WEBVTT - The Return of Inflation Pushing Up Yields in 2021: Bianco

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, last week we had

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the ten year yield range from seventy six basis points

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to seven basis points. Now, eleven

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points may not be a massive move in so

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>called normal times, but it is these days. So let's

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bring in Jim Bianco of Bianco Research to tell us

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what kind of volatility we're seeing and what's it get you. Jim, Hey,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me um the fine markets volatility normally

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a big deal, but given you know, eleven

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>basis points in a week is not the craziest thing

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have seen. But given the environment we're in,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a massively large move, and it came on

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the back of a stock market that sold off over

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>five That was probably the most surprising part about it

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was there was no risk off rally in the bond market.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Last week, and that's what's got everybody shaking their head

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. So, Jim, you know we have the election

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up tomorrow. How are you kind of I'm not

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna say playing it, but how are you forecasting how

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this market is going to react going forward? What's kind

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of your base case what we're gonn see tomorrow and

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the days ahead, and how that might impact the credit markets.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a little different base case than most um.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>If you if you look at the world of the

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>polls they're giving Trump, I'll go with the incumbent point

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of view, about a five to ten percent chance of winning.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the betting markets, they're giving him

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at chance of winning. The betting markets seem to align

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with the financial markets. I think the financial markets think

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that Biden is leading, but it's very very close where

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the polls are saying it's going to be a very

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>lopsided race. If the polls turn out to be right

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is as lopsided as they say it is,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be a lot of discounting in

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the market tomorrow or Wednesday and the Thursday as they

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>start to price in more of a Biden victory than

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they have right now, and I think ultimately how the

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>markets priced that in it's gonna come down to how

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the Senate goes. The Senate, I think is going to

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>probably be the real story as we go forward from here,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of touch and go as to which

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>way it can go. Wall Street wants a blue wave

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>because it wants fiscal stimulus um and I think if

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it gets that blue wave, there's probably going to be

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a rally based on the knee jerk reaction. But I

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that blue waves is completely priced and

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of people think right now, well, there's

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>also a very real possibility of the presidency turning over,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>but not the Senates in that situation. Jim, what are

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>we looking at in terms of policy for the next

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>four years? Well, for the next four years. History says

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that that should be bullish because Wall Street is always

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>liked gridlock of any kind. That seems to be the

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>best scenario for it over the next several years. Over

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the short term, it wor like grid luck because what

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it wants right now as it wants a fiscal deal,

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and if we get we were to get the Senate

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to be held by the Republicans. Uh, then what we

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>would wind up having happen is um the lessing of

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>less likelihood of a fiscal deal at that point. So, Jim,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the ten year it's

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>been trading after that volatility in March, and ten years

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of been in this range of six basis points.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there a scenario in your analysis where we get

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the ten ure to you know, one one and a

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>quarter percent something like that in a reasonable timeframe. Sure,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a likely scenario with that, and

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the return of inflation. With all of the

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>pump timing that we've done with the fiscal stimulus and

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the monetary stimulus, and the contraction of the economy meaning

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we're making less stuff less gross domestic product. That is

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a prescription for higher prices, otherwise known as inflation. If

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the market thinks that inflation is coming back and coming

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>back in a big way, yeah, you'll see investors run

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>away from the bond market and you could see higher yields.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think that might be one of the

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>things that's been bothering the market the last couple of weeks.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Even though the stock market is stumbled and the and

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the bond market has been unable to rally on. That is,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is this fear of inflation. If

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you add to that one other and uh, and that

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is a vaccine. If you keep sending people money and

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you keep pumping the priming the pump, and then you

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine and tell everybody, Okay, now we can

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>go back to normal. There really underscores the idea that

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you could get a return of inflation. So I do

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>see that is a plausible scenario for much higher yields

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as we move into So interestingly, Jim, the person we

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe should be watching that is your own power, because

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he has basically and his fellow Reserve is basically promised

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>ultra loose Masuri policy for years to come. But in

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the scenario you just described, the bond market would be

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>telling the Fed to actually raise rates. Now, yes, that's

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Um. We all have been looking at Paul

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and seeing thinking that he's been the guy that saved

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the markets, and that's largely been the case for twenty twenty.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And he's promised not to raise rates for years with

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an s on the end of it to come. The

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>only thing that changes that is the market itself if

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it decides that it wants a change of policy. It

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>did so in the fourth quarter of two eighteen when

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the FED was reducing the balance sheet and it said

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>stop sold off the stock market really hard until Paul

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>changed his mind and said he'd be patient and flexible

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>if we get inflation. We could see something like that

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in one where the market does in a buffets and

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it demands a change of policy and eventually the Fed

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>wal chorus and and give it to it. Hey, Jim,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate it as

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>always always appreciate your thoughts and opinions. Jim Bianco, President

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and founder Bianco Research. He's also a contributor to Bloom Opinion,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us and he's based in Chicago. Well, certainly a

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>better start to this week then we saw trading last

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>week here as we go into the election, let's see

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if this has some legs so we can do that

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist inhead of client

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio Management at Federated Hermes, he joins us. Phil, thanks

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. What do you make

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of last week's trading? Again one of the rougher weeks. Uh,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this market is seen going into an election. Well, you

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of things that were going on. I

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>guess there was a realization that we were not going

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to get this Phase four stimulus package that Congress has

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>been negotiating on for months now. We've got this third

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>wave of infections that that have spiked here as we

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sent our kids back to school, and you know, late August,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>early September, and then um, you know, investors were starting

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to think, well maybe we could get this this blue

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wave in the election this week, which means taxes and

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>regulations are going higher. So for all those reasons, you know,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you're probably down you know, let's call it ten percent

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>excuse me from where the market peaked out on September two,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>where we you know, sort of bottomed out on Friday. Uh.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And we're getting a little bit of a snap back today.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>That's good, you know, we we've gotten some better data. Um,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but the big anchilada, of course, is going to be

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the election tomorrow and whether it turns out to be

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>contested or not. So fell, if you're buying the market

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>today and many people are with the S and D

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at one, what is your reasoning? Um, I'm not quite sure,

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because we've got a two thirds chance of a contested

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>election tomorrow and the last time we had a contested

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>election was Bush Gore in two thousand with the hanging

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>chads in Florida, and stocks were down about from from

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>election day into the middle of December when the Supreme

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Court finally came in resolved the issue. Um. So, certainly

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets over sold here in your term, but you've

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>got to respect the fact that this is an extraordinarily

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>contentious election. There's any number of things that can happen,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them not particularly good in terms of the

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>contested nature of the election, and at this point, the

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>most prudent thing to do, in our opinion, is to

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just sort of stand back, um, see how it plays out,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and then figure out what to do from an investment standpoint. So,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the source of that that two thirds number. That's

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting number, and kind of how does that How

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do you define a contested election? Well, the fact that

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to know who won the election tomorrow night,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and the logic behind that very simply is this. We

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>had thirty three million mail in ballots out of a

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty nine million total ballots cast in the election.

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>This cycle is going to be very different because of

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. People are scared to death of showing up

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>at their their polling place and getting infected. So the

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>experts are telling us that instead of thirty three million

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots this cycle, we're gonna double that. We're

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at seventy or eighty million million mail in

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>ballots out of a hundred and fifty or hundred and

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty total million ballots cast. Literally half of the ballots

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>could be mail in. As a result, a lot of

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the states are by law, are not going to be

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to count those ballots until you know tomorrow. We're

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to have those results tomorrow night. Um. And

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and you've got you've got a number of key swing

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>states that that based upon the polling data, are going

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to be really close. We may not know the results

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks. Um. And So given that

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and equity markets hate uncertainty, that that suggests we

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>could drift down to you know, let's call it the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred day moving average, you know, which is another

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred points below where we are right now. Where

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>else is there a possible trade that might pay off

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hedging trade or some kind of a trade that works

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in either instance, and even if there is a contestation. Well,

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>what we did back in I guess the middle of August,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>anticipating all of this, because we spent a lot of

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>time studying, you know, the intersection between politics and Washington

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is we thought that technology stocks had simply run too far,

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>too fast, and and here we are. You know, at

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of September, the equity market was sitting just

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at about the thirty six hundred level. Our full year

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>forecast was so so and and most of that rally

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is being driven by tech. So we took some profits

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in that area, domestic large cap growth technology and and

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>rotated those dollars into value stocks, small cap stocks, and

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>international stocks. We think, now that the economy is back

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on the growth mode, that they'll start to be generating

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>positive revenues and earnings. Again. The valuation gap between growth

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>stocks and these other categories was massive, and we felt

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that that that was going to close over time. So

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going into this. We decided to lock in some profits,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>play defense a little bit, and then see how how

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this election plays out. I feel just real quickly seconds here.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>What's a blue wave mean for you? Well, it would

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that that the Democrats would have a legislative mandate.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We're probably looking at significantly higher corporate and individual tax

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>rates and regulations. That means that economic growth, corporate earnings growth,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>stock prices are going to come down. Um, so as

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>we look at the longer term cycle, that would be

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>less less beneficial, less favorable for equity investors. Well, Phil,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we shall see. Thank you so much as always for

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>giving us all of your ideas and your analysis. That

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Head of

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Client Portfolio Management at Federated Hermes. It's going to be

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so interesting to speak to more guests post election and

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>see what actually happened. And Paul, I'm also looking at

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>cmds today, the commodity pricing, and it seems like we're

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing some kind of a propane bids exactly. You know,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we was out at dinner over the weekend, eating outside

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and boy, there are this propane heating all over the

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>place and they were all being used and I could

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>just see the demand for propane going through the roof

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>here over the next several weeks. Well, it is time

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined today by Jonathan Bernstein. He's

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policies, out with

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating column today entitled Tomorrow won't be a normal

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>election dead. It sounds like an understatement to me, Jonathan,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I guess I

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>want to start with, will this election, in your opinion,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be contested by President Trump? And to what extent do

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you think? Well, of course, first of all, he could win.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is um. So put that aside about

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know five ten percent chance that he'll actually

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>just flat out win. If he doesn't win, Here's what

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we know. We know he'll claim that there's voter fraud,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>without evidence, without anything, because we know he'll do that

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>because he did that four years ago, even though he won,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he claimed that there was fraud against him. So pretty

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>confident that he'll claim all kinds of fraud. He's been saying,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>without any evidence and against all the evidence, that mail

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in absentee voting is fraudulent. It isn't. Um. He's been

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that, uh, the vote should stop, the counting should

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>stop midnight or on election day, which has never been

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the case before. That's not how the system works. So yeah,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at the very least, he's going to complain

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that he was that it was stolen from him. What

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>he will do in addition to that, he's claiming that

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna send out he we know he is sending

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>out a team of lawyers to put lawsuits against the

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>count everywhere. Can whether that will actually mount amount to anything,

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that's still to come. Jonathan. What a states that you're

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at in terms of a difficult process, if the

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>count is very close, or if something needs to be contested. Well,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that, UM, Pennsylvania in particular, which is a

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>most likely tipping point state that is the one that

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>puts one of the canidates or the other over the

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>top up, is expecting to have a slow count. Um.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>They're doing that because Republican legislature in the state mandated

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a slow count. They said you can't start, um opening

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the envelopes and even checking to see if they're legitimate

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>votes until election day morning. In many states, in Arizona

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and California, that's been going on for days already. UM.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the votes are being counted in a lot

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of states, and so as soon as the polls closed Florida,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, of all of the count of the early

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>vote UM that will have it. In Texas also, But

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania it's gonna go slow. They stay they've got

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>enough counters that they're gonna go twenty four or seven

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>until that the county has done. Jonathan, as you talk

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to folks in the political world if this is a

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>close election, is there a sense of how long this

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>could drag on? I guess the only real experience we

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have is two thousand and when it went weeks. Well,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the count itself could take UM one or two weeks

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the slowest states, UM. That's typical in California. If

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and the states we're really

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at that might affect the outcome of the presidential

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>election that are expected to be slow. Then lawsuits could

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>take weeks the way that they did in UH two thousand.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>There could be recounts, UM, and you know, we'll see

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>how that goes. There are constitutional and UM statutory limits

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as to when the electors are supposed to be appointed

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and then when Congress is supposed to open the electoral

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>votes and count them and all that and that happens

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in December and January to come. So those are sort of,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, guide posts that we have that we can

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>go by. Jonathan, Voter fraud is extremely rare. We know that.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We've been told that, and yet it's sometimes hard to

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>believe when you see some reports of of something that

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>might be fraud. Explained to us why it is rare?

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>What what what's in place to make sure that fraud

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can't happen very easily? Well, for example, on you know,

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots, they have the signature match and they

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have UM A lot of most states have it, you know,

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a code so they know that the ballot that came

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>back as the same one that was sent and it

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was properly sent UM. And again you know, some states

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have been doing UM vote by mail exclusively Washington, Oregon,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Utah UM for several cycles now and they haven't any

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>problem with it, so, you know, and including Republican states.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, one thing that happens is young voters

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to vote last. And so because young voters these

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>days are more likely to vote Democratic, as those votes

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>get counted, the election night totals will start shifting. Over

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the next several days to Democrats, and you know, Republicans say, oh,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with that, but that happens in Republican

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>run states like Utah and Arizona, which have a lot

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of absentee voting, the same thing happened. So obviously Republicans

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>are not cheating in favor of Democrats in those days.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just how the system works. Jonathan, is it fair

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to assume, I mean, if it's a close election, I

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>guess the default is it will be contested. What's the

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>scenario where you know the whole contestability of it. It

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>really kind of goes away that, in fact, we will

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>know something late tomorrow night. Well, it could get contested

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even though we know something. You know, Trump is going

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that he was ripped off no matter what.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Um so. But it is certainly possible. You know, Florida

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>counts its balance very quickly. They could have a result

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very quickly tomorrow night. And if Joe Biden wins in Florida,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no realistic chance that Trump is going to win

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the electoral College after that. So, and there's other states

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that also have quick counts, and if Biden wins, you know,

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, Biden looks like he's winning by about eight

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half points nationally. If it turns out that

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, he almost certainly is going to win

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the electoral College by a comfortable margin. And we'll basically

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>know that at that point, there's a question of, well,

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to what extent does Trump try to throw out legitimate balance,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>which they're trying to do. For example, in Texas right

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>now some Republicans are UM and so it could be

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>contested without having a really good chance of succeeding. Jonathan,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you do say in your column that President Trump's bark

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is often worse than his bite. How does that play

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>out here, because you know, if he barks here there's

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a great chance of goes to the Supreme Court. Well,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on what exactly he does and what happens,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>so that you know, for example, if Florida comes in

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly for Biden, if Biden wins by you know several states,

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump may continue to say it's fraud, it shouldn't ever,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he shouldn't have been allowed to run in

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and all that. He will probably say

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that up to elect up to inauguration day and past that,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>um but he may not actually be doing much about him.

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's possible the courts will look at some of these

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>absurd lawsuits um saying that legitimate votes just shouldn't count

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just because Trump doesn't like them to be counted, and

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they may toss them out, and it may not go

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court. It may not go anywhere at all.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, it could turn out that it goes to

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the courts and the courts make um new rules as

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they go along, as they did in the Wisconsin case

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>last week or Minnesota case last week. UM. So we'll see,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, what will happen. But the other part of

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this is we're gonna hear a lot of rumors about

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>fraud and all that on election day. Trying not to

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of ourselves. Yes, Jonathan, thank you great reminder

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in today's column. Tomorrow won't be a normal election day.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Bernstein, Bloomberg Opinion. Clearly there's a lot on the

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>line for the selection. Everybody, it seems like, has a

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>very very keen interest on the outcome of the selection.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>That includes environmentalists as well. To get the latest on that,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>we welcome our next guest, Dr a Shot Rathi, Climate

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and Enjury Porter for Bloomberg Green based in London. UM, actually,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. It seems, I

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>guess cut and dry that if you're an environmentalist, if

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about the environment, you're pulling really hard for

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>not just former Vice President Joe Biden, but a blue

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wave in the Senate. Is that as clear as it

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>convey is that is easy to analyze as it conveyors

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or other differences there? I think you nailed it. That

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is really the clearest distinction in this election, and I

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think it has ever been as clear as you've

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>laid it out. Give us a little more detail on that.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So what we know is that Joe Biden has put

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>forth with what is the most ambitious climate plan that

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any US presidential candidate has put forth so far. Among

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the details are that he's going to spend about it

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about two trillion dollars trying to reduce emissions. First step

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>will be to get carbon free electricity by twenty five

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>across the United States, build out a charging network for

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>electric cars, and to retrofit homes with better installations so

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that their energies falls and their emissions decline. On Trump's side,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what we've known from the past four years is that

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much of the work that has gone on through the

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>administration is to roll back regulations for fossil fuel industries

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and open up new areas around the country for extraction

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of fossil fuels. Among the few things that it has

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>done to try and reduce emissions um is to try

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and create this plan to plant a trilliant trees or

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at least join a global plan of planting trees, and

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to support a technology called carbon capture, where you capture

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>emissions from a power plant and then bury them deep underground.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But the distinction is very very clear. The science says

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to cut emissions really quickly, and Joe Biden's

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>plan gets us some way towards that. Under Trump administration,

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we get away from that task. So what's the most

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>immediate and most impactful thing you would expect a bid

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the administration to do. Biden has promised that on his

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>first day in office, he will rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That's something that Trump has pulled out of. He had

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>his intention made clear in twenty seventeen, and actually officially

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the US will be out of that agreement on November four,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a day after the election. So Biden is

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>elected first day back sometime in January, the US is

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>back into the Paris Climate Agreement, and that has a

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>number of ramifications because US, as a leader in global politics,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>carries a lot of weight when it comes to deciding

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which direction different countries should go in. So a very

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>recent example from my reporting has been that Japan, for instance,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>has a signal that is going to target net zero

0:23:55.119 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>emissions by twenty fifty. That's a line at the primary

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>has put forth right now, but it has to go

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>through their legislative system before it becomes law. If Biden

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is elected, Japan has all the reasons to support it.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>If Trump is elected, the lawmakers might did there a

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And that's the kind of impact that will

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>play out across many, many countries. Will it be just

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that easy, you just call up a bunch of countries

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and decide. Yeah. In case of the Paras Climate Agreement,

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually it is easy because it is a voluntary agreement

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that countries have come together and have agreed upon trying

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to reduce emissions. Of course, it will be much harder

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to actually cut emissions when it comes to the United

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>States itself. So a goal to reach carbon free electricity

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty five is something that none of the

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>countries in the world have yet committed to. So what

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden will have to do to reach that is going

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to be really really hard. Academics say you can get

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>up to but the last ten percent is going to

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be very hard. Equally, he's going to have to deal

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>with the tensions that the US has had to deal

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>within the past, which is, if you're going to move

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>away from the fossil fuel industry or move away from

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, how are you going to help the people

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in those industries transition away. It's a really hard question

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that many countries outside Germany, China, Australia are starting to

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>struggle with, but the US hasn't done as much, and

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that will be on Biden if he gets elected. Actually,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I just real quick twenty seconds. How what's been the

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cost of the four years of the Trump presidency in

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the environment. How bad has it been? Well, Luckily,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy has been cheap and so um Trump hasn't

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>been able to reverse that trend. But what we know

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is that for the first time emissions have gone back

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>up in the US under a Trump presidency. That is

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of adding a year or two words of damage

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in the long terms, in the long long scheme of terms. Yeah, actually,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. We really appreciate getting your thoughts and

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>insights dr ox Shot Rothy Heasy, climate and energy reporter

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Green based in London, giving it the thoughts that, uh,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, on day one, if President Biden were to

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>win the presidency, the day one of his presidency, he

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>would uh try, he would look to get back into

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement as it relates to global environmental curbs

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, so we'll have to see how

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that plays out, but that's clearly on his focus. Thanks

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Boomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Paul Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio