WEBVTT - S3 – INTERVIEW 4: Paul Begg

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcomed Unobscured, a production of I Heart Radio and Aaron Minkey.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Our final guest for Unobscured Season three is Paul Beg.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>When he published Jack the Ripper The Uncensored Facts in

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he set a new standard for serious historical writing about

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Whitechapel murders and challenged writers and investigators to bring

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a more complete and critical eye to the case. Fortunately

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 1>for all of us, Paul Beg continued to work in

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that mold. With each new book, Paul Beg has commanded

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the attention of interested readers and professional historians alike. Paul

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>has worked solo as well as with other writers to

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>publish books like Jack the Ripper, The Definitive History, The

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Complete Jack the Ripper A to Z and recently Jack

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper The Forgotten Victims, and along the way, Paul's

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>books have demonstrated to interested readers like Adam would, for instance,

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>what had been missing from the discussion without his comprehensive

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and rigorous devotion to historical detail. His collaborative spirits and

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his dedication to primary sources have made at him a

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>universally respected authority on the history and the facts of

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the case. Researcher Karl Nellis asked Paul to take us

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>back to how it all began for him, and so

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's how it will all begin for us. This is

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the Unobscured Interview series for season three. I'm Aaron Minky.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I started off investigating historical mysteries of one sort or another,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was coming to the centenary of the Jack

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper murders, and I had always been interested in

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper, and I bought every book that I

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>could find at that time, and nobody had really done

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a history of who saw what, where and when, which

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I suppose is part of my journalistic background, and so

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I decided to write a book that didn't have anything

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with suspects, but just looked at the crimes.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And that book led to another book and an other

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>one after that, and so before I knew it, I

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was spending probably the best part of my life research

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Jack the Ripple, which in a way I regret

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because I would like to have researched something infinitely more important.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, uh, Jack the Ripper is

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>is becomes acutely interesting subject too to research and write about.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, well, I can say, for my own part,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really grateful for the historical approach that you've taken,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and the way that you have researched and written

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about in Whitechapel, and you know so for for this program,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been consulting your definitive history the facts, and I've

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>especially appreciated the perspective that you take in the Forgotten Victims.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>And we hope that listeners interested in thoughtful, detailed work

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll seek out your books and maybe as a as

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a way into that. As a historian, how would you

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>describe your historical approach. You mentioned a history of the

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>crimes rather than focusing on the suspect, But if you

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>would put yourself in the context of other history writing,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what kind of is your approach as a writer of

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>these histories. Well, I think it's important to just establish

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>those basic facts as I as I mentioned earlier, the

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very basic stuff of who saw, what, where, when and

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>why that every good story should have, and very often,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the history of something like crime, that's one

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that people don't do. They are they will describe

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the crime, but they're real interest is in the suspect.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think in historical crime, the great thing about

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it is that it it it enables you to see

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>people doing normal things at the time a murderer is committed.

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of the few ways that you actually

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to see historically people doing ordinary things,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which historians don't normally bother to look at, and consequently

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't find out of that. So in kind of

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>general terms, how would you describe that ordinary life for

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>most people in the East End of London that we

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>get a glimpse of when we look at and almost

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>through this series of horrific crimes and then see the

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>ordinary life that was happening around it. What do we see?

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>What do we see there? Well, then we see, we

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>see we see an awful lot actually, uh, but it's

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a very hard life that the people were living at

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that time, particularly in the East End, and so it

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was uh, it was, it was tough. But but an

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>event like a murder captures the witnesses and the investigators

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in that moment of time going about their day to

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>day lives, and there things mains. As I said, mainstream

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>histories don't often tell you, and that many people probably

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't choose to read even if historians did. For example,

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there were lots of horses, lots of them. So what

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>did you do if your horse was injured in an

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>accident or if it dropped dead in the street? And

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>how dirty were those streets are washed with horse urine

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and worse? And what was it really like to travel

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in a handsome cab, rocking along like a ship tossed

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in a storm called in winter, hot in summer? And

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then of course if you opened the window in the

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>handsome cab because it was getting very hot, the horses

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>hooves flicked the mess from the straight back into the cab,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which brings us back two horses. And so we you know,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that is sort of stuff that you don't

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>normally find out about. Even the Sherlock Holmes story you have.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You have homes bowling along in a handsome cab, but

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't actually get told what it was really like.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And we don't have doss houses anymore. People don't go

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>into work into the workhouse. We buy our milk from

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a supermarket, not from a dedicated milk shop. We carry

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a torch to see in the dark, not an oil lamp.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And we don't have music calls, and we don't have clubs.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Every few yards. Um, So a murderer is a a

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing, but it tells us about ordinary people going

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to the who have to go into the workhouse and

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>who have to go into a doss house. And we

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>can find out a little bit of what it was

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like from people who we're writing at the time, and

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we we can we can collect that information together. But

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it there aren't that many books that go out and

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you these things, and when they do, it can

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>be it does can sometimes not have that level of

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>interest that the murder story has. It doesn't have that

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>frision of drama attached to it. So when when you're

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>discovering how people lived and how their world fund should

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that can be really interesting when when it's attached to

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a murder, because very often in some small way those things. Uh,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>knowing about those things could be relevant. Two understanding the

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>murder itself and perhaps knowing who the murderer was. M hm,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>m hm. For a little more context, Um, the Ripper

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>murders weren't the only kinds of violent crime in London's

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>East End. They weren't the only killings in that year,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and there was enough violent crime on record in the

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood throughout the eighties that we can get a more

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>textured picture. How violent was Whitechapel and what was the

0:08:54.679 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>general understanding of that violence among contemporary observers, writer is,

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and what do we know about how the people in

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood of Whitechapel, or Whopping or around bethnal green Um,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what did they think of the violence in their neighborhoods Well,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's again it's one of those things that

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat difficult to to pinpoint what the people themselves

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>actually thought. What we get a lot of is what

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people coming from outside the area thought of it. So

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you have lots of reasonably well off middle class people

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>commenting on the horrors that they saw and witnessed in

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the East End, but not a great deal of what

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>people who lived there actually experienced. The facts and figures

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>suggest that there weren't very many murders, surprisingly in the

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>East End of London, and in fact, I think, off

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head, I mean, for for the period,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the murders that were committed there with the

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>were the jack the Ripper murders. There weren't very many

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>other than those. As for the violence of the area, well,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a different thing altogether, and it does that there

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>does seem to have been a considerable amount of violence,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and very nasty violence of the sort that would make

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the top of the news today if it happened. Um

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and and things were happening there. I was just reading

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>recently about an altercation that took place. Uh. And the

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>man through an oil lamp at at somebody, and although

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't intending to that person, he missed h and

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>he hit the wall behind him, and the and the

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>oil lamp shattered and it burst into flame, and the

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>person was caught splattered with the oil from the lamp

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and and was burned quite badly. And of course there

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was an awful lot of of domestic violence going on.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So one another story told by a policeman called Benjamin Lease,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and he was walking down Dorset Street, uh and suddenly

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a knife was thrown from one of the houses and

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>stuck into some boarding close to him. So, I mean

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it possible that you could be walking down the street

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and have a knife thrown at you for no reason whatsoever.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>M So it was quite it was quite a dangerous place,

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was known even the police. When you read

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers and the police reports it was it was violent.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But one of the problems is that you get stories

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about um sailors coming into Whitechapel from the docks, and

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>one such man, Thomas Sadler, for example, was walking down

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a street and he was attacked and robbed UM. And

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>yet other times people are walking around the streets and

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't see a soul. It would appear that one

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper's victims, the first one Mary and Nichols,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>walked about half a mile without being seen by anybody

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>as she walked down the main street. M So some

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of the information that you get can be quite conflicting,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully you will be able over the next years

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to learn a lot more MHM. And

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and from what I've read, there are some places where

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it was especially dangerous to be if you were a policeman. Well, again,

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a common story that policemen wouldn't venture down

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Dorset Street unless they were in pairs. And UM, I

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that I can't find I'm not saying it's not true,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just that I can't find any evidence of that

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>being the case. And I can read of other areas

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of the east end, which were known to be

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly dangerous, and the same thing is said of those streets,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so it it's it really does dependent. Rsett Street may

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>have been a dangerous street, but other streets on Flower

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and Dean Street and Thrall Street, they were both they

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>were all just as dangerous to walk down, just as rough.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's not said that policemen walked down those streets

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in pairs. So I think you have to take certain

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>later statements with a pinch of salt. Mhm. Would you

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>would you describe Dorset Street for us? Yes, Dorset Street was.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a fairly narrow street. It had a pub

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>one end and a bigger pub the other end, and

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a small pub in the middle, and it was otherwise

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much line with with what we're called common lodging

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>houses or doss houses. There was a little shop there

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>run by a man called John McCarthy, which was basically

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and all grocer's shop, uh, and really nothing about it

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to be to be alarmed about. It had started out

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>its life being known as Datchett Street. That became Dorset Street,

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the locals used to call it Dosset Street because

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the number of doss houses that it contained. And

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the doss houses which had a really bad

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>reputation for being places of immorality because not too many

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>questions were asked if a man and a woman turned

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>up wanting a bed together. Uh. And they were thought

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to be hotbeds of crime and and thievery, and so

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they weren't really looked upon very kindly. But in fact

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they were fairly horrible places. But it's specially by today's standards,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but they really were the poor man's hotel. They were

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>where you went you could buy a bed for the night. Uh.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's popularly argued that sometimes some just strung a

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rope from one side of the room to the other

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and for a penny you could lean on the rope

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and go to sleep there. There are photographs of of

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing happening, but I think that was

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a fairly uncommon practice. So that, Yeah, the doss houses

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>were thought to be fairly dangerous, and to some extent

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they were, and the that gave Dorset Street a really

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bad name, which grew worse over the whereas more murders

0:16:53.080 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were committed there. MHM. When it comes to policing the

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>East End um and especially heading toward the events of

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty eight and the personalities and the people. Um,

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Charles Warren. Can you briefly describe Charles

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>warren'ts uh? Maybe his personality and his career leading up

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to Who was Charles Warren? Yes, Sir, Charles Warren basically

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was a soldier, a scholar, engineer and administrator. He had

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>basically been undertaking or overseeing engineering work done in various

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>places abroad. He was also an archaeologist of some distinction

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and eventually was a senior Freemason, and he undertook excavation

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>work in in Egypt and elsewhere in Palestine. Um, and

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he was. But it's also been claimed that whilst he

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was doing this work he was acting as a spy

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and mapping out land for for the government. But he

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was quite distinguished in that respect, wrote a couple of

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>books about it, and he also played a part in

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>investigating the death of a professor who had gone out

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>out there and had gone missing and had actually been

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>murdered by the natives. And Warren trapped down the natives

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and found out who they were, which really was It

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was no mean feat. So he came back to the

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>uk as uh, you know, quite quite a bit of

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>a national hero actually, the way the newspapers had portrayed

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>his actions abroad. So he came back. He he was

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>chosen to be commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. He that

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>was probably a very good decision because certainly the press

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>welcomed it because the police needed to be we're in

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>desperate need really of organization. Later he was accused of

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>organizing the police too much along military lines, paying too

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>much attention to minor things such as boots and shoes

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and things. But he did have a very keen concern

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>about the welfare of the ordinary policeman. So yeah, um,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what is interesting is that what happened at the time

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper uh caused a change in the

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>police which has carried on through to today and probably,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it might be fair to say

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's affected things on really on both sides of the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic and elsewhere. When the police were formed, it was

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>formed as an organization to protect the public from crime

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and protect and prevent crime. And that was the reason

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>why they started. Why why you had policemen patrolling the

0:20:55.240 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>streets on their beat. Detective work was really perceived as

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a sign of failure to have the detective meant that

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a crime had been committed and that needed it needed

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to be detected, whereas the whole object of the police

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>was was the crimes were not going to be committed.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So there was this difference. Now a man called James Munroe,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>his background being very much detecting crime. He had been

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>done a fair amount of workouts as running a clandestine

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>side of things, and so he was aware of of

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>all of that, especially when he was ahead of the

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>police in India, and he was appointed head of the

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>c I D which is the detective branch of Scotland Yard.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>And so you had these two men who were really

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>either end of things. And when Warren resigned as he

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>did later in he was replaced by James Munroe. And

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>so whereas Warren in his annual report had not even

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bothered to mention anything about the detectives, Munroe was very

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>probe his department MHM. And that's carried through right down

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to today where more interest is being given is given

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to detectives and many detectives almost became superstars in the past.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But the ordinary copper on a beat, the copper and

0:22:55.000 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>uniform UH is almost seen as a less so being,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't the case under Warren's regime. Warren, unfortunately, ah

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>after he resigned, he was sent out to to fight

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>abroad and he made are there's some slight evidence to

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the effect that he was a man and a general

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>appointing him was suffering from senility and thought he was

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. I thought Warren was somebody else and appointed

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>him to a job that he was a seriously deficient

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>inexperience to undertake. And there was a battle at a

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>place called spied On cop and it was an absolute disaster.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's basically stuck with Warren uh and has damaged

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>his reputation for the rest of his life and right

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>down to today. M hm. Now, his time as Commissioner

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>only lasted about two years, is that right? That's right? Yeah.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And as well as having a difference of approach to Monroe,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he also had frequent conflicts with Matthews, the Home Secretary. Um,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>can you describe what the conflicts were in their relationship? Well, basically,

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when Sir Charles Warren accepted the commissionership of the Metropolitan Police,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he believed that he had full authority over the police

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't aware so well led to believe that

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he was answerable to the own secretary and two various

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Home Office mandarins, and so he wanted to

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have full control over what was going on. That first

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, brought him into conflict with James Munroe, who

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>also believed that he had almost complete authority over the

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>c i D, and he resented Warren's involvement with the

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>c i D, and he resented Warren almost ignoring the

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>c i D. Matthews was also a fairly difficult man,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as was the sort of liaison between the two, which

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was a man called Godfrey Lushington, and eventually got to

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a point where Munroe sorry where Warren wrote an article

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that but he had received permission to write that article,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and he felt that all he could do at that

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>time was offered his resignation, which he did, and that's

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>why he went. But it typifies the sort of relationship

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that he had with Henry Matthews is that the Metropolitan

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Police was being criticized and he thought the criticism was unjustified,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and so he defended his department, only to discover that

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>he could only defend his department providing he had the

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>permission of Henry Matthews to do so. And if therefore,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if Henry Matthews said no, he had no alternative but

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to sit back and and sort of bite his tongue

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and seethe. And those are the sort of conflicts that

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they had. And in the previous prior to the murders,

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>there had been what turned out to be a riot

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>in Trafalgar Square as a consequence of the unemployed wanting

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to hold meetings, and there was this march was planned

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to take place on Trafalgar Square and Warren uh they

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they they, Matthews couldn't make up his mind what the

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>legal situation was with regard to trying to stop these marches,

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>so he vacillated from one thing to another. Warren was

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>putting out instructions that the march couldn't go ahead, and

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>then it was all right to go ahead. Everybody was

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>getting frustrated. The whole thing blew up into a riot

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that was quite nasty, and Warren got blamed for the

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. So he was now he was he Matthews

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a waste of time. Really. He

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>probably had his own troubles, which, unfortunately we don't know

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of that. Um. But he doesn't. He

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to have fallen out with most people in one

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>way or another. UM. And the even the government wanted him,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>really found him unsuitable as Home Secretary, but for various

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>political reasons, they were not able to get rid of him,

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so he had to stay in office, even though he

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>was causing quite a bit of difficulty. Mm hm hm.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a couple of other people who ended up

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>being pivotal figures um, either in the investigation of the

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>White Chapel murders or in the reporting on the White

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Chapel murders. Uh. Let's talk Dr Winn Baxter. Um. Who

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was he? Why is he such a significant figure in

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the investigation and in the press reporting about the Whitechapel Well.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Win Baxter was actually a lawyer, not a not a doctor,

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but which was possibly one of the problems. He was

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the coroner for the area where at least three of

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the murders were committed, and so it was his job

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to basically inquire into the crime and to establish cause

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of death, time of death and details like that. There's

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that he felt a little bit that

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>part of things were with an unsolved crime, that there

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was a responsibility there to interview and gave the gain

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>sorry interview and gain the evidence of people so that

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the event their testimony would be that were given

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>under oath, would be available to be brought to court

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if at some point in the future somebody was put

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on trial for the crime, because they couldn't always guarantee

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that some that a witness would could be found or

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would even be alive. Baxter is distinguished for perhaps being

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a little pedantic. He questioned in depth the his inquests

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>covered several weeks. There there were adjournments, and the press

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>would speculate whilst that the adjournment was taking place, and

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there would be lots of press reporting around around the

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the the inquiry themselves, the days the inquests were held.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So he was thought in some instances to be a

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bit of a pain, a bit of

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a nuisance. Uh So that that, But thank goodness he was,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's only as a consequence of his inquests that

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we have as much information about the crimes as we

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>do hm. Hm. The eighties offered the London Police little

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>by way of the forensic techniques that detectives used today. Um.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But over the course of investigating the White Chappel murders.

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a few interesting ideas that were suggested suggested

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>uh in one setting or another, either at the I

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>D or in an inquest um that might even seem

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a little strange today. What were some of the the

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge methods that were considered for collecting and analyzing

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence in the course of investigating the murders. Well, the

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the it's it's it's a difficult thing because the police

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>hadn't actually encountered something of this kind before, So for

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them this was a new and difficult experience,

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and the police had over the years they had worked

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>out how things were to be done. So the police

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>basically they were required to protect the crime scene pretty

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>much as we do today, although to compare how we

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>protect a crime scene today from how they protected a

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>crime scene in you would see very considerable differences. But

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ideally the body should be dis scribed and looked at

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>before the doctor and other policemen came up and trampled

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all over the area. The police were supposed to uh

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the clothing and and look at other aspects

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the the physical side of the crime. The a

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>doctor would look for would would be there to ensure

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that death had happened, but would also be providing a

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>time of death, would be trying to determine what the

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>weapon used was uh, and where it was used from

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth, which is all pretty

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>much the same sort of thing that that that is

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>done today. They didn't have any really techniques of anything.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't They couldn't identify human blood, couldn't distinguish that

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>too well. They obviously they didn't have anything like DNA photography.

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>They did use for crime scenes. They did that in

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the case of Mary Kelly, but it was a fairly

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>rudimentary process and bad lighting could affect that. So they

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>were they were really down in detecting crime. Was was

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>down to hard nose detective work, lacking the science that

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>were used to today. M Hm m hm. So let's

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>start stepping toward that investigation of the murders themselves. Um.

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the interesting facts that complicated the investigation was

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that Robert Anderson was absent from office on the day

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that Mary and Nichols is killed, and he continues a

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>month long sick leave the day after any Chapman is killed.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>M Can you describe the apartment that he left behind

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was on this sick leave. Well, what happened

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with with Sir Robert Anderson was that he was appointed

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>head of the c I D. And he had he

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or he says that he his doctor had at that

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>point prescribed him with a necessary holiday because he was

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>suffering from exhaustion. So when he was appointed to the job,

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he made this point known, and the date when and

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>for how long he should take leave was given to

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>him by Sir Charles Warren. So it wasn't at Anderson's

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>choice to go at that time. That was the time

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that Warren wanted him to leave, because Warren was actually

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>expecting there to be an up search later on in

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>when there would be when he thought there would be

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:23.919
<v Speaker 1>further demonstrations by the unemployed as had happened to him

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the previous year. So he wanted Anderson back and

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>fully ensconced in the Assistant Commissioner's chair for later in

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the year, so he told him to go at that time.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>So Anderson went on holiday. He couldn't have known that

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be a murder on the day

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>he left, nor could he have known or would he

0:36:52.800 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have expected, that there would be another week murder straight afterwards. Um,

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and so he was he when when he was alerted

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to to come back, he he did so. So Anderson

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>was away. But I don't think any any blame can

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be assigned to Anderson for that fact. Uh. What he

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>left behind, of course was it was a department that

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have him at the top. But it seems to

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have functioned reasonably well. The investigation seems to have gone ahead.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was towards the end of Anderson's absence abroad

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that the police um decided to do a house to

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>house search for investigating men who were living on their own.

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So all the all the all the usual things seemed

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to have done in the case being done with the

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>murders of of Annie Chapman and Mary Nichols. M Um,

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>who was Mary Anne or or Polly Nichols? What do

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we know about her life? Well? Um, Mary Anne Nichols

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was was born in eighteen forty five near Fleet Street,

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>which is where lots of newspapers were located until relatively recently. Um.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>She was the middle of three children. The others were brothers,

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>one older and the other younger, and she married a

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>man called William Nichols in eighteen sixty four um. He

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>was a printer, and they would have five children, and

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they lived quite comfortably in a block of flats or

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>apartments as you might call them, known as peabody buildings,

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>which this was a somewhat upmarket place. You had to

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be you had to pass certain qualities, have certain qualifications

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to to be allowed to live there. And they had

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>shared toilet facilities, they were cooking facilities, there was a

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>close washing area. You could even book and have a

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>hot bath every day if you liked so. There were

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>facilities for for personal hygiene, and most of those things

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were things that people in the surrounding houses didn't necessarily enjoy.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So you can see that this was quite a They

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit upmarket and paying a modest rent

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for for this kind of establishment. But about eight the

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>couple separated. The precise circumstances aren't probably understood, but William

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Calls said that Mary Ann began drinking heavily and had

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>left him on several occasions. Then she left him for

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>good and he provided some financial support, but in two

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that she was living by prostitution and ceased

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>making the payments. He was summoned for maintenance, but proved

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>his case, and that is what is said in the

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 1>police One of the police reports that have survived Mary's

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>life thereafter is a series of stays in workhouses until August,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>when she was staying in a common lodging house in

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Thrall Streets, Spittlefields, paying fortunes a night for a bed.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>She then moved to another workhouse, sorry, and the lodging

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>house and it was search that's where she was living

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>when on the thirty one of August she was found

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>dead in a street called Buck's Road. Mhm mhm. Um.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the people who is responsible for determining

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened, Uh, it's a detective named Frederick Aberlein who

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is attached to H division, the White Chapel Division, I believe, Um,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>can you describe what approach he would have taken, uh

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to beginning a murder investigation before there's a kind of

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>expectation that it's a serial killing. There's no idea about

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there being some figure named Jack the Ripper. It's just

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Frederick Aberlein and c I D investigating a murder. What

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>would would Airline's approach have been? Well, first of all,

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>there there were there had been two murders in Whitechapel

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>prior to the murder of Mary Ann Nichols. The first

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>had been earlier in the year when a woman named

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>emeral Elizabeth Smith was attacked by apparently by by a

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>group of three men u and one of them had

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>round some sort of object into her, causing paraitonitis to

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 1>set in, from which she had died. And then about

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a week before Mary Ann Nichols was murdered, another woman

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>called Martha Tabrum had been murdered on the landings of

0:42:55.920 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a block of flats, and she had been stabbed nearly

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty times, m in a friend that fairly frenzied attack,

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stabs being to the area of

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the genitals and upper thighs and so forth. So then

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the murder of mary Ann Nichols came along, So that

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was the third murder in Whitechapel, remembering that there weren't

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>any other murders taking place, those were the only three

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>murders that had taken place in Whitechapel at that time.

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So by the time he got to Nichols, it was

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning to be recognized that there was something odd going on.

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The original idea was that that the murders had perhaps

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>been committed by a gang who had been extorting money

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from the local prostituere u. And so basically these two attacks,

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>first of all, a very violent attack that wasn't necessarily

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:12.399
<v Speaker 1>intended to kill, and then a frenzied attack on which

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously was intended to kill, but were were these were

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>lessons to show what other women could expect if they

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay up to the gang. So that was the

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>had been a prevailing theory. Inspector Abilene had been assigned

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to the White Chapel area in March eighteen seventy three

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and had been been there until February seven, at which

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>point he was transferred to the METS headquarters Scotland Yard.

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So when Nichols was murdered, he was sent back to

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>investigate the murder us because he knew the area really

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>well and was very well respected there, and I knew

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, so you he would have had

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of eyes on the ground as it were, uh,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And so his investigation was really came to the conclusion

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that it was He then sort of abandoned the idea

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that this was a gang, and he came to the

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that they'd probably all been committed by the same person,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and that the murder of Mary Anne Nichols had it

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was by one person and not a gang, and that

0:45:49.680 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that person was a man. Mhm. So why um, why

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>would the the earlier killings of Ma Smith and Martha

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Tabrum later be omitted from considerations of the case as

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>a whole by someone like Dr Thomas Bond on November Well,

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I don't think we really know why it.

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bond didn't include those crimes. He he was, he wasn't

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>asked two h take any part in in the examination

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of those crimes, and it was with Nichols that we

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>start to get detailed descriptions of what were happening. So

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it may well be that his he was only provided

0:46:56.600 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with information from Nichols to Mary Kelly, which was a

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>crime that he was responsible for actually was there, and

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>he only worked from the reports that he had been

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>provided up to ah the murder of Mary Kelly. M hmm. Now,

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just before any Chapman's murder um the radical newspaper The Star,

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:32.399
<v Speaker 1>which had been publishing for less than a year UM

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they began to trump at the story that Polly Nichols

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>killer was a Jew named leather Apron. Can you describe

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>when these reports start hitting the public, what kinds of

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stereotypes about Jewish life in the East End would these

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:57.760
<v Speaker 1>reports have conjured up for the Stars readership. Well, the

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the East End Jewish community was as largely consisted of

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>recent immigrants fleeing persecution in Eastern Europe. Ah they formed

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tight knit communities, often often built around people who had

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 1>come across from there from the same village, So whold

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>streets could be taken over by uh people who have

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>fled from the same village abroaden and in Eastern Europe,

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and they had they'd have their own little places of worship,

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course, because they were looking for kosher food,

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they would only be eating the food provided in the

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>main by their own community. So that alienated a lot

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of the the native people, especially when accommodation that had

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>formerly been made available to one family, the immigrants coming

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>from Eastern Europe were content to take a room with

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole family living in a room, and so these properties,

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>many of these properties could be let to lots of

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>people instead of one person, and so the single tenants

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>were finding it very hard to find somewhere to live,

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of ill feeling about these people,

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>um which basically boils down to the difficulty that we

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>have in being able to distinguish between hostility towards people

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>because they were Jewish or just because they were that

0:49:53.040 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>they were there were foreigners, and not using not not

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of relating well to the native population. So that

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was the first thing that it's a bit uncertain about

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and the but what's interesting I think about the leather

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Apron story is uh he was portrayed in the Star

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>as a Jewish criminal, almost sort of in the in

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the tradition of Dickens Fagin. The Star reported that he

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>moved through the streets at night. He was strangely silent,

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>very menacing and threatening the prostitutes with a sharp leather

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>knife as a knife to cut leather, not a knife

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>made out of leather. As the Star reported his uh

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It said, his expression is sinister and seems to be

0:50:57.640 --> 0:51:00.360
<v Speaker 1>full of terror for the women who describe aimed it.

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 1>His eyes are small and glittering. His lips are usually

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>parted in a grin, which is not only not reassuring

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but excessively repellent. I mean, so that they're really going

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>overboard in their description of this sort of nightmare creation.

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And they also described features which are sterop stereotypically Jewish,

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>so it was quite obvious what they were aiming at. Uh.

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing is that is that leather Apron probably

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't have never existed. There were undoubtedly men who stole

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from the women, and it may well be that it

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was some of these men who women thought was the

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 1>leather Apron being described. But as far as we can tell,

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the original story seems to have been credited to a

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>man called Harry Damn, and he was an American journalist

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>who has looking briefly for the start in London. He

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was young, and it seems likely that some of the

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>women he spoke to when he was sent to the

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 1>East then to gain information, fed him the basics of

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the leather Apron story. Uh. And then he exaggerated that

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and worked that up in a way that American journalists

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were a bit more used to doing than the British

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>journalists were. And unfortunately for him, it turned out that

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>there was a man in the East Den with the

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:40.760
<v Speaker 1>nickname of leather Apron, and so the star story really

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that man much many favors m And that

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>man's name was was John Piser. That's right. Um, So

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>when this story comes to attach to John Piser, what

0:52:56.040 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are the consequences for him? Well, John Pies was the

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was the son of a Polish immigrant, and he was

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a slipper maker by trade. He and he wore a

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leather apron, which was the usual attire for someone in

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 1>his life line of business, and for some reason it

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>had also won him the nickname leather Apron, probably because

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he walked to work and came home and everything we're

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>wearing the apron. We don't really know an awful lot

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about it for certain, except that his health was poor

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and that a police sergeant for some reason thought it

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.399
<v Speaker 1>likely that he was the man allegedly spoken about by

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the local prostitutes to the start, and so he was

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>arrested and hauled in. And of course the result of

0:53:56.600 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that was that first of all, he found himself with

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with the fear of being jack the rippa being held

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>over his head uh and and sort of fighting not

0:54:13.560 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>two pcent to the gallows uh And And secondly, it

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>awakened even more animosity towards the Jews, because suddenly this

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people, it looked like this murderer

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was a Jew, was one of the recent immigrants from

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe. Is there a way to kind of generally

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 1>describe the relationship between the police and the press and

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the East End Jewish community in mid September. Is there

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>something that characterizes the relationship between those three kind of

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 1>parties to what's happening here at the beginning of the

0:54:55.600 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of the murder investigation, Well, I think the police. The

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>police seemed to have been fairly mixed, as as I

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>suppose you would expect there. They were fairly mixed in

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>their opinions about the the the immigrant Jewish population, but

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 1>then the native Jewish population was was unhappy about them

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, So they were not really winning on on

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>any account, so the police. But at the time of

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the crimes, the police were very happy with the way

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that that the Jews had accommodated there their inquiries. And

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>yet on the other hand, we have policemen reporting that

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>they were keeping watch on some Jewish property and they

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>had to pretend to be not to be policemen, because

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if it had been known that they were policemen, their

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>lives would have been at risk, so it it's very difficult.

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>One suspects that the Jewish immigrants kept very much to

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves as far as the police were concerned, because the

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:15.720
<v Speaker 1>police had been the agents of their persecutors in Eastern Europe,

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so they are not likely to have been particularly anxious

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to to get involved with them. The press was again

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>at times openly hostile. They there was a lot of

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic views were being expressed, but again there's still

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this uncertainty about whether it was anti Semitic or whether

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:54.399
<v Speaker 1>it was anti immigrant. Uh. And so the press and

0:56:54.560 --> 0:57:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the local population again they were they were fairly hostile

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 1>towards the immigrant population, and in a sense understandably so.

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>These people had were coming in large numbers fleeing abroad.

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They were coming with lots of beliefs of their own.

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They were coming from small villages into into a big city.

0:57:28.760 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They didn't speak the language, they didn't understand the customs,

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and for the most part they kept themselves to themselves.

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So by not integrating with the with the population, UH,

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they weren't at that stage doing themselves any any favors either.

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was really a very difficult situation,

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it could flare up at any moment. M hm. So

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>let's turn to Dr George Baxter Phillips, who was the

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>police surgeon who responds to the scene of any chapman's murder.

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe a police surgeon's role and the work

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that someone like doctor Dr Baxter Phillips was doing at

0:58:16.840 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the time. Well, a police surgeon was a surgeon, obviously

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>often a local doctor who was called upon to visit

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a murder scene to confirmed death, determine whether it was

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>from natural causes or not, and in the case of

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it not being from natural causes, then the surgeon was

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to estimate time of death, estimate things such as

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the instrument used, how it was used, and so on.

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So the police surgeon very often performed the autopsy as

0:58:56.840 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>well and when necessary, and he gave would give evidence

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at the inquest and the trial if there was one,

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And he could also be called upon to give advice

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to the police as and when they needed it. So

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the police surgeon was was a fairly central figure and

0:59:17.560 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>usually well almost always lived in the area where the

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 1>where the policeman were. So h division had its own

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>police surgeons. M hm. Can you describe the influence of

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr Baxter phillips judgment of any Chapman's murder. How did

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>what he concluded affect the investigation as a whole. Well, yes,

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in in his case, Dr Baxter Phillips did influence the

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 1>direction of the investigation. Um. In the case of any Chapman,

0:59:57.000 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing that the police surgeon did was

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the estimate of time of death. Now, he estimated that

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>she had died around about four twenty in the morning. However,

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:15.439
<v Speaker 1>he was not certain because the effect conditions such as

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>loss of blood and the coldness of the of the

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>day of that morning could have had on the body.

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So he wasn't certain about time of death, but he

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>said around about four twenty. It could have been earlier,

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it could have been later. The police gave weight to

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the police surgeon's conclusion m hm, whereas when Baxter he

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>gave weight to witness testimony. And those witnesses were a

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>woman who may have passed Annie Chapman with a murderer

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not long before the murder itself, and there was a

1:00:55.800 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>neighbor who may have heard overheard the murder to making place.

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So the police tended to virtually ignore both of those

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>witnesses because what they claimed to have seen and heard

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>took place after the estimated time of death. But of

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>course if Dr Phillips was wrong, and it would have

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>been fairly significantly wrong in the time of death, then

1:01:30.680 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>those witnesses should have been accorded greater seriousness than they were.

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So in that instance we have a case of the

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor's evidence then and the theorists still now being a

1:01:50.840 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>matter of considerable argument today at least. M hm. You've

1:01:55.880 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the length of the inquests that win Extra held. Um,

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the inquest for for Nichols and for Chapman conclude, uh,

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just four days apart from each other. At that point,

1:02:09.520 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>after both of those inquests have closed, Um, what were

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the results? Was there kind of a prevailing opinion, especially

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>among the detectives and those who are running the investigation,

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>about what was happening. Yes, By the time Abilene was

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>transferred to Whitechapel to take charge of the investigation, Uh,

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the he concluded that at least Nichols had been killed

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>by one person, and there are press reports that suggest

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that he was also of the opinion at that stage

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that possibly Smith and Taburn were also killed by the

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>same person. So there was a movement now towards thinking

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that uh, the that they were dealing with with what

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>today we would call a serial killer. Now it has

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to be realized that whilst the police, uh we're certainly

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>senior policeman, members of the medical profession, and the judiciary

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>were aware of a thing of what we call serial killers,

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't The average man in the street didn't understand

1:03:36.640 --> 1:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it at all. It was a completely new and frightening

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon as far as they were concerned. The senior police

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and the doctors and so forth didn't have a shared

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>language with which to describe these people. So whereas we

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>quite happily talk about serial killer and you know what

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, back then they didn't. And also, the

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>prevailing medical opinion was basically one that these people were

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a moral defectives in a way that insane people were

1:04:24.920 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>insane um and so they had a brain issue. And

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>others thought that the serial killer was and a moral deficiency,

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which obviously we now know well, obviously they do have

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a moral deficiency, but it's not an illness. Um. So

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a considerable amount of uncertainty about what serial

1:04:53.720 --> 1:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>killers were, but it was and for the average man

1:04:58.960 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the street. This was a completely new experience. And

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that is where what I suppose you might call the

1:05:08.120 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>beginnings of ripparology lie, because people then the man in

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the street and in the newspapers, uh, trying to speculate

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about the kind of person they thought the murderer was.

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So they weren't coming up with names, but they were

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking of things like a deranged doctor, or a mad midwife, uh,

1:05:37.480 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a religious fanatic. So they were they were trying to

1:05:43.640 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>work out who the murderer was by that kind of method.

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what and so the and they the

1:05:54.160 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Nichols and Chapman inquests partly running side by side, meant

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that the press had a lot of time, a lot

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of days in which to speculate about who the murderer

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was and what sort of personally was and what the

1:06:10.520 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>police were doing, and what the police should be doing,

1:06:14.000 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and what the police weren't doing mhm. And so it

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was all really quite a new form phenomenon really for

1:06:26.280 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for everybody to be dealing with mm hmm. And then

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we have the dear Boss letter arriving at the press office.

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe that letter and what effect it had

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on the investigation. Well, there was a news agency called

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Central News and they claimed to have received this letter

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on the seven September and treated it first as a joke,

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but on the twenty nine September they passed it across

1:06:57.000 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to the to the police and the letter started dear Boss,

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and the text purported to be from the murderer, who

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>signed himself Jack the Ripper. And whether or not the

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>police actually believed that this letter came from the murderer,

1:07:13.800 --> 1:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they gave publicity to the letter, probably just in the

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>hope that someone might recognize the handwriting and they could

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>investigate from that. The letter did two things. First of all,

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time the name Jack the Ripper

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was used, and whoever dreamt that up, well they it

1:07:39.120 --> 1:07:42.439
<v Speaker 1>was a work of genius. Really had caught the public's imagination,

1:07:43.280 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and it continues to do so. Whether or not the

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>murders would have been so widely known without it isn't known,

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly did no harm to the longevity of

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the story. And it also briefly passed into the language

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>because people started to threaten to Jack the Ripper somebody,

1:08:06.360 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and almost any murder bearing the least similarity and to

1:08:11.000 --> 1:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest sometimes no similarity, were called Jack the Ripper murders.

1:08:15.760 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>The newspapers reported Jack the Ripper murders from all around

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. The second thing it did was to spark

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a letter writing bug in thousands of people. So the

1:08:27.439 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>police were deluged with advice from the public and from

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the murderer, or at least so the letters alleged Um

1:08:42.479 --> 1:08:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the Dear Boss was just one of a number of

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>letters that made it into print, But not all of

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>them were were printed, made their way into the newspapers,

1:08:58.680 --> 1:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and in fact it would seem that there were thousands

1:09:01.000 --> 1:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of letters were received. In many the writers suggested that

1:09:05.880 --> 1:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the murderer was somebody they knew. Others suggested the type

1:09:09.560 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of person a ripple was a policeman or a doctor,

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as I said, and how aware how and a where

1:09:16.040 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he might be caught in. In others, people suggested how

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the police should do their job. Others were supposed to

1:09:24.120 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be from the murderer, and they were jeering or gloating

1:09:27.280 --> 1:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>about the stupidity of the police, or giving the location

1:09:30.960 --> 1:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>of where he intended to strike next. And other letters

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>were sent to newspapers, and a few were sent to

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:43.799
<v Speaker 1>private individuals in the latter case. Indeed, a few people

1:09:44.360 --> 1:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>were even arrested for writing these letters, meant most of

1:09:47.720 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>them thinking that they were being funny when they did so.

1:09:51.720 --> 1:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Mhm mhm uh. Would you describe the Saucy Jackie postcard? Yeah?

1:10:00.320 --> 1:10:04.639
<v Speaker 1>The Saucy Jackie postcard was posted to the Central News

1:10:04.680 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on the first of October. It also addressed the recipient

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>as Boss, and other contents suggested that it was written

1:10:15.760 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>by the same person as the Dear Boss letter, and

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the postcard appeared to give details of the murders of

1:10:23.479 --> 1:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Stride and Katherine Eddoes that only the killer at

1:10:28.720 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that time could have could have known. It's now thought

1:10:33.280 --> 1:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>possible that it could have been posted after the details

1:10:38.520 --> 1:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>of the murder were published, and neither Dear Boss nor

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Saucy Jackie areb are really now believed to have been

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>written by the murderer at all, but they certainly contributed

1:10:54.280 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 1>considerably to the notoriety of this series of murders. M

1:11:00.720 --> 1:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>hm hm uh. No, Liz Stride was Swedish. Can you

1:11:09.040 --> 1:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>describe what what brought her to London? What was her

1:11:11.760 --> 1:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>life in England like in the years before she ended

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:24.759
<v Speaker 1>up alone in Whitechapel well, this Stride was registered as

1:11:24.800 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a prostitute in Sweden, but how and why it isn't

1:11:30.479 --> 1:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly known. She managed to gain some decent employment in Sweden,

1:11:39.080 --> 1:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and um she was she was taken off the prostitute's register,

1:11:45.840 --> 1:11:49.759
<v Speaker 1>and then a small inheritance enabled her to emigrate to London.

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:58.519
<v Speaker 1>She worked here and then married, and even ran a

1:11:58.560 --> 1:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>small coffee shop with her husband, but the marriage eventually collapsed.

1:12:05.320 --> 1:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth had apparently started drinking heavily and this was the

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:15.759
<v Speaker 1>cause of the breakup. We're told she took to pleading,

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:20.639
<v Speaker 1>apparently meaning mainly for the Jews, and it was said

1:12:20.680 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that she could speak Yiddish, but her life spiral downward.

1:12:25.280 --> 1:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Her drinking landed her in court on charges of being drunken,

1:12:29.360 --> 1:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>disorderly and using obscene language on several occasions. There's no

1:12:37.360 --> 1:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>known record of her being arrested for prostitution, but um

1:12:46.400 --> 1:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to doubt that, as with many women

1:12:50.400 --> 1:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at that time, she could have resorted on them, and

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>did resort to prostitution whenever she had when there was

1:12:59.439 --> 1:13:03.479
<v Speaker 1>no other alternative. Somebody said to me many years ago

1:13:03.680 --> 1:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that you'd be horrified if you knew what great Granny

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had done in her life to make ends meet, so

1:13:13.200 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this was not an uncommon thing in the East End.

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But a fellow, a fellow lodger where she stayed from

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>time to time told a journalist. He said, when she should,

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when she could get no work, she had to do

1:13:29.200 --> 1:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the best she could for a living and so and

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that was in relation to being a a prostitute. But

1:13:36.840 --> 1:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>he was He was defending and said that she was

1:13:42.080 --> 1:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a nicer, cleaner woman you couldn't wish to meet. So, yes,

1:13:47.200 --> 1:13:57.519
<v Speaker 1>she was. This ride was had a tragic life, I think, hm, hm,

1:13:58.320 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>can you describe what Israel Schwartz saw on the night

1:14:03.560 --> 1:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of Liz Strides's murder. Israel Schwartz told the police that

1:14:10.080 --> 1:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he had been walking home at night. A short distance

1:14:15.120 --> 1:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him was was a man, and that man

1:14:17.920 --> 1:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>turned into Burner Street, which was also the direction in

1:14:21.240 --> 1:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Schwartz was going, so he followed him in a little

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:28.599
<v Speaker 1>up the way. Up the road, there was a lone woman.

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>The man ahead of Schwartz stopped. There may have been

1:14:32.040 --> 1:14:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a brief exchange of words, we we don't know, and

1:14:36.720 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then the man pulled a woman into the street and

1:14:40.200 --> 1:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>threw her to the ground. She gave a low scream,

1:14:44.840 --> 1:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and a Schwartz, thinking it was a domestic and not

1:14:48.160 --> 1:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting to get involved, across the street and hurried away.

1:14:52.040 --> 1:14:54.839
<v Speaker 1>As he did so, the man shouted out what sounded

1:14:54.880 --> 1:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>like Lipski, and Schwartz ran off, just seeing another and

1:15:00.360 --> 1:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>holding what he seriously described as a knife or a pipe.

1:15:07.360 --> 1:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>The attack had taken place very close to the spot

1:15:10.200 --> 1:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>where Elizabeth Stride was found dead, and had taken place

1:15:15.200 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen minutes before her body had been discovered. It

1:15:19.479 --> 1:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was therefore possible that Schwartz had seen the run up

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to the murder and the murderer mhm mhm. So in

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the case as a whole, and in terms

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of trying to identify a suspect on the part of

1:15:39.680 --> 1:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the police prevent further killings, how important was Israel Schwartz

1:15:47.000 --> 1:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as a witness for having seen these events. It's very

1:15:52.120 --> 1:15:57.599
<v Speaker 1>difficult to say how important Israel Schwartz was. He wasn't

1:15:57.640 --> 1:16:02.719
<v Speaker 1>called to the inquest, which perhaps suggests that what Schwartz

1:16:02.760 --> 1:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>witnessed had nothing to do with the murder, or that

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it was this decided he was lying and the assault

1:16:11.160 --> 1:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>never took place. Whether or not he witnessed an assault

1:16:15.240 --> 1:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on Elizabeth Stride. He was nevertheless a witness if he

1:16:21.040 --> 1:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was telling the truth to what was going on in

1:16:24.320 --> 1:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the streets shortly before Stride's body was found, So in theory,

1:16:29.200 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he should have been called to give evidence. But of course,

1:16:33.080 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if the police thought that he wasn't telling the truth,

1:16:35.400 --> 1:16:38.519
<v Speaker 1>then he had nothing relevant to say if he wasn't

1:16:38.560 --> 1:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in burning streets at the time. But however, we know

1:16:42.840 --> 1:16:47.639
<v Speaker 1>that another street witness in the street who had also

1:16:47.760 --> 1:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>seen nothing, but whose testimony was relevant to what was

1:16:52.400 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>happening or rather not happening in Burna Street at the

1:16:55.920 --> 1:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>time of the murders. She wasn't called either. So it's

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:03.599
<v Speaker 1>possible that the police were keeping Schwartz under wraps, which

1:17:03.960 --> 1:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't really have done and assuming they were doing it,

1:17:09.400 --> 1:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or or rather they shouldn't have done it, assuming that

1:17:13.240 --> 1:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>they did it at all, or it's possible that Schwartz

1:17:16.920 --> 1:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>gave his testimony and camera or off the public record,

1:17:21.640 --> 1:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or finally that he had gone to ground and the

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>police couldn't find him. So basically, if Schwartz was telling

1:17:32.840 --> 1:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the truth, then his testimony would be important. Obviously, if

1:17:40.880 --> 1:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't telling the truth, his testimony was unimportant if

1:17:46.040 --> 1:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he had been in the street at the time he

1:17:48.840 --> 1:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>said he was, but hadn't seen the assault on stride,

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>his testimony was still relevant because he was there shortly

1:17:57.360 --> 1:18:01.599
<v Speaker 1>before the murders were committed. However, Sir Robert Anderson, who

1:18:01.680 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>was the head of the c i D at the time,

1:18:04.400 --> 1:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>said in his memoirs written in that Jack the Ripper

1:18:08.920 --> 1:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>had been positively identified by an eye witness, the only

1:18:14.800 --> 1:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>person who ever had a good view of the murderer.

1:18:20.240 --> 1:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>This person had refused to give evidence because the murderer

1:18:24.800 --> 1:18:30.759
<v Speaker 1>was a Jew like himself. So we are being told

1:18:30.800 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>by Sir Robert Anderson that the witness was a Jew

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that he had a good view of the murderer.

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We know of only two men who saw a man

1:18:40.920 --> 1:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with a woman identified as a victim, a man called Novender,

1:18:45.880 --> 1:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the three men who passed a

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>woman they identified as Catherine Eddoes, and Israel Schwartz. By

1:18:55.800 --> 1:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>no stretch of the imagination could Levender genuinely be described

1:19:00.000 --> 1:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>aimed as having had a good view of the murderer.

1:19:06.320 --> 1:19:14.519
<v Speaker 1>So that means that the only Jewish eye witness to

1:19:14.840 --> 1:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>anything that we know about was Israel Schwartz. So either

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Anderson's story confirms what Schwartz said and also means that

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Schwartz was Anderson's eyewitness, or the whole thing is open

1:19:39.920 --> 1:19:48.559
<v Speaker 1>to serious doubt. Mhm mhm. Now, in that in that

1:19:48.680 --> 1:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>story that that Schwartz tells, there's that shout of of Lipsky.

1:19:55.400 --> 1:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe the Lipsky case that he is probably

1:20:00.760 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>referring to? There? Yes, very briefly, Israel Lipsky lived in

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Batty Street, which was a street adjacent to Burner Street,

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>which is where Stride was murdered. A fellow lodger in

1:20:18.280 --> 1:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the house was a young woman named Miriam Angel, and

1:20:24.160 --> 1:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in June of she was poisoned with nitric acid. On

1:20:30.320 --> 1:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>nitric acid, it also appears that Lipsky had tried to

1:20:35.240 --> 1:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>commit suicide by drinking the acid too, but he didn't die,

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and when he had recovered, he was charged and tried

1:20:44.040 --> 1:20:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and convicted of murdering Miriam Angel. He denied having done so,

1:20:50.120 --> 1:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people believed him, but the jury

1:20:55.040 --> 1:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't amongst them, and he was sentenced to hang. There

1:20:59.280 --> 1:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was a great deal of effort to try and persuade

1:21:04.439 --> 1:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Home Secretary to commute the sentence. But Henry Matthews

1:21:09.320 --> 1:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>refused to do so, and Lipsky then wrote a confession

1:21:16.000 --> 1:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>shortly before he went to the gallows. Many people still

1:21:20.240 --> 1:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>entertained doubt about his guilt. However, the name we're told

1:21:26.960 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that the main Dame Lipsky, was briefly used as a

1:21:32.439 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>term of insult. So uh it is to be assumed

1:21:38.320 --> 1:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that the man who Schwartz are attacking a woman was

1:21:46.479 --> 1:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>making a remark about Schwartz's appearance. M hm hm um.

1:21:56.400 --> 1:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>From that same night when with Dry was killed, can

1:22:01.240 --> 1:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you describe Leon Goldstein and what he contributed to what

1:22:06.080 --> 1:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>came to be the public image of Jack the Ripper.

1:22:10.880 --> 1:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Around the time Elizabeth Stride was murdered, a man was

1:22:15.479 --> 1:22:19.759
<v Speaker 1>seen in the street. He carried a black bag, and

1:22:20.240 --> 1:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>fortunately a man named Leon Goldstein recognized the description of

1:22:25.400 --> 1:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>himself in the newspaper and went along to the police.

1:22:29.240 --> 1:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The contents of his black bag were utterly harmless, and

1:22:33.400 --> 1:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Goldstein went on his way, But his black bag

1:22:38.280 --> 1:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>stayed in the public's mind and added to the image

1:22:41.520 --> 1:22:45.519
<v Speaker 1>of the top the the upper class gent with a

1:22:45.640 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>top hat, wearing a cape, and always carrying a black bag.

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The bag is iconic in the story of Jack the

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Ripper as much as the deer Stalker hat is icon

1:23:00.040 --> 1:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>nick in the image of Sherlock Holmes. So Leon Goldstein

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently gave rise to this, this myth of the black Bag,

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>and the police didn't help because they never released the

1:23:13.479 --> 1:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>story of Mr Goldstein too the press, so it was

1:23:16.960 --> 1:23:21.759
<v Speaker 1>never significantly reported. M Hm. When was it that that

1:23:21.840 --> 1:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the story that the police knew from their conversation with

1:23:25.160 --> 1:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Goldstein finally did become public so that you and I

1:23:28.800 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could know about it today. Well, that's that's known as

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a consequence of the since the release of the police files,

1:23:38.120 --> 1:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because they were they were kept private until the nineteen seventies,

1:23:42.120 --> 1:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's part of the information that's coming to light

1:23:48.640 --> 1:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in these recent years. It's worthwhile remembering that up until

1:23:57.880 --> 1:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>really the year two thousand, research into Jack the Ripper

1:24:04.600 --> 1:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and his crimes was severely curtailed by the fact that

1:24:11.840 --> 1:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>police files were closed. The newspaper library was in effect

1:24:17.479 --> 1:24:20.479
<v Speaker 1>was in London, which effectively meant that anybody not living

1:24:20.560 --> 1:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in or near London had to make a major sacrifice

1:24:26.200 --> 1:24:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to get there to to look through the newspaper files.

1:24:31.520 --> 1:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So researching Jack the Ripper was with which you know,

1:24:37.640 --> 1:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>has been done by private individuals, not people with with

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>tons of money and lots of spare time, and done

1:24:45.920 --> 1:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>when they are also trying to Very often they have

1:24:52.479 --> 1:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a job, full employment, and there maybe a family and

1:24:58.240 --> 1:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>family demands, so they weren't able to go off and

1:25:01.240 --> 1:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do all these things. But from two thousand, UH, we've

1:25:09.080 --> 1:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>benefited greatly from the vast you know, the genealogical records

1:25:14.680 --> 1:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that have been made available on sites like Ancestry, and

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the massive digitalization of newspapers which is going on in

1:25:25.280 --> 1:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>America and here and elsewhere in the world, which has

1:25:27.880 --> 1:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>opened up, uh, a huge range of information that prior

1:25:34.720 --> 1:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand people didn't have access to. And the

1:25:43.240 --> 1:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>search facilities available on the computers have made looking for

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>information so much easier, and with a click of a button,

1:25:51.680 --> 1:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I can now find records that it would maybe have

1:25:56.040 --> 1:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>taken me a week to find twenty years ago that

1:25:59.800 --> 1:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>one twenty years ago, thirty or forty years ago, So

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a big difference there. And also in two thousand m.

1:26:09.800 --> 1:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Stewart Evans and Keith skin Are published a book which

1:26:13.680 --> 1:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>contained all the police files which hitherto had again only

1:26:19.120 --> 1:26:25.599
<v Speaker 1>been available to people living in or near London who

1:26:25.360 --> 1:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>who could see them at the Public Record Office. There

1:26:29.800 --> 1:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are a few people, myself being one of them, who

1:26:33.120 --> 1:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>was lucky enough to be able to buy a photocopy

1:26:37.800 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of the entire files, but that cost about a thousand

1:26:42.000 --> 1:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>over a thousand pounds, and that was back in when

1:26:45.840 --> 1:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a thousand pounds was worth. However, a lot more have

1:26:49.200 --> 1:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>had a bigger buying power than it does today. So

1:26:55.320 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>when people say, oh, you know that reparologists aren't doing,

1:27:02.680 --> 1:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't haven't really paid an awful lot of attention to

1:27:06.840 --> 1:27:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the people involved in the victims and everything. That's because

1:27:10.560 --> 1:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really had access to the source materials until

1:27:15.920 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>relatively recently. M hm m hm um. And I really

1:27:24.960 --> 1:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>commend your your book Forgotten Victims to anyone who does

1:27:30.200 --> 1:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>want to undertake thinking along those lines. And I think

1:27:34.360 --> 1:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you've done such a good job with with that book

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in talking about a number of murders that happened over

1:27:42.000 --> 1:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a span of time, including the Jackie Ripper murders, and

1:27:44.439 --> 1:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>discussing with some sensitivity, um, how stories about especially you know,

1:27:51.720 --> 1:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>favored suspects and the identity of possible murders uh includes

1:27:56.200 --> 1:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or excludes consideration of the lives of women and who

1:28:00.280 --> 1:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lived and died in the East End in the eighties. Um.

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, in some ways it is a

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hard subject, but in some ways I found in a

1:28:11.320 --> 1:28:16.839
<v Speaker 1>beautiful book and I'm really grateful for that one, thank you. Um.

1:28:16.880 --> 1:28:21.519
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a footnote in that book, uh, about

1:28:21.560 --> 1:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the life of Katherine Eddos that she had attended her

1:28:26.760 --> 1:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>cousin's public hanging in eighteen sixties six. Um. Can you

1:28:32.760 --> 1:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>describe that event and the resulting Gallows ballad chat book

1:28:38.160 --> 1:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>about Christopher Robinson that was a part of who Katherine

1:28:41.280 --> 1:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Eddos was in the years before her murder. Well, um, uh,

1:28:48.160 --> 1:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not not a great deal really about that. It was

1:28:52.200 --> 1:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>passing passing statement that was made about Katherine Eddos that

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>she had gone to witness the execution of her relative.

1:29:09.120 --> 1:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>The story basically is that Eddoes and the man that

1:29:15.160 --> 1:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>she was living with at the time, he was, as

1:29:22.800 --> 1:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>far as we can tell, the one who apparently wrote

1:29:26.040 --> 1:29:31.519
<v Speaker 1>these little books and they were cheap almost sort of

1:29:31.560 --> 1:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>pamphlets really that that described events that had happened in

1:29:37.439 --> 1:29:41.479
<v Speaker 1>very often in rhyme of some sort. Uh, and the

1:29:42.040 --> 1:29:45.559
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Gallows ballads, and they had gone to

1:29:45.680 --> 1:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>witness this execution, and they had produced one of the ballads.

1:29:52.160 --> 1:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Whether this story is absolutely true or not, and whether

1:29:58.760 --> 1:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they were produced in these books again, um, we really

1:30:07.600 --> 1:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know. I don't know. The trouble is

1:30:10.680 --> 1:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that very few of these things have survived. They were

1:30:18.360 --> 1:30:23.559
<v Speaker 1>almost throw away things when they were created, So it's

1:30:23.680 --> 1:30:28.599
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to to know. And I haven't actually seen,

1:30:30.200 --> 1:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>uh seen any ballad relating to and as relative mhm, mhm.

1:30:39.080 --> 1:30:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Would you describe for us the events that occurred in

1:30:42.640 --> 1:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Minor Square right? Um? Well, and about one five in

1:30:54.280 --> 1:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the morning, uh PC. Edward Watkins was on his eat,

1:31:00.520 --> 1:31:05.599
<v Speaker 1>which took him into Mica Square, which was a small

1:31:05.640 --> 1:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>square with with three entrances. In the shadows of the

1:31:11.080 --> 1:31:15.559
<v Speaker 1>southwest corner, he saw the body of Katherine Edo's. It

1:31:15.680 --> 1:31:20.679
<v Speaker 1>emerged that about ten minutes earlier, three men had passed

1:31:20.720 --> 1:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the entrances to Mica Square and had there

1:31:25.160 --> 1:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seen a woman talking to a man. Two of the

1:31:29.120 --> 1:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>men walking past would later identify the woman by her

1:31:33.280 --> 1:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>clothing as Katherine Eddo's, and one of those men was

1:31:38.200 --> 1:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the man that I mentioned earlier, Joseph Lavender. Um, Now,

1:31:44.080 --> 1:31:47.519
<v Speaker 1>it's very likely that they did see Katherine Eddos with

1:31:47.600 --> 1:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a murderer, but it is equally likely that the woman

1:31:53.080 --> 1:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was not Katherine Eddo's, or even if it was Eddos,

1:31:57.880 --> 1:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that the man had just been accosted by her when

1:32:01.400 --> 1:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the three men walked by, and had disengaged himself and

1:32:05.000 --> 1:32:11.439
<v Speaker 1>walked on, leaving heads to meet Jack the Ripple. So again,

1:32:11.520 --> 1:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as with all of these cases, there are lots of

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>variable So they did see a woman. She they did

1:32:20.000 --> 1:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>recognize her and identify her by a fairly distinctive clothing

1:32:24.240 --> 1:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as being Edos. So they probably did see Eddoes with somebody.

1:32:30.400 --> 1:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But there was a small margin of time during which

1:32:39.800 --> 1:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the man that they saw could have left her, And

1:32:43.880 --> 1:32:48.679
<v Speaker 1>if she had wandered into the shadows of Might Square,

1:32:48.800 --> 1:32:52.719
<v Speaker 1>then she might well have encounter Jack the Ripper looking there,

1:32:53.960 --> 1:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to everything that had gone on, and maybe proposition

1:32:57.880 --> 1:33:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to her there and then so we can't say that

1:33:01.520 --> 1:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the man that she was with was the murderer. M

1:33:07.320 --> 1:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hm hm. Can you describe the way that the location

1:33:12.080 --> 1:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of Miter Square complicated the investigation? I assume you mean

1:33:22.160 --> 1:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that the murderer of Mita Square in Mighty Square was

1:33:25.200 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>committed in the jurisdiction of the City of London Police.

1:33:30.880 --> 1:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Many people don't realize that London actually has two police forces.

1:33:35.439 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>The central part of London, the business district known as

1:33:39.920 --> 1:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the Square Mile, is the jurisdiction of the City of

1:33:44.600 --> 1:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>London Police and the Metropolitan Police Orange, whose headquarters are

1:33:52.400 --> 1:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at Scotland Yard, have charge of the rest. So the

1:33:56.040 --> 1:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>murderer murder of Catharine Eddos introduced two forces, two sets

1:34:03.320 --> 1:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of inquiries. Um, they liaised with one another, but we

1:34:09.560 --> 1:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know for certain how well. There were some complaints

1:34:14.200 --> 1:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to the effect that the City Police weren't passing across

1:34:17.320 --> 1:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>all the information. Um. There may well have been complaints

1:34:24.600 --> 1:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>by the City Police and that the network passing over

1:34:27.800 --> 1:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>all the information. But unfortunately all the City Police files

1:34:32.160 --> 1:34:35.639
<v Speaker 1>on this case were destroyed in the bombing of World

1:34:35.680 --> 1:34:40.280
<v Speaker 1>War two, so we don't have any of the police,

1:34:41.080 --> 1:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the City Police documentation telling us anything, any snippets of

1:34:45.200 --> 1:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>inside information. Mhm hm, yeah, that's all us. Um. Can

1:34:55.720 --> 1:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you describe describe that the Gholston Street graffido and Charles

1:35:01.120 --> 1:35:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Warren's reaction to it. Yeah, A piece of apron seems

1:35:09.520 --> 1:35:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to have been torn from the apron that Katharine Edos

1:35:13.600 --> 1:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was was wearing uh and that that piece of apron

1:35:18.080 --> 1:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>was was later found in a sort of covered entrance

1:35:21.880 --> 1:35:26.599
<v Speaker 1>to some stairs leading to the landings of several flats

1:35:27.640 --> 1:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or apartments. The eight piece of apron was smeared with

1:35:32.960 --> 1:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>blood and it appears to have been taken by the

1:35:35.880 --> 1:35:40.479
<v Speaker 1>murderer to wipe his hands or knife. Above it on

1:35:40.640 --> 1:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the wall, there's some writing in short which said something

1:35:44.920 --> 1:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of the Jews are not the men

1:35:48.080 --> 1:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to be blamed for nothing. The odd thing was that

1:35:53.040 --> 1:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Jews were spelt j u w e s. We don't

1:35:58.080 --> 1:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>know whether that meant something or it was us playing

1:36:01.080 --> 1:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and ordinary misspelling. Anyway, ever since the leather apron business,

1:36:06.120 --> 1:36:11.479
<v Speaker 1>there was growing animosity towards the Jews and in this area,

1:36:13.640 --> 1:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and the head of the head of h Division while

1:36:18.280 --> 1:36:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Superintendent Thomas Arnold, and he concluded that the writing had

1:36:23.680 --> 1:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with the murderer, but he was concerned

1:36:27.479 --> 1:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that the message might incite further anti Jewish unrest. It

1:36:33.880 --> 1:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was a genuine concern because we know that fifty extra

1:36:39.120 --> 1:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>policemen were drafted into the area the next day to

1:36:42.960 --> 1:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with any trouble. MHM Arnold wanted to have the

1:36:47.720 --> 1:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>writing erased he had already got a man with a

1:36:53.800 --> 1:36:59.599
<v Speaker 1>wet sponge ready to wipe the wall clean. And Sir

1:36:59.680 --> 1:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Charles Warren, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, recognizing the

1:37:04.320 --> 1:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>seriousness of erasing what could have been the murderer's handwriting,

1:37:12.120 --> 1:37:18.559
<v Speaker 1>carefully listened to Arnold's concerns and took the responsibility of

1:37:18.720 --> 1:37:22.240
<v Speaker 1>giving the order to wipe off the joke writing. He

1:37:22.320 --> 1:37:27.439
<v Speaker 1>took that responsibility upon himself, so that basically he'd get

1:37:27.439 --> 1:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the blame and not Ah, not Thomas Arnold. So I

1:37:33.680 --> 1:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think that gives an insight, a little insight into Charles

1:37:37.160 --> 1:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Warren's character there anyway. Uh. Later commentators, including policemen such

1:37:46.160 --> 1:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as Sir Robert Anderson, decided that Warren's actions were wrong

1:37:52.479 --> 1:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and described them as cross dupidity um. And we're of

1:37:58.920 --> 1:38:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the opinion that war and had destroyed the only clue

1:38:02.320 --> 1:38:06.439
<v Speaker 1>ever to be left by the murderer. Their fairness to Warren,

1:38:07.880 --> 1:38:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Superintendent Arnold had recommended the range, and as I said,

1:38:12.680 --> 1:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>had been a waiting about to give the order himself.

1:38:18.840 --> 1:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>His concerns about the message perhaps barking anti Jewish unrest

1:38:24.720 --> 1:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>were genuine, So Warren really had very little option but

1:38:30.240 --> 1:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to accept that that the anxieties of the man in

1:38:35.040 --> 1:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>charge of that part of London. Arnold knew it far

1:38:37.840 --> 1:38:43.760
<v Speaker 1>better than Warren did, and Arnold also didn't believe that

1:38:43.800 --> 1:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the writing had any connection with the crimes. So Ever

1:38:48.120 --> 1:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>since then people have argued about whether the apron and

1:38:56.680 --> 1:39:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the writing were connected or not, what did the writing mean,

1:39:01.800 --> 1:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and if they were connected, what did the writing mean

1:39:04.640 --> 1:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and so on, So it's all a bit in the conundrum.

1:39:09.920 --> 1:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So would you describe for us the speculation of Dr

1:39:15.200 --> 1:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Frederick Gordon Brown when he examined Katherine Eddo's body. Dr

1:39:23.160 --> 1:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Frederick Gordon Brown was the police surgeon who conducted the

1:39:27.360 --> 1:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>autopsy on Katherine Eddo's A kidney had been removed from

1:39:32.280 --> 1:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Eddos and apparently taken away by the murderer. Dr

1:39:37.000 --> 1:39:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Brown concluded that the removal of the kidneys suggested that

1:39:40.600 --> 1:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the murderer possessed anatomical knowledge, and to have successfully removed it,

1:39:47.000 --> 1:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he thought that he must have had a degree of

1:39:48.760 --> 1:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>surgical skill. Other doctors who had examined the other victims

1:39:54.080 --> 1:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>did not necessarily agree, and some said that the ripper

1:39:59.120 --> 1:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't even possess us the skill of the butcher. However,

1:40:03.160 --> 1:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr Brown's opinion fired what's perhaps the most popular theory

1:40:08.120 --> 1:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about Jack the Rippon, namely that he was a deranged doctor.

1:40:14.240 --> 1:40:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Mhm h M. Can you describe the White Chapel Vigilance Committee, um,

1:40:21.600 --> 1:40:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and what led the committee to dissolve towards the end

1:40:25.439 --> 1:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of October. On October, a lot of the residents in

1:40:29.400 --> 1:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the East End were dissatisfied with the police investigation and

1:40:35.200 --> 1:40:42.519
<v Speaker 1>they that this and those especially those with businesses, formed

1:40:42.520 --> 1:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>together to offer a reward and to assist the policeman

1:40:46.439 --> 1:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on their beat by patrolling the streets, keeping an eye

1:40:50.360 --> 1:40:55.519
<v Speaker 1>out for suspicious men and reporting any they observed. They

1:40:55.560 --> 1:41:00.320
<v Speaker 1>were called the White Chapel Vigilance Committee. Uh. They were

1:41:00.400 --> 1:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not as they are sometimes described vigilantes. Uh. Maybe the

1:41:07.080 --> 1:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>same roots of the word, but they weren't taking the

1:41:10.240 --> 1:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>law into their own hands. They were merely keeping an

1:41:14.760 --> 1:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>eye open. They were being vigilant m hm hm um.

1:41:20.680 --> 1:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And despite the dissatisfaction with the police at the time

1:41:24.360 --> 1:41:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Vigilance Committee was formed, um, And you mentioned

1:41:28.240 --> 1:41:31.599
<v Speaker 1>earlier there is a major mobilization of the police in

1:41:31.640 --> 1:41:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Whitechapel in October. Um, how would you describe that operation?

1:41:36.840 --> 1:41:43.720
<v Speaker 1>That's undertaken well. Basically, the the the police had very

1:41:43.760 --> 1:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>little option but to catch the catch Jack the ripper

1:41:50.000 --> 1:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in in the act. Uh. And so therefore they drafted

1:41:55.880 --> 1:42:00.280
<v Speaker 1>police into the area in large numbers from other arts

1:42:00.280 --> 1:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of London. As ever, of course there were issues with

1:42:03.960 --> 1:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>regarding the um the cost of this exercise, so they

1:42:10.240 --> 1:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>were they they came in and then as things quiet

1:42:13.120 --> 1:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were moved out, and then they will move

1:42:15.120 --> 1:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>back in again m hm um. At the end of

1:42:23.200 --> 1:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the month, Robert Anderson asks Dr Thomas Bond, who we

1:42:28.680 --> 1:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, to examine all of the medical evidence of

1:42:32.720 --> 1:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the murders. To that point, Um, why was Dr Bond

1:42:37.320 --> 1:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a trusted observer, trusted by Robert Anderson? And uh, you

1:42:41.720 --> 1:42:43.639
<v Speaker 1>know what in his life had led him to be

1:42:43.720 --> 1:42:47.519
<v Speaker 1>in Robert Anderson's trust. And then when he did have

1:42:47.680 --> 1:42:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the amassed evidence together, what did he conclude and did

1:42:50.640 --> 1:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the police find it helpful? Um? Dr Thomas Bond was

1:42:57.520 --> 1:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really the doctor that Robert Anderson favored and was was

1:43:07.439 --> 1:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the senior, most senior of the of the

1:43:12.000 --> 1:43:18.240
<v Speaker 1>police surgeons. And on the twenty October Robert Anna Star's

1:43:18.320 --> 1:43:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Bond to assist in the Ripper investigation. He hadn't done

1:43:23.760 --> 1:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>much on the earlier victims, but he was able to

1:43:27.320 --> 1:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>study their inquest testimony. Uh, and he had seen Mary

1:43:33.200 --> 1:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelly's body, and he submitted a report on the ten oh,

1:43:45.000 --> 1:43:53.439
<v Speaker 1>sorry tenth of November. So he uh he was the

1:43:53.520 --> 1:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>senior as I said, was the senior surgeon. He was

1:43:56.680 --> 1:44:00.559
<v Speaker 1>the surgeon to a division of the Metropolitan Police, the

1:44:00.600 --> 1:44:06.479
<v Speaker 1>division basically Scotland Yards. And he reviewed the notes as

1:44:07.080 --> 1:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>m as we know, and had been involved in the

1:44:13.560 --> 1:44:20.479
<v Speaker 1>inquest in sorry, the autopsy on Mary Kelly. He was

1:44:20.720 --> 1:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>basically the first, if not the first, one of the

1:44:26.200 --> 1:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>earliest ah psychological or creat creators of a psychological profile.

1:44:33.560 --> 1:44:39.840
<v Speaker 1>He his report to Anderson basically profiled the murderer and

1:44:41.040 --> 1:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>said things like he he he concluded that the murderer

1:44:52.880 --> 1:44:58.240
<v Speaker 1>would not necessarily be splashed or deluged with blood. His

1:44:58.400 --> 1:45:02.599
<v Speaker 1>hands and arms must have been covered in parts of

1:45:02.640 --> 1:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>his clothing must certainly have been smeared with blood. But

1:45:06.800 --> 1:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he could have rolled down his sleeves and put on

1:45:10.880 --> 1:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>gloves and things, so he could have made his escape

1:45:15.080 --> 1:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>without blood necessarily being all over him. Um. He concluded

1:45:23.800 --> 1:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>things like he he thought the mutilations in all the

1:45:28.280 --> 1:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>cases except Bernard Street, were all of the same character,

1:45:35.000 --> 1:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>he said, and so we that's one of the reasons

1:45:38.840 --> 1:45:42.919
<v Speaker 1>why the murderer of the murder of Elizabeth Stride sometimes

1:45:43.439 --> 1:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't thought to be one of the Ripper victims. But

1:45:47.960 --> 1:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>then at the same having said that, the circumstances of

1:45:53.400 --> 1:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that murder we're different. She Stride wasn't mutilated. It appears

1:45:58.439 --> 1:46:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that the murderer had made an escape. Um. So, really,

1:46:06.240 --> 1:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>all I have to say on Bond, that's great, That's

1:46:08.800 --> 1:46:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that's good, and I'll have h Adam. Adam Wood has

1:46:13.320 --> 1:46:15.559
<v Speaker 1>has written a lot about about Bond's career in his

1:46:15.600 --> 1:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Swanson books, so when I talk with him, we'll get

1:46:17.920 --> 1:46:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to go into Bond's history a little more. So that's great,

1:46:20.600 --> 1:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's great. Um. After after Mary Kelly's killing, can you

1:46:24.080 --> 1:46:27.559
<v Speaker 1>describe the way that the police worked to make sure

1:46:27.680 --> 1:46:32.559
<v Speaker 1>that that her murder, despite it's horrific nature, did not

1:46:32.720 --> 1:46:36.559
<v Speaker 1>incite the same kind of of press coverage of the

1:46:36.600 --> 1:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>previous killings. Uh. The the issue I think with after

1:46:45.880 --> 1:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Mary Kelly was really that, um, it was it was

1:46:55.320 --> 1:46:59.519
<v Speaker 1>the murder of Kelly was committed within the jurisdiction of

1:46:59.640 --> 1:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the from coroner. Again, coroner's had had different areas that

1:47:06.000 --> 1:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they were responsible for, and the previous murders, with the

1:47:11.040 --> 1:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>exception of Katherine Eddoes in the City of London, had

1:47:17.600 --> 1:47:22.439
<v Speaker 1>fallen within the jurisdiction of Wind Baxter, and he was

1:47:22.479 --> 1:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a man who took care to question almost everyone with

1:47:26.479 --> 1:47:29.639
<v Speaker 1>something relevant to say, and to probe what they said

1:47:29.680 --> 1:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as best best he could. Mary Kelly fell within the

1:47:35.200 --> 1:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction of Dr Roderick McDonald, and he decided to take

1:47:41.360 --> 1:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>only that information necessary to establish the cause and time

1:47:45.040 --> 1:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of death, so the inquest was over within a day.

1:47:50.439 --> 1:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The effect of this was that it curtailed a sort

1:47:53.880 --> 1:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of press speculation that had been indulged in when reporting

1:47:59.520 --> 1:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the quests day after day in between adjournments. Whether this

1:48:04.320 --> 1:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was done in accordance with Dr McDonald's personal beliefs about

1:48:09.320 --> 1:48:12.559
<v Speaker 1>how in quest should be conducted, or was done at

1:48:12.560 --> 1:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the request of the police or even the Home Office,

1:48:17.680 --> 1:48:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the result was that it it switched off press interest,

1:48:21.560 --> 1:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>almost like he was switching off an electric light. Reports

1:48:27.720 --> 1:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>continued to be made of other murders in the area,

1:48:30.520 --> 1:48:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and there were flurries of Jack the Ripper excitement, but

1:48:34.200 --> 1:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for many it put a full stop to the murders.

1:48:37.800 --> 1:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelly was indeed remind regarded by many as as the

1:48:42.280 --> 1:48:49.479
<v Speaker 1>last Jack the Ripper murder m hm hm um. And

1:48:49.520 --> 1:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there there are some writers who have written that Charles

1:48:53.200 --> 1:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Warren resigns because of the failure of the police to

1:48:58.920 --> 1:49:02.439
<v Speaker 1>solve the case, to catch the killer. You mentioned earlier,

1:49:02.560 --> 1:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>his his conflicts with with Matthews leading up to the

1:49:05.640 --> 1:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Murray's Magazine article. UM, So, in your mind, what were

1:49:12.680 --> 1:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that Warren did resign, Maybe just the article

1:49:17.479 --> 1:49:20.679
<v Speaker 1>um and his and his conflict with Matthews, and then

1:49:20.840 --> 1:49:24.439
<v Speaker 1>what was the process for selecting as a new Commissioner Monroe,

1:49:24.520 --> 1:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, once Charles Warren had left his post. Um.

1:49:34.240 --> 1:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fairly well established that the reason why

1:49:39.800 --> 1:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Warren resigned was because he'd he was basically fed up

1:49:49.200 --> 1:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with the restrictions that were being placed upon him by

1:49:53.720 --> 1:49:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Home Office. He was somebody who ran his own businesses,

1:49:59.400 --> 1:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it were, and resented the fact that he had to

1:50:05.360 --> 1:50:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes go cap in hand to somebody else for permission

1:50:09.760 --> 1:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to do what he believed was the right thing to do.

1:50:15.040 --> 1:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>And the writing of the Murray's Magazine article, which didn't

1:50:21.800 --> 1:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>contain anything really that anybody could object to. But Matthews

1:50:29.439 --> 1:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>did object to it because simply because Warren hadn't asked

1:50:33.439 --> 1:50:39.679
<v Speaker 1>his permission to write it and have it published. Warren,

1:50:39.880 --> 1:50:48.599
<v Speaker 1>I think also had probably been quite keen to leave

1:50:49.960 --> 1:51:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the job, and prior to this blowing up in his face. UH,

1:51:01.800 --> 1:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Monroe was a had been a senior policeman in India

1:51:08.080 --> 1:51:11.599
<v Speaker 1>UH and on his return to England need have been

1:51:11.680 --> 1:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>appointed Assistant Commissioner c I D. He also ran into

1:51:18.240 --> 1:51:25.280
<v Speaker 1>trouble with with Warren, mainly because Monroe, like Warren, wanted

1:51:25.280 --> 1:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to run his own department his way, and he didn't

1:51:28.439 --> 1:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>like Warren interfering any more than Warren, like Matthews interfering.

1:51:35.880 --> 1:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>It's just odd perhaps that Monroe, who must have understood

1:51:40.880 --> 1:51:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Warren's problems, had no sympathy for Warren, who was suffering

1:51:45.640 --> 1:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the same as Monroe was suffering only with Warren. But

1:51:49.520 --> 1:51:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so he resigned, and the Home Office then appointed him

1:51:53.280 --> 1:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to a special permission to run a clandestine secret department

1:51:58.560 --> 1:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>reporting on subversive groups other than the Fenians. So he

1:52:05.280 --> 1:52:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was still there, if you like, running this separate section UH.

1:52:11.439 --> 1:52:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And he was consulted about the White Chapel murders throughout

1:52:16.040 --> 1:52:21.559
<v Speaker 1>and was perhaps therefore, for very many reasons, best equipped

1:52:21.560 --> 1:52:23.719
<v Speaker 1>ahead the met at the time. And I don't think

1:52:23.800 --> 1:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that there was much of a process of of selection

1:52:30.720 --> 1:52:33.559
<v Speaker 1>process going on. I think mon Row was basically chosen

1:52:33.600 --> 1:52:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for the job and put into it. M hmmmmm. You

1:52:41.520 --> 1:52:46.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that there are further murders that happened in the

1:52:46.640 --> 1:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>East End. Uh. Some of them do generate more speculation,

1:52:52.200 --> 1:52:55.639
<v Speaker 1>more press coverage, more interest in whether or not Jack

1:52:55.680 --> 1:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper, They say, you know that, whether or not

1:52:57.840 --> 1:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the same hand was involved. Um. So I'd like to

1:53:02.120 --> 1:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Alice mackenzie and Francis calls. Um.

1:53:06.479 --> 1:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>How was the murder of Alice mackenzie investigated relative to

1:53:11.280 --> 1:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the killings that we've talked about so far, Nicholson, Chapman,

1:53:14.240 --> 1:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ETOs Stride Kelly. Initially, in the case of Alice McKenzie,

1:53:20.200 --> 1:53:27.320
<v Speaker 1>M James Monroe personally took charge of that murder investigation.

1:53:27.600 --> 1:53:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And he initially because Sir Robert Anderson was on holiday again. Uh,

1:53:33.880 --> 1:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And he initially believed that she was murdered by the

1:53:37.600 --> 1:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>same person who had committed the earlier murders, but he

1:53:46.280 --> 1:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>later changed his mind, and so the the murder of

1:53:50.400 --> 1:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Alice Mackenzie was just followed as if it were an

1:53:53.000 --> 1:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>ordinary murder investigation. What's interesting, I suppose for today for

1:54:00.280 --> 1:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are interested in who the ripper was, is that,

1:54:04.400 --> 1:54:09.439
<v Speaker 1>although Monroe later changed his mind, his initial conclusion means

1:54:09.479 --> 1:54:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that the ripper had not been identified at the time

1:54:12.880 --> 1:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of Mackenzie's murder in July, so various suspects who were

1:54:21.520 --> 1:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>dead by that time or had either not become suspects

1:54:28.560 --> 1:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at that point or they weren't the ripper. The murder

1:54:35.520 --> 1:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of Francis Coles again is doesn't appear really to have

1:54:40.720 --> 1:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>any connection with the Jack the Ripper murders um, but

1:54:47.680 --> 1:54:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it is significant for being the last murder included in

1:54:51.800 --> 1:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the White Chuckle murders file held by the police. Francis

1:54:58.200 --> 1:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Coles also, to some ex then comes across as possibly

1:55:03.400 --> 1:55:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the nicest of the victims from what little

1:55:09.400 --> 1:55:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we know about mm hmm, yeah. What gives us that

1:55:14.320 --> 1:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>impression about about her? About her life? I think it

1:55:18.400 --> 1:55:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was the fact that she was She had tried various jobs,

1:55:26.520 --> 1:55:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and one of which appears to have damaged her hands.

1:55:32.760 --> 1:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>She was not able to do jobs. She tried very

1:55:39.440 --> 1:55:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to retain some degree in respectability, and particularly not

1:55:45.520 --> 1:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to let her father know what she was doing or

1:55:51.680 --> 1:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what she had become h and always trying to keep

1:55:56.360 --> 1:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>her clothes look or keep looking decent. She also when

1:56:04.920 --> 1:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>she met up with Thomas Sadler that that last night

1:56:09.920 --> 1:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of her life, she had tried to basically take care

1:56:14.080 --> 1:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of him and look after him. And she obviously taken

1:56:17.960 --> 1:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>drinks and done what she was supposed to do. But

1:56:22.600 --> 1:56:28.280
<v Speaker 1>she just comes across as being hard done by somebody

1:56:28.360 --> 1:56:32.280
<v Speaker 1>she she she wouldn't probably have been doing what she

1:56:32.440 --> 1:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was doing in at a different time, in a different place.

1:56:36.800 --> 1:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that she comes across as having other

1:56:41.040 --> 1:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>failings such as being a desperate alcoholic or or anything

1:56:47.560 --> 1:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like that, or not failings particularly, but but illness issue

1:56:51.960 --> 1:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of that kind. She was just somebody who seems to

1:56:56.920 --> 1:57:02.720
<v Speaker 1>have found herself in her having hard times almost through

1:57:02.800 --> 1:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>note falls of our own. Yeah, um, when we're thinking

1:57:09.440 --> 1:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about yeah, stepping further and further away from the time

1:57:14.880 --> 1:57:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the murders and and starting to look back on them, um,

1:57:20.960 --> 1:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and almost to shape our understanding of them from a

1:57:24.680 --> 1:57:29.760
<v Speaker 1>historical perspective. Who was Melville McNaughton and what role did

1:57:29.800 --> 1:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he have in enjoining the investigation. Melville mc norton had

1:57:37.120 --> 1:57:43.120
<v Speaker 1>been a was was a and from a wealthy family

1:57:43.960 --> 1:57:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that had tea plantations in India, and he had gone

1:57:48.840 --> 1:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to run the tea plantations. They were it was a

1:57:54.280 --> 1:57:58.240
<v Speaker 1>tough time for him. They were fairly remote from the

1:57:58.320 --> 1:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of civilization. He'd get to see an awful lot

1:58:01.200 --> 1:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of people. But he appears to have stuck it out

1:58:04.280 --> 1:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and being quite good at what he did. But at

1:58:08.160 --> 1:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one point he ran into trouble with some of the

1:58:13.400 --> 1:58:18.960
<v Speaker 1>natives and basically they beat him up and left him

1:58:19.120 --> 1:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for dead in the plane. Fortunately he recovered and he

1:58:27.040 --> 1:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>returned eventually returned to England. But as a consequence of

1:58:31.640 --> 1:58:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that event, he actually met James Monroe, who was the

1:58:36.960 --> 1:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>senior policeman out there at the time, and so the

1:58:41.480 --> 1:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>two of them became quite good friends. So when mc

1:58:47.480 --> 1:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>norton came back to Britain, Munroe wanted him to join

1:58:53.920 --> 1:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the met and become I think it was Assistant Chief Constable.

1:58:59.640 --> 1:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh All appeared to be going swimmingly until Warren found

1:59:04.040 --> 1:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>out about this incident of him being beaten up in India,

1:59:08.520 --> 1:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and he really then said no. And so that was

1:59:13.560 --> 1:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>another interference with with with Munroe's department that put him

1:59:21.960 --> 1:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at odds with Warren. So it was the following year

1:59:29.440 --> 1:59:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that that Norton was when, after Warren had gone, that

1:59:33.720 --> 1:59:37.520
<v Speaker 1>McNaughton managed to all the Monroe managed to get McNaughton

1:59:37.600 --> 1:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>into into place, and he joined the met in the

1:59:42.040 --> 1:59:49.360
<v Speaker 1>middle of and so he was there for all the

1:59:48.760 --> 1:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the later to investigate the later murders. But he had

1:59:52.320 --> 1:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous interest in the case and apparently kept pictures

1:59:58.560 --> 2:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the victims and other informa in his desk draw

2:00:01.920 --> 2:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so he would have been able to make it acquaint

2:00:05.640 --> 2:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>himself with with all the the basic facts of the investigation.

2:00:11.920 --> 2:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And then of course he was active in the subsequent investigation,

2:00:17.160 --> 2:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so he became quite a knowledgeable person. And he wrote

2:00:24.080 --> 2:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a report called the which we refer to as the

2:00:30.320 --> 2:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>mc norton Memorandum. And he wrote this probably in anticipation

2:00:38.880 --> 2:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of questions being asked of the police about a man

2:00:42.120 --> 2:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>called Thomas Cutbush, who a newspaper at the time was

2:00:46.280 --> 2:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>identifying but not naming him as Jack the Ripper. In

2:00:52.440 --> 2:00:56.839
<v Speaker 1>this report, he briefly summarizes the Jack the Ripper murders

2:00:56.880 --> 2:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and refers to three suspects. They were Montague, John Druette,

2:01:04.440 --> 2:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody called Kasminski, and a man called Ostrog. We don't

2:01:12.120 --> 2:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>know very much about any of them. Drew it appears

2:01:14.760 --> 2:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to have been come to the attention of the police

2:01:19.600 --> 2:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>some years after when Norton joined the met. A lot

2:01:26.160 --> 2:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of has been done on Kasminsky. We don't know for

2:01:31.240 --> 2:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>sure who Cosminski was, but the we do know that

2:01:34.160 --> 2:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>he went into an asylum and the only k anything

2:01:38.320 --> 2:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Ski that's been found in asylum records as a chap

2:01:42.000 --> 2:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>called Aaron Kasminski, and a lot of theorizing has been

2:01:44.760 --> 2:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>done about him and Michael Ostrog. Turns out that he

2:01:51.440 --> 2:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was actually in a prison in France at the time

2:01:56.280 --> 2:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the murders were committed, and so he couldn't have been

2:01:59.680 --> 2:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper, But obviously mc norton didn't know that

2:02:03.320 --> 2:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when he wrote the memorandum, so he's become quite an

2:02:08.280 --> 2:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>important figure in the case. Do we know how the

2:02:13.520 --> 2:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>memorandum was received on its first being written, Well, as

2:02:19.080 --> 2:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>far as we can tell it, it was never received

2:02:23.600 --> 2:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>by anybody we we suppose. We we assume that it

2:02:29.480 --> 2:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was written for his senior officer, which at that time

2:02:35.400 --> 2:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would have been Robert Anderson. Um or it was prepared

2:02:44.840 --> 2:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at Anderson's request forman Rose request, possibly for the attention

2:02:52.400 --> 2:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Home Office, But we really don't know, and

2:02:54.960 --> 2:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing. There are no none of the usual stamps

2:02:59.280 --> 2:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to suggest this was received by somebody or read by somebody,

2:03:04.000 --> 2:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>as as are appended to most documents, so it may

2:03:08.480 --> 2:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not ever have been needed and Munroe sorry, not just

2:03:13.640 --> 2:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>stuck it into the files. We do know. What's interesting

2:03:19.160 --> 2:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is that there was a copy that he kept a

2:03:22.560 --> 2:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>copy of that report, which differs slightly from the one

2:03:26.800 --> 2:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the police files, which some people have argued, ah

2:03:34.960 --> 2:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was something that mc norton wrote later. I think it was.

2:03:40.640 --> 2:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's more likely to be a rough draft of the

2:03:46.320 --> 2:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one that's in the police files. They basically say that

2:03:51.560 --> 2:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing m but there are important details that

2:03:56.000 --> 2:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are different, so it probably wasn't We can't you know,

2:04:00.720 --> 2:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't received by anybody, so there was no reaction

2:04:03.400 --> 2:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to it. Um Stepping now more towards those kinds of

2:04:10.240 --> 2:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>retrospective questions and considerations, you've written that that Wind Baxter,

2:04:16.880 --> 2:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the coroner for everyone except Atos and Kelly um that

2:04:22.400 --> 2:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he gained undeserved notoriety for advancing the theory that the

2:04:26.840 --> 2:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>murders were committed in order to obtain the victims internal organs.

2:04:31.440 --> 2:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you say more about that theory, why drew the

2:04:34.840 --> 2:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>attention it did to Baxter, and why it was undeserved? Well,

2:04:41.760 --> 2:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when Baxter had heard that an American doctor was trying

2:04:47.200 --> 2:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy you y ah and the explanation given for this,

2:04:55.760 --> 2:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>unprobable as it sounds, was to accompany a book he

2:05:00.560 --> 2:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>was writing. Now, when Baxter heard this story and at

2:05:05.240 --> 2:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the inquest, suggested that ah that they said possibly may

2:05:16.400 --> 2:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have been heard or something like it may have been

2:05:19.360 --> 2:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>heard by the murderer and given the murderer the idea

2:05:23.000 --> 2:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of killing women in order to obtain organs that he

2:05:26.560 --> 2:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>could then sell. In honesty, it was an insane idea,

2:05:34.440 --> 2:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but when Baxter suggested that it was, the murderer was insane.

2:05:40.760 --> 2:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So in fairness to Baxter, all he suggested was that

2:05:44.520 --> 2:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a madman might have been inspired by a story that

2:05:48.760 --> 2:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was in circulation at the time. And I think that's

2:05:53.200 --> 2:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>quite quite reasonable. I'm in a madman, to be honest,

2:05:56.440 --> 2:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>could have been inspired by anything, and we know that

2:06:00.000 --> 2:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the most obscure things seem to have inspired people to

2:06:05.240 --> 2:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kill um. It's just a pity that because win Baxter

2:06:11.160 --> 2:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>put forward this idea, it's been assumed that the idea

2:06:14.840 --> 2:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was his. It wasn't really his. There was a doctor

2:06:18.800 --> 2:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>who was trying to buy you try. We don't know

2:06:22.680 --> 2:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>who he was, unfortunately, but there was one am and

2:06:29.200 --> 2:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's perfectly reasonable to think that somebody who was insane

2:06:37.120 --> 2:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>would have might have been inspired by that. So I

2:06:39.760 --> 2:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's really unfair to take win Baxter there and

2:06:43.200 --> 2:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>give him give him trouble for for something that wasn't his.

2:06:48.280 --> 2:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm um. In and You've Forgotten Victims book, you

2:06:55.360 --> 2:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit about the random, the White Hart, the

2:07:00.560 --> 2:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Pension and other Torso or or Thames murders, and you

2:07:06.160 --> 2:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>noted that at the time of writing um, they had

2:07:10.240 --> 2:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>drawn little attention relative to what we consider the Ripper killings.

2:07:15.560 --> 2:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Could you say a few more words on on that. Uh? Yeah,

2:07:21.240 --> 2:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as a very good question. Unfortunately, it's one to which

2:07:26.960 --> 2:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no definitive answer. I guess it's part because they

2:07:32.600 --> 2:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>were overshadowed by the Whitechapel murders, and therefore they just

2:07:37.240 --> 2:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the publicity that they One imagine that they

2:07:41.160 --> 2:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>might have done had they had the Whitechappel murders not

2:07:45.560 --> 2:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>being committed at the same time equally, of course, it

2:07:49.920 --> 2:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>depends on what really grabs the attention of the press.

2:07:56.880 --> 2:08:01.839
<v Speaker 1>And these were bodied parts in effect that we're being

2:08:01.880 --> 2:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>found at different times in fairly separated places. And unlike

2:08:11.400 --> 2:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper killings, which were suggested one person operating in

2:08:15.400 --> 2:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a very small area, it may well be that the

2:08:22.120 --> 2:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to Also killings just didn't grab public attention. And we

2:08:25.960 --> 2:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have known about these murders for quite a long time,

2:08:28.600 --> 2:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's only in the last few years that people

2:08:32.800 --> 2:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>have been writing books about them and ah really bringing

2:08:38.400 --> 2:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>them into the sphere of of anybody interested in the

2:08:43.640 --> 2:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Ripper murders as well, because they show what was going

2:08:46.760 --> 2:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on at the time. Mhm Um. In that same book,

2:08:56.280 --> 2:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, and you offered a few comments on this

2:08:59.040 --> 2:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on this earlier Um, but just stepping towards wrapping up

2:09:02.160 --> 2:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>our conversation for today. UM. In that book, you've written

2:09:05.600 --> 2:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that often the stories of women killed in Whitechapel are

2:09:08.520 --> 2:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>omitted from the studies of the murder and that their

2:09:11.120 --> 2:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>status um, whether they're in or out of being included

2:09:16.240 --> 2:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in in the victims of a you know, Jack the Ripper,

2:09:20.280 --> 2:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of depends on in your term that the whim

2:09:23.800 --> 2:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of the theorist about the identity of the killer. Um,

2:09:28.560 --> 2:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind, would you be going to offer

2:09:31.440 --> 2:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>how you have gone about thinking about the identity of suspects,

2:09:37.800 --> 2:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>potential um possibilities for who the murderer was. Well, right

2:09:48.000 --> 2:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>from the I've never been terribly interested in the identity

2:09:52.280 --> 2:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper. Oddly enough, it was always for

2:09:57.120 --> 2:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>me was compiling the data, the about all the crimes

2:10:04.160 --> 2:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and what led to various conclusions and so forth. So

2:10:10.840 --> 2:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really I think that the chances of us ever

2:10:18.040 --> 2:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>knowing who Jack the Ripple was largely depends on who

2:10:25.200 --> 2:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the police at the time thought Jack the Ripple was.

2:10:29.120 --> 2:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And the only clues to that that we have are

2:10:33.360 --> 2:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the are the names provided in the Norton memoranda, and

2:10:39.440 --> 2:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to a slightly lesser extent, to Francis Tumbletye, who was

2:10:45.880 --> 2:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a definite suspect at a time at some point, UM,

2:10:53.440 --> 2:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe one or two others. But there's That's basically it.

2:10:57.960 --> 2:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And of those really, really I suppose it all boils

2:11:02.160 --> 2:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>down to Drewid and kause Minsky and the research that

2:11:09.560 --> 2:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>has been done on them. UM. And I wouldn't like

2:11:17.000 --> 2:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to I know, to be honest, I really don't feel

2:11:20.840 --> 2:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>capable of, uh, sort of nailing my colors to to

2:11:29.600 --> 2:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the master of either one. At the moment. I think

2:11:32.280 --> 2:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>there subjects that really do demand a lot more in

2:11:38.600 --> 2:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot more investigation and research. And I suppose that

2:11:43.880 --> 2:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really is we're trying to understand what was going on

2:11:48.320 --> 2:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and understanding the history of the case

2:11:53.200 --> 2:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes so important because, for example, it was h h

2:12:02.400 --> 2:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>In the case of Kazminski, we believe that he is

2:12:10.560 --> 2:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>also a suspect named by Anderson as being the witness,

2:12:16.560 --> 2:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>sorry that the person who was seen by a witness,

2:12:21.640 --> 2:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the only person who have had a good view of

2:12:23.720 --> 2:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the murderer. And so what Anderson wrote and how seriously

2:12:35.640 --> 2:12:39.919
<v Speaker 1>he can be taken depends to a very great extent

2:12:40.080 --> 2:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on what we know about Sir Robert Anderson and what

2:12:43.320 --> 2:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of man he was, and how things that we

2:12:48.960 --> 2:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>know about him may have influenced the way he believed

2:12:54.560 --> 2:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the things that he said. Is for example, some

2:12:59.240 --> 2:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people have said that he and it, strangely enough, has

2:13:03.680 --> 2:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>almost become an accepted fact that he was anti Semitic,

2:13:13.560 --> 2:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and that was something that was leveled an accusation that

2:13:16.880 --> 2:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was leveled at him at the time, and he vehemently

2:13:20.000 --> 2:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>denied it, and the evidence such as we have it

2:13:26.400 --> 2:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>would support that denial. So there's no real evidence that

2:13:32.560 --> 2:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I am aware of that Anderson was anti science semitic.

2:13:36.520 --> 2:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But this is a neat theory provided by people who

2:13:40.240 --> 2:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>want to undermine what he said, and it doesn't have

2:13:44.400 --> 2:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>any support. So we really need to study people like

2:13:50.520 --> 2:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Anderson and mc norton and Swanson in great depth. The

2:13:55.040 --> 2:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>trouble is there's not an awful lot of information out

2:13:57.600 --> 2:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>there that enables us to do the If they have

2:14:00.840 --> 2:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>been politicians or something, they've probably been fifteen biographies of them,

2:14:06.080 --> 2:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like there are with people like Gladstone. That's where we are,

2:14:11.840 --> 2:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and nobody has done that in depth research. Really. Um

2:14:20.080 --> 2:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam Wood has done a tremendous book about Swanson and

2:14:25.600 --> 2:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>probably has packed into that book everything that anybody will

2:14:30.400 --> 2:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ever know about Swanson and um and it does really

2:14:38.120 --> 2:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>help to get some sort of insight into into Swanson

2:14:42.040 --> 2:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>because he was the man who wrote the the notes

2:14:46.720 --> 2:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in a copy of Anderson's book that tends to confirm

2:14:49.360 --> 2:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that Anderson said about his suspect that we

2:14:52.120 --> 2:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>believe to be McNaught Skazminski, So, Um, you know that

2:14:57.040 --> 2:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it really is important. History now is is becoming really important.

2:15:02.880 --> 2:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't just theorize willy nilly, we we really do

2:15:06.360 --> 2:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have to get down to the serious level of history.

2:15:12.040 --> 2:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And maybe as a as a final thought to conclude

2:15:15.840 --> 2:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>our conversation, UM, could you offer what, in your opinion,

2:15:21.120 --> 2:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>studying the White Chapel murders gives to us in the present.

2:15:27.920 --> 2:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the value of this ongoing study which has been

2:15:32.840 --> 2:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>has been undertaken ever since the murders, and you know,

2:15:37.120 --> 2:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it will stop anytime soon. Um, But

2:15:42.880 --> 2:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>having dedicated, as you said, so much of your own

2:15:45.200 --> 2:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>writing life to this case, what have you discovered maybe

2:15:51.160 --> 2:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as you've done this work well, as I said, I

2:15:58.280 --> 2:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think the I think the main thing is that uh

2:16:09.080 --> 2:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>probably said it a thousand times, is that Jack the Ripper,

2:16:14.440 --> 2:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that the mystery if it attracts, if the if the

2:16:19.680 --> 2:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mystery itself is something that somebody enjoys, if they're curious

2:16:24.640 --> 2:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about trying to resolve who Jack the Ripple was, just

2:16:29.920 --> 2:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as they might be if they're

2:16:32.160 --> 2:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in who King Arthur was, or who Robin Hood was,

2:16:36.040 --> 2:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or any any of those sort of mysteries of identity.

2:16:42.760 --> 2:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The great thing about it is that it gets you

2:16:44.879 --> 2:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to read books. People who are interested and want to know,

2:16:48.640 --> 2:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they read the books, and they very often they collect

2:16:52.000 --> 2:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the books. More important than that is that they actually

2:16:57.400 --> 2:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>think about what they're reading. And that's no bad thing either.

2:17:01.800 --> 2:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So you those are two basic things that you get

2:17:04.920 --> 2:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>out of it, that you learn. And of course it's

2:17:10.840 --> 2:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I I have found from right from when I got

2:17:14.800 --> 2:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>interested in this myself, that people would be interested in

2:17:19.240 --> 2:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the mystery of identity. They would perhaps retain that mystery,

2:17:24.080 --> 2:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but they would get interested into some other aspect of

2:17:29.160 --> 2:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. So I always had one person in mind

2:17:33.320 --> 2:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>who I know was drawn to the ripper by the

2:17:37.520 --> 2:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>mystery of identity and then found out that one of

2:17:41.720 --> 2:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the suspects came from Chiswick, where he lived, and then

2:17:49.360 --> 2:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he started to investigate the connection with Chiswick. And then

2:17:53.240 --> 2:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he started took that even further and ended up being

2:17:58.840 --> 2:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>quite a uh well a highly knowledgeable local historian. Uh

2:18:06.400 --> 2:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And so it it took him off in all sorts

2:18:11.120 --> 2:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of different directions. I mentioned earlier the issue of horses

2:18:17.840 --> 2:18:20.039
<v Speaker 1>dropping dead in the street. When you think about it,

2:18:20.120 --> 2:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>horses then were like cars are today, and if your

2:18:23.160 --> 2:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>car breaks down now you call somebody like one of

2:18:27.840 --> 2:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the motoring organizations here, it would be the A A

2:18:31.280 --> 2:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Uh. There was a similar operation

2:18:38.879 --> 2:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which were the horse slaughterers in Victorian London, and they

2:18:44.879 --> 2:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>had a branch all over different places and they would

2:18:47.640 --> 2:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>come out and they would get the horse and take

2:18:53.800 --> 2:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it back to their to their yards. So there's all

2:18:58.280 --> 2:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this business going on um and about the way that

2:19:03.560 --> 2:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>people lived, and so there are people who have actually

2:19:08.320 --> 2:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>specialized in learning about the horse slaughtering business that was

2:19:14.879 --> 2:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>huge in Victorian London and really one company basically had

2:19:21.920 --> 2:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the monopoly on it. And so there's all kinds of

2:19:25.640 --> 2:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>things that people lead off to discover and as I say,

2:19:35.360 --> 2:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the murder aspect of it adds a frision of of excitement.

2:19:42.360 --> 2:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But of course it's not just that. I mean, Jack

2:19:45.720 --> 2:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper now is part of our popular culture known

2:19:52.040 --> 2:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world. You still can, I believe, go to

2:19:57.920 --> 2:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a burger bar Singapore where they're selling you can have

2:20:04.840 --> 2:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an anti burger, which is somewhat the thought of that

2:20:10.800 --> 2:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>is rather repellent, but nevertheless it's it just goes to

2:20:14.959 --> 2:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>show how how deep Jack the Ripper has penetrated into

2:20:20.959 --> 2:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the national psyche in in some cases you can see

2:20:24.360 --> 2:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>how the name has been used in everything from advertising,

2:20:29.520 --> 2:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>which virtually began as the murders were being committed, right

2:20:36.400 --> 2:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>through is everything. There was a worldwide World War Two

2:20:38.879 --> 2:20:43.039
<v Speaker 1>bomber called Jack the Ripper. There's everything from a toilet

2:20:43.080 --> 2:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>spray to a computer game being mat to a novel

2:20:46.520 --> 2:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or a movie or even an opera all about Jack

2:20:49.440 --> 2:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper. So that's an area that is a very

2:20:55.400 --> 2:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>valid area for study. And I'm sure that just as

2:21:00.760 --> 2:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>there have been books written just about the TV and

2:21:08.240 --> 2:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>movies about Jack the Ripper, I'm sure that somebody at

2:21:11.680 --> 2:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some point is going to write a popular culture book,

2:21:15.160 --> 2:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>probably quite an academic one which I wouldn't understand, about

2:21:20.000 --> 2:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>about the way that Jack the Ripper is part of

2:21:24.280 --> 2:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of everything that's going on today. And and then of course,

2:21:29.200 --> 2:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>right at the end is the is Jack the Ripper

2:21:33.320 --> 2:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is a mystery and understanding perhaps even solving it, you

2:21:38.360 --> 2:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>have to study the evidence. You have to know how

2:21:42.000 --> 2:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>people lived and so on, because all of how they

2:21:48.320 --> 2:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lived could have a bearing on what they did and

2:21:52.000 --> 2:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>therefore ultimately lead to perhaps a discovery of who the

2:21:55.800 --> 2:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>murderer was or getting close to that now means you've

2:22:01.080 --> 2:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>got to, as I said, you have to read books,

2:22:03.720 --> 2:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>which is no bad thing. You've got to learn about sources,

2:22:07.879 --> 2:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>which ones are and which ones aren't reliable, all sorts

2:22:13.400 --> 2:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of things that that historians do. That's part of their job.

2:22:19.160 --> 2:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And many of those things have applications in in our world,

2:22:26.320 --> 2:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ah such as now there is an increasing need to

2:22:30.160 --> 2:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy news stories and blogs and

2:22:35.640 --> 2:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>web pages goodness knows what else. And looking at the

2:22:42.400 --> 2:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Ripper mystery is a good way of learning how um,

2:22:48.879 --> 2:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how to do these things and how to be uh

2:22:54.400 --> 2:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so analytical and and how to understand sources and in

2:23:00.040 --> 2:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>many respects in schools where Jack Ripper is taught, because

2:23:05.120 --> 2:23:12.039
<v Speaker 1>it adds that frision of of excitement too otherwise tedious

2:23:12.160 --> 2:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>life in Victorian Britain, but it teaches people how to

2:23:20.480 --> 2:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about things like very simple historians one of one stuff

2:23:24.440 --> 2:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like what is the primary source, what's the secondary source?

2:23:27.840 --> 2:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>What's a tertiary source? Are news for make newspapers one

2:23:33.360 --> 2:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of those? Which so which one? And how do you

2:23:35.720 --> 2:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between the editorial in a newspaper and a news

2:23:41.440 --> 2:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>story all of that kind of stuff. So Jack the

2:23:45.680 --> 2:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Ripper really does have an area where it teaches. It

2:23:48.680 --> 2:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can teach people things on so many different levels, and

2:23:53.280 --> 2:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that for me, I think is the thing. And I

2:23:55.879 --> 2:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose as a writer, if you want to understand Jack

2:23:59.520 --> 2:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper, you're gonna read books, which is great because

2:24:02.920 --> 2:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>then you can go out in my mind and help

2:24:05.000 --> 2:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to brilliant Billiam Paul. That's it for this week's episode

2:24:12.600 --> 2:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of Unobscured. Unobscured was created by me Aaron Manky and

2:24:38.879 --> 2:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>produced by Matt Frederick, Alex Williams, and Josh Thane in

2:24:42.280 --> 2:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>partnership with I Heart Radio. Research and writing for this

2:24:45.680 --> 2:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>season is all the work of my right hand man

2:24:48.000 --> 2:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Carl Nellis and the brilliant Chad Lawson composed the brand

2:24:51.280 --> 2:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>new soundtrack. Learn more about our contributing historians, source material

2:24:56.040 --> 2:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and links to our other shows over at History unobscured

2:24:59.440 --> 2:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. M HM, and until next time, thanks for listening.

2:25:10.959 --> 2:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Unobscured is a production of I Heart Radio and Aaron Menkey.

2:25:13.760 --> 2:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit I heart Radio, app,

2:25:16.400 --> 2:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

2:25:22.040 --> 2:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>H