WEBVTT - Sixdegrees.com: A Social Media Origin Story

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, there's Chuck,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 2>here's Jerry, and we're going to take a nice little

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 2>stroll down Internet memory lane parent stuff.

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>You should Yeah, this is something I had never heard of.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Had you heard of this?

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>No? I ran it past. You mean she's like, oh, man, yes,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I've heard of it, and I don't know

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>if she has or no.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, you mean is an early adopter.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. She was definitely more Internetti than I was at

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that time.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So what we're talking about here is the first

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what's regarded as the first social media website, the thing

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that started the degradation of all mankind. Way back in

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven. It was called six degrees dot com

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>spelled out SixDegrees dot com. I was founded by a

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>guy named Andrew Weinreich and for about three years in

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties they were able to come online when

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a ton of people were online, and garner ultimately about

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>three and a half million users, which it pales in

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>comparison to what we look at today, but for the

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>time wasn't too bad.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not too shabby. Unfortunately, it wasn't enough to get

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>them over the hump and give them staying power. But

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they were also a victim of timing, as

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll see, Yeah for sure, but yes, the deck was

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>stacked against them, and the fact that they were essentially

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>very much ahead of their time. They were a social

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>media site before there were enough people online, not just

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>enough people to come and use your social media site.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>There was only something like I mean, if they had

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>three and a half million users, there's probably like three

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>point six million users on all of the Internet at

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 2>a time. I don't know if that's a correct estimate,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but something like eighteen percent of households according to the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>US in nineteen ninety seven when six degrees launched, only

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent had internet at home at the time.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a it was a competing stat from Pew

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Research Center that said thirty six percent did, but there

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was different methodologies and stuff. So let's just say, you know,

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between those numbers, I bet it was more

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>more like eighteen. This was you know, ninety seven was one, two, three, four,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>five years before Prinster launched Princester. That's hard to say

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. And but by that time the percentage

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of people in two thousand and two that had flipped.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>It was more like thirty nine percent of people did

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not use the internet, and sixty one percent of people did.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was right at that, you know, it was

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>just terrible timing, right there at the end of the

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties when the dot com bubble burst, and just right

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on its heels, other sites came along that did far,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>far better.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just one thing, I like that Pew Data

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>because it doesn't have like that small slice of like

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know, not sure. It's either yes, I use it

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>or I don't use it. It's a nice solid survey agreed.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so there's a lot of what ifs could

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 2>have been kind of thing, and we'll get into those

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more. But there were more things that

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>six degrees was up against. Another really really big one

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>was the slow speed of internet. Yeah, and you know

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>today you might look back and think, well, we had

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>no comparison back then, didn't matter. It was so slow

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that it would make you angry waiting around for a

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>song to download or a web page to even load.

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>There were transfer speeds using dial up modems of fifty

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>six kilobytes per second that was what you had to

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>deal with, not a gig per second, a kilobyte times

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty six per second. That was the transfer speed at

0:03:58.280 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the time, and that was the maximum.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we've laughed about it before, but just

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the days of just seeing a picture appear on the

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>screen like three lines at a time, down, down, down,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're just I just want to know what this

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thing looks like. And if you wanted to know, you

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>had just sit there for five minutes or whatever.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you had time to go make and

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>eat toast, Yeah while a picture was downloading.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hate a lot of toast back then.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So that was that was a big challenge for it too.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>And then one of the other problems too is we'll

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>see is that people I mean, if you have a

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 2>social media so it's kind of helpful to have pictures,

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and they just weren't around at the time.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we'll we'll get to that all the reasons

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>why in a minute, but just to sort of, you know,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>locate it on the timeline in nineteen ninety seven when

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at launch, like Google dot com had just registered as

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a domain, so it wasn't even a real thing yet.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>The word weblog had just been coined or you know

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>what it would become is blog and Netflix was sending

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>DVDs through the mail. So remember that it seems like

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a thousand years ago, but it wasn't that long ago

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>No, and it's kind of sad that six degrees has

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of gotten lost to history. Most people think Friendster

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>was the first social media site. No, six degrees was,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't even one of those things where it's

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 2>technically the first social media site, even though it really

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>was not. It didn't resemble social media at all. No,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>this was the first social media site, and it essentially

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>laid the groundwork for all the social media sites to come.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It just was so far ahead of its time that

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>it got lost to history.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. For sure, Friendster ultimately got about ten million, but

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of technical problems, so they didn't last.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>MySpace was the next big one. In two thousand and three,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>they were the first to reach a million monthly active users,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which was a big deal. Some people say that at

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one point it was the most popular site in the

0:05:59.240 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>United States.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 2>I believe that.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, even if only for a brief amount of time.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But then in two thousand and eight, Facebook came along

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and sort of smashed everything, and just to put a perspective,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>three and a half million users for six degrees. Facebook

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>has more than three billion users and Blue Sky has

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty three million, and that's looked at as like a

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>tiny thing.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah for sure. So yeah, it kind of puts their

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>three and a half million users into perspective. Yeah, so

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>six degrees may sound familiar to people. It's actually very

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 2>much related to the six Degrees of Kevin Bacon or

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>six Degrees of Separation that play by John Gwayer and

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>then later the movie adaptations starring Stockard Channing, of course,

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's actually I didn't realize this based on a

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>study that Stanley Milgram, of the very famous Milgram experiment

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>where he had people shock some unseen person in another

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 2>room to find out just how obedient people were to authority,

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 2>even against their own set of morals. You know that one, right.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>He also carried out a study where he was one

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>of the first to kind of determine how far apart

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 2>the average person was from the other from anybody else

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in the world.

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he got together with another psych professor named Jeffrey

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Travers and This is pretty cool. I think it was

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty low fi way to do it. But this is

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what year was this. Was this the nineteen.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Fifties, No, it was the late sixties.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Late sixties, okay. But what they did was they said,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get some people in Kansas. Let's get

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some people in Nebraska. They said, here's a folder and

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it has a document with a target person that we

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>want you to get this to them. But you can't

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>just look them up and see if you can find

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>their address and mail it to them. One of the

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people was in Cambridge, one was in Sharon, Massachusetts, and

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they said, what you want to do, or what we

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>want you to do, is send it to a person

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that you personally know who you think might be able

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to get it to another person who could get it

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to another person who could eventually get it to this

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>target person. And then we will measure that and see

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what the average or the mean might be. So literally,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a farmer in Kansas got it, you know, this is

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>just one example. Got it to the wife of a

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>student Massachusetts, who gave it to an Episcopalian minister in

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this town, who gave it to an instructor at the

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>theological seminary there who got it to that target? So

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that would be one, two, three, four degrees of separation,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty remarkable.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I think yeah. And I also think chok that it's

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of funny that to Stanley Milgram, Nebraska and Kansas

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>are the most socially remote locations in all of the

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>United States, because that's where he started to see how

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>long it took to get to I guess civilis like Boston.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>But they actually did a lot of analysis of this.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 2>They released a version of the study in Psychology Today,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>which was meant for a general audience. But then they

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>did like the real deal in a journal called Sociometry

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty nine, and they found that there was

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a mean length mean is the one in the middle. No,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 2>mean is average, it's another word for average, just say average,

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, of four point four to five point seven intermediary.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So they found that people have a degree of separation

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of four point four to five point seven. And this

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>was all the way back in the mid to late sixties.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Think about how closer we are now.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, what I wonder too is did they throw

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>out the ones? Because apparently most of the folders never

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>even made it. Did they just toss those and say,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ones who got there, this is how they're connected.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but I believe that most of the ones that

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't get there were because the initial farmers in Kansas

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and Nebraska just threw them out. They didn't participate. Oh really,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what happened to the majority of them.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it wasn't like the most robust study of

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>all time, but it was so fascinating that it just

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>captured the imagination of people and became kind of a

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>pop cultural meme. But what's interesting about it is that

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:23.359
<v Speaker 2>later scholarship that was pretty robust studies supported what Milgram

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and his collaborator Jeffrey Travers found in that study.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was one in two thousand and three that

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>found a media of five to seven. This is pretty

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>old data. But in twenty eleven they did the degrees

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of separation on other social media sites, and for Facebook

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time, it was four point seventy four and

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for the at the time named Twitter it was four

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point sixty seven. But the caveat there is like you're

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily counting just the people that you know, Like,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I know plenty of people when I was on Facebook

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that had lots of like what were they in Facebook? Friends? Yeah,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>friends who they had no idea who they were. It

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was just more of a maybe a networking thing kind

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of like LinkedIn.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And as we'll see six degrees too.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah. Laura doctor Claw, who helped us out with this,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 2>points out that social media kind of has a stretch

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the definition of what we consider a connection. Like you

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 2>just said, and also you said, what used to be

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>called Twitter. I think it's hilarious because very frequently you'll

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>see Twitter used in like some sort of article or whatever,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and then in parentheses after that it'll say X.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I mean everyone still says Twitter. It seems like, yeah,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't take.

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Like sorry, the name change for the business you bought

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>did not take.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's because X is dumb.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess. So Twitter was just so perfect.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess well, I mean, I don't know if Twitter

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is a good name or not, but it had such recognition.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just like, Yeah, it's like the people who bought

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the Sears Tower and try to change the name and

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>everybody's like, nope, still Sears Tower. Sorry.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I love that when a corporate sponsor takes over

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, no, we're still going to call it

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing at once.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Before it's still the Toastedos Fiesta Bowl. Sorry, sorry, cars

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 2>dot Com.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you mentioned Kevin Bacon and we should mention real quick.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>The six Degrees of Kevin Bacon was a very popular

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thing created by some college students, where in the ideas

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin Bacon has been in so many varied movies

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>over the years that you can connect any actor in

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood to Kevin Bacon in less than six degrees or less.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But the Bacon number apparently is three point one two,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're five hundred and twenty two actors who have

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a smaller connectivity number or Bacon number than that.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're more connected to people than Kevin Bacon. I

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't know that, Chuck, did.

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You, Well there were five hundred and twenty two, or

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that there were more connected actors both. I figured there

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>were more connected actors because there are people, well, Eric

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Roberts is the number one with two point nine zero

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>eight four one because he has eight hundred and sixty

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>five IMDb entries as an actor. So I figured there

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>were people that were in way more movies. And that's

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just Matt, You know.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Sure it is. But also you can make a case

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that Kevin Bacon's one hundred and eleven movies typically are

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>with more stars who have more work, So there it's

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>likelier that the people he work with are in more

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>movies with more other people, whereas Eric Roberts is probably

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>in movies with people like this is their one and

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>only movie.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Or people who are in like six hundred movies that

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you just have never heard of.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true too, That's possible if Rifftrek taught me anything.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>It's that. Yeah, Like I know who Cameron Mitchell is

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>for Pete's sake, is that he's one of those guys

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>who's in a million movies that you've.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Never heard of, but you recognize his face.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Face name. Yeah, I think I actually know some of

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>his family members.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Now right, I'm gonna have to look this guy up.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh man, it will take you on an odyssey.

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>And don't even bother watching the original version of the movies.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Just watch the riff track version of Cameron Mitchell's movies.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh a rare in store or in show. Look up

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Mitchell. Huh oh no, he's a restaurateur.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>That's not him. Look at Cameron Mitchell's Space Mutiny.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know that guy. Was he in

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Plan nine?

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he really might have been?

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, and now I'm seeing a picture of him as

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>an older gentleman, and I've seen him in movies as

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>an older gentleman too.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Space Mutiny, that's a really great rift tracks

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to start with.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are the best.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>And wait, actually I think that's an MST three K

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to start watch both versions? How about that?

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, well that's what I meant.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, okay, so do you want to take a break, Chuck.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's take a break and talk more about old

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Internet right after.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>This, okay, Chuck. So we said we were going to

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>take a stroll down Internet memory lane. And this was

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a time when, like I think the year before six

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>degrees launched, Craigslist launched, Amazon dot Com launched, and they

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>were just selling books at the time. Yeah. One of

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the big search engines was ask Jeeves, and it was

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>revolutionary because you could use natural language rather than have

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to figure out exactly what keyword you needed to put

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 2>in to get results with licos. Yeah, yeah, totally, which,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>by the way, asked Jesus, ask dot com. Did you

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>know that?

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I did know that. I knew it changed

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>into something. They just got rid of Jeeves, which is

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>super sad.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I know, it is pretty sad. They retired him. He

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>went off to live on a farm, as they say, yeah,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>which means they killed him.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>How six degrees worked, though, is interesting because not only

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was it the name copped from six degrees of separation,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they actually organized the website in such a way and

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like part of the fun of it. And again,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this is early Internet. If you're a youngster out there,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you may think this is super funny that people thought

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this was fun, But it seems like part of the

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fund SixDegrees dot com was finding people you didn't know

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and then tracing that connection through the website.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Right. So one of the things that you would do

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>is go through the I guess the registry of other

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>six degree users, and there were so few initially that

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you could do that. Rather than go through three and

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a half million people, it was just a few hundred potentially,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and you'd be like, oh, I know them, I know them,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and you would make a connection with them. They would

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>confirm it, and now you were a first degree connection.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>You two were because you actually know each other.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, and you, like you said, you had to

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>confirm that connection. But you could also include people who

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't on it yet, like I'm just going to list

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>out my family members or whatever and put their email

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>addresses in. Keep in mind, this is at a time

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where you didn't get a lot of email. You didn't

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>get much, if any spam email, and sometimes getting an

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>email was like, oh wow, look at this, this is cool.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 2>It's cool.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about that now, like oh yeah,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>just put all your family and friends and put their

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>emails in. That's like a fireable offense, like socially.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>You go to jail.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you can. But back then it was a

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>different deal. So you can include people put their emails

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and they would get an email asking for confirmation and

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>saying and also, do you want to sign up for

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the school new thing? No, yeah, exactly.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>So the people that knew the people you knew, but

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you weren't directly connected to them, you were now second

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>degree connected with them. And then those people were connected

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>to people that you didn't know, and they were third

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>degree connections. I think it didn't go beyond third degree,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Like they didn't go all the way up to six.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that was totally unnecessary. But this was like, yeah,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 2>this is very groundbreaking and revolutionary, and people were just

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>amazed by people they knew. And the point was like,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 2>who do your friends know that you want to know

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that you don't know yet. Now you can make a

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>first degree connection with those people if they confirm you.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's the way. It was sort of

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>like a predecessor to LinkedIn. I mean, you'll see again,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like you said, like seeds of all the social media websites.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They were doing it because you could create a profile

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with your professional affiliations and stuff like that. You were

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>encouraged and I think most people probably really did use

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>their real identities because at the time people were like, well,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of a weirdo would just create some fake

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>identity on the internet just to mess with people. So

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there were real people on there. That was a member

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the trust E Data Privacy Program, which has now

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>been bundled up under trust ARC. But email was very

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>central to it all. It was not an app. They

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't have apps yet. You would get an email asking

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for confirmation, you would reply via email. You would add

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>others via email, so it was just a different time.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there were I mean you would add your hobbies,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 2>you would add who you worked for, what degrees you

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 2>had maybe so yeah, again, lots of seeds of linked

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 2>In for sure. Again no pictures, and this was a

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 2>huge stumbling block, as we'll see. But they did have

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 2>other functionality that was thrilling. It had basically in network emailing, right,

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 2>so you could directly contact your context had they confirmed you.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>They are bulletin boards where you could essentially chat, and

0:19:58.400 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they had a bunch of other kind of

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and whistles that they added over the years. They had

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>something called channels, which were essentially special interest groups and

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you could be like, oh, I'm interested in business and finance,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 2>or I'm interested in games I think, meaning at the

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>time nothing but Oregon Trail, right, and you could just

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 2>go and find other people on these message boards that

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>were interested in these things and maybe make some context

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 2>if they confirmed you.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, again, way ahead of its time with Facebook groups,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what they did. We got some and you

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>can go look these up if you want to see

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like screenshots of what the screen looked like. I believe

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>we were sent one from October nineteen ninety nine a

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome scream scream screen, and it was it was cute.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>It looked like a fun website of the day. It

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>had a service marketplace. There was daily trivia on the

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>homepage that this is hysterical. There was a daily poll,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and on that day in October nineteen ninety nine, this

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was the poll. When you get a chain letter from

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a friend, you a immediately throw it away, B do

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what it says asap, c hold on to it for

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a while, and then lose it. So it's clearly they

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't like super future facing. If they were like chain letters,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's relatable, right right.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I found on also Chuck from February twenty ninth, two thousand,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>so that was a leap here. It was the question

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 2>of the day was Bill and Monica, and then your

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>choices were love lust and as long as it's not Hillary,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that was the question of the day.

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty funny. By that time, six or eight months

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>after the October one that was sent, and probably in

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the February one that you saw, there were little nuggets

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of engagement boosting that they were trying to use, like hey,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>here's some content, here's some like join this mother's day group,

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>or we're going to spotlight this channel it was. They

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would tell how many people were online at that moment,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>which in the October nineteen nine Ney No, I was

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and ten people, which sounds very funny. But

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I distinctly remember being in like chat rooms where they

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>would say like like three hundred people are in there,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and I would it would blow my mind.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>That there were that many.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it just seemed like, oh my god, dude, I'm

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in my living room in New Jersey and I'm on

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this computer and there are three hundred people around the

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>world that I can talk to right now.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>That's neat And what did you say that?

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Well? I did have one specific interaction with someone. Of course,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time, I thought it was a real girl

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>about our love of Cat Stevens, and we had a

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>real back and forth going and a lot in common.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that was probably a nine year old boy.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You got cat fished over Cat Stevens.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I might have, who knows, but I remember thinking like,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hey man, this girl sounds super cool and there are

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 1>no pictures so a bit you know, she's cute as

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>far as I know.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, a nine year old boy who's into Cat Stevens

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is probably pretty cool too.

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that probably would have been a better life unfriend

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to chat about real music, right.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Another thing I saw on that February two thousand page

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>was the theme of the week, and this theme was

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 2>to thine own self improve. So there was like you

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 2>could click on to zen practice Group, self help, functui, Reiki,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 2>there's a book club. They were just throwing everything they

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>could at this to just get people to interact more

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and more and more, because it would the more engaged

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you were, the more likely you were to send out

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>those emails to your friends and be like, hey, join

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>me on here. It's pretty awesome.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>So maybe let's talk about pictures real quick and then

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break, because the lack of pictures is

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the big deal, especially when you look at the modern Internet.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>A website with just text and maybe you know, clip

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>art and stuff like that isn't super engaging obviously. So

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why they didn't have pictures is because there

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was no way to get pictures there. You know, there

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't digital cameras. The There was the Apple Quick Take

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred that was released a few years before. If

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you look up pictures of this it's about the size

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of a sandwich, kind of funny looking. It was the

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>first digital camera. It costs seven hundred and fifty bucks.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The Canon Power Shot was the first digital camera that

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>could write images to a hard disk. That was released

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of one yeah, one year before six degrees came

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>online in nineteen ninety six. That was almost one thousand dollars,

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and seventy six megs of storage. But

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the first camera phone didn't come along until ninety nine,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was a Kyo Serrah Visual Phone VP two ten.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was actually cheap, considering it's six hundred and

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 2>thirty four bucks in today's dollars for a camera phone.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>It was a point eleven megapixel camera. For comparison, the

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 2>iPhone sixteen has as much as forty eight megapixels. Yeah,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>but if you look up some of like the the

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>promotional images of this, there's like like Japanese women holding

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the phone that's showing a picture of themselves. You can

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 2>clearly see who it is. Yes, that's another word for it.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm using nineteen ninety seven. Yeah, terminology though they like

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you can see you can tell it's them. I think

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>one version of it is in color. It's not that bad,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 2>especially for you can tell them. Yeah, you don't have

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to like like squint your eyes to make the pixels

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 2>come together. And you're like, is that popeye? It's like

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you can tell it's them. I guess yeah. I was

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>impressed by it.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>So it did its most basic function as an image

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>capturing device, yes, being able to tell it was that

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>same right.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh. One other thing I saw about the Apple quick

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Take one hundred. At its highest resolution, it could store

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 2>up to eight photos at once. Whoa, this is so

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>much fun. I love making fun of the early Internet.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that we live through. This is also a

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>true story. Winreich, the founder, would get emails where people

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, hey, can I snail mail you a physical photo?

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I have it? Can I send it to you via

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the US Postal Service? And can you scan it and

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>attach it to my profile because you really need pictures

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on this thing.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, And they were like maybe. And then somebody around

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the table at the bull session said, well, what if

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>people want to start like updating or changing their photos?

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And Andrew Wine I think it's wine Rich maybe, said yeah,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 2>let's just skip that, all right. Okay, No, no, I'm

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>saying wine Rich said that not us. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Well there's like a rare intro edit that didn't get

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 2>edited on purpose.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Should we take that break now?

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we need two.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right, I'm going to go do twenty pushups

0:26:54.320 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for that and they'll be right back. All right, So Winrich,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's wine Rich, wine Rich. I think wine Rich.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's how. I think it

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 2>was Wikipedia that had the pronunciation, and I think he

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>said wine.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Rich okay, all right, maybe he was trying to seem

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>less German.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yeah. That always reminds me of that part in

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 2>thirty Rock where Tina Fey is like, well, she's apologizing

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and she said, I'm very sorry, like mister Wiener slav

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and he said, it's Wiener slave.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That's such a good joke.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever seen Unbreakable, Kimmy Schmidt? Have you seen

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that yet?

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I watched it when it I mean when it came

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>out years ago. I watched the first like season or so.

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 2>There aren't that many shows that can make me actually

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 2>laugh out loud, and that's one of them. And it's

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>because Jeter is one of the best comedy writers to

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 2>ever live.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, agreed. I don't have you seen the Four Seasons yet?

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm avoiding it. I saw that it's a remake

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 2>of an Allan all the film, and I have a

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>strict policy not to watch late seventies early eighties Allen

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>all the films or their remakes.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, your distaste for Alan Alda is truly disturbing.

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, I've got nothing against Alan Alda personally.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just those kind of movies. Same with Elliott Gould.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't stand those kind of movies like where it's

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>just like like, hey, I can't even do an impression

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of it, but I can't stand those kind of movies.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>And somebody out there knows what I'm talking about.

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Elliott gould kind of movies, Yes.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's Capricorn one or that Shaggy Dog movie that

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>he's in he plays the detective.

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say that one movie I think you would

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like is The Long Goodbye.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the one I'm talking about. That's the Shaggy Dog

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Detective one. I don't think I would.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>What does Shaggy Dog Detective mean? I don't know.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>So Shaggy Dog is where like there's this whole build

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>up of like say, a mystery or something, and it

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>turns out to be nothing, Like there's really no point

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to the movie in the end.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, So I thought you would like The Longabye

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>great Robert Altman.

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Noir, and I like Robert Allman stuff too.

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Chandler book. No, still nothing, Huh.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't if you made it. No, I can't make

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 2>if you made it before Elliott Gould was in it,

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I would probably watch it, all.

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, fair enough?

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait one more thing? Yeah, yeah, speaking of great directors,

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I finally saw a ghost dog way of the sam

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 2>But Jarmish, did you see that ever?

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw that in the theater, Buddy.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I was guessing that you had. That is such a

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>good movie, man. I can't believe that slipped under my

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>radar because that totally was in my wheelhouse for that time.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Jarmish is the best. And Forest Whitaker was

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so good in that. Yes, he was good music too. Yeah,

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, where how did that start? Winwreck trying to

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seem less German? This is the six degrees of that conversation. Yeah,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>winter slave. So here's what wine rich.

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait, there's one other thing that reminds me of too,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 2>can you remember we were talking about the vanity license

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 2>plate episode. Yeah, uh huh, And like the greatest misconstrued

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>vanity plate of all time is where the guy had

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 2>j is Lord, like Jesus's Lord, but it's all one word,

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>so it says jizz lord Lord. That's the greatest vanity

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 2>plate anyone's ever had.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that definitely beats as Man even.

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I think so too, which is a good one.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's really.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Funny, especially taking it in the content.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. Yeah, who that guy was to be that

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, dedicated of a Christian to do that on

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>your license plate, and that's what you end.

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Up with rolling up the church with Jiz Lord on

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 2>your car.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Man, Well you can make a movie about that.

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Was starring Elliott Gould Lord.

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So win Rich said, and this is a quote that

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of shows how far ahead of his time

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he was. His vision. It is a bun clear to

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>me that the world will index all of their relations

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone's relationship in a single database. And that was like

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>before anyone else is doing it. So they started off

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this thing as a just with a launch, like a

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>physical launch event, a party in New York City. They

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>had two hundred invited guests, and those were the first

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred members, and they were like, now you all

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>go out and and make this a thing inviting your friends.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious who those two hundred people were. That's

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty interesting way to start at site like this.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I think there were a lot of tech savvy people

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>who were kind of like probably prime to take part

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>in this to begin with. And I think at first

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they were adding like fifty new users a day, wow,

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>which again that's really small and thin. Even for the time.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>This was pretty small. But they're doing this through like

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 2>email and stuff, you know, like it's it's really it's

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a weird transfer from online world to real world. It

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>straddled both because it had to. Another good example of

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that is that they would use reps to go to

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>campus to sign people up, just like that same credit

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>card model that credit card companies used to screw college kids'

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>parents out of a thousand dollars.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember I had the AMEX College card. And

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I got it I didn't even really

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>want need a credit card, but you got three Delta

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>flight vouchers who when you signed up for that card,

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so I got three plane flights.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 2>So where'd you go, I don't remember.

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I do remember, because I know I went to

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>LA for the first time to visit my brother when

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he lived there. Nice when I was in college.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Did you go visit the six or nine year old

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Cat Stevens fan?

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I did, and that was a seventy five year old woman.

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Man, this story goes all over there.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it took it quite a weird turn. But we're

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>still good friends. She's still whether she's one hundred and two.

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, yeah, that's cool. Man. Does she listen to

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the podcast or is she like.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Nah, only Cat Stevens all the time.

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 2>That would get kind of old, I think.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the end of this thing, because,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, it's not still around. Although doctor

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Claw said if you went there had a homepage, I

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>went there and I got an error.

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Gateway time out the old five oh four.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Same here, the old five oh four.

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I I but it's there. It's if it weren't

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a domain that was active, it would come back as like, hey,

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>you want to buy this domain, but it doesn't do that.

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 2>It just is so slow that you can't connect to it.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 2>But it does domain to be there. Six degrees dot

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 2>com sure.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean considering the public knowledge of just that term.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>It's like you try go to trying going out these

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>days and getting a better domain name.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't do it, You just can't.

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't feel too bad for wine Rich or Reich or

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Rick because he sold in nineteen ninety nine for one

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and one hundred and twenty five million in stock

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>options in youth Stream Media Networks. But this, you know,

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>if you know anything about Internet history, you know that

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this thing shut down in ninety nine and what that meant.

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>That dot com bubble right there on the horizon in

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand shut down more websites than you could check

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a stick out.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and actually you can feel pretty bad for a

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 2>wine Rich because he took it that one hundred and

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty five million dollars in stock and a company that

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>folded like months later because it was debt financed. So

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much he actually walked away with,

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 2>especially if there was possibly a blackout in him selling

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>those stock options.

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh so yeah, yeah, what you're saying is youth Stream

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>itself also went under.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, because they were just borrowing,

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 2>bar and borrowing, and that's how they existed, and then

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 2>when the when the dot com bubble burst, they were

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>worth nothing, and so that stock was worth nothing. I looked,

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't find how much he actually did make from

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that sale, like.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And we'll never find that out.

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 2>No, and that usually means that it's not a very

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 2>good amount. Yeah, they like to leak that stuff when

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>it's like eye popping, but when it's not, they're like, oh,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good point. The other problem was it was very

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>early in the Internet and that monetization was a real struggle.

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>They had some ads, of course, I believe their Question

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Day had an actual sponsor, but it was

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit too early, Like right after they

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fell off, Friendster came along that also failed again, but

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>then MySpace and Facebook. Just just on the heels of this.

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>He did make some other dough off of it. I

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>think the patent that he had with six degrees for

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the software for the platform he sold for seven hundred

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand real dollars to the CEO of LinkedIn and the

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO Mark Pinkus a website called Tribe and they were

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>both Friendster investors.

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and read Hoffmann and he said he and Mark

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Pinkas were like essentially fans, like they were like Winrich

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is a god here he this patent not only is

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>for the software, it's for the methodology of creating an

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 2>online social network. No when it ever come up with

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 2>something like that before. So they actually kind of bought

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 2>it for a song. I looked and LinkedIn is apparently

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>definitively not built on six degrees architecture, and it never was.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 2>But it almost seems like they were either taking it

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to learn from it or almost like they were buying

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 2>like some memorabilia. Oh, they were fans of I almost

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>got that an impression from an interview with Reid Hoffman.

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, very interesting. Andrew Weinreich went on to, do you

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of more things like this. He's kind

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of a serial entrepreneur. And again it seems like he

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was always right there before the real thing came along,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because he had something called Meet Moi as an Moi

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>frinch for me, right, Yeah, yeah, I thought so. I

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>was just making sure. But that was a location based

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 1>dating app, and it was basically this idea that like hey,

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>dating app or dating websites are really tough even at

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the time of the early Internet and like, let's at

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>least connect people who are physically close and it might

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be easier to get real dates. The dating part of

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that business was bought by the parent company Amatch dot com,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>once again just right there next to the thing, and

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he and his Memewhile co founder bought out the business

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>analytics part of their own company and use it to

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>found a data analytics company called Indicative.

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Which is still around from what I can tell.

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>And all right, so maybe he's done right there.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so this was I mean, this was very

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 2>early two thousands too, and they were like they were

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 2>using like location tracking data at the time, and that

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 2>was huge and new, and so they kept that. I

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>think they ended up either selling it or licensing to

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a company called Xtifi not a very good name. I

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 2>should call it twitter Ifi.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they had some like high profile clients. They

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>had Ritz Carlton, they had Staples, they had Sephora publisher's clearinghouse.

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So they were they were using those location apps

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 2>to advertise to you and send you push notifications on

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 2>your phone, which sadly means that Andrew Weinrich is going

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 2>to be going to hell for that.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did he create that idea.

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I wonder he gave or he sold exsify the ability

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to do that, so.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And then I bought them, right.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I'm not sure how much he made from

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 2>these buyouts. I hope a lot, because again, this guy

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 2>is like coming up with ideas and making stuff happen

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 2>long before they can become viable. And a lot of

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>people probably have gotten very rich off the back of

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 2>his ideas too. So I hope he's doing well.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if he's listening, or if someone knows him through

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>their degrees of connectivity, just get to him and have

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>him email us at Stuff podcast at iHeartMedia dot com

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and just send us your bank statement. That's right, And

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>well know.

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to specify by doing well, I don't mean

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>just financially. I mean I hope his well being is

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>sens of well being is totally nice and inflated and happy,

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know that he's he's living a good life.

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I agree. I cheapened it by making it financial.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you're the heart of the show.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's me. I'm the one you're not supposed to touch. Remember.

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, well, you know what I mean.

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, one thing that I did see that he's doing

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 2>now is a podcast called Predicting Our Future. It's about

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 2>what life is going to be like in the fairly

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>near future. It's pretty cool, fantastic, So, Chuck, I think

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>there's that's it for six degrees dot com. We got

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>forty minutes out of it.

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, not bad, lots of fun stories in between.

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and what did you just say in between? Right? Well,

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 2>then that means it's time for listener mail.

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Boy. I'm glad I always know the trigger word.

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's amazing you never fail each episode. Go me yep.

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, I'm a forty something man with autism who

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>lives on his own and the need for impression management

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>hit close home. So this was I remember about. We

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even speculated about impression management that we might hear from

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>some people with autism.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>This was a great email.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a great This is a Josh curated even I

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>simply cannot match the body language of others and have

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to fake it. I don't instinctively smile or look angry.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>People say I have an almost disturbing calm demeanor. Being

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>calm sounds great, but it has gotten me searched for

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>additional screening. At twenty airports and even strip searched at one.

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.280
<v Speaker 1>When people grill you for questioning a straight answer without

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>fear frustrates the hell out of people whose job it

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is to make you feel uncomfortable. To help mask my autism,

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I wear sunglasses to hide my eyes. Because of that,

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten the nickname terminator. A flat affect. Direct language

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help either. Discrimination is very real, guys, But I

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like to say, getting angry at a person with autism

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't adhere to societal norms, it's like getting angry

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at a person with one leg that doesn't run marathons.

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully people who listen will give people with a bit

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of a quirk some slack. Thanks from a long time

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>listener that is Matt.

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad Matt wrote that one, and that was a

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>good email, and I think he probably speaks for a

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of people in that situation.

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Totally good reminder to everybody, and something that, like we

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about on that episode, as we've gotten older, we

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of think about not just that, but

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>what everyone's going through in their life and maybe they're

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not having their best day when you meet them. You know.

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep, too true, Chuck, too true. If you want to

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 2>be like Matt and send us a world class email,

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 2>we would love that. You can send it off to

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Stuff Podcasts at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.