, so slightly different it

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would be either gov or sitting governors or sitting senators,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but the five most vulnerable of those. I thought it

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would be a different way to slice that idea. Going forward,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll take some questions, but obviously, in the world of politics,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it is still we are still living in one story

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that is going to continue and will continue to dominate,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is all things Iran. It is as as

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>has been foreshadowed on this podcast, and I've said in

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>other places, Donald Trump was not going to have a

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of patience and he was going to look for

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>an exit ramp. And he is certainly trying to talk

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>talk his way into getting out of this war that

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he got himself into. And it's clear he is struggling

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with the political pain is causing because remember, as I

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>reminded you on Monday, the people feeling the immediate tax

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>hike from this war, and in this case, the tax

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>height is the rise in gas prices. It is more

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>folks who supported him, right, this is this gap. When

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>gas prices go up, it is folks in rural and

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>exurban America who are hit hardest. Well, that is geographically

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the Trump political base. So this is

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>having a huge impact on his side politically, which is

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>why he knows and is so desperate to find his

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>way out, But what does victory actually look like. It's

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a question that Donald Trump is trying to He's like,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if we can they pledged never to have a nuclear bomb,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>which they had actually pledged to do before, or if

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they get we destroyed their navy, he's saying, and we're

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>able to get them from doing a state sponsor of terrorism.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But and he's trying to say, and there's gonna be

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>new people in the regime, so it's kind of like

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>regime change. Yeah, but it's not regime change, right, And

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. He's trying to spitball how he would

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>sell victory in this, But this is the problem he's in,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is that there is no easy way out of here,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a good answer because there might not.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no victory he can declare in the next four

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to six weeks. And at this point they kind of

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>know it. And it looks like he is desperate to

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>get out of this energy crisis that he's helped create.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>So we've arrived at one of those moments in American

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>form policy where every path forward carries risks. And this

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is I've said up before, he boxed himself in. He

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>boxed the country in You know, no matter your political persuasions,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>your political feelings about Donald Trump, America's prestige is on

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the line here and that's a huge problem. So what

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are the options that are facing it. It's clear that militarily,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he's being given the option to escalate. Right, we continue

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to send more troops who look like they would be

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the first troops on the boots on the ground for

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ground incursion. Maybe it's just simply to

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>keep this straight of horn moves open. But the type

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of resources we're sending over there now is in case

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the President makes the decision and gives the green light

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to putting actual American troops on the ground in Iran.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But of course that's an escalation. And if you do that,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that risks a wider regional war and more energy shocks

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and a long term commitment with no clear endgame. If

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing what he's doing now, he's trying to hurry

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up and de escalate, okay, but he risks something that's

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially just as dangerous, handing Iran a strategic victory without

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>ever formally admitting it. Right, the Jemes survived who won this?

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>For Yes, we've absolutely eviscerated their military, and we've certainly

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>degraded their ability to cause problems for the United States.

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>What about for the region itself? And any circumstance that

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he's negotiating at the moment continues to keep. And this

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is where geography is Iran's best weapon. Here they're going

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a large say over who gets to travel

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>through the Straight of Hormones. So former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who was the Defense secretary for Donald Trump in his

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>first term, and he's no Iran dove, trust me on this,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but he put it as bluntly as anyone has. Earlier

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, he said, the United States declares victory and

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>steps back. Now, Iran will effectively claim control of the

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Strait of Horn moves. And we know what that means.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It means that any moment in time they can essentially

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>create an energy problem for the United States and the world,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's a political problem for the US and is

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had his own warning here was even

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>more vivid because he expects that under any scenario, they're

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going to start to charge basically charging attacks on global

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>shipping to go through the Strait of ormentors because if

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you were then, you know, Israel wants regime change. How

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do you know that they've set it? Prime Minister that

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>now who's said it? So they're not going to feel secure.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the United States is going to guarantee that the

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>US would somehow prevent Israel from attacking them? Again? Are

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we going to do that? Is Israel going to sign

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>off on that? I'm skeptical. So here we are, we're

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be in a situation where the Iranians will

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>control the strait, this regime will control the straight. I mean,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>still roughly twenty percent of the world's oil passes through

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this narrow passage, and that continues to give the Arminians

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>leverage over the global economy. So it's hard to imagine that.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>First of all, they didn't have this much. You know,

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they arguably always kind of had this leverage if they

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>chose to use it, but there was an uneasy piece

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that was there. But now by engaging in this, they

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>know and what is their incentive not to continue to

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>cause disruptions because they know their days are numbered if

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they just sort of stand pat So it's hard to

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see how we get an uneasy cease

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>fire here that somehow is attainable in sticks. I hope

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. I don't think any of us want to

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>see a war that escalates where we have American young

0:15:55.280 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>American men and women coming home in body bags fighting

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a war of choice. Yes, aron's a menace, but it

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a war of choice. Is this the time

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to have this war? I think we know what the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is, and certainly President Trump has created

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a situation with our allies that makes it where we're

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>going in alone on this. I'm going to get to

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>more on that in a minute. But Mattis is warning

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes something bigger than just a military assessment, because militarily,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's both the military has had massive strategic

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>victory here and at the same time, there's only so

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>much the military can do. Mattis said one other thing

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in his interview. He said, you know, we're in a

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tough spot. Now. This goes back to being boxed in.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't identify a lot of options. This is coming

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>from Jem Mattis. This isn't coming from some left wing blogger, okay,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's the reality. There's no clear path forward here,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear they didn't think this through at the

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>White House. They really believed, or the President believed that

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be just like Venezuelan and that

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the incentive to survive would somehow. You know, he doesn't

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>seem to acknowledge that this regime has kept power for

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>forty seven years, which means there's a lot of people

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that are devoted to this regime and they're not going

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to go away quietly because their livelihood depends on the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>regime staying in power. You would think Donald Trump would

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>understand when you have kind of that kind of loyalty, right,

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the type of loyalty he tries. He wants people

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>loyal to him, not because they like him, loyal to

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>him because they need them. Well, that's the type of

0:17:52.160 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>loyalty this regime is created. They're not going easily. This

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you by Soul.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you love that end of the day unwined

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but hate the hangover, Soul's out of Office is for you.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>These sparkling THCHC drinks and gummies give you the same

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>relaxed social feeling without the alcohol, without the calories, and

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>without the crash. Soul is a wellness brand that believes

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes in

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>delicious hemp derived THCHC, and CBD products designed to boost

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>your mood and help you unwind. Their best selling out

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of office gummies were designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz,

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>boost your mood and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>different strengths, you can tailor the dose to fit your vibe.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So also has a variety of products specifically designed to

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's rest, including their top

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy Gummies, a fan favorite for deep, restorous sleep. Look,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I have made no secret. I am a believer in

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, in cannabis and hemp derived. I do not

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>partake an alcohol. For the most part, I think this

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff is a lot safer than alcohol, a lot less

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>addictive than alcohol. And yes, I have to say I

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>love these drinks. It is the glass of wine and

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know after work, that's what this is. So no

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hangover and no excess calories like this. I'm a big fan.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Sold today, right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. Go to getsoul dot com

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and use the word toodcast. That's getsold dot com promo

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>code podcast for thirty percent off. And yes, I too,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>am a customer. And there's another reality that's hard to ignore.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Airpower alan doesn't change regimes. History continues to show this

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>again and again. So even after weeks of strikes, even

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>after the damage to all these Iranian military targets, we're

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>still left in a position where we've demonstrated force and

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't secured the outcome, and are how are more

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, more rats sort of fall on deaf ears

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to those that have survived, just surviving, what more is

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>there for us to destroy? And again this is asymmetric.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Just the regime surviving is victory for them. So we're stuck.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Neither side can force the other to change course, neither

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>side can claim a decisive when, And the longer that continues,

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the more this becomes about perception and who looks like

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>they held firm and who looks like they blinked, And

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>let's just say Donald Trump is blinking lot. So this

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about Iran. This has got second order effects

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>already in motion among the Iranian diaspora menary who hope

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this would be a turning point. Now that hope fades

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>right among the Gulf States, the question becomes is the

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>United States still the security partner of choice? And if

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer becomes even slightly uncertain, they don't walk away,

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to hedge. That's where China comes in.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>There'll be regional arrangements, There'll be a lot of self preservation.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Because alliances don't break overnight. They hollow out. And this

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is yet another uncomfortable part of this. We didn't just

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>stumble into this moment. Donald Trump helped create this moment.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the hardest thing is to say in politics are

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious ones that because they're complicated, but because

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're so basic, you assume one doesn't need to even

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>say it. It doesn't need to be said. But if you

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>hollow out expertise, you get worse decisions. If you surround

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>yourself with people who agree with you, you make more mistakes,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you alienate your allies, you end up alone

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>when it matters. This is an advanced political science. This

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is organizational leadership one oh one. Yet here we are right.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>How did he hollow out the expertise, He gutted the

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>National Security Council, He surrounded himself with a bunch of secofans.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Right there is no gym Matis at the Defense at

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon right now offering, say e questionable advice. There's

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Pete Hags who, let's just say, couldn't carry Jymnatis's jockstrap.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a Secretary state in theory that I

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think is sort of reality based. But his political future

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>hinges on whether Donald Trump thinks he's the heir apparent.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So we know what kind of limited pushback. And notice

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>when you get all of the the fact that JD.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Vans and Telsea Gabbert have both used the same spin

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>while the President came to this conclusion, and Marco Ruby,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>while the President decided there was an imminent threat, and

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the President decided right by the way talk about CYA.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>None of them want to own this. They're making it

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>clear this is a Donald Trump decision all the way through.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They somehow think that they don't have it, that this

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is just sustain and not a tattoo. But we shall see.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So here we are. He has spent the last year here.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>In a couple of months berating our allies, using tariffs

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to bludgeon our allies, and ad tacks, creating all sorts

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of uncomfortable alliances, making NATO, you know, threat with the

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>threat on Greenland, shaking the confidence of our NATO allies.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's how we spent twenty twenty five as a nation.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And then he's boxed himself in and on this Iaran decision.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Could use some allies to help us out with the

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>straight of Oar moves, and they're all like, hey, good luck, brother,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you're on your own now. You can sit here and complain.

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Where are our allies? Well, you alienated them. You made

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it a lot harder for them to stick by us,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because sticking by the United States is suddenly politically unpopular

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in places like the UK, Germany, France and Italy let

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>me repeat myself, or Japan. Can you believe that standing

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the United States is unpopular in

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>those countries? That's a problem. Ironically, Donald Trump had in

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>theory diverse voices in the room. He had a national

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>security team that looked like it did represent a range

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of perspectives, from a dove like Tulsea Gabbert to a

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hawk like Marco Rubio. But here's the difference between theory

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and practice. No one appeared willing or able to tell

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the President something he didn't want to hear. General Kine

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>came the closest, but he even did that through proxies,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>right through interviews with the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. And that distinction matters a lot here

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because dissent isn't about having different resumes in the room.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's about whether anyone feels empowered to challenge the decision

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that's already been made. And if they don't, then what

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you have is in a debate, it's a performance. And

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we spent all this time beating up our testing all

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of our alliances. We treated them as transactional people, even

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>publicly lecturing them. The Vice President lectured Europe about the

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>their internal values. When I thought the whole point was

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>real politique. You do you, we do we? And it

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>raised a simple question, if you knew you might be

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>heading into a conflict that could disrupt global energy markets,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>would you spend the previous year making it politically harder

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for your allies to stand with you, or would you

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be strengthening those relationships. Because what we're seeing right now

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't a collapse of alliances. It's something more subtle. It's hesitation,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>it's hedging. It's a quieter kind of distance. They're not

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>saying they won't help, but like, wrap up this war

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll see what we can do. And then

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this is where it all connects. When you narrow the

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>circle of advice, when you prioritize loyalty over challenge, when

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you weaken alliances, you don't just change the environment around

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a decision, you actually change the decision itself. The risks

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>look smaller they weren't. The timeline looks shorter, it wasn't.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The outcome feels more manageable. Well, this hain't been as well. Now.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting here is that polling is showing this war

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is unpopular, Okay, not surprising, and that's a huge issue

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for him, and I think he's very aware. I mean,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem here, right. He knee jerked his way

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>into this, and now he's going to knee jerk his

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>way out of this. And it ain't going to be

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>that clean. I know he thinks it could be, and

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he has you know, rolled the dice before on Middle

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>East decisions, and he's not and it hasn't hurt him

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>yet until now, and I think he still thinks in

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>his head that if they can somehow wrap this up,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>he can declare some sort of victory and somehow the

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>markets will write themselves sooner rather than later. There's no

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>doubt this global economy and the American economy has been resilient.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But at some point it ain't going to be this resilient,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, everybody's going to start hedging all over

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the place. What's been interesting is what we're watching among

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>independence in the polling. They don't like Democrats, they don't

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>like Republicans, but they particularly don't like Donald Trump and Mega.

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So that is why independents look like they're supporting Democrats,

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.959
<v Speaker 1>because what they're voting against is Trump and MAGA is Trump.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump is Mega support among independences that sit in the

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>low twenties. That is a huge problem here. Wherever independence

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>go in Chunk is usually when that party wins. Something

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>else that's popped up in the polls that I kind

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of want people to pay attention to. Marquette is out,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and what's interesting is that they did fave on favor

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ratings for Democratic Party, Republican Party and then MEGA believe

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it or not, the Republican Party are the best ratings

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of those three entities. Democratic Party they had the lowest

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>rating of those three entities. But MAGA was looked closer

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to being as unpopular as the Democrats were, and certainly

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more unpopular than Republicans. And now there's always been a

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>distinction between those that call themselves Republicans and those that

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>call themselves MAGA, and of course anything MAGA is always

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more loyal to the President on everything like this. Around war,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some polling showed like ninety nine percent support

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>among MEGA voters, but among those that consider themselves more

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican than MEGA, it's been like fifty five to forty.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not been a clean break, you see.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>And I know, I know MEGA influencers are more anti

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>war than the rank and file of MEGA, right, but

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it tells you how bad the MEGA brand has become.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Where the Republican brand is in better shape with voters

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>than the MAGA brand. If you're a Republican on the ballot,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you should be relieved that this is true. I think

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the great fear among some Republicans is that Trump and

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>MAGA was going to drag. The republic can brand with it.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>If you've got voters willing to distinguish between the two,

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this should be the time to go rush and grab it.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Except guess what this Republican Party and Jerryman. It's made

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>primaries so important that Republicans can't distance themselves fast enough

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>from Trump because if they do, they won't win primaries.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the trap that John cornyns, right, So it's

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's it's it's interesting here none of this is

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>yet benefiting the Democrats brand, even as it benefits them

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in binary choices when you do those head to head tests.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that this is really and in some

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>ways you know, this Iran war could be the death

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>knell for the MEGA brand, right because even though the

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>influencers want the MAGA brand to be something else, as

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has always said, Mega is whatever he says

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it is. And it turns out the voters are look

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at MAGA through the prism of Trump, and maga's numbers

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are as bad as Trump's numbers. But the fact that

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party's numbers are actually slightly better than MAGA

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and Trump in theories an opportunity for the Republican Party

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to find its way away out of the wilderness, away

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>from Trump, if they so choose. What that really tells

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you is that independent voters, because that's where these numbers

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>are coming from. Independence, have a better view of Republicans

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, the Republican Party when it's not associated with

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. I'll be curious to see what that means

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty eight and does the unpopularity of Trump's

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on pot you know, if this isn't recoverable, and there

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are always points and second terms where once it's gone,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gone. He's bounced back a few other times, there's

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a point he stops bouncing back. This

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>might be the time he stops bound back, which means

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there's an opening. And what's interesting, there's one there's one

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>person I'm keeping an eye on, closest when it comes

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who would run as a sort of a

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>non maga but maybe mega call it, you know, not

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>anti this, and it's Brian Kemp in Georgia. And guess

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>what state is the only state so far to do

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a gas tax holiday. Brian camp in Georgia. Feels like

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>an easy way for Brian Kemp presidential candidate to distinguish

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>himself from a JD. Vance or Marco Rubio in the primary.

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So not lost on me that Camp you know, already

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has that feather in his twenty twenty eight cap should

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he need it, and you're starting to see polling conformed

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. Look, this is just early days of this,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is going to be worth keeping

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tracking a which is, how can does the Republican brand

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>start improving in the mind of some independent voters simply

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>because Trump and MAGA have become so dominant, and what

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican office holders find a way? Hear that? All right?

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>With that, I had a few more political items I

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get to. I think I'm gonna punt. We're

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. We'll do that with tomorrow's episode,

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>including this bizarre sort of Chuck Schumer sort of attempt

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to sort of quell the There is clearly a growing

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>band of senator Democratic senators that want Schimmer to go.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>He did a crazy interview with the Wall Street Journal

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>where I think he sort of exposed himself as either

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>being a bit out of touch or not fully on

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>top of what is happening here, and at the same

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, one can understand what he's tried

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to do, and so if Chuck Schumer doesn't want progress

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to look like Progressives have defeated him, he may want

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to go out on his terms rather than test the

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>premise whether he could survive a vote himself come December,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>should Democrats end up with the majority of the Senate.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna get more than that tomorrow. Will do

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on the democratic side of things.

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But considering where we are at the run, it is,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>as I've said before, there is only one story impacting

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>American politics until until it is no longer front and center,

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be hard to focus on anything else.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisanal pastries, and

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code, the

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. If you use the promo code podcast at

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 1>check out, you get thirty dollars off. I've already used

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it as a gift to somebody else who loves this bread.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to find good gluten free bread. It

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic. They give you step by step instructions. I

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really dig this. There is nothing like having an artesian

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bakery in your freezer to chase away the winter chill.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Now is the best time to stay in and enjoy

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>some comforting homemade meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>recommend it. It is worth giving Wild Grain to try.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now. Wildgrain is offering my listeners thirty dollars off

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your first box plus free croissants for life. Come on

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>when you go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>start your subscription today. That's thirty dollars off your first

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>box and free Croissants for life when you visit wildgrain

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash podcast, or simply use the promo code

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast at checkout. This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so use that code. Top five top top jest top

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, this week I got a unique take on

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the top five list. I've been giving you my top

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>five most you send it, seats most likely to flip,

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>your top five governor seats most likely to flip. I've

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>done some historical top five lists, and I'm going to

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>keep that going. But I thought i'd do a slightly

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>different take on on something, because which is the top

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>five right now? My top five most vulnerable state wide

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>incumbents Because in some cases, you know, like the case

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in Louisiana or Rhode Island, where there's a state wide

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>incumbent who's going to lose, but they're the same party

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up with the seats, so they

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>don't doesn't make my top five most likely to flip, right,

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in the senate races with Louisiana or the

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>governor's races with Rhode Island. So that's why I thought

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we do a little bit of a take on that,

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to give you right now, who I

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think are the five most vulnerable state wide office holders

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>who are more at this point, four of the five

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to lose than win given the situation

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're currently in literally for them underwater. One arguably

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has still got a slight advantage here and it is

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in my fifth slot. So number one on the list

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of most vulnerable incumbent is John Cornet, right, He's already

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>been forced into a run on off. We will find

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out after Memorial Day whether that'll happen. A new pole

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>came out a couple of days ago showed him down eight.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of the forty one percent, you know, he

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>basically the number he got in the primaries, the number

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting on the runoff. Paxston looks like he's got

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the more likely. You know, this runoff

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>is going to probably be lower turnout, and that is

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to advantage Paxton on this front. Trump is clearly

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not decided whether to endorse. I think in some ways

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he was probably he doesn't like being smoked out and

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the corn and people were trying corning in Thune. We're

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>trying so hard to corner him into an endorsement within

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that first forty eight hours after the Texas primary, and

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>when it didn't happen, then they knew others were going

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to get to him. And that's exactly what's happened. Others

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>have gotten to Trump. So I think we're at the

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>point now where I don't know if he gets if

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>he gets comfortable endorsing, I just don't buy it. Not

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if poles continue to show corn And losing, and he

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>does not like tobacco loser. You know he does not.

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>He will back somebody trailing in the polls if it's

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>early in a primary and he thinks and he knows

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that it will flip. He doesn't like doing it late

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because he does it want to. He hates being with

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the losing candidate. And if he can't be convinced that

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Corny could win, I don't think that solo endorsement is coming.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So Cornn's in the one slot. In the number two

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>slot is somebody that I haven't been mentioning. But it's

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like not even a close call. Dan McKee, who's the

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>current governor of Rhode Island. He ended up replacing Gina

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Romundo and as governor back in twenty twenty two. He

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has just been in a hole for it feels like months.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got a job approval rating that at

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>times has been in the twenties. There was a primary

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>University of New Hampshire poll that had him at eighteen percent.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He's likely his main rival is actually the niece of

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Dodd for those of you keeping score at home,

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Helena Folks. He's a former executive from CVS the pharmacy,

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>which is headquartered in Rhode Island, so they have that

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is that is not a net negative being a former

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>CVS executive. Being a former CVS executive is mostly a

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>net positive there. And look there's the you know Rhode Island,

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a very strong democratic state in general, so the

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>primary is where all the action is. And you see

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>these labor and business divides, like all the normal divides

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you normally see in a general election in Rhode Island

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>always takes place in the primary, kind of like what

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw in Illinois, right where interest groups know that

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there's only what it's a one party state, so you

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>start to see that, Well, Dan McKee is just it.

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I you know, it's unusual for a governor to lose primary,

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but it happens. It is happened. Frank Murkowski, Lisa Murkowski's father,

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>basically over appointing his daughter of the Senate seat, among

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>other things, lost to primary back in twenty Back in

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty oh six, this woman named Sarah Palin ended up

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>primary in him and she became She became governor and

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of made a name for herself there

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for a few years. But this is why I wanted

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to do this top five lists. I haven't been able

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to get this on the table. So Dan McKee number two.

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to see a path. You could make

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 1>an argument that McKee should be in the one slot

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose, Cornyn in the two. The only

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm putting corn in first is he's already been

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>through round one of a primary and now the runoff.

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is sitting out there in theory mcke's

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that primary is not un till September, and so he's

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in theory got five more months to fix himself. So

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just because he's got more time, he's number two. Corning's

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>number one. In my third slot is Bill Cassidy, another

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>one who's more likely to lose in a primary than

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in general. He appears slightly more competitive in a multi

0:40:54.600 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>candidate primary as Julia Letlow, who is basically the unofficial

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>official endorsed challenger of Cassidy in some form. Right, these

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are the getting let Low in. This is where Trump

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to be. It's likely who he's gonna end up supporting.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how heavily he comes in. But there are

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple candidates in the race, and the more crowded this

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>primary is, in theory, the better for Cassidy. But it

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 1>would end up in a runoff as well. I mean,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>they remember the state of Louisiana changed its rules basically

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just so that Bill Cassidy could be primary because of

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>his impeachment vote pure and simple, right, Louisiana used to

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be a jungle primary state, all parties on one ballot.

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>If nobody gets fifty, top two face off. Well, the

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fear this would have been Cassidy's opportunity, he would have.

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Cassidy would be winning reelection under the ole the rules

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of Louisiana's election system that they had the first time

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he ran. I promise you there is, and he would

0:41:55.320 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>probably be running a different race. Now maybe there isn't

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Maybe he's somehow done. He has figured out

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>how to alienate the left over with his playing footsie

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>with RFK Junior and the right by it voting to

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>convict Donald Trump. And maybe there's no coming back from that,

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and because of that squeeze, there really isn't There isn't

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's so alienated both that nobody wants to

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>see him succeed either way. He's easily number three on

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the list, but he he's not dead yet. And I

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just think that that is you know, I it is

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I keep waiting. You know, I just don't

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>know if he ends up benefiting when Bobby Kennedy messes up,

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, even though he's

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>been a critic now of what Kennedy's doing, he's still

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy that got Kennedy into that job. And we

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of and I think we all know why he

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>did it. He thought this is if he thought, this

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is what it would take to get Trump's endorsement. And

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 1>we know what the Trump White House did, well, they said, well,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly it will help. He was never going to he

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was never going to flip. He was never going to

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. That's something I don't know why Cassidy misread

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that situation Number four on the list, Susan Collins. She

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>trails both Mills and Platner and polling and I've seen

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>she is now benefiting that Mills and Platner are going

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>after each other. Mills is up with another attack ad

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 1>on Platner. And we're going to find out, right, how

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>much do voters in Maine care about this stuff? You know,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>how powerful is the Donald Trump effect on Democratic primary voters?

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We already know that Republican primary voters that the you know,

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the personal character issues just are not what they used

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to be, not at all. Right, Donald Trump is is

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, is sort of almost like pardoned

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody running for office on the Republican side on character.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's clear a lot of Democrats think, hey, they

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't be as picky either. I think this is generational.

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think those that have grown up mostly living online

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>know that a lot of dumb stuff gets said. So

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to be a younger voter is

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be more forgiving for what Platner did, and

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an older voter is going to be less forgiving. Right,

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And in Maine, Maine is the oldest state, oldest electorate

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the country, the single oldest electorate in the country.

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So I do think we underrate Mills's chance to get

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to win this primary this way and death by a

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand cuts then I think, you know, I know, the

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 1>energy feels like it's with Platner. What don't underestimate sort

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of the main electorate, which is again not a young electorate.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Just something to think about there. As for Susan Collins,

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I think she's you know, I think she's in. I

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.399
<v Speaker 1>don't see a way out of this for her because

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>independence have turned on her and I don't know if

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be any moment where she can show

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 1>her independence again. And if anything, it's you know, she's

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>had those opportunities and she's chosen partisanship over independence. Right.

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 1>If you think about Lisa Murkowski's is and Collins, who

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>both essentially have a similar electorate, you know, cranky independence,

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the Alaska that's the Alaska voter arguably, and that's

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the main voter. Collins tries to always find herself on

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the side of Republicans. Murkowski always seems more likely to

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>find her side herself on the side of not being

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there with the Republicans. Being more independent or sometimes voting

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 1>against them. And I think Murkowski's displayed independence more credibly

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.760
<v Speaker 1>than Collins has. And that's why I think this time

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. So when I say the first four on

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>my list are all underwater, all trailing at the moment,

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Corny and McKay, Cassidy, Collins, that is true. Number five

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on the list is somebody who's not trailing. And I

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say, here are the people I had to

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>choose from who I think are all vulnerable incumbents at

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment. You have the governor of Nevada, Joe Lombardo,

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>being a Republican and a dem leaning state. You know,

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he knocked off a one term incumbent. He's going to

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>be facing a wealth on the challenger. Nevada is as

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:22.479
<v Speaker 1>swinging of a state as there is. I think he's

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>holding up as well as you could under the circumstances,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but he is the wind is decidedly blowing against him.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Governor Arizona in this case, I think she's

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>got the wind at her back a little bit Katie Hobbs,

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but and she you know, if Andy Biggs is the nominee,

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think she's in better shape than if Schwikert, David

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Schwikert is the nominee there, so there, that's a nominee

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>for the fifth slot. See Katie Hobbs, Joe Lombardo, Dan

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Sulivon Alaska, John Ossoff and Georgia and Pete Ricketts. And

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you right now, at the moment,

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that the incumbent and that right now is

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the toughest shape. Who has who has the most

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>well formed challenger is Pete Ricketts in Nebraska. Look, he's

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>still favorite, It's still Nebraska. But man, it is fascinating

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to watch how well how resilient Osborne is. He's already

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 1>taken a bunch of incoming claiming he's a Democrat in

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 1>independent clothing, and it hasn't really budged his numbers. So,

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, while I'm still you know, let's see he

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>can get to fifty. I think the path to forty

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>seven is pretty clear for him, somewhere between forty five

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and forty seven. But can he get to fifty? But

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, right now, I think Ricketts more so than Slomon,

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more so than John Houston in Ohio, another candidate for

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 1>my incumbent list here, And you could make a strong case,

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>although I'd argue John Houston's an appointed so he doesn't

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>count as a real incumbent in that front. So my

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth slote a little bit of a Husker surprise, just

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like they've been to me. I know they're a four seed,

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but I still think of Nebraska basketball as a bit

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of a dark horse here, which translation means I'm probably

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>betting on Iowa. But there you go. There's the top

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>five most vulnerable statewide incumbents in the country. John Cornett,

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan McKee, Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, and Pete Rippons. We'll

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>update the list again next month. Ass chuck. All right,

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>let's do a little last chuck. Cue the music. Hey,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this has been from Colorado. I saw recently that John

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Hickenlooper dropped out of the caucus assembly process because he

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was not getting the support that he needed to show

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>up on the primary ballot. I also saw some pulling

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that he is trailing fairly significant the primary right now

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to his challenger, Julie Gonzalez. If he loses, he would

0:48:58.120 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be the third single term Senator in a row in

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the last two Senate seat from Colorado. How about that,

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess You're right that has been the case. Have

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there been other cases where this has happened in the Senate? Thanks? Ben? Actually, yes, Ben,

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>here's your answer, because it is the So I guess

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it would say I love that you identified it as

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Class two. This would be the Class three seat in

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. Okay, So let me give you this this

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>run of one term senators. So you had Robert Morgan

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>elected in seventy four, lost reelection in eighty John East

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>elected in eighty he ends up dying, it's vacant. There's

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>an appointment Jim Broyhill. Then you have in eighty six

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Terry Sandford is a Democrat, is elected, He's a one termer.

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Locke Faircloth is elected in ninety two, defeats him, defeats

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Terry Stanford, he's a one termer. He loses to John Edwards.

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>John Edwards decides not to see reelection. And then that's

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when Richard Berwin's that seat in two thousand and four.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And that was two terms. So here we you have

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Edward's one term, Faircloth one term, Sanford one term. So

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's your three in a row. Really, you could argue

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>four in a row because East got one term Morgan

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>five in a row, so basically after sam Irvin, right,

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 1>sam Irvin resigns early in his seat. After sam Irvin,

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the most famous you know, and you know doing the

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Watergate hearings, that North Carolina Class three seat had five

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>straight one term senators. Some of them lost reelections, some

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of them chose not to run, one died, So you

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>had a death presidential candidacy and incumbents losing twice. What

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a fun question. But like I said, I'm sure there

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>are more than that. But if I found a five

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>spot for you, I think and look, you know, for

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>folks may not realize, Colorado has got an interesting little

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.359
<v Speaker 1>system you can if you go through the cock you

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>can go through the essentially the state convention process, and

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get into the details here, where

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you can qualify for a primary for the primary ballot

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>without having to do petition signatures. You can just get

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>it and you can try to get the endorsement. But

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the obviously, the party apparatus these days are dominated by

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the by the base voters, right base progressives with Democrats

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>based mago for Republicans. So if you're sort of a

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>center left or a center right politician, You're not going

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to be able to win an endorsement from your state

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>conventions these days, no matter where you are, particularly in

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a place like Colorado. So I understand why he's going

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to try to go in primary his way. Here, my

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>guess is, once he starts spending money, he's going to

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be quote unquote okay, especially because you'll you should expect

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to see a very large primary turnout. There's an open

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>seat for Governor Michael Bennett, the other senator from the

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>state is the sitting Attorney general or running against each

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 1>other in the primary, So there should be a large turnout,

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine Hickenloopers should be okay in a large turnout.

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the fireable offense is, and if

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the fireable offense is he's not progressive enough. I don't

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>know if there's enough enough voters to knock him off.

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But we shall see, you know, he certainly. I've said

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this before. I think being an incumbent on the ballot

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that's vulnerable this year hard stop. Obviously, some vulnerabilities are

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>greater than others, but I would keep that in mind.

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Next question, Matt Minneapolis, Hey, as a horse race election guy,

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>elections guy, I've really been enjoying the primary night live streams. Nice.

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Please keep them coming. We will. Next one is going

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to be for the Virginia special referendum, by the way,

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in on April twenty first. Then we'll do all the

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>May primaries. May. He's going to be a huge primary month,

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so mark your calendars. Recently, you said that if Antonin

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Scalia had lived, Trump wouldn't have been elected, which seems

0:52:56.440 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to apply. Hillary would have won in twenty sixteen. But

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you also said the year it said the year you

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>thought she could have won was four. I do believe that.

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what you meant? Also, with and I

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>owe money and the transfer portal changing college basketball, do

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you think limiting players to one transfer could help fix

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the current issues and restore more team continuity?

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt in Minneapolis, Go Gophers? All right, you got three

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>questions here, so yes, I think ultimately, I do believe

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's best shot at the presidency was actually two

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four, the year she didn't run, you know,

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not OA in not sixteen. What do I mean? Why

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>do I say, oh, four more than any others? And

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I did this as a what if exercise, By the

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>way of alternative history, she was the front runner. She

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>had very high favorable ratings at the time, probably was

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>higher favorable ratings than John Carrey did at the time

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or even Al Gore. But that would happen with Hillary,

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 1>right like you know, when she was in the middle

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of a political campaign, then all the negatives would negative

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>negativity would come and it would lower her numbers. But still, look,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>we were in the middle of a war right after

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven. I just think that being the former

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>first lady with another president sort of with a former

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:22.240
<v Speaker 1>president as the first gentleman, would have probably been enough

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to convince that slice of voter who didn't want to

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.400
<v Speaker 1>change horses in midstream during a war. And we were

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at ward twenty oh four. So that's why I believe

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the only Democrat that could have won maybe Al Gore

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.360
<v Speaker 1>as a sitting former sitting vice president, former vice president,

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:39.399
<v Speaker 1>But I actually think that would have been the moment.

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Hillary would have been seen as hawkish enough,

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, those voters that might be a little hesitant

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>about electing a woman president might have been reassured by

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's a former president who she happened

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to be married to I just think when you're changing,

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're asking voters to change commander in chiefs, they're

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>going to want more familiarity. And that's a case where

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I think this is where by point, this is where

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>her her being tied to a former president was an asset,

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think a four would the only time was

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:08.799
<v Speaker 1>an asset. Right, it was a liability in no A

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>because it didn't signify change, and by sixteen it was

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a liability frankly for the same reason. Now, yes, do

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that she ends up winning, I think she's

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>only a one term or if she does in sixteen,

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>if Scalia lives, I do because I do think Trump

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>had been disqualified and I think the only thing that

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>brought many Republicans back to hold their nose and instead

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of voting Gary Johnson as a as a protest vote,

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but when ahead to vote to Trump was the fact

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that there was an open seat that was going to

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be that could change literally change ideological hands depending on

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the election of the president. And I do not I

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 1>think if Scalia is alive, I do not think. I

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>think you have more of those events, those people that

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't like his character, who weren't ready to come aboard

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Trump train, probably end up in the Gary Johnson column,

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and Gary Johnson probably ends up closer to ten percent,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>which would have been the decisive figure for Hillary Clinton.

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's my explanation of that. All right, let me

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 1>take one more question here, because I went long on

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 1>both of those. This comes from Patrick in Los Angeles.

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 1>He goes the talk of I five and I ninety

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>five and political party messaging made me think of one

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite pop culture quotes that unintentionally sums up

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of American politics. You see Homer meaning Homer Simpson.

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You see Homer. There's a place between New York and

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. We call it America. Do you have any

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>pop culture quotes or moments that unintentionally carry weight politically,

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick and Los Angeles, I'll tell you one that I

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>use all the time. I always say my favorite political

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:40.360
<v Speaker 1>pundit is Buffalo Springfield, which of course is a group,

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not an individual, but some people think it Buffalo Springfield

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like an individual. But there's a there's a great

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Springfield song. So the song title this is a

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Springfield song. The song title is for what It's worth.

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It was written by Steven Stills. But it's but I

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>always say, you know, I think the most important, the

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 1>smartest political pundit we've ever had in handicapping elections as

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Springfield. Because and this goes back, and I'll tell

0:57:09.520 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you the origin of why I became obsessed with this quote.

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>The quote goes, there's something happening here. What it is

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ain't exactly clear, and it's that first half. Now, the

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of the stanza goes, there's a man with a

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gun over there telling me I gotta beware, So I

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>leave the gun line out. But there's something happening here

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and what it is ain't exactly clear. It is my

0:57:30.680 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite cop out political punditry quote. And the first person

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I ever saw use it was actually Stan Greenberg. He

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was Bill Clinton's polster in ninety two. We made it

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:44.280
<v Speaker 1>our quote of the day in the Hotline, and it

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was just I just thought it was the funniest thing ever,

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>because it was like, it was clear to me that

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the reporter who was quoting Greenberg thought they were taking

0:57:53.400 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a serious quote from the polster, going well, you know,

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there's something happening out here, but what it is ain't

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly clear. Didn't say he was quoting somebody, so the

0:58:02.280 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>reporter was sort of oblivious to the fact that he

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was doing a lyric, you know. And so I've always

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just thought, I mean, you know, when you're a political reporter,

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest things crack you up, and this one always

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>cracked me up. So it's always actually been my go to,

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey whenever I you know, if I've been asked for

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the empteeenth time, which way are things going? You know?

0:58:24.480 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>What did this poll mean? Well? You know, you know, Leicester,

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there's something happening out of here, and what it is

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 1>ain't exactly clear. You gotta stop. Hey, what's that anyway?

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So with that, I will leave you here. I've got

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a real great rant to come on the Wizards and Nationals.

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I do believe, and I challenge you, my listeners, to

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to prove me wrong. Of all the form. If you

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>want to count NHL as your fourth major sport, NFL, NBA,

0:58:56.240 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>MLB and NHL, is there a four major sports city

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in worst shape than right here in Washington. I don't

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think there is another for sport, major city, major league

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>city who doesn't have at least one team can actually

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>contending for a title. The best we got is sort

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Caps and OV who you just had and

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can't ever count them out, and who knows, right hockey playoffs,

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:27.480
<v Speaker 1>anything can happen. But let's be honest, it's kind of

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:31.919
<v Speaker 1>weak tea, right, It's aging. You know, it's a mess here.

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 1>The Wizards and Nats are embarrassing, embarrassing their fan bases.

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And I have a lot more to say about this

0:59:39.360 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>tanking thing, but I've got to wrap up this broadcast,

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so with that, I'll see in twenty four hours.