WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Nicknames

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the short Stuff. I'm Josh, there's Chuck,

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>there's Josh, and this is short stuff. Like I said,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your nickname is Josh, which is short for Joshua, and

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. It does almost boringly. So your nickname

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is Chuck, which is short for Chuck. Now it's short

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for Charles. Yeah. That's what kind of got me onto this.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I realized I sort of never knew how Chuck came

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from Charles. And there are a lot of examples of

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>names that, uh, we're going to go through right now

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't quite make sense, and there are some interesting

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and murky stories behind a lot of these. Well let's

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>start with yours. Look, Chuck, I always thought Chuck was

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>short for Chuck Chuck bo Buck, but it's not. It's

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's short for Charles. But it doesn't really make sense.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is the ch that that you know,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, okay, there's so see it in that way.

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>That's about it, though, But it turns out that the

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>story behind how Chuck got associated with Charles is one

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of the most fascinating, convoluted stories that anyone's ever come

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>up with, And unlike most nicknames for English language names. Um.

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It does not come from England or even from the

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>UK or Europe. Comes from America, specifically the Lower East

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Side of New York, in Chinatown, where there was a

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>guy named Um George Washington O'Connor who came to be

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>known as the first Chuck, Chuck O'Connor, org just Chuck Connors, Yeah,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and not the Chuck Connors, the actor of the Yeah,

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a little confusing, but this is a gangster. He

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Chinatown, and this is how the story goes.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we weren't there. Um hung out in Chinatown

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot by growing up there obviously, and became known

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as a mayor of Chinatown. And he says that he

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>got the name Chuck because he loved Chuck Steak, and

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone else said that's not true. Man. Yeah, I mean

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's the guy he should know, but

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>other people appointed to the eighteen fifty census in the

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>US where if you look at those names and you

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pick out the Chucks or the variations of Chuck, they

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>were Chinese. He's in Chinatown, variations of Chuck in Chinatown.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>And so basically when he dies, they misprint his name

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as Charles. He never wants Charles. No, it was George.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So it was just basically a big mistake. I'm a

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>big mistake. Well, your nickname is, that's all. Yeah, not

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad one. Not about another. How about um hank

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Hank is short for Harry or Henry. Right. Weird, but

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>this one makes more sense. It does. It's actually pretty straightforward.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Um Hank h gyng k is actually the Dutch name

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for Henry, right. And so back in the century again

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>around New York with all the Dutch settlers, they would

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have called somebody whose name was Henry Hank h g

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>n k, which eventually became Hank. Pretty boring until you

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>realize that the original nickname for Henry wasn't Hank, but

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>among English speakers it was Harry, so much so that

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry, his real name, is actually Prince Henry, which

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea until today yesterday, same here. Uh.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>This one is super interesting because I've often pondered how

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>does a Richard become a dick? And this one is.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>This one kind of goes back to medieval times when

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>basically there were kind of like four names. You were John, William,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Robert or Richard um and then there was always like

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, says over in the corner, but it was

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>basically those four names more or less, and so it

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>got really confusing, and so nicknames became really popular, so

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you could sort out your Richard's and your Robert's and

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>your John's and your Williams. Yeah, because not only did

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they all have the same first name, people didn't have

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>last names by that time. Yet. It's just so confusing

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>back then, it really was. So people started coming up

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with rhyming names where the first letter would be different, right.

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You had to make sure you were killing the right

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>guy right, exactly right. So Richard has always had the

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>shortened form of rick basically, but because you might know

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>seven ricks, you might also call one of them hick

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or dick. Because rhyming names and switching letters with an

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>H or a D was very very popular back when

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>people had absolutely nothing to do but farm and then die,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so they would come up with with stuff like this.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So the original nickname for Richard was hick Um at first,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand. Yeah, the same for Robert. Robert

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Bob at first, it was Dobb or hobb, and

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>then Bob came along much later. For the same reason. Yeah,

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>and actually you can see this. There are people walking

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>around with the last names of Hobson or Dobson. That

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>would be the son of a Bob or Robert who

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is nicknamed Hobbard dobb by the people again who had

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with their time. All right, this is

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>getting really confusing, So we're going to take a quick

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>break and come back and talk about Williams and Margaret's

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and Sarah's and Ann's and John's right for this, Okay, Chuck,

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>William to Bill seems pretty straightforward. Will Bill at rhymes,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but apparently that's not the story behind it. If you

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>go into the Irish Gaelic dialect, which is probably a

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>form of Celtic, if you'll remember from the Druid episode,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if you um look at the letter W, you would

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>typically want to say W, but now it actually makes

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a buzz sound. And so when William the Conqueror headed

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>into Ireland in the late seventeenth century UM, he was

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not very well liked, and so the local people who

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>spoke Irish Gaelic saw that William and called him Billy

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of Willie. They called him Billy King. Billy was

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the first Bill and that's how Bill became the nickname

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for William. But how does the Bill become a law uh?

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>On Capitol Hill? It just hangs around. Uh, ladies, we

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't forgotten about you. Uh. Mark Peggy is a nickname

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for Margaret. Which this is where things get really interesting

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>with the rhymes. Yeah, if you weren't interested before, prepared

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to be finally in this episode, because apparently in the

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundreds, in the sixteenth century, there was another fad

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for rhyming M names with P names. So the this

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is how it goes timeline wise. Margaret becomes Marge, that

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes mag or mag I guess um, that becomes meg

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Eventually that becomes Meggie perhaps, and then that becomes Meggy yep,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Maggie Peggy. And they say that that's the lineage or

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not the lineage. But you know what's the word I'm

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for? The uh, well, the lineage. I think that works.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The etymology, the evolution, Yeah, the evolution. There you go

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that thing. Here's another one from Margaret. So did you

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>know that Daisy is a nickname for Margaret? I had

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>never heard that. I hadn't either, which makes zero sense

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>until you start speaking French and you find out that

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>um marguerite is the word for the flower daisy. And

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so some English speakers, who we're pretty full of themselves, said,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start calling Margaret's daisies. Okay, I buy that,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Martha would turn into math or moth um.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Eventually that would become Maddie, and then Patty and then Patsy.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So Patsy is apparently still a nickname for Martha. Did

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not know that one. I did not know that either.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So my favorite of all is and to Nancy. Yeah,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I like this one too. Actually, so instead of like

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>calling saying something was my m y, people would say mine,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and they would speak affectionately of people or I guess

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>possessively of people by saying like mine an right, And

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>then because people don't like to expend a lot of energy,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that got shortened to Nan my Nan Nan Right. Then

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Nan got kind of changed and dalled up to Nanny

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and then Nancy and then finally Nancy. So Nancy is

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a nickname for Ann. And the same thing also applies

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to like ned nelly um any any English name that

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>begins with a vowel um could be changed from mine

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ed to ned pretty easily. There's one apparently ascribed to

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>baby talk or attributed to I guess I should say

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Sarah um. Apparently some kids have problems pronouncing the little

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the letter R, it will sound like an L. So

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah somehow makes the leap to Sally because of kids.

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess have you Have you ever heard Sally is

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a nickname for Sarah? No? I always thought Sally was

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>just that was just the name you were born with,

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was short for salsa. You know, my

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>daughter started making up nicknames for ghost friends, which I

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guess her imaginary friends. Uh. And it's funny to see

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>her just come up with these names because one of

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>them is salsa. Oh really, that's awesome. Yeah, there's uh

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>o C, salsa, fossil um andy, see saw and see you.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>She loves the sibilants. Huh yeah. I mean it's it's

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>all sort of you know, it's it's uh, she's working

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it out. You're like, it's all in good fun. It is.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>But now, like I reference salsa or fossil or o

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>C and she's like, yeah, they're right over there, And

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>then I laugh. But part of me goes is my

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>house haunted? Right as long as they're not telling her

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to burn things. I think you're okay. My my oldest

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>sister had imaginary friends and they were named Bobby Teak

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and Peak. Bobby Teak and Peak. Was it Bobby Teaka

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is one name or there were three people? There were

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>three people, so there must be something to that alliteration,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think, so, all right, let's finish up with

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>John and Jack being a nickname for John, because I

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>always when I first heard that, I think it was

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in the presidential debates when uh, who was it that

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>said you're no Jack Kennedy Lloyd Benson. Yeah, I remember

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing that and being like, who the heck is Jack Kennedy?

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he met John and uh, then I found

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>out it was a nickname, and I never I never

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>quite got that until yesterday. Yeah, which is weird because

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>nicknames are usually shortened names. This is just two four

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>letter names and John and Jack. But yeah, Jack is

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a is a nickname for John and they There's a

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of theories. One is an easy one that it

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the Norman invasion where the French would

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have brought the name Jacques over and that's that People

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>were like, oh, Jacques Jack, you know, makes sense. The

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>problem is is that Jacques is the French name for James,

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not John, so there's a little bit of a hole

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in that one. The other is again in medieval England, um,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you would add ki n Ken as a suffix.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So William was Wilkin, Peter was Perkin, which is how

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you get things like again wilkins son or perkins um.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And apparently John became Jenkin, and Jenkin was shortened to Jink,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which became Jack. I think really this just demonstrates no

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>one knows where Jack came from. I think. So. So

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Hopefully your name was in there. If

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't, you can make up your own nickname. It's cool. Um,

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and let us know what it is. Find

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>us somewhere on social or via email who knows. But

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>we leave it up to you to determine which route

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to take. In the meantime, we're out of here with

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>our short stuff. Stuff you should know is production of

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts for my

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.