WEBVTT - How to Escape a Toxic Workplace (Correct)

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>What would you do if it was your first day

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>at a new job as an engineer and your manager

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>sent you a chat saying he's in an open relationship

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and would like to find new partners to have sex with.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And then what would you do if you reported him

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>immediately to HR and they did nothing about it? This

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>week we are talking about toxic work environments. This is

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>game plan. Hi. I'm Francesco Leady and I'm her back

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>of Greenfield, And the scenario I just described is not

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>actually a hypothetical. You might have heard a lot about

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Uber in the news last week. A former engineer there

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote a fairly explosive article alleging that she was pretty

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>extensively sexually harassed and that so were other women working

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at Uber, and the company really didn't do anything about

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it and even sabotaged her and other female colleagues. Yeah,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that was what was striking about it, right, that it

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was pretty institutionalized. And there was this follow up New

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>York Times article that dove into how that's the culture

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at Uber, how there's bullying and people are protected if

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they are quote unquote high performers, and how management is

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>against some employees and it's not just women. According to

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>this article, right, like, it isn't only women being sexually harassed.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>There men getting bullied as well. Yeah. One example was

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that a manager threatened to beat an underperforming employees in

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the head with a baseball bat. Um. That was one. Yeah,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really weird and scary kind of can you imagine

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that happening to No, I can't. And I think that's

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>where you cross over into what we kind of call

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a toxic workplace. It's a little bit of a buzzword,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that it's useful to think about

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what it means to work someplace that is toxic. What

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to you? So when we dine our

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sexual harassment episode, our guest said that had things will

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>happen when you get a lot of people together. So

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the very fact that there is somebody sexually harassing someone

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at work doesn't necessarily make the workplace toxic. It's the

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that at uber it seems that they don't address

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it and they may even protect these people. So that thought,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to me, is what really makes a place seem like

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>somewhere I wouldn't want to work. What about you, Francesca, Yeah,

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's exactly that that it's not just one

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>jerk or you know, one person you don't get along

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with it work. It's it's a bunch of systems that

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>really make you feel powerless. I mean, I know I've

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>worked in places, certainly not now or any time recently,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but I have at least one job that comes to

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>mind that I would I would call a pretty toxic

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>work environment. And the reason it was that way was

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>not just because I had a mean boss or I

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had a mean coworker. It was because there was a

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>manager pretty high up who I would describe as a bully,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think that his management style trickled down to

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the managers below him and the managers below them, and

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it really felt like there was nothing you could do.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>There was no way you could get justice, so to speak,

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for the way that you were being treated at the job,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you were going to stick around, you had

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of come up with coping strategies, Like it

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was all about just how to get out of bed

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>every morning and go into work and know that something

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you felt really unfair was going to happen to you

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that day. That kind of brings me to my question

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about this, which is how people get stuck in these

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs and why they stay and then what finally gets

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>them to leave? Yeah, the obvious answer would be money,

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it's hard to leave jobs and you can't really

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>leave if you depend on the paycheck. But it's it's

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more nuanced than that, right. Yeah. I wrote a story

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about why people stay in jobs they hate, which wrote

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>up some research that found often these people who didn't

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>link our jobs for one reason or another, stayed because

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they were being overpaid basically at their current jobs. And

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>why would you leave? But that cannot be the case

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for all these stories we're hearing. I mean Susan Fowler,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, as an engineer and uber. She got a

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>job me or weeks later, but it took her an

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>entire year. Right You hear all about the talent shortage

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley. There's really it's not that hard for

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>an engineer to find something new if they if they

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>want to switch jobs. And there are toxic work environments

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and other high paying fields right here. These stories from

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of workers, not just people, are stuck in

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>their positions. Right, So there's a lot of coping that

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>happens in mental thought processes that I think get You

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>may be stuck in these environments for longer than you

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>would like to be, and it's a perfect time to

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>introduce our guest, who herself worked in a toxic work

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>environment many years ago. Our guest today is Maureen Sherry,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>whose book Opening Bell is a fictionalized account of her

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>time as the youngest female managing director at Bear Stearns.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Opening Bell is soon to be a movie starring Reese Witherspoon,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're very happy to have Maureen with us. Welcome, Maria,

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I'm happy to be here. Maybe you can

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>start by telling us a little bit about what the

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>culture was like at Barristerns in the late nineties early two. Yeah.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So the culture of Bear and I think some other

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>investment banks on Wall Street, particularly on the trading floor

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>where I worked, was very much a meritocracy in the

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>way that you could whatever you There's this terrible expression

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>eat what you kill, but you were on commission and

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>people were quite motivated to really be successful by bringing

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the most commissions or doing the most deal or that

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. And so as an outlier that you

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>had this incredibly competitive environment that was probably nine it

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>was male professionals, and so women were far outnumbered, and

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine, it was a very very loose

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from a behavior standpoint. And uh, if you remember, the

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>economy at that time had gone through a a blip

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and had really recovered nicely. So there was a lot

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of energy, there's a lot of money being made, and

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty wild time. Can you give us

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some specific examples of that wild time? So I think

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that as women were coming more into their own on

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street at that time, there was a feeling that

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>almost a question of of place. Where they really hadn't

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>been large breadwinners, they now were in some situations, and

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think for some, especially more senior men, it

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>felt it was a little disconcerting. They felt a little bit,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>uh that there was a power play. There was a

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, a way that men asserted themselves in their

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>role of being more powerful. And one of the ways

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they did that was through a lot of fraternal jokes,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of juvenile behavior stuff that we've yeah, you've

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about people moving at you. Yeah, that's right. So

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the more awful examples was I had at

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the time just had my first child, and I was

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>expressing breast milk, and so it is as you know,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a very familial environment, very much like a newsroom where

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>people sit quite close to one another. Nobody really has

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>office stores that they closed. So I did keep a

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>pump under my desk. I would have to go to

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We had a barber shop at bear Stearns, and I

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>would go in there to express breast milk. And when

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I would get up and pull the bag out, sometimes traders,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing me leaving the desk would move and you know,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you would blush and it was funny, and and yet

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>part of you felt very sad about it. It seems

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like these incidents can add up like that wasn't the

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>only thing that happened right, right, And you have to

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>remember that part of it is acceptance. Like I don't

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think these were necessarily bad men who were trying to

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like objectify me in any way. I think it was

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we worked very closely together. They thought it was funny.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes men performed for other men in a very fraternal

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and as I know, some people call it now the

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>broke culture of Wall Street. And so that's the environment

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I worked in, and so I think this was part

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. Was the environment toxic for men in ways? Also,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say not because they had been the establishment

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for for quite a while. I wouldn't say toxic. I

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>do think that the women who were coming in and

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>women that I recruited to join the firm, who were

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>younger than me, had a much stronger sense of of

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>right and wrong behavior. And so one thing that was

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of great frustration to me was so many of them

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>would leave. They would last about two years, sometimes three,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and then just say, you know, I I can make

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a living in a different way. I don't like the

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>culture here. And so so one thing that myself and

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the other professional women did is we formed

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this group and we didn't want to, you know, make

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>class action status or or or sue or do anything

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. What we wanted to do is change the

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>culture of the place we worked. And so we called jokingly,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>we called ourselves the Glass Ceiling Club, and the Glass

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Ceiling Club just aimed to call men on behavior that

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we thought was unacceptable and that we thought other women

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was causing other women to leave. For ourselves,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we felt like we had been there for so long

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that we almost had accepted it, or felt we had

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a thick skin. But I really felt like with younger

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>women that was no longer going to to work anymore.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Why did you decide to stay and spend some time

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to change the culture rather than just finding another opportunity.

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what I think it's interesting about that question

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is when you're in it, I didn't say to myself

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>every day, Oh, I should really leave this is this

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is abusive. I felt a little beaten up sometimes by

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this constant drum of call it sexism if you will,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But I stayed for so long because it starts to

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>feel familiar. Like a lot of people who are in

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>even a bad relationship, it feels familiar, it feels comfortable.

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's financial security, and so I think that had

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with it. To some of us,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this can sound like a time a long time ago,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and things have changed. And you even said younger workers

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have different reactions to this. But you've been interviewing traders

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>working on floors now as part of research for your movie.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Are these things still happening? So yeah, it's been very

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting to go around with the screenwriter and to go

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to a trading floor, and we really targeted women who

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are really on the professional track doing great, and to

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>talk to them incredibly frankly, and they're mostly women who

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>have been referred to us by other women because there's

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this, oh you should hear what happened

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to her, But they they share stories sometimes, but nobody

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really wants to be the one who is raising her

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hand and saying, you know, we need to do something

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about this. But for us, because it is sort of, um,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of this little safe environment to speak with,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten a lot of really good feedback and so

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>so things have changed as far as the overt, uh

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>really overt awful stuff that would happen on a trading floor.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We think partly that's because stuff is far more documentable now. Right,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody has a camera phone, We have messages and emails

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and things like that that are evidence based. And so

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what's different now is that they would say it has

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>gone to be a more covert sexism. So, for instance,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one woman gave us the example where she had had

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>she has a young child, she returned to work. Another

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>woman had a child and decided to be home with

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>her family, and so at her going away party, their

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>mutual boss stood up and said, I'll call her Jane.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know, let's all raise a toast to Jane,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>she's going home to be with her baby. She's doing

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the right thing, and everyone had to toast to that. Well,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine how this makes this woman who's not

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>home with her child all day feel. It's stuff like that.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>We had really countless examples, and so to keep this

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>story current in the movie, we're trying to use examples

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more like that. Do you have advice or thoughts for

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>how women can deal with that more more covert version.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>One thing that has struck me with the numerous cases

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>not just on Wall Street, but we've seen this now

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the news area. Obviously we're talking about it now

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and with uber women not speaking to one another, is

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that something that nobody has really explained to me very well.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And so one very senior woman said to me that

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>she felt she was so kind of honored to have

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>been chosen to become a partner at an investment bank.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>There are so few seats at the table for women.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>She felt really grateful to be there for her to

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>start raising her hand and and kind of like kivetzing

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>with other women and sharing stories with other women didn't

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really seem like a good career move. And so that

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is one thing that I felt, if women can break

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that habit and and look out for each other more,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but even more importantly to have men look out for

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>women in that way. So, for instance, we talk a

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>lot about mentorship, and often it's a senior women being

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>assigned essentially a younger women who she's supposed to to

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bring in and to to help her with career advice

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. And the women I spoke to

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>generally didn't like that relationship, only because sometimes it works

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>out and it's terrific, sometimes it feels very artificial. I

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think that I would say to younger women, speaking to

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other women is great. Finding organic relationships is great. I

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>also think when you do that, if there is some

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sexism or or I al would say non promotion from men,

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a male mentor or a good friend who

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>can look out for you, I think that helps immeasurably too.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>So I talked a bit about why people's day and

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>why you've stayed and partly, yeah, it's because you've built

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this great career and you've invested so much time and

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing. How did you eventually get out? Well? I

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't leave because there had been any one big event.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt beaten down because I had I have a number,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I have four children, and so after each maternity leave,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I would return to a lesser job. I think partly

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that was because I worked with men who, in general

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they were large income earners, their wives didn't need to work,

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so it felt to them a little strange to work

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>alongside a working mother. That wasn't that common back then,

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and I still think it's It's a much smaller percentage

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the in the higher ends of Wall Street than

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>than you can imagine. So when I did leave, it

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was a feeling. Yes, I felt beaten down a bit

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>by my job. I had felt that when I came back,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>my accounts that I covered rare, always fewer of them,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would often get them back, but it was

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of uphill work again, and so I

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>felt worn out when I left. What was really interesting

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is I went to our human resource department because you

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have this mandatory exit interview, and I wanted to be

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really honest because I felt like despite many meetings and

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to defend some women who had signed you fours

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and had left in the kind of in the dark

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of night, and it had gotten uh, gotten nice checks

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for their for their silence. I didn't want to do

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. So when I sat down, there was

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this lovely offer for me to sign a piece of

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>paper that was a nondisclosure agreement, and I had this

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>very expensive statement that I said where I said, I

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>said to her, well, how would my signing this help

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>any women? Her coming behind me, and so it's sort

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of she sort of, you know, had her tongue for

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And then I said, and what exactly

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is this money for? And again she really didn't have

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>an answer for me, and so I left, and I

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't leave with this intention to go and write a

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>book about it. But as years went by and I

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>saw these occasional class action suits come to fruition, and

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw enormous settlements, you know, Morgan Stanley, a smaller

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>one of Goldman Sachs City Group at JP Morgan. When

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you see these happening at so many places and you

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>never hear the details because all the women are essentially

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>handed checks for their silence, I kept saying to myself,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever will make this change, And for me, the change

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was something I could I could do because I had

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>not signed anything, and b I could novelize it. My

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>intention was never to get certain people in trouble or

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>name names. It was just to describe a culture that

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>previous I felt to this book had never really been described.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Just give us a little bit more detail about that system.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is the you for and what is

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in nondisclosure agreement? And how do they keep us from

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>learning more about how common these stories can be? So

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just a Wall Street phenomenous uh. And in

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>several industries, on your first day of work, when you

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>sit down and most people don't read the fine the

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fine print because they're so excited to have a job.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It says that if you ever have an issue with

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this firm, you will settle it in house. You'll come

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to human resources, you'll describe what's bothering you. They will

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>either verify it or not verify it. And that's the

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>U for. That's right, that's the U four. And it's

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>an arbitration agreement. You will arbitrate and have this settled

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in house. And so everybody signs it. And when you do,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you've given up your essentially your your civil rights to

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a day in court. Some people get out of that

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>by forming class action when they have so many people

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on board that they're able to present as a group.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>But even with that, we we have never seen that

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>come to a court where people testified. I'm wondering, since

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about uber, when you read that, what

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was your reaction? So I so my reaction was not

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one of great surprise. My reaction was here she has.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I felt Susan Fowler had a tremendous amount of evidence,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>right she had. I guess I can't remember if their

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>emails or text messages from her superior basically propositioning her

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>very blatantly, and so to me to present that to

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a human resources department, that's a it's just a very

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>open and shut case. But when I read how long

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it went on for because he was a large income

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>earner and and a great employee as far as bringing money,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>did it surprise me? It didn't surprise me. No. Well, yeah,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that it's just really interesting how

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you hear these stories yours and Susan Fowler's, and they

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>sound really shocking, But the truth is that there may

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>be many, many more of these stories out there. I

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to add, you know, I had written an

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>op ed about it, and one thing that really shocked

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>me were the amount of else I got, not from

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>women in Wall Street or banking, from so many industries.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It was women in research, women in education, women in science,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and it went on and on, and so it made

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it made me feel emboldened to to talk about this more,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because it is obviously not just isolated to industries where

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you do sign a you for, but many others where

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>women feel I think sort of they just have somehow

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>gotten themselves used to putting up with this coersive behavior

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that that to hang on to their jobs and of

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>course financial stability, and maybe that's another reason why women

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and people get stuck in these work environments. Where else

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do you go if it's happening at so many places

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and in so many industries. Yeah, likes you feel that way,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I've I felt that way, and the and the again,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the feedback made us, myself and the screenwriter, we were

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of marveling about the broad brush of of industry

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US and and how prevalent it is, and

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe women just feel that this is part

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the cost of money. Well, thank you so much

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for talking to us, thank you, thanks for having me

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so Marian tried to change that culture from within, and

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>clearly that did not work and sounded very exhausting. So

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>then her other option was to leave the field completely

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and use the platform that she has now, which seems

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to be working a little better. Right. It seems like

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if you if you actually want to change a toxic

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>workplace culture and not just leave it, those are your

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>two options. You can stay there and try to make

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>things better from within, or you can leave and make

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it really public what happened to you. But as Maureen described,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that carries its own penalties, and if you want to

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>stay in your industry, you might be really reluctant to

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>do that and burn bridges. But it also seems like

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the more effective strategy. Like even at Uber, in

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the wake of these two, you know, really high profile articles,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the company and now it was going to do an

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>independent investigation and bring in former Attorney General Eric Holder

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and Arianna Huffington and all these other people to figure

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>out what had happened there and take it really seriously.

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And I can't imagine that happening if all the stuff

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>hadn't come to light. Oh, no way, no way. And

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little unfair to make the victims do all

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the work if you're going to stay within the culture

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and try to change things, like that's just unfair that

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not only are you being bullied at work, but it's

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>on you to fix it. It's kind of nice to

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>see Uber getting aggressive and kind of on the defense

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. And even if it's under these unfortunate circumstances,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is how things are going to change, right, Like,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>companies really aren't going to have that much pressure to

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>change if every time somebody leaves a toxic workplace they

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>do it kind of quietly and they have to sign

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 1>an NBA or do the you for arbituation and she

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was talking about, right, or even if you don't have

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to do those things, and you just don't want to

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>ruffle feathers, you don't want to leave on a bad

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.239
<v Speaker 1>note because you might have to work with somebody at

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that company sometime again in the future. Sure, I mean,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I certainly know of plenty of people who have left

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>jobs because they hated working there, but the reason they

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>said they left was because they got a better job

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or they wanted to spend more time with their family. Yeah,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you rescue reputation. And Susan tweeted that she thought people

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do oppositional research on her and smear her. Geez,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's already it's already affecting her. I mean, she

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>has another job. Hopefully her reputation won't be ruined because

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>she decided to speak up. But it's a risk, right,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and then anybody that hires you down the line may

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or may not take that into consideration, the fact that

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you were a troublemaker your last jobble rouser. I just

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to say, rabble rouser. Yeah, you got that

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in cossion. Well, let's hope that some of that rabble

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>rousing actually forces companies to do better in the future.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, I think it's time for half

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>fake takes, happy faith takes. Becca. What is your idea

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this week that you haven't fully thought through but you

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about anyway, I would like there to

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>be more sizes of drinks available when I go out. Interesting.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So the other day I was telling a story to

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our producers and saying that I had two

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half glasses of alcohol, and he was like,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how could you have half a glass of alcohol? Well?

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want the full serving size, but in this society,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we are forced to order one glass of wine. There's

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>no like half glass or like I want more variation

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the sizes of drinks I can have so that

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to waste them or like guzzle something

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want. That's that does seem to be true

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for wine, there's a certain pore for what like for

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for hard liquor, you can get a shot or two shots. Yeah,

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but you get like a double could and for that's

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of what I want. I want all our variations.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I want like half a beer sometimes. And this isn't

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>me being like, oh, I just don't drink that much. No,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, I want to moderate in smaller doses.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You know some places, and I think this is more

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>common in Europe that so omoous. I do think it's

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>work common in Europe, though that some places will do

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a half point and that is a great amount of beer.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a perfect amount of beers point. But you can't

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>most bars here in New York. You can't walk in

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and ask for a half point. No, so I'm forced

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to be someone who doesn't finish their drinks, and I

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of crap for it, or I have

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to be someone who wants to do something I don't

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>want to do. I choose to be a waster. That

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds that sounds rough. Yeah, that's my happig. Take more

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>variation and drink sizes. What is yours? Okay? My half

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>big take is about how great cubicles are. So, cubicles

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>are like this symbol, like they became. They became the

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>symbol of workplace drudgery. You sit in your cubicle and

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you just like you don't even get a real office.

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have the dignity of being in a room.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You're in like a fake play room. But honestly, it's

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>been years since I've had a cubicle. We've were I

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>work in an open plan office, as do you, and

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I have for years, and I would give anything to

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be back in that cubicle. There was so much more privacy.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I miss it. I missed my cubicle. That's my happy take.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>That is really controversial. Um. The thing about cubicles, it's

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like you feel like an animal. I guess now you're

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>at a trough where you're in a pen. Okay, you're

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>at a trough. So I have to be clear about

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>something because there are different kinds of cubicles. I'm talking

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>about the kind of cubicle that has high walls, so

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like an office. Like I worked at

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>this place where I had a cubicle. It had a

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little opening that was almost like a door. You could

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pin little pictures up inside and personalize it. You. You

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of got some privacy. And I would be over

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the moon to work in a cubicle like that again,

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>because right now we just basically work in a giant

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>bullpen with open desks and there's not even really enough

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>height on the walls that separate our desks or the

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>divider's it's it's they're not well to put a picture of,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a loved one or your dog or whatever. Wow,

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>standing up for cubicles. Cubicles, bring back the cubicle, I say.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And this has been half big takes, half baked takes.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to game Plan. You can find me

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at at Francesca today and I'm at rs Greenfield.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you have your own half big takes or

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just feel like tweeting at us, tweet them at game Plan.

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also call our hotline at two and two

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>six one seven zero one six six. If you like

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, please go to iTunes or wherever you get

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>your podcast and subscribe. And if you write us a review,

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we will send you a cake. We won't actually send

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you a cake, but please write us reviews. We really

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate every single one. This show was produced by Liz

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Magnus Hendrickson. The Head of Podcasts is Alec

0:26:42.960 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>McCabe and we'll see you next week. See you, and

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you can also call our hotline at two and two

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>six one seven. I don't know the rest of the numbers.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like, did she have it ready? One s

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>six