WEBVTT - Trump Indictment, PCE Inflation Data, and Markets

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast News. Over the last

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>cycle here twenty four hours has been former President Donald

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump indited in New York and that is a developing story.

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We want to get some perspective on that, and the

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>first call we put out was to Tim O'Brien. He's

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>his senior executive editor for Bloomberg Opinion. He's been doing

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that since twenty thirteen. I think before that he was

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at the Huffington Post, The New York Times, the Wall

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal. My takeaway from all over that is the

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>guy has a hard time keeping a job, but he's

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>done a pretty good job here at Bloomberg. He wrote

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a book back in the day, Trump Nation, The Art

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of Being the Donald, in two thousand and five, that

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is the definitive biography of Donald Trump. He got sued

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>by the former president of that but he won and

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to talk about it, Ken, But Tim,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the news about the New

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>York indictment? What's your initial read? Well, well, Paul, the

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>first thing I'm to say, the reason I have a

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>hard time keeping a job is because of mean colleague.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You no support? Yeah, I think we don't know, right.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of those moments in which

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to a pine and analyze, and I think

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>until we actually see the indictment itself, it's underseal, I

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>imagine it we'll get unsealed Monday or Tuesday. Trump is

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>likely to be arraigned on Tuesday. But that's not completely

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>written in the stone either. I've written before that I

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think that Alvin Bragg's case is relatively flimsy relative to

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the other investigations and prosecutions that are ongoing.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that this was the best case you

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>would want to bring to him, bring it out of

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that office at this point in time against a former president,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's chosen to do so. And Donald Trump has

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>spent decades weaponizing the law law and avoiding any accountability

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in courtrooms, and at a minimum that that's been pierced

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's going to be indicted for the first time.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>He's the first president to be indicted. But I think

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in his own narrow world, it's also the first time

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he's been indicted, and he's going to react against that

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in strident ways. Let me let me ask Tim Matt

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Miller here, by the way, thanks for joining us. Let

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>me let me ask about Alvin Bragg, because I thought

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Bragg was less likely to indict Trump. In fact, I

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>thought a couple of the people in his office wanted

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to indict Trump previously and quit because they were so

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>angry that they weren't able to stopped by their boss,

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Bragg. So what's the deal with this? Remember remember

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the context of that. So Albert Bragge inherits, the case

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>built by Cybance and sivances on. Prosecutors were very split

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>around whether or not they had enough evidence to take

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to court on a criminal charge. Remember a criminal charge,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the standard is the you have to prove intent on

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the part of the perpetrator. It's a very high bar,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think the people in Sivance's office were very

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>split down the middle on this around whether or not

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they had the mojo to take it to court. Dance

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>basically leaves dumps this on Bragg's desk without resolving it.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Brad comes in, he looks at it. He decides that

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there's too much division here. We can't bring this particular

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>case involving you know, I think years and years of

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>financial fraud allegation. But he goes down a new path

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>based on other evidence he has involving the payments to

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>store Mey Daniels and bookkeeping fraud attendant to that that.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that that's one thing he's looked at. Here's

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the coveat on that. There's been reporting out there that

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>say there maybe more than thirty counts in this indictment.

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>He could well have assembled other evidence well beyond the

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Stormy Daniels thing. I think for this case to app

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>gravitas and traction, it needs to have actually much more

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>than that. Well is this reminds me of you know,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>when Merrick Garland had the FED raid Mara Lago. We

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>all thought, man in order to do that, he must

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have something serious, But it so far doesn't look like

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he has anything serious. Well, wait a minute, you know,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to let the legal system work through these things.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>The Moral Lago incident is very serious. Federal authorities believe

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he violated the Aspeona Jact. Potentially there are classified documents

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that he took down there without handling it in proper

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>ways that any president, regardless of par or persuasion, should observe. Well,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have a president in office right now

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>who don't interrupt me. Matt. I know you're prone to

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do that, but i'm your cast, so hear me out.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>The legal system is there as a process to protect

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>all of us, regardless of party. It can be flawed,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it can be inexact, but it is there for a reason,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's very good reason. The Moral Lago incident is

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>being examined, and it should be regardless who was in

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the in the white outs, and we don't know what

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they have yet. So we have to be patient with

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this so we can get properly aired publicly. And I

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's true of all of these cases. Patience is

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>not one of my virtues. I know that. So Tim,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>help us put into content. I mean, we have the

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>New York City issue, won't get more clarity on it

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>next week when it's unsealed. Help us frame out the

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>other risks for the former president in terms of this

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>federal investigation as well as the investigation in Georgia, because

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>those seems to seem to be on the first read,

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>more serious and perhaps more of a problem for mister Trump.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they are. I honestly think you know.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a civil case in New York, New York ag

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>she's a Democrat, that one could it's a civil case.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It could result in a serious financial penalty. It could

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>put him out of business in New York. It's not

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>going to put him in prison. It's not going to

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>prevent him from running for the president. For the presidency

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia, there's a criminal case there by the Fulton

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>County District Attorney Fani Willis that involves voting fraud. That

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is also unlikely to put him in jail. It also

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>won't prevent him for running for president. Eugene Debs ran

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>for president as a socialist from jail about one hundred

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Lyndon the Lararuge, a serial tax dodger, ran

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the for presidency for the presidency a number of times,

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>even though he've been convicted of tax run crimes. Don't

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>keep you out of the office. What keeps you out

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the office is if you've led an insurrection. The

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth Amendment specifically points at insurrection as a disqualifying factor.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It was instituted after the Civil War to prevent Confederate

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>seditionists from running for office. That's in the DOJ case

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with the January sixth prosecution. In my mind, the moral

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Lago case, the in the January sixth case, those investigations

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are the only things that's going to keep him out

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of office. And potentially, and even they may not so

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for I think for people who have an emotional investment

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the outcome of these that they think ultimately these

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are the only things they're going to stop Donald Trump

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>from inhabiting the White House. That's a splender threat. The

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>only they keeps Trump out of the White House ultimately,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I think our voters. So by the way, I just

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>want to point out we were talking this morning, and

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of people we'll talk about this.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim you probably already know about it. I thought Trump

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>would be would have been the first president ever arrested

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>after office, and some reports of surface that Ulysses S.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Grant had been arrested for speeding in the late eighteen

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>on a horse's feeding on a horse, Yes, exactly. I

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>find it incredibly hard to believe that's a good story, though, Tim,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think this? How do you think the

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>other I don't know, Republican potential nominees. How do you

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to position themselves here? Are they going

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to just maybe lay low and let a play out.

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's tricky, you know. I think Pence came

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>out and defended Trump the Santis has. I think the

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing in terms of the politics of this is

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump has a very firm hold on about

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of the Republican Party. It makes them an

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>important fact in the primary races. He has I think

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>statally turned off independent moderate Republicans and moderate Democrats, like

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of middle middle tier of voters I think

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>now know who he is, and it hobbles him as

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a national candidate. So the party has kind of held

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>hostage to getting new people out on the stage who

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>can get through the primary process without being capped by

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump while still being viable national candidates. And I think

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>each of those individuals, Santists, Haley, they're all trying to

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>navigate around that. I think they don't want to be

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>appearing to be exactly in the same boat as Trump

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or supporting some of his you know, some of his

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>greater obscenities. On the other hand, they also know that

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>they need his voters. So it's a tricky balance. I think, Tim,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just about twenty thirty seconds, is a Trump voter? Can

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a Trump voter be a Decantist voter supporter or a

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Haley supporter? Yeah, they can, I think so. I mean,

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they can. I think that, I

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think that. I just don't think enough. I don't think

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you can. I don't think de Santists or Haley can

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>win only with Trump voters. Yeah, I think they need

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump voters plus moderates. And how do you thread that needle.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like watching a hostage video. Yeah, yeah, all right, Tim,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time. You really wanted

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to get your perspective and opinion here. Tim O'Brien's is

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a senior executive editor for Bloomberg Opinion Again. He wrote

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The Trump Nation, The Art of Being the Donald in

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five. It was described as the definitive

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>biography of Donald Trump. So he has a lot of

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>personal experience reporting on President Trump. We're gonna more coming up.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am easting on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We're listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Some

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>latest reporting on this Trump in Diamond that hit the

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>tape late afternoon yesterday. Amory Horder in Washington, correspondent with

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television and Bloomberg Law hosts June Grasso. They joined

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>us here, both in studio. We appreciate that they both

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>get the coveted gold star for being in studio. So, June,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you from a legal perspective,

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is this a good case? Well, first, let me say

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that we do not know exactly what the case is. Yeah,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all speculation because the grandjury indictment is still

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>under seal. If what we think it is is actually

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>what it is, then it's a novel case. I mean,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>week or strong. It's it's different, It's never been done before.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It's taking as it's taking a misdemeanor, which is the

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>falsifying of business records and do and in order to

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>make it a felony. I mean, they're not. They don't

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>want to bring a People are complaining that they're even

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>bringing this case. They don't want to bring a misdemeanor

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>against the president. So former president, and so you take

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the falsifying business records, and you have to show that

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that Trump also had an intent to defraud that included

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>an intent to commit we're thinking a second crime of

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>election campaign finance violations. I mean, that's what we're thinking.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're taking two, you're taking a felony and a

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>misdemeanor and hooking them together. And it's it hasn't been

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>done by New York prosecutors. I don't know if it's

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>been done by any want anyone. So there's a chance

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think a judge would dismiss it before

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>went to trial, because you want to get the jury verdict,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and a judge is not going to be the one

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that wants to say that. People say I threw that

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out against Donald Trump. So but after on appeal, I

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>mean an appellate cord could reverse Okay, So, Anne Marie

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>from the political perspective, here again, the first time a

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>former president has been indicted. What's the feeling in Washington,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the feeling about and the first time Trump's been

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>indicted and the first time Trump's which that's I think

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>more shocking. Exactly exactly what's the feeling from Washington. Well,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not just a former president, he's also a candidate

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>right on the Republican Party to be their front runner.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's right now he's is their front runner. He's

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>winning in all their polls for twenty twenty four. So

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>what you can imagine is that for Washington, this is

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just hardening those political divides. The one place you will

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>not see a comment from is the White House. President

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden left this morning to go to Mississippi, and he

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was asked repeatedly, you have a comment asking anything about

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the indictment, any thoughts at all. I'm not going to

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>comment on that. I'm not going to comment on that.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The Republicans in Congress, though, there's talk of them even

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>sending out a subpoena to Alvin brag because they think

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that this is well, they're calling it outrageous. So this

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is not going away. But we should also know, and

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something that potentially can coalesce around the president

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in the next few months, is this is only one

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of a number of cases that their former president is

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>under investigation for and looks like right now, from what

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we know, and as June points out, we don't yet

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know what the act looks like the weakest and least

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>important of any right. I mean, you've got a much

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>more important case, it seems in Georgia. You've got a

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>much more serious civil case. Here in New York you've

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>got a serious federal capital cases. So yeah, but the

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor can't look at what other prosecutors are doing. He's

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>got his own grand jury that he called. What is

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he supposed to say, Okay, grand jury, go home for

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a year, come back. Wish you can anyway, go home

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and come back, and will you know, after Georgia indits,

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>then will indite. He's on his own track, and he

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>has other problems to think about. He has statute of limitations,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>problems and all kinds of things to think about it.

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do admit. You know Mark Palmerantz, who

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was a former prosecutor there who made a big deal

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about Trump, right, he called this case the zombie case.

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's been called the zombie case because it's

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>been dead and then revived so many times. So obviously,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's been dead and then revived that

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not the strongest of cases. So but you got

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to sound resilient, are resiliently exactly how you watch that

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is us? Yes? Yeah, the last of us that

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was they did you? I mean, you've heard the criticisms

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from Republicans that this is you know, personal even um,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's a witch hunt. Obviously that's the term that

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they've used since before he was an elected the first time.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But does Alvin brag have some kind of personal vendetto

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or issue with Donald Trump that we've seen any hint

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of previously. No. I mean, he did have a case

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>against him when he was in the Attorney General's office,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't one of the people who ran on

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to prosecute Trump. He didn't. He would say

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't really talk about that in case the case

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>comes before me. That old line. So, I mean, there's

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>no And he's also a very careful man. He's a

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>very known as a careful prosecutor who'll go over things

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and over things. So I have to believe that if

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>he's bringing this case he thinks he can get a conviction.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's pretty sure of himself, because I don't

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think you'd bring a case like this unless you're sure

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can get a conviction. Remember he was the

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>one that initially decided in February of twenty twenty two

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not to pursue an indictment. Yeah. Well, I mean this

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>reminds me to some extent of the Marlagoid, which we

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>said at the time, like, wow, you can't raid the

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>ex president's house. We also said that it wasn't a

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>raid because it was it has subpoena to get there.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Only people who are divorced from reality only needed a

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>subpoena because they wouldn't turn over these highly classified documents.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I just everyone was waiting to see a smoking gun

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>from Merrick Garland and we haven't. Well, no, there's a

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>special counsel. This is being investigated. Special the special counsel

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is has been serving subpoenas on people. He's gotten He's

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten Trump's lawyer to testify about attorney client privilege by

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>using the crime fraud exception that tells you that a

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>judge thinks there's a crime there. Otherwise you don't have

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the crime fraud exception. Right, He's got all these pieces

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>got Mark Meadows coming in vice president of Evans Mike

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Pants he also had a He also just won this

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>week his case against Mike Pens, forcing him to come

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in to testify, but leaving a few things out because

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of the all the balls in the air, Guys, do

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we have any sense of timing for the federal case

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia? Is this measured in weeks? Months? Even more? Yeah?

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>More more? Okay? But first of all, you know, we

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet when Georgia. That investigation has been going

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on longer than any other, and special grand jury came

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>back with its recommendations and she's still as as far

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>as I know, has not called another grand jury to

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>indict the you know, the special Council. Who knows how

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>long that'll take. But in this case, the last trial

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>against Trump took up eighteen months I think to get

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to trial, and that was the checks Broad case. So

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>who knows how long this will take to get to Well,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it gets steals before November twenty twenty four, right, Well,

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be ideal. But June's point, that's we don't

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>know that this stuff takes a very long time. Also,

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, I mean in our history, American history.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>We had Eugene Devs who campaigned and ran for president

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>when he was in jail on the Socialist part in

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenty Okay, this no. What I'm saying is

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>even if the president, even if the president is going

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>through this, maybe his party will want to say, we

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>don't want to deal with this drama and we're going

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to choose another candidate. But he could still run for president. True,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>unless he gets busted for inciting an insurrection. Right, I'm

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about specifically about the New York case. Oh well,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the other cases, the big ones. You know,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Georgia him from holding federal office one hundred percent. And

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely now that he lacks support from his party,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>right because complete opposite what you are seeing is the

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>base is coming out, they are donating. He is campaigning

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>off of this. Since he said I will be arrested,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he has been sending out campaign letters. He has been

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. You saw his rally in Waco, Texas, saying,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I am the one that it is a victim here.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I need your support. Look at what these Democrats are doing,

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's forcing every Republican to make decision on who

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>they stand by. So not only going to see the

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>hardening of politics between Democrats and Republicans, I think you'll

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>see a hardening of politics within the Republican Party. Those

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that say we need to lean into him and support

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the former president, those that say he didn't win us

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the midterm elections. He didn't win the last election. It's

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>time we move on to a new leader. When does

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it get tiring? The witch hunt thing? I'm a victim.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't believe he's still able to raise

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>money on that. He's been saying that for how many

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>years before he became a president. So, I mean, it'd

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how this shakes out. And from

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the Washington perspective, how aggressive do you think the Republicans

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and Congress will get here? Well, they'll be incredibly aggressive.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We already before the former president was indicted, you had

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan, you had James Komer. They're coming out sending

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>letters to Alvin Bragg. They want him to come to DC.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They want a hearing about this. But it's it's adhering

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to nowhere. Right, the Republicans only hold the House. All

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of this is going to be posturing and it does

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>remove a lot of oxygen in the room for some

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>other big issues they're supposed to be tackling. I just

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>have to say one thing. I can't imagine Alvin Bragg

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going to Washington heard a committee. They want information on

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a grand jury that's secret, and they want information on

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what the prosecutor's office is doing before a trial that's

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. Posturing. Posturing is a word, all right. Guys,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Hemory Horder and Jeran Grassop, both from Bloomberg News and

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television, bring us the latest year. You're listening to

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the tape Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. Tune in alf Bloomberg dot

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Com and the Bloomberg Business Half. You can also listen

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. Take a look

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 1>again at this story President Trump being former President Trumping

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>indicted by New York and what it really means for

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the political landscape, not just for mister Trump, but also

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for the general presidential election coming up in twenty twenty four.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We can do that today with the Director of the

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Center for American Politics and Policy for Around University, Professor

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Schiller joins us professor, thanks so much for taking

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the time here. I mean, just you know, incredible news

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>broke yesterday about the indictment from New York. What do

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you think the political implications are for Let's just start first,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for the former president. Well, I mean, he'll get a

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention. Trump loves attention, and he will be

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>able to shore up his support within the Party's already

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>asking for small level donations like twenty four, twenty five

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars or something. I think he's doing twenty four dollars

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty four for his defense, So it'll be

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a short term boost for him. And if people like

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Ronda Santis or Tim Scott or thinking he's already in

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the race, but Mike Pompeo anybody else is thinking of running,

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if they wait too long, he'll just soak up all

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of that momentum, energy and oxygen and he may actually

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>gain a lead that might be hard to surmount, even

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>though voting hasn't even begune in the primers, does this case,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Wendy matter to potential Trump voters? I mean, even Republicans

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who don't necessarily support them all the time. Do they

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>care if he paid hush money to a former porn star.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. It's the nature of the accusations as

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the doors now open to indict them

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for other things that I think they do care about,

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>like interfering with the election results in Georgia or promoting

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>violence on January sixth. I mean, I think that's the

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>big question mark here. The political jeopardy for Donald Trump

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily in this indictment. It's the fact that

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he is indicted at all, and that the Manhattan DA

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has taken this step means that other district attorneys or

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States Justice Department could feel a little bit

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable indicting a former president since they won't be

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the first ones. Now, all right, So let's say your

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santis or any of the other Mister Mike Pence

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other folks think, hey, Nicky Haley, thank you

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that maybe considering running against former President TRUMPO. How do

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you think they should play her? How do you think

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they will play it? Well, you know, there's a real

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>big gulf. I mean, it's a really great question. There's

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a big gulf between how the potential presidential candidates should

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>play and how the House of Representatives. Republicans are going

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to have to play it because you know, you can

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 1>get in, get out, and you can say, well, maybe

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go his way, or you can't give them

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all that you know, it's just going to cloud everything

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>else is going to be the Trump story. You can't

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>give them all that press all the time, you just

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>will never get any momentum. Nicky Haley already announced essentially,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're still treating her as a maybe. So I

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>think this is the big dilemma for them. And if

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you're Lawanda Santis and your argument is that, well, i'll

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have to wait till the Florida legislature goes out, I

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's the end of April, if I'm not mistaken.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>You know that's a whole month away. That's you know,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you're leaving a month full of a press hole for

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. And if you want to be president United States,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>chops take a risk. You have to be willing to

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>jump in and say I support at the former president,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but I also think I'll be a good president. Pay

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>attention to me. Are there any Republicans who other than

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Liz Cheney who say I don't support the former president.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he incited violence at the Capitol and did

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a disservice to our democracy by doubting the twenty twenty election.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Or are they all pretty much behind him, because even

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pence, you know, even Mike Pence seems to still

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>support Donald Trump. After Trump essentially like put the knife

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in his back. Well, I've actually left him in an

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily dangerous situation, not just like not just you know, literally,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's something to behold. I don't think we've

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>ever seen a former president. Even Nixon when he came

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>back in one in sixty eight, didn't have a hold

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>on the party in sixty four. So it's really you

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>just haven't seen this kind of hold. And for the

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans who just won, particularly in New York and

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>California for example, the newbies, they're worried about a primary.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're always worried about a primary, but they're

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really worried about a primary, and that primary challenge will

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>come from an avid Trump supporter. So the House Republicans

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be behind Donald Trump now for their own

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>individual survival. That means McCarthy has to be behind him

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a speaker, because he can't stay speaker if he doesn't

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>keep the house. So it puts them in his bind,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the party can't move forward, and so they're

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they're really stuck. And unless somebody else is an alternative,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they can say they believe everything Trump believes, but without

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the baggage, then there's nowhere for them to turn and

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of almost a stalemate within the Republican Party.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, profession we want to get the legal side

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of this right now. We can do that with a

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>former federal prosecutor and former special counsel to Robert Mueller

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>when you worked at the DOJ, that is Michael Zelden. Michael,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. What do you

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>make of the legal case for New York against former

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump? Here that was I know it hasn't been unsealed,

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but what we know now, Well, first, of course, as

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you just said, we have to wait for it to

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>be unsealed to see exactly what he's charged with, because

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of speculation about that. But going

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with what's been available to us in the public record,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it appears that he'll be charged with multiple counts of

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>business record misstatements that will be each time Trump Org

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>made a repayment to Michael Cohen as quote unquote a

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>legal fee about ten or twelve of those those will

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be separate counts of business records violations. Then the question'll

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be will they make that into that group of misdemeanors

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>into a felony by saying all those payments were made

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for the purpose of evading federal election or state election

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>violations because they were hiding him from the Federal Elections Commission,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and therefore it's a felony. So that's what we're thinking

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>will likely be the case, multiple business records cases and

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>then federal election felony on top of the business records. Michael,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>what's the distinction here between state and federal because this is,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a New York DA and I've heard a

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, well, it's going to be hard

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to appeal it to a federal appeals corrid or get

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it up to that level from here. Well, it's not

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a matter of whether it's appealed or not appealed. The

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>question is a difficult legal question is can you take

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a state violation the business records and turn it into

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a felony where the felony is a federal felony. If

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they have a state felony and they say the business

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>records misstatements were made to further the state felony, then

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they're on solid ground. If they're saying it was to

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>further a federal felony, then you have this tricky business

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of a state crime being enhanced by violating a federal law,

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and that has not been tested, Professor Schiller. To the

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>extent that these federal issues move forward in the does

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that change the calculus a political calculus for for mister Trump,

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for maybe presidential Candidas, and maybe in his supporting Congress.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>He's the political calculation. Mister Dulton's incredibly articulate. And I

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was listening closely, but not everybody has the time to

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>listen this closely. This is a complicated case. It's probably

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the most complicated indictment that might come down against the

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>former president if we look at all the possible ranges

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of charges he faces in other cases. It's very hard

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to sell, it's very hard to explain. Republicans know that,

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats are just chomping at the bit to have

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this man held accountable whatever way they can, so they

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.239
<v Speaker 1>don't really care what the nature of the case is.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It matters, I think also to know that it's unclear

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this would even prohibit him from running for office. Even

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it gets convicted and serves time and comes out again,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>he may still be able to run for office. So

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are all sorts of ways in which

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the real on the ground applications for most people are,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, did he d lie, did he break the law,

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>what did he do? Or I just I can't stand

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>them and I want to see him punished. And I

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think these are this is the political environment in which

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>these messages are going to be sent out by both parties.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He does seem to be the test Tethlon Don does

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael Zelden, do you see in any of these cases

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia on the federal level, any likelihood that Donald

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump is you know, found guilty and you know, not

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>able to run for president because he claims he's a

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>completely innocent person. Well, let's leave his claim aside for

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a second. The only crime that would in theory bar

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>him from running for president again is if he's convicted

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of seditious conspiracy. In the January Sixth case, the Florida case,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia case, this New York case. None of them

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>would bar him from running for office again. He might

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have convicted as a felon not be able to vote,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but he can still run. And so that's not really

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on the table except for a seditious conspiracy. And you know,

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>whether he is able to capitalize this on political grounds

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>really remains to be seen, because, as the professor indicated,

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a need, I think in the Republican Party

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to move past Trump and his demagoguery. I

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that is a sustainable general election party, but

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they're right now tethered to him, and they are unwilling

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for short term benefit to individual members willing to move

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. So they're sacrificing the long term health of

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>their party for their individual short term benefit, like Speaker McCarthy,

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, their choice. YEP, it is all right, Michael,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. Michael Zelden, former

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecutor, the former special counselor Robert Muller when he

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>worked at the DJ and also the professor Wendy Schiller.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>She's a director of the Center for American politics and

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>policy for Brown University. You're listening to the Team Cancer,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am easting

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heart Radio app, and

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. We're listening on demand wherever you

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast. I'm gonna go rate to our next guest,

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>John Authors. He's an opending columnist for Bloomberg News. And

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you can probably tell he's not from these parts. He's English,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not from around He's not from around here. But

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow he's become a rabid Red Sox fan. I have

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>no idea how that happened. But he's got a piece

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out today where he's gonna tie in moneyball the opening

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of baseball season to investing. I have no idea how

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he tried to do that, But John, give us your

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here on moneyball investing. Okay, just first making sure

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that I do have a US passport. Okay, yeah,

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but you live in New York. Why are you Red

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Sox fan? My first experience that this wonderful country was

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an exchange student of the high school in Belmont, mass

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is true. So I stayed with a family

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and the oldest brother was away at college, and I

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had his bedroom, and I slept my first night in

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this country underneath a signed photograph of Bobby or I

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had no choice. I have been a hardcore Boston plan

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even though I've never never picked up a Boston accent,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>which is which I think it could all be grateful now.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>In terms of baseball, basically, the rule changes that they've

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>made for this season are very interesting, and I think

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they reflect the way baseball has moved in its use

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of stats and data, and that there's a very close

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>parallel there with the way markets have moved. That quants

0:32:55.480 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and factory investors have steadily got ever more sophisticated in

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>their use of stats, which has required everybody else to

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get that much more sophisticated, with the result that you

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have a market where it's very difficult for new entrance

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to have any success at all unless they've got some

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really powerful computers, which is not so dissimilar from the

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>baseball revolution of looking at the launch angle with which

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you hit the ball, looking at measures for applying the shift,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and so on, that ruthlessly using stats to organize your

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>baseball team increases your chance of winning and makes it

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a much worse spectacle and much harder for others to compete.

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So that was that's my basic comparison there, and so

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bringing it to investing, how does that work? Which is

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>much less interesting. So, well, we don't have the same

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of rule changes, do we. I mean, baseball started

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and they got a twenty second shot clock essentially

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>pitch clock. You can only what you can only try

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and pick off a runner twice. Yes, then apparently the

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger Yeah, the basses are bigger. Fourteenth inning, you get

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a runner on base if you get out that far

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on second base. Um, that's I have a bit of

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it. But then I'm a purist. That

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>seems gimmicky to me. Yes, but the I mean, the

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox managed to lose their first game of the

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>season ten nine, and even though there was that much scoring,

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it barely lasted more than three hours, which which is

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something you'd normally expect the game. If only soccer would

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do something like that, well, sucker lasting more than nineteen

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes or less than nineteen minutes. And anyway, Okay, I

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>thought you wanted to worth investing, so yeah, in terms

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of investing, yes, You're quite right. There

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is no um. There's no equivalent of theo Epstein to

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>come in and change the rules on you. In investing,

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it's ultimately the market. The way people behave, the way

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they invest, the way they deploy funds changes the way

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the market behaves. But there is no opportunity to just

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>change the rules. I think what you have is an

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>arms race where more and more people are going to

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>spend ever more money trying to get data for every subtle,

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>little extra edge they can get. So it's no longer

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about analyzing, which is this is what happened in money ball.

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You take these traditional statistics like batting average, which is

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a really misconceived notion, unfortunately, dating back to a British

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>journalist called Henry Chadwick in the nineteenth century look him up,

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>who misapplied concepts from crickets. I'm very embarrassed about this,

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but initially looking for things like value stocks, momentum stocks,

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and so on was analogous what Michael Lewis wrote about

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.959
<v Speaker 1>in Moneyball. It's taking the stats we can all see

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and looking at them more cleverly. This now is like

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>using your laser gun and your brilliant cameras to see

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>launch angles and defensive positioning or whatever. It's a crunching

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>data on trades, on credit card purchases, on you name.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's analyzing text of every time of CEO speaks in

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>public or whatever, anything that might conceivably get a new edge. Yes, yes, exactly.

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>See who's see who's still got a lot of cars

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in there in their warehouse or who hasn't or whatever.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see how this ends because there is

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>no CEO epstein of the market to just say no,

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stop doing it that way now. So

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I suspect what you see is that investing will become

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a game of people investing ever more silly amounts of

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>money in crunching data ever more precisely. And that does

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. Obviously this concerns about TikTok and so on,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about the lack of privacy these days. I think that

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>probably means that the investment industry will come face to

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>face with the people who are worried about that private

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>privacy in the in the surveillance state. So, I mean,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had data, high speed trading, all this stuff has

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>been in the market for a while now, I mean

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>in AI yeah, so I guess your contention, John, and

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, get used to it, because it ain't going

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>any word, and in fact, it's going to get become

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>more the piece I wrote, just remember the main point.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a very interesting piece of research coming out

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of Mannumert showing that factors are decaying, that they are

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>not so the value factor, of the momentum factor and

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so on are not working as well as they used to.

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>They have ask people have thrown more armory at exploiting

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>anomalies when they can find them, those anomally steadily go away,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and so yes, a lot of this has been around

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, but we're getting to the point

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where you no longer have an edge by doing those

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>things in the same way that Billybean no longer has

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>an age by looking on base percentage, and that requires

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you to pay more money to get ever more. Excuse dates, John,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We had some economic data came out today. A lot

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of folks are focusing on inflation these days. Came in

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than expect it a little bit

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and what's your region as to how

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>our federal reserve will We'll look at this data. I

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't had the chance to go crunching through all of

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the angles of it. Yet I, at first glance, I

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think it means that they don't hike. I think

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the way the market has recovered as swiftly as it has,

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and that the early signs that there really is so

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>much deposit flight going on suggest that the banking crisis

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>really isn't a reason for them to stay their hand,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's still too far above targets for them to

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to change course at this point. Isn't it comforting

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if they hike a little? I mean, I felt good

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>after the ECB did exactly There was a risk. I

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>criticized for saying this at the time, and if if

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they had not hiked at all, or even cutters, some

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>people would have thought that would have been a very

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>clear signal. The said is a charge of regulating the

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>banking system, and they obviously think something really bad has

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>just happened. That confidence does have its own self reinforcing factors,

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly when you're talking about banking. If people lose confidence

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in the back, it will lose it will lose all

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>its deposits, even though there's nothing wrong with it. So

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they probably made the right call this month

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with the twenty five bits, the market at the moment

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks we'll get another twenty five bits and that will

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be the end of it. I think that's a reasonable baseline.

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm still nervous about we need more inflation. I'm still

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>nervous about the notion that Rachel will be coming down

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.879
<v Speaker 1>by the end of being Hey, Johnny, you mentioned that

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you've gained your US citizenship. Good for you, but I'm

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>guessing you're still an Englishman at heart. May eighth, the

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Carnation of King Charles the third, How locked in or

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be on that or not? I

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>had forgotten that was happening on I thought you were

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>going to sell me the FA Cup final the day

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we see I know that's unblazed these it still feels

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>very strange that the national anthem has actually changed to

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>God's Save the King. It's very strange that the barristers

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 1>who bring prosecutions in course aren't gold QC for Queen's

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:04.359
<v Speaker 1>cancel anymore. They oh interesting in the sunshine bands and yes,

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>so it feels very strange that right this guy's in charge. Well,

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I suggest just get a nice point, raise a glass

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and toast your your new King. John Author, Senior editor

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. You're listening to the tape cans are

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Good way to end the week

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>here on an up note. Good way to end the solid,

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ending the week, ending the month, ending the quarter. Exactly right,

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not too bad again, sp up nine tenths to

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Let's get a sense of kind of what

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>some of these professional folks are doing at there, what

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of advice that they given to their clients? And

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Ahn equity strategist at Wells Fargo joins us, and she was,

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to the part of the Yale varsity sailing team.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty cool. My son was a sailor at Penn State,

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's kind of cool. Those sailing people are a

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>little strange though, Anna, and thanks for joining us here.

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling your clients here these days? After

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a brutal twenty twenty two, but a nice snapback so

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>far in the first quarter. Well, you know, the good

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.399
<v Speaker 1>thing about being a sailor, you have that spatial awareness. Yeah,

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty good at that big macro picture, and what

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to clients spout right now is to not

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>be fooled by sort of the headstake we've been getting out.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You're right, according to date, markets are up. You're seeing

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong rally recently, but I think a lot of

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's driven by what we've seen aggressive lowering in yields

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and the perception of the head of the end of

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the tightening cycle. I think that's premature and a lot

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of that's going to give back. This is the opportunity

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to reposition the portfolio. So do you think that means

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a pivot point for markets

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>as well? The last few days there didn't seem to

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be much reason for Ralley, and I think a lot

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of it was window dressing and momentum. Does that change

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>in Q two now? You bring up a good point

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about momentum. Part of it was a sort of initial

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>fight to safety, and then another part of it was

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just the natural mechanics the window dressing lower yield growthier stocks,

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>especially more tech, and you saw the Nastac really rally.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>But that rotation for US is coming in which we

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of those trades could be a longer

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>term We want to see growth in the longer term,

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but in the immediate term we were pretty much shedding

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that value exposure. We're staking for lower

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets. That's kind of the direction we're going in.

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And how did you in your team at Wells Fargo,

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you kind of factoring in some of the

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>termoil we've seen in the US regional banking space, and

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>then of course the news which made meet idiosyncratic over

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>credit suite. So the regional banking fallout that we've seen,

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we think there could be much bigger ripple effects because

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here, it's not just a couple

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of banks that had a very peculiar situation. It's interest

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>rate risk. We had the FED tighten at an extremely

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>aggressive pace, almost unprecedented in history, and that interest rate

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>risk affects more than just a handful of banks. We

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>just haven't seen it all come to light yet. On

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>top of that, you're already seeing regulations coming down, So

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that combination of additional regulation and what could be more

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>problems for banks as they realize their unrealized losses or

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as we see more difficulty with credit liquidity due to

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the caution in the financial industry. This combined just tightened

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions even if the FED decides to stop. So

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're concerned about here and why we're taking

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a little more negative view. But the FED isn't going

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to stop, at least this next meeting. We still expect

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>them to hike twenty five bases points, right, And I

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>also wonder what your take is on the market pricing

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in cuts by year, and it seems terribly unlikely to me,

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's happening. If you look at the w RP

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>function on the Bloomber terminal, Yeah, looking at it right now,

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, it's happening. But remember about a year ago,

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>people thought they were going to be cut to mid

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>year as well, and that had to get priced out.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>As that got priced out, you saw yield rise again

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and equities have a difficult time. I think that's something

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to expect again. I think these cuts,

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You're right, they're premature and as a market has to

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 1>reprice that that kind of turmoil is where we want

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to be cautious and make sure we're position in the

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>right way. But I think longer term when we talk

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>longer term, right now you've got the ten year nomen

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of three half. We think that it can go up

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to about three sixty three seventy. The longer term it's

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>coming back down, and that longer term trend is how

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we want a position. That's why we're favoring that long

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>duration trade. How about valuation here? A lot of folks say,

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, we might get a trade here on you know,

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a pause in the FED, but long term valuation still

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not our friend here. And given maybe some of the

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>macro uncertainties out there, how are you guys thinking about that.

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>We're being very careful about valuation, very particular. What we

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>want here is growth at the right price. Now that

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds cheesy and it sounds money on that back in

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, right and it sounds obvious, But right now

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to grab for growth because you're fearful of

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a recession, or grab for growth because that's kind of

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the safety trade that was ingrained in US when we

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>had that nice growth momentum trade pre pandemic. But what

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got to notice now is the better valuations are

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>slightly down the cap we like, especially the mid growth

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>MidCap growth space. You're seeing more friendly valuations, you're still

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing steady growers, and you're still seeing clean balance sheets.

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So this combination is a pretty sweet spot for us

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that we think there could be more edge rather than

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>chasing these really big large cap growth names that may

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>already be too expensive, in particular with some of the

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>rally we've seen in the last few weeks. What kind

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of advice do you give just your average retail investor,

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe somebody at a bar or ask your take on

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a sixty forty portfolio? Is that dead or is that

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>still something to stick with after you know it was

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>turned on its head last year? You know, I really

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like that question, because when we're talking for the average investor,

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that sixty forty is dead. You know,

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at certain deals, you look at the market volatility.

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Our price target is forty two hundred on that SMP.

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>We're already at forty eighty five. You know, it's not

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the most attractive price return there. But I think what

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm emphasize here is to be lower risk when you're

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:39.919
<v Speaker 1>uncertain and we're not sure they fall out, and really

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the full impact of this regional banking crisis. We're expecting

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>tighter financial conditions and you just have this turmoil. I

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>think as a retail investor, you want to be a

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>little more high quality, lower leverage, you want lower volatility

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>names and kind of a tighten the book a little

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>bit so you can see where things shake out. Because

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>if things turn out for the better, I think that's

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>something you will have time to reposition into. But for now,

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the pain point could really be a downturn in the markets.

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We want to avoid that in particular, you know, no

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>need to get burned in the high risk names. So

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and as some of the big cap tech names that

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>had been in stalwarts for the last decade plus a'

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>actually had a really good start to the year here.

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Microsoft, Apple, of course Met has got its

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>own story on the cost cuts. Have they got ahead

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of themselves? I think a bit. You know, these big

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cap tech names, it's easy to lump them all together,

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but you look at a lot of it. It's duration risk,

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and you know, as you see yields come lower, they

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can have that nice rally. They also had some tough

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>underperformance from last year, so you're seeing a little bit

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of that give back. But to us, when we look

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>at big cap tech, it's too much of a lump sum,

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a darling favorites that we see in

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the headlines. For us, we like to be particular, you know,

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>within tech, if you want to be a little more defensive,

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest more leaning towards software, particularly ven Semis

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Semmes had a little more of that cyclical exposure traditionally.

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>But still it's not that there aren't opportunities in big

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>cap tech. We just think it's a little premature because

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing that risk rally here. But really, if you're

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>positioning for a year out, then there are opportunities to

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be had, but look for that right valuation. All right,

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and I thank so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective and a hunt. She's an equity strategist

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>at Wells Fargo. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and I'm

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast.

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio