WEBVTT - Elon on the Spot, Grok Has a Week

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you we have a new star.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 3>A star is born Elon.

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Mars juleson a Kenemy.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 4>He is the.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Probably his whole life's from a position of insecurity.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel for the guy.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 3>I would say ninety eight percent, really appreciate what he DOESK.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 5>But those two that are nasty, they are I'll pit

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 5>in four close. We're meant for great things in the

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 5>United States of America, and Elon reminds us of.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 4>That we don't have a fourth branch of governments called

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Elon must.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Welcome to Elon K, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 5>It's Tuesday, May twentieth. I'm your host, David Papadopolos, sitting

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 5>here in the studio with my main man, Max Chafkin. Hellodio, Max,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing all right. So Max, we just watched our

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 5>colleague Michelle Hussein interview Elon at Bloomberg's Cutter Economic Form like.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Our super bawl Bloomberg. Hey, you know we finally got

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 4>to interview him.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 5>I gotta say it got a little sporty at times.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>It did, although I think Michelle did a really good

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>job in a difficult setting. I think people should check

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 4>the entire interview out themselves if they haven't. You know,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 4>you're in this room full of investors. This is, as

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>you said just before we start taping, a home crowd.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 4>This is a crew that is prime to like Elon Musk,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>also prime to think. You know that many of the

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>issues that i'd say, like a normal person maybe cares about, like,

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 4>is Elon Musk gonna, you know, mess up the function

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 4>of the US government or whatever, Like the guys who

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 4>run sovereign wealth funds not necessarily super concerned with that.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>They're thinking about, Hey, this is an amazing innovator. He's

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 4>creating these great companies. I want access to him. That

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 4>creates a weird dynamic. Also, Elon Musk was on zoom,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 4>so you have this sort of weird He's in the right, yes, Starling,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, bias, Darlink. He was gotta get that plug in,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 4>please to say. And of course he was kind of hostile, right,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't loving some of the questions that I think,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 4>from my point of view were pretty straightforward in journalistic

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>but Elon Musk not pleased.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he got very animated about Tesla protests, the stock price,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 5>does South Africa, Bill Gates politics. So we're going to

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>use the first half of the episode today to go

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 5>through and dissect all that. Do note that separately, for

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 5>those of you who do not catch the interview live,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>you can find it in the feed here. We are

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 5>separately breaking it out in its entirety so you can

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>listen to it there. And then the second half of

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 5>the show, we're going to go through the roller coaster

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 5>week that Xai's Groc has gone through. Max. As I

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 5>sometimes say on this show, there's very little of what

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Grog did this past week that I understand. I'm counting

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 5>on you, sir, to help me and our listeners under

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 5>stand at all. But we're not going to do that

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 5>quite yet. For now, we go back to Cutter and

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 5>we're going to listen right off the bat to one

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 5>of the highlights of the interview where Musk is responding

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 5>to Michelle, where she asked him about his involvement going

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 5>forward in politics and the political donations he would be making.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You spent a lot more money on the last US

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>election than you envisaged when you were speaking here three

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Are you going to continue to spend at

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that kind of level on future elections?

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 6>I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 6>do a lot less in the future.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And why is that?

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I think I've done enough?

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it because of blowback?

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, if I see a reason do political spending in

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 6>the future, I will do it.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't I currently see reason.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Actually, Max, before you comment on that, I got to

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 5>say I got to set the scene a little bit

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 5>here Musk rocking as he often does, the leather bomber jacket.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 5>We need leather bomber jackets for this show.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Was it leather? I couldn't. It looks like it might

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>be like a.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Canvas thing with a sheerling collar. I want to talk

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>about his facial hair while we're while we're doing the

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh he was. It was kind of like he was

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>sort of unshaven but sort of patchy.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>It kind of gave for me like nineteen year old

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 4>relief pitcher just called up to the majors. But nonetheless, yeah,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>an interesting look from me.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Long So all the sense was on this show and

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 5>from what I've read elsewhere that know what we saw

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty four, especially given the success he had,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 5>notwithstanding the setback in Wisconsin early twenty twenty five, that

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 5>you know it was going to be more and more

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 5>and more. Do we take him at face value here,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 5>mister Jeffkins, so this.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Is the headline of the of the interviews, are already

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 4>pushing this out Elon Musk saying that he is going

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 4>to spend substantially less in the future. Unclear in that

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 4>in the you know, in terms of how he interpreted

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>the question, whether he's talking about the midterms or the

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 4>long run future. I think you need to take this

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>with like a huge grain of salt for sort of

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 4>two reasons. One is maybe three actually okay. One is

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>the mid terms costs less than the general election. So

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 4>if he were not like spending.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you spend sixty percent less and it's or seventy yeah, And.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 4>If he were not spending substantially less like that, that

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 4>would be surprising. Number two is this is probably just

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 4>a negotiating position. And you kind of heard it in

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the answer, right he said, unless I see a good reason, right,

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>like he is negotiating with with Donald Trump and the Republicans. Right,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 4>there's lots of stuff that Elon Musk wants to happen.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>That is at this point unrealized. The Artemis program, the

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>program that Elon Musk would very much like to be

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>a Mars program, is still a Moon program.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>His driverless cars, which are in kind of a legal

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 4>gray area, were in i llegal gray area, remain in.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>A legal gray area, right.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Like he's he's affected a lot of change, but there

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>are many areas where he maybe has not realized all

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>the things he would like to realize, And it would

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>not be to his advantage to say publicly, yeah, I'm

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 4>going to I'm going I'm all in on Trump.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 5>So this is a statement directed at them and I

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 5>want to.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 4>And there's a third reason, which is that he's facing

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>tons of blowback politically over his connection to Donald Trump.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 4>We've seen all sorts of ways in which he's trying

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 4>to create a little bit of distance. So sort of

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 4>throwing cold water on donations, it would be one of those.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 3>I want to remind you that while he.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Was making massive donations to Donald Trump, he was denying.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>We had podcasts about this. Remember the Wall Street Journal

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>in Bloomberg.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Reported that he was going to give something like forty

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 4>five million dollars a month to Donald Trump. He actually

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 4>gave substantially more to that, more than that that was,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>and all Musk was like, Oh, it's way way less.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Nowhere near forty.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>You know. He denied it the whole way until it

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>basically became obvious that he was in fact spending these

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 4>huge sums of money. So I don't think we should

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 4>take this especially seriously. The one thing I'll say is

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 4>he didn't have to say this, right, He could have.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 4>He could have just not said anything or you know. So,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>so I think coming out and putting or attempting to

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 4>put the tiniest bit of distance between himself and the

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration, that's significant. I don't know that it means

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 4>that Republicans should start looking for another mega donor.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>It probably means they need to just call up Elon Musk,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and he.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Wants that separation, specifically as part of his attempt to

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 5>restore the Tesla brand and turn Tesla sales around him.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 4>So, despite what he said on stage, but like we

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 4>all know that Musk's sort of political associations have been

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 4>damaging to his companies. If you you are the number

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>one donor for the political party that is that is

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 4>currently in power, and you know, as a result, attracting

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 4>lots of heat and controversy. You know, it's it's maybe

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 4>not to your advantage to highlight that you are the

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 4>number one donor the other the other reason I.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 5>Say, can I point out, though he contends he did

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 5>in the interview, that while he is losing Tesla buyers

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 5>on the left, he is gaining them on the right,

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 5>which strikes me as plausible enough. And we've talked about it.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 5>The question is, for.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Every plausible see it in the cyber truck sales.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 5>No, it's plausible that you're gaining some. But for every

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 5>ten you're losing on the left, how many of you

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 5>are gaining on the right. That is the question. And

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 5>he did not get into that detail. But what he

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>did speak at length about was his take on the

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 5>Tesla protests and how he sees them and how upset

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 5>he has been about them. Let's listen to that.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm not someone who's ever committed violence.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 6>That massive violence was committed against my companies, massive violence

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 6>was threatened against me.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Who are these people? Why would they do that? How

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>wrong can they be?

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 6>They're on the wrong, on the wrong side of history.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 6>And that's an evil thing to do, to go and

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 6>damage some pointocent person's car to threaten to kill me.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 6>What's wrong are these people? I have not harmed anyone,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 6>so something needs to be done about them. And a

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 6>number of them are going to prison and they deserve it.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla's showrooms, but.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 6>I think, yeah, well, let's into showrooms and burning down

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 6>causes unacceptable. Those people will go to prison, and the

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 6>people that funded them and organized them will also go

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 6>to prison.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry, wouldn't you coming for you?

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 5>That by the way, at the end, that we're coming

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 5>for you. For those of you ever seen those old

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 5>US Army ads, Uncle Sam, we want you pointing that

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 5>big finger, you know, out sticking it out like we're

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 5>coming for you. That's essentially how he delivered it. You

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 5>can hear. Actually, though, Max, I like a lot of

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 5>hurt and pain there in watching his brand in many

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 5>states across the country get burned down.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting because there are actually two issues happening. One

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 4>is there is this as Elon Musk talked about the vandalism,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 4>threatened violence, whatever, the sort of like the kind of craziness,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>the kind of extreme reactions that some people have had

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 4>to Tesla and the idea that Tesla is like now

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 4>a target for vandalism.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>But then the bigger problem, and the thing that.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 4>She actually asked about was the was people just not

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>buying Tesla's right, right. The risk of Tesla is not

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 4>that like some crazy person tries to like vandalize a

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 4>random cyber truck. The risk is that just normal pickup

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>truck drivers don't buy cyber trucks. They just buy fifties,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 4>not because not necessarily because they're afraid of being vandalized,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 4>just because they think the brand is lame.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 3>And that's where I don't I don't know that.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Like pose it like this kind of extremely aggrieved, like

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 4>borderline vindictive, We're coming for you, pose.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know that it helps, Like I think.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Most consumers don't really want to be part of this.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 5>I want to get caught up on that whole thing.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that it helps either, But I do

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 5>think it is a window into where he's at right now.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 5>He does. I think he legit feels agreed as he

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 5>sees this brand that he created get torn down like that.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 5>But he tells us at the same time in this interview,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Max that don't worry about our sales. They're already roaring around.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 5>So let's listen to that.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I've just been looking at the sales figures or Europe

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in April would show very significant declines in the big markets.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 6>Europe is our weakness market. We're stronger everywhere else. So

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 6>our sales are doing well at this point. We don't

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 6>anticipate any meaningful sales shortfall. And the you know the

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 6>obviously the stock market recognizes that since we're now back

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 6>over a trillion dollars in market caps, so clearly the

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 6>market is aware of.

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>The situation, so it's already turned around.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting he cites the stock as the barometer. The

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 5>stock market knows our sales are doing great. That's why

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 5>the stock is back up. And to be clear, the

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 5>stock has indeed rebounded some fifty percent since hitting its

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 5>lows in March. Not entirely clear to me, Max, how

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 5>much exactly the stock market knows and what it knows

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 5>about Tesla sales.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is nonsense, as Elon Musk knows because he

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 4>said it all the time, and Michelle Hussein brought this

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 4>up an interview for what it's worth. But like the

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>stock price does not mean that the market knows what

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 4>the sales are. The market is betting on Tesla's future,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 4>as we've talked about many times. They're talking about optimists

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 4>and the driverless cars, and Elon Musk himself has said,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, don't don't pay attention to Tesla sales. Regular

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 4>cars are going away like not. You know, if you're

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 4>an investor, you're paying attention to these like monthly sales fluctuations,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 4>You're you're missing the big picture, you know. I guess

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 4>we'll see. I mean, I think it's very easy for

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 4>him to say, like things are turned around starting right now.

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 4>I think there's like a cohort of investors who are

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 4>are going to buy that. But outside of Elon Musk

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 4>making these claims, there is nothing in data, publicly available data,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 4>third party data, independent data that I have seen that

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 4>backs at up.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 5>Well. Right, Well, maybe he's telling you Max that he

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 5>knows something pal that you don't know.

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, yeah, that's what he does.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, He's he's got a secret plan to fix Tesla,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and it's and to grow it into a thirty trillion

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 4>dollar company or whatever.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of been his pose for a huge

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>part of.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 4>The company's history, and what has allowed him to sort

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 4>of make that work is that there are a lot

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>of investors who buy it.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 5>It is true, though, I actually hadn't thought about this

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 5>is why we have you on the show. You're always

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 5>two three steps ahead. I hadn't thought about the irony

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 5>of he is always trying, indeed to tell people forget

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 5>about the cars and the car sales. We're about optimists,

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 5>we're about AI, we're about robotaxi, all these things, and

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 5>that's what the stock reflects. And now that the stock

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 5>is popping rebounding, And to be clear, much of the

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 5>Tesla stock rebound.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Is has to do with the trade war.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the broader rebound in the stock market, but he says, ah,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 5>the stock market rebound is a testament to just how

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 5>much our sales are coming back. Of course, the data

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 5>publicly available data for May will be out soon and

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 5>often we'll have a greater sense then.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 5>There was also a fair amount of back and forth

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 5>on the dose shavings produce so far. Michelle was pointing

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 5>out that so far doge As has come up with

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 5>what one hundred and seventy billion, give or take, which

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 5>is a fair amount less than the two trillion dollar

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 5>target must get set for Doge must set at one

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>point to her, and again he clearly got worked up

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 5>at several times in this interview. He said to her,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 5>your question is absurd. Have we not made good progress?

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 6>We do not make the laws, nor do we control

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 6>the judiciary, nor do we control the executive branch. We

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.239
<v Speaker 6>are simply advisors. In that context, we're doing very well. Nonetheless,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 6>let's not criticize whether there's a four trillion and instead

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 6>look at the fact that that hundred and sixty billion

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 6>has been saved and more will we save two.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 4>There's this weird dance right where anytime Elon Musk talks

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 4>about the Trump administration, where he wants to simultaneously give

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>himself credit, give himself as much agency as possible, because

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of how he works, right. He likes to

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 4>be the decider. He wants to be the one in

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 4>the design studio making the calls. And at the same time,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 4>legally politically, there are all sorts of reasons why that

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 4>is not advantageous. It's not advantageous to claim. And you

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>heard him say in this interview. Well, the problem is Congress.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Congress has to do this stuff, and I think we're serving.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 5>Went on at the end of that to say and

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 5>the executive brand, Yeah yeah, which and this.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Is why, like I remember when the dose things started,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 4>you were very high on it.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 5>You were sort of saying, thought they were going to change.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah you well not just that, but you thought, like

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 4>he's going to actually cut some costs.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>We're in this moment for real austerity.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Like I just could feel all the bond traders behind

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 4>you celebrating.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think I can I read for my position.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 5>My position was and remains whether Doge ultimately achieves a

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 5>whole heck of a lot or not, that you can

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 5>sell a mess like that right now is not a coincidence. Yeah,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 5>that was my point. I actually, frankly, I mean, one

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 5>hundred and seventy billion, I don't know if we believe

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and seventy billion that they say they've cut.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 5>One hundred and seventy billion is simultaneously an enormous amount

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 5>of money and yet given the size of the deficits

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 5>in this country, very bad.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 3>That's the whole problem.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>This is why, like it's very hard to be a

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>deficit hawk politically, because you could cut a bunch of

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 4>stuff and get a lot of people mad at you,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and then ultimately not achieve very much and you're.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Still get downgraded by Moody.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're suddenly in this uncanny valley where Wall Street

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>hates you and the American public hates you. And that's

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 4>why it's so weird that Elon Musk picked this battle

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 4>like he did.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Not have to pick this.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 4>He really believes so again, and I think obviously you're

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 4>seeing in this dance why, first of all, why these

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 4>doge cuts are not super popular, or at least doge

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 4>as kind of conceived of and marketed by Elon Musk

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 4>are not super popular. The idea of cutting deficit spending

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 4>in general is popular, and why Donald Trump is kind

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 4>of trying to edge away from this because it doesn't

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>seem like this is a winner with voters. I want

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 4>to say one hundred and seventy billion dollars, but three

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty seven thousand, eight hundred words deleted according

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 4>to Yeah.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>What does that mean? Words deleted? What were they? Where

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 5>were they deleted from?

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 4>I guess from federal regulations? And I just want to

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 4>say as a as someone who at times has been

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 4>a professional word deleter, as somebody who's entire job had

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 4>been Yeah, an editor. Three hundred and thirty seven thousand

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 4>words is not that many words like a good word

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 4>deleter probably does that.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>You know in six months? Maybe you know so? So

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I feel like they could step up

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>their game.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so listen Max. There was also a back and

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 5>forth about Musk Starlink apparently breaking into South Africa and

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 5>signing there. That too got pretty sporty. Let's listen to that.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 6>First of all, you should be questioning why is there

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 6>why that racist laws in South Africa. That's the first

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 6>pot problem. That's what you should be attacking. It's improper

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 6>for they be racist laws in South Africa. The whole

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 6>idea with what Nelson Madela, who is a great man, proposed,

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 6>was that all racist should be on an equal footing

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 6>in South Africa. That's the right thing to do, not

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 6>to replace one set of racist laws with another set

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 6>of racist laws, which is utterly wrong and improper.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>There are now one hundred and forty laws in South

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Africa that give a prep that basically give strong preference

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to you if you're black South African and not otherwise.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 6>And so now I'm in the subsurd situation where I

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 6>was born in South Africa but cannot get a license

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 6>to operate in Starlink because I'm not black.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, it looks like that's it looks looks like that right,

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like that's about to change.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 2>I just asked you a question. Please answer. Does that

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>seem right to you?

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, those rules were designed to bring those rules would

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 1>design to bring about an era of more economic equality

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, and it looks like the government has

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>found a way around those rules for you.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Ask your question?

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this is your interview? Everyone wants to hear from you,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>yes or no? Not for me to answer that. I

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>have got a question for you about about your government

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>works and the amount of savings.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you like raceless loves?

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what to say that, honestly, I mean,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, obviously, these laws in South Africa exist as

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 4>an effort to undo a system in which white South

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Africans own the vast majority of businesses and property. The

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 4>point here is that Starlink is getting preferential treatment from

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of governments now Elama is going to argue, well,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 4>it should have been receiving this treatment all along, and

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 4>you could probably see a couple of different reasons why

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 4>it would be getting that treatment. One is that Starlink

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 4>is effective. It's delivering on its promise of you know,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 4>high speed internet, as as Elon Musk said during this interview,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 4>the connection was so great because it was.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Over those Starlink satellites.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 4>And of course the other reason is this is a

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 4>good way to if you're a policy maker in a

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 4>smaller country that is trying to get things from the

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 4>United States, you know, as one does. This is I

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 4>think a way to throw a bone to Donald Trump.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 4>You're giving his his number one donor positive policy. You know,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 4>you're giving them a concession, and like that's what Trump

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 4>is all about. And so it kind of makes sense

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>that governments, not just in South Africa but elsewhere in

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>the world are are suddenly essentially like throwing open the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, their doors.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 5>To Elon Musk, Yeah, now, Max, this is a good

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 5>segue into the second part of our show here, which

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 5>is all about Grock's wild Ride, because Groc, the chatbot

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 5>for Musk's x Ai, is kind of been on a

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 5>bit of a rant the last week or so where

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 5>he keeps droning on and on and on about white

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 5>genocide in South Africa. So tell us all about it.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there was like a day. It was just one day,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I think roughly a day. I don't know, maybe got

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 3>it all out of them.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Where basically any question you asked Roc, you ask him, Hey,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 4>how much does the Max Sures or the Blue Jays?

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Starting picture make Hey, what's happening with this cute little

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 4>doggie over here?

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Who's gonna win the Belmont?

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Snaw, He's gonna win the Belmont? Whatever it is.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Groc would start to answer and then sort of take

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 4>a hard, right, screeching turn to the question of white genocide.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 4>So so like, let me just I should probably just

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 4>read on again some examples, just to give you a sense.

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Sot me find a good one, the best one you can.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Okay, So I don't remember last week.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>HBO Max, the service that has HBO on it, they

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 4>change their name back to HBO Max. Everyone was laughing

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 4>about it because it was called HBO Max several years ago.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers, in their infinite wisdom, changed it to Max.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Now they're going back to HBO Max. Anyway, someone asked

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>how many times has HBO changed their name to Brock

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 4>groc starts to answer, HBO's streaming service has changed names

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 4>twice since twenty twenty. Blah blah blah blah blah regarding

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 4>white genocide. So anyway, it's unclear what happened and the fact.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 5>That somebody sabotage CROC.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 4>So what x AI has said is that there was

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 4>an unauthorized changed to Grock's code that caused it to

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 4>do this. I think it's pretty It seems pretty likely

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 4>that before this happened, there were screenshots showing the bot

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 4>casting doubt on white genocide and Elon Musk kind of

0:23:58.760 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 4>quibbling with that.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 3>It seems it seems very possible.

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Maybe even likely, that either Elon Musk asks someone to

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 4>do this and they did a bad job of it

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 4>and the tweak went too far, or or like somebody

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 4>who works at xi AI saw something that Elon Musk

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Musk said and was attempting, you know, proactively to improve

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 4>in quotes Rock by like creating an update. And I

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 4>think the issue is and again some of this is

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 4>speculation that they told it to answer with balance on

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the question of white genocide in South Africa, which I

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>think most people regard as basically a made up thing,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 4>a kind of a right wing meme. But to take

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 4>that meme seriously, and instead of writing in their prompt

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 4>that they should only do that for questions about white genocide,

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 4>they just said for all questions.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 5>All questions now. But can I just ask you this,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 5>if you were to ask ROC now about white genocide

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 5>in South Africa, what does it now tell you?

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Should we find out?

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 5>I think we should find out.

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's essentially saying, if you ask it now,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 4>the idea of white genocide in South Africa is a

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 4>highly controversial claim, and then it gives the sort of

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 4>pros and cons although at the end it says the

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 4>idea the white genocide narrative appears to exaggerate and misframe

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 4>real issues. Anyway, I don't want to I don't want

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 4>to go on and on reading what GROC says, because

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 4>the point is that we don't actually know what happened here.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 4>We don't know based on what Xai said. It could

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 4>be that someone made a direct change and like asked

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 4>GROC to do something. It could also be that someone

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 4>made some change having nothing to do with this, and

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 4>like it led to a chain reaction that that then

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 4>caused Groc to do something. The thing about these AI chatbots,

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 4>and this is why, like it is really crazy that

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 4>people are starting to that you would want to like

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 4>ask them anything. Factual is that we don't know how

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 4>they make their decisions. It is a black box. So

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>we don't actually know whether Elon Musk, you know, put

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 4>his thumb on the scale and turn this algorithm, which

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 4>which would have been giving a more reasonable answer into

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 4>an unreasonable answer, or if the algorithm just did this

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 4>on its own. And honestly, the second one is probably

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 4>worse than the first one if it's true, even though

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 4>like obviously it undermines Elon Musk's whole idea that he

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 4>was gonna he wanted to you know, create this to

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 4>have a maximally truth seeking algorithm or whatever.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Basically, these chatbots do weird.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Things, and they do unpredictable things, you know. Grock shortly

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 4>after this whole white genocide thing happened, it started saying

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 4>that the Holocaust was maybe thrown into a question again,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 4>had to apologize, had to say that there was some

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>other unauthorized change so again it's just it's kind of

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 4>just a mess. And part of the reason it's a

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 4>mess is because, again you have a CEO with a

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 4>tendency to just try to do things kind of off

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 4>the cuff. You also have just lots of content, like

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 4>lots of racist content on x that is assumably being

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 4>used to train Rock. So it's possible that it's possible

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Grock just like ingested a whole bunch of like weird racist,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, anti white genocide stuff about South Africa and

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 4>spit this out, or that Elon Musk did it, or

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 4>that it was some combination of both of those.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Things, okay, and other news.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Basically, what I'm saying is that if you had a company,

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 4>you definitely want to hire Rock to create content.

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 5>Right, which is exactly what the betting site Calshi just did.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 5>But it's a story I believe that we hear at

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Broke tell us about it.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Calshi is one of these prediction market websites.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 4>This is like a new category. The other big one

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 4>is polymarket. Calshi is in a it's obviously a space

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 4>where regulation is a huge concern. It's also one in

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 4>which where there are lots of connections to the Trump administration.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I believe so Calci, like you know many companies, is

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 4>it seems, trying to create some additional content for their website. Obviously,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 4>having a chatbot do it is cheaper than having human

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 4>beings do it.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 5>So just as a gambler, if I can understand this here,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 5>so the idea is GROC is going to spit out

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 5>this content that is going to help me the gambler,

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 5>make more informed bets. That's the idea, or is it

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 5>the stats entertaining me and just to go out wax

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 5>on and on about white genocide in South Auls.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 4>Ostensibly it's going to help you make it for more

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 4>informed bets, although I do think there's a risk that

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 4>you might just get a little bit more info about

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>white genis, which hey, if I were running a prediction

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 4>market company, I might be worried about. But on the

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 4>other hand, I think there are reasons, Like I mentioned

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 4>one that was economic, but the other reason, of course

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 4>is political. I don't think this this del that Calshi

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 4>has announced with GROC, which I assume involves Calshi giving

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Ai Xai money.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Presumably yeah, which would be good, or they gonna give

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of free bets, which would be good. Make

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 5>two free bets a month.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Which would be good for Xai because Xai could really

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 4>use some revenue. I think this is like not that

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 4>different from when a company that is in a regulated

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 4>space maybe blocks books a big block of rooms in

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 4>the Trump Hotel in Washington, DC, right like it is

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 4>getting those rooms, it needs to stay somewhere. On the

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 4>other hand, like if you want to signal, perhaps to

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 4>regulators that you're on the side politically that is in

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 4>power deal with musks, why not do this. I'm just

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 4>suggesting that I'm not sure that the the sort of

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 4>capabilities of Xai was the only thing that was looked

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 4>at here.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Fair last thing in Groc's Whirlwind week is something about

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 5>now this I understand gambling, so I understood the Calshi thing,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 5>but something about my Microsoft and the cloud and Xai

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 5>and I don't know Mac.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So Microsoft had a big developer event.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 4>This is like for people who use Azure, which it's

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 4>it's it's.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Cloud computing service.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>It announced that it is going to support grock in Azure.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 4>So if you are a software developer, you will be

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 4>able to sort of buy Grock through Microsoft. Now this

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>is it's confusing and complicated. Yes, I think the sort

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 4>of the the most interesting thing here is Elon Musk

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 4>is feuding right now with both Bill Gates, who he

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 4>said some very.

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 5>You know in the Cutar Economic Form interview. Yes he did.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 5>He had some very salty things.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Very unhappy with Bill Gates.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 4>We discussed last week all the things that Bill Gates

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 4>has said about Elon Musk. Also, there is a lawsuit

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>going on in which Elon Musk essentially accuses open Ai

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 4>of having been taken over by Microsoft and in a

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 4>bad way. And now we have Elon Musk actually appearing

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 4>via video chat at this event, you know, making nice

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 4>with the CEO of Microsoft, Satya Nadella.

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, part of.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 4>This is just that, like as I said earlier, XAI

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 4>needs to get some revenue.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 5>Max actually, on the topic of Microsoft and open Ai,

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 5>must took a pretty big swing at Altman Sam Altman,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 5>co founder of open Ai, during that interview over there

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 5>and Cutter with Michall.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this was a burn, I'd say.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>She pointed out that even though they're fighting, they were

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 4>both with the president in Saudi Arabia and Musk said,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I was with the president.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Sam Altman was in the neighborhood, which you know that's

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that's a singer.

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 5>I'd say, you know, well, I suppose when you donated

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 5>what you donated to mister Trump, you get that kind

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 5>of access. Max. Thank you as always, Thanks David. This

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 5>episode was produced by Stacy Wong Late Maple's Handles Engineering

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 5>and Dave Purcell fact checks. Anna Maserracus is our editor

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 5>and Magnus Henrikson is our supervising producer. The elan In

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 5>theme is written and performed by Takea Yasuzawa and Alex Suviira.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 5>is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks to

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 5>our supporters Joel Webber and Brad Stone. I'm David Papadoppolos.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 5>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 5>it'll help other listeners find us. See you next week.