WEBVTT - Pre-preseason Q&A

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for day? Edith Steak is that woof? Woof? And Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and Tie welcome back to the solid verb of boys

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and girls. My name is ty Hildebrand, joining me as always.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Are there still in Chicago, Illinois? My man, Dan Rubinstein?

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, sir? I'm good. I keep forgetting to

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>swap out my squeaky chair. Can you hear it? I

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you can kind of hear it. It's

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not great. It's not great for audio, it's not great

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for video. I need to swap it out. I told

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you you don't need to swap it out. You just

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>need a little w D forty. Yeah, it's true. I

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we have any lubricating elements. Lubricating elements

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>in our in our house. We need to get some.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a very very weird start to what are

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? Q and A show? Dan? Yeah, we

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>love three things. We love off topics, we love college

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>football and your mister lubrication. So how am I speaking

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>out of turn here? This actually kind of collects everything

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to talk about, and then we have, yes,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of college football and non college football topics

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about on Today's Q and A show. But

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're writing the crosshairs here, right in the

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>cross here. Sure, whatever you say, I am tied. He

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is Dan. We are the Solid Verbal. Don't forget to

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>follow along across all of our social media channels. Go

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on out to your website at solid verbal dot com.

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also sign up for our newsletter while you're

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on the website, or if you go to newsletter dot

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>soliverbal dot com you can fill out a little form there,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>give us your email, will promise not to spam you

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>and send you some interesting stuff over the next couple weeks.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What else, Dan, Solid Verbal at gmail dot com, forballers

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. For ballers dot com is where you can

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>go to get some of our bonus content out on Patreon.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of news coming I hope I'm not speaking

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out of turn, but news coming later this week on

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that front. If you are are interested in becoming a

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>verball or you've got a lot of new people signing

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>up to join the teon in the dance of the

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>college football season. Yeah, and we've got our show on Friday,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>which were very all years in the making. Yeah, twelve

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>years in the making, Dan, Yeah, Okay, what is today's show?

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a Q and a show and we haven't

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>done one in a while. We've got a bunch of

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>good questions both. I mean, it's largely going to be

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>about college football and the upcoming twenty twenty one season,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a couple of big picture questions, but also

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some non college football questions because we scratch all of

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>our itches, ty, not the easiest ones, but all of them.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it. Congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail. You've

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got mail on the solid verbal Dan. As often as

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we can, we like to pay homage to those of

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>view verbalers out there who write in soliverble at gmail

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We also solicited questions across every possible platform,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>be it Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, plain old fashioned email. Certainly,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we tapped into our verballer community out there on Patreon

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and in our Discord server, so a bunch of different

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ways that folks could get in touch with us with

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>their questions. I'm gonna start with Will, Dan, that's Will

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with one L one L. Is that true? Says just

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>one l here on the sheet, which teams in twenty

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty one do you think will look better than they

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>actually are due to an easy schedule? And then conversely,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which teams fall into the opposite category, i e. They're

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going to look worse than they are because of a

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>harder schedule. So look, we have started to do some

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of our preseason research. We're going to be announcing at

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>some point soon not to give too much away, when

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start doing our previews, because the college

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>football season, now that we're in July, it's getting a

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit bigger in the window. So we started Danny

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Canell to the mix. We've not added Danny Capelt. Sorry

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he costs too much. We couldn't afford it. I know

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's true. We started doing research, we started looking at teams.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you started looking at schedules? I have, Yeah, especially

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of the conferences that we're doing early on,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's as always fascinating to see like, well, this

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>team isn't that good, but they could win eight, they

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>could win nine, Like they return enough that they were

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only so so, But it's a schedule that really gives

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>them a chance to sort of push up against their ceilings.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I have been looking at schedules. I have

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>been looking at you know, better than their schedule, what

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have you believe or better than you know you would

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>believe based on their record based on a really tough schedule.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've talked about Clemson with this that maybe

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>their record will be better than their reality. Although you know,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the ceiling of where they are at quarterback

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and receiver and upfront on defense, it's just after Georgia,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole lot of maybe. Okay, that's one of

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the those teams for sure. Arkansas, Arkansas year two of

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Himan. What a brutality, brutal schedule. So we already

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about Arkansas getting Texas in the non conference. They've

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>also got Georgia as one of their cross conference inter

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>divisional matchups. I believe they also have Bama and LSU

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road, which right out of the shoot, that's

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>four losses as a starting point, I think, I guess,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your Texas love is now documented, but continue.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So Arkansas is one of those teams that I think

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>falls into the category of having a really hard schedule.

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, Phil Steele just from looking at the magazine,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhere in this studio for those watching on the

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>video feed. He's pretty high on Kentucky finishing third in

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the SEC East, and that is due in no small

0:05:52.800 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>part to its schedule. Eighty fourth schedule wow in FBS.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, they get a game against Louisvilleville Louville

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on the road, but for the most part their non

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>conference schedule outside of Louisville, they've got um, They've got

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico State. Does he has everything right? The easiest

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and toughest schedules in each conference, correct, that's all laid out,

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>go through it. Yeah, Well, I don't have this magazine

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. I just put couple. I have

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it right here, ty. Look. Easiest schedule in the Big

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve Oklahoma, Yep, they've got Nebraska. That's the big heavyweight

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the early portion of their schedule. The toughest is Kansas. Well, yeah,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Kansas is no matter what their schedule look like,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>short of it being a like a MEAC schedule or

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a I don't you know, a Big Sky schedule or

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>something like that, that was going to be a tough

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>road anyway. And you're one of a new coach with

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>all the turnover they have. The Arizona schools are on

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>either end of the spectrum. Arizona State with a pretty

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>easy you know, they get BYU, but it's BYU with

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a new offensive coordinator and a new quarterback. And I

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like I don't have the big ten in front

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of me, but I feel like it was North I

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>having Eastern, Yep, Northwestern and Perdue easiest, hardest. Yeah, Okay,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's the Arkansas one is really unfortunate for Sam Pittman,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will probably serve to detract a

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>bit from the progress that they made last year, because

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they did make progress last year. Sure, it's just an

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>impossible schedule that he's going to have to deal with.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>The Northwestern one is interesting to me as well, because Northwestern,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>again slow but steady, always finds a way to be

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the mix, and with the benefit of a good schedule,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they could again contend for that big ten. West. Well,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're a good program. They did have

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a catastrophically pad offense two years ago and last year

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it improved to simply definitely bad. But yeah, they they

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can navigate it. Who's in that they have what who

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do they have anybody of note in there? They have

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Duke who is sort of dramatically changing things up on

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>offense and moving on to a new starting quarterback and

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>loses a few big pieces up front on that defense.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So Northwestern is in a really good spot to to

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>once again contend for the West. Will by the way,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is a verboler fi ver baller on our night Patreon

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>forballers dot com. Okay, let's go to Pundevil pun Devil,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>also another verballerballers dot com. Yes, what is your favorite

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mascot name? I'm saying, what is your favorite mascot name?

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Like their actual first name? Okay, so like not necessarily

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the falcon, the way, the buffalo, the green wave is

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a popular one, The green Wave. I don't and I

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want like you to say, like, you know, the whatever,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the Stanford Tree, although I don't know if the tree

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>actually is named like Edgar or something like that, but

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>O great, I can't imagine. Is it just the tree?

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a very Standford thing to do. If there's a

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>name for it, I have never heard it. It's always

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just been referred to as the tree. What would be

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a good name for the tree. If that tree is

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>simply not named and it's just the tree, now, you

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have to remember it dances around in wacky ways, it

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has wacky googly eyes, so it needs a name befitting

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of its presence. If you named it Conifer, it sounds

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like Lucifer, which gives Stanford more of

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>an edge than you'd expect. And also it sounds like

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the tree. Yeah. Yeah. That also it sounds like a

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, an arrested development Parks and rec kind of combination.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Non existent name conifer. But I don't believe it's a

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>conifer tree. I don't know what kind of tree it is,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so regardless, that's the first thing that came to mind.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess it would have to be a Conifer tree,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>right in order to be named Conifer. Yeah, something like uh.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>I actually like Edgar a lot Edgar. Edgar covers the

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>spectrum for me of either very serious or very silly.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a Walter, maybe a maybe a Leslie. Not a

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of tree names out there. To be honest with you,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's a Douglas fir, but if

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it were, it would be a you know, Doug is

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>easy Doug. Yeah, Doug would Beezy my favorite actual name

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for a mascot. Uh, it's a tie to me. I

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>love the name Ramsy's o, the you know, the the

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Longhorned Sheep whatever you know, kind of uh tar heel

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>mascot wise. Yeah, and Ralphie obviously, Ralphie is a wonderful name.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Ralphie is up there for me. I have a sauce

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>spot for Bucky Badger, Monkey b Ainger, Bucky b Edger. Okay,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I just think that is the coolest mascot to look

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>at outside of all the almost one name though, Like

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do you like Bevo? I like Bevo. Bev's fine, but

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying in general for me, outside of the

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>live mascots mm hmm, the very clearly fake, big headed mascots.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>For me, Bucky Badger is the coolest one. And I

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just love the name Bucky Badger, So that's always been

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the answer for me. I like the sort of creativity

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of naming George's bulldog Uga after Uga, right, and got

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>an espen quality to it. Right. It's kind of controversial

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>among Oregon fans, but technically speaking, it's just the duck,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>which is very boring. But I believe it was when

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Oregon had a live duck mascot. The duck's name was Puddles,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and that has carried over and I think that's adorable

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm if people want to call the duck Puddles,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thrilled to go along with that. So that's my

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>asterisk here. Let's go to Joseph, also another verballer, Okay,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>assemble your dream college football Saturday, not related to your

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>own team in any way, and he highlights a few

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>possibilities here can be a unique college football venue or

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>college town. A question on this is coming up here also,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe by Joseph, the same Joseph. I don't know, but

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question that I'm going to ask next.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Hold that in mind. Also could pertain to matchup tailgating

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>food a celebrity fan to watch the game with Dan.

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You have been is It's no secret in this show

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you have been to many more college football venues than me.

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>So with the benefit of that experience, what does your

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>dream college football Saturday not related to Oregon now right?

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like for you? So I cannot choose? Okay,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so of the locales both in terms of town, city

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and tailgate and atmosphere of a game. I mean I

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>do have favorites. I mean I loved going to Baton

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Rouge and seeing a game at Death Valley SYLSU South Carolina,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which was not a mark matchup, but it was an

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>insanely fun time. Nonetheless, Now Baton Rouge as a town,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a perfectly good town. Does it stand

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>out in college towns to me? Not necessarily, but you

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>do have the New Orleans ability, so there's that element,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's not the college town. God, It'd be hard

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to turn away Madison at this point for me because

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I like the food, I like the town, I like

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere of the game. It's you know, there's an

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>electricity there that I do love. But if I had

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to put everything together, man, I don't know, see, and

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going up and down the list of places I've been, Like,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I love ann Arbor, but like the Michigan in game experience.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's just that that's where it falls

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit. For me. What about you, Well,

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>now you love Athens. I do love Athens. I'm not

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>going to go Athens with this because I've been there,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but I the best I can do here is tell

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you the elements of college football that I'm intrigued by

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and have yet to experience. So, for example, I am

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>very intrigued by some sort of pregame tailgating experience that

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>involves boats. That's Tennessee Washington standout. And I've done both. Yeah,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and Washington standout, So you would tell you could

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>tell me which one's better, But I am intrigued by

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that first and foremost. I ate better Before a Washington game,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the local seafood people were grilling up fish and making

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fish tacos, and I think there was some sort of

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>oyster situation that was great. That was legitimately a great

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>eating experience for me outside of I think it was

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a Washington Oregon game two thousand and seven, so that

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful. So I would recommend that. But the Tennessee

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Vall Navy is great too, and that is a

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Meland stadium is an overwhelming stadium experience. Now are you

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get that electricity for current Ish Tennessee matching

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>up in a big game. I don't know. I don't know,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's takes away something about it. But I think

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if if Washington lives up to their hype and ceiling

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this season as a top fifteen ish team. I think

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you would have a really good time. It's a loud stadium.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've spent time in Seattle, have you? No, No,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been a college town. I've been to Portland and

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>never been the site. Seattle's great. You can eat well,

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you can explore, there's different neighborhoods. It's on the water.

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You want to go. There's like different islands you can visit.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You can see orcas certain parts of the year. To me,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a big positive in a college town orca

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>options options all right, So let's say Washington just by happenstance.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But the boat thing, to me is interesting as a

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>tailgating exercise in terms of which I would love to

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tailgate in a kackaboose at South Carolina. I think Columbia

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't crazy attractive to me. Let me move on to matchup,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, okay, pretty much any big time rivalry, So

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give me Ohio State Michigan. I don't know. I mean

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the rivalry to end all rivalries in college sports,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe in sports in general. I mean it it's fine.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So if i'm picking, I'll just pick a rivalry. I

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a proclivity towards any one particular matchup.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Tailgating food. Tailgating food's interesting to me. It's interesting to me.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not as interesting to me as it is to you.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You're the foodie of the group. But no, but you're

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in food, am I am intrigued by having

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>tacos outside of a college football game? Sure, I've never

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>done that at a Penn State game or a Notre

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Dame game. To be perfectly honest with you, great tailgate

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>food handheld can grill. Also anyone who does Poe Boys.

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that drives me more towards the South Southwest.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it's not a big tailgate food

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>though maybe I'm wrong on that, just throwing I see

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of When I went to Baton Rouge, and

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been to I mean, I've been to a lot

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of plays in the SEC, but especially Baton Rouge, which

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I would assume Louisiana is most associated with Poe Boys

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and New Orleans and everything. Uh, it was much more

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>giant pots of different stews and different options in terms

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of royal crap oil right dumping out, Well, it's more

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>shrimp to me. I don't know, cross, but I don't

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>know if crawfish is fully in season in the fall.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it is. But yeah, that's what I

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>associated big pots, cauldron type situations and it was freaking amazing.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think your answer should be lsu Bama,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>lse Ole miss something like that in Death Valley and

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then the final one here celebrity fan to watch a

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>game with. Now you go a thousand directions here, right,

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we're biased towards McConaughey. He was on the show. I

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it did, like walk us through he

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>walked us through his ideal Texas football weekend. He did.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.959
<v Speaker 1>We asked him specifically about that. And so for my money,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he came on the show outside of Lex Steel And

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think what other celebrities we've had on

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the showcanaughey is clearly the most famous person that we've

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>had on the show. So for me, it's got to

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be had Ralph Russo on. We have had Ralph on Okay,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So don't just say McConaughey without fully considering the breadth

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of options. Stu Mandel. We've had Stu on too. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't have a celebrity. I mean McConaughey

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would be fun. That'd be ridiculous. Let's say the Big

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>twelve tie. Chris wants to know big picture thoughts on

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State heading into the season, and I think he

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>went on to ask about a possible hot seat for

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Chris Climb and I'm gonna say no. Yeah, I'm definitely

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>going to say no to that because I do think

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the early returns are promising. Not his fault that Will

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Howard had to step in last year, and you know,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the record certainly indicated the falloff at quarterback between he

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and Skyler Thompson. My big big picture thoughts on k

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>State is they need to get the defense in order.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>They brought in some promising transfers. We hope Skyler Thompson's healthy,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and if Skyler Thompson and that offense are able to

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>look like they did at times together, we should see

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculously entertaining and productive douce Vaughn. Now what develops

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a round douce vont to, you know, take away some

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of that gravity. I don't know if it's Malik Knowles.

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who it is who had kind of

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a disappointing year last year. That's what I'm curious about.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>On offense, the schedule is I believe, and I had

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it in front of me earlier. It's really tough early on,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and especially in terms of quarterbacks consecutively. It was like,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Brock Party and Spencer Rattler, Spencer Sanders if

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>he reaches his potential like a bunch of those guys

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>early on, and then the back half is pretty nice

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of quarterback matchups. So I would say eight

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>wins is relatively realistic if they are going to return

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, not regrest, but progress to the

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mean in terms of injury luck. So you know, it

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was it was an unfortunate twenty twenty for k State

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of all of the like numbers issues they

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>had because of health and safety protocols in Skyler Thompson.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think they are going to return to where

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they should be in terms of availability and just luck.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I see them as an eight and four programmer.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Eight eight wins is totally doable with this schedule. The

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>other thing about K State's schedule is that they open

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with Stanford neutral syche game, oh bodyclock game right, like

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>an eleven am local kick. Yeah, yep, yep, eleven am

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>local kick. I play it in Arlington, and we have

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>been pretty public that. You have been way more public

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>than I have about your Stanford distained. Maybe I'm being

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a staying harm but you're not a Stanford SR. Yeah,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you're not a Stanford fan. You're not a fan of

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>this iteration of Stanford football. Let's say going to the

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one season, that's a that's an interesting matchup

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for k State. Stanford's got some acclaim. You beat Stanford

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the shoot it puts k State a little

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more in the conversation right off the off the bat.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Two very winnable games after that against Southern Illinois and

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>nov maybe startling. Illinois did beat North Dakota State in

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>February TI they beat North Dakota State, but also Southern

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Illinois has that that DNA in them. They have the

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>antibodies tie. Chris crime Climan is the North Dakota State

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a Dakota State I get, but possibly off to a

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>three and zh start before you get to the real

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>teeth of that schedule. Which is Oklahoma State, Oklahoma a

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bye week, and then Iowa State. Sure, so nonetheless, you

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the schedule, you could you could find eight

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>wins here. So I think I think I'm with you.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 1>They had the number one rate at all things, you know,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>being not great for k State in terms of numbers

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and their bad luck last year. I think I saw

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that their defensive line was the number one havoc filled

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>line in college fotball last year, obviously in large part

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to Wyatt ubi Hau, who is no longer there. He's

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he was drafted by the Bengals, so uh

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>production to be replaced for sure. But yeah, I think

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they have a nice bounce back here because even when

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Will Howard was struggling at times, they were in I

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was the Baylor in Oklahoma State games, so

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they had a shot at games, even though they finished

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty unexceptionally last year. Alrighty Dan, let's go to Let's

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Bert. Let's go to Bart all the way

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of the dock. What atom Bart? Is

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>TCU a dark horse Big twelve contender Flora's yours? No

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not. That's oh man, can you can you carve

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out a path for me. Can I carve out a path?

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I can pull up their schedule and we can try

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to carve out a path. I cannot in good faith

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sit here before the verballer hood and come up with

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>any scenario in which Oklahoma does not win the Big Twelve.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma is loaded, Really, they are loaded this year. They

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have the best offensive line in college football, maybe the

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback in college football. Do you think so? I guess.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean the transfer situation is nice for them. Ohio

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>State's tackles, but they've got so much coming back. Their

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>defense presumably should be just a little bit better. And

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like I've said time and again with Oklahoma, the defense

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>does not need to be Alabama. The defense needs to

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be marginally better, marginally better, marginally better, just a little

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>bit better. They improved really impressively last year. If they

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can just continue to take some steps forward, I feel

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>like they're in a really good spot. What I don't

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the question wasn't about Oklahoma. I get that. What I

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>don't like about TCU trying to carve this path is

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>TCU's problem over the last however many years now has

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>been inconsistency. Now, I like Max Duggin we like Max Duggin,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>but there has to be consistency around him. There has

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to be consistency with him as well. But the offense,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to me has really let me down. The defense in

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>spots has really let me down. I just don't feel

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>like I'm getting a level of canssistancy with TCU that

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I can really rely on. So the schedule, on its face,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the schedule does not look like it is a murderer's

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>row by any stretch. They play Dukine and Cal in

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the NORN Conference, right, and the other games that they've

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>got here are I think spread out pretty well. They've

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>got Texas and they've got Oklahoma, But in between the two,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they've got a road tilt against Texas Tech, nice little buffer.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Then they've got k State, which that game's on the road,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but there's a buffer against West Virginia in between. Then

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they've got Baylor. West Virginia is a buffer that's disrespectful.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Then they've got Baylor, who I don't think any of

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>us is all that high on, but Baylor before they

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>go on the road again against Oklahoma State. You know,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a grimy guy. And then Kansas before they close

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>out the year on the road at Iowa State. So

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they've got adequate buffer in between those big games, which

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is nice for them. But they've got a road game

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>against Iowa State, a road game against Oklahoma State, a

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>road game again Kansas State, a road game against Oklahoma

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's pretty tough, Dan, It's pretty tough to emerge

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>unscathed from all those big time road games. So for

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>my money, no, nobody's asking them for that. But then

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we're saying dark horse candidates. So dark horse means what

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it means, they're winning toss up games, there's a unit

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or two that's much better than expected, or they have

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>incredible injury luck and other teams don't. So we're talking

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about things need to happen. This needs to be what

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is it called like a Rube Goldberg machine in the

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Twelve. It's where one team something catastrophic happens to them,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and that'd begets something else weirdly to another team. Like

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>if all of the quarterbacks in the room at Big

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Twelve media days, if suddenly, like a bunch of spiders

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>crawl out of the wall and sting every quarterback other

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>than Max dug In. Right, we're having a conversation unless

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>those spiders are radioactive and they have spider Man powers.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So I, you know, I think things. There needs to

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of weird word a path for TCU

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that they keep getting teams with backup quarterbacks so they

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>keep like weather're talking about here, We're talking about real,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>true universal weirdness that affects everybody. But TCU. No, the

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is no. The answer is no. If it's not Oklahoma,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's not Iowa State, if it's not Texas, if

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not Oklahoma State, right, it's not happening. It's not happening.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So I like TCU. You know, I always kind of

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I get to this stage in mid July every year

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and I start looking at TCU with that twinkle in

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>my eyeburt. I still have the twinkle. I still have it.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I always come back to TCU, no matter how much

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to, and I like them, I really do,

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not this much. There's got to be a limit to it,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is my limit. There has to be some

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of pop in the passing game to open things

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>up for the run game. There just has to be.

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>There has to be somebody on the outside, and maybe

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we are just that. Maybe a name is just not

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>popping into our heads right now. But that passing game

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to improve from bad to above average, which is

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a tough ask with the same quarterback and no especially

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>talented receiver transferring in or offensive line. Like, there needs

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to be some indicator right now to us for us

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to feel optimistic. But I think, look, you look at

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their schedule last year, and they won what their final

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>three games. I mean, they trounced Louisiana Attack whatever, but

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, beating State is something. Beating Oklahoma State the

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>way that they did, it's just I remember the Max

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>dug and pass at West Virginia. It was just like,

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>how can I have faith in a team who passes

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like that? And I think he just through like an awful,

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>awful misfire on a wide, wide open player in the

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>end zone from like eleven yards out. So I think

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they can win the losable games. You win some more

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>toss up games it was close against. I'm looking at

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>their schedule last you know, they lost to k State,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they lost to Iowa State early, and I don't know,

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those teams that can bounce back, But personally,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like it to see more new personnel being a

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why. Rocco says, what is more likely to happen

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fooente who getting fired after going four and eight,

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or Fuente leaving for Oklahoma State after flucking his way

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>into a nine win season. Just I think it was

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the former. In Virginia Tech four and eight, explain, I mean,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their schedule is not terrible, so there's good reason to

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that. You know, they won't go four and eight.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, man, I think Braxton Burmeister

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is okay. But this was supposed to be Justin Fwente's strength,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing the ball downfield an interesting, difficult pass game to

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>defend like he had at Memphis, and they haven't found quarterbacks,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they haven't found receivers, they haven't developed a system to

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>consistently get that. And it looked like Hendon Hooker was

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback for stretches and now he's gone. Khalil Herbert

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was the guy responsible for adding the pop to that

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>offense last year, and it's a really nice offensive line

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. I just it's hard to see now their

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule splits are nice, right. I don't have it in

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>front of me, but I remember looking at it when

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we were research when I was researching the ACC and

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they open with North Carolina, which I guess will know

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about Virginia Tech after that game. But

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think after that they're home for a while and

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't play Clemson, they have notre Dame at home.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know what Virginia Tech's identity is,

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so the teams like that. That's the problem with an

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>identity free team, with a team that you know they

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>won games they were supposed to win and weren't all

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that competitive in other games, and not having a quarterback

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel great about. As nice as the schedule kind

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of appears early, I think I say four and eight

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more so than nine and three. The Braxton Burmeister thing

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is troubling to me. He completed some nice passes, but

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I rewatched some of him and the Virginia

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Tech offense late in the year last year, like I

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>rewatched the Virginia game, and he hits guys if they're

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically schemed open, like if there's like a tight end delay,

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like the tight end chips a defensive end and then

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it leaks out late and is wide open. Braxenbermeiser recognizes

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that and hits him, there's like a wheel route that

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>develops that there's a you know, a crazy mismatch that's

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>anticipated great. But in terms of finding those one on

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>one guys and or going through progressions and pushing the

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ball downfield, I don't think Virginia Tech's getting that from

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the passing game this fall. I just don't. Yeah, I mean,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt on and off throughout the course of

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the year last season. Last season was weird, full acknowledgment,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was up and down for him.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Last year. Hendon Hooker went to Tennessee. He transferred, so

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with Braxton Burmeister now as like the top guy. I

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't feel great about that. First off, He's been

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>around forever, forever at this point, and it feels like

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>if there were going to be any kind of notable improvement,

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we would have seen it by now. Just haven't. Right now,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there's an identity crisis, and it's like, what exactly is

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what are they? What do they? I mean I thought

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>there was an identity crist last year they lost their quarterback,

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like the I don't know. There were moments, there were

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>promising moments, and you win, look, you win your rivalry

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>game to end the season. Things aren't fully terrible, but

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with Babcock, the AD had to call a press conference

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to clarify that Justin funte was not being fired. Yeah,

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good that's not a great moment to

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>go into an off season on Georgia. Yes or no,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Catherine wants to know via Instagram. Yes, yes, of course, yes,

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I'm a little bit worried about JT. Daniels'

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>health just because he's a little bit snake bit and

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's a JT. Daniels thing or

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a universe thing that that concerns me. But there's there's

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so much depth all over the field up front on defense,

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, receiver should be good. I know they lost

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Demetrius Robertson and George Pickens got hurt, but they should

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be in a pretty good fire. They'll be fine. And

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>look they're in you're common about JT. Daniels health is fine, Yeah,

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and totally fair. They're in a good spot though that

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at least they have a returning quarterback. And I know

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to affect Clemson in Alabama and Ohio

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>State the way it would affect ninety percent of the

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>other programs around the country. But it still is advantageous

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to bring back a quarterback who towards the end of

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>last season was really fighting as stride. So I like

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that about I always like JT. Daniels. I liked him

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>at USC the little bit we saw of him. I

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>loved him coming over to Georgia. I love the fact

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that they might try to incorporate more of a vertical

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game. They wanted to at the start of last year,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but Daniels wasn't healthy, so now hopefully with a full

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 1>off season, hopefully they can start to accomplish some of that.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>From an offensive standpoint. I'm really bullsh on Georgia. I

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>am every year, but I am especially this year. Their

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>schedule rules, by the way I just looked it up,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's phenomenal, great, like Jim Row would say, phenomenalh nomenalull phenomenal. Yeah,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they have Clemson, Yeah that's going to be difficult, but

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>away from Athens otherwise, you know you're always going to

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have the Jacksonville matchup against Florida, but new Florida quarterback,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and the road games at Auburn, new coach, at Vandy,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>new coach at Tennessee, new coach at Georgia Tech, trying desperately,

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to break through to become a bowl team. So

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I say Georgia, Yes, I love their lines. I mean

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to love. Now, the question is can

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they generate a complete four quarters? Can they generate an offense?

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Can they figure out the firepower? Can they figure out

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a game plan to beat Alabama? Ever on a neutral field,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>away at home wherever? I don't know. That's the bar.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the bar right now. They had a great team

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that are a really good team and ran into lightning

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in a bottle LSU. At this point they have the

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>most promising quarterback known quantity quarterback in the conference. Yes, yeah,

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean we don't know what Bryce Young

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like. We don't know what LSU

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ceiling is. We don't know what Texas A and M

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like at quarterback. We don't know

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things about quarterback. But the position George

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>is in right now year two of the Monk and era,

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the health at receiver. Yeah, I think they

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.720
<v Speaker 1>should be in a fantastic place and we'll know early

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and whatever. The Clemson game brings about is whatever. It's

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>still week one on a neutral field, so they've plenty

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of time to recover or regress. But I mean, this

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like another real terrific opportunity for Kirby Smart to

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>take a next step. Let's go on over to amateur

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>photog HM. I wasn't really sure how to qualify this person.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand his or her screen names. So this

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is where we are. What will be the most or

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>will be the more competitive game Iowa at Iowa, Oh,

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Indiana at Iowa, or Miami against Bama. The more competitive

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>game Indiana Iowa or Miami versus Bama. I believe. I

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>believe if memory serves that the early line on that

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami Bama game was seventeen and a half points in

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>favor of Alabama. So unless this respondent has a different

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>definition of competitive, the answer would have to be Indiana

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at Iowa, right, I guess I mean the low of

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>both Indiana, the low points of both in the Actually,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>three of these teams have had low points in the

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>last year. Indiana's low point offenseively is worrisome. Now, granted

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that was both with and without Michael Pennix, but depending

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on health on Indiana's offense. I you know, I could

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>see a situation which Indiana loses that game seventeen to three,

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and almost no part of that game is entertaining or competitive.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I really like Indiana just holistically as a program right now,

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so I don't necessarily see that happening. Miami is probably

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a higher floor than Indiana and Iowa. We'll see though,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because I just I worry more about where Indiana and

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Iowa at quarterback wise, Like there's a lot I really

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do like about Iowa, and you know, they've they've taken

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>strides to become more creative on offense. But I I

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I feel phenomenal about Spencer Petros, pet

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Trust Petrousts, So that concerns me. I'd say, track record wise,

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Indiana I was going to be more competitive,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just because I don't see either one of those offenses

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>running away. Where Alabama's ceiling with that line, with that

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>stable of backs, so much of another promising crop of

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers and Bryce Young. Yeah, it's probably Alabama Miami right now.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But that being said from an entertainment standpoint, from a

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>TV product standpoint, the answer is Miami in Alabama Yeah,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that's the more entertaining matchup. Yeah, but may not be

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>as it could be a blowout. That game in all

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>likelihood will be over by start of the third quarter.

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And we're still talking about a Miami team that really

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>disappeared offensively for stretches last year despite having dear King,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a Miami team that lost by forty that just completely

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>ran out of gas. Now this is Week one, but

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they lost by forty ish against North Carolina, and so

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, they lose some talented defensive linemen, but there

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are guys back on that defense that are really impressive.

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.439
<v Speaker 1>And we saw Derek King, we sell Mike Harley. There's

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>their pieces to really like, but man to do it

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for four quarters against Alabama week one, and Alabama has

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>this sort of even though they're winning national championships, they

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>also come out of the gate pretty strong in these games.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So no, yeah, that's just the reality. I hope d R.

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>King really like flashes knee wise like that he has

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fully recovered and is recuperated. Let's go back to this

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>question that I teased earlier from Joseph Okay, what are

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>some unorthodox venues we could play college football games at,

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with cool backdrops. Not even stadiums, just venues where

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you can put a makeshift field like they did in

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Tahoe with the rink. I'm thinking the National Mall with

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the monuments or a corner with ten out west the

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>mountains could also be amazing. Dan, do you have any

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this? The salt flats where they try to

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>go really fast in cars, I guess that's not grass though.

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have horse racing venues Churchill Downs. I

0:38:54.239 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know how wide the infield is. Baseball stadiums really

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>do it for me, especially after seeing when they tried

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to play what was it, Illinois Northwestern at Wrigley and

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>how close the end zone was Wall. Yeah. Yeah, those

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>always scare me a little bit. The international ones where

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they play in soccer or football stadiums, they're fine. You know,

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>they've played what in Australia, they've played in Ireland. Those

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>don't do it for me. In terms of non traditional

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>venues they played. They played some NFL games and I

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>want to say it was the Giants against the Dolphins

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at Wembley and this is one of the early games

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't switch out the turf and so guys

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>were out there pretty much on skates, trying to trying

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to run around on the turf and just tearing it

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to shreds. That was kind of interesting, not from an

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>injury standpoint, but I was trying to look at this

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of like, where's a really cool plateau

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the world, Like can we do this? Can

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we do this somewhere in South America in the Andes

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on a big plateau where we have a cool backdrop?

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not the best stadium about the Grand Canyon. Set

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up a field, it makes your field. They wheel a

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>feel into the University of Phoenix Stadium or whatever that's

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>called now Glendale. So drive that field to a Grand

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Canyon adjacent. What about they have that glass overhang somewhere

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Grand Canyon, don't they. Yeah, that's not I'm

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not okay with that where you can kind of see

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>through the bottom, Like that would be cool. What about

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like Pebble Beach? I thought, a yeah, I don't know

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have enough flat territory that you could just

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>build a field, right, you would have to do some grading,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of like beachside cliffs, ocean side cliffs,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Pebble would be cool. For something like that. It's already

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>an iconic venue, so if you could do something like

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>along the cliffs there, that would be pretty damn cool.

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It's something like I'm trying to think if there's any

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>desert you know, to have like the Desert Escape with

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the palm trees something like that. I don't know if

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a play you know, Palm Springs or Vegas or

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Kind of such a weird question that

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it kind of like specific venue. I mean national there's

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of national parks that'll be interesting, but it's

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing a game in Yosemite or something like

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the feasibility Yeah, in terms of venues like where people

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>already gather, right, So big wide open grassy air, like

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a game in Central Park, right, that's something Yeah, no, sure, yeah, yeah.

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you do for stands, makeshift stands,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but like you need wide open grass. That's it. I

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, what a weird question. All right, let's get

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to We got a couple of minutes left here. Let's

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>let's get to some of our non college football questions.

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the best way to eat on a road trip

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>from Luke overbolor do you pack sandwiches. Do you take

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>long breaks for sit down restaurants, do you embrace fast food?

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you do? I think it depends where you are.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd think it depends who you're with, it depends how

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hungry you are. I would definitely make an effort to

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>try as much regional food as possible, So whether that's

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>sit down, whether it's you know, burger shacks, I think

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the shack experience. Like if I were to go on

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a road trip and I was I wasn't in a rush,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I would look up where the like local

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>iconic burger shacks or burrito or taco set, you know,

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that, where you're eating outside, something that's been

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>there since like nineteen sixty three. I snack food doesn't

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do it as much for me. I'm, you know, happy

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to go grocery shopping before you leave and load up

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on what you want. But I think I would make

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort to research the sort of road food places

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>along the way. I don't care about eating really well,

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about going to steakhouses, but like if

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm driving up the coast somewhere in New England or

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast or in the Gulf or something like that,

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and the like, oh man, you need to go to

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 1>this like fried clamshack. Okay, I'm going to do that.

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I am steering into the shack lifestyle on a road

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>trip in terms of food, steering into the shack lifestyle

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:17.959
<v Speaker 1>and also steering into the immediacy, the urgency, the emergency

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of a potential bathroom break on the road. Yeah, because

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you just don't know what you're going to get, right.

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>The only thing is, though, if you go greasy as

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a priority, you're going to slow down your road trip.

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>You're going to slow down. Might have some issues, you

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>may have some issues. And so for that reason, and

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>really that reason only, I have no problem with regional food.

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But there is something cool about the low rent nature

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of like let's stop at wah wah, Let's get a

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>couple hogis. Let's load up the cooler with some ice packs.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll stop at some place along the side of the road,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the rest stops. What have you, Pop open

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the cooler, eat our hogies, and we'll continue on. It's

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot quicker in most cases, it's a lot cheaper.

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely not as exciting. But my only point there

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is jacks are pretty quick though, I mean shacks are quick.

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Shacks are quick, for sure, Gonna be waiting for a

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>long time for a Burgram Fries or something in the

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 1>middle of like who knows where I'm route sixty six

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or something. No, of course not. But my only point

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is if you're into the regional food thing, eat the

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>regional food once you get to your destination, because then

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not on the open road. Then you don't have

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the whole bathroom thing. Sure, Like, just

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>get to a place where you're okay, I'm good. I

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>know I'm going to sleep tonight. I've got accommodations nearby.

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>That's when you take the food. What is your most

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>common minimum three hour drive, like when you go to

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jersey Shore. What does that drive for you, like

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in the last like decade or something. Yeah, I mean

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's two two and a half, okay, So do

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you have places that you love stopping that you don't

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 1>normally get to go because it's only on that route?

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Not really, No, I mean, if I'm if I'm looking

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at where I've gone about three hours away, I'd say

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Jersey Shore is about to to two and a half.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I've gone down to like Ocean City, Maryland, Rehobeth, Delaware,

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that's about three three and a half. Yep, Baltimore is

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>about three ish from here. And you don't have any

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of food traditions on any of those, not really.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>DC is about three penn states two and a half.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, going a different, different direction. So no,

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't really have any food. Will you

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>shot before? Will you like? Will you get that? Wah wah?

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Sub is that? Just? Is there a food that you

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>look forward to, like, Oh, I'm well on the road,

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm gonna have on on my person.

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 1>It's all it's it's always got to be some sort

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of HOGI yeah for sure. Okay, so you're will you

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>eat it as you drive or just during a pit stop?

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>As a pit stop? Yeah yeah, okay yeah? Hot or

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>cold HOGI you know, I go either way. I just

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I like it toasted. I don't care if it's cold

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and toasted. Bit could dry out the bread if you

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.360
<v Speaker 1>let it go too long. It could. No, it's fair,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but I prefer to have the whole. And they give

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you the option at Wawa if you want the whole

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sandwich toasted after they after they build the sandwich right

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or just the bread. I always go everything because then

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it melts the cheese. Really gives you a different experience.

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>The original tie the guy Mike, who I hosted my

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>college radio show with. He is from Boise and we

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 1>would drive home, which was, you know, eight or nine

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hours from Eugene, because I mean there are two different ways,

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>one of which you go through Portland. One of itch

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is more direct, but you got to go through mountains

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or something. He and his dad would get like whatever

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the like catering KFC size pack of popcorn chicken was.

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They had a dipping station on the console, the dashboard,

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever area of it was an older a cord or

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and they found a way to really

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>secure I think it was like at the at least

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time the popcorn chicken. I think it was KFC.

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was somebody else, a fast food place to

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>secure the giant it would come in like one of

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:08.439
<v Speaker 1>those movie popcorn basket type situations, and that they would

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:11.439
<v Speaker 1>just go to town on like a one and eighty

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>piece por chicken container, which I think is a great

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>road food if you can secure and have the coordination

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to dip as you drive. Yeah, no, it's a good one.

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean any any related field of fried chicken, nuggets, tendos, whatever,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think lends itself pretty well. So this is like

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that answer underrated question from Luke. Thank you very much.

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Anything else that stands out to you? I mean, we

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of other college football questions. Well, God

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>dump it jump in. Jeremy wants to know with the

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>SEC going ESPN ABC soon, what is the next move

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for CBS. Do they go after the Big ten rights?

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Do they after Big ten rights? Do they have a

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship with it? They do have a relationship. My English

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>is off today with a Big ten in basketball. I

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It seems like the PAC twelve is probably

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the move in terms of of eventually available and needing

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:09.479
<v Speaker 1>more exposure i e. Network television and not super duper

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>duper duper duper hard to find premium cable, So PAC

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve could be that move. NBC could expand its offerings,

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but NBC Sports is sort of with the they dissolve

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the sports network, right, NBC Sports Network no longer exists,

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>so they're not and hockey has gone back to ESPN.

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe so I know what NBC's investment is like

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and more broadly speaking in sports, but CBS is still

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a brand that's that's pretty heavily associated with college football.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the PAC twelve is the move there, I

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>mean the Big Ten. I mean, they just signed that

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>new deal a few years ago, so I don't know

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>when that actually comes up, but that is a premium, premium,

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.919
<v Speaker 1>premium price tag because Fox badly wanted to get into

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>college football more than they were, and they ponied up.

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And obviously you see like the Big Noon Saturday and

0:48:57.480 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, putting their those huge, huge, Big Ten

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>games at noon. So CBS is gonna have to pony up,

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and the PAC twelve might be a deal. Maybe you

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>buy in early, thinking, okay, whoever, USC maybe hires after

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Clay Helton and you have Mario Christabaul and Oregon rolling

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the way that they have, and maybe you think Jimmy

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Lake is going to be really good, and maybe you

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think David Shaw is going to bounce back and her

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Edwards is going to survive or as was building up

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a monster. So maybe it's a buy in early and

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 1>CBS gets a deal in the same way they had

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the SEC for quite some time. Does

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this mean that Nessler and Gary Danielson are going to

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have to call like UCLA football. It's a good question.

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Is that where we're headed with this?

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I assume I think it was established that Joe Tess

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to become the voice of the SEC came

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the week at espnabies. What is Danielson going to

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>do if he can't go full SEC? I don't know,

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>collect a paycheck and go to Pacady. Yes, I guess

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's you could do. I don't necessarily think he I

0:49:57.680 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of these guys have like super duper

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>long term deals so they can even just hop somewhere

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>else all right where else you want to go? Go ahead,

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you pick the best twenty twenty one group of five

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>team TIEGE, which I really hope is a reference to

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>being named TJ. Who is that team? I mean clearly

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati to me. Yeah, But here's what I noticed ty

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>about the group of five this year, A really really

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>deep roster of impressive quarterbacks. Group of five teams. I

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've paid that much attention to group

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of five quarterbacks obviously, Desmond Ritter is getting NFL attention

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and leading Cincinnati, who I still feel really good about.

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Especially I mean, even with the loss of Marcus Freeman

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to Notre Dame, a coordinator on defense upfront, Cincinnati should

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be strong once again. But I wrote down the list

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of names right here. So you have Caleb Allibie and

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Dustin I want to call him Dusty, but Dustin Crumb

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mac rayce McCalls back at Coastal Carolina, you

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have I lost my place. I believe Nick Starkle's back

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>at San Jose States. Dylan Gabriel should be healthy and

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>good to go, and now has Gus mels On in

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 1>charge of that offense, so I assume we are thinking

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good things there for sure. Jake Hayner was pretty

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>promising in year one the Washington transfer to Fresno State.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know. Laane Hatcher was good. Malik

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Willis is getting NFL attention, and he had a really

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting year at Liberty impressive year at Liberty, So I

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's a surprisingly deep Carson strong.

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even mentioned that Nevada has got a couple

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of really strong no pun intended, but it's true. Receivers

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and Nevada. So no, that to me is one of

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting elements because we we've talked about looking

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>at the top of college football and like, oh, it

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a huge year for quarterbacks. You're like, Okay,

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Ratler and Sam Howell, like they're not necessarily arousing

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.399
<v Speaker 1>our quarterback instincts right now, are they? Like they're good,

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They're very good, But it's not like we we have

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>known killers across the sport like in certain years we do.

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think you can look at the group of

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>five for some really entertaining games because there's experienced, talented

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks all over the place. Yeah, the Grays and McCall

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thing will be interesting to watch, you know. I like

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Holt Naylor's see you, I do like him. I don't

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 1>care what you say. Now, Grayson McCall a year after

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of the big coming out party will be interesting

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch see which direction coastal heads. Levi Lewis twenty

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Levi Lewis and he is the face of

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Eat Lafayette. Great with nil stuff all right for Levi Lewis,

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Tall Rico. Let's do it. Who I

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like this one. Which summer Olympic sport do you think you,

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:45.439
<v Speaker 1>in your prime could have at least outperformed the very

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>lowest performers, assuming you had the necessary prep time. This

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is a very entire life. This is very difficult. So

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what does prep time mean? I have no idea. I

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. So essentially, if you have four years

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to prepare, if you have four years to prepare, which

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of the looking, gosh, there are countless sports here, which

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of these do you think you could at least outperform

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the worst? I think this has to be a team sport,

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>don't you. It has to be some sort of team

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sport where you or I could be effectively buried in

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>right field, like in baseball or softball, right, I guess.

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 1>But what sport is that? It'd be basely if I

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>replaced Kevin Durant with you, Well, it's not basketball. It's

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly the joke of the Olympics. But you could bury

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody in right field in baseball and you could get

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>away with it. You'd strike out, you'd be a mess,

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but the team could still go on and be pretty

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>successful even with a deadbeat and right field. He's saying

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>out per the lowest performers. In this situation, you would

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be the absolute lowest performer in the baseball Olympics. So

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not outperforming the lowest I was thinking team sport.

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking it had to be a team sport

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because you can know where you got outperform the worst

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>person at the Olympics. You have to outperform them. I mean,

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be somebody worse in right field, right,

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>My answer is racewalking. My answer is racewalking. I think

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 1>if I dedicated my life to it. I'm six' one

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one seventy four. ISH i don't have especially long, legs

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>WHICH i imagine you need to you gotta. HAVE i don't

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have any hip, issues WHICH i think that's where you

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 1>generate a lot of the power in. Racewalking, okay beyond,

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>THAT i would be scared to jump off any platform

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of any sort of, height so diving is. OUT i

0:54:55.840 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>don't have any sort of dexterity for, gymnastics, swimming, fencing

0:55:01.960 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing like. THAT i could even approach the lowest PERFORMER

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>i lost to you a table. TENNIS i can't, SKATEBOARD

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>i can't shoot. GOLF i would be the absolute worst field.

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Hockey the problem is even the stuff that we're good,

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at we would still be the. Worst. YEAH i don't

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.240
<v Speaker 1>actually don't even THINK i. Would is there men's field

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>hockey in The. OLYMPICS i have no. Idea where do

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you find? Racewalking by the, Way i'm looking for some

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>of these that no longer an. Event it's within track and.

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>FIELD i have no. Idea i'm looking to try and

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>find a full roster of the, events AND i do

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not see. Racewalking racewalking is, yeah it's let's see who's. Qualified,

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>yeah there's a twenty k and a fifty. K fifty

0:55:50.920 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>k yeah, Right oh my. God the world record for

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>racewalking and a fifty k is three and a half

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>hours of. Powerwalking that's thirty one mile stand a fifty. K,

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>yeah it's a long. Time oh the normal, again if

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you gave me four years to dedicate my life to,

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>IT a normal, person just at a normal, pace does

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a mile in twenty, minutes, right just a normal. Walk

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you're three and a half hours thirty one. Miles so

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what are those ten minute? Miles ten minute? MILES i, yes,

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 1>YEAH i was at The olympic trials in two thousand

0:56:35.040 --> 0:56:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and eight and watched the Racewalking olympic. Trials those, first

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those are. Athletes, yeah those are full on, athletes and

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they are. Moving it's sometimes harder to walk really quickly

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:51.320
<v Speaker 1>than just flat out. Right it does it does damage

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on the. Hips i'm just SAYING i have the best

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>chance of not being the lowest performer at. Racewalking i'm.

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>LOOKING i think it's incredibly, skilled in difficult AND i

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>respect everybody who does it on An olympic. Level BUT

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>i think that's the. Close, like what AM i going

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to start? Cycling what about? Shooting, NO i don't have

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the eye for. It, no these are these are people

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>who have been shooting rifles their entire. Lives is croquet

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>An olympic? Event no? Canoeingestrian it wasn't the at the

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Hundred Summer. Olympics, No i'm looking at twenty twenty

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 1>one artistic. Swimming, NO i don't THINK i have the

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>core strength of the leg strength to even in three four.

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>YEARS i THINK i have the attitude and enthusiasm four.

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 1>YEARS i don't THINK i have the athleticism four, years

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>four years of Equestrian what is? Okay i've asked this

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>question BEFORE i just think in real life to people

0:57:56.800 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in offices and, stuff what is the or do you

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have the list of? EVENTS i have a list of,

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>sports SO i. DON'T i still don't see. Racewalking but

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>look at, here look Up olympic track and field. Events

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:12.439
<v Speaker 1>olympic track and field. Events, like you're not gonna throw

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the javelin. Impressively you're not gonna throw a shot put, impressively,

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Right so what is the event you would? Least? Like?

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>What what do You which event do you think would

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be the most personally embarrassing for you on the international

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>stage to wake up out of a dead sleep and

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be expected to perform on international. Television i'm a podcast

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 1>had to do. It you have to attempt the. Event

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>i'm a. Podcaster so probably. Weightlifting let's be. HONEST i

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 1>see weightlifting is really, binary, Right, well for for you AND,

0:58:55.800 --> 0:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>i weightlifting is more you either lifted or you. Don't

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so you would get there trying to deadlift or whatever

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you're doing and you just wouldn't be able to lift,

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it and you're, like well The american was unable to

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:07.600
<v Speaker 1>even lift, it and it would be, like well look at,

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Him like that's to be, expected, RIGHT i think it's floor,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>exercise floor, exercise it's a floor, exercise OR i think

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the high platform. Dive the high platform dive would

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be a huge belly flop and we'd probably knock ourselves,

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>out but you knock yourself, Out but also you'd look

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like a spaz on the way. Down you just look

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like a complete spaz. Flailing and think about the eight

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>k cameras that are on your face right before the, jump,

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>right and you're just out of a dead, sleep expected

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to perform like you, Would you wouldn't even be on

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>camera running the hundred, Right the cameras would bypass you,

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>immediately and you'd see the replay that The american was

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sluggish and you could at least at least you could

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fake a hamstring injury halfway through a, sprint. Right but,

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah jim nass like the floor exercise where you're expected

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to be creative and have a routine like you wouldn't embarrass. Yourself,

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>golfing you would be, bad but you wouldn't embarrass. Yourself

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fencing your face isn't, seen you'd lose. Immediately. Whatever swimming

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you just get, killed but you can, swim so you

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>would just be enapt you wouldn't be embarrassing. Man but,

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>YEAH i think the high, dive super high, platform the

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>high dive would Be i'd be, terrified wouldn't you be?

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Terrified off skateboarding would be rough if you can't? Skateboard

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>can You skatebourfing would be rough if you can't. Surf

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's just that to me is just, like, well

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>IMMEDIATELY i can't do. It you would have to attempt

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>something like what if you had to do the pommel horse?

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Tie that would be? Problematic, yeah NOW i ask you,

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>This so this is the follow up question to this

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical for years and years. Ago would you rather wake

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>up out of a dead sleep and be expected to

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>perform on the high platform or you, know or whatever

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>gymnastics event that you would have to, Attempt or would

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to wake up out of a dead sleep

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and be in front of a microphone expected to sing

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the national anthem at The Super? BOWL i? Think or

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>host The, Oscars like you would have to go out

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and host The. OSCARS i think you could wing The.

1:01:23.480 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Oscars you? Could, YEAH i MEAN i would rather do

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>each of the last two than rather wake up out

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of a dead sleep and have to sing the national

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>anthem at The Super. Bowl, sure, sure, Absolutely so you'd

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>rather be you'd rather be embarrassed on an emotional level

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:41.439
<v Speaker 1>than a physical. LEVEL i think. So. YEAH i think

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that's What i'm going, for because we've at least been

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in front of, microphones in front of. Camp maybe not

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on that, stage but, no, no, no we've at least

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>experienced something of what that's. Like, right a pommel, horse

1:01:55.160 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a high platform. Dive now not rings the even, bars forget, it,

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>man forget. IT i wouldn't even know what to. DO i.

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>KNOW i think about you sprinting, up oh to the,

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>horse to The oh my. God have you ever seen

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the one where the guy like tries to do the

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>vault and just takes one in the. Chest, YES i,

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have and you see the dust kind of fly off.

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Them it's real. ROUGH i would not want to do

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that because then you risk real bodily, harm LIKE i

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>could deal with emotional by the way they're boxing, exists forget. It,

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>no in The. Olympics but that here's the. Thing you

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>AND i are both reasonably, Athletic, yes, yeah reasonably. Athletic

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>reasonably we're not elite. Athletes we're not the worsty fifth

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>percentile of our age. Group, sure we're reasonably, athletic mm,

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>hmm and we would still be bottom of a barrel

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for any and All olympic. Events of, course at least

1:02:54.080 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you could wing the. Oscars at least you could at

1:02:57.480 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>least we know the words to the national, anthem, right

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and you get. It you've seen enough oscars where you

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>wake up out of a dead sleep and you're in

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a tuxedo and you're walking to a. Microphone you can

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bs your way, through like we all celebrate the majesty of.

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Film we're here To like you. Could you could make

1:03:16.760 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the piece. Together you can see certain you just sort

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of work the room and you're, like, okay There's Dame

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Judy dench and There's Jack nicholson, whatever and you don't

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be, funny but you could just, like let's give.

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Them you would just have a disastrous but efficient. Opening

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:37.439
<v Speaker 1>as long as you are not, disastrous you're. Fine it's

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like doing a wedding, speech, right, right as long as

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not notably, bad it's. Fine it's. Fine so you

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>could get away with doing. That just don't be super.

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Controversial you could get away with doing. That but there's

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>really nowhere to hide if you're out there on The

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>olympic stage unless it's right, field which is WHY i

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>said baseball put me in Right do you think do

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you think your lega see as an embarrassing performer would

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>be more pronounced if you immediately got knocked, out like

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>as a judo participant here mcnely. Style, yes you're just

1:04:12.080 --> 1:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>immediately knocked, out just like boom knocked. Out or do

1:04:16.440 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you think it's worse if you are attempting a high

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>dive and you're bad but you're not? Unconscious? WOW i

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>MEAN i think YOU i think you are less memorable

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just being knocked out right. Away, oh you're definitely less

1:04:29.280 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>memorable because there was something for you. Physically it's definitely

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>worse for you, physically especially if you don't know how

1:04:35.240 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to take a. Punch but there were a couple guys

1:04:38.400 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Last olympics AND i forget where from who

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>were horrible off the highest, platform terrible and like really

1:04:46.960 --> 1:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hurt themselves of course trying to jump off that. Thing so,

1:04:51.840 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>NO i, mean, look it happens in real, boxing in real,

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>mma where people who are the favorites take a punch

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>quickly and go down. Quickly that's a. Thing so you

1:05:02.080 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>could get away with. That the high dive lives in infamy.

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>FOREVER i would also, ADD i would add that wearing

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what you would need to wear on the high, dive

1:05:14.560 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>wearing what you would need to wear as a, gymnast

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Super it's not super forgiving esthetically right, now that's.

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>True that's also very. True where is a tuxedo's? Fine

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what is it called a ghee that you'd be fighting?

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>In as a judo? Participant who asked this question Tal,

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>regan this is a terrific. Question, WELL i took it

1:05:38.000 --> 1:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to a different, place but it is a good. QUESTION

1:05:40.280 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>i don't know if the question you know what you?

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Here it? Is, okay they're, Sailing, well that's another. One

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>could you could you think you could become the second

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>worst sailing participant if given three or four. Years now

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>these are. Lifers what about all? Right so hold? On

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what about the dude or the man or woman to

1:06:00.040 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be politically, correct that sits the person who's like in

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>charge of the boat as they're, rowing who just yells

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out the. Commands m, H i could Do coxson. TYPE

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>i don't know what it. IS i could do. That

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>if you gave me enough time and told me what

1:06:15.680 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not to, DO i could do. THAT i could conduct

1:06:21.000 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that person gets a, medal they're on the. Team, no

1:06:23.920 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but What i'm saying, IS i mean this quite what

1:06:25.800 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this question is asking is, like wouldn't you then be

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst cox in? There i'm saying we need to

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have your coxson abilities at least outranks somebody. Else this

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is very. COMPLICATED i was thinking team, sports so you

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:42.439
<v Speaker 1>could just hide me. Somewhere, SURE i, mean you would

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be best probably what a, golf, golfer baseball in terms

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the possible version of. Yourself AND i would

1:06:47.640 --> 1:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be the best at, tennis AND i don't know how,

1:06:49.880 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Many like is there a country with a particularly bad

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>history of? Golfers like is there a country that's sending

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody to participate In olympic golf that can't break a? Hundred?

1:07:02.760 --> 1:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>No maybe there's no. Chance, no there have been some

1:07:06.680 --> 1:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>really bad participants that get in for whatever. REASON i

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>JUST i. Don't and also there are the home countries get, in,

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Right so there's that element to. Things those guys are

1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>playing from the, tips they're playing in at a hard.

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Course it's not the LOCAL muni you put me out,

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>There i'm not breaking. Ninety there's no way there's somebody out.

1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>There everybody out there is going to be sub ninety for.

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure i'll look up the Last olympics the golf. COURSE

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>i think golf you are prone to having full breakdowns me. Especially,

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>yeah Well i'm not saying, You i'm saying one is

1:07:46.560 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so all, right that's all we have time. For this

1:07:49.920 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>question went a little bit longer than. Expected this is

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a terrific. Question, though terrific. Question thank, you Find sir

1:07:57.200 --> 1:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Taal rico with that. One, Okay so, look we have

1:08:00.760 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a big show coming up On, thursday and then an

1:08:03.400 --> 1:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>even bigger show coming up On. FRIDAY i have seen

1:08:06.040 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of folks who have already started signing up

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for The patreon in anticipation what you have deemed as

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:17.479
<v Speaker 1>twelve years in the, making twelve years in the making a,

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>show twelve years in the. Making it will be available

1:08:19.720 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to Our patreon subscribers Come friday morning at six a.

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>M eastern Standard eastern Daylight eastern. Time, also our show

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>On thursday will be jampacked with all sorts of other

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 1>show related. News so we're very excited about the next

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>show that we've got on the docket. Here don't forget

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to go on out Tu verballers dot com if you're

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>interested in more on The. Patreon don't forget to go

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on out to solid verbal dot com if you want

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to find some of our old. Shows of, course we

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are everywhere that you could possibly imagine on social. Media

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be At, twitter be At, instagram be It, facebook be,

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it read it with all these, things go and check

1:08:56.920 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it out right. Now you can go on out to

1:09:00.240 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>our website Against seliverble dot com for more information on all,

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that and you can sign up for the. Newsletter fifty

1:09:06.280 --> 1:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>k racewalk, brutal, brutal thirty one, ankle thirty one. Mile

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's blistering out my, eyes stand by. IT i know

1:09:20.160 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people who are proud of themselves if they do a

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>half marathon in three and a half hours thirteen point. One, yeah,

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sure of, course half. Marathon you're telling me the world

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>record for fifty k racewalking is shade over three. Hours,

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>yeah you said it's thirty one. Miles thirty one. Miles

1:09:44.280 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a. Lot that is, impossible. Impossible look up. Racewalking,

1:09:50.400 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>NO i believe those those dudes and ladies are for

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:57.479
<v Speaker 1>real for that guy over, there my good Friend Dan,

1:09:57.560 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>rubinstein for, Myself Tie. Hildebrand we will talk to you

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>y'all On. Thursday in the, meantime stay, safe stay, healthy

1:10:04.520 --> 1:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>stay sold. Peace yah h m hm