WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Weighing The Options With 88

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman and bar Garcia and

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Wednesday, January thirty, first, twenty eighteen,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>Season thirteen, episode number one oh one. Welcome to another

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>edition of The Break. I am Derek Eagleton and we're

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>here live in the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It feels like it's been a little while, two weeks,

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>feels like an eternity in the offseason. But happy to

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have the crew back here. We're talking Cowboys football here

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with you guys for an hour. It's super Bowl week,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so at some point in this show we're gonna nail

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody down on Super Bowl predictions and see what these

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>guys think is going to happen Sunday for Super Bowl Sunday,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll probably get into I know, we will

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>get into some desk talk. I think that's gonna be interesting.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Dave had a little tweet yesterday that kind of sparked

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>my interest a little bit. So we're gonna talk a

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Dez Bryant, and we'll start in the show.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's some here at the beginning, talking a little bit

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>about some coaching changes that have happened. How's everybody doing today,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doing great? Derek good? Good? Great. I saw Dave's tweet

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and I decided to hold myself and save it for

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the show. Oh wow, it, But I'm like, I'll just

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>wait till tomorrow we go getting into this. We're gonna

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>get into this. We're not gonna get into it right

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>now because we've got a couple of things we need

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to hit first, but we're definitely gonna get into this.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this because me and Nick

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has some interesting conversations too. I think Nick has some

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting opinions there on Dez Bryant. So not not that

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the in the whole country that's a Cowboys

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>fan or otherwise doesn't have an opinion. There's a lot

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of people talking right now about Dez Bryant. Good point.

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll jump into that conversation. Before we do that, though,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>catch me up on some news around the coaches. We've

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>heard some reports. Now, of course, we got to make

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it clear the Cowboys have not made an official statement

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on any of the coaching changes UM inspecting them to

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do that sometime around May. Yeah. I think at some

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>point they'll get around to that and say it's a

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>good good time to maybe introduce everybody. But I mean,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>if it just history serves correct, they typically like to

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do it as one big thing, right, they make one

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>big kind of introduction, but what tell me about the

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>last okay that they do. But that's dumb, okay, so

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not you're not announcing anything. Yeah, I mean, well

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just I don't know why they do that. You

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>probably it's probably should be called an introduction. Yeah, not

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>an announcement, it's an introduct Please don't send a press

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>release to say that they they've signed or they've added

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Paul Alexander who's had probably is no longer hear type thing, right, Yeah,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It'll be an introduction at some point

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>where they'll introduce to the media. But officially, here are coachings,

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>our coach, but our listeners know what's going on. They follow.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So the latest stuff is just that they've UM unofficially

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>officially announced that men Bloom will be the linebackers coach.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like Keith o quinn will be the special

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>team's coach. Yeah, that leaves one unbelievable coach to coach

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten to be the eighth tight end coach for

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten, I was joking around, I guess yesterday when

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they announced, So, I mean, that's those are the final

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>two hires that we don't have a pretty good idea of.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jerry Jones said that they have an agreement

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with Kellen Moore in place, but he wouldn't say what

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>your guests is as good as mine what it could

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:33.279
<v Speaker 1>be if it's not quarterbacks coach. Um. Yeah, So realistically,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one vacancy left on the staff, which is tight ends.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And isn't it clear Jason that you really don't are

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the coach and you don't really need a coach? I

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>am about to say. I was joking yesterday. I was like,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>would anybody even like bat and eyelid if they just

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>were like, we're just gonna have Jason Witten player coach.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have him be the player coach. Does it

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in the NFL. I don't know. I'm sure that

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>happened back in the day. I don't remember anybody other

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>than Pete Rose ever being a player coach Bill Russell

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tattoo yeah, Bill Russell. Yeh um, you say tattoo Yeah,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas sidekicks great tattoo player coach. Okay, that was like

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he lost me with tattoo. I had no idea, but yeah, okay,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>now you now I'm back with MLS. I would like

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>if they were just like, yeah, Jason Witten is gonna

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>be tight end one end coach, and he's gonna teach

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Hannah and Swim and whoever else, Enrico and whoever else

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is here. Uh, and that'll just be it. You know,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the coaching's gonna go do what I do. Yeah, And

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I would just be like, just do what I do.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I would just be like, yeah, that's fine. I mean, okay,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>like who are they gonna bring in? I mean, who's

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>who they bringing in that You're just like, well, this

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is this is the authority on tight ends right here.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's more of an authority than Jason Witten

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>probably be some Yeah, I wouldn't I wouldn't care at

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all if Jason Witten was the player coach that doesn't

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>need to have that would be interestless. It does not, No,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it does not. I'm sure they will hire a tight ends,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>absolutely something. There'll be somebody in this day's up till

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>midnight and gets here at five am and cuts up

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tape and runs the practice. That should not He doesn't

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. That should not be Jason. What

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think about those hires though? How do

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel about those hires one way or the other?

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Happy for Keith O'Quinn. I think he's definitely paid his

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dues and he's you know, he's done a lot of things.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you think about what makes Will McClay

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>good as Miltwill was a coach, and he was a

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>coach that now is into the player personnel role that

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>understands what coaches need. And I think Keith O'Quinn, you know,

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of the other way around. He was

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in the scouting department for a while and now he's

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>been a coach and so you know, he's been bounced

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>around different positions, so it's a good opportunity for him,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and I guess the same could kind of be said

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>about Ben Bloom. Right, he's put in his dudes and

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>been here. Why quite a while. He's been in. He's

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>put in quite a bit of dudes in a variety

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of places. I mean, I think he was he's done.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He's done a little bit of special teams. He was

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like special projects. He's a defensive end coach. A couple

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of years ago he was Rob Ryan's the one that

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>brought him here. Right, Yeah, yes, so he's been I mean,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he's been putting in So what's what's that seven years.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I won't quote everything Rob Bryan said because he wasn't

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>always flattering towards Ben Bloom, but he you know, but

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he said, there are smarter people in the world. They

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>just work at NASA. That's what That's what he said

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about Ben Bloom. Super smart guy. Think took toughs. Uh.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He had kind of a six lags roller coaster of

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a coaching. I mean there was some time when it

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't look like he was even going to be on

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the staff, and there were other times where it looked

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like he was the rising star of the staff. Yeah,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he was the young guy that you expected to but

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>into the top at something. I didn't expect him to

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be on the staff this next year. I don't know

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if he did. And now he's a position coach for

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the first time, so, you know, great opportunity for he's

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>he's worked with linebackers before, but it was in a

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>three fourth scheme. His buyer will tell you that they

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>went to two linebackers made it the Pro Bowl that year.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>He worked as an assistant. I don't know if he

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was helping DeMarcus Ware make his seventh Pro Bowl or whatever,

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>but well, if there's a position, great where he's going

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to another. If you told me, if you told me that,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they were like, well, we're just gonna make Sean Lee

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the linebackers coach, I again would not really bad and eyelid.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, but you still are developing some young guys,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith being one of them that you got to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>take some time with, right Yeah, which I mean my

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>point being there's there's a guy in that room who

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>can help him a lot in Shawn Lee. So and

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, we'll see where it goes. That's it's

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. It's interesting the way that they did all this,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of in house promotions and then a

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of like really far outside help. I mean, you know,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Richard is expected to be secondaries coach and passing

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>game coordinator, taking over the Mattie Refluse role. Recruiter, Yeah,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Sanjay Sanjay Lal is your new receivers coach. So like

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they they went and Paul Alexander. I don't remember if

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about him, because it's been a minute since

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been on the air, but again, a very established

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line coach coming from CINCI. So like a lot

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of established guys coming from other places, and then a

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of just promoting your own. So it's a little

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of mix and match. But the thing is it

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't surprise you the promoting from your own because it

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>still seems like their overall objective here was to keep continuity.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And some of these coaches that they lost were not

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>coaches they necessarily wanted to lose. They were coaches that

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>got other opportunities and decided to take those other opportunities.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I would mention like Ebrafluis was Eberflus a guy they

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily wanted to leave. He left because he had another opportunity.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They very much wanted him to stay, right, And you

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can talk about him you can talk about Besachia. Did

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to get rid of Besacchia? He's obviously already

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has a job. But I'm just saying he already has

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a job. So we don't know if it was kind

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a mutual thing or were they trying to get

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>rid of him. I don't know. You tell me, well,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean if they if they didn't want him to go,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have to let him go. I mean, he

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>wasn't he was under contract. Understood that. But that's also

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a thing of Okay, so do you keep a coach

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, you have done a disgruntled coach.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've done that before, and as soon as

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy was able to leave, he was out the door, right.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Jerry classified it as the right thing to do, which

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, yeah, I mean it's you know, John

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Gruden is an old friend of his and they've worked

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>together going back away as he helped them win that

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl in Tampa. But to suggest that he didn't really,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they he's gonna sleep well at night that

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>rich Bisacci is not here like here, Yeah, I mean yeah,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and don't they're not. That's what And I wasn't saying

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't saying that they that they were trying to push,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's my question. Doesn't want to be here right right,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's mutual parting of ways. He wanted to

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>go and they're like, we can live, Okay, we can

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>live if you go. But I guess the overall point, though,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is I think there were two or three coaches that

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at least it looks to me like they were not situations,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>whether cowboys were trying to get rid of them as

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>much as it was cowboys just decided you want to

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere else, will allow you to go somewhere else,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>or their contract was up and they had the right

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to go somewhere else. I just think what they did

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they did just enough to keep me on the fence.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm I'm very intrigued and and excited by the

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hiring of Chris Richard, who was a defensive coordinator and

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely coached a lot of great players there. You would

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine he's going to bring some new ideas and man,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all right, I'm just I'm not gonna go there.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we'll see hampering Derek, what if we

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>learned about it. We'll see we'll see. I'm intrigued to

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know and see if we really see some changes, because

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll find out exactly where the problem is

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>coming from. But then again, they could go to the

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Well, it takes some time to get adapted

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to this new coaching staff and everything. That's I guess

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>that's where I was going to go is I'm intrigued

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of those things. You know, Paul Alexander

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from from since he's coached some really good offensive

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>linemen up there. I mean, they had you know, Kevin

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Zeitler is currently the highest paid guard in football

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coming from Cincinnati. Zack Martin's probably going to top that.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But um, but then, you know, as bitterly disappointing as

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>last season was, they were just like, well, we're gonna

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>keep a lot of these guys that were a part

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of that and just give them bigger job. I mean,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm not saying anything. I think a

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of fans agree with that, and I think it's

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a fair criticism, which if they had done nothing but that,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then I would be alarmed. But they did just enough

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bringing in new faces where I'm like, all right, let's

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>let's see how it goes, see how this goes, but

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I mean, that's that's pretty much where I

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>sit with it, which, like I said, there's there's two

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or three hires that really intrigued me, and then there's

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple where I'm like, Okay, it's not fine whatever.

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on. Let's talk a little bit

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about Dez Bryant. This week. There have been a couple

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of different statements that have been made in the media

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of get that conversation rolling. The one

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was most interesting and that will kind

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of center our conversation around, was one that Michael Irvin

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>form a wide receiver of the Cowboys Hall of Famer

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and Ring of Honor guy, one of the more decorated players,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely wide receivers in history of the Cowboys. And here

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was this quote about Dez Bryant. You don't find number

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>one receivers hanging off trees like leaves. So what are

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you going to do? Let Dez go? Who you got

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to replace him? You don't find them this easily. And

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys would be stupid, stupid to let this boy go.

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Dave that I saw the reason why I

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that I wanted to bring this up on the

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>show is because I then saw you tweet after this

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>tweet that it sums up your feelings and not to

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>put words in your mouth. So I'll let you kind

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of talk about it. Tell me what you like about

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this statement and how it kind of kind of wraps

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>up your thoughts on Dez Bryan what the Cowboys should

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>do with him. Well, I think I've said it a

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>number of times on a variety of different platforms that look,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, he had a bad year. He had a

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>year that is not you can't justify his salary based

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on that. All that good. I know all that. I'm

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not trying to convince you that Dez was actually good

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>last year, But I do think in the grand scheme

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of things, he is better than anything you could realistically

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>hope to find for this coming year. And I think

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get rid of him gives you a problem

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that you don't currently have. Like I mean, you look

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at the landscape of this team and you say, we

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>need a left guard, we need better depth to tackle,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to figure out what's going on with our

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>line backers. Could always use pass rush help, could you

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stand to improve the safeties. You have a number one

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver right now, I'm not I know he was

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>disappointing last year, but you have a guy who can

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>shoulder that workload, and taking him off of this team

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>makes your wide receivers as as disappointing as he was.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes your wide receiver corps immeasurably worse,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and it gives you a hell of a job of

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>replacing him right now. Maybe I mean in the long run,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sure you can do that, but I'm talking about in

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. I think your wide receiver corps is noticeably

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>worse if he's not part of it. Nick, you agreed, disagree.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's it's on the table. This is

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>late January and I'm still looking at all options. I'm

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask him to take a pay cut, because if

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't making not a lot at all and had

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a blow up season, he'd be asking for a raise.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So he is making a lot of Money's the third

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>highest paid receiver in the league. He had a year

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that was in the twenty five pretty much drank twenty

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>fifth across the board in all three major categories. So

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I would ask him to take a pay cut. Actually,

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't really lived up to the contract for the

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons now, so but I don't I don't

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know if you'll I don't. I mean, I don't know

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if he'll he'll get that. I mean, I don't know

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if he'll he'll agree with that. But I'm just looking

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at all options. I want to see, maybe, you know,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can you draft someone, Maybe can you do free agent,

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something's better. I mean, I don't understand what you're

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>saying about if he's not on the team. I mean,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably worse unless you throw that money into another player,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, from another team. I got a couple of

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>things that you tipped me off that we were gonna

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be talking about this like I brought the thunder today,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm ready to talk about this, sure one well

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>before before, but real quick, before you get to that, though,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to let Amber kind of sound off on

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>whether she agrees overall with that statement or not. Well,

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do agree that you can't just get

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>rid of him when you don't have anybody else lined up.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, here's where my problem comes from

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from the statement that Michael Irvin made the saying you

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>guys need to kind of back off on this and

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>less wait till next year, reload again and give it

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>another shot. Well you can't say that, and that really

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bothered me because you wait a whole year to play

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games with the hope of a few more than that.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's not a game that you a season

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that starts every four months or so. You wait so

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>long to play for this little amount of games, and

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>then it's not that easy to like, oh yeah, let's

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just give it another shot. No, you guys need to

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>figure out. But the complicated part, it just goes again

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>with the whole thing that you can't bring someone else.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And then even if you drafted a guy, you would

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>want a veteran here and someone that has that kind

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of experience and knows the team. But I just more

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that I do I agree with him

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>probably needing to be here another year is just what

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>bothered me. Was that second statement that Michael Irving gave,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>well you can back off of this, Well that, I mean,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of football. Though, like we spend so

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>much time, we spend eighty five percent of the time

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and fifteen percent of the time actually

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>watching it, there's sixteen games, less than fifteen percent. It

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>gives you, it forces you into tough situations like that,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, is that not what's happening with the

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff right now. I mean you're like, hey, it

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was a bad year, We're gonna reload, We're gonna try

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this again. If next year is bitterly disappointing, you think

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the changes will be as minute as they were this

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>year in the grands, Probably not. You're probably making wholesale

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>changes if you know, if they don't make the playoffs

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>or if they have a losing record next year. I

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a stretch to say. And so I

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>look at it similarly with Dez. I mean, you chalk

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it up to you chalk it up to a crap year.

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll cross the board and you try to reload. Okay,

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I see that, And so I'm basically saying I see

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael Irvin's logic and saying I don't like Michael Irvin's

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>first line. Number one receivers don't grow on tree. Okay,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there's thirty two number one receivers obviously, So yeah, I mean,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody's got to be the number one receiver. But we're

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about the third highest paid receiver in the league,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and and and it's not He's not producing anywhere close

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to that. That's the issue. And you know, I've never

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>heard the term Dez friendly. I've heard Romo friendly, I've

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>heard Dak friendly. Let's make these this offense friendly to

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>help this quarterback. I don't know if Dez is Dak friendly,

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure that he is, and I'm not

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>sure that it's best for for Dez to be with DA.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>But they're clearly saying we want things to be Dak friendly.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna center this thing around Dak. This is and

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this is something I meant to bring up your last statement,

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's something that's been bothering me for a week

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>since Jerry and Stephen brought this up at the Senior Bowl.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Am I am? I crazy? Like I just feel like

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the world is just choosing to lump Dez's twenty sixteen

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>season in as like this bitter disappointment. He was good

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen. He did not put up numbers, but

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fitting up his salary. But he is not playing in

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an offense that puts him toward that he knew going in.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a run heavy team with a rookie quarterback,

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and he went out. I think he missed three games.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>What he caught like fifty balls for eight hundred yards

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and eight touchdowns. He made clutch plays down the stretch

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, long touchdown against Pittsburgh, was one

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the only guys who delivered on offense against Minnesota,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>put up something like six or seven hundred yard games

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and went off in the playoffs. I mean, he had

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty yards and a touchdown against Green

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Bay and that loss. He played well. His numbers do

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>not show that because he's playing with a rookie quarterback.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But to lump twenty sixteen in as well, you know why,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know why that's happened. The reason why that happened

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is because it's sandwiched between two years that weren't for sure.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why when you look at and when

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you compare those three years to the three years previous

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to that, there is a stark contrast. And I think

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that's why people are starting to say, well, maybe you're

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>getting the downside of Dez Bryan in the last three years,

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>even though I agree with you. In sixteen he had

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a good year. You can't twenty seventeen. And it's I mean,

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an excuse to say he was hurt in twenty fifteen,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>even though it's true. But everyone had a good year

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in two sixteen. Basically. Yeah, but again, that's the kind

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of energy that bounces off of each other. Now you

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>got a year that your running back goes out and

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you are you're counting on the receivers to kind of

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>help out this offense, and the number one receiver doesn't

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. I mean, that's a problem. And you can't

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>blame it on Dak. I mean I get that, Dad. Yes,

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not perfect, and part of it was, you know,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he didn't play one hundred percent great. I agree, But

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I see, Okay, you go

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>into the second year, you had training camp, you had

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all those practices that you have during the week out

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>there on the field, practicing with each other, and you

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>still don't see a progress between the two. You still

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>don't see that connection. And take away the fact of

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all those plays where Dag didn't throw well the ones

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that he did, still it was death. He couldn't as

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a RECEI he couldn't do the job as a receiver.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I would argue though, And that's another thing. You know,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we talk about how bad their chemistry is. It looked

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>fine in twenty sixteen. I mean maybe it wasn't. It

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as good as it was with Tony Romo. Tony Romos,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>which is to be expected exactly, So don't even come

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>at me with that, because if you expect Dac to

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be on that level right now, I don't want to

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Like the blueprint for the way this team

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>operates changed when Tony Romo lost his job. It's not

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that team anymore. And by the way, you signed Deaz

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to play for that kind of quarterback. So no, this

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>contract is not great and it would be wise to

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>probably try to get out of it maybe next year

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if his play doesn't improve. But I think it is

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what it is. And like I said, I think with

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff being said, this is a team that's

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>built a very specific way. There's a very specific way

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for this team to win, and losing your running back

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and your left tackle for a significant chunk of the

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>season drastically altered that. Again, not trying to say it.

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Deaz played well, but I think you have to take

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff into account and just saying he's crap.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go and take our first break. When

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I think we're going to change the

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation a little bit because I think there are really

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>two questions here that we need to answer. Number One,

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is this team really worse off if Dez Bryant is gone?

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I think we need to look back to those

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>three games where they missed him in twenty sixteen and

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>see if maybe that gives us some perspective. And then

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the second thing is, if you really believe they have

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to replace him, are there better options out there, specifically

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in free agency that you could bring in If you're

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to pay top dollar, should you be paying top

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>dollar maybe to a better option. I think those are

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the two questions we got to answer. We'll do that

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. It can be hard to find the right

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>resource for learning about important financial matters. You search how

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to build savings, you end up reading about the one

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you a taller.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Com a safe little corner of the internet for answering

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>your financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Money Habits can show you how to make the most

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of your money without resorting to random searches that always

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>seem to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit better money habits dot com. What

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>means you've got the passion and the heart to do

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season. Law AT

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nations. Ice

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>called Doctor Pepper and the Dallas Cowboys go way back.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They belong together like Texas and football, Silver and Blue

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Shotgun Formations and Hail Mary's. Having a Cowboys football party

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>without Doctor Pepper is like having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't recommend it. So next time you have a tailgate, homegate,

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else kind of gate, grab some ice called

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper for you and your friends to enjoy. It's

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper, the one U crave.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land. You need equipment with values

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are. Like

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>John Deer compact tractors with a six year power train

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>warrant to hiding big features that help you work less

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>deals in my John Deer dealer dot com. Slash Football terms, conditions, exclusions,

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and warranty limitations apply, so if you love for details.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome back. It is the second

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>second of the Break live from the s w DC

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage studios. At the start, we're talking about Dez Bryant

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 1>some interesting thoughts. I guess in that initial segment what

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do is I want to focus in

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on two specific things. One Michael Loran

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of made and I think actually, Dave, you made

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this point that you feel as though with Dez being

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>gone there would be a big, gaping hole left without him.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's the production or not, there's something that you're

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>missing if you don't have him. I want you guys

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to discuss for a second the three games period in

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen when Dez wasn't here, when he was out injured,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at those three games, I went

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>back and pulled some of the numbers. They won all

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>three games, cowbel Boys with three and oh in those

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>three games, Dak had two hundred and forty seven two

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty seven and two hundred and forty five

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>yards in the three games, had a total of six

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and only one interception. They played pretty well. Terrence

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>william was the leading receiver in two of the games. Zeke,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>which was the big story, played out of his mind,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and fifty seven, one hundred and thirty four,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty eight. But when you start thinking

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about how this team was constructed, and Dave you kind

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of mentioned this as well. Who they beaten here? They

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>beat Green Bay at Green Bay, which is a big

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>win I think, and then they beat Cincinnati at home,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and then they beat San Francisco in San Francisco, which

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and whatever, Cincinnati probably whatever. I just feel

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like here, I mean, I'm just looking at the order

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is not Yeah snows it was at San Francisco, then

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>at home against Cincinnati, then at Green Bay got it. Yeah,

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not missing that Cincinnati game. What happened then? Zeke

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at Zeke balled out? Nothing? Lead? Yeah? Yeah, right, keep

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>away from them. But my point is that if you

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>look at how this team is constructed, which you guys

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>have all talked about, this team is constructed to be

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a running team, and maybe that means you don't need

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a high paid, top wide receiver in order

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>for this offense to go. Assuming your running backs in

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>place and he's not out suspended for six games, and

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>assuming your offensive line is intact, what do you guys think?

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there's merit to that. And like I, you know, Des'

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>contract is not good for this team in the long haul,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and I've said it a million times. In an ideal world,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, you would go through this year as

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>best you can, keeping him, and then seek to offload

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that deal next year because it's easier and more friendly

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. Um I think there's something to be said

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for that. But again, that's great they played. They played

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>great in that three week stretch. I think I'm just

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm leary about the idea. I mean, let's I'm assuming

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Butler is no longer a part of this team

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen either, which he had a role in

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>at least two of those games. He had a touchdown

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco and was big for this That was

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>his best game, one touchdown, and he was big for

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them against Green Bay too. He had a nice touchdown

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on that drive right before the half, so he played

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a role there. So you're basically saying, I mean, if

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're not keeping Dez, you're signing a mid tier

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver replacement in free agency who I mean, maybe he's better,

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe isn't for the month, and and you're still you're

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.959
<v Speaker 1>overpaying him, so you're still gonna have to pay more

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>than you probably want to, or you're drafting a guy

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>who history indicates won't likely be ready to go from

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>day one, especially with a rookie quarterback. And I've got

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers to back this up, just in case you were curious.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't at work yesterday. I spent the entire afternoon

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>researching wide receivers. In the time since Dez Bryant has

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>been drafted, So, going back to twenty ten, two hundred

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifty receivers have been drafted into the NFL. Thirty

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>seven of them have made a what I would call

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a significant impact in their rookie year, which so my

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>cutoff for that was forty catches, give or take six

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards, give or take five touchdowns, give or take.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Thirty seven guys hit those How many of those were

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>first round picks? Twelve of the thirty seven, and seven

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of those twelve were in the top fifteen. How many

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>overall were first round picks? Like, That's what I want

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to know, is, like you you're total number of two

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty something that were drafted wide receivers ever drafted.

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking how many first round wide receivers were drafted,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and then compare that number to how many of those

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>were I can impactful players. I can answer that for you.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I'm not going to do it on the

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>air because I would have to go through but thirty seven.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So of the thirty seven guys who have hit that milestone,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve of them were first round picks, ten were second,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're you need to draft the guy high, first

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>or second. Right. Yeah. And by the way of the guys,

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of those thirty seven guys, nineteen of them matched what

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're calling a bad season by Dez Bryan in twenty seventeen.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen guys in the last eight years. Right. But if

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you get if you get that production in their rookie

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>year of what you call the bad season, your expectation

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is that that's their floor. Right, sure, right, but there's

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>an eight percent chance you're going to get a guy

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>who's capable of doing that in his first year. Well,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that because we don't know if it's

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a first and second round pick. That's why I was

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>asking the total number that are first and second round

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>picks fifteen of the nineteen or first and second round picks.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Even still, and I can go back and do this,

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're still talking. You're talking six second round picks

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out of probably thirty that have been drafted. And that's

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>why I want to know. The numbers aren't in your favor.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the point I'm trying to make. Then you go

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to free agency, who you who are you looking at.

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I got a name for you, go for it. I

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>think Jarvis Landry is a guy that you definitely should

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>look at. If you talk about can you is there

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a way for you to take the money that you're

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>giving to Dez Bryant? And what's wrong? Nothing? This is

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>where my contract no, and and because he's too I

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But here's the deal. You think about it

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of a guy like Jarvis Landry, if

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you signed him to a long term deal, it is

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five year old wide receiver. You signed him

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to a long term deal, there's a way for you

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to get him for this year for relatively cheap. Right, Yes,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to count against your cap. So all that

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>being said, would you rather have a guy like Jarvis

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Landry who is a guy who has great hands, runs

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>great routes that maybe adds that that extra little whatever

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you need in a in an offense where let's let's

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>face it, what's most important in from a receiver. I

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>think in this offense is can you move the chains?

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think he is a volume receiver. He fits

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the bill. I think he checks a lot of the

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>check marks of what would be a great receiver in

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this particular offense, you're going to spend the money on

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody like that, then, does that make make it more

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>palatable to not have Dez Bryan on this team. I

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely despise the idea of cutting Daz just to take

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on another seventy million dollar contract, and that's what it

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would cost. You're talking, Oh, yeah, you gotta have to

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>pay him, no doubt about. You have to pay him.

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Boatrack dot Com puts his market value at thirteen point eight,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and teams drastically overpay for market value all the time.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Franchise tag is sixteen based on what Jarvis Landry's done

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in his career. It's understandable if he tries to demand fifteen,

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and it won't be surprising if he gets it right.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're cutting days to immediately take on a similar

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>number with no guarantee that it's going to pay off

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>based on what we've seen so far from your quarterback however, Well,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you cut Daz this year, you save about

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>eight million on your cap and you could probably save

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more if you did them, if you'd cut him after

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>June for you know, designated. You can't use that money,

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't, Yeah, you don't use it on that, but

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you you use it when you that's when you pay

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Lawrence and all that kind of stuff, right, you

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can do Zach Martin after June first also, um, but

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but I you know you also you got Romo's money

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's counting this year as well. So I agree with

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>your point about you front you backload the contract a

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit where you can kind of make that swap,

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about a twenty nine year old receiver

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to a twenty five year old receiver who runs better

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>routes and is better a better fit. Like I see

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that part of it there. Because if you say you're

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna save eight million dollars if you cut days, but

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you I mean, what does Terrence make four

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>million a year something like that? Four point five okay

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>four point five as as a number two receiver, So

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you got to you gotta replace it somehow, So you're

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not really gonna save a lot of money. I mean,

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that would be a bold move. But I kind

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of can see the point because what this team needs

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is a better route runner, a guy that can adjust.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you're gonna keep Dez on this team,

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then sang law this new receiver's coach. You need to

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>put him to work, and he's not. If he doesn't

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>take a pay cut, then Desney needs to spend the

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>entire year trying to get better at running routes. That's

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>just you wouldn't think that after an eight year career,

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but he needs to. So it's holding him back. Let

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>me let me ask you this. Y'all just outline that

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so beautifully, and so I just I feel like we're

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>walking into a trap here. You're not. You're not walking

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>into like there. I mean, you can have whatever opinion

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you want. It's totally doable. The Cowboys have something like

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty million in cap space. Would you agree that they're

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a long term deal well done

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>with DeMarcus Lawrence before free agency, before free four the

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>league year starts. Probably yeah, Probably not. It seems unlikely.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd have no idea why it was a report out

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the other day to sit that they were trying to

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that it might, but I don't know. Steve Oh Stephen

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones said at the Senior Bowl that he wants to

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>get it done as quickly as possible and not have

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to use the franchise and if it does, it's that

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>means it's a very favorable deal for the organization if

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you and maybe I'm wrong, but if I'm DeMarcus Lawrence

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm done with the Pro Bowl, I would sit

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in my house and not risk injury for anything and

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm either about to get a one year,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen million dollar payday or I'm going to hit the

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>open market and somebody might get really nuts. I have

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>no idea why he would agree to a deal right now.

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. Yeah, maybe he will, but

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense to me. So you're spending seventeen

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>million of your twenty million on DeMarcus Lawrence for the

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>time being. Assuming you don't get an extension done with

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin right now, you can restructure Travis Frederick's contract

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to give you something like six seven million. This is

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.959
<v Speaker 1>all coming from spotrack dot com. You can look at

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it yourself. This isn't it's not like. Let me ask

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you this question real quick, just as a point of clarity.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>When you say you have that seventeen million against your cap,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do you have to be under the cap starting with

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>free agency? Once you tag let's say they have to

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>tag him. Once you tag him, do you have to

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have that seventeen million allotted against your cap? I believe

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's held, it has to be accounted for you. Yes, yeah,

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>even if he doesn't sign his tender and until July,

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and you have to stay under the cap the entire

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>free agency period. Like I thought there was a point

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>at which there was like a date with after which

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to be under the cap. I didn't know

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that there was, like that was always you had to

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be under the cap. Is that accurate? You have to

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be under the cap by the start of the league year, right,

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and then your top fifty one salaries count right? Okay, thanks,

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So with all the finagling and the Cowboys do this

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>every year, it's not as drastic as it sounds. Even

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>if you have to carry the franchise tag, they can

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>probably find a way free up about ten million in

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>cap space. If they were to get an extension done

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with Zach Martin, that would probably give him another four

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to five million, Like you're talking about as much as

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen million dollars in cap space. You can do it,

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. And then that's not even including cutting Deaz,

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>which would free up another eight. So if you want

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a splash, you got the money, you can

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>make the money to do you absolutely can, would you

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really do you? And maybe you do. I hate the

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of doing all that work and then immediately tying

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>myself to Jarvis Landry or Alan Maybe Alan Robinson's your guy.

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You can go get him for thirteen million dollars a year.

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't love that. And then after there's a kind

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of a steep drop off after those two. You got

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Lee. There's not a lot of great free agents

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>outside those Marquis Lee and Paul Richardson who have never

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>had thousand yards seasons, Sammy Watkins, who's had injury issues.

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I hate the idea of turning around and handing that

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of money to one of those guys when I've

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>already got Dez Bryan on there. I'm already overpaying a receiver.

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He's already been here, he's already comfortable. As far as

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I know, he gets along with everybody in the locker room,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>even in light of all this stuff. I mean, if

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>he left the team, who knows what would come out.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have any reason to believe that there's

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some type of rift in the locker room. What if

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry is deck friendly, because it is not. The

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>problem I have with Michael Irving's statement about being number

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>one is that how many number one receivers have defensive

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>coordinators said we'll give you Deaz, we'll give that to you.

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not giving you Beasley, and we're not giving you Witten.

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take away your easy throw and we're gonna

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>make you have a hard throw. That to me. And

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that it's all on DEAs because I

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think Dak that's where Dak Dad can't make that throw consistent. Now,

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where his end experience has come into play. And

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think when we talked to all years is defense

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>coordinators is going to figure him out. I think they did.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they figured it out and they won. They

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>said we will will. We're not giving you these short throws.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to go these fifty fifty balls. And it

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was about fifty fifty. He caught what sixty something passes,

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine passes. It was like one hundred and twenty

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and thirty, So it was about fifty fifty

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on every ball. And you know we call them fifty

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty balls the faith. Everything was fifty fifty with Daz,

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not all Deaz's fault Dak. Dak still has to figure

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that out. But I'm talking about if they're making Dak friendly,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe Dez isn't anymore. And you know, that's the interesting

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>thing about this whole conversation. I think if Dak goes,

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry, if Dez goes to another team

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with a more experience, more accurate, will order back, he

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>will light it up and have a great year. This

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>is not about Dez by himself. This is about, like

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you say, Nick, this is about is Dez a great

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>fit for Dak? And that's why I don't know if

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that's accurate. I think there might be. And that's why

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I bring up the guy the name Jarvis Landry. I

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think a guy like him that gets open more, it

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>has more separation, has better hands. In my opinion, I

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think he might be a better fit for this offense

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and what they're trying to do converting those third downs

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>moving to chains. I think he might just be a

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>better fit than Dez is in this offense. I already

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a knee jerk reaction to say Dak

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and Dez just absolutely don't fit because I thought, I

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody saying that. I'm saying, all right, that's

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what it's being sucret. Well, I never got to the

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>other half of my hypothetical, which is, would you rather

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>do all that finagling, maybe jeopardize your long term cap

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>by backloading another deal for another receiver paying him seventy

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 1>million that's what it would cost to sign Jarvis Landry

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Or would you rather just grin and Barrett hope that

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>des can recover and spend one of your first three

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>draft picks on a receiver, because that's again looking at it,

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where it says you have to find these guys.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you still you still would spend a pick

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>one top three picks on a wide receiver, whether you

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>go out and get a free agent or not. And

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>if that's I just I don't understand the point of

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>putting new money and new deals with new years on

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the table. When so all right, let's you keep Dez.

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>You just you don't touch his money, you just leave

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>it alone. You restructure Frederick because knock on wood, he's

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>never missed a snap in his life. You can go

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>get Juju Smith Shuster sixty second overall pick. You can

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>get Cooper Cup sixty ninth overall pick, Sterling Shepherd forty,

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas forty seventh overall pick. And then you got

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>your freak shows, Amari Cooper, Sammy Watkins, Mike Evans, Odell Beckham.

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>That's probably not realistic. Jordan Matthews forty second overall pick,

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry sixty third overall pick. You can find solid receivers.

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find really solid receivers even as late as

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the second round. Bring them in here. Don't make them

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>do it all from day one, because very few guys

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>have proven they can handle that. Let them be the

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>third right wide receiver on this team. And if Dez

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't recover, or if Terrence doesn't recover, hell, you could

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>cut them both next year and it would be way

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>better for you. But my thing about it is when

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about sticking with what you got, I think

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that what we're seeing in today's NFL is that sticking

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>with what you got gets you beat, especially if you're

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive or defensive coordinator, is not creative enough to do

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>different things with them than what you did before. You

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the teams now that have had

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>success over the last several years, a lot of them

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>went out and they got a piece here, piece there,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>or piece there that they added to a team that

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of pushed them over the top. We saw it

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>happen with the Giants couple of years with their a

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago with their defense. We saw the

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos do it. They went out and got three

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a player at each of the levels on their defense,

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and it took their defense all the way to the

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. We saw the Eagles last year. They did

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. They even got a Ji in the

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>middle of the year. All I'm saying is if you're

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>staying the same, if you're gonna say we're just gonna

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>roll out what we got, well, then you better be

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>really really creative with doing different things with those players.

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't do the same thing in today's NFL, I

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think and be successful. The Broncos are a very

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>rare example where they just they bucked the trends. I

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>mean they did. They went out and plashed a bunch

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of money and immediately were in three straight in AFC

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>title games and won a Super Bowl. But that's just

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>three examples I just gave you in the last five

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>years the Eagles. I don't chalk that up in the

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>same like the Eagles took calculated risks that paid off Alshon.

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey was a one year deal, right, That's not what

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about with Jarvis Landry. How much they paying

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for that one year or eight million dollars that was it. Yeah,

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't give him money at all. I mean they

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>extended him this year. They didn't. They get some free

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>agents on their defense. On defense side of all, Timmy

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Joern again. Timmy Joern again was a trade for like

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round pick. J giy was a trade for

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifth round Yea. All I'm saying. All I'm saying

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is they've changed up their team. So what are you

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna It's not just about the draft. I think you

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>got to bring in some players and change it up

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>or you're gonna be in a gonna be in a

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're doing the same things. And I don't

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>think that works if you've got twelve million dollars on

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your salary cap. I'm all in favor of doing something

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more bold than signing Stephen pie Nolan Carroll

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, the elephant in the room. Would

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you rather just keep Dez Bryant or would you rather

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>let him go and get the safety? Get the guy

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if the safety became available and Cowboys had an opportunity

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to go get him. Frederick Zach Martin, all this stuff,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it, if you got to make

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a choice between the two, I'd rather go get a safety,

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a really great free agency, I'm sorry, a really great

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>veteran safety, than worrying about what I'm gonna do with this.

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced that you have to choose between the

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>two based on everything we just sat to. Maybe in

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a rare circumstance, and for anybody that's not picking up

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>what we're putting down, they're talking about going after Earl

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Thomas in a if, which is not tampering, because he

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>went after Jason Garrett. He went up to the whole team,

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.479
<v Speaker 1>physically went after him and said, come get me if

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if they kick me to the curb in a rare So,

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if they kick him to the curb in a rare

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>circumstance where he is available and he wants to be

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys, probably get him for a good deal.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know that I buy that. But if

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not a great deal, I mean, is he still want

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to get paid, but you can get him for a

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>good deal. Played Sunday in this far and that's it.

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget that. And he'll bring that up in the negotiate.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thomas is from Texas and wants to be a

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys until the forty nine ers offer him double. The

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys like, that's nobody's gonna They're not gonna offer him.

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Remember he played Sunday. There are some roll

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>bowls were a We're talking about how well the Cowboys

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are in good shape because they have fifteen million dollars

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in cap sways, forty nine ers have one hundred million dollars.

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>They can throw whatever the hell they want around. So

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't tell me it's a lot impossible. Yeah no, But

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still saying, though, I think there is something

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to a veteran player that already has a ring and

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>him wanting to go and play for a specific team.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that happens a lot in the end, in

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a rare in a rare circumstance, And honestly, I think

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a better scenario because didn't see it

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>would get something, it would have. It would have to

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be something like this Alex Smith thing where he agrees

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to a new deal immediately, not absolutely one year. Absolutely,

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the deal. Um in a rare sur

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>round pick, fourth round pick. They're gonna lose them anyways, No,

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not. He's under contract for a year. I mean this, Okay,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I would I would give a third. I'm just laying

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>out and maybe I'm a homer when it comes to

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but I would give a third. No good text for

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>every person that says, God, you can get Jason Witten

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in the third. You can also you can get j. J.

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Wilcox in the third. You can get Terence We're going

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to play that game. Yeah, I mean third and fourth.

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I would give a third for Earl Thomas. I would too.

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolute in again, if if it was between Deaz or

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you can have Earl, I'd probably roll the dice and

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 1>go after Earl Thomas. But that doesn't change my opinion.

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Then I think it's it's knee jerk and shortsighted to

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>just think you gotta dumped as sometime in the next

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>three months. That's true, That's okay. We all have our

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>own opinions of what we think should happen. Well, we

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>want it to happen, But you guys all know how

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys work realistically speaking, do you really expect the

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to actually do anything about that? All? Right, hold

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>right there, that's a good tease. We're gonna take a break,

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna come back, and I want you guys to

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>answer that question. What do you think the Cowboys will

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>do in this situation that when we come right back

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio Cowboys fans know that

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the second best of anything simply won't cut it, and

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 1>your skincare should be no different. A long time locker

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>room favorite of the players and the official men's skincare

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the number one best selling men's skincare brand in the

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.720
<v Speaker 1>country because we make products that help guys look, smell,

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to get ten dollars off your first order of

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.479
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good, Smell, oh Good,

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Feel good, official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to talk

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>x's and those with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay,

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us.

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I hear all this talk about what it takes to

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas, but I just

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>say to myself, it's what's up top that matters. Sure,

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you need men with the muscle and heart to get

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>her done. But if your scouts and coaches are listening

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>out there a word of advice. Pick the man with

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the most well worn stetson. That's the one most cut

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 1>out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats are handmade right

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>here in Texas and have been on Cowboys heads for

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred fifty years. The rest of you can

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>visit st dot com slash cowboy to find a retailer

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>nearest you. What does it mean to be a Dallas

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fan. It means you've got the passion of the

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>heart to do your part supporting the Boys no matter what.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why when the game's on the line, you're on

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your feet, whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're more than a fan. You are a member of

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Nation, and so is AT and T doing their

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>part to keep you connected to America's team all season

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>law At and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation.

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break Welcome Back. It is the final

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.760
<v Speaker 1>segment of The Break live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Studios at the Star and Nick, why don't you take

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it away? Oh yeah, yeah, I forgot about that. But

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the figure maybe we jump right in here. Yeah, well,

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't forget about Tommy John when it's that time

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in the morning to put them on, Like, that's never

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a time. You might forget about them here in the

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the second segment to start the third, but

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you certainly. Let's just because they're so comfortable, you don't

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think that they're there, right, You don't ever think about

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>him until it's time to put them on. Don't think

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of the the day because it's so soft

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't even know you're wearing any underwear, but you

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.959
<v Speaker 1>really are. Mostly so it was using the shop exclusively. Yeah,

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>most time, most people, Oh, that's it mostly like got

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like one leg in its. Most guys wear underwear, I

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>would imagine, I don't know, no but them. I don't either.

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Shop exclusive Cowboys underwear at Tommy John dot com Forward

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>slash Cowboys. You get twenty percent off your first order

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys. Tommy John. Thank you, Nick,

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>real real quick. I looked this up during the breaks, Joe,

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I would thank you. Since twenty twenty nine, teams have

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>spent a first round pick on a wide receiver twenty

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>nine total, twelve of them, like I said, hit that

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>six hundred yard in the first year. In the first year,

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and of those twelve, about a little over half, I

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>mean little under half. Of the twelve that did it,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seven of them were top ten, top fifteen types picks.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you take the Cowboys pick this year, five

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 1>guys drafted in that range have done that. So you're

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>looking at a seventeen percent chance that your pick at

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen this year and one of them is ready to

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>go immediately. One of those guys is Dez Bryant, Yes,

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one of one of the five is death, which Damarius

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Thomas says to be another one. He had three hundred

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.479
<v Speaker 1>yards as a rookie. Oh are you talking about guys

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>who hit forty forty catches, six hundred yards five six touchdowns.

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why I guess my argument, like if I'm wrapping

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing up, my argument is, your decision is

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>either you keep Dez Bryant, or if you're gonna get

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of Dez Bryant, you go get yourself the best

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>free agent wide receiver that's out there in Jarvis Landry

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and and if you're not to me, those are really

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the only two options. I don't think that you can

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>count on a on a rookie wide receiver necessary to

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>come in here and be what you wanted to be

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for first. He might be better in future years, so

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I still think you draft him. You just can't count

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on him for this year. And if you get one

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that that shows up this year, great, but you can't

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>count on the fact that this year he's gonna be

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna replace the production that Dez with this Sorry,

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.720
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, I would do something though, in free agency,

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I would do that type of I'm not saying get

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the eagle receiver Alshan Jeffrey, but that type of player.

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you do that with Alan Robinson? I don't know,

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:06.959
<v Speaker 1>because of his injury last year. I just I'm paying

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>my starting quarterback a million dollars. I'm gonna take advantage

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, I'll take advantage of it. Now. It's

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back victually of that fact right now. Well,

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 1>depends depends of what he does and he balls out

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>next year, maybe you try to get a deal early.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>If I'm saying, wines deal up two more years. But

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't, can't. We can't have a good year.

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>He had a pretty good year. But if he has

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a better year and they was zeke back and they

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do better, who is there's no way you can just

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>go in with fourth fourth round pick who franchise wasn't

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>convinced about his deal. I'm trying to make a Kirk

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Cousins comparison here. Is that a dumb deal to you guys?

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make it seem it doesn't make any sense

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. It just says the Redskins knew behind closed

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>doors that just Kirk Cousins absolutely did not want to

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>play there, and so they were like this, this isn't great,

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but we gotta do what we gotta, dude, to protect ourselves.

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Aren't there aren't there other options out there as far

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 1>as veteran quarterbacks that will be available this year that

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you could maybe if you want to spend money on,

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you could spend money on. I mean, this is a

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty four year old quarterback in Alex Smith, and you

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>gave up, in my opinion, one of their best cornerbacks.

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 1>If I was them and a third round pick, it

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me if you're gonna have Alex Smith

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for a year or two and draft a guy. But

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they signed him to a four year deal

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>extension today, so they got him five Smith like thirteen.

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you could maybe get Baker Mayfield. They

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>need to get a running back. To me, Alex Smith

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is better in a balanced offense. You don't like some

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>no do you like big Rob, No, bat Rob Rob whatever,

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Thompson's good, But I'm just saying they need

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a balanced offense that will help Alex Smith. Thompson is good,

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>really good. Yeah, he's good. He's a receiver. He's a

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>little receiver back. But I mean the way they run

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>their offense, I wouldn't be surprising a couple of years

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>if he's their primary guy, because they did that is

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a pass heavy offense. They could like, why the offense

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 1>with Kirk Cousins. Is it going to be a pass

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>heavy offense with Alex Smith? I'll tell you this right now.

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think their positioned to be a run heavy offense.

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So if they're not gonna be passive, what are I

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>going to do? Well? Yesterday I thought the Redskins are

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the NFC from the Cowboys perspective.

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, teams that you have to worry about, and

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>today I think they're the worst team. I mean, I

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's the same either way. You know, I'm not

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a big Kirk Cousins guy because he hasn't ever beaten

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. He's bet he's always been in a one

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 1>dimensional offense. I think if he finds a more balanced offense, yeah,

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal, Like, you know, if you're just

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>assuming Cousins will play where you want them to and

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like you're just taking all that out of the equation,

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd way rather have Kirk Cousins at twenty seven million

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>than Alex Smith at twenty three. I agree with this.

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>It's just me. I agree with you. Okay, let's get

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the question that Amber posed before the break

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has with regards to Des Brown. We've talked a lot

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about what our thoughts are and what we would like

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to see happen. But let's talk about the Cowboys. You

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>guys know this team, well, you know the front office. Well,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect that they're going to do with

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Dez Bryant? And Saul said done. I think when it's

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>all said and done, I don't think Dez is on

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the team next year. Wow, I don't. I mean, if

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I had to just guess, I don't. I'm not going

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and say that that's a better move.

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm really on the fence with it because I see

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>all the points. But I think if you're asking what

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they will do, I think they will try

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to give a pay cut. I think Des has got

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>too much pride for it. I don't think he said,

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what, cut me and see what happens. I

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to an NFC team and to face

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, and I think I think that would happen.

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to just guess, I think I

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's on the team, all right, Dave the

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones's comments at the Senior Bowl don't give me a

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of confidence that I'm right. And I mean I've

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:47.479
<v Speaker 1>talked to plenty of other people who agree with Nick too,

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know when where there's smoke, there's fire,

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But I just I gotta see it to believe it.

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should, maybe I should be more cynical. I mean,

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this team cut to Marcus Ware and Tony Romo, so

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>anything's possible. But these types of things, it just seems

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like there's always a lot of sound and fury signifying

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing Like I just I think he's gonna be here.

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they can, you know, if they draft a guy,

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can badger Room into taking a pay cut

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or something. Maybe, but maybe that's the badgering has already

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>started in Senior Bowl. Yeah, maybe that's what those comments were. Yeah,

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think he'll be here one way or the other.

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Amber Well comments on the Senior Bowl, Yeah, it makes

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>me kind of doubt. But at the end of the day,

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll just stay here. I mean, I find

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it hard to believe. With the Cowboys, Yeah, they've made

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>crazy moves, like you just said, Dave, but at the

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 1>same time, it's like how they feeling they make a

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bold move in the coaching staff. I doubt they're gonna

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>make a bold move with Des. I don't know. I

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:54.439
<v Speaker 1>just he'll be a good headline. It'll be a lot

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>of news to talk about that, but I don't think

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen. I waffle every time I talk about this. Today.

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>My feeling is, I think I agree with Day that

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be here, but I think it's kind

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of a combination of what Nick saying. I think they're

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask him for Pacup, but I think the way

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to structure the new deal gives him

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a clear path to be able to make the money

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>if he can get those numbers back up, And I

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 1>think that will allow Dez to say face on this okay,

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think Des will look at it as okay,

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll show you that I could hit those numbers, and

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna talk some more after this seasons done,

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's how he ends up staying here.

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this the other day. So Dez Bryant

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously wants the football a lot. Yeah, you give him

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a incentive base. I'm not saying it's a good idea. Yeah,

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 1>what happens when the Cowboys defeat the Bears twenty eight

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to seven? Zeke has one hundred and eighty all purpose

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>yards and Dak I mean, and Dez has four catches

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine yards, two catches for fifty five yard pass

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:52.720
<v Speaker 1>interference penalty down to the one that helped but doesn't

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>really show up on the stats. He's not hitting in

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>center base. But Dez was a big part of that.

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you angry Daz at this point? What kind of

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>des are you getting that? Now his money is tied

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to his numbers. Yeah, did they win? They won the game.

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>They won't worry about it later. No, no, no, I

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>don't yeh. But But the question is the question is

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for there are there are some players, there's some players.

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>There's some players that you don't worry so much about

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>whether they're happy or upset about whatever. Dad is one

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of those players. As as as Stephen talked about Senior Bowl,

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he can be volatile at times, and so do you

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>get do you start to worry worry that now you're

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have angry days, even in a locker room where

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're winning. If you go, if you read between

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines on things that he said in twenty sixteen,

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest to you that he wasn't completely happy

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then he I mean, he finished with fifty catches and

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>less than a thousand yards. He ain't cool with that,

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think he had just gotten paid. Now you're

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about his money, and now his money's tied to it.

0:55:45.840 --> 0:55:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I think if if the team is winning, I think

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be all right. I think he's such a

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:53.239
<v Speaker 1>competitor and it's wired to his personality. He might not

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be happy. But if the team is winning, I don't

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>buy that. He was not going to call it like

0:55:57.800 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of noise. And I don't want to be

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy here, But what if the Cowboys were like a

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and eight, nine and seven type of team. You know,

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that really around here, but let's say

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of back and forth. Yeah, I'm getting crazy.

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Now we're getting crazy with the Yeah. I'm not saying

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna fish eight and eight or anything like that,

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. I'm just saying I think that's it

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds good to make it incentive base, But well, this

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is not a friendly offense for Decked. I mean, does

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the throw poll. What if they're gonna get him to

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>cut his salary, They're gonna have to make it incentive base.

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a part of it. Like they're not gonna just

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:30.439
<v Speaker 1>say we're just cutting your salary out right, They're gonna

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a way to be able to earn it back.

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that just seems like what you do in these

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of situations where you have a veteran player, right,

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and that money goes on the cap too. Yep, However,

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>however happy or unhappy he is. When DJ Moore's done

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>having his thousand yard rookie breakout season, you can move

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on from Dez next year. But it's nice to have

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that security blanket. All right, real quick, we got about

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a minute. I need you guys to give me some

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl predictions. New England Patriots face to Philadelphia Eagles.

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you, Amber. Who wins the game? Patriots?

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They better? I hope. So wow? All right, Nick, I

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:09.799
<v Speaker 1>think the street continues, um. I think the Patriots win.

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles stay at zero. I think Cowboy

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:16.959
<v Speaker 1>fans will be more excited about that. Uh. And also,

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the Tom Brady and Bill Belichick.

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if they're playing, they win good year for

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. That's David, That's not true, though. I mean,

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they've lost two. They've lost two of them, and I

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, I feel dumb. I feel dumb going

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>against the I think Tom Brady's the best quarterback ever.

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And I mean Bill Belichick's awesome. Everybody knows that. But

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you better not say no, don't even how do how

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even say it? How the Giants? How the Giants

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>win those two? What they have defensive had a pretty

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 1>nasty pass rush, didn't they Just saying, Man, these Eagles,

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>these Eagles front sevens gross in a good way. And

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust Nick Foles, but if they can run

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball with a giant and blown and you get

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a few sacks and maybe get a sack fumblers, I

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of feel like the Eagles might win this game.

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe I'm crazy, but it's just kind

0:58:10.280 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of You're not the only person that's saying that. I

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>heard other people say it, and you're absolutely right, Like

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not and it's not. It's not just like they

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have like this one badass in They've got like eight

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 1>guys who get after the passer. And when the Patriots

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have lost in the Super Bowl, it's been because the

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive front for the other team, the Giants, was appreciably

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>better and they beat Brady up. As long as the

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Boys has that. You think the Cowboys have ever been

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl winning team's last loss? Like, like, it's

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a good question. I lost to the Cowboys then they

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:43.480
<v Speaker 1>won Super Bowl. Definitely wasn't a shutout. Yeah, I know

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that game doesn't matter six nothing, baby, But it's like,

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>after that game, you can still not looking them like

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go win. So you're going for the Eagles too. Oh,

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going for the Eagle, make no mistake about it.

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I have never ever in my life rooted for the Patriots.

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I will be rooting for the Patriot. Who do you

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think is gonna win? Yeah? I think the Patriots ultimately win,

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just because I say, do you think it's gonna be?

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I still believe Belichick is just so good. I just

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Eagles have enough to beat him. Yep.

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's kind of how I look at it,

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's probably the safe pick because you look

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at history and history says that that's usually what happened.

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So says the Eagles don't wines are full. That's a

0:59:21.920 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>good point. That's a great point. All Right. We appreciate

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys. You want us to be back next Wednesday.

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>These guys will be back next Wednesday. Talk more Cowboys

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>football here on the Break till then for Nick Eatman,

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave helm and Amber Garcia Derek Eagleton. This has been

0:59:32.520 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This

0:59:39.880 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.