WEBVTT - China Trading Curbs, Bilateral Eco Talks

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Good morning.

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Brian Curtis and I'm Doug Prisner. Here are the

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 2>stories we're following today.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, a new medical emergency for the British monarchy. Let's

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 3>get to Dan Schwartzman in New York with more.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hey.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Brian Buckingham Palace says that King Charles is being treated

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 4>for an unspecified form of cancer and will be stepping

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 4>back from public duties. The cancer was discovered late in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 4>January while the seventy five year old was in the

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 4>hospital being treated for an enlarged prostate. The pass only

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 4>has said that the cancer is not related to that

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 4>prostate condition. President Biden has expressed his concern and says

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 4>he will reach out to the king, whom he met

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 4>back in July. Charles has only been king since September

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 4>after the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth. Northern California

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.959
<v Speaker 4>is trying to dig out from the storms. Southern California

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 4>is still under emergency warnings. Bloomberg's Had Baxter reports from

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Four days of the atmospheric river weather conditions were the

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 5>worst coming over the weekend. Some Bay Area peaks got

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 5>one hundred mile per hour winds, not that high for

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 5>most of US, and the power outages were widespread. At

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 5>one point, as much as half of Silicon Valley customers

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 5>lost power at our home eighteen hours without power of

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 5>things of ease now hopefully, although tragically two people did

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 5>die from falling trees. The focus now has gone to

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 5>southern California, where there is flooding and power outages, as

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 5>well as landslides in the Hollywood Hills and Santa Monica Mountains.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 5>There are still evacuation orders in place and several rescues

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 5>have had to happen in San Francisco. I'm at Baxter Bloomberg.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 6>Radio thanks Ed.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Secretary of State Anthony blinkoln has kicked off his fifth

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 4>visit to the Middle East since Samasa's attack of Israel

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>back in October, and he started it with a meeting

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Blincoln will

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>visit Egypt cutter in Israel also on this latest trip. Meanwhile,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 4>ceasefire talks continue, with the US cutter in Egypt drawing

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 4>up a proposal that would see a stop in hostilities

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 4>for several weeks, the phased release of remaining hostages Both

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 4>House Republican leaders and GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump have

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 4>rejected a bipartisan Senate deal to impose new border restrictions

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 4>while tying in billions of dollars of aid to Ukraine.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Speaker Mike Johnson has called the deal quote dead on

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 4>arrival and a wasted time. Both Senate leaders Chuck Schumer

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>and Mitch McConnell back the bill, which allows the Department

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 4>of Homeland Security to start turning away asylum seekers whenever

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 4>encounters reached four thousand daily for a week. The bill

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 4>would also tough in qualifications to seek asylum in the country.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Johnson and other Republicans are pushing for much stricter immigration

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 4>policies in exchange unlocked tens of billions of.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 6>Dollars of aid to Ukraine.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 4>The Wall Street Journal reports that Republican presidential candidate Nikki

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>Haley has requested Secret Service protection after receiving threats. Haley's

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 4>campaign has not detailed what threats led to the request.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 4>The Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to grant

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 4>a protective detail after consulting with a Congressional advisory committee.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Haley has previously talked about a swatting episode that occurred

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 4>back in December that sent law enforcement to her South

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Carolina home.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 6>The former governor, though was not home at the time.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Global News twenty four hours a day and whenever you

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 4>want it with Bloomberg News.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Now. I'm Dan Schwartzman, and this is Bloomberg Brian.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Dan, thanks very much. Six minutes past the hour. It's

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>time now for the top business stories of the hour.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 3>China is said to be tightening trading restrictions on domestic

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors and some offshore units. Bloomberg Yvon Mann has

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 3>more on this story from Hong Kong.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 7>We hear Chinese officials have imposed caps on some brokerages

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 7>cross border total return swaps with clients. This is a

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 7>channel that can be used by Chinese investors to short

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 7>Hong Kong stocks. At the same time, Chinese brokers who

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 7>use a channel to buy mainland shares for their offshore

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 7>units were told not to reduce their positions. Also, we

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 7>hear some hedge funds have been banned from placing cell

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 7>orders completely, and still others have been barred from cutting

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 7>stock positions in leverage funds. Economists say this could provide

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 7>some short term relief, but may be counter productive as

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 7>investors worry about their ability to exit the market in

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 7>Hong Kong. I'm von Mann Bloomberg Radio.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Well here in the States, we mentioned a moment ago

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>how strong the economic news of the day was US

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>services expanding by the most in four months during the

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>month of January. Now that follows last Friday's surprisingly strong

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>jobs report. Both of these data points kind of spoil

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the notion of a federate cut in March. We heard

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>today from the head of the Chicago FED, Austin Goulesby.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>He was saying, it's important to consider all aspects of

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the data.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 8>We just got to be mindful in seeing these big

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 8>strong jobs numbers and big GDP numbers that they do

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 8>not have to mean overheating in the traditional sense, if

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 8>the supply side is moving around.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>That is Austin gouls me the head of the Chicago FED.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>He went on to say that he will not commit

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>to any specific decision on rate policy before the Fed's

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>March meeting.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Bright Well, US and Chinese officials are set to meet

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>in Beijing for another round of talks on economic issues.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up this week.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>We hear a five person delegation from the US Treasury,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 3>we'll meet with Chinese counterparts. The discussions mark another round

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Economic Working Group that was established last year.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 3>The talks will cover topics including the macroeconomic outlook the

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>two countries, investment screening regimes, and coordination on debt and

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>climate change. Let's get to our guest now in the

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>studios with US Live. It's Eric jew a Bloombery economists

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 3>covering China and Hong Kong. Eric, thanks very much for

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 3>sneaking into our studios here with us this morning. So look,

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we all know that the stock market is

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 3>not the best barometer for judging what's happening with the

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Chinese economy, but it is still a useful indicator. Small

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>cap stocks hit very hard. The CSI one thousand index

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>is down twenty seven percent for the year. Now that's

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>an extraordinary number. The benchmark is only down three percent,

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>and we all know that the benchmark.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Itself has been down.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 3>But we're thinking that perhaps if you don't have support

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>from the so called national team, then you hit even harder,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>like we see with that.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty seven percent figure. And what does that tell us

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about the economy?

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think I think you're partly right that saw

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 9>market not the you know, the best parameter you know

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 9>to to to see what's going on in China. But

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 9>I think at least it's a good parameter of what's

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 9>a sentiment, especially I'm shore China. I think there used

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 9>to be a joke saying the only two things which

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 9>is still telling the truths in China is stom market

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 9>and the football China soccer team. So yeah, so you see,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 9>so yeah, I mean it's it's a it's kind of

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 9>a real time you know, monitor of the sentiment in China,

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think that the tumble is very much telling

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 9>the truth that actually invest at least the investor investors

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 9>are increasing being disappointed on how the government irresponding to

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 9>the economy, to the you know confidence and yeah, the

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 9>national team is probably giving some hands, but we don't

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 9>see that's a long term solution. It's probably helping to

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, stabilize a bit in short term, but they're

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 9>not going to last long, right. We have seen last

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 9>week so after Premier League Chance said something about stabili

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 9>in the market, we see a few days of stabilization,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 9>but too quickly, you know, renew the tumble again. So

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 9>I think they such measures the national team, it's not

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 9>really addressing the fundamental underlying issue why it's calling in

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 9>the low sentiment in China, and unless a government they're

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 9>really you know, doing something to addressing those issues, I

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 9>don't think we're going to see a sustainable rebound in

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 9>the stock market.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It's very interesting you make that point. I was looking

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>at a piece citing Goldman Sachs data. Actually the firm

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>estimates the amount of stock buying that we have seen

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>on the part of the national team at about seventy

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>billion YU one. That would work out to be maybe

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>just under ten billion US over the last month. But

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Goldman is going on to say that we're only about

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a third of the way there, that you need a

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>total of about two hundred billion you want in buying

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>just to stabilize the market. I mean, and I'm wondering

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>about the message that that type of aggressive buying would send.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, as I said, I don't think that's a long

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 9>term solution. Right. You can buy by today, you can

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 9>buy a tomorrow, you can buy next week, but you

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 9>cannot buy forever.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, let me counter that though with you know,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 3>your own team at Bloomberg Economics says that economic activity

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>is actually accelerating a little bit in January. It's a

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 3>rebound in production and construction. And you're citing high frequency

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>indicator indexes and that it's not quite at the pre

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 3>pandemic levels, but it is rising. And you say that

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg now cast points to GDP expanding five point

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>five percent year on year annualized in the first quarter.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that's up from five point two percent growth.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>But is it just too short a time for that

0:08:58.200 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to actually filter through the sentiment?

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and also bear in mind, so we need to

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 9>read this data with question because it could be that

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, factory that just Russian before trying to new

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 9>your holiday in early February, so they just guessing is

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 9>done before the holiday. So we do expect you you're

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 9>going to see more weakness in February, and that's natural

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 9>because a long disruptions from the holidays. So I think

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 9>a better gauge is that we have to combine the

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 9>first two months. You know, probably we get more hard

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 9>data in much that will give us a better picture.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 9>But for now, yeah, some pick up in general, but

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 9>I think it's too early to be careful.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>We had a guest on the program yesterday saying, when

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I asked a question about trying to turn around sentiment,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the answer was very blunt. I mean, deregulate the economy.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Is there?

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think on the part of government officials an

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 2>experiment happening, a thought experiment on ways to to change

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>regulation as a way of fundamentally shifting sentiment.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that's the expectation by the markets or

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 9>by some investors, But we are not sure if that's

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 9>what the government is thinking, because the government is thinking

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 9>you if you recall President She last week talk about

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 9>the high quality growth and stuff, So what's in his definition?

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 9>What's the high quality growth? Probably he's more focusing on

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 9>national security or you know, toughening some regulation even in

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 9>those financial sectors, trying to make it more equal among society.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 9>So I think our excitation is probably different from what

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 9>she or what's the top officials a vision for China.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 9>So that's that's the key. I think the key uncertain

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 9>right now at the moment.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Is President She channeling his inner mouth?

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, but obviously he has a big ambition

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 9>right trying to be if not the most.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean I asked that, because it's it's really the

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>essence of that is is ideological trumping practical.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, I think it's You're true, it's he's more

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 9>you're not talking about ideolgical. But for many in Chinese

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 9>I think they're increasingly frustrated because it's for ordinary people.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 9>For some people, it's just looks like you're calling black

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 9>white right, and you're not really telling the truth. Let's

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 9>just be honest what's going on in the country. Let's

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 9>everybody from top government to the bottom, everybody just being honest.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 9>What's the problem we're facing now, So you don't have

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 9>to we don't buy ideology of those stuff. It's it's

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 9>just calling black white right when we don't know.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 2>So, Eric, you referenced the Lunar New Year holiday. Do

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>you have expectations about how well the Chinese consumers will

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>hold up during this period? I mean, are there pretty

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 2>high expectations that there's going to be a fair amount

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of spending.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the issue on that too, if I can

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>just put something on the back of Doug's question, is

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>that you know, normally you see a little bit of

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 3>a slowdown during the Chinese New Year because the factory.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Shut down, people go home.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>But I understand that Chinese leaders that they recently the

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Ministry of Industry and Information Technology gathered provincial leaders and

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>so let's not shut down as many factories. Let's let's

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>get the factories running because we need this for the country.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this a sort of new line.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 9>But it's hard to run those factory in China. New holiday, right,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 9>and I think, I guess this year we're going to

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 9>see a very substantial travel across the country because it's

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 9>it's probably the first year, you know, people can totally

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 9>freely travel, you know, during a Chraining new period. Last

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 9>year it's open, reopened, but still many people got sick

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 9>because of the COVID. So I think this year we're

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 9>going to see a big traveling across country. But on

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 9>the consumption side, we don't expect a very strong number

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 9>this year, so as we have seen in past holidays. Yeah,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 9>people are traveling, but they're not really spending so much money,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 9>right so because the income got hit, their jobs got hit,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 9>so everybody just you know, uh, just keeping the minimum spending.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 9>But of course they want some home gathering, so want

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 9>to see their parents for for so many years, So

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 9>I think we're going to see lots of travel, so

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 9>probably they'll travel related to some tourism related business. Are

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 9>going to see some booster during the holiday. But I

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 9>think overall consumption good consumption, probably won't be so strong.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>We talk a lot about kind of deflationary forces that

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>work in the economy. So at the retail level, I mean,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>are people going to be dealing with much lower prices

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>as they consume?

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 9>I think I read something. You know, even the pop

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 9>prices haven't increased a lot this year around before the

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 9>China New Year, So that's another, you know, bad sign,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 9>not a good sign of the deflation part. I think, yeah,

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 9>but it's it's it's it's just demand not there. It's

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 9>it's cheap. But even it's cheap, probably people don't have

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 9>that so much money to spend like before. I think

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 9>that's thesue.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to the slightly more or optimistic read

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that I mentioned from Bloomberg Economics. You say we'll have

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 3>to get really two full months in to be able

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>to gauge that. But let's say that things are actually

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 3>improving a little bit through here. What would be feeding that?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, what's driving the pickup? We mentioned production and construction,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>but can that continue.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 6>It's more the strengths.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 9>I think in the past a couple of months we

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 9>have seen quite strong reading on the construction PMI, so

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 9>that's probably suggesting some physical stimulus was feeding into you know,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 9>some construction part, but it's mostly still infrastructure investment. That's

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 9>a traditional way the government're trying to boost an ecoloony.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 9>Of course the efficiency is probably decreasing, but it's still,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, I can have some impact on the economy,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 9>at least I think in the first quarter, because they

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 9>they frontload some fiscal stimular in the end of last year.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Gay Break Asia, your morning b on

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the stories making news from Hong Kong to Singapore and

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Look for us on your podcast feed every day, on Apple, Spotify,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>You can also listen live each day on Bloomberg eleven

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>three to zero in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>one in Washington, Bloomberg one oh sixty one in Boston,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and Bloomberg nine sixty in San Francisco.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Our flagship New York station is also available on your

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app, SiriusXM,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Curtis.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Doug Krisner. Join us again tomorrow for all

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the news you need to start your day right here

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg day Break Asia