WEBVTT - Amazon & Google Are Defining Consumerism's Future, Munster Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you the most important, noteworthy and useful

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>interviews for you and your money, whether you're at the

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>grocery store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>m L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>All right now, right now, let's talk about Amazon and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet parent company of Google earnings with Gene Munster. He

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>is with the Loop of Ventures and Gene Munster tell us, well,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>first of all, congratulations on Loop Ventures as always for

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your prosperity and your your upward trajectory. Uh, you're gonna

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>match that along with what's going on with Amazon and Google,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you seem to have hitched your ride

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to to behemos that just keep growing. Yeah things. So,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are both megacab companies that are enjoying

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal core business and have some other beds that

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>should really reinvent these companies over the long hals, So

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to give you two quick points. First

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>is on Amazon, their unit growth is twenty four percent.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the pace of the sold units. That was the

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>same unit growth as in the December quarter, which is

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>hard because the numbers get bigger, it's harder to continue.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the impression number. And from Google's perspective, dead

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>paid click growth, that's the key metric in the street

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was looking forward was up from last quarter. So what

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I really want to emphasize here is these are behemoth companies.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Their core businesses are doing phenomenal, but the other crazy

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>part is that they're investing in these other optionality values

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that will reinvent these businesses in the next decades. You know,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as you talk about these behemoth companies that are taking

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>over everything, I have to bring up the main theme

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that is on a lot of people's minds. At what

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>point are these companies too big and are actually restricting

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>growth in other parts of the economy and are frankly

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>stifling out any competition that could possibly come up. Well,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>both of these companies have a disruptive factor on competition.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So in to both cases, they had a huge impact

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in the media world. Obviously Amazon what they've done to

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar, and so yes, they are causing an

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible wake of heartache for other companies. But the reality

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is that this is how consumers want the future to evolve,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and they are defining that. And so I think that

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that's just the they're not too big too. They still

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>have room to get bigger, and unfortunately for other companies,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get some companies, a lot of companies

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>will get run over teen months to just a but

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know your numbers into perspective, all right, So unit

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>growth at Amazon, at a company that is doing it,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>has a run rate right now of a hundred and

0:02:55.880 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>forty two billion dollars. It's really hard to put your

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>mind around. And we love doing this kind of stuff.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But one other thought here is that if you think

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about total e commerce in the US, about twenty of

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it today is is Amazon, as you mentioned, growing overall

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>e commerce from the US and growing at eight percent.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>So these are just staggering numbers. And and I want

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we also talk a little bit about

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>what some of the things that both these companies are

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>working on, because that I think it is equally as exciting. Well,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>go for you, go for it, Jim, because as you say,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is almost like creative destruction, and it is really uh,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>well it's creating the future now. It is so in

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's case, the three areas that they're really focused on

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>our media fulfillment and then uh international, but media this

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>basically they want to become more like a Showtime or

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an HBO and just continue to add content their fulfillment.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>They're doing last mile. And then for Google's side, I

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>just want to leave your listeners with a new word

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>called TensorFlow. Tenser flow and remember that because this is

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the new platform that Google has that allows anybody to

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>access it for doing machine learning and artificial intelligence. And

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they basically Google is allowing everyday people and companies to

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>access all their learnings and machine learning. Their CEO mentioned

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Google CEO mentioned it. So the first thing you mentioned

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on the call last night was TensorFlow, and I just

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>want to point that out. This is an example of

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>how Google is going to redefine themselves with the next decade.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>What about the Google Car. I know that that was

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>something that was a pretty hot topic a while back,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>but now there's sort of this feeling that in Detroit,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the big beheemoth automakers are really gonna have the upper

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hand when it comes to autonomous driving and electric vehicles.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Detroit is going to be in a world

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of hurt in the next one years. I'm sad to

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>predict that, but I think that that they just have

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh infrastructure around manufacturing and labor that

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is difficult for them to break from. But Google is

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take over. I think Google test lads and

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a great position. Google mentioned on their call last night

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that they see their way Motivision, which is the car division,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to also be in public transportation. I mean, this is

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the type of broad thinking that we're hearing from Google

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>when you just don't hear that type of broad thinking

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>from Detroit. You know, I just want to take you

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>back to this tensor flow t E N s o

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>r flow because this is really an amazing site that well,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get to use words like neural networks

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for machine translation. I'm not sure exactly what that is.

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I can make a guess, but what are the kinds

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of companies that will be using this so that what

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that is is basically Google allows you to use their

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>voice recognition so we can just tap into them. They

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can listen to what we're doing, it can do a

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>transcript of it and start to build insights from those transcripts.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's some of the things that you're talking about there.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But other things that this uh tensor flow does is

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>allows you to use Google's learnings by looking at an image,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>so uh looking at image and reading what that image

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>my uh information about that image, and so it is uh,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just the start of what is going to be

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a machine learned driven world. Yeah, Gene Munster, thank you

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We could talk a lot

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about this. Unfortunately we have to leave it there. Jane

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Munster is the co founder of loop Venture's former managing

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>director and senior research analyst at Piper Jaffrey Companies. I'm

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abramoid's here with pim Fox. You've been listening to

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets on Bloomberg eleven three. Oh. We did get

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>our GDP report this morning. In the U S economy

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>expanded at the slowest pace in three years. This is

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps due to the weaker auto sales and lower home

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>heating bills. But does this signify some kind of broader

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>weakening that is starting to set in? We want to

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>find out. Constance Hunter has some answers for us. Constance

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Hunter is chief economist a KPMG and constants. What was

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>your main takeaway from this particular report. Well, two things. One,

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody's focused on the consumption data because of

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>course the consumer seventy GDP and it's very important. And

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the lower energy prices and and mild winter really contributed.

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>That subtracted thirty basis points off GDP. Then the lower

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>rate of consumption of auto subtracted another forty five basis points,

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're looking at factors that really slowed consumption in

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a concerning way. Even if you added back those factors,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we only have a one percent annualized consumption rate in

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. And the question is why. Because we've

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>had seventy seven consecutive months of jobs growth, we're starting

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to see wages go up, and not just the wage

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>data that we got today, but for example, the Atlanta

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Fed has an index the employment caused their employment cost index,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't factor in UH benefits like healthcare. It's it's

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the money that goes right to the individual and only

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for families earning under a D fifty dollars. So it's

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a really important piece of data, and that's showing at

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>up three point five percent year of a year. So

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this really is a puzzle. And and so given that,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking at somewhat of a temporary blip

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the consumption numbers. But the other thing that's not

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>getting as much air time is that we subtracted almost

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one percent off of the GDP growth rate because of

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>inventory declines. And those inventory declines go hand in hand

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with um imports. So we saw imports increase. We also

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>saw exports increase, which is a really good sign. Even

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>though net imports subtracted from GDP, that increase in exports

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>supports the idea that the rest of the world is

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>growing in a more robust and stronger fashion. So it's

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>going to help lift GDP overall. And so I think

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a hold on one second, I'm actually struggling

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand that. In other words, if inventories drop, that's

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because our imports are no, no, no, Sorry I didn't

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>explain that. Well. So if if we see the strap

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in inventories this quarter corresponding with an increase in imports,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what it suggests that the next quarter we're going to

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>see those inventories filled back up. Sorry, thank you for

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>clarifying that. That wasn't terribly clear. Let me see if

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I can just understand where we are in the cycle though,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because I I keep hearing this idea that you know,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're eight years so whatever it is, seven years into

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a bull market, and they're this business cycle, and then

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you get people will tell you that it's different this time,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because if you measure it from over here, you know

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same. What's your take on where we

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are in the in the business and interest rate cycle? Yeah,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at late stage. We're what I would

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>call the aph inning, and the FEDS job is to

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>create extra innings, all right, Um, but we are getting

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we're having um wage increases. We're

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna start to see labor shortages when I don't know,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sometime in sometime in and that in and of itself

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to hamper how much growth we can have

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>going for wards. So I think we're going to be

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at the all things being equal, which of course

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they never are, but all things being equal, we're looking

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at a mild recession sometime in late nineteen because of

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>labor shortages, because we have increased wages, and that's going

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to put a crimp on our ability to continue grows.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So just in time, for the mid term elections, just

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in time for the mid term. I just wanted to

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>make we got that twenty eighteen mid term elections. I

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know that will happen in I would say late either,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like just sort of starting at the end of twenty

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen into twenty nineteen. I think we've got some runway. Well,

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll put you down for November two thousand eighteen. I

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>want to just point out, Yeah, for now, I wanted

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to point out. Black Rock's chief executive officer, Larry Fink

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was on Bloomberg Television earlier this morning, and he said

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that it was improbable that the US is GDP will

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>grow to three percent given the current demographics, and said

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that right now the US is truly slowing down. Um,

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Constants, you seem like it seems like you

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with the way, and not just demographics, but also productivity.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So potential GDP is the sum of the change in

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the growth rate of productivity plus the change in the

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>working age population. Working age populations growing at zero point

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that is is immigrants by the way, and productivity zero

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>point eight. That gets us to a one point one

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>potential GDP. Three is a pipe dream. Constant We were

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>talking earlier about the results from Synchrony and Capital One

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>showing an increasing number of charge offs for credit card loans.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>How concerned should we be about this? Look at it.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it's it's a moderately worrying sign, and

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's something where I would say, this is now

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>an indicator you need to watch, whereas to three years

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ago it wasn't an indicator you need to pay attention to.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>If you have a dashboard you're looking at, you need

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to make sure this is on that dashboard, All right,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that dash But we gotta do you think that dashboard

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is on everybody's desk? Do you think everybody gets we

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have a doomsday countdown? Pretty much everyone here? I mean,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I asked is because it certainly doesn't

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>look that way when you see you know, when you

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>see bonds sell off and you see people go into

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>risky acids like stocks in high yield. Yeah, well, look

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where are we on bonds to twenty right? So I

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know that looks like a bond rally from where

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I sit based on the last six months, right, we

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>had that that we had that backup in the tenure

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>year old and now we're back down to twenty and

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>my hashtag rates low for a long time has remarkable

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>shelf life that has surprised even me. And you're calling

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff for two more interest rate hikes one I think

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one more this year. So they had forecast three for

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this year and and I think they'll be lucky to

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>get away with two rate hikes this year. All right,

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much appreciated. Constance Hunter joining us KPMG Chief Economist,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>much appreciated. We want to take a moment to let

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know about something new from Bloomberg. Starting right now,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you can use our io s app or our new

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome extension to scan any news story on any website,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>instantly revealing relevant news and market data from Bloomberg and

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>other sources related to the companies and people you're reading about.

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So no matter where you're reading the news, you can

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bring the power of Bloomberg's news and data with you.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty amazing. Download our io s app or search

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store to try

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it out. Learn more at Bloomberg dot com. Slash lens

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Well the zero point seven percent increase in first quarter GDP,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding our next guest says that trends and consumer confidence

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>are healthy, and that consumers are expressing optimism regarding the

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>short term outlook for business, jobs, and personal finance. This

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all leads us to housing and Cheryl Palmer, the chief

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>executive of Taylor Morrison. Cheryl Palmer, thank you very much

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, my pleasure. Thank you very much

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Now. I was able to go through

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>your conference call, and boy, there are a lot of

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>different metrics that you use to judge the health of

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>your business, and I don't know whether you want to

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>start with net sales orders, just explained for people how

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>do you determine success, and then maybe talk a little

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bit about the regional strength, which you say is pretty comprehensive. Yeah, no,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. You know, we did report yesterday and we're

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>quite delighted with the results we were able to share.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And there are a number of metrics to your point,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but they all do derive from your opening comments, and

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how people are feeling about the world today. And

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been very encouraging signs as we you know,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>came through fourth quarter and certainly came into the spring

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>selling season of the first quarter. The consumers feeling good,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They're feeling confident, healthy, there's out there spending money, they

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>feel good about their jobs. They're starting to see UM

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>improvement in income, you know, affordability. So it is still

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>very very good low interest rates. And that's know, that's

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>creating UM an optimism in our business and it really

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>manifested itself through UM a thirty three increase of sales

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>here over a year, you know, Cheryl Um. First of all,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask if you are concerned about the

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>pricing in certain markets, particularly Toronto, San Francisco, New York.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>People are saying that the acceleration is certainly slowing down.

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>If not, uh, you know, showing signs of petering out,

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the highest end. Are you seeing something similar

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to sort of edify the concern of sort of slowed

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>down in those markets? You know, we actually have had

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>great success across all of our price point. Now, some

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the markets you mentioned we build, and we used

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to build in Toronto, we don't anymore, UM, but we

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>do build in San Francisco. We do build in markets

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>across the US and to a number of consumer groups,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and we are seeing strength UM at the first time

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>buyers We're seeing it in that move up second time buyer.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing it with our fifty plus and those are

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>some of our highest average sales prices. And um, some markets,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are getting back to what I would

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>call some of the historic highs and some markets still

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.119
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of runway. But as we reported yesterday,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know we've raised prices and probably about our community

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is just in the first quarter. So could you speak

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the Esplanade Golf and a country

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>club community. That one is in sarah Sota, but you've

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>got a variety of them, and I want you to

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>use that as an example of the kinds of products

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are putting into the marketplace and maybe tell

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about the customer reception and cost. Yeah,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that one's really exciting. Our Esplanade brand is in Florida,

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and we have ten of these lifestyle communities throughout Florida.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And the one that I highlighted in our call yesterday,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're right, was in um Sara Soda, and I spoke

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to the new amenities that we've opened and really the lifestyle,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ritz Carlton approach and our programming that we've created

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with really dedicated concierge's staff, and we have seen throughout

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Florida and throughout the Esplanade brand building since the middle

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of last year through the shoulder selling season um at

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a number of price points. Is even in our Esplanade

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>communities we build from, you know, the low two hundreds,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>well over a million dollars. And these are very discerning

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>folks know what they want now, when they wanted, how

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they want it, and they're going to get exactly that.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And we've had just a phenomenal spring selling season, and

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I credit the team's great execution in delivering new amenities

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with great pulside service, antiki bar and new restaurants. That's

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>how I gotta say. So that sounds it sounds lovely

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and clearly well. But I want to also while we've

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>got to want you to talk a little bit about

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>where you are making new deals, where you are acquiring property,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because I know Atlanta has been a focus as well

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as Dallas, and you've got that Darling brand, You're correct,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and so our Darling businesses in Dallas and Houston, and

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we are certainly investing in It's it's new for us.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we just introduced our Taylor Morrison Brandon Dallas.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So now we have both our Darling and Taylor Morrison

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, we also have both brands, So Dallas with

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the new Taylor Morrison brand, were investing California, were investing

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>UM some of our newer markets in the Caroline. It's

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>really across the portfolio. Phoenix is one of our larger

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are larger businesses, so that machine continues to need to

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>be invested in UM. So we're looking for opportunities across

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the US today. Cheryl, this might seem like a kind

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of stage left question, but in my opinion, we read

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, you know, potential flooding on the coasts

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and concerns that potential buyers might have about this when

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people are buying your properties. Are you finding that a

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more people are talking about that where it's located,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what the potential risk would be in a flooding type

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the situation. You know, we don't see that often. Certainly

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we have exorbitant range and some markets across the country,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't tell you that that's top on the

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>folks mind. Not with rains, not with raids. I'm talking

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about coastal properties. As you know, sees rise because we've

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>been reading a lot about you know that this could

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially even impede valuations in places like Miami or other

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>coastal cities. Yeah, I'm really going to come down to

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>once again, we don't We're not in Miami, but we

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly are in many coastal cities in California, and it

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>really comes down to the design and the development of

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>those communities UM and how that infrastructure has been created.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And be honest, it's not something that I would tell

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you is on top of consumers minds. Land acquisition, Where

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are you doing the most acquisition? I know you try

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it organically, but maybe give us some markets.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So some of the markets I just mentioned Texas, UM's

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very healthy, California, Arizona, are smaller businesses in Colorado and

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Caroline As. We are investing, and we're investing over

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, we've done some UM acquisitions

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of new companies. Right now, we're very focused on organic

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>acquisition to your point, and I would tell you it's

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>really across our entire portfolio, and we tend to have

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>our longer landbanks where we build large master planned communities

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like our esplanades in Florida, but we're still looking for

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there and then in Arizona as well. Are you

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned because this you're describing something that sounds like a

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect alignment of the stars, and I'm wondering when that happens.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you there's a little voice go off in your

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>head that says, well, this isn't gonna last forever. Um,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that voice is always in my head and that's why, um,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it might sound good and it is, and

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>generally I am very bullish on how the market hang on.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to just have to break in Cheryl Palmer,

0:20:49.000 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive Taylor Morrison, thank you very much. Well, we

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to learn more about utility stocks because utilities used

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the stocks you went to if you were

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for yield, but perhaps times have changed. We have

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>John Bartlett. He is the vice president of Reeves Asset Management.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. John,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for coming in. Our utilities looked upon

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as investments for yield or has that just been thrown

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>out the window? Him? Principally not yield is a very

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>still important part of the total return of um of utilities.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But but they do have an opportunity for you know,

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty modest earnings growth. We see the industry growing

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's earnings about five percent per year, and that's really

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on the back of continued investment, largely at the state level,

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>but also at the federal level too. So UM, I

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to talk a little bit of

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it infrastructure spending because definitely your world overlaps we had

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>heard during the campaigning season about a one trillion dollar

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending plan. We haven't heard much more about it,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, is there still some opportunity from fiscal

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that you are expecting to actually happen in the

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>near term. Well, you know, the good news on that

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>front is, UM, it doesn't really matter that much to

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>me as utility investor. UM. One of the things we're

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to right now is getting UM five

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>commissioners back at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that's going

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to That's probably the easiest way that the federal government

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>can get money started spending on infrastructures, just to get

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>those uh uh, those commissioners back in their seats, because

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>once that happens, there's a real spending opportunity. And for instance,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of pipelines that are just simply held

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>up by the fact that they don't have commissioners in

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>their chairs. The federal government doesn't need to spend the

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>time to get that stuff going. Well, you know, John,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we Uh, Lisa and i UH and the Bloomberg team,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we were at the Bloomberg New Energy of Finance, a

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>summit looking into the future of energy, and the constant

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>theme was renewables and the actual cost of generating electricity.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm one, I'm warning you know, your your firm

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has been what fifty five years in business, you specialized

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in this. You manage nearly three billion. You've got an

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>E t F that focuses on on utilities, which maybe

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you can paint us a picture of the utility that

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>is the most forward thinking when it comes to embracing

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this renewable and low cost structure. Well, we're very excited

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>him uh. And if you look at the portfolio UH

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that that's in the E t F, the ticker symbol

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for that is U T E S, you'll see that

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>we're we're for us. Renewables are a very important focus

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for us. We see that wind um resources will become

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very competitive with UH, with other forms of electric generation,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>even without the tax credits that they enjoy Today. Generally speaking,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the price of power is going down. There's not a

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand incremental demand for new power. We continue

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to find new ways to make generating power cheaper, and

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the price of natural gas remains under control. So everything

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>from from that perspective really creates a great backdrop for

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>investment in utilities or for utilities because you know they

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>can go put put dollars to work and help help

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>their customers without having to go hat in hand back

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to the regulator asking for for big rate rate increases

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>above inflation. So in your almost three billion dollar portfolio

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of assets, what proportion would you say is tied to

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy utilities versus others? And how much has that grown? Sure? Um, Well,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at at everything that we manage, our

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>our largest single customers are closed and mutual fund and

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the ticker symbol for that is is u t G.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's about eight percent utilities. In fact, it's called the

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Reeves Utility Income Fund. UM. I would say across the

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the spectrum about um would be would be

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.719
<v Speaker 1>utilities And how much is that up from say, five

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Um, you know, it's it's probably about about

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the same. Um. We will always have obviously a great

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>deal of utilities and what we do. It's something that

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we're experts on and spent a lot of time time studying.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>But what I like about this particular portfolio, just in

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of its diversity, is it not just it does

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not just include what we consider energy utilities. It concludes

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>companies such as Charter Communications, Comcast, Verizon. We forget that,

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Verizon and A T and T. We forget

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that the telephone and the mobile phone operators nowadays

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>are considered utilities and therefore those dividends are available for harvest. Well,

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not regulated in the same way that utilities are.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But but you're absolutely right. We we we consider them

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>core infrastructure holdings and uh and we're very excited about

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about cable generally because I noticed also, and we were

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>talking with Vince Piazza are US oil and Gas analyst,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the companies in here is Royal Dutch Shell.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Now he doesn't cover but you know, I was looking

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at the dividend of Royal Dutch Sell and we're talking

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>like over seven percent. That's right, and Pim, we're not

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>really counting on a on a huge rebound in the

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>price of oil right now. We're we're sort of it.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>We try to be as agnostic as we can to

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil, but within Royal Dutch there is

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful cost cutting opportunity that's been at work and

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we think is going to continue to play out. Thank

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Truly a pleasure to

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>speak with you. John Bartlett is vice president of Reeves

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management that he is focusing on utilities with a

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of almost three billion dollars UH and certainly a

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of changes coming up with both the potential infrastructure

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>spending as well as the move toward renewable is one

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that we heard a lot about earlier this week,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>really was trying to make money off of renewables at

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a time when there is so much policy uncertainty. Thanks

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Abramo wits one before the podcast. You can always catch

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio