Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt, California back into lockdown.
Speaker 1: The teachers unions holding students hostage this fall, Cuomo's extreme
Speaker 1: quarantine rules, and what is anti racism? Buck Sexton missions,
Speaker 1: coding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence, make
Speaker 1: no mistake. Great, You're a great American again. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show promo. CIA analysts again can speak
Speaker 1: to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No,
Speaker 1: welcome everybody to the buck Sexton Show. Great to have
Speaker 1: you here with me as always and honor a privilege
Speaker 1: and a pleasure. They get to talk to you about
Speaker 1: everything happening across the country. My mind, we have a
Speaker 1: very clear declaration of intent, I think from the teachers unions,
Speaker 1: which we should always think of as the as the
Speaker 1: the shock troops, if you will, of the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: They are right out there and have been for a
Speaker 1: long time. They don't burn down buildings, they just hold
Speaker 1: the kids hostage. Going into this fall saying that they
Speaker 1: are they're making demands of what they want, and this
Speaker 1: at a time when the whole country is trying to
Speaker 1: figure out what exactly is going to happen here. If
Speaker 1: we're now going to have these restrictions in place that
Speaker 1: are even preventative restrictions. In some states that don't have
Speaker 1: very high COVID cases, we have extreme restrictions, and other places.
Speaker 1: Who knows when those can end, because then you might
Speaker 1: have a surgeon cases. There is just a panic out
Speaker 1: there right now, and schools are now on the front
Speaker 1: lines of the make sure Biden gets elected campaign. That's
Speaker 1: what's happening with the teachers units. I'll get into more
Speaker 1: of that, and what are their demands? What are the
Speaker 1: demands that they're putting out there In case you're wondering
Speaker 1: if they really are acting like a teachers unions are
Speaker 1: acting like a Marxist terrorist group that has taken our
Speaker 1: schools hostage. And my friends, we are entering this phase
Speaker 1: now where everything about COVID, the economy, law enforcement, it's
Speaker 1: just all a big political fight. You will not have
Speaker 1: any good faith effort from Democrats to come into the
Speaker 1: center on these issues or to work with Republicans to
Speaker 1: make anything better. And of course I don't think Republicans
Speaker 1: will go over to their side. They already have a
Speaker 1: little bit with some of this police reform stuff. But
Speaker 1: I also think they shouldn't go over to their side.
Speaker 1: I think the Democrats obviously are wrong on all this stuff,
Speaker 1: but they will they will double down, they will dig in.
Speaker 1: They're not going to move on any of this in
Speaker 1: the least. And then that brings me to what we're
Speaker 1: seeing at or in California. Now. Remember, remember the narrative
Speaker 1: for the last week or so has been that California
Speaker 1: that the states that are having a really rough time
Speaker 1: really the last two weeks, Texas and Florida, Texas and Florida.
Speaker 1: Yesterday I had that guy from MSNBC searchas in Florida
Speaker 1: the dumbest leaders and they're so stupid and they're and
Speaker 1: then we have sure enough California now going back into
Speaker 1: a lockdown, stay at home orders. Now California is saying,
Speaker 1: you know you got you gotta respect our authority to
Speaker 1: tell you exactly what to do. After weeks of protests,
Speaker 1: after weeks of protests that not only were a loud
Speaker 1: but that Governor k Newsom was encouraging. They were all
Speaker 1: pretending that this was fine. They want to lecture us
Speaker 1: all about public health. They want to allow the Democrat,
Speaker 1: the Democrat base of lunatics to mobilize in the streets
Speaker 1: were also oppressed and police violected all that stuff. And
Speaker 1: now after the virus has reached large levels, high levels
Speaker 1: of cases in these states, they're telling us that they
Speaker 1: want to bring back all of the all the old
Speaker 1: stuff of shutdown, lockdown, same thing, that's what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do. This is astonishing. Here's Governor k Newsom saying himself,
Speaker 1: Blake clip seven, we are now effectively, rather effective today,
Speaker 1: requiring all counties to close their indoor activities, their indoor
Speaker 1: operations in the following sectors restaurants, wineries, tasting rooms, movie theaters,
Speaker 1: family entertainment centers, zoos and museums, card rooms, and the
Speaker 1: shuttering of all bars. This is in every county in
Speaker 1: the state of California, not just the counties that were
Speaker 1: on the monitoring list that we announced on July first.
Speaker 1: So this is a new statewide action effective today. Every
Speaker 1: county in the state of California impacted by a requirement
Speaker 1: now to modify indoor operations and to expand opportunities for
Speaker 1: outdoor operations in these specific categories. Now, to be fair
Speaker 1: and to be clear, they're getting they're they're moving back,
Speaker 1: They're not going all the way back to square one.
Speaker 1: You can still have some outdoor things that are allowed.
Speaker 1: But just wait, just wait, see where this goes, see
Speaker 1: what ends up happening, especially if cases continue to be
Speaker 1: very high for a few more weeks. There's a problem
Speaker 1: with what we've been told last last few weeks about
Speaker 1: what's happening in the country with COVID nineteen. Texas and
Speaker 1: Florida have been the focus of all the criticism from
Speaker 1: the media. Why because they both have Republican governors and
Speaker 1: they're considered to be full of enough red state people,
Speaker 1: even though Florida is not a red state. Although we
Speaker 1: should probably all move there, my friends and flip it
Speaker 1: like now, make sure, hint, hint, let's all go. Let's
Speaker 1: all you know, I got an idea. You guys want
Speaker 1: Trump to win. Those either are thinking about Florida, Producer
Speaker 1: Mark included, maybe it's time for us to head on
Speaker 1: down there, register and make it happen. So they've been
Speaker 1: focused on Texas and Florida because Texas and Florida are
Speaker 1: able to be put on the Republican side of the equation.
Speaker 1: And I know that it's very imperfect. And now they're
Speaker 1: even saying I've seen these polling that says the Democrats
Speaker 1: are thinking that Texas might even be a battleground state
Speaker 1: for them, And Biden's up five points. And I don't
Speaker 1: think that the Democrats are gonna win Texas, but remember
Speaker 1: if the Democrats win Texas, were it's all over. So
Speaker 1: keep that in mind. California, though, is a state that
Speaker 1: has been sanctimonious in its We respect the science, we
Speaker 1: wear masks. We've been very slow to reopen. California was
Speaker 1: the place where they were shutting down beaches and they
Speaker 1: were chasing individual paddle borders out on the ocean with
Speaker 1: nobody within a hundreds of yards because of COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: That's the state of California run entirely by Democrats, dominated
Speaker 1: by Democrat voters. This is the liberal left wing stronghold
Speaker 1: of America, really only rivaled by New York. And California
Speaker 1: has had an enormous spike in cases and now they're
Speaker 1: shutting down. So if what we've been told recently was true,
Speaker 1: that it was because Republicans don't believe the science, right,
Speaker 1: That is what we're always saying. Republicans don't wear enough masks.
Speaker 1: You've got a lot of mask wearing in California. You
Speaker 1: got all kinds of you know, they'll listen to everyone
Speaker 1: listens to Democrats there. They believe the science, all that stuff.
Speaker 1: Why is California in this condition right now? Then? Now
Speaker 1: there is an answer to this that isn't really about
Speaker 1: the science entirely, which is they're always going to err
Speaker 1: on the side of more strict lockdown, more restrictions on
Speaker 1: economic activity. Because the Democrats, remember, not only are they
Speaker 1: going to have do they have the incentive of beating
Speaker 1: Trump in the fall, they're also going to just keep
Speaker 1: pumping money, pumping money through the system to people, and
Speaker 1: they're going to keep their social services going. They're going
Speaker 1: to do all these things while small businesses are going
Speaker 1: out of business, of course. And then they're going to
Speaker 1: make demands from the federal government, and they're gonna start
Speaker 1: raising taxes on people that still have jobs and are
Speaker 1: being productive. Now not to say that people without jobs
Speaker 1: in millions of cases, it's no one's fault. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying they're gonna go after whoever still has a job
Speaker 1: or whoever owns a home, raising their property taxes and
Speaker 1: start redistributing wealth that way. That's their plent, so they're
Speaker 1: not worried about it. If everyone has to stay home,
Speaker 1: order in you groceries, and watch Netflix until election day.
Speaker 1: State of California, it's pretty much fine with that. That's
Speaker 1: what it seems like. And if it means that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is guaranteed to lose the election, which I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say this, if you have major states on lockdown
Speaker 1: and an economy that has not been able to recover,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be It's gonna be a miracle. If Donald
Speaker 1: Trump wins, it's gonna be a miracle. Now, some of
Speaker 1: you are probably already saying, yeah, buck, but it was
Speaker 1: a miracle in twenty sixteen, wasn't it true? True? But
Speaker 1: are we really going to expect two miracles in a row?
Speaker 1: You expect lightning to strike twice. I'm concerned. I think
Speaker 1: we all should be very, very concerned. But I just
Speaker 1: want to point to California as a place where I'm
Speaker 1: sure the mask shaming was at a maximum and has
Speaker 1: been for a long time, and you have an entirely
Speaker 1: Democrat controlled state legislature, a Democrat governor. They hate Trump,
Speaker 1: They're all you know. Doctor Fauci is the voice of sanity. Reason, decency,
Speaker 1: and all the rest of it. And yet they're having
Speaker 1: to shut down now. I don't think they would shut
Speaker 1: down if they didn't have a high level of cases
Speaker 1: they have had. I have friends in California who I
Speaker 1: know have gotten COVID in the last thirty days. So
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm talking to people who are saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: they've had it. Most of them, I'll just have, you know,
Speaker 1: minimal symptoms. Some it's like the flu, and they're in
Speaker 1: rough shape. But I don't know anybody in California who's
Speaker 1: gotten a really, really bad version of the disease. But
Speaker 1: this is now going to be the fight, which we
Speaker 1: now an election to. What you're going to see is
Speaker 1: the absolute politicization of every decision made in the name
Speaker 1: of public health to really be about defeating Trump. That
Speaker 1: between now and then, we've known this is coming for
Speaker 1: a while, but we've really we've reached the tipping point
Speaker 1: where middle of July, you know, the next ninety days
Speaker 1: you're just gonna see Nope, shut it down, keep it
Speaker 1: shut down. Everyone be panicked. Don't worry. The cavalry is
Speaker 1: coming America. They will tell you, in the form of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Let's just hope he knows which way to
Speaker 1: ride the horse? Am a show up? Ramo? Where which
Speaker 1: where am I? Yeah, Joe Biden's gonna fix all of this.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the answer to our prayers. It's a
Speaker 1: terrifying thought, but that's what we're gonna be told. And
Speaker 1: the the viciousness. You know, for years, Democrats were so
Speaker 1: nasty about Trump, I mean really really insidious in not
Speaker 1: just the way they talked about the president, but also
Speaker 1: their view of his supporters. When things were great, not
Speaker 1: fighting any big wars, booming economy, and they still convinced
Speaker 1: themselves fascism is coming to America. Trump has been given
Speaker 1: with this whole COVID pandemic, an enormous open door if
Speaker 1: he really was a fascist or somebody who wanted to
Speaker 1: be an authoritarian, an enormous or open door. You know.
Speaker 1: The only people who were walking through that door and
Speaker 1: being little petty tyrants are Democrats, no surprise, but they
Speaker 1: were saying that Trump was a fascist and a tyrant
Speaker 1: and all these horrible things when the country was doing
Speaker 1: so well and everything was pretty much on track. It
Speaker 1: wasn't perfect. Yeah, we got problems, of course, right, I'm
Speaker 1: not crazy. All. I remember all that stuff about the
Speaker 1: border and the border surge and how do we get control.
Speaker 1: Democrats were lying about that. Of course, Oh, they're just
Speaker 1: going for a thing because they need asylum. No, they
Speaker 1: just wanted to cheat the system and coming to the country.
Speaker 1: But those were the challenges we were dealing with before. Now,
Speaker 1: I mean, you're looking at a death toll that's going
Speaker 1: to be between one hundred and fifty and two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand come election day, and the Democrat left instead of
Speaker 1: looking at what's going on around the whole world and
Speaker 1: the fact that there have been a lot of deaths
Speaker 1: from this disease, and this is it's a very it's
Speaker 1: a tragic and terrible circumstance that there is this pandemic
Speaker 1: that is a global phenomenon. Instead of saying this was
Speaker 1: a challenge that hit us akin to similar to a
Speaker 1: natural disaster like a massive earthquake or a tsunami or
Speaker 1: something like that, they're they're going to put the blame
Speaker 1: squarely on Trump's shoulders and Trump's supporters. They're going to
Speaker 1: say they're already convinced of this, that the reason people
Speaker 1: have died from COVID nineteen is not that it is
Speaker 1: a highly infectious and very dangerous virus or dangerous to
Speaker 1: people of a certain age with certain comorbidities. That's the
Speaker 1: real danger zone. But instead of viewing it that way,
Speaker 1: they're going to view it as every single death, every
Speaker 1: lost life from this disease can be attributed to Trump
Speaker 1: and the supporters that put him in office. That's the plan.
Speaker 1: Of course, that's unfair, it's immoral, it's crazy, But they
Speaker 1: don't care. This is what they're going to do. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you, I've predicted the Democrats moves for months, and
Speaker 1: you know that. I've been telling you. We're gaming out
Speaker 1: what their next plan is. I told you would get
Speaker 1: to lockdown two point zero. I've told you that they
Speaker 1: were going to say that there was no danger from
Speaker 1: the protests, and then when enough time passed there like, yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe there was a little bit of transmission from but
Speaker 1: now we're way past that. Now the transmissions community spread.
Speaker 1: So who cares that the protests did In fact, the
Speaker 1: I mean the mayor of Los Angeles has said that
Speaker 1: the protesters probably did, yeah, spread this. So let's all
Speaker 1: be very clear right now about what is coming our
Speaker 1: way and what we are facing you're in the freedom line.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. President Trump's
Speaker 1: total hostility towards science, evidence, facts, logic, reason. He is
Speaker 1: a showman. He is a reality TV star. He likes
Speaker 1: to try to bend reality to suit his own preferences.
Speaker 1: He had really made it clear that he was more
Speaker 1: interested in the optics than the facts when the virus
Speaker 1: first hit, and he kept saying, you know, we have
Speaker 1: fifteen cases. It'll be over soon. So you've got to
Speaker 1: begin and end with His total lack of leadership is
Speaker 1: indifference toward what this virus has cost us, not only
Speaker 1: in lives, in jobs and livelihoods. And now of course
Speaker 1: he doesn't want to hear from our leading infectious disease
Speaker 1: experts like doctor Fauci. He doesn't want to hold the
Speaker 1: even the sham of the meetings that he used to
Speaker 1: hold to try to talk about it. He's he's helping
Speaker 1: that it either goes away or it leaves our attentions fans,
Speaker 1: so that he can get back to be president. Good God,
Speaker 1: too much. Hillary, Sorry about that team, But here she
Speaker 1: is telling you you could say what happened? Remember she
Speaker 1: was gonna be president the United States. Everybody and Now
Speaker 1: she's all, Donald Trump doesn't have leadership. I should have
Speaker 1: been the leader. Oh it's horrible. I know it hurts
Speaker 1: your ears, it hurts my ears. But that's it's really
Speaker 1: the most true, most true to the essence of Hillary
Speaker 1: impression you could ever do. It's just all off putting
Speaker 1: and screechy and awful. But yes, that's right, she's telling
Speaker 1: you exactly what I said. The Democrats will continue to say,
Speaker 1: which the Donald Trump's lack of leadership has cost us
Speaker 1: lives and jobs. Meanwhile, let's look at the choices that
Speaker 1: the president made about the virus. He handed over the
Speaker 1: policy essentially to Burkes and Fauci, so they're not listening
Speaker 1: to the experts thing it's just a lie. He shut
Speaker 1: down flights from China, which now everyone who looked at
Speaker 1: this admits, well, that was a good idea. It wasn't perfect,
Speaker 1: it didn't stop everything, obviously, but it was a good idea,
Speaker 1: and he was heavily criticized for that. And that was
Speaker 1: an early decision. They said we were gonna run out
Speaker 1: of ventilators, used the Defense Production Act Bam, lots of ventilators,
Speaker 1: more ventilators than we need. Turns out, ventily is aren't
Speaker 1: even a very good way to treat the disease. It's
Speaker 1: a really very much a last stitch effort. But they
Speaker 1: said we're gonna run on a PPE Defense Production Act. Nope,
Speaker 1: we didn't run out a PPE. And then they said
Speaker 1: that Trump was going to be a tyrant by telling
Speaker 1: states what to do. No, he said, the CDC's guide
Speaker 1: is as follows. It's up to states. When they reopened,
Speaker 1: what do they oh? Because he said that this was
Speaker 1: gonna go away or he was hopeful about hydroxy chloroquin.
Speaker 1: Once again we see that liberals talk as though Trump
Speaker 1: has made catastrophic decisions when really and this has been
Speaker 1: their problem, this has been their psychosis. So along he
Speaker 1: has said things that upset them, which they take to
Speaker 1: be catastrophic, but which had no meaning, doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: The President says, you know, yeah, hopefully it's gonna go away. Okay,
Speaker 1: that was then, and then he took a lot of that.
Speaker 1: We saw what was happening. I mean, the president doesn't know.
Speaker 1: Fauci was saying it was no big deal too. I
Speaker 1: mean they're just hoping that you don't ever look and
Speaker 1: do the research and figure out what a bunch of liars.
Speaker 1: The libs are thanks for listening to the buses and
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcast. I think it is
Speaker 1: a fair point to raise as to whether or not
Speaker 1: if he loses, she's going to go quietly or not,
Speaker 1: and we have to be ready for that. I come on,
Speaker 1: this woman wanted to be present the United States. She's
Speaker 1: supposed to be serious. Hello, here's Hilarie Clinton saying that Trump,
Speaker 1: if he loses, may not peacefully leave the White House.
Speaker 1: These people are insane. This is not reasonable or rational
Speaker 1: at all. They said that he was a fascist, he
Speaker 1: was an authoritarian. People were making all these allusions to
Speaker 1: the Third Reich when Trump won in twenty sixteen, and
Speaker 1: you have a pandemic where he could be an absolute
Speaker 1: iron fisted because look at what people are doing in
Speaker 1: different states, Democrat governors and even some Republican governors these days.
Speaker 1: But no Trump has said, Okay, we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 1: work on this. We're gonna work with the I would
Speaker 1: seck there. We're going to have you know, committees and
Speaker 1: talk to different states and give them funding and work
Speaker 1: with CDC, nothing fascistic about it. In fact, if anything,
Speaker 1: he might have been a little bit too much of
Speaker 1: a of a soft touch on dealing with these different issues.
Speaker 1: He might have benefited from being a little bit more
Speaker 1: hardline in his approach to you know, for example, the
Speaker 1: speed of reopen or whatever the specific dispute may be.
Speaker 1: But they haven't. The Democrats haven't recalibrated any of the
Speaker 1: talking points, they haven't changed any of their initial set
Speaker 1: of hysterical analyzes. And Hillary is just another example of
Speaker 1: this with her, Oh he may not leave the When
Speaker 1: is that? When? What you could say? This is without evidence?
Speaker 1: That's one of the Democrat's favorite snide little phrases. What
Speaker 1: with what evidence is there at all? Their zero? And
Speaker 1: so why do they say this? Why do they do this? Well,
Speaker 1: because it goes to that part of the liberal brain
Speaker 1: that has been so polluted with anti Trump propaganda that
Speaker 1: there's nothing that they can say about him that it's
Speaker 1: too extreme to believe. Remember, they've called him a traitor
Speaker 1: for years now, without evidence, call him a trader, be
Speaker 1: trade his country, such a bad guy. What are the
Speaker 1: horrible things that Trump has done in office? I love
Speaker 1: asking liberals this and theyllwist turn to some remember what
Speaker 1: he said about the Charlottesville It's like, that's a lie.
Speaker 1: Stop lying. He didn't say the neo Nazis were good.
Speaker 1: I've read the transcript dozens of times now, it's obvious
Speaker 1: what he said. He clarified it. That's a lot, But
Speaker 1: that's one of their first go to because Libs are
Speaker 1: used to arguing from this cheap virtue position all the
Speaker 1: time of oh, well, I'm the good person and they're
Speaker 1: the bad person. So it doesn't matter what they actual
Speaker 1: argument or issue is. You know, I'm a supporter of
Speaker 1: BLM and they are not. Therefore I'm a better human
Speaker 1: being than those Republicans. This is what they do with
Speaker 1: everything all the time. It's never about the issue. It's
Speaker 1: always about they're just superior. Their side is so smart.
Speaker 1: That's always an amazing one to me too, right, their
Speaker 1: side is so smart. Meanwhile, if you're dependent on the state,
Speaker 1: if you're effectively award of the state, you vote Democrat.
Speaker 1: And if you're an ultra elite billionaire, chances are you
Speaker 1: will also be a Democrat. You know, there's a wide
Speaker 1: swath of ideological proclivities and of individual situations that the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party encompasses and what it doesn't include people that
Speaker 1: see things for what they are, just want to live
Speaker 1: their lives, make as many decisions for themselves as they can,
Speaker 1: and just be left the heck alone. That's the kryptonite
Speaker 1: to liberalism, which is of course the worst word ever
Speaker 1: for it, because as they're anti liberal, but conservatives not
Speaker 1: only have we ceded institutions and this is a this
Speaker 1: is a major complaint of mine, and I know I
Speaker 1: complain about it in the hopes that this will just
Speaker 1: catch on more and we will think about this more.
Speaker 1: And my friends in conservative media, I think we need
Speaker 1: a better name even for usselves sometimes or better shorthand
Speaker 1: phrases than just calling ourselves conservatives. I'm okay with right wing.
Speaker 1: I don't see what the problem is with that, but uh, there,
Speaker 1: we need better language to use in these debates. We
Speaker 1: need a better term for you know, what is the
Speaker 1: word that brings together BLM activists and ANTIFA lunatics and
Speaker 1: statue toppling, you know, mediocre PhD students like what brings
Speaker 1: them all? Yeah? The left? But that's very broad. We
Speaker 1: need better terms. Liberal is a misnomer, an intentional misnomer
Speaker 1: the same way that Black lives Matter is the name
Speaker 1: of the group, So that if you challenge the groups
Speaker 1: policy positions, there's the implication of racial animus, because are
Speaker 1: you saying you don't agree that black lives matter? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is it's it's a cheap trick, but it works. Right,
Speaker 1: do you support black lives matter? You better say yes
Speaker 1: to that, right, even though, of course black lives matter.
Speaker 1: But are we talking about the group? Are we talking
Speaker 1: about the phrase? This is? This is how the left
Speaker 1: argues the same thing they do with Do you believe
Speaker 1: in climate change? Of course I believe in climate change.
Speaker 1: Climate's always changing. What kind of Oh? No, do I
Speaker 1: think that we should put morons like AOC in charge
Speaker 1: of reordering trillions of dollars at the economy and putting
Speaker 1: endless government commissions and bureaucrats in control of every aspect
Speaker 1: of your life down the manusha down to the minutia
Speaker 1: of the light bulbs in your house, what you're eating,
Speaker 1: how you deal with your waste. No, no, I do
Speaker 1: not agree with that. Right. So the same have the
Speaker 1: same problem with calling them liberals. They are anti liberal.
Speaker 1: But to be constantly talking about the liberals assault on
Speaker 1: liberty creates a cognitive dissonance just the language we use.
Speaker 1: And this really matters. You go back and read Orwell's
Speaker 1: Orwell's essays on politics and the English language, and he
Speaker 1: knew that this is this is a critical part of
Speaker 1: the battle of ideas. What words do we have to use?
Speaker 1: Why are they always trying to force us to say? Undocumented?
Speaker 1: Undocumented is so easy? Right, that's there's no law breaking there.
Speaker 1: You're just let's just give them some documents. Illegal alien
Speaker 1: sounds like somebody that shouldn't be doing what they're doing.
Speaker 1: It's illegal, and an alien is something foreign. But no, no, undocumented,
Speaker 1: Let's just give them some documents. Right. You see endless
Speaker 1: examples of this. But Hillary, Hillary, Hillary, There's nothing that
Speaker 1: can be said by Hillary or any of the Democrats
Speaker 1: that will be considered beyond the pale about this president.
Speaker 1: They will go to absolute extremes and they will lie
Speaker 1: right to your face, right to America's face, about all
Speaker 1: of this. Think about what they've been willing to say
Speaker 1: when the country was doing well, and now now the
Speaker 1: country is in trouble. It's not the end. I mean,
Speaker 1: if Democrats win, maybe, but you know, well, well, we
Speaker 1: will get through this. But the ferocity that has built
Speaker 1: up in the leftist mind from years now of what
Speaker 1: they view is having to suffer under Trump. This is
Speaker 1: a major issue. This is a major concern. We're all
Speaker 1: gonna have to deal with. The psychosis, damn is breaking.
Speaker 1: They're going to come at us with so much. And
Speaker 1: people that you thought were reasonable, who were in the
Speaker 1: media before, people that that you thought we're maybe willing
Speaker 1: to be fair minded sometimes are just going to sound
Speaker 1: like the most extreme huff Post do as I say,
Speaker 1: or you're a racist ibologue, imaginable. You're going to see
Speaker 1: this happening all over the place, and it's going to
Speaker 1: be a very disconcerting to anybody who hoped for a
Speaker 1: better future for this country. Oh and you're going to
Speaker 1: have people weighing in, like Susan Rice on why Trump
Speaker 1: is such a bad guy, because now we're thinking about
Speaker 1: we're being told at least that Susan Rice may become
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's vice president based on what Susan Rice. You know,
Speaker 1: And I guess we've reached this point too in politics,
Speaker 1: where it's just all about the narrative that can be
Speaker 1: forced upon people. It's not really about accomplishment or ability
Speaker 1: or leadership, certainly off of the Democrats. And look, I
Speaker 1: got a lot of nasty words for Republicans these days too.
Speaker 1: Republicans are asleep at the wheel, not getting it done.
Speaker 1: Where is the Republican Party? How much different would the
Speaker 1: country really be right now if Republicans didn't exist? It's
Speaker 1: worth asking the question. I mean the Republican Party, not
Speaker 1: people who are conservative in their ideology, but how different
Speaker 1: would the country be if the Republican Party's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're just gonna vote present. It's kind of what they're doing.
Speaker 1: They're just showing up voting present. So you're going to
Speaker 1: have people like Susan Rice who are just repeating the
Speaker 1: most mindless talking points. But if you hear it enough,
Speaker 1: maybe for you and me, it doesn't have any effect.
Speaker 1: For a lot of people who are frustrated, who are scared,
Speaker 1: who don't know what the future holds, given what the
Speaker 1: country's going through right now, they hear enough of this
Speaker 1: and they're going to think, maybe we just need something else.
Speaker 1: How bad can Joe Biden really be? Guy's been in
Speaker 1: politics for longer than I've been alive. How bad can
Speaker 1: this really be? Well, pretty bad. But here's Susan Rice
Speaker 1: play four, and he shouldn't respect the science and respect
Speaker 1: the experts, stop assailing people like Tony Faunci put them
Speaker 1: in the lead. The reality is that this is not
Speaker 1: an pandemic that we can wish away. The President Trump
Speaker 1: was cheerleading the reopening of the economy. It proved to
Speaker 1: be deadly premature, and that's why we're seeing in the
Speaker 1: South and the West some of the first states to
Speaker 1: reopen these extraordinary resurgence. We cannot do as the President
Speaker 1: Trump is doing and play politics with and be willing
Speaker 1: to sacrifice the lives of our children and their teachers.
Speaker 1: So we need to get the testing ramped up even further.
Speaker 1: We need to get the contact tracing sorted out. We
Speaker 1: need to restore some of the restrictions that were put
Speaker 1: in place early on and lifted prematurely, as California has
Speaker 1: just done everything. She says here, let's think through for
Speaker 1: a second. Okay, this is moronic. We're testing would do
Speaker 1: what exactly? We're testing more than we've ever done before,
Speaker 1: and you know we're finding out we're catching about, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, ten percent of the actual cases that are
Speaker 1: that are new every day, So we're gonna do ten
Speaker 1: times as much testing. People are getting sick all over
Speaker 1: the getting this disease all over the place, in California
Speaker 1: and Texas and Arizona and Florida. Recently. You know how
Speaker 1: many deaths were in Florida with you know, fifteen thousand
Speaker 1: cases in a day or whatever. It was thirty I
Speaker 1: think it was thirty four. You know, these are this
Speaker 1: is still a manageable situation. But what she tells us
Speaker 1: is listen to the science. That's a stupid slogan. What
Speaker 1: does the science tell us testing testing, testing, This is meaningless.
Speaker 1: The disease is spreading. You can have testing all over
Speaker 1: the place and we do, and people will still get
Speaker 1: the disease because it is at widespread levels. It's all
Speaker 1: over the country, it's all over the world. Yeah, we'd
Speaker 1: know a little bit more, we'd have a little more
Speaker 1: data on where some of the hot spots work. Guess
Speaker 1: what we already know where the hot spots are. Testing
Speaker 1: is not a cure. They act like testing is a vaccination. Oh,
Speaker 1: just got enough people tested it and everything's gonna be fine. No,
Speaker 1: And then the tracing thing that she even says that
Speaker 1: that's laughable. You're gonna trace this right now? A lot
Speaker 1: of people are waiting. I am a friend who just
Speaker 1: got tested and waited a week for results. So unless
Speaker 1: we're going to get everybody to have fifteen minute tests,
Speaker 1: how are we ever going to have a tracing system.
Speaker 1: The only way a tracing system is going to work
Speaker 1: is at the virus level went down to effectively zero,
Speaker 1: and then it was at such low levels of spread,
Speaker 1: and you would have to have people in place and
Speaker 1: ready to go and be efficient and be pretty lucky
Speaker 1: to trace it and to try to contain it before
Speaker 1: it's already spread all over the place. There's no tracing this.
Speaker 1: So when they say things like keys to listen to
Speaker 1: the science, more testing and we need to get our
Speaker 1: tracing squared away, bull crap. This is just noise. This
Speaker 1: is meaningless. But this is what you're just gonna hear
Speaker 1: more and more the think it through. Okay, we're gonna
Speaker 1: we're gonna do. What What is testing gonna do for us?
Speaker 1: Beyond what we are? We're already testing. All I hear
Speaker 1: about this all the time. We're already testing. We're seeing
Speaker 1: record levels of testing. If we doubled the testing, what
Speaker 1: would that mean we have more test on it's just
Speaker 1: that they have no real answers on this. Oh, and
Speaker 1: then more restrictions, the the policy tests and trace. All
Speaker 1: of this was never about shut down the country until
Speaker 1: the virus is gone. That was never offered to us.
Speaker 1: That was never the bargain we were told. It was
Speaker 1: about hospital capacity. And now you have people who keep
Speaker 1: coming forward to say, listen to the science. There are
Speaker 1: too many cases. Lockdown again. Okay, you go into restrictions,
Speaker 1: tell people this, stay home, no indoor activities, but the
Speaker 1: virus is still out there. When you start doing things again,
Speaker 1: the virus will return to a level of spread. And
Speaker 1: we cannot have a functioning society that keeps locking down
Speaker 1: for a virus that kills less than one tenth of
Speaker 1: one percent of people who get it, which when you
Speaker 1: look at the real numbers, eventually it's probably gonna be
Speaker 1: you know, point one, maybe point three or four percent
Speaker 1: fatality rate. You can't keep locking down America over this. Oh,
Speaker 1: but they pretend like they have answers. These people are
Speaker 1: They look the shameless demagogues, and they're ruining the country
Speaker 1: right now. They're ruining it. You're in the freedom hunt
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And when
Speaker 1: you test, you create cases. So we've created cases. I
Speaker 1: can you. Some countries they test when somebody walks into
Speaker 1: a hospital sick, or walks into maybe a doctor's office,
Speaker 1: but usually a hospital. That's the testing they do, so
Speaker 1: they don't have cases, whereas we do. We have all
Speaker 1: of these cases. So you know, it's a double edged short.
Speaker 1: At the same time, we have the lowest mortality or
Speaker 1: just about the lowest mortality in the world. We're doing
Speaker 1: a great job. We're doing very well with vaccines, and
Speaker 1: we're doing very very well with therapeutics, and I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna have some very good information coming out soon.
Speaker 1: But we have the best and certainly the biggest, by far,
Speaker 1: the biggest testing program anywhere in the world. We do
Speaker 1: have the biggest testing program, and we still have all
Speaker 1: this criticism from people about how there's not enough, there's
Speaker 1: never enough testing, there's never gonna be enough testing. This
Speaker 1: this is the way, because this is it's like the
Speaker 1: theoretical how do you ever get to the place where
Speaker 1: there's enough testing? Were never there? So let's just complain
Speaker 1: about it constantly. Look some of what Trump said, there
Speaker 1: is a little off by the facts, but he's right
Speaker 1: on the broadside since but yeah, I know we're not.
Speaker 1: We don't have the lowest mortality in the world compared
Speaker 1: to some smaller countries in New Zealand and Japan, and
Speaker 1: Japan's not a small country, but there are there are
Speaker 1: countries out there that have done better than us when
Speaker 1: it comes to per capita mortality against this virus. But
Speaker 1: what he's referring to is that compared to the societies
Speaker 1: that are of comparable size, complexity, diversity, you know, international
Speaker 1: travel hub, etc. To the United States, You're looking at
Speaker 1: large Western European countries and you have the US beating Italy, Spain,
Speaker 1: the UK, every large European country on a per capita
Speaker 1: basis except for Germany. France better than France. So you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's not like America is the one place that's
Speaker 1: been hit really hard by this. But that is the
Speaker 1: lie the Democrats lean into and just will not stop
Speaker 1: telling it, And now that is going to turn into
Speaker 1: a giant battle over schools. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Teachers unions,
Speaker 1: you may have figured out at this point, I'm not
Speaker 1: a fan. I'm not a fan of any public sector
Speaker 1: union quite honestly. I mean, I could be persuaded that
Speaker 1: cops and firefighters need them, but not civil servants, not
Speaker 1: you know, bureaucrats working in state capitals, people that are
Speaker 1: teaching kids in public schools. I just I'm not signing
Speaker 1: on for that. But unfortunately, that's the reality of the
Speaker 1: education system in this country. You have a massive, bloated
Speaker 1: and highly ineffective on the whole public school system that
Speaker 1: is largely a jobs program for adults and at best
Speaker 1: a babysitting program for kids in failing schools. But the
Speaker 1: LA if you want to know what this is really
Speaker 1: all about, Yes, it's true. And it's obvious that the
Speaker 1: shutdowns of schools in places. Los Angeles County has already
Speaker 1: said no, not gonna, not gonna open schools in the fall.
Speaker 1: They've already said that that's their position as it now.
Speaker 1: Now that could change, But when you look at what's
Speaker 1: being talked about, hold on, I thought this was just
Speaker 1: about safety. I thought this was just about making sure
Speaker 1: that everyone's okay in the classroom. Oh No, it turns
Speaker 1: out it had to the Daily Caller for this one.
Speaker 1: The United Teachers Los Angeles union has called for the
Speaker 1: defunding of police, a moratorium on new charter schools, new
Speaker 1: wealth taxes on California's millionaires and billionaires, and Medicare for
Speaker 1: all at the federal level. In a research paper issue
Speaker 1: on Thursday, It's time to take a stand against Trump's
Speaker 1: dangerous anti science agenda that puts the lives of our members,
Speaker 1: our students, and our families at risk, said United Teachers
Speaker 1: Los Angeles president Cecily my Art Cruise. Yeah, there you go. There.
Speaker 1: I got a paper here that says that the reopening
Speaker 1: of school should be conditioned upon the passage of Medicare
Speaker 1: for all at the federal level, along with all that
Speaker 1: other stuff. Wait, wait a second. I thought teachers unions
Speaker 1: just wanted to teach man. I thought they were all
Speaker 1: about the kids. I thought this was just about getting
Speaker 1: the classroom safely to open up the wonders of the
Speaker 1: children's minds to the great literature of And there's this.
Speaker 1: There's a whole other conversation that we should have and
Speaker 1: we'll have sometimes about what constitutes great literature or literature
Speaker 1: worthy of teaching children anymore. From what I understand from
Speaker 1: a friend of mine who is a public school teacher
Speaker 1: in New York, there's a there are a whole series
Speaker 1: of books, and I have not read them, and so
Speaker 1: I'm not deeply familiar with them that go into um,
Speaker 1: shall we say, stories that would be more familiar in
Speaker 1: high crime and largely minority neighborhoods, instead of you know,
Speaker 1: reading Charlotte's Web or you know, other books that many
Speaker 1: of us were would be familiar with from the what
Speaker 1: had been considered, you know, Catcher in the Rye, Right,
Speaker 1: I don't know things like that. No, no, no, Now
Speaker 1: they're reading books about guys who are This is what
Speaker 1: I this is what I was told, guys who you know,
Speaker 1: don't have like like a guy who comes home doesn't
Speaker 1: have a mom or dad, you know, living with his grandma.
Speaker 1: They're drug dealers on the corner at all. And I
Speaker 1: understand maybe they're trying to do this outreach of familiarity
Speaker 1: of under certain circumstances. But I thought that great art
Speaker 1: and great literature was something that all people. It's it's
Speaker 1: our all of our inheritance, right, It's something we should
Speaker 1: all agree on, and what they teach in schools increasingly
Speaker 1: seems more overtly like political indoctrinations. That's what I hear.
Speaker 1: And everyone that I know who teaches at a private
Speaker 1: school leaven in New York, and there's some very fancy
Speaker 1: private schools here, they will say the schools have just
Speaker 1: become the administrations are very liberal, because what you have,
Speaker 1: even in the private school system now are all these
Speaker 1: ultra rich Democrats who send their kids to these schools
Speaker 1: that are very homogeneous racially, and they send their kids
Speaker 1: to these schools, but they want at least the administration
Speaker 1: to reflect the most progressive approaches because then they feel like,
Speaker 1: you know, oh well, yes, we send little Timothy to
Speaker 1: our fifty thousand dollars a year first grade. Which that's
Speaker 1: a real thing that exists in New York for those
Speaker 1: of you who are wondering, it's plenty of schools fifty
Speaker 1: grand for grammar school year. Yes, we sent little Timothy
Speaker 1: to that school. But at least the headmaster put out
Speaker 1: a strong statement in favor of black lives matter. Oh well,
Speaker 1: then in that case, everything's fine. In that case, you know,
Speaker 1: come on, you've done your part for social justice. You're good,
Speaker 1: you know, give yourself a palament back when you take
Speaker 1: a helicopter out to your beachfront mansion in the Hamptons.
Speaker 1: That's very, very nice. Pelosi is California. Of course, Pelosi
Speaker 1: weighs in on this as well, and she wants to
Speaker 1: help the teachers unions hold schools and the education of
Speaker 1: these children hostage to whatever the demands the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: are Play clip six. So all of these things are
Speaker 1: related to the safety of our children going back. Is
Speaker 1: it hybrid, is it virtual? Is it actual? Well, let's
Speaker 1: get given it our best shot. Putting our children first,
Speaker 1: we know what we need to do. The Republicans have
Speaker 1: resisted the Hero's Act and impartially because they don't want
Speaker 1: to support the state and local government, which is essential
Speaker 1: to the safety of our children going back to school
Speaker 1: as well. The resources are there, but to make a decision.
Speaker 1: I mean, Pelosi is so shameless that I almost I'm
Speaker 1: almost in awe of her shamelessness. Sometimes here's someone who
Speaker 1: has been nothing but unhelpful at every stage, who delayed
Speaker 1: you recall twice votes to get money to people who
Speaker 1: no longer had jobs, no longer had businesses to operate
Speaker 1: because of government mandate. That's not the free market. That's
Speaker 1: the government's fault. That's the government's decision right to shut
Speaker 1: down your business to mean that make it so that
Speaker 1: you don't no longer have a job. And now Pelosi
Speaker 1: is trying to leverage this for the maximum. Look, there's
Speaker 1: a very a very clear process at work here. They're
Speaker 1: using the school issue as really a proxy for shutdown,
Speaker 1: for the feeling at least of the country in shutdown
Speaker 1: going into the election season, and if they get schools
Speaker 1: shut down, they feel like it's gonna be very hard.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be very hard for Trump to win, because
Speaker 1: how can you tell people you're better off now than
Speaker 1: you were four years ago when your kids can't even
Speaker 1: be in school. That's it. That's that's really the game
Speaker 1: that is being played. It's very damaging, it's ruthless, and
Speaker 1: it's a it's a shame that the politics of this
Speaker 1: have gotten so ugly. But that's where this is. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. If you think that Democrats being wrong is
Speaker 1: ever an impediment to their power grabs, If you think
Speaker 1: that democrats making RMIs errors of judgment based on the
Speaker 1: results would at least result in some accountability. Unfortunately, you'd
Speaker 1: be wrong, especially in states that have become political monocultures
Speaker 1: like New York, where I am currently doing this show.
Speaker 1: Of course, I'm doing it for many of you all
Speaker 1: across the country. Governor Cuomo. Governor Cuomo, who is one
Speaker 1: of the most shameless, ruthless politicians I've ever seen in
Speaker 1: my life. He likes to do the press conference where
Speaker 1: he has this kind of rhythm. Okay, next slide, New York,
Speaker 1: give yourself a pat on the back because we did
Speaker 1: such a good job. We don't even buy a good job.
Speaker 1: A good job is whatever I say it is, and
Speaker 1: so stop asking questions. But he put out his own
Speaker 1: state authorities put out a report on the nursing home,
Speaker 1: really the nursing home massacre that Cuomo is as a
Speaker 1: matter of direct policy and decision making responsible for. He
Speaker 1: put out this report that exonerated him. You know, just
Speaker 1: a nurse totally an os Cuomo's fault, federal government's fault
Speaker 1: of anything. This has become that this is the escape
Speaker 1: hatch for every stupid Democrat decision that has been made
Speaker 1: during the COVID pandemic. It's blamed the federal government. Blame Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what they really mean, Blame Trump. And when when
Speaker 1: you have thousands of nursing home deaths. And in March
Speaker 1: twenty fifth order that said that that coronavirus patients coming
Speaker 1: out of hospitals from nursing homes have to go back
Speaker 1: into nursing homes. And this was because of the greatly exaggerated,
Speaker 1: as we now know, fear that they were going to
Speaker 1: run out of spittal bed, which was never even close.
Speaker 1: And Cuomo puts out this report that says, quote, eighty
Speaker 1: percent of three nursing homes in the state that took
Speaker 1: coronavirus patients already had patients before Cuomo issued his order. Okay,
Speaker 1: what about the other twenty percent? Anyone want to guess
Speaker 1: what happened there? What could be more straightforward? Coronavirus is
Speaker 1: particularly lethal, particularly dangerous to elderly people. Period. All the
Speaker 1: data in every country, in every circumstance suggests that you
Speaker 1: add a layer of danger on top of that for
Speaker 1: those who have diabetes, heart conditions, breathing issues, comorbidities, obesity.
Speaker 1: We know that's a that's just established fact. And how
Speaker 1: could it be more obvious that there was a mistake
Speaker 1: made here than the Cuomo sent people who are already
Speaker 1: at high risk from the disease themselves, who likely had it,
Speaker 1: and sent them back into nursing homes where they were
Speaker 1: almost guaranteed to spread it to other varying at risk individuals.
Speaker 1: And that's why, you know, I just want I just
Speaker 1: want to hit the roof. I mean, I just lose
Speaker 1: my mind when I'm seeing all this. Look at what
Speaker 1: a good job Cuomo did versus the stats. Cuomo did
Speaker 1: a terrible job. In New York, there's this former Obama
Speaker 1: administration health you know, a health expert moron. I'm forgetting
Speaker 1: the guy's name right now, but he's gone on a
Speaker 1: few terrors on Twitter where you're saying New York shows
Speaker 1: how it's done. New York lost thirty five thousand people dead,
Speaker 1: California has lost about six thousand, Texas has lost you know,
Speaker 1: three to four thousand, Florida something along those lines, about thousand.
Speaker 1: New York lost thirty five thousand people, and quomost taking
Speaker 1: a victory lap. I think about this and the media
Speaker 1: is like, yeah, that's right, I Quota did a good job.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom has been a tyrant in California, and guess what,
Speaker 1: now they're back into you know, a moderate lockdown phase
Speaker 1: even though they've had all we made it, probably because
Speaker 1: of the protest right, but no one wants to talk
Speaker 1: about that. We have seen, particularly younger people have been
Speaker 1: where the spread of this disease is. I know, younger
Speaker 1: people also are more likely to congregate in bars and
Speaker 1: you know, play flip cup and do all these things.
Speaker 1: But I was never very good at flip cups. I'm
Speaker 1: a little get a little bitter about that. Or what's
Speaker 1: the other one, producer, Mark, what's the game? The beer pong? Yeah? Yeah,
Speaker 1: beer pong? Thank you, thank you. We actually called it
Speaker 1: something else in my college. But it's a weird name,
Speaker 1: and no, I feel like no one ever used that
Speaker 1: anymore anyway. Yeah, people are young people are more likely
Speaker 1: to be in close quarters in those situations and possibly
Speaker 1: give each other COVID, but they're in really close quarters.
Speaker 1: I mean there's a photo of a protest in California
Speaker 1: with just thousands and thousands and thousands of people in
Speaker 1: such close proximity, just jammed in like sardines, and Newsom's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is great, that's great. We were really doing a
Speaker 1: great job here in California. These people are terrible. Producer.
Speaker 1: Nick says Beyrout. Yeah, they used to call it Beyrout
Speaker 1: in college, which I don't know that that's what they
Speaker 1: used to call beer pong, And I mean, I think
Speaker 1: it's because Beyrout had a long civil war and people were,
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of artillery shells. Maybe I don't know,
Speaker 1: but it was called by route. I think you there's
Speaker 1: that too. Yeah, how many kids today even remember the
Speaker 1: lett Any civil war would stretch really from I think
Speaker 1: about nineteen seventy five to nineteen ninety or so, fifteen
Speaker 1: year long civil war. It was a rough time anyway.
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo has put out this report and it's just absurd.
Speaker 1: This report is absurd. There is a theory out there.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say this, There is a theory out
Speaker 1: there that it's not just because they keep on doing
Speaker 1: these serology tests looking for antibodies, but there's also T
Speaker 1: cell immunity to infection, which means that your T cells
Speaker 1: are capable of very quickly responding to an infection so
Speaker 1: it does not become a serious infection take hold in
Speaker 1: you and you have all the symptoms and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth of the worst symptoms at least, and
Speaker 1: there's a theory out there that there may have been
Speaker 1: much more broad exposure that also, let I'm not this
Speaker 1: has not proven. This is a theory that there may
Speaker 1: have been broader exposure. And so New York, for example,
Speaker 1: where I'm telling you this disease, when it was out there,
Speaker 1: it was all I mean, it was spreading all over
Speaker 1: the place. Right. We all know that I was riding
Speaker 1: the subway four times a day when this virus was
Speaker 1: at its absolute, unrestrained maximum, just people coughing on each
Speaker 1: other everywhere, and we're told, don't wear masks, don't No
Speaker 1: one even heard of social distancing at that point. So
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who were exposed to
Speaker 1: this who didn't get it or didn't really get symptoms.
Speaker 1: The prology testing that's done right now looks for the
Speaker 1: looks for antibodies, but t sell immunity is not something
Speaker 1: that it would it would catch. And this all goes
Speaker 1: to a theory that I think is likely. I give
Speaker 1: credibility or credence to this theory that is in some
Speaker 1: corners of the medical community. Again, this is not a fact,
Speaker 1: this is a theory, but that the virus effectively spread
Speaker 1: hit and now you have a population that's much less
Speaker 1: susceptible to it because it effectively burned through New York.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like a forest fire. It's already burned through,
Speaker 1: it's burned down the trees and what's left. What you know,
Speaker 1: then the regrowth is happening. And that hadn't happened in
Speaker 1: other parts of the country. It hasn't happened yet, not
Speaker 1: the same way. So I know there's tremendous concern about
Speaker 1: the second wave here. And now you've got CUOMO with
Speaker 1: twenty two twenty two states on a list that are
Speaker 1: required to do additional quarantine if they come back, required
Speaker 1: to do quarantine for two weeks, if they come back
Speaker 1: to New York City from traveling in those states, and
Speaker 1: they're going to make you fill out a form and
Speaker 1: they're going to find you up to two thousand dollars
Speaker 1: for non compliance. Well, where is the authority on this? Now?
Speaker 1: How is this? Where's the DOJ? Why aren't they suing?
Speaker 1: How is this not a violation of interstate Gammer's clause?
Speaker 1: You're going to lock people in their homes for two
Speaker 1: weeks just because they've visited a state where the governor
Speaker 1: of New York thinks there are too many COVID cases. Remember,
Speaker 1: they've they've expanded this not just to people who have
Speaker 1: the disease that's quarantine, but people that go to places
Speaker 1: where there are people with the disease and they're going
Speaker 1: to come back and now'll be in or two week quarantine.
Speaker 1: We can't keep living like this, folks. I think that's
Speaker 1: We're all just going to have to deal with this.
Speaker 1: You know, I've told you this all along. I may
Speaker 1: come on to the show one day and say, guys,
Speaker 1: I feel I'm really sick. I gotta take some days
Speaker 1: off here because I've caught COVID nineteen. I understand that.
Speaker 1: I know that that could happen, and that will change
Speaker 1: nothing that I have said to you. We all take risks.
Speaker 1: We are all living in an imperfect world where there
Speaker 1: is no guarantee of safety, certainly not from the state,
Speaker 1: but there's no guarantee of safety period. And we keep
Speaker 1: on getting told things by the people in charge who
Speaker 1: are seizing more and more authority for themselves that are
Speaker 1: just fundamentally nonsensical and not true week. We cannot beat
Speaker 1: this virus by having these arbitrary government you know, lockdown, shutdown,
Speaker 1: mass distance, lockdown, shutdown mass distance. Through cycles and cycles
Speaker 1: of this, it isn't working. It has not worked. It
Speaker 1: did not work in California. Why is it going to
Speaker 1: work now in all these other places? Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 1: Let me say what honor it is for me to
Speaker 1: serve under a president who is such a strong supporter
Speaker 1: of law enforcement. I've said repeatedly that, to my mind,
Speaker 1: there is no more noble profession in our country than
Speaker 1: serving as a law enforcement officer. The police put their
Speaker 1: lives and well being on the line every day for us,
Speaker 1: and their jobs have never been more difficult than it
Speaker 1: is today. I believe it's a important to understand that,
Speaker 1: just like any other institution, there's always room for improvement,
Speaker 1: and over the past several decades, there's unquestionably been a
Speaker 1: lot of progress and reforms in policing that's improved policing
Speaker 1: and life for the officers, their families, and their communities.
Speaker 1: We have the most professional police in the world. Thank
Speaker 1: goodness that we have an administration with people like Bill
Speaker 1: Barr who will say what needs to be said at
Speaker 1: this point in time about law enforcement. The Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has not just turned their backs on law enforcement. They
Speaker 1: are They are throwing law enforcement officers to the violent,
Speaker 1: vengeful mob and making it less safe for all of
Speaker 1: us on the streets and doing tremendous damage to the
Speaker 1: rule of law. To the sense that we have certain
Speaker 1: parts of our day to day lives in this country
Speaker 1: that we all agree on, right, we all want everyone.
Speaker 1: I want everyone. I want every person in America to
Speaker 1: be safe going home at night, walking to work in
Speaker 1: the morning, you know, driving to their job. I want
Speaker 1: every person to have the full protection of law enforcement,
Speaker 1: to have full due process as well. If they're on
Speaker 1: the wrong side of law enforcement, that's not These are
Speaker 1: not partisan agenda issues, right. I don't want anyone to
Speaker 1: be the victim of a crime, and I want the
Speaker 1: maximum amount of police protection feasible and reasonable to have
Speaker 1: a bare minimum of violent crime in our society for everyone.
Speaker 1: I don't want anyone getting attacked by whether it's one
Speaker 1: individual or a violent mob on the street. Democrats don't
Speaker 1: seem to subscribe to this theory anymore. You know, we're
Speaker 1: a bad country that's very racist, that needs to be punished.
Speaker 1: We need more violence on the streets. We need our
Speaker 1: cops to be defamed, to be demoralized. That is their approach.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening in America today. And I'm happy to
Speaker 1: hear that the Attorney General will say these words, but
Speaker 1: we need a lot more. We need a lot more
Speaker 1: than just words. You have Deblasio for examples out there,
Speaker 1: saying things like this play clip five. We obviously took
Speaker 1: money out of the NYPD budget, put it into youth programs,
Speaker 1: put it into social services, put it into recreation centers
Speaker 1: for young people. That's really the right direction. I'm glad
Speaker 1: we did that. But the fact that we're going to
Speaker 1: have to fight crime in many ways is also clear.
Speaker 1: We need the good work of the men and women
Speaker 1: in NYPD the streets of our city. We need communities
Speaker 1: to come forward, particularly through civic leadership, clergy to your
Speaker 1: violence movement, do all the things that they can do,
Speaker 1: and they can do things that police can't do. And
Speaker 1: the NYPD is quite clear about that. Community voices, community
Speaker 1: members can achieve some things differently, and we need both
Speaker 1: pieces to happen. So we're going to devote ourselves to
Speaker 1: all of it. We are going to fight this back.
Speaker 1: I've seen us fight back from much, much tougher circumstances
Speaker 1: in terms of crime and violence. We're going to fight
Speaker 1: this back, but it's going to take everyone. Oh wait
Speaker 1: a second, you mean that moving funds from the police
Speaker 1: and making sure the cops don't feel backed up when
Speaker 1: they have to do their jobs and deal with violent thugs.
Speaker 1: Do you mean that that's resulted in more crime? Who
Speaker 1: could have guessed? Oh, everyone guessed, everyone knew, But now
Speaker 1: it's oh, no, I guess we have a problem. We
Speaker 1: need to have a whole of community approach to do
Speaker 1: with this Deblasia never talks about how we need to
Speaker 1: talk to clergy or just community leaders. About parental involvement
Speaker 1: in school activities, meaning parents drop the kids off, pick
Speaker 1: them up from school, if they can make sure their
Speaker 1: homework is getting done, make sure that when they get
Speaker 1: home they're asked about their school day. Make sure that
Speaker 1: there is a focus put on learning and that there
Speaker 1: is an expectation that children will do their homework, will
Speaker 1: be responsible, will be respectful to teachers, will be quiet
Speaker 1: when quiet is requested by teachers. That intact family situation,
Speaker 1: intact families. I mean, if you look at the data
Speaker 1: on intact families, and hat tip to Matt Walsh over
Speaker 1: the Daily Wire who pulled all this data together recently,
Speaker 1: and I mean, I've known these, I've known the analysis here,
Speaker 1: but Matt actually pulled some facts and figures I was
Speaker 1: looking through last night. If you just look at families
Speaker 1: that are intact across America, the problem of poverty and
Speaker 1: problems of poverty and domestic violence and dropping out of
Speaker 1: school and criminality all plummet across all racial categories. So
Speaker 1: if you really want children, whether it's White children, Black children,
Speaker 1: Hispanic children, Asian children, if you really want to promote
Speaker 1: something as a policy and as a goal that is
Speaker 1: the single most likely thing to improve their life outcomes,
Speaker 1: it would be the family. It would be promotion of
Speaker 1: getting married, staying married, and waiting until marriage to have children.
Speaker 1: This is the I was gonna say, it's like the
Speaker 1: secret pathway, but it's not secret at all. It's obvious,
Speaker 1: it's known. But Democrats won't touch it. How can they?
Speaker 1: Black lives matters out there arguing for the elimination of
Speaker 1: the nuclear openly arguing for the elimination of the nuclear family,
Speaker 1: the exact wrong thing for the Black community. For all communities,
Speaker 1: all families do matter. Families are important. Families are the
Speaker 1: basis for so much of our sense of how we
Speaker 1: deal with authority and our emotional and psychological and intellectual development. No, no,
Speaker 1: but de Blasio acts like, you know, if we just
Speaker 1: we have a couple of more you know, after school
Speaker 1: programs or something where people can play sports, there won't
Speaker 1: be any more violenced. Look, I'm not opposed to after
Speaker 1: school programs. It's great. I'm not some maniact things that
Speaker 1: you know, we shouldn't have kids have more opportunities to
Speaker 1: play and do fun things. But I'm also not the
Speaker 1: one who was locking down playgrounds while massive protests were happening.
Speaker 1: De Blasio was. But I also would like to see
Speaker 1: better outcomes for all of us. It will be better
Speaker 1: for society and promoting intact families. But you know, there's
Speaker 1: a degree of individual responsibility that goes into that. It's
Speaker 1: not the system that's preventing people from getting married and
Speaker 1: staying married. That's an individual choice that's an individual responsibility.
Speaker 1: And if you look at, for example, immigrants that come
Speaker 1: from communities from countries around the world, including say Nigerian immigrants,
Speaker 1: we're told the system is very, very racist in America. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: immigrants from Africa, who particularly if talking about immigrants who
Speaker 1: have intact family structure, and immigrants from Africa have basically
Speaker 1: the same percentage, it's within a few percentage points as
Speaker 1: white American native born white Americans do on a per
Speaker 1: capita basis, the household income of those immigrants that come
Speaker 1: from Africa, dominently West Africa, and the analysis that I
Speaker 1: saw is higher than the average white born in America
Speaker 1: pera capita household income. So somehow the system that is
Speaker 1: so racist and that is to blame for everything does
Speaker 1: not prevent immigrants from Africa from coming here. They are black,
Speaker 1: and they do very well, and they have intact family structure,
Speaker 1: and they are success stories, right, And we know about
Speaker 1: Asian family structure and the success stories there. Right, The
Speaker 1: overwhelming number of Asian immigrants to America have intact family
Speaker 1: structure and their children, you know, are you going off
Speaker 1: to fantastic schools? These are all generalizations, but we're talking
Speaker 1: about numbers and we're talking about numbers, you're talking about
Speaker 1: the aggregates. If you're going to talk about policy, policy
Speaker 1: has to be made based upon what's generally true. You
Speaker 1: can't make policy based on what's always true, because nothing
Speaker 1: is going to be always true about a public policy matter.
Speaker 1: There's always going to be exceptions or places where there
Speaker 1: are a gray area or confusion. But it's just it's
Speaker 1: so remarkable that we're all focused now on how do
Speaker 1: we and look they're not even the Democrats aren't even
Speaker 1: really focused on making these communities better. This is all
Speaker 1: just window dressing. Now, Oh yeah, we need more money,
Speaker 1: no more funding, whatever. No, this is about hating the cops,
Speaker 1: turning out the minority vote for Biden against Trump, and
Speaker 1: creating the Democrat Party, creating a whole lot of excuses
Speaker 1: for why Democrat controlled enclaves just can't get it together,
Speaker 1: can't manage to control crime in places like Chicago or
Speaker 1: Saint Louis, and now in New York, which couldn't control
Speaker 1: crime for a long time, got under control but is
Speaker 1: now losing control. You have a just a whole series
Speaker 1: of excuses and no willingness to look at what would
Speaker 1: really make things better. For everyone, encouraging behaviors that would
Speaker 1: make things better for everyone. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Princeton University is
Speaker 1: a very fancy place. It's very fancy. They have eating clubs,
Speaker 1: which are like fraternities, but in multimillion dollar mansions. Well
Speaker 1: you're served lunch on porcelain, and then you get to
Speaker 1: talk about how much Daddy has put in your trust
Speaker 1: fund this year. Princeton's a very fancy place, no question
Speaker 1: about it. But Princeton University because it's an elite school now,
Speaker 1: and I don't even know we should call them elite,
Speaker 1: because who knows why people who can get into these
Speaker 1: schools anymore. There's an open letter though, that has been
Speaker 1: published there. Remember this is I think consider the third
Speaker 1: the number three Ivy League school after Harvard and Yale.
Speaker 1: A lot of people would put Stanford ahead of it,
Speaker 1: but Princeton's still certainly a very international renowned institution. And
Speaker 1: here is what this. This is a faculty letter signed
Speaker 1: by I mean one hundred, one hundred and fifty professors.
Speaker 1: A huge number of professors have signed this thing, and
Speaker 1: it's on anti blackness as a foundational element to America.
Speaker 1: In fact, the very first line is, quote anti blackness
Speaker 1: is foundational to America. Wow, that's the very first line
Speaker 1: of this letter. And then they get into a discussion
Speaker 1: of how we deal with this, and the way we
Speaker 1: deal with this is anti racism. Now, many of us
Speaker 1: have thought that the the only obligation we have as
Speaker 1: individuals and as people is to not be racist. Right,
Speaker 1: just don't be racist, That's okay, and then you're not
Speaker 1: a racist, and then what's the problem. And racism is
Speaker 1: treating people or thinking of people as less than or
Speaker 1: thinking of them differently because of their skin color. Very
Speaker 1: straightforward definition. Don't do that, You're not being racist. But no,
Speaker 1: anti racism is the affirmative taking of steps demanded of
Speaker 1: you by the woke left in order to deal with
Speaker 1: the As it is said in this letter from Princeton University,
Speaker 1: anti blackness that is foundational to America. And quote, So
Speaker 1: anti racism now turns into a whole list of demands.
Speaker 1: Now there are demands that are coming with all of
Speaker 1: this too. Right, George Floyd is shot, is not shot?
Speaker 1: Is killed asphyxiated in Minnesota by a police officer. National movement,
Speaker 1: and now here we are prince University demanding additional pay
Speaker 1: and perks for professors of color. Well that's quite a
Speaker 1: oh no, But this is the way it works, right,
Speaker 1: This is the way movement was always going to conduct itself.
Speaker 1: Here's what they write. It plays a role anti blackness
Speaker 1: and where we live and where we are welcome. It
Speaker 1: influences the level of health care we receive. It determines
Speaker 1: a degree of risk we are assumed to pose in
Speaker 1: context from retail to lending and beyond. It informs the
Speaker 1: expectations and tactics of law enforcement. Anti black racism has
Speaker 1: hamstrung our political process. It has rampant even in our
Speaker 1: most progressive communities, and it plays a powerful role at
Speaker 1: institutions like Princeton, despite declared values of diversity and inclusion.
Speaker 1: So anti blackness, according to this open letter, signed by
Speaker 1: written by professors at Princeton, Signed by professors at Princeton,
Speaker 1: anti blackness is a constant failing of Princeton University, even
Speaker 1: though Princeton University thinks of itself as very diverse and
Speaker 1: progressive and all the rest of it. Right, not enough,
Speaker 1: So you'd say, well, okay, what are we supposed to do?
Speaker 1: But let's just assume that let's just accept this premise
Speaker 1: for a second, that the country is still so racist
Speaker 1: and we don't talk about this enough. We've talked about
Speaker 1: it every day, we talked about this all the time. CNN.
Speaker 1: I've left this out of today's show. I shouldn't have
Speaker 1: is creating a new I believe it is called a
Speaker 1: quote race Coverage team end quote to focus on race
Speaker 1: issues at CNN, specifically in the newsroom. They're going to
Speaker 1: have a race you know, you talk about your beats
Speaker 1: in the news in the news world. Race is now
Speaker 1: going to be a specialization at CNN for journalists. I'm
Speaker 1: not making this up. This is what Jeff Zucker said yesterday.
Speaker 1: They came out and talked about this. So, okay, what
Speaker 1: can we do. How do you get to be an
Speaker 1: anti racist? Is it enough to just treat people of
Speaker 1: color as hello, human beings deserving of all the same
Speaker 1: rights and dignity and decency that you'd give to any
Speaker 1: and to any person, And to be an advocate for
Speaker 1: treating everyone equally under the law and make sure that
Speaker 1: everyone is judged by the content of their character, not
Speaker 1: the color of their skin. Oh no, no, no, that's
Speaker 1: not anti racism. Anti racism is quote quote create a
Speaker 1: center specifically dedicated to anti racism at Princeton University. Reward
Speaker 1: the invisible work done by faculty of color with course
Speaker 1: relief and summer salary. That's right. Additional financial perks. Reconsider
Speaker 1: the use of standardized testing at Princeton University, which research
Speaker 1: shows to be strongly correlated with the underrepresentation of people
Speaker 1: of color. Acknowledge on the Princeton homepage that the university
Speaker 1: is cited on indigenous land. The statements should explicitly acknowledge
Speaker 1: that Princeton University's land is unseated and quote acknowledge the
Speaker 1: land of this university is the unseated traditional territory of
Speaker 1: the nanticoke any Lenapey tribal nation. Oh my god, that's right.
Speaker 1: Bend the need, do as we say all of our
Speaker 1: give us money, give us privileges, give us what we want,
Speaker 1: or else you're racist. That's what it's turned into at Princeton,
Speaker 1: and it's not the only place. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Buses and Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's
Speaker 1: harsany time we should make like a little intro form
Speaker 1: or something. Our buddy David Harsani is with us now.
Speaker 1: He is a senior writer at National Review, and he's
Speaker 1: got a piece coming out on what I was talking
Speaker 1: about earlier in the show about Cuomo's ill deserved undeserved victory.
Speaker 1: Lap mister Harsan, You're great to have you back, sir.
Speaker 1: What was the pleasure? Thanks for having me? Ah, So, Cuomo,
Speaker 1: with thirty five thousand deaths in his state, is create artwork.
Speaker 1: That's right. This is a real thing, folks, for those
Speaker 1: who are wondering artwork. You commemorate what a tremendous victory
Speaker 1: he has had here with all of this. Tell us
Speaker 1: what you think about all that? I mean, hold on,
Speaker 1: I actually I'm trying to pull up the name of it.
Speaker 1: It is the New York Tough poster of success under
Speaker 1: Cuomo's leadership fighting against COVID nineteen. What do you think,
Speaker 1: David not a not a fan of it because it's
Speaker 1: mythical and it's obviously a conservative conservative effort by his
Speaker 1: allies and himself to make it seem that new that.
Speaker 1: You know, his policies were successful in New York, which
Speaker 1: they most certainly were not by any standard. In fact,
Speaker 1: if you if you compare New York to other countries
Speaker 1: in the world, it's one of the worst. To compare
Speaker 1: to any state in America, it's the worst. And when
Speaker 1: you think about it more deeply, and you know, many
Speaker 1: people have mentioned this, but Cuomo made perhaps one of
Speaker 1: the most deadly policy mistakes in the whole coronavirus crisis
Speaker 1: by sending infected people back to the nursing home. So
Speaker 1: that whole entire ridiculous pyramid poster he has is insulting
Speaker 1: to anyone who was paying attention. If it was done right,
Speaker 1: there would be thirty thousand dead people. At thought him
Speaker 1: of that pyramid, frankly, you know. And it's just disgusting
Speaker 1: that the media has basically given him a pass. It's
Speaker 1: disgusting that his poll numbers are so high because I
Speaker 1: have to assume that most people don't know all the
Speaker 1: you know, things that have happened. And it's disgusting that
Speaker 1: he blames other states now for for mismanaging when he
Speaker 1: is most incompetent governor in America. I can put him
Speaker 1: work starkly, Yeah, No, I mean I tell us that
Speaker 1: I really feel I totally agree with you. I'm a
Speaker 1: little astonished. I look, New York is overwhelmingly Democrats state
Speaker 1: as we all know. I think statewide it's like three
Speaker 1: to one New York. It's like eight to one Democrat
Speaker 1: to Republican. And yet I don't know how anyone could
Speaker 1: be so dumb And it's like a seventy percent approval
Speaker 1: rating he allegedly has in the state be so dumb
Speaker 1: as to think that he did a good job. But
Speaker 1: it really this is turned into whoever mouths the approved
Speaker 1: slogans of the lockdown movement? You know, who's ever like
Speaker 1: where a mask and you know, social distance and a
Speaker 1: listition to the sacience and all these things that Cuomo
Speaker 1: saying all the time. If you just say all that stuff,
Speaker 1: you're like one of the good guys. Even if you
Speaker 1: were sending COVID positive seniors into nursing homes to kill
Speaker 1: a lot of their fellow nursing home residence. That's what happened,
Speaker 1: was that your New York accent you just did? That
Speaker 1: was Cuomo. This is you know, you have a here
Speaker 1: with a press conference. He sort of he goes up
Speaker 1: here and then sometimes he brings it down here for
Speaker 1: a little bit, but then he goes back and it's
Speaker 1: kind of slow. But you were saying, David, Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, that's all correct, you know, And I think
Speaker 1: part of the problem is that you have him giving
Speaker 1: competent looking or you know, something that projects competence in
Speaker 1: press conferences. Right, So I think those press conference has
Speaker 1: almost fooled me in the beginning as well. You know,
Speaker 1: he looked like he knew what he was doing. It
Speaker 1: look like he had control of the situation. He's got
Speaker 1: the code on, you know, all that stuff. And then
Speaker 1: obviously he's on you know, CNN every day with his
Speaker 1: brother just lobbing softballs at him. He's on the Tonight
Speaker 1: Show where they're talking about all the women who are
Speaker 1: really into him because he's so competent, et cetera. And
Speaker 1: you create this perception of competence that does not exist.
Speaker 1: And then the media not all I have to say.
Speaker 1: I mean, some people have gone after him, but in
Speaker 1: general given him a pass. And I think that that, all,
Speaker 1: you know, is part of it. And then partisanship is
Speaker 1: part of it as well. You know, people want to
Speaker 1: blame Trump, so they don't blame Cuomo or you know,
Speaker 1: or whatever. But seventy seven percent. He's one of the
Speaker 1: most popular governors in America, and his state has mentioned
Speaker 1: I think this last week on your show, but there
Speaker 1: are more deaths in New York nursing homes than they're
Speaker 1: on the entire state of Florida's, entire state of Texas,
Speaker 1: and I believe still entire state of Arizona, which is yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean you would think that, don't. We always hear
Speaker 1: things that don't the results speak for themselves. This has
Speaker 1: been a as you, as you let it out, a
Speaker 1: propaganda campaign to completely overcome and really erase the results
Speaker 1: because there's there's no arguing the numbers. I mean, New York,
Speaker 1: I'm right in the middle of it. I was living here.
Speaker 1: I couldn't see family members for months, couldn't do anything,
Speaker 1: and this place was a catastrophe, an absolute catastrophe. And
Speaker 1: you know, David, I also have to wonder, and I
Speaker 1: know you're somebody who you're you know you're you're more
Speaker 1: open to some of the more traditional mitigation arguments working
Speaker 1: than I am. I'm not saying they're wrong. I just
Speaker 1: I think I'm a little more skeptical of some of
Speaker 1: the new Although I don't want to put words in
Speaker 1: your mouth. But New York had a lockdown where everyone
Speaker 1: wear a mask and the disease was raging out of
Speaker 1: control for about ninety days, right, and I never saw
Speaker 1: anybody without a mask, and everyone was on lockdown, but
Speaker 1: the disease was still spreading and spreading and spreading, including
Speaker 1: spreading in people's homes. California has been under you know,
Speaker 1: the Democrat mantra of mass, mass masks, social distance, all
Speaker 1: this stuff, and now they're rolling back, no more indoors stuff.
Speaker 1: They're just shy of a phase one lockdown. If the
Speaker 1: policies work, why aren't they working right? Well, here's my
Speaker 1: position on this stuff. Some makes sense. I have to
Speaker 1: I have to trust experts because that's how we live
Speaker 1: in life. I get on a plane, I have to
Speaker 1: trust that the pilot's going to get me there. Um.
Speaker 1: But more, as we get deeper into this, I realize
Speaker 1: how little they know. Yeah, and I'm very, very skeptical
Speaker 1: of anything they say, not because I think that most
Speaker 1: of them have, you know, bad intense. It's just that
Speaker 1: they don't know everything we think we know we do.
Speaker 1: There's just no we will not make sense of this
Speaker 1: for years and I'm all with the experts until one topic,
Speaker 1: and maybe you've discussed this is opening the schools. It
Speaker 1: is clear that the science says open to schools. The
Speaker 1: science says a common sense says that. My empirical view
Speaker 1: of it says so. And yet now Democrats were against
Speaker 1: that as well, which just tells me they want to
Speaker 1: keep this going until November, many of them, And there's
Speaker 1: just no other way to look at what they're up
Speaker 1: to and not come to that conclusion, at least from
Speaker 1: my perspective. Yeah, no, I think so, And on your
Speaker 1: that's for me. The main thing, David, it's that there
Speaker 1: are things that experts know, and there are things experts
Speaker 1: know more than the general public. But it's important to
Speaker 1: establish and know what those are as a non expert,
Speaker 1: because there are also things that experts either think they
Speaker 1: know or should know, and do not. And what we're
Speaker 1: seeing with this virus, I think is a lot of that.
Speaker 1: You know, you ask them, why is it that we
Speaker 1: have this six foot guidance rule? What's that? Based on
Speaker 1: the answer is it's a guess. There are other countries
Speaker 1: that have a three foot social distancing rule. Why is
Speaker 1: it at ten feet? How could you even enforce this.
Speaker 1: It's actually absurd, but it's just, you know, like telling
Speaker 1: people to wash their hands a lot. If washing hands
Speaker 1: could stop this disease from being a pandemic, obviously we'd
Speaker 1: be in much better shape. It's not enough. Now I
Speaker 1: understand all these things together, they would argue might lower
Speaker 1: the transmission some degree, but we're still in the middle
Speaker 1: of a pandemic, one for which they can't tell us
Speaker 1: how long immunity lasts, one for which they can't tell
Speaker 1: us whether a vaccine would even be good for more
Speaker 1: than one year, more than one side. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: there's all these things they just don't know. But all
Speaker 1: you have to do if your Democrat is go on
Speaker 1: TV or go on social media and say listen to
Speaker 1: the experts, as if that's some kind of panacea. But
Speaker 1: I did want it to get your take also on
Speaker 1: this just this was just breaking today. So it's something
Speaker 1: new to add into our discussions about Barry Weiss resigning
Speaker 1: and sending out a blistering letter of resignation. She's at
Speaker 1: the New York Times. Tell folks, who, why do we
Speaker 1: care about who Barry Weiss is? And what does this
Speaker 1: tell us about? What's going on with the crazy woke
Speaker 1: lives at the New York Times. Barry Weiss is a
Speaker 1: person that maybe five years ago we just call it
Speaker 1: a liberal, right she has She's probably more on the
Speaker 1: moderate side. I don't know all her positions, but she's
Speaker 1: you know, she's pro Israel. You know, she takes a
Speaker 1: more moderate view of Israel and other issues like that.
Speaker 1: You know, she calls that anti Semitism, even if it's
Speaker 1: coming from certain you know, it's coming from far Coon, etc. Yeah, Firac,
Speaker 1: unlike some some other editorialists. But she, as we know
Speaker 1: at the New York Times, you have incredibly woke and
Speaker 1: incredibly you know, I don't know what's called them progressive
Speaker 1: people who complain and I get people fired who they
Speaker 1: disagree with and pretend that words are violence. And she's
Speaker 1: on the liberal end of things, I mean the liberal
Speaker 1: and the small l real sense of things. And she
Speaker 1: was basically from what her letter says, and there's no
Speaker 1: reason to disbelieve it, considering all the other things we've
Speaker 1: seen that she was bullied and insulted and made to
Speaker 1: feel unwelcome there and to leave. So she wrote a letter,
Speaker 1: which I think is probably the best thing She's written
Speaker 1: fantastic letter about liberalism and liberalism and about what went
Speaker 1: on there in open discourse and she left. I think
Speaker 1: it's a it's an incredibly notable for people who are
Speaker 1: in journalism and writers. I think that her letter is
Speaker 1: incredibly important. I feel like it will be. It feels
Speaker 1: that way to me, and maybe it will be a
Speaker 1: turning point. I hope it will be. Do you think
Speaker 1: it's a sad sense that she might sue them? You know,
Speaker 1: she's kind of intimates that she will, and I hope
Speaker 1: she does. Actually, do you think that there's how you
Speaker 1: look you've worked? I know you've worked at some some
Speaker 1: large newspapers in the path that you worked at the
Speaker 1: Denver Post, and you've been at a few places in
Speaker 1: the past where I'm sure there were liberal journalists there.
Speaker 1: So do you get and you haven't worked at times
Speaker 1: if memory serves, But do you think that there's embarrassment
Speaker 1: among the employees of the newsroom who just won't come
Speaker 1: out and say it, or do you I know, I'll
Speaker 1: ask you to kind of look into Crystal Ball a
Speaker 1: little bit, but they can't. You can't really think you're
Speaker 1: a journalist and that you make you're living on free
Speaker 1: speech and that what's going on right now isn't insane, right?
Speaker 1: Or am I giving I'm talking about for the majority
Speaker 1: of the people that work in these places, or am
Speaker 1: I giving them too much credit? I think that's probably
Speaker 1: a large contingent that are just not you know, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't call them cowards, but they don't want to be fired,
Speaker 1: they don't want the attention. They just want to do
Speaker 1: whatever they're doing right, their movie reviews, whatever, right. And
Speaker 1: then there's a contingent the people we know on the
Speaker 1: editorial page and the columnists who are themselves bullies and cowards.
Speaker 1: And I think they're activists and they think that what
Speaker 1: they're doing, like a religious fanatic does, is always okay
Speaker 1: because they're zealous about it and they believe it really deeply.
Speaker 1: These are the people who you know, pedal Pseudohistoric sixty
Speaker 1: nineteen projects and like column at race obsessed column after
Speaker 1: column calling anyone who disagrees with them a racist. And
Speaker 1: these people on the page, and clearly including Paul Krugman,
Speaker 1: who does similar sorts of things, are people who see
Speaker 1: no problem bullying other So Paul Krugman went out of
Speaker 1: his way recently, he tried to get someone at the
Speaker 1: University of Chicago fired because he said all lives matters
Speaker 1: or forgot what he did some some you know, free
Speaker 1: speech crime or thought you know, wrong thing crime. And
Speaker 1: so that's I think what you know, it's a small segment,
Speaker 1: but it's the segment of people, the faction that run
Speaker 1: the paper. Barry White said that Twitter is the real
Speaker 1: editor of New York Times editorial page. And that's the truth.
Speaker 1: I think a mob runs the paper. Remember a few
Speaker 1: like last year or on a number of occasions, they've
Speaker 1: changed headlines the news such changed headlines because the Biden
Speaker 1: camp being cold or the Twitter got mad. They are
Speaker 1: They're just cowards. These are cowards that started at the
Speaker 1: Atlantic with Kevin Williamson's my colleague Nano being fired for
Speaker 1: having an opinion about something, and now we see it there.
Speaker 1: Damon Arsani, everybody, David keeping the fight, stay safe. Thanks
Speaker 1: for joining us, my friend, Thank you anytime you're in
Speaker 1: the freedom und This is the Buck Section Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I figured i'd share with you some of what this
Speaker 1: New York Times editor Barry Weisse puts in a resignation letter.
Speaker 1: Remember New York Times is the the Grand Cathedral that
Speaker 1: they probably wouldn't like to be called that, But you know,
Speaker 1: it's the I don't know what's what's the what's the
Speaker 1: proper way of saying it? Um, the Superdome? How about that?
Speaker 1: It's the superdome of leftist journalism, of democrat aligned journalism
Speaker 1: in America. It's it's the most elite newspaper, even more
Speaker 1: so really than the Washington Post. And yeah, they've lost
Speaker 1: their minds over there. That's that's for sure. Barry Weiss
Speaker 1: in her resignation letter, how's the following? Um, this is
Speaker 1: I guess for this is to Salzburger, the guy who
Speaker 1: owns it, runs it. It is with sadness that I
Speaker 1: write to tell you I'm resigning from New York Times.
Speaker 1: I joined the paper with gratitude, an optimism three years ago.
Speaker 1: Blah blah, a voice to bring other voices, blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. Okay, here we go, good stuff. Twitter is
Speaker 1: not on the masthead of The New York Times, but
Speaker 1: Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and
Speaker 1: mores of that platform have become those of the paper.
Speaker 1: The paper itself has increasingly become a kind of performance space.
Speaker 1: Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy
Speaker 1: the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious
Speaker 1: public to read about the world and then draw their
Speaker 1: own conclusions. I was always taught that journalists were charged
Speaker 1: with writing the first draft, a rough draft of history.
Speaker 1: Now history itself is one more ephemeral thing, molded to
Speaker 1: fit the needs of a predetermined narrative. Wow, I mean,
Speaker 1: this isn't surprise at all. Right, it's just somebody from
Speaker 1: the inside, a liberal, my friends, who would disagree with
Speaker 1: you listening to this on ninety percent of stuff in life,
Speaker 1: or maybe seventy percent. She's a little less crazy than
Speaker 1: some of the others, but I would disagree with you
Speaker 1: almost all the time. And was an editor at this paper.
Speaker 1: And she's resigning, and she is telling you what I
Speaker 1: tell you every day about the New York Times, and
Speaker 1: what you know about the New York Times is in
Speaker 1: fact entirely true. It's true. I'm not I'm not exaggerating
Speaker 1: Murra right wing radio. Ur. I'm not sitting here, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know where they hate him. And it's terrible,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not doing any of that. I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you the truth, and it's amazing that this is
Speaker 1: what it's come to. The most famous newspaper are arguably,
Speaker 1: I think pretty clearly in the country is run by
Speaker 1: She says, Twitter and the opinion of Libs on that
Speaker 1: social media platform, I mean, Twitter has effectively destroyed the
Speaker 1: facade of journalism because you have all these people who
Speaker 1: now don't have to go through an editor, don't have
Speaker 1: any quality control over their sharing of thoughts, and they're
Speaker 1: telling us I'm a huge leftist, I'm a Marxist, I'm
Speaker 1: a lunatic social justice warrior. Oh, I'm now just covering
Speaker 1: national politics on the front page of the New York Times,
Speaker 1: and I swear I have no bias, as if we're
Speaker 1: all morons right, as if we don't know exactly what's
Speaker 1: going on there. A little more from her resignation letter,
Speaker 1: My own forays into wrong think have made me the
Speaker 1: subjects of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views.
Speaker 1: They have called me a Nazi and a racist. I
Speaker 1: have learned to brush off comments about how I'm writing
Speaker 1: about the Jews. Again, several colleagues perceived to be friendly
Speaker 1: with me were badgered by coworkers my work and my
Speaker 1: character are openly demeaned on companywide slack channels, where masked
Speaker 1: head editors regularly weigh in. There. Some coworkers insist I
Speaker 1: need to be rooted out if this company is to
Speaker 1: be a truly inclusive one, while others post ax emojis
Speaker 1: next to my name. Wow. Still, other New York Times
Speaker 1: employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot
Speaker 1: on Twitter, with no fear that harassing me will be
Speaker 1: met with appropriate action. They never are. There are terms
Speaker 1: for all of this unlawful discrimination, hostile work environment, and
Speaker 1: constructive discharge. I'm known legal expert, but I know that
Speaker 1: this is wrong. Oh yes, sue them. Go for it. Barry,
Speaker 1: sue the New York Times into oblivion. Go for it.
Speaker 1: I think this is fantastic. They should be sued. It's
Speaker 1: this is a great a great letter, the basics. Look,
Speaker 1: it's worth reading the whole thing. I won't read it
Speaker 1: to you all in air prusin Mark. Maybe we should
Speaker 1: post it on bucksex and dot com. I don't know
Speaker 1: if people what do you think people would like? I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'll tweet, I'll tweet it out, I'll tweet
Speaker 1: it out. But it's amazing. This is my favorite thing.
Speaker 1: Why added something challenging to our readers or something boldly
Speaker 1: only to go through numbing process of making ideologically kosher
Speaker 1: when we can assure ourselves of job security by publishing
Speaker 1: our four thousandth op ed arguing that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a unique danger to the country and the world. It's
Speaker 1: totally true. She's telling you the truth. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: The show ain't over yet, folks. Keeping it real, It's
Speaker 1: time for roll call. All right, roll call, let us
Speaker 1: hit it. Remember Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. Please
Speaker 1: follow the page if you have not already. If you're
Speaker 1: on Facebook and you listen to the show every day,
Speaker 1: why aren't you part of the freedom hud online and
Speaker 1: also go to Bucksexton dot com for stories posted throughout
Speaker 1: the day. You can even listen to the podcast there.
Speaker 1: You can listen on Spotify, and producer Mark points out
Speaker 1: the company that both that pays us has a fantastic app,
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app which you can listen to the podcast on
Speaker 1: that as well. Please pass the Buck, am I have?
Speaker 1: I am I good here? Mark at anything else I'm
Speaker 1: leaving off Bucksexen dot com Right, Bucksexen dot com. Great
Speaker 1: website that we've got going on. So yeah, there we go.
Speaker 1: We got good things, good things. Oh and don't forget
Speaker 1: the Buck Brief. Please share that to your Facebook page.
Speaker 1: That'll be up. That's up today already, all right, Jim
Speaker 1: Buck love the show. Listen to it often after work
Speaker 1: at the golf course while I practice my game. I'm
Speaker 1: usually starving at this time. My attention focus is when
Speaker 1: you talk about food, in particular. You've recently discussed both
Speaker 1: a skillet seared steak that you based an herb butter
Speaker 1: and a spaghetti carbonara. Both of these sound decadent and delicious.
Speaker 1: Unable to decide which of these to have tonight, so
Speaker 1: I decided to have both. I want you to know
Speaker 1: the meal was amazing. Not surprised. The two go together
Speaker 1: perfectly and should become your sign your dish. Thanks for
Speaker 1: the food tips, and keep up the good fight. She'll
Speaker 1: tell my friends. Now I'm off to a food coma. Jim,
Speaker 1: you made us. It's a power move, my friend. That's
Speaker 1: some good stuff. Making sure that you have what you
Speaker 1: need on the plate. Let's producer Mark. If I if
Speaker 1: I told you that tonight you were going to have
Speaker 1: a fantastic steak cut of your choice, perfectly cooked and seasoned,
Speaker 1: or a really excellent creamy spaghetti carbonara, but you can
Speaker 1: only have one. Which would you go? That is a
Speaker 1: tough choice, Buck, I think so too. Actually, they're both
Speaker 1: so good. I go steak just because I think that's
Speaker 1: my favorite thing. Yeah, I probably go steak too. But
Speaker 1: what's on the side of the steak? Maybe and I
Speaker 1: speaked potato? Yeah, something like that. If you get you know,
Speaker 1: you gotta have some kind of a starch. I guess
Speaker 1: steakhouse sides are good, but you know, you get more
Speaker 1: variety that you go to a steakhouse for steak, maybe
Speaker 1: for the seafood. Sometimes the sides are good. Um anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm making myself hungry, man, it's not even dinner time
Speaker 1: for me making myself hungry to staking about this. But yeah, no,
Speaker 1: carbonara is my favorite. You told me your favorite pasta
Speaker 1: was ravioli. Uh no, I don't even remember. If No,
Speaker 1: that was not my favorite. Rigatoni was Producer Nick's favorite.
Speaker 1: Rigatoni was producer Nicks. I guess i'd go Penny Alivadka. Yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe some tortellini. All right now, I really am getting hungry.
Speaker 1: D Buck. My husband and I met you on July four,
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen at the Trump International Hotel Cool. We live
Speaker 1: in Mississippi. We listen to you on the radio today.
Speaker 1: You said that there aren't enough people standing up for
Speaker 1: what is right. I'm ready. Please give us some insight
Speaker 1: on how we need to start. Should we start having
Speaker 1: peaceful protests locally and try to build from there. We
Speaker 1: are ready to stand up for America. I think that's
Speaker 1: what we will call our group. We still need some
Speaker 1: advice from you. D I think you got, first of all,
Speaker 1: very lovely meeting you in the husband and yes, indeed
Speaker 1: I was on July fourth, twenty nineteen at the Trump
Speaker 1: Hotel in DC, so that is accurate. That is true.
Speaker 1: And as for how to get going and how to mobilize,
Speaker 1: I think that you're on the right track. I think
Speaker 1: that you've pretty much got it. Do as you were
Speaker 1: planning on doing here, get up and running on it,
Speaker 1: you know, just do your thing. Local organizations very important.
Speaker 1: With social media, there's a lot of reach and power
Speaker 1: that you can have, especially if the movement, you know,
Speaker 1: if you are on message and people seeing like they're
Speaker 1: both energized. But also think of the way that we
Speaker 1: could have such a differentiation between conservative mobilization, Republican Party
Speaker 1: people voting for Trump, and how we would have orderly, safe,
Speaker 1: respectful protest or respectful demonstrations versus the anarchy, absurdity and
Speaker 1: a viciousness of these lib protesters who are out there.
Speaker 1: So there you go. Yeah, I think d that's the
Speaker 1: way to do it, and I think your instincts are
Speaker 1: spot on. I would just go for it. And to
Speaker 1: say hi to the hubs for me, shield Tie Toby Buck,
Speaker 1: I am crushed upon hearing about Jay Severn. I'm a
Speaker 1: fan from Boston and he introduced me to conservative talk
Speaker 1: radio when he had the afternoon show. Even a liberal Boston.
Speaker 1: He was a giant. Very saddened and Toby, I totally
Speaker 1: appreciate and understand that Jay Severn was. He was a
Speaker 1: real radio host. And I mean that in I think
Speaker 1: he would know that too. I mean that as a
Speaker 1: term of real respect. You know, he was. He was
Speaker 1: the real deal. He wasn't somebody that just uh, you know,
Speaker 1: was able to play the corporate game and you know,
Speaker 1: have a lot of guests on or hang on to
Speaker 1: somebody else's coattails to get a radio show. Uh, and
Speaker 1: you know, get on get on stations. I mean, he
Speaker 1: he's really good. He was good at radio. He was
Speaker 1: talented at that medium and was a guy who did
Speaker 1: his own thinking. And look, I know that he had
Speaker 1: he got into some hot water here and there for
Speaker 1: what he said. Um, but that's because he was a
Speaker 1: guy who was pushing it along the edge and that
Speaker 1: makes for interesting radio. And I always appreciated he. We
Speaker 1: weren't close or anything like that, but I could speak
Speaker 1: to him about the business and especially it was very
Speaker 1: early for me and he, and there was a respect
Speaker 1: between us whenever we talked about this because he knew
Speaker 1: right away and said that I was. I was a
Speaker 1: real radio guy. And he recognized that and said that
Speaker 1: you're gonna have a very You're gonna have a very
Speaker 1: big career if you keep doing this. And Jay was
Speaker 1: not a warm and fuzzy kind of a guy, but
Speaker 1: he you know, game respects game kind of a thing.
Speaker 1: And I always listened to Jay as somebody who I knew.
Speaker 1: The only reason this guy had a radio show is
Speaker 1: because he was good at this. That's not true about everybody. Um,
Speaker 1: let's see here, James Buck. Anyway, I also pardon me,
Speaker 1: just to finish off with with Severn. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: thoughts and prayers to his family, and it was it
Speaker 1: was said, look, we've lost. It wasn't even planning going here.
Speaker 1: We've lost Jay Severn this year from the you know,
Speaker 1: the world of media that I've operated in. Someone that
Speaker 1: was a colleague of mine. We lost Doc Thompson a
Speaker 1: terrible accident. You know, it's we've lost. Those are two
Speaker 1: guys I worked with at the Blaze, and they were
Speaker 1: taken way before their time. So make everyday count, folks,
Speaker 1: Make everyday count. I know it's maybe trite to say,
Speaker 1: tried to hear, but it's still true. James Buck. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you've talked about this. Now, we are
Speaker 1: being more or even more forced to wear a mask
Speaker 1: at stores. If you don't in all of New York State,
Speaker 1: you can get a thousand dollars fine, and stores will
Speaker 1: get a two thousand dollars fine. Cops can get called
Speaker 1: on you. To me, this is unconstitutional and in my
Speaker 1: view illegal, with the fine, they are wasting or our
Speaker 1: emergency resources to arrest maskless people. She'll tie from w
Speaker 1: G y up in Albany, James, New York is going nuts. Man,
Speaker 1: we made COVID basically is not a problem in New
Speaker 1: York anymore. This is not I mean there's like very
Speaker 1: few cases. No one's dying from it, really, I mean
Speaker 1: maybe a half dozen people a day, which is sad
Speaker 1: for every case is a tragedy. But you know, hundreds
Speaker 1: of people are dying from cancer, hundreds of people are
Speaker 1: dying from heart to use every single day. I mean,
Speaker 1: people die from things that happens. And the mask mandates
Speaker 1: are only going to get more extreme. And uh, fights
Speaker 1: that we see we didn't play. There was this guy
Speaker 1: who is this great who was approached by two I
Speaker 1: should have pretty sermark. Can we find I'll play. I
Speaker 1: know it's late, but I want to use it tomorrow.
Speaker 1: We got to clean it up though, because there's a
Speaker 1: little bit of curses. But the guy who's is he
Speaker 1: in a costco and a woman comes up to him
Speaker 1: and she's like, you aren't wearing a mask? You know,
Speaker 1: why are you just back off like I'm just you know, oh,
Speaker 1: look getting up in my faith of the whole you
Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about. Yeah, I think we played
Speaker 1: that last week, did we. Yeah, the guy who's yelling
Speaker 1: I'm threatened or something like that. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: the very no no nos a hot spot for this lately.
Speaker 1: No no, no no that that guy just lost his mind
Speaker 1: on somebody was screaming. This guy was like, oh, look
Speaker 1: at you, trying to get a little bit, a little
Speaker 1: bit of video. He's got like jean shorts on, a
Speaker 1: tucked in T shirt, trucker hat. This guy's great. This
Speaker 1: guy I would be buddies. He's hilarious. There's two women
Speaker 1: or videotapium because he's in a store without a mask,
Speaker 1: and he's like, why don't you just mind your own business,
Speaker 1: and they're all just like, yeah, I'm taking video. I'll
Speaker 1: find it. I'll said it to you. It's great, it's great.
Speaker 1: I really like this guy. He's he's just funny, like
Speaker 1: he just makes a joke out of it because they're
Speaker 1: really trying to antagonize him, and he's just like, what
Speaker 1: are you doing? You know what? The chances are that
Speaker 1: they're antagonizing a guy who doesn't have a virus, who
Speaker 1: has nothing to spread to anybody. It's about ninety nine.
Speaker 1: That's how insane people are. Now. Oh, if there's any
Speaker 1: chance at all of you know, somebody having um, you know,
Speaker 1: it just drives me nuts. It's really interesting advertising strategy
Speaker 1: by Costco there. They keep sending in people without a
Speaker 1: masks so they get videotaped in Costcos. It's not sure
Speaker 1: that's necessarily the kind of it's definitely not the truth.
Speaker 1: But if it wasn't, I know what you're saying, I'll
Speaker 1: get you. Yeah, this mask thing is going to be.
Speaker 1: This is going to continue on and look were really
Speaker 1: what we really need is we need to run experiments
Speaker 1: with people wearing masks, and you know, we have to
Speaker 1: do this. We're gon we're gonna have to run some
Speaker 1: some true, controlled, gold standard mask experiments and I will
Speaker 1: bet money that they will find out if and when
Speaker 1: they no. But they're going to try not to do
Speaker 1: this because think of what that would mean for the
Speaker 1: global health community and all the experts. We've we've been
Speaker 1: masking people thinking that it protects. It's one thing, you know, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it prevents you from spitting on somebody if you're up close.
Speaker 1: If a doctor is going to be examining you. You know,
Speaker 1: you don't have their breath directly on you. So there's
Speaker 1: some just sort of general hygiene field, dude, But in
Speaker 1: terms of preventing viral spread of respiratory droplets that spread virus,
Speaker 1: I look, I'm I would be fascinated to see a
Speaker 1: real study or you have Okay, let's have a bunch
Speaker 1: of people in a room for an hour with somebody
Speaker 1: who has COVID, and you know, you have a bunch
Speaker 1: of volunteers who are in there. Everyone's wearing masks, and
Speaker 1: they're all in a room together for an hour, and like,
Speaker 1: how many of them get it and how many of
Speaker 1: them don't? I mean, I don't know how you'd even
Speaker 1: construct the experiment so that it would be definitive, but
Speaker 1: get as close to it as possible. That's that's what
Speaker 1: I would want to see, because I just if it
Speaker 1: was just as easy as wearing masks, we wouldn't have,
Speaker 1: you know, the problem, we wouldn't have this problem. People
Speaker 1: have been wearing masks four months, for months still, hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of cases all the time. Anyway, I just
Speaker 1: I wish, I wish it were as simple as just
Speaker 1: browbeat those evil Republicans into wearing masks, Dave, Dude, I'm
Speaker 1: an observer on Facebook for the most part. Love seeing
Speaker 1: people's kids, picks, family vacation, etc. God forbid you try
Speaker 1: to be nice and respond to anything political. People freak out.
Speaker 1: I have no idea how you do what you do.
Speaker 1: You have much thicker skin than I do. My friend, Dave,
Speaker 1: you will freak out of me all the time. The
Speaker 1: thing is, and even who freaks out is inherently an
Speaker 1: unstable loser. And you just you learned it very quickly.
Speaker 1: You're like, what is wrong with people? You know what
Speaker 1: is wrong with them? So there's that you just got.
Speaker 1: You Just gotta roll with it, man, just gotta roll
Speaker 1: with it. You're in the freedom. Huh. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more roll called John.
Speaker 1: Listen to your Friday night show right now on podcast.
Speaker 1: Heard your response to Frank at the end. Heard you
Speaker 1: mention getting a PS four and hopping on some call
Speaker 1: of duty. Man. I haven't been out of work due
Speaker 1: to COVID because I work in water distribution. However, my
Speaker 1: job has had me quarantine to home outside of work
Speaker 1: hours to ensure we don't bring it in the rest
Speaker 1: of the staff, minus working out or binge watching movies
Speaker 1: and TV with my wife. My life has been bourbon
Speaker 1: and Call of Duty. If you do, indeed get a
Speaker 1: PS four and hop off for Call of Duty, give
Speaker 1: me a holler. We can start a Freedom Hutshields High team,
Speaker 1: keep up the good fight and God bless John. This
Speaker 1: may have to happen. I kind of like this idea
Speaker 1: we started. We start a team freedom hunt on Call
Speaker 1: of Duty and I'll play, and we could all talk
Speaker 1: and play Call of Duty together with whoever wants to
Speaker 1: show up and do it. That producer mark, do you
Speaker 1: ever do Call of Duty? I've dabbled, but not as
Speaker 1: much as some of the more extreams do. I played.
Speaker 1: My older brother and I were playing together of the weekend.
Speaker 1: We had a lot of fun, and I am getting
Speaker 1: less terrible at it. I'm a I'm sort of freakishly
Speaker 1: good at the FIFA soccer game, like I have a
Speaker 1: lot of ability there for whatever reason, well because I've
Speaker 1: played it a lot in my youth and I just
Speaker 1: understand soccer well, which I shouldn't admix. It makes me
Speaker 1: sound less American. But Call of Duty, man, these guys
Speaker 1: people are really fast with those controls. I just gotta
Speaker 1: say they're very good. That's why I don't play any
Speaker 1: of the shooter aims often is because I'm so bad
Speaker 1: at them in comparison to everyone else. Yeah. I also
Speaker 1: sometimes I get I shouldn't admit this on the radio,
Speaker 1: but I'm the guy that someone will sneak up behind
Speaker 1: when I have a fully automatic weapon and they have
Speaker 1: a knife, and they will knife me, and then they'll
Speaker 1: squat on my corpse and I'll hear someone screaming over
Speaker 1: their headset. That's right, Neube, that's right. Most like, why
Speaker 1: do you have to be so mean? You already stuck
Speaker 1: a knife in me from behind? That's what ends up happening.
Speaker 1: Mark rights Buck, please explain on your show why a
Speaker 1: governor can declare a state of emergency and why they
Speaker 1: appear to have no limits on their power during this
Speaker 1: time period with no expiration date in sight. Why are
Speaker 1: our Republican state legislators not fighting back anywhere? Why our
Speaker 1: business is not pooling money to sue. Why are these
Speaker 1: powers not being challenged in the courts. Why is there
Speaker 1: not a tsunami of lawsuits across the country finding these
Speaker 1: arbitrary hours. How can how long can a government governor
Speaker 1: maintain these emergency powers? Because to me, it seems the
Speaker 1: answer is forever. Mark, you are absolutely correct. It does
Speaker 1: seem like it's forever. It seems like it's at their
Speaker 1: whim and there's no stopping this, and it's just absurd.
Speaker 1: It is just it's just I don't know, Dio Jane.
Speaker 1: He's to start suing. We need we need some legal
Speaker 1: pushback on this against the states. They're out of control.
Speaker 1: So it's nuts, Brent, right, San, I hope you and
Speaker 1: Mark get a laugh out of this. My gym Crunch
Speaker 1: Fitness in Ohio is making us wear masks when we
Speaker 1: walk in and as we walk around from equipment to
Speaker 1: equipment aka about five minutes of my workout. The other
Speaker 1: hour plus of my workout, I'm allowed to spread all
Speaker 1: the germs I want. Follow the science. Yeah, man, this
Speaker 1: is just it's just nonsense. What people say, just nonsense.
Speaker 1: What's going on with a lot of these restrictions to
Speaker 1: just counter it's counterintuitive, it's irrational, it's irrational. You don't
Speaker 1: have to be an expert to know when something's irrational.
Speaker 1: You just have to be a smart person who's not
Speaker 1: afraid of the truth and knowing the truth. Well, that's
Speaker 1: why you're here in the Hut, my friends, because you
Speaker 1: know we are not afraid of it. In fact, we
Speaker 1: chase down that truth. We say truth. I want to
Speaker 1: be friends, Be my friend Truth. Thanks for hanging out.
Speaker 1: As always, pass the buck speaking of friends to some
Speaker 1: of your friends. We'll be back tomorrow, Mark and I
Speaker 1: with a fantastic show for all of you. As always,
Speaker 1: here in the Freedom Hut. No matter what we face,
Speaker 1: we face it together, shields high,