WEBVTT - Max Grounding Will Cost Boeing $100 Million Per Month (Podcast)

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Bowing back on the hot seat

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they cannot catch a break. The latest is at Seattle

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Times is reporting that the f a A was alerted

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to issues at Boeing and Bowing should have been aware

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of some of the regulatory problems here seven years ago.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now to talk about it is Peter Robinson,

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>projects an investigations reporter, as well as George Ferguson of

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh, Peter, let's start with you. What do

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>we know here? What should Boeing have been aware of

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that led to the two fatal crashes that have left

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so many people wondering whether their new jet is fit

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to fly well? The the issue for Boeing and that

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason the shares are down almost three percent today

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>is that the the process by which the seven thirty

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>seven plane and involved in the crashes was certified as

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by the f a A is is coming under really

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>unusual scrutiny by both the Department of Transportations Inspector General and,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>according to the Wall Street Journal, federal prosecutors. A grand

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>jury in Washington, d C. That the journal is reporting

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>issued a subpoena to at least one person involved in

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the planes development, which is not something that in recent

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>memory has happened within a new aircraft program. Yeah, George,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a question for you, if I mean, the thing that

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>strikes me about Peter story what was unnamed sources in

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Times that they underestimated the power of the

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>flight control software that they reported to the f a A.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And the newspaper also cited and said that the system

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>could not reset itself each time a pilot or or

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>each time a pilot responds. In essence, it ratcheted the

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>horizontal stabilizer into a dive position. How does something like

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that just go by the boards? Yeah, I mean, I

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>think that's uh, that's going to be the big question here.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like the first time they showed the f

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a A some of that data, that's the deflection they

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>had on that on the elevator, that trim piece was

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>much less than it ultimately was at at the final

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>approval or what have you gonna call it? For the airplane,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so um, it shouldn't go by the boards the f

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>A ship been looking at that closer. I think that

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there's always a challenge when you're when you're the big

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>behemoth in the in the industry. Right. We've seen it

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in finance, where the regulators try to regulate an industry

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a heck of a lot more conversant and

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on inside the you know, in the cutting

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>edge of the space. And I think that's you have

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>a bit of maybe the FA differring too much to

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Boeing here and thinking they're were in the cutting edge

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and not focusing on details like that, details details that

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>led to the death of hundreds of people. Uh. But

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Peter to that point to exactly what George Ferguson was

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just saying, how much is this a problem with the

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>f a A And how much is this a problem

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with Bowen? I mean, who looks worse here? They both

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are on the hot seats. As you were saying that

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the the issue we we we reported on UM concerns

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that people within the f A had as as long

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 1>as seven years ago, that people, UH, we were set

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>enough about this way that Boeing had over the approval

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>process that they went to the Department of Transportations Inspector

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>General and said that there needed to be changes in

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the process. Who are those people? Can you just give us?

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So the the in its report, which was only released

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>UM in a public records request, which didn't get any

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>attention at the time, some of these allegations weren't anonymous

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>facts is which were sent from f A managers UM

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to the O I G and and these UH employees

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that the FAA felt that they weren't being heard and

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that they were trying to hold Bowing accountable but their

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>managers were not letting them. So. Again but back to

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the the you know, as you say, who's more culpable,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>the f A or or Boeing. SKay, we're trying to

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>um Peter. They were trying to speed up the certification

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>process because they were behind. You know, you talk about

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>bank regulation being one thing. You know, somebody embezzles money,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a plane doesn't fall out of the sky. To to

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>try to rush a brand new design of an airplane

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>seems perilous and irresponsible. I'm sorry, I understand, but you know, yes,

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a question, and I guess that George to you,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, do you have a sense of what the

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>bigger liability is to Bowing at this point from a

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from a financial standpoint? Is it the potential for lawsuits

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>or is this a potential for are for airlines not

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ordering from them because of concerns about safety? Yes, so,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think you know the numbers that we're

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to run, is that the cost of the airplane

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>being out of service and getting it back in service

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will be a lot more. I mean, notwithstanding our sensitivity

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that people died on this crash, these

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>two crashes, you know, we kind of see Bowings liability

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>being about a hundred million dollars a month um to

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>buy to support airlines that have airplanes grounded in maintaining

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>their um the route networks. We don't think there's enough

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>airplanes actually parked to get that done as we go

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>through the year, because there's the majority of the deliveries

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 1>for Boeing seven seven throughout this year would be would

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have been max is like I still think they'll get

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this airplane in service UM in a bunch of months.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the the the burden will be hired to

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>get into service, given the issues at the f A

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>A and and Boeing. But we see again a hundred

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>million of month. We think every month as another twelve

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or months, two hundred and twelve months, three four million UM,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't even started to We can't really give

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a good estimate on what it's going to take to

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fix the airplane. We think if it takes work to

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the structure, that will be a lot more money than

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just a software fix. And I tend to think there'll

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>be at least some work under the structure UM to

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>make it easier to shut off the autopilot and maybe

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to manage some of the center gravity issues. So Peter

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>um back to the public if you will, UM. Even

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>solving all these problems, UM, it doesn't strike me that

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is going to feel terribly confident flying in

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>this airplane immediately after the fix. How does that impact bowing,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how does that impact the air traffic system, etcetera. Well,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>there there's a lot of conversation that that this is

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going to impact bowing future sales of this plane. And

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>already you see commentary on social media. You see that

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Line Air which I had the first seven thirty seven

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Mac they crashes, has has pulled a twenty two billion

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar order for Boeing planes. Uh so, over time it

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>could create pressure for Boeing to to move on to

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of airplanes, which is going to be

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely expensive, and just to sort of finish up here. George,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious from your perspective going forward, what does Boeing

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>need to do to give people confidence that it has

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>reached a bottom in this whole issue. Yeah, I think.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that any fix that comes out can't be

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a partial fix. It has to be clear that it

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is um the right fix, maximize his safety, I think,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to restore faith in Boeing, I think that's gonna that's

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be huge. Thank you so much to both

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of you. Peter Robinson, Projects an investigations reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Seattle. George Ferguson, Senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:07:54.840 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Right now it is that

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>time to take a look at small and mid cap shares.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson has not blasted off into space. Just yet,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he is joining us here in her believe we're getta active.

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Broger Studios. Small caps and mid caps doing pretty well.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I am firmly on the ground. Cap stocks are firmly higher.

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The Wrestle two thousand index up one percent, while the

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred is only up four tenths

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of a percent. So smaller companies leading the way here

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Russell's biggest game belongs to Dermira, whose ticker

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is d e r M. The drug developer has soared

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties seven per cent. Second stage study data showed the

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>company's proposed treatment for a skin condition was safe and effective.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Dermira's results also lifted shares of a Claris Therapeutics ticker

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a c r S. They're up twenty two and a

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>half percent. The company is developing a rival medicine for

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the condition known as a topic dermatitis. Now. The Sans

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Joanes Solutions ticker dz s I has risen ten and

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.599
<v Speaker 1>a half percent. To communications equipment maker narrow It is

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>projected first quarter loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The russell steepest drop belongs to n II Holdings ticker

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>n i h D, the owner of a seventy percent

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>stake in the wireless company next to Help Brazil is

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>down twenty six percent, and II is Selliens holding to

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Mexico's American Mobile as part of a nine five million

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar takeover and will dissolve once the deal is final.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And Synaptics ticker s y n A as well in

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent. The maker of touch sensitive paths from mobile

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>phones and computers, was cut to neutral from by Mitzuho Financial,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>which cited market share losses. DA Wilson firmly on earth.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for that, Davilis some lyrics sucks. Editor.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Right now, let us turn our focus to Lift, seeking

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to raise almost two point one billion dollars in its

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>initial public offering, which will be the largest startup listing

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>since Snaps twenty seventeen. I p O joining us now

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to discuss a Tish Davda, chief executive officer of Equiti

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Zen based in New York, A tich, what do you

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think of this valuation, which would give the firm a

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>value of about twenty billion dollars. Well, I'll tell you this.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Lift wants to be compared to

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Snap too many times ahead of this public list they're

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>working on. Uh lifts last valuation was at fifteen billion dollars.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>UH and Equities and is a firm that allows buying

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and selling of private companies with issuer approval for many

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>years ahead of the I p O. With that said,

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at our data and not talking about

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>anyone company in particular, I think it's uh, you know,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty promising for a company to come

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>out there and put evaluation target meaningfully higher, it's above

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>round um because you know, we've definitely seen some some

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>unicorns go out to the public market with with the

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>value at or even sometimes below their last private valuation.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>So this definitely seems promising. A question for you is

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we we had a Bloomberg story that said in its filing,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Lifts said that expenses are likely to increase and that

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the future. How does that speak to attended to

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>hold multiple Basically, you know, that's UH that's actually becoming

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>more and more common in a lot of companies going public,

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unicorns going public. Look if you take

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at what wall streets looking for Uh. Wall

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Street seeing a record low number of publicly listed companies

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>into which it can and it can invest. Uh. You know,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>growth has been continuously rewarded over the last several years.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think what LIFT is trying to say publicly, um,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the same way that you know, Uber apparently next month

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to go out with its own roads show

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and is gonna likely say the exact same thing, same

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thing We've seen many other companies out there that are

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>public now say, is we are focused on growth. We

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>believe we have that of the interneconomics. Uh so if

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we ever turn off the marketings pigot, we automatically turn

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>positive in terms of our net income. But one of

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the best things we see about LIFT, and it is promising,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is that in addition to a growth, you know, they

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>went from about a billion in revenue to over two

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>point one in revenue last year, we see shrinking net income,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>lost margins. UM. That's not something you see in every company.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously very important to show that there's a line

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of sight to profitability. UH. And I think the LIFT

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>is trying to make sure that that is seen by

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>its you know, by the investors. It's road showing too today.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So one thing a teach that you said was that

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>probably Lift doesn't want to be associated with the Snap

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>i p O too much, given the disastrous performance of

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that IPO in subsequent trading months. But I do have

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to wonder if there is a similarity here, because these

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>are both startups that waited quite a long time before

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the i p oed being able to get financing through

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>private markets and through public debt markets. I'm just wondering,

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>does that set these company needs up to have less upside.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they've already become mature enough that the

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>growth perspective just isn't there. I think that's true for

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the typical public market only investor. I mean, one of

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the reasons our business exists is that, you know, equities

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't allow is qualified, accredited investors that want to invest

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the I p O to actually gain that access.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, whether or not you know it's it's Lift

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>or Uber or the you know twenty other companies that

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we believe are going to go public later this year,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing is absolutely true is that you know,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you hit the nail on the head more and more value,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>more and more value creation is happening in the private

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>markets now. The story Lift and Uber and many of

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>these other firms are trying to say is that we're

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>still in the kind of early stages of transportation as

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>a service as a sector um and so you know

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see Lift come out and say, you know,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>here's why we see U. You know, we only operate

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in North America at the moment. There's the rest of

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the world to conquer. Uber is going to come out

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefull a month from now and come out and say, look,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we already have bits and pieces of the world now.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>In addition to ride sharing, we're offering Uber eats and

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles and you know the four or five other

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>ways in which they can see, um, you know, a

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>way to capture market. I think one comparison though, that

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Lift wants to avoid but can't get around, is that

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of corporate governance. You see. You know, the same thing

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that Google and Facebook did, that Snapped tried to do,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it did successfully, really didn't work out well for them,

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is the dual class listing of shares and listed Lift

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, it's no different in that matter.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>A TI Data, Thank you so much for being with

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>us a Ti Dafta, chief executive of Equity Zen talking

0:14:39.080 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about that lift I p O. Over the weekend, President

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump tweeting about General Motors plan to close an Ohio

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>factor their closure of an Ohio factory, demanding that the

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>carmaker reopen UH the facility, also saying that the United

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto Workers, run by Democrats, are to blame for this closure.

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now, Alan Baum principle of Baum and Associates,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which is in a Michigan based research firm focused on

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>automotive UH for analysis of auto sales. Allan, thank you

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Let's start with what

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this closure actually came as a result of How long

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was it in the works. Can you give us some background? Well,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the the obvious problem is that GM has far more

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>assembly plants than it has sales that that justified those plants.

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that's particularly true on the car side. UM

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and so you saw closures uh in Oshua, uh In,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in Lordstown, uh and in Detroit ham Trammic the unforced.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The thing is GMS cars are a lot better than

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>their sales. UM. Now, of course GM some responsibility for that.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They've had some marketing issues on those cars. UM. But

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is that cars and crossovers are in

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>fact built on the same platform, and they're they're made

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to be built together. UH, Honda, Toyota, Nissan all understand that.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the rest of the industry does as well, they're

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just not as good as implementing it. And obviously GM

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is is an example of that how much of this

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is economics and how much of it is politics? And

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the GM said they've they've placed more than a thousand

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>employees from the unallocated plants and that they have opportunities

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>available for basically all of the impacted employees. And of

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>course those employees are going to have to give up

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge uh portion of their personal lives if because

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the UW contract allows for bumping UM to other plants,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but of course the plants are are not necessarily within

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lord's town or even Cleveland area, and so they're

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about major moves the the the issue is

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously much more economic, and the obvious problem is we're

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>also into a period where the auto industry is starting

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to turn south, not dramatically, but the auto industry was

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the overall economy and its recovery. It's also

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the overall economy and its downturn. How much

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is this alan a case of automation taking jobs and

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just not there being the need for as many plants

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or as many employees at each plant. And how much

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is this that it is just cheaper to produce cars

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in the parts elsewhere? Well, and that's not just a

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>North American issue. Obviously, North America is competing with the

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. When you look at the case

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Detroit three. UH, the Detroit three is generally

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>maintaining obviously declining in some situation issues. It's it's footprint

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>here in then in North America, whereas the rest of

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the world's automakers see North America as a great opportunity.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Our volume is not increasing so much, but our our

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>profitability remains among the highest in the world. UM with

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>respect to automation. That's true across the board. UH. It's

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's true when you particularly when you have declining profit

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>margins and you need to reduce your cost UH. The

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Detroit three UH in cars obviously have had that. Again,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit three could be as profitable UH and sell

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>more cars than they do as compared to their competitors.

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>They simply haven't put as much opportunity or focus on

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>cars and perhaps more importantly, on crossovers where the market

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>is growing. Sure they're strong, but they're losing some of

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their their share there as well. Is there an opportunity

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for the for the North American three, if you will,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to get a potential bump if we imposed tariffs on

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>European cars, Well, this sort of be a backdoor push

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>for them. Maybe. Well, that's that's the idea. The the

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, the dirty little secret is all automakers use

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of parts and to different levels of degree, car

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>imports from around the world, and of course I should

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>say vehicle imports. Um So in theory the Detroit three

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>would be less disadvantaged in the other players. But the

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>point is what I just said, less disadvantaged. Uh, Those

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>those brute forced tarraffs are likely to reduce the overall industry,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and obviously UH to the extent that that a company

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is less in less than great shape relatively speaking, they'll

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be heard even more. Allan boun thank you so much

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, Alan bound principle of Baum and

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Associates joining us from Michigan and Vince I am struck

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>by the idea that this is Ohio, we're talking about

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a swing state, and that President Trump is making this

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>into something of a campaign issue as we sort of

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have a drumbeat towards elections. Sort Of interesting to note that, yeah,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it does have it rings, a lot of politics and

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot less economics to me, to be perfectly honest.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Generator shares though, are down one percent today. Interesting to

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>see that to sort of what degree President Trump's involvement

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>in this just there is a certain political risk that

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is inherent to companies regardless of the economic factors. Right now,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>let us talk about the wicked experience of trying to

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>bet on the Commerce Bank Deutsche Bank tie up that

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>has been in the works for so long. Joining us

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>now is a Lisa Martin Usy. She's a columnist covering

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>finance for a Bloomberg opinion. Joining us from London. We

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>have seen the shares rally of both Deutsche Bank and

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Bank. I guess the key question is how much

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of a game changer is it that the German government

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>has officially or not officially but given a sign that

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they are okay with the job cuts that would make

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this tie up worthwhile? Yes. On the one hand, as

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you say, the government has signaled that they would be

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't stand in the way of job cuts. On

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, you had Angla locals. The chief of

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>staff today is signaling that, you know, there wouldn't be

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>too keen on job cuts. And in the middle all

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of this is the role that will be played by

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the employee and label representatives that of course sit on

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>both of those banks supervisory boards. So we are quite

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a long way, it feels like from from an agreement. Um,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the formal discussions only started over the weekend, but critical

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to the steel working would be tens of thousands of

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>job cuts in Germany, something in the order of you know,

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as many as thirty thous So getting the backing for

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>those is going to be absolutely crucial. How much of

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this when you put it all together, um, and you

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>know it's separately, both banks would have had to have

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>job cuts and consolidation to make both institutions work anyway,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>how much of this makes it a little easier to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>swallow in job cuts when you say, well, there was

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a merger and that the job cuts are as a

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>result of the consolidation and the merger as opposed to

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just meaning both absolutely. But I think the trouble there

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is that these two banks overlapped considerably in parts of

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>commercial and consumer banking in Germany, and by putting them together,

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>as you are allowing the cost, but you're not necessarily

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>changing the competitive landscape in Germany because they would become

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the dominant player. They're still competing with hundreds of local

0:22:55.600 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>savings banks, local cooperatives that compete on very different terms

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're not necessarily competing to make huge you know,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to make profit, so that dynamic will remain unchanged. And

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, you're not really grapping with the

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses the Deutsche Bank banks to the table, which is

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's investent bank, because Commis Bank doesn't have much of

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>an investon bank. So putting those together isn't really going

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to change the difficulties that Deutsche Bank has. On Wall Street,

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching the Coco bonds. These are the tier one

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>capital debt instruments of Deutsche Bank that have been pretty

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>volatile over the past few years, and I'm struck by

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>how much they're gaining on this news. I'm just wondering

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>across the board whether this is a bet that the

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>German government will enable Deutsche Bank and Commerce Bank together

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to have higher capital buffers and that these that these

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>instruments will be treated nicely in any kind of merger. Yes, well,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the the expectation is that this deal would come with

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of capital requirement or capital need and um

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>those talk about how the bad wild the negative good

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>will that the you know, the target would would would

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bring up, and how that could be used to strengthen

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>capital um. But I think, you know, more to your

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>point about Germany is backing. I think even though on

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>paper the steel doesn't look too great, the fact that

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Germany behind the scenes seems to be orchestrating it is

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing the odds that there actually happening. Does this does

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it dramatically change the tier one capital? Holdings of both

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>banks are our Deutsche and commerces Um, for instance, large

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>holders of sovereign debt, as as a lot of the

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Italian banks are. Does it? Does it does that cause

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>them or will that force them to switch out of

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some of those assets into others to structure the capital? Well,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as you come, as you come together, there's obviously into

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a review of the assets and both books and you know, yes,

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Commace Bank UM own some sovereign Talian sovereign a talient

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>debt that it hasn't that mark to market UM though.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, on the other hand, Deutsche Bank has a

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>very large UM portion of of Level three assets which

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know may have to review. So UM I think

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, we don't really have the numbers yet,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little bit unclear to see how they

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>come out of this. But the expectation is that UM

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>there would be some kind of capital requirement needed. What

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to the investment banking Deutsche Bank, Well, this is

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what the talk still is about. And you know, the

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Commons Bank has shifted away from that space, so they're

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to want to inherit a large investment bank that's

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so inefficient UM and so it doesn't really alleviate the

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure on on Deutsche Bank and a combined entity to

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>try and make that business work. People have talked about

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>retrenching from the US, certainly in terms of trying to

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>compete head on with Wall Street firms or new US staff.

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Is what they would have to look at and potentially

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>scale back considerably their equities business, which is subscale. So

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>but Deutsche Bank has been actually scaling back quite some

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>time in the United States, at least from a competitive advantage.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, putting the banks together, while you

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you really don't have a United European banking system, puts

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>them continues at a state of disadvantage. Um. Interesting how

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this is going to play out. Most of the people

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've talked to don't feel terribly confident that this

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is really a solution for both of the banks. What's

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>your take on that? Agreed? I think you know it

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>leaves you know, it leaves the combined business still very

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>much exposed to the interest rate circle as well here,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and of course we're into negative. We have been a

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>negative territory for some years. There's no real end in

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sight to that. And it still doesn't alleviate um that

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Prussia and you know, in the in the German market,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they're still very exposed to the competitive Prussias. So it

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really solve much that they're trying to glapple with independently.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>A Lisa Martin Newsy, Thank you so much for being

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with us calumnist covering finance for Bloomberg Opinion. Thanks for

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg penl podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. Paul Sweenie, I'm on Twitter at et Sweeney,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Abram Whods. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>whits One. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio