WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Deere, Walmart Earnings, Berkshire Hathaway 13F Filings 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Concerned about rising crisis spooking investors?

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>What does renewables investment look like in the US?

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>More power talk coming out of this administration.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>The President wants a lower interest rates, He wants a

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 3>rate cut cycle.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 4>How do you.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Broaden out the AI play?

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Are people just looking for someone to worry about when

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>it comes to China?

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Originals and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why AI is emerging as a

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>catalyst for office space demand despite fears of job cuts.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Plus we'll discuss what you sent. Thirteen f filings revealed

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 3>about Warren Buffett's last quarter as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>But first we begin with news from the farm machinery

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>leader Deer.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>This week, Deer boosted its annual profit outlook as the company,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>which is the world's biggest farm machinery maker, anticipates the

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>agriculture economy will soon get better.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 5>For more.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>We were joined by Chris Ciolino, Bloomberg Intelligence senior US

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>machinery analyst.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 3>We began by asking Chris for his take on the

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 3>latest at Deer.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 6>It was a really solid beat and race quarter, and

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 6>I think this kind of gives us the all clear

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 6>on the cycle and that you know, twenty six will

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 6>be the trough earnings year. The one Q beat was

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 6>broad based, all segments, better top line, better margins than expected,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 6>really on the back of higher shipment volumes, with particular

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>strength in the small agg business and construction. Those are

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 6>markets that you know, have started to already recover now

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 6>this year. The large agg business, which is obviously their

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 6>bigger growth engine, continues to be soft, but I think

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing that business to stabilize and really for the

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 6>first time, you know, in years, we're starting to see

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 6>some green shoots emerge there. Order books, you know, strengthened

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 6>a little bit during the quarter as well.

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>How does this compare in contrast with what CNCH Industrial

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 3>reported earlier this week, which took a more it feels

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>like a cautious stance.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, I think so. Both companies are calling

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 6>twenty six as the bottom. I think that's pretty well

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 6>understood at this point. I think the incremental piece coming

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 6>out of Deer is that you're starting to see some

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 6>early signs of improvement in the North American lar jag business.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 6>That's a market they're projecting in terms of unit volumes

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 6>so to be down fifteen to twenty percent this year.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 6>That's going to put volumes at the lowest level in

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 6>more than four decades. But what you're starting to hear

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 6>from them this quarter is that the order books strengthened,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 6>particularly just in the last month of the quarter. You're

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 6>starting to see a little bit more trade flows going

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 6>to China, the fleets continue to age, you have the

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 6>government aid support, so this is not a big step change,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 6>but it's really the first signs of incremental improvement.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>You got to have a great sense of time. Chris

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>as I said, Deer's up forty two percent year to date,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>so the market's anticipating this business bottoming and then turning up.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 2>How long is this cycle for some of these companies

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that you follow here, they're cyclical.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so a typical downturn in this business will last

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 6>anywhere from two to four years. This will be the

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 6>third year of the downturn. So in terms of the downturn,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 6>it looks very similar to what we've seen historically. Typically

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 6>the upturns last a little bit longer. But you know,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 6>this is an incredibly volatile market and it's ultimately dictated

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 6>by crop prices and farmer profitability. So the crop outlooks

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 6>do have a significant impact here in terms of what

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 6>farmers are willing and able to spend.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And it looks like Deer relies on the US for

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>a huge part of its revenue, if not half. What

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>is it doing in terms of growing it's business overseas?

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it just kind of a trajectory of growth there

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 3>that is so learn to what it sees in the US.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Or is it competing against some established players?

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so they're regional markets, But in terms of what

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 6>markets matter for Deer's it's North America and then South

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 6>America is becoming more important reason being those are you know,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 6>typically the bigger producers of road crops, corn, soybeans. They're

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 6>larger farms, they utilize more the larger equipment that you know,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 6>is more conducive to some of the precision technologies which

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 6>come in at a higher margin. Europe tends to be

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more stable. They get a lot of

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>government support, So I think of that market as less cyclical.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 6>You know, lower peaks, higher troughs. Those are really kind

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 6>of the three big growth engines if you think about

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 6>Deer's geographic exposure.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So what is Deer saying about the US farmer these days?

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 6>Listen, things are still challenging. Let's not understate that, you know,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 6>crop prices really haven't moved that much and still under

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 6>tremendous pressure. As we look at another year of you know,

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 6>near record production, they are seeing some signs of stability,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 6>I would say, And like I mentioned earlier, I think

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 6>we're starting to see some early signs of improved order

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 6>activity again, albeit off a very low base, and a

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of that's predicated on you know, we're starting to

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>see a little bit more exports going to China, you

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 6>have a continued government support, and then also you know,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 6>there's certainly a need for replacement. The age of the

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 6>fleet is as old as it's been in a number

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 6>of years. So as farmers get more money, you start

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 6>to see some stability on the crop price front. That

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 6>that should, you know, unlock some pent up demand.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm just looking at the stock price trading at

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>a record high, but it really has gone on a

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>tear over the past three weeks or two weeks. What

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 3>accounts for that? Was it anticipation of this report or

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>was it something else.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 6>A combination of things, you know. I think, you know,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 6>it's pretty well understood now that this year will be

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 6>the trough of the cycle, so I think there's some

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 6>positioning ahead of that. And you know, a lot these

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 6>heavy machinery companies typically do well in early in the

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 6>rate cut environment. So the anticipation of lower rates stronger

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 6>growth environment not only in the ag business, but also construction.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 6>I think that sometimes gets overlooked. They're completely refreshing their

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 6>excavator product lineup. They have a pretty strong position in

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 6>construction equipment, and I think the growth dynamics there moving

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 6>for twenty six and twenty seven are still quite favorable.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks to Chris Ciolino, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US machinery analyst.

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 3>We move next to the retail giant Walmart.

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>This week, Walmart issued a forecast for four year earnings

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that missed higher expectations, flagging the unpredictable state of trade

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 2>and labor market conditions.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>So we brought in Emily Cone, Bloomberg's consumer team leader.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Emily for her take on Walmart's most

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>recent results.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 7>There's another solid quarter for Walmart in the fourth quarter.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 7>They did come out with conservative guidance, which is pretty

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 7>typical for Walmart, come out with cautious guidance and then

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 7>exceed it later in the year, which is sort of

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 7>their playbook. And then their guidance was also paired with

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 7>some warning signs or cautious outlook about the economy, which

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 7>I found interesting.

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want to pick up on that idea, because

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the CFO talked to Bloomberg and mentioned that tariff driven

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>inflation has reached or is reaching its peak, which I

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>thought was really interesting given that there's so many people

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>expecting rate cuts later on this year. Given that inflation

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>seems to have settled down, what more can they tell

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>us about pricing?

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 7>I think they told us that prices rose one percent

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 7>in the quarter, which I think was the same as

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 7>the last quarter. But they also mentioned other things like

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 7>tepid job growth, student loan delinquencies, rising consumer sentiment being uneven,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 7>things that you know, would give any CEO or CFO

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 7>or company pause when they're trying to outlay what might

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 7>happen in the coming year.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And I've noticed over the last a couple of years

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>they've talked about how maybe their customer base is changing

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. People some middle class, maybe even upper

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>income areas coming down to Walmart. They're seeing more and

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>more of that. Is that still the case.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 7>I think yes, that's definitely the case, and that's sort

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 7>of their superpower right now that you know, poor this

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 7>is the case shaped economy that we talk about a

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 7>lot poor customers are pulling back in areas, but what

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 7>they're seeing is wealthier clients clientele who might not have

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 7>come to Walmart in the past shopping at Walmart, especially

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 7>for things like their groceries, which they've invested in a

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 7>lot in the last ten years. You can now find

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 7>organic groceries and that's really paying off.

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>And they also have this Walmart Plus program which they're

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>really putting a lot of emphasis on. It's actually one

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of the benefits if you're an American Express Platinum cardholder,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>which speaks to that idea that they're really reaching for

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 3>the higher income consumer. How's that going and is it

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>making any headway on stealing Marcus share from Amazon with

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 3>its Prime program.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they're seeing a huge growth in e commerce. I

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 7>think that was one of the major areas that grew

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 7>this quarter. That is drawing in higher income shoppers who

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 7>actually pay even more than the membership for faster deliveries,

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 7>speedier pickup times, and that's helping them also grow market

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 7>share among wealthier shoppers who are looking for convenience over

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 7>everything else.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying about Did they even talk about

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>on comments called tariffs anymore? That's still a discussion point.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And what's the company saying about tariffs?

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, tariffs came up a little bit, but they said

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 7>that they expect that that tariff driven inflation to peak now.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 7>I think they also benefit here again from their groceries.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 7>Groceries are a portion of their assortment that is less

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 7>impacted by tariffs, and they're really benefiting from I think

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 7>sixty percent of their sales come from groceries these days.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned e commerce. It sounds like Walmart will continue

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>to invest in technology and automation. What were some of

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the things that they flagged that they're working on in

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>terms of innovation and building on the technology that they

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>have already implemented into their system.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it was interesting. They said most of their fulfillment

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 7>and stores is now coming from automated warehouses, most of

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 7>their fulfillment for e commerces coming from automated warehouses. They

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 7>have really made huge gains here to speed up fulfillment centers,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 7>and I think we should expect to see more of

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 7>that in the coming quarters. They cited story models and

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 7>automation as the main areas where they're going to be

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 7>continuing to invest.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the things that's amazed me really

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>for ten fifteen years about Walmart is how well their

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>digital business has been, their e commerce business. They have

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>built that to not only I mean they can go

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>toe to toe with Amazon dot Com just about anything.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It seems like is that still a growth story for them?

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? I think they said something like a third. They've

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 7>seen a huge amount of shoppers are now actually interacting

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 7>with their AI, their AI assistant on their app and

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 7>on their website that really helping people make shopping decisions faster.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 7>They're seeing an increasing spend from customers who interact with

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 7>the AI shopping assistant, they said, which which I think

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 7>we can expect to see.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Just in the last five years, their ibathas roughly doubled,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>but their cap X is tripled.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Commerce build out, that tech build out, yep.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So I mean they're putting their money where their mount

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 2>is here.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 3>You know what Paul's dream job is, Emily does. He

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this to you, No.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Be a greeter at Walmart. See, I'm a nice, friendly guy.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I want themock. He wants to wear the smock. I

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 3>bet you know. To that point, Walmart employees about two

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>point one million people, which makes it a huge employer.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Do we have a sense of whether they've been growing

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>their employee base at all with this commitment to technology,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 3>to automation.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 7>I think they've definitely made a huge investment in technology.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 7>They have a lot more people working on tech than

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 7>they ever have, and I think we could expect to

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 7>see more of that for sure.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>That was Emily Cone, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett Foo.

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Next to news from the amusement resort operator six Flags Entertainment.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>This week, six Flags reported twenty twenty five earnings and

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>revenue that were slightly ahead of analyst estimates. For more

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>on this and the latest in the travel and leisure space,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 3>were joined by Jody Lori, Bloomberg Intelligence credit analyst.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Jody for her take on six Flags earnings.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 8>So I think what's interesting, Paul, is that we're seeing

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 8>that some of what six Flags said, oddly was similar

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 8>to what we saw on APHIS's call. And both companies

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 8>has had these large impairment charges to boost EBADA, but

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 8>it didn't necessarily equate to cash generation. And both companies

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 8>are focused on improving their debt load and also just

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 8>the core of the business, the operational side, adding in

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 8>AI to boost the business and figuring out ways to

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 8>turn around, and both companies are dealing with new CEOs.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.359
<v Speaker 8>So it's just like a weird sort of compare contrast

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 8>scenario that I've been toying with my head.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Paul was talking about how Hershey Park was

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>his first amusement park, and then we're obviously the big

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>one would be Disney yep or Universal. Have you been there? No, Okay,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>that's a pretty good one.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that the competition for six Flags or does it

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>work on a different level than those It is and.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 8>It isn't the competition Scarlett. I mean, I think you know,

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 8>six Flags likes to compare itself more to alternatives in

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 8>leisure and entertainment. There was a great slide that they

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 8>provided that showcase the value proposition if you compare it

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 8>to like concert tickets or in inert sporting event. The

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 8>amount of time that you spend at six Flags, in

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 8>theory is all day, right, So the cost to enter

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 8>and the cost for the you know, the sort of

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 8>concessions is much lower than what you would pay to

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 8>go to a Taylor Swift concert. Now that said, I mean,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 8>I think what's so interesting is is when the company combined,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 8>there was this image that they could create like an

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 8>all pass promotion right that you can enter in all parks.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 8>They've only finally started rolling out something that's a regional

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 8>pass recently, and I'm curious to see what could happen

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 8>with the company as they improve those sort of points

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 8>of it, because what's funny is if you look at

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 8>it from a revenue perspective, it did actually pretty well

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 8>this year compared to twenty four, and twenty four was

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 8>a pretty strong year. Same thing with some of the

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 8>per cap spending pieces of it, right, the per cap component,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 8>the admissions were down, but the in park spending was decent,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 8>and so you say, what's going on, like why are

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 8>they having such issues? And it comes down to an

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 8>operational issue. It comes down to the fact that the

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 8>legacy six Flags assets. I think we're in way worse

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 8>shape than Cedar Fair anticipated when they took on the company,

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 8>and they're saddled with a lot of debt. So it's

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 8>really a question of if the capital markets are going

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 8>to be encouraging enough to help them through. You know,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 8>they help them through in January with a new issue,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 8>but really are they able to sort of support the

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 8>company through this transition.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>That park past You mentioned sounds like a you know,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the amusement park version of an epic past, which makes

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>sense if you're skier and you are chasing the weather

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>around the country. What doesn't make sense to go to,

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, the West Coast for six flocks and they

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>come back.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't know it could scarlet. You don't talk to

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 8>Ira Jersey enough. Apparently, at least when it comes to

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 8>roller coasters. You probably talked him about interest rates. Next

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 8>time when you have him on, ask him about his

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.119
<v Speaker 8>son's American Coasters Enthusiast card.

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 3>That he proudly carry.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 8>If you are deep into the roller coaster dynamics and culture,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 8>people will go to the end of the Earth. And

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 8>I am curious to see how the Middle East traction

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 8>for six Flags, for SeaWorld and for some of the

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 8>other parks that have expanded there. How that's going to

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 8>play out if you do see these park coaster enthusiasts

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 8>fly out to Saudi Aravia, fly out to the OAE

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 8>to ride certain coasters.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Jody Lourie, Bloomberg Intelligence credit analyst, we

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>move next to the real estate sector.

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence recently put out research entitled AI Drives Office

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>demand amid job cut fears.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>And according to BI, AI is emerging as a catalyst

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>for office demand, reinforcing leasing momentum in New York City

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and San Francisco.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Jeffrey Langbaum,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US rit analyst.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>We started our conversation by asking Jeffrey to discuss what

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 3>people are saying to him with regards to AI and

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>office space.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Right now, what people are thinking about is what the

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 4>impact is going to be on office space if AI

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 4>makes all of these industries that lease office space irrelevant. Okay,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>what does that mean for demand for space? And you know,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 4>we saw last week that you know that started with

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 4>software and then it went to you know, industry after

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 4>industry and ended up with the real estate brokers and

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 4>eventually the office rates getting hit hard.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So so far, this is just kind of fear that's

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>wafting across the market. Have we actually seen any evidence

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 3>of this happening.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Not yet, And in fact we've seen some of the opposite.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Leasing velocity has been at the highest level since before

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic in markets like New York and San Francisco.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 4>The reats that we follow names like sl Green Bornado

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Boston properties are now BXP. These guys are reporting very

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 4>strong leasing volumes. We're starting to see occupancies tick up

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 4>off the bottom in their portfolios. And you know, one

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 4>of the one of the dynamics at play is that

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.719
<v Speaker 4>AI firms are leasing space as they grow, and to

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 4>the extent that companies being you know, impacted by AI

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 4>start to receive a little bit, there's an offset there.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>So your office reached docs last week sold off on

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>this fear.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's not a new fear. I mean it's

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 4>been it's been at play for some time now.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, work from.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Home kind of worked its way through and everyone kind

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 4>of got comfortable with where hybrid kind of settled in,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 4>and then you know what was the next thing to

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 4>hit office? And it was this And it's been you know,

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 4>it's been out there for probably a couple of quarters. Now,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 4>what is the impact going to be? But last week

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 4>when software rolled over it, it's just compounded.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Is this something where because of the evidence that companies

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 3>are still leasing quite a bit of space, that we're

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 3>going to see a just as sharp recovery.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Well that's possible, but you know there's also the risk

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 4>that you know, the the equity markets are turbulent and forecasting, right,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 4>and so there is the possibility that there will be

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 4>negative leasing news to come. It's certainly not showing up

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 4>in the numbers now. And we do think, and this

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 4>is backed up by some survey work that we just

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 4>did last week of office workers in both New York

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 4>and San Francisco.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 9>We actually think that.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 4>There's still a period of time to come where firms

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 4>are actually leasing more space, they're expanding their headcount to

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 4>try and figure out how to take advantage of AI

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and to grow their business. And that could actually you know,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about a sharp snapback, but it could

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 4>you prolong the positive vibes for some time.

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>What's the sector of the remarket that you like the

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 2>most right now?

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Senior housing is I mean, you know, it's the one

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 4>aspect where you cannot refute the demand story at all.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 4>And at the same time, where real estate guys typically

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 4>love to build what to take advantage of those demand stories.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 4>There's not much senior housing coming out of the ground,

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>so there's a huge supply demand imbalance.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but a senior housing more attractive in certain markets

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>over other markets. How do you pick between winners and

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>losers when it comes to senior housing.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 4>It's really more about the local operator than it is

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 4>about the specific market. I mean, obviously, if you're in

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 4>a place where you know, economics aren't as strong and

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 4>you don't have this affluent a potential resident base, then

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>that's going to you know, potentially impact but local strong

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 4>local operators. When there's not a lot of supply coming

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>out of the ground, and you know you basically just

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 4>have an aging American population that is going to need

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 4>housing solutions, it's really a play across the board, all right.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Jeff Langbaum, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US Route analyst, we.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Move now to some research at Bloomberg Intelligence recently published

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 3>on American Express.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>According to BI, American Express is focused on attracting new

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>premium cardholders should help it meet its consensus EPs growth

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>So we brought in Edward D. Jerry and Bloomberg Intelligence

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 3>consumer finance analyst.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>We first asked ed about Amex's most recent quarter and

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>what we've learned since a company rolled out it's increased

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 2>fee for the Platinum card.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 5>When they reported the quarter, great quarter.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 10>Uh, everything everything kind of in line with expectations or

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 10>in some areas better and gave great guidance in terms

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 10>of mid teens EPs growth for twenty twenty six. And

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 10>you know a lot of a lot of conversation about

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 10>the refresh and how great the refresh is going and

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 10>acquiring you know, lots of new customers.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 5>But generally there were two things that.

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 10>Sort of analysts picked on in the quarter when you're

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 10>when you're trading that sort of a high multiple financial

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 10>and and those two things were.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Number one, that new card the new card.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 10>Acquisition rate kind of went down a little bit relative

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 10>to last year and relative to the third quarter. And

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 10>initially all the money that they're spending on rewards and

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 10>services and and all of what they call variable customer

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 10>engagement expenses went up a lot, a little too much

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 10>in some people's opinions. So what what we kind of

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 10>learned recently with sort of some supporting data around two things.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 10>And the big thing was while the number of new

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 10>cards acquired went down a little bit, the fee per

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 10>new card went up from one hundred and ninety six

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 10>in the third quarter to two hundred and eighty two.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 5>So huge jump. Now why is that?

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 10>That's because a lot of the much bigger percentage of

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 10>those new cards came from new Platinum customers, which is

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 10>much better than just a regular customers. So even though

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 10>a little less customers acquired, you're getting many more new

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 10>Platinum customers, much better economics.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 5>So that's sort of one thing.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 10>And then talked a lot about how they're absorbing all

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 10>of those extra reward costs if you will. But still

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 10>that's and that's fine because it's enhancing revenue growth, and

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 10>sort of the revenue growth benefit of that offsets the

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 10>reward cost more than offsets that reward cost.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Edward. One thing that I've noticed from these Facebook

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 3>groups is that people get a Platinum card that's you know,

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 3>for the sign up bonus and everything else. But then

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 3>they start branching out and they get the Gold card

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>because there's more reward points for groceries there. They start

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to compile a lot of AMEX cards, so a lot

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>of the users have multiple cards, don't they.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no question about that.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 10>And obviously you've got to you know, a lot of

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 10>sort of families on the Platinum card, so there's sort

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 10>of a primary Platinum card owner and then issuer of

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 10>multiple cards related to that. So you sort of have

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 10>this this sort of network effect of the Platinum card

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 10>that just keeps building and to some extent, you know,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 10>if you can, you know, when you come back to

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 10>the JP Morgan Sapphire card, if you can, you know,

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 10>build that reward and service infrastructure even bigger and better,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 10>you know, you create the you know, sort of the

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 10>mode effect, which is what they're trying to do and

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 10>seems to be working.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, ed the I have the Green card I got

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 2>the day I graduated college at kept it all. But

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Scarlet and other folks, I understand they go crazy for

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 2>these really expensive cards and all the points in managing.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 5>You need to go platinum.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Paul, No, I just can't. I can't do it. But

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>how big of a business is that for these card companies?

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that really the value driver? The Scarlet foods of

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, they care much more about Scarlett than they care

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 10>about you. I have to say, yes, she's going she's

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 10>about to pay eight hundred and ninety five dollars a year,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 10>up from six hundred and ninety five dollars a year.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 5>They're going to give her a heck of a lot

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 5>of rewards and services for that, but I had a

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 5>big sign of bum on average.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 10>Now I hope this is not completely true, but on average,

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 10>she one of the Platinum card members, spends about ten

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 10>times as much on her card as you do.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That was Edward Nigerian Bloomberg Intelligence consumer finance analyst. Coming up,

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll look at why MSG sports is considering splitting up

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>its Nicks and Rangers businesses.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio of riding

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in depth research and data on two thousand companies and

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty industries.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence through b I go on

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foe and I'm.

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Paul Swiney and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 11>Everyone needs to take care of their mental health, even

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 11>running back Jon Robinson.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 5>When I'm on the field that filling the pressure. Usually

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 5>just take a deep breath.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 12>When I'm just breathing and seeing what's in front of me,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 12>everything just slows down.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 5>It just made us feel great before I run the play.

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 11>Just like Bijon, we all need a strong mental game

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 11>on and off the field. Make a game plan for

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 11>your mental Health at Love youomindplaybook dot org Love You'reby

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 11>Brought to you by the Huntsman Mental Health Foundation, the

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 11>author n Blank Family Foundation, and the ad Console.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 13>With the Bloomberg Small Business Report. I'm John Tucker. There's

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 13>a historic mansion on the northeast corner of San Francisco's

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 13>Alamo Square Park where several dozen people live spending their

0:25:56.359 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 13>days immersed in esthetic concentration. Welcome to HFO or Hacker

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 13>Fellowship zero. The goal is to attract the best entrepreneurs.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 13>The Living's startup Accelerator promises to strip away all of

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 13>life's tedium so that founders can have the most productive

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 13>twelve weeks of their life and birth their real life's work.

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 13>The program comps living expenses and hands over cash in

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 13>exchange for equity in each startup operating from its house.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 13>The Residency, which started in twenty twenty and just completed

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 13>its seventh batch, has maintained a relatively low profile, even

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 13>as it gets thousands of applications for each session's ten slots.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 13>Among those who've attended or a dozen founders who previously

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 13>build companies with billion dollar valuations, HFO it takes a

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 13>five percent equity in each participating startup. And that's the

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 13>Bloomberg Small Business Report.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 2>We move next to some news at the multi national

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 2>conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 3>This week, the company released its thirteen F filing for

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter, and investor Warren Buffett's last quarter as

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Berkshire Hathaway CEO reflected a bearish sentiment.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Berkshire slast its holding of Amazon by more than seventy

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>five percent in the fourth quarter, while also building a

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 2>stake in The New York Times.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Berkshire also continued trimming Bank of America and Apple during

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the quarter while increasing its stakes and Chevron and Chubb.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>For more on all of this, we were joined by

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Matt Palizola, Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst.

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>We began by asking Matthew if this will be the

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 3>last time we mentioned Warren Buffett buying or selling shares

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 3>in companies.

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 14>Yes, it is so he was the CEO as of

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 14>the fourth quarter. So these moves that we're looking at

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 14>in the thirteen F took place in the fourth quarter

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 14>of last year.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 9>To be totally fair. He's been stepping back.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 14>He probably wasn't behind a lot of this anyway, but

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 14>this is actually the last quarter that you could even

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 14>attribute these things to him. He remains chairman, so you

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 14>never know he'd be looming behind the scenes. But his

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 14>last quarter as CEO, he.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Famously said he was only investing in things that he

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 3>understood then that typically did not include technology companies. But Apple,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 3>I guess he saw more as a consumer company than

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 3>anything else.

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think so.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 14>And I think the you know, his thing was motes

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 14>right and probably still is, but the iPhone mode and

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 14>the infrastructure built in, I think those were appealing things.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 14>They have been pairing that that investment, as we know,

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 14>part of that, and you know, it's it's kind of

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 14>a twist because he had said this said of the

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 14>annual meeting a couple of meetings ago, that it was

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 14>a kind of tax reasons that they had these huge

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 14>unrealized gains in there, and he thought taxes would be

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 14>going up. Now they're certainly not going to go up

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 14>under the current administration kind of anytime soon. But Buffett

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 14>is always long term thinking, so I think that's what

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 14>he was looking at. As we've got you know, tens

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 14>of billions of dollars of unrealized gains that will be taxed.

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 14>And I think it does still hold true that in

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 14>ten years from now, probably the corporate tax rate could

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 14>be higher. And I think that was his concern and

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 14>part of the reason they were taking down those those

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 14>big gains in those big positions.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 2>And Lambert also cut its Amazon steak by seventy five percent.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 14>They did so Amazon. They initially got into Amazon him

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 14>in twenty nineteen. That was one of his investment deputies,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 14>I think brought it to him. Then again also like tech,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 14>but a retailer. Right, that position we calculated was up

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 14>about one hundred and thirty to one hundred and forty

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 14>percent over the time. They hold it nice but kind

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 14>of in line with the S and P five hundred.

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 14>So it didn't really outperform, so I think it was

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 14>kind of taking some money off the table. I sold it,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 14>I believe like one point seven billion worth of that stock,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 14>cutting most of the position, So that one I think

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 14>was probably a company specific didn't really outperform. They bought

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 14>four billion of Alphabet last quarter, so you know, the

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 14>kind of tech aversion you know, maybe changing over time,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 14>what did he increase stakes in so two big ones

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 14>Chevron and Chubb. So Chevron is they their fifth biggest holding.

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 14>I think they interestingly, I don't know if they were

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 14>kind of betting on US intervention in Venezuela, which happened

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 14>kind of after the quarter, so you can't say that

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 14>like murderer got taken out and this stuff happened and

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 14>they did it and Reaction did it before. But maybe

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 14>they were reading the tea leaves there. I don't know.

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 14>It's a big holding for them. I think the kind

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 14>of geopolitical energy play makes total sense. The other one

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 14>is Chubb, which I don't want to get too excited

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 14>thinking about insurance mega deal here, but they are now

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 14>the second well they've been the second largest holder of

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Chubb stock.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 9>Chubb makes total sense.

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 14>It is, in our view of BI a cream of

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 14>the crop insurance company, global reach, still growing nicely, great management.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 14>It's a company that Berkshire would want to own. Now

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 14>Berkshire's got their own massive insurance business. Yes, the interesting

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 14>thing is you've got two massive insurance businesses. They're actually

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.959
<v Speaker 14>quite complimentary if one were to want to put them together.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 14>So the Berkshire business very big personal atto in Geico,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 14>very big reinsurance, kind of global global reinsurance. Those are

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 14>two businesses that Chubb is not really in. There's some

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 14>overlap in the kind of US specialty businesses that they're

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 14>both in, but it would be phenomenally complementary of those

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 14>two businesses. I think there's probably a lot of hurdles

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 14>to some sort of you know, total deal there. Chubb's

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 14>market cap is one hundred and thirty billion. Berkshire has

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 14>three hundred billion of cash, so they theoretically could buy

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 14>Chubb in cash if they wanted to. But I think

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 14>it's probably some cultural issues and would Chubb really want

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 14>to sell as the other thing? But you know, it

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 14>is something it as a stock something Berkshire would want to.

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Is that a strategy that Berkshire actually follows through on

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>where it starts off with a stake and then eventually decides,

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you know what, we're just gonna buy the whole thing.

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 9>Scarlett, Yeah, they do do that.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 14>So I think with Burlington Northern, which is a little

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 14>bit before time when they bought it, they did things

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 14>like that where they acquire the public stake and then

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 14>they build.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 9>It over time.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 14>That's why there was a lot of speculator about occidental.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 14>Buffett then came out and threw cold water on it,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 14>saying that but it seemed like it was going along

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 14>with their playbook of huge acquisitions that they made before.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 2>So none of the warns out. Can we have a

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>serious discussion about a dividend?

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 9>We can?

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 14>I think you know, we'll get you on the phone

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 14>with Greg Abel Let's see what he says. But you know,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 14>I think our take has been in the early years.

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 14>Able will probably adhere to the ethos of Berkshire. And

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 14>I don't think he's going to come in and start

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 14>breaking down walls like I don't think anyone would like

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 14>to see that, especially Buffett's still there. I mean, they

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 14>have tremendous excess capital. Buffett is praised Able as being

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 14>a great capital allocator, great capital manager, and they've also

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 14>said we literally can't there's so much money, we can't

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 14>put it to work in a reasonable way. So it

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 14>would make sense to see something happen there. And I think, look,

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 14>the other thesis is they're not going to be as

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 14>good as anything anymore. Right, there's no better investor than Buffett.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 14>Give a g Jane, who is the head of the

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 14>insurance operations. He's been selling a lot of stock. Perhaps

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 14>he's getting close to retirement, so you're not going to

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 14>be good at any of these things anymore.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 9>Some sort of capital which there will be a big catalyst.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thanks to Matt Palozola, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Analyst.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 3>We move next to some news in the business of sports.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>This week, we heard that Madison Square Gardens board of

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 2>directors approved a plan to explore splitting the NBA's New

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>York Knicks from the NHL's New York Rangers.

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a move that would make each team a separate,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 3>publicly traded company.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>From more on this, we were joined by Randall Williams,

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business of Sports reporter. We first asked Randall to

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 2>break down why this deal may happen.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you look at the enterprise value of the Knicks

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 12>and Rangers and what they're traded at its seven billion dollars.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 9>But you look at what the Lakers sold for.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 12>A loan ten billion dollars, and I think the Knicks

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 12>obviously are in a larger market than New York. The

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 12>Lakers have won more titles, but New York is New York,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 12>and so both the Knicks and the Rangers, I think

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 12>would carry a tremendous value, maybe twelve billion dollars combined,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 12>and that's on the low end.

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>So is this maybe a first step for selling one

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 2>of the teams, selling a piece of one of.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 12>Them, getting into speculative territory.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, James Dolan, that's always a fun place to look.

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 12>I mean, silver Lake owns a piece of MSG Sports,

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 12>and so that's five percent. It's a ten percent stake,

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 12>but probably five percent each. And when you think about

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 12>someone wanting to buy into that, you would want to

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 12>know how much each individually is worth. If not, you're

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 12>buying into something and it's like you could be buying

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 12>in at a supreme price or maybe something that's a

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 12>little bit lower. And I think buyers who are interested

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 12>in there have been several over the years want a

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 12>want a more precise price, and so do the shareholders

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 12>of MSG Sports.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So what's held up the company from being split up

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 3>up until now because there's been a lot of calls

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 3>for the enterprise value trading at a discount to the

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 3>actual value of each franchise has been there for a while.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I know the answer for voting stock is from the

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Dolan control.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think that James Dolan has long been the

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 12>controlling person for all of these companies. He decides where

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 12>for worse, yes, exactly, he decides, you know what he

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 12>wants to do. And there is a board of directors

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 12>that voted on this. But this would have never put

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 12>up been up for a vote had James Dolan that said,

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 12>you know what, maybe we should consider this, and then

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 12>from there on, you know, things happen and then they

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 12>vote on this.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Madison Square Garden, James Stone, did they own the garden itself,

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the building?

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 9>I believe so.

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's always a big That's always a big part

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.439
<v Speaker 2>of it too. Do you own the arena they plan?

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Or yes, in a different publicly traded company, exactly exactly.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 12>And I had a Bloomberg terminal reader and the original

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 12>copy that I wrote, I said Madison Square Garden was

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 12>one of the most famous in the world, and someone quickly,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 12>someone quickly replied and said, no, it it is the

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 12>most famous arena in the world. So Madison Square Garden

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 12>is a huge, you know, attraction. When you think about

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 12>arenas in New York, there's the Barclay Center, of course,

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 12>which is newer but the legacy of New York is

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 12>often rooted in MSG and the events that it's held

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 12>over many, many years.

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, first of all, and they also put

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 2>in I think close to a billion dollars and renovations

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 2>several years ago, so they've really upgraded the garden. What's

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the many great things about going to the

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Garden is they have the photos on the wall, the concourses,

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 2>all the great events, whether it's a concert, a game, whatever,

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and there's thousands of them.

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 12>There's no there's no venue that has a greater history,

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.479
<v Speaker 12>I would argue than Madison Square Garden that is still

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 12>you know, open and operational, and.

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 9>That's that's part of this.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 12>I mean, you think about the Knicks playoff end last year.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 12>You think about the Rangers and what they've.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Done, not having the.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 12>Past two seasons, but in the seasons before that, all

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 12>of these things. When they eventually win, you know, God willing,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.959
<v Speaker 12>it isn't MSG. It it isn't one of the deals

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 12>where you know they're in away game and then they

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 12>have to come back. If it happens in MSG, that

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 12>will probably be the biggest moment in that arena in

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 12>the last twenty five years, and so whoever wants to

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 12>buy into that potentially is going to want a good

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 12>value at it.

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 3>There is also a note from light Shed that pointed

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 3>out that there's a new tax law that goes into

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 3>effect for the twenty twenty eight fiscal year that for

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>public companies limits deductions two one million dollars per cover employees.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 3>For sports teams, it's easy to find a lot of

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 3>employees that make at least a million dollars a year.

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 3>So once this goes through in twenty twenty eight, that's

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 3>going to put the company in a negative free cash

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 3>flow situation unless the Knicks, for instance, go deep into

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a playoff run or the Rangers go deep into a

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>playoff run. So it also allows the company, you know,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 3>for tax reasons, to be in a better position.

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely absolutely. I mean there's not a lot of publicly

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 12>traded sports companies out there for this reason in particular, And.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 9>You think about all of the big ones.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 12>You think about the Cronky Sports and Entertainment, which houses

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 12>the Rams, the Nuggets, I believe, another soccer team, and

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 12>so many more. It's private, and that's that's for a reason.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 12>But this one is unique, and Madison's square Garden is

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 12>Madison Square Garden. The Nicks is the Nicks and the

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 12>Rangers of the.

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Rangers our thanks to Randa Williams, Bloomberg Business of Sports Reporter.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 3>go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foo and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Today's time stories and global business headlines

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 2>are coming up right now

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 11>Mm hm