WEBVTT - Banks, Supply Chain, Real Estate, and Pets

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Fund the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. So you were making

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>a making fun man, First Citizens five ticker. We have

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>five letter ticker we have if you're a good company, right,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're like a blue chip, then usually you get

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like one letter like t no. But this is why

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you know this is a good company because Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>covers the stock. Herman Chen is the analyst here. He

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>actually covers the stock good because a lot of questions.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>We got him here. He's in studio. He covers the

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>regional banks. Alison Williams joins us on the phone. She

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>covers all the big global banks as well. A swaying

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a financial roundtable here, Herman, let's

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>start with you tell Matt what he needs to know

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about First Citizens and why First Citizen stock is up

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a ga jillion percent here on this news. Sure, so

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>First Citizens. It's a regional bank based in Raleigh, North Carolina.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It has grown tremendously with the deal with C I T,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which also has offices of New Jersey. So you should

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>know c You should know, ye run wasn't it run

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>at one point by the former governor of New Jersey

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>John Cosign that had Manuchin owned. They own One West,

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>which was part of Indiemac, so that that banking operation

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is part of the First Citizens, as well as the

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>specially landing operations and the CRI lending that they do

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in the southeast. So it's a over one hundred billion

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars bank prior to the SBB deal. It basically doubles

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the size of the of the institution and the deal

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is very lucrative. Hard to say what the tangion book

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>value accreciation accretion is, but it's probably around fifty percent.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's why the stock pops into PA. So I

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about m Global, Yes you were, yeah, but

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>C I T was mister Cushner ran that right. In

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>any case, this is a bank that I guess has

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>made a number of First Citizens, has made a number

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of distressed purchases. Basically still it's only an eight billion

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap, Right, how does it work out a deal? Like, Yeah,

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it got a huge pop obviously because it's getting this

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>asset at such a big discount. Right. It was It

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>has traditionally been a distressed acquirer, and this is part

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the game plan for for the management team that

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>has been at the bank for decades. It's very unique,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>family operated. The grandfather of the CEO was the founder,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's a unique operating success story. Yeah, and

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very much insider owned. So it's a different type

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of animal that we're used to. Go Alison, I want

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring you in here, Alison Williams. She covers the

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>big global banks. How come I mean First Citizens Matt

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and I are just learning about First Citizens bank shares.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not JP Morgan Chase. We didn't see much

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>interest from the big banks for any of these troubled

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>regional banks, did we. Well. I think first of all,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they're they're limited, Um, you know. JP Morgan by definition

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is limited in terms of what it can acquire. And

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, you know, the presumption is that

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulators would allow um something if needed. Um. But

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly there was interest and clearly this is this is

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a result that I think the government would much rather

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>see in terms of um, you know, a smaller bank

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>taking on this this deal and creating a competitor at

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the at the at this end of the scale. I mean,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they were allowed to buy Barrastarns, right, So, but that

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was the U regulation relates to deposits, and so bank

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US cannot acquire if they're beyond a ten

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>percent market share of deposits, and they kind of grow organically,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but they can't do acquisitions. And at the time, so

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington Mutual was the one that was sort of on

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the edge for them. You know, there was also the

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Wacovia and Wells Fargo deal, but I think that first

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, there was the Wammoo had different righte glads,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so that's like a little bit getting into the weeds

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, and the other deal is sort of add

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. But I think the presumption is, you know,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if if needed, they would do it. And I think

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, also Embarrasserns that was also a government supported deal.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>So I think in times of crisis, obviously the government

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gets involved. We've seen that globally and can sort of

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>change the rules. Herman, are we still in is this

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>still a time of crisis or you know, was there

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>was there a problem structurally or was this just a

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of idiosyncratic issues that led to one bank run

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or two bank runs and everything's okay Now. It definitely

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's lowered to temperature a bit. And we've

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>written about how there's only a handful of banks that

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be stressed, Pacquest, First Republic and the banks

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that have already been folded SVB signature. If you look

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at the discount window usage that the numbers that came

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>out last week, and the usage of the new bank

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>term liquidity program, things seem pretty stable. So it suggested

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to us that you're not seeing some of the liquidity

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>risks that that felled some of these other institutions spread

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to the broader regional bank space. So again you mentioned

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>pac West, It's up four and a half percent, First

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Republics up seventeen percent here, So do you expect to

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>see some more deals happening to kind of, you know,

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>see more combinations occur for some of these other stress banks. Yeah,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that remains to be seen. I think the

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>regulators would ideally like a bank like First Republic to

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>continue operating as as first Republic without needing any any acquirer.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That remains to be seen if that can be feasible.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But but the hope is that the deposits have stabilized

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and eventually, once there's more confidence in the system, they

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>can regain some of the deposits that they lost to

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>other institutions. Alison, what's the feeling just out there? I mean,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you talk to these institutional investors for all kinds of

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the financials, the asset managers, the big money

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>center banks, regionals, you kind of see it all. What's

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>your feeling about kind of just the banking system in general?

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Do we need any more concern Do you think we

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>need any more regulatory review here? Where were are we today?

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that the regulatory view and those

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns are certainly being raised by politicians, I say, for banks,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for bank investors, they sort of recognize that there was

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there was some mismanagement at a few institutions that um,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of exacerbated some of the industry wide

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>issues in terms of the setup with Kewey and now QTUM.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think broadly in terms of investors, you know,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>now the focus is turning towards the credit aspects, that's

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>turning towards recession, and we're starting to hear a lot

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more about the concerns of related to commercial real estate.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>M Herman actually has at out this morning in terms

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of the regional banks on that. I'd love to get

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that Alison and Herman. I keep hearing real estate, real estate,

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate, that's the next bogey for banks. Alison. So wait,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it was hold to maturity portfolios. Yep, And and now

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what a bunch of banks hold big commercial real estate portfolios? Right?

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean that that shouldn't be h So

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that shouldn't be a surprise. I mean, I think that

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the health to maturity portfolios were a surprise just because

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that being an issue for banks in

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>many decades. I think that, you know, commercial real estate

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that the you know, everyone's been focused on

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of the pandemic, especially office because there

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>were so many questions around that. And now you know,

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as we think about getting closer to recession, that is

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gaining focus, you know, not just for the banks, but

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know broadly from what we're seeing in the CMBs

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>market and regional banks do tend to have significant portfolios

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in that area, and they'll turn it over to Herman

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about some of the work here.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>So I mean Herman. The problem with the Hold to

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>Maturity's portfolios wasn't that they had them or that they

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>were you know, not marked to market, but that when

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>investors want to pull their money out, these banks had

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to sell that stuff in, take huge losses and then

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have enough money. That's that's the that was the worry, right, correct.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So should we have the same concerns about commercial real estate?

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Have they not marked those portfolios to market? Had they

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>not tried to unload them? As you know, everybody, even

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, has gotten used to the idea that workers

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>are no longer coming to the office. Right, So let's

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>take a step back. The original issue with SBB was

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Health to Maturity portfolio, which was not marked to market.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The issue with First Republic is they have a big

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>chunk of residential mortgage loans that are not marked to market.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So now the focus has shifted a bit to other

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>areas within bank balance sheets that may you know, the

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fair value of that asset may be less than the

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>carrying value So that's what we're looking at now in

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.239
<v Speaker 1>terms of focus on commercial real estate, specifically office exposure

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>where people are working from home and the cash flows

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are are down from where they were pre pandemic and

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are rising. So how the bar or refinanced

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that loan? When? When? When that loan comes due? You know,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, next year, in a few years. So it's

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a longer term turn in the maturity profile of these loans,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's something that a lot of folks are looking

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>into more. And have you identified a number of banks

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that are going to have the biggest problems? Sure? So,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you look at the banks that we

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>cover on the regional side, there are a few banks

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that stand out in terms of their commercial real estate exposure.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank oz K is the one that stands out with

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>higher CRI concentration. OZK likes ozarks correct, So yeah, nice

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>pick up there, man. So it's it's a bank that

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>historically has been great in terms of managing their credit quality,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but they do screen high in terms of office content.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, in my town where I live, they're putting

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>up this big mixed use um, you know, office building,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what's going to be in there.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the traffic is going. I don't

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think they thought about that at all, um, But it's

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>financed proudly, big sign by local bank. And I remember thinking, boy,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the way it works. That's what makes America great.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>You got a local lender financing growth in a local market.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm thinking about, oh boy, if they can't

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fill this thing, you know, you know, you think about that,

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and you think about that, you'd drive around any town USA.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The office buildings, I don't know, are they have full?

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Are they two thirds full? I don't know where I

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would I would say that most of the cre and

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>office stress is really in San Francisco and New York. Right,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in a suburban market, you're probably going

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>to the office more than the folks in Silicon Valley,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>where they're working from home in majority of their time.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So our view is that the regional banks probably have

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>headline risks because of the office exposure, but the actual

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>credit losses should be definitely manageable. All right, good stuff.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Alison Williams, she covers the big global banks. We're gonna

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be talking to her a lot because we have a

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks time, we're gonna have the banks, the

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>big investment banks and the big money center banks reporting numbers.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 1>We'll be talking to Alison a lot. She covers the

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>big global banks. Herman Chen senior analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>covering the regional banks, and he has been the man

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the hot seat for the last few weeks because

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares about regional banks until they have to, and

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>then it's you know, where's Herman Chan? Get him up here?

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>We need to know what's going on. But I'll tell

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you what. At the very beginning of this, Herman taught

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>us Tom Matt and I how to look at a

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bank balance sheet and to look at those hell to

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>maturity things versus the deposits. And after five minutes we

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>figured out that SVB was in trouble. How did the

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>regulators miss it? That's that's that's the question that I

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think are not going to be delving into. In fact,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Senate looks into that starting tomorrow, and

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>then Congress looks into it on Wednesday. This is Bloombergen.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I Heard radio app and the Bloomberg Business app. We're

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>listening on to mand wherever you get your podcast. All right,

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking real estate and maybe the risk

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that may you know, point for some of the regional

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lenders out there. Let's just talk about it right from

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary perspective. Let'stuck real estate. We can do that

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with Lisa n She does all that stuff. She's a

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>real estate lead at Eisener Amper. Joins us here in

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg and Advisory Group. I know it is Is

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it that is courage? Sorry I will say that and

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me this. But they got the big,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the big building on. She was at Burden and she

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was at Eisener Amper. Now she is at Eisener Advisory Group.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Okay, very good, I think. But the

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is she's here in a Bloomberg Interactor

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio, so she gets a gold star. She's also

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer and a CPA. All right, that's enough enough education,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>enough education, Let's get back to it, all right. I

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>walk through mid ten Manhattan. I see empty building after

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>empty building after empty building. What do you real estate.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>People say about commercial real estate these days, I think

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a disaster. Am I overreacting? So we're cautiously optimistic.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>That is the mood, So people are that's my favorite phrase,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but that is the mood for where we are this

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>year and where we are in the cycle. And so

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we know what's going on with the interest rates. Feds

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>increase the seven times in twenty twenty two, and they're expected,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to continue. But are we at the peak?

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>And we're hoping that we are at the peak? And

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so the problem with commercial real estate right now is pricing.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Because there isn't a lot of transaction volume. People don't

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>know where the pricing is and so that's really where

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we're hoping that this year we can get a pricing stability.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the lack of transaction volume, like what we hear

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about in residential where sellers don't want to let go

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of their holdings at a low price, so buyers can't

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>pick up bargains or has everyone who wants to sell

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>already let go of what they've got now. I think

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination. And when you look at interest rates,

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change your cash flow and what your

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>yield is in your return right, So whether it's personal

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>real estate, investing your own home or commercial real estate,

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that interest rate is going to change your bottom line

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and cash flow. And so when interest rates go up

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and valuations go up, your returns go down essentially. And

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's really where that combination is, and it's making

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for people to find out where that happy

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>median is. I was just wondering if there are any

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>distressed bargains out there. You know, if there's some commercial

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>real estate holder that has buildings on Third Avenue and

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they've decided, okay, we can't do anything with this. No

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one wants to have an office on Third Avenue because

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of gross, and nobody wants to live there

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because they can't, you know, they can't renovate the commercial

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>space into a residential space, so they get rid of

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it for fire sale prices or are you seeing any

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of that? So there's two key points in what you said.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>There is just stress opportunity, and where that's coming in

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is on the lending side. So if you're a little

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of a riskier investor or you want to get

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in on a preferred or mezzotine lending that's where your

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities are going to come in because people have to

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>come in to make those As we've said before, those

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>cash flows work, and so you're going to get a

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>higher yield and a higher return if you're willing to

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>be a riskier investor, right, And so that's going to

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful for that. Paul, you were just talking

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about you want to take some risk risks. I just

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>went along some New Jersey, Jersey shore real estate, but

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a mortgage that is brutal um. Can I

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>refinance my mortgage in like twelve to eighteen months and

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe get a four handle on it? What do I

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>wish I could be able to different business? Different business?

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe real estate? Is it just New York and San

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Francisco where it's really challenged in other parts of the

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>country are better or we just kind of warped kind

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of given where what market we live in. So when

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at the gateway, everyone always focuses on these

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gateway cities. But when you look at the US and

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at global real estate, a report came out

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>where Florida the transaction value is high right now, and

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people are looking still at those Sunshine States or the

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>smile states where you want to do it an opportunity,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but you also I hate to throw this in there,

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but when you look at climate change, there could be

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a demigration, migration back up north depending on what's going

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on in climate and insurance costs and overhead down in

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these more states that are more affected by climate. Right,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and so when you're looking at it, it's hard to

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of say, right now is where we are with

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>New York and San Francisco. People want to still live,

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>work and play here. It's still New York. I'm with you,

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're still optimistic. Shaking his head. No, it's shaking

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>his head. No, that's good thing. It's well, I just

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I just don't know. The commercial I honestly,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know what's going to happen with these commercial

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>real estate, office real estate in New York City. I

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>really don't know. If I'm Billy Ruden, what am I

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>doing with my port? Not just office real estate? Dude?

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Look downstairs, right, we used to have like an H

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and M container store. There was a Victoria's Secret across

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the street, like a Jay Crew or Banana Republic or

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Though those are all gone. The only

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>thing we have is like some high end chocolate tier,

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure is a front for something else. No,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it was awesome. It was packed, even though in a

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic they had people in there. But again, what's the

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what is the smart money saying about New York office

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>real estate and San Francisco for that matter. Right, So

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at the smart money that those A buildings, right,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are beautiful fifteen percent, that makes up

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of the real estate they're they're occupied, Yes,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen percent. So the yards is Hudson Yards occupied.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go into on their vacancy, and I wouldn't

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dare to do that on the radio. But any class

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>A building that's going to have the prime amenities is

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have an easier time of being able to

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lease it up. That middle sector, which is sixty percent

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of real estate for office and for retail, that's going

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to need some capital. Those those buildings are going to

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>need to have either the rescue capital coming in there

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or somebody really doing an infusion. It's the bottom twenty

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>five percent that's really what you need to worry about.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is USY not just New York, not just

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. So it's that twenty five percent of the

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the that's going to have to be reconfigured

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and how do you put that in and what do

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you do with that? And that's the real challenge. So

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the top seventy five percent is going to be able

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to be usable, but you think that's sixty percent in

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I wouldn't put money into that thing. I

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't put it like a gym or a coffee machine,

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking that's going to workers back. But dude, your risk

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>tolerance doesn't go on Muni's that's true. That's true. So

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where your opportunity is. And when I said to

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you before, a real opportunistic investor or somebody who's willing

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to you're gonna get a higher yield. By the way,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to put that money up, that's the

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>higher yield. And that's where the you can make a

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of money in that exact space. What are you

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing about people actually going back to the office. I mean,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while it was forget about it. The kids

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>were telling potential employers, no way, Jose. But as we

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>get closer to a recession, I would imagine that resolve

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>breaks a little bit, right. I mean, if you need

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to find a job, you're probably going to be willing

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to go in like at least three days a week.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the same thing everyone's been saying. It's

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that teamwork, camaraderie, and when people are in offices and

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>they're able to be around each other, you're gonna be

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>able to create a career for yourself versus sitting at

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>home in front of your computer or watching TV. This

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is really where you're going to create your life. And

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you mentioned you just mentioned it that when

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we head into a little bit more challenging time, the

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>job market's going to change. And so what really makes

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a difference is how you've created a work life balance

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for yourself and how you're going to start working with

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>your employers. Also, what we're demanding as employers. You know,

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're allowing for that work life balance in that three

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>days a week, and so you know at some point,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where where's that going to break and where are we

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>going to say, come back to work. It's much more fun.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We miss you. So at Eisner Advisory Group, I'm guessing

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys like transactions. You like the fees associate or transactions.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>What's your outlook for the next twelve months. I mean

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get some more transactions or is these

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates just kind of keeping everybody on the sideline.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So when you think of transactions, you can also look

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at there's going to be a lot of refinancings that

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have to come up. Where we are in the cycle,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the data is due and so we're going

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to go in there and talk to lenders

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>make sure we do some workouts. That's where mes lending

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>comes in. A preferred equity position can come in. So

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the times that you're at some point in

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, you're going to have to do some conversation

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>in speaking to the banks and figuring out where you

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are and making sure that the cash flow is still

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the right yield for your investors. So in times of

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>good and bad in real estate, transaction markets can still

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be very We're still excited to see what could happen

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because as we say that, you know, real estate is

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>still a nice investment for a part of a portfolio.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Any tax changes coming into view, or is there any

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>possibility of that, I'm not asking about all things I'm

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>asking about salt because all I care about a salt, right,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But I know that you're kind the commercial side that

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. However, I would imagine that legislatures, you know,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>local and state, are looking at making changes that they

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>can to attract investors. So there's two different things. I

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>think people saw Biden put some real estate proposals that

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he had that we're in the last bill that didn't

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>go through. He brought them back in things with ten

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty one exchanges that we're a little nervous about. Aggressive. Yes,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and we do care about salt because we do care

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about those state taxes and wanting to make sure which

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to sunset out. So there's a lot of

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>things that we're keeping our eye on, but not to

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's depending on where we are in the political cycle.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>So what's going to go through not going political here

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>by sunset Paul in twenty five, I know, so the

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>big sun shotting provision. We need to all right, be

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>mindful of good stuff. Lisa Knee, thank you so much

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thank you for coming into our Bloomberg

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in Actor Broker Studio. Really good stuff. We'll have you back. Lisa,

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Ni's a partner, National tax leader for real Estate practice

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>at Eisner Advisory Group. Thank you very much. We got

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that so good stuff on the commercial real estate side.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Need some deals to happen here, get some big prints

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on the tape. You're listening to the tape cancer our

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. We have four seats in

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful Bloomberg Inactor Brooker studio, but they are full

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right here. We got Matt and Eye and then we're

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>joined by Anne Hunter. Van Kirk, bi senior industry analyst,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was a bio Pharmaceuticals and Diana were set open bi

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>industry analysts covering the consumer staples. Why are they in here?

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Why are they talking to us? Because apparently during the

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 1>pandemic amount a lot of people got a lot of pets,

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and apparently that's like a big business. How big is

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it will? These two analysts project that it will be

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a five hundred billion dollar business by twenty thirty. I

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just don't get it. I'll tell you. I'll tell you

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a quick anecdote. Right, My wife, as you know, is

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>from Spain. They were not allowed out, they were not

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed out of their homes unless they had to walk

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a dog. Really, so a lot of people who didn't

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have dogs would start renting dogs from their neighbors. That's

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not a joke. They were renting dogs so that they

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>could go out on a walk with their dogs. And

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they were exhausted. The dogs were dogs. They

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>were hiding the hiding the leash. All right, Diana, let's

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>start with you on the consumer side here, five hundred

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. That's a lot of cash. That gets my

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>attention at least. What's driving that. It's basically the humanization

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of pets, um boy, Yes, we are starting to treat

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>our pets the same as we would treat children, you know,

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>part of our family. And also on the food side,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there is the you know, you have to put more

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>attention to the ingredients that going food, and that allows

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the premunization of food that includes um, you know, the

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>premunization of pet food as well. I mean for a

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>long time, so I've had three dogs. The first couple

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I just fed normal food. But for Steve he got

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:47.719
<v Speaker 1>organically grown goat meat or I would even get you know,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>organic cage free chicken and make it for him. No, no, no,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, you have to if you care about the

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>pet like you do about a family member, which is

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's your point, then you want that pet

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as healthy as possible. Well, the big I think, the

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>big ticket item, so I hear from a lot of

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people is healthcare. So Anne Hunter van Kurt jump in here,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about like what are people spending healthcare

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>wise for their pets? Absolutely, Paul, and actually to pull

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it back, it's actually from that increased spending on goat

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>goat products for your pets that's driving the higher healthcare

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>needs because pets are living longer. But the we are

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>now seeing monoclonal antibodies for pain, for dermatitis. People are

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>making healthcare decisions as they would for a human because

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they are humanizing their pets. So rather than perhaps putting

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a pet down, you're you're going to get that cancer

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>therapy for them now. So orget like Steve, I had

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>his knees done twice, right, And I know somebody else.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>His dog had a knee problem and he just put

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the dog to sleep because he was like, I'm not

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to spend five grand was seeing his knees done.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I had to do at at at

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at a vet in Tuckahoe. They were very good. They

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>redid the whole thing with like pig ligaments, and more

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>people are making that. Yeah. But is there insurance? I mean,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>there is absolutely insurance. The insurance market is a small

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>penetration right now, we think only about two percent, but

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely growing. You have it from a lot

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional insurers out there, you know, your your

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>state farm or whatever else. But you are also seeing

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it from a lot of the pharmaceutical companies are getting

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>involved in it. So let us now has pumpkin insurance.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that we think will go to the

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>government level. It's like a pumpkin insurance Pumpkin is there

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is there insurance brand? Oh? I see, So not insuring

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a squad, not insuring a squash, now insuring a dog

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>or a cat called pumpkin. So Diana talking about like

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>companies like Chewy, Like in my building, we have a

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>very maladjusted, very angry pitbull by the name of Harry,

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and he and I don't we're not on the same

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>page or I need to work on that a little bit.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But he gets his Chewy delivery like every couple of weeks.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean talk to us about like just the food

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the toy. Does Chewy dominate? I mean, is Chewy? That

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is there any number two after Chewi? Well, actually, Chewie

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>has thirty six percent of the pet e commerce market

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. The second one is Amazon, which

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent, and then you have your retail store

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>such as Petco, pet Smart, Walmart that each have less

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>than ten percent. All right, well they're doing that poorly. Yes,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty amazing that they're doing so badly. Well, I mean,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Chewie. I mean it's a fourteen point five

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar market out of nothing, right, I mean this

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>has started I think long after petc and it's just

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>completely dominated this market. It seems to me that there

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>would be room for someone else to come in because Amazon.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I get people everyone orders everything from Amazon, but when

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you really care about your pet, you want to order

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>something from a brand that's specifically four And also another

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that Chewie has is pretty much. It gives you

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this specialty or experience at the comfort of your home.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>We estimate that pet Ecommers has about twenty two the

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>pet industry market in the United States, and they will double.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The industry will double to fifty eight billion, or thirty

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of the market by twenty thirty. So there's a

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of growth in that part of the market, and

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Chewi has a big percentage of that. What about medical care?

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I noticed when I moved back to New York from

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Berlin that there are a lot of highly priced, but

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>well staffed and fast service vets all over the place.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Bond Street is one of the veterinarian chains

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have around here. But every couple of blocks

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Upper east Side you see these vets springing up.

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>How is that? How is that working? How is that structured?

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The vet channel is huge, and it's actually right now

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>facing pressures for staffing just because they can't get enough

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>people in to keep up with the demand to meet

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with the pets. We cover IDx, which is a diagnostic company,

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing increasing rates of diagnostic usage for pets,

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's doing fecal tests, urine tests, blood tests, and

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>again older pets need need more tests, and they need

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>more follow up from those tests. Um, and that's really

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>driving a lot of the of the healthcare usage. What's

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the average age of it? I know a dog depends

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on depends on the breed, right because yeah, I mean

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if you smaller dogs live longer. Yeah, exactly. So if

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a little mutt, it could live to twenty

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>years old. If you have a big cane corso that's

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a pure bread you know, from a line of probably inbread,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pure bread cane corsos, he's going to live to eight

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or nine. What was Steve? Steve was a rottweiler. Uh,

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he comes from a line of champions and uh, yeah,

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he lived till he was eleven. Unfortunately not longer, right,

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but those lifespans are increasing as an average, and it's

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>still like a dog years like seven years to a human.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's still still commonly held, right, Yeah,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe so do Diana real quick. Just on the

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>consumer side, what's the what's the growth story there, Like,

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the big growth area within like for pets, Well,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely we estimate that pood that food will remain the

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest expenditure for pet owners um in terms of what

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is driving that, Like I just said, the humanization of

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pets is driving the premiumization of food. You want, like Steve,

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to give Steve or like the Steeves of

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, you want to give them the best of

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what you can afford. Um On a subsegment of that

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you have we have fresh frozen, which is pretty much

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a cooked meal that is distributed frozen. So

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we estimate that the growth of that market will be exponential.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And actually fresh pet has ninety percent of that right,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>gazing stuff. And you guys have a great report out

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on this whole industry. Uh go check it out a

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bi go on the Bloomberg terminal. Diana or set up

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>equity research channels and Anne Hunter van Kirk also senior

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>annols there at Bloomberg Intelligence talking about the pet food biz.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>r Heard Radio app and the Bloomberg Business App. We're

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Let's start

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds here. We want to talk fix it income. We

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to R. J. Gallows, Senior portfolio manager with Federator

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Hermes m r J. Give us a kind of the

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>lay of the land here we are coming to the

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the first quarter in twenty twenty three. Give

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>us a lay of the land. What we've seen in

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the bond market this year versus twenty twenty two, which

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is just there was just no place to hide. Last year,

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>well there was there was no place to hide. You know.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The bond market instead of being a flatliner, was a

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>downward sloping line and a very sharp one last year.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>That was a reference to the movie you guys were mentioned.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't miss it. I did not miss that. But

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the spirit in the bond market it's pretty much the

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what we saw last year. So, you know,

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury index was down. I think it was twelve

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent if I recall last year. The

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>US Treasury index right now as of Friday's closes up

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>three point five seven percent. Much of the rally has

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>been just in the month of March. It's been in

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a very turbulent March month. You mentioned the move index

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>has massively surged. You know, the confluence of prior bond

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>losses and deposit instability in the sort of second tier

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>size of banks was not something that was I think,

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on the market's radar until SDB came along pretty much

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on March ninth. You know, on the month two, five

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and ten year treasury yields are lowered by eighty seven,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty two and forty three basis points. Now interesting, the

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>long end is thirty years only down eighteen And the

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>reason for that greater voltility the short end of the

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>curve is because the nexus of banking stress and FED

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>policy has been fundamental. As the banking stresses have emerged,

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the expectations of FED tightening have completely reversed, and the

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>FED has sort of blessed that in their own words.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a very eventful month in bonds, which

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we said to start the year. Our back are posting

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>nice mid single digits total returns in a more uncertain

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>world as inflation still high. But the banks are rickety.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So r J, what has the FED base? I was,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was down in Mexico on the beach last week,

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>paying zero attention. I saw something from Bullard and then

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I saw cash Car yesterday on TV. But what have

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they kind of implicitly told us about the path this

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>year that that they're done, or that you know they're

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>almost done. They're certainly not going to cut right. I

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think to the first question, I think they've told us

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that when banking stresses emerge, I think the phrase the

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Sharon pale U's the literature, namely the economics research literature,

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is abundantly clear that when when the bank channel of

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>monetary transmission starts to feel pain, then that transmission becomes

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>more intense. Credit creations should slow. Banks will probably pull

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>back on making loans. The cost of deposits is going

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to go up, bank profits go down, which is why,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in part why some of these banking stocks have struggled.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So when banks are feeling the strain of monetary policy,

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the bank transmission channel starts to bite, and that will

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>intensify the real economic effects and the anti inflationary effects

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of the monetary policy moves that are already in place.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We've been waiting for a long time for the lags

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to sort of you know, you know, be worked through.

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Well they got worked through rather rapidly with this banking stress.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think what the FED says, uncertainties high chair

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>power comment that the banking stress is like one tightening,

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe more you know, alluding to that literature. I was

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just mentioning, and I think that the Feds signaled that

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they're close to The dot plot is not a promise,

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is a projection. It's the summary of economic projections,

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and those projections move because they're inherently uncertain. But they

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>projected that they will that they will still be easing

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. I don't think they'll be easing

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>this year. They projected that the FED funds rate on

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a median dot will be five and eighth, you know,

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which is basically maybe one more tightening. But if you

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>go out a year from now, the median dot is

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>now four and a quarter. It was four and eighth

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>at the last meeting. So they they I think, had

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the banking stresses not shown up on our doorstep, might

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have flattened mount the dots trajectory, raising them all closer

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to five for this year and next. Instead, the twenty

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four dot is still in the low four range,

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and even easier in twenty twenty five. I think the

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Fed feels like we're getting closer to a recessionary like outcome.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>They're getting closer to being done. That's friendly for high

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>quality bond returns. So done is almost stubbish in itself.

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>But it's a cut seems like something that they would

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>only do if we saw real stresses. What would happen,

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>What would have to happen for them to cut? Um?

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think? So how also is clear that he doesn't

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>see a cut this year, that's not in the cards,

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but uncertainties high, So we'll see how things unfold. Um.

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the FED has gone and the ECP

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>has under same. They've tried to separate their UH, their

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>financial stability, their macropudential controls and and and tools from

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy. But there's I think there was a great

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>article on Bloomberg about how that's it's hard to do

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that forever. When the financial crisis hit, Ben Bernanke was

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was making loans. That's you know, financial stability, using the

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet in that way, and then cutting rates and

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 1>ultimately doing QWE and that's monetary policy. So these two

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>tools do compliment each other at times. The Fed right

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>now is trying to separate them. Why because we still

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>have a high inflation problem. If inflation was low, I

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>don't they'd be sweating this out very much. Maybe they

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>would have eased a little bit, but inflation is still

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>way too high. They are making loans, but they aren't

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>making loans. The balance sheet has grown rapidly because the

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>banks are availing themselves of these support mechanisms that the

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:16.439
<v Speaker 1>FED has has expanded and motivated people to do because

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to help. But I do think that the

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>FED still faces an inflation problem. That's why they're sort

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of between a rock and a hard place. And at

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the last week's meeting they were They did the rational things.

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five basis points is a nod to the inflation

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that is still too high, but all the language that

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it came with, and the dot plot that's still downward

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>sloping sort of softens the blow that the FED is

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>telling the markets. The FED is not toned death. They

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>get it. There are banking stresses in the system, and

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're going to come under some scrutiny as

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to how these banking stresses emerged. The FED doesn't manage

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the banks. They supervise them. There's a difference. So the

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>managers should be the ones in trouble for the bank's problems,

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but the supervisors also get called to task about what

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>did you see how come you weren't contemplating this your

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>stress test, for example. So the Fed's going to get

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>some heat from this too. So they're interested in trying

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to balance these objectives of ease the bank stress but

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>still allow inflation to hopefully renew its downward path. That's

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty event the markets all phase now, J just

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds quick, what is your recession call? So from

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a firm wide basis, sederated Hermy's, we've been arguing that

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the recession risk was getting higher and higher as the

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>FED got tighter and tighter. Pretty much. If you are

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>our macro committee, of which I remember, we have a

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>recession emerging in the second half of the year. Our

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>view is it will be a somewhat mild recession. It's not,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, not every recession has to be two thousand

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and eight or the onset of COVID. This might might

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be a recession that looks a lot more like the

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, for example, And so you have a

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>modest diminished, diminished economic activity and it helps to the

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>disinflation that the FED needs to take hold. All right,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, Thank you very much. R. J. Gallo, Senior

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Federated Hermes giving us his call on

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>all things fixed income. We'll have more coming up. This

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. You're listening to the tape cancerre Live program

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty. I mean telling Matt, I'm ready to

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>take some risk there in my investment portfolio. But everybody's saying,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fund manager strategists gotta stay defensive. What's

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the fun in that? Though? Boring? Boring? I agree, but

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>let's see what why why do you want to take risk? Now?

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Just a lot of house At the stage of my life,

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to let a couple of show live once. Yeah,

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, go on the table here. Uh. Katteriita Simon Eddie.

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>She's a professional, she does this for a living. She's

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a senior vice president Private Wealth Management of work and Stanley. So, Katerina,

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm your client. I call you up, I say, hey,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to go out on the risk profile. Here.

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>What would you tell me, Paul, I'll tell you there's

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing wrong with boring, and sometimes sometimes it's good

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to be strategic. Let's replace the work worring web strategic.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is where you know, we kind of just

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, see where the market is at and the

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>staid and inflation story is still unraveling. We're not quite

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>done with that yet. But now this whole regional bank

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>situation added another data point, and you know, we're now

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at the credit availability and how that is going

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to affect the market. And so while we're waiting for

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the market to normalize, we have to see what's ahead

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>of us. And the part that is troubling us the

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>most is the fact that earnings still remain below the

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>current market values and we're still seeing the earnings revisions,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, which might negatively affect the market. You know,

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as we go on throughout this year, and we are

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>our longer term outlook is positive, but we believe that

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we still remain in the bear market. And usually if

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we look back at history with bear markets before the end,

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>things sometimes get worse before they get better. As the

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>market goes to this normalization process, which absolutely presents buying opportunities,

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 1>but we might want to stay defensive and not quite

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, go in, go in on the risk. I'll

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you what if a drop in earnings and a

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hawk ish FED is all we have to deal with,

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes me feel a lot better. Are we passed?

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we are we passed? The bank turmoil? Are we passed?

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Concerns of a systemic failure? Well, in our review, systemic

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>failure was not really in the in the mix, but

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we think that, you know, this is definitely a very

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>serious situation. But you know, in our review it wasn't

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>affecting our entire banking system. With that, there are definitely concerns,

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is another thame for FED to focus on,

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, while they're really trying to get this this

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbered down to two percent, you know. But the

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>exciting part of this market is that this remains to

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>be a stock pickers market. And while we're seeing if

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get recession and dealing with that slowing

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth, the question is which sectors are going to

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hold up. And this is where, of course, some people

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are looking already at cyclicals and our review this just

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit too premature. And we're looking at

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples, at utilities, and specifically for companies with strong

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth, with strong balance sheets, with competitive positioning at

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>every sector of the market. You know, there are a

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of buys out there. We're just not too enthusiastic

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about the index investing at the moment. So what's it

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We've heard a lot about, you know, this being the

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>decade of the dividend, you really want to start paying

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to good quality dividend paying stocks as opposed to maybe,

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, just great growth or how do you think

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>about that? Well, dividend always plays the role in the

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>overlast allocation. And you know, I generally tell our clients is,

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say you wake up on January first, and you

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>absolutely have no idea what the market is going to do.

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the estimated dividend payments of

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your high dividend stocks, that's your starting point. At that moment.

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that at the very least your portfolio is

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to earn something. So this takes an element of

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>risk out of it. And of course for the clients

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that are using their investment portfolios for income, that's a

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>really important fact as well. So when we look at

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>dividend paying stocks. We look at the sectors that are defensive.

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we are not positioning them as the sectors

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that we want to own right now. We view this

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>weakness in the market and we view the volatility as

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to rebalance, as the opportunity to improve the

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>quality of the holdings, but also to increase the dividend

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>yield because it's a very important overall component over the

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>long term positive investment results. So do you use the

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>term sell the rip? I mean, are you selling on rallies?

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>We use a different term. The terms that we use

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is profit taking, because when you have an investment that

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>did very well, there's absolutely nothing wrong with taking some

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>profits to off the table. But this is not to

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be confused with market timing, where we're absolutely abandoning the sector.

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We might like. Certain market sectors like consumer staples right now,

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of financials present a lot of interesting buying opportunities right now,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So we would be strategic and pivot from one sector

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to another, but more so as an overweight and underweight

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>element versus abandoning a sector like you know, there's a

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversation right now of technology, and we think

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>while we have to be extremely selective in our security selection.

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Technology still presents a lot of interesting buying opportunities. Katarina's

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>what's the view of kind of you know, the Morgan

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Private Wealth Management about crypto because I'm guessing you

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>get some inbound calls from clients saying, Hey, do I

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>need to have exposure here? Um? If so, how do

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I do it? What's what's kind of the Morgan Stanley call. Well,

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to comment on something like this because

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know what we don't know, but we

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely are aware that the volatility exposure in that space

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is significantly higher than the broad equity markets, and so

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 1>we we tell our clients to proceed cautiously. And while

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we can our advice that we can operate, they're limited

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in this space. We just tell them to, you know,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just just just manage the risk there and not to

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>be exposed more than they're willing to to risk, because

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the risk factor is significantly higher than anywhere else in

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. Understood in terms of what you're watching for, um,

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the end of this rate hike cycle

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and for uh, you know, the end of the earnings downturn.

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>What are the signs. I know people don't want to

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>go and catch falling knives, love that phrase, but at

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>some point you do want to be ahead of the

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>pack in terms of buying right well, of course, and

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so what we tell clients is that instead of thinking

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>two months out or six months out, which seems to

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 1>be the latest strength, we should go back to thinking

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years out and focus on good quality

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>stocks and understand that what makes this market difference from

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>let's say last year, is that we have attractive yields.

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We have attractive interest rate that we can earn on

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.240
<v Speaker 1>everything across the board, from our cash to high quality

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. And this is where the strategy really comes

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>into place because recoveries, they are not always all the same,

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and the last bear market will not the last bloemarket.

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I meant to say, it's not necessarily going to be

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>as the same as the bloom market ahead of us.

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So positioning the portfolio insectors that have that competitive advantage,

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that have the benefit of stable earnings in this post

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID economy, defining the new normal, what is going to

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be earning s going for and the profect margins are

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>squeezed but not every area you know is experiencing the

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>same type of effect. Katerina, thanks so much for joining us.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting your thoughts there. Katarina Simonetti, Senior vice president,

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Advisor at Morgan Stanley. You're listening to the

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>easting on Bloomberg dot com, the I Heard Radio app

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business app. We're listening on demand wherever

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. Over the last three years, supply

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>chain is a topic that we probably didn't know a

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot about, but we've all gotten a lot smarter

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. As you know, we hear company after company

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about supply chain challenges. Can't get the products, can't

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>get the raw materials, lots of cogs in the machine,

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and we've all gotten a lot smarter about how the

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>global supply chain works. Nobody is more on the front

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 1>lines of the global supply chain than Gene Siroca. He's

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, which

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is the busiest container support in North America. Joints is

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from our DC studio. Gene, thanks so much for joining

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>us again. You've been just so helpful to us as

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we try to figure out what is the global supply chain,

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>how does it work, and where are the bugs in

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this system? So it feels like, you know, we're on

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the back end of this in a big way. I'm

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure if we're back to normal, but give us

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>an update from your perspective of kind of what you're

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>seeing at the Port of Los Angeles and kind of

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where you're seeing it just in a supply chain in general. Paul,

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Good afternoon. Great to be here from DC talking to

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys again. Global supply chain is witnessing a slowdown

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in demand worldwide, not just us in Los Angeles, but

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>across the country and across the globe. We've seen that

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>over the past three years, the global supply chain's weaknesses

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>have been spotlighted. And that's why I'm here in DC

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this week talking about infrastructure, a ground truth update and

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening operationally, and a little bit about our labor

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>contract negotiations. Talk to us about those labor contract contract negotiations.

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>You have gone through it or you're going through it now,

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think the East Coast goes through it a

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on. Yeah, we're in about our tenth months,

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>which is usually the outer edge of how long it

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 1>takes for the bargaining to really culminate in a contract.

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're not quite there yet. The Pacific Maritime Association,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the Employers Group, and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union.

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The dock workers remain at the table. They're talking on

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis, and equally is important the rank and

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>file dock worker is out on the job everyday moving cargo.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.879
<v Speaker 1>The productivity numbers are elite there where they're at. There's

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just not a lot of cargo moving right now, So

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>would you say the cargo volume is gene versus perhaps

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a normalized time A couple of pieces here. For the

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 1>month of February, with a longer than normal lunar New

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Year break in Asia, we're at about fifty percent capacity

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 1>five zero. It looks like the month of March will

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit better, an uptick of about twenty

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>percentage points in cargo volume for that month, but still

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>much lighter than we witnessed in recent years. In fact,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the first quarter will be down

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by about a third compared to an all time record

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Q one of twenty twenty two. So in terms of

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the kinks in the system. Are the backups? Where are

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they right now? The backup on ships in Los Angeles

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and Long Beach, the Southern California twin ports was effectively

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>gone last August. We set records in five of the

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>first seven months last year, while bringing the number of

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 1>ships at anchor from one hundred and nine down to

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>single digits by the first week in August. Then there

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was a purposeful shift and cargo to the East and

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Gulf Coast importers exporters weary of these contract negotiations and

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:58.800
<v Speaker 1>possible work stoppages. Even though both sides have publicly stated

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>through the media and other channels that they're not going

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to lock out labor and labor guys are not going

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to go on strike. President met with both sides along

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>with then Secretary Marty Walsh of Labor on June tenth,

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>first sitting president to my knowledge in history, to meet

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>with both sides during an active negotiation. Still not enough

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to convince importers and exporters to keep their cargo in LA.

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think this plays out? Gene? I'm

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure how many of these work issues you've been

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>through doing in your career. I'm guessing this isn't your

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>first but how do you think this kind of plays out?

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I think we probably need a little more time. As

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I've shared with you guys before, it's not only a

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>coastal framework that needs to get done within the collective

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bargaining agreement itself, but there are twenty nine ports on

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast, each with its own local agreement. Those

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are being sure it up. We probably need just a

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time to get this done. Again, I

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 1>don't see anything disrupting the supply chain based on the workforce,

0:51:57.200 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'll let these experts continue to chip away at this. Unfortunately,

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>last Friday, the White House got a letter signed by

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and thirty eight organizations imploring the President to

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get involved and bring these negotiations to closure. So we'll

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>be talking with folks at the White House again this

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>afternoon to give them a lay of the land of

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what's happening on the ground and try to ease anyone's fears.

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>There's not going to be disruption from the workforce. Hey,

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're out there on the West Coast and I know

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>significantly south of Sandhill Road. But the collapse of SVB,

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>does that have any effect on your organization. Are you

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just too darn big to notice that kind of that

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of ripple. Well, as an amateur economist that I've

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>talked with you guys about before, this economic equation is

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just so complex. From a jobs market that is still

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>towards the employee ten point seven million jobs open, lowest

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate since the late nineteen sixties, and even in

0:52:56.960 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the phase of inflation, although it's come down eight consecutive

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of months, the American consumer still buys SVB. Because we've

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>been talking all along a great concern. Some companies couldn't

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>even make payroll because that's where their money was. So

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>anything that hits the banking system is a shock. We

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all remember what happened in O eight and O nine,

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But to see the administration jump forward so quickly, Treasury

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Secretary yelling backstopping those bank accounts and that of signature

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>in New York here we are. Hopefully it's no more

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>widespread than what we've seen here the credit Swiss European

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>transaction coming over that weekend. Hopefully these are isolated cases.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But watching this very closely, like every other variable in

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the economic equation. Yeah, the root of that problem I

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:47.800
<v Speaker 1>guess was specific to SVB and very bad risk management.

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>But driven by rates that rose four fifty now five

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis points in a year and a half. Does

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that have any effect to these high rates have any

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>effect on your ports business? Sure it does. And I

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>think what folks look at is what are their inventory

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>carrying costs most close to home? Right Purchase orders are

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at a low EBB right now for a couple of reasons.

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the inflation, the concern over the strength of the

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer in the intermediate term, although proven to be pretty resilient.

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>The interest rates on the cost of those goods that

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:26.479
<v Speaker 1>importers purchase and exporters finance, that weighs heavily. Folks trying

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to get inventories right sized because the inventory sales ratio

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>is still elevated here in the United States, and while

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting emails and text messages on deep discounts from

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 1>our retailers to get older inventory out, the new products

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>won't start coming in until there's a bleed down of

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that warehousing inventory across the nation. Again, not just in

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles but nationally. Gee. Another global issue that I

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 1>know you have a lot of familiarity with it is

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>China given your port and your customers in the trade.

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>China reopening maybe a little bit faster than people thought.

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:04.400
<v Speaker 1>How are you seeing that in your business? What are

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from your shippers? It's been interesting, and having

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lived in China during Stars, I had a view of

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what a global pandemic might have looked like. This was

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a ten thousand times greater. Obviously now with the benefit

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of hindsight, but with the reopening, we're starting to see

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some stabilization, whether it's land transport, barge traffic, factories and

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>their subassembly suppliers getting really back to one hundred percent capacity.

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>We never really lost a lot of steam because the

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.800
<v Speaker 1>central government in Beijing and the ports, especially the Shanghai

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Young Shan Deep Seaport, kept us in focus and made

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that long haul traffic, that long haul container shipping business

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a priority. So even while some a pine that shutdowns,

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hurt international transportation for this container business

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.919
<v Speaker 1>between mainland China in La it stayed strong. We'll see

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a little more steady cadence as we go forward. But

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down now to the purchase orders that

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are going in from American manufacturers and retailers that usually

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have a window of ninety to one hundred and twenty

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>days before ship sailing, so we're seeing all that activity

0:56:10.080 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's my belief we'll get on a more

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 1>normal calendar after the fourth of July holiday. You'll start

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing seasonal products, year end holidays, and those specialty items

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>start coming through as they used to based on the

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:29.760
<v Speaker 1>timing factors. So you'll see the summer goods, fall fashion, Halloween,

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back to school, and then the year end holiday products

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lining up a little bit more distinctively than they have

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the recent past. All Right, Jane, thanks so much

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really appreciate getting your perspective. You're insight there.

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Jean Siroka, Executive director of the Port of Los Angeles,

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and on fall swee

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:02.479
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.