Speaker 1: All right, the question is on the table. Why is
Speaker 1: it that liberal Jews, Hollywood Jews, Jewish people are liberal
Speaker 1: all over the country don't seem to join the fight
Speaker 1: for Israel. Uh. There are many theories out there, but
Speaker 1: the simplest explanation, folks, and I have, I have it.
Speaker 1: It's gonna sound simplistic, and oftentimes trust the simplistic because
Speaker 1: the simplistic is right in the money. Most liberals, whatever
Speaker 1: their faith, put their liberalism first. Liberalism is a more
Speaker 1: powerful religion uh than any other. To the committed liberal
Speaker 1: in the world of liberalism. Israel is too powerful. Israel
Speaker 1: is using jets against these defenseless, little backwards terrorists. That's
Speaker 1: not fair. Israel is richer. Uh Uh, it's Israel is
Speaker 1: like the United States. Uh. This, this is just not right.
Speaker 1: And you cannot exclude from this the element of guilt
Speaker 1: which pervades liberalism and and perpetuates it. Um. A liberal
Speaker 1: in the United States is really no different than the
Speaker 1: liberal in Europe or liberal working at the United Nations.
Speaker 1: They have the same worldview. Liberal here was no different
Speaker 1: than the liberal in the Soviet Union. They all, I
Speaker 1: don't care where you go find a liberal in Congo.
Speaker 1: Find a liberal in Kuala Lumpur. Find a liberal in Tibet.
Speaker 1: Find anybody in Tibet. You're talking about a bunch of
Speaker 1: people getting the butts kicked. Nobody cares about that because
Speaker 1: nobody's got the guts to go up against the Chinese.
Speaker 1: But I get sidetracked. Find a liberal anywhere. They all
Speaker 1: think we need to negotiate with terrorists, that we should
Speaker 1: have a Manhattan Project for terrorists and so forth, that
Speaker 1: we uh, I need to examine what it is we're
Speaker 1: doing to cause these people to become terrorists? Why do
Speaker 1: they hate us? So it's our fault, well not, there's
Speaker 1: the liberals, of course, of the understanding and compassion. It's
Speaker 1: the it's the it's the blockheads, the conservatives and others.
Speaker 1: They're the ones causing the problem. Conservatives and conservatism pose
Speaker 1: a much greater threat to liberals than terrorists. Do check
Speaker 1: their language against the terrorists versus their language against George W.
Speaker 1: Bush or me or any other prominent conservative public figure,
Speaker 1: and ask yourself about whom do they have the most
Speaker 1: criticism for loom did they have the most criticism and
Speaker 1: about whom do they speak in the most harshest of terms.
Speaker 1: It's not the terrorists. Liberals in this country want terrorists
Speaker 1: to have essentially constitutional rights, the Al Qaida Bill of Rights.
Speaker 1: Another story today in the stack. United Nations emit all
Speaker 1: this going on with the Hezbos and the Israelis, the
Speaker 1: United Nations demanding that we close our secret prisons around
Speaker 1: the world. Well, if they're secret, how do those bone
Speaker 1: heads know that we have any? But number two, who
Speaker 1: the hell are they? A bunch of liberals of the
Speaker 1: United Nate, the Human Rights UH Committee Conference whatever they
Speaker 1: call themselves up there, And don't forget this, this human
Speaker 1: rights club. But the United Nations can have as one
Speaker 1: of its leaders somebody likes Addam Hussein or a country
Speaker 1: like a rock under Saddam Hussein, it rotates, So it
Speaker 1: does matter Catholic, Jewish, Protestant. The only competition liberals really
Speaker 1: have of the religions is the religion of Gaea, which
Speaker 1: is the earth, a tree whatever that's They're a little
Speaker 1: conflicted there, but they don't see Israel as anything UH
Speaker 1: with which they have in common UH in any way,
Speaker 1: religious or otherwise. They have no understanding of this enemy,
Speaker 1: as they had no understanding of Communism. And for the
Speaker 1: longest time, they had no understanding of Nazism, and actually
Speaker 1: they still don't have a real understanding of Nazism. The
Speaker 1: associate Nazism with conservatism when Nazism is is one of
Speaker 1: those horrible things as you get on the left, Communism, socialism, Nazism, fascism,
Speaker 1: those are all on the left side of center. But
Speaker 1: liberals have found a way to put it on the right.
Speaker 1: And of course that's become popular confect conventional wisdom. Now,
Speaker 1: just like the Voting Rights Act, the President Bush signed
Speaker 1: a Voting Rights Act extension, and liberals out there, oh, whoa,
Speaker 1: this is a wonder of the voting what I teks
Speaker 1: the wonderful, wonderful. What they don't tell you is it
Speaker 1: was a bunch of Democrats that made the damn thing necessary.
Speaker 1: It was a bunch of democrats came up with the
Speaker 1: poll tax, it was a bunch of democrats, came up
Speaker 1: with literacy tests. It's a bunch of democrats and liberals
Speaker 1: that came up with the restrictions. But somehow that's been reversed,
Speaker 1: uh in in popular culture and conventional wisdom today. There
Speaker 1: are exceptions to this, however, as I said, Alan Dersher
Speaker 1: Witch writing today in the Washington Times would be the
Speaker 1: Washington Times for those of you in uh Rio, Linda.
Speaker 1: He writes, as a liberal Democrat, I listened carefully to
Speaker 1: the opposition voiced by many Democratic Senators to the nomination
Speaker 1: of John Bolton as our chief representative to the the UN.
Speaker 1: Mr Bolton has been representing as at a U n
Speaker 1: since August during the current Middle East crisis. I've been
Speaker 1: able to listen and for myself to what Mr Bolton
Speaker 1: has been saying at the United Nations. On the basis
Speaker 1: of his performance, I have become a Bolton supporter. He
Speaker 1: speaks with moral clarity. He is extremely well prepared, He's
Speaker 1: extraordinarily articulate. He places the best face on America policy,
Speaker 1: particularly in the Middle East during this crucial time. But
Speaker 1: Mr Bolton is right to be skeptical, and all the
Speaker 1: great US ambassadors to the United Nations, from Stevenson to
Speaker 1: Goldberg to Moynahander Kirkpatrick, have shared that skepticism of the body.
Speaker 1: Bolton's absolutely justified in pushing for reform of the notoriously
Speaker 1: corrupt and inefficient bureaucratic structure at Turtle Bay. As he
Speaker 1: once said, if member countries want the UN to be respected,
Speaker 1: they should begin by making sure it's worthy of respect.
Speaker 1: I have observed Mr Bolton's performance with regard to Israel
Speaker 1: and its conflicts with Hezbollah and Hamas. On many other fronts,
Speaker 1: he has proved himself a staunch advocate of freedom and
Speaker 1: human rights, specific in Sudan, North Korea, and Cuba. Some
Speaker 1: critics of argue that Mr Bolton is better in his
Speaker 1: public role as advocate than his besides behind the scenes
Speaker 1: role as conciliator. But at this point in history, the
Speaker 1: United States needs a public advocate who con further its
Speaker 1: case in the court of public opinion. No one does
Speaker 1: that better than John Bolton. So Dershowitz, uh, you'll, you'll,
Speaker 1: You'll not hear this from any liberal in Hollywood, regardless
Speaker 1: their religion. But Dershowitz does have an alliance and a
Speaker 1: deep love and the relationship with Israel and has written
Speaker 1: books about it. And this is fabulous. By the way.
Speaker 1: I was happy to see this, happy to read it.
Speaker 1: But and I don't want to poison it or sadden it.
Speaker 1: But I do have just one small complaint. It would
Speaker 1: it would just it would just be wonderful if Mr
Speaker 1: Dershowitz would join his country and other efforts, as he
Speaker 1: has joined us in our effort in Israel. That's the
Speaker 1: one thing that I would uh, I would add because
Speaker 1: if it's not Israel, than the usual liberalism in mister
Speaker 1: Dersherwood surfaces, and he is part of that chorus. I
Speaker 1: hope this helps answer the question, Ladies and gentlemen, really
Speaker 1: no more complicated than that.