1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,400 Speaker 1: All right, the question is on the table. Why is 2 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: it that liberal Jews, Hollywood Jews, Jewish people are liberal 3 00:00:07,240 --> 00:00:10,640 Speaker 1: all over the country don't seem to join the fight 4 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: for Israel. Uh. There are many theories out there, but 5 00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: the simplest explanation, folks, and I have, I have it. 6 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 1: It's gonna sound simplistic, and oftentimes trust the simplistic because 7 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 1: the simplistic is right in the money. Most liberals, whatever 8 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: their faith, put their liberalism first. Liberalism is a more 9 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 1: powerful religion uh than any other. To the committed liberal 10 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 1: in the world of liberalism. Israel is too powerful. Israel 11 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: is using jets against these defenseless, little backwards terrorists. That's 12 00:00:55,720 --> 00:01:02,640 Speaker 1: not fair. Israel is richer. Uh Uh, it's Israel is 13 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:07,559 Speaker 1: like the United States. Uh. This, this is just not right. 14 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:12,960 Speaker 1: And you cannot exclude from this the element of guilt 15 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 1: which pervades liberalism and and perpetuates it. Um. A liberal 16 00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 1: in the United States is really no different than the 17 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 1: liberal in Europe or liberal working at the United Nations. 18 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:34,200 Speaker 1: They have the same worldview. Liberal here was no different 19 00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: than the liberal in the Soviet Union. They all, I 20 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:42,040 Speaker 1: don't care where you go find a liberal in Congo. 21 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,320 Speaker 1: Find a liberal in Kuala Lumpur. Find a liberal in Tibet. 22 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:52,600 Speaker 1: Find anybody in Tibet. You're talking about a bunch of 23 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: people getting the butts kicked. Nobody cares about that because 24 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 1: nobody's got the guts to go up against the Chinese. 25 00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:05,760 Speaker 1: But I get sidetracked. Find a liberal anywhere. They all 26 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:08,360 Speaker 1: think we need to negotiate with terrorists, that we should 27 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 1: have a Manhattan Project for terrorists and so forth, that 28 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:14,640 Speaker 1: we uh, I need to examine what it is we're 29 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: doing to cause these people to become terrorists? Why do 30 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:23,520 Speaker 1: they hate us? So it's our fault, well not, there's 31 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:26,120 Speaker 1: the liberals, of course, of the understanding and compassion. It's 32 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 1: the it's the it's the blockheads, the conservatives and others. 33 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: They're the ones causing the problem. Conservatives and conservatism pose 34 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:45,680 Speaker 1: a much greater threat to liberals than terrorists. Do check 35 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:48,800 Speaker 1: their language against the terrorists versus their language against George W. 36 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:53,760 Speaker 1: Bush or me or any other prominent conservative public figure, 37 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 1: and ask yourself about whom do they have the most 38 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 1: criticism for loom did they have the most criticism and 39 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:04,000 Speaker 1: about whom do they speak in the most harshest of terms. 40 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:08,680 Speaker 1: It's not the terrorists. Liberals in this country want terrorists 41 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:13,040 Speaker 1: to have essentially constitutional rights, the Al Qaida Bill of Rights. 42 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 1: Another story today in the stack. United Nations emit all 43 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 1: this going on with the Hezbos and the Israelis, the 44 00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 1: United Nations demanding that we close our secret prisons around 45 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:29,720 Speaker 1: the world. Well, if they're secret, how do those bone 46 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 1: heads know that we have any? But number two, who 47 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: the hell are they? A bunch of liberals of the 48 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 1: United Nate, the Human Rights UH Committee Conference whatever they 49 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 1: call themselves up there, And don't forget this, this human 50 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:49,240 Speaker 1: rights club. But the United Nations can have as one 51 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 1: of its leaders somebody likes Addam Hussein or a country 52 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: like a rock under Saddam Hussein, it rotates, So it 53 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:06,320 Speaker 1: does matter Catholic, Jewish, Protestant. The only competition liberals really 54 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: have of the religions is the religion of Gaea, which 55 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 1: is the earth, a tree whatever that's They're a little 56 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:19,160 Speaker 1: conflicted there, but they don't see Israel as anything UH 57 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,400 Speaker 1: with which they have in common UH in any way, 58 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:26,279 Speaker 1: religious or otherwise. They have no understanding of this enemy, 59 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 1: as they had no understanding of Communism. And for the 60 00:04:29,920 --> 00:04:34,239 Speaker 1: longest time, they had no understanding of Nazism, and actually 61 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:36,800 Speaker 1: they still don't have a real understanding of Nazism. The 62 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:42,680 Speaker 1: associate Nazism with conservatism when Nazism is is one of 63 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 1: those horrible things as you get on the left, Communism, socialism, Nazism, fascism, 64 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 1: those are all on the left side of center. But 65 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: liberals have found a way to put it on the right. 66 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:59,000 Speaker 1: And of course that's become popular confect conventional wisdom. Now, 67 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:03,480 Speaker 1: just like the Voting Rights Act, the President Bush signed 68 00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: a Voting Rights Act extension, and liberals out there, oh, whoa, 69 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:10,280 Speaker 1: this is a wonder of the voting what I teks 70 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 1: the wonderful, wonderful. What they don't tell you is it 71 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:15,120 Speaker 1: was a bunch of Democrats that made the damn thing necessary. 72 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:18,279 Speaker 1: It was a bunch of democrats came up with the 73 00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:20,159 Speaker 1: poll tax, it was a bunch of democrats, came up 74 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,040 Speaker 1: with literacy tests. It's a bunch of democrats and liberals 75 00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 1: that came up with the restrictions. But somehow that's been reversed, 76 00:05:27,960 --> 00:05:32,840 Speaker 1: uh in in popular culture and conventional wisdom today. There 77 00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:36,279 Speaker 1: are exceptions to this, however, as I said, Alan Dersher 78 00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:39,159 Speaker 1: Witch writing today in the Washington Times would be the 79 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:43,279 Speaker 1: Washington Times for those of you in uh Rio, Linda. 80 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:46,919 Speaker 1: He writes, as a liberal Democrat, I listened carefully to 81 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 1: the opposition voiced by many Democratic Senators to the nomination 82 00:05:50,440 --> 00:05:53,080 Speaker 1: of John Bolton as our chief representative to the the UN. 83 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,160 Speaker 1: Mr Bolton has been representing as at a U n 84 00:05:56,279 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: since August during the current Middle East crisis. I've been 85 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:01,400 Speaker 1: able to listen and for myself to what Mr Bolton 86 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 1: has been saying at the United Nations. On the basis 87 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 1: of his performance, I have become a Bolton supporter. He 88 00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:11,520 Speaker 1: speaks with moral clarity. He is extremely well prepared, He's 89 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:15,920 Speaker 1: extraordinarily articulate. He places the best face on America policy, 90 00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:21,560 Speaker 1: particularly in the Middle East during this crucial time. But 91 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:24,279 Speaker 1: Mr Bolton is right to be skeptical, and all the 92 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,600 Speaker 1: great US ambassadors to the United Nations, from Stevenson to 93 00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:32,679 Speaker 1: Goldberg to Moynahander Kirkpatrick, have shared that skepticism of the body. 94 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:37,920 Speaker 1: Bolton's absolutely justified in pushing for reform of the notoriously 95 00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:42,440 Speaker 1: corrupt and inefficient bureaucratic structure at Turtle Bay. As he 96 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 1: once said, if member countries want the UN to be respected, 97 00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:48,240 Speaker 1: they should begin by making sure it's worthy of respect. 98 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,679 Speaker 1: I have observed Mr Bolton's performance with regard to Israel 99 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: and its conflicts with Hezbollah and Hamas. On many other fronts, 100 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,240 Speaker 1: he has proved himself a staunch advocate of freedom and 101 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:03,040 Speaker 1: human rights, specific in Sudan, North Korea, and Cuba. Some 102 00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 1: critics of argue that Mr Bolton is better in his 103 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:08,000 Speaker 1: public role as advocate than his besides behind the scenes 104 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 1: role as conciliator. But at this point in history, the 105 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:13,760 Speaker 1: United States needs a public advocate who con further its 106 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: case in the court of public opinion. No one does 107 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 1: that better than John Bolton. So Dershowitz, uh, you'll, you'll, 108 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:26,080 Speaker 1: You'll not hear this from any liberal in Hollywood, regardless 109 00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:30,680 Speaker 1: their religion. But Dershowitz does have an alliance and a 110 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:34,640 Speaker 1: deep love and the relationship with Israel and has written 111 00:07:34,640 --> 00:07:38,480 Speaker 1: books about it. And this is fabulous. By the way. 112 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: I was happy to see this, happy to read it. 113 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 1: But and I don't want to poison it or sadden it. 114 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:48,920 Speaker 1: But I do have just one small complaint. It would 115 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 1: it would just it would just be wonderful if Mr 116 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:55,760 Speaker 1: Dershowitz would join his country and other efforts, as he 117 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: has joined us in our effort in Israel. That's the 118 00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: one thing that I would uh, I would add because 119 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 1: if it's not Israel, than the usual liberalism in mister 120 00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:11,960 Speaker 1: Dersherwood surfaces, and he is part of that chorus. I 121 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:16,600 Speaker 1: hope this helps answer the question, Ladies and gentlemen, really 122 00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: no more complicated than that.