WEBVTT - This Is What We Just Learned In Jackson Hole

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to a special episode of the Odd

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway Racy, So we are.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Here for you and me the first ever time at

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hall.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I know I always wanted to go, partly for the scenery,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>but also just to get a feel for some of

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the economic discussions and wonkery. I've seen this described or

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>heard this described as the super Bowl for central bankers.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 3>You know what. I like the description.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very apt because like when I think of the

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, I think of like a bunch of like

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>parties and people just hang out if.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>There's the game.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But seriously, like you said, like partly for the scenery,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like for me, that's like ninety five.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I was so jar dropped the first time I walked in.

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It was gogeous, like the gran I was just like,

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like totally flabbered gust.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Also the chance to finally break out my cowboy boots.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't get to do that that often in New York.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>If anyone sell the photos of me on Twitter this

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>week and Wednesday morning, as I was scrambling out of

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the house, I could not locate I have multiple cowboy boots.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't find any of them there.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Joe, Sure they all go conveniently missing right before

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you need them. No, but it is an amazing event.

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting to sort of witness it for the

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>first time because it is at this kind of unusual

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>moment for central bankers.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, and so it's like this like weird uneasy piece,

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like inflation has come down a lot, the

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>labor mark is robust. We had this hiking cycle, but

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no one really knows why and how it all happened

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and what exactly the mechanism was. And I think that

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>leads to a little bit of anxiety about what will

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the inflation the disinflation persist.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it leads to a lot of anxiety. I mean,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>these are central bankers who are steeped in economic theory,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>things like the Phillips curve, which tell you that inflation

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be coming down without a corresponding rise in the

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>unemployment rate. And we've seen the exact opposite happen. And

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>if anything, it seems like there are some signs that

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 2>the economy is accelerating. Now you have the Atlanta Fed

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>GDP now right, which is kind of crazy after we've

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 2>seen this huge run up in interest rates.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I know there's something like there's I'm thinking trying

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to think of some gift of like some of the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>person like sort of awkwardly smiling and it's.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, things are good. Well, we can't entirely explain

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>why that's sort of.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 2>The vibe I would say, right, yeah, I think that's right.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what have we learned? We're going to

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>try and do a little bit of summation of this

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary weekend with some very special guest. For this special episode,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be speaking with two of our

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>illustrious colleagues here at Bloomberg. We're going to be speaking

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Surveillance co host Tom Keen, who happened to

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>be the first ever ODLOTGS guest years ago. And then

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>afterwards we will be speaking to Bloomberg TV's policy correspondent

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee, the legend Tom Keen, co host of Bloomberg's Surveillance. Tom,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming back on the odd line.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>It's great to be here. But you gotta paint this.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you don't know, you don't have a video for.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>This podcast, I'll take a photo.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 4>We're sitting here in literally an historic landmark. Back in

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 4>my ute, you there weren't planes, there weren't trains.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Tom.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 4>You went west in the car with four screaming kids

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 4>and no air conditioning, and you went out to the

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 4>National Parks and there were these little gorgeous nineteen sixties

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 4>mad men bungalows. Yes, and I expect Rock Hudson and

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Kim Novak to walk through the door at any moment.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>These are definitely bungalows. So for people who haven't been

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to the Jackson Lake Lodge, they're kind of rustic. There's

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>no TV. There's a warning sign in the room saying

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>if you encounter mice or bats, please call staff, don't

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>try to trap them yourself.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Take ants.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I haven't, but it doesn't get too hot. But there's

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>no air conditioning either.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, air conditioning has at to option.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>How many times you've been here to Tom, I have

0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>been here roughly.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>I haven't kept count like Davos, but I've been roughly

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>seventeen years. What I'll say is off and on, but

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I've had a good fortune of being here most of

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 4>the maximum tension years.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracey, you know what I really like about here, And

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom mentioned Davos, which is why I bring it up.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>In Davos, you know, they clear out all the civilians,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like when all the everyone comes, like you cannot get

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>into that whole town. Here, it's like we're around by tourists,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like anyone could actually just sort of come hang out

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>here and sort of like sit on one of the

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>couches and the Jackson like lodge. You just got to

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like buy like a hotel room or something. It's like

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more like peaceful vibe.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It's true. I did actually have this older Australian couple

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 2>that came up to me and they were looking at

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg TV setup and they sort of tapped me

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>on the shoulder and they were like, what's going on,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>what's happening? And I was trying to get them very

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>excited about Oh, Jerome pal is here and maybe even

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>someone from the RBA is around. They were into it.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Bud Nethel was once on the coach. They're hanging

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 4>out with this guy sixty five years old Gray they're

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 4>talking about so how sure it's the wonderful Irvin King from.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>The Baker, It's great. What have you learned. What struck

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 3>you about Paul speech.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, not much about Paul speech. I mean I

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 4>listened to it. It's in my ear and we've got

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of production issues going on at the time,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>So to be honest, I don't hear it word for

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>word like you guys do, and Tracy really sits on

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 4>it and listens. But different than any other meeting, even

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 4>CenTra and Portugal, this is a meeting where you have

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 4>no clue what the zeitgeist is going to be until

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 4>deep into Friday. And the one word for me this

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 4>unique moment in our history is complexity. Everyone of every

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 4>shape and flavor is overwhelmed by the complexities of the moment.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's exactly right. And do you the people

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you speak to, do they express much anxiety about this

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>current period of economic time or is the vibe very much? Well,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>last year pwe was talking about how we'd have to

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 2>have lots of pain in order to bring down to

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>claci media.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the media. That's a no.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 4>These are people, is you all know? These are the

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>people who were first in their fourth grade class in

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 4>math and they had a meeting in June with their

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 4>parents to say, well, we think he should jump to

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 4>sixth grade. They were those kind of people, and so

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>they have a huge arrogance about how smart they are,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 4>but also a built in humility, and the humility right

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 4>now is maxed out. I don't care if they're you know,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Barry Iiking Green of Berkeley or the youngest peahd he

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>was lucky to breathe the air. Here, they're all humbled

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 4>beyond belief about how wrong they've been.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I the final paragraph. I think of

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Powell's speech. He talked about the cloudy skies, which I

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the whole question is like the stars

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are a star neutral rate, which.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, one knows what they are.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, Paul expressed that in the

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>speech that it's like the guy's are cloudy. Even if

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>even if such stars even exist, it does not seem

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like we could see them right now.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 4>I live in New York where there's like one damn

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 4>star in the sky. It's our terrorists. If you think

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 4>it's Stevie Winwood and Arc of the Diver, it's one

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 4>of the stars on the record album You Come out Here,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 4>and it's the stars were in the sky last night.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, there'll be a lot of analysis. Frankly, you

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 4>guys are better at that than me. It'll be hawkish,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 4>hawkish and this level in that. I think they're overwhelmed

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 4>by the non economic, non monetary things, and to me,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 4>it's just an extension of the pandemic and we really

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>don't know where we are in that continuum.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seems like they're struggling with some of the

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>real economy aspects of this. And you saw it in

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Pal's speech where he was talking about supply chain pressures

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>starting to ease, what's going on in housing. It feels

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>like that's not that's not their comfort spot.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 4>It's oh decidedly not. I mean to take it academic,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>and to take a structure like a Hicksey and Islm structure,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 4>which is, you know, blah blah blah nineteen thirty eight.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's in play right now. You let

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 4>meet with a Phillips curve, which was what fifty two.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to think, London School of Economics. None of

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 4>this is working right now. I don't know what the

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty fourth theory is. It waits odd lots to

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 4>tell us.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You brought up nothing is working right now, and I'm convinced.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I did a TV hit yesterday. We were

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the disinflation and something Someone's like, well, in

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a year, will we have more sense? And I kind

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of think that, like this is going to be a

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>period that not next year, not ten years, like for

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty and thirty years, people will be writing papers about

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this period right now and what happened. And I suspect

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to ever really have something that

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>resembles a consensus.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 4>I strongly agree with that. My book of the Summer

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 4>is Olivia Blanchard, very controversial right now, we don't need

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>to go into it. But the answer is Olivier has

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 4>this phrase for all the stuff we don't get, called

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 4>other factors. It's like an academic usage with quotes around it,

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 4>and that we're overwhelmed by the other factors. I mean,

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 4>look at what we have right now, Tracy. We've got

0:08:54.240 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 4>labor dynamics, pandemic dynamics, the uaw thing that's happening, Pharaoh's gone,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 4>He's going to make one hundred and seventy thousand a

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 4>year at UPS. And then you got the fact the

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Red Sox beat the Houston anstro of seventy to one.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>There are other factors out there that matter.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot happening, that's for sure. So on that

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>note she jured me. This is called a pivot. This

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is what I learned from the Central Bank meetings. Hot

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a pivot. So on this note, I'm curious you've been

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 2>going for a long time. One thing I was kind

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 2>of surprised about is so much of the focus from us,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, reporters here to talk about this event is

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>on the short term policy outlook. But the event itself

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to be discussing the longer term analytical framework

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>for monetary policy. How has the sort of emphasis of

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 2>this symposium changed over time?

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Tom Hanig and I had a nice chat out front

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 4>of the door here at the lodge. Tom Hanig reinvented

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Jackson Hole in the Kansas City FED. This started for

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 4>years ago with Paul Volker. They said, Paul, I know

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 4>you hate conferences, you don't want to travel. There's fly fishing.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 4>So I Volker showed up, literally, I kid you not.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 4>That's how they started this thing, and off the top

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 4>of my head, eighty two.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Well it worked.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 4>And it still works to this day. But they had

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 4>to get reinvigorated, and Tom A. Honig did that his

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 4>head of the Kansas City Fed before Esther George. But

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>what Honig had to do was police the modern media,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 4>and they it's sort of been a you know, you

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>see it. You come out of the lodge folks, and

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 4>there's this huge mountain range picture and there's this place

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>where they take the photos of the central bankers, and

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 4>off to the right it looks like the Republican National Convention.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's like three networks lined up everything but

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the satellite trucks and the And the answer is that

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City Fed has had to police the short term

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 4>analysis with papers looking out thirty years. Yeah.

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It does seem, however, in different years. And obviously the

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>chairman doesn't not every year that most years the chairman

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>gives a speech. But every once in a while I

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>think that German doesn't come. Yeah, I think it's twenty

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like twenty.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen or something.

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it feels like to some extent it's sort

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of the dial goes back and forth about how academic

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they're so like right now and last year was probably

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>more famous.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's like that pow'll.

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Give an eight minute speech in twenty twenty two, which

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I've characterized as like, we're not here to make friends,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>We're here to get inflation done. This year, I think

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this speech was closer to maybe like fifteen or twenty

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes or something like that, but still like not a

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly academic speech. But if you go back to twenty

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen or twenty eighteen and Polo speech is very much

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like talk about the different stars, So it feels like

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you sort of get a feel for the moment based

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on how academic that speech.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes this happens, and it happened. I believe it

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 4>was a droggy. It may have been thrche, but the

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 4>moment here is the European Central Bank, in my conversation

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 4>with Christine Linguard, is an example of the urgency in

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 4>in ECB to to September sixteenth and beyond and the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 4>complete mystery of the europe An experiment. It makes us

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 4>look like virtual certitude. What we're doing, it's all insane.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>So when you come here, what are the goals?

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 2>What would what constitutes a good Jackson hole for you?

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 4>And the tom han is to get me out of

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 4>a suit. He came up to me once and he said,

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 4>can we lose the tie?

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 5>What do you wear BOTHA?

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I traveled when I first joined Bloomberg. Actually I wore

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 4>a bolo once. We interviewed the art director of mad Men,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 4>and I wore a bolo. That was some endorsement from

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 4>mad Men or something. I can't remember, but it at

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Jackson's Hole. I travel like I always travel, which is

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 4>as simple as I can, because I used to travel

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 4>NonStop for the company. And you know, I started out

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 4>like Audrey Hepburn and charade with seven suitcases and a

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 4>hat box, and then I got down to three suitcases,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 4>and now it's like you get to one.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I did ask Mike McKee, who we are about to

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 2>speak to, actually how many hats he typically brings with

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>him to Jackson Hole. I was disappointed to hear it

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>was only one. I imagine him Audrey Hepburn style with

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>like seven hat boxes on the plane.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't realize he's a he's a western man.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 3>He's Colorado. So this is a joke come out? Did

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I make that.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 4>He's milking every Western jun kid, the.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Economic Western He's like, this is my natural habitat.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's north of here. He's up by Jellystone Park

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 4>in Idaho or someplace he's here. Then he'll go down

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 4>to Arizona. What he's got the whole Mountain time thing.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 4>He's nailed it.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, now we have to ask Mike about this.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Nice true.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, one more question from me. For people out there

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 2>who are trying to understand Jackson Hole, what's your most

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>important piece of advice? What should they be looking out

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>for the thing?

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 4>And particularly for younger people, this is so true social

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 4>media podcasts, The blah blah I do doesn't cut it.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 4>You have to read the material. And the material can

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>be books, obviously, it can be papers, it can be

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 4>longer commentaries. You know, what's what we did when we

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>were kids. You read the Economist to cover. I mean,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 4>that's how you do it. There's no substitute for reading.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 4>There's just absolutely no substitute for reading. That's just it's

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 4>as simple as that.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Did you read all the papers?

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Jeff?

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate to admit it, but Tom is totally right.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is like it's taken me like forty three

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>years of my life too, like acknowledge, like actually, you

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to do the reading. And if you

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>read an academic paper, you can't just like for years,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I just read the abstract and then skipped to the

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>end and look for a chart that I could screenshot

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and tweet. And I have to admit that there might

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>be actually some good meat in the middle.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:37.479
<v Speaker 2>The good stuff's in the footnotes.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I know, all right.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>My last question, you know, a few more months of

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, three FED meetings before the end of the year.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>What are you watching for?

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you what are you looking

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>out for for the rest of the year, both from

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the MACRO and the FED, like, what do you what

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>interest you read the.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Word I over use the TV. People will say to me,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 4>why are you saying vector? No one knows what that is.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people know what a vector is.

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a straight line essentially, but in two or three

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 4>dimensional space to the end of this year, with all

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 4>that we've got, Joe, it's a massive three dimensional space

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 4>right now. I want to know the power of any

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 4>of these vectors, like inflation. I want to know which

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 4>way they're going. I have no idea what the vector

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 4>is on Javas claims, no idea at all, but I

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 4>want to see established to the end of the year,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 4>any belief in these vectors. Well, you know, we make

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>jokes about I'm so pessimistic. I'm in the triple leverage

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 4>doll cash front. I haven't usually no, no, there's a

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 4>new offering coming up in February. It's forbule leverage. But

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 4>the answer is I have a huge optimism. It's like

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Churchill said about America, We'll figure it out at some point.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 4>I have a huge optimism forward about our exceptionalism on

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>technology getting us into twenty twenty four.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jackson Hole is definitely a place that makes you

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>believe in America.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I was dming with someone early like you need to

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>travel for America is so much, so.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Much, Tom, that was a blast, so much time.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Can I take them out? Yes?

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And now let's let's chat with our colleague Mike mcka.

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike McKeith, thank you so much for joining us. Happy

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be here, Mike, really important question to start. So

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom said, you're not really Western. He's like, oh, Mike

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>mc so, he just pretends to be a cowboy. What

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the truths there?

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 5>I will gladly take Tom out on the range with me.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 5>I grew up in Colorado, grew up writing, come out

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 5>here every year and uh help my friends on the ranch,

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 5>and so yeah, I mean I can cowboy.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, because you for those who haven't seen the pictures,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike wears a cowboy. A lot of people like to

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>dress up, but you know, I think Mike is a

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>little more credible than most.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike probably has the best Jackson Hole wardrobe.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I put it that way.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it's what I would wear. I mean, this is

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 5>this is Jackson Hole.

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>It's Jackson Hole.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>How many hats do you actually have with you?

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I only have one hat with me. I own seven.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>And how many times have you've been out here?

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how an exact count, but the first

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 5>time I came was nineteen ninety seven, and most years

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 5>between ninety seven and now I've been here.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>So one thing I didn't realize about Jackson Hall. I

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of assume that, you know, media was invited and

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>that media would have access to the actual conference. But

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that's not the case. They have a kind of weird system.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Can you describe that to us?

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Basically, it's one representative from each news media organization and

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Radio TV, and unfortunately you guys are blumped under

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 5>that gets one, and Bloomberg News gets one, and then

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 5>the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, et cetera.

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 5>And so the media presence is there, but it's not huge.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about this with Tom earlier. But it

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>feels like the.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Dial changes from time to time.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>And some years it's this is clear, you know, the

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>interest is in something very academic, and then some years

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the interest is in how fast is

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED GETNA raise right? And over the next three

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>or four months. How does this ear feel different or

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>similar to past Jackson halls You've.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Been Well, it's maybe a little more in the middle.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 5>What happened basically was it was an it is an

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 5>academic conference. People think that something goes on in there

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't happen. It's academic economic papers with econometrics math

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 5>in there, and they talk about things that might happen

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 5>in the future and in terms of economics. But the

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 5>chairman always gets to give a speech. And in two

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 5>thousand and nine Ben Bernanke had something he wanted to

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 5>say because this was just before they were going to

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 5>start QE, and so he announced it here and then

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 5>the following year he announced Round two because they still

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 5>had the recession and the economic problems, and then that

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 5>got Wall Street's attention, and it became obvious to central bankers,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 5>to the chairman that they could make some news or

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 5>they could steer because not much as else is happening

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 5>in August anyway, and so some years when they've had

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 5>something to say, they've used this platform. Last year, Jay

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Powell gave his famous eight minute slap the markets upside

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 5>the head speech and got a lot of attention. So

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 5>that didn't focus is everybody's attention on this year, and

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 5>he gave an economic outlook speech. I think he wanted

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 5>to set the predicate for going into September, but we

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 5>could easily go back to something anodyne next year.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>What was your favorite Jackson hole? Is there one that

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 2>stands out to you as a sort of seminal moment?

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 5>I think probably the most interesting seminal one was two

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 5>thousand and five. Alan Greenspan was retiring, and they set

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 5>this up as a sort of hay geography to Alan Greenspan,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 5>because remember we had had the great moderation and productivity

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 5>gains and the Fed had its soft landing, and so

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 5>everybody was here to praise Alan Greenspan except for Ragaran Regin,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 5>who was at the University chicag Go and then later

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 5>the governor of the Indian Central Bank. He came here

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 5>and said, you guys are all missing it. We are

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 5>going to have a crisis because we've got this borrowing bubble.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 5>And he was sort of ostracized by the economic community

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 5>and the people here until obviously he was proven right

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 5>and came back a couple of years later.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So I knew that Rogen had given that speech. I

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that was a jackson Hole speech, and I

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly did not realize that it was essentially at you know,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the sort of big Allen Greenspan run at the party.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't realized the context of that before.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was. It was kind of fascinating because he

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 5>stood it stood out so much from what everybody else

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 5>was saying. Because the John Clutchiche was the ECB president

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 5>at the time, came here to talk about how great

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 5>Alan Greenspan was.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Is anyone getting ostracized this year? Is there someone we

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 2>should be paying more attention to?

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.239
<v Speaker 5>I think this year everybody is kind of welcome at

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 5>the table, even esther George, who has retired, is back

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 5>to see her old buddies, and I talked to her.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 5>She said she's very happy to sit in the back

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 5>and not have to worry about it this year.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So something that we were talking about before is that,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's compared to last year obviously, when I think,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, CPI picked around nine percent.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 3>The FED probably.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Feels and many central bankers probably feel better about things,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but there's a few to you know, there's an uneasiness

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>right because no one really knows why inflation fell as

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>fast as it did, given that we saw three and

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a half percent unemployment, and no one really knows why

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth seems to be accelerating in Q three despite

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED having raised rates to five percent. And then

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, you just have all these other

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>things going on.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>What was the term that Tom.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Used started just all the flexity, other factors and vectors.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he said, very very tough vectors matter.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.479
<v Speaker 5>That was a terrible time, Tom Dictionary somewhere.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit like, you know, it

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like we're just in a period of it's a cliche,

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>but just like real uncertainty about what is going on.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, two thoughts on that one is that coming into

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 5>this meeting. I talked earlier in the week with a

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 5>central banker who said, this is a tough one for

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 5>us because it was easy last year, right inflation, we

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 5>know what we need to say. We're going to raise rates.

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 5>We're going to raise rates. We're going to raise rates

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 5>this year. We don't know what's going to happen, and

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 5>it's kind of hard to convince people that we don't

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 5>know and we don't have a plan and we're going

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 5>to be data dependent. That was one thought. The other is,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 5>if you remember in Jay Powell's speech he said we

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 5>are trying to navigate by the stars under cloudy skies. Well,

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 5>you'll appreciate this, Joe, because you're a musician. It's a

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 5>little bit like listening to an oldie, maybe an old

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 5>grateful dead song, and you remember the lyrics because you

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 5>were around. That came from his two thousand and eight speech,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 5>eighteen speech, his first speech here when he talked about

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 5>about our star u stars, et cetera. And so I

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 5>think it was Jay Powell's little inside joke to everybody

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 5>about we don't really know where we are now.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I have a media naval gazing question, which is, why

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>did this expectation that he was going to give some

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>big r star policy stance come about anyway, because if

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at the twenty eighteen speech, he was always

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of doubtful about it, And of course he is

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 2>not an economist by training, and so I don't know

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 2>where that expectation came from that he was suddenly going

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 2>to give a very academic speech about how maybe the

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 2>neutral rate was higher than we thought.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm not exactly sure. The estimates of the neutral

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 5>rate that the New York Fed did got suspended during

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 5>the pandemic because the data weren't accurate enough to make

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 5>any kind of determination. They brought it back late this

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 5>spring in May, I think, and then you had some

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 5>articles about it that and whether or not it was accurate,

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 5>and John Williams view that we would see the neutral

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 5>rate fall back to where it was. And then this

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 5>week the Wall Street Journal wrote about our star debate

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 5>actually suggested it wasn't going to come down like John Williams,

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 5>but it wasn't in the context of a Jay Pole speech.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 5>But some of the people somewhere picked up and ran

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 5>with it. And then what happens is the Wall Street

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 5>economists start writing about it because they're reading it in

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the paper, and then the people who are writing for

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 5>the papers pick up the Wall Street economists things, and

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 5>it becomes this circular thing. And if you knew the fad,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 5>you knew he's never going to talk about that because

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't like our star and because it's too imprecise,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 5>there's just no.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Way to know.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that description of how the news works, which

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is like, hey, I saw someone else writing about that,

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and then the economist is like, well, I got to

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>weigh in, and then we write about is like one

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the best descriptions of I mean, we all hope

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to avoid it, right, we hope to avoid group thing

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or echo chambers. But that was probably one of because

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>people like look at the media and like all it

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like there is if it's a conspiracy or like

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some we all get back together, but really it's

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just a bunch of people looking around at each other.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Is like that talking about it, Well, we better talk

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 5>Too, Yeah, And everybody was trying to figure out what

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 5>to say about Jackson Hall this year. Because of the uncertainty,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 5>there wasn't any kind of obvious speech for j Pidle

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 5>to give.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>So the other thing I wanted to ask you is

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>just on this question of uncertainty and why inflation has

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 2>come down. I haven't heard anyone here utter the dreaded

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 2>word transitory for obvious reasons, but it does feel like

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there is an element of the supply side creeping in here.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>So in Pal's speech, for instance, you see him talking

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>about maybe some of the supply constraints are starting to ease.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's a factor. And then one of the papers

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 2>that was presented was all about the supply chain and

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>reshoring away from China and things like that. Do you

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 2>see more economists and policymakers paying attention to the sort

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>of real economy aspect of inflation.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think everybody is. They're looking for evidence that

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 5>what they're seeing with inflation is going to last. I

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 5>heard this phrase the other day and I thought it

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 5>was great. After a period of long COVID, we've got

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 5>long transitory. Yeah, it is a lot of supply side

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 5>stuff that the FED was right would go back down,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 5>but they got the timing wrong.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, you know, you mentioned the

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>grateful dead. So when I walked in I got here

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday afternoon and there was like, no one here.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the lodge I saw Chairman Powell and he

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was chatting with CNBC's Steve Leishman, and I was like,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to introduce me, but I couldn't think of

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>anything to say.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was like, I don't.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But in retrospect, I was like, Oh, that's like that's

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the Grateful Dead Caucus right there, because I think.

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Leaman plays in a tribute.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Baseman is a dead head.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Powell is a dead head, so I should have made

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some crack and Steve, Steve's a competitor but a friend,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and he knows members of the dead and uh he

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>talks to them all the time, and so I'm sure

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>he was telling j Powell, we could maybe introduce you.

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 3>That should have been my lines a deadline you're in.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Also, I do think that staring at stars under a

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>cloudy sky would be like a great thirteen minute Robert

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Hunter instrumental Jam instrumental. So what do you We asked

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom this earlier, but you know, like for the coming months,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and the irony is, of course this is an academic conference,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but like ninety nine percent of the media attention is like, yeah,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but okay, what does it mean for the next three

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting or whatever, like the most narrow version of

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the focus. But I'm going to ask you that in

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of like what are you looking for now?

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think we will probably see relatively restrained inflation,

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 5>probably rise a little bit, just on base effects and

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 5>things like that. But if we can maintain a sort

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 5>of level inflation rate, you'll see the FED on hold

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 5>for September. We'll watch the inflation rate and the unemployment

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 5>rate for November, and they might act. Then the trick

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 5>is going to be if they don't think they need

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 5>to raise right away, what do they say to keep

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 5>people from thinking we're done? If they're still worried about

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 5>inflation possibly coming back, they have a December meeting, then

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 5>they meet again in late January. Do they leave a

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 5>rate increase as a live possibility. That'll be the thing

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 5>to watch for.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>I think I have just one more question, which is

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>what's your favorite Jackson Hole moment? I just want to

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>hear the Jackson hole lore, like, did Alan Greenspan wants

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 2>run into a grizzly bear or something like that.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 5>No. Don Cone, who was vice chairman, was known as

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 5>a slave driver on the trails because when they would

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 5>go hiking, he would just power up the trails and

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 5>people had to follow him. But I think the most

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>fun that people have had is when they've taken us

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 5>out a couple of times to ranch for the horse whisperer,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 5>to see horse whisper training of horses. And then of

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 5>course there are those of us who slip away to

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 5>the Jackson Hole Rodeo and have a great deal.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>We're taking me and Tracy at the rodeo tomorrow.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 5>All right, we're all going to the rodeo.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Mike. Wait, I just thought of one more question.

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I heard a rumor that you have a plaque at

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the bar, the famous bar in Jackson, the.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Million dollar Cowboy Bar.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I try to hide that, but there have been

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 5>some memorable moments there, but we can't talk about them

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 5>on that What happens as.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Soon as we turn off the microphone, we'll get this. Yeah,

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>there we go, Mike mckaith, thank you so much for

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>coming off here.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Tracy. I love talking. I love our colleagues.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, what do you do?

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You remember the old ESPN commercials? Did you ever see

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>those where it's.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Like you're gonna have to describe them.

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>To me, it's like.

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They're walking through the ESPN grounds and there's all these

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like famous athletes just doing stuff like filling up the

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>coffee pot and like raking and stuff like that. That's

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>what I often feel like that working at Bloomberg, it's

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's I love getting to run it talk to

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>our college.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it's absolutely fantastic. And I love hearing the old

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of Jackson Hole war from Mike and Tom. I

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>gotta say, we need to set up like a satellite

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 2>au Lolot's office here in Jackson.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Hole for listeners.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>All weekend, Tracy has just been talking about why can't

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a Bloomberg jackson Hole bureau like twenty four

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or seven.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I would move here in an instant.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Tracy is like I would live in a Bloomberg dorm,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a fox Con dorm if it meant

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I could just be in Jackson Hole all the time.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Joe, what's your favorite Jackson Hole moment?

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I really enjoyed hiking. I really every morning. The

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>view I just like have not gotten over, Like the

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>view of the Grand Tetant behind the lodge here is incredible.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I am looking forward to actually going into Jackson tonight

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and going to the Silver Dollar Bar and trying to

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>find Mike's plaque.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking forward to that.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk ekon for a second.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Should we talk about.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>You don't just want to talk about Jackson Hole? Yes, okay.

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I actually thought Pal's speech leaned a little bit dubbish,

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and I've seen it. It's sort of like a warsh

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>test I think for everyone's preferred policy positions at this

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>point in time. Because I've seen some people say it

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>was hawkish and others say it was dubbish. I lean

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 2>towards the dubbish camp. He's saying that policy is restrictive.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna have to see a really significant

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>deterioration in the data to justify any sort of rate cut.

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think like the market is coming here

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on to your view, and like even a month ago

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there or like more rate cuts priced in, and I think, like, yeah,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like it would be tough to make. We're still

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the FED is a long way from feeling like they'd

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable stopping the hikes, let alone cutting rates.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I think, like, you know, both.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom and Mike talked about it, but like it still

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like if there were a way to measure uncertainty.

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be high, be very high right now.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>For so many different reasons. And I do think like.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You brought this up with Tom, which is that like

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>things like supply chains, things like the effects of Russia's

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine, et cetera, like climate spending. I don't

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's like particularly comfortable ground for monetary economists who

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are sort of like it's you know, navigate these waters.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, I think this is like kind of uncharted

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>territory for me.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, you're telling a bunch of economists that used car

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>prices are now a significant portion of inflation, and so

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>they all need to become experts in the used car market.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they have to understand like a semiconductors that

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to allow for the expansion, Like they're all

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>these sort of distinct variables.

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there for now?

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's leave it there.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Follow our guests Tom Keane. He's at Tom Keen and

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee at mconomy. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Armant and dash O Bennett at Dashbot, and our

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>special Jackson Hole guest producer Sebastian Escobar at Under the

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Sea vass. Follow all of the Bloomberg podcasts under the

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>handle at Podcasts and from Oddlots content. Go to Bloomberg

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Oddlogs, where we have transcripts, a blog,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and a newsletter, and check out the discord Discord dot

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>gg slash odd Lots. There's a great econ room in

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>their listeners are chatting twenty four to seven about these.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Topics specifically, and if you enjoy Oddlots, please leave us

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening.