1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,520 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to Movie Mike's Movie podcast. I 2 00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:04,760 Speaker 1: am your host Movie Mike, joined today by my wife 3 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:06,040 Speaker 1: and cohs Kelsey. How are you. 4 00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 2: I'm great. 5 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:09,800 Speaker 1: We're about to get into the Oscar nominations, which I 6 00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:11,840 Speaker 1: don't even know how I'm gonna react yet. I've had 7 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 1: some time to process that a little bit. But we 8 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,200 Speaker 1: will give you the snub surprises and my predictions. In 9 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:19,279 Speaker 1: the movie review, we'll be talking about Boys in the Boat, 10 00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:20,440 Speaker 1: which you read the book? 11 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:20,919 Speaker 2: I did? 12 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:23,239 Speaker 1: I did not. I never read the book, but we'll 13 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 1: give the comparison of what was better in your opinion, 14 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 1: the movie or the book. And then in the Trailer Park, 15 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:31,640 Speaker 1: we'll talk about the new Roadhouse trailer that came out 16 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 1: with Jake Gillenhall. Thank you for being subscribed, thank you 17 00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 1: for listening every single week. Shout out to the Monday 18 00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 1: Morning Movie crew. And now let's talk movies. 19 00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,560 Speaker 3: In a world where everyone and their mother has a podcast, 20 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:46,960 Speaker 3: one man stands to infiltrate the ears of listeners like 21 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:51,000 Speaker 3: never before in a movie podcast. A man with so 22 00:00:51,120 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 3: much movie knowledge, he's basically like a walking IMTB with glasses. 23 00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 1: From the Nashville Podcast. 24 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:03,600 Speaker 3: Network, This is Movie, Mike Movie, popat Oscar. 25 00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 1: Nominations came out last week. We have a lot to 26 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: get to, so let's get right into it. Kelsey, Who's 27 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:10,319 Speaker 1: nominated first for Best Picture? 28 00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 2: All right? 29 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 4: We have American Fiction, Anatomy of a Fall, Barbie, The Holdovers, 30 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:22,800 Speaker 4: Killers of the Flower Moon, Maestro Oppenheimer, Past Lives, Poor Things, 31 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 4: and the Zone of Interest. 32 00:01:24,319 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 1: As far as surprises, I feel like everything here is 33 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:32,840 Speaker 1: pretty typical. My only real surprise is that Air wasn't nominated. 34 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:34,959 Speaker 1: And it's hard for a movie that comes out early 35 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,360 Speaker 1: in the year to be considered once the award nominations 36 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 1: come out. 37 00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 2: That was twenty twenty three. 38 00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 1: It was I am just surprised that that one wasn't nominated. 39 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:45,080 Speaker 1: You have Ben Affleck, you have Matt Damon, you have 40 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:47,560 Speaker 1: so many people involved in that movie. But man, I 41 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:49,680 Speaker 1: feel like that was one that was left off the list. 42 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 1: I don't think it's a full on snub. I just 43 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 1: thought maybe it would land in the category. Well, getting 44 00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: to some snubs here, iron Claw, I. 45 00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 4: Really thought that was gonna get a nom That movie 46 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 4: was fantastic. 47 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: And the thing about the Oscars in this class of movies, 48 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 1: I love the Oscar. You know I love the Oscars. 49 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 2: You love the Oscars. 50 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 1: Every single year I watch it and I'm so dial 51 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:11,960 Speaker 1: bow type and my boat, my bow tie hoodie, and 52 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:13,920 Speaker 1: I get so excited about it because there are always 53 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 1: movies that just change me and get nominated for Oscars, 54 00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:18,640 Speaker 1: and it's hard for me to pick the one that 55 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:20,320 Speaker 1: I love the most. It's the hardest thing I have 56 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:22,920 Speaker 1: to do every single year. And this time there's not 57 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: a sad movie that I love. Those are the types 58 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,080 Speaker 1: of movies that really speak to me, that stay with me. 59 00:02:27,480 --> 00:02:29,680 Speaker 1: Last year it was The Whale. There's always that one 60 00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:31,640 Speaker 1: that just hits an emotional level with me that I'm like, 61 00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:33,880 Speaker 1: all right, like I want that one to win. I 62 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: have no real emotional investment in any of the movies 63 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:39,720 Speaker 1: nominated for Best Picture. The movie that moved me this 64 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:42,359 Speaker 1: year that I continue to think about was The Iron 65 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:45,559 Speaker 1: Claw and I can't believe that it's not even nominated. 66 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:48,839 Speaker 1: And I guess it's because of the politics and who 67 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 1: votes in these some other snubs. Obviously, my favorite movie 68 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:55,639 Speaker 1: of last year, God'silla minus One. I thought that would 69 00:02:55,800 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: maybe had a slight chance. It had that Oscar level 70 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 1: to me, But I guess because it's Godzilla, and there 71 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:05,239 Speaker 1: are like over thirty five Godzilla movies. Maybe it's not 72 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:07,919 Speaker 1: his novel, which is always what the Oscar nominees tend 73 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,600 Speaker 1: to be movies that represent the year but also do 74 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:13,239 Speaker 1: something different. And that is why I like this category 75 00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: every single year, because I feel like it's a time 76 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:19,119 Speaker 1: capsule representing a period of time. But man, I thought 77 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,800 Speaker 1: that one could have been nominated. Also The Killer, and 78 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 1: also Saltburn. 79 00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:24,720 Speaker 2: Not that disappointed about that one. 80 00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 1: I just feel like that movie had an impact, A 81 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 1: lot of people talked about it, it came out at 82 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 1: the right time. I feel like if they were going 83 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:33,720 Speaker 1: for a movie to kind of be that X factor, 84 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 1: it would have been Saltburn. So what I think the 85 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:40,040 Speaker 1: winner here easily is Oppenheimer, which as we go through 86 00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,240 Speaker 1: all of this list, I think it's good a clean House. 87 00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:45,160 Speaker 1: It had the most nominations with thirteen, and it's the 88 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 1: only one on this list I can really see that 89 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 1: also has the critical acclaim, the financial success and it's 90 00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 1: only challenging that department would be Barbie, which I think 91 00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: honestly probably deserves it more than Oppenheimer. But if I'm 92 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 1: looking at who I think is gonna win. I just 93 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:05,160 Speaker 1: think Oppenheimer is good at clean house. 94 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 2: I would love for American Fiction to win. 95 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:09,800 Speaker 1: That's a great movie if you haven't seen that one. 96 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 1: It's a story about a guy who isn't having much 97 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:15,520 Speaker 1: success as a writer. He's a black author, hasn't really 98 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 1: published anything in a while, so he decides to give 99 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 1: his publisher something so absurd and out of pocket, and 100 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: then they end up loving it and he has to 101 00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: commit to creating this whole entire alias a great movie. 102 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: Last Comedy Heartfelt. I would love for that one to win, 103 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:33,960 Speaker 1: but I don't think it has the caliber compared to 104 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 1: the rest of the movies here. I don't think Killers 105 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:39,039 Speaker 1: of the Flower Moon will win. Yeah, I'm going with 106 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 1: Oppenheimer here. 107 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:41,760 Speaker 2: What have we got next best director? 108 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 4: We have Justine Tree for Anatomy of a Fall, Martin 109 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:48,600 Speaker 4: Scorsese or as they say Scorsese. 110 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:49,479 Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess that's how they say it. 111 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:54,480 Speaker 4: Killers of the Flower Moon, Christopher Nolan, Oppenheimer, Yourgos Lanthemos 112 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:57,200 Speaker 4: for Poor Things, and Jonathan Glazer the Zone of Interest. 113 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:00,599 Speaker 1: My surprise here, even though I didn't love movie, I 114 00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 1: thought Ridley Scott would get a nomination for Napoleon, just 115 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,919 Speaker 1: because he kind of appeals to what I believe is 116 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 1: the Academy. So that's my only real surprise here. Everything 117 00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: else kind of tracks the snub here. The major snub 118 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 1: is Greta Gerwig not getting nominated for Barbie. I couldn't 119 00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:19,039 Speaker 1: believe it. 120 00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 2: It's such a snub. 121 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,720 Speaker 1: It is the biggest snub in years. Every single one 122 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,359 Speaker 1: of her films has been nominated for Best Picture, Ladybird, 123 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:29,279 Speaker 1: Little Women, Barbie, and for her not to get a 124 00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 1: nomination for Best Director, a movie that has been the 125 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 1: highest grossing movie of the last year, one that dominated 126 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:39,279 Speaker 1: social media. I'm choking on my own rage here that 127 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 1: she wasn't nominated, just nominated. I don't think she has 128 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:47,160 Speaker 1: to win, but to not even nominate her is ridiculous. 129 00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 1: So I don't know what they were thinking there, and 130 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 1: that really made me lose kind of my I don't 131 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:55,960 Speaker 1: know why I hold the Oscars to this level of 132 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: like being the greatest thing for somebody to achieve, which 133 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:01,080 Speaker 1: I guess they are, but man, it kind of diminished 134 00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:02,920 Speaker 1: it a little bit for somebody like Greta Gerwy to 135 00:06:03,040 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 1: not be nominated for such an impactful movie that is 136 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:09,800 Speaker 1: a snub of the century right there. So who I 137 00:06:09,800 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 1: think is gonna win? It's gonna be Christopher Nolan. What 138 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 1: do we got next? 139 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:17,880 Speaker 4: We have Best Actor, got Bradley Cooper for Maestro, Coleman 140 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:22,760 Speaker 4: Domingo for Rustin, Paul Giamatti for The Holdovers, Killian Murphy 141 00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:25,559 Speaker 4: for Oppenheimer, and Jeffrey Wright for American Fiction. 142 00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:29,480 Speaker 1: The only surprise here I see is that Leonardo DiCaprio 143 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:32,599 Speaker 1: was not nominated for Killers of the Flower Moon. I 144 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:35,560 Speaker 1: don't think it's a snub because while he was good 145 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: in that movie, and he's really the only actor I 146 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:41,280 Speaker 1: could see portraying that character, not really his best role. 147 00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 1: It wasn't anything out of pocket for Leonardo DiCaprio. He 148 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:47,520 Speaker 1: was just being his best self. But I don't always 149 00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 1: think that that warrants a Best Actor nomination. I was 150 00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 1: just surprised, But I don't think it's a snub. The 151 00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,719 Speaker 1: snub here is Zach Effron for him not to get 152 00:06:56,760 --> 00:07:00,320 Speaker 1: nominated for The Iron Claw after what an amazingform warments 153 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:02,359 Speaker 1: for an actor who I didn't think he had that 154 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: type of caliber of acting in him. 155 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:08,359 Speaker 4: It was, honestly, I think, the best role because he 156 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 4: has perfected the bro comedy. He's perfected being the good 157 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,480 Speaker 4: looking one on the screen. But this was such a departure, 158 00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 4: and it was such a good dramatic role, and he 159 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 4: played it so well, and that ending scene and like 160 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,760 Speaker 4: the one line that we all know made everyone cry. 161 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 4: I mean that was emotion. That was raw talent in 162 00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:34,240 Speaker 4: a role. And I've been a Zach Effron's stand since 163 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:35,400 Speaker 4: the high school musical days. 164 00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 1: And aside from the acting level that he reached in 165 00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 1: that movie, also the physical, say, the physical transformation as 166 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:44,880 Speaker 1: well the amount of time that he spent on his body. 167 00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: And then some people may ar like, oh, he was on steroids. 168 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: I don't think he was, so I think a type 169 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,920 Speaker 1: of achievement with that should also be recognized, the toll 170 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: that actors put their bodies through. If somebody loses a 171 00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 1: bunch of weight for a role, they get an easy nomination. 172 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:00,720 Speaker 1: If they gain a lot of way, they get an 173 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 1: easy nomination. But for some reason, putting on muscle and 174 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 1: doing something so physical doesn't warrant that same respect. I 175 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 1: don't understand how he was not nominated. I also feel 176 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:14,000 Speaker 1: like Barry Keegan could have been nominated here too. He's 177 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:15,840 Speaker 1: really great in that movie, Like, without him, I don't 178 00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 1: think that movie would have really hit as well as 179 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:20,200 Speaker 1: it did. So I feel like that's a little bit 180 00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 1: of a snub just because he's really on the rise here. 181 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 2: I mean, how many people have walked around their house 182 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 2: singing Murder on the dance floor. 183 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: And that's what a movie does, That's what a performance does. 184 00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: Makes people talk like that would really represent twenty twenty 185 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:36,360 Speaker 1: three for me, if that had a nomination, I would 186 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: look back like, oh yeah, Saltburry came out that year. 187 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 1: It's not represented here. The winner, though, is Kelly and Murphy. 188 00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:45,320 Speaker 1: I think easily he had the best performance out of 189 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:47,640 Speaker 1: all the actors on this list. So if I were 190 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,080 Speaker 1: a betting man, which I'm not, I would parlay these 191 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,600 Speaker 1: three Best Actor, Best Director, and Best Picture all going 192 00:08:53,640 --> 00:08:55,280 Speaker 1: to Oppenheimer. What do we have up next? 193 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 2: We've got Best Actress. 194 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:00,280 Speaker 4: We have Annette Binning for Naiad, Lily Gladstone, Killed of 195 00:09:00,280 --> 00:09:04,280 Speaker 4: the Flower Moon, Sandra Huler Anatomy of a Fall, Carrie 196 00:09:04,320 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 4: Mulligan Maestro, and Emma Stone Poor Things. 197 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: No major surprise for me here, but the snub obviously 198 00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 1: is Margot Robbie not getting nominated for Barbie along the 199 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:17,840 Speaker 1: same lines of Greta Gerwig not being nominated like she 200 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 1: should easily. She could have easily won this category and 201 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 1: to not be nominated not be nominated makes no sense 202 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:25,680 Speaker 1: to me. 203 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 2: I'll tell you who the easy winner is, though, What 204 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 2: do you got? 205 00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: Lily Gladstone. Yeah, that's who I have too, easy winner. 206 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:33,800 Speaker 1: The only one who could pick it up. I don't 207 00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 1: think she will is Emma Stone. 208 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:37,439 Speaker 2: Agreed, but I think it's gonna be Lily. 209 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 4: Yeah. 210 00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: I think it's gonna be Lily too. I don't want 211 00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: to make less of Emma Stone's role in Poor Things 212 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,760 Speaker 1: because any other year she probably would win this category 213 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 1: for a really hard role when you think about it, 214 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: strong contender because how weird she had to be in 215 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 1: that movie, also being very vulnerable and doing full frontal 216 00:09:56,920 --> 00:10:00,959 Speaker 1: like a lot of it. That is a to and 217 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:04,440 Speaker 1: the transformation that her character goes through in that movie 218 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:06,880 Speaker 1: and the way she depicted that was amazing. So I 219 00:10:06,920 --> 00:10:10,600 Speaker 1: think any other year she would have won this category. 220 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:15,040 Speaker 1: But Lily Gladstone made that movie. I don't care about Leo, 221 00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:17,840 Speaker 1: I don't care about de Niro in that movie. I 222 00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 1: care about Lily Gladstone. So easily. She said, win for 223 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:23,000 Speaker 1: Best Actress. What do we have up next? 224 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 4: We have Best Supporting Actor. We've got Sterling K. Brown 225 00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:31,080 Speaker 4: American Fiction, Robert de Niro, Killers of the Flower Moon 226 00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 4: Robert Downey, Junior Oppenheimer, Ohno. 227 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 2: They're both nominated again. Yeah, Ryan Gosling, Barbie and Mark Ruffalo, 228 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:38,199 Speaker 2: poor things. 229 00:10:38,440 --> 00:10:41,520 Speaker 1: The surprise here, I feel like is Sterling K. Brown. 230 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:44,520 Speaker 2: Just because I love Sterling K. Brown. 231 00:10:44,679 --> 00:10:46,679 Speaker 1: I didn't watch it and think, oh, he's going to 232 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 1: get an Oscar nomination for that. But looking back on say. 233 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:52,079 Speaker 4: When you think back, and also I will say I 234 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:54,440 Speaker 4: I'll explain why. I was saying that both the Roberts 235 00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:56,160 Speaker 4: were nominated because of the globes. 236 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:57,760 Speaker 2: One of them won and the other. 237 00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:02,120 Speaker 4: Oh yeah, thought Downey one right, yes, and DeNiro like 238 00:11:02,160 --> 00:11:04,000 Speaker 4: started to get up Robert and. 239 00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 2: He was like, yeah that was the other. 240 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:07,440 Speaker 1: Oh they should hold on to that. Robert put the 241 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:09,079 Speaker 1: camera on both of them and see who wins. 242 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 2: Yeah. 243 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:12,280 Speaker 1: I just thought Sterling King Brown, I love it. I 244 00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 1: just didn't think he would be nominated. The snub here, 245 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 1: I think is going to the Iron Claw cast Jeremy 246 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:21,080 Speaker 1: Allen White and Harris Dickinson, who were both amazing in 247 00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 1: that movie, and also Chris Tucker in Air, who I 248 00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 1: thought was hilarious and added just another comedic level to 249 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:30,120 Speaker 1: that movie. The winner here is tough because I want 250 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 1: to say, Mark Ruffalo, I think it's Gosling. You think 251 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 1: it's Gosling. 252 00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:34,720 Speaker 2: I just have a. 253 00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 4: Feeling it's gonna be Gossling, and then it's gonna spark controversy. 254 00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 1: How I could see that. I'm gonna go with Robert 255 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: Downey Junior. And I hate to load up so much 256 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 1: on Oppenheimer, but he's been nominated three times. This is 257 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:49,640 Speaker 1: his third nomination and he hasn't won. I almost feel 258 00:11:49,679 --> 00:11:53,240 Speaker 1: like he's about to have his DiCaprio moment. I always 259 00:11:53,280 --> 00:11:55,480 Speaker 1: look at it. Who can I visualize up there on 260 00:11:55,559 --> 00:11:58,800 Speaker 1: the podium accepting their award Gosling, and I could see that, 261 00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 1: I could see Robert. I just don't think the voters 262 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 1: are gonna go the way of Barbie, kind of like 263 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: what happened at the Golden Globes. They didn't win as 264 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 1: many as I thought they were going to, So I 265 00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:12,600 Speaker 1: feel like all these people are gonna lean towards Oppenheimer 266 00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:15,600 Speaker 1: really strong. So again, don't want to load up so much. 267 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 1: I just think they're the clear cut winner in a 268 00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 1: lot of these categories. 269 00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 4: What if they pull a La Lowland and Moonlight and 270 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 4: they say the wrong Robert because. 271 00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:24,559 Speaker 1: They also both start with a D, And then de 272 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:26,920 Speaker 1: Niro gets up there and they're like, actually, come on, 273 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:28,120 Speaker 1: Downy Junior. 274 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:29,880 Speaker 2: And then you gotta take the oscar from de Niro 275 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 2: to Downey Junior. 276 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,320 Speaker 1: Oh, I ain't doing that, all right? What do we 277 00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 1: have up next? 278 00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:37,479 Speaker 4: We have best supporting actress. We have Emily Blunt in Oppenheimer, 279 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:41,400 Speaker 4: Danielle Brooks for The Color Purple, America Ferrera for Barbie, 280 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:49,280 Speaker 4: Jody Foster for Naiad, and Davin Joy Randolph for The Holdovers. 281 00:12:49,559 --> 00:12:52,960 Speaker 1: The surprise here for me is America Ferrera, who delivered 282 00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:57,240 Speaker 1: one of the best movie monologues of all time. In 283 00:12:57,720 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 1: a world now where we don't really have movie man 284 00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 1: on the lugs anymore, movie quotes are becoming less memorable. 285 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:06,920 Speaker 1: That was such a powerful monologue that I feel like 286 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,880 Speaker 1: that is what got her that nomination. The snub here 287 00:13:09,960 --> 00:13:13,800 Speaker 1: I think is ma nameI Hamambe from god Zilla minus one. 288 00:13:14,120 --> 00:13:16,600 Speaker 1: I don't know Japanese, and was able to feel so 289 00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 1: much from her character who she plays this woman who 290 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 1: essentially is kind of the guy's wife. They kind of 291 00:13:23,480 --> 00:13:26,920 Speaker 1: play pretend a little bit and then something crazy happens 292 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:29,200 Speaker 1: to her and just, oh my gosh. She was so 293 00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:31,480 Speaker 1: great in that movie. And just to watch a movie 294 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:33,520 Speaker 1: that's not in your language and to be able to 295 00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:36,360 Speaker 1: really feel something and to really just resonate with the character. 296 00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,679 Speaker 1: I couldn't believe that god Zilla minus one didn't get 297 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: any acting nominations, so that would be my snub here. 298 00:13:44,280 --> 00:13:46,840 Speaker 1: But the winner here, I think is Davin Joey Randolph 299 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:49,199 Speaker 1: from The Holdovers, and it would be amazing to see 300 00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 1: her win. I think it would mean the most to 301 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 1: her and oh Man to talk about a character who 302 00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: went through so much and had so much just baggage 303 00:13:56,920 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 1: and emotion. Oh my gosh, just thinking about her character. 304 00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,000 Speaker 4: She's an amazing the actress too, because I do this 305 00:14:02,040 --> 00:14:04,800 Speaker 4: thing where I AMDB everyone every time I see something, 306 00:14:04,920 --> 00:14:07,840 Speaker 4: and she had a funny role on Only Murders in 307 00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 4: the Building and then she switches to this and had 308 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:13,800 Speaker 4: this serious, like heartbreaking role. But she puts so much 309 00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 4: like grief and comedy into it. She was fantastic, and. 310 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:20,600 Speaker 1: It's like the subtle grief that her character has where 311 00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:24,240 Speaker 1: in conversation with the other people in the movie, she's 312 00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 1: relatively normal, and then it's just weighing on her, weighing 313 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,680 Speaker 1: on her before it just really like hits her. And then, man, 314 00:14:29,960 --> 00:14:32,520 Speaker 1: her acting ability has really come out in that one. 315 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:35,360 Speaker 1: So I really hope she wins. All right, and we'll 316 00:14:35,400 --> 00:14:37,440 Speaker 1: go through the rest of these, we'll just talk about 317 00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:38,760 Speaker 1: who we think is going to win. 318 00:14:39,200 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 4: Next up, Best Animated Feature Film, The Boy and the 319 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 4: Heron Elemental Pnemona Robot Dreams and Spider Man Across the 320 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:47,200 Speaker 4: Spider Verse. 321 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:49,840 Speaker 1: I love that Spider Man was nominated. I feel like 322 00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 1: they do that as a formality, but man, the amount 323 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: of work that was put into that movie. It is 324 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:58,160 Speaker 1: a work of art, and I fully enjoyed every aspect 325 00:14:58,200 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 1: of that. I just felt like it was a little 326 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:02,320 Speaker 1: bit and incomplete because of the way it left us. 327 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:04,400 Speaker 1: I would love for that one to win, because Spider 328 00:15:04,440 --> 00:15:08,440 Speaker 1: Man is my favorite character. I just think in this category, 329 00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:11,400 Speaker 1: the Boy in the Aaron has more of that critical 330 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:13,880 Speaker 1: appeal to it. It's an easy win for me. I'm 331 00:15:13,880 --> 00:15:15,560 Speaker 1: going the Boy in the Heron. Next up. 332 00:15:15,680 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 2: Best Adapted Screenplay, American Fiction, Barbie Oppenheimer, Poor things and 333 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:21,640 Speaker 2: the zone of interest. 334 00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:26,240 Speaker 1: So adapted screenplay is a movie that was written based 335 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 1: on an established material. So a book, a play, something else, 336 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:32,560 Speaker 1: and they adapt it into a movie. So for that reason, 337 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:35,560 Speaker 1: again loading up here, I'm going with Oppenheimer, which was 338 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:36,600 Speaker 1: based on a book. 339 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:41,479 Speaker 4: Next up, best Original screenplay, Anatomy of a Fall, The Holdovers. 340 00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:44,240 Speaker 2: Maestro made December and Past Lives. 341 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 1: So different from adapted screenplay. This was just written as 342 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:50,200 Speaker 1: a movie. I'm going the Holdovers here. 343 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:51,760 Speaker 2: I'm going Past Lives. 344 00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:55,560 Speaker 1: I think The Holdovers is a little bit more novel 345 00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:56,560 Speaker 1: than Past Lives. 346 00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 2: We can agree to disagree here. 347 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:00,720 Speaker 1: I'm going with The Holdovers here. What do we have next? 348 00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:06,400 Speaker 4: Best international film? We have Io Capitano, Perfect Days, Society 349 00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 4: of the Snow, The Teacher's Lounge, and the Zone of Interest. 350 00:16:09,480 --> 00:16:11,960 Speaker 1: I'm gonna go with the movie you bailed out of 351 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 1: watching with me, Society of the Snows too Much, which 352 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 1: is about the plane crash in the Andes and. 353 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:18,800 Speaker 2: I was on the one to watch it. 354 00:16:19,080 --> 00:16:20,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, you were like, hey, let's watch this movie, and 355 00:16:20,880 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: then about I don't know, twenty minutes into it, you're like, 356 00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:24,400 Speaker 1: this is too graphic for me. 357 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:26,640 Speaker 4: It was, it was and I know it's based on 358 00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:28,760 Speaker 4: a true story, and it's so amazing how they survived. 359 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:30,240 Speaker 2: I physically couldn't stomach it. 360 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:33,960 Speaker 1: So, without giving away the entire story, plane crash goes down, 361 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:36,760 Speaker 1: they get stuck in the mountains and freezing cold temperatures 362 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: and they have to resort to some pretty unusual things 363 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,160 Speaker 1: in order to stay alive. But the plane crash itself 364 00:16:43,280 --> 00:16:46,480 Speaker 1: is very graphic, and things happen in that that you 365 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:49,520 Speaker 1: don't really think about that would happen in the plane crash, 366 00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:51,600 Speaker 1: and that's what made you bail out of this movie. 367 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:53,720 Speaker 1: And it is a hard movie to watch because of 368 00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 1: them trying to survive and just all the things they 369 00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: went through. The amount of time that they were stranded 370 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,280 Speaker 1: there is quite InCred c edible. And it was also 371 00:17:01,640 --> 00:17:03,640 Speaker 1: done in Spanish, so it feels a little bit more 372 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:06,719 Speaker 1: authentic to the actual people who were involved. And then 373 00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:08,760 Speaker 1: at the very end when you see all the comparisons 374 00:17:08,760 --> 00:17:10,920 Speaker 1: of the real life people, oh man, it kind of 375 00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: hits you in the gut too. So I'm going Society 376 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:14,840 Speaker 1: of the Snow, What do we have next? 377 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:15,920 Speaker 2: Best film? 378 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:19,440 Speaker 4: Editing Anatomy of a Fall, The Holdovers, Killers of the 379 00:17:19,480 --> 00:17:21,520 Speaker 4: Flower Moon Oppenheimer and Poor. 380 00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 1: Things, getting into the nerdy categories here, which I still 381 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:27,600 Speaker 1: really enjoy. I love a good edited movie. I'm going 382 00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:29,840 Speaker 1: with Poor Things because of the way that movie looked 383 00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:32,879 Speaker 1: and just the flow of that movie that made me 384 00:17:32,920 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 1: want to continue watching visually that you don't really think 385 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:38,199 Speaker 1: about those things sometimes before a movie, just to have 386 00:17:38,280 --> 00:17:40,960 Speaker 1: like a really nice pacing to show you a lot 387 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:43,040 Speaker 1: of things in a lot of really weird ways, and 388 00:17:43,080 --> 00:17:46,160 Speaker 1: also just great color palettes and all the things involved 389 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:48,879 Speaker 1: in that movie goes a long way. I'm going with 390 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:49,600 Speaker 1: Poor Things. 391 00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 2: Next up, best costume Design Barbie, Killers of the Flower Moon, 392 00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:56,240 Speaker 2: Napoleon Oppenheimer and Poor Things. 393 00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:58,919 Speaker 1: I'm between two here, Barbie and Poor Things. 394 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 4: That's exactly what I was because, oh Barbie, the color palette, 395 00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 4: the color palette, and the amount of characters in that movie, Like. 396 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:09,800 Speaker 1: That's a lot, I think Barbie, Yeah, because you have 397 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:12,640 Speaker 1: to make all these different types of Barbies and then 398 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:15,359 Speaker 1: everybody who dressed up. There's a lot in there. 399 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:17,639 Speaker 4: But I also feel like the crusty old men of 400 00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:19,480 Speaker 4: the Academy are just like Barbie. 401 00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:22,320 Speaker 1: And yeah, I'm thinking of that too, But I'm also 402 00:18:22,359 --> 00:18:26,000 Speaker 1: thinking of I'm going with Poor Things. I just think 403 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:28,359 Speaker 1: it's a little bit more artsy. I feel like the 404 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:31,199 Speaker 1: Academy would vote a little bit more towards like, oh this, 405 00:18:31,359 --> 00:18:32,880 Speaker 1: look at their cool costumes. 406 00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:35,160 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm gonna say they're all crusty old men don't 407 00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:38,160 Speaker 4: appreciate the work that went into I mean they looked 408 00:18:38,160 --> 00:18:39,960 Speaker 4: like the Barbies of my childhood. I mean they had 409 00:18:40,040 --> 00:18:44,120 Speaker 4: midged the pregnant Barbie in her ugly floral maternity shirt. 410 00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 1: I'm going with poor Things. 411 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:47,760 Speaker 2: Weird Barbie alone should win an award. 412 00:18:47,800 --> 00:18:49,000 Speaker 1: Give it to Kay McKinnon. 413 00:18:49,320 --> 00:18:51,480 Speaker 2: Honestly, all right, what do we have of next? 414 00:18:51,600 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 4: Best Makeup and hairstyling golda Maestro Oppenheimer, Poor Things and Society. 415 00:18:57,840 --> 00:18:58,320 Speaker 2: Of the Snow. 416 00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:01,640 Speaker 1: Society of the Snow is interesting because it shows their 417 00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:05,720 Speaker 1: characters getting dirtier and dirtier and more disgusting, their teeth 418 00:19:05,760 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 1: getting grittier, their skin just getting so dark and dirty. 419 00:19:09,119 --> 00:19:10,719 Speaker 1: I would like that one to win, but again I'm 420 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:11,760 Speaker 1: going with Poor Things here. 421 00:19:12,040 --> 00:19:16,080 Speaker 4: Next up, Best Visual Effects The Creator, Godzilla minus one, 422 00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:20,560 Speaker 4: Guardians of the Galaxy Volume three, Mission Impossible, Dead Reckoning 423 00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 4: Part one, and Napoleon. 424 00:19:22,240 --> 00:19:25,119 Speaker 1: They throw some bones in this category. The Creator to 425 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:29,720 Speaker 1: get an Oscar nomination is outstanding Guardians. That's a nice 426 00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 1: nod to a movie that could have easily, in my eyes, 427 00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:35,399 Speaker 1: been nominated for Best Picture for the emotional toll it 428 00:19:35,440 --> 00:19:38,240 Speaker 1: took on us for like a week. Mission Impossible is 429 00:19:38,320 --> 00:19:41,240 Speaker 1: interesting to see an action movie get nominated. That's part 430 00:19:41,280 --> 00:19:44,560 Speaker 1: of a big franchise, Napoleon getting it's nod here. But 431 00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:45,800 Speaker 1: you know what I'm going. 432 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:48,360 Speaker 2: With Godzilla minus one, the movie that was made. 433 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:50,880 Speaker 1: For less than fifteen million dollars, and I believe only 434 00:19:50,920 --> 00:19:53,719 Speaker 1: had a team of thirty people working on the visual effects. 435 00:19:53,800 --> 00:19:56,040 Speaker 1: Thirty people. To think of the amount of people that 436 00:19:56,119 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: work on one Marvel scene is probably triple dot trip 437 00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 1: and they spend so much more money on the entire thing. 438 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: This movie was made for less than what a She 439 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 1: Hulk episode was made for. 440 00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 4: It makes like the American written editions of Godzilla looks 441 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:11,399 Speaker 4: so cheesy. 442 00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:13,960 Speaker 1: And then you look at how good Godzilla looks in 443 00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:16,359 Speaker 1: this movie, all the action it needs to win. If 444 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:18,840 Speaker 1: it doesn't win, I'm writing, I'm writing, what do we 445 00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: have up next? 446 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:20,200 Speaker 2: Best sound? 447 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:24,240 Speaker 4: We have the creator Maestro, Mission Impossible, Dead Rackoning Part one, 448 00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:28,560 Speaker 4: Oppenheimer and the Zone of Interest Oof Oppenheimer. 449 00:20:29,080 --> 00:20:32,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm going with Oppenheimer. The sounds kept it driving 450 00:20:32,119 --> 00:20:35,040 Speaker 1: in this movie, and also the absence of sound because 451 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:37,760 Speaker 1: whenever the big moment happens, it gets entirely quiet. So 452 00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:39,879 Speaker 1: it's not always what you put in, it's what you'll 453 00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:41,080 Speaker 1: leave out. What's up next? 454 00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:45,880 Speaker 4: Best Cinematography, El Conde, Killers of the Flower Moon, Maestro 455 00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:47,439 Speaker 4: Oppenheimer and Poor Things. 456 00:20:47,840 --> 00:20:50,679 Speaker 1: I'm going with Killers of the Flower Moon here. I 457 00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:54,959 Speaker 1: think the cinematography in that movie really played into the 458 00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:59,159 Speaker 1: landscape of Oklahoma. It really made that movie feel like 459 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:02,120 Speaker 1: a modern day war Western, and there was just some 460 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,400 Speaker 1: beautiful imagery and Killers of the Flower Moon that out 461 00:21:05,400 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 1: of all the movies in this category, I could just 462 00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:11,600 Speaker 1: take single frames of that frame it and put it 463 00:21:11,640 --> 00:21:14,679 Speaker 1: on the wall and it would look amazing. So I 464 00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:17,960 Speaker 1: love cinematography. When I go watch a movie, I'm always 465 00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:21,600 Speaker 1: paying attention to it, and Oppenheimer would probably be next 466 00:21:21,640 --> 00:21:23,800 Speaker 1: in that category, also because we saw that movie in 467 00:21:23,840 --> 00:21:26,359 Speaker 1: seventy milimeter. But I still think that Killers of the 468 00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:28,199 Speaker 1: Flower Moon did a better job, So I'm going with 469 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:28,800 Speaker 1: Killers here. 470 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 2: Next up, Best original score American Fiction Indiana Jones and 471 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:36,840 Speaker 2: The Dial of Destiny, Killers of the Flower Moon, Oppenheimer, 472 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:37,560 Speaker 2: and Poor Things. 473 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:40,320 Speaker 1: The score in Poor Things was really good. It had 474 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:44,919 Speaker 1: like this modern, almost like electronic sounds to its fun 475 00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:48,159 Speaker 1: and like really artsy two and that really added to 476 00:21:48,200 --> 00:21:50,879 Speaker 1: the tone of that movie. But I loved the score 477 00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:54,920 Speaker 1: in Oppenheimer, which was really driving and along with the sound, 478 00:21:55,040 --> 00:21:58,160 Speaker 1: created that idea of tension and in moments where there 479 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:01,160 Speaker 1: was really just dialogue happening and you know, the scientists 480 00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:03,520 Speaker 1: figuring out things and writing things on the wall, it 481 00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:05,800 Speaker 1: was the score that kept it moving and made it 482 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:08,359 Speaker 1: impactful and made it feel epic, and that is really 483 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:11,160 Speaker 1: any Christopher Nolan movie. So I'm going with Oppenheimer. 484 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:15,320 Speaker 4: And final up, best original song. We have the fire 485 00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:18,240 Speaker 4: Inside from Flaming Hot. It wasn't expecting that. 486 00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:25,000 Speaker 1: There's a little clip of that such such Next. 487 00:22:24,840 --> 00:22:33,800 Speaker 4: Up, I'm just ken from Barbie anywhere else? Next up 488 00:22:34,280 --> 00:22:37,200 Speaker 4: it never went away from American Symphony. 489 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:44,840 Speaker 1: Never went away. Next up was. 490 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:48,800 Speaker 4: A song for my people from Killers of the Flower Moon. Also, apologies, 491 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:54,359 Speaker 4: I didn't say that correctly. 492 00:22:55,560 --> 00:22:57,000 Speaker 1: And finally, what. 493 00:22:56,880 --> 00:23:03,800 Speaker 2: Was I made for? From Barbie? 494 00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:05,240 Speaker 1: This is a tough category. 495 00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:06,439 Speaker 2: These are all strong. 496 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:09,200 Speaker 1: Barbie kind of splits the votes here between I'm just 497 00:23:09,280 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 1: canon what was I made for? 498 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,919 Speaker 2: I'm just Ken, which is a. 499 00:23:12,800 --> 00:23:15,720 Speaker 1: Great fun and novel song, and I love it when 500 00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:17,880 Speaker 1: you can incorporate that in a movie. I think that's 501 00:23:17,920 --> 00:23:20,680 Speaker 1: what makes movies more memorable, to have an original song 502 00:23:20,840 --> 00:23:23,199 Speaker 1: like that that's so kind of out of pocket and 503 00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:26,159 Speaker 1: you have Ryan Gosling singing that. But I'm gonna go 504 00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 1: based on out of all these songs, one that I 505 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,000 Speaker 1: would just listen to normally, which is the way I 506 00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:32,960 Speaker 1: have to go in this best original song, just because 507 00:23:32,960 --> 00:23:35,720 Speaker 1: this is a tough category. So I'm going what was 508 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:38,880 Speaker 1: I Made For? By Billie Eilish and Phineas from Barbie. 509 00:23:39,040 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 4: I'm gonna say I think that a song for my people, 510 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:43,600 Speaker 4: Killers of the Flower Moon is gonna take it. 511 00:23:43,640 --> 00:23:45,760 Speaker 1: That's your pick, Yes it is. We'll throwing it in. 512 00:23:45,840 --> 00:23:51,600 Speaker 1: We'll come back and talk about The Boys in the Boat. 513 00:23:52,680 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 1: Gonna get into it now. A spoiler free movie review 514 00:23:55,520 --> 00:23:57,880 Speaker 1: of The Boys in the Boat. This was a movie 515 00:23:57,920 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 1: that came out in December. You missed it then because 516 00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:02,600 Speaker 1: there were so many movies coming out in December. I 517 00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:05,280 Speaker 1: hadn't finished the book either, but now it is available 518 00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,360 Speaker 1: for you to rent at home, so we thought now 519 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:09,679 Speaker 1: is a perfect time to review it. Kelsey, You take 520 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:11,640 Speaker 1: it away with what the movie is about. 521 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:16,560 Speaker 4: The Men's Crew rowing team from the University of Washington 522 00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:21,560 Speaker 4: going to the nineteen thirty six Olympics, their journey there, 523 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:24,119 Speaker 4: the results of all of that, and just kind of 524 00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:27,440 Speaker 4: the tension surrounding the nineteen thirty six Olympics, which were 525 00:24:27,440 --> 00:24:30,199 Speaker 4: held in Berlin right before World War Two started, And 526 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 4: of course that was the most fascinating part of the 527 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:32,320 Speaker 4: book to me. 528 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:34,320 Speaker 2: Okay, into that, wa you love World War Two. 529 00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:38,000 Speaker 4: Okay, here's what I have realized. World War Two is 530 00:24:38,040 --> 00:24:40,440 Speaker 4: fascinating to me because it wasn't even one hundred years ago, 531 00:24:40,720 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 4: and it seems like this very far off historical event, 532 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,200 Speaker 4: and we have so much knowledge, and there's so many 533 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:48,879 Speaker 4: books written about it, and there's so many survivors of 534 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:52,720 Speaker 4: the Holocaust and members of like these spy organizations that 535 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:55,040 Speaker 4: are writing these books and they're still alive to tell 536 00:24:55,119 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 4: us the history. 537 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:58,080 Speaker 2: And that just blows my mind, Like. 538 00:24:58,040 --> 00:25:01,959 Speaker 4: There are people still alive that survived the Holocaust. That 539 00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:03,920 Speaker 4: just it literally blows my mind. 540 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:07,000 Speaker 1: I love the way they incorporated it in this movie. 541 00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:09,280 Speaker 1: I almost wish that it was a bigger plot point, 542 00:25:09,280 --> 00:25:11,480 Speaker 1: but I almost feel like if it were to be, 543 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:13,159 Speaker 1: it would be an entirely different film. 544 00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:15,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, because there was so much more in the book. 545 00:25:15,200 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 4: So I'll just go ahead and say the most interesting 546 00:25:17,480 --> 00:25:20,280 Speaker 4: part of the book to me was when they get 547 00:25:20,320 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 4: to Berlin for the Olympics, and the meticulous detail that 548 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:30,560 Speaker 4: Germany put into making sure that their very nasty agenda 549 00:25:30,680 --> 00:25:32,879 Speaker 4: was hidden. They took down all of the signs that 550 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:36,520 Speaker 4: said Jews aren't welcome here. They were building the concentration 551 00:25:36,640 --> 00:25:38,639 Speaker 4: camps not far from where the Olympics were held, and 552 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:42,200 Speaker 4: krall one knew what was to come in the next 553 00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:46,560 Speaker 4: few years, like the sinister underlying, like Hitler and his team. 554 00:25:46,840 --> 00:25:50,560 Speaker 4: He had a Minister of propaganda. They worked so hard 555 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:54,439 Speaker 4: to convince the world that Germany was just trying to 556 00:25:54,440 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 4: rebuild itself after the First War, that they were just 557 00:25:57,800 --> 00:26:01,480 Speaker 4: a great country, and that he was really leading the charge. 558 00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:05,520 Speaker 4: And knowing what we know now, it's so fascinating to 559 00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:07,119 Speaker 4: look back and read about that. 560 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:10,840 Speaker 1: It's always just like jarring for me to see like 561 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,080 Speaker 1: a swatstika in a movie and to see Hitler represented. 562 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:15,840 Speaker 1: I know you have to put it in there because 563 00:26:15,840 --> 00:26:18,240 Speaker 1: it's history, but I think about the making of the 564 00:26:18,280 --> 00:26:21,199 Speaker 1: movie process. Somebody has to make those things. Somebody has 565 00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:24,000 Speaker 1: the dress of like Hitler. Yeah, it feels really weird 566 00:26:24,040 --> 00:26:24,280 Speaker 1: to me. 567 00:26:24,400 --> 00:26:27,240 Speaker 4: Getting back to the book, I will say I, as 568 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:29,720 Speaker 4: always in my opinion, except for where the crowdheads sing, 569 00:26:29,960 --> 00:26:32,200 Speaker 4: the book was better than the movie. I loved the book. 570 00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:34,879 Speaker 4: There's so much more detail. Obviously they have to adapt things. 571 00:26:35,040 --> 00:26:38,120 Speaker 4: I'll do it without giving any spoilers. The movie starts 572 00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:40,120 Speaker 4: like the beginning of the year in nineteen thirty six, 573 00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:42,439 Speaker 4: and they act as if they're just putting together this 574 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 4: rowing team. In reality, they've been rowing together for several years. 575 00:26:46,200 --> 00:26:48,760 Speaker 4: The book starts in like nineteen thirty three when the 576 00:26:48,800 --> 00:26:50,120 Speaker 4: boys Refreshman. 577 00:26:50,600 --> 00:26:52,040 Speaker 2: Obviously you just have to cut some stuff out. 578 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:56,000 Speaker 1: Does the book also focus on one character, like in 579 00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 1: this one it's Joe who's the main character? Is it 580 00:26:58,400 --> 00:26:59,960 Speaker 1: all okay? So it's the same, yep. 581 00:27:00,359 --> 00:27:03,639 Speaker 4: I wish that they had given more of Joe's backstory. 582 00:27:03,720 --> 00:27:06,639 Speaker 4: He had a very sad childhood. He and again this 583 00:27:06,680 --> 00:27:08,640 Speaker 4: isn't spoiler because this isn't even in the movie. 584 00:27:08,640 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 2: It's in the book. His mom passed away when he 585 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:11,960 Speaker 2: was little, and his dad. 586 00:27:11,840 --> 00:27:14,639 Speaker 4: Remarried and his stepmom didn't really care for Joe, and 587 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:17,119 Speaker 4: so at a young age, he was literally left. His 588 00:27:17,119 --> 00:27:19,240 Speaker 4: family packed up and moved and he was like, where 589 00:27:19,280 --> 00:27:20,720 Speaker 4: are we going? And his dad was like, well, you're 590 00:27:20,720 --> 00:27:23,360 Speaker 4: not coming with us, And they left this kid behind 591 00:27:23,480 --> 00:27:27,400 Speaker 4: to survive on his own. And he just not even 592 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:30,639 Speaker 4: a rags to riches but a true you put your 593 00:27:30,680 --> 00:27:33,600 Speaker 4: mind to surviving, like you are capable of so many things. 594 00:27:33,680 --> 00:27:35,960 Speaker 4: I think so many of us hear stories are like 595 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:37,800 Speaker 4: I could never do that, But until you're put in 596 00:27:37,800 --> 00:27:40,480 Speaker 4: the position of like having to survive and fight for yourself, 597 00:27:40,840 --> 00:27:43,000 Speaker 4: he just did what he had to do. The book 598 00:27:43,080 --> 00:27:46,479 Speaker 4: also goes a lot more into George Pacock. I think 599 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:48,560 Speaker 4: it's how you say his name, and he was the 600 00:27:48,600 --> 00:27:52,920 Speaker 4: boat builder. He actually built the racing holes for most 601 00:27:52,920 --> 00:27:55,720 Speaker 4: teams in the US, which was really fascinating. He was 602 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:58,439 Speaker 4: kind of a sub character in the movie, but he 603 00:27:58,480 --> 00:27:59,800 Speaker 4: had a lot of wisdom to offer and he and 604 00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 4: kind of built a relationship. The book dives more into 605 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:07,399 Speaker 4: Joe and Joyce's love story. Yeah, they're just we're parts 606 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:10,000 Speaker 4: of the book that I really enjoyed. Similar to Killers 607 00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:11,359 Speaker 4: of the Flower Moon, it took me a minute to 608 00:28:11,359 --> 00:28:13,359 Speaker 4: get into it. I started it on a flight on 609 00:28:13,400 --> 00:28:15,800 Speaker 4: our way back from Christmas, and I was kind of like, oh, 610 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:18,240 Speaker 4: this is boring. And then once you get just kind 611 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:20,080 Speaker 4: of past like the intro of Here's who is Who, 612 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:21,760 Speaker 4: I was like, I can't put this down. 613 00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:23,560 Speaker 2: I gotta know what happens next. This is so good. 614 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:26,919 Speaker 1: So in the movie, it focuses on Joe going to 615 00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:29,760 Speaker 1: college at Washington. He doesn't really have a whole lot 616 00:28:29,760 --> 00:28:31,280 Speaker 1: of money and he's trying to find a way to 617 00:28:31,800 --> 00:28:33,960 Speaker 1: pay for his semester because they're telling them if you 618 00:28:33,960 --> 00:28:36,520 Speaker 1: can't pay, you're gonna have to get kicked out. And 619 00:28:36,560 --> 00:28:37,880 Speaker 1: that's why he joins. 620 00:28:37,560 --> 00:28:39,520 Speaker 2: The team because there's a small stipend. 621 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:41,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, you get a little bit of money for joining 622 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 1: the team. But it's a very very competitive team because 623 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:48,040 Speaker 1: it's just a crazy sport. And watching this movie, I 624 00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:51,479 Speaker 1: was just thinking about the physical aspect of rowing and 625 00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 1: how much of a toll that takes on your body, 626 00:28:53,960 --> 00:28:57,040 Speaker 1: and how much physical upper strength goes into rowing. 627 00:28:56,880 --> 00:29:00,200 Speaker 4: And your lung capacity all of that. It's like, I 628 00:29:00,240 --> 00:29:02,040 Speaker 4: feel like you have to have the lung capacity of 629 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:07,160 Speaker 4: a swimmer, the upper body of anyone doing like. 630 00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:10,520 Speaker 1: Strength, Yeah, like a bodybuilder, exactly. 631 00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:13,760 Speaker 4: And then just the ability to put those together, because 632 00:29:13,800 --> 00:29:16,040 Speaker 4: when you're in those boats that they were rowing, then 633 00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:18,480 Speaker 4: like you were just one single file, one after the other. 634 00:29:18,560 --> 00:29:20,680 Speaker 4: You can't see the other people because your back's are 635 00:29:20,720 --> 00:29:23,320 Speaker 4: to them. I just I'm in awe of the you 636 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:25,280 Speaker 4: have to like become one. And that's what the book 637 00:29:25,280 --> 00:29:27,760 Speaker 4: talks about a lot, is like how they struggled to 638 00:29:28,680 --> 00:29:32,280 Speaker 4: get their strokes in sync and just really become one 639 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:34,440 Speaker 4: unit instead of eight people on a boat trying to 640 00:29:34,440 --> 00:29:34,920 Speaker 4: make it move. 641 00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 1: And I thought of it from a perspective of I run, 642 00:29:38,800 --> 00:29:40,920 Speaker 1: and that is the thing that you have to have, 643 00:29:41,040 --> 00:29:45,000 Speaker 1: basically good breathing and just stamina. And I feel like 644 00:29:45,360 --> 00:29:48,400 Speaker 1: from running it's kind of benefited all other aspects of 645 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:52,400 Speaker 1: my physical health of just not getting tired and having energy. 646 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: And I think of it, if I were to take 647 00:29:55,240 --> 00:29:57,400 Speaker 1: what I have now and the stamina I built up 648 00:29:57,400 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 1: and tried to do a rowing, I don't think I 649 00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:00,600 Speaker 1: could do it because it just so much of that 650 00:30:00,720 --> 00:30:03,280 Speaker 1: upper body strength that I feel like me being able 651 00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:06,760 Speaker 1: to breathe well and to withstand long distances would have 652 00:30:06,880 --> 00:30:07,680 Speaker 1: no effect on it. 653 00:30:07,840 --> 00:30:08,760 Speaker 2: I wouldn't even try to row. 654 00:30:08,920 --> 00:30:10,240 Speaker 1: I do it a little bit at the gym, just 655 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:12,280 Speaker 1: the row machine like that takes a lot out of you. 656 00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:15,080 Speaker 1: So I feel like that aspect of it was cool 657 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:17,800 Speaker 1: for me to see of how demanding the sport is. 658 00:30:18,280 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: For the overall movie, I thought the tone of it 659 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:24,280 Speaker 1: was pretty good. It's from director George Clooney. I love 660 00:30:24,360 --> 00:30:27,680 Speaker 1: the trend of big time actors, or even up and 661 00:30:27,720 --> 00:30:31,800 Speaker 1: coming actors or we're just well established actors being directors 662 00:30:31,800 --> 00:30:34,520 Speaker 1: because I feel like they can have a better relationship 663 00:30:34,560 --> 00:30:37,120 Speaker 1: with the actors. They know what it's like to be 664 00:30:37,120 --> 00:30:40,320 Speaker 1: behind the camera, and they have an interesting perspective on 665 00:30:40,640 --> 00:30:43,200 Speaker 1: how to get certain performances out of actors, which is 666 00:30:43,720 --> 00:30:45,800 Speaker 1: the main job of a director to get what you 667 00:30:45,840 --> 00:30:48,400 Speaker 1: need out of your actors and to create this story 668 00:30:48,440 --> 00:30:51,200 Speaker 1: that you have envisioned in your mind. And I thought 669 00:30:51,200 --> 00:30:54,400 Speaker 1: you did a really great job at creating a very 670 00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:57,640 Speaker 1: inspirational drama which kind of felt like a two thousand drama, 671 00:30:58,480 --> 00:31:01,400 Speaker 1: which sports dramas then were like really really popular, And 672 00:31:01,440 --> 00:31:04,040 Speaker 1: this movie kind of reminded me of a movie that 673 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 1: you would watch in school to learn about history, which 674 00:31:07,040 --> 00:31:09,000 Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know if they still watch 675 00:31:09,080 --> 00:31:09,840 Speaker 1: movies in school. 676 00:31:10,200 --> 00:31:11,720 Speaker 2: Oh Man, when that TV. 677 00:31:11,560 --> 00:31:15,040 Speaker 1: Was Yeah, when they roll that thing in We're gonna 678 00:31:15,080 --> 00:31:17,520 Speaker 1: watch a movie today. It was always like October Sky 679 00:31:17,720 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 1: or remember the Titans. Yes, those were the best days. 680 00:31:21,400 --> 00:31:25,600 Speaker 4: On that cart with the VCRV yeah, VCR and the 681 00:31:25,720 --> 00:31:27,360 Speaker 4: VHS tape hs, thank you. 682 00:31:27,760 --> 00:31:29,760 Speaker 2: Wow, those were some good days. 683 00:31:29,880 --> 00:31:32,480 Speaker 1: Tech me back, and after watching this movie, I thought 684 00:31:32,520 --> 00:31:36,480 Speaker 1: I could see this being shown in classrooms across America 685 00:31:36,520 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 1: to inspire kids. And I like that aspect of it 686 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 1: because it felt inspirational without feeling cheesy, which sometimes sports 687 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:45,120 Speaker 1: dramas are like that. They kind of all have the 688 00:31:45,160 --> 00:31:49,160 Speaker 1: same formula of oh, here's this ragtag group of individuals 689 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:52,280 Speaker 1: who can't win a single competition, but they're going to 690 00:31:52,360 --> 00:31:53,760 Speaker 1: go on to win it all, and it has a 691 00:31:53,760 --> 00:31:57,080 Speaker 1: big cheesy montage and all those things. It didn't really 692 00:31:57,160 --> 00:32:00,040 Speaker 1: have that. It had real life emotion. You had a 693 00:31:59,920 --> 00:32:03,200 Speaker 1: love story in there. You had the main character, Joe 694 00:32:03,400 --> 00:32:08,000 Speaker 1: struggling of trying to be the best rower, but also 695 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:12,080 Speaker 1: had this emotional trauma with his dad and his family, 696 00:32:12,160 --> 00:32:16,160 Speaker 1: and then the other people in the team also butting heads. 697 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:17,520 Speaker 1: From here to that. There were just a lot of 698 00:32:17,600 --> 00:32:21,200 Speaker 1: aspects to the movie that it never really felt forced 699 00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:21,960 Speaker 1: in a new way to me. 700 00:32:22,280 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 4: I just wish they could have put more of the 701 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:27,240 Speaker 4: struggle of the team because they do to condense it. 702 00:32:27,440 --> 00:32:29,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, they kind of had to make it seem like Okay, 703 00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:30,520 Speaker 2: they tried, they made it. 704 00:32:30,520 --> 00:32:32,479 Speaker 4: Here we go, but there was a lot of like 705 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:34,960 Speaker 4: changing members of the team and fighting for their place 706 00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:37,120 Speaker 4: on the team. And again that's just the risk when 707 00:32:37,160 --> 00:32:39,000 Speaker 4: you turn a book into a movie. 708 00:32:39,040 --> 00:32:41,680 Speaker 1: Which it does have a bit of a longer run time, 709 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:45,360 Speaker 1: but to get to all the aspects longer. Yeah, you described, 710 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:47,800 Speaker 1: I almost would have enjoyed to see it. This movie 711 00:32:47,800 --> 00:32:49,640 Speaker 1: would be interesting to see of how it would have 712 00:32:49,680 --> 00:32:52,600 Speaker 1: worked as a mini series because there are so many 713 00:32:52,600 --> 00:32:54,880 Speaker 1: more plot lines that you could go down some of 714 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:56,800 Speaker 1: the stuff I wanted to see more of. Like I 715 00:32:56,840 --> 00:32:59,640 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier in the World War two connection, I feel 716 00:32:59,640 --> 00:33:01,640 Speaker 1: like they're could have been a lot more story overall. 717 00:33:01,760 --> 00:33:05,479 Speaker 1: But I do enjoy the movie easily digestible version of it. 718 00:33:05,720 --> 00:33:07,480 Speaker 1: But yes, there could have been a lot more in here. 719 00:33:07,520 --> 00:33:09,640 Speaker 1: So if there were any movie, I would have been 720 00:33:09,680 --> 00:33:11,719 Speaker 1: curious to watch it as a mini series more than 721 00:33:11,720 --> 00:33:13,480 Speaker 1: a movie. It could have been this one. 722 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:16,320 Speaker 4: And here's a little history factoid. People probably know this, 723 00:33:16,520 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 4: but I was like, hmm, nineteen thirty six Olympics right 724 00:33:19,480 --> 00:33:21,520 Speaker 4: before World War Two? So did they not have them 725 00:33:21,520 --> 00:33:23,440 Speaker 4: in nineteen forty, because don't really know how we can 726 00:33:23,440 --> 00:33:25,640 Speaker 4: all come together to celebrate athletes when we're all fighting 727 00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:28,479 Speaker 4: each other. They did not have the Olympics in nineteen 728 00:33:28,560 --> 00:33:31,040 Speaker 4: forty due to World War Two, So if you didn't know, 729 00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 4: now you do. 730 00:33:31,600 --> 00:33:33,720 Speaker 1: Another connection that this movie has with the movie we 731 00:33:33,760 --> 00:33:38,080 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier was the things going down in the Iron 732 00:33:38,120 --> 00:33:40,880 Speaker 1: Claw that keeps Jeremy ellen White's character from competing in 733 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 1: the Olympics, where the US pulled out of it. 734 00:33:43,040 --> 00:33:45,120 Speaker 2: Yes, that was during the Cold War. 735 00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:46,840 Speaker 1: So it's kind of interesting to go back, and I 736 00:33:46,840 --> 00:33:48,040 Speaker 1: don't know have the. 737 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:51,560 Speaker 5: Olympics as a historical marker of like this is the 738 00:33:51,600 --> 00:33:53,480 Speaker 5: state of the world. It is weird to think about 739 00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:55,880 Speaker 5: the entire world coming together to compete when we're all 740 00:33:56,000 --> 00:33:58,800 Speaker 5: just really fighting at any given time. So overall, for 741 00:33:58,920 --> 00:34:00,920 Speaker 5: the boys in the Boat, what would you rate it? 742 00:34:01,000 --> 00:34:02,520 Speaker 2: Four out of five? Ors? Oh? 743 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:03,920 Speaker 1: I thought you would go a little bit higher. 744 00:34:04,120 --> 00:34:06,240 Speaker 4: I think I gave the book four and a half 745 00:34:06,280 --> 00:34:08,400 Speaker 4: or four point seven five, so I need to be 746 00:34:08,520 --> 00:34:10,520 Speaker 4: fair in that. I thought the movie was a little 747 00:34:10,560 --> 00:34:12,360 Speaker 4: soub par compared to the book. Great movie, but I 748 00:34:12,400 --> 00:34:13,080 Speaker 4: like the book better. 749 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:15,480 Speaker 1: I enjoyed it a lot more than I was expecting to. 750 00:34:15,760 --> 00:34:18,440 Speaker 1: I give it as well a strong four out of 751 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 1: five college tuitions. Come back and talk about Roadhouse with 752 00:34:22,120 --> 00:34:22,800 Speaker 1: Jake Dyllenhall. 753 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:30,640 Speaker 3: It's time to head down to movie Mike treylar Hau. 754 00:34:31,600 --> 00:34:34,959 Speaker 1: The big question I have with the new Roadhouse movie 755 00:34:35,000 --> 00:34:40,320 Speaker 1: starring Jake dyllon Hall is who asked for this? Seriously? 756 00:34:40,360 --> 00:34:43,160 Speaker 1: Who asked for this? The original movie from the eighties 757 00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:50,160 Speaker 1: starring the legendary Patrick Swayze is a cult classic. One 758 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:53,200 Speaker 1: day we look back and think of, oh, remember Roadhouse. 759 00:34:53,200 --> 00:34:56,760 Speaker 1: That was a good movie. But in twenty twenty four, 760 00:34:57,719 --> 00:35:01,360 Speaker 1: who was asking for this movie too be remade? So 761 00:35:01,520 --> 00:35:04,799 Speaker 1: going into this trailer, going into all the sort of 762 00:35:04,840 --> 00:35:07,600 Speaker 1: controversy around this movie, I just thought this was gonna 763 00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:10,319 Speaker 1: be another cash grab and I thought I was gonna 764 00:35:10,320 --> 00:35:12,960 Speaker 1: hate it with every fiber of my being. But then 765 00:35:13,000 --> 00:35:15,880 Speaker 1: the trailer dropped and I was like, Oh, this is 766 00:35:15,920 --> 00:35:19,520 Speaker 1: not what I was expecting. This actually looks pretty good. 767 00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:22,160 Speaker 1: It doesn't look like anything that's gonna change my life. 768 00:35:22,280 --> 00:35:26,200 Speaker 1: But man, and maybe it's because I like Jake Jillenhall, 769 00:35:26,719 --> 00:35:29,400 Speaker 1: just how slick all the action look, the fact that 770 00:35:29,440 --> 00:35:33,120 Speaker 1: it didn't feel anything like the original movie. Aside from 771 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:37,560 Speaker 1: Jake Gyllenhall's character being named the same as Patrick Swayze's character, 772 00:35:37,960 --> 00:35:41,640 Speaker 1: a very loose connection to the actual story is very loose. 773 00:35:41,760 --> 00:35:44,960 Speaker 1: Just happens to also take place at a roadhouse. Everything 774 00:35:44,960 --> 00:35:48,640 Speaker 1: else feels completely different. So before I get into morerow 775 00:35:48,719 --> 00:35:51,319 Speaker 1: my thoughts about roadhouse, here's just a little bit of 776 00:35:51,360 --> 00:35:55,239 Speaker 1: the trailer. A friend of mine suggests it. 777 00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:58,000 Speaker 2: I come talk to you. I own a roadhouse out in. 778 00:35:58,000 --> 00:35:59,160 Speaker 3: The Florida Keys. 779 00:36:00,719 --> 00:36:02,560 Speaker 2: Lately it's been at tracks in the wrong clientele. 780 00:36:04,080 --> 00:36:06,279 Speaker 1: I can pay you good money. Judge him by your car. 781 00:36:06,360 --> 00:36:08,359 Speaker 1: You need that well, I like my car. 782 00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:09,480 Speaker 2: Think about it. 783 00:36:09,680 --> 00:36:11,920 Speaker 1: I know who you are, that Ad Dulton. 784 00:36:14,440 --> 00:36:17,439 Speaker 3: I got it you for you don't let no one 785 00:36:17,480 --> 00:36:19,560 Speaker 3: get this close. 786 00:36:21,560 --> 00:36:25,080 Speaker 1: So in this reboot, Jake Gillenhall is a former UFC 787 00:36:25,160 --> 00:36:28,960 Speaker 1: fighter and now the owner of a Florida Keys roadhouse, 788 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:31,520 Speaker 1: finds him sleeping in his car, offers him the job 789 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:33,879 Speaker 1: to come work at the roadhouse, and then he gets 790 00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:37,800 Speaker 1: roped into this big war between outlaws and bikers. There 791 00:36:38,160 --> 00:36:40,800 Speaker 1: at the end of that trailer you heard real life 792 00:36:41,080 --> 00:36:44,400 Speaker 1: mixed martial artist Connor McGregor, who I thought his performance 793 00:36:44,440 --> 00:36:47,160 Speaker 1: in this was gonna be so cringe, But maybe it's 794 00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:51,319 Speaker 1: because Connor McGregor himself is like a caricature. He's very 795 00:36:51,400 --> 00:36:55,359 Speaker 1: over the top and cheesy and somehow translated perfectly into 796 00:36:55,440 --> 00:36:58,279 Speaker 1: this movie trailer so far. So I thought that was 797 00:36:58,320 --> 00:37:00,359 Speaker 1: going to be a terrible addition, and I was gonna 798 00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:02,279 Speaker 1: feel like, oh, look, we got Connor McGregor in this, 799 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:06,080 Speaker 1: we're making it different, but somehow actually really works for me. 800 00:37:06,280 --> 00:37:09,520 Speaker 1: This movie is coming out on March twenty first on Prime, 801 00:37:09,760 --> 00:37:12,840 Speaker 1: which after looking at this trailer, I thought, how is 802 00:37:12,880 --> 00:37:16,359 Speaker 1: this movie not getting a theatrical release? Given that going 803 00:37:16,360 --> 00:37:18,280 Speaker 1: into it, I thought, why is this even being made? 804 00:37:18,560 --> 00:37:21,080 Speaker 1: Throw it on the streaming service and we'll forget about it. 805 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:24,680 Speaker 1: But seeing how good it actually feels on a trailer, 806 00:37:24,880 --> 00:37:28,280 Speaker 1: I can't imagine not seeing this movie on the big screen. 807 00:37:28,560 --> 00:37:32,240 Speaker 1: But Amazon really now isn't in the business of putting 808 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:34,960 Speaker 1: movies in theaters anymore. That's really not what they're all about. 809 00:37:35,440 --> 00:37:39,400 Speaker 1: They are all about selling Amazon Prime subscriptions. If you 810 00:37:39,480 --> 00:37:42,520 Speaker 1: forget that element of it, then you gotta be reminded 811 00:37:42,560 --> 00:37:44,880 Speaker 1: that these are the same people selling you toilet paper. 812 00:37:45,160 --> 00:37:48,480 Speaker 1: They don't really care about the integrity of a movie. 813 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:51,600 Speaker 1: They love having a movie name that people know with 814 00:37:51,719 --> 00:37:54,440 Speaker 1: a big star like Jake Jillenhall, throw it on their 815 00:37:54,480 --> 00:37:57,080 Speaker 1: streaming service and give people more of a reason to 816 00:37:57,120 --> 00:38:01,040 Speaker 1: subscribe to Amazon. So much so that the director is 817 00:38:01,160 --> 00:38:05,200 Speaker 1: boycotting the premiere of this movie because he wants it 818 00:38:05,239 --> 00:38:07,520 Speaker 1: to be put into theaters. Now, I have to say, 819 00:38:07,560 --> 00:38:10,600 Speaker 1: after watching this, I'm kind of with him and Jake Jillenhall. 820 00:38:10,680 --> 00:38:13,799 Speaker 1: I think this movie should go out in theaters. You 821 00:38:13,880 --> 00:38:16,200 Speaker 1: have a big star who can go out and promote 822 00:38:16,280 --> 00:38:19,120 Speaker 1: the movie, and it just seems like an easy plug 823 00:38:19,160 --> 00:38:21,880 Speaker 1: and play. And this is coming from somebody who normally 824 00:38:21,960 --> 00:38:24,959 Speaker 1: rolls their eyes at movies like this. Like I said, 825 00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:27,080 Speaker 1: it feels like it was something that nobody asked for. 826 00:38:27,200 --> 00:38:29,760 Speaker 1: But it looks way better than the half baked attempt 827 00:38:29,760 --> 00:38:32,720 Speaker 1: that I was expecting. It looks like a big, fun 828 00:38:32,840 --> 00:38:35,400 Speaker 1: action movie that demands the big screen that people can 829 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:37,960 Speaker 1: go and just enjoy and have a good time. That 830 00:38:38,120 --> 00:38:40,640 Speaker 1: is the important part here. Now, Don't get me wrong, 831 00:38:40,760 --> 00:38:44,560 Speaker 1: Jake jillen Hall is no Patrick Swayze. Patrick Swayze was 832 00:38:44,640 --> 00:38:48,279 Speaker 1: incredibly charming in Roadhouse, even as he was beating dudes up. 833 00:38:48,400 --> 00:38:50,920 Speaker 1: With Jake Jillenhall, it feels like they are turning up 834 00:38:50,920 --> 00:38:53,560 Speaker 1: the violence a little bit more, giving him the backstory 835 00:38:53,600 --> 00:38:55,960 Speaker 1: of being a UFC fighter. It seems like the way 836 00:38:56,000 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 1: they are really making this one different is making a 837 00:38:57,960 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 1: little bit more violent. Not that the first one was, 838 00:39:00,200 --> 00:39:02,520 Speaker 1: but it was kind of like eighties violence. This is 839 00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:06,319 Speaker 1: way more modern day, big Hollywood studio violence. And I 840 00:39:06,360 --> 00:39:08,960 Speaker 1: also just love that Jake gillen Hall will do movies 841 00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:12,400 Speaker 1: like this. He's an incredibly versatile actor, and I feel 842 00:39:12,440 --> 00:39:14,600 Speaker 1: like in the last few years he's really had this 843 00:39:14,960 --> 00:39:17,799 Speaker 1: moment of clarity of realizing that he doesn't need to 844 00:39:17,840 --> 00:39:20,080 Speaker 1: do all these big dramatic roles to be taken as 845 00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:23,239 Speaker 1: a serious actor. That he can also do big, fun 846 00:39:23,320 --> 00:39:26,319 Speaker 1: movies that people enjoy, but then also do the movies 847 00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:28,719 Speaker 1: that are more critically acclaimed and challenge him more as 848 00:39:28,760 --> 00:39:31,640 Speaker 1: an actor, which is throw him in a dramatic role 849 00:39:31,680 --> 00:39:34,400 Speaker 1: and nobody questions it. And if you look back at 850 00:39:34,400 --> 00:39:37,239 Speaker 1: the original movie, which only costs fifteen million dollars to 851 00:39:37,280 --> 00:39:39,759 Speaker 1: make and went on to make thirty million dollars, it's 852 00:39:39,760 --> 00:39:42,879 Speaker 1: not like it's a giant hit, so arguably still it's 853 00:39:42,880 --> 00:39:44,960 Speaker 1: a cult classic. But I don't feel like there was 854 00:39:44,960 --> 00:39:47,520 Speaker 1: a mega fan base really wanting this movie to be made, 855 00:39:47,600 --> 00:39:50,399 Speaker 1: So maybe putting it on streaming is the better move 856 00:39:50,880 --> 00:39:53,880 Speaker 1: for my financial standpoint. But Amazon, I just throw them 857 00:39:53,880 --> 00:39:55,719 Speaker 1: the money and put it in theaters. But again, it's 858 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:58,520 Speaker 1: coming out March twenty first on Prime Video. 859 00:39:59,560 --> 00:40:02,320 Speaker 2: That is this week's edition of Movie Live. 860 00:40:02,719 --> 00:40:04,880 Speaker 1: Tram or Bar, and that is going to do it 861 00:40:04,920 --> 00:40:07,680 Speaker 1: for another episode here of the podcast. But before I go, 862 00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:10,120 Speaker 1: I got to give my listeners shout out of the week. 863 00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:12,800 Speaker 1: I normally do it to somebody who sends me a DM, 864 00:40:13,200 --> 00:40:16,160 Speaker 1: tags me in their Instagram story, comments on my TikTok 865 00:40:16,239 --> 00:40:19,360 Speaker 1: at Mike Deestro, or my Facebook page. You just searched 866 00:40:19,400 --> 00:40:21,480 Speaker 1: Mike d Shrow on Facebook and you'll find me there. 867 00:40:21,520 --> 00:40:24,359 Speaker 1: But this week I'm actually diving into the voicemail line 868 00:40:24,400 --> 00:40:27,160 Speaker 1: of the Bobby Bone Show. Got this really nice message 869 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:29,040 Speaker 1: from a listener who did not leave their name, but 870 00:40:29,120 --> 00:40:30,360 Speaker 1: this is what they had to say. 871 00:40:30,360 --> 00:40:32,960 Speaker 6: Morning Studio. I wanted to give a shout out to 872 00:40:33,120 --> 00:40:36,360 Speaker 6: Mike d. I am a high school teacher and my 873 00:40:36,560 --> 00:40:40,640 Speaker 6: students are currently doing a movie review unit, and I 874 00:40:40,760 --> 00:40:44,640 Speaker 6: played one of his podcast episodes to my class to 875 00:40:44,719 --> 00:40:47,319 Speaker 6: show them what a spoiler free review sounds like, and 876 00:40:47,400 --> 00:40:49,400 Speaker 6: it was awesome. Thank you so much for all that 877 00:40:49,480 --> 00:40:51,680 Speaker 6: you do. We appreciate you. We love listening to you. 878 00:40:51,960 --> 00:40:55,120 Speaker 1: A movie review unit in high school. What high school 879 00:40:55,200 --> 00:40:57,040 Speaker 1: is this? I wish we had that because I was 880 00:40:57,080 --> 00:40:59,400 Speaker 1: just watching movies and reviewing them for myself back in 881 00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:02,400 Speaker 1: high school. But thank you for sharing my reviews. I 882 00:41:02,520 --> 00:41:06,479 Speaker 1: take pride in doing spoiler free reviews. It's a kind 883 00:41:06,480 --> 00:41:09,279 Speaker 1: of tough process because there are always details that I 884 00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:10,920 Speaker 1: want to get into, but I don't want to ruin 885 00:41:10,960 --> 00:41:13,280 Speaker 1: it for anybody who is going to watch the movie later. 886 00:41:13,800 --> 00:41:16,160 Speaker 1: But this is what I've learned over the years of 887 00:41:16,200 --> 00:41:18,120 Speaker 1: doing spoiler free reviews, and you can share this with 888 00:41:18,160 --> 00:41:21,160 Speaker 1: your high school students. Here's my process. First, you go 889 00:41:21,239 --> 00:41:24,160 Speaker 1: watch the movie, and going into watching the movie, I 890 00:41:24,360 --> 00:41:27,319 Speaker 1: like to know some background as far as who directed it, 891 00:41:27,360 --> 00:41:30,400 Speaker 1: who is starring in it, the general plot of the movie. 892 00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:32,840 Speaker 1: And because of the nature of doing this podcast, I 893 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:35,600 Speaker 1: have probably already seen the trailer. So I go watch 894 00:41:35,640 --> 00:41:38,000 Speaker 1: the movie and as I watch it, I'm thinking of 895 00:41:38,080 --> 00:41:41,360 Speaker 1: different things that I'm enjoying, and as I'm watching the movie, 896 00:41:41,440 --> 00:41:45,200 Speaker 1: I'm asking myself different types of questions and really making 897 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:48,319 Speaker 1: notes on how the movie makes me feel, because as 898 00:41:48,400 --> 00:41:51,920 Speaker 1: long as you talk about how a movie makes you feel, 899 00:41:52,120 --> 00:41:54,960 Speaker 1: that's not really giving a whole lot away. And when 900 00:41:55,000 --> 00:41:58,000 Speaker 1: I do a review, I usually stop talking about things 901 00:41:58,080 --> 00:42:01,160 Speaker 1: that happen after the second act of the movie because 902 00:42:01,200 --> 00:42:05,200 Speaker 1: everything there is total spoil zone. So after watching a movie, 903 00:42:05,239 --> 00:42:07,320 Speaker 1: I'll go into my phone and just make a list 904 00:42:07,360 --> 00:42:09,520 Speaker 1: of notes of all the ideas that came to me, 905 00:42:10,000 --> 00:42:12,719 Speaker 1: as far as moments I liked, things I didn't like things, 906 00:42:12,760 --> 00:42:15,279 Speaker 1: I saw things I wasn't expecting. If it's part of 907 00:42:15,320 --> 00:42:18,320 Speaker 1: a big franchise, I asked myself questions like, are people 908 00:42:18,320 --> 00:42:21,319 Speaker 1: who love this franchise gonna like this installment? What were 909 00:42:21,360 --> 00:42:24,040 Speaker 1: some key players in here? What actors had good moments, 910 00:42:24,120 --> 00:42:27,080 Speaker 1: what actors had bad moments? What was the directing like? 911 00:42:27,239 --> 00:42:29,520 Speaker 1: What parts made me laugh? What parts made me cry? 912 00:42:29,600 --> 00:42:32,719 Speaker 1: What parts made me angry? What moment did I want 913 00:42:32,760 --> 00:42:34,880 Speaker 1: to leave the theater if it was a bad movie? 914 00:42:35,200 --> 00:42:37,680 Speaker 1: And then to top it all off, before I do 915 00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:40,399 Speaker 1: my review, I'll go and watch the trailer one more 916 00:42:40,400 --> 00:42:42,239 Speaker 1: time to make sure all the things that I am 917 00:42:42,280 --> 00:42:45,520 Speaker 1: talking about are featured in the trailer. Therefore, I would 918 00:42:45,560 --> 00:42:47,759 Speaker 1: say our fair game to talk about. And then when 919 00:42:47,760 --> 00:42:51,239 Speaker 1: it comes to talking about endings, I just avoid them altogether. 920 00:42:51,719 --> 00:42:55,200 Speaker 1: Every movie has an ending, so talking about the way 921 00:42:55,320 --> 00:42:57,239 Speaker 1: a movie makes you feel at the end of it, 922 00:42:57,320 --> 00:42:59,080 Speaker 1: I don't feel as a spoiler and lets you talk 923 00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:01,759 Speaker 1: about who lived and who died. But sometimes I don't 924 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:03,680 Speaker 1: even like to know how movie endings are going to 925 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:05,680 Speaker 1: make me feel, so I don't include that anyway. So 926 00:43:05,760 --> 00:43:08,120 Speaker 1: that's your process. You go and watch it, you make notes, 927 00:43:08,200 --> 00:43:10,120 Speaker 1: You go back and look at those notes, maybe write 928 00:43:10,120 --> 00:43:13,200 Speaker 1: a little bit more, and then maybe go read an 929 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:16,640 Speaker 1: article or two that director or an actor has given 930 00:43:16,680 --> 00:43:19,200 Speaker 1: an interview so you can add a little bit more insight. 931 00:43:19,400 --> 00:43:21,600 Speaker 1: There you go. That's how you do a spoiler free review. 932 00:43:21,840 --> 00:43:24,160 Speaker 1: So feel free to share that with your high school class. 933 00:43:24,280 --> 00:43:26,520 Speaker 1: Thank you for listening, thank you for being subscribed, and 934 00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:29,319 Speaker 1: until next time, go out and watch good movies and 935 00:43:29,360 --> 00:43:31,000 Speaker 1: I will talk to you later.