WEBVTT - Chiefs-Bills Preview, Rodgers’ 2025 Plans & Nick’s Picks Week 11

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome In what'ch driving Me? Great?

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Episode two seventy eight, Demonde and the producers worried that

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I was so quiet in the pre show run up.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Bill Barnwell just dropped an opus, as he is wont

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to do, and it the headline of it is can

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs go undefeated?

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>How they're winning? What's next?

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I mean, it's a Barnwell article, so

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 3>it's just great. It's all different sections, and the different

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>sections are how the Chiefs have gotten here. I've read

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that part is their start actually sustainable? I just read

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>that part and I just got to this section, are

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>they the worst nine to O team ever? And I

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>got irrationally angry before even reading it, And so I

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 3>haven't gotten to the other sections. What has sunk the

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>previous unbeaten teams? And will the Chiefs improve and go seventeen?

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And oh, I'll get to that. But Barnwell's articles are

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>like four or five thousand words, so you really, you

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 3>really got to sink your teeth into him. So that's

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>why I was so quiet, and the pre show run

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>up is I was trying to get through as much

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of this as I could before we because I know,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs Bills Game of the Year, four twenty five CBS

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and no counter programming. There's not another CBS game and

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>there's not another four to twenty five games, so I

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>don't want to step on our a block. But at

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the this week in Slate starting tonight, I mean there

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>are some A plus games, Commander's Eagles, NFC East leadership

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 3>on the line one PM Sunday, some good games and

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 3>one A plus game Raven Steelers. I mean, listen, I'm

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a Fox guy, but shout out CBS. Going from Raven

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Steelers at one to then Chiefs Bills at four to

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, pretty sick. And the only other four o'clock

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 3>games Falcons Broncos, which will be watched by dozens and

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>dozens of people, and Seahawks Niners, which is not a

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 3>bad one Seahawks and I is actually a good game.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>But those are both four five starts, and so the

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 3>nation's eyes are gonna be on Mahomes and Allen. I

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>would imagine this will be the highest rated non Thanksgiving

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>regular season game of the year, and I can't wait

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>for it. So we'll get to that in a moment. First,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>what missed the cut in surprising absolutely no one? Anthony

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Richardson back being the Colt starter. Poor Jalen Rose relives

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the fab five thirty plus years later, the timeout they

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>didn't have when Spoe called that when he was sitting

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 3>courtside and Jake Paul only a two to one favored

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>against Mike Tyson. I don't want to spend a ton

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 3>of time on this listen. I'm rooting for Tyson. I'm

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 3>not really a Jake or Logan Paul guy that you

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 3>call it my age, whatever it is. I'm not into

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>their brands, but I'm worried about Tyson. I'm shocked Jake

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Paul's only a two to one favorite. I mean, Tyson's

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>older than Brew Like, Tyson's damn near sixty, and I

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>just don't know if he's gonna have enough go ahead.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know if he'll be able to keep up,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>And so nothing would thrill me more then for a

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Mike Tyson flurry to lay Jake Paul out. I just

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's realistic. But I would have thought Jake

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Paul was gonna be minus three point fifty. So the

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 3>fact that he's minus two ten means Vegas is saying

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Tyson has a chance. Also, if you're wondering, as Demonsday was,

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're watching on YouTube, why I'm wearing a hat

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>today when I never wear a hat on the pod.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 3>No TV show today. We're preempted by a soccer match.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back tomorrow, and so since there's no TV show,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't have to do my hair. I don't have

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 3>to do my hair. I can wear my Royals hat.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Shout out Bobby wit Junior. I don't even know if

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>the voting has come out yet, but second in al

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>MVP voting, I'm sure of it all right, Demanse, let's

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>get to Chiefs Bills.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So we talked about on Hell on Tuesday. It's

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 4>crazy that the Bills were favored in this Chiefs game

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 4>that they came. That's coming up here soon, and America

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>clearly agrees. The books have eighty percent of the money

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 4>on the Chiefs plus two and a half. Yet the

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 4>line is still standing there. So does Vegas know something

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that we don't.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, so the Sharps like the Bills, and the Sharps

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>don't like the Chiefs in this spot. And so I

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>understand that to a degree. In this regard, the Chiefs

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 3>metrics are not overly impressive. They're on the road, you know,

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the Bills. This is a bigger game for Buffalo than

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City. The Bills have won all of no, not

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.559
<v Speaker 3>all of the Bills have won three of the four

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>regular season meetings between Mahomes and Allen.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>So all those things.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 3>And if you remember Demanse, before the year, when I

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 3>picked the Chiefs to go fourteen and three, the one

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 3>specific game I said I thought they would lose was

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>this game. I said I thought they would lose one

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 3>divisional game, one dumb game like to the Browns or

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers one dumb game and to the Bills an

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Orchard Park in week eleven.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 2>That's what I said.

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't quite feel the same way right now, and

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the reason is.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Multi layered.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 3>One is, I really do think the Chiefs got a

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 3>real emotional boost from the way they beat Denver, and

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>while they won't talk about it, I do think the

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>whole can we go undefeated is a thing. Also, given

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 3>how the offense looked in that Denver game. Now, Denver's

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>got an excellent defense.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I give them credit.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>It did feel to me, like I had said leading

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>into the Denver game, I thought might be the case

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>that some of Kansas City's focus last week was on

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos and some of it was on preparing for Buffalo,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 3>because if the Chiefs win this game, they essentially lock

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>up the one seed, unless you think Pittsburgh's running the table,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 3>which I don't think anybody thinks pittsburghs running the table. Hell,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh's an underdog this weekend to Baltimore. If the Chiefs

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>win this game, in order for Baltimore or Buffalo or

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Houston to catch them for the one seed, the Chiefs

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>would have to go h three and four the rest

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>of the way, and any of those teams would have

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>to go undefeated. Think about that. For the Chiefs to

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 3>for any of those teams to catch Kansas City, Kansas

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>City would have to lose four times and those teams

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>would have to go undefeated.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>That is not gonna happen now.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Conversely, if the Chiefs lose to Buffalo, then all Buffalo

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>has to do is finish with the same record as

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City because they would have the tiebreaker and they

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>would be sitting at two losses in Kansaity to be

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>sitting at one, So it'd be a real dog fight

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>for the one seed potentially if Kansas City loses, as

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 3>opposed to putting it away. The other reason that I

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 3>am not quite as bullish on Buffalo right now as

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I was in the preseason for this matchup is who

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>is injured and what it means for them. So we

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 3>know Keon Coleman isn't playing, Okay, that's fine. We don't

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 3>know if Amari Cooper is or isn't playing. My guess

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 3>is Amari Cooper is gonna play, but Dalton Kinkaid not.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>It has not practiced yet this week. The one spot

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>on the Chiefs defense that has been really susceptible is

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 3>defending tight ends. So if King Kaid is out for Buffalo,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>that is a huge loss for them and the one

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>that the Chiefs can have two things right now. They're

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>struggling at the left tackle position, which is a legitimate concern.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 3>But Wanya Morris luckily practiced in full yesterday at Kingsley Sumteya.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>The rookie is just not ready, so he should be back.

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 3>He left last week's game with injury, and then defending

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 3>tight ends has been a bit of a problem. If

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Kincaid's out, that's a tough spot for Buffalo.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>So I have been.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Consistently respectful and consistently correct about the Bills this year.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Wilds yesterday said to me that my Bill's opinions confusing

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 3>the audience because I've been such a Bill skeptic in

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>years past and this year I'm a Bill's believer, and

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I somewhat annoyedly said to Wild's, my Bill's confusing is

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>My Bill's opinion is not confusing at all. It's very

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>very simple. It's correct consistently year over year. When other

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>people thought they were a Super Bowl team, I was

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>correct in saying you're overrating them, and when other people

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.719
<v Speaker 3>thought the Jets were gonna win that division, I've been

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>correct in saying they're un underrating them. I think the

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Bills right now have an argument right alongside Detroit as

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the second best team.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>In the league.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I do think that now Baltimore is a weird one

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>because Baltimore beat Buffalo by twenty five. But Baltimore also,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 3>to me, has a glaring weakness that pass defense is awful.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Buffalo has a glaring weakness, and so

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Buffalo's really good. But Patrick Mahomes as an

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>underdog is twelve one and one against the spread and

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 3>eleven and three straight up. This is a huge game

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>for Kansas City and it allows them to really kind

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of play with how they approach the final seven weeks

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the year. I don't think the offense is happy

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 3>with how they played last week. Buffalo, in my opinion,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is due for a bit of a poor offensive performance.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>They've scored thirty plus in four straight games. I thought

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>last week against the Colts that they had some shaky moments,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 3>but Joe Flacco made it to where that was not

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna matter. He was just addicted to turning the ball

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 3>over in that game. I thought Buffalo played with fire.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 3>A couple weeks ago against Miami. I do like the

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs in this spot, even though all offseason I said

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 3>this was a game I thought the Chiefs would lose.

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the emotional boost that they got from the

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>blocked field goal, to go along with Mahomes being annoyed

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 3>that he missed Kelsey to win that game outright essentially

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>put the game away.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>All of those things to me, going the Chiefs favor

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, demanse.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Feel like I'm surprised. Well, I'm not gonn feel like

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised, but I am surprised that you're going in

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the opposite duration. He felt like the Bills were gonna

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>win this game, the Chiefs were gonna lose this game

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the whole time, and then I guess the time and

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 4>they're coming off of that emotional side, and I feel

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 4>like that's more of a reason that they should lose

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 4>because they did just at.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like, yeah, unless it's kind of like a team

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 3>of Destiny Field and no, no, no, I get I

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 3>understand what you're saying, but the I just that was

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 3>it was such a you know, Mahomes celebration in that

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>was telling to me, Like the way he ran onto

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the field and was so excited that that was because

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs, Let's be honest, they could have afforded to

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>lose that game. Like It's not like the vision comes

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 3>into question. It's not like they'd be like, oh man,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>what woe is us? He was hype, which makes me think,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 3>even though they won't talk about it, that they they

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 3>want to see how far they can run up this, uh,

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 3>this win streak.

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 2>And I also think that they are gonna be able.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>To score some points on this Bill's defense, which has

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 3>been good to their credit. Listen, Bill's defns has been good.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>But the Chiefs have not allowed twenty eight points in

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>what is it now, thirty straight games since the Super

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Bowl against Philadelphia. And I wouldn't be shocked if Kansas

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>City gets to twenty seven in this one, twenty eight themselves.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna go ahead and say twenty seven Chiefs.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Let me think of the right number for Buffalo twenty

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 3>three Buffalo and the Chiefs win by The Chiefs win

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>by four and get to ten and zero, and Buffalo

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>falls to eight and three.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, next.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 4>So Tonight's game is huge for your season long bets.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>You bet Washington to win that division, and you also

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 4>bet Philly under ten and a half wins, So that

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 4>really awesome. Yeah, say, but Philly last year lost five

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 4>of their last six. Do you see that happening again

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 4>or is it more likely that they exposed the Commanders tonight.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, I don't think Philly's gonna collapse. And I've

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 3>got to give Philly credit where it's due. They've won

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>five consecutive games now. Four of those five have been

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>against truly dreadful teams Browns, Giants, Jags, Cowboys. But one

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>of them was a dominating second half performance against Cincinnati,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and they the way they obliterated Dallas Cooper rush through

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>for forty yards is impressive. And that defense has turned

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a corner under Fangio. And so listen, Jalen Hurts has

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 3>been good on the big plays. They're letting him run

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a little more again. He seems healthier. I have to

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 3>be fair. I picked Philly to miss the playoffs right now.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>That looks super shaky, I said Philly. I thought that

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Siriani could have been fired during the year.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>That's not gonna happen.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 3>With that said, Philly is about to have four of

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>their next five, or I'm sorry, five of their next

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 3>six brutal spot like. You're playing some real teams now, Commanders, Rams, Ravens, Panthers, Steelers, Commanders.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's five games of your next six against seven

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 3>win teams plus the Rams, who I think are a

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 3>good team, even though they haven't played quite up to

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 3>that standard. The Commander's thing. I don't think the Commanders

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 3>are gonna get exposed. Here is my slight concern. Throughout

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Cliff Kingsbury's entire coaching career at Texas Tech, at Arizona, everywhere,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 3>his offenses have gotten off to these excellent starts and

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>then cooled significantly, significantly, and a few weeks ago against

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Chicago eighteen points. The last couple of weeks they've scored

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven Jaden. However, this past week was the worst

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 3>game I think he's played this season, the game against

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh and that twenty seven you know they had the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Steelers did that ridiculous fake punt, and they had some

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>short fields. So I'm a little concerned, not major, a

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 3>little concerned that Washington is going to cool off offensively

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 3>as Cliff Kingsbury teams historically have done. And I will

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 3>be for my bets and for my own you know,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>priors rooting for Washington tonight, Demonsey, but I actually like

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Philly in this spot. I hope Washington wins, but I

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 3>could I can see a scenario certainly where Philly beats

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Washington and covers the three and a half h Philly

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 3>or Washington will be fine either way because after this

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 3>they get Cowboys, Titans, Saints, So I mean they have

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 3>they have four games left against the Cowboys, Titans, and

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Saints because they played the Cowboys twice. So since they

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 3>already have seven wins, Washington to me is like almost

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>locked into the postseason. But tonight's game is the kind

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of divisional swing game. If Washington wins tonight, they are,

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, a significant favorite to win the division.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>If Washington loses tonight, it feels like Philly is probably

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna take care of that division. Take, you know, take

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that division, and that'll be a shame for my preseason gambling,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 3>because Washington eleven to one was gonna be one of

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 3>my best preseason divisional picks.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 2>And if Philly wins tonight. It's a bad spot for me.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 4>It looks like probably the most complete of teams that

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 4>the Philadelphia Eagles have faced on this run. No, I

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 4>mean they did just face the Cowboys. They dominated them.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 2>No, you're absolutely right.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 4>That one's got like a little bit of an astress

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 4>on it.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, no, you're one hundred percent right. Like

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 3>as far as on this run they've played, the Eagles

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>have played the Browns with the Shawn starting, the Giants,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals, who have just a dreadful defense, not that the great,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's not.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 4>The but that team's not complete.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, exactly, the Jags, who's got one of the

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 3>worst defenses in the league. In the game I think

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>that was the game Trevor got hurt in. And then

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys with Cooper Rush, and so yes, there is

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>there's no question that this will be This is the

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>best team Philly has played by a lot since Week

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 3>one in Brazil against Green Bay. Like the Eagles this

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 3>year have played I think four good to very good teams.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 3>The Bengals I think are good even though the record

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 3>isn't and they you know, it was seventeen to seventeen

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Philly scored twenty straight. Give them credit the Bucks when

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 3>the Bucks were fully healthy, and the Bucks trashed them.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 3>The Falcons which came down if you remember, that was

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the game Saquan dropped the ball, and the Falcons when

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 3>they you know, on the little swing pass. And the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Packers in week one and Brazil. But so I still though,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not putting any asterisks on it, because you gotta

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 3>take care of business. And Philly. Philly looked really shaky

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>that first month. They beat the Packers, then they blew

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons game. The Saints had them dead to rights

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 3>in week three, and then Goddard got loose on like

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a seventy yard little tight end leak play up the sideline.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 3>There's no Saints defender within a mile, and that won

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 3>them that game. And then they got blown out by Tampa.

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 3>And then the Browns game. That was the game that

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they escaped and Sirianni was yelling at his own fans

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>against the terrible Browns. But since then, beat the Giants

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>by twenty five, beat the Bengals by twenty, beat the

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars by five, but they were up twelve.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>With five minutes left.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 3>Jags got a you know, a late back door touchdown

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 3>and beat the Cowboys by twenty eight. So if you're

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna play bad teams, crush, that's what they've been doing,

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and I give him credit for that. I'm very interested

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 3>to see. The other thing to watch tonight is Jaden

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna run because and I understand this is me maybe

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>confirmation bias, because I was so worried about Jaden's health.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>But since Jaden got those ribs cracked, he hasn't been

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the same runner. And last week he ran the ball

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 3>three times for five yards. So I'm really interested in

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 3>watching that. Also, the Eagles two rookie secondary players, Quinyan

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell and Cooper dejan have been excellent. They've both been

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the last few weeks in particular, have been excellent, So

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>shout out to them all.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Next, Cincinnati was one of the teams you had in

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 4>the conversation for the AFC seven seed. You said this

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 4>on Tuesday. But they're flying across country to face Justin

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 4>Herbert and the Chargers, and that defense has been allowing

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 4>thirteen points per game.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 2>So the Bengals lose.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 4>That, yeah, that's insane. But if the Bengals lose, is

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 4>there and over and if so what else changes for them.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 3>So I oddly don't think the Bengals season is over

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>with a loss, and I know that sounds crazy because

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 3>they would be four and seven, But this is the

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 3>reason for this demansa is that the seven AFC playoff teams, Like,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 3>if the Bengals lose, that would mean the Chargers get

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to seven wins and you would have essentially six of

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>your seven AFC teams locked. As we talked about Kansas City, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Houston, Baltimore,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers, all those teams would have seven plus wins

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>except for Houston, which is in the AFC South, so

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>that they have six wins, but they're fine because of their.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Division that eighth spot.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Denver is sitting on five wins, the Colts and Bengals

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 3>are sitting on four wins, and then your two Miami,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the Jets, the Patriots, who have three wins.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 2>One of those teams is getting in.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And so even at four and seven, I would think

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals are alive, when you know they would at

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 3>some point they gotta win games. But they still have

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>games left against Dallas, Tennessee, the Browns, a game against

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos that could be for the final playoff spot

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 3>and two games, and this is important against the Steelers.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk more about the Chargers, however, because

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers to me have been an awesome story and

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Herbert's playing really well and that defense has been great.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>With that said, they have played three teams that are

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>we think are good, and they're zero to three and

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>they have played six of their seven other games are

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe the six worst teams in football. And then the

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 3>other one is they beat the Broncos, who's like the

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 3>definition of league average. So their losses are Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Arizona.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So three teams that are all division leaders right now.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 3>They're Wins, Raiders, Panthers, Saints, Browns, Titans, plus Denver and

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 3>again give them credit for Denver, that was a road

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>divisional victory.

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 2>You give them credit.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I am really interested in what the Chargers are gonna

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>look like over these next half dozen games. Sincy, Baltimore, Atlanta,

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City again and then Tampa with Mike Evans back

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 3>at that point before they finished the season. Broncos, Patriots, Raiders.

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>But if you remember before the year, when we picked

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers to make the playoffs, one of the reasons

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>we picked them was they had that last place schedule.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 3>They had a worst record last year than the Raiders

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 3>or the Charge or the Broncos did. That's how they

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 3>were able to draft Joe Alt with what the fifth sixth,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the fifth overall pick, I think it was. You know,

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 3>they were a four win team last year, and so

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 3>they've reaped those rewards and thirteen points of games, thirteen

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 3>points a game, I mean the Chargers, here's what they

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>have allowed this season ten three, twenty seventeen, sixteen seventeen, eight,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 3>ten seventeen. That's awesome, man, Like that is they they

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>have of opening the season with nine straight games not

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 3>allowing twenty one points is literally historic stuff, Like I

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's been done in twenty years, and so

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 3>you give them a ton of credit. I do think.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a coin flip game. This is

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 3>not one of my picks. I don't you know. I

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think Cincinnati's got traveling fans. Usually LA home games

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>are actually road games because the other team travels. I

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Bengals are a big national fan base.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's a I mean Sunday football man, Like I

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.239
<v Speaker 3>was saying, Steelers Ravens at one, Chiefs Bills at four

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>point thirty, Bengals Chargers at eight point twenty on NBC,

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which should be a really fun one. That one's too

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 3>close to call my opinion, but I think that I

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 3>give the Chargers a ton of credit. But I also

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 3>need to see them beat some teams with a pulse

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>which were yet to.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 2>See, but they haven't had to really go ahead?

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 4>What was yours? There's a Bengals win there and them

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 4>eventually going on to lock up that seventh seat. It's

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 4>that a nightmare scenario for you in Kansas City.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of people think that.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Because this scenario obvious would be the Bengals are the seven,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 3>they then upset the two seed in round one, and

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 3>then they would be playing the one seed, like if

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the seven seed wins in round one, they play the

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>one seed because the NFL reseeds.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And my answer to that is.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 3>No, it wouldn't be, because first of all, that would

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 3>mean the Bengals clip Buffalo in round one? Are they

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>who's the two seed? Is it gonna be Buffalo? Is

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>it gonna be Baltimore? I guess if it's Pittsburgh, I'd

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 3>probably rather Pittsburgh go ahead and you know, and move on.

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 3>But at that point, if Pittsburgh's earned the two seed,

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 3>it means Pittsburgh's beaten Baltimore at least once Pittsburgh's beaten,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, it means Pittsburghs pretty damn team.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 2>And TJ.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Watt against the Chiefs left tackle is not a scenario

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 3>that I look forward to. So I don't I yes,

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 3>obviously i'd rather as a Chiefs fan, the Colts get

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the seven seed and win in Round one, but the

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 3>two seed getting eliminated is typically not bad for the

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.479
<v Speaker 3>one seed super Bowl chances, And so I don't, you know,

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't hate the idea of a Bengals team that

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe has to win four straight just to make the playoffs,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 3>does that, then has a crazy emotional road playoff victory win,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 3>and then with the Chiefs having been rested for a

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks, comes into Arrowhead with that defense, and

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs you know, get to knock them around a bit.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 3>So no, it's not the ideal scenario. And I think

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>it really has to do with who is the two seed.

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 3>If Buffalo is the two seed, I'll take Cincinnati as

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the seven.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 3>To me, that's a win win. Either Buffalo's got to

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 3>really expend a lot of emotional and real energy to

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 3>beat them, or Cincinnati knocks the Bills off for us

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 3>don't even have to deal with them. And so now

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 3>if somehow Houston is the two seed or Pittsburgh is

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 3>the two seed, then I'd rather one of those teams

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 3>beat Cincinnati because I don't think either of those teams

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 3>are good. Like the thing about Houston, and I'm not

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to disrespect them, the interior of their offensive line

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>is so bad that I just think that's a game

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Chris Jones can win by himself. I think when you

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 3>have the best d tackle in football and you're up

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 3>against one of the worst guard center guard combos in football,

0:30:55.760 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 3>that game can just be over. And so that's.

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Cee J.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Stroud in Arrowhead like that's that's a tough spot for him,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 4>Last one the Jets has been The Jets season has

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 4>been the joy to watch for everyone, especially you, I

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 4>feel like, but not for Jets fans. When asked if

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 4>he was coming back to play next year, Rogers said,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 4>I think so, yeah, So not sure how much to

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 4>read into that with everything that's gone on with Aaron

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Rodgers and the Jets this year. What do you think

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 4>is more likely he comes back, retires, or the Jets

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 4>cut it?

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So am I out to lunch on this that I

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 3>was shocked. I'm I'm shocked Aaron might want to come back,

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm even more shocked that there seems to be

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the general media reaction that the Jets would want him back.

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>In what world is it good for the New York

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Jets to bring back Aaron Rodgers? Like, demon call me

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>on my shit here if you think I'm being unfair

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 3>or right like that, it's that I'm missing it. But

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.959
<v Speaker 3>I they're going to be hiring a new head coach.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 3>When you're interviewing the best head coaching candidates, do you

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 3>think saying you'll have one more year of forty one

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 3>year old soon to be forty two at the time,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Rodgers is a proer a con as to why

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>that coach would want the job. And if you're trying

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 3>to build up a culture and a new program, why

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 3>on earth would you want Aaron Rodgers to be a

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 3>part of it. And then you add to that's just

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the intangible stuff. Then you add this factor which is

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I just think people are living in a in a

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 3>make believe world.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>He's terrible, He's really bad, Like.

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 3>He's just as a football player, he's sixty two percent

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>passing six point four yards per carry or yards per carry,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 3>yards per attempt. Pardon me, I he cannot escape at

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>all to save his life. I just why would the

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the Jets have if if the speculation is correct and

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Trump is gonna reappoint Woody Johnson to be the ambassador

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 3>to either England or some other ambassadorship, and what he

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>has to once again hand over control of the team

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 3>to his brother Christopher wo He made this deal with Aaron,

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 3>not Christopher. Shouldn't Christopher Johnson look at it and be like,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have a top five pick, new head coach,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 3>new GM. We've got our three young guys, Quinn Sauce

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 3>and Garrett Davante. You can go, Aaron, you can go,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 3>Tyrone Smith, you can go. We're gonna start Olufashanu our

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 3>first round pick, and we're gonna try to be an exciting,

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 3>fun young team with cam Ward or should or Sanders

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>or whomever. Like, isn't that the obvious plan? Why would

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the Jets want Aaron Rodgers back and you don't owe

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 3>him anything. It's been an unmitigated disaster, so I he

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 3>can want to come back all he wants, like that's

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 3>a player.

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 4>The question from a reporter of the media, the Jets

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 4>probably don't want him back, right, like it was like.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 3>But everybody seems that the general I guess this is

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 3>why I send him I out to lunch. The general

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>impression that I get from the media is that covers

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the team is this is Aaron's decision, meaning if he wants,

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 3>if he doesn't retire, he's the Jets quarterback next year.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 3>And my response is him retiring has nothing to do

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 3>with the fact they've got to cut him, like he's

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 3>he's a bad, aging, injured, distracted player who has sucked

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>all of the life out of that building. And so

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 3>it cap wise, here's the deal next year, if he's

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 3>on the team, it's a twenty three million dollar cap hit,

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's fifty million dead if he's not. But you

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 3>just you made that deal already. Like the way his

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>contract is currently set up is if he plays next year,

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 3>he's twenty three million on the cap, and then the

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 3>following year when he's out of the league. He's twenty

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 3>one million dead in twenty twenty six. If they make

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 3>him a post June one cut, he's fourteen million on

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 3>your cap next year and thirty five million on your

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 3>cap the following year. So by making him a post

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 3>June one cut, you save nine million cap dollars for

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>next season, and you lose twelve million cap dollars for

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty or twenty six. But you just got to deal

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>with it like that's the move, and so I don't.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I am constantly surprised at how much of the media

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 3>is with Aaron Rodgers nonsense and the we never really

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 3>we've never gotten an answer about if he thought they

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 3>fired Robert Solid too early, and he claimed to love

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Robert and have this great relationship. But then I heard

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 3>him yesterday when he was talking about coming back, talking

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 3>about how much he loves Olbrick and wants to play

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 3>for Olbrick, which would be a disaster, Like, no dispect

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Olbrick, but the defense has been a train wreck

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>since you've been there, and the offense doesn't move like

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I just think the Jets are gonna go five and twelve,

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 3>And to be like, let's run it back is baffling

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 3>to me. I think this is as obvious of a

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 3>hey man, Sorry this didn't work out out, but we're

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 3>moving on as we've ever seen.

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But maybe I'm wrong. Now.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 3>The counterpoint to maybe I'm wrong is I have been

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 3>right about the Jets every step of the way, so

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 3>who knows. But this one is confusing to me. Speaking

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 3>about people being right, demone hit a three team teaser

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 3>last week. That means seven of the last eight weeks

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 3>his teaser is hit. I had a winning week, but

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 3>it was I thought it was gonna be a five

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and oh week, and then Sunday Night football and Monday

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Night football both bit me, so three and oh turned

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 3>into three and two. We'll getting all that on the

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Gambling Show. By the way, I haven't asked you guys

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to do this in a very long time. Uh, but

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually there's reasons for this. I'm actually kind of

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 3>doing a bit of an experiment if you will, If

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 3>you could, if you're not already subscribed on YouTube, subscribe.

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 3>We haven't done a subscribe push in quite some time.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 3>If you're listening to this be a podcast, subscribe via

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Spotify or iTunes or whatever it is, and give us

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a five star rating, if you don't mind. Again, I

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 3>almost never do the like rate subscribe thing. I think

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it probably annoys the bosses or the producers that I

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 3>don't do this, but I actually want to see if

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 3>there's since I never do it, if I actually do

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a call to action, subscribe, if there's something of an impact,

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 3>or if that's all just wasted time anyway, and it's

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 3>just organically grows.

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 2>However, it grows so.

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 3>On YouTube in particular, if you could subscribe hit the

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 3>bell so you get alerted and we go live, that

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 3>would be awesome. On our RSS feeds. On podcasts, if

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 3>you could subscribe and if you want to leave us

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 3>a five star review, that would be awesome as well.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Our Week eleven. I can't believe it's already Week eleven.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Gambling Show. Next, What's Right?

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in What's Right with Nick wrighton Real Quick. Uh.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 3>You know how I found out that Lebron had a

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 3>huge game last week night? Because when I woke up

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 3>this morning because I didn't watch the game last night.

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 3>When I woke up this morning and I checked Twitter,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a whole bunch of Michael Jordan nostalgia and Michael

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Jordan clips going on, which is the surest fire sign

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 3>that Lebron must have had a huge night. Third straight

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 3>triple double thirty five, twelve, and fourteen for Lebron.

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Great night in the NBA.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Last night, Wimby or Wimby goes for fifty his first

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 3>career fifty point game, fourth youngest player ever, the youngest

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>ever Brandon Jetting's second youngest of course Bron and then

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Giannis fifty nine points to steal away escape against Detroit.

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So awesome night in the NBA.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 3>And speaking of the NBA, the Emirates NBA Cup is here.

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 3>You can win big getting in on the action at

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 3>DraftKings Sportsbook and Invisual Sports, winning partner of the NBA

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Picture This all thirty NBA teams battling it out, divided

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 3>into six groups, matchups every Tuesday and Friday, each game

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 3>pushing him closer to Vegas for the ultimate NBA Cup

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 3>Championship showdown. Catch every play, every nail biting moment, and

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 3>check out the latest lines and odds on the DraftKings

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Sportsbook app. Remember, lines and odds are always on the move,

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 3>so check back off and new to the game, no

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 3>worries first time customers can bet just five bucks and

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 3>get a slam dunk two hundred dollars in bonus bets.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Instantly score big with DraftKings Sportsbook. Download DraftKings Sportsbook app

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and use the code right and actually, just like the

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 3>subscribe thing I was just talking about, I want to

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 3>test this out as well.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually do this for me today.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to download the sportsbook app and you when

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 3>you do it, use my code right Wright.

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>If you're a new customer.

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Code for new customers, get two hundred dollars in bonus

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 3>bets when you bet just five bets five bucks only

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 3>on DraftKings.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>The crown is yours again.

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Promo code right wr GHT gambling problem call one eight

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 3>hundred gambler in New York, call eight seven seven eight

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 3>hope in y or text hope and y which is

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 3>four six seven three six nine in Connecticut. Helps available

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 3>for problem gambling called eight eight eight seven eight nine

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 3>seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 3>play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino on resort in

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Kansas twenty one plus. Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction.

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Void in New Hampshire, Oregon, Ontario. Bonus bets expire one

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional terms

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot co slash b ball.

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 3>All right, so demanse, let's recap my picks from last

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 3>week three and two, twenty five, twenty four and one

0:42:54.000 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 3>on the year. Cincinnati plus six against Baltimore on Thursday

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Night Football. That was a weird one because it looked,

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they were up twenty one to seven. I

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 3>looked like I was in great shape. Then all of

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a sudden, with a minute left, they're down seven and

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh my god, I'm gonna lose this, and

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 3>then score the touchdown, go for two, lock in the bet.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh plus three against Washington. That's another weird one. Pittsburgh

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 3>dominating that game and Washington can't move the ball at all.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Then they do the fake punt some other weird stuff.

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 3>All of a sudden, Washington has a significant lead, but

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 3>a couple Russell Wilson moonballs later, Pittsburgh wins outright. Arizona

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 3>plus one against the Jets. That was the definition of

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 3>not a weird one. Arizona annihilated the Jets. That was

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 3>the dumbest line of the week, thirty one to six.

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I think Detroit plus three and a half at Houston.

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>That would have been stealing if I had won that one.

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Jared Goff threw five picks. But if Jake Bates doesn't

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 3>hit that field goal at the end and we're going overtime,

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and I have a chance for Detroit to win by six,

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 3>but I deserve to lose it. And the Rams minus

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 3>one against Miami. Shout out to Miami's defense for showing

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 3>more fight than I thought it could. Anti shout out

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Sean McVay. I love you McVeigh, but kicking a field

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 3>goal down eleven from the four yard line is just

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.479
<v Speaker 3>coaching malpractice. Six minutes left in that game.

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Kick.

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 3>When you kick that field goal, what you're saying is

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna make the field goal, get a stop, get

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 3>a score, get the two point conversion, win in overtime.

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 3>That's your path. That is your that's your path if

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you go for it. What you're saying is, we're gonna

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 3>get these four yards, get a stop, get a touchdown,

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 3>win the game. So you need like a six way

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 3>parlay to come through when you opt to kick that

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 3>field goal, all it does is delay your loss.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.479
<v Speaker 3>It's like, well, but if we get stopped on fourth down,

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 3>we lose the game.

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 3>But when you kick the field goal, what you are

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 3>saying you need the following to happen. You need to

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 3>get a stop, You need to go score a touchdown,

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 3>which you have evidently so little confidence you can do that.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 3>You are kicking a field goal from the four yard line.

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 3>You then have to complete a two point conversion. You

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 3>then have to win the game in overtime. You need

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 3>all those things to happen. If you go for it. Yes,

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 3>if you don't get it, you lose. But if you

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 3>do get it, need two things to happen, you can

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, if you go for it and

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 3>get it, you can still play the dumb two point

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 3>conversion overtime game because if you go for it and

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 3>get it, you're gonna go for two. If you get

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the two point conversion, you're down three. Now you can

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 3>do field goal overtime if you want, and but a

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 3>touchdown wins you the game either way.

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Just stupid, but regardless.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Last week, eleven of fourteen underdogs covered, which is funny

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 3>because two weeks ago, fourteen to the fifteen of the

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 3>favorites one straight up. All right, Deman's first pick, and

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I know you like this one. I gotta think you

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 3>like this one.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, You've got Pittsburgh plus three.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Pittsburgh plus three at home against Baltimore. I mean

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Mike Tomlin as a home dog, Mike Tomlin as a dog,

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 3>Mike Tomlin as a divisional dog. First of all, in

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 3>this series the last twenty years, the underdog twenty eight

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.399
<v Speaker 3>and ten against the spread twenty eight, ten and three,

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 3>So three pushes. I mean, if you're all of these

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 3>games come down to a field goal, you're giving me

0:46:53.480 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a field goal. Tomlin as a dog is in fifteen

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:06.439
<v Speaker 3>straight up against Harball. Wait, hold on, he's been that camp.

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't been an underdog thirty five times? Okay, yeah, sorry,

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 3>he's twenty and fifteen straight up as a dog. I

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 3>was gonna say he hasn't been an underdog thirty five

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 3>times against John Harbough.

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't make sense.

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 3>And and I think Pittsburgh absolutely can win this game outright.

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about Tomlin as a dog overall sixty two,

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 3>thirty five and two. He doesn't cover big numbers, but

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 3>he absolutely as a dog, wins outright and covers the spread.

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 3>And so the fifteen of their last eighteen matchups have

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 3>been one score games. I think Pittsburgh can win, and

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Steelers secondary is gonna have a

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 3>hard time covering George Pickens on those Russell moon balls.

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I like the Pittsburgh special teams more. I like the

0:47:56.520 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh defense more. Obviously I like the Baltimore offense way more.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 3>But this is I mean, this is a game TJ.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Watt's going to be flying around, and this is where

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 3>I remind everyone and I understand that we all must

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 3>kneel at the altar of Lamar Jackson. He's beaten the

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh Steelers once plays him twice a year, theoretically every year,

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 3>but he's missed a bunch of them. Lamar Jackson has

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 3>beaten the Pittsburgh Steelers as a starting quarterback one time

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in his career, and I think that one game was

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 3>against Duck Hodges. So the Lamar wins eighty percent of

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>his games if you remove the games against the Chiefs,

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers in playoff games, so the like against everyone else,

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 3>he's as good of a bet as there is. I

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 3>like the Steelers in this spot, and I and I

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 3>got I've got to think that the I've got to

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 3>think that this game comes down to the final possession.

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'll take the plus three points. All right, Demons,

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 3>go ahead.

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 4>You've got New England plus four and a half versus

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 4>the Rams.

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 3>New England plus four and a half against Oh on,

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 3>real quick, before I even do that one, did you

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 3>not like my Steelers Ravens analysis?

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 4>No, it's just unfortunately it makes sense. Like I do

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 4>think Russ is gonna be able to light up the secondary.

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 4>Lamar Jackson's obviously going to do what he wants. But

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I do think that the Ravens defense will be the

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 4>biggest hindrance. I think it's the biggest weakness of the game,

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 4>and I think it'll come back to bite them. I

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 4>do think the Ravens are gonna win, but I do

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.359
<v Speaker 4>think it will be a close game. See him winning

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 4>by three, and I can also see them losing. Unfortunately,

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm realistic.

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, fair enough, all right, the Patriots in

0:49:56.719 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the Rams. I've got the Patriots plus four and a half,

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 3>So obviously I don't think the Patriots are good and

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 3>You guys know, I like the Rams, so I would

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 3>understand why this pick seems silly. However, the Rams played

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 3>on Monday night. They are a West Coast team going

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 3>cross country. It is a one o'clock East coast start.

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 3>It is they are laying, you know, more than a

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 3>field goal. The Patriots are going to, you know, try

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:42.439
<v Speaker 3>to just at run Drake May run Remandre not let

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 3>this game, you know, get into the twenties. The Rams

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 3>defense has actually, to its credit, been good. The Rams

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 3>offense is what has struggled as of late. I just

0:50:53.600 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 3>think this is a ugly, boring, twenty to seventeen, seventeen

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to fourteen, twenty one to seventeen type of game. I

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 3>think the Rams control the game, but I do not

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 3>think they run away with it. Four and a half

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 3>points is just too many points for a Rams team

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 3>on a short week going West coast to East coast

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 3>for a one o'clock kickoff. Patriots feeling great right now,

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 3>coming off you know, their best defensive performance.

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Of the year.

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't love it. I will be honest. Four of

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 3>my five picks were easy. I'm not saying they're gonna

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 3>none of this is easy, but my point is four

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 3>of the five games, I instantly knew which what I wanted,

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and I searched long and hard for a fifth. This

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 3>was the fifth I landed on. So I don't feel

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 3>great about it, but I feel like this is the sharp. Yeah,

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 3>this is the Sharp's side of this bet. I just

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 3>think the Rams haven't earned the right to lay more

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 3>than a field goal on the road against a team

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that has shown a pulse, particularly going Monday to Sunday

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.280
<v Speaker 3>at one o'clock. So I'll take the New England plus

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 3>four and a half.

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Next thanks, you have Cleveland minus one at New Orleans.

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, so the Saints goot hear me out here,

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Demansey because Demonsey doesn't like this one. The Saints got

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 3>the fired coach bounce.

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>They hated Dennis Allen. He got out of there. They

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 2>get the win.

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 3>If you watch that game at Atlanta, it had a

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of opportunities to win that football game and blew

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 3>it and Coop had a tough game. Cleveland, coming off

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a bye, had shown signs of.

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Life with Jamis.

0:52:56.120 --> 0:53:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I do not think New Orleans offensive line is going

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to it is gonna be able to handle the Brown's

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 3>defensive front front especially Miles Garrett looking better and playing

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 3>better the pre buy after being not great at dealing

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 3>with some injuries earlier.

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 2>So you have.

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland off of By, you have a Saints team that

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I think is truly bad, not gonna have Chris Olave,

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 3>no one on the outside to really threaten you down

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the field at all, Derek Carr having, you know, getting

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 3>skittish in the pocket thanks to Miles Garrett, and a

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland team that since they made the change to Jamis

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Winston or you know, since the win did what's the

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 3>game Deshaun got hurt? Did Deshaun get hurt in the y?

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 3>He got hurt? Deshaun got hurt in the Bengals game,

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 3>and they went to Dorian Thompson Robinson and then to

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Jamis in They Cleveland beat Baltimore and then played poorly

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Chargers. I don't believe New Orleans is gonna

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 3>have the level of energy they had last week, and

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 3>I think Cleveland's better than them. I'm just picking a

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 3>winner here and post by Cleveland's the healthiest they've been

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.479
<v Speaker 3>all year. Stefanski three to one in this career off

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 3>of Bye and the Saints since the last six years

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 3>they're one of the worst teams in the league against

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 3>the spread, at home, all those things. I like Cleveland

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 3>win this game. I'm only laying a point. This is

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 3>a game. I'll be honest. I don't plan to watch

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 3>if I can help it, I won't watch a second

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.839
<v Speaker 3>of this game. But I like Cleveland minus one at

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans next, all.

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, So thank she got Atlanta plus two and a

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 4>half at Denver.

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I don't This is a weird one because

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta can't get up pass rush at all. So you

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 3>do feel like bo Nicks is gonna be able to

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 3>move the ball a bit. And Denver's defense, obviously is excellent.

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 3>It's been excellent all year. However, Atlanta has won. Going

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 3>into this past week against New Orleans, had won five

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 3>of six. Offense had been explosive. The Saints game, again,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 3>as I mentioned, I think they blew it. The Saints

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 3>got that, you know, had the energy of getting rid

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 3>of Dennis Allen, but Atlanta still had plenty of chances there.

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 3>I think Atlanta is a good team. I think at

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Denver is the best of the bad teams, but Atlanta's

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:48.720
<v Speaker 3>actually a good team. And Atlanta bounce back spot Denver.

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the there is a real psychological aftershock of

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the way they lost to the Chiefs, and I was

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.720
<v Speaker 3>not in pressed by the Denver offense. I was impressed

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 3>by the Denver defense. And I know people want me

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:09.879
<v Speaker 3>to give Bo Nicks more credit. I just think he's

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 3>been fine. But Atlanta getting two and a half points

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in a game that feels like is a coin flip

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:23.399
<v Speaker 3>game and absolutely could be, you know, a down one

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 3>field goal at the gun type of game for either team,

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of these Atlanta games are, is the

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 3>right side of it. Atlanta also is in a position

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:38.280
<v Speaker 3>where they they are in a good position in the division.

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:42.839
<v Speaker 3>But Tampa's schedule the rest of the way is the

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 3>worst in football. Tampa the rest of the way Giants, Panthers, Raiders, Chargers, Cowboys, Panthers, Saints.

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So Tampa, aside from the Chargers game, plays six games

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 3>against the worst teams.

0:56:58.440 --> 0:56:59.240
<v Speaker 2>In the NFL.

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So Atlanta knows, even though they have a cushion in

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that division, Tampa's gonna start stacking wins. I like it

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Lanta to win this game. I certainly like him plus

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. And that's the fourth pick and

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the fifth one is going to be pretty obvious given

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 3>what we discussed at the top of the show.

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you've got a Kins City plus two and a

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 4>half against Buffalo.

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean so. Mahomes has been an underdog fourteen

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 3>times in his career. He's eleven and three twelve one

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and one against the spread. The three losses are the following.

0:57:35.480 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Twenty eighteen against New England. That game at the two

0:57:40.320 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 3>minute warning was forty to forty. New England hits a

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 3>field goal at the gun.

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 2>To beat them.

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Twenty eighteen, the famous Monday Night football game against the Rams.

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 3>That game at the two minute warning was fifty one

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 3>forty seven Kansas City and the Rams score a touchdown

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 3>with a minute left to win. And twenty twenty two

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 3>against Buffalo. That game at the two minute warning was

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty to seventeen Chiefs and Buffalo scored a touchdown in

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 3>the waning moments to win the game. Point is this,

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 3>fourteen times Patrick Mahomes has been an underdog. Eleven times

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 3>he has won outright. The other three he has either

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 3>been tied or leading with two minutes left. It is

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 3>just an absurdity to go against Mahomes in this spot.

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 3>And here is the really remarkable thing about this, Demanse.

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 3>This will be the fifth time Mahomes and the Chiefs

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 3>have been underdogs since they last lost a game. They

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 3>last lost a game on Christmas Day. They were underdogs

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Divisional Round against Buffalo, in the Championship game

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 3>against Baltimore, in the Super Bowl against the Niners a

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago against the Niners, and now against Buffalo.

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 3>So they don't lose but a third of the time.

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:17.919
<v Speaker 3>Vegas thinks they will all take the Chiefs plus two

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half and.

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll feel really good about it.

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 3>So our five picks this week are as follows, Pittsburgh

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 3>getting three at home against Baltimore, New England getting four

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and a half at home against the Rams, Cleveland laying

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:36.320
<v Speaker 3>one on the road at New Orleans, Atlanta getting two

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and a half at Denver, and Kansas City getting two

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and a half at Buffalo. Now for the main event,

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Demonse's teaser, having won six of seven, just Red Hot

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 3>last week hit his first three teamer new I mean

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 3>you deserve it. You hit a three teamer and not

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 3>only did you hit it, Demanse have won as a

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 3>parlay you got you bought all these points you didn't

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 3>need them. You had Cincinnati teased up to plus thirteen.

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 3>They covered the six, Pittsburgh teased up to plus ten,

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 3>they covered the three, Tampa Bay teased up to plus thirteen,

1:00:15.440 --> 1:00:18.800
<v Speaker 3>they covered the six. That is what we call an

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a plus teaser. What are you going with this week?

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 4>This week, we've got a two teams seven and a

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 4>half point teaser minus one sixty three. So the obvious

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City, we're teasing them up to ten and then

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Pittsburgh up to ten and a half versus Baltimore. So

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 4>that that's the teaser we're going with.

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>And then we have a supermoval one of the super teaser,

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the Pittsburgh.

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Even though I like Pittsburgh plus three.

1:00:52.440 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 4>It me your picture in here. I just teased them.

1:00:56.800 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but even though I like Pittsburgh plus three, I

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 3>oddly don't love them as a teaser, leg only because

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore has shown the ability to blow people out and

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>so like the I'm always a little afraid of teasing

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:20.200
<v Speaker 3>against Baltimore because at times they just dog walk you.

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 2>But all right, so that's your teaser. I'll give that

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a minus.

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>The but you said you have something else as well.

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we've we've got a super teaser for week

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 4>eleven for those that like live dangerously. We've got a

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 4>fourteen seven and a half point teaser at plus one

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>seventy and.

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It's the same.

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:40.440
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna keep Kansas City and Pittsburgh in there, but

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna add Jacksonville plus twenty one against Detroit and

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 4>then Seattle plus fourteen at San Francisco. Yeah, listen, I

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 4>don't like this one.

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't like this one.

1:01:57.720 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 4>This one doesn't count against my record. This is just

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 4>a uh, this is a fun one. The one, the

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 4>one that you guys count me on is the first

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:06.200
<v Speaker 4>one that's fine.

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I just the mac Jones Mac Jones.

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I feel like Detroit could score twenty four

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and cover the twenty one that they'd be laying in

1:02:17.560 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>this scenario. And the Seattle it's just consistently has a

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of trouble with Shanahan's.

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Niners, Sam Franners moving the ball on them. Uh.

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>I thought you were just seeing like the Niners are

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 4>aggressing a little bit. Though, even even with you.

1:02:33.120 --> 1:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>No that I agree with you entirely.

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought you were gonna have uh, the Texans teas

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>down to a pick them against Dallas and Cooper.

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:51.959
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, and that's fair. The yeah, to not get

1:02:52.000 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 4>exploited like the other team. I don't think Baltimore.

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>They do.

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:57.480
<v Speaker 4>They show the ability to bow teams out, but I

1:02:57.920 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 4>can't see them doing that to the Steelers. I think

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>they've got something real going on over there. And it's

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 4>divisial that ye.

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>No, that's I obviously like it because I've got him

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>plus the three. It just makes me nervous as he'ser like,

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 3>all right, what's the offer this week?

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Uh So, we are heading into the NBA Cup this week,

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>and we're picking a couple of group winners, So New

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 4>York not New York'll go Nick's Cleveland, okay, see to

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>win their groups is a plus seven hundred and yeah.

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any I don't.

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I'll be honest with you. I don't have any

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>NBA Cup predictions. I will I'm gonna do a different

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>offer this week, the which is not NBA Cup related.

1:03:43.640 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelcey anytime touchdown he scored last week, he could

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>have scored twice. He the he's you know, the bane

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Bills. Existence. I like a Kelsey anytime touchdown.

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I assume that's probably like plus one thirty would be

1:04:03.040 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>my guest. The producers can tell me in my ear,

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>that's the offer that I'm presenting to the audience. I

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:11.200
<v Speaker 3>don't really do player props, but that's the one I'll do.

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, quick plus one forty, So it's about what

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought.

1:04:15.120 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Quick break.

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Answer some listener questions. Next, what's right? All right, welcome

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>back in What's right?

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>We think? Right, Demanda, let's answer some listener questions.

1:04:28.240 --> 1:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>AJ Figs is, well, the Chiefs try to go seventeen

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>and oh where they start Carson Wentz for Christmas?

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I hope they start Carson Wentz on Christmas? And you

1:04:37.760 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>still try to go seventeen. Oh, try to win that game.

1:04:40.000 --> 1:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>But I you're playing one pm on a Wednesday. If

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>you're fifteen to oh to chase the record is not

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>worth it when you're going for a three peat in

1:04:49.120 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>my opinion.

1:04:49.800 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Next, Danny Tanner, do you think the cart Oh? Wait, no,

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>not Danny Tanner? Hordon GMR is this seven and four?

1:04:57.160 --> 1:05:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Lakers start? Vilebar? Is it fools? Gold? Lebron keep up

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 4>this pace?

1:05:02.280 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean Lebron's playing unbelievable. It's a little fool's gold

1:05:05.600 --> 1:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in that. I just don't.

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I think they have some of the worst depth of

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>any team that's trying to be a real team. I mean,

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the Gay vincent Is just can't play. They're playing Coloco.

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>The Jackson Hayes got hurt, and that's like a big

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 3>loss for them. He's barely an NBA rotation guy. But

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Lebron and ad have been unbelievable.

1:05:25.360 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:05:25.800 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Next now, Danny Tanner, do you think the Cardinals could

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:32.920
<v Speaker 4>be a sleeper team in the NFC? Uh?

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually do, and I said it earlier this week.

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll say it again.

1:05:39.680 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that they're gonna be in that divisional race

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the year. I think Week eighteen is

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna be Cardinals Niners Sunday Night football with the division

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:47.960
<v Speaker 3>on the line.

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Next Alex Perdrovik for Petrovic vitz Nick. A lot of

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:57.720
<v Speaker 4>people are out on the Texans. They already beat the

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Bills and should have beaten the Lions with the healthy Nico.

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Could you see them having a twenty twenty one Bengals

1:06:03.120 --> 1:06:03.600
<v Speaker 4>type run.

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're gonna have a twenty twenty one

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Bengals get all the way to the Super Bowl type

1:06:09.240 --> 1:06:11.919
<v Speaker 3>of run. But I do think Nico Collins coming back

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 3>is gonna make the offense look a hell of a

1:06:13.600 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>lot better. And when Joe Mixon is healthy and Nico

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Collins is healthy, that offense is elite and you and

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>so I think people maybe are a little too down

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>on Houston right now. I just think they're I think

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>they're a B plus. I don't think they're an A

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 3>level team. I think they're a B plus. And I

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:34.360
<v Speaker 3>think that's solid, Like you're just building something there next.

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Adam Dell guides Geez the names today, I'm sorry, guys,

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 4>yea names. Would you rather be a Super Bowl winning

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 4>quarterback who is average like Flacco, Brad Johnson, Jeff has

1:06:47.880 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 4>hostas hostetler or at all time hostetler, Yeah, or an

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:57.080
<v Speaker 4>all time great quarterback who never want a ring like

1:06:57.120 --> 1:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Mike like Marino or Jim Kelly.

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to me, that's no question.

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>You'd rather be an all time great like I mean,

1:07:05.120 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Dan Marino is one of the greatest players in the

1:07:06.840 --> 1:07:09.600
<v Speaker 3>history of the league. You don't like Brad Johnson is

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 3>just a guy who was.

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>On the Bucks when they won the Super Bowl.

1:07:13.040 --> 1:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>So like that is like, to me, it's more like

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the more interesting question is would you rather be to

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>go to the NBA like Charles Barkley, one of the

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>greatest players ever.

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>But who never won a championship?

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Or Clay Thompson, you know, a Hall of Famer but

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>not all all timer, but you have a handful of championships.

1:07:42.320 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a real question, you know what I mean? Like that,

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>to me, there's a real pro and con to that.

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 3>But being just a guy that happened to win a

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl versus being a Hall of Famer all time

1:07:53.840 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 3>legend is to me, it's not.

1:07:55.760 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Even Thompson or Charles Barkley, obous see it's Charles s Maarkley.

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 4>But it's like, but that's the question I feel.

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Like, right right, that's what I'm saying.

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>That's a real debate, and so the like, would you

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>let me think of another NFL.

1:08:14.960 --> 1:08:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's an off season discussion.

1:08:17.560 --> 1:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>But like, to me, just being a guy who happened

1:08:20.120 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 3>to be on a team to win the Super Bowls

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 3>not nearly the same. Jammer is one of the ten

1:08:23.920 --> 1:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>greatest quarterbacks of all time. All right, great job today,

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>to Mon's good luck, to everyone's bets. No TV show today,

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>be back on the air Friday, So Friday. See you

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:36.400
<v Speaker 3>guys Friday on First things first, and don't forget, like rate, subscribe, review,

1:08:36.800 --> 1:08:39.680
<v Speaker 3>YouTube podcast, leave five stars, hit the bell, do all that.

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you guys Friday.

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>What's right?

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for watching. If you're still here, do me

1:08:44.640 --> 1:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a favor.

1:08:45.479 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Hit the subscribe button, then hit the bell so you

1:08:48.080 --> 1:08:49.320
<v Speaker 3>can be notified when.

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>We have new episodes.

1:08:51.000 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>After you've done that, one more favor, go to your

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>favorite audio platform of choice and subscribe there as well.

1:08:57.240 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget.

1:08:58.320 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 3>We're live every Tuesday and Thursday ten thirty am Eastern

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Ish ten thirty five, ten forty. It sometimes changes, but

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>that's why you hit the bell. You hit the bell

1:09:08.360 --> 1:09:11.320
<v Speaker 3>so you're notified. You subscribe so we can get to

1:09:11.439 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 3>two hundred thousand followers. We're right around one hundred and

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand.

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:16.719
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to get to two hundred thousand.

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Get demands another plaque, so like, subscribe, rate, send a

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 3>rating to do all that cool stuff.

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys,