WEBVTT - Becoming Caitlin Clark with Howard Megdal

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where we're avoiding

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>cracks in the sidewalk, being careful around mirrors, and staying

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>far away from ladders. Just in case. It's Friday, June thirteenth.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Happy Friday the thirteenth to everybody except my Triskadeca folks.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, we'll be skipping the need to know

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and jumping straight into my conversation with Howard Meggill, founder

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and editor of The Nine Newsletter and the Next Women's

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Basketball Newsroom. He's got a new book coming out on

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>June seventeenth, titled Becoming Caitlin Clark, The Unknown Origin Story

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of a Modern Basketball Superstar. So we talked about how

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>we approached putting Clark's meteoric rise in context, the research

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>he did to tell the history of women's basketball and

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dig up the stories of past women's soups grates, and

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>his role guiding young writers in the evolving women's sports

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>media landscape. It's all coming up right after this, joining

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>us now. He's the founder and editor of The Nine

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Newsletter and the Next Women's Basketball Newsroom, a staff writer

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for Baseball Prospectives, and senior contributor at Forbes dot com.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He's published eight books, including his latest, Becoming Caitlin Clark,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>out June seventeenth. He'll take the occasional break from women's

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sports to down a Metz Cheese steak, egg roll, or

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>witness the glory of the Philly fanatic hot dog Cannon.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Howard Magdoll.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Howard, Hi, Sarah. Great to be with you always.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, great to have you. Congrats on the book. Before

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we get to that, I want to back up a

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>little for our listeners that might not know your extensive

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>history in the women's sports space. So can you give

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>us a sort of condensed version of how you got

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>here and how you've been such a big part of

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 1>women's basketball and women's sports.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that, you know, for me, it has been

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>our journey over the course of my career. I've been

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>in sports journalism about twenty years. And as soon as

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>you get involved and you know this that you can

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>see this gap between how men's sports and women's sports

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 3>are covered, and you can't unsee it. And so the

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>question is in my mind and has been what do

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you do about it? And I've covered women's sports at

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>legacy publications for many years, always felt like I was

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>building in sand, and so how do you go about

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>building the infrastructure that creates the everyday coverage Number one

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>and number two creates opportunities for others to be doing

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the work as well. And so in twenty eighteen started

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 3>The Nine, which is a women's sports newsletter. It was

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>three sports, then we're up to six now one per day,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 3>and then in twenty twenty the newsroom the next, which

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 3>is a women's basketball twenty four seven, three sixty five

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>newsroom where we have over one hundred reported pieces every

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>single month on women's sports. We have a WNBA beat

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>reporter or sometimes two on every single team. We try

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>to cover with the fierce urgency that you can really

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 3>take for granted when it comes to men's sports. And

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 3>so that's essentially the thumbnail version of how I'm here.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I love it, and it's so true, and it's something

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of course we think about a lot here at this show.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The only daily podcast is what can we bring to

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>people consistently and with regularity that they can't find anywhere else,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so that they can keep up and connect all the

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.399
<v Speaker 1>stories in different stars across the space. For those who

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>want to subscribe The Nine is like title nine the

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Roman numerals IX, so if you're searching forward, it's the

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>IX newsletter and then the next Women's basketball so you

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe to those and get all the goodness in

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>your inbox. I want to talk really quickly about that,

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's great to have those goals. It's great to

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>want to create something. But did you actually want to

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be a boss, an entrepreneur, someone who had to handle

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a staff and manage payroll and like all those other things,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because I don't. So I'm very impressed that you are

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>helping so many other young reporters and journalists in the space,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's a lot of extra work on top of

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you actually want to do, presumably, which is

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the journalism side.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that question. You know.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>What I have found is being able to create these

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>opportunities and build this infra structure with permanence makes it

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>worth doing those other things. I can't tell you that

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I love the process of taking on payroll by hand

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>every single month, but absolutely to be able to reward

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the folks who are doing it is also really significant

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 3>to me. And being a mentor in this space is

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>something that's really important to me. So there's enough that

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I love out of it that, Yes, the place where

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel most at home is in a pressure room

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>or sitting in a one on one interview, but being

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>able to do those things as well important in something

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 3>that I've come to really find joy in.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the toughest part about managing folks, especially folks that

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they're maybe in one of their first gigs learning the

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>ropes as journalists.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>The most difficult? Then? That's hard to say.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, everyone comes with certain strengths and certain weaknesses,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 3>and it's sort of identifying what are the best ways

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that I can support a young journalist, you know, as

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 3>she makes your way forward in this work. So I

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't say that there's one thing that stands out most

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of all. You know, they're different challenges for different people,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 3>But the joy of seeing somebody figure it out is

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>my favorite thing. I may enjoy that more than doing

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 3>the work itself.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, Oh, that's amazing. That's probably why you're in the

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>position that you're in. That's that's a really good quality

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to have to care so much about watching other people

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as they rise. I find what's interesting to me moving

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>across different spaces is even at ESPN, at different spaces

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>at ESPN, how the newsroom, whether that was a radio

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or a TV or a written kind of newsroom operated differently,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder for you how that works. You've got

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of whatever you make and create is the rules

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>for how you operate. But then you're working with journalists

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>who might have jobs at other places. You're working with

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>folks who maybe have never worked in an official journalistic

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>capacity anywhere. What do you tell them about how to

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>handle themselves in the women's sports space, particularly as it

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>changes so much, because it went from sort of pay

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your own way, show up if you care about it,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes too sick a phantic coverage because you're trying to

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure you connect with the athletes and continue to

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>get access to Now where there's an expectation to really

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>be professional in the space and to potentially be able

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to and have access to ask tougher questions. How do

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you help them adjust to that?

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 3>There's no simple answer to that, but the way you

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 3>framed it is exactly right. I mean reflects obviously the

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>work that you do in this space all the time. Right,

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a baseline we have to set up professionalism of

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>an understanding of you are there to cover and a

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of people come from and this is not a

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 3>criticism from a place of we love the sport. We

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 3>care about the sport. You may even have fandom that

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you bring into it, and we check that at the

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>door and we say, look, this is what we need

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 3>to do, and you do it for not just the

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 3>reasons of being able to maintain that distance, to be

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>able to cover, so that our audience understands we are

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 3>you can trust.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Because we are here to inform.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>And ultimately our relationship is with the reader, the viewer,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the listener in all these cases, but also so that

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 3>there is that space to allow a writer to be

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>critical when necessary, not critical in a way that you

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>cannot look that person in the eye when you see

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.559
<v Speaker 3>her the next day at practice, but to make sure

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>that you are telling the truth about what's happening. And

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I think we've found a lot of success with that.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Being able to provide people the access to do the

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>work is something that is of course a fight in

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and of itself sometimes but critical part of making sure

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that people are there, people are showing up. And then

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 3>the flip side of that is is that the people

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 3>who we have covered through the years. Understand we will

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>be there. We will be there when they're winning, we

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>will be there when they're not. We covered the Indiana

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>fever when they were five and thirty one, no less

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>than we cover the Indiana fever today.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I think that's a big part

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of this space in general, is how are teams and

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>leagues and pr people and comms folks adjusting to the

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>new normal, and in some cases, I think not always

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that great. I was talking to a local sports person

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who said that their access to the women's teams in

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>their city is significantly less than the men's that they

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are trying to give them more coverage. But whether it's

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth resources that you know, not long tenures of the

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>folks working there who don't have relationships in the city

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the same way, or whether it's the athletes themselves who

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>are rightfully gunchy about some of the coverage. How have

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>you seen the players in the w change over the

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, Because I do think that they

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good reason to wonder about some of the

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>reporters parachuting in for the first time and asking dumb questions,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But they also need to be ready to make the

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>transition from fan like reporters to higher level journalists asking

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>tougher questions that are fair.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's less binary than this. I think you've

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>identified a lot of critical parts of the issue that

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 3>we see right now, and it's severalfold. And one is

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 3>that not all teams and not all leads have come

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to the conclusion we don't need to credential literally everyone,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 3>whether or not they're.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Doing the work.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 3>And as a result, players are not going to necessarily

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 3>know whether somebody is parachuting in without a lot of information,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 3>somebody is coming to cover, or somebody is there in

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 3>a fan capacity but credentialed as if they are media.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 3>And when you don't know where the next question is

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>coming from, I don't just mean physically, but I just

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>mean from what perspective you can meet unshy as a result.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 3>And so there's a lot of work that needs to

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 3>be done on multiple levels. Right The media needs to

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>come in an informed way and that needs to happen.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Needs to be work at the team and lead level

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to understand who ought to be in those spaces, and

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:15.239
<v Speaker 3>then for players, you know there's an information and understanding

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 3>of who are the people as individuals who are covering

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 3>me rather than the media as a monolith, I mean

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>those of us. And you've been in these rooms too,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>where you just you want to bang your head against

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 3>the wall when you're a question from another quote unquote

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>media member. And unfortunately even it's even binary hpray area.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not old media versus new media. It's not print

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.359
<v Speaker 3>versus digital. You know, there's it's always complishing.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Case by case really yeah, And I think like one

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things that stood out to me was talking

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to a veteran player who said, it's as simple as

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>being able to tell by someone's question that they don't

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>know that they were just traded this year, or they

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be an MVP, or they've won a title before,

0:10:58.640 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think.

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Their name is pronounce right. I mean, there's a lot

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of basics.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think a lot of that though, is

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>also like there's a real fear and I've been there

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of walking into male professional league locker rooms and worrying

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what the other media will think about you if you

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't done your homework. And in the women's space, there

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>are far too many media who stroll in having done

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>zero homework and feel perfectly fine. Asking dumbshit questions that

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the people who do know recognize as dumb shit immediately.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I do think it's more helpful

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you are allowed to be mad about that, and where

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>does that get you as a player if your reaction

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is frustration as opposed to can you choose instead, especially

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>if someone seems to be coming with good intention and

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just maybe needs to learn how to better prep to

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>help them through that. It's not their responsibility or their job,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but for their response to be offering a little bit

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of grace, we'll probably serve them in the coverage of

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>them better than to get frustrated and shut down. So

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like a little bit of both sides,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>where again it's not the player's responsibility to do that,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and also does it help them or the league or

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>their team to essentially be mad and not do media

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore because they want everybody to show up and ask

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>better questions, you know, like what's the end goal? The

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>end goal is more coverage, better coverage, you know, and

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>teaching those people with the dumb shit questions.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to note as well that we

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>want to see places that haven't necessarily covered. The WNBA

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>or room in sports in the past to cover it.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of times that means that the editorial

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>structure in place doesn't even have folks who are able

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>to bring people along to do it the right way,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and so they are forced to learn on the job.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>It's something that I'm really conscious of at the next

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 3>where we're trying to build people up to the point

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 3>that for those who stay with us, that's amazing. And

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>for the people who end up at a lot of

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>other places and they have they're coming in with the

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 3>training to be able to do it the right way,

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>but that type of modeling is not there in the

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>way that it is for a lot of men's sports,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>just because the structures have not covered it before. So

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's significant, and I, you know, I

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>just wanted to mention it as well.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I agree, And like I think that's why

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end, everybody has allowed their feelings. But what

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>ends up getting us to the best place, and that's

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of grace on both sides, right and

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>understanding that some of those people got assigned to you

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>an hour before drove out. They're trying to do their

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>best and when you help them, the coverage is better

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>than when you stonewall because you're frustrated. And we talked

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to athletes about that too, and how they're ready for

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the fair and tough questions. They just want them to

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be well researched, which I understand. Let's talk about the book,

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>because you've written a number of books. Why, Caitlin Clark?

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Why right now?

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 3>It's several years in the making, to be frank, And

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 3>it goes back to even just seeing her as an

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 3>initial phenomenon and seeing an understanding that as she blew

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>up and I mean that before she blew up in

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>an audience sens so she just blew up as a player,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>which you could see right from the start, right from

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>day one as a freshman at Iowa, there was this

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>legacy clearly tied not just to the previous few years

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>at University of Iowa, but going back a century. And

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, I've had the privilege of covering and writing

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 3>about Molly Kashmir, who was Molly bowlan machine dun Molly,

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>dating back to the nineteen seventies in the WBL, and

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>you just couldn't help but see those parallels right away.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 3>And so just the more I dug into it, the

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>more it was just very clear to me this is

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a multi generational story. And then the more she blew up,

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the more it was clear and obvious that there's a

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 3>large audience out there who may not know why this

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>is happening now. And I think that's what's really important.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 3>That's what drove me when I wrote Rare Jam, which

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 3>is about effectively four generations of women's players in Minnesota

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and where that came from, and to see this history

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>in Iowa, it goes back even further and there are

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>these direct links. You know, Jan Jensen is the lead

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 3>assistant coaching Caitlin Clark, and her grandmother was a star

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>in girls six on six basketball, not only in the

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>nineteen twenties, but writing about it, and I had access

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 3>to her journals in a way that no one had

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>ever seen before writeing about it in ways the language

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>parallels the way Caitlin talks about living as a basketball

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>player today. And so the more you see that, the

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>more you just feel like, you know, Wow, this is

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a story that runs so much deeper than I'm going

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 3>to be able to get to in one story or

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>one podcast.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We got to take a quick break when we come

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>back more with Howard mgdal hang tight. I loved the

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>history that was in the book because it's Caitlin Clark

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has done a lot, but her story is still relatively short.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that you connect that short story that's

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>been broadcast on the highest and biggest stages alongside this

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>lengthy history. And you talk mostly about Iowa and how

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Iowa's had this incredible support for women's basketball dating back

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to even previous iterations of the sport, and you do

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>compare it to other places and how it's different, And

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the part about Illinois is stuck with me,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was uniform across many states. But this is

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the example you used from Illinois, you write, as historian

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott Johnson Chronicle quote. Not long after the introduction of

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>basketball as an athletic activity for high school girls, all

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>levels of the educational hierarchy were engaged in a debate

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>over its merits. As a simple playground game, girls basketball

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>had prompted few objections. However, when girls started developing interscholastic

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>programs that rivaled those of the boys, basketball quickly turned

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>into a nightmare for school administrators. While students and empathetic

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>teachers push for more interschool play, school principles, and professional

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>educators marshaled their resistance to what they perceived as the

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>masculinization of the female athletic program. This scenario played itself

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>out in practically every state during the early twentieth century. Now,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not surprising to folks who have been in

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the women's sports space. In fact, it feels weirdly reminiscent

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of some of the reactions to the w last year,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for folks who hadn't watched before, who said, oh, this

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is mma. They're boxing out there, this is too physical,

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone's mean, they're targeting Caitlin, and we're all like, this

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is basketball, bro, Like, why have you been watching? But

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea that girls playing is fine until people come

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to watch, or tickets get sold, or the stakes get high,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>or it becomes similar to the boys or surpasses the boys.

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And there were plenty of examples in early Iowa basketball

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that you cite where thousands of people are going to games,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>where there's a tiny town of just a couple hundred

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand people show up to celebrate when they win,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>lining down the street. And what was the big takeaway

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for you of the waves of fighting that are required

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to push women's sport forward from the eighteen hundreds to

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen hundreds and carrying on.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>So this is a big takeaway for me from this book,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 3>but frankly, this is a big takeaway for me from

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Rare Gems. This is a big takeaway for me from

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.239
<v Speaker 3>covering women's sports with a historical lens, and that is

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 3>that every time you see a gap between outcomes with

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>men's and women's sports, you can always trace it back

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to process. And the thing that I think frustrates me

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the most is where I hear people mistake process for outcome,

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 3>and to your point, and this is the most significant

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 3>part of it. Every time there's an elevation, every time

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 3>there is growth, there is a backlash to what we're seeing. Look,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing it in women's sports. We're seeing it, and

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 3>we've seen it at every wave of feminism that we've

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 3>had in this country throughout the world as well, you know,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>again and again and again a pushback. And so that

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>for me is the big takeaway for people to understand

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that women were playing basketball as soon as there was basketball,

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 3>just the same as men were. So everything that we've

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 3>seen for the EBB and flow and the fact that

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>there is not a parallel rise in men's basketball and

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 3>women's basketball is everything to do with efforts made to

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>stop the progress of women's basketball.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one thousand percent. I talk about that all the time,

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't understand the intention behind holding back

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>women's sports, you will continue to blame the product. And

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the product has never been the problem. It has always

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>been the infrastructure and the people around it who are

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to hold women back or keep women in a

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>specific lane. And it's frustrating to see that ebb and

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>flow and come back and repeat itself over the course

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of time. We're currently fighting our way still in this

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>massive moment of growth, but of course we look at

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>some larger administration and other folks, the Trump administration, other

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>folks looking to push us back into yet another eb

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What was the most surprising thing you learned about Caitlin

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in the process of writing this book, because you sort

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of tell these parallel stories of the history and then

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>her history as well.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 3>The most surprising thing to me is that she never

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 3>had a moment of breaking. If that made sense, there

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>was something and it made sense within the context of

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 3>understanding that in a lot of ways she was born

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and raised to meet this moment. But she did not

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 3>have a moment where her game failed her. She didn't

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 3>have a moment where she wasn't able to handle what

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>has been a gradually rising but clearly attention that she

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>has been receiving dating back to her high school days

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 3>and even before that. You know, she's playing at seventh

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>and eighth grade in these AAU tournaments in front of

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, people like Lisa Bluter, and at no point

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 3>did she falter. And that is astonished.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So she is a robot.

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's astonishing, right, I mean, this is a

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty three year old woman, and I just think about

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 3>myself at twenty three and what we are all prepared

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 3>to handle, and for her to handle this hurricane around

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 3>her that gets more and more intense, seemingly.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 2>By the day.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 3>And there was no moment where publicly she cracked. And

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that to me is amazing because she would be understandable,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>she would be human, she would be forgiven for having

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>done so. But we haven't seen it, yeah at all.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>You talk about the coverage and conversation around her in

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the book and on our show, we have struggled to

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>both address the problems that result from some of the

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>toxic discussion around her, and also embrace and acknowledge how

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>conversation around the league itself has changed and grown as

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a result of her arrival. And I always describe her

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>as the match that lit the bonfire. You needed this

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>giant stack of sticks for that match to do anything,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but the match also expedited the fire in a way

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that we'd never seen before. And you write in the

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>book the WNBA had existed as a safe space for

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>marginalized people for nearly three decades because broader American culture

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>so often ignored it. That trade off was felt in

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>ways large and small that filled the league's players, coaches, executives,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in long tenured fans with ambivalence. So this feeling of

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how to feel about this growth because

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>we love it, and it's also bringing with it a

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>whole new kind of conversation that wasn't here before and frankly,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is not welcome. Ultimately, I loved that you came to

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion that we have here, which is that you

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>can't name one thing or one reason as to why

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin blew up the way she did. You can't name

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing or one reason as to why the reaction

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to Caitlin blowing up became so problematic? Can you talk

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>about some of the things that when writing this you

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>really recognized about how Caitlin became such a for many people,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>black and white evil or good villain or hero sort

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of character or avatar in the league.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 3>And I would be remiss not to point out, as

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>a Rabbit listener that I am very appreciative of the

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 3>way you guys frame this on a regular basis, as

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>well as it relates to the question you asked. It

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>is mind boggling to me that people are trying to

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>come up with a single answer or to assign singular

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>motivations to how people even ought to feel about it.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And I spoke to players and coaches and gms all

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>around the lead. You know, I do that anyway in

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the day to day course of my work, but for

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 3>this book, specifically in the idea that a player cannot

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 3>simultaneously be thrilled that the media rights deal is going

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to be worth between eight and nine times what the

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 3>last media rights deal is, but also to want to

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 3>go out there and beat the hell out of her opponent,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Kitlan or anybody else, it doesn't make sense.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Both of these things are obviously significant motivations in a

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 3>professional athlete. You know, the idea that Caitlin is doing

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 3>this now and breaking through now is very much a

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 3>consequence of what we have seen in terms of growth

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 3>of the lead in the years leading up to it.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 3>If we look at the number of games on national

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 3>television when Kathy Engelbert took over as commissioner, compared to

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 3>where we are now, it's exponentially larger.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the fact that.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 3>There is shoulder programming around WNBA games, that was a thing,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, a WNBA pregame show. No, you couldn't

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 3>imagine it in a million years. Now we see it

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 3>at ESPN, we see it at ION and CBS it

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>just last week. And you know, all of these things matter.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 3>We know, for instance, that when shoulder programming was built

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and there was cross promotion leading up to the twenty

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>fifteen Women's World Cup, that is when the US women's

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 3>national team in soccer broke through into the larger culture.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And so there are all of these elements that play apart.

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 3>But yes, absolutely there is this awful, ugly undertone that

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>reflects where the country is here in twenty twenty five.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 3>There are people who are new to the WNBA space

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 3>who are fans, and there are people who have entered

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the WNBA space because it is part of broader culture

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 3>and using this as an opportunity to attack women who

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 3>are overwhelmingly black women in the WNBA. And those two

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 3>things are both true at the same time, and pretending

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>one or the other doesn't exist is doing a disservice

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to the current moment that we're in.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Completely agree. I really liked what you had to say

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>about DJ Carrington being assigned to guard Caitlin Clark and

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>then afterwards being asked about her in a way that

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>felt in congruous with the job she'd just been assigned.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You wrote, was it difficult for Carrington to effusively praise

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Clark even as she fulfilled the obligation of her job

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to battle her fiercely on the court? Of course? Why

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>was that even her responsibility? And I think that's something

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that stands out to me is players can be grateful

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for the attention Caitlin brings and also be frustrated if

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing they're asked about. I've heard of

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>players in the league tell reporters, I'm happy to sit

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>down with, you know, Kaitlin Clark questions, And maybe that's

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>going too far. And I can get why that's frustrating

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>for the reporter, but also maybe if you don't say that,

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you sit down and you answer ten straight questions about

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>another player and not yourself, and you ask, what are

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we getting at here? Are we really trying to uplift

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the league, spotlight other players, get everyone to watch more,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or are we operating to idolize a single individual and

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>keep her separate from the whole. And I think that's

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a job that's still happening now. I think that's a

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>conflict we're all still feeling. I got frustrated last year

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>when I wanted to get excited about Caitlin, and if

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I did, I was accused of being quote unquote on

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a side of the larger thing. And then if I

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't cover her, then I was accused of being on

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side and actively working against her. So we're

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so sick of that. And I think it's gotten better

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, but maybe just because she's been injured, so

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been fewer opportunities for people to lose their shit

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>over stuff. That's just basketball. Has writing the book changed

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>your coverage of Caitlin day to day at all?

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all, which has been a delightful part

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 3>of it. And it reflects the mission that we have

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 3>over at the next which is to make sure that

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 3>the type of coverage that Caitlin Clark deserves is the

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 3>type of coverage that we need to see throughout the league.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>And the stars are going to get more coverage than

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the role players, but to make sure that everybody is

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>being covered is something significant.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 2>And this is a critical story.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, to your point that you just made is

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>very amusing to me to be in the middle of

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 3>writing a book about Caitlin Clark and to say, oh wow,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I feel like these people are going too far in

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 3>terms of isolating focus on Caitlin Clark.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a very.

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Strange moment to be in. But you know, again, it

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>comes back to are we treating Caitlin Clark like she

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 3>is the sum total and the only reason for anyone

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 3>to pay attention.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 2>To this league.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>That's insane And we know this is and I know

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>this is someone who's been privileged to cover this lead

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 3>for over a decade, and so it's getting the opportunity

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>to see she is growing an audience. I mean, listen,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about this in the book, but one of

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the most satisfying things for me was at Caitlin Clark's

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>pro debut.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Two point one million.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 3>People also got to see Alssa Thomas put up a

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 3>triple doll, which is for some reason normal for Lysa Thomas,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 3>but for you know, those of us were humans instead

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 3>of immortals. That's a crazy thing to conceive of. And

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>so you know, there are all these ancillary effects, and

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>for positive and for negative as well, right, and and

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 3>so I do I think about someone like a Djna

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Carrington who had to work her way into this regular opportunity,

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 3>somebody who had the privilege of covering dating back to college,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and so what kind of player she was, you know

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 3>in championship teams. She is now at a moment where, yeah,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 3>like you said, simultaneously, she's going to get more opportunity,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 3>She's going to get more financial reward. The league is

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 3>going to right size financially to where it needs to be,

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 3>where it ought to have always been. But yeah, I

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 3>could also see her being very tired of the tenth

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Caitlin Clark question and when it's when it's framed in

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>poor in bad faith, then.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a whole other question.

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>For sure. You know, I actually wrote a coll thesis

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on Michael Jordan and his intersection with cable becoming global

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and global capitalism and how his arrival was as much

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about him being an unbelievable player, being charming, telegenic, all

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the other things, but also that the world was pivoting

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, at the right time for him to explode.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think writing about Caitlin Clark in this moment

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is that conversation. It's not just singling out one person,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's this one person in this moment is having

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this impact. And you mentioned Molly Bolan earlier. There's a

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>great espn. I think it's one of the nine for

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>nine stories about her, and if you don't know about her,

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you would have your mind blown by the statistics and

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the ability. And she was Kaitlyn Clark, but she didn't

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>end up like Caitlin Clark because she didn't arrive in

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the same moment that Caitlyn did. And that's why I

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think the conversations about Caitlin and the moment that we're

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>having in women's sports are so necessary and shouldn't be

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>shy away away from because we're afraid of putting a

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>spotlight in one player. But I wanted to just read

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this quickly. A biography in a program for a tournament

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty three that Molly Bolan played in. Read

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>three year pro a high school All American. Molly averaged

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty four point eight points per game and hit a

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>record high of eighty three points as a senior. Just

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable score. Whatever you think Caitlin Clark is doing,

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>she's not averaging fifty four point eight points per game.

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's a really incredible story around Molly having to

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>try to sell calendars and other things to help promote

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>her ability to play so she could keep playing. The

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>end of her bio says she's working construction and Riverside,

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And that was your point. That's what it meant to

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be Caitlin Clark in nineteen eighty three, is you're working

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>construction in Riverside and then when you go hoop you

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>get fifty plus points. And the difference between what it

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>means to be great now and what it meant to

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>be great then is something to celebrate. And when we

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can strip away all the bullshit around Caitlin. We can't

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>celebrate it, which is I think what you're trying to

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>do with this book. Here's a whole bunch of context

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so that when I tell you about Caitlin you could

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. Did you get to talk to Caitlin much

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>for the book.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And she understands that she is standing on the

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>shoulders of the people who came before her, and she

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 3>knows about stories like Molly's, and she knows.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>About and there's pictures of them together.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And to see that come full circle, I mean that

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 3>moment you talked about. I've had the ability to talk

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 3>to and cover Molly for many years, and we dedicate

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a significant portion of our coverage to the WBL and

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to those stories of that lead, which there is no

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>WNBA without the WBL from nineteen seventy eight through nineteen

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.239
<v Speaker 3>eighty one. And we have a special section over at

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the next about it. And I say all that to

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>say I knew Molly, I knew her story, I.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Know it well.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>And yet I'm in the Iowa Women's Center researching for

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 3>this book. I come across this clip as part of

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the molleyball and papers that are in there, and it

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>just it hits you just to see that that after

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 3>all this she's working as a house painter, what is

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the prime of her basketball career. And so yes, there

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 3>there Again, I think there is a misunderstanding of the

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 3>way in which most people are processing this Caitlin Clark moment.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Within the game of women's basketball, there is an understanding

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of a yes and mentality when it comes to it,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, And so from that perspective, I think it

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 3>was important that people understand, you know, we talk about

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 3>all the time at the next but we want to

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>live within the dray area that it's okay if the

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 3>player you're going to cover goes, doesn't go for forty

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 3>or has an offer or anything like that, that's okay.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 3>We're not telling the story of player axes amazing or

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 3>player axes the worst.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>It's here's what's.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Going on with player X right now, and so making

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 3>sure that we're able to do that again, the broader

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>context time is Caitlin Clark comes of age at a moment,

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the first moment that ESPN broadcasts all of the women's

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 3>NCAA tournament, the entirety that doesn't happen until twenty twenty one.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 3>This comes at a moment where we are seeing understanding

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the gaps between the men's and women's Final four, right

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 3>up to the point that the logo had to be changed.

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 3>It was the final four in the women's Final four,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and the NCAA finally got around to, oh, yeah, we

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 3>can actually call it the men's instead of making it

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 3>obvious in our branding that women's is the other.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Branding, March Madness branding was finally being used by the NCAA.

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>What an owned goal for the NCAA say, we're going

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to not use that branding on our own women's basketball tournament.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So all of which is to say, this is Caitlin's moment.

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Caitlin is the transcendent athlete who has taken advantage of this.

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 3>I spent a lot of time thinking about my time

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 3>covering Brianna Stewart, and if it had been Brianna Stuart

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 3>when this happened, she would have broken through. If it

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 3>had been in twenty ten, it would have been maya more.

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 3>If it had been in twenty oh four, it would

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 3>have been Diana Taraji. And if it had been nineteen

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 3>seventy eight, it would have been Molly Bowling.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask, there's a I don't know if

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>competing is the right word, But there's another Caitlin Clark

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>book from Christine Brennan coming on around the same time.

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Why are the covers basically identical? Can you explain to

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>us is there some sort of like photo rights only

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>using this particular game uniform ball position, because they're almost

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the same covers.

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 2>It's amusing to see, I know the truth that.

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Is amusing the word you first thought of, or have

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you come around defining an amusing?

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 2>It is?

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I like what I think it's funny to

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 3>be honest with you. No, I just I haven't had

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 3>any contact. You know, Christine, someone who I've certainly been

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 3>in contact with in the past, and you know I

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>would anybody and everyone Locke covering women's basketball. There needs

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to be more. I'm not of the belief there needs

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to be one book anymore than we want to have

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>one reporter who is covering at any given time. But no,

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 3>it's as I understand it, it's a coincidence, but I

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 3>haven't been able to speak to that specifically.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're excited for everybody to get to read it.

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>June seventeenth is the date that the book comes out. Howard,

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, not just for coming on, but

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for all you've done for the game and for furthering

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>what we try to do here as well, which is

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>how do we give everyone the stars, stake, stats and

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>stories every single day to keep up with and care

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>about women's sports. And you've been doing that for a

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>long time.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, Sarah, thank you for everything you guys do.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much to Howard for taking the time to chat.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>We got to take another quick break when we come back.

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 1>What the fact that puts the discrepancy between WNBA and

0:36:54.600 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>MNBA salaries in perspective? Welcome back slices. It's time for

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>another What the fact? As folks who've been around the

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>women's sports space for some time now, we've seen all

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sorts of gender pay gaps from soccer to tennis, to

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>golf and more. Women and nonsense, male athletes always seem

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>to get the short end of the stick. This, of course,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>parallels the traditional labor market, where women still earn only

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty four cents for every dollar a man earns. Today,

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the pay gap in pro basketball.

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Claudia Golden, a labor economist, economic historian, and Harvard professor,

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.479
<v Speaker 1>wrote a guest essay in The New York Times last

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>week laying out just how underpaid WNBA players are, and

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>she brought the data and facts. Y'all, let's start with

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those facts. The average MNBA player's salary, approximately

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars in the twenty twenty five season, is

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty times the average WNBA players salary about one hundred

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seven thousand for the twenty twenty four campaign

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty times eight zero. And here's another from Golden quote.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>A key fact is that the NBA and WNBA resemble

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a joint venture in which the league's individual finances are

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not transparent to the public. The NBA owns around half

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the WNBA and helps a portion money between the

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two leagues. Last year, the NBA negotiated joint television contracts

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>for the leagues, in which Disney, NBC and Amazon Prime

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Video agreed to pay the two leagues roughly seventy seven

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for the right to show their games over

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven years. The gap in player salaries appears to reflect

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the highly unequal way that NBA owners divide the league's

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>revenue end quote. So Golden worked with the WNBA Players

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Association over the past year to dive into the relationship

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>between player salaries and the revenue, viewership and attendance numbers

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the MNBA and WNBA, using those numbers to decipher

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>what a reasonable gap between the salaries might be. The

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>most significant factor she looked at in each league's revenue

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is viewership, which is what makes big networks pay big

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bucks to sell ads during games. From Golden's article quote,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the average WNBA game recently drew about seventy seven percent

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of the eyeballs for the average NBA game. The gap

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in total eyeballs per player is much larger because the

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>NBA has more games per season and longer games. Taking

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into account all of these differences shows that the WNBA

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>attracts about thirty percent, or roughly one third as many

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs per player as the NBA does. This ratio is

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable estimate of the actual relationship between WNBA and

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>NBA broadcast revenue per player, and by extension, what WNBA

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>players should receive in salary relative to NBA players end quote.

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Another important factor in the dollars and cents is attendance.

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So here's what Golden had to say about how butts

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in seats should affect money in pockets. Quote. In twenty

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, for example, the WNBA's total attendance was about

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one tenth as large as the NBA's attendance. Adjusting for

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the fewer teams in the WNBA shows that it attracts

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>about one quarter of the attendants per player in the NBA.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>All these numbers suggest that the average WNBA salary should

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be roughly one quarter to one third of the average

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>NBA salary to achieve pay equity end quote. We've all

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>known that WNBA players were not making enough of a

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>percentage of revenue when compared to their MNBA counterparts, but

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Golden has laid it out with facts and data. It

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>should be one quarter to one third, not one eightieth

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what the guys are making.

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Link to Golden's essay at our show notes so you

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>can read it for yourself. Her concluding paragraph really hammers

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the point home she wrote. Quote, the world of women's

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>professional basketball is ripe for an economic update that better

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 1>reflects its influence and irresistibility, but it has not happened.

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet the people who run the NBA and WNBA are

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>instead badly underpaying the women who enter tain and thrill

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>us with their feats of athleticism. End quote. Yet again, y'all,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm screaming, what the fact? This what the fact? Brought

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to you by Elf Beauty. And here's another fact. When

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a company reflects the community it serves, it makes elf

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in sense, especially when it starts in the highest seats

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of decision making. ELF Beauty, who has delivered twenty five

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>consecutive quarters of net sales growth and market share gains,

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of only five publicly traded companies in the

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>US with a board of directors that is sixty seven

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>percent women and forty four percent diverse. It is the

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>only cosmetics brand to grow market share every single quarter

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for the past twenty five quarters. Elf is for every eye,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lip and face, and when you are for the every

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone wins. Learn more about what Elf Beauty is doing

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to help diverse by corporate boards visit changethboardgame dot com.

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>We always love that your listing slices, but we want

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you to get in the game every day too, So

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>here's our good game play of the day pre order

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Howard's book, we'll link to a site where you can

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>snag your copy. In our show notes and we always

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you, so hit us up on

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>email good game at wondermedianetwork dot com or leave us

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail at eight seven two two o four fifty

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy and don't forget to subscribe, Rate and review. It's easy.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Watch the ultra runner who stopped to breastfeed three times

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and still one, rating ten out of ten. What Can't

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Women Do? Review? At the recent Ultratrail Snowdonia one hundred

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>kilometer race in northern Wales, forty two year old runner

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and new mom Stephanie Case paused at three different times

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 1>during the race to breastfeed her six month old daughter,

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and not only still finished, she placed first among female competitors.

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>That's sixty two plus miles of running six months after

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>baby and balancing both roles at once with grace. Case

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>told NPR of the photos of her mid race that

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>went viral, they show quote an athlete being a mom

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, and those things not actually competing

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>with one another. We don't have to lose ourselves in

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>becoming a mom, and we can keep setting big goals

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves end quote. The course has thirteen hundred and

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five feet of elevation gain, with runners traversing the

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tallest mountain in Wales and traveling rough and tough terrain.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Case stopped at checkpoints at twenty fifty and eighty kilometers

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to nurse her daughter, Pepper, and then jump right back

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:20.760
<v Speaker 1>into the race and the story somehow gets better. Case

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>ran while on parental leave from her job working for

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations as a human rights lawyer per NPR quote.

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Running long distances helps Case cope with the stress of

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>working in a humanitarian crisis end quote. Case's experiences inspired

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>her to found Free to Run, a nonprofit that empowers

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>girls and young women in conflict areas through running and

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 1>other outdoor activities. So if you want to show love

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to a woman holding it down for moms, for women

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 1>over forty and human rights advocates, go check it out

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>free toorun dot org and you can read the whole

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>NPR article. We'll link to it in our show notes.

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Now it's your turn, rate and review, y'all. Thanks for listening.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>See you next week. Good game, Howard, good game, Stephanie Case.

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>You tech Nik from writing for hours and hours and

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hours on Deadline. I'm telling y'all write a book for yourself.

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You'll see. Good Game with Sarah Spain is an iHeart

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>women's sports production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You could find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Production by Wonder Media Network,

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our producers are Alex Azzie and Misha Jones. Our executive

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>producers are Christina Everett, Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan, and Emily Rudder.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Our editors are Emily Rudder, Brittany Martinez, Grace Lynch, and

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Gianna Palmer. Our associate producer is Lucy Jones and I'm

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your host Sarah Spain