WEBVTT - JPMorgan, Micron, JetBlue, and Meta (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Equity BQ. That gives me my Bloomberg quote,

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which is my go to quote for any security I

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>pop in there. It's up like one tenth to one

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>percent today, it's up four percent year to date. Aren't

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they having an investor day today? Shanli bassk you cover

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all the Wall Street stuff I was expecting. Maybe not

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a bombshell, but can I have a little bit of

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>excitement coming out an investor day?

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But so far not so much.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean JP Morgan makes money, big deal. No, I'm kidding, Hi, Well,

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 4>that's the thing.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 5>I mean.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan the typically when they do investor Day, you've

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 4>got a lot of detail about how they're managing the

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 4>business line by line, business by business, executive by executive.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 4>But you know, they they have not been known to

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 4>sit there and throw out massive, big targets on a

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>fester day. They have reiterated the targets that've set, but

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 4>they have a one target I think in particular is important.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 4>It's the twenty twenty three that interest income expectation. They're

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 4>expected to make more, and it's because of that First

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Republic deal. You would expect some of that, but it's,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 4>to your point here, somewhat muted because there is still

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of uncertainty and JP Morgan's executives tell you

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 4>all about it.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So there haven't been any bombshells yet, have there from

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>this acquisition of this bank. I mean they kind of

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you go when there and you're like, uh, oh,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, but they didn't have any of that so

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>far at least.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I think what it will be is a matter of

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 4>showing just how much this will move the deal for

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan overtime. You think back to bear Stearns, for example,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and it wasn't immediately clear, especially when on the horizon

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>there were so many hiccups to work through just how

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 4>much of a huge strategic change bear Stearns would be

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 4>have made them one of a the top fixed income

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>trading house on Wall Street. It now is making them

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 4>such a competitive institutional broke if you will, you know,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>just at the heart of capital markets, competing with the

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 4>investment bank. But First Republic will really make it a contender,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>bigger and bigger in wealth, wealth and consumer.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Here, I'm just looking at a red headline going across

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. Biden, We'll meet with McCarthy at five

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm today Wall Street time to discuss the debt limits,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have more reporting on that. But that seems

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like a move in the right direction. Pretty gup that

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>joints us here Bloomberg Interactior broker students just coming off

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the TV screen. So Creta's just talking to Shanali here.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Not a whole lot of action coming out of the

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan. I wanted to ask you about a smaller

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>deal green Hill, Mizuho Bying green Hill. Now green Hill

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is only it's a small company, it's less than a

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar market cap, but it's Bob Greenhill, who was

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a just a.

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Legendary deal maker.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They were one of the first boutique investment banks to

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>come public like twenty years.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Ago or something.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 4>There's a reason, and I've got to say I thought

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>the story would do well. It is the most read

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 4>on the terminal already and within a couple of hours here,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and the reason is, Yes, Bob Greenhill, he was a

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 4>bank over the Sumner red Stone. He was a banker

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 4>to Sandy while he was really in that era of

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 4>legendary investment bankers Morgan Stanley former Morgans only left out

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 4>on his own form green Hill and Company. And yeah,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 4>it was one of the original boutiques and one of

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 4>the first to go public, really the first in this generation,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>and it inspired others like Evercore, PJT. Hulahan, Loki Mulison

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Company to go public too. So it's really an end

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of an era for a public run for green Hill

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 4>in Company, but really a tough decade. Paul, Yeah, I mean.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm just looking at the stock price chart.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's you know, they're getting paid double where

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they closed on Friday, but still it's a fraction of

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>where was it its peak.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in the heat in the aftermath of the

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>financial crisis, this was a stock at more than eighty

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 4>one dollars a share on Friday. It closed at less

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 4>than seven dollars a share, So that just shows you

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 4>how far they had come. And remember, investment bankers are

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 4>partly paid in equity of their own investment banks, so

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 4>it's a tough retention tool when you're facing that much

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>pressure on your stock price.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 6>So one of the key takeaways I'm going to bring

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 6>back to JP Morgan here because five hundred and fifty

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 6>million dollars from a Zoho. But it feels like JP

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Morgan all eyes on Jamie Diamond, especially with geopolitics kind

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 6>of rearing its ugly head once again. What is the

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 6>JP Morgan take on China?

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's funny you keep on asking that to

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 4>take unt I know, I'm you're so convinced that the

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 4>investment banks are stepping away at full scale.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, so the reason I ask is because it feels

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>like we're headed towards a and correct me if I'm wrong.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 6>It does feel like we're headed towards an era or

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 6>a couple of decades where you do start to see

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 6>this kind of de globalization, right, it's been in the

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 6>works for the past couple of years as well.

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 6>I think you might be the one of who showed

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 6>me this, or maybe someone else said. But when you

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 6>look at the league tables, a lot of the deal

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 6>volumes fallen in Asia specifically. I'm not sure whether that's

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 6>a function of kind of recession or these late COVID

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 6>measures or things.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Let me give you the let me give you the

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 4>bold case, because you have seen a lot of hedge

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 4>funds come back into China. You have seen a lot

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>of big investment managers hold tight into China even amid

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 4>all these uncertainties. When you're a banklet Morgan listen to

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 4>your America's biggest bank. America is your biggest market. A

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>city group, however, is a little more diversified. They have

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot more global businesses. The reopening of China has

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 4>been so far a pretty big boon to activity, and

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 4>not just in China, in Europe pretty where the investment

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 4>banks are also trying to double down. I think the

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>bigger question here is one how global supply chains start

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 4>to untangle, and then also geopolitical risks, because the big

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 4>whale in the room is China's relationship to Taiwan. And

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 4>again we've been talking about this a lot. The US

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>bank CEOs have been grilled on Capitol Hill asking what

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 4>they would do in that event, and it's a complicated question.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Because they answer really is nothing. That is the real answer,

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's because they follow what the US regulators would

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 4>make them do, which at this point in time is nothing.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, how does that work exactly? When you kind of

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 6>let's say they have these deals or even assets sitting

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 6>in China in that kind of scenario, just play this

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 6>out for me, worst case scenario. I mean, what happens

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 6>to those assets? I mean when I'm kind of comparing

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 6>this to and correct me if I'm wrong, if this

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 6>is an extreme example, but kind of the bank presence

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 6>in Russia, for example, would we see something similar.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a long shot. I think that it

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 4>would be a long shot to equate the two. It

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 4>would take a lot. But it is on the surface,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 4>it is under the minds, on the minds of many executives.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 4>But the idea of it getting to that point is

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 4>still not the immediate concern because it's not happening. And

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 4>China is such a whale in the room, the activity

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of China as a global force in the economy, the

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 4>demographics being more on their side than in the United States.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 4>I'll give you another example of this. Let's not take

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan. Let's take credit Sweez Credit Squeze. When they

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>tried to build another investment bank, they tried to do

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 4>it with a firm that focused only in China and

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Arabia based in New York City. I don't know, Critty,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't show me a story that is trying to

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 4>untangle from the rest of the world.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Chani Bask thanks so much for joining as Shannalani Basic.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>She covers all things Wall Street Today, giving us the

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>latest reporting JP Morgan again. They're having an investor day

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>ongoing today in New York City, as I recall, so

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>getting all their investors and analysts together talking about the future.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe go take a tour of their new headquarters, which

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is being built on Park Avenue. It is awesome. I

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to see what it looks like when it

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>opens up, but I'm sure it'll be state of the art.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 8>On Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 8>Business App.

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Or listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we want to talk energy, We want to talk

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ETFs and so we want to do that. We talked

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to Will Ryan. He's the chief executive officer of Granite

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Shairs Advisors. He joins us live here in our Bloomberg

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Burger studio. So Will on the commodities front here,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with gold. Our commodities analyst here,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike McLoone of Bloomberg Intelligence. He says, basically, buy gold

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and short everything else, including the oil. Talk to us

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about gold. What's your call there?

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>What are you guys thinking about that?

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 9>Well?

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 10>Gold right now? I mean the biggest concern for I

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 10>think point most people in the market, but certainly for

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 10>those who are interested in gold is the debt ceiling.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 10>Because you may remember that back in twenty eleven when

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 10>the US ultimately defaulted and sorry, as you say, the

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 10>credit rating was downgraded for the first time. That propelled

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 10>gold to at the time high and so clearly if

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 10>there was any breakdown and talks and a deal doesn't

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 10>get done, fears that that could happen again certainly elevates

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 10>that premium for people looking for a hedge in gold.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 6>How does that work exactly? When you invest through the

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 6>ETF space, it feels like there's that one ETF that

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>everyone uses for gold, But then if you're doing any

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 6>other sort of commodities, ETFs aren't really the vehicle to use.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 10>Right, I guess it sort of depends, because you know,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 10>the beauty of gold and the beauty of precious metals

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 10>is that their natural state after they've been mined is

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 10>you can store it in a vault. So the bars

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 10>that you can put in a vault, they won't decay,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 10>nothing will happen to them unless they're you know, clearly

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 10>something nefarious, and so they're ideal to hold in a

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 10>fund that's a natural investment state. When you go outside

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 10>of precious metal, as you're dealing with commodities that can

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 10>decay or even die, you know, that's a different proposition.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 10>And typically the way that we address that is via

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 10>the futures market. And so you're talking about broad commodity

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 10>TF or even an ETF on oil, et cetera.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 6>That's typically done like you isn't Wasn't there kind of

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 6>a famous story about copper ETF's not working for that

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 6>exact reason that they fall apart or something that the

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 6>storage becomes an issue.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 10>That's right, So you know they're a physical any physical

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 10>backed physically backed commodity is clearly going to be challenged

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 10>to the extent that there's a challenge on securing supply.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 10>So if you can imagine something like copper, the price

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 10>of a pound of copper is clearly materially different from

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.119
<v Speaker 10>you know, gold, so you need a lot more storage

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 10>for the same weight of metal as you do in gold.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 10>And so it's not to say that you can't do that.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 10>You can, it's just that it's going to be logistically

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 10>a lot more challenging than providing storage for gold.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Touch on a platinum, that's what we hear. I hear

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>more and more about and you've guys have got the

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>granite shares platinum trust. Why would I want to have

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>exposure to platinum here.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, platinum's a really interesting one because the fundamentals for

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 10>this year we're expecting a big deficit, so in other words,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 10>more demand than we have supply for this year, so

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 10>automatically for any commodity, that puts you on a firm footing.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 10>What's interesting is the majority of platinum comes from South

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 10>Africa and at the moment they're having very very big

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 10>issues with energy supply to the sector, so you're seeing

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 10>that manifesting in blackouts across the country, but particularly obviously

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 10>is it pertains to the production itself. So once you

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 10>have energy blackouts, that that affects mind supply and so

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 10>the outlook for supply gets even bleaker. But the demand

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 10>story for platinum is really there's two fold good stories.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 10>One is main uses in catalytic converters, so particularly for

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 10>diesel engine cars, so cleans the emissions, and vehicle sales

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 10>despite all the negative news we have, vehicle sales across

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 10>the globe are expected to increase this year. The second

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 10>thing is that you need platinum or as a vital

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 10>ingredient for the production of hydrogen. And so hydrogen is

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 10>another story which people are focused on as an alternative

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 10>or a complement to electricity produced by batteries, and so

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 10>hydrogen is an alternative fuel source is something that a

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 10>lot of governments and indeed make makers of autos to

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 10>aeroplanes and start to focus on. Now, so we need

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 10>platinum for that.

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 6>When you're talking about platinum, what do you from an

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 6>investment point of view, though, what's the narrative behind that?

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 6>For gold? It's easy, it's the debt ceiling, it's inflation.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 6>It's all about jazz, copper, it's China oil, China US whatever.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 6>What's the investment narrative behind platinum.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, platinum's much more of a fundamentally driven commodity. So,

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 10>in other words, do you expect the demand for platinum

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 10>to go up over time? And in an ideal scenario,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 10>is the demand going to outstrip supply? And therefore, like

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 10>any commodity, it's sort of economics one oh one that

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 10>that will dictate where pricing goes. So for platinum, you know,

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 10>we look at this market. We have more demand than supplies.

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 10>That's good. Outlook for autos is positive, so more sales

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 10>for orders. And we think that the hydrogen story is

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 10>a really good one. You know, we're going to have

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 10>hydrogen as an alternative green fuel source and we need

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 10>platinum for that. But you know that's really the it's

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 10>a metal. It's thirty times rareer than gold's much smaller market.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know that.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, let's go more boring stuff, mundane stuff,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>WTI crude oils.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>It's under seventy two.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bucks a barrel. It just feels like it should be higher.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it?

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 10>The main reason is, again the debt ceiling scenario at

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 10>the moment, But.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>That's going to get fixed.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You're go down to the trading pits of oil and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>tell these guys it's going to get fixed.

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 6>The contrary, and.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 10>Exactly no, it is. I mean, the the any any

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 10>kind of downward move we've had in oil typically, and

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't want to over generalize, but over the last

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 10>twelve months has been about recession narratives. So whether we're

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 10>talking about the debt ceiling immediately leading to recession or

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 10>whether we're just talking about a more global slowdown. But

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 10>but that's the story. I mean, the data coming out

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 10>of China's actually been really good. March was a huge

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 10>month in terms of oil demand consumption. And we know

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 10>from you know, the Middle East that you know, Saudi

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 10>Arabia and the OPEC Consortium are definitely not opposed to

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 10>cutting production if they feel like pricing is at a

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 10>lower left level.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 6>Can we go back to the gold story. I'm just

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm looking you up on your LinkedIn profile. Used to

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 6>work at the World Gold Council, which that's pretty cool.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>There is a thing, there is a thing. Come on,

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you just count gold.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 6>What do you do with the World Gold Council tell

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 6>our audience, Well, the World Gold Council is the official

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 6>industry body, if you will, for the gold industry.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 10>So it's supported by the gold mining companies with a

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 10>mission to raise awareness for gold. So think of it

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 10>as like a trade association at some respects. But the

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 10>most well known thing that the World Gold Council probably

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 10>does is it owns the gld ETF, which is the

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 10>largest gold ETF. So I was the CEO of that

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 10>for for two and a half years. For starting my

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 10>own one bar with granite shares. That's the ticket, sorry bar,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 10>But yes.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, So Critty, here's the thing about Will Ryan.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time he comes in, I'm like, I go look

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>through my notes and I see he goes to he

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>went to the University of Bath in England.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 6>So I google that and what you should only say

0:14:58.120 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 6>in an accent apparent.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly you can say.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But you google it and it looks like the most

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful town anywhere. And then I keep asking myself how

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>come I've never been there? And I go to my

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>little map thing, immajig. It's only an hour and seventeen

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>minute train ride from Paddington station in London. Why haven't

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I been. I've been to London like a thousand times.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 10>It's a good question. So all right, I think it

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 10>just made an itinerary for your next trip.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I can do a day trip there, right, or I

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>could do an overnight trip.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Oh yeah, easily, easily.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, put that on the itinerary.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 6>Put that on the itinerary. Let's go back to market

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 6>pricing here. I think we've got a few more minutes left.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 6>Pull me back to gold, though, we were just near

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 6>record Do we break the record high? I can't remember,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 6>but we were near record highs for gold and then

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of retreated back. I think we're in nineteen seventy

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 6>the last time I checked nineteen seventy two on spot gold.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 6>What would it take to break that record high?

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 10>Most immediately, some kind of breakdown in the debt ceilings.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 10>That's the clear and present danger for the market. But

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, gold prices will thrive off any kind of

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 10>dislike cation event, and you know, the fear of this

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 10>happening has been one of the main reasons why gold

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 10>has climbed back up to these levels. But clearly, if

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 10>we have any breakdown, obviously, worst case scenario, we had

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 10>some kind of default event, prices of gold would be

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 10>materially higher.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And silver doesn't the silver foul gold. What's the relationship

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>gold to silver?

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 10>It does?

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 3>You know silver?

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 10>Silver is more industrial because the majority of demand for

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 10>silver is more industrial. So it's a bit like platinum

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 10>where it's going to be more related to the business cycle. However,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, silver is the closest correlated to gold, and

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 10>so when gold prices are going up, typically silver prices

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 10>are also going up.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But you can't corner that. Like who cornered the silver

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>market back in the day. That wasn't the Hunt brothers.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you corner a silver market?

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is it? Is it the size that it

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>can be done?

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, most most commodities are at the size that

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 10>they can be done. I mean clearly you know opek,

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 10>remember is a cartel, and if it's self, it's designed

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 10>to corner the market in the in the same sense

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 10>as the Hunts did. But you know that's I guess

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 10>short order, why we have regulation in these markets to

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 10>try and stop these days happening.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, Okay, we'll Rind joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio Will Rand. He's a chief executive officer

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of Granted Shairs Advisors.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>He woke this morning to the news at China declaring

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Micron Technologies a cyber security risk. I guess that's a

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>no no. So they're China's barring Micron chips. What does

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it mean? A stockment is down about four percent of

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>John just mentioned here. Let's bring in an expert here

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of frame this out. Paula Pincal, she covers

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors with Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins us live here in

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So we appreciate you coming in.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You get a gold star for that, unlike your management,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>which mails it in, phones it in. I appreciate you

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>coming in, Paula. How big a deal is this for Micron? Again,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the stock is off a little bit, but frame it

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>out for.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 9>Us happy to be here, Paul, Thank you. Look, it

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 9>was a low ball punch against the United States. And

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 9>I say that because MICRONU China can easily replace the

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 9>product with its by its competitors in Southeast Asia, Samsung,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 9>sk Heinex, So it's not really hurting itself by banning

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 9>these products. Micron stock is down, yes, but I think

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 9>they're starting it's starting to pair some of those losses.

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 9>I think as people look at it more closely, China

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 9>roughly represents maybe eleven percent of direct sales of Micron's

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 9>direct sales, but of that the majority goes into consumer

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 9>electronics products, and so even less of that is likely

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 9>to be exposed to this ban.

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Yet.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 9>You know caveat here, though, is that China has not

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 9>completely defined what it means by this ban. There's very

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 9>few details out there. There is a risk it could

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 9>be broader than that.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 6>So you said, it's.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Given very few details.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 6>What has it said about this ban.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 9>It basically said that it's banning Microns chips that are

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 9>used in critical information infrastructure product and you know that

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 9>could be anything from defense, healthcare, transportation. But it's very vague.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 9>And so we know that Micron makes most of the

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 9>chips for consumer electronics like phones and notebooks and things

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 9>like that. So even though they have this roughly eleven

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 9>percent direct exposure, actually sixteen percent if you include Hong Kong,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 9>the exposure could be a lot less than that. But

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, for headlines, it's like, wow, you know, China

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 9>is banning Micron chips and that's not gonna you know,

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 9>the stock market is clearly reacting to that.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 6>So when you say there is no direct exposure, kind

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 6>of unpacked that for us here, because from a very

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 6>rudimentary knowledge of chips, when you put a chip into

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 6>or manufacturer chip and then sell us a Chinese company

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.239
<v Speaker 6>and that goes into a consumer electronics whatever, let's say

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 6>a smartphone hypothetically bus smartphone has brought let's say exported

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 6>right back here to the States. Is that the chip

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 6>that's included in this ban or is it not included

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 6>because it's ultimately going back into a consumer smartphone.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 9>It's not completely clear, and that's sort of a broader

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 9>potential risk within the supply chain. And but what I

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 9>will say is that direct exposure being Micron has a

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 9>contract with a local Chinese distributor or company, who does

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 9>you know, contract manufacturing for large chip manufacturers and they're

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 9>literally putting the product together and there they usually buy

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 9>Micron chips. So in this case, those Chinese companies within

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 9>China are not going to be allowed to purchase certain

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 9>chips directly from Micron. Now you look at a company

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 9>like Nvidia, they use Micron chips in their latest gaming

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, video gaming products GPU that is manufactured in China.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 9>That's Micron chip. Okay, that's still consumer electronics. But like,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 9>there is a risk if China really wants to play hardball.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 9>I'm not suggesting I think they will, but there is

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 9>the risk that this could broaden and expand beyond just

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, memory chips sold directly to China.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So where are we on this kind of budding tech

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>cold war between China and kind of the US and

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the West. I mean, you follow these big chip companies,

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies, they have broad exposure there. What are

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from your companies? This is really something to

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about. As President Biden, you know, kind of

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>came out today and said not to worry, We're gonna tone.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 3>It down a little bit with China.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But is there a cold war in technology?

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 9>Okay, and there has been for some time, and it's

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 9>actually it's heating up right now. And you know, we

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 9>just had a G seven event and at that event,

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 9>China was criticized not just for economic policies, but also

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 9>for human rights abuses all these other things. And so

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 9>it's not surprising that literally a day later they come

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 9>out with the conclusion on cyber security risk for microns chips.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 9>So there is a cybersecurity war. So what we're seeing

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 9>is just a disruption in the overall supply chain. There's

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 9>a regionalization taking place. No one really knows what it's

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 9>going to look like in the end because everybody it's

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 9>so complicated and everybody's so integrated. So even China, they're

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 9>walking a fine line because they need many of our

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 9>advanced chips. So that's why I say banning microns chips

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 9>was an easy one because they can source them elsewhere

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 9>pretty easily because they're commoditized. But they're not going to

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 9>potentially ban you know, Qualcomm's chips right away because that's

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 9>half their phones going into their own domestic market.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 6>I was just about to say, so that's a soft punch.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 6>What does what does a hard punch look like to

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 9>You know, I again, that would be a hard that

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 9>would be looking at a Qualcomm or some company like

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 9>Qualcomm sixty four percent of their revenues derived from China

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 9>and so, and I don't know how realistic that is,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 9>but something like that would be a hard punch. If

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 9>China came out today and said, yeah, we have three

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 9>nanometer node technology, which you know, they say they have

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 9>seven nano, which is more advanced. Mostly China uses twenty

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 9>four nanometer technology right now, advanced to seven nano and

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 9>under in general they developed seven nano, but it's not

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 9>being mass produced yet and it takes time to like

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 9>experiment with these things to get them up running efficiently.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 9>So if China came out and said, oh, we have

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 9>three nanotechnology or we now have advanced memory technology, that

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 9>could be a big blow. They could steal it. They

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 9>may have it and they're trying to develop it further,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 9>or they may have a product and often they look

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 9>at that product and sort of back into the technology

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 9>to create their own. So these are the kind of

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 9>thing things that could be hurtful. But I suspect there's

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 9>going to be more negotiation because no one wins in the.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>End, right, it's very integrated, as we're finding out. Paula,

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Paula Pencalocy is the semiconductor analyst on the technology team

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence, again, in my opinion, the best tech

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>team on Wall Street. Appreciate getting some time from Paula.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 7>Here. You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 8>On Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 8>Business app, or listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's turn to this debt ceiling issue where

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like President Biden has a call with Speaker

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the House today at five point thirty pm Wall

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Street time.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I take that as a good sign.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I kind of think in negotiations

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll want the sides to be talking rather than not talking.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>But let's check it with Nancy Kimmelman, professor at Northeastern University. Nancy,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about this these discussions here? Is

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it just just the cost of doing business in America today?

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there something that we should be maybe more concerned

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>about this? There might be a bigger risk out there

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>than maybe the average person thinks, well.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 11>There could be risk. I mean, we are getting remarkably

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 11>or distressingly close to this judent first dead line, and

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 11>it's a real deadline. I mean, if we push against it,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 11>Medicare payments aren't going to get out, Social Security payments

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 11>aren't going to get out, and it's going to have

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 11>a real impact on real people. So it's not something

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 11>to pooh pooh about. That said, you know, this year,

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 11>the dead ceiling talk is taking place in a different world.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 11>We live in a different world politically. You know, we're

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 11>in the midst now of figuring out who the candidates

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 11>are going to be for the next presidential election. We

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 11>have the Santis throwing his hat and Trump is going

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 11>full bore. You know, that is a part of this

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 11>whole conversation, because I think a lot of what's going

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 11>on between McCarthy and Buden at this point is political theatrics,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 11>and neither side can really afford to be seen given ground,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 11>and it's causing this death ceiling debate or this negotiation

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 11>to just be held at a different level than we've

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 11>seen previously.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 12>So then do you think that this is more a

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 12>debate that is just for showmanship, like you said, or

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 12>do you think there's real risk here to a potential

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 12>default that markets might not even necessarily be properly pricing

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 12>in right now.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 11>I think the impact on the economy and especially the

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 11>financial markets could be very, very real. It already is.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 11>We're already seeing the prices getting hammered for treasury securities

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 11>that would be affected by the by the Treasury not

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 11>being able to roll over the debt. We've seen the

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 11>forecasts that are coming out of private forecasters as well

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 11>as the Council of Economic Advisors and others in Washington

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 11>suggesting that if we if we breached this this this

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 11>line in the sand, the impact on unemployment could be severe.

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 11>It could immediately throw the economy into a recession. I mean,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 11>this is this is real, real side economics, and it's

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 11>really unfortunate that the politicians are planning a little bit

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 11>loose with these negotiations. Not that they're not trying, but

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, nobody's willing to give brown. There's really a

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 11>sense that politics at this point in time, neither side

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 11>can be seen giving in. And that's a very dangerous

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 11>position for us to be on politically as well. As economically.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's my dumb question of the day, professor,

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can help me out. What what are they

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>actually negotiating? Like, is it a debt ceiling raise? Is

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it to solve our problems for the end of time?

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 3>What are they negotiating?

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 11>No, No, it's certainly not for the end of time.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 11>It would be nice if it were. No, here's the

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 11>gig the treasury has. The government has already. This is

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 11>the irony that probably those people don't realize. The government

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 11>has already authorized payment of these moneies. In other words,

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 11>the government has a spending plan of what it has

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 11>to spend on every day of the year. And the

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 11>problem is we don't raise enough in the way of

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 11>taxes to be able to make those commitments real. In ords,

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 11>if we want to send out Social Security checks, we

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 11>have to either have enough tax revenue in the Treasury's

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 11>coffers to be able to pay those Social Security checks

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 11>or we have to borrow the money. Now, everyone knows

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 11>that the US government runs a deficit. We have in

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 11>for decades, and therefore the gap is always made up

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 11>by issuing new debt. But the commitment to spend the

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 11>money is already there. What they're arguing about is whether

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 11>they're going to approve the debt to be issued so

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 11>that the payments can be made. So that's what it's

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 11>about now. The problem is, because we run a continual

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 11>deficit year after year after year, the amount of debt

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 11>outstanding just keeps growing and growing and growing. Pay off

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 11>the debt that we issued last year or ten years

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 11>ago or thirty years ago, we never really pay it off.

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 11>We just replace it with newer securities, with newer bonds.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.719
<v Speaker 11>So the debt is going to continue to accumulate. That number,

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 11>which obviously is in the trillion. It's is just going

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 11>to keep getting bigger and bigger, and they'll agree to

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 11>a debt limit, I hope before June first. But all

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 11>that will do is take the debt limit, that debt

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 11>ceiling off the conversation, out of the conversation. I'll take

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 11>it off the table for a period of time, maybe

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 11>a couple of years, and then we'll be right back

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 11>in it again with another negotiation. Because the government really

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 11>doesn't ever get to a point where the level of

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 11>debt outstanding at repulse.

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 12>Do you think that they let it expire for a

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 12>couple of years though, or do you think Republicans say, hey,

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 12>let's have another expiration date before the twenty twenty four election.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 11>Oh, that is a nasty question. That is a nasty question.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 11>I think everyone can earned is praying that that's not

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 11>what happened. And I also have to say, no, Eli,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 11>are we all praying it doesn't happen. I'm not exactly

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 11>sure who which side is going to be the loser

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 11>in this. Neither side is going to come out the winner,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 11>but which side is really going to be the worst loser?

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 11>You know, if the McCarthy and the Republicans really play

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 11>hardballs here and the Democrats, which they haven't done yet,

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 11>by the way, can say, tell a convincing story about

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 11>how they're playing ball, but the other side isn't. I

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 11>don't think, you know, the Democrats have done a particularly

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 11>good job for themselves in that regard. But if the

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 11>American people decide that Grandma didn't get her Social Security

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 11>check and it's because of that wrangling in Washington, I

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 11>don't know that that's going to be particularly good for

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 11>election prospects for either side. So I suspect that the

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 11>Republicans as well as the Democrats, we'll get this thing passed,

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 11>and it will take us test hopefully will take us

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 11>past the election, because I don't think either side wants

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 11>to be negotiating this going into an election in a

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 11>few months.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>At some point, do we as a government of people,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do we have to pay down this debt, pay back

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this debt, or we just can let it roll into perpetuity.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 11>We let it roll into perpetuity. Now, let's be realistic

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 11>about it is what is at risk here if we

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 11>don't pass a debt ceiling is that the world will

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 11>not look upon US debt the same way it has

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 11>in the past. For decades now, foreign buyers of US

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 11>Treasury securities have been robust. Those purchases by foreigners have

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 11>been very robust. So we really haven't seen any need

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 11>to pay down our debt because every time we have

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 11>a new bond issue or a new bill issue, not

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 11>only do American Americans buy those securities, but people come

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 11>all over the world by those securities, and they do

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 11>so willingly. Not only do are the buyers there willingly. Remember,

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 11>the US Treasury has a relatively low interest rate to pay.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 11>Our interest rates are sort of the benchmark, and they're

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 11>below all the other interest rates that companies and individuals

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 11>have to pay, so there's no incentive for the US

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 11>Treasury to get to the point where we would pay

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 11>down the debt. As long as as long as the

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 11>rest of the world, and as long as the Americans

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 11>are willing to lend that money to the US Treasury.

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 11>It seems a model.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That works, all right.

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a model.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 11>I don't think anyone's ready to break that model.

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a model that doesn't work for me, But

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess it works for the government.

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Good for them. I guess, doctor Nancy Kimmelman, work.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 11>For you individually at all. It doesn't work for any

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 11>of us.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>No, exactly, Doctor Nancy Kimmelman, economics professor for Northeastern University

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and Tufts University, talking about this debt ceiling.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape can'sur live program Bloomberg Markets

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 7>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 7>thirty and.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We need to know about tech. We talked to this guy,

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>man Deep Singh.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 3>We hired him.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We can't get rid of the dude. He just keeps

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sticking around. He's our senior tech anistor for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and he shows up every day. None of this phoning

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it in, working from home, any of that silliness. He's

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in here in a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio. All right,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>so meta, there is nothing stopping this freight train this year.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it got crushed last year, down sixty percent,

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's up over one hundred percent. They get fined

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:30.919
<v Speaker 1>by the EU, and the market's just.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Like, no big deal. Is that? Is that a.

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Reasonable read that it really is not that big a

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>deal for their business?

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, so, I think last year the sentiment was too negative.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 5>This year everyone realizes that it's a great business. It

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 5>can print thirty forty billion dollars in freak cash flow

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 5>every year. And then you know, when you think about

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 5>the size of the fine, one billion dollar isn't that

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 5>big off a deal. I think what it conveys to

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 5>me is one regulators feel this business model is too good,

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 5>and it's you know, kind of driven by the ad market,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 5>which there is a very fine line between privacy and

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 5>showing ads. And we have seen that with Google over

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 5>the years. Google has paid over eight to ten billion

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 5>dollars in cumulative fines just in the EU.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So and Microsoft before, Microsoft before.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 5>We have and and so it's not changing. I think

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 5>what it does to a company is it limits their

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 5>ability to really innovate in a sense that they can't

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, acquire any company. I mean, forget about you know,

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 5>capturing more data from the users. In turn, they have

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 5>to change their business practices to please their regulators, and

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 5>you won't see any effect, you know, in the next

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 5>one or two quarters, but over time it limits their

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 5>ability to grow. And I think that is the big risk.

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Given the business model is so good, given they keep

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, printing free cash flow, is will it hurt

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 5>their growth in the long term. And the answer to

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 5>that is yes. We did see my Microsoft Limited you

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 5>know for a number of years now the EU has

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 5>approved the activision deal, but for a number of years

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Microsoft couldn't buy anything. And I think that is what

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:10.959
<v Speaker 5>you will see with Meta as well.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 12>Can Meta hedge against that through any changes on their

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 12>end or by just suffering the losses that aren't that

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 12>big of a deal for them, well.

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 5>So GDPR came into effect, you know, three years back,

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 5>and they have plenty of time to change AD or PETE.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>That is the stuff that says I got to click

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>yes if I want the cookies one kind of stuff.

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that. Yes.

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 5>And also the regulations with regards to storing the data

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 5>within the EU region. That is why they had to

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 5>pay this fine. Is because right now they are storing

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 5>the data, the EU data outside the region in the

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 5>US data centers.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 3>And the EU regulators don't want that.

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 5>But when you think about you know, generative AI and

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 5>large aguage models, it's about gathering a lot of data

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 5>and then doing AI on it. So Meta, even though

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 5>it has all these different assets Instagram, you know, Facebook, app, WhatsApp,

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 5>and then it operates globally, it can't really combine all

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 5>those data sets because of these restrictions. So if EU

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 5>restricts their ability to take the data outside the region,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 5>then basically, you know, think of it this way, they

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 5>can't even apply AI to their own first party data

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 5>set that they have across regions. And I think again

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 5>it goes back to the point about putting restrictions which

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 5>limit your ability to target ads and then on top

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 5>of that, you have to make business model changes to

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 5>please their regulators, So it is restrictive in that sense.

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Markus Zuckerberg the metaverse, it's a business. Most of his

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>shareholders don't understand, but what they know is he initially

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to spend a gajillion one dollars on it.

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 3>How is he.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Viewing this metaverse and the expenditures associated with developing it.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's been a complete one eighty you know,

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 5>in the sense that last year he was like, we

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 5>are doing this, and we're going to do this at

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 5>all costs. This year it's been more shareholder of friendly

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:10.439
<v Speaker 5>acknowledging what shareholders want in terms of restraining their meta

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 5>worse bets, and they have taken down the guidance in

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 5>terms of this spend. So clearly that is what's driven

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.959
<v Speaker 5>that one hundred percent move in the stock. I mean,

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 5>has a completely given up on meta worse. That can

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 5>happen only if he changes the name of the company

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 5>back to Facebook from Meta I don't know if that

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 5>will happen anytime soon.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, it sort of feels like the metaverse very minimal

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 12>wave was like totally overtaken by the AI wave. If

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 12>we're going to compare the two. Does metas focused on

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 12>cost cutting become the new headline story for them? And

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 12>is the market happy about that?

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean market is happy about the cost discipline that

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 5>they have showed this year. I don't know if they'll

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 5>be happy about Meta being a cost cutting story for

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 5>the medium to long term, simply because if it's not

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 5>a growing asset, why does it serve a premium multiple

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 5>in the peer group. And we've got a lot of

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 5>you know, assets within tech which becomes low growth over time,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 5>and then the market is like, okay, this is just

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 5>a cash machine. They can do buybacks, but there won't

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 5>be any top line growth. And that is what they

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 5>need to answer, whether it's metawors or generative AI. I

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 5>don't think it's that we answer that then well so,

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 5>I mean, ad models are beautiful in the sense they

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 5>scale very well. And Meta has got Instagram, WhatsApp. WhatsApp

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people would argue is under monetized, and

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 5>they have been talking about click to message ads being

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 5>a ten billion dollar revenue run red business. If they

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 5>can scale that, that could easily drive the next three

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 5>years of top line growth. And Instagram we know how

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 5>well that has done. They have a problem with the

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Core Blue app, but clearly I think they have levers

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 5>to pull. The question is what will that meta verse

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 5>that look like? And if Apple launches a device, which

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 5>we are hearing they could next week, then maybe that

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 5>validates that metalworse much. Next week, well, they have their

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Apple has their developer conference, right, so you know that

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going, but we have coverage within bi.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Within bi Okay. Sandis Stander is a Ford investor day today,

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>just pointing that out. All right, let's talk about the

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>NASDAK here up twenty one percent year to date. That's good,

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but we're still down twenty percent from that late twenty

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>one high.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Do I buy NASDAK here? Do I buy tech? Or

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 3>do I make a value call? Do I? I mean? What

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 3>am I doing here?

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 5>Well, so it all goes back to I think what

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 5>FED does in terms of interest rates. Remember these are

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 5>all long duration assets, right, so if the FED has

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 5>hit a pause and they are not going to raise

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 5>interest rates, that is a positive for a lot of

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 5>the tech stocks, and that is why they've gone up

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 5>so much. The question is can the top line growth

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 5>come back, which is really what is not very obvious

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 5>right now is can Google go back to, you know,

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 5>growing fifteen twenty percent, Can Meta go back to growing

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 5>fifteen twenty percent? I think clearly we've seen an inflection

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 5>in terms of ad pricing headmans ad pricing is getting better.

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 5>So that's a fourth step, and then you just have

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.959
<v Speaker 5>to watch out for how the overall global economy does

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 5>in the second half.

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the chart here for Meta again, it's

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>up one hundred and some odd percent this year, but

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still down pretty big from it's late.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Twenty one high.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>So I mean it seems like the market is kind

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of in between on these names.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Oversold them, as you said, last year, and now trying

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to get some of that back. All right, I'll go

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>with that.

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, how can you not own big tech?

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just because we've been so influenced over the

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years really and even longer than that quite frankly,

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but the big tech is back.

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and I'm fall Sweeney.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the Pods cast.

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio