WEBVTT - The Power of The University

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:24.076
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is deep background to show

0:00:24.156 --> 0:00:27.516
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.036 --> 0:00:32.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. As the school year starts up again,

0:00:32.956 --> 0:00:35.716
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about a form of power that

0:00:35.836 --> 0:00:40.156
<v Speaker 1>we often overlook, and that is the power of universities.

0:00:40.916 --> 0:00:44.796
<v Speaker 1>Universities are not just centers of learning and of research

0:00:44.916 --> 0:00:49.716
<v Speaker 1>and of teaching. They're also powerful actors in the socialization

0:00:49.796 --> 0:00:53.316
<v Speaker 1>of young people into the values that our society cares about.

0:00:53.836 --> 0:00:57.316
<v Speaker 1>There are places where common sense is created, where new

0:00:57.396 --> 0:01:00.556
<v Speaker 1>knowledge is formed, and there are also places where there

0:01:00.556 --> 0:01:06.836
<v Speaker 1>are internal power dynamics, with faculty, students, deans, and administrators

0:01:07.156 --> 0:01:12.476
<v Speaker 1>all involved in a sometimes collaborative but sometimes antagonistic effort

0:01:12.516 --> 0:01:17.836
<v Speaker 1>to determine who controls what happens in the university. To

0:01:17.956 --> 0:01:22.316
<v Speaker 1>discuss power in the American university today, I'm joined by

0:01:22.396 --> 0:01:26.476
<v Speaker 1>Tamar Gendler. Tamar is the Dean of the Faculty of

0:01:26.596 --> 0:01:30.116
<v Speaker 1>Arts and Sciences at Yale University, where she's also the

0:01:30.196 --> 0:01:34.396
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Scully Professor of Philosophy. For those of you who

0:01:34.436 --> 0:01:37.596
<v Speaker 1>aren't academics, the dean of the Faculty of Arts and

0:01:37.636 --> 0:01:42.396
<v Speaker 1>Sciences is an extremely important and powerful person. Her job

0:01:42.796 --> 0:01:45.436
<v Speaker 1>is both to talk to the president and the provost

0:01:45.476 --> 0:01:49.036
<v Speaker 1>on the one side, the faculty on the other, and last,

0:01:49.036 --> 0:01:52.156
<v Speaker 1>and not least, the students and the people who actually

0:01:52.276 --> 0:01:56.036
<v Speaker 1>make the university run every day, the clerical and technical

0:01:56.076 --> 0:01:59.636
<v Speaker 1>workers who actually make sure that the lights are on

0:01:59.916 --> 0:02:02.756
<v Speaker 1>and the classrooms are ready, and that students have food

0:02:02.796 --> 0:02:05.196
<v Speaker 1>to eat. All of that cycles back to the power

0:02:05.236 --> 0:02:07.316
<v Speaker 1>of the dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences.

0:02:07.956 --> 0:02:12.716
<v Speaker 1>And because Tamar was and remains a brilliant philosopher whose

0:02:12.796 --> 0:02:15.356
<v Speaker 1>job is to think about the deeper meaning of the

0:02:15.396 --> 0:02:20.316
<v Speaker 1>world around us, she brings a distinctively thoughtful take to

0:02:20.516 --> 0:02:28.276
<v Speaker 1>questions of power in and around the university. Tamar, thank

0:02:28.276 --> 0:02:32.276
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining me. The organization of power

0:02:32.316 --> 0:02:35.236
<v Speaker 1>in the university has evolved a lot. There used to

0:02:35.276 --> 0:02:37.676
<v Speaker 1>be an ideal of a university as a self governing

0:02:37.716 --> 0:02:42.396
<v Speaker 1>institution where the faculty more or less collectively ran the show.

0:02:42.436 --> 0:02:45.436
<v Speaker 1>But that's not been true for decades in the US,

0:02:45.516 --> 0:02:47.796
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably even less true today than it's ever been.

0:02:48.036 --> 0:02:51.236
<v Speaker 1>So when you want something to happen, to what degree

0:02:51.276 --> 0:02:54.876
<v Speaker 1>can you get it to happen? So governance in the

0:02:55.036 --> 0:03:00.676
<v Speaker 1>university is fundamentally a collaborative exercise. But I do have

0:03:00.956 --> 0:03:05.436
<v Speaker 1>resources that allow me to shape the segment of the

0:03:05.516 --> 0:03:09.036
<v Speaker 1>university for which I'm responsible in various ways. For example,

0:03:09.596 --> 0:03:16.316
<v Speaker 1>I control the budget importantly, I control the hiring of

0:03:16.436 --> 0:03:21.476
<v Speaker 1>faculty in certain areas, and I oversee the process of

0:03:21.996 --> 0:03:26.396
<v Speaker 1>tenure and promotion. One of the primary things that I

0:03:26.476 --> 0:03:29.436
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out how to do is to determine

0:03:29.636 --> 0:03:35.876
<v Speaker 1>whose voices to trust in making decisions, and how to

0:03:36.236 --> 0:03:41.956
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to speak honestly about things. But something that's

0:03:41.956 --> 0:03:45.316
<v Speaker 1>distinctive about academic management, at least in the US, at

0:03:45.356 --> 0:03:48.876
<v Speaker 1>least these days, still is that people in powerful positions

0:03:48.876 --> 0:03:52.316
<v Speaker 1>like you didn't come up through a managerial chaining process.

0:03:52.476 --> 0:03:54.596
<v Speaker 1>You came up by being a professor, in your case,

0:03:54.596 --> 0:03:58.836
<v Speaker 1>a philosophy professor. How does the fact that you and

0:03:58.916 --> 0:04:05.836
<v Speaker 1>other senior administrators were professors rather than professional managers affect

0:04:06.036 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 1>do you think the way that you exercise the lens

0:04:09.476 --> 0:04:14.516
<v Speaker 1>and responsibility that you have. So the kind of managerial

0:04:14.596 --> 0:04:20.156
<v Speaker 1>work that I do with regard to staff has been

0:04:20.276 --> 0:04:23.836
<v Speaker 1>a skill that I acquired only in and on the

0:04:23.956 --> 0:04:28.876
<v Speaker 1>job sense, and I found it enormously gratifying to learn

0:04:28.956 --> 0:04:33.116
<v Speaker 1>from people on what we sometimes call the backstage vice

0:04:33.116 --> 0:04:37.396
<v Speaker 1>presidential side of the academic house. How it is that

0:04:37.436 --> 0:04:42.676
<v Speaker 1>one engages in things like HR management, budgeting, thinking about

0:04:42.716 --> 0:04:45.316
<v Speaker 1>how we relate to the Office of General Counsel, the

0:04:45.596 --> 0:04:49.436
<v Speaker 1>city and state, how we relate to federal relations. All

0:04:49.476 --> 0:04:53.596
<v Speaker 1>of those are skills that are acquired through the course

0:04:53.756 --> 0:04:58.076
<v Speaker 1>of engaging in managerial work. Let me ask a question

0:04:58.116 --> 0:05:01.956
<v Speaker 1>about the relationship between those two parts, the front of

0:05:01.996 --> 0:05:03.556
<v Speaker 1>the house and the back of the house. To use

0:05:03.596 --> 0:05:05.836
<v Speaker 1>the analogy that you just use, which if I am

0:05:05.916 --> 0:05:09.076
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken, comes from the running of restaurants, may be appropriate.

0:05:09.116 --> 0:05:13.396
<v Speaker 1>A lot of faculty, a lot of my faculty colleagues,

0:05:13.476 --> 0:05:16.396
<v Speaker 1>especially my colleagues who are say, ten twenty years older

0:05:16.396 --> 0:05:19.956
<v Speaker 1>than I am, talk a lot about how there seem

0:05:19.996 --> 0:05:26.316
<v Speaker 1>to be many more layers of sub deans, dean lits, deanlings,

0:05:26.796 --> 0:05:31.996
<v Speaker 1>people who are effectively professional administrators and when they're being

0:05:31.996 --> 0:05:37.676
<v Speaker 1>described negatively, bureaucrats who are crucially involved in running these huge,

0:05:37.796 --> 0:05:40.556
<v Speaker 1>rich institutions. And I think it's true even at the

0:05:40.596 --> 0:05:43.836
<v Speaker 1>less rich institutions. And my older colleagues tend to talk

0:05:43.836 --> 0:05:46.436
<v Speaker 1>about this as something that they feel has changed significantly

0:05:46.436 --> 0:05:49.956
<v Speaker 1>over their time in the university. Do you think of that.

0:05:50.036 --> 0:05:53.596
<v Speaker 1>First of all, is that perception accurate or is that

0:05:53.796 --> 0:05:57.636
<v Speaker 1>a nostalgic perception that they have, And if it is accurate,

0:05:58.196 --> 0:06:00.956
<v Speaker 1>how is it changing our universities if they're being run

0:06:01.276 --> 0:06:04.716
<v Speaker 1>by people with increasingly with people with more professional training

0:06:04.716 --> 0:06:08.716
<v Speaker 1>and how to manage things, but with less knowledge of

0:06:09.156 --> 0:06:14.156
<v Speaker 1>the academic side of the job. The deans and deanlets

0:06:14.196 --> 0:06:17.916
<v Speaker 1>about which your colleagues complain are very often people whose

0:06:18.236 --> 0:06:22.716
<v Speaker 1>assignments are either regulatory in the sense that they are

0:06:22.796 --> 0:06:27.076
<v Speaker 1>asked to make sure that the university remains in conformity

0:06:27.116 --> 0:06:32.996
<v Speaker 1>with either an internally or externally imposed constraint a process

0:06:33.076 --> 0:06:35.476
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be followed in order to achieve a

0:06:35.516 --> 0:06:40.436
<v Speaker 1>certain outcome. Or they are involved in various aspects of

0:06:40.556 --> 0:06:46.476
<v Speaker 1>student services and student life where they interact directly with

0:06:46.636 --> 0:06:53.396
<v Speaker 1>students for whom college may be an unfamiliar familial experience.

0:06:54.636 --> 0:07:00.516
<v Speaker 1>That's two thirds. And in addition, as we know from

0:07:00.996 --> 0:07:09.476
<v Speaker 1>sociological theory, any bureaucracy develops systems which it then perpetuates. Tomorrow,

0:07:09.516 --> 0:07:13.636
<v Speaker 1>we've talked so far about the way that the power

0:07:13.716 --> 0:07:16.836
<v Speaker 1>operates within the university. I want to turn now to

0:07:16.876 --> 0:07:22.796
<v Speaker 1>the question of how universities exercise power and influence or

0:07:22.836 --> 0:07:27.316
<v Speaker 1>don't exercise power and influence over the society more broadly,

0:07:27.956 --> 0:07:30.396
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I think we often take for granted.

0:07:30.676 --> 0:07:34.116
<v Speaker 1>Rather than breaking down and thinking about I want to

0:07:34.156 --> 0:07:38.876
<v Speaker 1>begin that by asking you, how do you think a

0:07:39.036 --> 0:07:46.076
<v Speaker 1>university does influence the society more broadly, and then we

0:07:46.076 --> 0:07:48.756
<v Speaker 1>can move to how it should do that. Yeah, that's

0:07:48.796 --> 0:07:55.996
<v Speaker 1>a terrific question. So the fundamental purpose of a university

0:07:56.516 --> 0:08:03.396
<v Speaker 1>is to preserve, create, and transmit knowledge, and so at

0:08:03.396 --> 0:08:09.516
<v Speaker 1>its most fundamental level and in its ideal form wandwich

0:08:09.556 --> 0:08:16.436
<v Speaker 1>In university has power in society and empowers society is

0:08:16.476 --> 0:08:21.836
<v Speaker 1>through the preservation, creation, and transmission of knowledge. But one

0:08:21.836 --> 0:08:27.156
<v Speaker 1>of the most powerful things that universities do, in addition

0:08:27.316 --> 0:08:34.036
<v Speaker 1>to transmitting knowledge is certify that the transmission of knowledge

0:08:34.116 --> 0:08:39.836
<v Speaker 1>has taken place, and in so doing they create and

0:08:39.916 --> 0:08:46.716
<v Speaker 1>sustain the professional class. And of course that operation brings

0:08:46.836 --> 0:08:53.316
<v Speaker 1>with it the incredibly important socialization function, and universities in

0:08:53.516 --> 0:08:57.716
<v Speaker 1>America in particular, but in the world in general, play

0:08:57.716 --> 0:09:04.716
<v Speaker 1>an incredible role in forming and socializing the elite and

0:09:04.956 --> 0:09:09.556
<v Speaker 1>in differentiating among those who have been present at this

0:09:09.756 --> 0:09:14.476
<v Speaker 1>incredibly formative time of life between the ages of eighteen

0:09:14.796 --> 0:09:18.556
<v Speaker 1>and their early twenties, and those who have not been

0:09:19.156 --> 0:09:25.836
<v Speaker 1>formed in that kind of environment. What universities and colleges

0:09:26.196 --> 0:09:30.756
<v Speaker 1>do is, in addition to provide training that isn't professional training,

0:09:30.876 --> 0:09:37.596
<v Speaker 1>training of a kind that says, beyond the twelve years

0:09:37.636 --> 0:09:43.716
<v Speaker 1>of universal education, I have gone on to explore something.

0:09:44.196 --> 0:09:47.516
<v Speaker 1>And one of the astounding things about the way that

0:09:47.556 --> 0:09:53.036
<v Speaker 1>the American collegiate educational system works is, with the exception

0:09:53.396 --> 0:09:59.916
<v Speaker 1>of areas like engineering, it is largely content indifferent. And

0:10:00.436 --> 0:10:05.076
<v Speaker 1>what that suggests is that it is the acquisition of

0:10:05.076 --> 0:10:11.276
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of mastery of something complicated and the

0:10:11.676 --> 0:10:16.276
<v Speaker 1>co presence with others who are also engaged in study.

0:10:16.356 --> 0:10:21.356
<v Speaker 1>That is what college is providing, in addition, of course,

0:10:21.436 --> 0:10:24.876
<v Speaker 1>to the particular skills that are being provided, skills of writing,

0:10:24.956 --> 0:10:29.396
<v Speaker 1>skills of mathematics, and knowledge of some or another subject matter.

0:10:29.956 --> 0:10:36.676
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that American industry typically hires people regardless

0:10:36.676 --> 0:10:40.556
<v Speaker 1>of area of studying college suggests that that certification process

0:10:40.996 --> 0:10:44.756
<v Speaker 1>is a process of certifying a different kind of knowledge

0:10:44.756 --> 0:10:48.756
<v Speaker 1>and skill acquisition. Although aren't a lot of students at

0:10:48.796 --> 0:10:51.516
<v Speaker 1>least voting with their feet and hinting that they don't

0:10:51.556 --> 0:10:53.836
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that it's going to be that way in the

0:10:53.876 --> 0:10:56.156
<v Speaker 1>long run. I mean, when you and I were in

0:10:56.236 --> 0:11:00.636
<v Speaker 1>college thirty plus years ago, we thought that majoring in

0:11:00.676 --> 0:11:03.556
<v Speaker 1>the humanities was something that could lead you to a

0:11:03.676 --> 0:11:05.716
<v Speaker 1>job teaching of the humanities is you and I both

0:11:05.796 --> 0:11:07.756
<v Speaker 1>ended up doing. Or it could lead you to working

0:11:07.756 --> 0:11:10.196
<v Speaker 1>for an investment bank, or could lead you to become

0:11:10.476 --> 0:11:13.076
<v Speaker 1>a poet, or could lead you to almost any sort

0:11:13.076 --> 0:11:17.796
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But today fewer and fewer students, not only universities,

0:11:17.796 --> 0:11:22.476
<v Speaker 1>but at elite universities, are interested in majoring in more

0:11:22.516 --> 0:11:26.796
<v Speaker 1>abstract humanities fields, which they don't perceive as leading to

0:11:27.596 --> 0:11:30.476
<v Speaker 1>a job so measured by a market stance. At least,

0:11:31.036 --> 0:11:37.556
<v Speaker 1>that idea of a general certification seems to be increasingly obsolete.

0:11:37.796 --> 0:11:42.476
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting question what explains the decline of majors

0:11:42.636 --> 0:11:46.516
<v Speaker 1>in humanities, And I teach at one of the very

0:11:46.596 --> 0:11:49.676
<v Speaker 1>last universities that continues to have almost a third of

0:11:49.716 --> 0:11:53.996
<v Speaker 1>its students majoring in humanities fields. It is certainly the

0:11:54.036 --> 0:12:00.396
<v Speaker 1>case that students in university today are increasingly taking courses

0:12:00.476 --> 0:12:03.076
<v Speaker 1>in what we might think of as technical areas in

0:12:03.156 --> 0:12:07.916
<v Speaker 1>computer science, in data science, and in social science, fields

0:12:07.916 --> 0:12:12.756
<v Speaker 1>that have quantitative aspects like economics. But even though there

0:12:12.756 --> 0:12:17.236
<v Speaker 1>aren't as many students majoring in humanities, it remains the

0:12:17.316 --> 0:12:21.876
<v Speaker 1>case that the skills that are acquired through humanistic education,

0:12:22.516 --> 0:12:28.356
<v Speaker 1>the capacity to analyze argument, the capacity to take evidence

0:12:28.556 --> 0:12:34.436
<v Speaker 1>from an ambiguous source of information, the capacity to appreciate

0:12:34.516 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>what is esthetically valuable in addition to what is practically valuable,

0:12:40.156 --> 0:12:46.076
<v Speaker 1>remain things in which students are interested, and the remain

0:12:46.236 --> 0:12:51.636
<v Speaker 1>things that allow people to do, even in practical fields,

0:12:52.196 --> 0:12:58.076
<v Speaker 1>more interesting and more fulfilling work. So I don't know

0:12:58.436 --> 0:13:03.596
<v Speaker 1>whether the explanation for why it is that students aren't

0:13:03.636 --> 0:13:08.036
<v Speaker 1>studying humanities is solely that they think that it isn't

0:13:08.196 --> 0:13:12.956
<v Speaker 1>useful for careers. It may be in some ways just

0:13:13.236 --> 0:13:16.996
<v Speaker 1>a crowding out with the recognition that there are other

0:13:17.036 --> 0:13:21.196
<v Speaker 1>things that also need to be acquired, that are skills

0:13:21.236 --> 0:13:24.396
<v Speaker 1>that are at this point not yet taught fully in

0:13:24.516 --> 0:13:30.716
<v Speaker 1>high school. They require more than the twelve years to master. Yeah,

0:13:30.716 --> 0:13:32.836
<v Speaker 1>and I should be really clear that I am very

0:13:32.916 --> 0:13:39.116
<v Speaker 1>sad about the general decline in the humanities focus of students,

0:13:39.196 --> 0:13:43.676
<v Speaker 1>mostly because my own view is that without the humanities,

0:13:43.916 --> 0:13:46.676
<v Speaker 1>you can make stuff, you can build stuff, you can

0:13:46.716 --> 0:13:50.116
<v Speaker 1>solve certain kinds of technical problems, but you'll never know

0:13:50.196 --> 0:13:52.956
<v Speaker 1>what the right thing to do is. I mean, humanities

0:13:53.036 --> 0:13:57.276
<v Speaker 1>is interested fundamentally in normative questions and questions of what

0:13:57.716 --> 0:14:00.836
<v Speaker 1>the world ought to be arranged, like whether it's ethical

0:14:00.956 --> 0:14:06.156
<v Speaker 1>or moral, or esthetic or political. And in that sense,

0:14:06.476 --> 0:14:08.676
<v Speaker 1>in my view, at least, if you don't have the humanities,

0:14:09.316 --> 0:14:11.756
<v Speaker 1>your whole system is going to grind to a halt

0:14:11.876 --> 0:14:14.316
<v Speaker 1>because you're just I mean, well, it won't purely grind

0:14:14.356 --> 0:14:16.156
<v Speaker 1>to all, because people will still make decisions about what

0:14:16.156 --> 0:14:18.596
<v Speaker 1>they should do, but they'll do it without thinking. And

0:14:18.636 --> 0:14:21.756
<v Speaker 1>then you get the consequences that we have in the

0:14:21.756 --> 0:14:25.716
<v Speaker 1>world where new technologies emerge and are immediately deployed, and

0:14:25.756 --> 0:14:27.996
<v Speaker 1>then people look back a few years later, sometimes not

0:14:28.076 --> 0:14:29.876
<v Speaker 1>very many years later at all, and say, oh, no,

0:14:30.636 --> 0:14:32.636
<v Speaker 1>what did we do? And often the answer is you

0:14:32.676 --> 0:14:35.556
<v Speaker 1>didn't stop to think about the way you wanted things

0:14:35.596 --> 0:14:38.076
<v Speaker 1>to turn out. You only thought about the fact that

0:14:38.076 --> 0:14:41.796
<v Speaker 1>you had this cool new technology to play with. And no,

0:14:41.916 --> 0:14:44.916
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. The world doesn't stop because you're not

0:14:44.996 --> 0:14:47.796
<v Speaker 1>asking the normative questions. And one of the things that

0:14:48.036 --> 0:14:53.236
<v Speaker 1>humanities and the humanistic social sciences cause people to realize

0:14:53.276 --> 0:14:56.876
<v Speaker 1>is that there are always normative questions, whether attentive to

0:14:56.916 --> 0:15:01.076
<v Speaker 1>them or not, and that if you just move forward

0:15:01.116 --> 0:15:05.436
<v Speaker 1>without attending to them, you will end up with patterns

0:15:05.436 --> 0:15:07.876
<v Speaker 1>in the world which aren't the patterns that you would

0:15:07.916 --> 0:15:12.676
<v Speaker 1>have wanted. Tomorrow. When I asked you about what the

0:15:12.756 --> 0:15:16.236
<v Speaker 1>university is in fact to do powerwise, you started with

0:15:16.876 --> 0:15:21.116
<v Speaker 1>the ways that they transmit knowledge through certification and through socialization.

0:15:23.316 --> 0:15:26.596
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you one more question about that aspect,

0:15:26.636 --> 0:15:28.556
<v Speaker 1>and then I want to switch to the question of

0:15:28.596 --> 0:15:31.796
<v Speaker 1>the making of knowledge. But before we get there, I

0:15:31.796 --> 0:15:33.476
<v Speaker 1>do want to ask one more question about the idea

0:15:33.516 --> 0:15:36.796
<v Speaker 1>of intellectual socialization, which I think is a phrase that

0:15:36.836 --> 0:15:39.556
<v Speaker 1>you use or something similar to that, and I wonder

0:15:39.596 --> 0:15:41.636
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by that, because one of the things

0:15:41.716 --> 0:15:44.916
<v Speaker 1>that a sociologist would say, or that a Martian would

0:15:44.916 --> 0:15:47.596
<v Speaker 1>say if they came and looked at our universities is

0:15:47.596 --> 0:15:51.316
<v Speaker 1>that the students do seem like they leave thinking a

0:15:51.316 --> 0:15:53.996
<v Speaker 1>little differently on a whole range of issues, or maybe

0:15:53.996 --> 0:15:56.876
<v Speaker 1>a lot differently than they do when they came in.

0:15:57.796 --> 0:16:00.796
<v Speaker 1>And that involves a whole bunch of different things. But

0:16:00.876 --> 0:16:04.316
<v Speaker 1>it's approaches to how they think about problems ideally, but

0:16:04.396 --> 0:16:08.076
<v Speaker 1>it also seems often to include solutions to those problems,

0:16:08.636 --> 0:16:13.596
<v Speaker 1>including sometimes political solutions. And so I'm wondering what did

0:16:13.636 --> 0:16:20.556
<v Speaker 1>you mean by intellectual socialization. Yeah, universities are like cities

0:16:20.836 --> 0:16:24.916
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that they bring together people from a

0:16:25.036 --> 0:16:31.276
<v Speaker 1>wide range of previous life experiences in a tightly socially

0:16:31.396 --> 0:16:39.476
<v Speaker 1>knit space that produces a lot of nonintended accidental encounters

0:16:39.516 --> 0:16:44.636
<v Speaker 1>that require people to recognize that the way in which

0:16:44.676 --> 0:16:47.476
<v Speaker 1>they happen to have lived up until the point when

0:16:47.516 --> 0:16:50.436
<v Speaker 1>they arrived at the university is just one of many,

0:16:50.516 --> 0:16:54.076
<v Speaker 1>many ways to have lived. So this is about the

0:16:54.116 --> 0:16:59.996
<v Speaker 1>way in which the socialization function almost inevitably results in

0:17:00.276 --> 0:17:05.316
<v Speaker 1>an unseating of what it is that had been accepted

0:17:05.436 --> 0:17:12.076
<v Speaker 1>as the natural or only or marked way of being. So,

0:17:12.156 --> 0:17:15.876
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the socialization an example of that because

0:17:15.876 --> 0:17:17.836
<v Speaker 1>that was that was that seemed correct to me, but

0:17:17.876 --> 0:17:22.876
<v Speaker 1>also abstract. Yeah, So, a student who grew up in

0:17:22.996 --> 0:17:26.516
<v Speaker 1>a particular religious community, a student who grew up with

0:17:26.676 --> 0:17:30.996
<v Speaker 1>a particular set of political values, a student who grew

0:17:31.036 --> 0:17:35.276
<v Speaker 1>up in a particular language, a student who grew up

0:17:35.396 --> 0:17:39.396
<v Speaker 1>in a particular social class. All of those are ways

0:17:39.436 --> 0:17:42.236
<v Speaker 1>of being that are felt very, very naturally to students,

0:17:42.436 --> 0:17:46.156
<v Speaker 1>and they typically grew up in a town. Towns have

0:17:46.236 --> 0:17:50.316
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree of heterogeneity to them. But to the

0:17:50.316 --> 0:17:52.996
<v Speaker 1>extent that you grew up in a particular locale, you've

0:17:52.996 --> 0:17:56.036
<v Speaker 1>had a particular set of experiences. You grew up on

0:17:56.116 --> 0:17:59.156
<v Speaker 1>a farm in the Midwest, or you grew up in

0:17:59.716 --> 0:18:02.476
<v Speaker 1>the Upper West Side of New York City, and those

0:18:02.476 --> 0:18:06.116
<v Speaker 1>are the set of experiences that you have. Coming into

0:18:06.236 --> 0:18:10.796
<v Speaker 1>contact with individuals from a wide range of other experiences

0:18:11.156 --> 0:18:14.236
<v Speaker 1>just makes it in f and coming into contact with

0:18:14.316 --> 0:18:19.596
<v Speaker 1>them in the particular way that universities and other youth

0:18:19.796 --> 0:18:22.356
<v Speaker 1>organizations do this right, if you go into the army,

0:18:22.756 --> 0:18:26.756
<v Speaker 1>you interact with people in an intense environment, in a

0:18:26.916 --> 0:18:32.036
<v Speaker 1>deeply social space, in an age stratified environment for a

0:18:32.076 --> 0:18:36.676
<v Speaker 1>crucial period of time. But the disruption of the assumption

0:18:36.796 --> 0:18:39.676
<v Speaker 1>that the only natural way to do things is the

0:18:39.756 --> 0:18:42.676
<v Speaker 1>way that you have always been doing things is one

0:18:42.676 --> 0:18:46.996
<v Speaker 1>of the crucial disruptions that universities bring. And that's a

0:18:47.036 --> 0:18:50.916
<v Speaker 1>result of the formal structure of the university. We haven't

0:18:50.996 --> 0:18:54.476
<v Speaker 1>yet gotten to the second question, which is the content question,

0:18:54.556 --> 0:18:56.996
<v Speaker 1>which is not just that you bring this group of

0:18:57.076 --> 0:19:00.716
<v Speaker 1>people together, but what it is that you do with them.

0:19:00.756 --> 0:19:02.916
<v Speaker 1>But let me make sure that I've answered your first

0:19:02.996 --> 0:19:05.196
<v Speaker 1>question before I move on to the second. I mean,

0:19:05.236 --> 0:19:07.356
<v Speaker 1>I think you have. I do think we should just

0:19:07.516 --> 0:19:11.556
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that the effect that you're describing, you take a

0:19:11.556 --> 0:19:14.876
<v Speaker 1>lot of bright, young, impressionable people, you put them in

0:19:14.916 --> 0:19:18.836
<v Speaker 1>a single community, can produce for all that we talk about,

0:19:18.876 --> 0:19:24.156
<v Speaker 1>the diversity of viewpoints in our universities can produce some

0:19:24.316 --> 0:19:29.996
<v Speaker 1>degree of homogenization of their views. They come in very diverse,

0:19:30.316 --> 0:19:32.756
<v Speaker 1>and in principle, one of the reasons that we want

0:19:32.796 --> 0:19:35.716
<v Speaker 1>a big diverse student body is so that the student

0:19:35.716 --> 0:19:38.756
<v Speaker 1>body can remain intellectually diverse. So when they graduate, they

0:19:38.796 --> 0:19:41.396
<v Speaker 1>have many different points of views since they came in

0:19:41.396 --> 0:19:43.196
<v Speaker 1>with many points where they've been recruited to have many

0:19:43.236 --> 0:19:46.276
<v Speaker 1>points of view. And yet sometimes it doesn't work that way.

0:19:46.316 --> 0:19:48.956
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sometimes it leads to people reaching a kind

0:19:48.996 --> 0:19:54.076
<v Speaker 1>of background consensus on what they think. And critics of

0:19:54.076 --> 0:19:56.556
<v Speaker 1>elite universities, you know, I'm not one of them, but

0:19:56.596 --> 0:19:59.676
<v Speaker 1>there are critics of elite universities who say, gee, you know,

0:19:59.676 --> 0:20:03.116
<v Speaker 1>they come in students come in from a Trump county

0:20:04.076 --> 0:20:08.156
<v Speaker 1>and then they come into a university where statistically almost

0:20:08.156 --> 0:20:11.356
<v Speaker 1>nobody on any faculty anywhere in the United States voted

0:20:11.396 --> 0:20:15.596
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump. It's not just elite universities, it's all universities.

0:20:15.956 --> 0:20:18.756
<v Speaker 1>And then they're in a community where they emerge with

0:20:18.836 --> 0:20:22.796
<v Speaker 1>a view of, roughly speaking, what people with their education

0:20:22.836 --> 0:20:26.556
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to think, and that's a kind of liberal

0:20:26.876 --> 0:20:30.956
<v Speaker 1>or left of center consensus, which over the course of

0:20:30.956 --> 0:20:33.076
<v Speaker 1>their careers they may or may not sustain that point

0:20:33.076 --> 0:20:35.676
<v Speaker 1>of view over their lives, but that is the environment

0:20:35.676 --> 0:20:38.436
<v Speaker 1>that they're in, in in the environment that they that they leave.

0:20:38.436 --> 0:20:40.516
<v Speaker 1>And it just raises this interesting question of whether the

0:20:40.596 --> 0:20:46.116
<v Speaker 1>socialization affects are in some way a little bit at

0:20:46.116 --> 0:20:49.476
<v Speaker 1>odds with our stated goal in our universities of bringing

0:20:49.476 --> 0:20:52.316
<v Speaker 1>in people from all different perspectives and putting them all

0:20:52.356 --> 0:20:54.156
<v Speaker 1>together and mixing them up so that they'll come out

0:20:54.196 --> 0:20:59.476
<v Speaker 1>with lots of different perspectives. So a huge number of

0:20:59.476 --> 0:21:02.116
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions there. And of course there are students who

0:21:02.276 --> 0:21:06.196
<v Speaker 1>come to university without religious commitment and get involved with

0:21:06.236 --> 0:21:09.276
<v Speaker 1>a religious community and leave the university with the more

0:21:09.396 --> 0:21:13.916
<v Speaker 1>traditional set of values than they entered. But I agree

0:21:13.996 --> 0:21:18.956
<v Speaker 1>that in the contemporary context that direction of motion is

0:21:19.116 --> 0:21:23.156
<v Speaker 1>significantly rarer than the other direction of a student who

0:21:23.276 --> 0:21:28.716
<v Speaker 1>comes from a politically conservative environment and leaves with a

0:21:28.796 --> 0:21:36.676
<v Speaker 1>certain sense of justice driven concern about the well being

0:21:36.716 --> 0:21:41.676
<v Speaker 1>of the community. So what I would say is motivating

0:21:41.836 --> 0:21:47.716
<v Speaker 1>and appealing about the generational passion that you and I

0:21:48.156 --> 0:21:52.156
<v Speaker 1>think both feel among our students is that it is

0:21:52.316 --> 0:21:57.676
<v Speaker 1>driven by a deep sense of wanting the world to

0:21:57.876 --> 0:22:03.316
<v Speaker 1>be a more just and equitable and verdant place. To

0:22:03.356 --> 0:22:06.676
<v Speaker 1>the extent that I think the two sets of primary

0:22:06.716 --> 0:22:10.396
<v Speaker 1>concerns that I hear from students on our campus are

0:22:10.436 --> 0:22:14.796
<v Speaker 1>about racial and political justice on the one hand, and

0:22:15.236 --> 0:22:19.556
<v Speaker 1>about the long term concern for environment on the other.

0:22:19.996 --> 0:22:23.356
<v Speaker 1>And some of what's going on is the world is

0:22:23.876 --> 0:22:28.596
<v Speaker 1>a messy, ugly place in which lots of messy, ugly

0:22:28.716 --> 0:22:32.036
<v Speaker 1>evil things have happened. And some of our students come

0:22:32.036 --> 0:22:37.116
<v Speaker 1>to university without full knowledge of the way in which

0:22:37.156 --> 0:22:39.996
<v Speaker 1>the world that we live in came to be, and

0:22:40.196 --> 0:22:44.276
<v Speaker 1>some of them come to historical understanding of a kind

0:22:44.316 --> 0:22:47.596
<v Speaker 1>that they never had before. They continue to have the

0:22:47.676 --> 0:22:51.436
<v Speaker 1>normative moral commitments that you and I were talking about earlier,

0:22:51.956 --> 0:22:55.516
<v Speaker 1>and those combine to cause them to take on a

0:22:55.636 --> 0:23:03.116
<v Speaker 1>sort of passionate social justice picture. But it is certainly

0:23:03.156 --> 0:23:07.756
<v Speaker 1>the case that the recognition that there might also be

0:23:08.076 --> 0:23:14.676
<v Speaker 1>politically servative solutions to some of the justice challenges that

0:23:14.996 --> 0:23:18.876
<v Speaker 1>our students are moved by, that there might be ways

0:23:18.916 --> 0:23:23.916
<v Speaker 1>in which market, rather than regulation, could best determine the

0:23:24.036 --> 0:23:28.836
<v Speaker 1>sorts of outcomes that they seek. Environmentally are less prevalent

0:23:29.076 --> 0:23:35.556
<v Speaker 1>in at least the public voices on many elite campuses,

0:23:36.076 --> 0:23:42.076
<v Speaker 1>and I think, however, aware one is of the undercurrents

0:23:42.196 --> 0:23:46.516
<v Speaker 1>that run counter to that. It is undeniable that universities

0:23:46.836 --> 0:23:51.276
<v Speaker 1>right now are places where the dominant discourse is the

0:23:51.356 --> 0:23:56.396
<v Speaker 1>discourse of social justice, the discourse of environment, and interestingly,

0:23:56.396 --> 0:24:00.636
<v Speaker 1>in the case of social justice, it's very domestically focused.

0:24:00.916 --> 0:24:06.596
<v Speaker 1>I hear much less conversation on campus about issues of

0:24:06.876 --> 0:24:13.796
<v Speaker 1>international justice, global poverty, global freedom, civil rights of individuals

0:24:13.876 --> 0:24:18.196
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States than I do about dialogues of

0:24:18.316 --> 0:24:22.036
<v Speaker 1>the very undeniably important set of questions that we face

0:24:22.076 --> 0:24:26.076
<v Speaker 1>as a nation around issues of racial justice and social class.

0:24:27.676 --> 0:24:40.636
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back tomorrow. Let's turn to the making

0:24:40.676 --> 0:24:45.316
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge research. Universities are supposed to be places where

0:24:45.436 --> 0:24:49.556
<v Speaker 1>we get new knowledge, not just transmit it, but discover it,

0:24:49.756 --> 0:24:56.356
<v Speaker 1>invent it. How does that project express itself in power

0:24:56.516 --> 0:24:59.636
<v Speaker 1>terms visa via the rest of the world. I mean,

0:24:59.676 --> 0:25:02.316
<v Speaker 1>assuming that these universities do in fact produce knowledge, which

0:25:02.316 --> 0:25:05.956
<v Speaker 1>I think they do, how does that affect the rest

0:25:05.996 --> 0:25:10.476
<v Speaker 1>of the world from a power perspective. It's an interesting question,

0:25:10.516 --> 0:25:14.276
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking about the ways in which the

0:25:14.356 --> 0:25:18.596
<v Speaker 1>United States, I think, both in medicine, in drug development,

0:25:18.796 --> 0:25:27.636
<v Speaker 1>and in universities, produces a disproportionate amount of what the

0:25:27.676 --> 0:25:34.876
<v Speaker 1>world gets intellectually in a way whose financing is extraordinary.

0:25:34.956 --> 0:25:39.556
<v Speaker 1>That is, a large proportion of the world's most highly

0:25:39.636 --> 0:25:45.316
<v Speaker 1>ranked universities are American universities, and the proportion of the

0:25:45.316 --> 0:25:50.156
<v Speaker 1>world's discoveries that were made in American universities due to

0:25:50.436 --> 0:25:56.276
<v Speaker 1>federal funding and student tuition and the other resources taxpayer

0:25:56.316 --> 0:26:00.556
<v Speaker 1>resources that go into state universities, were really truly extraordinary.

0:26:00.716 --> 0:26:04.556
<v Speaker 1>And so what I would say is American universities became

0:26:04.716 --> 0:26:10.476
<v Speaker 1>the place that the world went to gain knowledge. Virtually

0:26:10.516 --> 0:26:15.956
<v Speaker 1>all of the elite Chinese universities have faculty on them

0:26:15.996 --> 0:26:22.116
<v Speaker 1>who were trained in American universities. Most of Iran's engineers

0:26:22.156 --> 0:26:27.676
<v Speaker 1>are trained in American universities. Large number of the world's

0:26:27.716 --> 0:26:33.196
<v Speaker 1>political leaders were trained in American universities. And so the

0:26:33.276 --> 0:26:39.876
<v Speaker 1>production of knowledge in American universities gave America as a

0:26:39.876 --> 0:26:44.516
<v Speaker 1>place where discovery happened a sort of disproportionate role in

0:26:44.556 --> 0:26:49.316
<v Speaker 1>the world's intellectual economy. It's now the case that Asia

0:26:49.556 --> 0:26:53.076
<v Speaker 1>in particular, China in particular, but other parts of Asia

0:26:53.156 --> 0:26:59.036
<v Speaker 1>as well, and in some ways parts of Europe and

0:26:59.236 --> 0:27:06.076
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in Canada are producing new knowledge at

0:27:06.356 --> 0:27:10.676
<v Speaker 1>a rate and with investment of a kind that are

0:27:11.356 --> 0:27:13.836
<v Speaker 1>as intense as in the US. Certainly that's the case

0:27:13.916 --> 0:27:18.196
<v Speaker 1>in China in terms of scientific knowledge, and the question

0:27:18.276 --> 0:27:24.756
<v Speaker 1>of whether that will ultimately undermine the fragile ecosystem that

0:27:24.916 --> 0:27:29.596
<v Speaker 1>is the American university system is a really interesting one.

0:27:30.276 --> 0:27:32.916
<v Speaker 1>How close are we to that kind of an undermining

0:27:32.956 --> 0:27:37.276
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much do you see that decline as

0:27:37.676 --> 0:27:41.876
<v Speaker 1>imminent versus being something that's still some years off. I mean,

0:27:41.876 --> 0:27:44.356
<v Speaker 1>it still remains the case that people from all over

0:27:44.396 --> 0:27:46.796
<v Speaker 1>the world want to send their children to study in

0:27:46.796 --> 0:27:49.076
<v Speaker 1>American universities, even people who don't particularly care for the

0:27:49.196 --> 0:27:54.156
<v Speaker 1>United States. Somehow, our educational system remains highly desirable from

0:27:54.196 --> 0:27:56.716
<v Speaker 1>a global standpoint, even as the power of the United

0:27:56.716 --> 0:27:59.636
<v Speaker 1>States more generally is often perceived by many to be

0:27:59.676 --> 0:28:03.996
<v Speaker 1>in decline. So I think there's a number of questions there.

0:28:04.116 --> 0:28:08.756
<v Speaker 1>American universities do much more than transmit knowledge. American universities

0:28:08.956 --> 0:28:15.476
<v Speaker 1>are places where a crucial kind of socialization happens, and

0:28:15.516 --> 0:28:18.836
<v Speaker 1>where the creation of a certain kind of cultural capital

0:28:19.436 --> 0:28:22.356
<v Speaker 1>is provided to the individuals who attend them, and a

0:28:22.476 --> 0:28:27.756
<v Speaker 1>set of social connections are established. So the rise of

0:28:28.156 --> 0:28:32.236
<v Speaker 1>research in places other than the United States, I think

0:28:32.396 --> 0:28:38.116
<v Speaker 1>doesn't undermine the particular socialization role that American universities play.

0:28:38.156 --> 0:28:43.196
<v Speaker 1>And of course American universities have this very interesting structure

0:28:43.316 --> 0:28:50.516
<v Speaker 1>whereby the value of the degree of their alumni depends

0:28:50.596 --> 0:28:55.716
<v Speaker 1>in part on the contemporary status of the institution with

0:28:55.756 --> 0:28:59.596
<v Speaker 1>which the alumni are affiliated. So every American university has

0:28:59.676 --> 0:29:04.996
<v Speaker 1>thousands and thousands of people across generations in whose self

0:29:05.116 --> 0:29:11.356
<v Speaker 1>interest it lies to keep that university leat and respect it.

0:29:11.676 --> 0:29:15.276
<v Speaker 1>So there's a very interesting set of interest in parties

0:29:15.516 --> 0:29:21.556
<v Speaker 1>keeping the socialization and social network role of American university's intact.

0:29:22.276 --> 0:29:26.196
<v Speaker 1>When I was talking about the rise, particularly of investment

0:29:26.436 --> 0:29:30.756
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese universities, I was thinking about the ways in

0:29:30.796 --> 0:29:36.356
<v Speaker 1>which there is serious investment in scientific research, And you're right,

0:29:36.516 --> 0:29:39.756
<v Speaker 1>in the biological sciences, in the physical sciences, and in

0:29:39.836 --> 0:29:43.716
<v Speaker 1>engineering and applied sciences, and in some of those cases,

0:29:43.876 --> 0:29:48.196
<v Speaker 1>with regard to the capacity to make discovery that comes

0:29:48.356 --> 0:29:51.916
<v Speaker 1>most effectively at scale, that is, if you have a

0:29:51.996 --> 0:29:55.396
<v Speaker 1>thousand of a particular machine as opposed to a hundred

0:29:55.796 --> 0:29:59.036
<v Speaker 1>or ten of them in that domain, I think it

0:29:59.196 --> 0:30:03.476
<v Speaker 1>is imminent that discoveries will take place of a kind

0:30:03.676 --> 0:30:07.236
<v Speaker 1>that won't take place in this country. But with regard

0:30:07.316 --> 0:30:11.076
<v Speaker 1>to the socialization role of diversities, I don't think that

0:30:11.436 --> 0:30:16.036
<v Speaker 1>change is imminent. Do you think, tamarrow that seen as

0:30:16.076 --> 0:30:20.436
<v Speaker 1>a whole, that elite US universities have too much power

0:30:20.476 --> 0:30:22.476
<v Speaker 1>in the world, or too little power in the world,

0:30:22.596 --> 0:30:25.196
<v Speaker 1>or just about the right amount of power. I mean,

0:30:25.316 --> 0:30:29.596
<v Speaker 1>is there a kind of Goldilocks answer to this? I

0:30:29.636 --> 0:30:35.796
<v Speaker 1>would say, as gate keepers to a certain kind of

0:30:35.956 --> 0:30:41.276
<v Speaker 1>social elite, that one's ability to enter that world is

0:30:41.316 --> 0:30:47.916
<v Speaker 1>determined at age seventeen, is I think non ideal if

0:30:47.956 --> 0:30:50.956
<v Speaker 1>what it is that we're trying to do is identify

0:30:51.396 --> 0:30:56.036
<v Speaker 1>and cultivate talent and allow a certain kind of flourishing.

0:30:56.436 --> 0:30:58.516
<v Speaker 1>The United States is one of the few places where

0:30:58.596 --> 0:31:03.236
<v Speaker 1>you have flexibility throughout the life course with regard to education,

0:31:03.356 --> 0:31:07.516
<v Speaker 1>but not with regard to access to elite education. So

0:31:07.556 --> 0:31:11.676
<v Speaker 1>I would say with are to the socialization role that

0:31:11.716 --> 0:31:16.396
<v Speaker 1>they play and the fact that it requires an identification

0:31:16.516 --> 0:31:19.716
<v Speaker 1>of skill and talent so early in life in a

0:31:19.756 --> 0:31:24.396
<v Speaker 1>country that has invested so little in its public education

0:31:24.476 --> 0:31:28.636
<v Speaker 1>system is problematic and is a way in which the

0:31:28.876 --> 0:31:33.476
<v Speaker 1>particular gatekeeping role that universities play, or elite universities play,

0:31:34.036 --> 0:31:39.596
<v Speaker 1>is problematic against a backdrop of uninequitable K twelve and

0:31:39.756 --> 0:31:43.116
<v Speaker 1>in fact pre K system. On the other hand, I

0:31:43.156 --> 0:31:48.156
<v Speaker 1>would say that the information and discoveries and insights that

0:31:48.356 --> 0:31:54.156
<v Speaker 1>universities have take longer to permeate culture than would be ideal.

0:31:54.196 --> 0:31:58.516
<v Speaker 1>It took behavioral economics as a way of understanding human

0:31:58.556 --> 0:32:03.436
<v Speaker 1>decision making longer perhaps than it should have to affect

0:32:03.516 --> 0:32:06.916
<v Speaker 1>how it is that we think about governance and behavior.

0:32:06.996 --> 0:32:10.156
<v Speaker 1>So there's a way in which universities have too much

0:32:10.196 --> 0:32:15.076
<v Speaker 1>power the socialization at seventeen, and ways in which they

0:32:15.116 --> 0:32:18.836
<v Speaker 1>had too little the role that information plays in determining

0:32:18.996 --> 0:32:22.236
<v Speaker 1>our activities tomorrow. I want to thank you for a

0:32:22.236 --> 0:32:25.436
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation and for being so candid about the upsides

0:32:25.476 --> 0:32:28.916
<v Speaker 1>and downsides of the way power is deployed in universities.

0:32:29.076 --> 0:32:32.196
<v Speaker 1>I feel very lucky to know that a person as

0:32:32.196 --> 0:32:34.636
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful as you are is deeply involved in that process

0:32:34.676 --> 0:32:36.716
<v Speaker 1>and as thinking so hard about how it happens. So

0:32:36.836 --> 0:32:39.636
<v Speaker 1>thank you for the work that you're doing now in

0:32:39.916 --> 0:32:43.116
<v Speaker 1>running one of the great American universities. Noah, thank you

0:32:43.236 --> 0:32:49.716
<v Speaker 1>for a characteristically insightful, provocative, and thoughtful set of questions.

0:32:49.756 --> 0:32:53.836
<v Speaker 1>It is always a joy to interact with you. We'll

0:32:53.876 --> 0:33:06.476
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Talking to Dean Tamar Gender, I was

0:33:06.556 --> 0:33:09.916
<v Speaker 1>really struck by the dual way that she conceives of

0:33:09.916 --> 0:33:13.996
<v Speaker 1>power in and around the university. First, there's the question

0:33:14.076 --> 0:33:18.516
<v Speaker 1>of power within the university, and in that context, Tamar

0:33:18.756 --> 0:33:21.276
<v Speaker 1>was very clear that it's a mistake to think of

0:33:21.276 --> 0:33:24.916
<v Speaker 1>the university's power as emanating either from the top or

0:33:24.956 --> 0:33:28.436
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, or anywhere in between. Rather, power in a

0:33:28.556 --> 0:33:33.196
<v Speaker 1>university is complexly negotiated between all of the different actors

0:33:33.236 --> 0:33:36.716
<v Speaker 1>who are involved. It's not like the dean can speak

0:33:36.876 --> 0:33:40.716
<v Speaker 1>and expect the entire faculty to listen. Similarly, it's not

0:33:40.756 --> 0:33:43.556
<v Speaker 1>like the faculty can express their views and expect the

0:33:43.596 --> 0:33:46.596
<v Speaker 1>students to fall into line. In fact, what we see

0:33:46.596 --> 0:33:50.196
<v Speaker 1>within the university is a lot of different actors trying

0:33:50.236 --> 0:33:53.636
<v Speaker 1>to work out how they can function collectively while still

0:33:53.676 --> 0:33:58.836
<v Speaker 1>pressing for the things that they believe in the most simultaneously.

0:33:59.396 --> 0:34:01.756
<v Speaker 1>With respect to the role of the university in the world,

0:34:02.076 --> 0:34:06.796
<v Speaker 1>Tamar spoke extraordinarily thoughtfully about how important it is for

0:34:06.996 --> 0:34:11.236
<v Speaker 1>universities to train people and to generate ideas about what

0:34:11.396 --> 0:34:16.076
<v Speaker 1>our values are and what our values should be. Those

0:34:16.316 --> 0:34:20.276
<v Speaker 1>are the topics that the humanities covers, and without them,

0:34:20.556 --> 0:34:24.756
<v Speaker 1>our society would be adrift, full of technologies, full of

0:34:24.756 --> 0:34:28.316
<v Speaker 1>new financial instruments, but with no idea what we should

0:34:28.316 --> 0:34:31.556
<v Speaker 1>do with them, what's ethical and what's not, and what

0:34:31.756 --> 0:34:36.076
<v Speaker 1>overall objectives we should be aiming to achieve. Simultaneously, the

0:34:36.156 --> 0:34:40.556
<v Speaker 1>university's power in the world also stems from the social sciences,

0:34:40.596 --> 0:34:43.836
<v Speaker 1>which study the ways that human beings actually interact with

0:34:43.876 --> 0:34:47.036
<v Speaker 1>each other and actually deploy power relative to one another,

0:34:47.556 --> 0:34:52.196
<v Speaker 1>and the sciences, which themselves explore in the deepest sense,

0:34:52.556 --> 0:34:56.996
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the world around us. In those senses,

0:34:57.196 --> 0:35:01.276
<v Speaker 1>the university plays a crucial role in helping to shape

0:35:01.436 --> 0:35:05.756
<v Speaker 1>a healthy society, and where the universities go awry, the

0:35:05.916 --> 0:35:10.756
<v Speaker 1>society's own troubles are unlikely to be far behind. So

0:35:10.796 --> 0:35:13.036
<v Speaker 1>as you send your kids off to school, or go

0:35:13.116 --> 0:35:17.436
<v Speaker 1>back to teaching or studying yourself. Remember that, whether you

0:35:17.516 --> 0:35:21.356
<v Speaker 1>like it or not, you're participating in multiple great power

0:35:21.476 --> 0:35:25.236
<v Speaker 1>dances that shape the way the world around us operates.

0:35:26.156 --> 0:35:28.956
<v Speaker 1>Until the next time I speak to you, Breathe deep,

0:35:29.476 --> 0:35:33.396
<v Speaker 1>think deep thoughts, and, if circumstances will allow it, have

0:35:33.716 --> 0:35:37.756
<v Speaker 1>a little fun. Deep Background is brought to you by

0:35:37.796 --> 0:35:41.876
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Mola Board, our engineer is

0:35:41.916 --> 0:35:46.116
<v Speaker 1>ben Toalliday, and our showrunner is Sophie Crane mckibbon. Editorial

0:35:46.156 --> 0:35:50.756
<v Speaker 1>support from noahm Osband. Theme music by Luis Gara at Pushkin.

0:35:50.876 --> 0:35:54.756
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton, Lydia Jeancott, Heather Faine,

0:35:54.996 --> 0:35:59.836
<v Speaker 1>Carlie Migliori, Maggie Taylor, Eric Sandler, and Jacob Weissberg. You

0:35:59.836 --> 0:36:02.396
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. I

0:36:02.436 --> 0:36:04.876
<v Speaker 1>also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can

0:36:04.876 --> 0:36:09.396
<v Speaker 1>find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To discover bloombergsals

0:36:09.476 --> 0:36:12.956
<v Speaker 1>late of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts,

0:36:13.316 --> 0:36:15.796
<v Speaker 1>and if you like what you heard today, please write

0:36:15.836 --> 0:36:19.556
<v Speaker 1>a review or tell a friend. This is Deep Background.