WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - May 5th, 2023

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We turn our attention to the markets this week, USCPI endeavors,

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing concerns about inflation. The financial stories that sheep are

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>worth a really different reaction to Mark. It's more indications

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of just how hot the US economy really.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Is rude the eyes of the most influential voicing.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Keating, CEO of b and Y Moan, Ryan Winningham,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a Bank of America, Sam Zell Charman and founder of

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Equity Group Investment Bloomberg.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Testing the economy, more bank tremors, more FED rate hikes,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and the unimaginable prospect of a US default. This is

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. This week Stephen

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Ross of Related Companies on Wall Street moving to Miami.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Miami is probably the most dynamic city in the country today, and.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Melissa Karney of the University of Maryland on thousands of

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>college students gone missing.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>The decline in the Rollman is not an encouraging trend.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Global Wall Street had plenty to focus on this week.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>As we began the week breathing a sigh of relief

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>over resolution of last week's banking crisis over First Republic.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We are all very pleased to get the major source

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty that was remaining from the recent bank term

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all addressed, and that that is a good thing. But

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>then Treasury Sector A. Yellen told us that we may

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>have less time than we thought to deal with that

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling problem. Well, it would be absolutely disastrous for

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>me to be completely blunted. And by Tuesday we were

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>back to worrying about the banks again, as each day

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>seemed to bring news of another regional bank seeking a

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>new path.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 5>It's tumbling right now.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 4>By forty two, after seeing it's winging strategic options.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 6>A TD bank has agreed with First Horizon to terminate

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 6>the previously announced merger, which had been agreed upon let's

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 6>be honest before all this turmoil in the banks.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But despite the problems with the banks and concerns over

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the dead ceiling, the Fed on Wednesday went ahead with

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the twenty five basis point rate hike. It had to telegraphs,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which here Powell opening the door to a pause, but

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 1>saying that inflation is still with us for now. Inflation

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>remains well above our longer run goal of two percent.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Then on Thursday, the European Central Bank followed suit, but

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>said it does not plan to pause.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 7>In light of the ongoing high inflation pressures. The Governing

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 7>Council today decided to raise the three key ECB interest

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 7>rates by twenty five basis points.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And if all that weren't enough. On Friday, the US

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>jobs numbers came in much stronger than expected, adding another

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty three thousand jobs last month, though

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they took away some from the month before, and as important,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate went back down to their record three

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>point four percent level and wages increased at a brisk

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>pace of five ten percent month over months. Equity markets

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on Friday reversed all or most of all of their

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>losses from the rest of the week, with the S

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred ending the week off a mere

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>eight tenths of a percent, while the NASDAG gained less

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>than one tenth of a percent, and the yield in

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the ten year went all the way up to three

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>point six percent and then all the way down to

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>under three point three percent to end the week just

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about where it started at three point four to three percent.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>To take us through the week, in the markets and

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy, welcome back now, Ellen Lee, she's portfolio manager

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at Causeway Capital, and Savita Supermanian she's Bank of America

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead of US Equity and Quantitative Strategy. So welcome to

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>both you. Great to have you here. Let me start

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with you, Ellen, if I could, Given what we saw

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from the FED, but then from the jobs numbers, what

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>do we make of the economy right now and where's headed?

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 8>Clearly inflation is still high and FED still has concerns

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 8>around that, and the latest job numbers still indicate that

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 8>there is more slowing down to do. However, what's happening

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 8>with the regional banking devices. I think that will help

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 8>in this effort, but there's still more world to be done,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 8>as inflation is not quite there, and also the slowdown

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 8>is not at a pace that we would want it

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 8>to be in the current environment.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So what about you, Savina. We heard about a possible

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>pause maybe on Wednesday. Is that still viable after the

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>jobs nurbs who saw on Friday?

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 9>I mean, look, I think we're in a data dependent

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 9>environment and the data so far is suggesting we're probably

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 9>not going to see that rate cut that everybody is

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 9>hoping for by the end of the you know, in

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of quarters. I mean, our view is

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 9>that inflation might remain stickier and higher for the rest

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 9>of the year. I mean, if you look at jobs,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 9>a big part of the tight labor market is just

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 9>a great resignation during COVID and those folks haven't come

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 9>back yet, so you know, I think it remains tight

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 9>in certain parts of the economy.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So, Savita, let's talk about the equity markets. You are

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one of our twenty four l's. I'm glad to say

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here, and you're so live in

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the pack. Four hundred dollars on the

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>EPs and and four thousand on the SB bus. Yes,

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are you inclined to change that at all? Given what

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw this.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 9>Week, I'm right in the middle of the consensus.

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Elf.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 9>I guess well, I think we're a little lower than

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 9>consensus on earnings, and I think, if anything, I would

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 9>be inclined to move that higher after what we've heard

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 9>over the last few weeks. I mean, what really impresses

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 9>me about earning season is that guidance has been very

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 9>positive despite every reason that companies have to guide down

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 9>on this year's earnings or next year's earnings, they're actually

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 9>guiding above what consensus is expecting, so I was surprised

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 9>by that optimism. We're also seeing beats across the board,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 9>not just in you know, technology stocks, but also in

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 9>financials and healthcare. So it's been a very healthy earning

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 9>season relative to what what folks were expecting coming into it.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 9>I think on the market itself, what I wore about

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 9>is that it's still very tech top heavy, and that's

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 9>the part of the market that I'm actually more concerned

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 9>about from a rate risk perspective.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Allan what about tech? Tech had been a leader for

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time, then it sort of gave up leadership.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to lead down?

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we believe in the next cycle, with you know,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 8>themes like energy transition and more automation and energy infrastructure

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 8>built and on shoring, we think industrials will be more

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 8>at the head of market leadership, as we are hearing

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 8>not only in the US but also in Europe of

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 8>continuous capex plans because of the change that's needed to

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 8>get us to the next era. And again with interest

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 8>rates where they are, you know, if we believe the

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 8>zero rate con interest rates are not bad, the biggest

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 8>beneficiarias of that actually reside in the tech sector, and

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 8>we don't think that we'll come back, and therefore we

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 8>believe in which was like industrials and energy will lead

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 8>the next valley.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So what Savita. As you look at equities, are there

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>some idiotocratic areas, particularly when it comes to credit, they're

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>getting hit worse than others. I mean, everybody's interest rates

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>are going up, but it may hit some companies differently

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>from others.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, So, you know, one of the big surprises to

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 9>me is when you look at some of these so

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 9>called defensive areas of the market, like healthcare or telecom,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 9>the credit risk is actually higher than you would expect,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 9>whereas energy, materials, commodities, which are typically you know, kind

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 9>of at the epicenter of most credit downturns, are in

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 9>a much better position. They've been deprived of capital for many,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 9>many years. They've become very disciplined about cash return and

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 9>balance sheets and capital allocation, Whereas the companies that have

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 9>gotten more easy money might not be in as great

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 9>a position to handle this market increase in interest rates. So,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, healthcare was I think it's the fourth highest

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 9>industry in terms of floating rate risk sitting on balance sheets,

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 9>which means they're going to face that move and that

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot faster than other sectoris did not.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Know that quickly here at the n L. And you

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like Europe when it comes to securities. Why is that?

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, first of all, europe valuation is much more attractive

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 8>versus us. Secondly in terms of a higher rate, higher

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 8>interest rate environment, that should be advantageous. And thirdly, think

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 8>about the energy crisis that Europe is going through right now,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 8>and they have to shift their energy infrastructure, which is

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 8>a very strategic element of an economy, so that spending

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 8>is going to continue, and not only that, they are

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 8>leading the efforts on decarbonization, and again that will act

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 8>as a fiscal stimulus for the growth of the economy.

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 8>And again Europe has had very little spending and infrastructure

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 8>the last thirty years. So we think this again will

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 8>work in the favor of companies that are in energy

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 8>and industrials to fuel economic growth in the next decade.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating and I did not know that actually a

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>healthcare It's a fascinating voice. Savida, Thank you for bringing

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>it to us. Thanks so much to Sevida Supermanian and

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America, and also Ellen Lee of Causeway Capital.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It's time now for our weekly look at Wall Street

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Week past. Back in April of nineteen ninety one, the

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>number one movie in the US was out for Justice,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>starring Steven Sagau. The number one song was You're in

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Love by Wilson Phillips. And as now, people were worried

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about the banks, with Lewis Rockgeiser to give us taking

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>us through the problem as he saw it back then.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, where have all the college students gone? We

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>talked with Professor Melissa Carney of the University of Maryland

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>about the drop off and high school students headed to

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>college and what they are missing out.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 4>That wage premium that college graduates are getting an economy

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is still really high.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Glee on Bloomberg.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Well Street Week with David Weston from

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio College.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been the dream of American students and their parents

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for decades, the proven pathway to better jobs, higher pay,

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and social mobility, and not incidentally, a crucial source for

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the highly skilled workers we need for the next generation.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 6>And we're talking about what do we have to do

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 6>in order to get our economy going, to make sure

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 6>that we are a twenty first century education system that's

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 6>preparing our children how not just to be employees, but

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 6>how to be employers.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But the risks and rewards of getting that college degree

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are coming under fresh scrutiny as the cost of getting

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the degree have been rising much faster than inflation for

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>both public and private colleges and universities, and the burden

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of barring to pay those costs has been so crippling

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Biden administration is trying to forgive a fair

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of it.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Entire generation is now sattled with unsustained death the exchange

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>for an attempt at least to a college degree.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Even a Speaker McCarthy's new budget proposal would cut back

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on pelgrants, which provide financial aid to the most needy.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Education shared how the Speakers bill would

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>remove up to sixty thousand teachers from classrooms.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Eliminate student debt relief for more.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 4>Than forty million Americans, and make college more expensive by

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 4>reducing pelgrants for millions.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And if all that weren't enough, the COVID pandemic hit

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>college students particularly hard, as far fewer high school students

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>enroll in college today than before the pandemic, leaving us

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with a critical question whether college is still worth it

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and to take us through whether in fact a college

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>degree is still worth it, we welcome now back to

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week Melissa Karney. She is professor of economics

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>at Universe and Maryland as well as director of the

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Aspen Economic Strategy Group. So Melissa, great to have you

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back with us. First of all, start with the basic

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>question about enrollment. Is enrollment down, If so, how much?

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And is it because of the pandemic or did it

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>start before the pandemic?

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, recent numbers on enrollment rates suggest that enrollment is down.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 4>This is the sixth year that enrollment is down, so

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>it was starting to decline before the pandemic took hold.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 4>But the pandemic knocked a lot of high schoolers and

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 4>young adults off their college going plans. So we hear

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot, David about the learning loss in elementary schools

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 4>and high schools. I think another thing we really have

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 4>to be focused on is how many graduating seniors would

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 4>have otherwise enrolled in college who haven't and they haven't

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 4>come back yet. So this is concerning and how much

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 4>it's the.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Cost of the whole thing, Because you saw that Wall

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal poll that said something like fifty six percent

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of Americans don't believe a college degree is worth the price.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that I found those polling numbers really quite troubling. So,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 4>as you mentioned, a majority, a small majority, but a majority.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 4>None of the last of American adults now doubt that

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 4>a college degree is worth it, and that is that's

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 4>just emphatically not true. So in general, people who graduate

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 4>with a four year college degree will make back the

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 4>amount of money that, if they made good decisions, that

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>they would have paid to get that degree. So a

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 4>college degree is still an excellent investment in one's economic future.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 4>We know that college degree holders, four year college degree

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 4>holders in particular, have an easier time finding work. They

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 4>command much higher earnings when they do work, even in

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 4>today's tight labor market. But as you mentioned, the price

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 4>is really it's hard to figure out, and so a

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of people actually think getting a college degree would

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 4>be more expensive than it would be for them.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>In particular, Melissa, you mentioned the relative lack of transparency

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and exactly knowing what the cost is. It's hard to

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do a cost benefit analysis. So if you want what

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the cost side is, whatever the benefit side is, why

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>is it so opaque.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>They have their sticker price, their tuition prices, they're all

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 4>in price. What they charge people who can pay full price.

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 4>That's also what they charge the government for people who

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 4>are paying on behalf of others. But that's not what

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>an individual student pays. So about three quarters of students

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 4>at for Your institutions are getting some form of aid,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 4>and so it's just really hard for students to figure

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 4>out until they've gone through the whole process of applying

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 4>for financial aid, filling out the FACA how much any

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>individual school will take. There are a lot of efforts

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 4>underway to make that pricing more transparent so students can

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 4>figure out earlier in the process. But I think the

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 4>real message that needs to get out is that students

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 4>should not be discouraged from applying to flagship schools, selective

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 4>for Your schools because they think they can't afford it.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>They should go through the process. Students who go to

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 4>selective schools, who go to four year degrees seeking, you know,

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 4>degree granting schools, they tend to have better outcomes. Those

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 4>schools often have more resources and are better able to

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 4>serve their students. So students should not be discouraged from applying,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 4>and they should take advantage of information that's out there

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 4>net cross calculators, information on student on school websites to

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 4>figure out what, on average is a typical student paying

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 4>to attend this school. And by the way, people should

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 4>make smart choices, like public schools charge a lot less

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 4>than private schools. So getting back to why a lot

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 4>of people don't think a school is worth it or

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 4>pursuing a college degree is worth it, you know, you

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 4>could get a lot of really good deals if you're

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 4>looking at public four year institutions as opposed to private,

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 4>especially if you're looking at in state tuition, those net

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 4>prices are much lower for typical students, and people should

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 4>take that into account when they decide where to go.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So typically in economics, as I understand it, and you

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>understand it much better than I do, and supply and demand,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if the supply stars come down, it might put some

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the system if in fact we're getting the

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>less enrollment. Do you see any indication some of these

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>institutions of higher learning are saying, you know, we've got

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to get our act together. We got to be for example,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more transparent, more direct, and by the way, even give

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a sense over the four years what's going to happen

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the years, because one issue is how much you're

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going to raise it once I get.

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>In unambiguously, the decline in the enrollment is not an

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 4>encouraging trend. Whatever pressures it might put on some schools

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 4>that are losing students, I think the decline in enrollment

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 4>is really troubling because, as we said, a college degree

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 4>really does grant an earnings premium to students who attend

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 4>and complete a four year degree. So the earnings premium

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 4>going to college workers was rising tremendously in the nineteen

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 4>eighties and nineteen nineties when demand for college level skills

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 4>really took off, and the supply of college educated workers

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 4>didn't keep up. Since two thousand, that we premium has stalled,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 4>but importantly it is still tremendously high. So in a

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 4>typical year, you know, let's just take twenty nineteen before

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic, you know, someone with a four year college degree,

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>on average would make about eighty eight percent more a

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 4>year than a full time, full year worker with just

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 4>a high school degree.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about the earnings premium, it surely must

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>depend in part upon what you study and what the

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>line of work you go into, right, I mean, I

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can just imagine, for example, what the demands are right

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>now for technology, and some of the expertise and technology

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are very different from what they were thirty years ago.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, and this is a really important point. So in general,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 4>even though I'm really emphasizing that a college degree is

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 4>a good investment in one's future, the fact of the

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 4>matter is not all institutions and not all majors deliver

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 4>large earnings premiums. And that again is something that students

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 4>have to take into account and have to make good

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 4>decisions about where they're studying and what they're studying. And

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 4>that information too is now much more readily available than

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>it used to be in the past. Students can look

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 4>up what is the typical earning path for someone who

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 4>pursues this major, who attends this institution, and again make

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 4>smart choices.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So well, as you look at the decline in enrollment,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 1>what about the demographics of it? Is it affecting some

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>people more than others?

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the decline enrollment has been much larger among men.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Than women, which is, you know, women are doing better

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 4>overall when it comes to young women getting college degrees,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 4>and so this is worrisome. And the pandemic related decline

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 4>was especially pronounced among non white men. Again, this is

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 4>another you know, this is another reason why these trends

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 4>are particularly worrisome. We think a college degree is a

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 4>great engine of upward mobility, and we worry if kids

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 4>from lower income homes, from non white families in particular,

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 4>are the ones who disproportionately had their college going plans

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 4>knocked off track.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Melissa, thank you so much for being back with

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>us on Wall Streeve. That's Melissa Carney. She's professor of

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>economics at the University of Maryland. Coming up, The FED

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>told us this week it might just pause, but with

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the jobs numbers, let it pause, We asked Stephanie Flanders,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>she's senior executive editor for Economics and Government on Bloomberg.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 5>That does tell you something about the underlying strength of

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 5>this economy, and certainly in the labor market, which has

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 5>continued to confound the Fed.

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Well Street Week with David Weston from

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Wall Streek. I'm David Weston. It was a

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>week full of economic news as well as actions by

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>central banks, and to take us through it all, we

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>welcome now Stephanie Flanders. She is Bloomberg Senior Executive editor

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for Economics and Government and also the host of Stephanomic.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So Stephanie, thank you so much for being here. Everything's

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 1>connected to everything else as far as I can tell.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's start with the Federal Reserve decision on Wednesday,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>raising twenty five basis points, not exactly saying what comes next,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>but at least opening the door to pausing. Is it

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>justified the idea of a possible pause given where we

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are with the economy in the United States, Well, of course.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 5>We've ended the week with a really strong employment report.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, we've had ten interest rate increases in a row,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 5>but now thirteen payrolls numbers that exceeded expectations. And you know, David,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 5>economists have we expect them to be wrong where they're

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 5>not usually wrong in the same direction every month for

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 5>over a year. So that does tell you something about

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 5>the underlying strength of this economy and certainly of the

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 5>labor market, which has continued to confound the FED and

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 5>made it still quite difficult in trying to balance that tightening,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 5>that historic degree of tightening in the last year, against

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 5>the sort of justified fears of creeping credit crunch problems

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 5>for regional banks, and you know, still inflation above target.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about inflation just for a moment. The

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>connection between the strong labor market and by the way,

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>including those jobs numbers, were some pretty robust wage gains

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>month over month. So as a practical matter, have we

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really got our arms around inflation? Do we have any

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that the monetary politis thud a reserve

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thus far is having a material effect, It's having some effects,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a material effect on inflation.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it is one of those things that

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 5>has the policy makers in the FED wondering, you know,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 5>has the transmission mechanism that takes these rate increases out

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 5>of the broader economy? Has that broken down? Has it

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 5>become slower than in the past, or is there something

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 5>that's something specific in the sort of post covid Us

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 5>labor market that's causing a delay but not an end

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 5>to that transmission of tighter policies. I think what has

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 5>changed is you have in these problems in the regional

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 5>banking system, which I know we'll probably talk about, you know,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 5>the failure of yet another bank that is telling you

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 5>that there's something that is very tangible that is going

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 5>to quite shortly has to have an impact on hiring,

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 5>and that's the squeeze in small business lending. You know,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned my podcast Stephonomics, and we heard in this

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 5>week's episode actually about somebody who wants to invest in

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 5>a pickleball slash restaurant having trouble getting a loan, a

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 5>small business having trouble getting alone. Now, you know, pickleball

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 5>is a massive phenomenon at the moment. If you can't

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 5>get money for that, I think we know that lending

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.239
<v Speaker 5>conditions are tightening, and that is if small businesses are

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 5>the ones most affected by that kind of lending squeezing out.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 5>It's tightening up, drying up, and it's small businesses that

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 5>are the source of most job growth. So it may

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 5>not happen this month, it may not happen next month,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 5>but we do now know that this labor market is

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 5>going to cool and we have to assume that's going

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 5>to bring down inflation, might also cause a recession.

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's good to the of the original banks and the

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>pressure we've seen. We had a Silicon Valley Bank, and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then you had Signature Bank, and every time we would

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>come up, we say, oh, it's really idiosyncratic. It was

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some special failure of the management there. And then we

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>had First Republicle that's a different sort of secrecy. This

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>week we saw pack West, we saw a Western Alliance.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every time we look around there's another

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>idiosyncrasy popping up. At what point does it become systemic

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>rather than in astocratic?

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think we're starting to say idiosyncratic is

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 5>if you're a bank that's not one of the big

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 5>four banks in the US at the moment, that's starting

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 5>to feel like the divide because almost every other bank

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 5>at one point or another has been under pressure, and

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 5>almost every other bank in the US may not be

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 5>in the kind of difficulties that we saw, the kind

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 5>of extreme business model, extreme disregard of risk that we

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 5>saw in some of those other cases, but is certainly

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 5>facing a kind of fundamental issue. Inverted yeeal curve makes

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 5>it very severely Inverted yeal curve in the key key

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 5>part of the market between you know, three months and ten,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, that making it hard to make money, and

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 5>this long riding of expectation that you can make profits

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 5>by not passing on short term policy rates at the

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 5>time the time when short term policy rates arising, well,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 5>that's harder.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 4>And harder in a world way.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 5>We know we can have these digital instantaneous massive falls

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 5>falls in deposits.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 4>And bank runts.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think there are questions about quite a

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of banks in the US right now, not that

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 5>they're going to survive, but certainly that it's going to

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 5>be quite hard for them to make money in the

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 5>near future.

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Except for the very big ones, as you suggest, they

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to be doing very well, Thank you, ma'am. Does

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED reserve face a form of a zero sum

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>game here where either it goes after inflation with increasing

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>rates or it helps the banks by not increasing rates

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>or even cutting rates, because part of the problem here

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously is an interest rate risk issue that was created

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe intentionally, maybe it's a good thing by the rapid

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>increase in the rates.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 5>Well that is, you know, that's how the policy is

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 5>supposed to work in many ways, at least it's not

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 5>aimed at reducing the bank's ability to make money. You're

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 5>challenging its business model, but it certainly aimed at tightening

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 5>credit conditions, reducing lending, and reducing economic activity. As a

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 5>result of that, I think we've got to a point though,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 5>where the Fed and indeed other central banks are so

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 5>keen to persuade us that they're not going soft on

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 5>inflation as a result in response to these concerns around

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 5>the banks, that there's almost a risk of going the

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 5>other way. You could see that with Jaypowe this week.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 5>There was absolute determination of that separation principle that we

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 5>are going to continue in our battle against inflation and

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 5>where we have other tools, we're thinking in a separate

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 5>way about the banks, but they obviously can't be completely separated, so.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Everything you've just discussed would be plenty. But on top

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, we had Janet Yell on the Treasury Secretory

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this week saying, by the way, that's so called X

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>state when the government will really run out of money

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and not be able to pay its debt, maybe as

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>early as June one. We have meetings coming up next

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>week of the President with leadership and Congress give us

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how the debt sealing crisis may play

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>across the issues we've been discussing well.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 5>When we talk about the US economy dodging recession. So

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 5>we're basically saying that it's going to drug off the

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 5>effect of the credit crunch and the smaller lenders that

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 5>I was talking about earlier, but also that we won't

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 5>have some default moment or a big increase in financial

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 5>tension around fears of the default in the next month

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 5>or two. And we think, you know, if that actually

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 5>came to a head, that could have a very significant

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 5>effect on the economy because you know, if you think

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 5>about it, it means overnight the federal government has to balance

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 5>its book, balance its books, and that means very significant

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 5>reductions in spending there and then we don't think it

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 5>will come to that, but the kind of tensions around that,

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 5>I think, you know, do give Janet Yellen and the

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 5>broader banking community. I was in at the Milk And

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 5>Institute earlier this week in LA you know, quite a

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 5>lot of concern under the surface about how this debt

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 5>ceiling issue is going to play out, and some phone

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 5>calls being made to Congress, but no real sense that

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 5>people are getting a hand on it and.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Finally, Stephan, let's not leave Europe out of it. We

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>heard also from the European Central Bank this week, who

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>hiked as well, twenty five basis points like the FED,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>but unlike the FED said, you know what, we're going

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep going, Madam mcguard was. I thought very clear

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. What's the difference between the two economies? And

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can the ECB take such a different route from the

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Fed if the Fed effect does pause, well.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Of course the European Central Bank started later. It's in

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 5>a very different kind of situation. I think we tend

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 5>to maybe certainly if you talk to people in Frankfort,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 5>they say we overplay the amounts of which they're watching

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 5>every move of the FED and thinking about their move

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 5>and relation to that. But I mean, I think it

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 5>is the case that that interest rate rise from the

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 5>FED and the talk of possible pause from the Fed,

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, it did give some cover to Christine Legard

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 5>and her colleagues at the European Central Bank to reduce

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 5>the amount of increase that they had. So we just

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 5>saw that quarter point. They're slowing the path of interest

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 5>rate rises. She did talk about another two. We think

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 5>it's more likely to be another one that you will

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 5>see a pause in the summer because they have other

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 5>that they're allowing their balance sheet to run off after June,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 5>so that's a continued form of tightening that they can

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 5>rely on. But you're right that ultimately, if the market's right,

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 5>for example, that the Fed's going to start cutting rates

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 5>the end of this year, that could prove very difficult

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 5>for the European Central Bank because there's certainly a long

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 5>way from cutting.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there a prospect in Europe of having similar difficulties

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with the banks to what we've seen in the United States,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And given the fact that the UCP has been raising.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Rates, well, it's interesting, I mean, we haven't got quite

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 5>the same dynamic playing out. You certainly you don't have

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 5>the same inverted yield curve and that kind of pressure

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 5>on profitability of the banks. But on the other hand,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 5>you have the fact that bank the broader economy is

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 5>much more dependent on bank lending. So a smaller problem,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 5>a smaller squeeze on the European banking system could have

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 5>actually as large or even a larger effect on the economy.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 5>So you know, it is something that the European Central

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Bank has to look at we are seeing credit conduct

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 5>conditions sharpened Titan dramatically in the last few months. I

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 5>think that'll be another factor that will cause the European

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Central Bank to pause in the summer.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie, thank you so much for being a Wall shery.

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Stephanie Flanders. She is Senior executive editor for Economics

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and Government at Bloomberg.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 10>Let's see why frightened Americans looking at the financial scandals

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 10>of recent years have begun to ask is it safer

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 10>under the matpress. In the past four years alone, more

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 10>than seven hundred and fifty US banks with deposits of

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 10>seventy billion dollars have closed. So far this year, there

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 10>have been twenty two more bank failures, representing assets of

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 10>another twenty five billion. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Fund,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 10>which guarantees that depositors won't be left in the lurch,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 10>has steadily dwindled in recent years. In nineteen eighty five,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 10>the fund had a dollar nineteen to cover every one

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 10>hundred dollars of deposits. Today it has only seventeen cents

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 10>for one hundred dollars.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Wall

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Street Week. I'm David Weston. We've all been talking about it,

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the leaving of major financial firms New York City and

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for them that are from Chicago to go south to Miami.

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Some people who are been calling it Wall Street South

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>these days. Well, one person who is ahead of the

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>times on this really down there developing particularly commercial real estate,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is Stephen Ross. He is the founder and chairman of

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Related Companies. So, Stephen, thank you so much for joining us.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got a big new advance in your strategy of

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about commercial real estate down there. Talk to us about

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>one Brickle City Center.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're very excited, you know, to be here in Miami.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Miami is probably the most dynamic city in the country today.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you look at statistics of where growth

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is occurring, Miami leads the way, or South Florida leads

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the way. And so being able to develop, well, we

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>believe to be the biggest building in Miami at a

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 3>location that's Maine and Maine with all the technology and

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 3>all the things that Related puts in their buildings, and

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, people were looking to be a

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 3>tenant in a Related building today is evidenced by our

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>success in New York and Hudson Yards, which really continues

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 3>to grow as well.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, obviously you're a very big in West Palm Beach.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Miami we're talking about. Now, how does it

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>fit into your long term strategy? What comes next?

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, you know right now, I mean, we're

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 3>continuing to build in New York, and we're very excited

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>about New York. But Florida is really the growth you know,

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the country today and where there's need for

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>a class A office space it really needs. And it's

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 3>more than just delivering office space, it's really you know,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 3>building communities, building cities and making sure that those cities

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>have the hospitals, bringing schools and all the amenities that

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>new tenants want in relocating to Florida.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephen, thank you so much, really great to have you back.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>That is Stephen Rossy, of course, is the founder and

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>chairman of related Companies. Finally, one more thought heavy lies

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the head that wears the crown, and as of this week,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>King Charles the third of Great Britain knows just how heavy,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like five pounds heavy, but with nearly twenty nine hundred

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>diamonds embedded in it. And that's after they cut it

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>back for the coronation of George the Fifth and nineteen eleven.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Before that, the crown was so heavy that no one

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>could wear it, so they just carried it around in

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the procession. The British monarchy goes back to at least

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ten sixty six, and its history and tradition are a

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>good part of what keeps it going after nearly one

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand years. But there are also some very modern aspects

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of this coronation. Take for example, the effects of inflation.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It is hitting us all.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 10>Inflation is still too high.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 4>It's sticky, it's not coming down fast enough.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And that apparently includes the monarchy, which is cutting back

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in the number of days and the number of people,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>though it is still estimated to cause upwards of one

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred million pounds.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean a cost of living crisis. The king has

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 5>asked for the service to beat good value, but with

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 5>a reported one hundred million pound price tag, it's double

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 5>the cost of his mother's.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>King Charles rides in not one but two royal coaches

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for the coronation, the oldest working coach in the world,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for heading back to Buckingham Palace from the cathedral after

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>his crowned. That is the gold State Coach, dating back

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen sixty. It was first using a coronation in

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen thirties, but to get to the cathedral, it's

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the much newer, air condition and much more comfortable Diamond

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Jubilee State Coach that Queen Elizabeth had made after she

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 1>found the ride in the old one unbearable back at

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>her coronation in nineteen fifty three.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 5>This coach, beside me, will be a key part of

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 5>the procession going from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But for all the ancient customs and traditions surrounding the

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>British monarchy, the US has some more recent parallels, and Biden,

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, has his own sort of state coach. It's

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>called the Beasts, made by Cadillac, dating back only to

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. And we had our own sort of modern

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>coronation in New York just this week, not of the

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>King of England, but of King Jamie, the first of

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>all of US banking, as JP Morgan stepped in to

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>rescue what was left the first Republic Bank, making the

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest bank in the US even bigger.

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 8>We support and want community banks and regional banks.

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You need big banks too. And finally, King Charles shares

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>with another president some of the difficulties in getting whom

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>he wants to perform at his celebration, with reports that

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the new King was turned down by Elton John as

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was President Trump back in twenty sixteen morulery he would

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>never ordinarry him, But not so. The Italian tenor as

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Buchelli, declined to perform for the forty fifth president

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, but answered the call from the new

0:34:55.200 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>King this week because of reportedly his special relationship. But

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>then again, King Charles does not have to face an

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>election in four years to keep his new job. That

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>If you missed any part of today's program, you can

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.959
<v Speaker 1>listen on demand with our Wall Street Week podcast. Find

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. Stay with us. Today's top stories and

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>global business headlines are coming up right now.