WEBVTT - Citi, Alphabet, and Munis

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market movin news.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>A lot going on across Wall Street. One of the

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>things that's going on, in particular to City Group, the

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>company is shutting down. It's muni business that was once

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the envy of rivals, and right now to discuss that.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>We are going to be talking with Bloomberg Finance team

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 3>leader Sally Bakewell, who has been leading the coverage all

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>over everything developing with City. Sally just kind of give

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>us a thirty thousand foot look of what this means

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>for City Group. As our CEO, Jane Fraser, still continues

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to reshape the company in its operations.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 4>Right, well, it means a lot of this City Group

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>and it means a lot for the muni market there

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 4>because City had really dominated that four trillion space of

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 4>underwriting local and state debt for most of the past decade.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 4>In fact, it ranked among the two biggest of municipal

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 4>bond underwriters by volume. It's been on deals like the

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 4>rebuilding of the World Trade Center, on rebuilding the portal

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 4>authorities of New York and New Jersey. But as City

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 4>has struggled in recent years through a number of issues

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 4>and including it sort of ability to deliver returns and

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 4>meet financial goals. And so Jane Fraser, who has been

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 4>at the helm for a number of years, her border

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 4>aim is to make City a bank that you know

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>serves large multinational corporations but also improves returns which have

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 4>been trailing. So I think the muni business became incompatible

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>with that goal for a number of reasons. I think

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 4>a big one being that Hexas is the biggest state

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 4>for muni bond sales. But City, owing to firearms policies,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 4>got frozen out of a number of big deals there

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 4>and that did crimp a lot of its revenue and

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>ability to generate profits. And I think deliberations continued for

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 4>a number of months over this big decision, and they have,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, decided that it would be better for City,

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 4>which is undergoing a number of restructurings in other areas,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 4>if it was out of this market.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the almost the impeach, well, I guess it was

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 5>in peach. It wasn't really, but the Attorney generaler Ken

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 5>Paxton is kind of in charge of that, taking aim

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 5>at all the big underwriters, all the money center banks

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 5>that have policies with which he disagrees by freezing them

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 5>out of that market. The end result was that it's

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 5>taxpayers who fit the bill because they don't get the

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 5>best pricing for their munis. Is there anybody around to

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 5>pick up the slack or are other banks facing the

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 5>same situation? Is anybody going to be left.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I think the scrutiny is definitely there on all of

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 4>the banks, but I think there are banks who are

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 4>picking up the slack. In fact, a team of from

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 4>City actually defected to Jeffries just in November after news

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 4>that City was weighing pulling out.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 5>They saw the writing on the wall.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I think the writing has been on the wall for

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 4>a little while. In fact, City also shut the its

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 4>muni prop trading desk not too long ago, which that

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 4>was the desk that used the firm's own cash to

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 4>trade and invest in the debt, and that has now

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>translated to a complete wind down of the business by

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>the end of the first quarter. But you know, City

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 4>ranked number seven in terms of muni bond sale underwriting.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Bank of America is first, RBC Capital Markets is second.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Then you of course have the likes of JP Morgan,

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Jeffrey's Morgan, Stanley, Wills Fargo. So in terms of picking

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 4>up the slack, there is still very much a market there.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 4>You know, for City, it represented at one time, you know,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 4>a very significant business and also the ability of the

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 4>bank to connect to the country on a broader, sort

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 4>of deeper level because it was providing financing for you know, schools, hospitals,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 4>railroad and so on. And that's an important thing for

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 4>a bank to do and to be seen to be doing.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>And sally, just for a sense of how crucial munis are.

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 3>What how does immunis play into the broader business for

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>these banks in terms of generating fees? Just looking at

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the league table that you guys have in the chart,

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Bank of America with an almost thirteen percent market share

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>at forty four billion dollars of volume, how does that

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>compare two things like IPOs and M and A and

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>actually generating fees for these big banks.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's a very substantial part of what

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 4>any any bank that's involved in the market does. I mean,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 4>there is an sort of unending s figot of material

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>and deals to work on if you're in the in

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 4>the municipal space. So it is definitely a blow for

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>City that it was unable to really participate, for example,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 4>in the Texas market specifically, and it's a big it's

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>a very substantial change for the company which historically had

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 4>been such a big player in this space going back decades.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>But you know, City is currently going through a big

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>overhaul that it unveiled in September its biggest overhaul in decades,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 4>where it's trying to refocus on five core areas. The

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 4>goal is to make it a leaner, more efficient organization,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>to remove layers of management again with that broader, broader

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 4>aim of improving returns, and that is going to spark

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of change at the bank, which we've already

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 4>started to see. We know that there will be job cuts,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 4>and there have already been some job cuts and we

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>can anticipate more next year. But yes, the goal is

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 4>to make City at a lina organization, and I think

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 4>focusing on more higher revenue, higher margin businesses is the

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>goal and Immunia business didn't quite align with that anymore.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, Sally, we had the news earlier in the

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>week from our colleagues in London about City offering partial

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>early bonuses amid this restructuring. So as you talk about

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and look at what the path forward looks like, does

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four actually look like for City Group to

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 3>rein in their spending and costs and also compete in

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>what still seems to be a very hot war for

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 3>talent on Wall Street, right, And.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 4>That's a really good point to bring up the bonuses

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 4>with City, because yes, it offered a select number of

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 4>staff the ability to take a portion of their guaranteed

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 4>bonus now and leave rather than risk next year potentially

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 4>losing their jobs under this restructuring, but being left with

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 4>no job and no bonus. I think it kind of

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 4>underscores it's a fairly shocking move, you know, to basically

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>ask people to do this, And I think it underscores

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the urgency with which Jane Fraser knows she has to

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 4>start to deliver. The bank had already tried to or

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>has nearly completed an exit of a number of its

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 4>global retail markets. And I think, you know, it's undertaken

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>other men to try and write the ship that perhaps

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>weren't deemed to be fully effective, and this latest overhaul

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.239
<v Speaker 4>is a real attempt to show shareholders that it can

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 4>set financial targets and meet them, that it can improve returns.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think for twenty twenty four, actually things possibly

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>are looking fairly solid. We just had Mike Mayo, who

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 4>is the Wells Fargo very well known bank analyst. He

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 4>actually named City as his top pick among large cat

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 4>banks heading into twenty twenty four, replacing JP Morgan Chase

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 4>as his favorite. So, you know, he said he's been

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 4>long and wrong on City Group, but he thinks that

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 4>the restructuring is making them more simple, the management is addressing,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, two decade or problems at the banks, and

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 4>that it's seeming to get expenses under wraps. So perhaps

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 4>the subtotal of all of these measures in twenty twenty

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 4>four is when we do start to see them pay off.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 5>Are going to see similar moves by other banks dropping

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 5>their municipal departments.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say. I think it depends on the

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 4>level of scrutiny from Paxton. It will depend on the

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 4>economic viability of the business under that scrutiny. The other

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>banks don't have the same issues as City, though, they

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 4>don't have to make these dramatic moves to kind of

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 4>really reshape the organizations. So that I think is why

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 4>City was slightly unique in feeling the impact of the

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 4>situation in Texas and having to weigh up the viability

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 4>of its business. It is doing this against this backdrop of,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 4>as Mike mos said, a decades long sort of problem

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 4>at the bank of not being able to generate the

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of returns that the other banks were able to

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 4>do so. I think there will be under scrutiny, but

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 4>they probably won't feel that need to act in the

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 4>same way that city has.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 5>City dropping its municipal business. Sally bankwell with the story

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 5>for Bloomberg News. Sally, thanks very much, appreciate your time.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the team. Can's a live program Bloomberg

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 8>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 8>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Making the energy transition no easy tasks as we try

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 5>to decarbonize utilities across the United States. Let's bring in

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 5>our next guest. Maria Pope is the CEO of Portland

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 5>General Electric. We got a picture of just how difficult

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.599
<v Speaker 5>that transition is. I think it was today or yesterday

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 5>with California the governor there in his attempts to recommission

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 5>the Diablo Nuclear Power Plant Diablo Canyon because they need it. Basically,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 5>they can't just do it alone with renewable sources. So Maria,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 5>what is the timeline for you guys with your utility,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Portland General Electric to decarbonize and are on track at

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 5>this point.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 9>So we're looking to decarbonize the energy supply eighty percent

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 9>by twenty thirty and then net zero by twenty forty.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 9>Obviously we'll need new technologies by twenty forty, but we

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 9>are on track with forty percent of our customer's energy

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 9>coming from renewable sources today.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 3>And with that technology transition, is that developed in house,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>are you licensing it from startups or kind of how

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>does that play out?

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 9>It really comes from a variety of sources, first legacy hydro,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 9>then we take solar and wind, battery storage. We have

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 9>the second largest installation of battery storage outside of California

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 9>taking place right now, and we use a lot of

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 9>technologies to integrate all of those renewables for safe, reliable, affordable,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 9>clean energy for our customers.

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Maria, just how vulnerable is your utility to droughts?

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned hydro power and even wildfires with the transmission lines.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's something a lot of people ask. We're

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 9>in actually a drought period right now in the Pacific Northwest,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 9>and we've actually been relying a lot more on energy

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 9>from markets outside of this region. Much of that is

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 9>renewable solar and other sources. That come into this area,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 9>but also being able to construct new wind resources, new

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 9>solar resources is augmenting our legacy Hydro. As we look

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 9>going forward, we will need ever increasing amounts of renewable energy,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 9>which are today price competitive with other sources.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And how much does that cost? What's your capex looking

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>like to make some of these investments.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, we have taken our investment up over time,

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 9>and in the last three years, our invested asset base

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 9>has actually grown about thirty percent overall. Our revenues are

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 9>also up about thirty seven percent. As we see customer growth.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 9>We have five percent more customers today than we did

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 9>three years ago, and they're using ten percent more energy.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 5>In terms of the total return opportunity for the stock

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 5>based on the earnings per share. I mean, you guys

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 5>have been beaten up to some extent because of worries

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 5>over the things that we mentioned. Where do you hint from?

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 5>What's your message to investors at this point?

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're committed to growing at five to seven percent.

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 9>We've been leaders actually in addressing wildfire. While one can

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 9>never predict what will happen, we've invested tremendously in reducing

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 9>those risks. And again are committed to the five percent

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:41.599
<v Speaker 9>earnings growth projectory.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 3>And when you look at expectations for twenty twenty four

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and even beyond, looking at some of the energy transition

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 3>mission there or goals that you guys have in the

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 3>state of Oregon and really broadly around the world has

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 3>laid out, how does that How does twenty twenty four

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>look for your business?

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, twenty twenty four looks really good. We actually

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 9>will see revenues probably about fourteen to fifteen percent higher

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 9>year on years we turn into twenty twenty four. I'd

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 9>also say that we're focused on meeting our customers' needs,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 9>whereas the largest semiconductors and global manufacturers to small startups

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 9>and over two million residential customers who are focused on

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 9>the clean energy transformation and ensuring that we do so

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 9>with a smart integrated grid.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, as we make that transition, I mean, overall the

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 5>grids in the United States, are they prepared for all this?

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 5>And what sort of infrastructure upgrades do they need? And

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, are you getting any help from the Biden

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 5>administration on that front.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 9>So we've been investing in grid technologies as well as

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure for a long time, where the fourth largest electric

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 9>vehicle market is an example, and have been thinking about

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 9>those new technologies for years. From the Biden administration, We're

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 9>very fortunate to have received several very significant grand one

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 9>in particular around technology is a partnership with Nvidia and

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 9>the startup Utili Data, the three of us coming together

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 9>and bringing our unique capabilities to deliver for customers, to

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 9>grow earnings, and to ensure really a solid clean energy

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 9>future is attainable in a very short period of time.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 5>That sounds like the intersection of artificial.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Bringing an AI. It's everything. I well, I guess this

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 3>is my question, Maria. We've been talking about this transition

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen some things happen. I guess are you

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>surprised with where we are going into twenty twenty four,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 3>with how quickly or slowly things have evolved? And do

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>you expect that to kind of pick up in the

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 3>coming years.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's interesting. We're very optimistic about the future.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, when we come together in partnership, we're able

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 9>to do great things. And the acceleration of clean energy

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 9>has been remarkable not only for our company but across

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 9>the entire United States and really globally. But we'll see

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 9>coming out of There's no question that this will continue

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 9>to accelerate and then we'll work together on new technologies.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 9>One of the other grants that we received was part

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 9>of the Northwest Hydrogen a billion dollars to invest in hydrogen.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 9>And then we also have received two hundred and fifty

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 9>million dollars on a consortium with the Confederated Tribes of

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 9>the Warm Springs where we have worked together with them

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 9>co owning a four hundred and fifty megawatt facility hydro

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 9>power that we will now be able to increase the

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 9>transmission with a two hundred and fifty million dollars grant

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 9>enabling further renewable energy development on the reservation for the

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 9>benefit of the future employment of the tribes as well

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 9>as renewable energy across the state.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Is climate change the far and away the biggest risk

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 5>or that you face in the future.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I think we were facing a lot of risk

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 9>as we go through a transformation. Clearly, we're using technologies,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 9>we're changing at a pace that is unusual for utilities

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 9>but very exciting, and so as we manage everything from

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 9>a changing and warming climate to changing expectations by customers

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 9>to new technologies at what ares Managing risks is also

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 9>managing opportunities.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 5>Ria Pleasure, Thanks for stopping by. Appreciate it. Maria Poulp,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 5>the CEO of a Portnam General Electric, the ticker symbol

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 5>por and as they look at it right now among

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 5>the analysts, seven buys, five holes, and zero sales. The

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 5>average price target for the stock, according to data compiled

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 5>by Bloomberg, forty eight dollars per Sure.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Just recently got upgraded this week over at Barclays talking

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>about the upside and despite it being a wildfire stock,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>they kind of point out that we're exiting wildfire season,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 3>and as someone who's spent the first eighteen years of

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 3>my life in California, were season is the thing.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to The tape cats a our live program,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 8>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 5>Let's switch to fixed income right now. Alex Batrand, our

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 5>next guest, the director of Fixed Income at Rockefeller Asset Management.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 5>I missed out on five percent, But is what are

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 5>we looking at four forty one or three ninety two

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 5>right now in the ten are those screaming buys?

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean three ninety two is the new five percent?

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 7>Isn't that how we we shift?

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 10>And if you want spicy and not sleepy into the

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 10>end of the year, that is what we have right now.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 7>Quite clearly, rates drive in the market. The FED FOMC. J.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 10>Powell Williams happy to unpack that, making it fun for

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 10>us into your act.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 5>With all That'speiag and Williams today, I mean, how do

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 5>you set strategy with all these different narratives out there?

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely great question.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we are long term investors have said for

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 10>quite some time as we think about what was driving

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 10>markets in twenty twenty three, it was the rate story

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 10>driving Muni's driving Corporus in twenty twenty four. That is

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 10>going to be no different from here. The message is

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 10>quite clear this week from the FED, even with Williams today.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 10>Williams came in and tried to walk back some of

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 10>this dubvish interpretation of what was a dubvish meeting. Three

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 10>cuts instead of two. Many people were caught off guards

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 10>by that.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 5>The view from me, he was walking it back at

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the instructions of mister Powell. He was walking in the

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 5>instructions from.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 7>Someone or he's a loose canon.

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 10>Whether that is the case is not for us to

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 10>necessarily try to decide. But if you unpack what Williams

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 10>said is he said that we are not talking about

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 10>cuts right now. That doesn't mean that they're not talking

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 10>about cuts.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 7>So when you look at the summary of.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 10>Economic projections, the dot pot, what does it tell us?

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 10>It tells us three cuts, doesn't tell us when. And

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 10>so the market feels like it got a little bit

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 10>of itself pricing in sick. Some people calling for March,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 10>some people calling for June. What the FED is telling

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 10>us is they are comfortable with this level of employment.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 3>But how how independent will the FED be in an

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>election year, in a year where there's expectations that looking

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>at the.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 5>World, Oh, it's that fantasy.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, well, listen, we are here to think about

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 10>market volatility relative value. I can have many cocktail discussions

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 10>around the independence of the FED. That is a fun

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 10>topic to really go down a rabbit hole. Or maybe

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 10>Abigail mentioned Twitter. I'm sure there's plenty of things there.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 10>Our goal simply is, to your point, John three ninety two,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 10>relative value or not fair value.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 7>And what we start to look at is where do we.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 10>See the trend line over the next three months, six months,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>twelve months across the rates market? And then most importantly,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 10>how is that going to impact a municipal market on

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 10>a go forward basis?

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 5>How is it going to be impact market on a

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 5>EKO forward?

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for letting me continue that. I think from

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 10>our perspective it's quite simple. Ratios continue to matter here.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 10>With this move lower in rates, you have a tremendous

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 10>amount of demand that's come back into the market. So

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 10>we look at rates, we look at technical supply and

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 10>demand supply driven by new issuers stepping into the market,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 10>supply driven by whether retail is a net buyer net seller,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 10>retail is stepped back in there a net buyer.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 5>Tangential to that? Can I just ask go quick with

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 5>the city group story dropping of their municipal department, how

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 5>looney is the municipal market getting when you take into

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 5>context the whole ken Paxton, Texas thing.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 10>Another key risk factor that we really think about is

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 10>liquidity dynamics in the municipal market. What you've seen since

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 10>my early days PREGFC till now is this consolidation of

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 10>desks across the street. When we look at that as

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 10>the dealer community shrinks, it is a really fortunate thing

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 10>for the UNI market. For investors. Liquidity dynamics change. There

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 10>is more friction in those periods of mentioning technicals where

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 10>there are outflow cycles and you have fewer people stepping

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 10>in to provide liquidity. It can create some more challenges

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 10>for those who need liquidity. It can create a lot

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 10>more opportunities for those who are looking to be the

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 10>source of liquidity. So while we don't like to see it,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 10>it's looking through that and really emphasizing managing the liquidity.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>For a new homeowner like Bailey. It's just like probably

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 5>means is taxes are going to go up at some point.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's right if you're having trouble doing these

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 5>deals or having an underwriter and the market is impacted

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 5>that way, ultimately it's going to be more expensive gas.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, Let's make no mistake.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 10>If you look at the market yesterday, you have issues

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 10>that are there. They are able to bring deals Illinois

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 10>toll example, yesh Day fifteen to twenty times over subscribed

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 10>spreads were half of what they were back in April

0:22:58.680 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 10>when they brought a deal.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 7>You will still see deals being brought.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 10>I expect issuance picks up materially heading into next year,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 10>both in terms of corporate risk as well as muni

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 10>risk because guess what, the FED has just made it

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 10>a much better entry point. These deals will get done.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 10>It will just continue to be consolidated from here.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Well how much I guess how quickly does the FED

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 3>need to cut for some of those deals to come

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 3>to market or does that not matter as much?

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, they're coming now, right, We're seeing it. We're seeing

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 10>deals that are added to the calendar. Abigail was talking

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 10>about a sleepy week we in the municipal market. We

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 10>hope that next week we can catch up on all

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 10>the work that we didn't necessarily do, you know, maybe

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 10>trade on the margins. There are deals that are stepping

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 10>in that weren't on the calendar. In particular, it's really

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 10>across the board. We're seeing healthcare, we're seeing general obligation risk.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 10>It is deals that we're tagged to come at some

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 10>point likely in the first quarter, first half of next year,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 10>and they're saying, let's do it today based on what

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing at the moment. So regardless, even prior to

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 10>the FMC call it pivot towards a softer tone, we

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 10>expected that issuance was going to pick up in twenty

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 10>twenty four, somewhere to the twoe of four hundred and

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 10>fifty billion or so.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm not exaggerating when I say this, but I get

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 5>in the mail now at least it seems like once

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 5>a month a letter from I don't know, some firms

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 5>saying you know we represent well. In my instance, my

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 5>healthcare provider Robert Wood Johnson Hospitals, saying you know they've

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 5>been hacked. We don't think your personal information, but we're

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 5>not sure. In the meantime, you should really monitor your credit. Well,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 5>no kidding, is that. Let's talk about cybersecurity risk, where

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 5>it figures into your business and how important it is.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, when we think about risks that are forming in

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 10>the municipal market, we think near term risks, so balance

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 10>sheet pressures, rising costs, declining revenues, all of those things

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 10>you're seeing. But then we think longer term as well,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 10>cybersecurity risk is one that's on that is on our radar,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 10>no different than companies that are facing these same pressures.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 7>And so we like to look towards our.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 10>Municipalities taking the necessary steps today to really protect data, integritory,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 10>financial SYSM scary stuff, John Ransom. Ransom, you don't want

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 10>to think about that. When it comes to UNI credit,

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 10>we agree they are not. It's a question of as

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 10>these things, excuse me, we don't agree that they are not.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 10>Many are, But it's looking through to ensure that issuers

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 10>are taking the necessary steps today just as companies are

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 10>doing the same.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>And how is looking through some of the notes climate risk.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 3>We were talking to the CEO of Portland General Electric

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 3>earlier about some of the green transition. You look at

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>places like Florida and California where insurance companies are just leaving.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>So how does that factor into the marketing?

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's wild.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 10>It's something that we've talked about quite a bit on

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 10>the desk, and as we think through bigger picture, longer term,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 10>the frequency of events, the intensity of events, they are

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 10>going to get bigger, They're going to get larger. It

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 10>is going to put press are on bounce sheets. So

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 10>it's both some of the costs associated with rebuilding. State

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 10>and local governments will need to issue more debt, both

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 10>to shore up infrastructure, water resiliency rebuild, but also bigger picture,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 10>long term, what's the biggest risk for Muni's out migration right,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 10>look at Detroit, think of some of those examples, and

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 10>so as you think through it, I think the average

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 10>individual buying a home is not really thinking through the

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 10>climate rest long term big picture airs like Florida, at

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 10>some point people will and when that well.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 5>They're going to think about it when they go there

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>and they can't get insurance homewards insurance, for instance. That's

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 5>happening everywhere, not just Florida.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's not always the case a lot of times

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 10>when people really think about it, and there was a

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 10>lot published on this topic earlier this year around insurance,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 10>it's when the event happens to them.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 7>So it's a little bit of hindsight.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Alex, that was great. I hope we didn't get too

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 5>far Afield.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 10>If you're yeah, this is fantastic, Lively Friday, Alex Patrol,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 10>the director of fixed income at Rockefeller Asset Management.

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 8>tune It app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's been a tough one for Google as

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 5>of late. We had the story earlier this week about

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 5>their fight with Epic Games. They lost, but is their

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 5>trouble over. There's a tough, tough road ahead potentially. Let's

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 5>bring in our next guest. Jenrie is the senior litigation

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 5>analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence on the Anti Trust Watch. So

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 5>what's the panther the head for Google at this point

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 5>or should I say alphabet?

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 6>Well, John and Bailey. I think Google's going to have

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 6>a rough year next year. You know, first they've lost

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 6>with this jury trial on the play store side, and

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 6>the judge will be deciding what the appropriate remedy is

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 6>next year. Now there will appeal, and they have some

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 6>chances there given how different this was from Epics lawsuit

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 6>against Apple, But I don't really think that they're going

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 6>to win that appeal and be able to overturn this verdict.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 6>It's a very high standard, So they're going to face

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 6>a remedy in that area. The other thing that's going

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 6>to happen is that there will be a verdict or

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 6>a ruling in the Department of Justices lawsuit against Google

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 6>that finished trial earlier this year over its search business

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 6>and whether or not it's maintaining a monopoly in Google Search.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 6>And I think that decision is probably going to come

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 6>out maybe late first half, sometime in the second quarter.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 6>And again I think that was a bit that's a

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 6>very close call, but I tend to lean toward the

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 6>DOJ winning that one. So they may also be looking

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 6>at a potential remedy imposed on their search business. Then

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 6>the third thing, which I actually think is the most important,

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 6>or I should say the riskiest lawsuit that Google's going

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 6>to face, is a Department of Justice suit that's challenging

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 6>its entire ad tech business, and that is in a

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Virginia court that moves really fast and could possibly get

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 6>to trial toward the end of the first half of

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 6>next year.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 5>How far does that go. It goes right up to

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you think, Well, they only go up to the

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court if there's anell. If there's an appeal and the

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court agrees to take the case, the Supreme Court

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 6>doesn't have to, and in fact, they actually only accept

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 6>a very small percentage of the cases that apply to

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 6>be heard. So I guess I'm assuming Google would appeal

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 6>anything that it loses. So these things could actually drag

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 6>out for a couple of years. But at the very least,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 6>what it could see is some really bad headlines next

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 6>year that impact the stock. Because if they have losses

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 6>at the district court, while it's not over, because they

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 6>will appeal and it will continue on. You know, those

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 6>initial losses aren't a good thing.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And just to call out this week, Alphabet down two

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent. That compares in a backdrop with

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the NASDAC up three point four percent and the S

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and p F two and a half percent. Jen just

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 3>wondering how much could this cost Google from a monetary standpoint,

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 3>given the number of cases ongoing.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, it's so hard to say so on the

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 6>search side. Let me start there, because I think it's

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 6>the easiest. I actually don't think even if they lose

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 6>on liability and there's a remedy imposed that it's really

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 6>going to impact them in any significant way because at

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 6>this point they're entrenched. I mean, people use Google Search.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Most people prefer Google Search to being or to Duck

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Doc Go. And even if they're in a position where

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 6>they have to offer up choice screens, Let's say somebody

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 6>buys an Android device and they're using it for the

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 6>first time and they get to choose the default search

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 6>engine rather than Google just being automatically installed, or if

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 6>they have to sort of open up open up the

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 6>space to other competing search engines, people are still going

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 6>to use Google. So I'm not so sure that's whatever

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 6>happens there, it's going to hurt them very much. Now

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 6>in the play Store, it could hurt a lot more.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, they make a lot lot of revenues from

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 6>the fifteen to thirty percent commissions they charge to developers,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 6>and that's really going to change if these remedies that

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 6>we expect stick, you know, if they don't win on appeal,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 6>because they're no longer going to be able to keep

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 6>competing app distributors off Android devices, which means people can

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 6>download these apps outside of the play Store, and they're

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 6>also no longer probably going to be able to link

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 6>an app developer within the Play Store using Google's payment services,

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 6>which is how they collect those fees, and so I

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 6>think there will be an impact. They will obviously find

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 6>some other way probably to make up for that revenue

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 6>and charge developers for using their services. But if competition increases,

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 6>that alone is going to force them to push down

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 6>their commissions. So I think that one hurt.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 5>This Department of Justice has been particularly aggressive in antitrust cases.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 5>Can I say that absolutely? Why don't they just, like

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, try to weigh out this administration and hope

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 5>for a change at the top.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, they very well could, because if they can

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 6>do whatever they can to drag their heels, you know,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 6>they can appeal, they can try to slow those appeals down,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 6>They can do those sorts of things to try to

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 6>drag it out. You know, if you think about it,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 6>way back in two thousand, when Microsoft lost a really

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 6>big monopolization suit, they actually got out of it in

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 6>a sense because the administration changed George Bush became the president.

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 6>It was remanded to the district court, and in the meantime,

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 6>George Bush's administration settled the case, and so that kind

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 6>of thing does happen. Things change with administration, so certainly

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 6>they can try to do that. You know, I have

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 6>to tell you, John, I wonder all the time why

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 6>all these big deals I'm seeing get signed up don't

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 6>just wait, Because they're also aggressive when it comes to

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 6>challenging mergers and transactions.

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 3>And when you look at some of the antitrust battles

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>that Alphabet is working through, are there similar cases that

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>come to mind that you can kind of look back

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>at as examples of what could play out in the

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 3>coming months and years.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, the Microsoft case I mentioned, even though it's really

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.719
<v Speaker 6>old at this point, is one of the best examples.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Up until now, Up until the last two years, the enforcers,

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 6>which includes the Federal Trade Commission too, not just the

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 6>Department of Justice, rarely ever sued a big company for

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 6>a monopolistic conduct. This is really new. So you had Microsoft,

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 6>you had a few other little cases, and then about

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 6>five years ago, the Trade Commission suit Qualcom for monopolization

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 6>in the chip markets. They lost that case. They wanted

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 6>the diss report, they lost on appeal. That case ended

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 6>when the Supreme Court refused to review. So we don't

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 6>have a lot of examples, and what we saw with Microsoft.

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 6>I think that's really important for all these cases is

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 6>that while Microsoft was found guilty, one of the things

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 6>the appellate court said is that a structural remedy in

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 6>these instances is really drastic, and it has to be

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 6>applied only with enormous caution, and the least sort of

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 6>imposing or intrusive remedy that will fix the problem is

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 6>the one that should be used. And so it suggests

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 6>to me that if the courts are following that precedent,

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 6>even if there is liability found here with Google, that

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 6>structural remedies are really unlikely.

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 5>And then when it comes to social media and the

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 5>debate over whether or not it's addictive, particularly for youngsters,

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 5>what's happening on that front, and what are the risks

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 5>to Google alphabet.

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's a lot of activity on that front.

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 6>But on that one, I'm afraid I'm going to have

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 6>to refer you to my colleague Matt Chattenhelm, who is

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 6>covers more of the consumer protection side of the Federal

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 6>Trade Commissioning. He has been all over what's happening on

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 6>the privacy front, and I think you'll have to speak

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 6>to him. Because on the FTC side, when it comes

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 6>to Facebook Meta, I should say I am much more

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 6>focused on the current lawsuit that the FTC has to

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 6>try to force Meta to sell off Instagram and WhatsApp.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 6>That's the one that I'm following more so than the

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 6>privacy seats, although the privacy seats have more immediacy right now.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess what other you mentioned it? But what other

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 3>trials are you keeping an eye on or should we

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 3>be keeping an eye on in terms of whether it's

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the anti trust space or kind of other big tech names.

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, we have a lot going on, as

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 6>you both mentioned earlier, against big tech, So there's been

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 6>a lot of focus on Google. There are a lot

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 6>of cases against Google. But bear in mind we also

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 6>have a pretty big case against Amazon that's pending by

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 6>the Federal Trade Commission, and that's challenging some of Amazon's

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 6>third party seller practices anti discounting practices they call it.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 6>That basically force sellers to provide the lowest price that

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 6>they provide anywhere on Amazon. So that's pending. The lawsuit

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 6>I've just mentioned is also pending and could even get

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 6>to trial next year, where the Federal Trade Commission has

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 6>challenged Meta, saying, hey, you just run around and you

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 6>have for years buying up your competitors so that you

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 6>don't have viable competitors down the road. You look at

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 6>these nascent up and coming startups and if you think

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 6>they could threaten you down the road, buying them so

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 6>as not to compete with them. And that's what the

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 6>FTC allege has happened with WhatsApp and with Instagram, and

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 6>so we have that pending too. So among kind of

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 6>the big four big tech platforms that we all understood

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 6>were under scrutiny, the only ones, if are that isn't

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 6>facing a Department of Justice or Federal Trade Comission law

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 6>Foo is Apple, and that could still happen. I understand

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 6>that investigation is still.

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Ongoing, and we haven't brought up Europe and the regulators there,

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 5>but that's a discussion for another day. Jen. Thanks. It

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 5>always a pleasure to see Jen Reed, the senior litigation

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 5>analyst Anti Truns with the Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller I'm on Twitter

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and I'm fall Sweeney.

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Twitter at Ptsweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 2>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio