WEBVTT - The Drop | Cavs-Nets Madness, Jaylen Brown's Future With Celtics & Bad Week For NBA Refs

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Here I didn't get started up putting.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, sweet world, and welcome to the No Dunks

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on the Athletic Network. Today's episode brought to you

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>by Neutral Vodka Seltzer made with real vodka, Real Seltzer,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>real juice. It's Neutral to one with you Loud. It's Friday,

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>March twenty fourth, twenty twenty three. This is the drop.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm g E. Sky's here in the Classic Factory and

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>alongside me as always, that's Test.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Milists podcast listeners. It's for you.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Next to him, it's the Beard one a tap Shaw,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hot Boy, Trey Kirby.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 4>Hey he.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And last but not least, over Yonder making the magic happen,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>super producer jd Hello, there he is here. Our shout

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>out to the stream team joining us live right now

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Like David, please subscribe, grab your No Dunk's

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>merchover at No dunks dot com, hoodies, t shirts, mugs,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And if you've ever wanted a subscription to

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>The Athletic, now is the time to get one one

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar a month for twelve months. Yeah by subscribing today.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Athletic dot com slash No Dunks and

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get access to thousands of stories and add

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>free podcasts as well dollar a month up to twelve

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>months there and also check out yesterday's No Buffs podcast,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>our recap of episode four of Survivor forty four with

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>very special guest Owen Knight here in the factory. We

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>even had him sign our Jeff Probes cardboard cutout and

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we just had a blast. He was incredible, you know,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sharing stories from his time on the island in Survivor

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>forty three and his thoughts on episode four. So go

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>check that out No Buffs to on YouTube feed don't

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast feed. This weekend, in this very feed, we are

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>re releasing the next installment of our twenty twenty one

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>summer podcast series, Fast Friends, where we tackle every single

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.119
<v Speaker 1>movie from the Fast and Furious franchise. So up tomorrow

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. Two thousand and six's Tokyo Drift a polarizing

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>flick in the universe. I also forgot with this one.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You won't notice at all when it comes to the

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>actual podcast listening to it on Apple or Spotify, but

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this was the YouTube version where we forgot to record it.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So the first like fifteen minutes is this incredible graphic

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that one of you guys made of dom saying somebody

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>forgot to press for ReCore. It looks amazing and then

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we kick on like fifteen minutes in so very cool. Yeah,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo Drift that drops Tomorrowmorrow. Our third installment here of

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>our Fast Friends series One More Thing. Even tease the

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>graphic for a second live show in Houston Monday, April

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>third at the White Oak Music Hall. Tickets are free,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just use the link in our show notes. It's right

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>around the corner, guys, so get your tickets, come hang

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with us on Monday, April third. And exciting news about

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this show. The athletics Houston Rockets beat writer Kelly Eco.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>He's going to join us on stage for a little

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>basketball talk and for you NC double a sickos, White

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Oak and Neutral has promised to show the championship game

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on quote their ginormous big screen. He following the live podcast,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so they called it ginormous. They tweeted at me tasks

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and said it was ginormous. White Oak did the Music Hall,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, that's gonna be.

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 5>It's not a projector apparently it's like an led screen.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 5>This place is nice. I hear it's nice.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>This place a little too nice for us.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 5>It might be a little too nice for we usually.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Play in like dive bars.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 5>I know, well it's the Neutral.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a look. We're pumped. Neutral sponsoring this live show Monday,

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>April third, So get your tickets. If you are in

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>town for the Final four in Houston, or you live

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the area, come see us. Kelly Echo again. Like

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, that's gonna be a blast.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Kelly Echo and Trey Herby, you're gonna have a

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 3>fit off.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, Oh good call.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 4>You think I gotta bring it.

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 6>He's gonna be a home court advantage unfortunately. Yeah, travel

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:25.679
<v Speaker 6>with several options clothing.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he brings it. He brings it. I know you'll

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>bring it, so no problem.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>My best, all right. I can't wait for that. On

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>today's Drop podcast, we are gonna discuss Jalen Brown's future

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Boston Celtics in a brand new segment. We

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>came up mere hours ago with call Read and React,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Read and Reacts. I guess sounds cooler, but it's just

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>read and react. Let's just read something and talk about it.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Task has Worst of the Week nominees. We got rapid fire,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>fun but let's touch on last night's games quickly. I'm

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna lump two of them together. Here. We had a

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Coros three pointer to send the Cavs pass the Nets

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>once team one fourteen, and then Pello Bancaro and the

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Magic turn back the Knicks one to eleven, one oh six.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>This is important, of course, Calves win, Nets lose, Nicks

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>lose because of where these teams are jockeying for playoff

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>position tasks. But I don't know if you have thoughts

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>specifically on either of those games.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Who needs March madness. We had a great ending in

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Brooklyn there. It was a wild race on didn't seem

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>like the Cavs were going to pull this thing out.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how it happened. They're down eight with

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 3>two minutes left, and they're still down two twenty four seconds

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>left to pull up the press. Somehow they got a

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>turnover on that press. Donovan Mitchell driving to the hoop

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 3>to try and tie the game fouled by Spencer Dinwiddie

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 3>intentionally and they were out of foul, so he goes

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 3>to the line. Donovan Mitchell wanted a continuation. The ref

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>said no, can we review that thankfully.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 3>So he goes to the line, hits one, misses the second,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the best, the best misser in the world. I thought

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 3>for a second after he went after that second one

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 3>that maybe he missed because he's so good at missing,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>but he maybe mispurpose. But he missed on accident. He

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 3>went after it, missed twice in trying to finish it

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 3>off there and it came out to Karroslovert. And this

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is where the play started. What a play by carrislverta

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 3>seven seconds left, just calmly, calmly found Isaaca Carro in

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the corner. Usually you'd think Carrosilvert's going to fire that thing.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 3>That's his reputation, He's going to shoot that ball with

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>seven seconds left, but he took his time. This is

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 3>the best version of Karislvert we've ever seen. He's grown

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot as a player, even though his points per

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 3>game are way down then his earlier in his career

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 3>in Brooklyn. Find a Caro who buried that shot from three,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>and he's got the confidence. He's got three straight months

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of shooting forty percent over three. He does not shoot

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot right, not by any means, but he'll hit

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 3>won a game he'll hit one and a half a

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>game in this one his first game winner and he

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 3>knew it. He said after the game, Oh yeah, that's

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>my first one. And he felt good shooting that ball,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>and he felt good having the confidence of his teammates.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>But bad loss for the Nets, dropping them into the

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>play in tournament picture, because they should have won this thing.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're now half a game behind the Miami Heat

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for that conference's final guaranteed playoff spot. They're in seventh,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Knicks, after losing three in a row, they're

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>only one and a half up. Awesome night for the Heat, Yes,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>very good night. Fit. Nothing New York has seven games left,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami has eight. The winner that race is gonna get

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland in the first round. Loser will get Boston or

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Philly fairly likely. So yeah, any thoughts on the on

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that Madness game In the NBA, there were some great

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>games and obviously the Sweet sixteen last night too, but

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this was pretty.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Wild ending task nailed it.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 6>That was March Madness because in eight pointly with two minutes,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 6>you should probably win that game unless you turn the

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 6>ball over three times in the last couple of minutes,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 6>which you see all the time in a March Madness game,

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 6>maybe not always in an NBA game, but that's what

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 6>happened for the Nets. It allowed Cleveland to start playing downhill,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 6>get some easy baskets and semi transition, and then task

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 6>is totally right. Good poised by Carris Lavert to not

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 6>panic and just chuck up a three, cause you never

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 6>know how much time is actually gonna be left on

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 6>the clock. After two offensive rebounds, after Mitchell's miss, you

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 6>could just be scrambling thing. I got one second left

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 6>to chuck it up. Nah, he found a corro there

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 6>in the corner. Biggest shot of his career. I heard

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 6>on the Daily Ding this morning. They were saying maybe

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 6>the best pass of Karris Lavert's career. Great stuff regardless,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 6>And man, Donovan Mitchell, this guy is just a clutch

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 6>lane violator.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I know to get ahead.

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they ain't watching the shooter. They were watching for

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 6>fouls underneath, so get in early. It worked out for him. Man,

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 6>He was focused though, trying to shoot that free throw,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 6>calming hisself down, and he missed three shots.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>You weren't the only one like confused, if you want

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to call it that, whether or not he actually meant

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to miss it on purpose. I think House of Highlights

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>had the YouTube short and they labeled it as like

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>intentionally miss his free throw to set up game winner.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, he didn't. I'm pretty sure he wanted

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to hit the second and tie the game up, but

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it came up short and he timed it perfectly again

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>helped out by the lane violation. Missed sort of the

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>easy bunny at first, somehow goes back to him again,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and then he sort of botched the second one within

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the traffic and then nets player there was like two

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>or three of them around the ball and it just

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like squirt it out to LeVert, who made a million

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>great plays down the stretch. Like you said, they were

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>down eight, he got it going right. He scored in

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>transition to cut it to six. Well, actually he was fouled,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>went to the line, hit both free throws. Then he

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>got one of those steals off of bridges that went

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the other way where he set up another basket, and

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>then he had that one where yeah, great trap from

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell and Garland on DINWITTI I believe it was in

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the back court, kicked ahead to Dorian Phinney Smith, but

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he's sort of like falling out of bounds on the

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>sideline and he sort of trucks it behind him. And

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that was LeVert and he's just got a nose for

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>knows for the ball in these situations and he was

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a big reason why they won this game. But rough

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>loss from the nets here, especially as they fall into

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the plane.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and they've really been struggling basically. I mean their

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 6>season turned when Kevin Durant went down and they're I

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 6>think twelve and twenty two or something along those lines.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 6>Since then, obviously the team has completely changed over. But

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 6>they had this win. I will say I loved all

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 6>the sea foam green accessories. Yeah, but they were wearing

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 6>last night. Apparently it was for Women's Impact Night, a

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 6>nod to the New York Liberty, who also play in

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>the Barclay Center. It looks sweet black and white all

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 6>the time.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 4>It looked really really cool.

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 5>It's not pop of color there.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And anything from the next game there. Losing there to

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Magic and like I said, took you through the

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of standings. It's a tough loss. They're still in

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the driver's seat, but not good here to the Rotlanto Magic.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Knicks seems like they peaked at the wrong time,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 3>getting their winning streak a couple of weeks ago, ending

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 3>at nine, and then Jalen Brunson went out and he

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>wasn't in this game, so you could easily just attribute

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>it to that. You could just say Julius Randall sort

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 3>of sped up and Manual quickly sort of sped up.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>You put in that rock in Jalen Brunson. That slows

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>things down, and maybe all is right in the world.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, they haven't been shooting well

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. They haven't shot well the last

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 3>nine games. They're shooting about thirty three percent from three,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and I wonder if the Jalen Brunson injury is serious

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 3>or not. They have seven games to really find their

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>flow with Jalen Brunson. A news Day is Steve Popper

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>said he had a hard plastic brace on his right wrist,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>which is sprained. Does that mean it's bad, I don't know,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 3>But hard, I guess, is worse than soft, so so

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I would think that it's It's slightly worrisome that they

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 3>had that role a few weeks ago when they won

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>nine in a row, and they haven't found that groove whatsoever.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Who played well last night for them, Quentin Grimes. But

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>that's right. Other than that, Julius Randall extremely peeved again,

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Ban Carrol getting under his skin, Magic getting under his skin,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and they were poised down the stretch, the Magic super

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>poised down the stretch and you had Wendell Carter being

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the calm one, you had Gary Harris being the calm

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>one in the fourth quarter. Well, the Knicks didn't have that,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>So let's it is worry time. I think for the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>nixt seven games is not a lot. And yeah, they

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>need Brunson back, yes, clearly.

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on the Knicks in the Magic.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 6>Game, I totally agree about Brunson and Randall because I

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 6>just feel like when Randall plays in these games without Brunson,

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 6>and he is the unquestioned number one guy, the pressure

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 6>like overloads him sometimes. I think like he was on

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 6>tilt after he got a technical thing in the first half, right,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 6>and then he was just completely completely fired up, and

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, they screaming on his own teammates exactly. And

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 6>I feel like when Brunson plays, the vibes are just

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 6>a little more chill and a little more steady for

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 6>the entire team. But I also thought that this was

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of the schedule catching up to the Knicks. They

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 6>likely overlooked the Magic to begin with. It was also

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 6>the third game in four nights, and you could tell

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 6>it in the fourth quarter the Magic looked a lot fresher.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 6>They hit seven threes in the fourth quarter, which is

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 6>tough stuff. And like tas said, when Dell Carter Junior

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 6>completely outplayed Mitchell Robinson last night, it was all effort

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 6>and just being in the right place. Nicks looked a

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 6>step slow, so they're probably hoping the playoffs start soon.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And they did this thing where they got down a

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ton the Knicks did, got it all back in the

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, and then still a quarter to play. Magic

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>took care of business down the stretch. And markol Foltz

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to see him getting a lot of love recently.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>It feels like from some of the Sicko bloggers out there.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have an amazing game shooting the ball in

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>this one, but he is playing really well for Orlando,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and he had an incredible sort of dropping it over

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>his shoulder dime in traffic right at the net. I

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you guys saw that it was a

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Beauty assist and he's just playing really well. So it's

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>nice to see him like finding his footing here in

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the league. Going over to the Western Conference, wins just

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly here, brandon ingram first career triple double for Bi

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lifted the Pelicans past to Hornets, and Kawhi scored thirty

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>two as the Clippers beat the Thunder without Paul George.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It was close for about three quarters as well, and

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>then the Clippers just hammered them in the fourth. Any

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on either of those two games, Yeah.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Trey said yesterday, it's tough to beat a team twice

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 3>in a row, especially a good team. So a Thunder

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>took him on Tuesday night. And then Kawhi was angry

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 3>at the way that game ended, that long possession. So

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>we had Robot Kawhi. That was a sequel, Kawhi. I

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was RoboCop too. I was eye Robot to look like Megan.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Out maybe Terminator.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll go with Meghan. I mean we went to two

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 3>old ones. Let's stick somewhat modern. Megan technically a robot.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 4>No, no, just Meghan, Well, they give it time.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Meghan is Chucky too, Let's be honest. Chucky eight. Yes,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 3>there was a lot of checks, but he was thirteen

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>to fifteen. He was a robot out there. He just

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 3>rolled over them. And that's why I think every series

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 3>that the Clippers are going to play in the postseason,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be a seven game series. However many they play,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think. I don't think they're going to be

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>good enough to rop teams, but they ain't losing either.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 3>You see teams guys like Batoom yesterday with four threes.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Those type of guys maybe not great night in and

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>night out, but great every second night. So I think

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have some long ones with with the Clippers.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Two weeks remain in the regular season. Basically just over

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, six teams in the Western Conference are tied

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>with thirty seven losses. Six teams with the the exact

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>same amount of losses at this point, with less than

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ten games to go for a lot of these squads,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or all these squads at this point, j D, I

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think you got the playoff picture. We can show everyone

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>here on YouTube, at least Pelicans now in there in

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the tenth seed. You see the movement there in the

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Conference. Anything jump out at you, TK.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean That was a huge win for New Orleans,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>taking on a team like the Hornets that they need

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 6>to beat. Go it because they're heading out on a

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 6>four game road trip starting tomorrow and it's basically against

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 6>good teams. They got the Blazers thrown in there. That's

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of their only gimme for the rest of the season.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 6>So I thought, pretty good stuff for Brandon Ingram to

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 6>actually put the team on his back. Yeah, coming out

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 6>really strong in the first half. And then I thought

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 6>Yonis valen Jun has had a massive impact in the

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 6>fourth quarter. They're just posting them up every single time.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 6>It looked like nineteen ninety eight all over again. But

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 6>the ball was moving, it was going into the post,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 6>it was coming back out, it was finding guys for shots.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 6>And then like the tast take, Kwie was so good

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 6>last night, seven for seven in the first half. But

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 6>I was almost more impressed with his player. He was

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 6>passing the ball so well, very contagious. I thought they

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 6>finished with thirty four assists.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 4>They look great.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to our brand new segment here

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on the No Dunks Drop podcast. It's called Read and Reacts.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, read it reacts.

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Shared some articles we read them, we react to them.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>It's as simple as that, but you had to have

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>read it on a kindle like that. Guy.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, I gotta go home quick. I'll be

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>back in thirty eight minutes.

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay. First one, it's from ESPN's Dave Mcmanhamon and woj

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James could play final week of the regular season. Now,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they wrote, Lebron is progressing toward a comeback from his

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>right foot injury, and there is increasing optimism that the

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Lakers star could return to play a few games in

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the final week of the regular season. Now here's the

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting part. Lebron tweeted soon after this article he read

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and reacted. This is what Lebron said, quote, there wasn't

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>an evaluation today and there hasn't been any target date

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for my return. I'm just working around the clock every day,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>three times a day, to give myself the best chance

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of coming back full strength whenever that is God bless

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>y'all sources. Face palm emoji. I speak for myself. That

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>was Lebron countering two of the most plugged in guys

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>when it comes specially to the Lakers, mcmannimon and whoach

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so react.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 3>We said he's working out three times a day. All

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I know is when we're leading up to the play

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 3>in tournament or the playoffs wherever they may land, start

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 3>releasing some footage from those workouts. That's what I think.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Start intimidating your opponent. This guy, the best of this era,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 3>working out hard three times a day, shirt off, I'm sure, yelling,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>screaming tight bands on the arms and making them look

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>uh super jacked. Let's do it. You just want to

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 3>see some footage advantage Lebron. I mean that part of

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the game is intimidation. That's all I'm thinking. When he's

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 3>saying he's working out three times a day, I believe

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>him puts a lot of money into his bod, and

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 3>especially this time of year, I think he is this

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 3>is his I don't know if it's his, you know,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>plast run as a number one guy, whatever it is,

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 3>it's he's taking it seriously. Why did he tweet this though?

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this was this is strange, this part of it,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>All these guys saying looks like he's probably gonna come

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>back in the final week of the regular season, and

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I speak for myself, Well, tell me when

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming back, there's no evaluation.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Sources practicing so hard that I might be back. I

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 4>will be back eventually. Oh yeah, very weird.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 6>I guess we were just kind of expecting a Lebron

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 6>update at about this time we got a Lebron update.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 6>But he says that's not completely the right update. But

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 6>then you look at their schedule and you see that

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 6>they've got the Clippers, Sons, and Jazz their last three games. Yea,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 6>all of them are in LA because the last two

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 6>are home games, the other ones in away game in

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 6>Crypto dot Com Arena.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 4>So I look at that.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 6>And think, yeah, Lebron could play in the final week

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 6>of the regular season. Those games are going to be

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 6>super important. They'll have a chance perhaps at being to

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 6>the number six seed, depending on how things shake out

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 6>in this next week here. So I think, if it matters,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't be surprised to see Lebron out there, because

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 6>ain't nobody want to go into the play in tournament,

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 6>especially Lebron.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 4>He's trying to get that guy fired that.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Came up with them.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 6>He's like, no way, but actually, you know what, it's okay,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Be in it, but it'll be all right, could you

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>give me a chance? So the Lakers have stayed afloat

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>here without Lebron. I mean, they've gone seven to five

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>since he was sidelined. They've won their last two. That trade,

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that three team deal with the deadline with Minnesota and Utah,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it saved their season. I think that's fair to say

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because they turned it around. They turned Westbrook Jta Damian Jones,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seven first round pick, and then a twenty

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>four second round pick into D'Angel Russell, who's played pretty

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>solid for them after coming back from injury, Jared Vanderbilt,

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>guy that plays defense, gives them some energy. And then

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Malie Beasley, a three point shooter. You pair that with

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty at center, Austin Reeves playing incredibly as a point guard, playmaking,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>putting pressure on the rim. And then those other guys,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like I said, D'Angel Russell's shock creation, some defense from Vanderbilt,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>some three point shooting from Beasley, shooter off the bench.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>You add Lebron to this team, can you convince yourself? Damn?

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't they make a run or is it just

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>so far back? Such a struggle even maybe getting into

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the play in or out of the play and into

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, like it's just like too far, It's just

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>too much to ask. Even if Lebron is back putting

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>up thirty and tents.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 4>What do you think nobody's gonna want to play the Lakers?

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 6>That will be the go to line when we're talking

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 6>about Lakers playoff previews. I think they can win with

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 6>a healthy Lebron playing to his capabilities, they can win

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 6>any series in the Western Conference, but it'll be hard

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 6>to win three straight series in the Western Conference, even

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 6>though their team clearly makes a lot more sense. We

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 6>just haven't really seen him playing altogether the games. Did

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 6>Lebron even get to play with all of these new

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 6>guys two or three something like that.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 4>We saw a huge.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 6>Malik Beasley game once upon a time, We saw Jared

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Vanderbilt's defense once upon a time, But we haven't seen

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 6>what their actual playoff rotation is gonna look like, which

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 6>is why Lebron will likely come back to get a

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 6>little bit of a run with these guys.

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good point about them not having played together,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 3>because the first thing people will say if they make

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the play in tournament is these guys have experience. You

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want to play them, but they do have to

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>have chemistry going into the playoffs somewhere.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>But there's so many other teams like that too in

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference, with the Suns and Durant, even the

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Mavericks to some extent, they don't played a ton of

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>games Kyrie and Luga together. Yeah, Like it's wild how

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>many teams are like that.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but the strongest teams in the Nuggets, the Grizzlies

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 3>some degree there they've played together. And you know with

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 3>the Suns that sure, that's a decent example. They're not

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna have played that many games. They're not as old

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 3>as as as the Lakers, I think. I think the

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 3>other point is theym played a lot together. And the

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 3>second thing is it's hard to win all these series

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>over and over and over again. Can they go on

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a run? Yeah, how long is this run? Is it

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a quick sprint? We're running one hundred meters? They can

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 3>win one series if that's one hundred meters, but we're

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 3>we're running a fifteen hundred meter. You got to take

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>all those other teams I mentioned there, you're taking the Nuggets,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you're taking the Suns. But yeah, it is it is

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>still somewhat open. There's no doubt, but it's hard to

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 3>do two months. You're asking them to run for two months.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know our next article, This was a great

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one from the Ringers Logan Murdoch. Encourage you to go

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>read it. Seek it out if you haven't. It's titled

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown is trying to find a balance and there

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of intrigue from this article TK, especially

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>around Jalen Brown being a little non committal to his

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>future with the Boston Celtics. I don't think that's a

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>stretch for me to say, you know, really in his words,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>what were your thoughts on this article?

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 6>The quote I will stay where I'm needed and treated

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 6>correct to me, sounds like saying you better pay up, buddy,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 6>because he's going to be eligible for an extension here

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 6>pretty soon. It could be a super duper max contract

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 6>depending on how things shake out with all NBA at

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 6>the end of the season. And reading it, it feels

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 6>like Jalen Brown doesn't totally trust the front office because

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 6>he knows that Jason Tatum is their number one guy,

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 6>and it's been made quite obvious the fact that he

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 6>was in Kevin Durant trade rumors over the summer, that

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 6>the team and Wick Grusbeck come right to him and

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 6>talk about, you're not in trade rumors right now. When

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.719
<v Speaker 6>KD became available again at the trade deadline.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 4>He just is like, I don't know what they're doing.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 6>They tell me what they're saying, but I don't necessarily

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 6>know if it's true, because I think Jalen Brown knows

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 6>deep down in his heart if they could have traded

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 6>me for Kevin Durant, they probably would have done it

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 6>if the price wasn't too high.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 6>It feels a little bit like he's making sure that

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 6>the Celtics know that he is a quality player.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 4>The guy's awesome, and he's really.

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Grown since he's come to Boston as well, So he

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 6>wants to get paid the way he should be paid

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 6>come summertime. But also I don't think he's gonna be

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 6>a lifelong Celtic. I mean, I don't necessarily know that

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 6>this means he's asking out in the summer if they

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 6>don't come with a super duper max contract, But just

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 6>seems like he's got a lot of interests, a lot

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 6>of ideas that he wants to explore in places that

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 6>likely will not be Boston.

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 3>After reading this one, I thought, have I already read

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>this article? I thought, have I been doing a lot

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 3>of reading and reacting because there was another article by

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Soapin deb on The New York Times which wasn't all

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 3>that dissimilar. He was talking this week. I mean, he

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 3>went on a short media run of two different authors

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and Murdoch and deb and basically telling it like it

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 3>is to me reading these two articles, maybe like him more,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I thought he was just he's just real, really, I mean,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>he said he's about something. He said, he's about the

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>players getting more of the league profits. I said, he's

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 3>about kids getting education, and he's looking out for himself.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And he also he said stuff smart stuff like to

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 3>The New York Times. He said, listen, maybe if I

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>don't see eye to eye with Celtics owners, but doesn't

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>mean we can't win a championship together. And he also

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>called out part of the Celtics fan base for getting

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>after him, which is true. And he just said I'm

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 3>a Max dude without saying I'm a Max dude. He's

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 3>a Max dude. He is, Yes, he deserves it, so.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>He's amazed if he is not an All NBA selection

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this year. Now, the problem might be and the voters

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>need to get on the same page with this one.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Are we voting for him for a guard or are

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we voting him for a forward? Because I believe you

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>know you'll be given that option as a voter. But

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if let's say forty people put them all NBA forward

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and thirty eight put them all NBA guard, they don't

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>jam the two together and say, well, okay, that's seventy

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>eight votes for a forward. They say, nope, you only

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>got forty as a forward. Like it could screw him here.

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope that's not the case.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 3>His next contract, yes, oh yeah.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That's super super max. We're talking two hundred and fifty

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>million ish.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so, just to be clear, he signed through

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>next year. He signed, You'll be a free agent in

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the summer of twenty any four unless they extend him

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>this offseason, which why the hell wouldn't they. It's up

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 3>to him if he wants to sign it.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But he might be silly to do that because of

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>increase in what he could eventually make, so he probably

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>will not, depending again on this All NBA.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Thing, Yeah, exactly. Yeah, the All NBA thing. He could

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 3>sign a big, big max this offseason and be paid

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>more than Jason Tatum.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he'll be a busting Celtic then, like

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>his next contract, you think he's just gonna sign a

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>max contract they've given the White why wouldn't they? Or yeah, yeah.

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean they've had so much success as a

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 6>team and as a duo, Like that's what everybody's looking for,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 6>its big wings who can play on both ends of

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 6>the court. The Celtics have two of them, and they're young.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 6>But I can foresee a future like if the Celtics

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 6>don't win a championship, things will change eventually, right Jalen Brown,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 6>I could see him wanting his own team, wanting to

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 6>be the number one guy. He gets to be the

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 6>number one guy a lot with Boston, but he's behind

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 6>Tatum in the pecking order, So maybe he sets his

0:26:58.760 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 6>site somewhere else.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Like for instance, his hometown of Atlanta.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which I said. There's a lot of Dallas Mavericks

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>rumors too with the Jason Kidd cal connection, and there's

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk about him and Kyrie sort of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like uh, you know, fixing if you want to say,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>their relationship who knows if he's going to be in Dallas.

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>There was one line in this that stuck out to

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>me from Logan. Quote Brown generally doesn't trust easily, and

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>now that extends to his relationship with the Celtics end

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>quote on that and that, I mean, you can sort

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of sense that from this guy. And also, you know

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I heard Bill Simmons talking to Logan about this article,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like all these rumors coming up. Did

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics not do a great enough job in saying, dude,

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>we're not trading you. Man, we don't want to trade you. Like,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>don't don't believe any of this, don't believe these like

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>teams probably leaking this till.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 3>And then they had it out there as a rumor,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>right right.

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know, if you're the Celtic's like, well,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what can we do. It's like if it's the Nets

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>leaking this rumor to report X, like we can come

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>out and say it all we want, but still it's

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like out there and it's like, also it's Kevin Durant exactly.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like he knows that he would be traded for

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant, right, Yeah, I guess he would still take

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>offense to it. Yeah, when you're a top fifteen play.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess they could have gone to him

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 3>afterward and said we didn't want to trade you. That

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>would probably be a lie because it did seem like

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 3>they were in talks for Kevin Durant.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Any other thoughts on this. It is a great article.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Again to go check this one out from Logan. He

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of work into this. It is funny

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that both of those came out because these were like,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>these weren't done in three days, you know, these were

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>months of at least in Logan's case. Can't speak for

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the other one, but I'm sure it took a while.

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it seemed to be timed. It seemed to be this.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>This is clearly his way of saying I want to

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 3>be paid. I don't think it's an accident that these

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 3>two happened to come out, and there's a media tour

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 3>which had two stops. You know, maybe Murdock writs QUI

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, because I think Dev's he's a quick writer.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 3>The man writes books. So I feel like it's just

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Jayleen Brown voicing his his his business. And I like

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that he called out in the New York Times article,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>he called out the Celtics fan base. He said, if

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you have a bad game, they tied to your personal character.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>He's he's been a good player for them, a good

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 3>role model for them. He hasn't complained about being the

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 3>number two guy. There's controversy, but in terms of his

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, his relationship to Kanye and and and the

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie comments afterwards. But he's made it clear that he

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 3>supports Kyrie and and he has also made it clear

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 3>that we can disagree and I and I enjoy that

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>about him. We can disagree, but at the end of

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the day, he is he is focused on winning a

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>championship and focused on the right thing.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>There is this whole part of whether or not he

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't want to be Imposton because he wants to

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere else. Yep, for whatever his personal reasons, either

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with the organization, fan base, city all that.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 4>This is an.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Underlying part to all of these articles. I think and

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know. You's not come up said that,

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, especially like even like, all right,

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>here's two hundred and fifty million dollars, man, Like, are

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you gonna say, eh, No, I don't really like it here,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go x jeezus. I mean I doubt he

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>would do that. Be a little wild for anyone to

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>turn down that type of money, generational money. But maybe we.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 6>Haven't seen him make a choice to be in Boston. Yes, right,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 6>Like it's like when your first contract comes up, your

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 6>original team, not only can they match, they can pay

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 6>the most. That's also going to be the case here.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 6>And when you finally get a chance to like get

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 6>your huge contract, you look around.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, final one here in read and reacts the Athletics

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>John Hollinger interesting article titled you thought MVP, Rookie of

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the Year and other races were settled? Not so fast? Okay,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So Hollinger points out that if you had taken a

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>survey around the All Star Break, voting for at least

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>three of the major awards would have looked like slam

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>dunks around the All Star Break, MVP, Jokic, Pallo, Rookie

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Year, and Mike Brown Coach of the Year. Done,

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>done and done. But Johnny Holly says, we've seen a

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>giant sea change, and then he goes through each race.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question off this is of those

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>three MVP Rookie of the Year coach, which one, in

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your opinion tray is the most settled. Which one do

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you think is the most locked up.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 6>Ball not MVP, MVP that's super upper grabs right now.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Hmm.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 6>I would lean Rookie of the Year. A lot of

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 6>people talking up Jalen Williams, no doubt about it. He

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 6>has been incredible since the All Star Break. Was great

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 6>before the All Star Break, but it's definitely taken it

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 6>to another level. Scottie Barnes did steal the Rookie of

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 6>the Year from Evan Mobley in the second half of

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 6>last season, but I still think it's Polo Poncaro. The

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 6>guy is the number one player on the Magic and

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 6>he's been the number one guy the entire season. Jalen Williams,

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 6>maybe he is the number two guy for OKAC right now.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 6>It's between him and Giddy for sure, but he's not

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 6>seeing the number one defender every single night though cool

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 6>I was on him for a huge chunk of the game.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Last night, so I don't know.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 6>I definitely think that as the Magic have fallen in

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 6>the standings, despite the fact that they're playing pretty well

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 6>right now, got a chance to make some noise the

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 6>last couple of weeks of the season. The fact that

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Okac is still in the play and race, maybe even

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 6>in the playoff race, and that Jalen Williams is making

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 6>these strides in the last quarter of the season. Definitely

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 6>he's getting more votes than he would have at All

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Star break.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was like it was unanimous at the All

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Star Break, like everybody was like, Yeah, he's gonna get

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>every single first place vote. Palla bank Carroll. Now there's

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>might there's very likely going to be some first place

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>votes for for Jalen Williams. I think it could happen,

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even Walker Kessler in the just maybe how many.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I think this Holger's article is all about the MVP

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 3>not being as settled as it was a couple months ago.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Bank Carroll still the number one guy. This is how

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 3>people vote for a rookie of the Year, who had

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the best season and who has the best outlook in

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the future. And he's got both. He had the best

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 3>season and he's got the big brightest outlook out of

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 3>all of those guys. As good as Jade has been

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 3>and Kessler has been, I think he's he's got botes

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>so maybe he's not unanimous, and maybe maybe it's nine votes,

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 3>but it's freaking I okay, so I wouldn't worry about that.

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 3>And Coach of the Year, maybe Michael Burton Brown doesn't

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 3>have it as much as he did a couple of

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 3>months ago.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I still think he ultimately is going to sure.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know. At first. I don't know, and

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to know how how voters think about

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Coach of the Year because it.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Could be it's I'll tell you how they do. It's

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 1>just it's all based off expectations. Yeah, exactly, based off

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 3>But Willie Hardy's got some votes. Yeah, to be had.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Uh yeah, what's Mark?

0:33:55.400 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 4>What's Mark's d name? I can't find it? Great art well,

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't know it's middle name.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yea good good Are a good line by John Hollinger

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>in this article, he said Mark Digno has done so well.

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I finally learned or tried to learn how to pronounce

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 3>his name. Just kidding. It's Mark good wine good anyway. Okay,

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 3>So is the one MVP is the one that is

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 3>not settled And it's totally true. At All Star weekend,

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 3>we were in Utah and the struppole was done by

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 3>our man, Tim Vontepsen. It was basically it was high

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and so, yeah, it feels loud like Joel Embiid. It

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 3>feels like the argument for Joel Embiid is very very

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>loud right now. But I think it's pretty even between

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 3>those two. I would say, Yoki Chin Embid, I think

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 3>it could. It's a seesaw. So people yelled, were yelling

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 3>at Jokich a month ago, people are yelling Embid right

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 3>now and there's still time. I think it's definitely not settled.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's the exciting part.

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's an awesome line in this from Hollinger that

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about the MVP. Of course, once again, Jannis and

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Beat and Yokich or each having seasons that historically are

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>usually good enough to win somebody an MVP trophy. So

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this is happening again. Consider that of the top thirteen

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>all time seasons in per player efficiency rating since individual

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>turnovers started being tracked in seventy seven and seventy eight,

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there have been seven such instances by these three guys

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past four seasons. They have more than half

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>between the three of them of the greatest player efficiency

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>rating seasons of all time. That is that is wild.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>There's the three best players in the league right now

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>by significant margin. Yeah, and that's why it's coming down

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to the wire and everybody's making their case for each guy.

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that changed at the All Star break

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with Jokich was the Nuggets hit a slump and then

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers went on a massive, massive run, and then

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, there's just gianis always lurking the entire time

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>because everybody he's probably the best player, and we don't

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>talk enough about like they missed Chris Middleton basically all

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>season long, so that was like always an excuse or

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a good, like a positive for Yokic winning previous seasons,

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Like he's missing his best, second best guy in these

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>guys that were injured at the time in Jamal and

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. We don't really talk about that with

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Johannis at all. And maybe it's because they have Drew

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and Brooke and they still have great counted team. Maybe

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason. But it's still impressive. But I love this,

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, I know it gets a little toxic,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>this debate, but this is way better than somebody just

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>running away with an MVP. We have three elite bigment

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>of all time, hands down, with ten days to go,

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out, like who's gonna eke it out?

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Like this could be one of the closest MVP votes

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>we ever get? Is the other play? Other thing in play?

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 6>I should say, Yeah, people remember that, right, Like, isn't

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 6>it Charles Barkley and Magic Johnson is the closest one

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 6>nineteen ninety People like me remember that on an accident.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 6>I didn't even know it was in there, but yeah,

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 6>the MVP race is awesome, and I don't know Doc

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 6>Rivers now.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Dad, He's like, we don't have to diss other guys

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 4>to big up the guy.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately, that's exactly what starts happening once you talk about it,

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 6>because you gotta come when it comes down, when it

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 6>comes down to it. As long as we're just quoting

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 6>lines here that we read, I would like to hear

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 6>JD's reaction to this. Johnny Holly writes he can still

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 6>have his foibles.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 6>Sixers fans have made a new sport out of zaprudering

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 6>Yokic's defensive failings. Hey, it's still better than pickleball and

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 6>Bead's own defensive effort can fluctuate sharply from play by

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 6>Wow play pickleball stray it didn't.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 8>Exist, A stray from the Zapruda film Yeah Wow Wow.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah listen, I was watching pickleball yesterday. Major League Pickleball

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Daytona started this weekend. It's on right now. A very

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 8>pregnant woman playing in a major league pickleball.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 5>It's like, it's odd to see.

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>You don't see. It's incredible.

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 5>She's good. Yes, it's great.

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but the you know, Rachel Ira having a debate

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 8>is this good for the sport or is it bad

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 8>for the sport?

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 5>You know, like.

0:37:59.400 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 8>And then there's a there's another like a forty seven

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 8>year old woman and she doesn't look like she's in.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 5>The best shape, but she's an elite player. Is it

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 5>good for the sport or not good? But she's like,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 5>that's great for this. I would say it's good for this.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. How many weeks pregnant are we talking?

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking like very right.

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to guess between seven and eight months.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Pr Oh my goodness.

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Whoa.

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 8>And at one point she kind of dove like not

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 8>she didn't died, but she was like wan forward to

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 8>to grab a dink, but.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Rachel so she grabbed a dig seven or eight months ago. Yes,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>possibly possibly closest races in MVP history. Just Star Magic Johnson,

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Charles Barkley, and Michael Jordan was in that one. We

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>had a Karl Malone, Michael Jordan in ninety six ninety seven.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>We had a Malone, Duncan Alonso Morning in ninety eight

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine, Nash and Shack four oh five, and then

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>uh the Westbrook Harden and Kawhi in sixteen seventeen.

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 4>That was a good one. One that was quite the race.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I it's feeling like it's going to crack

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the like that top five lists this, yeah,

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's like the crazy part is like you have

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to decide the order of the three. So it's not like,

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're right, and maybe it is just yokicchen Biid,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but you were like.

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not.

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get first place team in the league and

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you're taken the defense and all that. Like it's close, close, close.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, tell me if this is true.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, first twenty games of the season and the last

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 6>twenty games of the season are the most important, have

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 6>the biggest impact for voting hands down, like Jason Tatum

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 6>is still going to probably finish top five in MVP

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 6>voting because he was on fire for the first twenty

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 6>games of the season. Like Tatum, for the last half

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 6>of the season has been pretty average. Jill And has

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 6>been more consistent. Absolutely correct, But we remember those first

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 6>twenty TATA games. Even when it comes to like Embiid's case,

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 6>people are like, yeah, but remember his very first three

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 6>games of the season, he was slacking.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Set the tone. Whatever happens, set the tone in the rency.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>It's those Yeah, it's a good point.

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 3>People like making up their mind early for sure. I

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 3>mean this is it was a week ago. Embiid was

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the leader by far. People yell in the moment.

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that big the game on March twenty seventh, might

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it could in some people, in some voters' minds determine,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like where they lean to if Yo Kicch dominates a

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bead or Embiid once again dominates Yo Kitch in that

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>particular matchup.

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 3>We'll be watching on playback join us Monday night, Monday Night,

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Monday Night. We'll try not to turn to Monday Night Raw.

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 3>As long as the game is good. We won't go

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 3>to WWE Raw, but we like we jump.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Over to it for like literally thirty seconds and we're like,

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>who's that Max Nic splash?

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Otis can't help it, can't help it. I see that

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 3>option WWE. Do you want to watch this?

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I like what I Rather than the wrestling, I just

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 3>want to walk ins. That's the most entertaining part to me. Sure, Yeah,

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 3>there's a splash. There was a large man. He did

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 3>a splash. Last Who was that?

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Again, it wasn't Otis.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 3>It was a shoe.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 4>Who was the man?

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Who didn't that guy's name? It doesn't matter, no, no, anyway.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought.

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He's a fairly new guy. He's newish. We'll figure it

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>out during the break when we come back, Tass mellis

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>with the worst of the Week nominees. Don't go anywhere, Okay.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The wrestler that we saw do a big old splash

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on our last playback when we watched thirty seconds of

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Raw was Bronson Reed, But we also saw shout out

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to Jerome for reminding us on slack. Ricochet did a

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>shooting star press and we gave a shout out to

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Billy Kidman. It was our thirty seconds Raw review there

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>from playback, so we'll do it again. Maybe we'll jump

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>over you never know. Okay, let's get.

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Too big men going at it. Yokchin em beat. Hopefully

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 3>we see a big man match.

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Otis versus Bronson Reid or something. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 1>let's get to words.

0:41:59.920 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 5>The ladies and gentlemen. The worst of the week.

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Us for talking about WWE perhaps, but we do have

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 3>a repeat. I knew I love fifteen seconds. I love

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 3>tuning into the forty eight hour bonanza that is WrestleMania

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 3>for fifteen seconds. I can't believe they still they do

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that for two days anyway. The Grizzlies Dylan Brooks, two days,

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 3>two weeks, back to back weeks for this guy. This week,

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 3>after playing the MAVs, Dylan Brooks, he was asking for

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie Irving's jersey. Kyrie said, nah, Dylan, Well he got

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie's jersey, but Kyrie just decided now I don't want

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 3>your jersey. I'm just moving on. He played it off

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 3>really well, played it off really smoothly. When he was

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 3>asked about afterwards, he said he was just moving on

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 3>to the next thing. That's where my mind was. Maybe

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll get it from him next time, but he just

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't want his jersey. Played it well, so sorry, Dylan,

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 3>got you gotta be nominated for that. And then his

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 3>rival Draymond Green was prodded by his producer on his

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 3>podcast to talk about this, and we have the clip

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 3>of Draymond talking about it.

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 7>By the way, dude, Jackson wanted me to talk about

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 7>Kyrie not not taking Dylan Brooks jersey. Wow, wow, wow.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 3>That's it. Just a good laugh. So Dylan Brooks he

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 3>received his eighteenth technical foul in that game as well,

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 3>meaning he's suspended for the second time this season. Too

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 3>many texts, you suspended for one more game. So that's

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 3>back to back weeks here. He is a Worst of

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 3>the Week nominee. Last week he pushed a camera person.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 3>If you remember that, I remember that he was fined

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 3>thirty five thousand dollars over the weekend for that push

0:43:57.760 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 3>on the court. Otherwise, things are going all right for

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Brooks. Actually they won beat the Warriors, doing all right.

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, do you think you can do

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it next week? You think back to back to back,

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's very difficult to threepeat. It's true, and

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>worse of the week, especially if anyone could do it,

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Brooks.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Kind of what kind of performance you've got Dylan easily,

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, some attire or something, because we mentioned that

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 3>last week.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>So this is probably his third worst of the week.

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Did he get it for the Dick punch on?

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 5>Is that a Mitchell?

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>He didn't get it for that.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Did he get it for fighting with Shannon Sharp?

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Yeah, you didn't get it for that. He's got

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:36.959
<v Speaker 1>to have three or four by this point.

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 4>What a season.

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he would get the banner in the All Starter

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>studio Brooks o his mug on. It would be great.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 4>Just got to keep it going. Grizzlies have won seven

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of eight.

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's playing better.

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's Dylan Dylan.

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 3>This is I checked because he's got eighteen texts leading

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the NBA. I checked. If he was a serial technical

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 3>foul getter, if he was up there the last few years. No,

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not. So you's got to keep it up. You're right,

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Just just keep getting well.

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>There was a huge conspiracy going around that he's actually

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the greatest teammate of all time, and Dylan Brooks his

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>behavior over the last couple of weeks was all like

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a smoke screen to draw attention away from John Morant

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and his struggles and what was going on in his life,

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to get all of us just focusing on Dylan Brooks.

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Being a weirdough, no focus on John Moran. At worked,

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 3>there was less.

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean we did talk a lot of them, Dylan Brooks.

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Man, yeahhole lot. Yeah.

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a great teammate. I'm sure he is

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>best of the week.

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 4>He was wearing a cardigan with nothing underneath.

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Oh I missed that.

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 6>That's crazy. That seems itchy to me. But I'm sure

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 6>he has luxurious fabrics.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's the thing. It's like, that's not even that

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy for him, Like, oh, he had a shirt on.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.839
<v Speaker 5>Nice all right, I turned, I've changed my mind.

0:45:58.880 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 4>I've been on Dylan.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 6>I was out on Dylan Brooks for the entirety of

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 6>his career until March, basically an event he started talking trash,

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 6>getting technicals and playing better.

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And sure, I'm excited for the series where he loses

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies a game going for a twenty one and

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then wins them a game in the same series because

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>he locks somebody up at the end or hits six

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>threes and hits a game winner or something like that,

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Like that'll happen within like a four day window, and

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm here for it, So go on, Dylan.

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And it's interesting that he's turning into Draymond Green

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 3>in some degree, you know, just being loud, talking a lot,

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 3>backing up his teammates, getting tax it's working, and he's

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the clip came out recently when he was with Oregon

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that he said he wanted to beat Draymond Green right essentially,

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and now it's working. So keep it up for sure,

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 3>all right. Second nominee the MAVs and the referees. Unfortunately,

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the Mavericks allowed the easiest basket in the history of

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 3>the NBA. Talked about it. It was an inbound under

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 3>their defensive hoop. They stood on the other side of

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 3>the floor. There's five warriors under their hoop. How do

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 3>you explain that? So it's mostly on them. But after

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 3>thinking about a little bit more over the last twenty

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 3>four hours, I think the refs should be held a

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit more culpable. I still think it's seventy five

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 3>to twenty five, okay, but maybe I was swayed by

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Mark Cuban tweeting.

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>At me, that's what happened.

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's still a mass fault, there's no doubt. But

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 3>I tweeted a video of Jordan Poole hanging out with

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the referee literally for fifteen seconds before he inbounded the ball,

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and the MAVs were on the other side of the

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 3>floor scratching themselves. Essentially, they were just hanging out on

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the other side of the floor. Cuban replied, said, then

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 3>why was the ref who said it was our ball

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 3>lined up by our baseline and not on the other

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 3>side of the court. I can answer that. And why

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 3>did they blow the whistle after the play to clarify

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 3>rather than before because the ref knew he had made

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a mistake. They have to all give the thumbs up

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 3>to start, okay, So I do think there's a little

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 3>point in this unwritten referee rule that they have to

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 3>give a thumbs up to each other.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So he's saying there's miscommunication the officials, right, That's

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what Cuban's really saying here that maybe some of them

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>knew it was of course the Warrior's ball, but this

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>one particular referee thought it was Dallas Mavericks ball.

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what he's saying, well, he's saying the one guy

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 3>was on our side. You're referring to the he said

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a few things. He's saying the one guy was on

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 3>our side, but he was. The referee just goes where

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the players are. I mean, he's he has to be

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 3>where he was outside the baseline. It's not that's where

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the referees go. The referee goes where the players are.

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 3>They officiate where the players are. Where do you want

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.479
<v Speaker 3>the referee to be on the other side, like he's

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 3>behind the player. You always have to have a referee

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 3>behind all the players. So that part, I don't really care.

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:54.720
<v Speaker 3>The whole thumbs up thing again, we said it yesterday.

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 3>There could have been better communication, of course, Yeah, the

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 3>rest could have said, okay, before I give the ball

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to your pool, here's my thumb do you want to

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:06.479
<v Speaker 3>tell these guys that they should be coming down here?

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 3>But also the MAVs didn't pipe up.

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of confusion. You have a lot of confusion.

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you.

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 6>In the ensuing days, I've become more anti ref pill

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 6>though on this one. I heard Jeff Van Gundy talking

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 6>on Zach Lowe's podcast basically just saying this is complete

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 6>mismanagement by the referees. This kind of thing doesn't happen

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 6>in other games, and similar confusion could have happened.

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 4>The way everybody is set up.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 6>It looks like the Warriors should be bringing the ball

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 6>to play deep, to play against the MAVs playing defense.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 6>But that's completely flipped for literally everything should have been

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 6>some thumbs up, That's all I'm saying.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, think a mass watch it.

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 4>The refs botched it. Yeah, and you know, suck it right.

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>The MAVs watched it. The ball is down at that end.

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>You thought you were inbounding the ball. Why is there

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>no one inbounding the ball?

0:49:57.360 --> 0:49:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Done? Like, what did they say, think that the ball

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>was coming to the other end, which would have been

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the opposite way they were going.

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't ask what did they think because they were

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 3>not thinking, that's clear. They were not thinking. Why did

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the ref blow the whistle after the play to clarify

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 3>rather than before? Well, because it was the most confusing

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 3>play in NBA history, So there was going to be

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 3>a whistle. They were going to talk about it, and

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 3>again they may have been. They may have made the

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 3>mistake of not talking a little bit more and saying, hey,

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 3>team in blue, you know where the ball is. The

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 3>ball is over there. Why not go near the ball again?

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I showed the clip of Jordan Pool sitting there for

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 3>fifteen seconds.

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 4>I was a lone.

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>If we get into this idea, should there have been

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like sportsmanship displayed by the referees, because you could argue like, okay,

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't know, they have no idea that it's actually

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Warriors ball. They're on the wrong end of the floor.

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The official in theory could be like, just hold on, Pool,

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just hold on, guys, you're down here. Yeah, like I said,

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.399
<v Speaker 1>what we do when we coach gratings or eight year olds.

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Pool was trying to confuse them. Pool was talking about

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 3>something else, and all of a sudden he said.

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, Pool realized on holding our ball, and he's like, okay,

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's your ball for sure. Yeah. Yeah. He is demanding

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and the officials like, well, I guess it

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is your ball, so here you go.

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the ref the ref and watching it again,

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the ref says we're here, here's your ball. And I

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:20.720
<v Speaker 3>guess his thumb was in his fist or whatever.

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Cuban actually filed the protests. Did it really happen or

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 1>was that all him talking up Gabe because I think

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he's the window is getting smaller here. So I don't know.

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything that it's officially been protested.

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 3>As cubes come on the show, we'll talk about refereeing

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:38.399
<v Speaker 3>some more. Why don't we do it now? With our

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 3>third nominee for Worst of the Week, it's the referees

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 3>again again. This one's going to be short. This one's

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 3>going to be short, but week to week to week,

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 3>we got to talk about the referees on this show.

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Thunder Clippers Tuesday, near the end of the first half,

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Kawhi wasn't happy with a non call. He clapped, ref

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:58.360
<v Speaker 3>teed him up. Teammate Terrence Man comes over and says,

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 3>come on, that was a fat where was the call?

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Gave another clap. Referee did not like that, gone Terrence,

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 3>so Qui just got one tech Terrence Man got two.

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 3>In the second half, the referee came back and told

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Kawhi apparently quote Kai said, he came back in the

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 3>second half and said, that was my bad. I made

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 3>a mistake. Everybody makes mistakes. I appreciate that. Appreciate that

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 3>a little too late though, you tossed the guy for

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 3>no reason, and they did end up losing the game,

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 3>not just because Man was out, but they did end

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:30.280
<v Speaker 3>up losing the game, and the League officially rescinded Man's

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 3>second tech foul, which was not deserved. The game won, though.

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 3>No clapping in basketball. So it's just like we can't

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 3>go a few days without talking about the rest unfortunately

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and in its. But you brought up earlier why Lebron

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 3>called out the media. It just seems like players are

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 3>calling out every person who has any sort of say,

0:52:56.440 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the media, the refs, They're just calling everything out there,

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 3>just being empowered.

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 4>And that's fine.

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I think that's totally fine. Just has a little bit

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 3>of spice. Nobody likes this ref player stuff overall. But

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 3>we just know too many rest names. They called too

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 3>many things. Put away the whistles.

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The official was a little too emotional last night. But

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you know what's interesting where we don't point out it

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was what's his name? Was it Leon Wood? Last night?

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to know.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It was Leon Wood with Julius randall right, we were

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about him going crazy and getting the technical at

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first half, but he was going nuts.

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and leon Wood, to his credit, he eventually

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 1>had to give him a technical, but he took a

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of Randall being pissed off, frustrated they're getting hammered

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>by the magic. He thought he got hit, you know,

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>right at the end of the half, and he let

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>him get away with a ton and like, we don't

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>really illustrate or point these instances out where that's good officiating.

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He knows the guy's hot headed and he's got a

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>temper right now, and like, all right, I'll give you

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a tech. I could have easily tossed you. You're coming

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>at me. You're probably yelling things. It's a former player

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe in leon Wood. I don't know. He just handled

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it a lot better than some of these other officials

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would have. I would love to see refstats ex players

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to technicals. Oh, I bet they give less. I bet

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a longer leash for players with uh. The

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 1>referees who used to play in the NBA realize and

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to kick you out for yelling at me.

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember what it was like to get mad at referees.

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee they gave less text that's probably true.

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I also want to see how fast they give it

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 3>time per tech. Let's get that long.

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Last night so long, and even that's why I think

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly he's like, all right, man, like you are going

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to get tossed from this game, like it's incredible you

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet. And then that's why they get into it

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>as he's trying to pull him wing, get them in

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the locker room. But best of the week to Leon Wood.

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's his name. Yep, yeah, all right, so

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who gets it? I mean, it's not a good week

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for the officials. It's never a good week for Dylan Brooks.

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But what do the people think worst of the week?

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:59.359
<v Speaker 4>Put it to a vote it okay, So.

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Who are you going? You gotta go. You're going Dylan Brooks,

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cuban and the MAVs and then just official.

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'll doom MAVs referee controversy all right, then just

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 6>straight up refs, but not Leon Wood. Please note that.

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 6>Get your votes in.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we gotta take our final break here the Drop

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Podcast when we come back, picking results and rapid fire

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fund don't go anywhere. Last night's game was once again

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers Lakers. Excuse me, clip, let me try that again.

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Last night's game was Thunder Clippers, and the Clippers won.

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>They were the favorites. I saw that line move from

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to four and a half, but

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't matter. They got it done. You guys got

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it right. Tray ten and seven, Task five and twelve.

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It bumped me down below five eight nine for the

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>month of March.

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:52.760
<v Speaker 5>What's tonight's game distance Raps.

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Does Dwayne Casey still have it over the Toronto Raptors?

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 3>WHOA all they have to do is lose by twelve

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:01.319
<v Speaker 3>or less because the is twelve and a half. The

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Reps favored by twelve and a half. Heats myself, think

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna cover that big, big, big line. Trey are

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 3>going with Dwayne the Dwayne If I understand.

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 4>When it Duane's it pours, it's hard.

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 3>It's hard for the Reps to beat their former definitely Trip.

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 3>He just gets them to play for them. They beat

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 3>them last time, though, didn't they Yeah it.

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Was close it No, it was like a five point game,

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:28.720
<v Speaker 1>four point game. So yeah, this is a big line.

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 4>But this is the only way the picks could go.

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 6>It has to has to has to do Homer picks

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 6>and I gotta take the switch up and that's how

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 6>it goes.

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a you have to serve and you're in a

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good spot with the way the pistons in Casey

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>play the raps very fair. We will find out tonight. Okay,

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>let's end this Drop podcast with some rapid fire fun.

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I got the questions this week. You guys got the answers.

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 1>First one we learned this week that Will Hardy's Utah

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Jazz are winning thanks to cheeseburgers, carrot top and fun.

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the NBA turns a lot of these dudes

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>into little old men. Hardy told the Saint Lake Lake Tribune,

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're so worried about doing everything perfect that we

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>got twenty two year olds eat fucking salmon and keela

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for every much end quote. Well, Hardy, that's a great line.

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing? So my question off of this,

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what's something you do to feel young again?

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 3>What's Will complaining about?

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Due the boys eat?

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Let the boys have some fun.

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 3>You want him to have cheetoes. They're playing so well,

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 3>you will, They're gonna win you this coy, I'm gonna

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 3>win the Coach of the year man. Let him eat

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:44.440
<v Speaker 3>salmon and fucking Greenway anyway. Everything that's just great stuff

0:57:44.480 --> 0:57:44.919
<v Speaker 3>from Will.

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 1>What's something you do to feel young?

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Well? I listened to new music, okay, just tough tough

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:55.600
<v Speaker 3>out there finding new music. I've never pronounced it young ma. Never,

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it's young m a. That's what it's pronounced like. I

0:57:59.400 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 3>do it.

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I go in, I go out and fade in a

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 3>fade out. Yeah. I want to listen to music. Nah,

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't, Yeah, I do. I don't. Sometimes I feel young.

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I feel like e Salmon and keen one.

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you do it? Do you?

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you get your suggestions from your music service or

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>do you turn to someone younger in your life, a

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>young cousin.

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Or something like that. I look at my keyboard, I

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 3>type in a letter into the search bar.

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh b, I'm just too It comes up bad Bunny Beatles. Yes,

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 4>younger old either way? All right?

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 6>What about you Trey argue about Disney characters? Oh yeah,

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 6>it felt so good. I haven't thought about Aladdin er

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Simba that much in like twenty years. Having opinions on

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 6>it felt very much like being I don't know, twelve

0:58:48.640 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 6>years old.

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Aladdin could definitely beat up scarm if they.

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Thought felt great. You know, I said some things I regret.

0:58:58.120 --> 0:58:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Aladdin was a good guy.

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:00.919
<v Speaker 4>He's a fine guy.

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 6>Did you say he was a bad guy, said he

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 6>was nothing until the genie showed up.

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you did say.

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 4>That's not true. Yeah he was a liar.

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was a thief.

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 6>He was power hungry, doing everything he could to get

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:19.960
<v Speaker 6>into the royal family. And meanwhile Simba just wanted his

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 6>dad back. But you guys are right, Aladdin's a better character.

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, you also said something wrong about the Lion King.

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 6>The Lion Experience was based on King Lear, It's really

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 6>loosely based on Hamlet.

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 4>But for sure the Lion King has a better soundtrack.

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 6>That was a debate that a lot of That got

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people going, who's a better musician, Elton

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 6>John or Robin Williams.

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:49.920
<v Speaker 3>They didn't. They didn't make a new movie about the

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Lion King because they didn't have a will Smith.

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 4>They didn't make a new Lion King.

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, who cares all these?

0:59:59.520 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I know?

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But I got rush music.

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 5>I think like this is there is a live action

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Lion King.

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there now?

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but it's not worth anything. And compared to Aladdin,

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I agree, Guy Ritchie directed that one that was beautifully shot.

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The one with Will Smith. Yeah, I've never watched it.

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That's good, all right, Sure, Okay, what's something sorry? You've

1:00:22.720 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>done any more on the Aladdin symbol?

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 4>You got? Okay?

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Still he still believes that's fair that the Lion King

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has better soundtrack. That was the thing that was better

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>music overall than Aladdin.

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 5>I think there's too many lyrics.

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 8>Like this is Elton John sometimes this this is a

1:00:42.000 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 8>problem because he doesn't write the lyrics. So you got

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 8>Tim Rice writing the lyrics, and he just tries to

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 8>jam him all in like can you feel love tonight?

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 8>If you listen to that, just listen to it tonight.

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of lyrics just jammed in those verses.

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 8>But can you feel the love tonight?

1:00:57.440 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Is great? Hook?

1:00:58.760 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 5>I cannot deny it.

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 8>It's a great soundtrack, Trey, it's a great soundtrack. I

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 8>think I like Aladdin better Desert Island.

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm picking Aladdin open.

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>To repeat, listen. Yes, what's something you do to feel

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>young again?

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 5>It's play pickleball?

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 8>Because I'm by far the youngest person out there other

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 8>than Rachel. Like Rachel in there now they refer to

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 8>her as the kid.

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Old one.

1:01:25.720 --> 1:01:28.640
<v Speaker 5>She's like, here's the kid for the kid.

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So you are, yeah, you're young and my.

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Young guy out there.

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, do they know you got a podcast to

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>know pickleball? No dinks? Get these people.

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 9>On right, probably should whoever has the highest super rating

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 9>of the next guest.

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I got a cramp crump. I knew what bad guys

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:56.600
<v Speaker 4>leaving today.

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 6>I was like, I'm gonna cramp this this morning. I

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:02.760
<v Speaker 6>hoop night ate a banana as I was leaving.

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But bullet, it.

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't It's a big one.

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't tell. I couldn't tell if you were committing

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>to the bit of calling pickleball people old, I pretending

1:02:10.280 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>you were cramping.

1:02:14.480 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 8>Cramp, you need a Sara gun Man, I got you

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:21.959
<v Speaker 8>need a friend, Like ask the next question.

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna grab aar Okay, he'll survive, he's gonna get

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get it up, gets an elevation.

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you played, you played through pregnancy. Serena Williams sider.

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>This guy's this guy's podcasting through a cramp.

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Well it helps. That probably helps, though. There you go.

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Gd's gone to get him with Sarah gun I bet

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Rachel's using it right now. She probably played pickleball this morning,

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>probably in the other room, right in the back of

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the back of the leg, back of the hammer root.

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, here he comes my right handy last night.

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Is alright? Fire, fire it up. You never used one

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of those?

1:03:04.680 --> 1:03:08.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, not regularly or not not for more than like

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:09.919
<v Speaker 6>a tryout, Like is this cool?

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:11.840
<v Speaker 4>How does it work? But man, I'm loving it right now.

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's gonna really loosen. Yeah, okay, let's keep it going.

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>According to Nick Depaula, Curry brand is relaunching the white

1:03:19.120 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Chef Curry twos on April Fool's Day with a twist.

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The updated design features a charred toe, which is a

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>nod to Twitter roasting the original shoe if you remember that,

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and then also Steph writing straight fire emoji on his

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pair after I think we have a photo there it is.

1:03:37.960 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This was this set Twitter ablaze when those Chef Curry

1:03:41.440 --> 1:03:44.919
<v Speaker 1>twos came out, So they're re releasing them on April

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Fools Day. So that's pretty funny. So my question is,

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the ugliest shoe you've ever worn.

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna sound weird, but the Jordan eleven patent leather

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>because I purchased it. It's you know, it's the classic

1:03:58.240 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>some call the best shoe in the history of shoes, ok,

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the pat and leather. But I bought a fake. I

1:04:02.880 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>bought actually from a shop in China, and it was

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>not real whatsoever. So the fact that it's such a gorgeous, beautiful,

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 3>pristine shoe as a real one, one of the best

1:04:16.080 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 3>ever with all these little imperfections stitching off here, this

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>color here, makes it so much more disgusting. Good deal though, probably.

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I should have.

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Just been in Aladdin stole that thing.

1:04:32.840 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, what about you, Trey, what's the ugliest shoe

1:04:35.720 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you've ever worn?

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:39.480
<v Speaker 6>It was the mid two thousands was the era. I

1:04:39.520 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 6>don't know if y'all had these, but they were very

1:04:41.360 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 6>popular back in the day. Steve Madden is the brand

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 6>I think of that makes them. And it's like, what

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 6>is this like a damn bullying It's like a bowling shoe,

1:04:49.240 --> 1:04:53.360
<v Speaker 6>but a dress bowling shoe. I had like a similar

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 6>to this look was like a beige with like a blue.

1:04:57.480 --> 1:05:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Backwards h on it. Everybody likely that duck feet, but.

1:05:01.120 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know time everyone was doing.

1:05:03.480 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 4>It about square feet.

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure I had a pair of sn not white.

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean that is the next level. They were bad, Oh,

1:05:13.800 --> 1:05:14.320
<v Speaker 4>they were bad.

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>They looked big though it looked bigger than that.

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I was like, oh, gus, these are in give me

1:05:20.640 --> 1:05:21.720
<v Speaker 4>a fourteen.

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>These clown shoes. What about you, jd ugly shoes you've

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ever worn?

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:05:25.480 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean I bought myself a pair of Birkenstocks over

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 8>the pandemic, said I would never ever. But you know,

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 8>here's a picture of my feet this morning.

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Cool so cool. Look man, I guess this socks and stocks.

1:05:43.800 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, socks and Birkenstocks.

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:49.440
<v Speaker 8>It's a classic Canadian wool sock with the you know

1:05:49.520 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 8>this is this is camp weare?

1:05:51.000 --> 1:05:51.120
<v Speaker 7>You know?

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's tramp ware.

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:56.400
<v Speaker 8>A fine, But I also I have sunk to a

1:05:56.440 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 8>new level because coming today, according to my tre are

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:06.440
<v Speaker 8>these babies. It's a powder blue croc I ordered.

1:06:06.440 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

1:06:07.440 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 8>Okay, now this is because you know, my backyard is

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 8>a mess. I have a new dog, Hazel. She's tearing

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 8>up the place, and I need to wear something out

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 8>there that isn't the birkenstars.

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, these are outdoor slippers.

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:23.360
<v Speaker 5>They're outdoor slippers. Yeah, and this.

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Color because they were the cheapest ones, so oh they

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:27.440
<v Speaker 8>were on sale, so I.

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Was like, screw it.

1:06:28.520 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What did those go for?

1:06:29.840 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 8>What was those ones on sale were like thirty bucks?

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:34.280
<v Speaker 8>They're normally fifty bucks.

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 5>All the kids at Jackson's High School wear cross What

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 5>a run. Crocs have had, incredible.

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Crazy run.

1:06:42.960 --> 1:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. You thought they'd be here for a year

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and gone.

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:52.200
<v Speaker 8>I remember people wearing them seventeen years ago, like the

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 8>nurses at the hospital.

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Well they were told not to wear them.

1:06:55.120 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 8>I remember, oh, yes, exactly, but they were still wearing them.

1:06:57.840 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 8>Like I don't know when when Lincoln was was being born,

1:07:01.040 --> 1:07:03.760
<v Speaker 8>the nurses in the hospital were wearing craps. Wow, and

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 8>like people were wearing guys were wearing them in the

1:07:06.280 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 8>kitchens working.

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true kind of thing.

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>And they were just all the rage and.

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:12.120
<v Speaker 5>They're still going.

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They're just so comfortable.

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 3>What amazing are they comfortable? You'll find out a photo

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of you.

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And they're on everybody's feet because only look final one here.

1:07:23.400 --> 1:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>A reality star Larsa Pippen got frank about her sex

1:07:27.040 --> 1:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>life during the recent reunion episode of the Real Housewives

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of Miami, claiming bragging, definitely lying that she and her

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>ex husband Scottie Pippen had sex four times every single

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>night until they're divorced in twenty twenty one. Yes, Larsa

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Pippen claims to have had sex with Scottie Pippen over

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty three thousand times?

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that where we wor thirty three? I got a

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:55.880
<v Speaker 4>goal to hit?

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So I want to know what's something that you've maybe

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated before tests.

1:08:02.320 --> 1:08:04.720
<v Speaker 3>I believe them first four times every night?

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, about four times right up until the divorce. That

1:08:08.120 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 8>seems also.

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And Cole was like he was an NBA player that

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>traveled a ton every night. And she's like, yeah, I

1:08:15.640 --> 1:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>traveled with him everywhere. Wow, that's what she said. Anyway,

1:08:20.280 --> 1:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you exaggerate? Exaggerating?

1:08:23.400 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I exaggerate my shoe size for sure, and eleven

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>we're not going ten and a half. Eleven sounds bigger,

1:08:34.760 --> 1:08:36.000
<v Speaker 3>but isn't it more comfortable?

1:08:36.240 --> 1:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Like the shoe like a tag shoe.

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:39.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Steve's twelve.

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Steve Madden's extra baby, extra clunky. I made

1:08:50.000 --> 1:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the the change to a half sized up though in

1:08:52.840 --> 1:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>my basketball shoe because you guys, remember I kept like

1:08:55.640 --> 1:08:57.479
<v Speaker 1>every time we play hoops, i'd like have a bloody

1:08:57.520 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>toe in. Yeah, like Jesus, like I need more room

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>down there. It turns out you do.

1:09:02.400 --> 1:09:05.800
<v Speaker 3>It's you had a small shoe.

1:09:04.960 --> 1:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know they weren't. It wasn't small in any

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of my other shoes. That's the part don't make sense.

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the cutting in the moving.

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, not a lot of toe space.

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 6>You can maybe try a pair of Steve Maddens.

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 4>Run up and down the court wearing Steve Maddens.

1:09:21.760 --> 1:09:23.479
<v Speaker 1>We should have a game where we could only wear

1:09:23.560 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Madden's.

1:09:24.520 --> 1:09:28.599
<v Speaker 4>Everybody has air. I'm sure. Go in your closet, dig

1:09:28.640 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 4>out your fifteen year old pair of Steve man I

1:09:30.720 --> 1:09:31.160
<v Speaker 4>don't run.

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You've got to bring a pair of black Steve Maddens

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and white Steve Maddens. All right, so your shoe size,

1:09:37.280 --> 1:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you've exaggerated. What about you, Trey.

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:41.679
<v Speaker 6>I went on a podcast and compare myself to Nicola.

1:09:41.720 --> 1:09:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Yosh, he's better. He's a little better than me. That's

1:09:49.040 --> 1:09:49.599
<v Speaker 4>a good one.

1:09:49.760 --> 1:09:54.720
<v Speaker 6>But Meate Jones did say that prime Tray Kirby at

1:09:54.760 --> 1:10:01.719
<v Speaker 6>a media run is Drew Timmy. Yeah, like a crazy

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 6>game last night. He's not very athletic at all. It's

1:10:04.880 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 6>all spin moves in little dinks and dumps.

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I'll take it.

1:10:07.880 --> 1:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's funny and JD take us home. Something you've exaggerated.

1:10:12.120 --> 1:10:15.120
<v Speaker 8>Before, Yeah, I always exaggerated how long we've been doing

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 8>the show. For some reason, I always say seventeen years.

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:20.760
<v Speaker 8>Like this year, I've been saying been doing the show

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:23.160
<v Speaker 8>for seventeen years, but that's actually not it's.

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen NBA season.

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yeah, but it's sixteen years. I don't I don't

1:10:28.920 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 5>know why I feel the need to.

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:33.639
<v Speaker 1>An exaggeration would be like, yeah, I've been podcasting producing

1:10:33.680 --> 1:10:34.639
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for two.

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Decades, right, yeah, yeah, but it's literally seventeen years now,

1:10:38.640 --> 1:10:41.599
<v Speaker 3>well is it seventy Yeah, seventeen years plus two months

1:10:42.760 --> 1:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>May starting six, it's seventeen years. Wait a minute, because oh,

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>you're right earlier this season.

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the early.

1:10:54.080 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>You can round up a couple of months. You don't

1:10:56.960 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>need to.

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Sixteen years is enough.

1:10:59.080 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Enough, it's twenty many years.

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I've heard some other exaggerations.

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely drunk. I exaggerated a total number of podcasts.

1:11:08.280 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:11:08.960 --> 1:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I was recently on a podcast where I

1:11:10.720 --> 1:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just dropped like a yeah, we've done like five thousand podcasts. Like, what,

1:11:13.520 --> 1:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what what?

1:11:13.880 --> 1:11:15.320
<v Speaker 4>What we've done?

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Five thousand?

1:11:16.439 --> 1:11:19.560
<v Speaker 4>I would call that more of an estimation than an exaggeration.

1:11:19.680 --> 1:11:22.759
<v Speaker 4>We're closing in on five thousand. At least.

1:11:23.479 --> 1:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It all gets into like which ones are we counting?

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the spinoffs? You start adding all those up,

1:11:29.800 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you counting other just social not not

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube shorts, but other videos we've made before?

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:35.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:11:35.840 --> 1:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, five thousand pieces of media content. Maybe that's not

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that much of an exaggeration. Podcast.

1:11:43.200 --> 1:11:45.720
<v Speaker 8>I guess the question is when do you start rounding down?

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 8>Because it's like, I've been doing this for twenty five years.

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:49.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't want almost ashamed.

1:11:50.320 --> 1:11:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know what I mean, like, you've been doing

1:11:52.920 --> 1:11:54.559
<v Speaker 8>this for twenty five.

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Years, shame.

1:12:00.520 --> 1:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Years.

1:12:00.960 --> 1:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>When you say twenty years, that does sound correct.

1:12:03.120 --> 1:12:06.839
<v Speaker 8>I mean that's that's soon, that's soon, twenty years.

1:12:06.640 --> 1:12:09.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll be doing it's yesterday pretty much.

1:12:09.400 --> 1:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We're nearing a thousand podcasts of No Dunks, just with

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the athletics. What you got on you it's right there.

1:12:16.760 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>We did over one thousand as the basketball Jones, over

1:12:19.240 --> 1:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>thirteen hundred as the starters, seven as the free agents.

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's not forget those.

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget those two weeks or whatever it was,

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and then yeah, another thousand coming up.

1:12:30.040 --> 1:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Crazy, it's a lot.

1:12:31.000 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot, all right. That's the rapid fire, so rapid,

1:12:35.000 --> 1:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so fire. That's the drop. Thanks for joining us. Leave

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your boys a five star rating and review. Make sure

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you keep your your ears ready for this weekend's fast

1:12:43.400 --> 1:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Friends Tokyo Trif. That was a fun one to record

1:12:45.600 --> 1:12:49.759
<v Speaker 1>with the guys and get your tickets. Monday, April third,

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, Texas, a live show from No Dunks presented

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>by Neutral at the White Oak Music Hall doors at five,

1:12:58.080 --> 1:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>show at six. Special guests Kelly Eco of the Athletic

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>covers the Rockets. He's going to join us on stage

1:13:04.200 --> 1:13:06.479
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit, so that'll be a blast. And

1:13:06.840 --> 1:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>then if you want to stick around after the live show,

1:13:09.880 --> 1:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they are going to show the NCAA Championship game on

1:13:13.080 --> 1:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the ginormous big screen that Jad says is potentially a

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>led screen, not even a projector. Thank god those although

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're in the basement. It's not going to

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:27.639
<v Speaker 1>be an issue with sun. Oh yeah, and I ever

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>watched a trim watch a projector and it's like too

1:13:29.760 --> 1:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>much lights. I can't see anything. So there will be

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a blast that white oak. Come join us, that is

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up there.

1:13:38.120 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 5>All neutral will flow, man, I.

1:13:42.080 --> 1:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell you they better have the BlackBerry lemonade. I will

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 1>say this, No mango for us.

1:13:54.880 --> 1:13:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay, you know what.

1:13:55.960 --> 1:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's my least favorite, and I love all

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the other ones. But I had a mango last night,

1:14:00.800 --> 1:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the porch. Beautiful day here in Atlanta, great

1:14:02.920 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>day for a mango flaps sitting beside me.

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:06.760
<v Speaker 4>But just I think it's me.

1:14:06.840 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's I'm not a mango mango juice. So you never

1:14:09.840 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really want a mango like the actual fruit. You like

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>mango like light light, You.

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:19.639
<v Speaker 4>Do mangoes, fire juice, fruit, mango, anything, mango. Mango. Mango

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:20.160
<v Speaker 4>is a top.

1:14:20.080 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Tier fruit in my book. Doesn't doesn't pair nicely with

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>my my real Seltzer and my real vodka.

1:14:27.000 --> 1:14:31.599
<v Speaker 8>Fair fair, plenty of other flavors, flavors, most fun.

1:14:32.160 --> 1:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Mango has the most fun pit of them all.

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 4>That seed that crazy.

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:36.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't even know.

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:37.320
<v Speaker 5>What that thing is.

1:14:37.680 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man.

1:14:38.640 --> 1:14:41.960
<v Speaker 6>I love to slice the cheeks off a mango, feed

1:14:42.000 --> 1:14:43.439
<v Speaker 6>it to the kids. You can do the cool thing

1:14:43.479 --> 1:14:46.240
<v Speaker 6>where you like cross slice it, flip it out.

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:47.840
<v Speaker 4>And then you just get the nona on that seed.

1:14:48.160 --> 1:14:51.719
<v Speaker 4>Disgusting but so good, pure juice all in your teeth.

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:53.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a mango.

1:14:53.479 --> 1:14:55.640
<v Speaker 4>I bet that's a juicy Yeah, he would hate that.

1:14:55.760 --> 1:14:58.479
<v Speaker 3>He hates all juicy fruit gum.

1:14:58.880 --> 1:15:02.040
<v Speaker 5>He loves the gum iron locome.

1:15:03.520 --> 1:15:04.559
<v Speaker 1>It's all real fruit.

1:15:05.560 --> 1:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Is this good?

1:15:06.160 --> 1:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>New one coming up there? Early start up next week,

1:15:08.960 --> 1:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you subscribe to that as well, and

1:15:10.600 --> 1:15:13.839
<v Speaker 1>get on the Patreon. Maybe he could rank his fruits

1:15:13.920 --> 1:15:17.479
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. You should, he should. Here's what

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you should do. This is good Patreo material on camera.

1:15:21.240 --> 1:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Have Maddio have to eat allD the fruits?

1:15:25.600 --> 1:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it good? Nope? All right?

1:15:27.800 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Next b five fruits and he just has it.

1:15:30.439 --> 1:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He eats them all.

1:15:31.360 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, getting a mess, so messy like make yeah, make

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>them do it nude for sure. Okay, guys, thanks for

1:15:41.960 --> 1:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the job. Shout out to everybody joining us, Lie,

1:15:43.840 --> 1:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it. Make sure you subscribe and hit

1:15:45.840 --> 1:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that light button. We will see you when we see

1:15:48.320 --> 1:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you next, but probably here on Monday from the Classic Factory.

1:15:50.320 --> 1:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Until then, Clipper bros.

1:15:51.479 --> 1:15:54.040
<v Speaker 4>You heard it here first. Have a great time, turn up.

1:15:54.240 --> 1:15:55.479
<v Speaker 4>Love you guys awesome.

1:15:55.720 --> 1:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us I remember Scottie pippin War thirty

1:15:58.240 --> 1:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>three because you heard it here.

1:16:00.760 --> 1:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>First race, the weekend people