WEBVTT - How the US Dollar Became an International Weapon of War

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, you know something that has always struck me about

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, the financial system, I guess, is that

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from the US perspective, it feels like any time anyone

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>spends any money anywhere, particularly dollars anywhere, like the US

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>could sort of go after them, even if it's overseas

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>completely out of the country. It feels like the US

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>basically has the prerogative to say, you're breaking the law.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So what you're doing something we're not going to allow.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>This is what exorbitant privilege looks like.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, this is it. I guess that's it.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you're hitting on something that's kind of

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>fundamental about the current financial system, which is the dollar

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>is the global reserve currency, and there are some pros

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and benefits that come with that. One of them is

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 2>that you can use it as a tool of state craft,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>so you can go after people that you don't like

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>or people that are breaking the law. But there is

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>also this tension on the other side where it seems

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>like there are some downsides too, right, like maybe at

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>certain times the US would desire a weaker dollar in

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 2>order to jumpstart economic growth or certain exports, manufacturing, things

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>like that. I think on the whole, most people would

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>agree that the dollar's special status in the financial system

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>has been a massive benefit for the US, viz. The

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 2>huge deficit and people willingly funding that and things like that.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.919
<v Speaker 2>But there are downsides, and that debate kind of bursts

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>into the public consciousness every once in a while.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one thing, obviously since early twenty twenty two, when

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia invaded Ukraine, that sort of seems to have you know,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>then the US responded with an extraordinary amount of sanctions

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and cutting off Russia from the dollar base system almost

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>every way imaginable. It's sort of like, you know, maybe

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>catalyzed the new round of talk of, okay or parts.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Of the world power of the dollar, the.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Power of the dollar, exactly right. And I think that

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a pivotal moment. I don't know if

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it will be a pivotal moment for the future of

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, but at least it was a pivotal moment

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>at least in this current cycle of people talking about

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar alternatives.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting you bring that up because you're

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>absolutely right. It feels like that was the catalyst for

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the current round of discussion about the power of the

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>dollar and the future of the dollar in the financial system.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But thinking back to some all blots history, when I

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>think about that question of the US maybe overreaching or

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>using the dollar in this particular way, in the way

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>they used it for Russia, I think about the conversation

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>we had with the former head of Afghanistan Central Bank.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember that, Yeah, because there was I think

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 2>like seven or eight or nine billion dollars worth of

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>reserves held by the Afghan Central Bank, and when the

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Taliban took over, the US basically seized all of it.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 2>They put some of it aside for nine to eleven litigation,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>and then some of it got put into a fund

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that was supposed to be dispersed to the Afghan people

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in some way. But that to me, and maybe we

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>touched on it in the episode, but that to me

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was sort of the crossing the rubicon moment when you

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>can actually say I'm going to take these central bank reserves.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>You know what.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It sort of gets to this idea in my head,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a great example, which is that

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a dollar is not really a thing that you have

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to claim to capacity on this global, complicated dollar network, right,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and so we think maybe it's like, oh money, it's

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you have it. It's sort of like property, but it's

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not like really like property. It's really just it's almost

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's almost like a ticket in some way to

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>like a plane, but if the plane doesn't want to

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>honor your ticket, if the airline like it can and

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so it almost feels like there's sort of a reminder

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that yes, you could theoretically hold dollars, but in the end,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like the US could sort of decide like, actually, your

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars are no good here anymore.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's conditions attached to that ticket or that it's

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>not an actual piece of paper, but that line item

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 2>in a computer system somewhere.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's really interesting, like what is

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the history of all of this, What are the limits

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to this power? How did we sort of emerge with

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>this capability to sort of track the dollar flows and

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>decide who gets access and how do we cut people

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>off from the dollar system? It's extremely extremely interesting question.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's definitely core Audlot's content at this point.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So in addition to speaking to the former head of

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Afghan Central Bank. We've had Sultan Poso Yeah, on a

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>number of times to talk about his vision of dedollarization

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and Bretton Wood's three. We've had Perry Marling debate Sultan

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about this particular issue. And I'm happy to

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 2>say that today we have one of our own Bloomberg

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>colleagues to talk about this.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We literally have the perfect guest. We are going to

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with senior Washington correspondent for Bloomberg News, Salia Mosen.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>She is the author of a brand new book, paper Soldiers,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>How the Weaponization of the Dollar changed the World order. Seleia,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on odd Laws.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm so excited to be here.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe and Tracy, why did you write this book? What

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>prompted this book about the weaponization of the dollar.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a crazy thing. It might have been January sixth,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the insurrection. I don't know. It's hard for me to

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>put a pinpoint where, you know, for a journalist, it's

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>a natural course to say, oh, well, maybe I'll write

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a book. But something happened that day. A lot of emotions.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's set most of them aside and just talk about

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the Treasury Department and the dollar on January sixth, and

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>in the couple of days that followed, we all saw

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>reports and I reported on how then Treasure Secretary Stephen

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Mnushan may or may not have been involved in talks

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 3>about the twenty fifth Amendment, and do we need to

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 3>sideline President Donald Trump? And I thought to myself, Wow,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the Treasure Secretary's job has just gotten so huge. You know,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago, he was in Congress trying

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to get another spending bill through. A couple of days

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>after that, he was in the Middle East pitching our

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 3>international economic policy and economic sanctions programs and other elements

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 3>of geopolitics. And here we are now he might be

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>involved in removing the president. That combined with a op

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>ed that Bob Rubin wrote right after January sixth, And

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 3>he wrote an op ed. It was about a couple

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>of different things, but there was one sentence that I

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>think it kind of sums up the kind of reporting

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>that I've done for many years now, and it sums

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>up why I wrote the book. He said in this column,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>faith in democracy and faith in markets go hand in hand.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And I just thought, oh my gosh, the dollar is

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>part of our democracy. Democracy is part of our dollar,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's kind of what started everything for me in

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>my brain.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad he brought up Trump here because this

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>came up on an episode relatively recently. Actually, I think

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump is kind of, for once a very good prism,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a very clear prism to view some of the debate

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>around the dollar, because he sort of instinctually understands that

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>a strong dollar might be in the US interest. It

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>sounds good to be able to say, like, we have

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the world's reserve currency, and the dollar is great, et cetera.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, there were times during his

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>administration where he would talk about the desire for a

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>weaker dollar and we need a weeker dollar in order

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to boost manufacturing, get more jobs back to the country,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. In your reporting, was it ever clear to

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you like which side he landed on, or even broadening

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it out. The US Treasury kind of has a long

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and complex history when it comes to expressing its desire

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>for the green back, whether it wants a strong one

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>or not.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And that's what Paper Soldiers is all about. It's

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>all about the complexities of Treasury secretaries and any other

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>fed or White House or congressional official talking about the

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>dollar and how sensitive each in every syllable can be.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, if we talk about Bob Ruba and how

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>many words he used to describe his view on the dollar,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>what order those words were in currency traders in the

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>nineties used to listen to everything to determine how to

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 3>make their trades. Now, on the question of Donald Trump

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>in you know, from twenty seventeen through twenty twenty into

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one, you know, as usual, he's a mercurial person,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>lots of gray areas. He definitely saw the benefits of saying, yes,

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>we have a strong dollar policy, we have a strong

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>dollar because it reflects a strong economy. But he was

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the first politician who in any real way realized that

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>a strong dollar and that policy from the nineties and

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 3>that had persisted, was hurting certain parts of the country.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And we're talking about the forgotten man in you know,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 3>like the manufacturing sector, the roust belt of the country.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And I in book I take you into Weir in

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 3>West Virginia, into Marine Ohio and what happened to those

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>factory workers in the manufacturing sector. As globalization, which is

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>underpinned by a strong dollar policy sort of overtook everything

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>and people kind of forgot about the economic scarring that

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 3>happened as the manufacturing sector in the US kind of disappeared.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So he kind of looks at it both way. But actually,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>earlier in March, Trump was on as a presidential hopeful

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 3>again on CNBC talking about how he thinks it's dangerous

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 3>that people are talking about de dollarization. He is wading

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>into the d dollarization to debate, and we've all learned

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 3>that he puts action behind those kinds of words.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's two things, and they're sort of related, but

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're also sort of separate. So there is the strong

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar in the sense of the price of the dollar

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>against our trading partners or the price of the dollar

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>again and the end and the euro and all that.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And then there is the sort of strong dollar, which

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>is it is the currency that everybody for the most

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>part uses globally to settle trade. And you know, and

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this sort of gets to the incredible power that the

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>US has over this network, Like just high level, what

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is the limits of what the US can do to

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the dollar network, to the various like banks, et cetera,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and messaging services where dollars and goods are traded, like

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what is this sort of what is the perimeter of

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>America's ability to I guess police transactions.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>In the dot.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a debate that's raging in political and economic circles

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 3>in Washington and I think in pretty much every capital

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 3>around the world, because the US is actually figuring out

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>what that perimeter is, where that boundary is. There's been

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a couple of moments where the US has real ooh,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I touched it and it was too hot. So there

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 3>was in twenty eighteen when Steven Mnusian's Treasury department sanctioned

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 3>olag Derpaska, a Russian oligarch who owned a majority stake

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 3>of Russol at the time, like one of the largest

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>aluminum makers in the world, and Treasury in the US

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>found out kind of the hard way that maybe we

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 3>overdid it or didn't look into these sanctions deeply enough,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 3>because we had a lot of blowback from them. You know,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 3>there was a lot of self inflicted wounds there because

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 3>commodity prices swung twenty percent on each headline about those sanctions.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Any kind of change in the date that they would

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 3>be implemented, or what kind of carve outs were coming.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Markets swung, And that's not actually a goal of OPAC,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 3>which sort of oversees the Treasure Department's sanctions implementation. The

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Office of Foreign Assets Control. They want to move a

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit, a little bit more softly without triggering this

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>much turmoil. And what we saw was, you know, a

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>little manufacturing plant in Ireland that is realizing that, well,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 3>sanctions might completely muck up our cash flow, so we

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 3>might be forced to shut down our smelter. Okay, that

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>smelter runs at two eight hundred degrees fahrenheit. It costs

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money to shut it down. If it

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 3>should take days or maybe a couple of weeks to

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>actually physically shut it down, but if they run out

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 3>of money, they have to shut it down quickly. That

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 3>means there's going to be all these toxins polluting the

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>air and the water supply. But sanctions are going to

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>trigger that closure. Treasury did not think it through. That

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>was one example of the Treasure Department learning boundaries. And

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the other one is the one that Joe Trees you

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>guys just mentioned the big sanctions in February twenty twenty two,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 3>with you know, cutting Russia off from the dollar.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>So you go into detail on this in your book,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, I love that example of the

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>smelter and sort of an unanticipated consequence of doing this.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But you talk in your book about the internal debate

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of whether or not to sanction Russia, and I think

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned that Janet Yellen sort of had to be

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 2>convinced and that there was this memory of the oh

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>like dere Paska incident sort of hovering around. I guess

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>what I want to ask is how much of this,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this weaponization of the dollar is a question of political

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>will and how far the US Treasury wants to push

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>on that string versus technological ability. It seems like the

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>US does have the capacity to shut people off in

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>some respects, so for instance through the swift system, which

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>again you go into some detail on, but there is

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>this overarching question of whether or not it should, whether

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>or not it'll backfire either in the short term or

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in the long term by diminishing the desirability of the

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>dollar as a reserve currency.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated, as things tend to be in Washington. There

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 3>is huge political will to use economic sanctions and to

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 3>make them even more sophisticated than they've ever been. What

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>we've seen is we've gone from you in the early

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 3>nineteen hundreds up until pretty much two thousand and one.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>OPHAC was a bit of an orphan of the Treasure Department.

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>No one really paid attention to them. Economic sanctions at

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>that time, they were so blunt. It was just like

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>embargoes on Cuba. It didn't really have this great big impact.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't discussed in two thousand and one. Nine to

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>eleven hits, and you know, the global War on terror

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 3>did not start with military tanks rolling into some country

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 3>or American troops in their boots hitting the ground somewhere.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 3>It started September twenty fourth, two thousand and one, with

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 3>George W. Bush, with a stroke of a pen, giving

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the US Treasury Department the authority to weaponize the dollar,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to use the dollar to find out how did the

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 3>terrorists finance those attacks? Because nine to eleven it costs

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 3>those terrorists like four hundred thousand dollars, and later officials

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>found out that that money was moved in the light

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of day. So the US realized that, okay, we can

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 3>track these money flows and either stop the next attack

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 3>or just choke off, you know, bad actors or terrorists, organizations,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>or terrorists themselves from money flow and the ability to

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>get cash by cutting them off from the global financial

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>system because we control the dollar. That's kind of where

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it started, and sanctions have gotten more and more sophisticated.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Treasury created an entire unit called the Terrorism and Financial

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Unit that was created in the aftermath of nine

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to eleven in two thousand and four and built out

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 3>a basically an intelligence unit within the Treasure Department. So

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Treasury in the US is the only finance ministry in

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the world with its own intelligence operation.

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Basically. Yeah, this is so fascinating, And I thought this

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>part of your book where you talk about nine to

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven was really interesting. So what were these sort of

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.239
<v Speaker 1>capabilities of o FAC or the Treasury in terms of

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>tracking illicit money flows prior to nine to eleven and

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>then like sort of what was the difference between specifically

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what they did, what they could could do, and then

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>pre and post nine to eleven.

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>They didn't have much Before nine to eleven, Like I said,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 3>OPHAC was this orphan No one really paid attention to them.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 3>They did a lot of work, but their budget was small,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 3>their staffing was small. They didn't have a lot of

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 3>access to the Treasury Secretary, which you know, then you

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>have no one to sort of lift the profile. But

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 3>also the US wasn't looking at how to work in

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>this space. That's between kinetic action, which is you know,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 3>sending tanks and forces in and diplomacy. That's what sanctions are, right,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>It's that spot in the middle, meaning diplomacy has failed us,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 3>but we are not ready for like an actual, live,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 3>bloody war. So let's go in the middle and use sanctions.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 3>And it's pretty cheap, right, So that's where the like

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>what Tracy asked earlier, that's where the political will is

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that it's not as expensive and doesn't spill blood as

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 3>like a war, but it's a good option when diplomacy

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 3>isn't working.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>We talked us a.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Little bit more about technological ability. This is why I

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 2>was curious, like how much of it is the politics

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 2>versus what we are actually physically able to do. In

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>the financial system, so if I have a dollar, to

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Joe's point in the intro, there are certain conditions that

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 2>are attached to that dollar, and there is to some

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>extent visibility on that dollar as well talk to us

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about what a dollar looks like

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>or how much visibility the US government can have into it.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 3>That's such a good question, Tracy, because dollars are actually transported,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 3>sometimes wrapped in plastic shrink wrap and in trucks like

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>loaded into Afghanistan, Like the New York Federal Reserve actually

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 3>sends money like this to Cobble, or they did in

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 3>the past. Right, That's why the Treasure Department would have

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 3>an attache in Cobble there to sort of witness that

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>millions of dollars of actual physical cash greenbacks coming into

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the country. So that's the really hard part, right, how

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>to monitor that. Banks do have a responsibility to tell

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 3>the Treasure Department through these Suspicious Activity Reports sars when

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>they see transactions happening that touch their financial institution that

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>look suspicious to them. But these sars are just it's

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 3>just like throwing something in some obscure filing box and

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe someone shifting through it will see what they need

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to see. It's hard to see a pattern. Basically, after

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 3>nine to eleven, officials realize that they don't have a

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 3>ton of visibility the US itself autonomously to see how

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 3>dollars are moving through the global financial system. And this

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>is where it gets interesting. After nine to eleven, Treasure

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>officials wanted to get that glimpse, and they knew that

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 3>SWIFT based in Belgium, part of the EU, and that

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 3>jurisdiction has data within its fortresses. You know, the building

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 3>itself in Lahoopa, Belgium is you know, it looks like

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 3>an actual fortress, but they have the data that shows

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the routing number and the transaction time in real time.

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Swift is basically the Gmail of the banking system.

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>It is like that.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a way for banks to communicate with each other.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Here's the bank account number, here is the name, here's

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 3>the address and the amount that needs to be moved.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 3>But it promises privacy. No one will know the nature

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of the transaction, right And a couple of different central

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 3>banks are involved in sort of that network that SWIFT

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 3>has built up, including the Fed, Bank of Japan, Bank

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 3>of England and a couple of others. And so Treasury

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>officials got together and they spoke to Swift. The head

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>at the time after nine to eleven was Lenny Shrink,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 3>really really interesting guy that I spoke to for the

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 3>book Colorful Character, and he said, well, they approached me,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 3>and he said he knew that that call as soon

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 3>as those planes hit the Twin Towers in Manhattan. He

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 3>says he remembers he was in Europe for I think

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Ireland for a meeting with a Swift board member. He

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 3>was biting into a sandwich when he heard that nine

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 3>to eleven happened. He found out exactly the depth of

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 3>the problem and then he knew, right then, I'm going

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 3>to get a call from the Charges Department. They're going

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 3>to want data. They're going to want to know how

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 3>did money that financed that attack move through this system,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 3>how did we miss it, and how can we catch

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the next one? Because bring yourself back to September twelfth

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 3>and thirteenth, we were terrified. You know, everyone at that

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>time internationally said I'm an American today because if someone

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>can attack this country, they're attacking everyone. If you remember

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the Queen of England at the time, she sang the

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 3>national anthem, the American national anthem, because she said I

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>stand with America. So Lenny Shrink, an American himself, knew

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 3>that that call was coming. So when Treasury finally called

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 3>he had he was ready. You know, it depends on

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>who you ask, but it's possible that Treasury might have

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>approached Swift a couple of times before then looking for

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 3>some data and they always kind of said no. And

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>so they finally got to talking about specifics, and Lenny

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Shrink spoke to a couple of the different central bank

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 3>governors that were involved. According to one source, Alan Greenspan

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 3>at that time was against it, initially against Treasury having

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 3>any insight into Swift data because he said gentlemen shouldn't

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 3>read gentleman's mail, So he didn't like the idea at first.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I think you wrote in your book

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that this only came out like in two thousand and six,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that the that the Treasury had approached Swift about getting

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>access to more data, like it was done pretty surreptitiously

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or secretly for a while.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Swift, okay, Speed, that's what it alludes to.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Treasury's code name for the whole program was Turtle, the

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 3>opposite Swift.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I love the Yeah, it's great.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 3>So if you were like if you were at an

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 3>airport maybe in two thousand and one through six and

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>saw like these government, you know, gray or sort of

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>muted suits. A man may be handcuffed to a briefcase.

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 3>And if they were talking about a turtle, they were

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about swift. So they used swift. They were able

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 3>to come to an agreement. They would have to subpoena

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 3>the information. There was a lengthy process there. Lenny Schrank said,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I want the US to have the information that they

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>need and not a bite more because he didn't want

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 3>it to be abused and he wanted to set a precedent.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 3>He did say to me that the only reason that

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>the US was able to get that information was the

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>power of the dollar. It is the owner of the

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 3>world's reserve asset. Coming to Swift, saying we need to

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 3>protect our economy in our financial system because after nine

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>to eleven the stock market was wiped out. Up one

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 3>point four trillion dollars of value disappeared that day, the

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred plunged. Over a couple of weeks,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the markets were closed because physically the heart of American

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>stock market had been attacked right the financial district was

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>right by the World Trade Center. So he said, that's

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 3>why that's the only persuasive power. Any other country had

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 3>come to us, it was a very easy no. We

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't even have to explain.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 2>So one thing that I think often comes up when

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 2>we're debating the role of the dollar. I mean, obviously

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>people can see the benefits that it has for the US.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>There is that idea of exorbitant privilege, and the US

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>is able to issue a lot of dollar denominated debt

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and fund a lot of different things, thinks in part

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 2>to its currency. But I guess one thing that often

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get discussed, or doesn't get discussed as much, is

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 2>the idea of what the rest of the world gets

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>from the dollar's special position. Can you talk a little

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 2>bit about that, Why does the rest of the world

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 2>agree to do stuff like invoice in dollars or buy

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>US treasury debt or how large reserves of dollars that

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 2>it holds at the New York Fed and things like

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that terracy?

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 3>The answer that question actually begins like seventy eighty years ago,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteen forty four Breton Woods. Lots of economists and monks

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 3>here in Washington and around the world in financial and

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 3>economic policy circles loved to talk about Breton Woods. This

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 3>is when, by design, the dollar was crowned as the

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>reserve asset, the most important asset in the world. At

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the time, the world had just emerged from back to

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 3>back global wars. Europe's fiscal position most of the countries

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 3>there it wasn't good. The UK had held the reserve asset,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the British pound. They were no longer the largest economy

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 3>in the world, and since their actual physical infrastructure was

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 3>so damaged after two wars, they had a lot of

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 3>spending they had to do. The US was sort of

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 3>this hercules in a cradle emerging to take on the

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 3>global superpower role. It had been heading toward for decades

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 3>and it was ready for it. Everyone was looking at

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>America like they have got this figured out. They're going

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 3>to lead us into the future. All the technology is

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 3>there and everything is clean and shiny over there. They're

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>a stable country and helped wrap up the war. So

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 3>the US helped create the infrastructure of the World Bank,

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the International Monetary Fund, all ways to knit the world

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>together so that we're so economically integrated that we cannot

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 3>start a war with each other, because then there's that

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 3>deep and self inflicted wound because we are so economically

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>aligned so much trade going on amongst us. Everyone kind

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 3>of relied on the dollar to lead the way forward,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the same way they relied on the US to lead

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the way forward, because it was a safety net. Right

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 3>at the time, the dollar was pegged to gold, and

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 3>so there was this promise that is, as long as

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 3>we can continue on dollar dependency, then we will all

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>stick together and emerge from the ashes of two wars stronger.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>And in those eighty years, global GDP did grow a

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>lot because of globalization, because of that economic integration, and

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>so as the United States rose and consolidated power, its

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 3>superpower status, people were more and more invested in dollars

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 3>themselves and depending on the dollar. And it turns out

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 3>that when you know a crisis hit, whether it's a

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 3>regional crisis in some part of Asia or Europe or

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Latin America, or there was political instability in another country,

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>or something that was more global, a pandemic, a global

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>financial crisis, even if that financial crisis started in America,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the dollar has been seen as a safe haven. Let's

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 3>all flee to this place because we know that this

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 3>country has rule of law, free and fair elections, a

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>strong and stable democracy. If we park our cash and

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 3>our wealth and our savings in there in this asset.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>It'll be there when we come back to it.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you hold dollars like, there's the network

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>effects of everyone using the same currency. There's the general

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>price stability, there's the rule of law, et cetera. Now,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as we said in the introduction, or we were talking

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, like the sort of sanctions in twenty twenty two,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>or as Tracy mentioned, the seizing of the Afghanistan dollars,

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have woken much of the world up

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that yes, there are benefits to holding the dollar for

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe obvious economic reasons, but it comes with strings, or

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes with risks. Do you think that there's like

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a sort of I don't know, maybe a gap in

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that realization where maybe it's like people sort of around

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the world actors understood the benefits of transacting in the

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar network, and it only clicking later on that is

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>conditions to part of that network that the the US

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially has quite a bit of power to police reactions.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I think that this was something that kind of

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>crept up on us without maybe us realizing right away.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for one thing, the dollar and the US

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 3>has an immense dominance across the world. The world's largest

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 3>economy is the US. The next three countries on that

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>ranking put together and you get maybe to wear the

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 3>size of the US economy. So by sheer strength and

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 3>just internal power, a lot of innovation happens in the US.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot of fiscal spending, which drives more

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>research and development.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 2>So the other thing that tends to happen in this

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>type of conversation is people will say, oh, well, the

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars the reserve cur andy, because it's a unipolar world

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and the US has dominated at least up until relatively recently.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 2>But as you point out, it's kind of it's almost

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the opposite, Like there was a lot of consensus building

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 2>going into the initial stages of building up the dollar

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>as the reserve currency, and it feels like even now

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>there is still a degree of cooperation here. And you

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Swift for instance. I mean, Swift seems to have

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.959
<v Speaker 2>the cooperation of several central banks, which you already mentioned.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 2>But I guess my question is like, A, how much

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 2>cooperation goes into the dollar's special position, and then B

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 2>how vulnerable do you think some of that consensus is

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>in current day.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>That's such a good question. There is so much consensus,

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to point you to history again. If

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you look at the nineteen eighties, a really interesting and

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 3>exciting thing happened. I almost wish I was a financial

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 3>journalist back then, covering the Plaza and the Louver Accord.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 3>So in nineteen eighties, let's think it's inflation was really high,

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the dollar was really strong because interest rates had been

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 3>hiked up to combat inflation, and manufacturing sector farmers, a

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of x you know, our exporters were complaining about

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 3>how strong the dollar was, and other countries were saying

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>that the US has this quote benign neglect of the dollar.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 3>They don't care that it's so strong it's damaging its

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 3>own economy. They're, you know, folks insider complaining, and overseas,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>it's making it hard for other countries to buy goods

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 3>that America is making and trying to sell. So at

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the time, it was the G five, it was West Germany, Japan,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the UK, the US, and I think France got together

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 3>at the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan and I went there

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 3>to research the room. What it looks like. I asked

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 3>somebody of one of the bell hops or something like, Okay,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>has this room been the same since the eighties? Because

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I got to write about it and they all secretly

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 3>met with then Treasure Secretary Jim Baker to collectively agree

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that they were going to medal in currency markets to

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>weaken the dollar, and you know, that's kind of what

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>triggered the whole strong dollar policy lore of journalists and

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 3>currency traders trying to figure out what does a treasure

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 3>secretary say about the dollar? Because maybe there's going to

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 3>be government intervention in the dollar because they did it right,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 3>what about now?

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Like, so, does this feel like a different moment? Because,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as Tracy and I have talked about on multiple episodes,

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, both of us have aaly been reporters

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for about fifteen years, but within those fifteen years there

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are like multiple waves of people talk about post dollar

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ear multipolar era, new alternative. Does this feel like does

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two to twenty twenty four and beyond. Does

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this feel like something different where the conversations like, oh,

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right really might be a change or does this

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like another time in multiple cycles where yes, there's

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>plenty of talk about a post dollar ero, but it

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really amount to much.

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>You're right, A lot of people for decades since the

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Bretonwoods Agreement in the nineteen forties, have been wondering when

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 3>is the dollar's hegemony going to end? Where who's going

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 3>to be the one to take over? Is it gonna

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 3>be the Japanese yen? When the Euro came on the landscape,

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh maybe the Euro will take over the dollar, and

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 3>no one has really done that. What's different now is Trump.

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 3>He came onto the scene. He disrupted so many of

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.439
<v Speaker 3>our long held economic assumptions to the point where we've

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 3>got Biden and his first Date of the Union speech,

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>give it a different delivery, emphasize different words, capitalize different letters,

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and it could have been something that Trump said because

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Biden was talking a lot about buy America and now

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 3>we hear Janet Allen talking about friend shoring. All of

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 3>this to me sounds a lot populism and make America

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 3>great in America first. And so we are seeing that

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump's disruption continued. He shifted the trajectory. You know, now,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 3>let's get really wonky. The US Treasure Department twice a

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 3>year releases a currency policy report, and when I was

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 3>covering Treasury, I loved this report. I even sprung it

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 3>loose once ahead of schedule, and you know, even civil

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 3>servants were wondering, how on earth it's to like I

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 3>get a hold of this report because everyone to know.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 3>What everyone wanted to know, is the US going to

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 3>designate China a currency manipulator because they were the most

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 3>obvious contender for that tag. And what we've seen is

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that Trump has brought action behind his words and he

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 3>has shifted the debate. So now if the US wanted

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to get a bunch of countries together to manipulate the dollar,

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a totally different ballgame. For one thing, currency markets

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 3>are just too big to be able to allow a

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of governments to influence it. And then who's going

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to join the US in that The US does not

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 3>have the same standing that it did ten years ago

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 3>or forty years ago when the Plaza a cord happened.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Now we're in twenty twenty four. You know, in twenty

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 3>eighteen and nineteen, there's a deep chapter in the book

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 3>on this when Trump actually talked about intervening in the dollar,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 3>which would have been a huge deal. And Larry Kudlow,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's sitting on the other side of the

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 3>resolute desk inside the Oval Office said to Trump, who's

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 3>going to join us? No, ally is going to want

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to work with us on this.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So on a similar point, you know, there is this

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>vibrant debate now about whether or not the sanctions against

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Russia have been effective, whether or not the US in

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 2>one way or another, overstepped the bounds when it decided

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 2>to cut off Russia from the banking system or even

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>going back to the Afghanistan reserves and things like that.

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I know you're not covering the Treasury uh specifically now,

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>but presumably you're still talking to plenty of people in

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>DC where you're based. What are they saying now about

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that decision.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 3>The current administration has ended up in a bit of

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a defensive posture when it comes to talking about the dollar.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 3>The minute we started hearing Janet Yellen say there's no

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 3>threat against the dollar, and I'm going to give you

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the extreme example, it's like when Nixon said I'm not

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a crook, right, So it's like, oh, there's nothing to

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 3>see here. That's super extreme. But if she's talking about it,

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 3>if the Treasury Secretary and the Fed Fed chair Powell

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 3>earlier in March, testified and said to Congress there's no

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 3>threat to the dollar from russia sanctions. FED official Christopher

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Waller did a speech dedicated to the dollar's role in

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the global financial system and what its outlook could be,

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 3>and he also said Russia's sanctions are not affecting the dollar.

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's kind of like, well, if you're saying it,

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that means you're studying it. That means you thought it

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>was worth looking in, So maybe there's something there. At

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 3>the same time, we have a lot of countries who

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 3>are wondering, like, oh, are we too dependent on the dollar?

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Because if they cut off Russia, a G twenty country

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 3>that in twenty twenty two was the world's eleventh largest economy,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 3>so closely knitted with Europe, and they cut them off,

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 3>and it was pretty wild for the country. Right here

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 3>in the US, our gas prices at the pump went

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 3>up because of those sanctions, and at the time Americans

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 3>were willing to pay that price. But that's not going

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to last forever.

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I looked up the Swift headquarters after

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that it looks like a fort. It is

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>an incredible building. Actually, you were not exaggerating in fact,

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's far grander than what I expected. When Russia was

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>cut off from SWIFT in twenty twenty two, that was

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>just seen as like this, like watershed move the sort

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of like the finance equivalent of a nuclear option. Do

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you see, like when you talk about going back to

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>your answer just now, like a building up of new networks,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of alternative networks of moving money around.

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 3>When the Trump administration blew up the JCPOA, the agreement

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 3>around Iran's nuclear program and withdrew from it, we saw

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 3>European countries wondering, how can we continue to transact with

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Iran and abide by our agreement with Iran and not

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 3>violate US sanctions? Because Trump then reimposed nine hundred and

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>seventy one or more economic sanctions on Iran, and so

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 3>Europe didn't want to be in a violation of those. Now,

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the interesting thing that happened was that no European country

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 3>wanted to own that non SWIFT network and get blamed

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 3>by the US for creating that. The thing that I

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 3>would point to and the thing that actually, you know,

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I end the book on a note of hope that

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that the US, you know, as a democracy

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to be self critical. We're in a very

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>self critical moment right now, and that extends from social problems,

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 3>political problems, economic finance, and like let's get long key

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 3>currency policy. So I think that we're going to emerge

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 3>from this hopefully stronger. Like that's my pie in the sky,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 3>hopeful thinking. If you look at some of the countries

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 3>that are trying to create a network outside of the dollar,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 3>it's like the bricks plus and a lot of them

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 3>are closed detocracies. They are not open democracies. The way

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the US is now. Where I find hope is that

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 3>hopefully in a decade or two, we have shown that

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 3>we continue to be a country that has a stable democracy,

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 3>rule of law, free and fair elections, all those things,

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 3>independent agencies. But those other countries, you know, if they're

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 3>run by dictators, then that dictator, just like everyone else,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 3>their life will come to a close. What's going to

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 3>happen at that moment? And when there's political instability, people

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 3>lead to the dollar the next time there's some kind

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 3>of global crisis. If every one runs to the dollar,

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you can put a big period on that question.

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Is dedollarization happening? Because we are still the safe haven.

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And so then what's going to happen if Putin or

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Cheson Paying, or some of these other countries lose their

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 3>dictators or their authoritarian leaders. There's a power vacuum, and

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 3>there's a power grab, and there's instability. They don't have

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 3>time to deal with trying to become a reserve asset

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 3>or trying to outskirt or outrun the world's reserve asset.

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 3>By creating this network, they're going to be dealing with

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 3>their inside problems.

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Sleia Mosen, author of the new book Paper Soldiers, How

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the Weaponization of the Dollar Change the World Order. Thank

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming on odd Lots and congratulations

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>on the book.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much. I was an honored adjoin.

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>TSEA. I really like Sleia's perspective that dollar strength is

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of downstream from political stability, and I think that's

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a really important element of all of this, which is

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we look at measures get to GDP

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and inflation, et cetera. But the real thing that sort

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of undergirds at all and that sort of needs to

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>be maintained, is just this assumption that the US is

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a stable country at the rule of law, and probably

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the most stable with the strongest rule of law in

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Now absolutely, I really liked her final answers, sort of

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 2>linking a lot of the network effects and the politics together.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think Charlie Kindelberger made this point ages ago

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that like, the reason the dollar reigns supreme, the reason

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 2>there is this dollar hegemony like isn't necessarily because the

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 2>US is imposing it on the rest of the world

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:52.720
<v Speaker 2>or because there is this unipolar world. Instead, it's because,

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 2>like there has been decades of sort of consensus building

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.760
<v Speaker 2>and network building around this. And so the question is, Okay,

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 2>if people are uncomfortable with the dollar because they're worried

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 2>that the US can over exert its control of the system,

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 2>such as what we saw with Russia getting kicked out

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of the banking system or Afghanistan reserves getting seized and

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing, then they need to build up

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>an alternative, which means they have to build a network.

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, as Sleia was sort of intimating towards the end,

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>like dictators, they might not they might be busy, they

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 2>might be too busy to build up a network, but

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 2>also they might not be that good at it.

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, I thought that was a great answer, or

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they might that no one could just have the confidence

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of sort of an internal policy stability after that, Leader Leaves,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really fascinating point. Also, until

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>her book, I hadn't really appreciated the degree to which

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven specifically was a turning point for our

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>our aggressiveness maybe or our ability to essentially monitor global

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>financial flows.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's such a it's taken for granted so much now,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and it is such a given that it's kind of

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 2>weird to hark back to a time. I mean, I

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 2>guess it would have just been the year two thousand,

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 2>so twenty four years ago, when the US wasn't using

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 2>something like Swift to aggressively monitor terrorist financing. It is

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 2>crazy to think about how much I mean, I guess

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit obvious that nine to eleven was

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a watershed moment. But also in terms of the financial system.

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally't. I hadn't really appreciated that all. And also

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just this idea too of like there was a point

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can never go back to that where

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.959
<v Speaker 1>it's like you actually have leaders coming together and coming

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to some consensus, not just in terms of like the

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of weaponization of the dollar or the ability to

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>track dollar, but also coordination on price, as in the

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>case of the Plaza Accord. All of these things that

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are like so rapidly changed, so dramatically different, the current

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 1>system feels simultaneously obvious and also very new.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, it's like inevitable and also kind of mind blowing.

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it's happened at all. I'm sure we could go

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 2>on for longer, and I'm sure we will have many,

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 2>many more episodes on exactly this topic, but for now,

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 2>shall we leave it there?

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Follow our guests Seleia Mosen, She's at Seleia Mosen and

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>check out her new book Paper Soldiers, How the Weaponization

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Dollar Changed the World Order. Follow our producers

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman, dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and kel Brooks at Kilbrooks. And thank you to our

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>producer Moses On. For more Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash odd Lots where we have transcripts, a blog,

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and a newsletter. And check out the discord discord gg

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>slash odd lots where you can chat about all of

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>these topics twenty four to seven with fellow listeners.

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>when we discuss the history of US dollar dominance, then

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 2>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 2>can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 2>All you need to do is connect your Bloomberg subscription

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.