WEBVTT - Equity Relief Amid a Softening Tone on Powell and Tariffs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Everything we do, folks here is about a conversation with

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>people with breadth. There are few in the Western world

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 2>with a breadth of finance, like Cuba and Steinas. I'm

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>not going to bore you with a resume. He wandered

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>by a school named Oxford a few years ago, did

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 2>some serious work with Bank of England and added tour

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 2>duty at Morgan Stanley. He is definitive on our financial system.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams Scott Bessent ten am, what's a question you

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>would ask a secretary treasurer?

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow, thanks to having me on look.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 4>One conversation I'm hearing which doesn't come out in the

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 4>press much is about the strain on cash flow for

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 4>small business.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a huge topic for private equity and

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>for banks.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Right, Let's imagine you put in a ten million order

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 4>in for toys. You now have to pay twenty four

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 4>million dollars if they come from China, you simply don't

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 4>have that cash flow. So my question would be, how

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 4>worried are you about small business not being able to

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>stock their shelves?

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay, folks, you flunk this in a CFA exam. I've

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>done and I've enjoyed it. Working capital, and this is

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to go into the way a business runs. There's a

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>thing called the cash conversion cycle. Part. Did you memorize

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that that was with the three ratio and the five ratio?

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Do plat formula que Vestin is your expert at this?

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 2>When you see terror of adjustments, I don't understand how

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you go from three percent to ten percent or one

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent and your world blows up. I mean that's

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>where we are right.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, I don't think any of us have seen

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 4>anything like this before. I mean I think I wrote

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>a bit about the Nixon shock where obviously Nixon did

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>impose a ten percent tariff for four months, for four months,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 4>but I guess the markets can't stand that, you know,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't tolerate four months here and that did is you

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>know that did lead to product shortages and to price

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 4>bikes because people couldn't forget cash conversion cycle?

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Do at Walmart. That's the heart of the matter.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>That probably Walmart's not my expertise, But if I think

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 4>about the conversations we're having, the focus is predictlarly around

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 4>retailers small businesses who just don't have the cash buffer.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 4>If your Walmart, clearly you're really large, you're very sophisticated,

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 4>you do have big cash buffers. But if you're a

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 4>small business running from quarter to quarter to month to month,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 4>how are you going to be able to pay two

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>point four times what you expected when you may be

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>worried about not a pubby able to pass it on.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 4>So what we're picking up is people trying to wriggle

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 4>out of their orders if they can, and at least

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 4>not renew those orders. That's the conversation the Finance is having,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>which I don't see enough in the main impress yet.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 5>To the extent that the President in this team are

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 5>walking back some of this tariff rhetoric. Has some of

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the damage already been done? Do you think are we

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 5>seeing in the system already just because of the rhetoric?

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 4>So this is so I think this is what we

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 4>distinguished between like sort of the growth shock and then

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 4>kind of let's call it the more institutional shock, what

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 4>all the taboo questions which we wouldn't have asked in

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the past, which now opened. I think in terms of growth,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 4>it clearly has been a bit of a punch in

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the gut for small business, which is the heartlands of America.

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Larger business are clearly ducking and diving through this. If

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>I think about my area, thinking about the finance, finance, Look,

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the volatility has actually been quite good for the investment

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 4>banks because I've been trading, yep. But the business confidence

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 4>that one section. But the lack of conder corporate confidence

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>is pushing deals to the right and certainly our conversations

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>as some firms think, actually the deal pick up now

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 4>is not till twenty twenty seven, not till twenty twenty seven.

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>First, wow.

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Interesting. So I mean, I guess if nothing else, you know,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 5>we've this a million times before. The markets don't like uncertainty.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 5>But we're starting to see it in the survey data,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 5>whether it's the University of Michigan data or that you know,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 5>the pmis it's out there, right, I mean, it's not

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 5>in the hard data. Maybe the FED looks like but

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 5>we certainly see it in some of the other software data.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, look you I'm sure you know my

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 4>good friend Torston's looks great. On's trying to slice andize this.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at you know ships coming into

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>La or elsewhere about the stocking that they're down by

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 4>a third to a half, that's clearly a sign of

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 4>stress coming into the system. No, look, I mean at

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the data will come through, but the FED will need

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 4>to be very data to well. Could always be data dependent,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 4>but it will be the historic data. Markets are clearly

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 4>going to move way faster to.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Von steinas with US folks, Oliver Wyman can't see the

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>importance of this for Global Wall Street even more important

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in fifty minutes, Scott besn't with Tim Adams in Washington,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>hugely anticipated. Okay, you mentioned Torsten Slock, your Apollo management.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>You want to go out a choir, you get the

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Deutsche b brain power of doctor Slock. Wonderful. The bottom line,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and this is Paul's world, is I don't buy for

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>a minute. Everything's wonderful and private equity. What does an

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>adult like you do? What are the tea leaves, the

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>litmus paper, the measurements you're looking for for stresses in

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>private equity.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Look, these are unbelievably entrepreneurial folk, and so they're trying

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 4>to sort of weave their way through this. Look, I

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 4>think the first and second line is really about the

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 4>order books. Has the sales come down, whether I've got

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>highly leveraged companies trying to forensically work through that. So

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 4>I think it's about cash conservation and it's about getting

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 4>a cost down. So I'm already picking up people saying

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to all their management teams, have you thought about a

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 4>cost round? What are you doing about that? So that's one,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 4>But on the other side in credit land, they're actually

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 4>people trying to look this as an opportunity and actually

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>trying to buy in.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Some of the credits.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>A wider spreads than we'd see in eight weeks.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 2>There's somebody selling those spreads totally. Do they book a

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>loss now.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 4>To again, it depends depends we turn about the private

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 4>Let's be clear, about sixty percent of the new influs

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>for the private market firms for the last two years

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 4>has been credit and overwhelming. As we've discussed before, that's

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 4>coming from the insurers. These are steady hands they want

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.119
<v Speaker 4>to deploy in size, but obviously on the equity side

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>there more stress in the system. Bo was okay, g okay?

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 5>So you have has Wall Street kind of with the

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 5>earning sessments out there? Has was Street adjusted to this

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 5>no uncertainty or do you still see downside risk to

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 5>earning sessments out there?

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 3>God?

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think that Let's be clear. Everyone is struggling

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 4>to comprehend the range of scenarios. So to give you

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>a simple answer is just it's just inconceivable. I think

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 4>the like what are them the simpler moves, there's like

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>the overwhelming conclusion of this where we to to find

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 4>a better way to diversify your portfolio, and that at

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the moment than one way trade is look more towards

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Europe and Asia and look, European banks is stop twenty

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:08.679
<v Speaker 4>five percent year today.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you know, let's be clear, you.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Know, and I know that may not be the place

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>that's now that's a smaller market for you, but I've

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 4>clearly on this side of the pond there are Look,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 4>I think it comes back to how corporate confidence plays

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 4>out on the stress and the system and how quickly

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 4>the demonstration blinks. These are you know, complex questions which

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 4>you're dealing with every day.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, this is this wheelhouse. Hugh Einstein is folks. You

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>know you got to start somewhere, and he started by

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>being the required fourteen page read every four or five

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>days in the European banks. I mean, I'm don't you, folks,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>But Hugh doesn't understand. He's never used a Bloomberg. Here's

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>no clue. And the bottom line is I got JP

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Morgan hitting the ball out of the park with a

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 2>priced book of two times in trading at one third

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>even after the twenty five percent rally is BMP Perry

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Bar of Paris. I get the idea that the English,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the French, whatever, banks are off the mat, but do

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>they have the growthiness of America? I don't buy it.

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 4>I toltally by that. So that's a that's a value trade,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 4>not a growth trade. Look, I think the challenge here

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 4>is this is a growth shock and then somewhat of

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>an institutional shock. And I think all the financials I'm

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>talking to are working through reworking their plans, but they're

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 4>struggling to sort of be precise because they just don't

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>know how quickly the administration will blink on tariffs and

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>there for how how big a shock it is to

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the system. But you're right, Tom, we we're Europe's value trade,

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 4>not a growth trade.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 5>So but you we have seen I guess as recently

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 5>as kind of late last year, very early this year,

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 5>international money, none US money, was coming into the US

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>markets in waves. I was really noticeable people were seeing

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 5>in fund flows. Now that seems to have reversed a

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 5>little bit and we're now seeing funds go back into

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 5>your back into other parts of the world. Is that

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 5>a short term trade or is that something morris able?

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that those funds back out?

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 4>My sense from the international asset owners is that they

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>want to continue to repatriate, and I think that's partly

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>a concerned tactical concern about the market situation, but it's

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 4>also about weaker dollar. But also there's institutional pressure to

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 4>deploy at home. So if you're the Maple LX, sorry,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 4>the largest date Canadian funds, they're looking to try and

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>help the home by the home building spree that my

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 4>old boss, Prime Minster Karney is going to be doing,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 4>alongside many other interatives in Europe. Some of the big

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 4>pension funds are looking to help fund the defense spending

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 4>spree about to happen, So all of them are thinking

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 4>strategically they need to have more money back at home.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Now that's at the margin, but it's definitely more money

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 4>coming back.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's rip up the script and an extended conversation

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>with Hugh von Steins of Oliver Wine. You know Dan Tannemba,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm so brilliant and sanctions. They've really put together a

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 2>huge team at Oliver Wyman and we're thrilled he could

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>join us in our studios today in New York. So

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>then let's rip up the strip on this and go

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 2>sixty thousand feet Mark Kearney. Uh, you know there are

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>other worthies that are driving our mister Powell, the others

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that are driving our financial system. The heart of the

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>matter is the renominal GDP. Finally, back almost to Conrad

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>add in our and Viilli Brandt, we got to have

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>a Germany with pop Do you buy it?

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 4>I So I think this is the spending of probably

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 4>up to a trillion euros about rearmament, defense and just

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 4>quite frankly, resilience is a real game change.

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I think they're going to execute.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 4>But I think there will be slower to execute them.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 4>And the one era we've chattered back for is it's

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 4>not just about government spending. You need private sector spending.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 4>And the kind of breadth and depth of capital markets

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 4>in Europe are still not the deep depth you want.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 4>And we need the plumbers. We need the plumbers to

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 4>try and get the system to work much more effectively.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 4>The let's say, let's say, oh no, if you look

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 4>at the States, there is four trillion of US insurance

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>money is in the market to fund the system. European

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 4>insurers have got straight jacketed about how they can put

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 4>money into equities, into venture capital.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Private equity is the heart of the.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Matter, folks with he framed far smarter than me, or

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the absolute heart of the matter. Can Europe can the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>old world? Can Rubinian Taileeb's Old world equitize? That's the

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>heart of the matter.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's right.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's equitized and providing risk capital because it's really

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 4>about its venture capital.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>It's growing small businesses.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 4>It's how do you do all these you know, defense

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 4>tech startups. We need a range of risk capital, I mean,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>and the way we the markets it's improving, but we

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 4>need to turbo charge it from here.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I had a conversation with leguard Is, Trade Minister of

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>France ready twenty one years ago, and we were talking

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the same thing we're talking to human.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 6>Steve's exactly right now.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 5>So Hugh, in terms of Europe kind of reinvesting in

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 5>their infrastructure, maybe in their military, there's I guess what

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 5>I've heard is Okay, Germany can do it. Poland probably

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 5>could do it just because they had been doing it

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 5>for a while because given their geographic location relative the Russia.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 5>But can Spain do it? Can Italy do it? Can

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.359
<v Speaker 5>Portugal do it? I mean did they have the wherewithal

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 5>to do that?

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 4>So there's a fiscal question, and then it's kind of

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>like do they have the right ecosystem, the skills, the expertise.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>And you can see that actually, because Europe hasn't been

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>investing in defense, there's been a real aerospace is good

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 4>because there's a whole cluster around in the south of France.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Actually you should go and visit to what one time

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 4>around you know where you know the aerospace industry is

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>coming from. But elsewhere in terms of drones and some

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>of the other areas it's going to come. Look, the

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>fiscal challenges are huge, and that's the But in a way,

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen here is that the fiscal spending has

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 4>been part of the US exceptionalism. The real booster to

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 4>spending here has come also from the government perse right now, wrongly.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we're getting to get some of that in

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 4>cour Europe. Whether we're going to go enough to justify

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 4>the evaluations, it is a bit tougher question un seen us.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now the fun for lunch Bunch crew Lisa

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Matteo and Daniel Lives of of Red Bush. Here and

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>a bright pink for those of you on radio. You're

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>lucky wearing bright pink today? Comment down, Dan, is this

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>a corduroy? Look you're way it is?

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 6>It's it's corduroy. Will I mean a little? It could

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 6>be a little even Sweeney influenced. It's it's Lisa.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 5>You can't see me wearing that, can you?

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>I could see him walking into a showroom at Tesla's showroom. Yes,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and I'll take one of those.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 6>I'll take Paul.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you leave it up with his worship Dan.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 5>We had Tesla report earnings last night. We had mister

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk on the earnings call. The earnings were very disappointing.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>You have to stock is trading hired? Why is the

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 3>stock trading hired?

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean numbers were basically took a back seat. We

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 7>already knew was a disaster recorder the reality. This was

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 7>the moment of truth from Musk.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 6>To basically what I've used.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 7>It's an off ram to Trump Whitehouse and doage, and

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 7>that's essentially what he did. And he took a major

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 7>step back on doage, says one two days a week.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 7>I think there's the beginning of the end there and

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 7>going to recommit.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 6>His CEO of Tessa.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 7>Look, the reality is, and we've talked about on the show,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 7>brand damage was at a point he had to read

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 7>the room and if he didn't make this decision now,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 7>it would have been dark days ahead. And that's why

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>the stock's going to be up because now Tessa got

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 7>back at CEO.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Now Tesla's in a new world of competition. It just

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 5>looks to me as a you know, a lay person.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Here China is taking over the evy market globally with

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 5>the exception of the United States.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>How does Tessa.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Deal with by D and others?

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Look, I don't at first, I don't view as you

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 7>know that it's you know, you can't have success from

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 7>Tesla as well as Boyd. I don't have view as

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 7>zero some gunn. But look, Tessa has work cut out

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 7>for them. I mean they they have to have a

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 7>new vehicle that comes out. You have to have the

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 7>refresh in terms of model why and the reality is

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 7>China's forty five percent of out So that is the

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 7>hearts and lungs of Tesla.

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 6>But that's also why it's so important.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 7>There's only one person that could engineer this turnaround in China.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 5>It's Musk and I think Elon is probably the best

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 5>I've ever seen of kind of maybe Jeff Bezos as well,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of redirecting investor sentiment where he wants it to go.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 5>And I think he's saying, don't look at me as

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 5>a metal bender car company, look at me as an

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 5>AI company, robotics company.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 6>Is that valid?

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we believe the core value of the future

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 7>of Tesla is autonomous and robotics. And obviously Keen will

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 7>being there on supervised fist in Austin in June. I

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 7>know he's getting ready. And look, I think this is

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 7>just the beginning of what we're going to see in

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 7>terms of autonomous. That to me is a core value.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna do autonomous on fifty eighth Street in

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>New York City. I mean, it's just not gonna happen.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Look, I truly believe over the next three, four or

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 7>five years that autonomous is going to start to represent five, ten,

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 7>fifteen percent on Really.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Do I say, I don't agree, but he's wearing pink

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree. Okay, let's go to Intel. We got

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>a major story out this morning. This has gone worldwide

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>instantly on Bloomberg. This is Intel down sixty six percent

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>from the peak, and it's just simple, brilliant reporting by

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Jane Lenny Lee and Ian King. They're Gonnaly have twenty

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>percent of their staff the annual report of twenty nineteen.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 2>We are a world leader, our vision, our commitment to

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>corporate responsibility and sustainability. What happened this thing was iconic

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Dunda da du.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 7>I mean, just think about it. Go back to where

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 7>Nvidio was twenty nineteen, twenty twenty May. If you look

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 7>from gals Singer, it's just the whole corporate structure there,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 7>the red tape. I mean Intel, it's really a business

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 7>case study for what happens when you go as.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 2>A CFA business case study it is.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 7>It's what happened when you're on the treadmill.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 6>You think no one's going.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 7>To catch you, Okay, Apple, Apple makes their own chips

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 7>because ultimately that they box out Intel.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I am a Codec brattfo from Rochester. I lived this

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 2>with Codec. The marketing guys take over, the slick guys

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 2>take over, and the company goes down the tank until

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you're bringing culp from ge or Danaher to ballot out

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>their gross strategy. Is they got to get back to

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>basics in an engineer driven company. Is that a legitimate

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>model or is that just blah blah blah.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a model. But I think those days

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 7>have past. I think, I mean, I know that they're

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 7>doing this huge cut that was reported you know Bloomberg,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 7>but I think the reality is that this is going

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 7>to have to be a breakup. They're going to have

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 7>to restructure the company. You're gonna have to ultimately sunset

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 7>different products, focus on some of the growth areas because

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 7>the reality is for Intel it look, you know about

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 7>dark days. I mean, if you look up disaster in

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 7>the dictionary, you'd see Intel's.

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, my book of the Summer. I think maybe it's

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>book of the Year. I can't remember. It was chip war.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Is Intel competing against Taiwan's cell conductor? Are they competing

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>against some amorphous Chinese blob? We don't know who beat them?

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Who defeated Intel?

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 7>I mean AMD in video in video TSMC. I mean

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 7>when you think about Intel had the opportunity and just

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 7>go back to AI, the opportunity to go after AI,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 7>go back to next generationships. And what they essentially did

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 7>was look, it's in different like they're like a typewriter

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 7>company mid nineties being like this internet window. This is

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 7>ridiculous that people and what happens to years later that

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 7>comings bankrupt.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So I got yelled at it for that, look and

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>dog piles for real.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 7>But but that but that's really that's the sad thing

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 7>that's happened Intel. And look, yeah, obviously have a new CEO.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 7>But this is a very you know, it's really the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 7>collapse of a of a U S iicon.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Ask a question, Mike Robinson. Cones are hurting, My eyes

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>are hurting folks.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Hey, just a red headline crossing the tape there, Tom,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 5>I want to get that out. Boeing first quarter negative

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 5>just a free cash flow two point two nine billion

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 5>and the estimate was three point four billion. So better

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 5>on the free cash lit story for our friends at

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Boweing and stock us up about five percent here free

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 5>market to.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 7>Iron and talking Boeing and I and but Boeing and

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 7>Intel in the same.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Sense exactly exactly.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 5>We got Apple, We've got Amazon, we got Microsoft out

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 5>with erning nels a week.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>What are you looking for? Is it driven by tariffs?

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 6>Is an AI?

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 5>What's the the what's driving tech these days?

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 7>Look, the reality is that I expect basically new guide

0:19:58.160 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 7>into some crazy.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 6>Cowy odd guy.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 7>But when you look at a Apple, it comes down

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 7>like if these tariffs get them de escalation, the story

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 7>massively changes, as we've talked about, because then iPhone seventeen

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 7>comes out the AI store. You think about from a

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 7>hyperscale perspective in terms of capacs. Everyone's waiting, but this

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 7>book today, it's a pivotal moment, whether the walls are

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 7>caving in or whatever. And for attack a huge bullshit.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I got forty two seconds. You've been on the floor

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in China where they make apple stuff. Can Americans do that?

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 2>We got funny videos, snarky videos out on Twitter of

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 2>people Americans sitting there making iPhones and people are laughing.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 2>This is not funny. You're an expert at this. Can

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you transfer that manufacturing discipline to Illinois?

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 7>I've said from the beginning it's impossible, because of the

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 7>nature of the IP in the supply chain, the nature

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 7>of the web force there when you're in Taiwan, when

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 7>you're China. And that's why I've said from the beginning.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 7>We've told me on the show last three weeks, fairy

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 7>tale that that's going to happen again.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 6>If you want a.

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 7>Thirty five hundred dollar iPhone, let's build them in the

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 7>Jersey of Manhattan. But the reality is, we see no

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 7>way that that happens. I'm not saying onshoin King happen,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 7>but that is a fairy tale. And that's why the

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 7>market has just reacted.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 6>The way it has.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, after thought, just woke up and she emailed and

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>she said, can you ask mister Ives if you can

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 2>get us Taylor. She thinks I'd look good.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 7>In a I've told you pinks your color. But and

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 7>I'm glad there.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Is a New York Taylor.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 7>This is actually Taiwan. But the point is like what,

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 7>but I'm glad. Keenes finally on the train did a

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 7>clear customs.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, particularly the comments there on Intel.

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Just Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>We're pointing direct now with one of our favorite people,

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Christopher Criscenti is with the MAI Capital Management. Someone that's

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 2>looking I would say, all in all for the growthiness

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>in value and his world has turned upside down. What's

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the value of cash now? You say in your research

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>note you were trained on this to go from equities. Oh,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I'll buy bonds, but it's priced down, yield up,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>so where do you.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 8>Hide, tom That's a great question for this particular market,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 8>that there really has been no place to hide. We

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 8>were glad to have the cash that we had. The

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 8>interesting thing about that this, though, is with the market

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 8>down fifteen percent, we're actually not buying the dips. You know,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 8>we love value opportunities, and typically this would be one.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 8>We just can't do the math because we just can't

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 8>build models because the future is so uncertain. If you're

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 8>Mary Bara, are you going to build a fact, You're

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 8>gonna wait. Are're gonna hire people?

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 7>You're gonna wait.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 8>And so even if the tariffs went away tomorrow, I

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 8>think there's been enough of this paralysis in the system

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 8>that I'm relatively confident will be in a recession by

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 8>the end of the year.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean a lot of folks are suggesting kind

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 5>of where you are that even if they pull back

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 5>tariffs to some degree, which it appears to the rhetoric

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 5>is moving that way at least today. I guess so

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 5>at this hour that some fundamental damage has been done,

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 5>whether it's supply chains, confidence in US economy, confidence on

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 5>a part of the consumer executives.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, we've taken eighty years to build a

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 8>system which were we screwed a little bit? Yeah, we were,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 8>but did we benefit from it? Look Paul, thirty five

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 8>years ago, twelve of the top twenty five companies in

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 8>the world were American. Now twenty two of them are.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 8>It's hard to argue that this terribly skewed against us.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 8>So when you monkey with that, it causes uncertainty. But

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 8>uncertainty is a nice vague war. What you're gonna see

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 8>you within the next two months is a pause in

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 8>corporate earnings growth. And that's what's really going to hurt

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 8>the market because it's time is you know, Ben Graham said,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 8>like in the short term, it's a voting booth, but

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 8>in a long term, the market is a weighing machine,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 8>and what it weighs is corporate earnings, and corporate earnings

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 8>are going to start to face that the estimates have

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 8>already come down a bunch.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's just the beginning.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>You come into this with a whole twisted resume of

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 2>an actual legit, massive corporate law career, and one day

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 2>you decided that you like the four accounting statements better

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 2>and you need to see it and all that, But

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 2>the heart of the matter is Cris CASANTI, should we

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 2>change our retirement plans, our allocation, or even our hopes

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of a time worn.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Not not at all time.

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 6>Not at all times.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 8>And as any good financial advisor will tell you, you prepare

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 8>for this moment years before. You have a diversified portfolio.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 8>And by the way, if I'm right and there is

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 8>a recession, generally the market falls twenty five to thirty

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 8>five percent in those case. It's very broad range, but

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 8>just generally. And we're more than halfway there already. So now,

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 8>pretty soon, if this gets worse, as I suspect it will,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 8>we'll start looking for the opportunities and then as things

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 8>get more certain, we'll be able to do the math.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 8>I think the math will be worse than we thought

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 8>it was going to be, but then we'll be able

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 8>to step in. So you know, the cycle completes itself again.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, Chris, I look at this in value in growthiness?

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Is the mag seven growthness broken?

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't think so, Tom, I mean, the mag seven

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 8>isn't monolithic. I would I thought the Tesla numbers were

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 8>terrible yesterday, so that may be broken. We'll see.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 6>They need to do some new models.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 8>But the Amazon model's not broken, the Apple models not broken.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 8>They clearly have head winds, but the storm will pass

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 8>one way or another. These are very dynamic companies that

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 8>can adapt to this stuff. It's just you know, we

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 8>got to redo the math, and the math isn't going

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 8>to look as good as we thought it would two

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 8>months ago.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean, it's it seems like this market wants

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 5>to move higher. I mean, lack of tweets or anything

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 5>positive on the Twitter verse seems to move this market

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 5>materially higher.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 8>And Paul, that's not a surprise. I mean, it was

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 8>so over sold, and I would expect over the next

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 8>couple of weeks we may get a trade dealer two

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 8>and then that will be a catalyst for movement higher.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 8>But I again, in the long term, it's a weighing machine.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 8>What's going to happen to earning That's what we can't

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 8>take our eye off the ball.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we still have eight or nine percent earnings growth

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 5>this year, maybe eleven or twelve percent earnings growth next year.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 5>You think there's downside to those numbers?

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, because a month ago you would have said

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 8>we've got thirteen percent earnings growth. Because you're now it's

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 8>down to eight, and I will just about guarantee you

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 8>if we have this conversation in June, it'll be considerably

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 8>lower than that.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll see. How will corporations a depth you.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Know, Tom the way they usually do.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 8>They'll lay people off, they'll postpone capital expenditures.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 6>Bring good forward.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 2>An along's got us with a five percent unemployment rate

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 2>out there somewhere. I haven't hit anybody model six percent yet,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 2>but you get claims what Paul three hundred thousand, Yeah,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>to eighty thousand whatever. You get the unemployment rate to go,

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 2>the Fed does what the what mister Trump wants them

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 2>to do. They begin a rate cutting cycle. The system

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>heals or is it just broken?

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 8>Well's how the problem is that tariff news has kind

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 8>of pulled forward. Well, first we have some strong sales

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 8>up front, but we haven't gotten to the earnings downturn yet,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 8>so we can't fast forward this recession. It's going to happen.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 8>The market will drop what it's going to drop. I mean,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 8>it's going to happen more probably than not. So yeah,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 8>there's ways to come out of it. But I suspect

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 8>equity prices will be lower, when when those ways you

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 8>have to be employed.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Chris CONSENTI thank you for them, coup.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>NCK morroy Is is truly we got a huge response

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 2>when he's on. He's with a Lobo Institute.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 6>He has public.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Service to the nation, an extended career with the United

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 2>States Marines. You know, he's a former coach at USA Boxing.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 6>Really he does it all.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now from Montana. Mcnallwy mcka. I want to

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>pause for a moment here. You're in Montana, and you know,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the East Coast view of the military maybe goes distant

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>to Virginia Beach to talk about the Navy. Maybe they

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>get up to Army Navy at Philadelphia. The hallmark of

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>my ute was a Strategic Air Command at the three

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred thirty Forest Wing in the middle of nowhere in Montana.

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the backbone, not a bunch of offices at the

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon and your Defense department now is under not complete collapse,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>but huge controversy with the Secretary of Defense.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 6>How does that affect the Air.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Force in Montana or the Navy in San Diego with.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 9>You guys, I mean, ultimately, the military is going to

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 9>carry on regardless of the issues with this civilian leadership

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 9>and the Pentagon. That said, it really does reflect on

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 9>who is in charge when you have this level of

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 9>resignations and terminations. I haven't seen it. I don't think

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 9>anybody has seen it in this state, and that does

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 9>I think have when it comes to the line, you know, soldier,

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 9>sail or airman, marine, confidence in the leadership to see

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 9>that is not a good thing. But I do think

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 9>we are still in good hands. The chain of command

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 9>is strong, That's why they have it that way in

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 9>the military, and we can certainly amend all the important

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 9>positions that.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>We have mcmulroy. Then if it hasn't filtered down to

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the troops, are we ready to defend the nation? Now?

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is this a properly budgeted defense department, a

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 2>budgeted Pentagon?

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 9>So I do think it is. There us talk about

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 9>increasing the actual overall expense of the Defense Department, probably

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 9>to try to make these giant leaps and technology that

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 9>we really need to to stay far above what we

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 9>call it the offset of our adversaries, and I think

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 9>the military is adjusting to that. So I don't want

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 9>to give people the false, in my opinion, the false

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 9>impression that somehow the military itself is in disarray. I

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 9>do think it's important to have a solid chain of

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 9>command it and the Secretary of Defense, of course, is

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 9>in that chain of command. So there needs to be

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 9>a lot of changes at the top, certainly the way

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 9>we handle classified information. But I think it's important for

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 9>Americans to understand that the military is fully capable of

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 9>defending the United States here and abroad, even with this

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 9>level of what's being described as chaos.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 5>So Mick, I mean, I guess the latest news for

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Defense Secretary of Pete Hegseth has been the disclosure that

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 5>he has I guess, shared sensitive details about impending US

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 5>attacks on houthy militants on an unsecured commercial chat platform.

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 7>Is that a big deal?

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Is this warranted this concern?

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 9>It is a big deal. The reason why it's called

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 9>unauthorized is because you're not allowed legally to share classified information,

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 9>and if the reports are correct, these are specific attack plans, time, place,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 9>and manner of how. In this case, the US Navy

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 9>was going to carry out aerial strikes against the Houthies.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 9>So this is very sensitive information. I think anybody can

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 9>understand that if this were somehow to get to our

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 9>adversaries like Russia, they could give it to Iran, they

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 9>could give it to the Houthis, and then they would

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 9>know essentially how to defend themselves against incoming attacks. So

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 9>it's super sensitive. In addition to that, using the wrong platform,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 9>at least reportedly, people that were in this dat did

0:31:54.760 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 9>not have all of the necessary security requirements and a

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 9>need to know. Essentially that you could just look at

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 9>who's listed. They had no reason to know this, So

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 9>this would be something that if you were a private,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 9>seaman and airman, you would likely be removed immediately, an

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 9>investigation investigated under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Mister mulroy's with a Lobo Institute and we thank him

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>for being with us.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to walk forward, stagger forward to the newspapers

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>would do this with Lisa, Alisa, what do you have?

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so we all know professional baseball players, right, it's

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 10>all about the swagger, the style. But the Wall Street

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 10>Journal says it's actually trickling down to Little league. So parents,

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 10>moms and dads are spending bidden bucks talking about sliding mits.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 10>You know the professional pros wear. Yeah, I don't know

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 10>about the sliding mets, but they start around fifty bucks.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 10>But now parents are buying them for the cake.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Mom.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you know this stuff.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 10>We don't do the sliding mits. We do like the

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 10>elbow guards. We'll do those like that kind of thing.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 10>But what they're also doing is these crazy colored batting

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 10>gloves hello Bruce Bolt, arm sleeves that we do, the

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 10>crazy colors, expensive sunglasses, hello Oakley. Yes, fancy helmets too,

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 10>on showers.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>We come like ice hockey where you have to sell

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the third child, Dude, you do, and.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 10>It's it's all for these fancy things.

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 5>You can go with regular Well, well they have to

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 5>upset watch SEC softball sometimes because I love the pictures.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe how Yes, but they all were.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Amazing makeup and the hair, and it's about the hair,

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 5>the hair, and it's unbelievable.

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, but that's what it's about.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 2>The look.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, okay, two, So that's what it is.

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.719
<v Speaker 10>Custom fielding gloves. I mean, I know my daughter has

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 10>a pink and white one with the putter. You can

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 10>flag on it like it's itit's crazy, but you do.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I think she's taken over the Is there something else

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to mention about the third summer camp you're

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>going to?

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 10>You can't flight plates and.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 6>Thank you?

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 7>Okay, but that's what it is.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 10>They're actually they're blaming the pros because they're saying the

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 10>MLB switch their will so now they're allowed to wear

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 10>the colorful things.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a jackocracy. It's the mother's fault.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 7>It's the mom's fault.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the mom's fault. Next.

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 10>Okay, Oh, here you go, Tom, this one's for you.

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 10>Some Gen z ers and millennials are still opting to

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 10>live with mom and dad, so a lot of more

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 10>the kids are are living with the parents for longer,

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 10>so gen Z, you know, thirteen to twenty eight, so

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 10>twenty eight, and then you have millennials twenty eight to

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 10>forty three. So just to give you an idea of

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 10>who we're talking about, they're starting to live with mom

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 10>and dad longer. It's a Pew research, you know, center analysis,

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 10>and they say the biggest place places where this is

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 10>happening Texas, Florida, California, where jobs are kind of hard

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 10>wages or maybe not enough in some areas, and there's

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 10>a gender gap too. So it turns out that the

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 10>boat well men are living with mom and dad longer

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 10>twenty percent a paired to compare with fifteen percent for

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 10>the females who go off on their own.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Epidemic in Europe, it's completely preponderant in Europe. Yeah, like

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's a majority. I don't get it.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 2>I have varies. I got to be careful what they

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 2>say here on radio.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 10>But you know, I just it's there, right, it is

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 10>it is, And they say it is getting better, like

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 10>it's dropped in recent years, but it's still above like

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 10>the historic clothes.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>That way, we go to Paul Sweeney, who is the

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>only person I know in the surveillance universe whose children

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>are all employed.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, what's the bixis want? I went from six bedrooms

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 6>to two.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 10>Making sure they're not coming exactly right.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 6>The governor of New Jersey, you know, so you can

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 6>exactly right.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 10>So one more quickly quickly, Yes, if you've been to

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 10>the airport lately, the latest thing now are rooftop decks.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 10>This is happening at a lot. Yeah, they're doing these

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 10>outdoor spaces. So a lot of airports are stepping up

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 10>their game.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 6>Loa Guardia's Terminal B.

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 10>They're gonna have that new Capital one landing lounge is

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 10>gonna have the outdoor terrace. But we're talking about not

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 10>even the lounges, but regular airport like four green terraces

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 10>at Pittsburgh International Airport are coming.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 5>Well to get one at the outdoors California and my

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 5>kids when they're little, we can get like lunch and

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 5>watch the planes. But that's Parmeult, California.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not LaGuardia.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 10>They do have the heaters and everything kind of set

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 10>up for that, but it's just like the new thing,

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 10>like they're upping their game.

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Lisa, thank you so much, Lisa Matteo. There are the newspapers.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on bloomberg dot com,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio tune in, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg Terminal