WEBVTT - What do Venture Capitalists Think About the Crypto Market?

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg Ihad podcast, and

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Tuesday, February seventh. Like many buzzy, fast growth, high

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>risk industries, companies operating in and around crypto on the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>blockchain have relied heavily on venture capital to fund their activities.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Venture capitalists, or vcs as they're more commonly known, manage

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>pools of private money. What sets them apart from many

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of investors is that they tend to focus

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on the riskiest possible bets. For every ten or so investments,

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they expect that some eight or nine of them might fail.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But what keeps them in business year after year is

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that every now and then one of those high risk

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bets pays off spectacularly, covering the losses in the rest

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolio. Given their appetite for risk and reward,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprised that, for a while VC is big

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and small, we're flocking to crypto. But what does the

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>relatively depressed environment mean for VC investments and digital assets

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these days? Bloomberg reports Hanna Miller joins me now to

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>discuss Hannah. Always a pleasure to have you on the show.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Let's talk about one of

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>our favorite topics. I mean, I don't know if it's

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one of your favorite topics, but we do talk a

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lot about venture capitalists or vcs, and the reason we

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about them is because they provide the

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to use the buzzy word, the liquidity to use,

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the reality, the cash that crypto startups, especially right now,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really desperately need to fund their ongoing activities. Now, one

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things I've appreciated about your reporting over time

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is you know, if you go back and you read

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the various things that you've written, it starts from this

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>place of here are signs that vcs are positive on crypto,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>but not like a hundred percents invested too q one

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>all time record high investments made into crypto to four

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>quarto and they're like, oh, we're just gonna pull it

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit, not a huge amount, but some

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the investor sentiment in venture capital right now? Like

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking to these folks and you're asking them,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so all that money you put into f t X

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>regrets question Mark, how how does that go. Yeah. So

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I've always referred to venture capitalists as some of the

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry's biggest cheerleaders, so you know, they're definitely an

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>important barometer for how things are going within the industry.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>And with this fourth quarter, you know, venture capitalists are

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>still investing in crypto startups, that's clear. There's just been

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sharp decline. So it was a seventy five

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>percent drop in the fourth quarter of two compared to

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the same period a year prior. And you know that

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's just like, that is a big plunge. It

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>shows a pretty dramatic shift, and I think it's also

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>showing a divide. You know, we had a lot of

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>big name venture capitalists who are very established. They're known

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for investing in a broad array of tech companies, and

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they kind of came into crypto, you know, started back

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in companies like FTX, and now I think those generalist

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>FECs are starting to pull back. You know, they're like,

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, maybe this crypto thing isn't all it's cracked

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>up to be. And this is a point that you've

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>made a few times, which is that there's this real

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>divide between the phrase that you use like the neuralist vcs,

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>right who might have been investing in tech or in

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>finance and who kind of came into crypto and the

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of crypto native or crypto specialist vcs. Yeah, you know,

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>these these crypto native vcs are still sticking with the

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>industry because that's their entire investment thesis. That's what they're

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>staking on here. And you know, you're still seeing investments

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>from those vcs. And so I think that you know,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>while we saw this you know, dramatic plunge, uh, it

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that crypto is going away. There's still a

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, billions of dollars being poured into this industry.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>How come. So I think people still see use cases

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for blockchain, you know that they think the full potential

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of this technology hasn't been realized. And we've seen a

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest, you know in different types of startups

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that have cropped up in the crypto space. So maybe

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a cybersecurity for that audits your code

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that it's not susceptible to hacks, or

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a gaming startup that uses n f t

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>s in some way. So there are still people who

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>see promise in this and they think that, yeah, f

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>t X was a setback, but that doesn't define the industry.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There's also a lot of vcs who differentiate between centralized

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>exchanges and decentralized entities and are really betting on DeFi

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're looking at these centralized finance startups. They're

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they're backing those versus centralized exchanges like f t X.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And for the vcs who are sort of staying in it,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>even if, as you note, not necessarily at the level

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that they were last year, how has their approach changed?

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as an as an industry, as a set

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of investors, they're supposed to be relatively sophisticated. This is

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely the story that they tell about themselves to the market,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which is like you want us in your you know,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in your realm as it were, because we we can

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>help were smart as we give me connections. But some

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of that vaunted expertise seems to have gone right out

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the window when it came to asking founders tough questions

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about if they had any of the crypto that they

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>said they had. Yeah, so I think in the past,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, two years or so, vcs came into this

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they had to play a bit fast

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and loose in order to become a part of deals

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because things were moving really quickly. Evaluations were white hot.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were huge and venture capitalists I think

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>we're suffering from fear of missing out Felmo. And you know,

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they were maybe willing to set aside some of their

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 1>typical due diligence practices, some of the more intense questions

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would be willing to ask in order to

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>move forward with a deal. And I think now we

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a reset. You know, I talked to a

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalist named David Pacman. He's a managing partner at

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>coin Fund, which is a crypto native venture fund held

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>by the name Yes, and you know we talked about,

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pace of deals selling down. I think

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we went through obviously a major correction market correction last year,

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>exacerbated by a bunch of fat acting, you know, self

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>harm in crypto that led to a lot of money

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving the space. I would classify some of that money

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a sort of tourist money that's chasing just momentum anywhere.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But also we saw some of the traditional vcs who

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>had been there are more traditional expectations now that maybe

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>got thrown out the window previously. You know that there

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a board, There needs to be a

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>board seat. You know. It's definitely a sort of resetting

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of expectations from from before. Now when we talk about

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>things like vcs want to be on the board, what

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>does that mean in practice? Yeah, I mean, I think

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that more vcs are demanding board seats again,

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know post FTX, like that that makes sense because

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>FTX did not have a formal board, and that board

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>would have been a safeguard you know, in theory that

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would have helped keep things in check. Um.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We also know that a lot of the founders in

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space, including Sam Bankman Freed, are extremely young.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is their their first you know, big business experience.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They haven't led a company before. So having a board

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in place can help, you know, provide guidance to young founders.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It can also you know, make sure that they're not

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>engaging in unsavory or just ridiculous business practices like keeping

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>all of your accounting on QuickBooks. Um. But yeah, I

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think you know, moving ahead this kind of like you know,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing which companies have boards, which don't you know, that's

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very interesting thing that actually we're

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>looking into as a team. And one of the things,

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the points that David Pacman made in your

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>interview with him, is this idea that some of these

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto companies, especially in the FTX, be and we're like

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>doing too much. Now, obviously he's a Poston running a

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>specialist crypto fund, so he's going to be a fan

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of like narrow portfolios. But is there anything to the

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, you have these entities that are

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 1>run by relatively inexperienced folks that maybe their second or

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>third real job quote unquote out of college. They're raising

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars and suddenly they're like in gaming, in

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>centralized exchanges, in defy, doing token offerings over here and

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>their own investments over there. Like, is there suddenly kind

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of a in praise of simplification vibe going around the valley? Yeah,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been interesting to see, you know that

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some areas within crypto that have a lot

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of resilience. So even just going back to basics like

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>developing you know, block chain infrastructure, you know, things that

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can help with trading. You know, stuff like that that's

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a little maybe maybe it's maybe it's less sexy than

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>creating some massive centralized exchange, but still a vital building

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>block within the world of crypto. So yeah, you know, David,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>David mentioned that, you know that that infrastructure is a

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty key area right now, and you're asking, like, what

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are we focused on? Those people tend to be deep

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the infrastructure build out right now. We have base

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>layers Layer ones, which is a layer for decentralized compute

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and really record keeping. But we don't fully have decentralized storage,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't have fully decentralized databases, we don't have decentralized personalization,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have decentralized AI. These are pieces of the

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tech stack that are readily available in Web two that

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be built out. I think it's been interesting

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to see that, you know, startups that might not necessarily

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>identify as crypto startups, that they're gaming startups and maybe

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>use some element of blockchain, you know, like they non

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fungible tokens in the game, you know, something along those lines.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Those have seen some resilience over the past few months.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think, yeah, you know, thinking more specialized, thinking smaller.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, those are things that are helping founders, you know,

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as they scrounge up funds during this difficult time. Up next,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>more from Bloomberg Report to Hanna Milla on what this

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing crypto winter means for crypto vcs. We'll be right back.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We did ask for folks to tell us if they

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>had any blockchain games that you like. The people did emails.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna um, I'm gonna mention a couple of them, so,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one person talked about metal Core, another person

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about Hunters on Chain, which does have an n

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>f T element. There are other folks who kind of

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>made the point that you did, which is instead of

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>folks being like, this is a blockchain based game, it's like,

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a game that has some crypto elements. It

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>might be n f T s, it might be crypto.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And I was talking to the developers of a game

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's still very much in kind of like alpha early beta,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>where you know, they were like, the n f T

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>elements of this game are not the point, right, Like

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>there to be an interesting at or an interesting incentive,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're not the point. And so perhaps one thing

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see is more pure play gaming start ups

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, dabble in blockchain rather than the other

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>way around. Yeah, I think when I've talked to a

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of gaming developers who are experimenting with blockchain, you know,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>they want blockchain to be in the background. They don't

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be so in your face that this is

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a crypto game, this is, you know, an n f

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>T game. They wanted to just be an element and

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that the gameplay overall is smooth. It feels like a

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>normal game. You know, it's not clunky in any way.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, and talking to people who

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>are maybe switching over from traditional gaming into blockchain gaming,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they want to take a traditional gaming feel

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, improve that with blockchain, but have it

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of beyond the downlow, if that makes sense. Absolutely,

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And kind of as a kind of a closing thought,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Ventra capitals are relatively small industry. There's hundreds of billions

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in capital here, but it's you know, it's

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same I don't know, hundred or a hundred

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifty so people around the world, many of whom

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have been personally as well as professionally burned by the

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>results of the last several months. And this conversation is

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>happening around the same time when many of the vaunted

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tech companies that were also fueled by venture capital are

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>having their own reckoning is too strong a word, but

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at least questions are being raised about the sustainability of

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>their various business models. Is VC sort of doing its

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>own kind of like internal interrogation and asking like, are

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there things that the industry three needs to change, whether

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>it relates to crypto, whether it leads to tech, but

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just overall to you know, continue to be sustainable and

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>successful in the future. I think vcs are evaluating their practices,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at what went wrong here. We know there's

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>also outside pressure that regulators are looking into the role

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of vcs and the collapse of FTX, that they're you know,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>talking with them, questioning them, so that I think is

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just an added pressure on all of this. But yeah,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a reckoning. You know, this is

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, isn't unique to crypto, that venture

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>capitalists are are looking at the role that they played

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in pushing these companies to a very high point, you know,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe too high a point, maybe past realistic expectations and

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they're now, you know, reckoning with the consequences of that,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you'll continue reporting on those consequences. Thank

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you as always for being on the show. Thank you.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>That was Bloomberg reporter Hannah Miller. You can find more

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of her reporting in the Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and she also pops up in our twice

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>weekly crypto newsletter called Bloomberg Crypto, so make sure to subscribe.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more shows from I Heart Radio,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Vergelina. Our

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Faruke

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and Sharon Barrero. Our associate producers are Ty Butler and

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy Marie Schmal We'll be

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow. The fat At a s