WEBVTT - The Fish Had Fur, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>back with part two of our series on furry fish.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We had great fun in the last episode talking about

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some bizarre myths and legends of fish completely covered in

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>fur or covered in blotches or patches of fur. So

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about some old reports from Iceland of a

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so called shaggy trout that lived in the lakes and streams.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Allegedly i was said to be covered in fur, was

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>said to be poisonous when eating, or was said to

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have other strange effects when eaten. Um we talked about

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Marco Polo's secondhand reports of a giant furry fish found

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>dead in a river near the Chinese city he called

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Keen Sai. We talked about possible explanations for reports of

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fish covered in fur, if there is in fact anything

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>these reports are based on. So, for example, the possibility

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that Marco Polo's furry fish could have been maybe a

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>half remembered report of a decomposing river dolphin, or the

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>idea that some reports of furry fish or fish with

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>furry patches could actually be observations of fish with parasitic infections,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>such as a water mold called saprolegnia. But today we

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start with some more weird reports of furry

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fish from across the ages furry fish and fish like creatures,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first one we should do today

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Japanese furry fish. And this one is mentioned

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in a book that I brought up in the last episode.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a book by a British cryptozoologist named Carl Schucker

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>called The Beasts That Hied from Man and Shooker sources

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this claim of this bizarre creature to a book called

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>The World in Miniature Japan, which was published in the

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>early eighteen hundreds, edited by an author named Frederick Shoberl,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and this book records a claim that goes like this. Okay,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So the book says there's a river in Japan and

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's full of strange creatures that measure about four to

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>five feet in length. They have scaly bodies like fish,

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but their heads are covered in hair like a human's hair.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And these creatures don't sound like a type of fish

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>strictly because they can allegedly leave the water and move

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>around on the banks of the river. And from here

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to quote from from shooters summary on the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>banks of the River quote where they fight or engage

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in boisterous games with one another, emitting loud cries as

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>they disport in a singularly rowdy, unfish like manner. However,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there rombusteous behavior swiftly transforms into savage aggression if they

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>spy any people unhesitating lee attacking and killing their hapless

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>human victims by disemboweling them. Yet they do not devour

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>their bodies afterwards. Okay, so a weird report as usual.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There are at least a couple of options you can

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>start with at the get go. One is that this

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>could just be imaginative storytelling. Somebody is telling a yarn

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>based purely on, you know, combining elements out of their imagination.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But it could also be some kind of distorted account

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of something somebody saw in nature. I guess if we

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>want to consider possibilities of of imaginative storytelling, you might

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>want to look for similarities to other types of known beasts, monsters,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or creatures from the local mythology. Yeah, and this made

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>me turn to a couple of different things that but

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one that certainly came up with the Japanese uh Nno,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a sort of mer creature described, at least in some accounts,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is a huge fish with the head of a beautiful woman. Uh.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>She's often said to be protective of humans and warns

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>them against dangers. So, in a way, sort of the

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>opposite of of other models of a mirror creature or

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a siren or what have you. Um and and this

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty famous creature in Japanese mythology. In fact,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's even been brought to life in the in the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>films of Miyazaki. If you've seen Nyazaki's Panio. Uh, this

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a cute take on the idea of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a ningyo. Yeah. I was reading about the ningyo in

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an excellent book that I actually own a copy of.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.239
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Book of Yokai, and it's by a

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>folklore scholar named Michael Dillon Foster. The book is out

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>through University of California Press. Uh And if you're a

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fan of of Japanese monster legends, I highly recommend this book.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really good. So a few facts from Foster's telling

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on the ningyo So, first of all, though the word

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ningyo is sometimes translated to English as mermaid or merman,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>it literally just means human fish. And so, Rob, do

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you remember how in the stories we talked about in

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the last episode, how the shaggy trout of Iceland and

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Marco Polos were bard of the furry fish. They were

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>both said to be poisonous or to kill people who

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>ate them. So Michael Dillon Foster notes that there is

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a classic medicinal encyclopedia of Japan that notes that the

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>bones of the ningyo, which I think it just reports

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>as if it were any other mundane animal. It's like, yeah,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>here are the animals you can find. One of them

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is the ningyo, this half human half half fish. If

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you take those bones, they can be made into a

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>poison quote with wonderful effect. But he notes even more

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>stories on the other side of the scale, stories of

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the ningo having exactly the opposite effect. We're eating their

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>flesh or even just looking at one of them sometimes

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>can guarantee you a long and prosperous life. M hmm.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting detail because on one hand it sounds

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like medicine in general, right, I mean, there's so many

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>different properties of the natural world that you take it

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a certain way or under certain conditions or in certain

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>quantities and it's beneficial or potentially beneficial, and then in

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>other quantities or situations it can be deadly totally or

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the same animal. Again, I want to

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be clear, we're not actually saying that, like the bones

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of a mermaid will make you live forever, don't but

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Mermaid based on anything you hear in this episode. But

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I just mean, yeah, yeah, I think you're correct that

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the logic of it follows the logic of a lot

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of real properties of of medicines you would find in nature.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>But there's one thing I wanted to mention that's in

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Yokai. So there is this one classic

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tale about the nemeo U. There is a fisherman who

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>catches one of these things and then cooks it and

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>then offers it to a friend, and the friend doesn't

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>want to eat it because he's weirded out by the

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that it has a human head. You know, even

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>though it might taste like delicious fish and the muscular parts,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's got a human head. So he's like, yeah, I

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, So he takes it home with him, and

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>his sixteen year old daughter eats it. I don't know

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if some details are lost there, if she's just like

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>not squicked out by the human head like he is um,

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but she eats it and then as a result, she

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>lives to be eight hundred years old and spends her

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>life as a kind of superhero Nun, traveling the country

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>doing good like a like a fish, human cannibal, holy hulk,

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and she eventually enshrines her body in a cave by

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the sea. UM. Speaking of of Yokai, I do have

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to mention for anyone out there, and also speaking of

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli Films, there's a wonderful film titled

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>pomp Poco that came out from Studio Ghibli many years back,

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is It is a film about Tanuki's, about

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>magical Tanuki's, and there's a there's a full English dub

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think you can you can watch this

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on HBO Max if you subscribe to that um or

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you can watch it in the original Japanese. But it

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is it's absolutely fatless. Do not be scared away by

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it is um a film about magical

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Tanukis who do magic with their testicles. Uh or as

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it is translated into into English, they are raccoons using

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>their raccoon pouch, but we know they're testicles. Um. It's

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a wonderful film. It's totally it's totally for for

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>kids and adults alike. It has a strong environmental message.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole sequence in it where the tanukis

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just Tanuki's in it, there are also

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fox spirits. And then there's a sequence where the Tanukis

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>create a yokai parade. They take on all of these

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>fabulous yokai forms, all of these various classic ones you

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>may have seen in illustrations, like the giant skeleton and

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the umbrella creatures, that sort of thing. Uh.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's just absolutely gorgeous. So I highly recommend that

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>film if it's one of those you've you've kind of

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>shied away from because you weren't sure if maybe if

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it translates, um, you know, to a non Japanese audience.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely does. It's just a beautiful film. Clancy Brown

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>does one of the voices. Really, I haven't seen that one,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but now I want to check it. Out, Yeah, at

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>least fast far to the yokai parade. But anyway, going

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>back to that description from the book of this creature

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the river who has a head full

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of hair scales like a fish on this body. I mean,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see how that that's sort of similar to

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the neo tradition, but I'm not sure there's actually any connection.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>There might just be a few superficial similarities. It's hard

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell, you know. Speaking of fish at yokai, there's

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>another yokai called amaba A, which looks very much like

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>what we just talked about, except throw in a bird's

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>beak and some slightly different feet. And I was reading

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, and interestingly enough, it became something of a

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mascot for COVID nineteen pandemic measures in Japan um and

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>you'll see posters that say like stop COVID nineteen and

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>will be a picture of this creature. I was reading

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about it in this uh Anthropology Today article by Claudia

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Merley titled a Chimeric Being from Cayushu, Japan um and

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the quote from it. Quote presented as a

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mascot but viewed as an icon of protection. This uncanny

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>little Yochai from southern Japan in the pre modern Edo

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>period addresses our lives as they are caught in a

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>suspension of our usual temporal and spatial dimensions. A monster,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a hyper object, and an art effigy of our pandemic present. Okay, anyway,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's also cute creature. It is very cute. It's got like, yeah,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got the cute bird face, the fish scales, and

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>then just like a big old, luxurious mane of hair.

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, whatever the similarities to these other legendary beings

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of Japanese mythology. Regarding this one story from from this

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>book The World in Miniature Japan, Shoot Shooker asks, you know,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if these stories are based at least in part on

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>real observations, could there be anything that we could figure

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out they might be talking about? And he passes on

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting guess that was suggested by a curator of

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>mollusks at the Royal Museum of Scotland who's named David Heppel,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and Happel says, what if these stories were laid by

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>show Burl in the hun are based on observations of

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the northern fur seal or Calorinus or sinus. A seal

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>might kind of fit the bill um, so the stories

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>would have had to have been translated from the sea

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>coast to the river somehow, because fur seals don't usually

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're not going to go all the way

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>up the river. I don't know. They mess around in

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the river mouth, but um. But otherwise a fur seal

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>could partially match the description. It's not scaly, but it

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>does have flippers, so in body it is what Shugar

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>calls superficially fish like, but it is pretty close to

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the right size to match this story. It does have

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the notable whiskers on its head and of course fur

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on its body. They do definitely come out of the

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>water and romp around real good, so maybe possibly UM.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>As to the the stories about the aggression, again, it's

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell if this is based on anything, whether

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be part of the original observation or just

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an embellishment um with with these fur seals. While they

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can by northern first, seals do not seem to me

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to be especially noted for aggression towards humans that they

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>don't have like a disemboweling vertical And of course when

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you get into disemboweling, and you know, any kind of

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>account of animal um attacks, Like, there's so many additional factors,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like did you see this animal disembowel somebody? Or was

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there a body found and these animals were nearby? You know,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this could be the result of scavenging of decomposition. Uh,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so many additional factors to consider, but those are

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not factors that necessarily impact the myth making in any

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>given scenario, right, So it's hard to tell with this story.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one where it's it's difficult to

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of whether this is based on something

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody saw or whether it's more imaginative. But but yeah,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I like to think that somebody saw some seals and

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>then just just went wild. I mean seals, like some

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>other creatures will be discussing here. Under the right circumstances,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they can look very cute and and noble, but in

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>other situations they can be quite alarming. Uh. If I

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>was in the water once, um, this was what was?

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the Wayian islands, and there were

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>some some seals in the water, and of course humans

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>were trying to stay away from the seals, but occasionally

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a seal is just coming in and then you're you're

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>right next to it, and it can be extremely alarming,

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>especially if they're leopard seals. Don't don't go swimming with those, yeah, yeah, seals.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Seals can be quite quite alarming. And then even if,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly if you've seen footage of of them them froligging

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about on the on the shore, as alluded to in

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>these potential accounts off seals, then you can imagine how

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>people might decide, you know, it's best to stay away

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from this. This looks like a situation that might end

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in disembowling. You know. One more funny story that comes

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>from Shooters book. While we are on the subject of

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Museum of Scotland, where that that curator was

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who had the idea that maybe the story is about seals.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>The Royal Museum of Scotland also has in its collection

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a furry fish taxidermied and mounted on a wooden plaque,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>just like our patron saint big Mouth Billy Bass. And

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact you can look up pictures of this one.

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It might have been the episode art for the first episode.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, um, but but anyway, it looks a

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot like the photo The hoax photo that we talked

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>about in the last episode where that guy claimed to

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have caught a shaggy trout in Wisconsin. Yeah, it kind

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of looks like it could easily be some sort of

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>weird folk art pillow. It looks very soft, very luxurious. Yeah,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly a fish, but it is covered in thick,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>luxurious white fur, again like the forearm of a polar bear. Alas,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not a genuine furry fish but another hoax.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>The text that is underneath the fish, the mounted fish

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>says that it was caught in the Lake Superior off

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the is to Ontario and uh and was mounted by

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a taxidermist named Ross c. Job And it again repeats

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that allegation we talked about in part one from the

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>other hoax, that the fur is an adaptation to the

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>extreme cold of deep Canadian waters, which almost makes me

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder if it's this is sort of intentionally a joke

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and is meant to be understood as a joke. Well, yeah,

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the taxidermy as a as a craft

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately an art form is going to give way

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to artistic creations, and we see that throughout the world

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of taxidermy. Whether you're talking about jackalopes or squirrels and

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>chipmunks that are made to be drinking tea, that sort

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But at least not everybody was in on

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the joke, because Shugar explains the story of where this

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>came from, like how it ended up at the Royal

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Museum of Scotland. Apparently the museum acquired it when a

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>woman brought it into them after she bought it in Canada,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking it was real, it was a real animal, and

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>then she brings it into the museum and says, hey,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to know more about this fish. Can you

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>tell me about the furbearing trout. Once she found out

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a hoax, she donated it to the museum. Well,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the preservation of hoaxes is also important, absolutely

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because it will help us. It helps us realize what's

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>real and what's fake, and the story of our sorting

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>all of this out, all right, So at this point

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought we might turn to the Americus because we,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>uh more specifically, we're gonna look increasingly towards Central and

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>South America. I was reading the work of folklore's Carol Rose.

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>She has again those two wonderful tomes of of you know,

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedic tomes of mythological and folkloric creatures that I often

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>turned to. And in it, as she mentions the Hoga,

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this is described as a lake monster in the traditions

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico, known in South America as the andura. And

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this was apparently described as a giant fish creature with

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the head and ears of a pig and quote extremely

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>long barbs or thick whiskers around its mouth. It also

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>had things. It could also shift colors from red to

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>green to yellow, and it was described as a ravenous

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>beast to be feared by humans. Oh, I like this,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So giant fish body, head and ears of a pig,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>barbs or whiskers on its face, fangs can change colors,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>might attack humans, right uh And and of course this

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>instantly brings up a different couple of different possibilities, you know,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>some that are definitely within the fish world. And we'll

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get to some some real life fish that could potentially

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>match up with some of these descriptions in a bit.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>But also we're reminded of other, uh, non fish, but

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>fish like forms that we find in the wild. Now.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of these accounts are based on the writings of

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of Ambrose Pare, who lived fifteen ten through fifteen ninety.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a French surgeon, and he mentioned the Hoga legend

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in his book Monsters and Marvels, writing quote, its head

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and ears are not different from a terrestrial swine. It

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has five whiskers a half a foot long, or they're

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about similar to those of a big barble. It's flesh

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is very good and delicious. The fish produces live offspring

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fashion of a whale. If you contemplate it

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>while it is disporting itself swimming in the water, you

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>would say that it is now green, now yellow, and

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>then red, just like the chameleon. It keeps more to

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the edge of the lake than elsewhere where. It feeds

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>on leaves of a tree called Hoga, from which it

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>took its name. It is very toothy and savage, killing

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and devouring other fish, indeed those bigger than it is.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>That is why people pursue it, hunted and kill it,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because if it entered into the conduits, it wouldn't leave

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a single one of them alive, whereby the person who

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>kills the most of them is most welcome. Wow, now

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I've seen connections here between this legend and that of

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the furry trout. But I can't help but wonder if

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if this is indeed a natural creature that is being

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>described here where it's the echo of a natural creature

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in in myth and legend, then perhaps we're talking about

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>an otter, because certainly you know their their otters have

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>found throughout the America's In South America you have the

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the the giant otter, the South American giant otter, which

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>is is quite quite a specimen. They can look really

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>intimidating their apex predators. They've been known to charge at

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>boats uh and um. And then even outside of this environment,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at a North American and Central American otters

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know they can still be very ferocious, very territorial,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you take them outside of that cute context,

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they can be quite impressive. Yeah, Rachel and I were

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>having fun googling pictures of South American giant river otters

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the other day, and they very much embody the spirit

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of uh he protect but he also attacked. Yeah, yeah,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>they can look very ferocious. I found a wonderful photo

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of one eating a fi and it has this this

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bloody fanged mouth uh and uh and has this kind

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of almost humanoid looking, uh you know form to it,

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it looks like some sort of a squat creature

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>just hanging out in the water eating it's it's bloody prize. Yeah.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>It looks like flipping on a dime between adorable goobery

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>dog face to just like beast from Hell with bloody jaws. Yeah. Yeah,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think I mentioned before there's there's an old

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>novel by Jeffrey Household, the the author of Rogue Mail,

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>uh titled Dance of the Dwarfs that it has has

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a very terrifying otter creature in it. Um. It's it's

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of an outdated novel. It has some very colonial

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and um and and macho ideas in it, but the

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>like the central concept, the central monster encounter, and the

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>contemplation of of unknown terrors is quite well done. That

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was the one where the has giant otters that are

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at first mistaken for humans. Yeah, and I mean I

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>main character begins to think he can reason with them

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and like leave gifts for them and communicate with them,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and then pretty late, too late in the novel, he

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>realizes that this is not possible, that it's a giant

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>river otter creature that is hunting him and will kill him. Now,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>as far as their place in Mexican lore, I was

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>reading Otters in Mexico by Juan Pablo Gallo. This came

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>out in six and the author points out that the

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Mexico is home to three otter species, though their numbers

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have declined in modern times. They were known to the

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Aztec and Mayan people's. One popular Aztec ruler was even

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>known by the nickname Autosotal, meaning the spiny one or

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the otter. And they're there are also emblems of of

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this otter in Aztec art, and it's it's quite ferociously.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of like a kind of like a

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>lion um, but also you know, has these kind of

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>aquatic dragon like qualities to it. Now, the the Mayans

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>knew them as tuzula, or the dog of the water,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because certainly, when you know, when you start observing an otter,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you don't already have a firm classification

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in mind, you might ask yourself, well, what is this

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>creature that in many ways is like a fish, in

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>other ways is like a dog? What is this thing?

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Or in k or yeah, may you may even describe

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it as having pig like features. Sure, now you look

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>at other cultures and they encounter similar scenario, similar category

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>confusions regarding the otter. The old Anglo Saxon name for

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the otter essentially meant water snake, and and to the

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Celts it was water dog. So again we see that interpretation.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And apparently there was debate among um Celtic clerics as

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to whether the flesh of an otter was fish or meat,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>which would be vitally important if you were determining what

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>could be eaten uh during Lent, and there were there

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>were even some monks, the Carthusian monks of de Gen, France.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>They were forbidden to eat meat at all, so they

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>only ate the meat of the otter as they determined

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that this was fish. Oh no, now this may you

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>may well wonder, well, what does otter meat taste like?

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps some of you out there know for certain

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and can and can shime in on this, But you'll

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>find various claims online that it tastes rather gamey. I

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>was also reading about it in a dove in pure

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>arcs Microscopic Analysis of feather and hair fragments, which cites

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>older texts about the taste about the about the taste

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of sea otter. Apparently the Alouette people of the Bearing

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Sea described otter meat as having the taste of mud

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and in older times did not eat it, as they

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>equated the otter body with the human body and used

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>as a reference point for human biology. And apparently if

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you did hunt and kill the otter for food, you

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>had to appease the person of the otter. So there

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>was this idea that it wasn't only like a physical resemblance,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there was perhaps some sort of like spirit chull connection

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>um that had to be appeased if you were to

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>consume of this flesh, like a like a ritual justification

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of the kill. Yeah. Now, Russian fur hunters who encountered

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>uh these people in these traditions, they apparently tended not

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to eat the otter either, though some writers have compared

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it to tasting favorably the flavor profile comparing favorably to

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>lamb uh So, Yeah, a lot of these seems to

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>depend on preparation and who's who's judging it, But it

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>does sound like it tended to taste kind of gamey

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>um and uh and wasn't to everyone's liking now, Otters

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>also pop up in Norse and Scottish mythology. In Norse traditions, Uh,

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the god Loki kills the dwarf Odor, while the dwarf

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>was is in the form of an otter Uh. And

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>in and then the Scottish tales tell of the of

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>an otter king who had grant wishes and travels with

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of royal guard of seven black otters WHOA

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I like that, and Rose makes mention of this particular

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>otter as well. Um uh dobehr chew Uh. This is

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the the Otter King, a fearsome, monstrous otter, also known

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as the King of the Lakes, and it is said

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to not only hunt animals, but to hunt human beings

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. And there's apparently a gravestone in County light

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Trim that's said to depict or to or may have

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>once depicted a fatal encounter with this monstrous otter, with

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the King of the Lakes. And I look up a

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>picture of it, and Uh, I can't make much out

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. It It looks like it's very much degraded over

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the years. But supposedly this may have once resembled an

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>otter murdering somebody now it appears to be very like

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and encrusted. Yeah. Now you'll find other monstrous otters and

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>otter like forms and folklore from around the world, including

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>some Native American traditions such as the te hold Stody

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from navajoed or Asians, which is apparently kind of a

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>combination of an otter and a bison. And and this

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>being had a son, and when this sun was abducted

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>by the spider woman, the creature shed tears, and these

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>tears caused a great flood. So again, you know, we

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>always have to, you know, acknowledge that there's a fair

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>amount of creativity and myth making going on that is

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not directly connected to observations of the natural world. But

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I do love the idea that at least some of

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>this may be due to just observations of the weirdness

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of the otter. And then and then how this category

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>confusion is then uh is then launched into the realm

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of legend and lore because again I mentioned that the

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the giant otter is an apex predator. But but this

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is often the case with with any otter species,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like they tend to not have have have any enemies

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the wild. Except for human beings. So they're they're

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty, they're pretty tough little creatures, and sometimes not

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>little at all. They are they are wonderful, goobery marvels

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of nature. Uh And and while the otter is quite real,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess to bring it back to furry fish. I

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we've directly said this so far, but

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe now it is time to break the bad news,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>which is that, really I think there is no such

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thing as a furry fish, or that there there might

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>only be if you're really willing to be generous and

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>loose with your definition of furry right, because I think

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the reports we've talked about so far are

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>either known hoaxes, or they are stories that could be

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>some combination of just like imaginative creative storytelling or misremembered

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>reports of other types of animals where there's some other

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>explanation that seems more likely than the idea of a

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>fish covered in fur or hair of the sort that

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we're used to seeing covering the bodies of mammals. And

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I think we can be pretty certain of that because

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of an understanding of evolution and file out. Genny fur

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is a trait of animals that developed along a totally

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>separate lineage from fish. That doesn't mean that fish can't

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have some bits on their bodies that can resemble for,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're not going to have mammalian fur. And so

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that should bring us to a section we

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>should do here about the biology of fur. What is for?

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And where do we find it in the animal kingdom?

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And why do we find it there? Uh? And and

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that the first question I've got to start with,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because this is one of those things that's like a

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>question that's popped into my head a million times that

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never looked it up to confirm our fur and

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>hair the same thing or are they different? Did you

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 1>have an intuition on this? I mean I always assumed

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that that fur is a matter of perspective. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the hair on the top of your head is essentially fur,

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but we just treat it differently, think about it differently,

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and label it differently. You are wiser than I was.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I For some reason, I was thinking there's got to

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of biological difference. Not really. I mean,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so fur is made up of hairs, and hairs are

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>filaments of protein, primarily the protein keratin. In the case

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of of mammals, primarily alpha keratin. Some people might make

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>an informal descriptive distinction between hair and for reserving the

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>term fur for like short dense coats of hair that

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cover the whole body of an animal. But there's not

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>really a fundamental biological difference between a dog's fur and

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the hair on a human's head. It evolved from the

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>same ancestor, and it's pretty much the same stuff. Though

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>within that range, of course, these hairs can take very

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>different forms and serve different functions, and I'll explain more

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of that in a minute. So fur is one of

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the primary traits of mammals. As an animal class, mammals

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are usually defined by the facts that they are warm

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>blooded animals that give birth to live young, secrete milk,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and possess fur, though some mammals, such as whales, have

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>evolved to lose most of their hair. In fact, there

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is broadly uh strong biological truth to the simple observations

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that even a child would make to see the distinctions

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>between birds, reptiles and mammals. Right, you know, if you

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ask a kid what is the difference between them, I

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>might say, well, birds have feathers, reptiles have scales and

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>mammals have fur, and that's probably correct with of course,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the exceptions about whales and cases of that sort,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, broadly that is true. Those are major differences

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>between these classes of animals. So I was reading an

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>interview that had some interesting stuff in it that was

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>for Scientific American an interview with the mammalogist Nancy Simmons

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the American Museum of Natural History. A mammalogist is

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a zoologist who specializes in mammals. This was done by

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>by Kate Wong in the year two thousand one, and UH.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>This brings up an interesting question, which is did the

0:30:56.160 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>mammals that existed at the same time as dinahs oars

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have for now At the time of this interview, UH,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Simmons didn't know the answer to this question, because, of course,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it can be difficult to know a lot of things

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about the soft tissues and outer coverings of long extinct animals.

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Hair doesn't generally fossilize, so the paleontological evidence is sparse,

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>though of course, you know, you can learn some things

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from special fossils that might preserve a kind of imprint

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 1>in in some kind of UH. Substrate or soil, or

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from genomics, maybe you might be able to learn some

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>things about the deep past there. I was reading a

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more recent article, uh in National Geographic by Riley Black

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from fourteen that highlights at least one fossil find that

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>does make it pretty clear that at least some mammals

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>had for by the Mesozoic period, because there are some

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>impressions of fur left stamped in a in a fossilized

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>piece of mud. So I think we've learned a little

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more since uh this interview is just talking about

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But another thing that's brought up here is the question

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of what are the origins of for? And I think

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it still seems to be the consensus of of evolutionary

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>biologists that hair evolved in correlation with indo thermi, commonly

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>known as warm bloodedness. That we've discussed some ways that

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the terms warm blooded and cold blooded, at least when

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>used as a binary, can be a little bit misleading,

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But with that caveat, mammals and birds regulate their internal

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>body temperature through metabolism to keep the body at a stable,

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>relatively high temperature compared to what is achievable by so

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>called cold blooded animals like reptiles and fish, And there

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are a number of big evolutionary upsides to endothermy. Endothermy

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>allows more powerful and sustained muscular activity, so athletic stamina

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not really available to so called cold, cold

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>blooded creatures. It allows more freedom to occupy different kinds

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of environments, and it even has some very very interesting

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and less obvious advantages. One of my favorite is the

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis that maintaining a stable high body temperature is a

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>major guard against fungal infections picked up from the picked

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>up from the environment. So these fungal infections just cannot

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tolerate the hot bodies of birds and mammals. I think

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.719
<v Speaker 1>this came up when we were talking about some of

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the you know, sort of the fungal hell of the

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>post KPg extinction period. But while endothermy gives you all

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>these superpowers, you know, lets you be much more of

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>an athlete, has stamina, sustained muscular activity, more freedom in

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of environmental niche you can occupy, it comes

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with big costs, great energy costs. You need to eat

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>more to maintain that metabolism to keep keep the heat on.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And so if you imagine you're designing an animal that

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>maintains a stable, high internal temperature that exceeds the temperature

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of the environment. This means that you're going to be

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>constantly fighting against the fact that you're losing heat through

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the skin and the breath and everything. It's just going

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>straight out into the air. And that heat is very

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>energetically expensive. So one obvious solution is to get some insulation.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Just like you would if you know you're losing too

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>much heat at the walls of your house, you can

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>line them with insulating material to try to keep the

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>heat trapped in. This is believed to be probably the

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>primary function, definitely one of the primary functions of fur

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>insulation against heat loss, for keeps precious body heat inside

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>by trapping a layer of warm air close to the skin.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Insulation seems to be especially the role of what might

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>be called underhair. So if you imagine a the fur

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>coat of an in of of a mammal, this whole

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>body is covered in for you might see like sort

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>of longer, glossier, stiffer hairs up on the top, and

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>then underneath them sort of shorter, finer hairs. Those those

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>underhairs are especially helpful with insulation. Um. But of course,

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>while insulation might be the primary driver of the evolution

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>of for there plenty of functions. For for example, what

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are those other hairs up on the top doing. Well,

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they might do some insulating too, but also they provide

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of various kinds of physical protection. So hair

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>can literally protect the skin against cuts and scrapes. It

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>might not seem like it offers that much protection, but

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it does something. Um. But also those outer hairs, often

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>called guard hairs, these can have a kind of more

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>oily texture. Uh. Those can help repel moisture, keeping the

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>insulating underhairs from getting wet. Yeah. Like, if you you

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>look at a cat or I guess a dog too,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you you kind of get a an education in the

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>various uses of the hair, because there's a lot of

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>difference between like what the whiskers of a cat are doing, uh,

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>compared to the like the belly hair of the cat,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which is its main purposes. Uh. Well, of course, to

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to insulate, but also to to tempt the human hand

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>closer to the belly, where will then be attacked by

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the sharp, sharp teeth and the sharp clause. Well, I

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like that you mentioned the whiskers because that highlights another

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>totally different but also extremely important evolutionary adaptation of hairs,

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which are hairs that provide significant sensory information. These are

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes known as vibrasy v I B R I, S,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>S A E. So these would be hairs that are

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>equipped with some kind of tactile receptors or nerve cells

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that help the animal sense something about its environment with

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>these hairs, So the whiskers on a cat or a

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>great example, or the hairs on a naked mole rat,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this underground dwelling animal. But then of course

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hair and fur can play huge roles in survival and

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>reproduction just through changing the appearance the outward appearance of

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the animal. So coloration and patterns on the fur can

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>play a role in everything from hunting and camouflage, to

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>providing warning signs to potential predators, to mating and fitness displays.

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded in all this is well of of things

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that seem like hair that may look like hair and

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>other animals but are not. For instance, if you look

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at the it would appear to be eyelashes on like

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a ground hornbill um, which is a which is a bird.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh if you don't know what you're looking at, you

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>might think, oh, look at those look at those beautiful eyelashes.

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Look at those hairs on the bird's face. Well they're

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not hairs, their feathers, but they do serve a similar

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>purpose to u to some of the hair that might

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>appear around the eyes of a mammal. Yeah, and so

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely some convergent evolution across the animal classes.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing that's true is if you go

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>way way back, far enough back, it does seem to

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>be true that feathers on birds, which is of course,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are derived from their dinosaur ancestors. Um for on mammals,

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which is probably derived from some kind of dermal structures

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on proto mammals like the synapsids, and then the scales

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on reptiles. Those all probably have a common genomic ancestor.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>But that goes way way back. So the truth is

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fish don't have fur because they are on a totally

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>separate evolutionary line there, on a different branch of the

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>tree of life than than the mammals that developed the

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>fur that we're familiar with today. But the fact that

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fish don't have for does not mean that there are

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not some there might be too many negatives there. But anyway,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is some fish really look like they

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>have for And so I figured, now we should talk

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about some fish that have um interesting examples of external

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>features fibrous coverings or something like that that look like fur.

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And we have to add here that when we say fur,

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go ahead include like the broader spectrum of

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>fur also meaning hair, because some of these fish are

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>described are are more described as having things like beards

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or more like hair. But in all cases we're even

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with something that may uh seem like for to some observers. Right, So,

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the first example I want to mention is the wonderful,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the glorious, the hairy frog fish, also known as the

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>striated frog fish. The scientific name is Antenaria striatus. This

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is a predator within the frog fish family, which is

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Antenarity and the frog fish family are ocean dwelling carnivorous fish,

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>which I believe we discussed to at least to some

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>extent in our episodes about the sargassum the seaweed, Right, yeah,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we did, because there's one type of or at least

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what we were focusing in on one type of frog

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fish that makes its home in the sarcasm um. A

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of them don't live so close to the surface,

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are these are these are fascinating little fish.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh I was. I get to visit the aquarium in

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Malle and they have some frog fish uh there that

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you can look at, and they're just they're all so

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>wonderful because they often they're often this weird mismatch of

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a looking a little bit gross but also sometimes super colorful,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>like like bright oranges, you know. And then they'll have

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these like little grumpy little faces that in many ways

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>seem more humanoid than fish. Like they you know, they

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>look like little goblins, like little brightly colored grump as

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>goblins that live in the sea. About human faced fish, yeah, yeah,

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Well the hairy frog fish is a beautiful grump as

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>goblin um. So these are there are These are a

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>species of frog fish that grow up to something like

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about twenty centimeters or maybe twenty two centimeters in length maximum,

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to live along the bottom of the

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ocean on the seafloor, sort of walking along like we

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>described with other frog fish species um. But the hairy

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>frog fish or striated frog fish in particular, is matted

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in these bizarre looking fluffy appendages that truly do look

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like hair. It's like a big wad of she bag

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>carpet just sucking down fish on the seafloor. Now, this

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is not actually hair or fur. These fibers you see

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>covering the outside of the hairy frog fish are a

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>dermal appendages known as spin ules um. They seem to

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be used primarily not for insulation but for camouflage. So

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the hairy frog fish is an ambush predator, and it

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>what it wants to look like something other than an

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ambush predator. It wants to maybe look like some kind

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of other massive organic material, maybe blend in with a

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>coral reef, look like just some kind of thing sitting

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>there stationary in the environment so that fish will get

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>close to its big dangerous mouth. And uh, and it's

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>worth looking up videos of its hunting strategy. You can

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>find these pretty easily online. I found a good clip

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from a documentary by the Smithsonian Video Channel, and you

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.240
<v Speaker 1>can see this critter. It works. So the hairy frog

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fish sits there and waits in this mop of spinules,

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and then when prey fish are close by, it can

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly expand its mouth cavity by a factor of about twelve,

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>creating this powerful vacuum force that sucks in the prey

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and a split second. And so these creatures are in

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>many senses, truly fearsome predators. I've I've read it claimed

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>at least that they can prey on other fish that

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>are about the same size as them. And I have

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to say this, the one that you shared a photo of,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it crawled out of Google deep dream.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it has this wild it's appendages are yes,

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it's quite psychedelic in multiple ways. So yeah, it's it's

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>got that abstract quality like it was a hallucination by

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a machine elf. But also it is a long haired hippie.

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh So this is not a furry fish, not in

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the true sense of mammalian fur. But I think this

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is about as close as fish get. This is a beautiful,

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>shaggy creature, a predator for the ages. Now here's another

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>example of of of something we might well classify as

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a furry fish, and that is the bearded obie or

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pelagic gobi, an Atlantic species of gobi. That it's it's

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>something sometimes called the bearded gobie but then you also

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have the bearded eel gobi, which is also sometimes called

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the bearded gobi. And the names here refers to barbels

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>under the chin and lower jaw, so barbles. And I

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the quote I read earlier um from that

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>monster book mentioned barble slightly in describing the physiology of

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of of a purported creature. But barbles are slender whisker

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>like sensory organs, such as those found in catfish. Uh.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>They are not, of course real beards uh. And they

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>can be found in various places on a fish's head.

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But when they pop up under the chin, certainly you

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can understand our urge to say, oh, well, this this

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>creature looks like it has facial hair. Um. And you

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>see some examples of the bearded gobie, and boy, it

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>does it looks like it has some sort of like

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a neck beard or a chin strap see Everett Coope.

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a beard going on. I'm inferring this fish's

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>theological opinions yea, from its facial hair. Yeah. Now, these

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are technically mandibular or mental barbels, and generally they're present

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to aid in low visibility food searches. So even though

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they might look like they're not doing anything. They are

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>helping the fish define food. Okay, so you could say

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that in a way, these are um These are a

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>case of something like convergent evolution with the mammalian vibrasy, right,

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the the sensory hairs that might be

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like in a cat's whiskers or something. Uh, these whisker

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like organs. Again, they're they're not exactly hairs, but they

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do a similar thing their sensory input. Yeah. Another example

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is the beard fish of the genus Polymyxia.

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>These are found in tropical and subtropical waters of the Atlantic,

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Indian, and the western Pacific Ocean. They live in

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the deep and they have these two elongated barbels like

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>underneath their chin, and that's where they get their name.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it. It looks like a totally different

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of beard, but you can understand why it was

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>referred to informally as the beard fish. It looks more

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like the like I don't know, Romstein fan who has

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>his his goatee in one long braid. Yes, yes, it

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>does look like like a braided gotee kind of a situation. Yeah,

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very cool look for a fish. Now, these are just

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a few examples, you know, the most probably most the

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>most obvious examples of fish being compared often by name,

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to beards and fur. But obviously you're gonna have barbells

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>occurring with the wide variety of fish. You're also gonna

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have other stuff going on with their fins and other

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:46.280
<v Speaker 1>appendages at times, and they're there are numerous situations where

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one might look at such a creature and say, oh,

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>well that if I'm going to compare that to my

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>own body and the bodies of of terrestrial creatures, then

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I might well say that that creature looks furry, that

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>creature looks hairy, or that creature looks bearded in some

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fashion or another. Yes, this catfish has a weird beard

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and mustache. Yeah, And we can imagine how like that

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, through the echo chamber of of of

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of oral tradition and storytelling and history, could take on

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the form of like increasingly hairy or increasingly bearded fish.

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And then what happens when that account runs into say,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>accounts of otters and seals and so forth. I mean,

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately that's that's where I end up landing

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about all of this is that you you

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>probably have just multiple things going on in the oral

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>tradition and then ultimately in the written tradition as well, um,

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and they end up converging and running into each other,

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and you end up with these, uh, these often elaborate

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>reinterpretations of what is going on in the natural world. Yeah, totally. So.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>There is truly no such thing as a genuine furry fish,

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of fish out there with

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with glorious shagginess of various kinds. There's some wonderful uh

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>aquatic and semi aquatic mammals, the otter and all that.

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So you know, once again, nature is stranger than fiction. Yes, now,

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we of course we'd love to hear from everyone out

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there who has any experience with accounts of harry fish

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and and these other creatures that we've discussed. If you

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have accounts or encounters with with otters, I would love

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear about them, because otters, I mean, even here

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, in a very urban environment, they are otters around.

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like I one day, I was picking up my

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:28.760
<v Speaker 1>my son from school and there's an otter just because

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a body of water close to the school. And

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>apparently otters lived there. I had no idea that's metal. Yeah,

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a golf course, so there. I don't

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>know how metal a golf course otter is, but stealth

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>otters their golf ball retrieving otters. Yeah, so yeah, let

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>us know if you're you know what, if you have

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>any intimidating encounters with with with with otters, we'd love

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to hear about that strange fish that appear to have

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, interesting bar bowls or things that look like

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>beards or for if there are other great examples from

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 1>folklore and legend and uh, you know, in different traditions

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of send them in. We'd love to review them. In

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, if you would like to check out other

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:12.359
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, you will find

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>them in the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed.

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We do core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, we do

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>an artifact. On Wednesdays, we do listener mail. On Mondays

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we do a rerun over the weekend, and then on

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Friday's we do a little bit of weird how Cinema.

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That is our time to set aside most of the

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>serious matter and discuss a weird film huge thanks as

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello, you can

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at Stuff to Blow Your Mind

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com Stuff to Blow your Mind. It's production of

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my Heart Radio.

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>With the iHeart Radio you up Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you listening to your favorite shows.