1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here, 2 00:00:03,880 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent. 6 00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 3: Coverage that is possible. 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,320 Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means 8 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support. 9 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 3: But enough with that, let's get to the show. 10 00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: So Mary and Williamson presidential contender, had an interesting exchange 11 00:00:27,440 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 1: over on Fox News Now. The context here is that 12 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:32,239 Speaker 1: most of the mainstream process completely shut her out. Now 13 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 1: Fox has our own self interested reasons if they want to, 14 00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 1: like so descent and all whatever. But Brian Kilmeade over there, 15 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: it gave her a very fair hearing. 16 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:42,960 Speaker 4: Take a listen to what she had to say to 17 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:43,840 Speaker 4: protect Joe Biden. 18 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 5: The DNC has announced there'll be no primary debate. 19 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:48,600 Speaker 6: So he does not have to flesh this out. 20 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:51,920 Speaker 5: That shuts out candidates like marian Williamson. She's running for 21 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 5: the Democratic Party's presidential nomination again. She joined us now 22 00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 5: with her reaction, Marianna, are you surprised on that DNC decision? 23 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 7: No? 24 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 8: I'm not surprised. They've been indicating for a while that 25 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:05,959 Speaker 8: there were probably going to be no debates. 26 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:06,800 Speaker 6: Disappointed. 27 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:12,160 Speaker 8: Disappointed certainly because I believe in democracy. I believe that 28 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:15,040 Speaker 8: the political parties should stay out of the issue until 29 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:18,120 Speaker 8: the primary voters have weighed in, and then whoever wins 30 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:20,960 Speaker 8: the primaries that to the DNC or where there arenc 31 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 8: for that matter, should support. So yeah, I don't think 32 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:27,119 Speaker 8: the DNC should be dictating from on high that they 33 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 8: will try to invisibilize any other candidates. 34 00:01:29,319 --> 00:01:31,039 Speaker 5: The DNC didn't want to hear from you, but we do. 35 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 5: Mary and Williamson, thanks so much, best of lucking your 36 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 5: appearance tomorrow. Thank you, you got it. 37 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 1: And you know, if you watch that whole exchange, she 38 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 1: doesn't pull any punches about you know, Medicare for all 39 00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 1: and like her view very like solidly progressive, left of 40 00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:48,480 Speaker 1: center view for her campaign, and you know they let 41 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 1: her voice it on their era. I think it's very 42 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 1: telling that the other networks are apparently afraid of having 43 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:56,240 Speaker 1: her on because they don't want to run crosswise with 44 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 1: their buddies in the Biden administration. 45 00:01:57,880 --> 00:01:58,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think you're right. 46 00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 2: I mean, and look, we also know, why is Fox 47 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 2: doing it because they like jabbing wid and you know, 48 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 2: I look, that's fine because they have a big audience 49 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 2: and even though much smaller now on Brian Field Show. 50 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:13,320 Speaker 2: That said, the points stand and they're actually very important, 51 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:16,760 Speaker 2: you know, to make sure that we have these debates. 52 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:18,560 Speaker 2: And the more I think about it, I think it's 53 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 2: really sad. I always come back to if the current 54 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 2: primary schedule that Biden has in place was there in 55 00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 2: two thousand and eight, Barack Obama would not be president. 56 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:29,959 Speaker 3: It would have been Hillary and then who the hell 57 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:32,040 Speaker 3: knows Romney. 58 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 4: With that representation and whatever they leave that. 59 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 2: Part out, Obama would never have been elected. If South 60 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 2: Carolina was first. A lot of people forget that. You know, 61 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 2: the voters in South Carolina didn't take up seriously untill 62 00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:44,239 Speaker 2: he won the Iowa caucuses. So it took the small 63 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:46,239 Speaker 2: state of Ioa. Now, I think Iowa was a problem 64 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 2: for many reasons, ethanol and all that. 65 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:51,079 Speaker 1: The last time around, they took themselves no favors. 66 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, look, administratively, demographically, economically, Iowa was a problem. 67 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,760 Speaker 3: But the theory behind it of giving the small people 68 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:01,040 Speaker 3: that you ants, yeah, I think that was good. 69 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:01,440 Speaker 9: It was good. 70 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 2: It was a good thing, I think for the country, 71 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,399 Speaker 2: and he's rigging it up up and down. And it's 72 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:08,680 Speaker 2: not just about Biden because as you know, Crystal, what 73 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 2: about next time? 74 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:11,920 Speaker 3: What are we gonna have the coronation of Kamala Harris? 75 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:12,280 Speaker 4: Yes? 76 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 2: Probably, yeah, most likely, right, but somebody deserves a chance, 77 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 2: or what that the coronation of Pete Budajedge. 78 00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 3: We don't live in a kingdom like we don't. 79 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,680 Speaker 2: This is we don't want to live in that system, 80 00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:25,240 Speaker 2: and yet we're moving towards that. 81 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 3: Away from the primary. 82 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 1: Not to mention how much have we heard from the 83 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 1: Democrats about democracy, how important it is to them, how 84 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: they're going to be protectors of democracy. 85 00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:37,680 Speaker 4: Joe Biden launched his campaign daring. 86 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:40,920 Speaker 1: To talk about how he will be the protector of democracy. 87 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 4: Then what is this? 88 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 7: Then? 89 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: Why are you actually afraid of the democratic process and 90 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 1: why are you doing everything you can to short circuit it. 91 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 1: You're talking about the re ordering of the states. Everyone 92 00:03:52,600 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: can see through this idea. We're doing this because we 93 00:03:54,880 --> 00:03:56,600 Speaker 1: want more diverse representation. 94 00:03:56,840 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 4: That's nonsense. 95 00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:01,320 Speaker 1: Obviously they're doing it as a political power play. Members 96 00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: of the DNC admitted outright as much But the other 97 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:08,200 Speaker 1: thing people are forgetting is New Hampshire didn't just lay 98 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:10,720 Speaker 1: down and say, okay, fine, we're going to lose our position. 99 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 4: Yes, they're still planning on moving. 100 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:17,080 Speaker 1: Forward, and they are furious at Joe Biden over this. 101 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:20,200 Speaker 1: And I'm not talking about like you know, random left 102 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:23,799 Speaker 1: wing operative. I'm talking about the longtime chair of the party. 103 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:28,480 Speaker 1: I'm talking about local state officials who have significant, significant power. 104 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:32,840 Speaker 1: They are deeply interested in hearing from other candidates, and 105 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,040 Speaker 1: they want to have them to the state. They are 106 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 1: not seating their ground and so that also is a 107 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:41,720 Speaker 1: problem for Joe Biden not to mention this narrative from 108 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:44,600 Speaker 1: the media that there are no quote unquote serious candidates, 109 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:47,160 Speaker 1: which I don't know who you know, appointed them to decide. 110 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:48,599 Speaker 1: I thought it was up to the American people to 111 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:50,040 Speaker 1: decide who they took seriously or not. 112 00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 4: This is not really panning out for them. 113 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:57,920 Speaker 1: They're not being successful at completely squashing support for Biden's 114 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:00,080 Speaker 1: primary contenders in the way that I know that I 115 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:03,400 Speaker 1: hope to. Fox News also did a poll of the 116 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 1: actual primary field, put this up on the screen, reported 117 00:05:06,120 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 1: on this earlier. And you know, given the fact that 118 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 1: Bobby Kennedy Junior and Mary and Williamson have been completely 119 00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:17,359 Speaker 1: invisibilized and smeared and dismissed by the media. You still 120 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 1: have Bobby Kennedy at nineteen percent, Mary and Williamson at 121 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:23,480 Speaker 1: nine percent, Joe Biden only at sixty two percent. 122 00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 4: This poll is. 123 00:05:24,760 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 1: Not orders of magnitude different from the Donald Trump, Ron 124 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:31,960 Speaker 1: DeSantis poles. So the more you have results like this, 125 00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:34,239 Speaker 1: and I would not be surprised to see these numbers 126 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 1: for the challengers grow give you a majority of Democrats 127 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:39,760 Speaker 1: who want another option than Biden, the more difficult it's 128 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:42,080 Speaker 1: going to become for the media to continue to say 129 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,799 Speaker 1: they're not serious. He has no real contenders, no real opponents, 130 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:47,720 Speaker 1: and it will become more and more difficult for them 131 00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:51,280 Speaker 1: to justify not having a single primary debate. 132 00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:52,920 Speaker 4: So Fox is. 133 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:56,000 Speaker 1: Self interested here, but also the mainstream press and the 134 00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 1: Democratic Party should be ashamed of themselves. 135 00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:01,080 Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, so yeah, look, maybe we should have Marion 136 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:03,280 Speaker 2: again soon. Let's have our fk On and the Mariona. Yeah, 137 00:06:03,320 --> 00:06:04,720 Speaker 2: we will make sure that we at. 138 00:06:04,720 --> 00:06:07,000 Speaker 4: Least definitely give them a platform here. It would be 139 00:06:07,040 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 4: fun too to have I was thinking about that. 140 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:13,120 Speaker 2: We'll see if you guys want it, Maybe we can 141 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:15,039 Speaker 2: try and make it happen. All right, we'll see guys later. 142 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:20,400 Speaker 2: Extraordinary bit of news out of Afghanistan. Let's go ahead 143 00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 2: and put this up there on the screen. The mastermind 144 00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:26,720 Speaker 2: of the Kabble Airport bombing, which killed thirteen US service 145 00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:27,720 Speaker 2: members was just. 146 00:06:27,800 --> 00:06:29,480 Speaker 3: Killed by the Taliban. 147 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 2: An extraordinary development, the post says, spotlighting the Biden administration's 148 00:06:33,720 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 2: newfound reliance on a former battlefield adversary to help confront 149 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:39,200 Speaker 2: terrorist threats. Now, I wanted to cover this for a 150 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 2: couple of reasons. I was told, in no uncertain terms 151 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 2: that when Biden pulled out of Afghanistan, Afghanistan was going 152 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 2: to become a terrorist hell hole, and that the Taliban 153 00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:54,839 Speaker 2: weren't going to kill anybody for us, and that we 154 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,919 Speaker 2: would all be less safe and in oh and also 155 00:06:58,040 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 2: there would be like a mass. 156 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 3: Slaughter of American citizens. 157 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:04,360 Speaker 2: Actually, not a single American citizen has been killed by 158 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 2: I am not supporting the Taliban. 159 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:06,719 Speaker 3: I'm not saying they're good people. 160 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:09,280 Speaker 2: I'm saying that I was told very few, very specific 161 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:12,760 Speaker 2: things that American citizens would be in danger and would 162 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:13,200 Speaker 2: be killed. 163 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:14,440 Speaker 3: Nope, that hasn't happened. 164 00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 2: By all accounts, every single American citizen at this point 165 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:19,040 Speaker 2: that wanted to leave the country has left the country, 166 00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:21,200 Speaker 2: and the Taliban has basically let them do so too. 167 00:07:21,680 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 2: On the terrorists front, we wouldn't be able to kill 168 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 2: terrorists in Afghanistan because we didn't have it on the 169 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 2: ground presence, except we actually killed the leader of al 170 00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 2: Qaeda I'm on al Zawahari with a drone. And now 171 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:37,320 Speaker 2: the person who was responsible for killing our service members, 172 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 2: we didn't even kill them. 173 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 3: The Taliban killed them for us. 174 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 2: It's almost like it was a multifaceted full of situation 175 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 2: and the people who were criticizing the withdrawal saying it 176 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,800 Speaker 2: was quote making us less safe, were full of shit. 177 00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 4: And they never follow up on that though. 178 00:07:53,720 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 2: Do Yeah, they never do follow up there. How many 179 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 2: people died in Afghanistan? How many Americans were killed? And 180 00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:00,240 Speaker 2: I was literally how many times did you hear that 181 00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:03,080 Speaker 2: abandoning Americas in Afghanistan? How many of them were killed? 182 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:07,080 Speaker 3: Name one, show me one person who was killed. Asn't happened. 183 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 3: I'm not saying what happening there is a good thing. 184 00:08:09,480 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 2: I think it's sad, but do I think that it's 185 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:15,800 Speaker 2: worth the lives of American service members so that Afghan 186 00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 2: girls can go to school. 187 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:18,120 Speaker 3: No, sorry, I don't care. 188 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:20,360 Speaker 2: And you know, I think it's sad, But do I 189 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:24,320 Speaker 2: think that it's worth like money, material? And I think 190 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:26,000 Speaker 2: this is the best thing that Joe Biden ever did 191 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 2: in his presidency. Everybody's like, oh, you should have left 192 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:31,680 Speaker 2: Bogram open. Okay, all right, you know, listen, that's like 193 00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:36,120 Speaker 2: criticizing the tactical stuff when the strategic is what matters. 194 00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:39,640 Speaker 2: He did it, He's the one who did it. And also, 195 00:08:39,720 --> 00:08:42,560 Speaker 2: if you support Ukraine so much, so many of these stands, 196 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 2: try and support Ukraine. 197 00:08:44,120 --> 00:08:46,480 Speaker 3: If we still had this goddamn Afghan war going on. 198 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:49,240 Speaker 2: There's a pretty good evidence actually that given the amount 199 00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:51,560 Speaker 2: of material we were pumping in Afghanistan or the military 200 00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:53,839 Speaker 2: resources and all that, that half of the amount of 201 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 2: Ukraine aid would have been actually needed by the military. 202 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 2: So even if you consider it on that face, it's ridiculous. 203 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:01,640 Speaker 2: We live in a realistic world and this is only 204 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 2: a vindication of the withdrawal. 205 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: I think it's important to remember too that in that 206 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 1: horrifying terrorist attack that killed thirteen American service members, it 207 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:13,679 Speaker 1: also killed an estimated one hundred and seventy Afghans, so 208 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 1: they certainly had a stake in taking out this leader 209 00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: as well. 210 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:20,959 Speaker 4: And the big you know, we heard a lot of. 211 00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:24,040 Speaker 1: Arguments for why the US should never leave Afghanistan, but 212 00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 1: the most core, sort of like compelling one, I suppose, 213 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:29,440 Speaker 1: was the idea that it's going to once again be 214 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:33,080 Speaker 1: a safe haven for terrorists as it was before nine 215 00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:35,320 Speaker 1: to eleven, harboring Asama bin Lad and they're going to 216 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:38,880 Speaker 1: go back to that. And to me, what this shows 217 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 1: is that does not appear to have come to fruition, 218 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 1: and in fact, you know, they are also not happy 219 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:50,080 Speaker 1: about isis K at least terrorist organization operating on their soil. 220 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,960 Speaker 1: So just shows you the landscape is a bit different 221 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 1: than the way it was painted by the detractors in 222 00:09:55,800 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 1: the wake of that messy withdrawal. 223 00:09:57,280 --> 00:10:00,440 Speaker 2: That's why the whole rhetoric around this is so stupid. 224 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 3: The Taliban and isis hate each other. 225 00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:05,560 Speaker 2: They've been killing each other for since twenty sixteen when 226 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,240 Speaker 2: i's K even emerged, and I think it was in 227 00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 2: Nangahar Province, which is near Pakistan. The point is it's 228 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 2: a complicated place and to try and put us politics 229 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:22,040 Speaker 2: onto it was the death of American soldiers of Afghan civilians. 230 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 2: From the beginning, it was a nightmare and it was 231 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:28,840 Speaker 2: a mess. We should have gotten out decades ago. Every 232 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 2: president kicked the ball, you know, kicked it down the road. 233 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:33,880 Speaker 3: You know, it's weird. I walk my dog past Stanley. 234 00:10:33,559 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 2: Macrystal all the time, and it's the weirdest thing because 235 00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:37,719 Speaker 2: I sometimes I'll look at him and all I really 236 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 2: want to say is a what happened to Michael Hastings. 237 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 3: That's number one. 238 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:43,600 Speaker 2: Number two is I just look at this guy who's 239 00:10:43,640 --> 00:10:44,280 Speaker 2: sitting pretty by. 240 00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:46,679 Speaker 3: He was making millions of dollars or some sort of consultant. 241 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 2: He's got this big office building nearby, and I'm just like, man, 242 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:51,960 Speaker 2: look at this guy. He's like, he's sitting pretty, he's 243 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:54,440 Speaker 2: getting into his nice car, he's got a chauffeur and 244 00:10:54,520 --> 00:10:56,679 Speaker 2: all this stuff, and like the wreckage of what he 245 00:10:56,840 --> 00:10:57,360 Speaker 2: left behind. 246 00:10:57,400 --> 00:10:57,679 Speaker 3: Nothing. 247 00:10:57,679 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 2: He made big promises and he was a failure. And 248 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,400 Speaker 2: all these guy they get richer when they leave. That's 249 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 2: what drives me nuts. 250 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 1: And then they get called on in instances like this 251 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,800 Speaker 1: by the media, Yes, to come on and advocate for 252 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:13,720 Speaker 1: war forever. I think it was so illustrative to watch 253 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: the bipartisan cross any sort of partisan media outlet, how 254 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:22,280 Speaker 1: they all fed the exact same narrative. And it's always 255 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 1: like this. The push from the media is always in 256 00:11:24,800 --> 00:11:28,839 Speaker 1: the hawkage direction. It is almost never in a ending 257 00:11:28,920 --> 00:11:33,280 Speaker 1: Wars pro piece direction. And that was never more obvious 258 00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:35,680 Speaker 1: than with regard to Afghanistan. I just want to say, 259 00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 1: since our withdrawal, I think some of our actions have 260 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:42,800 Speaker 1: been unconscionable in denying them funds. Afghanistan is going through 261 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:46,240 Speaker 1: horrible famine. It's been very tough times for their people. 262 00:11:46,320 --> 00:11:49,600 Speaker 1: We have been complicit in that. But suddenly again all 263 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,880 Speaker 1: of their feigned concern in the moment for the people 264 00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 1: out of Afghanistan, the women, the girls, et cetera, suddenly gone. 265 00:11:57,360 --> 00:11:58,720 Speaker 4: We never hear about it anymore. 266 00:11:58,920 --> 00:11:59,880 Speaker 7: Very very true. 267 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 3: All right, we'll see you guys later. 268 00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:04,640 Speaker 1: Just before actually the firing of Don Lemon, CNN announced 269 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: another significant move. They are bringing Charles Barkley and Gail 270 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:12,240 Speaker 1: King in a show together that they're calling King Charles 271 00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:13,959 Speaker 1: into primetime once a week. 272 00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:15,560 Speaker 4: Say listen to know what they had to say about that. 273 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:20,080 Speaker 10: All right, it's official, King Charles. A different kind of Woryalty, 274 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:22,960 Speaker 10: a brand new show hosted by award winning journalist Gail 275 00:12:23,080 --> 00:12:26,640 Speaker 10: King and NBA superstar Charles Barkley. It will be debuting 276 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:29,960 Speaker 10: on Wednesday nights on CNN this fall. They made announcement 277 00:12:30,040 --> 00:12:33,240 Speaker 10: just moments ago on TNT's NBA tip Off Take a Look. 278 00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:36,439 Speaker 11: I wanted to be non political, just too people. We'll 279 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:38,439 Speaker 11: talk about political will, yeah, but we don't want to 280 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:42,760 Speaker 11: say we're a liberal conservative, Republican Democrat. That's one of 281 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:45,240 Speaker 11: the things that is already ruin television in general. And 282 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 11: I know she's going to be a straight shooter. You 283 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:49,400 Speaker 11: know I'm gonna be a street shooter. And when we 284 00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 11: got together for lunch, we just started talking about random 285 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 11: things and it was really curious that we had different opinions, 286 00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 11: which is fine, like we want I always correct, but 287 00:12:58,080 --> 00:13:00,480 Speaker 11: we were like, all I want is people, even if 288 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:02,360 Speaker 11: I disagree with them, I want them to be honest 289 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:04,640 Speaker 11: with me. I don't want them saying things to get clickbait. 290 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 11: That's what driving me crazy about our people in our 291 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:09,240 Speaker 11: profession right now, we're not trying to get people to 292 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:09,559 Speaker 11: click on. 293 00:13:09,960 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 4: I know she's gonna be fair, not gonna lie. I 294 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:14,040 Speaker 4: actually will watch the show. 295 00:13:14,120 --> 00:13:15,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know if I'll watch it, I'll watch 296 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,120 Speaker 2: the highlight clips or whatever. I mean, Look, I actually 297 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 2: do think it is I don't. I'm not a huge 298 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:22,840 Speaker 2: fan of Gail King. She basically drifted off of Oprah 299 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:25,680 Speaker 2: and her relationship with Obama to get her position, So 300 00:13:26,080 --> 00:13:29,080 Speaker 2: let's put that aside. She has some genuine talent. She 301 00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 2: had a good job in what was it the R. 302 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:31,280 Speaker 2: Kelly interview. 303 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:33,439 Speaker 3: Oh she did. I was like a little job and 304 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:34,840 Speaker 3: that that was That's what a meme. 305 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 4: No, I think she's my life. 306 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 1: I mean in terms of like as a broadcaster, I 307 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 1: think she's a talented broadcaster. But the real action is 308 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:44,600 Speaker 1: Charles Barkley, who is no question she's funny, and I 309 00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:46,760 Speaker 1: mean there's all kinds of things. Of course I'm going 310 00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:49,280 Speaker 1: to disagree with him on but I am actually I'm 311 00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:51,840 Speaker 1: shocked that he's willing to do it. They must have 312 00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:55,600 Speaker 1: offered him a huge amount of money number one, number 313 00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:59,720 Speaker 1: two in the wake of the train wreck catastrophe disaster 314 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: that was their morning show attempt. 315 00:14:01,920 --> 00:14:04,160 Speaker 4: This is actually a reasonably good idea, Like I. 316 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:06,440 Speaker 1: Could see people watching this, I could see it creating 317 00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:09,680 Speaker 1: moments that people want to share I could see Charles 318 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:12,520 Speaker 1: Barkley in particular, saying things that like make the CNN 319 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 1: audience a little uncomfortable, or that are a little edgy 320 00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: or a little bit off from what the cable news 321 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:18,720 Speaker 1: audience normally expects. 322 00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:21,040 Speaker 4: So I am interested to see how this goes. 323 00:14:21,160 --> 00:14:24,480 Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, I mean listen to Charles, as I said, 324 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:28,680 Speaker 2: as a compelling talent. He's a guy who is funny, 325 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 2: he's got He's had some moments before I think we 326 00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 2: even posted one. 327 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:33,680 Speaker 4: I heard something. 328 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:35,120 Speaker 3: What was it? It was like Charles is. 329 00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:37,480 Speaker 2: Like, you know, Republicans and Democrats, like we should all 330 00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:38,800 Speaker 2: be able to come together. 331 00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:41,640 Speaker 4: And but he was like at actually both sides. 332 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:43,600 Speaker 2: He was trashing, like both sides, and he's like everybody 333 00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:45,600 Speaker 2: wants to rip us apart. I don't know if CNN 334 00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:47,840 Speaker 2: is a place where I go to heal the nation's wounds, 335 00:14:47,840 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 2: but I'm interested. Will this save CNN, especially if the 336 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:54,400 Speaker 2: Lemon thing? Look no, I mean even in primetime we're 337 00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 2: talking about a weekly program. 338 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 3: They need averages. 339 00:14:57,120 --> 00:14:58,960 Speaker 2: It will give them some well needed press, and it 340 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:01,960 Speaker 2: could give them a genuine hit. But I'm just you know, 341 00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 2: I don't know if hits exist in the cable business anymore. 342 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 2: Because let's say you take CNN Primetime from four hundred 343 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 2: K to a million, that's still seventy eighty ninety percent 344 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:14,600 Speaker 2: boomers who. 345 00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:16,040 Speaker 3: Are watching it. Is that really a hit? 346 00:15:16,360 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 2: You know, it's more it's bet it's like less dying 347 00:15:18,800 --> 00:15:21,480 Speaker 2: than before. You know, you've got a better heartbeat, but 348 00:15:21,520 --> 00:15:24,080 Speaker 2: you're still like on the verge of complete collapse. 349 00:15:24,400 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 7: I just don't know. 350 00:15:25,320 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 1: They're also I mean, Charles Barkley, I'm sure was a 351 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 1: huge amount of money. Gil King also was not coming 352 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:34,160 Speaker 1: here cheaply, So your talent expenses are very large for 353 00:15:34,280 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 1: a one night a week's show, and I'm sure the 354 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,360 Speaker 1: business thinking is okay. But we bring people into this 355 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:42,480 Speaker 1: show and then they'll stick around and they'll see what 356 00:15:42,520 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 1: else we have to offer. That's the piece that I 357 00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 1: don't think is going to pan out, and so then 358 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:50,280 Speaker 1: it just becomes a really expensive show that I do 359 00:15:50,280 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 1: think we'll probably rate better than whatever else they're doing 360 00:15:52,560 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 1: in primetime at that hour right now, but will justify 361 00:15:55,800 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 1: the expense, will lead to some rebirth of the network unlikely? 362 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:01,800 Speaker 3: All right, we'll see you guys later. 363 00:16:02,160 --> 00:16:04,120 Speaker 2: We're doing a lot of homages to Don Lemon here 364 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:05,840 Speaker 2: as you can see you've got my hoodie on. And 365 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 2: what we decided to do as a team is look 366 00:16:08,440 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 2: back throughout history some of Don's best or some might 367 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,440 Speaker 2: say worst moments on the CNN network. He shall be 368 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:17,680 Speaker 2: sorely missed, at very least from a content perspective. 369 00:16:17,680 --> 00:16:19,320 Speaker 4: Absolutely, well, now it's that content. 370 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, we certainly will. Don will will miss you. 371 00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 2: I'm not sure anybody else you ever worked with Will 372 00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 2: here were your best. 373 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:33,960 Speaker 11: That's how we started. 374 00:16:35,640 --> 00:16:36,520 Speaker 7: That's how we started. 375 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:39,280 Speaker 9: But it's gone down. 376 00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:42,080 Speaker 12: This All will talk about age makes me uncomfortable. I 377 00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 12: think that. I think it's the wrong road to go down. 378 00:16:44,680 --> 00:16:47,120 Speaker 12: She says, people, you know, politicians or something and not 379 00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:48,920 Speaker 12: in their prime. Nikki Haley isn't in her prime. 380 00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:49,320 Speaker 7: Sorry. 381 00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:51,440 Speaker 12: When a woman is considered being a prime in her 382 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 12: twenties and thirties and maybe forties, that's not according to me, 383 00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 12: for what it depends. 384 00:16:58,000 --> 00:16:59,600 Speaker 7: And it's just like prime. If you look it up, 385 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:00,160 Speaker 7: it'll see you. 386 00:17:00,400 --> 00:17:02,240 Speaker 12: If you google when is a woman in a prime, 387 00:17:02,280 --> 00:17:04,439 Speaker 12: it'll say twenties, thirties and forties. 388 00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:05,240 Speaker 7: I don't necessary. 389 00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:07,960 Speaker 12: So I got another I agree with that. So I 390 00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:10,879 Speaker 12: think she has to be careful about saying that you 391 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 12: know politicians aren't in their prime. 392 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:13,800 Speaker 4: We need to qualify it a you're talking about prime 393 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:16,600 Speaker 4: for like child or are you talking. 394 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:17,240 Speaker 3: About that's a drug? 395 00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 12: Jersey facts are Google at everybody at home. When is 396 00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 12: a woman in a prime? It says twenties, thirties and forties. 397 00:17:23,320 --> 00:17:25,440 Speaker 12: And I'm just saying, Nikki Haley should be careful about 398 00:17:25,480 --> 00:17:28,640 Speaker 12: saying that politicians are not in their prime and they 399 00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:30,120 Speaker 12: need to be in their prime when they serve, because 400 00:17:30,119 --> 00:17:33,720 Speaker 12: she wouldn't be in a prime according to Google, Google 401 00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:34,439 Speaker 12: or whatever it is. 402 00:17:34,640 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 4: Just google it, Emily in facts. 403 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:37,480 Speaker 6: I google it. 404 00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:38,359 Speaker 4: I can't find me that. 405 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:40,560 Speaker 3: I don't know what goes on in Don Lemon's. 406 00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: Br it'sn't like consuming too much Andrew Tate content. 407 00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:46,720 Speaker 2: But what he reveals is that at the trial is 408 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:51,359 Speaker 2: that CNN's Don Lemon warned him via text in twenty 409 00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:55,240 Speaker 2: nineteen that the cops did not believe his account of 410 00:17:55,280 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 2: the attack. 411 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:58,159 Speaker 12: I mean to bring that to the King's legacy and 412 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 12: to dict is to dictate the making of art in 413 00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:04,760 Speaker 12: the celebration of them, is really strange for me. I 414 00:18:04,800 --> 00:18:07,440 Speaker 12: think it's I mean, obviously, you see what you want 415 00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:11,359 Speaker 12: is said in the art and I think sometimes the 416 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:14,440 Speaker 12: most compelling art is. 417 00:18:14,359 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 6: A controversial art. 418 00:18:15,440 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 12: In large part of tongue in cheek interview, you know, 419 00:18:17,800 --> 00:18:20,360 Speaker 12: because it's still rogan and there's lots you're jockeying. 420 00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:20,760 Speaker 7: Back and forth. 421 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:25,160 Speaker 12: But he did say something about ivermectin that I think 422 00:18:25,359 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 12: wasn't actually correct about CNN and lying. Okay, Ivermectin is 423 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:35,119 Speaker 12: a drug that is commonly used as a horse dewormer. 424 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:37,080 Speaker 12: So it is not a lie to say that the 425 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:40,720 Speaker 12: drug is used as a horse de wormer. I think 426 00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:44,840 Speaker 12: that's important, and it is not approved for COVID. 427 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:47,560 Speaker 13: But when you're saying something and then the person you're 428 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,720 Speaker 13: saying it about has literally ten times the audience, you do, 429 00:18:51,160 --> 00:18:52,400 Speaker 13: you dumb motherfucker. 430 00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:54,639 Speaker 6: Do you know what you did? You just proved my 431 00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 6: point continuing that conversation. 432 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:00,359 Speaker 7: Well, thank you the conversation. Thank you so much. 433 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:01,080 Speaker 6: Thank you, Papa. 434 00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 4: We'll talk about China, Yes, talk about chime you come back. 435 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:06,880 Speaker 14: Oh, thank you much to say on declaring independence from China. 436 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:11,399 Speaker 3: So you've been now, Thank you, thank you, thank you. 437 00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 1: Very excited as always to talk to you. A great 438 00:19:16,359 --> 00:19:18,840 Speaker 1: friend of the show. A Rebosa from Pong of the 439 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:20,680 Speaker 1: Funky Academic great to see my friend. 440 00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:23,359 Speaker 9: Thanks for having me on. This should be a hoot. 441 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 4: Yes, as always. 442 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:29,399 Speaker 1: So, you've been thinking a lot about constitutional amendments and 443 00:19:29,440 --> 00:19:31,880 Speaker 1: what some good ones would be, and why it's important 444 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:35,440 Speaker 1: to hold out the idea of amending the Constitution even 445 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:36,920 Speaker 1: though that hasn't happened quite some time. 446 00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:38,560 Speaker 4: So tell us what you're thinking about. 447 00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 15: Well, you know, I get a little bit tired of 448 00:19:40,800 --> 00:19:43,359 Speaker 15: watching Americans kind of pray to the Supreme Court that 449 00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:47,360 Speaker 15: it rules in our favor and pretending that it's self governance. 450 00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:49,320 Speaker 9: That's not self governance. 451 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:53,159 Speaker 15: That's hoping that you know, some unelected people in robes 452 00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:57,320 Speaker 15: kind of like respond to your petition. So we need 453 00:19:57,359 --> 00:19:59,600 Speaker 15: to actually solve our problems in a way that's adequate 454 00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:00,880 Speaker 15: to the concept of the nation. 455 00:20:01,040 --> 00:20:03,880 Speaker 9: Right, So let's talk about why. 456 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:08,439 Speaker 15: We don't do constitutional amendments and what constitutions are. So, 457 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:13,000 Speaker 15: constitutions are just the way the governing authority declares the 458 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,720 Speaker 15: rules of the game. If the governing authority wants the 459 00:20:15,760 --> 00:20:17,800 Speaker 15: people to play the game, then the people need to 460 00:20:17,800 --> 00:20:19,920 Speaker 15: know the rules, and that way everyone can be accountable 461 00:20:19,960 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 15: for the rights and responsibilities of playing the governing authorities games. 462 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:27,840 Speaker 15: But just because there's a constitution, doesn't mean that the 463 00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:31,320 Speaker 15: people make the rules right. So the NBA has a constitution, 464 00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 15: but that doesn't mean that the players get to decide 465 00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 15: where the three point line begins and ends. 466 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 9: And the people of Kutar. 467 00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:41,119 Speaker 15: Kutar has a constitution, but that doesn't mean that the 468 00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:43,800 Speaker 15: people of Kutar get to decide are the governing authority, No, 469 00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:47,880 Speaker 15: it's just the way that the governing authority actually makes 470 00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:51,080 Speaker 15: its will manifest, makes the rules manifest to the people 471 00:20:51,080 --> 00:20:55,200 Speaker 15: that then play right. And there's freedom in playing by 472 00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:58,280 Speaker 15: somebody else's rules. You don't have to govern in order 473 00:20:58,280 --> 00:21:01,280 Speaker 15: to enjoy freedom. For example, it's it's arguable that there's 474 00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:03,159 Speaker 15: a quality of a freedom. 475 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,680 Speaker 9: There's the quality of Islam. You can only. 476 00:21:07,040 --> 00:21:09,600 Speaker 15: Practice and cut here, and you can't practice in the 477 00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:13,560 Speaker 15: United States because there's so many special interests that might 478 00:21:13,640 --> 00:21:17,040 Speaker 15: like distort our rules right. And there are a lot 479 00:21:17,119 --> 00:21:19,720 Speaker 15: of NBA players who don't want to decide where the 480 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:22,520 Speaker 15: three point line begins and how many fouls, And there 481 00:21:22,560 --> 00:21:24,480 Speaker 15: are a lot of people in the United States who 482 00:21:24,480 --> 00:21:26,760 Speaker 15: don't want to govern. They want someone else to govern 483 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:29,639 Speaker 15: and then just let us play and know that our 484 00:21:29,760 --> 00:21:32,720 Speaker 15: rights are secured. With someone else deciding what those rights 485 00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 15: are right, But if you're actually serious about self governing, 486 00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:39,920 Speaker 15: which the United States is supposed to be, we're good 487 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,840 Speaker 15: at like for the people, we're good at of the people. 488 00:21:42,880 --> 00:21:44,439 Speaker 9: We're not so good at by the people. 489 00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:48,560 Speaker 15: But if we're serious about self governing, then we have 490 00:21:48,600 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 15: to be serious about actually making the rules for self government. 491 00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:54,879 Speaker 15: So I wanted to just kind of kind of float 492 00:21:54,960 --> 00:21:58,640 Speaker 15: a few constitutional amendments that would actually I think make 493 00:21:58,800 --> 00:22:02,560 Speaker 15: self government more real in the United States. That would 494 00:22:02,560 --> 00:22:05,520 Speaker 15: be better for our democracy and better for our nation. 495 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:07,680 Speaker 1: And I romy to you mind. I know you probably 496 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:09,439 Speaker 1: have an order in mind, but I'd love to for 497 00:22:09,520 --> 00:22:13,640 Speaker 1: you to speak to one we've discussed privately before, which 498 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:17,679 Speaker 1: is the idea of requiring political candidates to subject themselves 499 00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:19,440 Speaker 1: to political debates. And the reason I asked you to 500 00:22:19,480 --> 00:22:22,400 Speaker 1: start with that one is because it's highly relevant given 501 00:22:22,400 --> 00:22:24,320 Speaker 1: that the DNC has just announced like, no, we're not 502 00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:26,159 Speaker 1: going to have primary debates. We're just gonna annoy and 503 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:27,560 Speaker 1: by and we're going to rig the states to make 504 00:22:27,600 --> 00:22:30,000 Speaker 1: sure they're the best in his favor. We're not even 505 00:22:30,040 --> 00:22:32,520 Speaker 1: going to allow Democratic voters who really would like other 506 00:22:32,560 --> 00:22:35,160 Speaker 1: alternatives to even know there are other alternatives, or certainly 507 00:22:35,240 --> 00:22:38,120 Speaker 1: to get to evaluate them versus the current guy, who 508 00:22:38,119 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 1: a lot of people have a lot of concerns about. 509 00:22:39,800 --> 00:22:42,640 Speaker 1: So this one seems very particularly relevant to be right now. 510 00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:45,399 Speaker 15: Right, So, there's this idea that the DNC is just 511 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:48,440 Speaker 15: this fully private entity that can do whatever it wants internally, 512 00:22:50,119 --> 00:22:52,840 Speaker 15: and it doesn't the public interest, doesn't have an there's 513 00:22:52,840 --> 00:22:56,600 Speaker 15: no public interest in the DNC, and that is an 514 00:22:56,600 --> 00:23:00,280 Speaker 15: illusion because these political parties have a privileged access to 515 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 15: our political system, which means even Republicans have an interest 516 00:23:05,560 --> 00:23:10,399 Speaker 15: that the DNC is run somewhat democratically and realizes the 517 00:23:10,440 --> 00:23:12,080 Speaker 15: value of the nation. So we have to get rid 518 00:23:12,119 --> 00:23:16,200 Speaker 15: of the illusion that these major political parties are merely 519 00:23:16,280 --> 00:23:19,480 Speaker 15: private entities and don't have a privileged access to our 520 00:23:19,800 --> 00:23:26,000 Speaker 15: political institutions. That doesn't mean we actually determine the content 521 00:23:26,280 --> 00:23:31,160 Speaker 15: of the candidacies of the political parties, but it means 522 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:34,840 Speaker 15: that we have as a people, have an interest in 523 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:35,760 Speaker 15: their procedures. 524 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:37,400 Speaker 9: Right, So you just have a. 525 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:41,879 Speaker 15: Constitutional amendment that acknowledges that political parties, that there's a 526 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:46,680 Speaker 15: public interest in the democratic workings of political parties, and 527 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:49,960 Speaker 15: that political parties need to mandate who have the elected 528 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:53,520 Speaker 15: office at least three primary debates at least and then 529 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 15: you just kind of let the parties at the time 530 00:23:57,160 --> 00:23:59,520 Speaker 15: to decide like when those are you could you could 531 00:23:59,560 --> 00:24:03,320 Speaker 15: throw it to administrative a body like the Commission on 532 00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:05,800 Speaker 15: Presidential Debates. It doesn't have to be detailed, but it 533 00:24:05,840 --> 00:24:10,879 Speaker 15: does have to be the expectation and the commandment almost 534 00:24:11,240 --> 00:24:16,240 Speaker 15: that political parties have three primary debates before that candidate 535 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:17,600 Speaker 15: is on a general ballot. 536 00:24:18,040 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 4: Yeah. 537 00:24:18,359 --> 00:24:21,000 Speaker 1: I think the other example where this is really relevant 538 00:24:21,040 --> 00:24:24,199 Speaker 1: right now is with Diane Feinstein, who you know, a 539 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:26,400 Speaker 1: lot of Californians had a lot of concerns about last 540 00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:29,000 Speaker 1: time she stood for re election. Part of how she 541 00:24:29,080 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 1: was able to secure her reelection was number one, Barack 542 00:24:31,920 --> 00:24:35,760 Speaker 1: Obama and Nancy Pelosi and other top national Democratic figures 543 00:24:35,800 --> 00:24:38,760 Speaker 1: came in and endorsed her, and number two, she basically 544 00:24:38,880 --> 00:24:42,119 Speaker 1: hit herself and didn't allow voters to evaluate whether she 545 00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:43,920 Speaker 1: was up to the task and whether this was really 546 00:24:43,920 --> 00:24:45,000 Speaker 1: the person they wanted. 547 00:24:44,760 --> 00:24:45,280 Speaker 4: In that job. 548 00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:48,080 Speaker 1: That's a real subversion of democracy. You can't claim that, 549 00:24:48,160 --> 00:24:50,200 Speaker 1: you know, oh, voters will have they had a democratic 550 00:24:50,280 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 1: choice to choose someone else, when they didn't even have 551 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:55,160 Speaker 1: an opportunity to really evaluate those choices. 552 00:24:55,920 --> 00:25:00,040 Speaker 15: No, it's a power play that ends up privileging the 553 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 15: party elites over you know, everyday citizens, which the government 554 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:04,080 Speaker 15: should be for. 555 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:04,760 Speaker 8: Right. 556 00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:09,400 Speaker 15: So if that's too much, if people find that federally 557 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:15,520 Speaker 15: elected officers shouldn't have to submit themselves to a debate, 558 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:18,679 Speaker 15: then I then we just have a like, we just 559 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:20,280 Speaker 15: have to hash that out as a public because I 560 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,879 Speaker 15: think we have different understandings of the responsibilities of democracy. 561 00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 15: I think I don't think that's too much to ask. 562 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:29,880 Speaker 15: I am disgusted that someone like Nancy Pelosi can get 563 00:25:29,920 --> 00:25:32,720 Speaker 15: through decades of leadership and deny debates. 564 00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:34,200 Speaker 9: Jim Cliburn is another one. 565 00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:37,320 Speaker 15: He just says he doesn't want to have debates and 566 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:41,560 Speaker 15: so there aren't debates, and that I don't think that's appropriate. 567 00:25:41,560 --> 00:25:44,720 Speaker 15: I don't think that's fair as a citizen and the media, 568 00:25:44,800 --> 00:25:47,199 Speaker 15: and I mean as a media person. How do you 569 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:49,399 Speaker 15: feel about Clyburn just saying like, I don't feel like 570 00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:50,400 Speaker 15: debating my challengers. 571 00:25:50,760 --> 00:25:53,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I mean, listen, it's it's very possible that 572 00:25:53,280 --> 00:25:55,800 Speaker 1: if he did have debates, people would look at the 573 00:25:56,119 --> 00:25:58,880 Speaker 1: you know, analyzing for whatever reasons that they perceive their 574 00:25:58,920 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 1: self interest to be they may stick with Jim Clyburn, 575 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:03,840 Speaker 1: but they at least deserve the opportunity to evaluate the 576 00:26:03,920 --> 00:26:05,000 Speaker 1: options in some. 577 00:26:04,880 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 4: Sort of a reasonable fashion. 578 00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:08,960 Speaker 1: I know another one you were interested in, and this 579 00:26:09,080 --> 00:26:10,600 Speaker 1: was one I've taken an interest in. 580 00:26:10,840 --> 00:26:11,879 Speaker 4: Lately as well. 581 00:26:12,400 --> 00:26:14,719 Speaker 1: Is you You posit there should be an amendment that 582 00:26:14,760 --> 00:26:19,200 Speaker 1: distinguishes the personhood of a citizen versus the personhood of 583 00:26:19,359 --> 00:26:20,000 Speaker 1: a corporation. 584 00:26:20,280 --> 00:26:21,119 Speaker 4: Speak to us about that. 585 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:25,520 Speaker 15: Yeah, there are both citizens and corporations are persons in 586 00:26:25,560 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 15: so far as they have willful actions. But there's going 587 00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:33,880 Speaker 15: to be a difference between a citizen who actually governs 588 00:26:33,880 --> 00:26:36,320 Speaker 15: with an idea of the whole and what kind of 589 00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:40,600 Speaker 15: rules should be installed for the good of the whole, 590 00:26:40,680 --> 00:26:44,840 Speaker 15: and a corporation, which is by its nature like just 591 00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:48,919 Speaker 15: designed for its public interests, its personal particular interest. 592 00:26:49,640 --> 00:26:49,880 Speaker 9: Right. 593 00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:53,280 Speaker 15: So, even when I act as a citizen, when I 594 00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:55,280 Speaker 15: pull the lever as a citizen, when I talk as 595 00:26:55,320 --> 00:26:59,160 Speaker 15: a citizen, I'm not just thinking about my particular interests. 596 00:26:59,320 --> 00:27:01,600 Speaker 15: I'm thinking about the rules of the game for even 597 00:27:01,600 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 15: people who don't agree with me. 598 00:27:03,840 --> 00:27:05,960 Speaker 9: When a corporation acts, it. 599 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 15: Is mandated to only concern itself with its shareholder profits, 600 00:27:12,280 --> 00:27:16,240 Speaker 15: so when it markets, it's not doing the same as 601 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:19,600 Speaker 15: when I speak, and we just need to clarify those 602 00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:20,360 Speaker 15: two roles. 603 00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:21,080 Speaker 4: Yeah. 604 00:27:21,240 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 1: Well, and this has been a sort of contested issue 605 00:27:24,720 --> 00:27:27,359 Speaker 1: throughout our history, and what corporations used to be and 606 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:29,359 Speaker 1: the way that we were treated by the law and 607 00:27:29,600 --> 00:27:32,320 Speaker 1: the way that we're understood and that their personhood was 608 00:27:32,400 --> 00:27:35,119 Speaker 1: understood stood has changed over time. So I think it 609 00:27:35,119 --> 00:27:37,040 Speaker 1: makes a lot of sense to sort of clarify what 610 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:40,120 Speaker 1: those rights and responsibilities are. You have a couple here 611 00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 1: that you suggest that speak to economic rights. One is 612 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:49,120 Speaker 1: a federal job guarantee and another one is guaranteed union membership. 613 00:27:49,800 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 1: What are your thoughts on those and are do you 614 00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: see those as qualitatively different from any other provisions in 615 00:27:56,840 --> 00:27:59,920 Speaker 1: the Constitution. I can't think of ones that really guarantee 616 00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:04,600 Speaker 1: any sort of like you know, specific explicit positive economic rights. 617 00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 15: We have a pre industrial constitution. We have to understand 618 00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:10,760 Speaker 15: that the Constitution was first ratified in seventeen eighty nine. 619 00:28:10,880 --> 00:28:14,479 Speaker 15: That's the contingent didn't even come to the early eighteen hundredths. 620 00:28:14,480 --> 00:28:18,960 Speaker 15: I think Eli Whitney was born like in the seventeen eighties, right, 621 00:28:19,040 --> 00:28:24,520 Speaker 15: So we have a pre industrial constitution, which means that 622 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:30,320 Speaker 15: the presumption was that all actual members of the like 623 00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:33,840 Speaker 15: meaningful body politic were either going to be landed gentry 624 00:28:34,280 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 15: or independent, independently wealthy, or independent professionals. Right, we didn't 625 00:28:41,120 --> 00:28:45,320 Speaker 15: have a constitution made for employees or nation of employees. 626 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:47,760 Speaker 15: And the idea that we are a nation of employees 627 00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:50,560 Speaker 15: is true since ninety five percent of the working populace 628 00:28:50,560 --> 00:28:54,080 Speaker 15: works for somebody else but is not really reflected in 629 00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:57,400 Speaker 15: our congress. That's why our Congress is made up of 630 00:28:57,440 --> 00:29:02,000 Speaker 15: landed gentry and independent professionals and it's not really represented 631 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:07,280 Speaker 15: in our democratic norms and guardrails. So and John Adams 632 00:29:07,280 --> 00:29:10,920 Speaker 15: actually talks about this because he says, like, look, people 633 00:29:10,960 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 15: who work for somebody else. And this isn't a letter 634 00:29:13,640 --> 00:29:16,080 Speaker 15: between John Adams and James Sullivan. He's like, people who 635 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 15: work for somebody else, they're not really politically independent. They're 636 00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:22,440 Speaker 15: just tools of their employer. So just give their employer 637 00:29:22,520 --> 00:29:24,240 Speaker 15: the vote and we don't really have to worry about 638 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:30,240 Speaker 15: the employees, which, in a way, while Ghosh isn't wrong, right, So, 639 00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:33,400 Speaker 15: if you were working for Rising and you had to 640 00:29:33,440 --> 00:29:37,040 Speaker 15: represent the brand every time you opened your yap, that 641 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:40,840 Speaker 15: would actually change the quality of your political speech. And 642 00:29:42,120 --> 00:29:48,640 Speaker 15: so we need to organize and kind of subordinate our 643 00:29:48,680 --> 00:29:53,280 Speaker 15: economic system to the needs of political democracy, which means 644 00:29:53,720 --> 00:29:55,800 Speaker 15: that in a way that like, you know, a command 645 00:29:55,840 --> 00:30:02,920 Speaker 15: of control economy doesn't. Because yeah, so we need to 646 00:30:02,960 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 15: make sure that even while we expect and demand that 647 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:09,960 Speaker 15: our people work or earn their daily bread in some 648 00:30:10,040 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 15: way that they are also they do so in a 649 00:30:12,800 --> 00:30:18,440 Speaker 15: way that's consistent with political participation. Right, So I think 650 00:30:19,160 --> 00:30:21,840 Speaker 15: we need to be honest at their economic conditions to 651 00:30:22,240 --> 00:30:27,000 Speaker 15: political independence. And if political speech and even running for 652 00:30:27,120 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 15: office jeopardizes your livelihood and jeopardizes the way that you 653 00:30:33,320 --> 00:30:37,240 Speaker 15: could actually secure bread for yourself and your family, then 654 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:40,920 Speaker 15: we need to reorganize a political and economic system so 655 00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:45,480 Speaker 15: that people can both participate in the economy and. 656 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:48,680 Speaker 9: Participate in public office. And I know you ran for 657 00:30:48,720 --> 00:30:49,680 Speaker 9: public office. 658 00:30:49,360 --> 00:30:51,640 Speaker 15: And had to kind of negotiate a lot of this, 659 00:30:51,920 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 15: But one of the ways we do that is by 660 00:30:54,280 --> 00:30:57,200 Speaker 15: saying that no matter what you say in your political speech, 661 00:30:57,920 --> 00:31:00,080 Speaker 15: you have a job at the end of it. And 662 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:03,840 Speaker 15: if we're serious about that, that means the federal government 663 00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 15: needs to be the employer of last resort and needs 664 00:31:07,040 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 15: to guarantee people a job. 665 00:31:09,160 --> 00:31:12,080 Speaker 1: It makes sense to me because it highlights the fact 666 00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:14,760 Speaker 1: that you do not truly have freedom, whether it's political 667 00:31:14,760 --> 00:31:20,040 Speaker 1: freedom or other freedoms, unless you have those basic economics secured. Right, 668 00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:22,640 Speaker 1: So it's a positive notion of freedom. And you know, 669 00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:24,600 Speaker 1: and you also don't really have democracy if you don't 670 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:26,960 Speaker 1: have democracy in the workplace, which is what a union 671 00:31:27,320 --> 00:31:30,720 Speaker 1: ultimately is all about. The next two I think also 672 00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:34,600 Speaker 1: fit together because they're both about having the ability to 673 00:31:34,720 --> 00:31:38,080 Speaker 1: navigate the systems that we all are forced to navigate. 674 00:31:38,120 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 1: That would be the legal system, since we, as you 675 00:31:40,120 --> 00:31:42,120 Speaker 1: put it, our nation of laws, and the tax system, 676 00:31:42,200 --> 00:31:44,880 Speaker 1: since we are so our nation of taxes, you posit, 677 00:31:45,000 --> 00:31:48,000 Speaker 1: we should have legal care for all in civil and 678 00:31:48,080 --> 00:31:50,880 Speaker 1: criminal matters and tax preparation for all. 679 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:52,560 Speaker 4: What brought you to those two? 680 00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:55,320 Speaker 15: Yeah, the amount of money you have any bank accounts 681 00:31:55,320 --> 00:31:59,880 Speaker 15: shouldn't decide shouldn't determine the quality of your legal reps 682 00:32:00,520 --> 00:32:04,240 Speaker 15: or your legal personhood. Right, So the idea that you 683 00:32:04,280 --> 00:32:06,720 Speaker 15: can buy a quality of lawyer that will get you 684 00:32:07,720 --> 00:32:13,640 Speaker 15: better representation than your competition is like on American it 685 00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:16,480 Speaker 15: should be acknowledged just so, right, So we need to 686 00:32:16,480 --> 00:32:19,240 Speaker 15: start talking about so Peter Thel, and I believe I 687 00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:22,240 Speaker 15: gave you an element concerning this Peter Thel. In an 688 00:32:22,240 --> 00:32:23,760 Speaker 15: interview with a you know, a friend of the show, 689 00:32:23,880 --> 00:32:27,760 Speaker 15: z Jilani admitted that you know single digit millionaires, and 690 00:32:27,760 --> 00:32:30,400 Speaker 15: if you don't know Peter theele is a billionaire. Single 691 00:32:30,400 --> 00:32:35,760 Speaker 15: digit millionaires just don't have real access to the legal system. 692 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 15: These poor single digit millionaires, they're just chump pretty much 693 00:32:40,960 --> 00:32:42,959 Speaker 15: for the billionaire. And this guy's a billionaire, he's got 694 00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:47,880 Speaker 15: no reason to lie, right. So if a billionaire is 695 00:32:47,920 --> 00:32:51,240 Speaker 15: telling you that single digit millionaires are not really in 696 00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:53,640 Speaker 15: the legal game, are not really governed by laws in 697 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:56,000 Speaker 15: the same way that he is, then we need to 698 00:32:56,280 --> 00:32:59,000 Speaker 15: actually take that seriously and think of it as a 699 00:32:59,000 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 15: problem for democracy. And some people will say that, like, well, 700 00:33:02,440 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 15: you know, there's like legal aid and all these charities 701 00:33:05,760 --> 00:33:07,920 Speaker 15: and pro bono work, but that's. 702 00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:10,080 Speaker 9: Like believing in magic to secure your rights. 703 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:14,560 Speaker 15: I don't want my rights to be secured by charity 704 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:15,880 Speaker 15: or like some. 705 00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:16,920 Speaker 9: Laurier's extra time. 706 00:33:17,080 --> 00:33:19,640 Speaker 15: I want to make like legal care in general less 707 00:33:19,680 --> 00:33:25,360 Speaker 15: sexy and give everyone access to the legal care in 708 00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:30,520 Speaker 15: civil and criminal matters that they deserve at at a 709 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:34,080 Speaker 15: rate that's comparative to the problems that they have. Right, 710 00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:36,400 Speaker 15: So it's not like you have cancer and you go 711 00:33:36,440 --> 00:33:41,000 Speaker 15: into like an emergency room. If you need a legal team, 712 00:33:41,200 --> 00:33:43,680 Speaker 15: you get a legal team. And that's why if you 713 00:33:43,680 --> 00:33:46,280 Speaker 15: have cancer, you get a team. Right, So everyone should 714 00:33:46,320 --> 00:33:48,800 Speaker 15: have access to the legal care if we're serious about 715 00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:52,000 Speaker 15: being a nation of laws to the problem that adequate 716 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:54,240 Speaker 15: to the problem that they come against. 717 00:33:54,760 --> 00:33:58,240 Speaker 1: And in terms of taxes, the fact that you have 718 00:33:58,360 --> 00:34:04,080 Speaker 1: a whole, massive, multi billion dollar industry around tax preparation 719 00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:06,720 Speaker 1: means they also have an investment in like making taxes 720 00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:11,600 Speaker 1: as confusing and complicated and burdensome on everybody as they 721 00:34:11,719 --> 00:34:12,439 Speaker 1: possibly can. 722 00:34:12,600 --> 00:34:14,280 Speaker 4: And then you also have this. 723 00:34:14,640 --> 00:34:17,600 Speaker 1: Vast inequality where again the Peter Thiel's of the world, man, 724 00:34:17,640 --> 00:34:20,000 Speaker 1: they've got the best accountants out there fighting to make 725 00:34:20,040 --> 00:34:22,120 Speaker 1: sure that they have to pay as little taxes as 726 00:34:22,120 --> 00:34:25,759 Speaker 1: they possibly can. And meanwhile for everybody else, they're just 727 00:34:25,800 --> 00:34:27,960 Speaker 1: like hoping and praying that this works out okay for them. 728 00:34:28,600 --> 00:34:31,320 Speaker 9: We like, we have the standard deduction for the poors. 729 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:34,640 Speaker 15: But if we are serious about actually having a tax 730 00:34:34,719 --> 00:34:38,680 Speaker 15: law that's lawful, which means it takes a specialist to 731 00:34:38,880 --> 00:34:42,080 Speaker 15: understand it, then we need to avail everyone of specialists. 732 00:34:42,360 --> 00:34:42,560 Speaker 9: Right. 733 00:34:42,640 --> 00:34:47,560 Speaker 15: So there's this idea that you could pay accountants. And 734 00:34:47,760 --> 00:34:49,480 Speaker 15: you know, some of these tax accounts we're friends with, 735 00:34:49,680 --> 00:34:51,799 Speaker 15: probably a few of them are very well to do. 736 00:34:52,040 --> 00:34:55,799 Speaker 15: They make a lot of good money doing taxes for 737 00:34:55,840 --> 00:34:59,480 Speaker 15: the wealthy. You can pay accountants to game the system 738 00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:02,680 Speaker 15: or to get you the most efficient tax return possible. 739 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:06,600 Speaker 15: It should be an American insofar as if we have 740 00:35:06,680 --> 00:35:09,960 Speaker 15: taxes and if we have tax breaks, everyone should equally 741 00:35:10,280 --> 00:35:15,280 Speaker 15: as American citizens be. 742 00:35:13,880 --> 00:35:15,319 Speaker 9: Be have access to them. 743 00:35:15,320 --> 00:35:17,400 Speaker 15: And that means you need access to the brain that 744 00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:20,960 Speaker 15: allows you to, uh, the mind that's been trained to 745 00:35:21,120 --> 00:35:25,239 Speaker 15: discern which tax privileges that and tax rights that you 746 00:35:25,440 --> 00:35:29,680 Speaker 15: are available to. So, yeah, single payer tax, single payer accountants, 747 00:35:29,840 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 15: tax accounts. Maybe not all business accounts. I think businesses 748 00:35:32,640 --> 00:35:34,920 Speaker 15: should pay for their own business accounts. But single payer 749 00:35:35,160 --> 00:35:39,160 Speaker 15: tax preparers, uh, single payer option for tax preparers, for 750 00:35:39,280 --> 00:35:44,840 Speaker 15: high quality tax preparation. It sounds like it's none of 751 00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:46,960 Speaker 15: these things. If you listen to me and you think 752 00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:49,480 Speaker 15: about it yourself, they're not going to make our democracy worse. 753 00:35:50,640 --> 00:35:54,120 Speaker 15: They're not going to America democracy work. I notice I said, 754 00:35:54,120 --> 00:35:56,880 Speaker 15: a federal job guarantee and not like I'm not in 755 00:35:56,920 --> 00:35:59,279 Speaker 15: favor of the UBI, just because I think that there's 756 00:35:59,320 --> 00:36:01,560 Speaker 15: a lot of work that needs to happen in order 757 00:36:01,640 --> 00:36:04,719 Speaker 15: to make our economy and our politics work, and there's 758 00:36:04,760 --> 00:36:06,120 Speaker 15: work that needs to be done. I live in the 759 00:36:06,160 --> 00:36:09,160 Speaker 15: South right now, there's like seventy years of deferred maintenance 760 00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:10,800 Speaker 15: that needs to be done. 761 00:36:10,920 --> 00:36:12,719 Speaker 9: And like you don't have internet at home? 762 00:36:13,239 --> 00:36:15,280 Speaker 4: Correct, that's right, So we could pay. 763 00:36:15,120 --> 00:36:18,319 Speaker 15: Someone twenty five to thirty dollars an hour to like 764 00:36:18,360 --> 00:36:19,760 Speaker 15: get fib at a Crystal's farm. 765 00:36:20,280 --> 00:36:23,080 Speaker 1: Listen, you just sold me right there, right there, you 766 00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:26,960 Speaker 1: just sold me. I mean what I appreciated value is. 767 00:36:27,239 --> 00:36:29,760 Speaker 1: In certain ways, I would even call you a cynic. 768 00:36:29,880 --> 00:36:33,080 Speaker 1: In certain ways, you're certainly very sort of practical about 769 00:36:33,080 --> 00:36:36,000 Speaker 1: the country as it exists, but you never lack in 770 00:36:36,080 --> 00:36:39,640 Speaker 1: political imagination. And I think it's always really important to 771 00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:42,680 Speaker 1: stretch our minds and imagine the things that could be. 772 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:45,000 Speaker 1: And when you lay all of these you know, potential 773 00:36:45,040 --> 00:36:46,960 Speaker 1: amendments down, every single one of them makes sense. And 774 00:36:47,040 --> 00:36:48,640 Speaker 1: like you said, they're certainly not going to make the 775 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:51,560 Speaker 1: democracy worse, and they definitely have a shot at actually 776 00:36:51,600 --> 00:36:54,720 Speaker 1: improving the quality of our democracy so that more closely 777 00:36:54,760 --> 00:36:56,319 Speaker 1: approximates in actual democracy. 778 00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:57,600 Speaker 9: Can I talk about one more? 779 00:36:57,880 --> 00:36:58,160 Speaker 3: Sure? 780 00:36:58,280 --> 00:37:01,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'll take care for all, elder care for all, 781 00:37:01,880 --> 00:37:02,560 Speaker 1: older care. 782 00:37:02,520 --> 00:37:05,239 Speaker 15: For all, look man like we decided that we have 783 00:37:05,280 --> 00:37:08,280 Speaker 15: a quality of elder care system with a social security system. 784 00:37:08,280 --> 00:37:10,520 Speaker 15: Insofar as you know, one way to make sure that 785 00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:12,960 Speaker 15: the elderly are doing well is to actually give them money. 786 00:37:13,000 --> 00:37:15,279 Speaker 15: They can spend it as they want. But another way 787 00:37:15,640 --> 00:37:18,399 Speaker 15: is to make sure that they actually have full time 788 00:37:18,560 --> 00:37:23,000 Speaker 15: like the care that they need. And caring for an 789 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:28,239 Speaker 15: elderly loved one actually kind of distorts the freedom of 790 00:37:28,280 --> 00:37:32,880 Speaker 15: the caregiver, right, Like, if your parent or loved one 791 00:37:33,320 --> 00:37:36,560 Speaker 15: needs full time care, you can't really participate in politics, 792 00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:38,759 Speaker 15: you can't really participate in civil society. 793 00:37:38,920 --> 00:37:40,720 Speaker 9: So if we're going to actually secure. 794 00:37:40,400 --> 00:37:45,040 Speaker 15: Everyone like the blessings of liberty, like the Constitution supposed 795 00:37:45,040 --> 00:37:47,600 Speaker 15: to do, we need to start talking about elder care 796 00:37:47,640 --> 00:37:49,480 Speaker 15: for all and sim with child care for all. 797 00:37:49,840 --> 00:37:52,880 Speaker 4: Yeah right, I agree with both of those. 798 00:37:53,280 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 15: And also children should not be punished because they come 799 00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 15: from poor parents. The USDA every year, every other year 800 00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:04,280 Speaker 15: comes out with a survey about how much it costs 801 00:38:04,280 --> 00:38:06,719 Speaker 15: to raise a middle class child. And apparently, after you 802 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:10,000 Speaker 15: take away childcare and elder after you take away childcare, 803 00:38:10,000 --> 00:38:12,160 Speaker 15: it's about nine hundred bucks a month. Let's just give 804 00:38:12,600 --> 00:38:17,520 Speaker 15: every parent nine hundred dollars a month per kid. That's 805 00:38:17,560 --> 00:38:19,640 Speaker 15: like and you put that with a federal job guarantee 806 00:38:19,640 --> 00:38:21,400 Speaker 15: which is supposed to take care of the parent, and 807 00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:26,200 Speaker 15: that means every kid is not punished materially for just 808 00:38:26,280 --> 00:38:28,480 Speaker 15: coming from poor parents. And that means they could actually 809 00:38:28,960 --> 00:38:33,280 Speaker 15: like participate in the quality of enrichment activities that will 810 00:38:33,840 --> 00:38:35,359 Speaker 15: lead to a robust citizenship. 811 00:38:36,080 --> 00:38:38,040 Speaker 4: I think that is all very well said. 812 00:38:38,440 --> 00:38:41,520 Speaker 15: Yeah, we can link it to the USDA's own report 813 00:38:41,600 --> 00:38:44,799 Speaker 15: about what middle class parents spend on their children's. 814 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:47,680 Speaker 1: And then pagets too inflation so that it continues to 815 00:38:47,880 --> 00:38:49,840 Speaker 1: just autoescalate and you don't have to depend on a 816 00:38:49,880 --> 00:38:52,920 Speaker 1: political class to increase it. I think that's all a 817 00:38:53,000 --> 00:38:55,440 Speaker 1: very good idea. I Army is always great to have you. 818 00:38:55,480 --> 00:38:56,520 Speaker 1: It's always great to speak with you. 819 00:38:56,600 --> 00:38:59,319 Speaker 9: Thank you so much, Thank you for having me. 820 00:38:59,600 --> 00:39:00,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, our pleasure. 821 00:39:03,640 --> 00:39:07,120 Speaker 13: I'm Matt Stoler, author of monopoly focused Substack newsletter Big 822 00:39:07,360 --> 00:39:10,000 Speaker 13: and an anti trust policy analyst. They have a great 823 00:39:10,040 --> 00:39:13,080 Speaker 13: segment for you today on this Big Breakdown. It's about 824 00:39:13,120 --> 00:39:17,880 Speaker 13: how the giant credit reporting bureau Equifax, through its monopoly power, 825 00:39:18,480 --> 00:39:21,480 Speaker 13: has become a firm that sells what are effectively tax 826 00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:26,799 Speaker 13: records of any American to pretty much anyone who wants them. Okay, 827 00:39:26,880 --> 00:39:29,520 Speaker 13: The movie The Big Short is about fraud during the 828 00:39:29,560 --> 00:39:33,239 Speaker 13: Great Financial Crisis. In it, there's a famous scene where 829 00:39:33,280 --> 00:39:36,279 Speaker 13: fund managers betting on a housing collapse are trying to 830 00:39:36,360 --> 00:39:39,200 Speaker 13: learn about the Florida housing market and are interviewing some 831 00:39:39,280 --> 00:39:42,319 Speaker 13: frat boy type Florida real estate agents. The agents keep 832 00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:46,080 Speaker 13: discussing their self serving and illegal behavior like falsifying paperwork 833 00:39:46,360 --> 00:39:49,840 Speaker 13: or selling homes to people who knowingly can't pay back mortgages. 834 00:39:50,280 --> 00:39:53,240 Speaker 13: At a certain point, the main characters when his fund 835 00:39:53,239 --> 00:39:57,440 Speaker 13: manager asks his colleagues about these guys, why are they confessing? 836 00:39:57,880 --> 00:40:01,239 Speaker 13: And there's a great response. Here's the scene. 837 00:40:01,560 --> 00:40:02,120 Speaker 7: I don't get it. 838 00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:03,600 Speaker 6: Why are they confessing. 839 00:40:04,320 --> 00:40:06,960 Speaker 7: They're not confessing, they're bragging. 840 00:40:08,600 --> 00:40:10,120 Speaker 6: Not confessing, but bragging. 841 00:40:10,560 --> 00:40:12,839 Speaker 13: So these people weren't just breaking the law, but saw 842 00:40:12,880 --> 00:40:15,680 Speaker 13: the law itself as irrelevant. It was a true story, 843 00:40:15,760 --> 00:40:18,520 Speaker 13: or mostly true, and it continues to be a true 844 00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:22,200 Speaker 13: story in many white collar areas so late last year, 845 00:40:22,239 --> 00:40:25,280 Speaker 13: the CEO of Equifax Mark Begor presented at a Golden 846 00:40:25,320 --> 00:40:28,600 Speaker 13: Sex conference for investors and openly told them how much 847 00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:31,440 Speaker 13: market power his firm has in the business of selling 848 00:40:31,440 --> 00:40:34,680 Speaker 13: what's called income verification services to creditors. 849 00:40:35,000 --> 00:40:35,800 Speaker 6: Let's take a listen. 850 00:40:37,320 --> 00:40:41,240 Speaker 16: We have meaningful pricing power in that business. I wouldn't 851 00:40:42,120 --> 00:40:45,719 Speaker 16: put it in the same zip code as Mico, but 852 00:40:45,920 --> 00:40:47,719 Speaker 16: we have a very un data asset, just like they 853 00:40:47,719 --> 00:40:51,160 Speaker 16: have with the micro score. Only Equifax has that employment data. 854 00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:54,000 Speaker 16: So you know, we bring price to the marketplace every year. 855 00:40:54,040 --> 00:40:57,000 Speaker 16: We've already got our January one, twenty twenty three pricing 856 00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,359 Speaker 16: increases in the market. They went in a couple months ago, 857 00:41:00,200 --> 00:41:01,640 Speaker 16: so we know what price is going to be in 858 00:41:01,640 --> 00:41:04,720 Speaker 16: twenty twenty three. And we have more pricing power here. 859 00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:05,920 Speaker 6: Than we have in other businesses. 860 00:41:05,960 --> 00:41:09,160 Speaker 16: And if you think about four percent from price and product, 861 00:41:09,600 --> 00:41:11,719 Speaker 16: decide how you split the four I won't do it 862 00:41:11,760 --> 00:41:15,239 Speaker 16: for you, but you know we have an ability to 863 00:41:15,280 --> 00:41:16,800 Speaker 16: grow price well in excess a BDP. 864 00:41:17,400 --> 00:41:20,440 Speaker 13: We have meaningful pricing power. Only Equifax has that income 865 00:41:20,560 --> 00:41:26,839 Speaker 13: and employment data. That's market power, that's monopoly power. Now 866 00:41:26,880 --> 00:41:29,480 Speaker 13: a CEO should know better than to confess to monopolization. 867 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:32,960 Speaker 13: Only it seems as if he wasn't confessing, he was bragging. 868 00:41:33,560 --> 00:41:38,120 Speaker 13: So why would a CEO brag to investors? Probably because 869 00:41:38,600 --> 00:41:42,120 Speaker 13: he can. I mean, Equifax's controversial behavior is near legendary. 870 00:41:42,360 --> 00:41:45,200 Speaker 13: The firm is an important credit bureau and credit data 871 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:47,040 Speaker 13: is exactly what we wouldn't want to fall into the 872 00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:49,759 Speaker 13: hands of hackers who could then easily use it to 873 00:41:49,840 --> 00:41:53,080 Speaker 13: engage an identity theft on mass. But in twenty seventeen, 874 00:41:53,880 --> 00:41:56,160 Speaker 13: Equifax had one of the biggest data breaches in history 875 00:41:56,200 --> 00:41:58,960 Speaker 13: when it accidentally exposed the personal data of one hundred 876 00:41:58,960 --> 00:42:02,200 Speaker 13: and forty seven million people, so that's social security numbers, names, etc. 877 00:42:02,400 --> 00:42:04,840 Speaker 6: Etc. The Federal Trade Commission find. 878 00:42:04,640 --> 00:42:06,960 Speaker 13: The company more than five hundred and seventy five million dollars, 879 00:42:07,080 --> 00:42:10,040 Speaker 13: and the CEO, CIO, and chief security officer were all 880 00:42:10,080 --> 00:42:12,759 Speaker 13: forced out. But the firm itself didn't suffer any long 881 00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:15,960 Speaker 13: term damage. And that's because it's a monopoly. There's nowhere 882 00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:17,680 Speaker 13: else to go. People may not like it, but they 883 00:42:17,680 --> 00:42:22,959 Speaker 13: have to use it, okay, so there's no real consequences 884 00:42:22,960 --> 00:42:26,880 Speaker 13: to the company. And let's go back to the product 885 00:42:26,920 --> 00:42:29,520 Speaker 13: that Bager told investors about at the Golden Sex Confact, 886 00:42:29,560 --> 00:42:32,080 Speaker 13: which is called the work number. That's a business line 887 00:42:32,080 --> 00:42:34,560 Speaker 13: that bundles data about the incomes of hundreds of millions 888 00:42:34,600 --> 00:42:37,080 Speaker 13: of people like you and me and sells it to 889 00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:41,920 Speaker 13: interested parties like lenders, landlords, employers, government agencies. Payroll in 890 00:42:42,000 --> 00:42:44,320 Speaker 13: data is by some estimates, a ten billion dollar market 891 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:48,319 Speaker 13: and now brings in a majority of the firm's domestic revenue. Now, 892 00:42:48,360 --> 00:42:50,800 Speaker 13: Equifects used to just track whether we pay our debts. 893 00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:52,960 Speaker 13: They would sell that information to lenders. That's what a 894 00:42:52,960 --> 00:42:55,319 Speaker 13: credit bureau does. But over the last ten years it 895 00:42:55,360 --> 00:42:58,520 Speaker 13: has transformed itself into a sort of tax information agency, 896 00:42:58,840 --> 00:43:02,640 Speaker 13: which sells data about our salary and income and workplace 897 00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:05,800 Speaker 13: to third parties. It's a better business than just credit 898 00:43:05,880 --> 00:43:08,920 Speaker 13: data because while three firms have information about whether you 899 00:43:08,960 --> 00:43:13,120 Speaker 13: pay back your credit card, only Equifax has complete information 900 00:43:13,200 --> 00:43:16,120 Speaker 13: about where you work and your salary. And a monopoly, 901 00:43:16,600 --> 00:43:21,800 Speaker 13: as the CEO bragged, is better than an oligopoly. Now, first, 902 00:43:22,000 --> 00:43:26,120 Speaker 13: let's start with why this business exists. Sharing information about 903 00:43:26,120 --> 00:43:28,319 Speaker 13: where you work and what you make is something we 904 00:43:28,400 --> 00:43:29,440 Speaker 13: all need to do. 905 00:43:29,560 --> 00:43:30,240 Speaker 6: On occasion. 906 00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:32,759 Speaker 13: If a bank or an auto dealer wants to lend 907 00:43:32,760 --> 00:43:35,200 Speaker 13: someone money to buy a home or car, that bank 908 00:43:35,280 --> 00:43:38,319 Speaker 13: or creditor needs a verification that the person works where 909 00:43:38,480 --> 00:43:40,880 Speaker 13: he or she says he works and makes the income 910 00:43:40,920 --> 00:43:44,000 Speaker 13: he or she says they make. Now, sometimes a potential 911 00:43:44,040 --> 00:43:46,799 Speaker 13: employer or landlord needs to check work history, or a 912 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 13: public agency needs to ensure that someone qualifies for government 913 00:43:50,200 --> 00:43:53,400 Speaker 13: assistance or that, or they have to update someone's immigration status. 914 00:43:54,160 --> 00:43:57,280 Speaker 13: All of these things require that kind of data. Well, 915 00:43:57,440 --> 00:44:00,600 Speaker 13: how do these third parties verify this data? Lawyers don't 916 00:44:00,640 --> 00:44:03,440 Speaker 13: like it when their human resource departments are constantly getting 917 00:44:03,440 --> 00:44:06,160 Speaker 13: requests from lenders about their employees and their salaries and 918 00:44:06,200 --> 00:44:08,600 Speaker 13: so on and so forth. So for years, employers have 919 00:44:08,680 --> 00:44:11,759 Speaker 13: been sending data on this to Equifax. If you're trying 920 00:44:11,800 --> 00:44:14,640 Speaker 13: to find out someone's work history and income, it's pretty 921 00:44:14,719 --> 00:44:17,520 Speaker 13: likely at this point that Equifax has it. And we're 922 00:44:17,520 --> 00:44:19,879 Speaker 13: not just talking about the data that the irs has. 923 00:44:20,080 --> 00:44:22,880 Speaker 13: We're talking about data on pay for every payroll cycle, 924 00:44:22,920 --> 00:44:25,600 Speaker 13: your overtime amount to start, an end date for your job, 925 00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:28,680 Speaker 13: your title, your healthcare provider, whether you have dental insurance, 926 00:44:28,800 --> 00:44:31,200 Speaker 13: if you've ever filed an unemployment claim, and so on 927 00:44:31,280 --> 00:44:35,280 Speaker 13: and so forth. Now, this whole income and verification business 928 00:44:35,280 --> 00:44:37,960 Speaker 13: line didn't start out with Equifax. It started out with 929 00:44:38,000 --> 00:44:40,960 Speaker 13: a company called Talks, started in the nineteen seventies, but 930 00:44:41,080 --> 00:44:44,439 Speaker 13: Equifax bought it in two thousand and seven, and along 931 00:44:44,480 --> 00:44:46,600 Speaker 13: with a bunch of companies in this space, Equifax and 932 00:44:46,680 --> 00:44:50,560 Speaker 13: Talks continue to buy up companies. Now, Talks had signed 933 00:44:50,560 --> 00:44:53,799 Speaker 13: contracts with most big businesses Fortune five hundred businesses, as 934 00:44:53,840 --> 00:44:56,000 Speaker 13: well as governments, universities, and so on and so forth 935 00:44:56,000 --> 00:44:59,000 Speaker 13: to get data. But part of these contracts, we're not 936 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:01,719 Speaker 13: just to get the data, but to stop these companies 937 00:45:01,920 --> 00:45:05,680 Speaker 13: from sharing their data with other brokers. So now that 938 00:45:05,760 --> 00:45:08,120 Speaker 13: was to exclude rivals, not some privacy things. So the 939 00:45:08,160 --> 00:45:11,880 Speaker 13: story here is monopolization. And I'm not just saying this. 940 00:45:12,040 --> 00:45:16,120 Speaker 13: Fifteen years ago, the Federal Trade Commission actually sued Equifax 941 00:45:16,160 --> 00:45:19,480 Speaker 13: Talx's business for antitrust violations, and that was because of 942 00:45:19,480 --> 00:45:21,840 Speaker 13: the contractual arrangements that I just described, the ones that 943 00:45:21,920 --> 00:45:25,400 Speaker 13: excluded rivals from the market. Only people didn't really notice 944 00:45:25,440 --> 00:45:28,919 Speaker 13: because the income verification business was a side show back 945 00:45:28,960 --> 00:45:33,280 Speaker 13: then to Equifax's main credit reporting revenue line. Today, however, 946 00:45:33,360 --> 00:45:36,319 Speaker 13: Equifax is now a monopoly income verifier and it's got 947 00:45:36,400 --> 00:45:39,360 Speaker 13: kind of a side hustle in the credit information business. 948 00:45:39,719 --> 00:45:42,719 Speaker 13: Now there are network effects here. The more data Equifax 949 00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:45,080 Speaker 13: gets from employers, the more likely it is to be 950 00:45:45,120 --> 00:45:47,719 Speaker 13: the place that lenders and government agencies seek to do 951 00:45:47,760 --> 00:45:51,400 Speaker 13: income verification. Now, of course, the employees don't know that 952 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:54,880 Speaker 13: their own data is being sold by their employers, and 953 00:45:54,960 --> 00:45:58,320 Speaker 13: even small businesses who use payroll services like ADP don't 954 00:45:58,560 --> 00:46:01,160 Speaker 13: realize their data is being so ADP sells it all. 955 00:46:01,320 --> 00:46:03,480 Speaker 13: A lot of third party services sell that data. Now, 956 00:46:03,520 --> 00:46:06,160 Speaker 13: small businesses can opt out, but they actually have to 957 00:46:06,239 --> 00:46:08,319 Speaker 13: know that this data is being sold, and then they 958 00:46:08,320 --> 00:46:10,719 Speaker 13: have to tell their payroll provider, which they often don't 959 00:46:10,719 --> 00:46:12,080 Speaker 13: know that they should or could do. 960 00:46:12,960 --> 00:46:14,920 Speaker 6: Big companies they just make money, you know. 961 00:46:15,080 --> 00:46:17,200 Speaker 13: JP Morgan just sells its data and they get money 962 00:46:17,239 --> 00:46:20,319 Speaker 13: in and so they've turned human resources into into not 963 00:46:20,400 --> 00:46:23,000 Speaker 13: a cost center but a revenue generator. Now, the net 964 00:46:23,000 --> 00:46:25,880 Speaker 13: effect of these arrangements, at least in terms of the 965 00:46:25,880 --> 00:46:29,040 Speaker 13: income verification market, is that smaller players in the market 966 00:46:29,080 --> 00:46:31,640 Speaker 13: are boxed out. If you're doing income verification and you 967 00:46:31,680 --> 00:46:35,320 Speaker 13: put someone's social Security number into Equifax, you have roughly 968 00:46:35,360 --> 00:46:38,319 Speaker 13: fifty to seventy percent chance of getting a successful hit, 969 00:46:38,360 --> 00:46:41,279 Speaker 13: a successful conversion finding out whether that person works where 970 00:46:41,280 --> 00:46:44,280 Speaker 13: they say they work for other brokers, it's much lower, 971 00:46:44,760 --> 00:46:48,719 Speaker 13: maybe thirty percent. So if you need the information you basically, 972 00:46:48,760 --> 00:46:50,320 Speaker 13: if you're credit or your lender and you want to 973 00:46:50,320 --> 00:46:52,719 Speaker 13: find something out, you have to use Equifax. Now on 974 00:46:52,760 --> 00:46:56,240 Speaker 13: the other side of the market, right, Equifax has also 975 00:46:56,480 --> 00:46:59,560 Speaker 13: erected barriers to entry. If you're a frequent buyer of 976 00:46:59,640 --> 00:47:04,200 Speaker 13: income verification or income or employment data, equifecs will offer 977 00:47:04,280 --> 00:47:06,880 Speaker 13: a loyalty discount if you move all your business to 978 00:47:06,920 --> 00:47:10,160 Speaker 13: the work number. So a loyalty discount sound sounds nice, 979 00:47:10,160 --> 00:47:13,120 Speaker 13: but it's basically just a mechanism to exclude rivals. So 980 00:47:13,200 --> 00:47:17,239 Speaker 13: one background check provider called swift Check, explained that Equifax 981 00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:20,560 Speaker 13: told them that, quote, if our organization performs the work 982 00:47:20,640 --> 00:47:25,680 Speaker 13: number verification on every employment verification, a discount is offered. 983 00:47:26,360 --> 00:47:29,240 Speaker 13: In other words, if you use a rival, your price 984 00:47:29,280 --> 00:47:33,400 Speaker 13: goes up. That's classic monopolization. That's standard oil and the railroads. 985 00:47:33,400 --> 00:47:35,000 Speaker 13: I mean, you go back one hundred years for this. 986 00:47:35,520 --> 00:47:38,560 Speaker 13: Now we can see this market power at work in 987 00:47:38,600 --> 00:47:42,200 Speaker 13: the pricing. As their CEO noted in December, Equifax has 988 00:47:42,239 --> 00:47:45,880 Speaker 13: been raising prices on lenders substantially for years. So in 989 00:47:45,920 --> 00:47:48,920 Speaker 13: twenty seventeen, the price for a record for just to 990 00:47:48,960 --> 00:47:51,880 Speaker 13: look up someone was twenty dollars. In twenty twenty, it 991 00:47:51,920 --> 00:47:54,880 Speaker 13: was forty one dollars and ninety five cents, and today 992 00:47:54,880 --> 00:47:57,560 Speaker 13: it lists its price at fifty four dollars and ninety 993 00:47:57,560 --> 00:47:59,839 Speaker 13: five cents for a record of where you currently work. 994 00:48:00,640 --> 00:48:01,680 Speaker 6: This is their public prices. 995 00:48:01,680 --> 00:48:03,880 Speaker 13: They have lots of other prices, so we're not totally 996 00:48:03,920 --> 00:48:07,880 Speaker 13: sure what they charge. It's likely much more to some customers, 997 00:48:09,000 --> 00:48:10,879 Speaker 13: but it can potentially be up to two hundred dollars 998 00:48:10,920 --> 00:48:12,720 Speaker 13: for records with more historical information. 999 00:48:12,760 --> 00:48:13,520 Speaker 6: Now, to give you a. 1000 00:48:13,480 --> 00:48:16,759 Speaker 13: Sense of these price hikes, that's an inflation rate of 1001 00:48:16,880 --> 00:48:20,440 Speaker 13: twenty five percent. That's why the CEO was bragging about 1002 00:48:20,440 --> 00:48:23,919 Speaker 13: being able to raise prices faster than GDP growth. Now 1003 00:48:23,920 --> 00:48:27,000 Speaker 13: it goes way beyond price. That's just the harms to 1004 00:48:27,200 --> 00:48:29,480 Speaker 13: the lenders and the ultimately they pass that down to 1005 00:48:29,520 --> 00:48:30,000 Speaker 13: the people. 1006 00:48:29,840 --> 00:48:31,800 Speaker 6: Who are borrowing money. 1007 00:48:31,920 --> 00:48:35,520 Speaker 13: The work number can according to the government, this is 1008 00:48:35,520 --> 00:48:38,520 Speaker 13: where it gets kind of creepy. Help determine quote unquote 1009 00:48:38,560 --> 00:48:43,120 Speaker 13: an applicant's social service eligibility or quote unquote informed child 1010 00:48:43,160 --> 00:48:48,960 Speaker 13: support collections and enforcement. There are also often errors and 1011 00:48:49,000 --> 00:48:51,680 Speaker 13: getting your own data from Equifax and getting them to 1012 00:48:51,760 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 13: change data so that it's right can be difficult. It's 1013 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:57,840 Speaker 13: also a system that is prone to abuse. So Apple 1014 00:48:57,920 --> 00:49:00,600 Speaker 13: told the work number that every worker who left was 1015 00:49:00,680 --> 00:49:05,240 Speaker 13: automatically given the title quote unquote associate, regardless of whether 1016 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:08,400 Speaker 13: they were a top engineer or salesperson or whatever. And 1017 00:49:08,440 --> 00:49:11,160 Speaker 13: according to one of these people who left Apple, the 1018 00:49:11,360 --> 00:49:15,280 Speaker 13: error quote delayed the hiring prospects process at a prospective 1019 00:49:15,280 --> 00:49:18,520 Speaker 13: employer by nearly a week, during which time the company 1020 00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:19,520 Speaker 13: rescinded the offer. 1021 00:49:21,080 --> 00:49:23,920 Speaker 6: That's bad. And though Equifax. 1022 00:49:23,600 --> 00:49:26,680 Speaker 13: Claims there are controls who can buy this information, security 1023 00:49:26,680 --> 00:49:29,959 Speaker 13: researcher Brian Krebs noted in twenty seventeen that it's easy 1024 00:49:30,000 --> 00:49:33,040 Speaker 13: for pretty much anyone to get this information to learn 1025 00:49:33,080 --> 00:49:36,160 Speaker 13: your salary. The work number, in fact, is so important 1026 00:49:36,360 --> 00:49:38,680 Speaker 13: that Equifax is engaged in the work that should be 1027 00:49:38,719 --> 00:49:42,120 Speaker 13: reserved to a government. Equifax uses its data to build 1028 00:49:42,120 --> 00:49:46,160 Speaker 13: services for firms, such as managing unemployment compensation. When a 1029 00:49:46,160 --> 00:49:48,360 Speaker 13: firm lays off a worker, that worker is supposed to 1030 00:49:48,440 --> 00:49:51,680 Speaker 13: have rights to unemployment insurance with the firm, which the 1031 00:49:51,719 --> 00:49:54,080 Speaker 13: firm has to pay for. But if that employee was 1032 00:49:54,080 --> 00:49:57,240 Speaker 13: fired for cause or quit, then the worker isn't entitled 1033 00:49:57,320 --> 00:49:59,720 Speaker 13: to unemployment payments and the firm is off the hook. 1034 00:50:00,080 --> 00:50:02,960 Speaker 13: So managing this process along with appeals is something that 1035 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:06,759 Speaker 13: Equifax does for firms, and at the height of the 1036 00:50:06,800 --> 00:50:10,680 Speaker 13: Great Recession in twenty ten, Equifax was processing thirty percent 1037 00:50:10,719 --> 00:50:12,320 Speaker 13: of the employment claims in the country. 1038 00:50:12,480 --> 00:50:15,120 Speaker 6: That's massive. But here's the thing. 1039 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:19,839 Speaker 13: It had an automated system to systematically deny applications regardless 1040 00:50:19,880 --> 00:50:23,000 Speaker 13: of merit, so it's clients employers would have to pay 1041 00:50:23,080 --> 00:50:27,440 Speaker 13: less in unemployment taxes. So in order if you applied 1042 00:50:27,480 --> 00:50:31,600 Speaker 13: for unemployment you had to escalate like that was just automatic. 1043 00:50:31,920 --> 00:50:34,880 Speaker 13: That's what's something that's a service that Equifax sold. We 1044 00:50:34,920 --> 00:50:38,880 Speaker 13: will automatically deny unemployment claims, no matter how legitimate, and 1045 00:50:38,960 --> 00:50:41,560 Speaker 13: this goal is on the firm's investment documents, which uses 1046 00:50:41,600 --> 00:50:44,480 Speaker 13: the anodyne wording of quote unquote. We offer the service 1047 00:50:44,520 --> 00:50:48,799 Speaker 13: of reducing the cost of unemployment claims through effective claims representation. 1048 00:50:49,920 --> 00:50:52,719 Speaker 13: That's how it describes as service it provides to employers 1049 00:50:52,800 --> 00:50:55,920 Speaker 13: who give it dead data. So it's perhaps no exaggeration 1050 00:50:56,000 --> 00:51:00,440 Speaker 13: to note that Equifax is a quasi governmental agency monopoly 1051 00:51:00,480 --> 00:51:03,640 Speaker 13: provider of evidence that you work where you work and 1052 00:51:03,680 --> 00:51:05,960 Speaker 13: what you make if there's an error or if someone 1053 00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:08,760 Speaker 13: lies about you. Too bad effect with the facts itself 1054 00:51:08,840 --> 00:51:09,440 Speaker 13: is paid. 1055 00:51:09,239 --> 00:51:10,440 Speaker 6: To harm you. Too bad. 1056 00:51:10,760 --> 00:51:13,360 Speaker 13: If a government agency gets the wrong data and denies 1057 00:51:13,360 --> 00:51:17,200 Speaker 13: you assistance or screws up your immigration status, that's on you. 1058 00:51:18,160 --> 00:51:20,840 Speaker 6: Well, you have limited to no rights in this situation. 1059 00:51:20,920 --> 00:51:23,080 Speaker 13: In some rights, you might have more a fear from 1060 00:51:23,160 --> 00:51:26,880 Speaker 13: Equifax than the irs, And Equifax understands this. They lobby 1061 00:51:27,080 --> 00:51:30,560 Speaker 13: for this particular situation. So here's Stephen Colbert making a 1062 00:51:30,640 --> 00:51:34,120 Speaker 13: quick point about the problem and Equifax's politics. 1063 00:51:34,560 --> 00:51:35,360 Speaker 3: Here's the nilio. 1064 00:51:35,480 --> 00:51:39,200 Speaker 14: Well, we still have litigation as the last line of protection. 1065 00:51:39,880 --> 00:51:44,680 Speaker 14: Maybe because Equifax is waging a concerted campaign to repeal 1066 00:51:44,760 --> 00:51:47,040 Speaker 14: federal regulations upholding. 1067 00:51:46,560 --> 00:51:48,360 Speaker 3: Consumers right to sue. 1068 00:51:48,560 --> 00:51:53,080 Speaker 14: Ah, No, our right to sue is what makes us American. 1069 00:51:53,200 --> 00:51:57,000 Speaker 13: Equal facts really wants to strip people's rights from making 1070 00:51:57,040 --> 00:52:00,600 Speaker 13: sure that their data is correct. It have to be 1071 00:52:00,680 --> 00:52:03,520 Speaker 13: this way. I'm talking about the whole industry. I mean, 1072 00:52:03,560 --> 00:52:05,480 Speaker 13: maybe you could make the argument a few decades ago 1073 00:52:05,520 --> 00:52:08,239 Speaker 13: when you had centralized databases and it was kind. 1074 00:52:08,120 --> 00:52:09,360 Speaker 6: Of hard to move this information. 1075 00:52:09,920 --> 00:52:14,120 Speaker 13: But with the Internet, and the Internet is twenty twenty 1076 00:52:14,200 --> 00:52:17,040 Speaker 13: years old or something at this point. But the Internet, 1077 00:52:17,040 --> 00:52:19,520 Speaker 13: with cloud computing, there's just no technical reason for a 1078 00:52:19,560 --> 00:52:23,520 Speaker 13: centralized repository of employment and verification data, at least not 1079 00:52:23,560 --> 00:52:25,760 Speaker 13: the way that it's set up today. It's quite possible 1080 00:52:25,800 --> 00:52:28,879 Speaker 13: to have a system allowing any fire verifier to ask 1081 00:52:28,880 --> 00:52:33,840 Speaker 13: the individual, to ask the individual for his or her records, 1082 00:52:34,040 --> 00:52:37,520 Speaker 13: but that would cut against Equifax's business model. That is, 1083 00:52:37,719 --> 00:52:40,080 Speaker 13: they don't keep your data secure, but they're a monopoly, 1084 00:52:40,200 --> 00:52:43,040 Speaker 13: so it doesn't matter. They don't ask you, but doesn't 1085 00:52:43,040 --> 00:52:44,680 Speaker 13: matter because they're monopoly, they have the data. 1086 00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:45,520 Speaker 7: Now. 1087 00:52:45,719 --> 00:52:51,319 Speaker 13: Frank Abognel advises companies and individuals on security's He was 1088 00:52:51,360 --> 00:52:54,080 Speaker 13: featured in the movie Catch Me If you Can, and 1089 00:52:54,160 --> 00:52:57,640 Speaker 13: here's his observation about the incentives that Equifax face is 1090 00:52:57,960 --> 00:53:00,720 Speaker 13: in the legal system in this country. 1091 00:53:00,760 --> 00:53:03,800 Speaker 17: Ever said to Equifax, you know what, you can store 1092 00:53:03,840 --> 00:53:07,000 Speaker 17: all my personal data and you can make billions of 1093 00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:11,360 Speaker 17: dollars selling it for background checks, employee checks, credit checks. 1094 00:53:12,320 --> 00:53:13,560 Speaker 7: No, I never said that. 1095 00:53:13,800 --> 00:53:16,000 Speaker 17: So what I want to say is, Equifax, you can 1096 00:53:16,080 --> 00:53:19,360 Speaker 17: keep my data, but you cannot show it to anyone 1097 00:53:20,160 --> 00:53:23,600 Speaker 17: without my consent, And if for some reason it gets 1098 00:53:23,640 --> 00:53:26,560 Speaker 17: in the wrong hand, I have the recourse to come 1099 00:53:26,600 --> 00:53:29,960 Speaker 17: back on you because you put me in jeopardy. 1100 00:53:30,480 --> 00:53:33,319 Speaker 13: So it shouldn't it shouldn't be this way, and in fact, 1101 00:53:33,400 --> 00:53:35,160 Speaker 13: it doesn't have to be this way. There are actually 1102 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:38,239 Speaker 13: other companies who notice this monopoly and they're trying to 1103 00:53:38,400 --> 00:53:41,120 Speaker 13: compete in the market using privacy safe solutions. A lot 1104 00:53:41,120 --> 00:53:43,880 Speaker 13: of you know entrepreneurs were like, this is a crappy system. 1105 00:53:43,960 --> 00:53:46,680 Speaker 13: Let's build something better. Only they're running into roadblocks. So 1106 00:53:46,719 --> 00:53:49,280 Speaker 13: there are two particular firms. I talked to the leaders 1107 00:53:49,280 --> 00:53:52,200 Speaker 13: of both sur Trey and Argyle, who recently sent letters 1108 00:53:52,200 --> 00:53:54,839 Speaker 13: to the Federal Trade Commission asking for an investigation into 1109 00:53:54,880 --> 00:53:57,040 Speaker 13: this market, and they were pointing at the abuse of 1110 00:53:57,040 --> 00:54:00,239 Speaker 13: consumers buy Equifax and to a lesser extent experience, which 1111 00:54:00,280 --> 00:54:04,000 Speaker 13: is the number two. But like way, way, way down now, 1112 00:54:04,040 --> 00:54:07,560 Speaker 13: the strategies for each of these rivals are different, but 1113 00:54:07,719 --> 00:54:10,520 Speaker 13: both give the customer control over who can access their 1114 00:54:10,600 --> 00:54:13,839 Speaker 13: data instead of building a giant centralized repository controlled by 1115 00:54:13,840 --> 00:54:18,320 Speaker 13: a monopolist, and both charge much lower prices. The overall 1116 00:54:18,320 --> 00:54:21,400 Speaker 13: point here is that having a centralized data broker that 1117 00:54:21,400 --> 00:54:24,279 Speaker 13: has a quasi monopoly over income and verification data and 1118 00:54:24,360 --> 00:54:28,480 Speaker 13: since largely unregulated, is ridiculous. It's obvious that Equifax is 1119 00:54:28,520 --> 00:54:31,680 Speaker 13: immune to competitive forces, despite the price hikes and devastating 1120 00:54:31,680 --> 00:54:35,160 Speaker 13: and routine news stories about hacks, errors and problems, as 1121 00:54:35,160 --> 00:54:38,960 Speaker 13: well as public polling showing increasing concerns over privacy and 1122 00:54:39,320 --> 00:54:42,520 Speaker 13: new technologies like large language learning models that make this 1123 00:54:42,600 --> 00:54:45,520 Speaker 13: data useful in all sorts of other ways that could 1124 00:54:45,560 --> 00:54:50,480 Speaker 13: be really useful but also dangerous. Equifax marches on unbothered 1125 00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:54,120 Speaker 13: and unchasened. And that's the classic monopoly position, a recognition 1126 00:54:54,160 --> 00:54:57,160 Speaker 13: that there is no alternative to the entity in the market. 1127 00:54:57,760 --> 00:54:57,880 Speaker 12: Now. 1128 00:54:57,920 --> 00:55:00,400 Speaker 13: There are many legal levers here, from anti tres trust 1129 00:55:00,640 --> 00:55:05,319 Speaker 13: to credit reporting laws to regulation that can work regardless. 1130 00:55:05,360 --> 00:55:08,280 Speaker 13: I'd like to thank Equifax CEO Mark Baker for bragging 1131 00:55:08,719 --> 00:55:11,799 Speaker 13: about his firm's market power, because without that, I never 1132 00:55:11,840 --> 00:55:14,200 Speaker 13: would have taken the time to learn out why Equifax 1133 00:55:14,200 --> 00:55:16,719 Speaker 13: can act as a private irs, put out a middle 1134 00:55:16,719 --> 00:55:19,520 Speaker 13: finger to each one of us, and collect our money regardless. 1135 00:55:19,880 --> 00:55:22,520 Speaker 13: Thanks for watching this big breakdown on the Breaking Points channel. 1136 00:55:22,640 --> 00:55:24,400 Speaker 13: If you'd like to know more about big business and 1137 00:55:24,440 --> 00:55:26,640 Speaker 13: how our economy really works, you can sign up below 1138 00:55:26,680 --> 00:55:29,640 Speaker 13: for my market power focused newsletter Big in the description, 1139 00:55:29,800 --> 00:55:31,239 Speaker 13: Thanks and have a good one. 1140 00:55:34,680 --> 00:55:36,920 Speaker 18: Hey everyone, I'm Ken Klippenstein with breaking points to the 1141 00:55:36,920 --> 00:55:39,800 Speaker 18: Intercept edition. I did a story recently that I'd like 1142 00:55:39,840 --> 00:55:43,359 Speaker 18: to talk to you all about. Let's talk about Havana syndrome, or, 1143 00:55:43,440 --> 00:55:48,759 Speaker 18: as the US government calls it, the anomaloust health conditions. 1144 00:55:49,160 --> 00:55:50,759 Speaker 18: That's the new official term. You don't use the word 1145 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:54,440 Speaker 18: havana syme for it anymore. What Havana syndrome refers to 1146 00:55:54,560 --> 00:55:58,160 Speaker 18: is a set of alleged symptoms alleged by US spies, 1147 00:55:58,560 --> 00:56:02,239 Speaker 18: diplomats and other person now at various US embassies that 1148 00:56:02,320 --> 00:56:08,320 Speaker 18: they say resemble you know, hearing strange noises, cognitive issues, headaches, nausea. 1149 00:56:08,320 --> 00:56:12,279 Speaker 18: It's a really mysterious set of symptoms, and over a 1150 00:56:12,400 --> 00:56:15,640 Speaker 18: thousand of these individuals have alleged this. So I took 1151 00:56:15,680 --> 00:56:19,279 Speaker 18: a look at the Pentagon budget which was released last month. 1152 00:56:19,320 --> 00:56:22,880 Speaker 18: To my surprise, nobody had reported one thing that was 1153 00:56:22,880 --> 00:56:25,560 Speaker 18: in it, which was the budget for responding to Havana syndrome. 1154 00:56:25,840 --> 00:56:28,759 Speaker 18: That's thirty six million dollars. That's a budget that's been 1155 00:56:28,800 --> 00:56:31,960 Speaker 18: increasing every year since they've first allocated money to this. 1156 00:56:32,560 --> 00:56:35,920 Speaker 18: And something I find interesting about the government response to 1157 00:56:36,040 --> 00:56:36,879 Speaker 18: Vana syndrome. 1158 00:56:36,600 --> 00:56:37,839 Speaker 7: Is how bipartisan it is. 1159 00:56:38,200 --> 00:56:40,879 Speaker 18: At the time that it seems we can't get folks 1160 00:56:40,920 --> 00:56:43,520 Speaker 18: in government to agree on anything. I mean, they're debating 1161 00:56:43,560 --> 00:56:50,520 Speaker 18: now cutting food stamps, subsidies to clean energy, you know, 1162 00:56:50,600 --> 00:56:53,960 Speaker 18: potentially sending the government into default if you believe some 1163 00:56:53,960 --> 00:56:57,560 Speaker 18: of the more extreme members of the Republican Caucus. Something 1164 00:56:57,600 --> 00:57:01,520 Speaker 18: that they universally agreed on, every single cenator, every single 1165 00:57:01,920 --> 00:57:05,600 Speaker 18: representative of Congress two years ago was to fund a 1166 00:57:05,640 --> 00:57:11,000 Speaker 18: response to the so called Avana syndrome, or rather anomalist 1167 00:57:11,040 --> 00:57:14,000 Speaker 18: health incidents. I'm sorry, we had the user proper verbidge here. 1168 00:57:14,960 --> 00:57:17,160 Speaker 18: And so what's interesting about that is not only did 1169 00:57:17,160 --> 00:57:18,960 Speaker 18: they authorize that fund in a couple years ago, it 1170 00:57:19,000 --> 00:57:21,920 Speaker 18: continues to increase every year. So let's talk about what 1171 00:57:22,040 --> 00:57:25,040 Speaker 18: exactly that thirty six million dollars entails. It's not just 1172 00:57:25,200 --> 00:57:29,480 Speaker 18: healthcare treatment for the individuals affected. It's also R and 1173 00:57:29,560 --> 00:57:34,680 Speaker 18: D research into what the conditions are that you might 1174 00:57:34,800 --> 00:57:37,520 Speaker 18: lead somebody to be susceptible to this, how to respond 1175 00:57:37,560 --> 00:57:40,760 Speaker 18: to it. And as Politico, the budget's not terribly detailed 1176 00:57:40,760 --> 00:57:43,600 Speaker 18: about what that all entails. But as Politico reported a 1177 00:57:43,680 --> 00:57:46,880 Speaker 18: couple of weeks ago, the military is experimenting with different 1178 00:57:46,920 --> 00:57:50,080 Speaker 18: weapons systems to try to see if they can induce 1179 00:57:52,160 --> 00:57:55,120 Speaker 18: the conditions that would cause what they believed to be 1180 00:57:55,680 --> 00:57:58,080 Speaker 18: a Vana syndrome. Now, something I think that's really important 1181 00:57:58,080 --> 00:58:00,000 Speaker 18: to address and all this is that it's not clear 1182 00:58:00,200 --> 00:58:03,120 Speaker 18: what havanas syndroime is exactly. There's all sorts of disagreement 1183 00:58:03,120 --> 00:58:07,400 Speaker 18: over you know, what constitutes it. And if you look 1184 00:58:07,440 --> 00:58:11,439 Speaker 18: at the CIA interim study that was released last year 1185 00:58:12,120 --> 00:58:15,840 Speaker 18: that spent you know, all sorts of resources investigating this, again, 1186 00:58:15,880 --> 00:58:17,840 Speaker 18: they had about a thousand a little over a thousand 1187 00:58:17,880 --> 00:58:19,760 Speaker 18: people saying that they had it. They were able to 1188 00:58:19,840 --> 00:58:24,360 Speaker 18: rule out the majority of those cases as having environmental causes, 1189 00:58:24,400 --> 00:58:27,160 Speaker 18: pre existing health conditions, so on and so forth. 1190 00:58:27,200 --> 00:58:28,960 Speaker 7: Now, I don't think it's bad to respond. 1191 00:58:29,080 --> 00:58:31,800 Speaker 18: I mean, even if something is psychiatric, that's still something 1192 00:58:31,800 --> 00:58:34,240 Speaker 18: that you can respond to and provide health care for. 1193 00:58:34,720 --> 00:58:36,960 Speaker 18: But the manner in which they're approaching this, as you 1194 00:58:37,000 --> 00:58:38,920 Speaker 18: recall when it first came out have van a smem 1195 00:58:38,960 --> 00:58:42,080 Speaker 18: The title refers to the US embassy in Cuba, where 1196 00:58:42,640 --> 00:58:45,919 Speaker 18: diplomats and spies first started alleging these symptoms. But since 1197 00:58:45,960 --> 00:58:49,560 Speaker 18: then these symptoms were reported all over the world, embassies 1198 00:58:49,560 --> 00:58:52,400 Speaker 18: all over the world, China, Russia, I mean there's like 1199 00:58:52,640 --> 00:58:55,000 Speaker 18: over a dozen of them. And what's interesting, you know, 1200 00:58:55,040 --> 00:58:57,600 Speaker 18: I do a lot of work in national security interviewing 1201 00:58:57,640 --> 00:58:58,840 Speaker 18: folks in that space. 1202 00:58:59,360 --> 00:59:01,760 Speaker 7: I realized when I started asking them. Almost immediately, I said, 1203 00:59:01,760 --> 00:59:02,760 Speaker 7: you know, what is this? What are you hearing? 1204 00:59:02,800 --> 00:59:05,280 Speaker 18: Because very often, even when stuff is highly classified, things, 1205 00:59:05,560 --> 00:59:06,439 Speaker 18: you know, word gets around. 1206 00:59:06,480 --> 00:59:07,680 Speaker 7: It's very hard to keep a secret. 1207 00:59:07,720 --> 00:59:09,800 Speaker 18: People would hear things from retired people, would hear things 1208 00:59:09,840 --> 00:59:11,720 Speaker 18: from people inside. People inside might talk to you and 1209 00:59:11,720 --> 00:59:14,200 Speaker 18: tell you what they're hearing about it. And what was 1210 00:59:14,240 --> 00:59:16,800 Speaker 18: amazing was the range of opinions that I was able 1211 00:59:16,840 --> 00:59:20,080 Speaker 18: to solicit. When I asked folks this question, it seemed 1212 00:59:20,080 --> 00:59:22,240 Speaker 18: almost like a roar shock test. It was like the 1213 00:59:22,280 --> 00:59:24,520 Speaker 18: people I knew that worked counter intelligence in Russia, They're like, 1214 00:59:24,560 --> 00:59:26,600 Speaker 18: it's got to be the Russians, it's a Russian energy weapon. 1215 00:59:26,840 --> 00:59:29,400 Speaker 18: The people working counter intelligence against the Chinese, it's got 1216 00:59:29,440 --> 00:59:32,240 Speaker 18: to be Beijing. They're doing this to us for X, 1217 00:59:32,360 --> 00:59:35,480 Speaker 18: Y and Z reason. Other people said it was Cuba. 1218 00:59:35,560 --> 00:59:37,520 Speaker 18: And you know these I mean, these are obviously probably 1219 00:59:37,640 --> 00:59:39,400 Speaker 18: private conversations that I had, But if you look back 1220 00:59:39,400 --> 00:59:43,000 Speaker 18: at the media coverage, initially it was taken very seriously 1221 00:59:43,040 --> 00:59:46,360 Speaker 18: that this must be some kind of directed energy weapon, 1222 00:59:46,400 --> 00:59:48,840 Speaker 18: and a lot of people pointed the finger at the Russians. 1223 00:59:48,880 --> 00:59:51,360 Speaker 18: But what that CIA interim report that I mentioned a 1224 00:59:51,400 --> 00:59:54,840 Speaker 18: couple of minutes ago found was that it's unlikely that 1225 00:59:55,280 --> 00:59:58,000 Speaker 18: there was a foreign adversary. And just a couple of 1226 00:59:58,040 --> 01:00:03,640 Speaker 18: weeks ago, a conclusive multi agency intelligence community assessment reiterated 1227 01:00:03,640 --> 01:00:06,440 Speaker 18: that in greater detail, finding that it was quote highly 1228 01:00:06,560 --> 01:00:11,240 Speaker 18: unlikely that it's a foreign adversary doing this. So they've 1229 01:00:11,280 --> 01:00:14,240 Speaker 18: just tossed out this idea that it's a direct energy weapon. 1230 01:00:15,240 --> 01:00:15,920 Speaker 7: Not much. 1231 01:00:17,680 --> 01:00:19,320 Speaker 18: You know, reflection on the part of the press about 1232 01:00:19,520 --> 01:00:20,880 Speaker 18: why did we run with this before? 1233 01:00:21,520 --> 01:00:22,760 Speaker 7: You know, when I were writing. 1234 01:00:22,480 --> 01:00:25,439 Speaker 18: These stories, I thought, wow, they're really throwing their lot 1235 01:00:25,440 --> 01:00:27,200 Speaker 18: in with this theory that if it turns out not 1236 01:00:27,200 --> 01:00:28,760 Speaker 18: to be true, they're going to have egg on their face. 1237 01:00:28,880 --> 01:00:30,440 Speaker 18: Turns out, if you just don't talk about it, there 1238 01:00:30,440 --> 01:00:32,760 Speaker 18: won't be any egg on your face. So there's just 1239 01:00:32,800 --> 01:00:34,680 Speaker 18: been this complete shift now where it's like, oh, it's 1240 01:00:34,720 --> 01:00:38,760 Speaker 18: not a foreign adversary, and you know, people can say, well, 1241 01:00:38,800 --> 01:00:41,040 Speaker 18: this is the intelligence community's assessment, how do we trust 1242 01:00:41,040 --> 01:00:41,880 Speaker 18: that that's true. 1243 01:00:42,160 --> 01:00:43,840 Speaker 7: I have a feeling that if they find something. 1244 01:00:43,600 --> 01:00:48,520 Speaker 18: Derogatory about the you know, nation state adversaries on which 1245 01:00:48,560 --> 01:00:51,520 Speaker 18: their budget and money and resources and really reason for 1246 01:00:51,600 --> 01:00:53,960 Speaker 18: existing depends. I'm a feeling they're going to release that, 1247 01:00:54,000 --> 01:00:55,640 Speaker 18: so I don't think they're going to be particularly shy 1248 01:00:55,720 --> 01:00:59,200 Speaker 18: about it. But in any case, what was most astonishing 1249 01:00:59,480 --> 01:01:02,560 Speaker 18: in this Pine Gone a budget to me not just 1250 01:01:02,600 --> 01:01:04,920 Speaker 18: the amount thirty six million, but the spending on R 1251 01:01:04,960 --> 01:01:07,440 Speaker 18: and D. As I mentioned the political report, they're experimenting 1252 01:01:07,480 --> 01:01:09,800 Speaker 18: with their own weapons systems to try to create conditions 1253 01:01:09,800 --> 01:01:13,600 Speaker 18: that they think might lead to Havana syndrome. Is just 1254 01:01:13,640 --> 01:01:17,000 Speaker 18: how sophisticated this response that continues to It's just classic 1255 01:01:17,080 --> 01:01:20,520 Speaker 18: national security. You allocate money to something and it never disappears, 1256 01:01:20,560 --> 01:01:23,320 Speaker 18: even after this conclusive report that found that it can't 1257 01:01:23,360 --> 01:01:26,160 Speaker 18: have been very unlikely to have been caused by a 1258 01:01:26,200 --> 01:01:29,560 Speaker 18: foreign adversary. What I found is it's not just the 1259 01:01:29,600 --> 01:01:31,760 Speaker 18: military that's doing this. Although the Pentagon budget, I think 1260 01:01:31,760 --> 01:01:35,840 Speaker 18: the Pentagon takes point because they have the healthcare resources 1261 01:01:36,680 --> 01:01:40,800 Speaker 18: in place to most effectively respond to this. They're responding 1262 01:01:40,880 --> 01:01:44,640 Speaker 18: in conjunction with a bunch of different agencies. This task 1263 01:01:44,720 --> 01:01:46,960 Speaker 18: force to have that's responding to it has more than 1264 01:01:47,040 --> 01:01:51,200 Speaker 18: doubled in size since its inception, which was just only 1265 01:01:51,240 --> 01:01:52,960 Speaker 18: just a couple of years ago. If you read a 1266 01:01:53,240 --> 01:01:56,600 Speaker 18: Inspector General report that the Pentagon put out last year, 1267 01:01:57,000 --> 01:01:59,200 Speaker 18: they found that not only has that staff doubled, it 1268 01:01:59,240 --> 01:02:02,280 Speaker 18: includes a two star military general to give you a 1269 01:02:02,320 --> 01:02:04,840 Speaker 18: sense of like how seriously they're they're taking this, who's 1270 01:02:04,880 --> 01:02:07,800 Speaker 18: detailed and a bunch of full time staff. So these 1271 01:02:07,800 --> 01:02:09,840 Speaker 18: are not just people working on the side occasionally to 1272 01:02:10,360 --> 01:02:12,160 Speaker 18: work on this task force. It's something that the military 1273 01:02:12,200 --> 01:02:14,640 Speaker 18: is taking very seriously with regards to not just money, 1274 01:02:14,680 --> 01:02:19,600 Speaker 18: but the seniority of the individuals detailed detailed to this 1275 01:02:20,000 --> 01:02:22,680 Speaker 18: task force. And in addition to that, it's people from 1276 01:02:22,840 --> 01:02:27,360 Speaker 18: all sorts of different service branches air Force, military, police, 1277 01:02:27,600 --> 01:02:28,480 Speaker 18: marine corps. 1278 01:02:29,640 --> 01:02:30,440 Speaker 7: So it's astonishing. 1279 01:02:30,520 --> 01:02:32,760 Speaker 18: The size of this response is something that we still 1280 01:02:32,840 --> 01:02:37,320 Speaker 18: don't know a what it is and b if there 1281 01:02:37,400 --> 01:02:40,400 Speaker 18: is even a what there even if it's something that's 1282 01:02:40,440 --> 01:02:44,760 Speaker 18: not just psychogenic. You know, when I interviewed folks who 1283 01:02:44,800 --> 01:02:47,240 Speaker 18: worked with the CIA, the impression I got was such 1284 01:02:47,240 --> 01:02:50,760 Speaker 18: an American story. It was like I heard the same 1285 01:02:50,880 --> 01:02:53,840 Speaker 18: kinds of distrust for their internal medical system that you 1286 01:02:54,040 --> 01:02:56,760 Speaker 18: hear from folks in this just ordinary everyday people. I 1287 01:02:56,800 --> 01:03:00,040 Speaker 18: don't trust the healthcare system, and I understand that that 1288 01:03:00,880 --> 01:03:03,800 Speaker 18: should precipitate a different kind of response than this mad 1289 01:03:03,880 --> 01:03:07,000 Speaker 18: dash to find out about the secret weapon that you 1290 01:03:07,080 --> 01:03:12,800 Speaker 18: know they've developed out of a Bond movie versus you know, Again, 1291 01:03:12,840 --> 01:03:15,800 Speaker 18: if it's just psychiatric I still think that's something that's 1292 01:03:16,080 --> 01:03:19,360 Speaker 18: reasonable to respond to. But does it require this whole 1293 01:03:19,440 --> 01:03:22,280 Speaker 18: regime that we've set up, not just within the military 1294 01:03:22,280 --> 01:03:25,520 Speaker 18: service branchies, but with the State Department as well. I 1295 01:03:25,560 --> 01:03:28,920 Speaker 18: had a document leaked to me last year showing that 1296 01:03:28,960 --> 01:03:32,160 Speaker 18: the Department of Homeland Security was trying to solicit reports 1297 01:03:32,160 --> 01:03:34,880 Speaker 18: from their personnel on whether or not they had experienced 1298 01:03:35,160 --> 01:03:37,080 Speaker 18: any of these symptoms. So what you're seeing is just 1299 01:03:37,120 --> 01:03:40,520 Speaker 18: this huge multigovernment dash. And we only know about the 1300 01:03:40,520 --> 01:03:43,160 Speaker 18: Pentagon side of the budget. We don't know about the 1301 01:03:43,200 --> 01:03:47,439 Speaker 18: classified intelligence community budget, which is a black budget, which 1302 01:03:47,480 --> 01:03:50,880 Speaker 18: is likely you know, includes at least a bit more money, 1303 01:03:50,880 --> 01:03:52,920 Speaker 18: if not a lot more. And so I just like 1304 01:03:52,960 --> 01:03:55,440 Speaker 18: to see some debate on this issue about which there 1305 01:03:55,480 --> 01:03:59,000 Speaker 18: seems to be total partisan There is total partisan agreement. Again, 1306 01:03:59,120 --> 01:04:02,120 Speaker 18: every single member of voted for that funding two years ago, 1307 01:04:02,760 --> 01:04:06,000 Speaker 18: but which the public isn't aware of and that's not 1308 01:04:06,040 --> 01:04:08,200 Speaker 18: their fault. The government has not talked about these things. 1309 01:04:08,360 --> 01:04:10,479 Speaker 18: There was no press release for this thirty six million 1310 01:04:10,520 --> 01:04:14,840 Speaker 18: dollar budget. There's no discussion by the press secretary. I 1311 01:04:14,880 --> 01:04:17,080 Speaker 18: only found it because I went through the you know, 1312 01:04:17,240 --> 01:04:20,720 Speaker 18: over thousands of page budget to just look for it, 1313 01:04:20,720 --> 01:04:24,080 Speaker 18: and I just searched for the term anomalous health incidents, 1314 01:04:24,200 --> 01:04:27,760 Speaker 18: knowing that that's what the government called it, and found this, 1315 01:04:28,200 --> 01:04:30,080 Speaker 18: and so I that's really what I want to bring 1316 01:04:30,080 --> 01:04:31,600 Speaker 18: this to your guys attention. I hope that there's some 1317 01:04:31,640 --> 01:04:33,919 Speaker 18: discussion on this on the part of committees, because again, 1318 01:04:34,040 --> 01:04:37,800 Speaker 18: we're talking about cutting all sorts of domestic programs because 1319 01:04:37,800 --> 01:04:39,320 Speaker 18: of the debt. And what is the one thing you 1320 01:04:39,360 --> 01:04:41,720 Speaker 18: never hear about cutting the Pentagon. That's something that is 1321 01:04:41,800 --> 01:04:46,240 Speaker 18: explicitly off the table that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said 1322 01:04:46,480 --> 01:04:48,320 Speaker 18: will not be something that's subjected to cuts. And that's 1323 01:04:48,320 --> 01:04:51,800 Speaker 18: incredible because virtually everything else is. That's not to say 1324 01:04:51,840 --> 01:04:54,520 Speaker 18: they will cut everything else with the ideas, they're open 1325 01:04:54,600 --> 01:04:56,800 Speaker 18: to the you know, discussing that, putting that on the 1326 01:04:56,800 --> 01:05:00,560 Speaker 18: table and having that be a part of the nego ciations. 1327 01:05:01,960 --> 01:05:04,160 Speaker 18: So I'll be your hero is always paying attention to 1328 01:05:04,440 --> 01:05:07,080 Speaker 18: what the Pentagon is doing and what they're not telling 1329 01:05:07,120 --> 01:05:10,120 Speaker 18: you guys about it. But thanks so much for joining 1330 01:05:10,120 --> 01:05:12,880 Speaker 18: me once again, and I'm Ken Clippenstein with breaking points 1331 01:05:12,920 --> 01:05:13,720 Speaker 18: to the Intercept edition.