WEBVTT - #566 Packers Unscripted: Valuable victory

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>by my trusted colleague West Hodkowitz, and yes we are

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>back on zoom. We have made the decision that talking

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>through masks for twenty minutes is not ideal. And while

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this will be a challenge as well, we've done this before.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I am in the studio. West is actually across the

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>hall in our boss's office of all places. Um, but Weston,

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing? The Packers five over the Chicago Bears.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay now eight and three with five regular season

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>games to go. Well, I resent that, Mike, because I

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>was hoping you would say that this was my office.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Then all the years out there thinks, so I'm some

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of big shot here that I can just, you know,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>slink into my office and do my thing. Uh No,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you're you're right, though, I mean, this is the type

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of performance I think Green Bay needed on so many levels.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Now was it perfect? No, But offensively they imposed their

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>will on Chicago. Now you can't tell that story without

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioning a Keem Hicks was not involved in this game.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But he goes back to something Mike Patton said last week,

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean nobody was sending any sympathy cards, and Green

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Bays was dealing with some of their injuries earlier this

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>season either, So for Green Bay to come out and

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>play the way they did, get off to the start

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they did, and then carry that into the second half

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a big victory. I think when you look at all

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>three phases of this game, a better performance and the

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>type of response they needed after a tough loss there

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in Indianapolis. Yeah. Absolutely. You could see right from the

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get go that this Bears defensive front was missing a

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Chem Hicks, big number ninety six there in the middle,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and with the way the Packers were running the ball

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the opening series of the game, you just could

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>see the confidence in the running game growing the commitment

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to it from Matt Lafleur. The Packers had a run

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>pass balance throughout this game, and not just from a

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>play calling perspective, but from a production perspective, because Aaron

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Jamal Williams combined for a hundred and sixty

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>three rushing yards. Jones had ninety, Williams had seventy three.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers through for just two eleven, but through for

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns, had a passer rating north of a hundred

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and thirty. Talk of him obviously being right in the

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thick of the m v P race here as December

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>rolls around. So this Packers offense did everything it needed

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to and uh, and you know, really kept the Chicago Bears. Really.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>The Bears are now on a five game losing streak,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tied for second place with the Minnesota Vikings in the

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>NFC North at five and six, and the Packers have

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a three game lead in the division with five to play,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>which is about as big as stranglehold as you could

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have with December arriving. Yeah, no, you're right. And there

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was a phrase that David Botr used in his post

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>game made the availability on Sunday. He called it attitude football.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what this game was going to be about. Uh,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay did it. It was a balanced, complimentary approach.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>They found some early adversity again. Corey Linsley has to

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>exit with the knee injury. That sounds like it's going

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep him out for a little while here. And

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Elton Jenkins, much like against the Colts, he has to

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>slide in that center in the train doesn't stop Lucas

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick battling through a toe injury. The Packers end up

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sounding like they rested him at the end of that game,

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But he just keeps his nose to the grindstone. Uh.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>In the have a guy like John Runyon, a mystery liable,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as Aaron Rodgers called him, stepping up again at left guard.

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So on the offensive front, they did what they needed

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to do in this game to be able to push

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the middle of the field. The Packers

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>did a little bit more of their inside zone concepts.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the right adjustment. As the game

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>wore on, the stretch plays and the pitches started to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>work a little bit better with the outside stuff. But overall, Um,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>when you look at that first series, I just thought,

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with having Alan Lazard back as a blocker and you're

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing Econemius a Brown step up. Now, Um, Marcedes Lewis

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>gets career catch. So many different little factors played into this. Uh.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I think a

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of it started with what they were able to

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>do in the trenches. Yeah. Absolutely, I was surprised. I mean,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>with with what Chicago's defense normally does and the way

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that unit normally plays, what the Packers were able to

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do between the tackles, as you said, with the inside zone,

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>running up the middle, moving the line of scrimmage, and

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>again chem Hicks was out. And as I mentioned in

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>Insider Inbox, when you're missing a big time performer, whether

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's on offense or defense, usually the first game that

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that player is out is the toughest one to make

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the adjustments. And and the Bears really just didn't look

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>ready for number ninety six not to be there for

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>their defense, and and the defense was on its heels

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the whole game. On the defensive side of

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>things for the Packers, the biggest development was getting three

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>turnovers three takeaways from quarterback Mr Rubinsky, two interceptions by

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>second year safety Darnell Savage, a sack strip fumble caused

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>by Zadarius Smith which was scooped up by Preston Smith

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and taken in for a touchdown. Those three takeaways. Packers

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are starting to get that cranked up a little bit

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in the takeaway category. They now have twelve on the season.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Eight of those twelve have come in the last four games. Now,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's still a long way from their total of twenty

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>five from last year's regular season, but eight in the

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>last four games. The Packers will take that and hope

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that that continues here through the final month of the

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>regular season. Well, and that was the funny thing in

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>this right in terms of you know, three weeks ago,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking over and over again about, hey, kN

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Green they start to get some of those takeaways that

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>were so prevalent last year. UH, and can they find

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to be able to create and generate big

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>place Mitchell Trubisky his first game back after some time

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>missed with the shoulder injury. Before that even benched UH

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Nick Foles. You wanted to be able

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to create some opportunities in this game, and I thought

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they did that. I thought Darnell Savage, before suffering that

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>back injury on his second pick, put together one of

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>his better performances of his Packer's career. UM and it

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>was funny. I asked him about that first interception that

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he made in the end zone, which was an ill

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>advised throw from Trubisky. There's no question about that. A

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>first intent throughout their own at the Green Bay thirty eight,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe at that point thirty six, and he airs

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one out and it's funny Savage mentioned if you go

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>back and watch, there was a play much like that

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>against Minnesota where the Vikings on the opposite side of

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the field ran a similar concept from the slot with

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling. Feeling shakes him with an inside move and

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>goes back out to kind of complete sort of a

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>skinny kind of corner route and Savage loses him and

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he catches the touchdown pass. That was late in that game,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bears tried to run the same concept to the

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>right side of the field. This time you saw Savage

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>flip his hips appropriately, was able to track the ball,

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>showed some really good center field skills there and pull

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>it down. And then he made another fantastic catch later

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on and again a sort of an ill advised throw

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>from Trubisky into triple coverage. But really the biggest story

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to me in this game was the defensive front. Now,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>they gave up the fifty seven yard run to David

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery right off the bat. That's not what you're looking for,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't quit there. They forced that to a

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>field goal. And then in the second quarter, Preston and

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Zadarius Smith combining on a strip sack and a fumble

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>recovery for a touchdown. These are the type of plays

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that when the Packers were really humming last season, uh,

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>their momentum driving plays and and those are the type

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of things that I think has been missing this season.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They have actually done a fantastic job of avoiding explosive plays.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Near the end of Don Caper's tenure. That was something

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that was really haunting them a little bit, was that

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they just they couldn't stop the sixty and seventy yard

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>or They've done that, and they made teams go the

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>full length of the field. But in order to really

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on that, you need to be able to take

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the football away. They did that and as you mentioned,

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>now eight takeaways in the last month. Well, I think

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest thing for the for the Packers

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>defense other than the turnovers, when you look at this game.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the fifty seven yard run early by David Montgomery.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm no XS and OS expert. It looked to me

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Packers were just completely misaligned like that, whether

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the first level, the second level, the the

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the the alignment in terms of the gaps and everything

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 1>was just wrong, and the seas parted in the middle

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and Montgomery was off to the races, but the Packers

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>defense rose up and stopped that drive and held the

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Bears to a field goal, so the Packers still had

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the lead after one possession. There After that, I thought

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay's defense clamped down on the run fairly decently.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other the other good sign that Matt Lafleur

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>talked about Monday in his zoom, which he actually did

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>from his house because the team facilities closed Monday and

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday by NFL mandate. But um he he talked about

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the defense in the third quarter because the Packers had

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>the lead at halftime. The Bears had scored right before

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first half to get it to

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten, and then the Bears were getting the

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>all coming out to start the third quarter, and that's

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>where the Indianapolis game got away from the Packers. The

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>defense started to give up the drives, you know, then

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the offense couldn't really answer, and the whole the whole

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>game started to go south. Packers defense in the third quarter,

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they give up one first down right off the bat,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but then force a punt. Then the next possession Savage

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gets his second interception. Then the possession after that is

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>another three and out for the Bears and then this

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>game was over. Um. The Packers defense did what it

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do coming out a halftime, and that was

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a good sign considering what had happened the previous week

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in Indie. Well, what's the best way to kind of

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>waste a really good first half. It's allowing the opponent

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to double up. And unfortunately for the Green Bay Packers,

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. Luck hasn't been on their side. And relates

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to the coin toss this season, I think m Olivia

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Rehiner from the Press Becazette Journal Sentinel she had that stat.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they're three three and eight this year. I

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think on the opening coin toss. They lost again on Monday.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Now Tim Boyle had nothing to do with that. It

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was not his call. It was the Bears that did that.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But by the deferral process, I mean in the Bears

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>receiving it in the second half, they went down and

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they put up some points. The game kind of changes

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on its axis if if you allow them to score again.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But in this particular case, they came out, they got

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the back to back sacks. They were able to really

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of stying me them as long as they needed to.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Now I know you and I going through Insider Inbox,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there were some fans that were displeased about the fourth quarter.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Um Matt Lafleur said, it's definitely a balance between wanting

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you are somewhat aggressive yet and

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>still you know, dialing up some of your blitz packages

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and making life difficult on the quarterback, but at the

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>same time not wanting to give up those explosive plays.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>My only challenge to people, and I wrote about this

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesdays, that if you want to take issue with

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what happened on that that run by Montgomery, or maybe

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the yards per play that the Bears had

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first three quarters, that's perfectly fine. We can

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation. There's a lot of people sort of

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>losing themselves here about that fourth quarter. It's not prevent

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>defense because you're trying to stop them from scoring. Certainly

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that is ultimately the goal, but it's prevent because you're

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to stop the explosive plays Green Bay. Although you

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to either get the fourth and

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven stop or get the Kevin King interception in the

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>end zone, the big game there is making sure that

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you force the Bears to use their time outs, you're

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>forcing them to eat the clock. Chicago had to do

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>both of those things, and it's one of the reasons

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>why Green Bay was able to come out with a victory.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not as dominating in terms of what it looked

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like on the scoreboard, but certainly a victory nonetheless. Yeah,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Lafleur looked at really two plays on Chicago's

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>last two touchdown drives there in the fourth quarter that

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that he really lamented, one being the fourth and eleven

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Bears first touched on drive. If the Packers

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>get the stop there on fourth and eleven, uh, you know,

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about massive substitutions. You can get everybody out

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of the game and all that, and the game is

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely over. So he really regretted that one. And then

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the second Bears touched under if

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin King had an interception in his hands were in

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the end zone, and you know this game, this game

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>ends up for seventeen, not fort if King just catches

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and now that's you know, la Fleur talked

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about that it was a three takeaway game for the defense.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>They definitely had opportunities for more. So that's hopefully a

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>good sign moving forward. But you set it west. The

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers didn't give up any big plays the Bears took.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was somewhere around nine and a half

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to ten minutes on the clock in scoring those two

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>touched on drives. Well, if you're down forty one to

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ten late in the third quarter and you're gonna burn

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half to ten minutes of what's remaining

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the game to get two touchdowns when you're down

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>by thirty one points, you know, as the team that's

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in the lead, you'll take that. You're not gonna sweat

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that too much. And and yes, the Packers wish they

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>had gotten the stop on fourth and eleven or gotten

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the turnover where that was in their hands. It didn't happen,

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So it ends up forty one five. But okay, forget

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. You move on now to the Philadelphia Eagles.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And before I forget in our new old slash new setup,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I need to make sure to take care of our

0:12:55.559 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sponsor business here serious x. NFL Radio Channel eighty eight

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is the only radio outlet dedicated to the National Football

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>League seven days a week, three d sixty five days

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a year, and Associated Bank Folks has a new promotion.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers fans score up to five hundred dollars for your

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>devotion to the pack when you open a Packers checking

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>account from Associated Bank. Learn more at Associated bank dot com.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Backslash Packers All right, West. As I mentioned before, the

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Packers have a three game lead in the NFC North

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with five games to go. You can't ask to be

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in a better position than that. Looking at the larger

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>picture in the NFC, there are three teams right now

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC with eight or more wins. The New

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints are nine and two. The Packers and the

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks are both eight and three in the race

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for that number one overall seed, which is going to

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>be the only one that gets a first round by

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. Here's the interesting thing, West, I took

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at all of the remaining schedules for these

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>three teams at the top of the NFC. Each team,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as of right now has only one game left on

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>its schedule against a team that is above five hundred.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>None of these teams has a loaded schedule down the

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>stretch as far as those above five hundred teams. The

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints have to play the Kansas City Chiefs. The Packers,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>as everyone knows, they're playing the Tennessee Titans right after Christmas.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The Seattle Seahawks have a game left against the Rams.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, we all know you take nothing

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for granted in this league, and there are some games

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that that you know could certainly cause problems. And and

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are gonna face the Philadelphia Eagles this week.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>They'll be coming off a short week, but the Eagles

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>are basically going to be playing for their season now.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They just dropped out of first place in the NFC East,

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that where all those teams are below five hundred. They

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped out of first and they they're not gonna be

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>able to afford to to fall back any farther. So,

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>uh so, this Eagles game coming up for the Packers,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at that obviously. You also look at Carolina

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>down the road. If the Panthers get Christian McCaffrey back,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that Carolina game looks quite different and along the same

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lines for those other clubs. The Saints have to play

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons, who are playing some pretty darn good football

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, even though they're below five hundred Minnesota Vikings

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are on New Orleans schedule as well. The Vikings are

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>playing some pretty good ball and the Seattle Seahawks also

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have a game left against the forty Niners who just

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>beat the Rams, and they're dealing with, you know, having

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to play in a new location and practice who knows where.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's a whole crazy situation for San Francisco. But

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is these uh, these schedules are not

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>loaded for these for these teams, but yet there are

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>some games that could definitely sneak up on them. Yeah, definitely.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And don't tell the San Francisco forty Niners that they're

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>out of this thing yet. I mean, they still feel

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like they can still find a way, maybe get healthy

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and get on a run here late. Um. To your point,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting for Green Bay because certainly Christian McCaffrey

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>now dealing with the knee injury, Uh if he would

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be back, you're looking at Christian McCaffrey and then Derrick

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Henry the following week. That that's something no NFL run

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>defense wants to have to deal with, and also coverage

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>linebackers having to deal with it. From the standpoint of

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of Christian McCaffrey. But the biggest lesson I think that

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>has been the takeaway this year. And you remember me

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>saying this a month or two ago. I felt since

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the beginning that it's gonna be which team gets on

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest run here down the stretch, Which team gets

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs with three out of four wins or

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>three or four victories in a row. Uh, that's gonna

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not only get you that number one seed, but I

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>just feel like, in a year in which parody has

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>been so prevalent in the NFC, especially at the top

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of the conference, that it's really going to be not

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the most complete team, but the teams that get

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the hottest down the stretch that are gonna be the

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>ones going far. For Green Bays standpoint, we will talk

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about this very shortly um later this week. About the

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles and the challenges that they present. I know

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>some people want to take them for granted, and certainly

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the performance against Seattle was not onspiring, but they still

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have weapons there that could hurt this team. When you

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>look at Miles Sanders, the fact that he's back now, Um,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy is still even though it was a quiet

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>performance against Seattle, Uh, the guy still is. You got

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to be careful with what you know. These running backs

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have been able to do. Just look at what Montgomery

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>did on ten carries or whatever it was last week. Um,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Travis Fulham is gonna be a guy that we're gonna

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be talking about this week. Richard Rogers got another Hail

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Mary catch that you don't want to take anybody for granted.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why you hear over and over and over again.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure fans get sick of hearing it. I'm sure

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to some extent media gets sick of hearing it. When

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt la Fleur talks about worrying about this week, he

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>said after the game, I don't I couldn't even tell

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you right away who we were playing the following week

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>because everything was so focused on needing this NFC North

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wind over, a Bears team at that point was their

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>closest contender in that division. So I've I've always liked

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the mantra, and you're certainly gonna start a path to

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs here shortly. Mike McCarthy, as long as I

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>cover this team, as long as I cover the NFL,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm always going to go back to that that sort

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of edict that he had of you win your division,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you win ten game games, that's when you can start

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about what the outlook looks like for the playoffs.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Screen Bays at eight and three. They're sitting at a

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>good spot right now, and they've set it a good

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>spot for most of this season. Now, can you get hot?

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Can the defense show itself out? Special teams? We didn't

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about it much, Mike, but special teams took a

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>big step forward in this game. I thought it was

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the cleanest performance from Hunter Bradley and j. K. Scott.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And uh, soon enough, we'll be probably talking about some

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>other acquisitions Green Bay is gonna be making. But this

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>has been a season of attrition and from the very beginning,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>green Bay, to my eye at least, has been one

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>step ahead of that. Yeah, well, as we as the

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers get ready for the Eagles here, you mentioned some

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the skill players that Eagles have on offense, and

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly Carson Wentz. You know, the statistics aren't there for him.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is a guy that I thought before he

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>blew out his knee in two seen, I thought he

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was headed possibly for League m v P honors. He

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was having a tremendous year. The issue with the Philadelphia

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles offensively is the offensive line, and heading into their

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game against the Seattle Seahawks, I believe the

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>statistic that ESPN had is the Eagles have used ten

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>different offensive line combinations now in their eleven games this season.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Now the Packers, they've weathered a lot of injuries on

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. We talked about how the shuffling around

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the train keeps moving. The Eagles have not handled them

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>been able to handle those injuries as well, and and

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it shows up with with just a lot of inconsistency

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the offense and with Carson Wentz leading the league

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>in sacks. Defensively, this Eagles team has a lot of

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>big name players on defense. When you're talking Darius Slay

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at corner, he had a rough night against DK Metcalf,

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but who hasn't had a rough night this year against

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf. But you're looking at Fletcher Cox in the

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>middle of that defensive line. Jalen Mills, the cornerback on

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side for the Eagles is a pretty good player.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this Eagles defense is going to present some

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges to the Packers now. They need to they need

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to rebound there on a short week, and as I said,

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they've they had a chance to stay in first place

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in their division that has slipped away. Now they have

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back quickly. I think this Eagles defense is

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>really going to be an interesting story this week because

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because the Packers are going to face some challenges from

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a team that is sub five. Yeah, and when you

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:18.959
<v Speaker 1>look at the games this season in which the Eagles

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have been able to, you know, kind of have success

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and prevail it, a lot of it has been based

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>on their defense and being able to pick up its offense.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's sometimes the Eagles are such an interesting case study, Mike,

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the running game really has not been

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>consistent for him. It's just been kind of a question

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>over and over again of why we are where we

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>are right now, and how do we how do we

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>find a way over that hill? Because the NFC East

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is right there for the taking, and even now it's

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>still there for the taking for the Eagles, what one

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>game out right now of that lead so or a

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>half game, whatever it works out to be with the tie,

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot a lot on the line this week, Mike,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for both teams, it's gonna be interesting to see exactly

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>how green they respond specifically to seeing if they can

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>consider they can continue that efficiency that they show an

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>offense sable against the Chicago Bears team that was pretty

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>darn good going in. Yeah, no question about it. All right,

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>With that, we will sign off on this edition of

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of I was about to say final thoughts were not

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>It sounded like final thoughts there for a second, but yeah, alright,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we're back to Packers Unscripted and we are calling it

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a wrap on this edition. Be sure to follow all

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the team on Packers dot com

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for WES, I am Mike. Thank you for tuning in everybody.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time.