WEBVTT - Trump Boosts Conservative Lean of Key Circuit

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grasso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's pushed to reshape the federal judiciary with conservatives

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is likely to slow this year, as most of the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>remaining vacant seats are for district courts in blue states

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>like California. In the short term, however, there's no slowing

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>down the Republican led Senate. Right after the lawmakers acquitted

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump on two articles of impeachment, Majority leader Mitch McConnell

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>went back to his quest of transforming the federal courts,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>teeing up judicial nominees for votes, and the Senate confirmed

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Brasher to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals last

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>week along a party line vote of fifty two to

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>forty three and over the opposition of Democrats and civil

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rights groups, including the n double a CP. Brasher was

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the fifty first Trump nominee confirmed to a circuit court.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is an expert on the federal judiciary. Carl Tobias,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>The Eleventh Circuit was ready flips, so to speak. So

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>how important is it to have one more conservative judge? Well,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it is important in the sense that President Trump has

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>been able to confirm half of the active judges on

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that court. He's had six confirmations, and that's incredible if

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you think about that in terms of how many appointments

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>any particular president is able to make on the court.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So he really has remade the court. We'll see in Plus,

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you're replacing people in the sixties and seventies with people

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>who are in their thirties and forties, and so it

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>makes an enormous difference. For example, Brasher, I think is

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight. Do they stay on the court until they

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>retire and when they're nominated this young yes, I think so.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Most federal judges assume senior status and then you know,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>take a half load and many of them never resigned.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Some retire, but a very small percentage. And so you

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have judges in their eighties on the number of the

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>courts around the country, and some of them are our

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>most experienced judges. So it's a long window. And why not,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're taking a half load usually when you

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>take senior status. Let's talk about Brasher, because he was

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed by Democrats, civil rights groups including the n double

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>A c P. Why was he opposed. Well, I think

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it principally went back to much of his work as

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>solicitor General in Alabama, basically defending a number of initiatives

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of the state legislature, and many of them, at least

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the civil rights groups said, suppressed voter turnout and suppressed

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>voter write those kinds of questions. He litigated on behalf

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of Alabama, essentially defending them, and they were very concerned

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>about that. But they seem to find a pretty long

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>history for someone who hadn't been a lawyer that long.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And of course the Republicans defended that by saying, this

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was his client and that's the state, and your complaints

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>should be with the legislature, not with the person who

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>defends them. And the Eleventh Circuit is especially important for

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>election law. It covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. So how

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>often do election law issues come up there? I think

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>rather frequently, as you suggest, and large percentages of African

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Americans who historically have had difficulty voting as recently as

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, I think in Georgia and Alabama, so some

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of the most important voting rights cases have come out

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of there. Shelby County was one which rolled back the

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Voting Rights Act, but there are many, many others and

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that litigation is ongoing. Did he receive a qualified rating

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from the A B A. I think he had well

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>qualified because you know, he had served for seven months,

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's another criticism as a district judge. Are there

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>any other circuit court nominees? There is only one appellate

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>vacancy in the country right now. Uh next in Mississippi.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It's an emergency vacancy for which Oserden, a district judge,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was nominated. But he's been opposed by two Republicans on

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the committee and his name has not been sent back

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate. So it seems that either he has

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>decided to withdraw or the White House has decided to

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>withdraw his name. So the Republicans will have to find

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody very quickly if they intend to fill that seat.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget Mitch McConnell has said that his thinking

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>is no vacancy left behind, so anyone nominated he's promising

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>will be confirmed. But they don't have someone right now,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>though there are rumors about who might fill that seat,

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was opposed by the Republicans as being not

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>conservative enough. Yes, the two senators were Holly from Missouri

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and Senator Cruz from Texas, and in his hearing they

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>grilled him on some of his cases where they felt

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that he was not sufficiently rigorous in helping opponents of abortion.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a healthcare case, but he pointed

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>out in the hearing that he was just following the

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>circuit precedent. He was bound by that president. According to

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the judge. The two senators have maintained that they don't

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's conservative enough, and so they intend to vote

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>against him, and Senator Graham, the chair does not want

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to go forward with a vote he can't win, and

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so that's where we are. I've been talking with Professor

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond Law School about

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's pushed to reshape the federal judiciary. Let's turn

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to the district courts. So the majority of the about

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy current and future vacancy these are in blue states.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Explain why it's a blue state red state thing for

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>judicial nominees. Well, it's especially true at the district level

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because Senator Graham's chair is still honoring the blue slips

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and so uh if home state senators a Democrat and

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>disagrees with the White House on a particular nomination, then

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that nomination does not go forward, there's no hearing in

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the process is over. And so those are more difficult

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.559
<v Speaker 1>for this White House and most White Houses to fill

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>when the opposition party has to agree. And so basically,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have found it much easier when there are

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>two home state senators who are Republicans to go ahead

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and fill those seats. And so that's a big part

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of it. And of course, the two major jurisdictions that

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we see our California which has six emergency district vacancies

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and no one has been confirmed, though they now have

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>nominees for all the seats, but it's doubtful they'll all

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>be confirmed this year. And then New York has had

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as many as sixteen or seventeen a number have been

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>filled there now, so it's not as um bad as

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it was. Um. But you might remember that Senator Schumer

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is from New York, and of course Senator Feinstein and uh,

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Senator Harris from California, and the President loves to rail

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Ninth Circuit and the California District judges, so

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>um that may in part explain why they've been so slow. UM.

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens in those major states, but

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there are many other blue states that have many vacancies.

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey is the worst case scenarios, six emergencies, and

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not yet been a Trump nominee, and so it

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like anything that's going to happened there, even

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>though they have only seventeen judges, so they're pretty much underwater.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to the New Jersey judges in that district.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about how this really happens. Because Delaware has

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>had two district court nominees approved. Why is there success

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in Delaware and not in New Jersey, which is in

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an emergency situation. Well, because I think the home state

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>senators Coons and Carper from Delaware UM undertook extraordinary efforts

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to work with the White House and find people who

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>were acceptable to the White House. One was called Connolly,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>who had been the U S attorney for Bush. I

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in the nominee but didn't make it at the

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>end of Bush and they thought he was uh find

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>US attorney, would be an excellent federal judge, and so

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they offered him and the other person who is named Nerika,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>who was well qualified um UM practitioner in Wilmington's and

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so they were able to agree. Very similar thing has

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>happened in Illinois. Senator Durban has worked very closely with

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the White House and they still have vacancies, but they

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have nominees for the few vacancies that are left. So

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>where home state senators reach out and work closely with

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the White House, then uh, their vacancies tend to be filled. Um.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And so there's some examples of that, UM. And I

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think the New Jersey situation is just unfortunate. UM. I

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think the senators have tried, but nothing has happened. So

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>then it's not only a problem with the Trump administration

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but also the senators from that state. It can be uh,

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes, for example, in California, I think that the

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>White House did not reach out to the senators and

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a big state and they have lots of vacancies,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and the commissions they have take time, UM, but they

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>just haven't been able to move to get the nominations.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Once to get the nominations, they haven't moved through the

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate and so uh that just creates these huge backlogs UM.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And the chief judges of the Eastern end, um Central

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>districts of California have written to the White House and

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate Judiciary Committee pleading to to have those

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>vacancies filled. Now, is it true that no California District

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Court nominee has made it through the confirmation under President Trump? Yes,

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>it's astonishing. It is. When you have sixteen emergency vacancies

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>out of sixty seats, that's a real problem. And they

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>had many of the judges carried double the case loads

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of judges and other districts, so you can get a

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of what how how bad it is in California.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't often hear Washington State mentioned in with judicial nominations,

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but three of the Washington states western district spots have

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>been vacant for about four years, and the average age

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the district judges there is seventy six years old.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>What's going on in Washington State four years? We can't

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>blame Trump for that, can we? Yes? We can, Um,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we can blame the Republicans for it. Before President Obama

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>head nominated three people for vacancies there, and well qualified

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>mainstream nominees, but they were held up by McConnell in

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and UM, Now there are five vacancies and all five

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are emergencies as you suggest, Um, but uh, no signs

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of nominees moving forward. And I've heard from people in

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington State that nothing is going to happen until after

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the election, and so they have very much a crisis

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>situation in that state as well. Red state nominees take

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred seventeen days to get from nomination to confirmation,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>but blue state nominees take about four hundred and twelve days.

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's a departure from Obama, where it took a

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine days for Obama's blue state nominee to be

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>confirmed in two for red state nominees. So why is why,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the how do you account for that difference between

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Obama? And the timing again, I mean, I

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the Judiciary Committee just has um not moved

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because first of all, the on the nominees, the White

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>House to lead nominating from blue states, and they went

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to the whenever they were nominated, they went to the

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>back of the line, and so they haven't made that

0:12:54.760 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a priority. And so for example, you have sixteen nomine

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>East for those emergency vacancies in California, and no one's

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>being confirmed. UM, and you can see the discrepancy. I

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think in Bush's time to it would look like Obama Um,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>there was no discrepancy or difference between UM, Blue states

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and Red states. UM. But Um. This approach by the

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>White House and the Judiciary Committee has allowed them to

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fill all but one appellate vacancy UM, and most of

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the red state vacancies. But the Blue states are disadvantaged

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and have been throughout the administration now, Carl. They rushed

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to fill the appellate court vacancies because the appellate courts.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's more important what your views are, isn't it than

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>district courts. I mean, so these district court judges who

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>do the everyday work, the trials, motion practice and stuff,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they should be easier to confirm, shouldn't they. Well, they

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are easier to confirm, but more of them, Okay, And

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so um it um. You're exactly right. Though, an appellate

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>judge UM typically issues an opinion which covers all of

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the states in that UM circuits U states, and so

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all judges in say, New York, UM, Connecticut, and Vermont

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are bound by rulings of the second circuit um. But

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a district judge can't even bind people in his or

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>her own courthouse with rulings and so as you can see,

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court takes so many, so few cases

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court for New York really is is

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the second circuit. And so those positions are critically important,

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and they just make more policy, cover more states um

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and so um, and their fewer to them. And so

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the administration has focused like a laser on the appellate courts,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have been very successful. In fact, there haven't

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>been that few vacancies since How many circuits has Trump

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>flipped And do you see a difference already? Well, I

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think we are beginning to see it, um, But I

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>believe it's the second, third, and eleven that have flipped.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But of course you have to remember in some of

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the other states that have not flipped, he has substantially

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>reinforced very conservative kind of perspectives of those circuits. And

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking for example, the fifth, the sixth, eight um,

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the seventh to some extent um, and also perhaps the

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ten so um, you know, having a substantial impact. I

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's still a little early to see very many

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>cases because some of the judges have been appointed quite recently. Uh,

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have you know, a full record, um,

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and sit in three judge panels, but there have been

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>opinions that have been important in Sometimes the difference on

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the three judge panel is one of the Trump appointees. Uh.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And that will just be magnified over time. Thanks for

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>being on Bloomberg Lack Carl. That's Carl Tobias, professor at

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the University of Richmond School of Law. And that's it

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Law. I'm June Grasso. Thanks

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening, and remember to tune to the

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law Show weeknights at ten pm right here on

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Yeah.