WEBVTT - Matinee Science Playlist, Part 6: ‘Silent Running’

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>My welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, you welcome

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. In today, of course, we're

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing a movie episode. That's right. We've

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been trying to do one of these a month just

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many, so many films we love, and

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>so many films that either have wonderful tie ins to

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>scientific and cultural topics that we've discussed on the show,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>um or you know, they allow us to discuss new

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>things and new angles. It wouldn't necessarily necessitate an entire

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>episode on their own. Alright, So what's on the docket today, Well,

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this month we're looking at really one of my I

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>have to say, it's one of my favorite films. Uh,

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of thinking about films you saw

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at a definite point in your life that had an

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>impact on your your your outlook. Uh. And the film

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is ninety two is Silent Running. I saw it for

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the first time this weekend. Yeah, I've never seen it before.

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd seen like stills from it. I think I've seen

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>stills of the robots because it's a very robot heavy film,

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>despite being one obsessed with nature and environmental themes of

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the robots getting awful lot of screen time they do. Yeah,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're having trouble picturing the film, if

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we just mentioned like Judesic Gnomes in space with with

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>forests and them Bruce Dern and then three domain diminutive

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>robots that kind of shamble around, that's that's silent running

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell. Now. This was directed by Douglas Trumbull, right,

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>who was like a visual effects guy for many years. Yeah. Yeah,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he he provided special photographic effects for such classic sci

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>fi films as two thousand and one of Space Odyssey,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the best close encounters of the third kind,

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek, the motion picture Blade Runner, and then later

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on The Tree of Life. Uh. And then it was

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the family too, because his father was a special

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>effects pioneer who worked on ninety nine The Whiz of Oz.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You can really feel the spirit of the sixties in

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this movie from seventy two, but maybe you can also

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>feel the despair of the seventies, and it is both

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of those spirits come crashing together in Silent Running. Yeah.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought about I've been thinking about this a lot recently,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in part because we're researching episodes about psychedelics and about

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic research, and then the the decades in which actual

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>medical research regarding psychedelics just completely languished. And it always

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of Hunter S. Thompson's commentary about the

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the the wave of the of the nineteen sixties crashing

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and falling back. Uh and and once again, I think

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that ties into to this film as well.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Before we continue, though, let's let's have just a quick

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>audio sample from the original trailer for Silent Running, just

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to remind everybody a little bit about what we're talking

0:02:55.639 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>about here. A space convoy on a strange voyage carrying

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>a rare cargo. The forests, the plants, the growing things

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>doomed to extinction on Earth. We have count received orders

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to abandon that nupler, destruct all the forests, and returned

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>our ships to commercial So we're going you blow up discourse.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you now more. Volga Silent Running characlysm in outer space,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>every moment bringing its own danger as man explores the

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mysteries of an unknown and limitless universe. Valiport volliport, little wrong,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>You will be out, you're accelerating. I got a premature,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think we have a taste in that that trailer.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a very ranty film, oh man. A lot

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of the movie also, and besides the scenes with robots

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of hanging out and not really executing much

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 1>uh much having to do with furtherance of the plot,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>just moving around and doing things, there's also a lot

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>of Bruce Dern chastising the camera and giving sermons to

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>other characters about their lack of appreciation for nature. Yeah,

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's a very it's a very weird movie

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, and you know that, thinking of you

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about how you watched it for the first time

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>just the other day. I watched it for the first time,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>probably like in a Sunday afternoon on cable TV in

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the nineties when I was like in junior high. I guess,

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>uh and and you know air on a any just

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like matinee showing of it, and I just like turned

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>over to it and was just sucked in by this

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>film that doesn't have much in the way of action.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>There's there are a few key action scenes, but it

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is not an action film. It is a it is

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>an environmental science fiction film. I mean I'd also say

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not even really a very plot heavy film. There's

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>basically a situation and that situation comes about and then

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that's about it. I mean, the huge swaths of the

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>runtime are just characters kind of hanging out. Yeah, and uh,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it benefits I think from three major factors. You know,

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if we're just sort of pull these out and then

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>realized it's complicated when you try and like pull the

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>key elements out of a picture when everything needs to

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>essentially be a cohesive hole. And then I think in

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this picture is but you have Bruce Dern's performance, which

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is fabulous. I mean, Bruce Dern is was and is

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>an acting treasure. I mean, often relegated to the villain

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>rolls for sure, but capable of much more. And I

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>think we see, uh, we see a little bit of

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that in this film. And then the other key aspects

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of this are they the sets look fabulous, Um, the

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>models look fabulous, The effects are all wonderful. Uh, and

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you have you have some wonderful music in the film too.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So again, this this film is a product of the

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen sixties spilling over into the early nineteen seventies, uh,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and and it is it's for several reasons for stars.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The studio apparently decided to give more first time directors

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a shot after the success of nineteen sixty nine is

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Easy Rider, which is directed by Dennis Hopper, said Dennis

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Hopper's first director red directorial feature and uh. In anyway,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the films to come in the wake of that included

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Silent Running. Also the music, so Joan Bayaz uh submitted

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like to two songs for this film, Silent Running and

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Rejoice in the Sun, both of which are prominently featured.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And for anyone not familiar with Joan Bayazz, first of all,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>go look up Joan Bayazz and and these songs in

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>particular are currently on streaming services. But she was a

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>major social and political musical force of the nineteen sixties

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and beyond playing at the original Woodstock. And she's always

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>advocated civil rights, environmentalism, and human rights including l g P,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>d q I A plus rights. Um. So I mean,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>all these elements I think really give it a feel

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that that sets it apart from everything else. Like so,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were watching looking around for any kind of

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>science fiction on TV in the in the late nineties

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like this stood out. This was a different type of

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>space and robots film. It's from another dimension. I mean,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got it really does have this feeling of the

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies culture coming together. But also it's a

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>very weird combination of elements. It's got these robots, but

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the environmental themes. It's got these great special effects and

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like practical miniature effects, you know, which watching movies like

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this really just makes me simmer with rage at the

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>c g I age. You know, I'm so sick of

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all the c g I space ships. I wish they'd

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>bring back the miniature models and you know in the

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>backdrops and the painted sets and everything. Oh yeah, I

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, they were so good, and those skills still exist. Uh,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they're just not being employed for the most part with

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>motion pictures. Yeah, but then you've got that, and so

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>those like sci fi special effects are clashing with just

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really in your face Joan Baya's musical numbers. Uh. It's

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a strange, unique kind of movie. I don't I

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can't think of another thing I've seen like it. So

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>let's talk to just a little bit about the plot,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just to remind everybody who's seen it before and refresh

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. We're gonna I guess I think we're gonna

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>avoid any real spoilers here in terms of the end

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the film. But you know, if you want to

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go into the film spoiler free, pause this, uh this podcast,

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>go watch it and then come back. So the basic synopsis,

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the future. The planet Earth is essentially dying. A

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>great dying has ravage botanical life on our planet, and

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the remaining shreds of botanical life and some animal life

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>now thrive solely within a series of geodesic domes that

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>are affixed to a spaceship called the Valley Forge, and

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Valley Forges orbiting just outside the orbit of Saturn,

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and here a four person crew tends to things. That

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>includes botanist Freeman Lowell, who's our our main character, played

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>by Bruce Den, and three helper robots named Huey, Dewey

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Louie Well. Originally, no, originally they have robot names.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>They're called like Drone number one, that's Drone number two,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Bruce Den, in a in a moment of

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of magical thinking, names them. And it said that

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>moment that they seem to acquire personalities that they don't

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to have had before. Yeah, the end this occurs

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>later when it's when it's just a durn. So how

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>does it just become a situation of only Bruce Den's

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>character in Three Robots. Well, basically, one day an order

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>comes down, uh that all the forest have to be

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>jettisoned and detonated with new clear ball with nuclear weapons. Yes,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the and the rest of the crew just

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>take this and stride. They're like, all right, it's time

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to go home. Time to ditch these uh these forests

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and head back. But Lowell is very upset by this

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and finally breaks and betrays his fellow crew members to

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>save one of the save the Last Forest pod and

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>uh he ends up faking a malfunction and then takes

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>off through Saturn's rings with the World's Last forest and uh.

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>You know what follows is a story of of survival loneliness,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>thus the naming of the robots and the bonding with

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the robots. But then also you know this this environmental message. Yeah,

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear that the orientation of the film is

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a pro environmentalist one, though it's not quite clear exactly

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>how much we're supposed to agree with everything Durn says.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Durn's character gives these monologues where he excoriates

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>his crew members for being satisfied with this horrible synthetic

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>existence that they're living where you know, they only eat

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this pre package freeze dried junk, that that they got

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>his rations from Earth. Whereas he picks you know, living

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>fruits and vegetables from the forest, he picks cantle opes

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and he sits there eating cantle open and just like

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>attacking them for putting that garbage in their mouths uh,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and and talking about how they don't care about the

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>trees and they don't care about the forest, and they

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>really they don't seem to care. They're just not bothered

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that Earth doesn't have any forests anymore.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>They just want to get home, and seemingly, uh, you

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are led to believe that they would be happy with

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the life of sort of bland synthetic consumer existence and

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>entirely artificial environments with no exposure to plants their animals.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So in a sense, it's it's like Bruce Tern's character

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is the spirit of the nineteen sixties speaking to these

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>denizens of the nineteen seventies and saying like how can

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>how can you do this? Like how can you abandon

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>these principles? Um? And uh? And in doing so? Yeah,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Tern's character, his performance is very abrasive at times.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he comes off as a real curmudgeon. Uh.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know they're also an idealist and it's

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of an interesting experience experiment to sort

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of take that apart and figure out, well, what's why

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is he so abrasive? He is, he's supposed to be

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>so abrasive. How are we supposed to feel about him? Um?

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Is part of this just what happens when you cast

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a character actor like Bruce Dern in this role. Bruce Dern,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>who had just come off this was just on the

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>heels of the film The Cowboys, in which he killed

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>John Wayne's character by shooting him in the back. Yeah.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like the ultimate dishonorable scumbag move in

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Western genre. Yeah, except maybe cheating by drinking clean water. Yeah.

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>He played a real real villain in that picture. Uh.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly enough, I was looking around at reviews from

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>when this came out, and Dern's casting is it seems

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a divisive aspect of the film, so some

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>critics thought he was great. Like critics who maybe were

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a little lukewarm on other aspects of the film were like, well,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Dern's terrific and though while others said, hey, it's

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.239
<v Speaker 1>really difficult to empathize with this character. Uh, and that ultimately,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps during his performance ends up hurting the message of

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the film. I don't. I don't think I would go

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that far. But you know, obviously he's an actor who

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>already had a career based on playing at times dislikable

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>characters and uh, and he's still going strong in that

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>department today at age a D three. I wonder what

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of this casting would be today, Like, who's

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody that you would cast in this role where they

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be like this divine messenger of environmental hope but

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>would come off maybe a bit abrace it. I would

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like to see a movie that's got an environmental conservation

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>message where the champion of the environment is Michael Ironside,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's even more difficult to picture. You can't destroy

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>these forests. Ironside is clearly an actor that was made

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to play the sort of character who gets who gets

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Jettis and a board and the forest and exploded, not

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so much the savior of the of the Pods. But

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they're different types of villain actors, right, I mean, I

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like Michael Ironside is the classic heavy He's the hinchman,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the tough guy, the tough bad guy. Bruce Dearn is

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>more kind of the scumbag. Yeah he played. Yeah, he

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>did play a lot of like like sniveling scumbag characters

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in his in his life, in his life. So yeah,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I still don't have a firm

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>answer for, like how how I feel about his performance.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like one of the reasons I connected

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>with the film so much as a kid is that like,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>here's this guy who he is a loner, you know,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and and like here I am, you know, as a

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>junior high kid who's you know, hasn't seems to have

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing in common with anybody else in my school, and

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I can, I can connect with him

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on some level. And his only friends their robots. I

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would love to have had robots as friends, you know,

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and and so you know that kind

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of that that spoke to me as well, and of course,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he's an idealist. He's trying to he's doing this thing

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that is that that he sees as very heroic, and

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like everybody at that age especially connects with that,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah. And then as as as you grow older,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a role like this you keep coming back to,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you end up being more forgiving of of

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the character's faults because you're like, you agree with

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the basic idea. Maybe you don't agree with his use

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of murder, right, but still you're you you agree with

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>his his basic ideology here that you know, the forests

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are worth saying, that nature is worth saying, that that

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>connection is is vital and human. Well, it really does

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ask you to think about something that that becomes more

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>profound the more you think about it. What is the

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>inherent value of nature? And this is something we'll come

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>back to as we discuss more about the movie later

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on in the episode, But we often today think about

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>environmental conservation in terms of the material benefits to humans

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>provided by the by environmental conservation, you you don't want

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to destroy natural habitats, you don't want to deforce the

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>landscape and all that kind of stuff, because it does

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of bad things when you know they're they're cascading

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>negative effects throughout the world when you do that. Um.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But there there's also a deeper questions, like what if

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there was just one forest left and a dome out

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in space and it wouldn't affect anybody on Earth, whether

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or not that dome state alive, would you fight to

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>save that forest? Does the forest have value in itself? Anyway?

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We can return to that. So I thought maybe we

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>should explore the sort of pure scientific question of growing

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>plants in space. Could you grow a forest in space

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>inside the geodesic dome on a space ship? If so,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>how would you do it? And do scientists who think

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>about space colonization take this idea seriously? What kind of

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>challenges do they expect? So, just because it's a recent

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>example that I read about, I want to talk for

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a minute about the the Chinese moon lander. I hope

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to pronounce this right. I think it's the

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>chung U for yes, this is named for the goddess

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>who who resides on the moon, uh, the the wife

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of the great Archer. Right. So, the the archer Ye

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>shoots down the nine surplus sons, leaving just the one son.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>As a result, he gets the elixir of immortality and

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>his wife, Chunga is I think there are different versions

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the story about how she drinks it, but she

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ends up drinking it and then goes to the Moon

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to live there. Um And so of course that's that's

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a good name for a lunar lander, right, And there

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have been four of these, now, these these four different

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lunar missions from the Chinese Space Program. This is the

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth in the series, and in January of twenty nineteen,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Changa four lander set down on the far side

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Moon, at the side that always faces away

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Earth, of course, because the Moon is tidally locked.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>So it landed in this massive impact basin on the

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>far side of the Moon called the South Pole Aitken Basin,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically within a crater called Von Carmen. And one of

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the experiments brought along on the Chongo four mission was

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a biological payload of cotton seeds inside a tiny biosphere

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which was supplied with soil, water, a small contained atmosphere chamber,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and a heater, and after the spacecraft landed, the seeds hatched,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and the Chinese Space Program even published a little photo

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>from the inside of the chamber with green sprouts on

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the far side of the moon. And it's pretty cool.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got a picture here for you to look at, Robert.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It looks like a little jungle of spinach underneath the

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>plastic net. Yeah, and then the plastic net kind of

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like one of the domes from the from Silent

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Running Clear Bias. But of course it was not to be.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>It would not last very long. The heater in the

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>little biosphere did not hold out, and so when the

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>night set in on the far side of the moon.

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the moon has you know, longer days and

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>night cycles because of its tidal locking with the Earth.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>When the nights set in on the far side of

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the moon, local temperatures reached about negative fifty two degrees

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>celsius from negative sixty two degrees fahrenheit, and the cotton

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sprouts froze and died about a week after or the

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>experiment began. And furthermore, the Chinese media reported that the

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>cotton seeds were not the only species within the biosphere

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>which also contained rape seed potato A rabbidopsis, which is

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a brassica plant that is often deployed in space missions

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh experiments with growing plants beyond Earth, as well

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as fruit flies and yeast, and apparently nothing except the

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>cotton registered any growth. So it can be hard to

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>grow life in space. And and this was in a

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sealed container on the relatively nearby Moon. Like, wouldn't the

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>problem get even harder if you're talking about trying to

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>grow a whole ecosystem, an entire forest in a ship

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in deep space. It seems like an almost impossible problem,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right right, Yeah. And of course in silent running like

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we begin with the forest being situated further away from

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the planet, and then developments in the plot just lead

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it to greater distances exactly. So the Chung of four

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>experiment was by no means the first attempt to grow

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>plants beyond Earth. I think it was the first attempt

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to grow them on the Moon. There have been many

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>experiments over the decades with growing plants in space. Lots

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of early space missions involved simply carrying seeds into space

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and then bringing them back to Earth to see if

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they would grow normally. I think there was concern about

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how primarily radiation, but perhaps other space conditions, maybe micro

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>gravity and so forth, how these would affect the seeds,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, would they grow normally if you just brought

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>them back and planted them. And in general, the seeds

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>taken into space seem completely unaffected. You bring them home

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're fine. In fact, all throughout the United States

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you can visit so called moon trees. These are trees

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>planted in public spaces from seeds that were taken into

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>orbit around the Moon by the Apollo fourteen command module,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and they grew fine. You can actually like look up

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>lists of these and see if you can visit a

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>moon tree near you. But the first plants actually grown

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>from seeds in space were of the species A rabbit

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Opsis thaliana, which is one of the same plants that

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese lander brought this year, but which did not sprout.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>And this was aboard the Russian space station the Salute

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen two, and since then lots of plant experiments

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have been conducted, and astronauts regularly experiment with cultivating plants

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the I S S. So I guess the question

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is what have we learned from all these experiments? What's

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it like to grow plants in space? So a few

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>takeaways as noted by Dr Anna Lisa Paul, an investigator

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>on the Advanced Plant Experiment or APEX experiment UH number one.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, seeds taken into space and then return to

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Earth consistently grow and don't show any changes. But if

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you let the seeds germinate in space, there are differences

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in how they grow. At first, we expected, like the

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>trophic patterns, that the growth patterns in plant development to

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>be different because of gravity. Right, you would think that

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the well gravity pulls the roots down and that's how

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they know to grow downward. But actually that's not entirely

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what we find. Some experiments have found that that some

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>plant are extremely sensitive to even very very tiny amounts

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of gravity and can detect very very weak gravitational fields

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and be manipulated by them. But also plants tend to

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>just grow toward light, with their roots generally growing in

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction from the light, but with individual patterns

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>determined by their genes. Also, the directionality of light is

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very important and determining growth patterns for plants in space.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>If there's a clear light source from one direction, like

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the sun would be on Earth, the plants tend to

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>grow toward that. But if the light sources diffuse, like

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of lighting the you know, the soft lighting

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you would get in a closed room. Then their growth

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>patterns are often very different and can be altered from

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what you would normally see on Earth. Now, despite the

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that we've discovered that healthy plants can grow in

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the absence of gravity, the lack of gravity and a

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>space station environment can still present a lot of problems

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for growing plants. If you just stop and think about

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it for a second, you can probably imagine what some

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of them are. Like. Think about this. You couldn't have

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a regular forest with a soil floor in micro gravity

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because the soil would float off everywhere, the water wouldn't

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sink into the soil when it was applied correctly. You'd

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have to have some kind of like you know, controlled

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>surface or like sometimes when astronauts grow plants on the

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I s s, they grow them out of these sort

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of packets of soil that it's almost like a package.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>You see this that's closed, but it's got something inside

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of It's like cat litter that's got fertilizer in it. Um.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>So you could maybe do something like that, but you

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have a totally natural forest type environment in the

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>absence of gravity. So in order to have something like

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>depicted in Silent Running. You would absolutely have to have

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>artificial gravity, and you know from our previous discussions no

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>magic fixes allowed here. Right as far as we know now,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have to simulate gravity through acceleration. And you

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>can go back to our artificial gravity episode for more

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>on how that might work. But I'll just say, short story,

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>your best bet would probably seem to be some kind

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of huge rotating cylinder with the forests inside it. On

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, that does present additional problems for energy. Right.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Forests need sunlight to grow, and if you can't simply

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>angle them towards the sun, because you know they'd have

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to be on the inside of the cylinder to benefit

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>from the effects of gravity, then you need an appropriate

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>artificial light source, or at least some sort of complex

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>reflective system like something that would that would would give

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>them the cost of sunlight they need. Right. However, if

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't care about simulating a full natural environment with

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole equal ecosystem and a soil floor and all that,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>your options really do expand to include hydroponic containers and

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>packet contained soil beds with growth via exposure to artificial

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>grow lights and all that, but then again, also some

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits might be reduced by some of those limitations.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is useful for a lot of reasons. Researching

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>plants in space is not just sort of a lark.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's useful for one thing, because knowledge about

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how plants growing space can actually be useful for agriculture

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>back on Earth. You can isolate variables in space that

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't isolate on Earth. But it's also useful for

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>long term space mission planning because, as Silent Running argues,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we really can't live without plants. Like any truly long

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>term space colonization efforts, if they're ever going to be

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>realized there, it's it's gonna be really hard to do

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>them entirely in metal boxes with prepacked rations. Those things

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually expire. Rehydratable or radiated or thermostabilized. Shrimp cocktail is

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>only going to take them so far. At the very least.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Long term astronauts or Mars colonists need to be able

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to grow their own food. And that's just food. That's

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>not even talking about uh, you know, holy ecosystems, in

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the environmental benefits they bring beyond growing crops. This is

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just about what potatoes am I going to eat tonight? Uh?

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>And I was reading a twenty nineteen article by Marina

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Corrin in The atlant Antic. Uh And I don't think

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I knew this fact before. Astronauts actually have been allowed

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to eat plants that they grew on space station. Apparently

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the Russian cosmonauts have been eating stuff on space stations

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, since around two thousand three. I

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>think they've been allowed to eat half the crops they

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>grew in their experiments, including early crops of a type

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of lettuce called missouna, which is I think a type

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of Japanese mustard greens. They've been allowed to eat peas

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they grew there. I think they tried to grow tomatoes

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but the crop failed. Um and and there have been

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>others since then. In twenty fifteen, I believe it was yeah, yeah,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to read from Marina's article quote, astronauts have already made

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a space salad. In astronauts on the space station were

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed to try the leaves of a red romaine lettuce

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that was cultivated in NASA's first fresh food growth chamber.

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They added a little balsamic dressing and took a bite.

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. The NASA astronaut KELLN Lyndagrin said, then tastes good. Uh,

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And I love red romaine. It's my favorite for salads

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at home. So that's a good choice there. Yeah. Well,

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the foods that we we gravitate towards,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like the artificial ones. Uh. You know, the argument is that,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like a potato chip is so satisfying because you know,

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's fatty, it's salty and all this, but it also

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>has a Christmas to it, as if we have discovered

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.959
<v Speaker 1>in the potato chip bag a crisp vegetable like lettuce

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that is ready for our consumption. Well, one of the

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>things when you look up these pictures of like the

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>lettuce screens growing on the I S s, they look

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like really high quality to me. Maybe maybe I'm just

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>hungry while I'm looking at the picture or something, but

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah, I want to eat that. They don't

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, limp and sad produce, the kind

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of limp and sad produce you sometimes find at the

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>grocery store when it's already been picked over. Uh. They

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>look like really good, like the best stuff you could

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>find in a really good farmer's market. Now, in mentioning

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the I want to go back to gravity for just

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a second, because I want to make it clear that

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what we see in silent running what is depicted there.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no attempt to depict any kind of rotation or

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>acceleration basis. It's just magic gravity. And ultimately, in science

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fiction we're off. We were often very forgiving of that.

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately sure, this picture is based in the

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the more the metaphorical scenario here of here

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is a portion of the world's dead forests sustained within

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>an artificial environment. They're just kind of attached to the

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sides of the valley forge. Yeah, in many ways, a

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>science fiction film can, even a good one, can be

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a science experiment. You know, they isolate

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>variables that they're not always gonna spend a lot of

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>time getting every detail accurate. They're more like focusing on

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>some key themes and they want you to contemplate a

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>scenario to you know, have you see what you think

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about it? Uh, sci fi films, I think are often

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're like the thought experiments that people do

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in philosophy classes. You know, when when you ask about

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy class like, wait, why was Donald Davidson walking

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in the swamp when he got turned into the you know,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>by the lightning strike turned into the swampman. Well, that

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>detail is not important. Just ignore that. And I think

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the gravity and silent running is kind of like that.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a detail that they don't want to

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be bothered with. Uh they you know, some some audiences

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>do get bothered by those things. Even so, and we're

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring up Carl Sagan in a minute, and that

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>will be uh, that'll be a point that sticks with him,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think. But anyway to sum up about growing plants

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in space, so I would say that summary is learning

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>how to grow plants in space is very important for

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the future of space travel and uh and even just

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for knowledge that we can apply in the present day

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. Plants do seem to grow just fine in

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>microgravity conditions, but they sometimes need a lot of special

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>care because of those conditions. Uh, special growing habitats, plenty

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the right kind of artificial light, special applications of

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>water and nutrients, atmospheric management because of course they need

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>access to c O two to grow their bodies. Uh.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And never forget you know that this is sort of

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a tangent, but you when you breathe out the you

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>two in your breath is later taken in by a

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>plant and made into leaves and wood plants are made

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of your breath. And we'll get back to that a

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>little later as well. But also, you know, growing entire

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems that simulate Earth ecosystems, like a full forest. It's

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not I would say, I don't know of any facts

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that make it impossible in principle, but you would encounter

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot more challenges related to energy and gravity and

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>environmental chemistry and the atmosphere and all that. And finally,

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just to point out, a lot of the future of

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>extraterrestrial botany research is probably going to be focused on

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>how to grow plants on Mars given those specific local conditions,

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than in microgravity. Because if you're going to Mars

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and you want to grow plants there, you can just

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like freeze seeds and take them with you. You don't

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be growing plants all the way there, right,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, based on you know, some of

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the recent discussions that I've I've been been been privy

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to regarding like traveling to Mars, like it's we we

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>could pack enough. I mean, it's kind of a you know,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a there's a lot of thought that goes into

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly how much you would need to bring and then

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>how you're going to sustain yourself when you when you

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>when once you get there. But the trip to Mars

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of trip in which we yes, you

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>could surround yourself with the plant, with the food and

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>water that you would need, and actually surrounding yourself with

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the food and water would help protect you from potentially

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>protect you from radiation. That's right, a hazard suit made

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out of sandwiches, yeah, made out of shrimp cocktail essentially, Yeah,

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or made out of water, I guess. And and the

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>food's got a lot of water and yeah, yeah, but

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>basically have food, food and water is protecting you. So

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't eat too much of it, don't. All right, we

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>should take a quick break and then we come back.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll we'll talk about Carl Sagan in Silent, Silent Running. Alright,

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we're back. Yeah. So one of the benefits of this

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>being a major science fiction film that came out in

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen seventies is that Carl Sagan around to

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>see it himself and to comment on it. Yeah, and

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he he mentions it in an article that was published

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in The New York Times on May nineteen seventy eight

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>called growing Up with Science Fiction. Now, this article isn't

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on Silent Running, but he devotes a paragraph to

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it in the article, and more generally he talks about, uh,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. And it's a great article, I think. Yeah.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It's collected in Broca's Brain, Reflections on the Romance of Science,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>which was published in nineteen seventy nine, still very very available.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I picked up a copy of this in the last

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years and read it. The whole book is

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>an excellent read. And yeah, this particular chapter, this particular

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>paper discuss his works that he both admires and criticizes.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it's not only a great read in and

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of itself, but I would say it's also a wonderful

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>place to get some fresh reading ideas, fresh in terms

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that they haven't been updated since the late nineteen seventies.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But still he mentions a number of important works of

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. Uh, you know, stuff that he grew up

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on as a kid, stuff that he learned about later,

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff that he thinks what he thought was really solid,

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff that you know, he had other, you know,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>decent things to say about it, like I I have

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at times thought what we really need like a Sagan

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sci fi book club in which we just used this

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>particular um chapter in the book as a guideline. Uh

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and just read everything that Sagan's discussing here, including the

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that he was critical off. He recommends Doon by

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the way there uh so say yeah. Sagan tells the

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>story of how he fell in love with science fiction

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>at the age of ten, and how his adolescent adoration

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for science fiction actually in the end led him to

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>real science. Like he tells stories of how there were

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>these sci fi stories with unanswered questions and inconsistencies that

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he wanted resolved because they were intriguing, and found real

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>science is basically is a way to get to the

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bottom of them, to get real answers to the questions

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>posed by science fiction. But he also talks about his

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>frustration with science fiction stories where characters don't know scientific

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>facts that it makes no sense for them to be

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>unaware of. And one example he gives his silent running

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so yeah and to to to drive home what he's

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about here, though the lower character in Silent Running

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>played by Bruce Dern is supposed to be a botanist

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and an ecologist. Yes he's Yeah, so he's a space botanist.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>He's space low Ax. Uh. I don't know if anybody's

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>called him that. Space low Axtleax and Dr Seuss Lotleax

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>is also you know, he speaks for the trees in

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the environment and is perceived as being abrasive and obnoxious

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the way of of you know, of the

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the advancement of the corporate world. Right. Uh so, So

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Dern is a botanist who takes these plants out and

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>he's flying them out into deep space farther and farther

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>away from the sun. Uh, And the forests are dying

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't know why, and he's trying to figure

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it out. And I guess this is a semi spoiler,

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's a moving from the seventies. Eventually it's revealed that, oh,

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem was they need sunlight and they weren't getting

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>enough sunlight because he, I guess, flew them too far

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>away from the sun. Right. Even forgiving the character a

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit and thinking, well, he's recovering from an injury,

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he's super lonely and maybe you know, there's some mental

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>health issues that are arising out of that, and perhaps

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>he's being bombarded with with cosmic rays. Still, that's a

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>big one to miss as a botanist. Yeah, I would

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>say so, and and uh Sagan thinks that too. So.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Quote in Douglas Trumbull's technically proficient science fiction film Silent Running,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the trees are dying in vast space born closed ecological

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>systems on the way to Saturn. After weeks of painstaking

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>study and agonizing searches through botany texts, the solution is

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>found plants. It turns out needs sunlight. Trumbull's characters are

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>able to build interplanetary cities, but have forgotten the inverse

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>square law, and that refers to the fact of radiation

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>becoming exponentially we acre as he gets farther away from

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the source um and that has to do with the

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional nature of space. But also, he continues, I

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was willing to overlook the portrayal of the rings of

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Saturn as pastel colored gases, but not this. Uh So,

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he's really bothered by the fact that that the Dern's

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>character would not have been aware of this. It just

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>he can buy a lot, but he can't buy that,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I suspect that I was reading about

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the story for Silent Running, and I

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think part of this might have to do with the

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that the the the original story like starting off

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>early versions of the screenplay apparently didn't have the protagonist

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as a botanist, and he he basically like broke free

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and ran off with the forest, not because he cared

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about the forest, but because he just want to be

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>left alone. He didn't want to go back to Earth,

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't sound nearly as interesting. But I wonder if

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a case where you know, the story evolves,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and as it evolves, it doesn't you know, completely um removed,

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>or it creates some problems that might not have been

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there originally, such as this, like you have to have

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>this character run away from the run further away from

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the Sun and then encounter problems, but it's complicated by

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that now you've made him a botanist. I mean,

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I would think that by the time you're at the

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>orbit of Saturn, you're already sufficiently far away from the

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Sun for those uh, those solar rays to really not

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>be helping your your forests like they should. So it's

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from Sagan especially, this is a this is a solid

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>criticism of the film. I do also think it's always

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting just as a little thing about each individual person's personality.

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the breaking point for you in a suspension of

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>disbelief scenario. You're you're engaging with fictional narrative and you're

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>okay with this, but not with that, And everybody's got

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>those little things that they're not okay with. What is

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it about about the character lacking this important piece of

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that's the breaking point for Sagan, whereas these other things,

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the fake artificial gravity and all that aren't. Yeah, I

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mean part of it is like there are certain things

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that are just so universally broken in our science fiction

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that we just don't think about it, Like they're being

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sound in space, like just open sound in space, or

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>or or certainly the magical gravity scenario like those that's

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just all over the place and you just you just

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>come to expect it um. But with this, yeah, maybe

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a part of it just being more crude

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>central to the plot. Now, certainly this is not something

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought about when I watched it in junior high

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and and I'm very forgiving of the

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>film I think overall, but in retrospect it does seem

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>like a major blunder. Just a couple other notes from

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Sagan's article, just because I thought they were interesting and

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention them. One fact he points out

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is that science fiction authors are often quicker to adapt

0:38:56.080 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>to new scientific knowledge than supposedly true accounts of space are. Uh.

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I just want to read a quote here. It is

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>satisfyingly rare to find a science fiction story written today

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that posits algae farms on the surface of Venus. Incidentally,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the UFO contact mythologizers are slower to change, and we

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>can still find accounts of flying saucers from a Venus

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>which is populated by beautiful human beings in long white

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>robes inhabiting a kind of Cytherian garden of Eden. The

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>nine degree fahrenheit temperatures of Venus give us one way

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of checking such stories. I do think that's kind of interesting.

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>People intentionally weaving clearly fake narratives that are meant to

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be fiction are often quicker to adapt to new information

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>about the planets and stuff than people trying to tell

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>supposedly true stories are I wonder if if this is

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason that the John Carter movie Um

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't do so well at the box office. Did you

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 1>ever see this when it came out? No? I didn't.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know it's it's based on the work of Ed

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Grice Burrows was a to say Williams, which has been

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>very been a very different film, but it's it's an

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>entertaining film, but it is bit is based on this,

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this older, pulpy sci fi vision of Mars. And indeed

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's based on books that Sagan discusses um in Uh

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>in the paper that we're discussing here. Sean loved them

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>when he loved him when he was a kid, and

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he he mentions how he came back to them later

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, oh, this just is not working

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>its magic on me anymore. But he still makes the

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>case for the for the usefulness of science fiction, and

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>not just in wedding the appetites of young people for

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>education about real science. That that is part of it.

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to read a couple of quotes here quote

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the greatest human significance of science fiction maybe as thought experiments,

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as attempts to minimize future shock as contemplations of alternative destinies.

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 1>This is part of the reason that science fiction has

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>so wide an appeal among young people. It is they

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>who will of in the future. No society on Earth

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>today is well adapted to the earth of a hundred

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or two hundred years for from now, if we are

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>wise enough or lucky enough to survive that long, we

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>desperately need an exploration of alternative futures, both experimental and conceptual.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And later he says, quote, I think it is not

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>an exaggeration to say that if we survive, science fiction

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>will have made a vital contribution to the continuation and

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 1>benign evolution of our civilization. I love that. I want

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to touch briefly on the concept of future shock. We

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of older episodes of Stuff to Blow

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>your Mind that dealt with this that I recorded with

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Julie Douglas back in the day. But this is referring

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to the book, the nine seventy book Future Shock by

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Alvin and Heidi toffler Um. I think Alvin alone had

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>credited on the original publication, but his wife wrote it

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with him, and they had co author status on subsequent books.

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:57.359
<v Speaker 1>But it was a very influential book that is talking

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about just the idea that technology was a

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>dancing and is advancing, you know, so swiftly that it

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it kind of reduces one to a state of shock,

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's uh, it's a little more nuanced than that,

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but that's the basic idea. There's also they're also also

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful TV documentary version of it, narated by Orson Welles. Uh,

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that is tremendously entertaining in its in its own right,

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but also kind of you know, hypes everything up a

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Uh, this is funny from the nineties seventies, right,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, from our perspective, it seems like technology is

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>only accelerated since then, you know, especially in the realms

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of consumer technology. You know how much our individual lives

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have been changed by especially communications technology. Yeah, but I

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>mean the concept of future shock, I think, you know,

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, like basically when I recorded that

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>episode with Julie about it, I I kind of viewed

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it more as something that was archaic or something that

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was maybe maybe didn't match up with modern reality. But

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>now years later, uh, now that I'm I'm forty years old,

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I I feel future shock a lot more yeah, like

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's enough advancement going on that I'm like,

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>WHOA hold on a little bit. I think sometimes I

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like things are moving a bit too fast. Not

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to criticize technology in the right of technology, but I

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder you have future shock to whatever extent it exists.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Also depends on just how how long you've been in

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the stream of time. You know, in what level of

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>technology you kind of grew uh comfortable with. Well, one

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that I do think is interesting about Silent Running

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it in this main character. We've got a

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>character who is a fierce sort of prophet of the woods.

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>He is a priest to the forest and an advocate

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the pure, undisrupted environment and and ecology. But at

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the same time he's not technophobic at least not like

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he he enjoys the company of the robots, even you

0:43:55.960 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>can see him being technologically proficient, like he reprogramm ms

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the robots himself and messes around with them. And I

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like in a lot of nineteen seventies visions of

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the future, I think you would probably see these two

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>tendencies paired against each other. You would have the people

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who have an affinity for technology and the people who

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have an affinity for nature and that that's what's in opposition.

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But the movie actually identifies a different kind of opposition.

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just the preservation of the environment versus

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the destruction of the environment. And that's that's not really

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>related to whether you also like technology or not. Like,

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can't you easily imagine the Horrible remake of this in

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>which the humans have to protect the forest from the

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>robots who have the program to destroy the forest, right,

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>because they wouldn't want to be controversial, And I mean

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>i'd see it probably chopped chopping mall meets silent running

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>um in space, of course, but but i'd watch the

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Terrible in its own right. Well, that does set way

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>into another thing that I want to talk about with

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.280
<v Speaker 1>regards to this movie, which is the way that environmental

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>conservation and preservation is presented as a public issue in

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>a public debate. So I think one maybe quibble I

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 1>would have with this movie is that it seems to

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>embrace a narrative um that I think unwittingly, But it

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 1>does sort of fall into this common narrative, especially of

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>past decades, that says human economic prosperity on the one hand,

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and the preservation of the natural environment on the other hand,

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are goals at odds with one another. And Dern's crewmates

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are fine with the world without forests. And they say

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>why they're fine with it. They basically say, because industry.

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the industrialization of the world has made resources

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>plentiful for everybody, and everybody has a job, and and

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>you've got everything you need, right, So there's like economic

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>prosperity on the one hand, but then you've got the

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>preserve vation of the forests as this thing in conflict

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with that, And Dern resists it. He takes a qualitative

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>view that defends nature for its own sake and revels

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in the aesthetic qualities of nature over the synthetic landscapes.

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's all these qualitative judgments. How do you

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>put that crap in your body? You know, when you

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>eat that, you want to go back to that, You know,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>landscape where you never see a tree. It's all qualitative,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's all aesthetic. And I don't think this classic narrative

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>about environmental conservation versus economic flourishing is actually a very

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>accurate diagnosis of what the what the risks and benefits

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>of environmental destruction are now obviously there are cases where

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you can say, increase the efficiency of a business by

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>dumping waste into a river rather than paying more to

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>dispose of it, you know, in an environmentally friendly way.

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But these tradeoffs are they're almost always I think temporary.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They're like temporary individual ways to leverage destruction of the

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>natural environment for personal gain. I don't think that overall

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the natural environment leads to widespread long term

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>economic flourishing in general. It's more just sort of a

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 1>temporary way for you to cheat, right, And I mean

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it basically comes down to a question of how far

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>down the road are you kicking the cane is are

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you are you going? Is it going to be like,

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, five years, ten years, is it one generation?

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it two or three generations? Yeah? What is the

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the cost? Yeah? And and so this is because

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the natural environment, of course, as we talked

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>about on the show all the time, at least all

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of costs and losses that are unpredictable and that

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to bear. Just to to go back to

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the example of you know, dumping industrial waste in the river,

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine every factory upstream says, Okay, we can increase profits

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have to dispose of this stuff properly.

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We just dump it in the river. They dump it

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in the river. But now the farmers downstream can't use

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the river water to irrigate their crops, so they have

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to get their water in a way that's more costly

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and inefficient, or maybe they can't grow their crops at

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>all or something. And here is a net maybe a

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>net economic loss actually from this, even disregarding all of

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the environmental devastation, this is just a loss to what

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what kind of wealth people are able to produce? Uh.

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And So for the specific example of deforestation used in

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie, because in the nineteen seventies, I think this

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the big environmental issue, right that people

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about the most. It was the destruction of the forests,

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why the forest geodesic domes or what the

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 1>movie is all about. Luckily, we've got that all taken

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>care of. There's no more forestation. No, it certainly is

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>still a problem, but for some reason, it's not like

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the main problem that comes to mind when people think

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about environmental problems. Now. I think it's probably been supplanted

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>by the global issue of climate change, I guess. But

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>any of this is also part of the problem, right,

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because because they're related, Yeah, they're related. But also the

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>messaging of the forest is so so much easier because

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there's an emotional connection to a definite physical location. You

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>can basically say, hey, you like going to the forest,

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>don't you You like it? Even if you don't want

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to go in it, you're probably like looking out the

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>window at it. Well, imagine if all that went away

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>like that is a mucher. That's far easier for us

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to wrap our hands it heads around, versus the realities

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of climate change. That as though some of the the

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the the ramifications of climate change you know down the road,

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean when they are described, when you're talking about uh,

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, rising ocean waters, I think that still creates

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some scenarios that definitely should have an emotional um uh

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know impact on anyone who hears them. Yeah, But

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the forest, I mean you can talk about today. It's

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a thing you have now. I mean people people feel

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>losses more than they feel the loss of potential gains. Right,

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a psychological problem. And if you if you say, uh,

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the future there could be economic opportunities that

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>would be lost because of you know, things about climate

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>change is harder to picture. You can say, if you're

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in a forest right now, imagine this forest is gone.

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's immediate, it's visceral. I think it reaches

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>people in another way though, I mean, yeah, I think

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you could make the same argument, like you're saying about

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about sea level increase if you're in a coastal area

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or something. Um. But yeah, just giving the example of deforestation, Uh,

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>this is something that of course I would say. You know,

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>there are sort of like maybe aesthetic and even people

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 1>might call them spiritual reasons to value nature for its

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>own sake. But imagine you don't and you're just you're

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like a Dern's crewmates who only care about economic flourishing.

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>They just want there to be resources for everybody, and

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody has a job and all that. I mean, even then, deforestation,

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I think reeks devastating effects on those kinds of things.

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>So deforestation leads to soil erosion. Roots you know, they

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>hold soil in place, and then if you have deforestation,

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you get all these exposed surfaces everywhere without plant life

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to hold the soil in place, the soil of roads

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>during exposure to weather and water, and that soil run

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>off drains into waterways and clogs them and you know,

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>washes away the good soil that you could be using

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for agriculture. And um, it's just so there's a lot

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of economic catastrophe right there. There's disruption of the water

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>table that happens through deforestation. There's like deforestation can lead

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to widespread flooding. You know, economic catastrophes from flooding, destruction

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of habitats and extinctions of course, which can lead to

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>downstream effects like the you know rise of new zoonotic

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>diseases and things like that. Oh yeah, increasing like boosting

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the diseases that we're gonna have in the future, while

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time removing various biological agents from the

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>world that you know, which we could find potential cures

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and new antibiotics to help us battle those very diseases. Yeah.

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And then of course, not to mention the way that

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the big thing, the way forests can help contribute to

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric dynamics. Of course, deforestation contributes to climate change, global warming.

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's it is not accurate to frame.

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Deforestation is an issue of like, well, you've got wealth

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gains on the one hand, and you've got protecting the

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>environment on the other hand. Like protecting the environment is

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a is a crucial investment in the future of human

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 1>kind and economic investment. You destroy those forests and there

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>will be so much lost wealth and economic potential from that. Yeah, exactly.

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>But then again, I don't want to discount the of course,

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the inherent value of nature for its

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>own sake. Now, to place this film in the context

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of US environmental history, uh, which I think is is interesting. Uh.

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>President Richard Nixon had only just created the US Environmental

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Protection Agency, the e p A in Nino and Uh

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting too. I was reading a little bit about this.

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at there was an Atlantic mini article.

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's a gallery why Nixon created the e p A,

0:52:57.880 --> 0:52:59.879
<v Speaker 1>which is the interesting read. And in the Science History

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>out Org has Richard Nixon in the rise of American environmentalism,

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because we tend not Nixon comes up a lot recently.

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of parallels being made today between

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>our current in a political um uh situation and UH

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and Watergate and Nixon etcetera. So we tend not to

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think about environmentalism and Nixon. But but it is interesting

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at this time because, you know, given how

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>tragically politicized climate change has become in the United States,

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's almost staggering to realize that the the National Environmental

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Policy Act enjoyed tremendous bipartisan support, uh, you know, and

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and politicians were responding to a very real pressing and

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>environmental danger at the local and national level level, or

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>dangers I should say. Was it in nineteen sixty nine

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Cuyahoga River river caught fire? Yes? Yeah, there

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>was actually heard a piece on NPR just this morning

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about that. And then of course you're talking about

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 1>how that falls into this this whole situation with the

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>creation of the e p A. Yeah, it's also interesting

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:04.360
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and look at exactly what was

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 1>being said, even by Nixon himself and speeches and so forth,

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and there was there was kind of this holy reverence

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>there for nature, even at times in Nixon's own words.

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Not to say that Nixon himself actually felt any of this, uh,

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was very much and he and his

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>people were very much responded just for the zecheist of

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the time and something that was again a bipartisan um issue.

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But at times Nixon cast such environmentalism as being in

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the tradition of Republican Theodore Roosevelt. Yeah. Well, I mean

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was, yeah, and I mean the Republican Party,

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I think has changed changed a lot between the time

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of Teddy Roosevelt in the nineteen seventies. Yeah. Absolutely, But

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is you know, it is I

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think helpful to to realize that environmentalism and environmental concerns, um,

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, have at plenty of times in our country's

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>history been a bipartisan issue and something that we can

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all agree on, is something that matters. And I think

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge case to be made that that's that's

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a part of of the American dream, you know, that

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is a part of some of the best of America,

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is what America has done, uh to sustain bits of

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>our natural environments, such as with the National Park UH services.

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It would be amazing if someone could figure out a

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:29.359
<v Speaker 1>vast sort of psychological program to just de politicize environmental issues. UM.

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really tragic the way they've taken on a partisan

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cast and of course that you know, that leads to

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>these bit just obvious solutions to environmental problems becoming these

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>impossible political battles. You know, one of the interesting things

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>about Silent Running is that they don't spend a tremendous

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of time describing what life is like on Earth.

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Now they allude to it, you certainly never really see it.

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh and it's I think that's tantalizing, and it

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 1>makes this wonder what this world is like? What does

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this world become? Uh? And I think that the film

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is at least in part, you know, they're pushing the

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>notion that humanity separated from nature is inherently sickened and

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it is lessened by that separation. And the other crew

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>members don't mind eating tasteless feud cubes and nuking the

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>world's less forest because they have no connection to nature anymore. Um.

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, per a discussion we had earlier over email,

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a there's a lot more focus in

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>modern environmental discourses on you know, framing the production of

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the environment in terms of its material benefit to humans, which,

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as we were just talking about, I mean, environmental conservation

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is not without material benefits to humans. But you notice

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's what people who advocate environmental conservation tend to

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about these days. They're thinking, like, no, it's in

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.359
<v Speaker 1>your interests to protect the environment. This was a different time.

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the film presents a very inherent case for nature.

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's this like that the forest in itself is a

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>holy and beautiful thing that must be protected for its

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>own sake. Yeah. The film, though, is is kind of

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing this more of a spiritual connection with it um

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:15.359
<v Speaker 1>which made me think of the microbiome in some ways.

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The micro microbiome and the effect you know, getting into

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the microbes that live inside us and their connection to

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the outside world. The interplay between us and our natural

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>environment and it's microbiome. You know, a lot of this

0:57:29.000 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>can feel kind of spiritual and kind of magic at times.

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So I was reading about this a little bit, and

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we've certainly covered this on the show but in the past.

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, with our growing understanding of the microbiome,

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we realize that there's this interplay between our

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>internal microbial legions, uh, and our exposure to the natural

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>world for us and fields if we can get them,

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but even access to a pet animal that has access

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to the outside can provide some level of this natural connection.

0:57:57.720 --> 0:57:59.439
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the things we often talk about

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with Charlie at home is that he brings us dirts

0:58:02.320 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>your yeah, your dog, Charlie. Yeah. And that's something that's

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>touched on in the book Never Home Alone by Rob Dunn,

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a professor of applied ecology at North Carolina State University.

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>In that book, he points out that, you know, we

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot to learn, but it seems as

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if families and urban environments with dogs tend to have

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kids who are less prone to allergy and asthma because

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the dogs may actually be serving as this kind of vehicle,

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of connection for the natural world, microbes that

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the humans used to live in. So you know, we're

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not getting out as natures into nature as much as

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we should. But if we're letting the dog do it,

0:58:39.480 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if the dog's really getting its nose into nature, then

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of rubbing some of that that that natural world,

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some of that microbiome off on us. Good reason to

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>let the dog in the bed, right and you know,

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 1>naturally there are microbes in the natural world to do

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>his harm, others that are beneficial or at least seem

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of benign and the grand grand balance of things,

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's something we've discussed in the show before as well.

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, our bodies are, our beings are a vast

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>multi cellular system inhabited by microbial legions. And you can

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>even make the argument that we are those microbial legions

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're us. Yeah, we might not share the same

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 1>d n A as them, but they are in a

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>sense part of us, right and they play into the

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like our our emotions and our our wants and needs.

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this, this manifestation of self that we you know,

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have wrapped up an ego and think of as being

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 1>separate from the world and separate from nature is all

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a product of of this interplay um in our artificial

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>environment's mess with that balance, and and that's today here

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. So imagine a world such as the Earth

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of Silent running with with an even more severely damaged ecosystem,

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one in which vegetation has been pretty much eradicated.

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And now imagine that world spacecraft. Because even if Lowell

0:59:54.800 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Box continually track in dirt, and even as

0:59:57.360 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they they distribute plants around on the place and thrust

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>melons at the other crew members. You know, it's uh,

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's still you know, a very artificial

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>world outside of the uh, the the farm, outside of

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the forest that they've sustained there. Well, I mean, I

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think this was envisioned by the filmmakers, But one

1:00:17.000 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>thing you could say to interpret the film is it's

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>long been a question of how would our microbiome be

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>messed up by space travel? Uh and by being confined

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to environments in space or on other planets. Even if

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we bring along a lot of our soil and plants

1:00:32.160 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>with us, you know, there might just be some ways

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in which the gravity environment, maybe the atmospheric difference, whatever,

1:00:38.200 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the the different artificial environments somehow changes the microbial loads

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that were exposed to and that we take into our bodies.

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And this could this could change us. It could change

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>who we are. It could make us sick, It could

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>affect our mental health, It could do all kinds of

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>things that we can't anticipate fully yet. And so I

1:00:56.440 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe that's getting to Durn's character a little bit,

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like Durn's yelling people about a cantaloupe because he's even

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>though he's the one out there in the forest. The

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>forest and the dome in space doesn't have exactly the

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>same kind of microbes that would back on Earth, and

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>his his microbial his microbiome is off and he's he's

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>getting a little antcy. Oh wow. So this is it's

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like the idea of say a people who once

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>had you know, an actual uh you know, visual or

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>audible connection with God and then when that goes away,

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that you have to sustain faith and faith alone because

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no direct, visible sign of the Almighty and

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that could that's kind of what he's doing. He is

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a profit of the natural world that that via the

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>loss of the biome, the microbiome, uh, microbiome, biomedic connection Uh,

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>must now rely on faith. He has faith in the fruit,

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>faith in the cantaloupe, but that actual connection to nature

1:01:53.640 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is gone. All right, we need to take one more break,

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but we'll be right back to finish up the discussion.

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Than alright, we're back. Uh. You know, this film also

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>made me think a lot about you know, Wilson's biophilia hypothesis. Uh. This,

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we did an entire episode on this in the last

1:02:10.680 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. But this is basically the idea is that,

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we have this innate tendency to focus

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on life and lifelike processes and uh in in the

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more extreme versions of the hypothesis, there might even be

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a genetic component to that. Yeah. So he basically says, like,

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we're wired to want to be in and around nature

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and living things that completely synthetic environments are not are

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>not what our minds crave. That there's an inherent predisposition

1:02:40.120 --> 1:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>against that, and it's not just cultural. Right. So if

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>if biophilia hypothesis is true, and I think it would

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be great if it were, and and EO. Wilson is

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and and and has been one of the I think

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the greatest minds writing and communicating about our connection with

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the natural world. But but if that we're not. You

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:03.439
<v Speaker 1>can see that in the way he shoves his hand

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>into a mound of fire, ants, yeah, look at them

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>biting me. Yeah. And also an unlike Lowell in the film,

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's very believed, like you, you're like, yes,

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this this guy is not abrasive about it, like you

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just totally bindo everything he's saying. But if bio philiate

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is true, it's difficult to imagine a species with

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>such an innate connection to nature reaching such a fall

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in place as you see the world in Silent Running.

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, because most of the characters that with most

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of the humans we meet in the movie, and then

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>presumably most of the humans on Earth are totally okay

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with this, or they've become totally okay with this disconnection

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from nature. Now, another way you could argue it is

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that Again, I don't think this was necessarily intended by

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the filmmakers, but you could also argue that Lowell's crewmates

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe are only they're they're only so happy to disregard

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>nature because cause they are the few humans that are

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>exposed to it, Like they're the fact that they can

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>be walking through these forests or actually they generally tend

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to drive through them on little go karts, but that

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they can drive through these forests and be exposed to nature,

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that is what makes them feel like they don't need it,

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you don't appreciate what you've already got,

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe all the people back on Earth are miserable.

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't hear from them, We don't know what life

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is like from from their point of view. But perhaps

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>these other crewmates are just like there and and not

1:04:33.760 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciating the how lucky they are to be one of

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the like five humans who gets to walk among the trees,

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. And this this brings us to another question

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that I had in thinking about the films, something I

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really thought about much in the past with past

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>viewings of it. But I started wondering, like this, this

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>earth that we're told about, an earth where like the

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of or if not all, botanical life it

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is over Like what would that even? Like? Uh? You

1:05:01.760 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>know what? Because as we've discussed the connection between the

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>botanical world and and the human world and the world

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of animals, uh is essential. How would a planet exist

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>without that? What would a world without plants be? Right?

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And I ran across a couple of sources on this.

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>There's an article from New Scientists from two thousand seven

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>titled I have all the oxygen producing plants disappeared suddenly?

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>How long would it take for us to die? And

1:05:28.600 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then I also found a really good source on the

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>website for the university. You see Santa Barbara at U, C. S. B.

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Dot E d U and Uh. Both of them get

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>into it. They start breaking down the numbers and there's

1:05:41.840 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>no like definitive answer for this because you end up

1:05:43.840 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>having to You're talking about an entire planet's worth of atmosphere,

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, and then the the interplay between

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire botanical world and the entire animal world and

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and other factors as well. Um, basically, the big take

1:05:56.800 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>home is that of course, ultimately we would die, all die.

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>It would be it would be a catastrophic That's that

1:06:04.960 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>much is for certain. I mean, the basic school grade

1:06:07.600 --> 1:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>explanation still applies. Animals breathe oxygen and excel c O two.

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Plants need the C O two and produce oxygen. We're

1:06:14.080 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in balance all of us and humans do not have

1:06:16.360 --> 1:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a private privileged status in all of this. According to UCSB,

1:06:21.320 --> 1:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>if all the plants went away, just like magically they're gone, um,

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it wouldn't be an end to oxygen on Earth.

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>We'd still have an atmosphere's worth of oxygen. And that's

1:06:32.960 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>roughly two quintillion pounds of oxygen remaining. It sounds like

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>plenty of right, But of course it's not just us, right,

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there are all these animals that need it to So

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to simplify it, okay, let's go ahead and go off

1:06:46.160 --> 1:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all the animals, because it's not expressly stated in Silent Running,

1:06:49.840 --> 1:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but we might well imagine that most of not all

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the animals are gone as well. Why Okay, so

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if all the animals were gone as well, that would

1:06:56.600 --> 1:07:00.439
<v Speaker 1>leave the human species with one thousand and four year's

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>worth of oxygen. Okay, that's one take on it. But

1:07:04.120 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they also break it down so that we might be

1:07:06.200 --> 1:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at more like one thousand, two hundred years of

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>breathable oxygen. But then the increase in C O two

1:07:12.920 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>would elevate global temperatures and other concerns would also probably

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bring this down even further, and we'd be talking more

1:07:19.840 --> 1:07:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like one to four centuries of breathable oxygen. Now, another

1:07:23.960 --> 1:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>take is that we have several thousands of years worth

1:07:26.840 --> 1:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of breathable oxygen because of the vast pools of oxygen

1:07:29.560 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the atmosphere, the origins of which stem from microorganisms

1:07:32.760 --> 1:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to begin with. Plus, there would be reserves of oxygen

1:07:36.000 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>locked up in H two O and in carbon dioxide

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that we can conceivably, you know, breakdown using our technology.

1:07:43.000 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Certainly we have the technology to send for us into orbit.

1:07:45.840 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Then maybe they also have the technology, uh, you know,

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to do some widespread breaking down of ocean waters into

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>breathable atmosphere. But another huge issue, a huge issue, is

1:07:57.040 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that without plants, the entire food pyramid essentially collapses. Right,

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>What would anything eat? Yeah, so I would. I would

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>sure hope that those disgusting food food cubes that the

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>crew members are eating on the valley forge are tasty

1:08:09.640 --> 1:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and that they don't require plants or animal life. I

1:08:12.400 --> 1:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they'd be made of. I guess they

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>could be made from what nutrients gained from microbial mats

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>or Sanda bacterias like that. But but otherwise there's a

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a very strong argument to be made that we

1:08:23.400 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>would starve before we ran out of oxygen um. Now,

1:08:28.120 --> 1:08:32.479
<v Speaker 1>other uh and estimates really kind of vary. James Lovelock,

1:08:32.520 --> 1:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>for instance, originator of gaia hypothesis, estimated we'd be looking

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at half a million years UM And then that New

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Scientist article I mentioned, they threw out a few different

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>estimates by different folks, ranging from a few hundred years

1:08:46.120 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to a few thousand years. Again with the food concerns

1:08:49.439 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and possible poisoned air concerns as well, Right, because we'd

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>also be breathing out c O two and pumping CO

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>two into the atmosphere of VR machines that would be

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not getting processed. But and of course all of this

1:09:01.240 --> 1:09:04.479
<v Speaker 1>again is is just very broad and big, big picture

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and not getting into all the other challenges that would

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>occur if all the plants died. How does this square

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with the sci fi Earth that is alluded to in

1:09:13.080 --> 1:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Silent Running? You know, could the leaders of such a world,

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>could the people and the institutions actually allow uh, such

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a cataclysm to come to pass and then scuttle the

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>key plan to correct it? Surely not. People would never

1:09:27.040 --> 1:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>let anything like that happen. Yeah, I will, that's the thing,

1:09:30.760 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you would, You would hope not certainly. And

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember as a kid thinking, well, you know, at

1:09:34.960 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some level, like, surely they wouldn't do that. Why would

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>they do this, because there's never a real great reason given, right,

1:09:40.600 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, oh, well, we've got to put these

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>uh the spaceship back into commercial use, So we're just

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>jettisoning all these forests, even though presumably they're up there

1:09:49.640 --> 1:09:53.599
<v Speaker 1>because they want to bring botanical life back to Earth

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the future. So um, yeah, details of how we

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:01.759
<v Speaker 1>managed to destroy all botanical whole life on Earth side.

1:10:02.080 --> 1:10:04.919
<v Speaker 1>In this stuff film, I think we can well imagine

1:10:05.000 --> 1:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>us as a people, as a species, continuing on, satisfied

1:10:09.400 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with assurances from the more optimistic estimates that give us

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, many centuries or even you know, thousands of

1:10:15.400 --> 1:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>years to correct the problem. They'll fix it down, they'll

1:10:17.840 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>fix it down the road. Look at these new technologies

1:10:20.120 --> 1:10:22.519
<v Speaker 1>are talking about. You know, essentially, we just kicked the

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>can down that that road for our children, for our

1:10:24.720 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>grandchildren to solve. We take comfort in the pending technologies

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of orbital for us and life on other world's oxygen

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>extraction and whatever you know process produces those mucky little

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>food cubes. You know. We so we'd grow complacent, we'd

1:10:39.080 --> 1:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>refuse to change, and one day someone might be in

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a position to say, you know, these space for us

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly expensive. Why are we we dealing with this? Uh,

1:10:49.360 --> 1:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just get rid of them. And I think all

1:10:52.040 --> 1:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of that line falls in line with how we have

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about our environment, just despite you know a

1:10:57.520 --> 1:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of tremendous environmental progress. Uh, you know, certainly just

1:11:02.800 --> 1:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>since you know, the since the nineteen seventy uh and

1:11:06.400 --> 1:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>despite all the you know, the very passionate voices and environmentalism. Uh,

1:11:11.040 --> 1:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, you know, collectively, we can still

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>make these kinds of errors. You know, the world of

1:11:19.520 --> 1:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>silent running, which is presented as a cautionary tale. It's

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>not a it's not presented as a hey, what would

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>happen of all the forest died? Uh sort of thing.

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying, here is what we do not want,

1:11:29.840 --> 1:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but here is a here is a you know, an

1:11:32.240 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated circumstance that is in many ways very much in

1:11:36.360 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>keeping with how humans think about the environment, or can

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>think about the environment if they don't listen to the

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>lolls of the world. I mean, we're obviously facing problems

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like this right now. I mean, the most pressing global

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>environmental problem now being climate change. And like it's one

1:11:55.400 --> 1:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of those cases where it's it's pretty clear what steps

1:11:58.160 --> 1:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to be taking right now, or you know,

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>really need to be taking yesterday, what we absolutely need

1:12:03.640 --> 1:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to be taking right now, and people that people just

1:12:07.200 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to deal with it. They just rather I mean,

1:12:09.400 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got some people, I think, who managed to delude

1:12:13.240 --> 1:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>themselves into thinking nas you know, it's all a hoax

1:12:16.840 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It's Chinese hoax or it's whatever. It's just

1:12:20.640 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of alarmism. And then I think you've got

1:12:23.160 --> 1:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people who they don't really know

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of any reason to disagree with the science. They just

1:12:27.760 --> 1:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>rather not think about it, you know, they just rather

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>kicked the can. And the day is a kick in

1:12:34.360 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the can, even as a as an opportunity grow mighty short. Exactly. Yeah,

1:12:39.400 --> 1:12:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've I think it was. It was actually

1:12:41.560 --> 1:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Alan watts Um, the Canadian science fiction author who you

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know who, who pointed especially to the nineteen seventies as

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>being like the time when you know, we should have

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten really serious about environmentalism, and if we had gotten

1:12:56.120 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>really serious about environmentalism, we could have avoided the even

1:13:00.200 --> 1:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tensor scenario we find ourselves in today. Um, but here

1:13:05.360 --> 1:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we are, but like the scenario in Silent Running, all

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the forests have not been jettisoned into space. Yet. We're

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we're we're we're nowhere near there. Just yet we need

1:13:17.360 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a Joan Bias song to get everybody on the same

1:13:19.920 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>page here. I know, I wish we could actually play

1:13:22.040 --> 1:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those Joan Bias songs on the podcast, But

1:13:24.920 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be problematic. I found some some

1:13:28.600 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>some music that has subtracts a similar vibe that perhaps

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we can lead out with here at the end of

1:13:32.920 --> 1:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the episode. So often we want to play a song

1:13:35.040 --> 1:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, but it all lies behind the door

1:13:37.760 --> 1:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the the intellectual property jail that we cannot free.

1:13:41.680 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The only place we would be able to play it

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>would be in orbit bord. No, actually, probably not, because

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of these these uh, the legal

1:13:50.080 --> 1:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>documentations for I P like they talk about the entire universe.

1:13:54.120 --> 1:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember the first time I saw that. I'm like,

1:13:55.840 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>really with the entire universe, Like I would go to

1:13:59.280 --> 1:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Mars and I still couldn't play this Joan Baez song. Um.

1:14:02.920 --> 1:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, even if Joan Bayez gave me the thumbs

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>up like a record company would be, would would just

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>say no, I'm sorry. The label says the entire universe.

1:14:10.120 --> 1:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So unless send a robotic probe to serve you, you

1:14:13.800 --> 1:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>would have to extend into an alternate universe in which

1:14:16.760 --> 1:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the rights were different. Commander Lamb, you've been served, all right.

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Well there you have it. A silent running uh still

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite films, very influential at this without

1:14:28.479 --> 1:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this film. We wouldn't have Mystery Science Theater three thousand either,

1:14:31.040 --> 1:14:34.519
<v Speaker 1>because clearly modeled on ye. Joe Hodgson is is very

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up and forward about that that like he saw it

1:14:37.040 --> 1:14:39.559
<v Speaker 1>in college and it was a huge inspiration to him.

1:14:39.640 --> 1:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and that's how we ended up with a

1:14:41.960 --> 1:14:45.439
<v Speaker 1>human and three robots in space watching terrible movies instead

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of tending to forest. The film is a yeah, films

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:50.559
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's available wherever you get your movies. Uh

1:14:50.680 --> 1:14:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know we're gonna go ahead and call

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but again, we're trying to do one of

1:14:54.840 --> 1:14:58.519
<v Speaker 1>these a month. We've had some wonderful suggestions from listeners

1:14:58.560 --> 1:15:01.439
<v Speaker 1>already about what films we should consider covering in the future,

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but we want to continue to hear from you. And

1:15:03.760 --> 1:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>also if you have thoughts about Silent Running, did you

1:15:06.360 --> 1:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>love it? Did you hate it? Uh? Did it? What

1:15:09.000 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>role did it have in your your own upbringing? Uh?

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Share your thoughts with us. Did you see in the

1:15:14.600 --> 1:15:16.599
<v Speaker 1>theater when it came out? I would love to hear

1:15:16.720 --> 1:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>about that experience as well. In the meantime, heading over

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com, Uh, that

1:15:22.640 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is that's the Valley Forge of our operations here. That's

1:15:26.240 --> 1:15:29.439
<v Speaker 1>our mothership UM. It has links out to our very

1:15:29.520 --> 1:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts, and it also has a module on

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it that, instead of being a forest, is our discussion

1:15:33.840 --> 1:15:37.599
<v Speaker 1>module UM on Facebook. That's just just a discussion group

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of folks hang out and discuss the show.

1:15:39.880 --> 1:15:43.679
<v Speaker 1>It's the one lovely green place on Facebook. It is. Yeah, long,

1:15:43.760 --> 1:15:46.439
<v Speaker 1>may it not be jettisoned into the black avoid of

1:15:47.000 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>social media emptiness. But anyway, those are all wonderful things

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to to check out. If you want to support the show,

1:15:52.800 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 1>just make sure you rate and review us wherever you

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:56.759
<v Speaker 1>have the power to do so. Leave us some stars,

1:15:56.960 --> 1:16:00.439
<v Speaker 1>leave a nice comment. It really helps out the helps

1:16:00.439 --> 1:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out the show when it comes to the almighty algorithms

1:16:03.240 --> 1:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that rule our world. Huge thanks as always to our

1:16:06.160 --> 1:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producer, Tori Harrison. If you'd like to get

1:16:09.760 --> 1:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>any other, to suggest topic for the future, or just

1:16:14.520 --> 1:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to say hello, you can email us at contact at

1:16:18.080 --> 1:16:29.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow

1:16:29.680 --> 1:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

1:16:34.400 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio app Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:16:37.040 --> 1:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.