Speaker 1: That we'll come in to your site going the way
Speaker 1: I get tales and saying you a conscious sound.
Speaker 2: Will be fire high Alan, and if you want a
Speaker 2: little banging your yin.
Speaker 3: You ain't come along.
Speaker 4: Okay, I know how it is to be spoken, but like,
Speaker 4: oh well, the Democrats need to just really the house
Speaker 4: is literally on fire and y'all still looking for the keys.
Speaker 5: The damage that the twenty twenty four campaign has done,
Speaker 5: the damage that this decade has done through Democratic brand
Speaker 5: is almost unfathomable.
Speaker 2: Well here's an alternative thought.
Speaker 4: Make your own dinner, mega, make your own sandwiches, wipe
Speaker 4: your own tears, troll amongst yourself with Elon, and leave
Speaker 4: us alone.
Speaker 2: Fradom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution that we're.
Speaker 6: Coming to your site going the way.
Speaker 2: I get talas and saying you a conscious sound. New
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity Show More I'm the Scene is information on
Speaker 2: freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America. Stay
Speaker 2: right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2: All right, News roundup and Information Overload hour. Here's our
Speaker 2: toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred and nine point
Speaker 2: one Sean. If you want to be a part of
Speaker 2: the program. So we had we had oral arguments yesterday
Speaker 2: in the United States Supreme Court. And it's a high
Speaker 2: profile case involving the right of transgender miners to receive
Speaker 2: gender transition care such as puberty blockers hormone therapy. One
Speaker 2: of the most closely watched, potentially impactful cases to come
Speaker 2: before the High Court this year. Anyway, this case centers
Speaker 2: on a Tennessee law that bans gender transition treatment for
Speaker 2: adolescents in the states by in the state, and by
Speaker 2: the way, that's the case in about twenty states, Unlike
Speaker 2: say Minnesota, California, they allowed gender affirming care with our
Speaker 2: parental consent. Separate issue, but it's related the petitioners in
Speaker 2: the case of the ACLU, which is now suit to
Speaker 2: overturn the Tennessee law on behalf of parents of three
Speaker 2: transgender adolescens. This case was argued by the first transgender
Speaker 2: attorney appearing before the US Supreme Court. The questioning was
Speaker 2: fascinating at times. Here's sam Alito citing multiple sources showing
Speaker 2: the risks of gender affirming care outweighing the benefits, which
Speaker 2: totally negated and contradicted the arguments that were being made
Speaker 2: against the law and what's fascinating about it. At the end,
Speaker 2: Alito actually said, would you like to retract your previous
Speaker 2: statement and your brief and change it, because what you're
Speaker 2: saying is total bs. Basically, Listen, in your petition.
Speaker 5: You made a sweeping statement which I will quote, overwhelming
Speaker 5: evidence establishes that the appropriate gender affirming treatment with puberty
Speaker 5: blockers and hormones directly and substantially improves the physical psychological
Speaker 5: well being of transgender adolescens with gender dysphoria. That was
Speaker 5: in November twenty twenty three. Now, even before then, the
Speaker 5: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare wrote the phone
Speaker 5: they currently assess quote that the risks of puberty blockers
Speaker 5: and gender affirming treatment are likely to outweigh the expected
Speaker 5: benefits of these treatments, which is directly contrary to the
Speaker 5: sweeping statement in your petition. After the filing of your petition,
Speaker 5: of course, we saw the release of the CAST report
Speaker 5: in the United Kingdom which found a complete lack of
Speaker 5: high quality evidence showing that the benefits of the treatments
Speaker 5: in question here outweigh the risks. And so I wonder
Speaker 5: if you would like to stand by the statement that
Speaker 5: you made in your petition, or if you think it
Speaker 5: would now be appropriate to modify that and withdraw the
Speaker 5: statement that there is overwhelming evidence establishing that these treatments
Speaker 5: have benefits that greatly outweigh the risks and the dangers.
Speaker 2: Then you have, which I think was a pretty fascinating moment,
Speaker 2: just as Sodomyo r saying well, every medical treatment has risk.
Speaker 2: Even taking an ask.
Speaker 7: For it cannot eliminate the risk of detransitioners. So it
Speaker 7: becomes a pure exercise of weighing benefits versus risk, and
Speaker 7: the question of how many miners have to have their
Speaker 7: bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits is one that is
Speaker 7: best left.
Speaker 8: I'm sorry, counselor. Every medical treatment has a risk, even
Speaker 8: taking asprom. There's always going to be a percentage of
Speaker 8: the population under any medical treatment that's going to suffer
Speaker 8: a harm. So the question in my mind is not
Speaker 8: do policymakers decide whether one person's life is more valuable
Speaker 8: than the millions of others who get relief from this treatment.
Speaker 8: The question is can you stop one sex from the other?
Speaker 2: No, that's not the question that is before the court.
Speaker 2: But that's a separate issue, separate and apart. Then you
Speaker 2: have Justice Katanji Brown Jackson comparing the ban on sex
Speaker 2: changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage. Listen to this.
Speaker 4: That was sort of like the starting point. The question
Speaker 4: was whether it was discriminatory because it applied to both
Speaker 4: races and it wasn't necessarily or whatever. But you know,
Speaker 4: as I read the statute here, excuse me, the case here.
Speaker 2: You know, the court starts off.
Speaker 4: By saying that Virginia is now one of sixteen states
Speaker 4: which prohibit and punished marriages on the basis of racial classifications.
Speaker 2: And when you look at the structure of that law,
Speaker 2: it looks.
Speaker 4: In terms of incontinuing you can't do something that is
Speaker 4: inconsistent with your own characteristics.
Speaker 2: It's sort of the same thing.
Speaker 4: So it's interesting to me that we now have this
Speaker 4: different argument, and I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten
Speaker 4: away with what they did here by just making a
Speaker 4: classification argument.
Speaker 2: The way that Tennessee is in this case unbelievable. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's almost like a surreal court at this time. Anyway,
Speaker 2: in the courtroom yesterday watching oral arguments, Roger Severino, a
Speaker 2: vice president domestic policy at the Heritage Foundation, and Donald
Speaker 2: Trump's former Director of the Office of Civil Rights and
Speaker 2: Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Alan Wilson,
Speaker 2: both here to discuss. Roger will start with you. What
Speaker 2: was your take in the court room?
Speaker 3: Well, it was electric seeing that the ACLU and pre
Speaker 3: leguar were called to the carpet by Justice Alito, by
Speaker 3: Justice Thomas really exposed them as the Emperor without any clothes.
Speaker 3: As you pointed out, the evidence is not overwhelming that
Speaker 3: this helps children, and in fact, I think the most
Speaker 3: telling question was when Alito said, is there evidence that
Speaker 3: this actually reduces suicides in genderice for youth and strange
Speaker 3: from ACLU said no, there is not evidence that supports this.
Speaker 3: So the number one argument that the LGBT left has
Speaker 3: been making that either you have a live girl or
Speaker 3: a dead boy, that sort of emotional black male they've
Speaker 3: put on children and doctors pushing in and you have
Speaker 3: to do this because lives are online was false. This
Speaker 3: does not actually help that at all. There is no
Speaker 3: evidence Britain has backed off of it, and that's a
Speaker 3: key point. Can a state act to protect vulnerable children?
Speaker 3: Vulnerable children from a lifetime of being patients a lifetime
Speaker 3: of harm and sterilevation, because once you get on this treadmill,
Speaker 3: it's aatrogenic it keeps you on it. When if you
Speaker 3: just flip puberty tickets course overwhelming you, over ninety percent
Speaker 3: of kids grow out of it. You used to be
Speaker 3: a thing called tomboys. Right now people say, oh, no,
Speaker 3: you're not a tomboy, You're actually a boy, and that
Speaker 3: ideology has hurt kid and damaged them for life.
Speaker 2: What is your take, Attorney General Alan Wilson, Well, what I.
Speaker 9: Was seeing Justice Soda my Ore and Justice Jackson engaging
Speaker 9: is what we call the the It's a fallacy, a
Speaker 9: straw man fallacy, where you take a legitimate argument, you
Speaker 9: replace it with a bad argument, a straw man, and
Speaker 9: then you attack the bad argument. Justice Jackson used interracial
Speaker 9: marriage and tried to apply or analogize that to this
Speaker 9: case of transitioning minors through basically genital mutilation or chemical castration.
Speaker 9: And then so to my Ore used the idea of
Speaker 9: taking aspirin with that genital mutilation or chemical castration, and
Speaker 9: they were applying false for all men fallacies to attack that,
Speaker 9: and I thought that was absolutely horrific. Here's the thing.
Speaker 9: Sean in South Carolina has a law just like Tennessee,
Speaker 9: which is why I was there. But states have a
Speaker 9: general police power to regulate and place reasonable restrictions on miners.
Speaker 9: We place restrictions on miners on whether they can sit
Speaker 9: in the front seat of a car, whether they can
Speaker 9: buy tobacco, whether or not they can buy alcohol, whether
Speaker 9: or not they can even consent to having sex. And
Speaker 9: we put these reasonable restrictions on miners to protect them.
Speaker 9: The other side is making the argument that having your
Speaker 9: genitals mutilated or being chemically castrated to gender therapy is
Speaker 9: not as bad as telling a de minor they can't
Speaker 9: smoke a cigarette. I mean, states have a right to
Speaker 9: protect the health and welfare of miners, and they're trying
Speaker 9: to punch holes in that through these ridiculous arguments. And
Speaker 9: again I'll remind you so to my ore was the
Speaker 9: same person who used the argument in the presidential immunity
Speaker 9: case that Donald Trump could use Seal Team six to
Speaker 9: assassinate his political opponents. What a ridiculous thing to say.
Speaker 2: I got the impression Roger Severino that Justice Kavanaugh and
Speaker 2: and other justices that they were sort of leaning on federalism,
Speaker 2: and we're feeling and seemingly telegraphing that they believe it
Speaker 2: should go back to the states. Did you get that impression.
Speaker 3: Yeah, in this sense, they didn't want to constitutionalize the question.
Speaker 3: They want to say an I think Chief Justice Robbers
Speaker 3: as well. They said, you know what there is, this
Speaker 3: is a medical issue. We're just a bunch of lawyers
Speaker 3: that happened to be judges, and you want us to
Speaker 3: put in the position to say that that we're going
Speaker 3: to decide over the state of Tennessee and other states
Speaker 3: that we're going to constantly.
Speaker 2: By the way, that was really highlighted by Soda mayors,
Speaker 2: you know, making the statement about comparing this to aspirin.
Speaker 3: Oh, of course, and states, Look, testosterone, that's one of
Speaker 3: the drugs that are issue here. You can't just walk
Speaker 3: into a GDS and say, hey, I want some testosterone
Speaker 3: or I want to do it because I want to
Speaker 3: bulk up. You can't. It's a Schedule three substance. Yet
Speaker 3: they're acting as if it's something that is like aspirin,
Speaker 3: which is nonsense. And one thing that Biden's lawyer said
Speaker 3: that really really annoyed me. She acted as if human
Speaker 3: beings are like Plato that all it is is you
Speaker 3: add testosterone to this human being and you get male characteristics.
Speaker 3: You add enters into this human being, you get female curse. No,
Speaker 3: you're born male or female, And it really matters what
Speaker 3: that baseline is. And it's critically important for the health
Speaker 3: of these kids that the state is able to take
Speaker 3: that into account. You don't block puberty if you don't
Speaker 3: have an actual illness of precocious puberty. Right, there are
Speaker 3: medical reasons to use these drugs, and they're non medical reasons,
Speaker 3: and the state is the one that's able to say
Speaker 3: the risks are too great, and especially here, we know
Speaker 3: the risks are overwhelming as opposed to sit lating major tickets.
Speaker 2: Course, way do you think. I know it's hard to
Speaker 2: glean listening to oral arguments which way the court is
Speaker 2: going to go here, but I kind of got the
Speaker 2: strong impression you're in the courtroom. You may have a
Speaker 2: better perspective than me. Alan Wilson, State Attorney General for
Speaker 2: South Carolina, but I got the impression that they're not
Speaker 2: going to be successful in this effort, and the states
Speaker 2: will be able to make whatever laws they want. But
Speaker 2: then there's a whole other level of constitutionality here, and
Speaker 2: that is parental rights. Of my view, because states like
Speaker 2: California and Minnesota allowed genda affirming care for minors without
Speaker 2: parental consent, that to me is completely unacceptable because that's
Speaker 2: the elimination and removal of all parental rights.
Speaker 9: Sean, I got the distinct impression that the Court, at
Speaker 9: least the majority conservative members of the Court, did not
Speaker 9: want to go down this rabbit hole. This is a
Speaker 9: very slippery slope. Obviously, one of the questions was raised,
Speaker 9: I want to say it was Justice Alito or Kavanaugh,
Speaker 9: how this would affect men and women's sports, and they're
Speaker 9: trying to not have these two things kind of be
Speaker 9: conflated with each other. So I got a distinct impression
Speaker 9: based on the questions of at least five of the
Speaker 9: six conservative members of the Court. Justice Gorgious didn't ask
Speaker 9: any questions that I heard, but from the questions that
Speaker 9: I heard asked by the conservative members, they seem very
Speaker 9: skeptical and cynical about opening Pandora's box. There's a reason
Speaker 9: you have twenty five states passing these restrictions, in the
Speaker 9: other states are not or going the opposite direction. There's
Speaker 9: a reason why the UK, Chile, Norway, Sweden, Finland, all
Speaker 9: these countries around the world are backing up from this
Speaker 9: because the science is so unsound. And I don't think
Speaker 9: or at least there's so much conflict and there's so
Speaker 9: many different varying points. I don't think the Court wants
Speaker 9: to put itself in the place of being the arbiter
Speaker 9: of what is good and bad science. And I think
Speaker 9: they're going to lead that to the states. So I
Speaker 9: don't think that they're going to rule for the government.
Speaker 9: I think they're going to rule with the State of
Speaker 9: Tennessee and all the other twenty five states like ours
Speaker 9: who passed similar laws.
Speaker 2: All right, quick break, right back. We'll continue more with
Speaker 2: Roger Severino, more with the Attorney General of South Carolina,
Speaker 2: Alan Wilson, and then your calls coming up. Eight hundred
Speaker 2: and nine to FOURT one Sean as we continue. We
Speaker 2: are in Long Island for the sixth annual Fox Nation
Speaker 2: Patriot Awards. Donald J. Trump in the House tonight. It's
Speaker 2: going to be a blast. I hope you'll watch on
Speaker 2: Fox Nation. All right, we continue now. We're discussing Supreme
Speaker 2: Court oral arguments from yesterday. With Roger Brino and Attorney
Speaker 2: General for South Carolina Alan Wilson. What do we do
Speaker 2: with states like California. I know it wasn't an issue
Speaker 2: or part of this particular case being argued before the court,
Speaker 2: Roger Severino, but what do we do about California? What
Speaker 2: do we do about Minnesota? What do we do about
Speaker 2: I guess elected officials that think they know better than
Speaker 2: parents and they want to be able to offer such
Speaker 2: care to minors without parental consent. To me, that's unconscionable
Speaker 2: because in many cases these treatments are irreversible and it's
Speaker 2: a lifelong decision, and somehow they think they know better
Speaker 2: them than parents. And I'm sorry, but I think parents
Speaker 2: ought to have a say in their children's healthcare. I mean,
Speaker 2: for crying out.
Speaker 3: Loud, yeah, you're absolutely right. And California is trying to
Speaker 3: get in between the parents and their kids by becoming
Speaker 3: a so called gender sanctuary state where if you have
Speaker 3: any inkling that you want to get this sort of treatment,
Speaker 3: and I hesitate. I don't think people call it gender
Speaker 3: affirming because if a father wants to say to a son, hey,
Speaker 3: I want to support you in being a boy, you
Speaker 3: know that's gender affirming, right, And what they're saying is
Speaker 3: to take a kid away from the parents, behind their
Speaker 3: backs in the schools and say to a boy, yeah,
Speaker 3: we think you're a girl, and we're going to treat
Speaker 3: you like a girl without telling your parents. We're going
Speaker 3: to give a new name, new pronoun and not tell
Speaker 3: your parents. And by the way, in Sayta California, there
Speaker 3: are cases where parents have lost custody because they have
Speaker 3: not gone along with state gender ideology. Talk about the
Speaker 3: interference with parental rights. Now, this was lurking in the
Speaker 3: background of the case. It wasn't raised and it won't
Speaker 3: be decided, but that's going to be the next issue.
Speaker 3: Canna state in like California.
Speaker 2: Oh, that's definitely going to be an issue and parents
Speaker 2: will will that eventually will appear before the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: There's no doubt about it anyway. Roger Savarino, thank you,
Speaker 2: Attorney General South Carolina, Allen Wilson, thank you. Eight hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four to one, Shawn on number. If you
Speaker 2: want to be a part of the program, this is
Speaker 2: what's right with America. You're listening to the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2: Hi twenty five to the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 2: hundred and nine to four one Sean, you want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program. Uh, don't forget. Tonight
Speaker 2: eight o'clock it starts the sixth annual Fox Nation Patriot Awards.
Speaker 2: I have the honor. I'm gonna be the MC this year.
Speaker 2: The recipient of the Patriot of the Year will be here.
Speaker 2: We are in New York, my triumphant return to Long Island,
Speaker 2: And yeah, obviously it's sold out, but it's gonna be
Speaker 2: a fun night. I hope you can watch Foxnation dot
Speaker 2: com and it's gonna be It's just gonna be a
Speaker 2: great night. We basically, we honor people that never get
Speaker 2: any credit. We honor unsung heroes. We honor the people
Speaker 2: that really make the country great and do great things
Speaker 2: that nobody ever hears about. And it's so different from
Speaker 2: the Academy Awards, the Grammys, the Tony's, the Cmas, this
Speaker 2: and that awards. Only I ask is that nobody in
Speaker 2: the audience, if I crack a joke, is gonna come
Speaker 2: up on stage and slap try and slap me in
Speaker 2: the face. Good luck to them if they do, since
Speaker 2: a will be nearby. Not that I need him. He's
Speaker 2: trained me well. But it's going to be a fun night,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump Patriot of the Year. It's going to be
Speaker 2: a very emotional night in many ways, and I think
Speaker 2: it will inspire you. And I'm very honored to be
Speaker 2: a part of it. I only wish it was in Florida,
Speaker 2: not New York. It's my only complaint. It's a little
Speaker 2: baby complaint. It's not a big complaint anyway. You know
Speaker 2: the feeling when you're about to cut into that delicious,
Speaker 2: juicy steak. It took all the time to prepare. You're
Speaker 2: hoping it tastes as perfect as it looks on the outside.
Speaker 2: You cut into it, well, you don't have to worry anymore. Ever, Well,
Speaker 2: what do you mean, Hennady, I'm going to give you
Speaker 2: the answer. Chef iq Sense. It makes it possible you
Speaker 2: will be a master chef. It'll be perfect every single time. Now,
Speaker 2: how is that possible? It is a modern, completely wireless
Speaker 2: cooking dermometer that eliminates undercooking overcooking of your food no
Speaker 2: matter how you cook it.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 2: Chef iq Sense designed to withstand extreme heat. It can
Speaker 2: even survive in your deep prior whether you're grilling or
Speaker 2: roasting or baking chef iq Sense. It guarantees that your
Speaker 2: chick and your pork, your meat, your fish is going
Speaker 2: to come out exactly to your preferred income. And using
Speaker 2: chef iq Sense, it's simple. You insert the wireless probe
Speaker 2: into your food, You choose your desired done this on
Speaker 2: the chef iq app, and it's going to tell you
Speaker 2: it's ready. It's perfect every time. You'll get it perfect
Speaker 2: every time. If you're looking for a great gift for
Speaker 2: a loved one or yourself this holiday season, anyway, go
Speaker 2: to their website chefiq dot com, or just go stop
Speaker 2: by your local Costco. You can pick one up there
Speaker 2: and join the hundreds of thousands of us. Frankly, the
Speaker 2: cook perfect meals every time. You can burn your food,
Speaker 2: you can undercook your food, you can have to put
Speaker 2: your food back in the fire. No perfect every time.
Speaker 2: Chefiq dot com very disturbing and it's almost mind thembing
Speaker 2: how hateful people can be. So you have the former.
Speaker 2: This was on media Eite, the liberal website, and it
Speaker 2: says we want these executives dead. What do you mean
Speaker 2: you want these executives dead? How do you say such
Speaker 2: a thing? Now? This was said by Taylor Lorenz melting
Speaker 2: down in an extended celebration of what happened to United
Speaker 2: Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson. He was gunned down in the
Speaker 2: middle of New York City. This happened yesterday morning. The
Speaker 2: NYPD Commissioner, Jessica Tish said the shooting was not a
Speaker 2: random act of violence, but had all the hallmarks of
Speaker 2: an assassination. I want to be clear at this time,
Speaker 2: every indication is that it was premeditated, pre planned, and
Speaker 2: a targeted attack. Anyway, we want these executives dead. This
Speaker 2: is a former Washington Post New York Times so called journalists.
Speaker 2: You know, she did everything here but basically throw a
Speaker 2: party after this guy was assassinated. You know, this executive,
Speaker 2: the CEO leaves behind two sons, a wife, she was
Speaker 2: shattered by her husband's murder, and Taylor Lorenz sees this
Speaker 2: as a cause of celebration and apparently did it online.
Speaker 2: In her first post referencing Thompson's deaths, she shared a
Speaker 2: post about how Blue Cross Blue Shield, one of United
Speaker 2: Healthcare's competitors, will no longer pay for anesthesia for full
Speaker 2: length for some surgeries, and some people wonder why we
Speaker 2: want these executives deb Wow, pretty sick stuff. And you know,
Speaker 2: legislative idea somebody writes and she says she endorses it.
Speaker 2: Healthcare executives and their families must be on the cheapest
Speaker 2: plan their company offers, and they aren't allowed to seek
Speaker 2: other care. Okay, here we go nationalize healthcare. Now listen
Speaker 2: to this. And this is not the only case. This
Speaker 2: is what's frustrating about this. There are many other people
Speaker 2: all over social media. And here's one lunatic I don't
Speaker 2: know who it is, you know, calls, you know, celebrates
Speaker 2: the killing of this CEO, calls for more insurance CEOs
Speaker 2: to be killed. And by the way, meanwhile, the FBI
Speaker 2: is going after you know, moms that that go to
Speaker 2: school board meetings and peacefully protesting pro life people, you know,
Speaker 2: looking at them as possible domestic terrorists. Listen.
Speaker 1: So, the the CEO of the multi billion dollar United
Speaker 1: Healthcare insurance company was shot and killed this morning in
Speaker 1: New York City. And I will say that it is
Speaker 1: it is pretty tragic that the shooter was only able
Speaker 1: to get one of them.
Speaker 2: But it's a good start.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's a good, good foundation, good we
Speaker 1: can only only move up from here. And before any
Speaker 1: of you come at me with oh my god, I
Speaker 1: can't believe you'd say that, go.
Speaker 2: Fund yourself, Seriously, go fund yourselves. How many husbands do
Speaker 2: you think have had.
Speaker 6: To bury their wives because wise cancer treatment was denied?
Speaker 6: How many parents do you think have had to bury
Speaker 6: their children because whatever healthcare treatment the child needed was denied,
Speaker 6: or they had to jump through hoop after hoop after
Speaker 6: hoop after hoop until finally the treatment the sickness had
Speaker 6: progressed so far the treatment just wasn't an option anymore.
Speaker 6: So yeah, I would say that this is probably a
Speaker 6: good start, a.
Speaker 2: Good start assassinating the CEO of a major healthcare company.
Speaker 2: I'm telling you, as Bob Grant used to used to say, Hey,
Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen, it's sick, it is getting sicker. Well
Speaker 2: this is, you know, pretty sick, Adam Schiff, I'll tell
Speaker 2: you that, really sick and dark and evil. And if
Speaker 2: you don't like their policies, well just go to your
Speaker 2: Obamacare exchange. How how much you want to bet a
Speaker 2: lot of these critics, and I'm not I'm just guessing
Speaker 2: here were big supporters of Obamacare keep you doctor, keep
Speaker 2: your plan. Average family saved twenty five hundred dollars a year. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: millions of Americans lost their doctors, millions lost their plans.
Speaker 2: Almost forty five percent of the country has one Obamacare
Speaker 2: exchange option. And oh one little other detail, the average
Speaker 2: premium has gone up anywhere between two and three hundred
Speaker 2: percent per American. So much for saving money. Anyway, to
Speaker 2: our busy telephones, we go. Let's say hi to Mary
Speaker 2: is in Wisconsin. Mary High, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 2: Thanks for being well. Let's welcome to the sixth annual
Speaker 2: Fox Nation Patriot Awards. We are in Long Island, We're
Speaker 2: in New York. It is my triumphant return.
Speaker 10: I just want to talk about the prefrontal cortex. That
Speaker 10: part of the brain that is behind the forehead does
Speaker 10: not mature until the late twenties for boys and girls,
Speaker 10: and that part of the brain is responsible for decision making.
Speaker 10: Prior to that maturity of that part of the brain,
Speaker 10: the only thing that matters to that child is societal
Speaker 10: acceptance and pure relationships. So that is why people can
Speaker 10: talk them into taking things to change their sex that
Speaker 10: they think they can do.
Speaker 3: That.
Speaker 2: By the way, you're you're raising a great point. Men's
Speaker 2: brains do not fully form. Well, some people women may
Speaker 2: argue never, I'm just saying, but they don't fully form
Speaker 2: till they're about twenty five or twenty six years old.
Speaker 2: Now that's if you follow the science. But putting that
Speaker 2: part aside, we're talking about miners here, and then you
Speaker 2: got the added burden of government thinking they know best,
Speaker 2: and government thinking that they should make the decision, and
Speaker 2: frankly just push parents off to the side that bothers me.
Speaker 10: And if every parent would know that you should not
Speaker 10: tell your child that this is okay to take this
Speaker 10: drug to prevent you from everyha having a baby someday
Speaker 10: until you're twenty seven.
Speaker 2: Well, but let me play devil's advocate. They're going to say, yeah,
Speaker 2: but what if the parents don't want the child to
Speaker 2: make a life altering decision and that they should wait
Speaker 2: to adulthood to make sure that they're really serious about it. No,
Speaker 2: I want what I want when I want it now.
Speaker 2: And there's the state saying, sure, you want to eat.
Speaker 2: You want to eat McDonald's for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and
Speaker 2: snack in between on pizza and hot dogs. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's pretty much what the state is saying here, I think,
Speaker 2: and that's the state of California, the state of Minnesota, right.
Speaker 10: And even Wisconsin. And I tried calling a clinic to
Speaker 10: inquire about what they're doing, and they said, do you
Speaker 10: have a child here? And I said no, and they said, well,
Speaker 10: we can't talk to you. But I think you know,
Speaker 10: it all started with Obamacare when you were talking about it.
Speaker 10: Then up until you're twenty six years old, you could
Speaker 10: pay for your child to have healthcare, but you couldn't
Speaker 10: know what are getting health care from.
Speaker 2: You know what this is? This is nuts. This, all
Speaker 2: of this ends January twentieth. Donald Trump's not going to
Speaker 2: put up with this. And you know what, when it
Speaker 2: comes to schools and DEI and the workplace and education,
Speaker 2: how about we return to very simple fundamentental basic things
Speaker 2: at school, reading, writing, math, science, history, and maybe how
Speaker 2: about the Golden rule and you can replace every HR department.
Speaker 2: You know, love God with all your heart, mind, body,
Speaker 2: and soul. I guess you can't mention God in the
Speaker 2: workplace either, although if you're Chick fil A you can,
Speaker 2: and you can dictate whatever policy you want, and you
Speaker 2: should be in a free society. But and then you know,
Speaker 2: treat your neighbors the way you want to be treated,
Speaker 2: treat others the way you want to be treated, and
Speaker 2: treat people with respect. There you go. I can sum
Speaker 2: it up in one page, and then you can get
Speaker 2: rid of hr departments all around the country.
Speaker 10: Hella ojah. And you know every child, every child should
Speaker 10: know the time commandment because some of them I never learned.
Speaker 10: They don't learn that at home. Shall not know, thou
Speaker 10: shall not lie, which for.
Speaker 2: The nineteen sixty they were back to back Supreme Court
Speaker 2: decisions about prayer in school. They used to have prayer
Speaker 2: in school, Bible reading in school. We never became a theocracy,
Speaker 2: as liberals now argue. Anyway, I got a role. Thank you, Mary,
Speaker 2: appreciate the call. Let us go to Anne in East
Speaker 2: Tennessee next on the Sean Hennity Show. Ann, how are
Speaker 2: you glad you called? I think your area got really
Speaker 2: hit hard by Curri Kane Helene also like North Carolina.
Speaker 11: You know we did. And I really appreciate you taking
Speaker 11: my call today. I wanted to let you know, and
Speaker 11: we're so thankful. You had mentioned people helping people, and
Speaker 11: you know the true test of this is something like
Speaker 11: a disaster like Helene. I personally was in a tent
Speaker 11: until a few days ago. I have a home. It's nothing,
Speaker 11: no mansion, but it's a comfortable, small home which I
Speaker 11: still can't access because my driveway has a landslide of
Speaker 11: about a quarter mile in it. So I've been displaced,
Speaker 11: and so many people down here are very very forgotten.
Speaker 10: You know.
Speaker 11: We're right outside of Boone, North Carolina. Cove Creek in
Speaker 11: the Boone area, by the.
Speaker 2: Way, is where the grand family is from.
Speaker 11: Yes, it is, And I'll tell you I have to be.
Speaker 11: I have to tell you that I would not be
Speaker 11: with a roof over my head if it weren't for
Speaker 11: Samaritan's Purse. The Rubicon Guys, Grindstone Ministries, a couple of
Speaker 11: folks like that who came out literally went door to door.
Speaker 11: We're still living in an area just over the Tennessee
Speaker 11: state line, in a little area called Trade, population four hundred.
Speaker 11: And that's the only main road that goes between Stay
Speaker 11: Booned in eighty one any of the big major highways.
Speaker 11: And it's a gorge with a cute little creek in
Speaker 11: it that basically erased homes and the roadway. It's due
Speaker 11: to be opened at the first of the year. But
Speaker 11: we're really forgotten here. The news has not covered this
Speaker 11: part of the country, Ashville certainly, and just as bad
Speaker 11: as shape that there are some enclaves here that without
Speaker 11: the help of people helping each other in the communities,
Speaker 11: in these groups, they literally have come out and you know,
Speaker 11: over two days give us a place to live, just
Speaker 11: one hand at a time, moving literally tons of rocks
Speaker 11: and sand and silt so that we could actually have
Speaker 11: a place to sleep. I'm so grateful for that. But
Speaker 11: I just want the world to know that we are
Speaker 11: all still here. We're in a lot of different places
Speaker 11: down here in the South, and we are grateful for
Speaker 11: you know, some of the donations that have come in.
Speaker 11: By the way, FEMA showed up I think a week
Speaker 11: and a half ago, which is so fabulous of them.
Speaker 2: Did you get your rejection letter yet, because that's next
Speaker 2: you know, I'm.
Speaker 11: Not going to go. I just don't think it's something
Speaker 11: I want to get involved. I don't know all the
Speaker 11: rumors swirling around.
Speaker 2: But well, I don't think if you need assistance the government,
Speaker 2: if the government doesn't protect us. This is why law
Speaker 2: and order matters. If we don't have a strong military
Speaker 2: that protects us from our adversaries, if government isn't there
Speaker 2: for Americans during natural disasters, but yet they're given, you know,
Speaker 2: hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine and to Africa,
Speaker 2: and you know, to every country around the face of
Speaker 2: the earth, and we're not taking care of Americans first.
Speaker 2: That's why I like Congressman Stuby's bill, which says, now,
Speaker 2: if there's a natural disaster, we're gonna stop foreign aid
Speaker 2: and take care of Americans first. And in the meantime,
Speaker 2: I urge you, I have to run because of the
Speaker 2: constraints of time. I apologize. But Samaritanspurse dot Org Operation Helo.
Speaker 2: We have a link on Hannity dot com Neighbor Helping Neighbor.
Speaker 2: These groups need help so that they can help our
Speaker 2: neighbor in need because Joe and Kamala pretty much abandoned them.
Speaker 2: It's unbelievable. Eight nine four one sewn. As we continue, right,
Speaker 2: that's going to wrap things up for today. As we
Speaker 2: now head into the Fox Nation the sixth annual Fox
Speaker 2: Nation Patriot Awards, Donald Trump Patriot of the Year. We
Speaker 2: honor unsung heroes that do amazing work, inspiring work every
Speaker 2: single day. Hope you'll tune in. It's on Foxnation dot com.
Speaker 2: All begins at eight pm Eastern time. Hope you'll join
Speaker 2: us tonight. We'll see on Fox Nation and watch Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: This should be great. It's always going to be great.
Speaker 2: Let's make America great again. See you tonight. Back here
Speaker 2: tomorrow